125
PART III
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Not
applicable.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements and related auditor’s reports are filed as part of this Annual Report.
Page
Report of the independent registered public accounting firm .............................................................................................
F-1
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 ...........................
F-2 to F-3
Consolidated statement of financial position at June 30, 2009 and 2008...........................................................................
F-4
Consolidated statement of changes in equity for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.....................................
F-5
Consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007................................................
F-6
Notes to the annual financial statements..............................................................................................................................
F-7 to F-68
F-1
Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of DRDGOLD Limited.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position of DRDGOLD Limited and subsidiaries as of
June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes
in equity, and the consolidated statement of cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2009. We also
have audited DRDGOLD Limited’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). DRDGOLD Limited’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
incl uded in the accompanying management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on DRDGOLD Limited’s internal control over
financial reporting based on our audits.
June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes
in equity, and the consolidated statement of cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2009. We also
have audited DRDGOLD Limited’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). DRDGOLD Limited’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
incl uded in the accompanying management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on DRDGOLD Limited’s internal control over
financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists,
and tes ting and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinions.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists,
and tes ting and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) pr ovide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) pr ovide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of DRDGOLD Limited and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2009, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, DRDGOLD Limited maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control –
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
of DRDGOLD Limited and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2009, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, DRDGOLD Limited maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control –
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
/s/ KPMG Inc.
KPMG Inc.
Registered Accountants and Auditors
Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa
November 27, 2009
KPMG Inc.
Registered Accountants and Auditors
Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa
November 27, 2009
F-2
DRDGOLD Limited
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
for the year ended June 30, 2009
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
for the year ended June 30, 2009
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
1
Total operations
2009
2008
2007
2009
2008
2007
2009
2008
2007
Note R'000
R'000
R’000
R'000
R'000
R’000
R'000
R'000
R'000
Revenue 2
1,910,738 1,843,912 1,534,777
-
89,235
674,928 1,910,738 1,933,147 2,209,705
Cost of sales
(1,834,025) (1,598,364) (1,397,046)
-
(139,369)
(847,150) (1,834,025) (1,737,733)(2,244,196)
Operating costs
(1,687,359) (1,503,015) (1,315,126)
-
(124,437)
(719,996) (1,687,359) (1,627,452)(2,035,122)
Depreciation 10
(99,217)
(69,077)
(63,905)
-
(854)
(115,027)
(99,217)
(69,931) (178,932)
Retrenchment costs
3
(34,922)
(11,344)
(938)
-
-
(26,507)
(34,922)
(11,344)
(27,445)
Movement in provision for
environmental
rehabilitation
environmental
rehabilitation
19
(19,545)
(30,171)
(19,952)
-
(4,019)
-
(19,545)
(34,190)
(19,952)
Movement in gold in
progress
progress
7,018
15,243
2,875
-
(10,059)
14,380
7,018
5,184
17,255
Gross profit/(loss) from
operating activities
operating activities
76,713
245,548
137,731
-
(50,134)
(172,222)
76,713
195,414
(34,491)
Loss on derivative
financial instruments
financial instruments
-
-
-
-
(433)
(50,852)
-
(433)
(50,852)
Impairments 3
(75,138)
(63,915)
(5,913)
-
(46,718)
(872,133)
(75,138) (110,633) (878,046)
Administration expenses
and general costs
and general costs
(83,583)
(79,439) (109,277)
-
(20,084)
(100,709)
(83,583)
(99,523) (209,986)
Results from operating
activities
activities
3
(82,008)
102,194
22,541
-
(117,369) (1,195,916)
(82,008)
(15,175)(1,173,375)
Finance income
5
205,991
91,975
7,908
-
3,040
21,215
205,991
95,015
29,123
Finance expenses
6
(41,743) (108,068)
(24,236)
-
(59,625)
(81,747)
(41,743) (167,693) (105,983)
Profit/(loss) before
taxation 82,240
taxation 82,240
86,101
6,213
-
(173,954) (1,256,448)
82,240
(87,853)(1,250,235)
Income tax
7
28,444
68,303
(737)
-
75,408
(4,996)
28,444
143,711
(5,733)
Profit/(loss) after
taxation 110,684
taxation 110,684
154,404
5,476
-
(98,546) (1,261,444)
110,684
55,858(1,255,968)
Profit on disposal of
discontinued operations
discontinued operations
8
-
-
-
-
1,169,210
90,938
- 1,169,210
90,938
Profit/(loss) for the year
110,684
154,404
5,476
-
1,070,664 (1,170,506)
110,684 1,225,068(1,165,030)
Attributable to:
Equity owners of the
parent
parent
129,124
128,558
(2,674)
-
867,483
(921,792)
129,124
996,041 (924,466)
Non-controlling interest
(18,440)
25,846
8,150
-
203,181
(248,714)
(18,440)
229,027 (240,564)
Profit/(loss) for the year
110,684
154,404
5,476
-
1,070,664 (1,170,506)
110,684 1,225,068(1,165,030)
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax:
net of tax:
Fair value adjustment on
available-for-sale investment
available-for-sale investment
(1,133)
1,744
-
-
-
-
(1,133)
1,744
-
Foreign exchange (loss)/gain on
translation
translation
(606)
83,571
-
-
-
(45,715)
(606)
83,571
(45,715)
Transfer of reserve on disposal of
subsidiaries
subsidiaries
-
-
-
-
(184,079)
-
- (184,079)
-
Non-controlling interest on
acquisition of subsidiary
acquisition of subsidiary
12,892
-
-
-
-
18,515
12,892
-
18,515
Revaluation of fixed assets
through acquisition of subsidiary
through acquisition of subsidiary
180,192
-
-
-
-
-
180,192
-
-
Total comprehensive income for
the year
the year
302,029
239,719
5,476
-
886,585 (1,197,706)
302,029 1,126,304 (1,192,230)
-
¹
The discontinued operations relate to the Porgera Joint Venture (disposed on August 17, 2007), Emperor (disposed on October 22, 2007) and NetGold (disposed on
March 13, 2008.)
² Operating costs equates to cash costs of production.
² Operating costs equates to cash costs of production.
F-3
DRDGOLD Limited
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
1
Total
operations
2009
2008
2007
2009
2008
2007
2009
2008
2007
R'000
R'000
R'000
R'000
R'000
R'000
R'000
R'000
R'000
Attributable
to:
Equity owners of the parent
260,727
199,902
(2,674)
-
867,483
(958,716)
260,727 1,067,385 (961,390)
Non-controlling interest
41,302
39,817
8,150
-
19,102
(238,990)
41,302
58,919 (230,840)
Total comprehensive income for
the year
the year
302,029
239,719
5,476
-
886,585 (1,197,706)
302,029 1,126,304 (1,192,230)
Earnings per share attributable
to equity owners of the parent
to equity owners of the parent
Basic and diluted
earnings/(loss) per share
(cents)
earnings/(loss) per share
(cents)
9 34
34
(1)
-
231
(270)
34
265
(271)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
¹
The discontinued operations relate to the Porgera Joint Venture (disposed on August 17, 2007), Emperor (disposed on October 22, 2007) and NetGold (disposed on
March 13, 2008.)
² Operating costs equates to cash costs of production.
² Operating costs equates to cash costs of production.
F-4
DRDGOLD Limited
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
at June 30, 2009
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
at June 30, 2009
2009 2008
Note
R’000 R’000
ASSETS
Non-current assets
2,075,252
1,073,290
Property, plant and equipment
10
1,733,219
812,875
Non-current investments and other assets
11
172,680
176,123
Non-current inventories
15
4,238
2,717
Deferred tax asset
21
165,115
81,575
Current assets
550,520
1,189,205
Inventories
15
93,935
62,857
Trade and other receivables
16
87,960
240,278
Current tax asset
70
210
Cash and cash equivalents
353,555
846,114
Assets classified as held for sale
17
15,000
39,746
Total assets
2,625,772
2,262,495
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Equity
1,583,979
1,305,461
Equity of the owners of the parent
18
1,481,473
1,244,257
Non-controlling interest
102,506
61,204
Non-current liabilities
715,799
529,654
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
19
412,454
381,252
Post-retirement and other employee benefits
20
43,639
22,740
Deferred tax liability
21
194,560
–
Loans and borrowings
22
65,146
125,662
Current liabilities
325,994
427,380
Trade and other payables
322,138
385,110
Loans and borrowings
22
2,101
39,972
Current tax liability
931
1,771
Bank overdraft
824
527
Total equity and liabilities
2,625,772
2,262,495
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
DRDGOLD Limited
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
at June 30, 2009
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
at June 30, 2009
Number
of
ordinary
shares
Number of
cumulative
preference
shares
Share capital
and share
premium
R’000
Cumulative
preference
share capital
R’000
Revaluation and
other reserves
1
R’000
Accumulated
loss
R’000
Total equity of
the owners of
the parent
R’000
Non-controlling
interest
R’000
Total equity
R’000
Balance at June 30, 2006
320,035,078
5,000,000
3,761,368
500
280,726
(3,260,447)
782,147
233,125
1,015,272
Issued shares for cash
50,132,575
314,594
314,594
314,594
Staff options exercised
174,328
973
973
973
Share issue expenses
(7,839)
(7,839)
(7,839)
Share-based payments
12,686
12,686
12,686
Total comprehensive income for the year
(36,924)
(924,466)
(961,390)
(230,840)
(1,192,230)
Partial disposal of subsidiary
-
18,515
18,515
Foreign exchange loss on translation
(36,924)
(36,924)
(8,791)
(45,715)
Loss for the year
(924,466)
(924,466)
(240,564)
(1,165,030)
Balance at June 30, 2007
370,341,981
5,000,000
4,069,096
500
256,488
(4,184,913)
141,171
2,285
143,456
Issued shares for cash
5,800,000
27,976
27,976
27,976
Staff options issued
429,607
2,353
2,353
2,353
Share issue expenses
(1,219)
(1,219)
(1,219)
Share-based payments
6,591
6,591
6,591
Total comprehensive income for the year
(55,145)
1,122,530
1,067,385
58,919
1,126,304
Fair value adjustment on available-for-sale investment
1,744
1,744
1,744
Transfer of reserve on disposal
of subsidiaries
(126,489)
126,489
-
(184,079)
(184,079)
Foreign exchange gain on translation
69,600
69,600
13,971
83,571
Profit for the year
996,041
996,041
229,027
1,225,068
Balance at June 30, 2008
376,571,588
5,000,000
4,098,206
500
207,934
(3,062,383)
1,244,257
61,204
1,305,461
Staff options exercised
1,429,715
6,707
6,707
6,707
Share issue expenses
(433)
(433)
(433)
Share-based payments
7,873
7,873
7,873
Dividend on ordinary share capital
(37,658)
(37,658)
(37,658)
Total comprehensive income for the year
131,603
129,124
260,727
41,302
302,029
Fair value adjustment on available-for-sale investment
(1,133)
(1,133)
(1,133)
Foreign exchange loss on translation
(606)
(606)
(606)
Non-controlling interest forming part of the acquisition
of subsidiary
of subsidiary
12,892
12,892
Revaluation of fixed assets through acquisition
of subsidiary
of subsidiary
133,342
133,342
46,850
180,192
Profit/(loss) for the year
129,124
129,124
(18,440)
110,684
Balance at June 30, 2009
378,001,303
5,000,000
4,104,480
500
347,410
(2,970,917)
1,481,473
102,506
1,583,979
1
Revaluation and other reserves comprise foreign exchange differences arising on translation of foreign subsidiaries, share-based payment reserves and asset revaluation reserves
.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
DRDGOLD Limited
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009
2008
2007
Note
R’000
R’000
R’000
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash received from sales of precious metals
1,910,738
1,933,147
2,209,705
Cash paid to suppliers and employees
(1,745,805)
(1,728,030)
(2,151,012)
Cash generated by operations
29
164,933
205,117
58,693
Finance income
88,964
46,859
15,925
Dividends received
4,829
4,074
3,829
Finance expenses
(3,605)
(35,528)
(58,842)
Income tax paid
(46,889)
(37,902)
(17,268)
Net cash inflow from operating activities
208,232
182,620
2,337
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of investments
Purchase of investments
(6,049)
(26,539)
(7,498)
Proceeds on sale of investments
47,467
19,225
3,774
Additions to property, plant and equipment
(345,132)
(286,664)
(313,034)
Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment
10,816
10,054
981
Cash flow on acquisition/disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash
30
(277,821)
(121,761)
(558)
Cash flow on (acquisition)/disposal of joint ventures, net of cash
31
(20,000)
1,936,726
-
Cash flow on acquisition of associate
32
(2,700)
-
-
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from investing activities
(593,419)
1,531,041
(316,335)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issue of shares
Proceeds from the issue of shares
6,707
30,329
315,567
Advances of loans and borrowings
-
24,864
111,576
Repayments of loans and borrowings
(54,438)
(819,916)
(518,046)
Share issue expenses
(433)
(1,219)
(7,839)
Dividends paid
(37,658)
-
-
Capital distribution to non-controlling interest
-
(74,080)
-
Net cash outflow from financing activities
(85,822)
(840,022)
(98,742)
NET (DECREASE)/ INCREASE IN
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(471,009)
873,639
(412,740)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
845,587
(12,429)
454,652
Foreign exchange movements
(21,847)
(15,623)
(54,341)
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
33
352,731
845,587
(12,429)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
DRDGOLD Limited is a company domiciled in South Africa. The consolidated financial statements of the company for the year
ended June 30, 2009 comprise the company and its subsidiaries, together referred to as the group and its interests in associates
and jointly controlled entities.
ended June 30, 2009 comprise the company and its subsidiaries, together referred to as the group and its interests in associates
and jointly controlled entities.
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
and its interpretations adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
and its interpretations adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on September 16, 2009.
BASIS OF MEASUREMENT
The financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis, unless otherwise stated.
FUNCTIONAL AND PRESENTATION CURRENCY
The consolidated financial statements are presented in South African rands, which is the company's functional currency. All
financial information presented in South African rands has been rounded to the nearest thousand.
financial information presented in South African rands has been rounded to the nearest thousand.
USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and
assumptions that affect the reporting amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The determination of
estimates requires the exercise of judgment based on various assumptions and other factors such as historical experience, current
and expected economic conditions, and in some cases actuarial techniques. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
assumptions that affect the reporting amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The determination of
estimates requires the exercise of judgment based on various assumptions and other factors such as historical experience, current
and expected economic conditions, and in some cases actuarial techniques. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors,
including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances. Revisions to accounting estimates
are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the
revision and future periods, if the revision affects both current and future periods.
including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances. Revisions to accounting estimates
are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the
revision and future periods, if the revision affects both current and future periods.
The judgments that management has applied in the application of accounting policies, and the estimates and assumptions that
have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial
year are disclosed in note 28.
have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial
year are disclosed in note 28.
Significant accounting policies
The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently by all entities in the group to all periods presented.
Change in accounting policy
The group adopted the following new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations:
IAS 1 – Presentation of Financial Statements
IFRIC 12 – Service Concession Arrangements
IFRIC 13 – Customer Loyalty Programmes
IFRIC 14 – The limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction
IFRS 8 – Operating Segments
F-8
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
IAS 1 – Presentation of Financial Statements
The group early adopted IAS 1 – Presentation of Financial Statements as of June 30, 2009.This standard affects the presentation
of owner changes in equity and of comprehensive income. It does not change the recognition, measurement or disclosure of
specific transactions and other events required by other IFRS standards.
of owner changes in equity and of comprehensive income. It does not change the recognition, measurement or disclosure of
specific transactions and other events required by other IFRS standards.
IFRIC 12 – Service Concession Arrangements
The group adopted IFRIC 12 – Service Concession Arrangements as of June 30, 2008. This interpretation deals with governments
which have entered into contractual service arrangements to attract private sector participation in the development, financing,
operation and maintenance of such infrastructure. The group has not entered into contractual service arrangements with the
government. The adoption of the interpretation did not have any effect on the financial position or performance of the group.
which have entered into contractual service arrangements to attract private sector participation in the development, financing,
operation and maintenance of such infrastructure. The group has not entered into contractual service arrangements with the
government. The adoption of the interpretation did not have any effect on the financial position or performance of the group.
IFRIC 13 – Customer Loyalty Programmes
The group adopted IFRIC 13 – Customer Loyalty Programmes as of June 30, 2008. This interpretation addresses customer loyalty
programmes which are used to provide customers with incentives to buy their goods or services. The group has not entered into
customer loyalty transactions. The adoption of the interpretation did not have any effect on the financial position or performance
of the group.
programmes which are used to provide customers with incentives to buy their goods or services. The group has not entered into
customer loyalty transactions. The adoption of the interpretation did not have any effect on the financial position or performance
of the group.
IFRIC 14 – The limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction
The group adopted IFRIC 14 – The limit on a Defined Benefit Asset Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction as of
June 30, 2008. This interpretation addresses paragraph 58 of IAS 19 which limits the measurement of a defined benefit asset to
‘the present value of economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the
plan’ plus unrecognized gains and losses. The group has a defined contribution plan and does not have a plan asset in respect of
the defined benefit plan for employees. The adoption of the interpretation did not have any effect on the financial position or
performance of the group.
June 30, 2008. This interpretation addresses paragraph 58 of IAS 19 which limits the measurement of a defined benefit asset to
‘the present value of economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the
plan’ plus unrecognized gains and losses. The group has a defined contribution plan and does not have a plan asset in respect of
the defined benefit plan for employees. The adoption of the interpretation did not have any effect on the financial position or
performance of the group.
IFRS 8 – Operating Segments
The group early adopted IFRS 8 – Operating Segments retrospectively as of June 30, 2009. This standard sets out requirements
for disclosure of information about an entity’s operating segments in a similar manner to the chief operating decision maker
(CODM), enabling him/her to allocate resources to the segments and to assess their performance and to report, in the same vein,
about the entity’s products and services, the geographical areas in which it operates, and its major customers. The standard
replaced IAS 14 – Segmental Reporting and the main difference is that IFRS 8 no longer requires disclosure of primary and
secondary segments but rather operating segments (or aggregations thereof) together with information about the relevant
products, services and geographical areas of the operating segments. Furthermore, IFRS 8 allows an entity to disclose amounts by
using different me asurements from those used in the financial statements. The adoption of the standard did not have any effect on
the financial position or performance of the group but does change the disclosures in the note on segmental reporting.
for disclosure of information about an entity’s operating segments in a similar manner to the chief operating decision maker
(CODM), enabling him/her to allocate resources to the segments and to assess their performance and to report, in the same vein,
about the entity’s products and services, the geographical areas in which it operates, and its major customers. The standard
replaced IAS 14 – Segmental Reporting and the main difference is that IFRS 8 no longer requires disclosure of primary and
secondary segments but rather operating segments (or aggregations thereof) together with information about the relevant
products, services and geographical areas of the operating segments. Furthermore, IFRS 8 allows an entity to disclose amounts by
using different me asurements from those used in the financial statements. The adoption of the standard did not have any effect on
the financial position or performance of the group but does change the disclosures in the note on segmental reporting.
New accounting standards and IFRIC interpretations
Certain new accounting standards and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) interpretations have
been published that have various effective dates. These new standards and interpretations have not been early adopted by the
group. A reliable estimate of the impact of the adoption thereof for the group cannot yet be determined for all of them, as
management is still in the process of determining the impact of these standards and interpretations on future financial statements.
been published that have various effective dates. These new standards and interpretations have not been early adopted by the
group. A reliable estimate of the impact of the adoption thereof for the group cannot yet be determined for all of them, as
management is still in the process of determining the impact of these standards and interpretations on future financial statements.
At the date of authorization of these financial statements, the following standards and interpretations were in issue but not yet
effective:
effective:
F-9
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Standards / interpretation
Effective date
IFRIC 16
Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation
Annual periods commencing on or
after October 1, 2008
1
Various
Improvements to IFRS 2008 (excluding IFRS 5 amendment)
Annual periods commencing on or
after January 1, 2009
1
IFRS 2 amended
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment: Vesting Conditions and Cancellations
Annual periods commencing on or
after January 1, 2009
1
IAS 23
Borrowing Costs
Annual periods commencing on or
after January 1, 2009
1
IAS 27 & IFRS 1
amendment
amendment
Cost of an Investment in a Subsidiary, Jointly Controlled Entity or Associate
Annual periods commencing on or
after January 1, 2009
1
IAS 32 & IAS 1
amendment
amendment
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and IAS 1 Presentation of Financial
Statements: Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on Liquidation
Annual periods commencing on or
after January 1, 2009
2
IFRIC 15
Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate
Annual periods commencing on or
after January 1, 2009
2
Amendments to
IFRS 7
IFRS 7
Improving Disclosures about Financial Instruments
Annual periods commencing on or
after January 1, 2009
1
IFRS 3
Business Combinations
Annual periods commencing on or
after July 1, 2009
1
IAS 27 amendment
Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
Annual periods commencing on or
after July 1, 2009
1
IAS 39 amendment
Eligible hedged items
Annual periods commencing on or
after July 1, 2009
1
IFRS 5 amendment Improvements to IFRS 2008 – IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and
Discontinued Operations
Annual periods commencing on or
after July 1, 2009
1
IFRIC 17
Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners
Annual periods commencing on or
after July 1, 2009
1
Various
Improvements to IFRS 2009: IFRS 2 Share-based Payment; IAS 38 Intangible
Assets – Additional consequential amendments arising from revised IFRS 3; IFRIC
9 Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives; IFRIC 16 Hedges of a Net Investment in
a Foreign Operation
Annual periods commencing on or
after July 1, 2009
1
Various
Improvements to IFRS 2009: (excluding IFRS 2 Share-based Payment. IAS 38
Intangible Assets – Additional consequential amendments arising from revised
IFRS 3; IFRIC 9 Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives; IFRIC 16 Hedges of a
Net Investment in a Foreign Operation)
Annual periods commencing on or
after January 1, 2010
1
F-10
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
New accounting standards and IFRIC interpretations (continued)
(1)
Impact not yet known or cannot be reasonably estimated.
(2)
Assessed: not applicable.
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the group. Control exists when the group has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the
financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting rights
that are currently exercisable or convertible are taken into account. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the
consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases.
financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting rights
that are currently exercisable or convertible are taken into account. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the
consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases.
Subsidiaries with a year-end on a date other than June 30, are included in the consolidated financial statements using the most
recent financial results with no more than a three-month difference if it is impracticable to prepare financial statements at the
group reporting date. Adjustments are made for material transactions and events between the group and subsidiary in the
intervening period.
recent financial results with no more than a three-month difference if it is impracticable to prepare financial statements at the
group reporting date. Adjustments are made for material transactions and events between the group and subsidiary in the
intervening period.
The accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to align them with the policies adopted by the group.
Associates
Associates are those entities in which the group has significant influence, but not control, over the financial and operating
policies. Significant influence is presumed to exist when the group holds between 20% and 50% of the voting power of another
group. Associates are accounted for using the equity method and are initially recognized at cost. The group's investment in
associates includes goodwill identified on acquisition and is presented net of any accumulated impairment losses. The
consolidated financial statements include the group's share of the income and expenses and equity movements of associates, after
adjustments to align the accounting policies with those of the group, from the date that significant influence commences until the
date that significant influence ceases.
policies. Significant influence is presumed to exist when the group holds between 20% and 50% of the voting power of another
group. Associates are accounted for using the equity method and are initially recognized at cost. The group's investment in
associates includes goodwill identified on acquisition and is presented net of any accumulated impairment losses. The
consolidated financial statements include the group's share of the income and expenses and equity movements of associates, after
adjustments to align the accounting policies with those of the group, from the date that significant influence commences until the
date that significant influence ceases.
When the group's share of losses exceeds its interest in an associate, the group's carrying amount of that interest is reduced to nil
and recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the extent that the group has incurred legal or constructive obligations
or made payments on behalf of an associate.
and recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the extent that the group has incurred legal or constructive obligations
or made payments on behalf of an associate.
Joint ventures
Joint ventures are those entities over the activities of which the group has joint control. They are established by contractual
agreement and require unanimous consent for strategic financial and operating decisions. The consolidated financial statements
include the group's proportionate share of the entities' assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, with items of a similar nature on a
line-by-line basis, from the date that joint control commences until the date that joint control ceases.
agreement and require unanimous consent for strategic financial and operating decisions. The consolidated financial statements
include the group's proportionate share of the entities' assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, with items of a similar nature on a
line-by-line basis, from the date that joint control commences until the date that joint control ceases.
Transactions eliminated on consolidation
Intra-group balances and any unrealized gains and losses or income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are
eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements. Unrealized gains arising from transactions with associates and
jointly controlled entities are eliminated to the extent of the group's interest in the entity. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the
same way as unrealized gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements. Unrealized gains arising from transactions with associates and
jointly controlled entities are eliminated to the extent of the group's interest in the entity. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the
same way as unrealized gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
F-11
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
FOREIGN CURRENCY
Functional currency
The functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. This is determined by
all companies in the group after analyzing all sources and influences of various currencies on their respective financial position
and performance, in order to establish the currency with the most dominant influence as its functional currency.
all companies in the group after analyzing all sources and influences of various currencies on their respective financial position
and performance, in order to establish the currency with the most dominant influence as its functional currency.
Each entity in the group has determined its own functional currency in accordance with the above process. The functional
currency of the company is the South African rand.
currency of the company is the South African rand.
Foreign currency transactions
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of the group entities at the foreign
exchange rates ruling at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the
statement of financial position date are translated to the functional currency at the foreign exchange rate ruling at that date. Non-
monetary assets and liabilities that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange
rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, measured at fair value,
are translated at foreign exchange rates ruling at the dates that the fair value was determined. Foreign exchange differences arising
on translation are recognized in profit of loss, except for differences arising on the translation of available-for-sale equity
instruments or a financial liability designated as a hedge of the net investment in a foreign operation, which are recognized
directly in other comprehensive income.
exchange rates ruling at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the
statement of financial position date are translated to the functional currency at the foreign exchange rate ruling at that date. Non-
monetary assets and liabilities that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange
rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, measured at fair value,
are translated at foreign exchange rates ruling at the dates that the fair value was determined. Foreign exchange differences arising
on translation are recognized in profit of loss, except for differences arising on the translation of available-for-sale equity
instruments or a financial liability designated as a hedge of the net investment in a foreign operation, which are recognized
directly in other comprehensive income.
Foreign operations
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on consolidation, are
translated into South African rands at the foreign exchange rates ruling at the statement of financial position date. The revenues
and expenses of foreign operations are translated to South African rands at rates approximating the foreign exchange rates ruling
at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange differences arising on retranslation are recognized in other comprehensive
income and presented in a separate component of equity, namely the foreign currency translation reserve. When a foreign
operation is disposed of, in part or in full, the relevant amount in the foreign currency translation reserve is transferred to profit or
loss.
translated into South African rands at the foreign exchange rates ruling at the statement of financial position date. The revenues
and expenses of foreign operations are translated to South African rands at rates approximating the foreign exchange rates ruling
at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange differences arising on retranslation are recognized in other comprehensive
income and presented in a separate component of equity, namely the foreign currency translation reserve. When a foreign
operation is disposed of, in part or in full, the relevant amount in the foreign currency translation reserve is transferred to profit or
loss.
Net investment in foreign operations
Foreign exchange gains and losses arising from a monetary item receivable from or payable to a foreign operation, the settlement
of which is neither planned nor likely in the foreseeable future, are considered to form part of a net investment in a foreign
operation and are recognized in other comprehensive income and presented in equity in the foreign currency translation reserve.
of which is neither planned nor likely in the foreseeable future, are considered to form part of a net investment in a foreign
operation and are recognized in other comprehensive income and presented in equity in the foreign currency translation reserve.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial instruments recognized on the statement of financial position include investments, derivative financial instruments,
available-for-sale financial instruments, trade and other receivables, cash and cash equivalents, long- and short-term interest-
bearing borrowings, trade and other payables, convertible loan notes and bank overdrafts.
available-for-sale financial instruments, trade and other receivables, cash and cash equivalents, long- and short-term interest-
bearing borrowings, trade and other payables, convertible loan notes and bank overdrafts.
Financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value and include any directly attributable transaction costs, except those
financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss. Subsequent to initial recognition, financial instruments are
measured as described below.
financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss. Subsequent to initial recognition, financial instruments are
measured as described below.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
An instrument is classified at fair value through profit or loss if it is held for trading or is designated as such upon initial
recognition. Investments are designated at fair value through profit or loss if doing so results in more relevant information
because either:
recognition. Investments are designated at fair value through profit or loss if doing so results in more relevant information
because either:
• it eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise; or
• the group manages and evaluates performance of such investments, and makes purchase and sale decisions based on their fair
value in accordance with the group's documented risk management or investment strategy.
Upon initial recognition, attributable transaction costs are recognized in profit or loss when incurred. Financial instruments at fair
value through profit or loss are measured at fair value, and changes therein are recognized in profit or loss.
value through profit or loss are measured at fair value, and changes therein are recognized in profit or loss.
F-12
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
Held-to-maturity investments
If the group has the positive intent and ability to hold debt securities to maturity, then they are classified as held to maturity. Held-
to-maturity investments are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
to-maturity investments are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables (which includes trade and other receivables) and other non-derivative financial instruments are measured at
amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
Available-for-sale financial assets
The group's investments in equity securities and certain debt securities are classified as available-for-sale financial assets.
Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses and foreign
exchange gains and losses on available-for-sale monetary items are recognized in other comprehensive income and presented
within equity. When an investment is derecognized, the cumulative gain or loss in other comprehensive income is transferred to
profit or loss.
Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses and foreign
exchange gains and losses on available-for-sale monetary items are recognized in other comprehensive income and presented
within equity. When an investment is derecognized, the cumulative gain or loss in other comprehensive income is transferred to
profit or loss.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, demand deposits, and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are subsequent to initial recognition measured at amortized cost, which is
equivalent to their fair value. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the group's cash
management are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the statement of cash flows.
three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are subsequent to initial recognition measured at amortized cost, which is
equivalent to their fair value. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the group's cash
management are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the statement of cash flows.
Interest-bearing borrowings
Interest-bearing borrowings (including the preference share liabilities) are subsequent to initial recognition measured at amortized
cost with any difference between the initial amount and the redemption value being recognized in profit or loss over the period of
the borrowings on an effective interest basis. If the group revises its estimates of payments, the carrying amount of the liability is
adjusted to reflect actual and revised estimated cash flows. The carrying amount is recalculated by computing the present value of
estimated future cash flows at the liability's original effective interest rate. The adjustment is recognized as income or expense in
profit or loss.
cost with any difference between the initial amount and the redemption value being recognized in profit or loss over the period of
the borrowings on an effective interest basis. If the group revises its estimates of payments, the carrying amount of the liability is
adjusted to reflect actual and revised estimated cash flows. The carrying amount is recalculated by computing the present value of
estimated future cash flows at the liability's original effective interest rate. The adjustment is recognized as income or expense in
profit or loss.
Convertible loan notes
Convertible loan notes that can be converted to share capital at the option of the holder, where the number of shares issued does
not vary with changes in their fair value, are accounted for as compound financial instruments. Transaction costs that relate to the
issue of a compound financial instrument are allocated to the liability and equity components in proportion to the allocation of
proceeds as explained below.
not vary with changes in their fair value, are accounted for as compound financial instruments. Transaction costs that relate to the
issue of a compound financial instrument are allocated to the liability and equity components in proportion to the allocation of
proceeds as explained below.
The liability component of a compound financial instrument is recognized initially at the fair value of a similar liability that does
not have an equity conversion option. This fair value is determined as the present value of the future interest and principal
payments, discounted at the market rate of interest applicable to similar liabilities that do not have a conversion option. The equity
component is recognized initially at the difference between the fair value of the compound financial instrument as a whole and the
fair value of the liability component.
not have an equity conversion option. This fair value is determined as the present value of the future interest and principal
payments, discounted at the market rate of interest applicable to similar liabilities that do not have a conversion option. The equity
component is recognized initially at the difference between the fair value of the compound financial instrument as a whole and the
fair value of the liability component.
F-13
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
Convertible loan notes (continued)
Subsequent to initial recognition, the liability component of a compound financial instrument is measured at amortized cost using
the effective interest method. The equity component of a compound financial instrument is not re-measured subsequent to initial
recognition.
the effective interest method. The equity component of a compound financial instrument is not re-measured subsequent to initial
recognition.
Interest, dividends, losses and gains relating to the financial liability are recognized in profit or loss. Distributions to the equity
holders are recognized against equity, net of any tax benefit.
holders are recognized against equity, net of any tax benefit.
Where the conversion feature in convertible loan notes is denominated in a foreign currency with a conversion option to convert a
fixed amount of notes into a fixed number of shares denominated in the functional currency, the convertible loan notes are
classified entirely as a liability.
fixed amount of notes into a fixed number of shares denominated in the functional currency, the convertible loan notes are
classified entirely as a liability.
Trade and other payables
Subsequent to initial recognition, trade and other payables are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest rate
method.
method.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Owned assets
The group's property, plant and equipment consists mainly of mining assets which comprise mining properties (including mineral
rights), mine development costs, mine plant facilities and equipment and vehicles.
rights), mine development costs, mine plant facilities and equipment and vehicles.
Development costs which are capitalized consist primarily of expenditure that gives access to proved and probable Ore Reserves.
Capitalized development costs include expenditure incurred to develop new ore bodies, to define future mineralization in existing
ore bodies and to expand the capacity of a mine. Mine development costs to maintain production, are expensed as incurred.
Where funds have been borrowed specifically to finance a project, the amount of interest capitalized represents the actual
borrowing costs incurred (refer to accounting policy on finance costs capitalized). Mine development costs include acquired
proved and probable Ore Reserves at cost at the acquisition date.
Capitalized development costs include expenditure incurred to develop new ore bodies, to define future mineralization in existing
ore bodies and to expand the capacity of a mine. Mine development costs to maintain production, are expensed as incurred.
Where funds have been borrowed specifically to finance a project, the amount of interest capitalized represents the actual
borrowing costs incurred (refer to accounting policy on finance costs capitalized). Mine development costs include acquired
proved and probable Ore Reserves at cost at the acquisition date.
Exploration and evaluation costs, including the costs of acquiring licenses, property and qualifying borrowing costs, are
capitalized as exploration assets on a project-by-project basis pending determination of the technical feasibility and commercial
viability of the project. The capitalized costs are presented as either tangible or intangible exploration assets according to the
nature of the assets acquired. When a license is relinquished or a project is abandoned, the related costs are recognized in profit or
loss immediately. Pre-license costs are recognized in profit and loss as incurred.
capitalized as exploration assets on a project-by-project basis pending determination of the technical feasibility and commercial
viability of the project. The capitalized costs are presented as either tangible or intangible exploration assets according to the
nature of the assets acquired. When a license is relinquished or a project is abandoned, the related costs are recognized in profit or
loss immediately. Pre-license costs are recognized in profit and loss as incurred.
Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.
Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets includes
the cost of materials and direct labor, any other costs directly attributable to bringing an asset to a working condition for its
intended use, as well as the costs of dismantling and removing an asset and restoring the site on which it was located.
Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets includes
the cost of materials and direct labor, any other costs directly attributable to bringing an asset to a working condition for its
intended use, as well as the costs of dismantling and removing an asset and restoring the site on which it was located.
Where parts of an item of property, plant and equipment with costs that are significant in relation to the total cost of the item have
different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items of property, plant and equipment.
different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items of property, plant and equipment.
Gains and losses on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment are determined by comparing the net proceeds from
disposal with the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, and are recognized in profit or loss.
disposal with the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, and are recognized in profit or loss.
Leased assets
Leases in terms of which the group assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases.
Upon initial recognition, the leased asset and liability are measured at amounts equal to the lower of the fair value of the leased
asset and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the assets held under finance leases
are accounted for in the same manner as owned property, plant and equipment.
Upon initial recognition, the leased asset and liability are measured at amounts equal to the lower of the fair value of the leased
asset and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the assets held under finance leases
are accounted for in the same manner as owned property, plant and equipment.
Subsequent costs
The group recognizes in the carrying amount of an item of property, plant and equipment, the cost of replacing part of an item
when that cost is incurred, if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the part will flow to the group and
the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognized. All other costs are
recognized in profit or loss as an expense as incurred.
when that cost is incurred, if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the part will flow to the group and
the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognized. All other costs are
recognized in profit or loss as an expense as incurred.
F-14
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued)
Depreciation
Depreciation of mining properties (including mineral rights), mine development and mine plant facilities relating to underground
operations are computed using the units-of-production method based on estimated proved and probable Ore Reserves, which are
calculated using our life of mine business plans and a gold price at the end of each financial year. Proved and probable Ore
Reserves reflect estimated quantities of economically recoverable reserves which can be recovered in the future from known
mineral deposits. Exploration assets that are available for use are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Changes in
management’s estimates of the quantities of the economically recoverable reserves impact depreciation on a prospective basis.
The prevailing market price of gold at the end of the financial year was R154,437, R208,287 and R236,227 per kilogram for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 200 7, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
operations are computed using the units-of-production method based on estimated proved and probable Ore Reserves, which are
calculated using our life of mine business plans and a gold price at the end of each financial year. Proved and probable Ore
Reserves reflect estimated quantities of economically recoverable reserves which can be recovered in the future from known
mineral deposits. Exploration assets that are available for use are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Changes in
management’s estimates of the quantities of the economically recoverable reserves impact depreciation on a prospective basis.
The prevailing market price of gold at the end of the financial year was R154,437, R208,287 and R236,227 per kilogram for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 200 7, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Other assets are depreciated using the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of each part of an item of property, plant
and equipment. Leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and their estimated useful lives, unless it is
reasonably certain that the group will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term. Land is not depreciated.
and equipment. Leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and their estimated useful lives, unless it is
reasonably certain that the group will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term. Land is not depreciated.
The current estimated useful lives are:
•
mining properties – life of mine for each operation, currently between two and 27 years
•
mine development – life of mine for each operation, currently between two and 27 years
•
mine plant facilities – life of mine for each operation, currently between two and 27 years
•
equipment and vehicles – three to five years
The residual values, estimated useful lives and depreciation methods are re-assessed annually.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Acquisition and goodwill arising thereon
Where an investment in a subsidiary, joint venture or an associate is made, any excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value
of the attributable mineral assets including value beyond proved and probable Ore Reserves and Mineral Resource and
exploration properties is recognized as goodwill. In the case of negative goodwill arising from an investment, the amount is
recognized in profit or loss immediately. Goodwill relating to equity accounted joint ventures and associates is included within
the carrying value of the investment and tested for impairment when indicators exist.
of the attributable mineral assets including value beyond proved and probable Ore Reserves and Mineral Resource and
exploration properties is recognized as goodwill. In the case of negative goodwill arising from an investment, the amount is
recognized in profit or loss immediately. Goodwill relating to equity accounted joint ventures and associates is included within
the carrying value of the investment and tested for impairment when indicators exist.
Goodwill relating to subsidiaries is tested annually for impairment and measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses.
Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold. Goodwill is
allocated to cash-generating units for the purposes of impairment testing.
Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold. Goodwill is
allocated to cash-generating units for the purposes of impairment testing.
IMPAIRMENT
Financial assets
A financial asset is assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any objective evidence that it is impaired. A
financial asset is considered to be impaired if objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on
the estimated future cash flows of that asset.
financial asset is considered to be impaired if objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on
the estimated future cash flows of that asset.
Financial assets measured at amortized cost
An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured at amortized cost is calculated as the difference between its carrying
amount, and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate, that is, the
effective interest rate computed at initial recognition of these financial assets.
amount, and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate, that is, the
effective interest rate computed at initial recognition of these financial assets.
Available-for-sale financial assets
An impairment loss in respect of an available-for-sale financial asset is calculated by reference to its fair value. When a decline in
the fair value of an available-for-sale financial asset has been recognized directly in other comprehensive income, and there is
objective evidence that the asset is impaired, the cumulative loss that had been recognized in other comprehensive income is
recognized in profit or loss even though the financial asset has not been derecognized. The amount of the cumulative loss that is
recognized in profit or loss is the difference between the acquisition cost and current fair value, less any impairment loss on that
financial asset previously recognized in profit or loss.
the fair value of an available-for-sale financial asset has been recognized directly in other comprehensive income, and there is
objective evidence that the asset is impaired, the cumulative loss that had been recognized in other comprehensive income is
recognized in profit or loss even though the financial asset has not been derecognized. The amount of the cumulative loss that is
recognized in profit or loss is the difference between the acquisition cost and current fair value, less any impairment loss on that
financial asset previously recognized in profit or loss.
F-15
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
IMPAIRMENT (continued)
Available-for-sale financial assets (continued)
Financial assets that are individually significant are tested for impairment on an individual basis. The remaining financial assets
are assessed collectively in groups that share similar credit risk characteristics. All impairment losses are recognized in profit or
loss.
are assessed collectively in groups that share similar credit risk characteristics. All impairment losses are recognized in profit or
loss.
An impairment loss is reversed if the reversal can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was
recognized. For financial assets measured at amortized cost and available-for-sale financial assets that are debt securities, the
reversal is recognized in profit or loss. For available-for-sale financial assets that are equity securities, the reversal is recognized
in other comprehensive income.
recognized. For financial assets measured at amortized cost and available-for-sale financial assets that are debt securities, the
reversal is recognized in profit or loss. For available-for-sale financial assets that are equity securities, the reversal is recognized
in other comprehensive income.
Non-financial assets
The carrying amounts of the group's assets, other than inventories and deferred tax assets are reviewed at each statement of
financial position date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, the asset's
recoverable amount is estimated.
financial position date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, the asset's
recoverable amount is estimated.
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In
assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that
reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. Future cash flows are estimated
based on quantities of recoverable minerals, expected gold prices, production levels and cash costs of production, all based on life
of mine business plans. The term "recoverable minerals" means proved and probable Ore Reserves which are calculated using our
life of mine business plans and a gold price at the end of each financial year. The prevailing market price of gold at the end of the
financial year was R154,437, R208,287 and R236,227 per kilogram for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets which generates
cash inflows from continuing use that is largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the 'cash-
generating unit').
assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that
reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. Future cash flows are estimated
based on quantities of recoverable minerals, expected gold prices, production levels and cash costs of production, all based on life
of mine business plans. The term "recoverable minerals" means proved and probable Ore Reserves which are calculated using our
life of mine business plans and a gold price at the end of each financial year. The prevailing market price of gold at the end of the
financial year was R154,437, R208,287 and R236,227 per kilogram for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets which generates
cash inflows from continuing use that is largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the 'cash-
generating unit').
An impairment loss is recognized directly against the carrying amount of the asset whenever the carrying amount of an asset, or
its cash generating unit, exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss. Impairment losses
recognized in respect of cash-generating units are allocated to the carrying amounts of the assets in the unit (group of units) on a
pro rata basis.
its cash generating unit, exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss. Impairment losses
recognized in respect of cash-generating units are allocated to the carrying amounts of the assets in the unit (group of units) on a
pro rata basis.
Impairment losses recognized in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or
no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable
amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount
that would have been determined, net of depreciation, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable
amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount
that would have been determined, net of depreciation, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
Exploration assets
Exploration assets are assessed for impairment if sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability
and facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount. For purposes of impairment
testing, exploration assets are allocated to cash-generating units consistent with the determination of reportable segments.
and facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount. For purposes of impairment
testing, exploration assets are allocated to cash-generating units consistent with the determination of reportable segments.
The technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource is considered to be determinable when proved
and probable Ore Reserves are determined to exist. Upon determination of proved and probable Ore Reserves, exploration assets
attributable to those reserves are first tested for impairment and then reclassified from exploration assets to a separate category
within tangible assets. Expenditure deemed to be unsuccessful is recognized profit or loss immediately.
and probable Ore Reserves are determined to exist. Upon determination of proved and probable Ore Reserves, exploration assets
attributable to those reserves are first tested for impairment and then reclassified from exploration assets to a separate category
within tangible assets. Expenditure deemed to be unsuccessful is recognized profit or loss immediately.
INVENTORIES
Gold in process is measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Costs are assigned to gold in process on an average cost
basis. Costs comprise all costs incurred to the stage immediately prior to smelting, including costs of extraction and processing as
they are reliably measurable at that point. Selling, refining and general administration costs are excluded from inventory
valuation. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of
completion and selling expenses.
basis. Costs comprise all costs incurred to the stage immediately prior to smelting, including costs of extraction and processing as
they are reliably measurable at that point. Selling, refining and general administration costs are excluded from inventory
valuation. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of
completion and selling expenses.
Consumable stores are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost of consumables is based on the weighted average
cost principle and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring inventories and bringing them to their existing location and
condition.
cost principle and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring inventories and bringing them to their existing location and
condition.
F-16
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
TAXATION
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognized in the statement of comprehensive income
except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity, in which case it is recognized in equity.
except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity, in which case it is recognized in equity.
Current taxation
Current taxation is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted, or substantively enacted,
at the statement of financial position date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
at the statement of financial position date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Deferred taxation
Deferred taxation is recognized using the statement of financial position liability method, providing for temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.
Deferred tax is not recognized for the following temporary differences: the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a
transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit, and differences relating to
investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the
foreseeable future. In addition, deferred tax is not recognized for taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition
of goodwill. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences, based on the
expected manner of realization or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, and based on the laws that have been
enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.
Deferred tax is not recognized for the following temporary differences: the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a
transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit, and differences relating to
investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the
foreseeable future. In addition, deferred tax is not recognized for taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition
of goodwill. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences, based on the
expected manner of realization or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, and based on the laws that have been
enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and
they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, and the
company intends to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized
simultaneously.
they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, and the
company intends to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized
simultaneously.
A deferred tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which
the temporary difference can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that
it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.
the temporary difference can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that
it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.
Additional income taxes that arise from the distribution of dividends, such as secondary tax on companies, are recognized at the
same time as the liability to pay the related dividend is recognized.
same time as the liability to pay the related dividend is recognized.
SHARE CAPITAL
Ordinary share capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares are recognized as a
deduction from equity, net of any tax effect.
deduction from equity, net of any tax effect.
Preference share capital
Preference share capital is classified as equity if it is non-redeemable, or redeemable only at the company's option, and any
dividends are discretionary. Dividends on preference share capital classified as equity are recognized as distributions within
equity. Preference share capital is classified as a liability if it is redeemable on a specific date or at the option of the shareholders,
or if dividend payments are not discretionary. Dividends thereon are recognized as interest expense in profit or loss as accrued.
dividends are discretionary. Dividends on preference share capital classified as equity are recognized as distributions within
equity. Preference share capital is classified as a liability if it is redeemable on a specific date or at the option of the shareholders,
or if dividend payments are not discretionary. Dividends thereon are recognized as interest expense in profit or loss as accrued.
Dividends
Dividends are recognized as a liability in the period in which they are declared.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Defined contribution plans
A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which an entity pays fixed contributions into a separate
entity and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts. Pension plans, which are multi-employer plans in
the nature of defined contribution plans, are funded through monthly contributions to these defined contribution plans.
Obligations for contributions are recognized as an employee benefit expense in profit or loss as incurred.
entity and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further amounts. Pension plans, which are multi-employer plans in
the nature of defined contribution plans, are funded through monthly contributions to these defined contribution plans.
Obligations for contributions are recognized as an employee benefit expense in profit or loss as incurred.
F-17
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (continued)
Long-service benefits
The group makes long-service bonus payments (long-service awards) for certain eligible employees, under the Chamber of Mines
of South Africa Long Service Award Scheme. The amount of the award is based on both the employee's skill level and years of
service with gold mining companies that qualify for the scheme. The obligation is accrued over the service life of the employees
and is calculated using a projected unit credit method. Any actuarial gains or losses are recognized in profit or loss in the period in
which they arise.
of South Africa Long Service Award Scheme. The amount of the award is based on both the employee's skill level and years of
service with gold mining companies that qualify for the scheme. The obligation is accrued over the service life of the employees
and is calculated using a projected unit credit method. Any actuarial gains or losses are recognized in profit or loss in the period in
which they arise.
Share-based payment transactions
The group grants share options to certain employees under an employee share plan to acquire shares of the company. The fair
value of options granted is recognized as an employee expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is
measured at grant date and spread over the period during which the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options.
The fair value of the options granted is measured using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, taking into account the terms
and conditions upon which the options were granted. The amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual
number of share options that vest except where forfeiture is only due to market conditions such as share prices not achieving the
threshold for vesting.
value of options granted is recognized as an employee expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is
measured at grant date and spread over the period during which the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options.
The fair value of the options granted is measured using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, taking into account the terms
and conditions upon which the options were granted. The amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual
number of share options that vest except where forfeiture is only due to market conditions such as share prices not achieving the
threshold for vesting.
Post-retirement medical benefits
Post-retirement medical benefits in respect of qualifying employees are recognized as an expense over the expected remaining
service lives of relevant employees. The group has an obligation to provide medical benefits to certain of its pensioners and
dependants of ex-employees. These liabilities are provided in full, calculated on an actuarial basis and discounted using the
projected unit credit method. The discount rate is the yield at the reporting date on corporate bonds that have maturity dates
approximating the terms of the group's obligations and that are denominated in the same currency in which the benefits are
expected to be paid. Periodic valuation of these obligations is carried out by independent actuaries using appropriate mortality
tables, long-term estimates of increases in medical costs and appropriate discount rates. The fair value of any plan assets is
deducted. Actuarial gains and los ses are recognized immediately in profit or loss. When the calculation results in a benefit to the
group, the recognized asset is limited to the net total of any unrecognized past service costs and the present value of any future
refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan.
service lives of relevant employees. The group has an obligation to provide medical benefits to certain of its pensioners and
dependants of ex-employees. These liabilities are provided in full, calculated on an actuarial basis and discounted using the
projected unit credit method. The discount rate is the yield at the reporting date on corporate bonds that have maturity dates
approximating the terms of the group's obligations and that are denominated in the same currency in which the benefits are
expected to be paid. Periodic valuation of these obligations is carried out by independent actuaries using appropriate mortality
tables, long-term estimates of increases in medical costs and appropriate discount rates. The fair value of any plan assets is
deducted. Actuarial gains and los ses are recognized immediately in profit or loss. When the calculation results in a benefit to the
group, the recognized asset is limited to the net total of any unrecognized past service costs and the present value of any future
refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan.
When the benefits of a plan are improved, the portion of the increased benefit relating to past service by employees is recognized
in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits become vested. To the extent that the benefits
vest immediately, the expense is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits become vested. To the extent that the benefits
vest immediately, the expense is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
PROVISIONS
A provision is recognized in the statement of financial position when the group has present legal or constructive obligations
resulting from past events that can be estimated reliably and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to
settle the obligation. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current
market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.
resulting from past events that can be estimated reliably and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to
settle the obligation. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current
market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.
Decommissioning liabilities
The provision for decommissioning represents the cost that will arise from rectifying damage caused before production
commenced. Accordingly an asset is recognized and included within mining properties.
commenced. Accordingly an asset is recognized and included within mining properties.
Decommissioning liabilities are provided at the present value of the expenditures expected to settle the obligation, using estimated
cash flows based on current prices. The unwinding of the decommissioning obligation is included in profit or loss. Estimated
future costs of decommissioning obligations are reviewed regularly and adjusted as appropriate for new circumstances or changes
in law or technology. Changes in estimates are capitalized or reversed against the relevant asset.
cash flows based on current prices. The unwinding of the decommissioning obligation is included in profit or loss. Estimated
future costs of decommissioning obligations are reviewed regularly and adjusted as appropriate for new circumstances or changes
in law or technology. Changes in estimates are capitalized or reversed against the relevant asset.
Gains or losses from the expected disposal of assets are not taken into account when determining the provision.
Restoration liabilities
The provision for restoration represents the cost of restoring site damage after the start of production. Increases in the provision
are charged to profit or loss as a cost of production. Gross restoration liabilities are estimated at the present value of the
expenditures expected to settle the obligation.
are charged to profit or loss as a cost of production. Gross restoration liabilities are estimated at the present value of the
expenditures expected to settle the obligation.
F-18
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
PROVISIONS (continued)
Rehabilitation trust fund
Annual contributions are made to dedicated rehabilitation trust funds to fund the estimated cost of rehabilitation during and at the
end of the life of the relevant mine. These contributions are recognized as a right to receive reimbursement from the fund and
measured at the fair value of the fund assets. Changes in the carrying value of the fund assets, other than contributions to and
payments from the fund, are recognized in profit or loss.
end of the life of the relevant mine. These contributions are recognized as a right to receive reimbursement from the fund and
measured at the fair value of the fund assets. Changes in the carrying value of the fund assets, other than contributions to and
payments from the fund, are recognized in profit or loss.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Gold bullion and by-products
Revenue from the sale of gold bullion and by-products is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable.
Revenue is recognized in profit or loss when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer,
recovery of the consideration is probable, the associated costs can be estimated reliably, there is no continuing management
involvement with the goods, and the amount of revenue can be measured reliably.
Revenue is recognized in profit or loss when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer,
recovery of the consideration is probable, the associated costs can be estimated reliably, there is no continuing management
involvement with the goods, and the amount of revenue can be measured reliably.
Government grants
Government grants are not recognized until there is reasonable assurance that the entity will comply with the conditions attaching
to them and the grant will be received. Grants that compensate the group for expenses incurred are recognized in profit or loss as
a deduction against the related expense.
to them and the grant will be received. Grants that compensate the group for expenses incurred are recognized in profit or loss as
a deduction against the related expense.
Finance income
Finance income includes dividends received, interest received, growth in the environmental rehabilitation trust funds, net gains on
financial instruments measured at amortized cost, and other profits and losses arising on disposal of investments.
financial instruments measured at amortized cost, and other profits and losses arising on disposal of investments.
Dividends are recognized when the group's right to receive payment is established. Interest is recognized on a time proportion
basis taking account of the principal outstanding and the effective rate to maturity on the accrual basis.
basis taking account of the principal outstanding and the effective rate to maturity on the accrual basis.
EXPENSES
Operating lease payments
Payments made under operating leases are recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
Finance lease payments
Minimum lease payments are apportioned between the finance charge and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance
charge is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining
balance of the liability.
charge is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining
balance of the liability.
Finance expenses
Finance expenses comprise interest payable on borrowings calculated using the effective interest method, unwinding of
discounting of provision for environmental rehabilitation, net foreign exchange gains and losses, net losses on financial
instruments measured at amortized cost, and interest on finance leases.
discounting of provision for environmental rehabilitation, net foreign exchange gains and losses, net losses on financial
instruments measured at amortized cost, and interest on finance leases.
Finance costs capitalized
Interest on borrowings relating to the financing of qualifying major capital projects under construction is capitalized during the
construction phase as part of the cost of the project. Such borrowing costs are capitalized over the period during which the asset is
being acquired or constructed and borrowings have been incurred. Capitalization ceases when construction is interrupted for an
extended period or when the asset is substantially complete. Other borrowing costs are expensed as incurred.
construction phase as part of the cost of the project. Such borrowing costs are capitalized over the period during which the asset is
being acquired or constructed and borrowings have been incurred. Capitalization ceases when construction is interrupted for an
extended period or when the asset is substantially complete. Other borrowing costs are expensed as incurred.
F-19
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
OPERATING SEGMENTS
Operating segments are identified on the basis of internal reports that the group’s chief operating decision maker (CODM)
reviews regularly in allocating resources to segments and in assessing their performance. The CODM for the group has been
identified as the group’s Executive Committee. Reportable segments are identified based on quantitative thresholds of revenue,
profit or loss, and assets. The amounts disclosed for each reportable segment are the measures reported to the CODM, which are
not necessarily based on the same accounting policies as the amounts recognized in the financial statements.
reviews regularly in allocating resources to segments and in assessing their performance. The CODM for the group has been
identified as the group’s Executive Committee. Reportable segments are identified based on quantitative thresholds of revenue,
profit or loss, and assets. The amounts disclosed for each reportable segment are the measures reported to the CODM, which are
not necessarily based on the same accounting policies as the amounts recognized in the financial statements.
Aggregation of operating segments is implemented where disclosure of information enables users of the group’s financial
statements to evaluate the nature and effects of the business activities in which it engages and the economic environment in which
it operates, where the operating segments have characteristics so similar that they can be expected to have essentially the same
future prospects and if they are similar in the following respects:
statements to evaluate the nature and effects of the business activities in which it engages and the economic environment in which
it operates, where the operating segments have characteristics so similar that they can be expected to have essentially the same
future prospects and if they are similar in the following respects:
• the nature of the production process;
• the type or class of customer for their products and services;
• the methods used to distribute their products or provide their services; and
• if applicable, the nature of the regulatory environment.
NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
A held-for-sale asset is classified as such if it is a non-current asset, or disposal group comprising assets and liabilities, that are
expected to be recovered primarily through sale rather than through continuing use. Immediately before classification as held for
sale, the assets (or components of a disposal group) are re-measured in accordance with the group's accounting policies.
Thereafter, in general, the non-current assets or disposal groups are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less
costs to sell. Impairment losses on initial classification as held for sale are included in profit or loss, even when there is a
revaluation. The same applies to gains and losses on subsequent measurement. Gains are not recognized in excess of any
cumulative impairment loss.
expected to be recovered primarily through sale rather than through continuing use. Immediately before classification as held for
sale, the assets (or components of a disposal group) are re-measured in accordance with the group's accounting policies.
Thereafter, in general, the non-current assets or disposal groups are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less
costs to sell. Impairment losses on initial classification as held for sale are included in profit or loss, even when there is a
revaluation. The same applies to gains and losses on subsequent measurement. Gains are not recognized in excess of any
cumulative impairment loss.
A discontinued operation in the group is a component of the group's business that represents a separate major line of business, or
geographical area of operations which has been disposed of or is held for sale, or is a subsidiary acquired exclusively for resale.
geographical area of operations which has been disposed of or is held for sale, or is a subsidiary acquired exclusively for resale.
When an operation is classified as a discontinued operation, the comparative statement of comprehensive income is restated.
EARNINGS OR LOSS PER SHARE
The group presents basic and diluted earnings per share data for its ordinary shares. Basic earnings or loss per share are calculated
based on the net profit or loss after taxation for the year attributable to ordinary shareholders of the company, divided by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year. Diluted earnings or loss per share are presented when the
inclusion of ordinary shares that may be issued in the future, has a dilutive effect on earnings or loss per share, which comprises
share options granted to employees.
based on the net profit or loss after taxation for the year attributable to ordinary shareholders of the company, divided by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year. Diluted earnings or loss per share are presented when the
inclusion of ordinary shares that may be issued in the future, has a dilutive effect on earnings or loss per share, which comprises
share options granted to employees.
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS INVOLVING ENTITIES UNDER COMMON CONTROL
A business combination involving entities or businesses under common control is a business combination in which all of the
combining entities or businesses are ultimately controlled by the same party or parties both before and after the business
combination and that control is not transitory.
combining entities or businesses are ultimately controlled by the same party or parties both before and after the business
combination and that control is not transitory.
In the absence of more specific guidance, the group consistently applied the book value measurement method to all common
control transactions on the basis that an investment is simply being transferred from one part of the group to another. Any
difference between the carrying amount of the net assets received and the consideration paid, if any, is recognized directly in
equity as an excess arising from the common-control transaction.
control transactions on the basis that an investment is simply being transferred from one part of the group to another. Any
difference between the carrying amount of the net assets received and the consideration paid, if any, is recognized directly in
equity as an excess arising from the common-control transaction.
F-20
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
2. REVENUE
Revenue consists of the following principal categories:
Gold revenue
1,870,574
1,897,723
2,160,800
By-product revenue
40,164
35,424
48,905
Total revenue
1,910,738
1,933,147
2,209,705
3. RESULTS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES INCLUDES
THE FOLLOWING:
THE FOLLOWING:
Auditors' remuneration
(10,520)
(10,453)
(15,418)
Audit fees – current year
(10,246)
(10,163)
(11,555)
(Under)/over provision – prior year
(116)
161
(2,291)
Fees for other services
(158)
(451)
(1,572)
Management, technical, administrative and secretarial
service fees
(12,916)
(15,760)
(11,811)
Staff costs
Included in staff costs are:
(681,717)
(652,168)
(795,926)
Salaries and wages
(582,509)
(598,160)
(706,663)
Share-based payments
(7,873)
(6,591)
(12,686)
Retrenchment and restructuring costs
(34,922)
(11,344)
(27,445)
Post-retirement and other employee benefit contributions
(56,413)
(36,073)
(49,132)
Profit/(loss) on sale of property, plant and equipment
10,266
10,054
(301)
Impairments
(75,138)
(110,633)
(878,046)
Property, plant and equipment
(72,438)
(116,522)
(872,133)
Investments and loans to associates
(2,700)
-
-
Other loans
-
5,889
(5,913)
During the year ended June 30, 2009, impairments of R53.0 million and R19.4 million were recorded against ERPM’s and
Crown’s property, plant and equipment, respectively. The impairments were due to the recoverable amount of these assets being
less than their carrying amount for ERPM due to closure of underground operations and for Crown due to restriction of deposition
capacity. The Crown plant, City plant and ERPM’s underground operations are separate cash-generating units. Furthermore, an
impairment relating to the investment in West Wits SA (Pty) Limited amounting to R2.7 million was recognized. The
impairment was due to the recoverable amount of this asset being less than its carrying amount.
Crown’s property, plant and equipment, respectively. The impairments were due to the recoverable amount of these assets being
less than their carrying amount for ERPM due to closure of underground operations and for Crown due to restriction of deposition
capacity. The Crown plant, City plant and ERPM’s underground operations are separate cash-generating units. Furthermore, an
impairment relating to the investment in West Wits SA (Pty) Limited amounting to R2.7 million was recognized. The
impairment was due to the recoverable amount of this asset being less than its carrying amount.
During the year ended June 30, 2008, an impairment of R69.8 million was recorded against ERPM’s property, plant and
equipment due to unprofitable long-walls, and an impairment of R46.7 million was recorded against Emperor’s property, plant
and equipment. The impairments were due to the recoverable amount of these assets being less than their carrying amount.
equipment due to unprofitable long-walls, and an impairment of R46.7 million was recorded against Emperor’s property, plant
and equipment. The impairments were due to the recoverable amount of these assets being less than their carrying amount.
An impairment of R3.5 million recorded during the 2007 financial year against the preference shares held by the black economic
empowerment partner, Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited, and R2.4 million impairment which was raised against the loan to the
DRDSA Empowerment Trust, were reversed during the 2008 financial year. The reversal of these impairments was due to the
recoverable amount represented by the value in use of these assets being higher than their carrying amount.
empowerment partner, Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited, and R2.4 million impairment which was raised against the loan to the
DRDSA Empowerment Trust, were reversed during the 2008 financial year. The reversal of these impairments was due to the
recoverable amount represented by the value in use of these assets being higher than their carrying amount.
During the year ended June 30, 2007, an impairment, amounting to R872.1 million was recorded against property, plant and
equipment at Emperor. R65.0 million related to an impairment of Tolukuma’s property, plant and equipment and R807.1 million
related to an impairment of Vatukoula’s property, plant and equipment. The impairments were due to the recoverable amount
represented by the value in use of these assets being less than their carrying amount.
equipment at Emperor. R65.0 million related to an impairment of Tolukuma’s property, plant and equipment and R807.1 million
related to an impairment of Vatukoula’s property, plant and equipment. The impairments were due to the recoverable amount
represented by the value in use of these assets being less than their carrying amount.
F-21
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
3. RESULTS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES INCLUDES
THE FOLLOWING: (continued)
THE FOLLOWING: (continued)
Operating leases
(2,670)
(2,635)
(3,428)
Pumping subsidy received
9,000
12,703
19,599
4. DIRECTORS' EMOLUMENTS
Executive directors
Executive directors
Services rendered as directors of the company
Salaries
(6,130)
(3,994)
(2,852)
Bonuses
(2,907)
(1,655)
(1,184)
Services rendered by directors as directors of subsidiaries
Salaries
(1,429)
-
(2,556)
Bonuses
(1,399)
-
(3,134)
End-of-contract payments
(747)
-
(1,905)
Non-executive directors
Services rendered as directors of the company
Directors fees and bonuses
(3,787)
(3,071)
(2,473)
Services rendered as directors as directors of subsidiaries
Directors fees and bonuses
-
(877)
(1,147)
Alternate Directors
Services rendered as directors of the company
Salaries
-
(1,562)
(943)
Bonuses
-
(716)
-
Pension/provident fund contributions
-
(130)
(70)
Services rendered by directors as directors of subsidiaries
Salaries
-
-
(398)
Bonuses
-
-
(431)
Included in administration and general costs
(16,399)
(12,005)
(17,093)
5. FINANCE INCOME
Dividends received
4,829
4,074
3,829
Royalties received
-
-
1,960
Interest received
75,035
70,232
12,998
Net gain on financial liabilities measured at amortized cost (refer note 22)
62,000
-
-
(Loss)/profit on realization of investment
(1,873)
12,005
1,152
Growth in environmental rehabilitation trust funds
12,867
8,486
8,061
Recognition of negative goodwill on acquisition of subsidiary
53,006
-
-
Other investment income
127
218
1,123
205,991
95,015
29,123
F-22
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
6. FINANCE EXPENSES
Interest paid on bank loans and overdrafts
(2,219)
(34,133)
(86,293)
Interest paid on overdue accounts
(865)
(787)
(988)
Interest expense on convertible bond
-
-
(11,795)
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries
-
-
(8,896)
Unrealized foreign exchange (loss)/gain
(10,318)
(37,314)
14,012
Net loss on financial liabilities measured at amortized
cost (refer note 22)
cost (refer note 22)
-
(83,721)
(5,182)
Unwinding of provision for environmental rehabilitation
(refer note 19)
(refer note 19)
(9,797)
(4,735)
(3,250)
Unwinding of discount on financial liabilities measured
at amortized cost
at amortized cost
(18,023)
(6,394)
(3,371)
Other finance expenses
(521)
(609)
(220)
(41,743)
(167,693)
(105,983)
7. INCOME TAX
Mining tax
20,729
147,737
(204)
Non-mining tax
11,332
(4,026)
(5,068)
Secondary tax on companies
(3,617)
-
(461)
28,444
143,711
(5,733)
Comprising:
South African
Current - current tax
(43,321)
(13,272)
(276)
- prior tax
749
-
-
Deferred tax - current year
74,633
81,575
-
Secondary tax on companies
(3,617)
-
(461)
Foreign
Current tax - current year
-
(32,678)
(4,792)
- prior year
-
-
-
Deferred tax - current year
-
108,086
(204)
- prior year
-
-
-
28,444
143,711
(5,733)
In South Africa, mining tax on mining income is determined based on a formula which takes into account the profit and revenue
from a gold mining company during the year. Non- mining income, which consists primarily of interest, is taxed at a standard rate
of 28% (2008: 28%) (2007: 29%).
from a gold mining company during the year. Non- mining income, which consists primarily of interest, is taxed at a standard rate
of 28% (2008: 28%) (2007: 29%).
The tax rates applicable to mining and non-mining income of a gold mining company depend on whether the company has elected
to be exempt from secondary tax on companies (STC). STC is a tax on dividends declared, which is payable by the company
declaring the dividend. At present, the STC tax rate is equal to 10.0% (2008: 10%) (2007: 12.5%) of the amount of income
declared as a dividend. In 1993, all existing gold mining companies had the option to elect to be exempt from STC. If the election
was made, a higher tax rate would apply to both mining and non-mining income.
to be exempt from secondary tax on companies (STC). STC is a tax on dividends declared, which is payable by the company
declaring the dividend. At present, the STC tax rate is equal to 10.0% (2008: 10%) (2007: 12.5%) of the amount of income
declared as a dividend. In 1993, all existing gold mining companies had the option to elect to be exempt from STC. If the election
was made, a higher tax rate would apply to both mining and non-mining income.
In 2009, 2008 and 2007, the tax rates for taxable mining and non-mining income for companies that elected the STC exemption
were 43% (2008: 43%) (2007: 45%) and 35% (2008: 35%) (2007: 37%) respectively. During those same years, the tax rates for
companies that did not elect the STC exemption were 34% (2008: 34%) (2007: 35%) and 28% (2008: 28%) (2007: 29%).
were 43% (2008: 43%) (2007: 45%) and 35% (2008: 35%) (2007: 37%) respectively. During those same years, the tax rates for
companies that did not elect the STC exemption were 34% (2008: 34%) (2007: 35%) and 28% (2008: 28%) (2007: 29%).
In 1993, the company elected not to be exempt from STC, as this would have meant that the company would be subject to normal
taxation at the higher rates of 43% for mining income and 35% for non-mining income. The company, having chosen not to be
subject to the STC exemption, is subject to 34% (2008: 34%) (2007: 35%) tax on mining income and 28% (2008: 28%) (2007:
29%) for non-mining income. With the exception of Crown, all of the South African subsidiaries elected not to be exempt from
STC. The tax rate for all the Australasian operations was 30%.
taxation at the higher rates of 43% for mining income and 35% for non-mining income. The company, having chosen not to be
subject to the STC exemption, is subject to 34% (2008: 34%) (2007: 35%) tax on mining income and 28% (2008: 28%) (2007:
29%) for non-mining income. With the exception of Crown, all of the South African subsidiaries elected not to be exempt from
STC. The tax rate for all the Australasian operations was 30%.
F-23
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
7. INCOME TAX (continued)
South African deferred tax is provided at the estimated effective mining tax rate applicable in terms of the mining tax formula to
the relevant operations at either 34% or 43% (2008: 34% or 43%) (2007: 35% or 45%) while the Australian deferred tax was
provided at the Australian statutory tax rate of 30% (2008: 30%) (2007: 30%).
the relevant operations at either 34% or 43% (2008: 34% or 43%) (2007: 35% or 45%) while the Australian deferred tax was
provided at the Australian statutory tax rate of 30% (2008: 30%) (2007: 30%).
Each company is taxed as a separate entity and no tax set-off is allowed between the companies.
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
Estimated unredeemed capital expenditure at year-end
(available for deduction against future mining income)
1,907,048
1,395,736 1,724,708
Estimated tax losses at year-end (available to reduce future
taxable income)
914,057
963,940
892,363
Estimated tax losses and unredeemed capital expenditure
carried forward
2,821,105
2,359,676 2,617,071
Estimated future tax relief at applicable statutory rates
922,492
748,071
879,635
Tax reconciliation
Major items causing the group's income tax provision to
Major items causing the group's income tax provision to
differ from the statutory rate were:
Taxation (charge)/benefit on net (profit)/loss at applicable statutory rates
(25,660)
27,987
451,071
Disallowable expenditure
(22,986)
(94,659)
(78,930)
Exempt income
32,372
226,850
139,705
Additional tax expense relating to the prior year
(1,373)
–
–
Tax incentives
2,114
5,678
3,107
Secondary tax on companies
(3,617)
–
(461)
Temporary differences (including tax losses) for which deferred tax assets (not
recognized) and previously unrecognized temporary differences recognized
recognized) and previously unrecognized temporary differences recognized
45,047
(22,145)
(516,926)
Other
2,547
–
(3,299)
Taxation relief/(charge)
28,444
143,711
(5,733)
F-24
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
8. PROFIT ON DISPOSAL OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The sale of Emperor’s 20% interest in the Porgera Joint Venture to Barrick was completed on August 17, 2007 for a cash
consideration of R1.9 billion ($255.0 million) and subsequently Emperor retired all its debt facilities, leaving the group debt- and
hedge-free. Emperor’s capital return to its shareholders amounting to R308.5 million ($43.9 million) was completed on
September 3, 2007 and DRDGOLD received its portion of the capital return, amounting to R242.8 million ($37.7 million).
consideration of R1.9 billion ($255.0 million) and subsequently Emperor retired all its debt facilities, leaving the group debt- and
hedge-free. Emperor’s capital return to its shareholders amounting to R308.5 million ($43.9 million) was completed on
September 3, 2007 and DRDGOLD received its portion of the capital return, amounting to R242.8 million ($37.7 million).
The sale of DRDGOLD’s 78.72% interest in Emperor was concluded on October 22, 2007 for a total consideration of R355.8
million (A$56.0 million), drawing to a close the group’s mining investment in Australasia.
million (A$56.0 million), drawing to a close the group’s mining investment in Australasia.
On March 30, 2008 DRDGOLD disposed of its 50.25% shareholding in NetGold Services Limited (NetGold) and in exchange
for its shareholding in NetGold obtained a 12.3% stake in GM Networks Limited (GoldMoney), which was sold during the
current year.
for its shareholding in NetGold obtained a 12.3% stake in GM Networks Limited (GoldMoney), which was sold during the
current year.
An extensive three-month review of the Vatukoula mine was completed in early December 2006. The results of the review
concluded that continuation of the mine plan was no longer economically viable. On December 5, 2006 mining ceased, and the
mine was closed and placed on care and maintenance. The mine was sold on March 28, 2007.
concluded that continuation of the mine plan was no longer economically viable. On December 5, 2006 mining ceased, and the
mine was closed and placed on care and maintenance. The mine was sold on March 28, 2007.
Comparative information has been restated and re-presented to show the
discontinued operations separately from the continuing operations.
discontinued operations separately from the continuing operations.
Profit on disposal of Porgera
-
1,052,393
–
Profit on disposal of Emperor
-
103,403
–
Profit on disposal of NetGold
-
13,414
–
Profit on disposal of the Vatukoula mine.
-
-
90,895
Costs recovered on liquidation of the North West Operations
-
-
43
Profit on disposal of discontinued operations
-
1,169,210
90,938
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
F-25
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
9. EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic
The calculation of earnings/(loss) per ordinary share is based
on the following:
Basic earnings/(loss) attributable to equity owners of the parent
129,124
996,041
(924,466)
Basic earnings/(loss) from continuing operations attributable to equity
owners of the parent
owners of the parent
129,124
128,558
(2,674)
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue
376,678,974
376,023,344
340,928,374
Diluted
Basic earnings/(loss) attributable to equity owners of the parent
129,124
996,041
(924,466)
Dilutive effect on earnings
-
-
-
Diluted basic earnings/(loss)
129,124
996,041
(924,466)
Reconciliation of weighted average ordinary shares to diluted weighted
average ordinary shares
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue
average ordinary shares
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue
376,678,974
376,023,344
340,928,374
Number of staff options allocated
223,547
22,813
895,747
Diluted weighted average number of ordinary shares
376,902,521
376,046,157
341,824,121
Basic earnings/(loss) per ordinary share (cents)
34
265
(271)
Basic diluted earnings/(loss) per share (cents)
34
265
(271)
Basic earnings/(loss) from continuing operations per ordinary share (cents)
34
34
(1)
Diluted earnings/(loss) from continuing operations per ordinary share (cents)
34
34
(1)
There was no dilution in loss per share for 2007 as the effect of dilutive
securities in issue would be anti-dilutive, as the group recorded a loss.
securities in issue would be anti-dilutive, as the group recorded a loss.
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
F-26
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Total
Cost
Total
Cost
2,901,436
1,809,606
Opening balance
1,809,606
2,783,736
Acquired through purchase of subsidiaries
740,874
-
Additions
346,668
371,389
Borrowing costs capitalized
5,154
2,613
Disposals
(866)
-
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
-
(1,391,555)
Foreign exchange movement
-
43,423
Accumulated depreciation, amortization and impairment losses
(1,168,217)
(996,731)
Opening balance
(996,731)
(2,133,966)
Current depreciation
(99,217)
(69,931)
Impairment
(72,438)
(116,522)
Disposals
169
-
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
-
1,366,295
Foreign exchange movement
-
(42,607)
Net book value
1,733,219
812,875
F-27
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued)
Mining property
Cost
Cost
284,800
259,313
Opening balance
259,313
935,223
Additions (b)
22,367
105,691
Borrowing costs capitalized
3,298
2,613
Disposals
(178)
-
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
-
(808,809)
Foreign exchange movement
-
24,595
Accumulated depreciation, amortization and impairment losses
(151,527)
(145,574)
Opening balance
(145,574)
(873,143)
Current depreciation
(5,746)
(9,927)
Impairment
(207)
(46,718)
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
-
808,809
Foreign exchange movement
-
(24,595)
Net book value
133,273
113,739
Mine development
Cost
Cost
1,806,500
902,845
Opening balance
902,845
901,907
Acquired through purchase of subsidiaries
672,140
-
Additions
231,715
124,194
Disposals
(200)
-
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
-
(127,371)
Foreign exchange movement
-
4,115
Accumulated depreciation, amortization and impairment losses
(614,272)
(513,450)
Opening balance
(513,450)
(531,574)
Current depreciation
(54,254)
(34,452)
Impairment
(46,568)
(69,804)
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
-
126,466
Foreign exchange movement
-
(4,086)
Net book value
1,192,228
389,395
F-28
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued)
Mine plant facilities
Cost
679,049
547,018
Opening balance
547,018
726,579
Acquired through purchase of subsidiaries
39,925
-
Additions
92,253
56,416
Disposals
(147)
-
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
-
(243,856)
Foreign exchange movement
-
7,879
Accumulated depreciation, amortization and impairment losses
(386,457)
(324,383)
Opening balance
(324,383)
(537,084)
Current depreciation
(37,401)
(23,276)
Impairment
(24,673)
-
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
-
243,856
Foreign exchange movement
-
(7,879)
Net book value
292,592
222,635
Equipment and vehicles
Cost
Cost
21,557
18,301
Opening balance
18,301
220,027
Additions
3,597
2,959
Disposals
(341)
-
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
-
(211,519)
Foreign exchange movement
-
6,834
Accumulated depreciation, amortization and impairment losses
(15,961)
(13,324)
Opening balance
(13,324)
(192,165)
Current depreciation
(1,816)
(2,276)
Impairment
(990)
-
Disposals
169
-
Disposed through disposal of subsidiary
-
187,164
Foreign exchange movement
-
(6,047)
Net book value
5,596
4,977
Exploration Assets (a)
Cost
Cost
109,530
82,129
Opening balance
82,129
-
Acquired through purchase of subsidiaries
28,809
-
Additions (b)
(3,264)
82,129
Borrowing cost capitalized
1,856
-
Net book value
109,530
82,219
F-29
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (continued)
Certain assets have been encumbered as security for specified liabilities (refer note 22).
Borrowing costs are capitalized at the prime lending rate.
At year end a reclassification took place to disclose exploration assets as a separate asset class, together with the early adoption of
IFRS 8 – Operating Segments to provide better information. For comparative purposes the numbers for 2008 are the only
numbers affected by this reclassification and have been amended accordingly.
IFRS 8 – Operating Segments to provide better information. For comparative purposes the numbers for 2008 are the only
numbers affected by this reclassification and have been amended accordingly.
In assessing the recoverability of the above assets, where there are indicators of possible impairment, the estimated cash flows
have been calculated using the following estimates:
have been calculated using the following estimates:
•
life of mine based on proved and probable Ore Reserves;
•
gold price estimates are based on a gold price of R270 000/kg of gold (US$885 per ounce) in year one, escalating at an
average of 7.42% per annum and a base exchange rate of R8.50 = US$1.00, with the rand weakening in future years
based on the expected differential between the local South African interest rates in those years over the United States
interest rates in those years.
average of 7.42% per annum and a base exchange rate of R8.50 = US$1.00, with the rand weakening in future years
based on the expected differential between the local South African interest rates in those years over the United States
interest rates in those years.
•
working cost estimates are based on current working costs per kilogram at June 30, 2009, escalated for expected South
African inflationary increases of approximately 5.5% per annum; and
African inflationary increases of approximately 5.5% per annum; and
•
capital cost estimates are based on current estimates of future development costs to mine the current proved and probable
Ore Reserves, escalated for expected South African inflationary increases of approximately 5.5% per annum.
Ore Reserves, escalated for expected South African inflationary increases of approximately 5.5% per annum.
(a) Exploration assets relates to phase two of the Ergo project (the Ergo Joint Venture) and include property, plant, and
tailings complex as well as the property included through proportionate consolidation of Witfontein Mining (Pty)
Limited (refer to note 13).
Limited (refer to note 13).
(b) Included in additions are rehabilitation adjustments amounting to R5.8 million and (R3.9 million) relating to mining
property and exploration assets, respectively.
F-30
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 200
for the year ended June 30, 200
2009 2008
R’000 R’000
11. NON-CURRENT INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS
Listed investments (see below)
-
-
Opening balance
-
2,042
Foreign exchange movement
-
191
Additions
-
27
Disposals
-
(1 402)
Fair value adjustment
-
(858)
Unlisted investments
9,556
10,689
Loan to DRDSA Empowerment Trust
10,078
13,628
Loan to Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Ltd
23,364
41,040
Investments in environmental rehabilitation trust funds
129,682
110,766
Opening balance
110,766
75,770
Contributions
6,049
26,510
Growth in environmental rehabilitation trust funds
12,867
8,486
Total non-current investments and other assets
172,680
176,123
Directors’ valuation of unlisted investments
9,556
10,689
Unlisted investments consists of:
Market
Carrying
Carrying
Number value value value
of 2009 2009 2008
% Held
shares
R'000
R'000
R'000
Rand Mutual Assurance Company
†
370
7
7
9
Rand Refinery Limited
4
16,157
9,549
9,549
10,680
9,556
9,556
10,689
† Represents a less than 1% shareholding.
Unlisted investments comprise investments in various unlisted companies in South Africa. The valuations, which are done on an
annual basis, are based on the net asset value of these investments. During the previous year the group disposed of all its listed
investments.
annual basis, are based on the net asset value of these investments. During the previous year the group disposed of all its listed
investments.
The monies in the environmental rehabilitation trust funds are invested primarily in low-risk interest-bearing debt securities and
may be used only for environmental rehabilitation purposes.
may be used only for environmental rehabilitation purposes.
F-31
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
12. INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES
Acquisition of subsidiary during the year
ErgoGold (formerly Elsburg Gold Mining Joint Venture)
The group entered into a 50.50 joint venture agreement through East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited (ERPM), together with one
of Mintails SA (Pty) Limited subsidiaries called Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited on August 15, 2008. The joint venture is called
ErgoGold. On March 31, 2009 the group acquired the remaining 50% interest in ErgoGold through ERPM acquiring 15% and
DRDGOLD acquiring 35% for a cash consideration of R100 million and R177 million respectively.
The fair value of the assets acquired at the date of acquisition, exceeded the cost of the acquisition, therefore resulting in a bargain
purchase. The bargain purchase was a direct result of the favourable change in the gold price from the time the purchase price was
fixed and the higher gold price on the date all the requirements were met for the acquisition to be recognized, which was the date
the fair value of the assets and liabilities were determ ined. The resulting negative goodwill arising amounted to R53 million and
was recognized in the statement of comprehensive income, under finance income.
The most significant fair value determined related to the mining rights included in property, plant and equipment and amounted to
R583.0 million. The Multi Period Excess Earnings Method (MEEM) was used to calculate the fair value, incorporating the
following assumptions on acquisition date: gold price of R288,665/kg, average escalation of gold price of 6.4% per annum,
working cost per tonne of R30 at an average escalation of 6%, life of mine (period) of 13 years, average yield of 0.14g/t and
discount rate of 22.5%.
The statement of comprehensive income since acquisition relating to ErgoGold which has been consolidated is set out below:
of Mintails SA (Pty) Limited subsidiaries called Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited on August 15, 2008. The joint venture is called
ErgoGold. On March 31, 2009 the group acquired the remaining 50% interest in ErgoGold through ERPM acquiring 15% and
DRDGOLD acquiring 35% for a cash consideration of R100 million and R177 million respectively.
The fair value of the assets acquired at the date of acquisition, exceeded the cost of the acquisition, therefore resulting in a bargain
purchase. The bargain purchase was a direct result of the favourable change in the gold price from the time the purchase price was
fixed and the higher gold price on the date all the requirements were met for the acquisition to be recognized, which was the date
the fair value of the assets and liabilities were determ ined. The resulting negative goodwill arising amounted to R53 million and
was recognized in the statement of comprehensive income, under finance income.
The most significant fair value determined related to the mining rights included in property, plant and equipment and amounted to
R583.0 million. The Multi Period Excess Earnings Method (MEEM) was used to calculate the fair value, incorporating the
following assumptions on acquisition date: gold price of R288,665/kg, average escalation of gold price of 6.4% per annum,
working cost per tonne of R30 at an average escalation of 6%, life of mine (period) of 13 years, average yield of 0.14g/t and
discount rate of 22.5%.
The statement of comprehensive income since acquisition relating to ErgoGold which has been consolidated is set out below:
Statement of comprehensive income (3 months to June 30, 2009)
Revenue
Revenue
8,713
-
Cost of sales
(54,614)
-
Gross loss from operating activities
(45,901)
-
Other income, administration and general costs
(1,250)
-
Loss before taxation
(47,151)
-
The statement of comprehensive income for the full 8 months trading period of ErgoGold
has been set out below:
Revenue
has been set out below:
Revenue
39,643
-
Cost of sales
(105,058)
-
Gross loss from operating activities
(65,415)
-
Other income, administration and general costs
(1,251)
-
Loss before taxation
(66,666)
-
The statement of financial position at acquisition of ErgoGold has been set out below:
Statement of financial position (as at April 1, 2009)
Statement of financial position (as at April 1, 2009)
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment
887,462
-
Current assets
Inventory
Inventory
17,866
-
Trade and other receivables
950
-
Cash and cash equivalents
1,666
-
Total fair value of assets
907,944
-
Non-current liabilities
Deferred tax liability
Deferred tax liability
(185,653)
-
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables
(33,381)
-
Total fair value of liabilities
(219,034)
-
Fair value of net assets on date of acquisition
688,910
-
Non controlling interest in fair value of net assets
55,866
-
Acquisition date fair value on 50% initial equity interest
344,455
-
F-32
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
13. INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
The joint venture for which the statement of comprehensive income and statement of financial
position have been proportionately consolidated were as follows:
Witfontein Mining (Pty) Limited – percentage held
position have been proportionately consolidated were as follows:
Witfontein Mining (Pty) Limited – percentage held
50%
-
Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited – percentage held
50%
50%
The group acquired a 50% interest in Witfontein Mining (Pty) Limited (Witfontein) on
February 28, 2009 for a cash consideration of R20 million. The group has the option to
dispose of its interest at a consideration equal to the acquisition price if Witfontein is
unsuccessful in obtaining the required approvals for a deposition facility. Witfontein had no
capital commitments at year end.
The group acquired a 50% interest in Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited (Ergo Joint Venture) with
effect from May 6, 2008. Ergo Joint Venture is jointly controlled by the group and Mintails
Limited. Ergo Joint Venture has contracted commitments which have not been provided for in
the financial statements amounting to R4.8 million (2008: R133.7 million), and commitments
authorized by the directors but not contracted for amounting to R30.9 million (2008: R146.1
million). The group’s proporti onate share in these amounts is 50%.
The group’s effective share of income, expenses, assets, liabilities and cash flows of the joint
ventures, which is included in the consolidated financial statements, is as follows:
Statement of comprehensive income
February 28, 2009 for a cash consideration of R20 million. The group has the option to
dispose of its interest at a consideration equal to the acquisition price if Witfontein is
unsuccessful in obtaining the required approvals for a deposition facility. Witfontein had no
capital commitments at year end.
The group acquired a 50% interest in Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited (Ergo Joint Venture) with
effect from May 6, 2008. Ergo Joint Venture is jointly controlled by the group and Mintails
Limited. Ergo Joint Venture has contracted commitments which have not been provided for in
the financial statements amounting to R4.8 million (2008: R133.7 million), and commitments
authorized by the directors but not contracted for amounting to R30.9 million (2008: R146.1
million). The group’s proporti onate share in these amounts is 50%.
The group’s effective share of income, expenses, assets, liabilities and cash flows of the joint
ventures, which is included in the consolidated financial statements, is as follows:
Statement of comprehensive income
Revenue
-
-
Cost of sales
(5,162)
-
Gross loss from operating activities
(5,162)
-
Other income, administration and general costs
(3,967)
(42)
Loss before taxation
(9,129)
(42)
Statement of financial position
Non-current assets
69,876
94,408
Current assets
34,269
51,318
Total assets
104,145
145,726
Equity of owners
10,830
(30)
Non-current liabilities
70,840
78,329
Current liabilities
22,475
67,427
Total equity and liabilities 104,145
145,726
14. INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATES
The associate has been equity accounted for in the statement of comprehensive income and statement of financial position. An
impairment has been provided against this investment.
impairment has been provided against this investment.
West Wits SA (Pty) Limited – percentage held
28.33%
-
Investment in associate – at cost
2,700
-
Impairment of investment in associate
(2,700)
-
Carrying value of investment in associate
-
-
15. INVENTORIES
Current
Current
Gold in process
42,861
30,398
Consumable stores
51,074
32,459
93,935
62,857
Non-current
Consumable stores
4,238
2,717
Total inventories
98,173
65,574
F-33
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
16. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
Trade receivables (gold)
30,966
58,650
Value added tax
27,494
32,357
Prepayments
386
285
Receivables from related parties
86
515
Interest receivable
6,181
19,983
Other receivables
31,161
136,689
Allowance for impairment
(8,314)
(8,201)
87,960
240,278
17. ASSETS CLASSIFIED AS HELD FOR SALE
Mining property of R15.0 million, being the Durban Deep mine village, is presented as held for sale following the decision of the
group’s management on January 13, 2006 to sell this disposal group as part of the closure of the old Durban Deep mine. A sale
was expected by June 30, 2009, however due to circumstances beyond the company’s control, the sale has been postponed and is
expected to be completed by June 30, 2010. The company remains committed to its plan to sell this disposal group.
group’s management on January 13, 2006 to sell this disposal group as part of the closure of the old Durban Deep mine. A sale
was expected by June 30, 2009, however due to circumstances beyond the company’s control, the sale has been postponed and is
expected to be completed by June 30, 2010. The company remains committed to its plan to sell this disposal group.
On March 30, 2008 DRDGOLD disposed of its 50.25% shareholding in NetGold and, in exchange for its shareholding in
NetGold, acquired a 12.3% stake in GoldMoney. DRDGOLD recognized the sale at a fair value of R22.1 million ($2.7 million)
with a subsequent re-measurement to fair value at June 30, 2008 to R24.7 million ($3.1 million). On September 12, 2008
DRDGOLD disposed of its 12.3% stake in GoldMoney for R26.2 million ($2.9 million).
NetGold, acquired a 12.3% stake in GoldMoney. DRDGOLD recognized the sale at a fair value of R22.1 million ($2.7 million)
with a subsequent re-measurement to fair value at June 30, 2008 to R24.7 million ($3.1 million). On September 12, 2008
DRDGOLD disposed of its 12.3% stake in GoldMoney for R26.2 million ($2.9 million).
The disposal groups are carried at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
Assets classified as held for sale
Property, plant and equipment
15,000
15,000
Non-current investments and other assets
-
24,746
15,000
39,746
F-34
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
2009 2008
R’000 R’000
18. EQUITY OF THE OWNERS OF THE PARENT
Details of equity owners of the parent are provided in the statements
of changes in equity on page F-5.
Authorized share capital
600,000,000 (2008: 600,000,000) ordinary shares of no par value
5,000,000 (2008: 5,000,000) cumulative preference
shares of 10 cents each
500
500
Issued share capital
378,001,303 (2008: 376,571,588) ordinary shares of no
par value
378,001,303 (2008: 376,571,588) ordinary shares of no
par value
4,104,480
4,098,206
5,000,000 (2008: 5,000,000) cumulative preference shares
of 10 cents each
of 10 cents each
500
500
4,104,980
4,098,706
Share capital
Unissued shares
Unissued shares
The group operates a share option scheme as an incentive tool for its executive directors and senior employees whose skills and
experience are recognized as being essential to the group’s performance. In terms of the scheme rules, a maximum of 15% of the
issued ordinary shares is reserved for issuance there under and no participant may hold options at any time, which if exercised in
full, would exceed 2% of the company's issued share capital at that time. The number of issued and exercisable share options are
4.6% of the issued ordinary share capital which is within the internationally accepted guideline of 3% to 5% for such schemes.
experience are recognized as being essential to the group’s performance. In terms of the scheme rules, a maximum of 15% of the
issued ordinary shares is reserved for issuance there under and no participant may hold options at any time, which if exercised in
full, would exceed 2% of the company's issued share capital at that time. The number of issued and exercisable share options are
4.6% of the issued ordinary share capital which is within the internationally accepted guideline of 3% to 5% for such schemes.
In addition, the participants in the scheme are fully taxed at their marginal tax rate on any gains realized on the exercise of their
options.
options.
In terms of an ordinary resolution passed at the previous annual general meeting, the remaining unissued ordinary shares in the
company are under the control of the directors until the next general meeting.
company are under the control of the directors until the next general meeting.
Cumulative preference shares
The terms of issue of the cumulative preference shares were that they carried the right, having priority over the company's
ordinary shares, to receive a dividend equal to 3% of the gross future revenue generated by the exploitation or the disposal of
Argonaut's mineral rights acquired from Randgold and Exploration Company Limited in September 1997. In 2005, the Argonaut
mineral rights reverted to the South African Government after no application for conversion was lodged within the stipulated
period of one year, under the provisions of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA).
ordinary shares, to receive a dividend equal to 3% of the gross future revenue generated by the exploitation or the disposal of
Argonaut's mineral rights acquired from Randgold and Exploration Company Limited in September 1997. In 2005, the Argonaut
mineral rights reverted to the South African Government after no application for conversion was lodged within the stipulated
period of one year, under the provisions of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA).
Option instruments
The company currently has one class of options authorized but not issued, namely Durban Deep ‘C’ options. There are
10,000,000 authorized option instruments at year-end which entitle the holder to subscribe for one ordinary share per option
instrument at a subscription price of R15 per ordinary share, which are exercisable at any time during the period from the date on
which the option is issued by the company to a date no later than five years from the date of issue.
10,000,000 authorized option instruments at year-end which entitle the holder to subscribe for one ordinary share per option
instrument at a subscription price of R15 per ordinary share, which are exercisable at any time during the period from the date on
which the option is issued by the company to a date no later than five years from the date of issue.
F-35
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
18. EQUITY OF THE OWNERS OF THE PARENT (continued)
2009 2008
R’000 R’000
Revaluation and other reserves
Foreign exchange translation reserve (a)
156,538
157,144
Asset revaluation reserve (b)
138,953
6,744
Share-based payments reserve (c)
51,919
44,046
347,410
207,934
(a) The foreign exchange translation reserve represents the cumulative translation effect arising on the translation of the financial
statements of the company’s foreign operations, as well as from the translation of liabilities that hedge the company’s net
investment in a foreign subsidiary.
statements of the company’s foreign operations, as well as from the translation of liabilities that hedge the company’s net
investment in a foreign subsidiary.
(b) Certain items of property, plant and equipment that have been revalued to fair value on or prior to July 1, 2004 – the date of
transition to IFRS – are measured on the basis of deemed cost, being the revalued amount at the date of the revaluation. A
revaluation adjustment of R5.0 million has been recognized in the asset revaluation reserve.
transition to IFRS – are measured on the basis of deemed cost, being the revalued amount at the date of the revaluation. A
revaluation adjustment of R5.0 million has been recognized in the asset revaluation reserve.
The reserve also includes a R1.1 million (2008: R1.7 million) fair-value adjustment on available-for-sale financial instruments.
On the acquisition of ErgoGold, an amount of R133.3 million was taken to the asset revaluation reserve. This amount represented
the increase in the fair value of ErgoGold’s net assets after the acquisition of the group’s initial interest, which is attributable to
that initial interest.
the increase in the fair value of ErgoGold’s net assets after the acquisition of the group’s initial interest, which is attributable to
that initial interest.
(c) The company issues equity-settled instruments to certain qualifying employees under an employee share option scheme to
purchase shares in the company’s authorized but unissued ordinary shares. Equity share-based payments are measured at the fair
value of the equity instruments at the date of the grant. Deferred share-based compensation is expensed over the vesting period,
based on the company’s estimate of the shares that are expected to eventually vest. During 2009, a deferred share-based
compensation expense of R7.9 million (2008: R6.6 million), was charged to the statement of comprehensive income (refer to note
3).
purchase shares in the company’s authorized but unissued ordinary shares. Equity share-based payments are measured at the fair
value of the equity instruments at the date of the grant. Deferred share-based compensation is expensed over the vesting period,
based on the company’s estimate of the shares that are expected to eventually vest. During 2009, a deferred share-based
compensation expense of R7.9 million (2008: R6.6 million), was charged to the statement of comprehensive income (refer to note
3).
Dividends
The following dividends were declared and paid by the group:
10.0 cents per qualifying ordinary share (2008: 0 cents)
10.0 cents per qualifying ordinary share (2008: 0 cents)
(37,658)
-
After June 30, 2009 a dividend of 5 cents per qualifying share (R18.9 million) was proposed by the directors for 2010. The
dividend has not been provided for nor the secondary tax on companies (STC) which is charged at 10% of the dividend
declared and which amounts to R1.8 million.
dividend has not been provided for nor the secondary tax on companies (STC) which is charged at 10% of the dividend
declared and which amounts to R1.8 million.
19. PROVISION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REHABILITATION
Opening balance
381,252
282,580
Acquired through purchase of joint venture
-
59,747
Increase in provision
1,860
-
Unwinding of discount (refer note 6)
9,797
4,735
Charge to the statement of comprehensive income
19,545
34,190
Closing balance
412,454
381,252
Amounts have been contributed to irrevocable trusts (refer to note 11)
The company intends to fund the ultimate rehabilitation costs from the money invested with the trust funds as well as, at the time
of mine closure, the proceeds on sale of remaining assets and gold from plant clean-up.
of mine closure, the proceeds on sale of remaining assets and gold from plant clean-up.
20. POST-RETIREMENT AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Liability for post-retirement medical benefits
42,498
21,504
Liability for long-service awards
1,141
1,236
43,639
22,740
F-36
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
20. POST-RETIREMENT AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (continued)
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
Contribution funds
In South Africa, the group participates in a number of multi-employer industry-based retirement plans. All plans are governed
by the Pension Funds Act, 1956.
by the Pension Funds Act, 1956.
The group pays fixed contributions to external institutions and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further
amounts. Pension plans, which are multi-employer plans in the nature of defined contribution plans, are funded through
monthly contributions to these defined contribution plans. Obligations for contributions are recognized as an employee
benefit expense in the statement of comprehensive income as incurred.
amounts. Pension plans, which are multi-employer plans in the nature of defined contribution plans, are funded through
monthly contributions to these defined contribution plans. Obligations for contributions are recognized as an employee
benefit expense in the statement of comprehensive income as incurred.
Amounts recognized in the statement of comprehensive income are as follows:
Contribution payments
(35,419)
(33,578)
Post-retirement medical benefits
The group has an obligation to fund a portion of the medical aid contributions of certain of its employees after they have
retired. A provision for post-retirement medical benefits has been raised, based on the latest calculations, using a projected
unit credit method of independent actuaries, performed as at June 30, 2009. Post-retirement medical benefits are actuarially
valued every three years. The obligation is unfunded.
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position are as follows:
retired. A provision for post-retirement medical benefits has been raised, based on the latest calculations, using a projected
unit credit method of independent actuaries, performed as at June 30, 2009. Post-retirement medical benefits are actuarially
valued every three years. The obligation is unfunded.
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position are as follows:
Opening balance
21,504
19,009
Current service cost
1,101
1,021
Actuarial losses
18,226
-
Interest costs
1,667
1,474
Closing balance
42,498
21,504
Amounts recognized in the statement of comprehensive income are as follows:
Current service cost
(1,101)
(1,021)
Net actuarial losses
(18,226)
-
Interest costs
(1,667)
(1,474)
(20,994)
(2,495)
Principal actuarial assumptions at the statement of financial position date:
Health care cost inflation
7.3%
5.8%
Discount rate
8.3%
7.8%
Real discount rate
0.9%
1.9%
Income at retirement (as % of final salary)
60.0%
50.0%
Normal retirement age
60/65
62.5/63/65
Expected average retirement age
59.9/64.1 61.6/62.0/63.5
Spouse age gap
3 years
3 years
Continuation at retirement
100%
100%
Proportion married at retirement
85%
85%
F-37
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
20. POST-RETIREMENT AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (continued)
Historical information:
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
Unfunded liability
42,498
21,504
19,009
There are currently no long-term assets set aside in respect of post-employment medical care liabilities.
Assuming all other variables remain constant, a 1% change in health care costs would have the following effects:
Sensitivity analysis:
Health care
Variation
cost inflation
Mortality
Resignation rate
100bp
R’000
R’000 R’000
Effect on the aggregate
+1%
626
(437)
(224)
service and interest cost
-1%
(493)
529
249
Effect in past-service
+1%
9,562
(6,715)
(3,400)
contractual liability
-1%
(7,522)
8,075
3,782
The group expects to pay contributions to the amount of R4.5 million during 2010.
Long-service awards
The group participates in the Chamber of Mines of South Africa Long Service Awards Scheme (the scheme). The scheme does
not confer on any employee or other persons any right of payment of any award.
not confer on any employee or other persons any right of payment of any award.
In terms of the scheme, bonus payments may be made to certain employees, usually semi-skilled, upon reaching the age of 55,
who have completed 15 years of continuous service in South African gold mining companies which are members of the Chamber
of Mines of South Africa and The Employment Bureau of Africa, provided such service is not pensionable service. The scheme
lays down the rules under which an employee may be eligible for the award. The award is paid by the company for which the
employee works upon becoming eligible for the award and electing to receive payment. All awards must be confirmed by the
Chamber of Mines of South Africa before payment.
who have completed 15 years of continuous service in South African gold mining companies which are members of the Chamber
of Mines of South Africa and The Employment Bureau of Africa, provided such service is not pensionable service. The scheme
lays down the rules under which an employee may be eligible for the award. The award is paid by the company for which the
employee works upon becoming eligible for the award and electing to receive payment. All awards must be confirmed by the
Chamber of Mines of South Africa before payment.
The amount of the award is based on both the employee's skill level and years of service with gold mining companies that qualify
for the scheme.
for the scheme.
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position are as follows:
Opening balance
1,236
1,322
Actuarial gain
-
-
Benefits paid
(95)
(86)
Closing balance
1,141
1,236
Amounts recognized in the statement of comprehensive income
Actuarial gain/(loss)
-
-
Share option scheme
a) Details of the scheme
The company operates a share option scheme, DRDGOLD (1996) Share Scheme, (the scheme), as an incentive tool for its
executive directors and senior employees whose skills and experience are recognized as being essential to the company's
performance. In terms of the scheme rules a maximum of 15% of the issued ordinary shares of the company is reserved for
issuance there under and no participant may hold options at any time which, if exercised in full, would exceed 2% of the
company's issued share capital at that time. The number of issued and exercisable share options is approximately 4.6% of the
issued ordinary share capital which is within the internationally accepted guideline of 3% to 5% for such schemes. In addition, the
participants in the scheme are fully taxed at their maximum marginal tax rate on any gains realized on the exercise of their
options.
executive directors and senior employees whose skills and experience are recognized as being essential to the company's
performance. In terms of the scheme rules a maximum of 15% of the issued ordinary shares of the company is reserved for
issuance there under and no participant may hold options at any time which, if exercised in full, would exceed 2% of the
company's issued share capital at that time. The number of issued and exercisable share options is approximately 4.6% of the
issued ordinary share capital which is within the internationally accepted guideline of 3% to 5% for such schemes. In addition, the
participants in the scheme are fully taxed at their maximum marginal tax rate on any gains realized on the exercise of their
options.
F-38
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
20. POST-RETIREMENT AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (continued)
The price at which an option may be exercised is the lowest seven-day trailing average of the closing market prices of an ordinary
share on the JSE Limited, as confirmed by the company's directors, during the three months preceding the day on which the
employee is granted the option. Each option remains in force for 10 years after the date of grant, subject to the terms of the option
plan. Options granted under a plan vest at the discretion of the company's directors, but primarily according to the following
schedule over a maximum of a three-year period:
share on the JSE Limited, as confirmed by the company's directors, during the three months preceding the day on which the
employee is granted the option. Each option remains in force for 10 years after the date of grant, subject to the terms of the option
plan. Options granted under a plan vest at the discretion of the company's directors, but primarily according to the following
schedule over a maximum of a three-year period:
Percentage vested in each period
grant:
grant:
Period after the original
date of the option:
date of the option:
25%
6 months
25%
1 year
25%
2 years
25%
3 years
Any options not exercised within 10 years from the original date of the option will expire and may not thereafter be exercised.
b) Share options activity in respect of the DRDGOLD (1996) Share Scheme was as follows:
Outstanding Vested
Average Average
price per
price per
Number of
share
Number of
share
shares
R
shares R
Balance at June 30, 2007
16,254,774
12.48
12,163,058
14.18
Granted 4,581,800
3.88
Exercised (429,607)
5.48
Forfeited/lapsed (4,471,348)
14.34
Balance at June 30, 2008
15,935,619
13.85
11,257,594
11.58
Granted 4,647,800
3.50
Exercised (1,429,715)
4.69
Forfeited/lapsed (1,848,775)
10.71
Balance at June 30, 2009
17,304,929
11.75
11,611,308 10.43
Options to acquire the company’s ordinary shares that were granted post November 7, 2002 and remain unvested at January 1,
2005, are measured at fair value at grant date. This fair value is recognized as an employee expense over the vesting period,
adjusted to reflect actual levels of vesting, with the corresponding credit to a share-based payments reserve, which is part of
equity.
2005, are measured at fair value at grant date. This fair value is recognized as an employee expense over the vesting period,
adjusted to reflect actual levels of vesting, with the corresponding credit to a share-based payments reserve, which is part of
equity.
The fair value of the options granted is measured using the Black – Scholes option valuation model, taking into account the terms
and conditions upon which the options were granted.
and conditions upon which the options were granted.
Analysis of share options:
Vested Unvested
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
2009 2010 2011 2012
R5<
2,554,676
2,113,006
2,081,962
1,110,828
R5>R10 4,343,111
387,825
-
-
R10>R15 1,232,700
-
-
-
R15>R20 3,006,421
-
-
-
R20>R30 474,400
-
-
-
11,611,308
2,500,831 2,081,962
1,110,828
F-39
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
20. POST-RETIREMENT AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (continued)
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
c) The fair value of the options determined using the Black - Scholes option valuation model.
Significant inputs into the model were:
Market price at date of grant (rand per share)
November 1, 2004 option grant
10.93
10.93
April 15, 2005 option grant
5.13
5.13
June 17, 2005 option grant
5.50
5.50
October 25, 2005 option grant
5.94
5.94
October 30, 2006 option grant
9.93
9.93
October 29, 2007 option grant
5.50
5.50
October 20, 2008 option grant
4.70
Vesting periods (years)
November 1, 2004 option grant
3
3
April 15, 2005 option grant
3
3
June 17, 2005 option grant
3
3
October 25, 2005 option grant
3
3
October 30, 2006 option grant
3
3
October 29, 2007 option grant
3
3
October 20, 2008 option grant
3
Option strike price (rand per share)
November 1, 2004 option grant
11.70
11.70
April 15, 2005 option grant
4.84
4.84
June 17, 2005 option grant
7.10
7.10
October 25, 2005 option grant
8.78
8.78
October 30, 2006 option grant
9.08
9.08
October 29, 2007 option grant
3.88
3.88
October 20, 2008 option grant
3.50
Risk-free rate
November 1, 2004 option grant
8.56%
8.56%
April 15, 2005 option grant
7.81%
7.81%
June 17, 2005 option grant
7.58%
7.58%
October 25, 2005 option grant
7.94%
7.94%
October 30, 2006 option grant
8.39%
8.39%
October 29, 2007 option grant
8.79%
8.79%
October 20, 2008 option grant
9.55%
Volatility
(1)
November 1, 2004 option grant
29%
29%
April 15, 2005 option grant
37%
37%
June 17, 2005 option grant
38%
38%
October 25, 2005 option grant
36%
36%
October 30, 2006 option grant
44%
44%
October 29, 2007 option grant
28%
28%
October 20, 2008 option grant
31%
(1)
The volatility is measured at the standard deviation of the expected share price returns and is based on statistical analysis of
daily share prices over the last three years.
F-40
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
21. DEFERRED TAX
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
Balances arose from the following temporary differences:
Deferred tax asset
Property, plant and equipment
282,940
194,445
Provisions, including rehabilitation provision
132,704
271,178
Estimated assessed losses
114,998
140,724
Other temporary differences
152,063
151,983
Deferred tax assets not recognized
(517,590)
(676,755)
165,115
81,575
Deferred tax liability
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment
(211,633)
-
Provisions, including rehabilitation provision
10,162
-
Other temporary differences
6,911
-
(194,560)
-
Net deferred mining and income tax (liability)/asset
(29,445)
81,575
Reconciliation between deferred taxation opening and closing balances
Opening balance
81,575
(104,334)
Foreign exchange movement
-
(3,752)
Subsidiary acquired
(185,653)
-
Statement of comprehensive income credit
74,633
189,661
Closing balance
(29,445)
81,575
22. LOANS AND BORROWINGS
Secured
AngloGold Ashanti Limited (a)
AngloGold Ashanti Limited (a)
2,101
24,734
Unsecured
Preference shares held by Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and the DRDSA
Empowerment Trust (b)
Empowerment Trust (b)
65,146
140,900
67,247
165,634
Less: payable within one year included under current liabilities
(2,101)
(39,972)
65,146
125,662
Loans and borrowings expected repayment schedule for capital amounts payable in
the twelve months to:
the twelve months to:
June 30, 2009
- 39,972
June 30, 2010
2,101 23,776
June 30, 2011
12,591 -
Thereafter
52,555 101,886
67,247 165,634
67,247 165,634
Analysis of gross loans and borrowings by currency:
South African rand
South African rand
67,247
165,634
Effective interest rates:
Secured liabilities
AngloGold Ashanti Limited
Secured liabilities
AngloGold Ashanti Limited
11.0%
15.5%
Undrawn committed borrowing facilities:
Investec Bank Limited
Investec Bank Limited
250,000
-
F-41
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
22. LOANS AND BORROWINGS (continued)
(a) On July 31, 2007 and on March 1, 2008 Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited entered into two separate loan facilities, amounting to
R85.3 million, with AngloGold Ashanti Limited for the purchase of the remaining moveable and immovable assets of Ergo.
These assets had a carrying value of R87.8 million (2008: R87.8 million) at year end. The facilities are repayable in equal
monthly installments over 23 and 19 months respectively. The loans bear interest at the prime lending rate, which was 11% at
June 30, 2009 (2008: 15.5%). The loans are secured over the assets that were purchased from AngloGold Ashanti Limited.
R85.3 million, with AngloGold Ashanti Limited for the purchase of the remaining moveable and immovable assets of Ergo.
These assets had a carrying value of R87.8 million (2008: R87.8 million) at year end. The facilities are repayable in equal
monthly installments over 23 and 19 months respectively. The loans bear interest at the prime lending rate, which was 11% at
June 30, 2009 (2008: 15.5%). The loans are secured over the assets that were purchased from AngloGold Ashanti Limited.
(b) On November 18, 2005, the group issued class A cumulative participating preference shares to Khumo Gold SPV (Pty)
Limited (Khumo Gold), for a subscription price of R10.6 million. Class B and Class C cumulative participating preference
shares, for a subscription price of R7.1 million and R8.6 million were issued to Khumo Gold and the DRDSA Empowerment
Trust respectively on November 30, 2006. The preference shares entitle Khumo Gold and the employee trust to receive a
dividend of R0.26 for every R0.74 paid by Crown, ERPM and Blyvoor to the company towards capital and interest on their
outstanding intra-group loans as at November 30, 2005. Crown repaid its loan to DRDGOLD during the year and a preference
dividend of R31.8 million was paid to Khumo Gold and the employee trust. There are no further obligations pursuant to the
Crown preference shares and they will be cancelled. The preference shares are measured at amortized cost. The extension of the
repayment periods of Blyvoor and ERPM resulted in a net gain of R36.1 million and R27.2 million, respectively, and a net loss at
Crown of R1.3 million.
Limited (Khumo Gold), for a subscription price of R10.6 million. Class B and Class C cumulative participating preference
shares, for a subscription price of R7.1 million and R8.6 million were issued to Khumo Gold and the DRDSA Empowerment
Trust respectively on November 30, 2006. The preference shares entitle Khumo Gold and the employee trust to receive a
dividend of R0.26 for every R0.74 paid by Crown, ERPM and Blyvoor to the company towards capital and interest on their
outstanding intra-group loans as at November 30, 2005. Crown repaid its loan to DRDGOLD during the year and a preference
dividend of R31.8 million was paid to Khumo Gold and the employee trust. There are no further obligations pursuant to the
Crown preference shares and they will be cancelled. The preference shares are measured at amortized cost. The extension of the
repayment periods of Blyvoor and ERPM resulted in a net gain of R36.1 million and R27.2 million, respectively, and a net loss at
Crown of R1.3 million.
F-42
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2008
for the year ended June 30, 2008
23. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
Capital commitments
Contracted for but not provided for in the annual financial statements
33,063
79,366
Authorized by the directors but not contracted for
79,333
143,074
112,396
222,440
This capital expenditure will be financed from existing cash resources.
Operating lease commitments
The company leases its office building in terms of an operating lease. The company does not have an option to acquire the
building at the termination of the lease. There is an escalation of 10% per annum imposed by the lease agreement.
building at the termination of the lease. There is an escalation of 10% per annum imposed by the lease agreement.
Crown leases its vehicles under various operating leases. There is an average escalation of 2.5% per annum imposed by these
lease agreements.
lease agreements.
The future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases are as
follows:
follows:
Not later than 1 year
1,874
4,589
Between 1 and years
307
2,246
Later than 5 years
-
-
Contingent liabilities and uncertainties
Environmental
At Durban Deep mine, rehabilitation of the surface has continued throughout the year. The management of the 2L24 tailings
complex has been taken over by Mintails who plans to reprocess it. Rehabilitation of the No 7 shaft pit is 90% complete,
rehabilitation of the No 8 shaft pit is 40% complete and rehabilitation of the Great Britain pit is 75% complete. Rehabilitation of
all these pits will be completed in the 2010 financial year. A full closure plan update is currently being done.
complex has been taken over by Mintails who plans to reprocess it. Rehabilitation of the No 7 shaft pit is 90% complete,
rehabilitation of the No 8 shaft pit is 40% complete and rehabilitation of the Great Britain pit is 75% complete. Rehabilitation of
all these pits will be completed in the 2010 financial year. A full closure plan update is currently being done.
At West Wits mine, the pit is being filled with tailings from the Mogale plant.
Management of West Rand Consolidated Mines’ tailings dams have been taken over by Mintails who plan to reprocess them.
Various shafts still need to be capped and closed. The closure plan for the area will be updated this year.
Various shafts still need to be capped and closed. The closure plan for the area will be updated this year.
The Western Basin Environmental Corporation (WBEC), a section 21 company, was formed by Mintails, West Wits and
Harmony to manage the underground water decant. Pilot plants were constructed and the results are very promising. The
feasibility study for a full-scale plant is complete. Approvals and permission from the various regulators is now awaited so that
construction can begin. The plant will be sited at the High Density Separation (HDS) plant at ERPM and will treat Western,
Central and Eastern basin water. The treatment plant will take 12 months to construct. A water pipeline connecting the western
and central basins has been proposed to stop any discharge and hence potential pollution. Regulator approval is awaited.
Harmony to manage the underground water decant. Pilot plants were constructed and the results are very promising. The
feasibility study for a full-scale plant is complete. Approvals and permission from the various regulators is now awaited so that
construction can begin. The plant will be sited at the High Density Separation (HDS) plant at ERPM and will treat Western,
Central and Eastern basin water. The treatment plant will take 12 months to construct. A water pipeline connecting the western
and central basins has been proposed to stop any discharge and hence potential pollution. Regulator approval is awaited.
Blyvoor continues to pump water from underground and discharges approximately 8 million liters (Ml) per day into the
Wonderfontein Spruit. Regular monthly quality meetings continue to take place with the Potchefstroom Municipality, with
Blyvoor being fully compliant with the requirements of the agreement with the Potchefstroom City Council. Blyvoor also
participates in the Mining Interest Group, a sub-group of the Wonderfontein Spruit Forum, to determine strategies regarding
potential pollution and remedial action for the Wonderfontein Spruit and eventual regional closure. The regulators have produced
a remediation report for the spruit that identifies certain areas requiring attention. Implementation task teams will now be set up
to do the necessary studies and remediation where required. Blyvoor has also commissioned a water treatment plant that will
treat approximately 6Ml per day of the dis charged water to potable standard for their own consumption.
Wonderfontein Spruit. Regular monthly quality meetings continue to take place with the Potchefstroom Municipality, with
Blyvoor being fully compliant with the requirements of the agreement with the Potchefstroom City Council. Blyvoor also
participates in the Mining Interest Group, a sub-group of the Wonderfontein Spruit Forum, to determine strategies regarding
potential pollution and remedial action for the Wonderfontein Spruit and eventual regional closure. The regulators have produced
a remediation report for the spruit that identifies certain areas requiring attention. Implementation task teams will now be set up
to do the necessary studies and remediation where required. Blyvoor has also commissioned a water treatment plant that will
treat approximately 6Ml per day of the dis charged water to potable standard for their own consumption.
Blyvoor has embarked on a surface clean-up project where slime from historic run-off and pipe bursts is picked up and the area
rehabilitated.
rehabilitated.
F-43
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
23. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (continued)
Crown has continued to engage proactively with the local community in terms of dust and other environmental issues. Since the
upgrading of pipelines there have been very limited slime spills. Dust is very well managed.
upgrading of pipelines there have been very limited slime spills. Dust is very well managed.
These initiatives are continuing with rehabilitation being an integral part of the operational management.
ERPM has updated its Environmental Management Programme (EMP) to meet the requirements of the Mineral and Petroleum
Resources Development Act (MPRDA) and submitted it to the Department of Mineral Resources (DME) for approval. The
concurrent rehabilitation of redundant structures and holdings continued throughout the year. Water pumping was stopped on
October 6, 2008 after two fatalities in September due to CO
Resources Development Act (MPRDA) and submitted it to the Department of Mineral Resources (DME) for approval. The
concurrent rehabilitation of redundant structures and holdings continued throughout the year. Water pumping was stopped on
October 6, 2008 after two fatalities in September due to CO
2
gas emissions. The water level in the Central Basin has equalized
with the Hercules Basin and is currently flooding at a rate of 0.7m per day. The level was 800m below surface in July 2009. This
water will need to be pumped from 150m below surface to prevent pollution of ground water. Central Rand Gold may pump
from deeper to preserve their resource. The water will be pumped to the proposed Western Utilities Corporation (WUC)
treatment plant to be purified to potable standards and supplied to Rand Water Board pending regulatory approval. The cost of
the 150m pumping option is approximately R66 million of which ERPM may have a 17% apportionment.
water will need to be pumped from 150m below surface to prevent pollution of ground water. Central Rand Gold may pump
from deeper to preserve their resource. The water will be pumped to the proposed Western Utilities Corporation (WUC)
treatment plant to be purified to potable standards and supplied to Rand Water Board pending regulatory approval. The cost of
the 150m pumping option is approximately R66 million of which ERPM may have a 17% apportionment.
ERPM’s mining area is completely isolated from the Central Basin.
ErgoGold has restarted depositing onto the Brakpan tailings facility. Cladding of the side slopes of the dam to prevent dust
progressed very well throughout the year.
progressed very well throughout the year.
Mining rights
The company’s rights to own and exploit its Ore Reserves and deposits are governed by the laws and regulations of the
jurisdictions in which the mineral properties are located. Currently all of the company’s Ore Reserves and deposits are located in
South Africa.
jurisdictions in which the mineral properties are located. Currently all of the company’s Ore Reserves and deposits are located in
South Africa.
On May 1, 2004, the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act of 2002 (MPRDA), which was passed by the
Parliament of South Africa in June 2002, came into effect. Prior to the introduction of the MPRDA, private ownership in mineral
rights and statutory mining rights in South Africa could be acquired through the common law or by statute. With effect from May
1, 2004, all mineral rights have been placed under the custodianship of the South African government. Under the provisions of the
MPRDA, old order proprietary rights need to be converted to new order rights of use within certain prescribed time frames.
Parliament of South Africa in June 2002, came into effect. Prior to the introduction of the MPRDA, private ownership in mineral
rights and statutory mining rights in South Africa could be acquired through the common law or by statute. With effect from May
1, 2004, all mineral rights have been placed under the custodianship of the South African government. Under the provisions of the
MPRDA, old order proprietary rights need to be converted to new order rights of use within certain prescribed time frames.
The MPRDA vests custodianship of South Africa’s mineral resources in the state which will issue prospecting rights or mining
rights to applicants in the future. The existing common law prospecting, mining and mineral rights will cease to exist but
transitional arrangements are provided in order to give holders of existing rights the opportunity to convert to new rights. The
implementation of the MPRDA may result in significant adjustment to the company’s property ownership structure, which could
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.
rights to applicants in the future. The existing common law prospecting, mining and mineral rights will cease to exist but
transitional arrangements are provided in order to give holders of existing rights the opportunity to convert to new rights. The
implementation of the MPRDA may result in significant adjustment to the company’s property ownership structure, which could
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.
Where the company holds mineral rights and mining authorizations and conducts mining operations on the date on which the
MPRDA came into effect, it will be able, within five years from the date of effectiveness of the MPRDA, to submit the old rights
and authorizations for conversion to a new mining right. It will need to submit a mining work program to substantiate the area and
period of the new right, and also to comply with the requirements of the Mining Charter. A similar procedure applies where it
holds prospecting rights and a prospecting permit and conducts prospecting operations, but it must apply for a conversion to a
new prospecting right within two years from the date of effectiveness of the MPRDA for which purpose a prospecting work
program must be submitted. Where the company holds unused rights however, it will have one year to apply for new prospecting
rights or mining rights.
MPRDA came into effect, it will be able, within five years from the date of effectiveness of the MPRDA, to submit the old rights
and authorizations for conversion to a new mining right. It will need to submit a mining work program to substantiate the area and
period of the new right, and also to comply with the requirements of the Mining Charter. A similar procedure applies where it
holds prospecting rights and a prospecting permit and conducts prospecting operations, but it must apply for a conversion to a
new prospecting right within two years from the date of effectiveness of the MPRDA for which purpose a prospecting work
program must be submitted. Where the company holds unused rights however, it will have one year to apply for new prospecting
rights or mining rights.
If the company does not acquire new rights under the MPRDA, it will be entitled to claim compensation from the state as
provided for under the Constitution of South Africa if it can prove that through this outcome its property has been expropriated.
Whether mineral rights constitute property and whether the MPRDA does bring about an expropriation are both aspects which are
the subject of legal debate which, ultimately, is likely to be settled by litigation. The factors in determining compensation include
not only fair market value, but also history of acquisition and use and aspects of redress and reform, which could have the effect
of reducing the compensation.
provided for under the Constitution of South Africa if it can prove that through this outcome its property has been expropriated.
Whether mineral rights constitute property and whether the MPRDA does bring about an expropriation are both aspects which are
the subject of legal debate which, ultimately, is likely to be settled by litigation. The factors in determining compensation include
not only fair market value, but also history of acquisition and use and aspects of redress and reform, which could have the effect
of reducing the compensation.
The company has been granted a prospecting right in respect of the Argonaut area and ERPM has been granted a prospecting
right over the Sallies area. The company has submitted applications for conversions in respect of the group’s mining rights,
however, as at year end the Department of Mineral Resources had not yet finalized the applications.
right over the Sallies area. The company has submitted applications for conversions in respect of the group’s mining rights,
however, as at year end the Department of Mineral Resources had not yet finalized the applications.
F-44
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
23. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (continued)
Royalty Bill
The South African government has enacted the details of the new legislation, whereby the old and new order rights will be subject
to a state royalty. The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Royalty Act was published on October 11, 2006 for public comment.
The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Royalty Act, No. 28 of 2008 was enacted on November 21, 2008 and was published in the
Government Gazette on November 24, 2008 and Mineral and the Petroleum Resources Royalty Act (Administration), No. 29 of
2008 on November 26, 2008. These acts provide for the payment of a royalty, calculated through a royalty rate formula (using
rates of between 0.5% and 5.0%) applied against gross revenue per year, payable half yearly with a third and final payment
thereafter. The royalty is tax deductible and the cost after tax amounts to a rate of between 0.33% and 3.3% at the prevailing
marginal tax rates applicable to the group. The registration process is to commence November 1, 2009 and the payment of
royalties will commence on March 1, 2010.
The South African government has enacted the details of the new legislation, whereby the old and new order rights will be subject
to a state royalty. The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Royalty Act was published on October 11, 2006 for public comment.
The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Royalty Act, No. 28 of 2008 was enacted on November 21, 2008 and was published in the
Government Gazette on November 24, 2008 and Mineral and the Petroleum Resources Royalty Act (Administration), No. 29 of
2008 on November 26, 2008. These acts provide for the payment of a royalty, calculated through a royalty rate formula (using
rates of between 0.5% and 5.0%) applied against gross revenue per year, payable half yearly with a third and final payment
thereafter. The royalty is tax deductible and the cost after tax amounts to a rate of between 0.33% and 3.3% at the prevailing
marginal tax rates applicable to the group. The registration process is to commence November 1, 2009 and the payment of
royalties will commence on March 1, 2010.
Merafong Local Council
According to legislation Merafong City Council has been appointed by Rand Water as the Water Services Authority in the area.
They are charging water at a premium of 53% for domestic water consumption. This premium over the rate that was previously
charged by Rand Water does not compel them to take over current water reticulation maintenance and monitoring.
They are charging water at a premium of 53% for domestic water consumption. This premium over the rate that was previously
charged by Rand Water does not compel them to take over current water reticulation maintenance and monitoring.
It is the opinion of our legal advisors that the amount levied is excessive and because there is no value that can be enforced, until
an agreement has been signed regarding the rate and the entity that will maintain the infrastructure between Blyvoor and
Merafong City Council. The potential liability could amount to R18.5 million. We are currently awaiting a court date.
an agreement has been signed regarding the rate and the entity that will maintain the infrastructure between Blyvoor and
Merafong City Council. The potential liability could amount to R18.5 million. We are currently awaiting a court date.
Litigation
The group is subject to litigation in the normal course of business.
24. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its
contractual obligations, and arises principally from the group’s receivables from customers and investment securities.
contractual obligations, and arises principally from the group’s receivables from customers and investment securities.
The group's financial instruments do not represent a concentration of credit risk, because the group deals with a variety of major
banks and financial institutions located in South Africa after evaluating the credit ratings of the representative financial
institutions. Furthermore, its trade receivables and loans are regularly monitored and assessed for recoverability. Where it is
appropriate, an impairment loss is raised.
banks and financial institutions located in South Africa after evaluating the credit ratings of the representative financial
institutions. Furthermore, its trade receivables and loans are regularly monitored and assessed for recoverability. Where it is
appropriate, an impairment loss is raised.
In addition, the group's operations all deliver their gold to Rand Refinery Limited (Rand Refinery), which refines the gold to
saleable purity levels and then sells the gold, on behalf of the South African operations, on the bullion market. The gold is usually
sold by Rand Refinery on the same day as it is delivered and settlement is made within two days. The group does not hedge
against fluctuations in the bullion market.
saleable purity levels and then sells the gold, on behalf of the South African operations, on the bullion market. The gold is usually
sold by Rand Refinery on the same day as it is delivered and settlement is made within two days. The group does not hedge
against fluctuations in the bullion market.
F-45
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
24. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
The following represents the maximum exposure to credit risk for all financial assets at June 30:
Carrying Fair
Carrying Fair
value value
value value
2009 2009
2008 2008
R'000 R'000
R'000 R'000
Financial assets
Unlisted investments (refer note 11)
9,556 9,556
10,689 10,689
Loans to black empowerment entities (refer note 11)
33,442 33,422
54,668 54,668
Investments in environmental rehabilitation trust funds (refer
note 11)
note 11)
129,682 129,682
110,766 110,766
Trade and other receivables (refer note 16)
60,080 60,080
207,636 207,636
Cash and cash equivalents
353,555 353,555
846,114 846,114
586,315 586,315
1,229,873 1,229,873
The following represents the maximum exposure to credit
risk for trade and other receivables at June 30:
risk for trade and other receivables at June 30:
Carrying Fair
Carrying Fair
value value
value value
2009 2009
2008 2008
R'000 R'000
R'000 R'000
Trade receivables (refer note 16)
30,966 30,966
58,650 58,650
Receivables from related parties (refer note 16)
86 86
515 515
Other receivables (refer note 16)
29,028 29,028
148,471 148,471
60,080 60,080
207,636 207,636
The ageing of trade and other receivables at June 30:
Gross Impair-
Gross Impair-
value ment
value ment
2009 2009
2008 2008
R'000 R'000
R'000 R'000
Not past due
48,868 (105)
167,832 (94)
Past due 0-30 days
4,202 (75)
20,300 (22)
Past due 31-120 days
6,067 (260)
15,236 (104)
More than 120 days
9,257 (7,874)
12,469 (7,981)
68,394 (8,314)
215,837 (8,201)
Impairments were raised due to the uncertainty of the timing of the cash flows.
Movement in the allowance for impairment in respect of trade and other receivables during the year was as follows:
Impairment
Impairment
2009
2008
R'000
R'000
Balance at July 1
(8,201)
(13,428)
Impairment (recognized)/reversed
(113)
5,227
Balance at June 30
(8,314)
(8,201)
The group has no significant credit risk as the majority of the group’s receivables are from customers with good track records.
F-46
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
24. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
Interest rate and liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The group’s approach to
managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due,
under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the group’s reputation.
managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due,
under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the group’s reputation.
The group ensures that it has sufficient cash on demand to meet expected operational expenses, including the servicing of
financial obligations. This excludes the potential impact of extreme circumstances that cannot reasonably be predicted, such as
natural disasters.
financial obligations. This excludes the potential impact of extreme circumstances that cannot reasonably be predicted, such as
natural disasters.
Fluctuations in interest rates impact on the value of short-term cash investments and financing activities, giving rise to interest
rate risks. In the ordinary course of business, the group receives cash from its operations and is obliged to fund working capital
and capital expenditure requirements. This cash is managed to ensure surplus funds are invested in a manner to achieve maximum
returns while minimizing risks. Funding deficits for the group's mining operations have been financed through the issue of
additional shares and external borrowings. Lower interest rates result in lower returns on investments and deposits and may also
have the effect of making it less expensive to borrow funds at then current rates. Conversely, higher interest rates result in higher
interest payments on loans and overdrafts.
rate risks. In the ordinary course of business, the group receives cash from its operations and is obliged to fund working capital
and capital expenditure requirements. This cash is managed to ensure surplus funds are invested in a manner to achieve maximum
returns while minimizing risks. Funding deficits for the group's mining operations have been financed through the issue of
additional shares and external borrowings. Lower interest rates result in lower returns on investments and deposits and may also
have the effect of making it less expensive to borrow funds at then current rates. Conversely, higher interest rates result in higher
interest payments on loans and overdrafts.
Unless otherwise stated, the following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments
and excluding the impact of netting agreements:
and excluding the impact of netting agreements:
Carrying Contractual
6
months
6-12 Morethan
amount
cash flows
or less
months
2-5 years
5 years
R’000 R’000
R’000
R’000
R’000
R’000
June 30, 2009
Secured
AngloGold Ashanti Limited
2,101 (2,373)
(2,373)
-
-
-
Unsecured
Preference shares held by Khumo
Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and the
DRDSA Empowerment Trust (expected
repayments)
repayments)
65,146 (197,803)
-
-
(109,015)
(88,788)
Trade and other payables
322,138 (322,138)
(322,138)
-
-
-
Bank overdraft
824 (824)
(824)
-
-
-
390,209 (523,138)
(325,335)
-
(109,015)
(88,788)
June 30, 2008
Secured
AngloGold Ashanti Limited
24,734
(28,488)
(13,972)
(12,123)
(2,393)
-
Unsecured
Preference
shares
held
by
Khumo
Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and the
DRDSA Empowerment Trust (expected
repayments) 140,900
repayments) 140,900
(237,065)
-
(60,577)
(147,044)
(29,444)
Trade and other payables
385,110
(385,110)
(385,110)
-
-
-
Bank overdraft
527
(527)
(527)
-
-
-
551,271 (651,190)
(399,609)
(72,700)
(149,437)
(29,444)
F-47
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
24. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
The following represents the interest rate risk profile for the group's interest-bearing financial instruments:
Carrying
Carrying
amount
amount
2009
2008
R’000
R’000
Variable interest rate instruments
Financial assets
483,237
956,880
Financial liabilities
(2,925)
(25,261)
480,312
931,619
Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments:
A change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased/(decreased) profit or loss by the amounts
shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. The analysis is
performed on the same basis for 2008.
shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. The analysis is
performed on the same basis for 2008.
2009 2008
Profit or (loss)
Profit or (loss)
100 bp
100 bp
100 bp
100 bp
increase
decrease
increase
decrease
June 30
R’000
R’000
R’000 R’000
Variable interest rate instruments
4,803
(4,803)
9,316
(9,316)
Cash flow sensitivity
4,803
(4,803)
9,316
(9,316)
Fair value of financial instruments
The following table represents the carrying amounts and fair values of the group's financial instruments at June 30:
Carrying
Fair
Carrying
Fair
value
value
value
value
2009
2009
2008
2008
R’000
R’000
R'000
R’000
Financial assets
Unlisted investments (refer note 11)
9,556
9,556
10,689
10,689
Loans to black empowerment entities (refer note 11)
33,442
33,442
54,668
54,668
Investments in environmental rehabilitation trust
funds (refer note 11)
funds (refer note 11)
129,682
129,682
110,766
110,766
Trade and other receivables (refer note 16)
60,080
60,080
207,636
207,636
Cash and cash equivalents
353,555
353,555
846,114
846,114
586,315
586,315
1,229,873
1,229,873
Financial liabilities
Loans and borrowings (refer note 22)
– long-term
– long-term
65,146
65,146
125,662
113,382
– short-term
2,101
2,101
39,972
39,972
Trade and other payables
322,138
322,138
385,110
385,110
Bank overdrafts
824
824
527
527
390,209
390,209
551,271
538,991
F-48
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
24. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
The fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged between
knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction.
knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction.
Fair values
Trade and other receivables
The fair value approximates the carrying value due to their short-term maturities.
The fair value approximates the carrying value due to their short-term maturities.
Loans to black empowerment entities
The fair value of these loans cannot be reliably estimated and are reflected at their carrying value.
The fair value of these loans cannot be reliably estimated and are reflected at their carrying value.
Preference shares held by Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and the DRDSA Empowerment Trust
Preference shares are measured at amortized cost based on expected future discounted cash flows. The original risk adjusted
discount rate of 13% is used when estimating the future liability and are re-measured on an annual basis.
Preference shares are measured at amortized cost based on expected future discounted cash flows. The original risk adjusted
discount rate of 13% is used when estimating the future liability and are re-measured on an annual basis.
Loans from AngloGold Ashanti Limited
Loans from AngloGold Ashanti are measured at amortized cost using the market interest rate. The loans bear interest at the prime
lending rate.
Loans from AngloGold Ashanti are measured at amortized cost using the market interest rate. The loans bear interest at the prime
lending rate.
Cash and cash equivalents and investments in environmental trust funds
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value because of the short-term maturity of these deposits.
The carrying value of investments in environmental trust funds approximates its fair value due to these investments being cash in
nature.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value because of the short-term maturity of these deposits.
The carrying value of investments in environmental trust funds approximates its fair value due to these investments being cash in
nature.
Listed investments
The fair value of listed investments is determined by reference to published price quotations from recognized securities
exchanges.
The fair value of listed investments is determined by reference to published price quotations from recognized securities
exchanges.
Trade and other payables
The fair value approximates the carrying value due to their short-term maturities.
The fair value approximates the carrying value due to their short-term maturities.
Unlisted investments
The valuations are based on the net asset values of these investments which approximates the investments’ fair value.
The valuations are based on the net asset values of these investments which approximates the investments’ fair value.
Foreign currency risk
The group’s reporting currency is the South African rand. Although gold is sold in US dollars, the company is obliged to convert
this into South African rand. The company is thus exposed to fluctuations in the US dollar/South African rand exchange rate. The
company conducted its operations in South Africa during the current year. Foreign exchange fluctuations affect the cash flow that
it will realize from its operations as gold is sold in US dollars, while production costs are incurred primarily in South African
rands. The company's results are positively affected when the US dollar strengthens against the rand and adversely affected when
the US dollar weakens against the rand. The company's cash and cash equivalent balances are held in US dollars, Australian
dollars and South African rands; holdings denominated in other currencies are relatively insignificant. The group does not hedge
against flu ctuations in foreign currency.
this into South African rand. The company is thus exposed to fluctuations in the US dollar/South African rand exchange rate. The
company conducted its operations in South Africa during the current year. Foreign exchange fluctuations affect the cash flow that
it will realize from its operations as gold is sold in US dollars, while production costs are incurred primarily in South African
rands. The company's results are positively affected when the US dollar strengthens against the rand and adversely affected when
the US dollar weakens against the rand. The company's cash and cash equivalent balances are held in US dollars, Australian
dollars and South African rands; holdings denominated in other currencies are relatively insignificant. The group does not hedge
against flu ctuations in foreign currency.
F-49
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
24. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
The following represents the exposure to foreign currency risks:
USD AUD
USD
AUD
2009 2009
2008
2008
’000 ’000
’000
’000
Cash and cash equivalents
3 1,373
1,191
2,787
Trade and other receivables
3,929 -
7,365
12,981
Trade and other payables
(8) (137)
(75)
(123)
Net statement of financial position exposure
3,924 1,236
8,481
15,645
The following significant exchange rates applied during the year:
Spot rate at year-end
Average rate
2009
2008
2009
2008
1 US dollar
7.8821
7.9645
9.0484
7.3123
1 Australian dollar
6.3433
7.6579
6.6725
6.5648
Sensitivity analysis
A 10% strengthening of the rand against the currencies mentioned at June 30, would have increased (decreased) equity and profit
or (loss) by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant.
The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2008.
or (loss) by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant.
The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2008.
USD
AUD
USD
AUD
2009
2009
2008
2008
R’000
R’000
R’000
R’000
Equity
4
(784)
(889)
(11,981)
Loss
(3,097)
-
(5,862)
-
A 10% weakening of the rand against the above currencies at June 30, would have had the equal but opposite effect on the above
currencies to the amounts shown above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.
currencies to the amounts shown above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.
F-50
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
24. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
The following table represents the carrying amounts and fair values per category of financial instruments at June 30:
Carrying
Fair
Carrying
Fair
value
value
value
value
2009
2009
2008
2008
R'000
R'000
R'000
R'000
Financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets
9,556
9,556
10,689
10,689
Loans and receivables
576,759
576,759
1,219,184
1,219,184
586,315
586,315
1,229,873
1,229,873
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost
Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost
390,209
390,209
551,271
538,991
390,209
390,209
551,271
538,991
25. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The primary objective of the board in managing the group's capital is to ensure that there is sufficient capital available to support
the funding requirements of the group, including capital expenditure, in a way that optimizes the cost of capital, maximizes
shareholders' returns, and ensures that the group remains in a sound financial position. There were no changes to the group's
overall capital management approach during the current year. The group manages and makes adjustments to the capital structure
as opportunities arise in the market place, as and when borrowings mature, or as and when funding is required. This may take the
form of raising equity, market or bank debt or hybrids thereof.
the funding requirements of the group, including capital expenditure, in a way that optimizes the cost of capital, maximizes
shareholders' returns, and ensures that the group remains in a sound financial position. There were no changes to the group's
overall capital management approach during the current year. The group manages and makes adjustments to the capital structure
as opportunities arise in the market place, as and when borrowings mature, or as and when funding is required. This may take the
form of raising equity, market or bank debt or hybrids thereof.
The Board of Directors monitors the return on capital, which the group defines as net operating income divided by total
shareholders' equity, excluding non-redeemable preference shares and non-controlling interest from continued operations, and
seeks to maintain a balance between the higher returns that might be possible with higher levels of borrowings and the advantages
and security afforded by a sound capital position. The Board of Directors also monitors the level of dividends to ordinary
shareholders.
shareholders' equity, excluding non-redeemable preference shares and non-controlling interest from continued operations, and
seeks to maintain a balance between the higher returns that might be possible with higher levels of borrowings and the advantages
and security afforded by a sound capital position. The Board of Directors also monitors the level of dividends to ordinary
shareholders.
26. OPERATING SEGMENTS
During the year the group changed its accounting policy regarding segmental reporting by early adopting IFRS 8 (Operating
Segments) which supercedes IAS 14 (Segmental Reporting). The comparative numbers have been updated to reflect these
changes and the effect thereof is clear from the disclosures due to the fact that previously only one business segment was
disclosed.
Segments) which supercedes IAS 14 (Segmental Reporting). The comparative numbers have been updated to reflect these
changes and the effect thereof is clear from the disclosures due to the fact that previously only one business segment was
disclosed.
The following summary describes the operations in each of the group’s reportable business segments:
- Blyvoor: Incorporates the Doornfontein mine, situated on the north-western edge of the Witwatersrand Basin. The mine has
underground and surface operations.
- Crown: Is a surface re-treatment operation and treats old slime and sand dumps to the south of Johannesburg’s CBD. The
facility consists of three plants known as Crown, City Deep and Knights.
- ERPM: Is an underground and surface mining operation, which is situated near the town of Boksburg. The underground
operations were placed on care and maintenance during the year. ERPM continues as a surface retreatment operation.
- ErgoGold: ErgoGold consists of Phase one of the Ergo Project which was initially known as the Elsburg Joint Venture and
has been renamed ErgoGold following the DRDGOLD group’s acquisition of Mintails’ share. ErgoGold is now wholly
owned by the DRDGOLD group. Phase one has been established as a surface retreatment operation to retreat the Elsburg
Dump owned by ERPM and the L29 dump.
owned by the DRDGOLD group. Phase one has been established as a surface retreatment operation to retreat the Elsburg
Dump owned by ERPM and the L29 dump.
- Ergo Joint Venture: Ergo Mining (Pty) Ltd is a Joint Venture between DRDGOLD SA and Mintails SA – known as the Ergo
Joint Venture. The Ergo Joint Venture consists of Phase two of the Ergo Project, which is to explore, evaluate and process
surface uranium – and sulphur bearing tailings on the East and Central Rand goldfields of South Africa.
surface uranium – and sulphur bearing tailings on the East and Central Rand goldfields of South Africa.
- Offshore: Represented the group’s operations in Australasia and included Tolukuma. The Australasian operations have been
disposed of during the financial year ended June 30, 2008.
F-51
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
26. OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)
2009
Blyvoor
R’000
Crown
R’000
ERPM
R’000
ErgoGold(2)
R’000
Ergo Joint
Venture
R’000
Offshore
R’000
Corporate
Headoffice (3)
and all other
R’000
Total
R’000
Financial performance
Segmental revenue
Segmental revenue
1,018,527
620,125
247,908
24,178
-
-
-
1,910,738
Operating costs
(842,329)
(456,205)
(303,581)
(69,365)
(4,057)
-
(11,822) (1,687,359)
Operating profit/(loss)
176,198
163,920
(55,673)
(45,187)
(4,057)
- (11,822)
223,379
Interest and other investment income
3,185
2,347
1,409
2
3
1,031 72,014 79,991
Interest expense
(521)
(5)
(860)
(1)
-
- (2,218) (3,605)
Retrenchment costs
-
-
(30,681)
-
-
-
(4,241)
(34,922)
Administration expenses and general costs
(1,719)
(4,980)
(1,592)
(1,256)
(1,554)
(756) (71,726) (83,583)
Taxation charge (1)
-
(41,529)
-
-
-
-
(4,660)
(46,189)
Working profit/(loss) before capital expenditure
177,143
119,753
(87,397)
(46,442)
(5,608)
275 (22,653)
135,071
Capital expenditure
(97,537)
(43,115)
(31,736)
(157,129)
(17,025)
-
(126) (346,668)
Working profit/(loss) after capital expenditure
79,606
76,638
(119,133)
(203,571)
(22,633)
275 (22,779) (211,597)
(1) The taxation charge excludes deferred tax.
(2) With effect from April 1, 2009, ErgoGold represents DRDGOLD’s 100% interest in ErgoGold (formerly the Elsburg Gold Mining Joint Venture).
(3) Corporate head office expenses are taken into consideration in the strategic decision making process of the CODM and are therefore included in the disclosure here, even though they do
(3) Corporate head office expenses are taken into consideration in the strategic decision making process of the CODM and are therefore included in the disclosure here, even though they do
not earn revenue.
Operating results (4)
Ore milled
-
underground
t’000 603
-
184
-
-
-
- 787
- surface
t’000 3,433
6,577
1,430
2,296
-
-
- 13,736
- total
t’000 4,036
6,577
1,614
2,296
-
-
- 14,523
Average yield
- underground
g/t 4.59
-
3.20
-
-
-
-
4.26
- surface
g/t 0.37
0.38
0.33
0.05
-
-
-
0.32
- total
g/t 1.00
0.38
0.66
0.05
-
-
-
0.53
Gold dispatched
-
underground
Kg 2,765
-
589
-
-
-
-
3,354
- surface
Kg 1,262
2,500
474
114
-
-
-
4,350
- total
Kg 4,027
2,500
1,063
114
-
-
-
7,704
- underground
oz 88,898
-
18,935
-
-
-
- 107,833
- surface
oz 40,575
80,377
15,239
3,666
-
-
- 139,857
- total
oz 129,473
80,377
34,174
3,666
-
-
-
247,690
Operating cost -
underground
R/kg 255,517
-
361,141
-
-
-
-
274,066
- surface
R/kg 98,124
182,482
222,430
608,465
-
-
- 164,549
- total
R/kg 209,170
182,482
285,589
608,465
-
-
-
219,024
- underground
$/oz 878
-
1,287
-
-
-
-
942
- surface
$/oz 337
578
778
2,077
-
-
-
566
- total
$/oz 709
578
1,060
2,077
-
-
-
753
(4)
Unaudited
F-52
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
26. OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)
2009
Blyvoor
R’000
Crown
R’000
ERPM
R’000
ErgoGold(1)
R’000
Ergo Joint
Venture
R’000
Offshore
R’000
Corporate
Headoffice(2)
and all other
R’000
Total
R’000
Reconciliation of assets
Reportable segment assets
Reportable segment assets
463,947
150,947
49,422
888,876
150,791
-
29,236 1,733,219
Other assets
96,536
183,235
155,240
61,007
34,268
25 362,242 892,553
Total assets
560,483
334,182
204,662
949,883
185,059
25
391,478 2,625,772
Reconciliation of liabilities
Reportable segment liabilities
182,783
297,498
87,877
66,092
84,454
60
127,538
846,302
Taxation and deferred taxation
12,403
650
-
182,150
-
-
288 195,491
Total liabilities
195,186
298,148
87,877
248,242
84,454
60
127,826 1,041,793
Other material information
Depreciation and amortization
(29,273)
(35,532)
(3,187)
(26,854)
(3,930)
-
(441)
(99,217)
Impairment of assets
-
(19,426)
(53,012)
-
-
-
(2,700)
(75,138)
Reconciliation of revenues
Total revenues for reportable segments
1,018,527
620,125
247,908
24,178
-
-
-
1,910,738
- Continuing operations
1,018,527
620,125
247,908
24,178
-
-
-
1,910,738
- Discontinuing operations
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Group’s revenue
1,018,527
620,125
247,908
24,178
-
-
-
1,910,738
Reconciliation of profit/(loss)
Segment working profit/(loss) before capital expenditure
177,143
119,753
(87,397)
(46,442)
(5,608)
275 (22,653)
135,071
- Depreciation
(29,273)
(35,532)
(3,187)
(26,854)
(3,930)
-
(441)
(99,217)
- Movement in provision for environmental rehabilitation
426
(11,002)
11,023
-
2,825
-
(22,817)
(19,545)
- Movement in gold in progress
(9,445)
3,658
1,573
11,232
-
-
-
7,018
- Impairments and reversal of impairments
-
(19,426)
(53,012)
-
-
-
(2,700)
(75,138)
- Recognition of negative goodwill on acquisition
-
-
-
-
-
-
53,006
53,006
- Net gain/(loss) on financial liabilities measured at
amortized cost
36,141
(1,403)
27,234
-
-
-
28
62,000
- Loss on realization of investments
-
-
-
-
-
(1,873)
-
(1,873)
- Growth in environmental rehabilitation trust funds
2,929
4,441
1,597
-
-
-
3,900 12,867
- Unrealized foreign exchange loss
-
-
-
-
-
(10,549) 231
(10,318)
- Unwinding of provision for environmental rehabilitation
(1,119)
(4,137)
(1,648)
-
(2,365)
-
(528) (9,797)
- Unwinding of discount on financial liabilities measured
at amortized cost
(10,388)
(3,237)
(4,398)
-
-
-
-
(18,023)
- Deferred tax per the statement of comprehensive income
(43,154)
25,593
69,525
3,503
(12)
-
19,178
74,633
Profit/(loss) after taxation
123,260
78,708
(38,690)
(58,561)
(9,090)
(12,147)
27,204
110,684
(1) With effect from April 1, 2009, ErgoGold represents DRDGOLD’s 100% interest in ErgoGold (formerly the Elsburg Gold Mining Joint Venture).
(2) Corporate head office expenses are taken into consideration in the strategic decision making process of the CODM and are therefore included in the disclosure here, even though they do
(2) Corporate head office expenses are taken into consideration in the strategic decision making process of the CODM and are therefore included in the disclosure here, even though they do
not earn revenue.
F-53
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
26. OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)
2009
Revenues
Non-
current
assets
R’000 R’000
Geographical Information
South Africa
South Africa
1,910,738 1,733,219
Australia
- -
Total
1,910,738 1,733,219
Information about major customers
The group has only one major customer regarding the sale of gold ore in each geographical are due to regulatory authority.
F-54
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
26. OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)
2008
Blyvoor
R’000
Crown
R’000
ERPM
R’000
Ergo Joint
Venture
R’000
Offshore
R’000
Corporate
Headoffice (2)
and all other
R’000
Total
R’000
Financial performance
Segmental revenue
Segmental revenue
848,230
528,625
467,057
-
89,235
- 1,933,147
Operating costs
(697,281)
(362,237)
(428,255)
-
(124,437)
(15,242) (1,627,452)
Operating profit/(loss)
150,949
166,388
38,802
-
(35,202) (15,242)
305,695
Interest and other investment income
3,296
1,081
1,608
-
10,067 58,472 74,524
Interest expense
(498)
(9)
(778)
-
(26,505) (7,739) (35,529)
Retrenchment costs
-
-
(5,528)
-
-
(5,816)
(11,344)
Administration expenses and general costs
(3,005)
2,034
(3,294)
(41)
(18,102) (77,115) (99,523)
Taxation charge (1)
-
(13,272)
-
-
(32,678)
-
(45,950)
Working profit/(loss) before capital expenditure
150,742
156,222
30,810
(41)
(102,420) (47,440)
187,873
Capital expenditure
(74,847)
(42,077)
(30,082)
(176,785)
(47,572)
(26) (371,389)
Working profit/(loss) after capital expenditure
75,895
114,145
728
(176,826)
(149,992) (47,466) (183,516)
(1)
The taxation charge excludes deferred tax.
(2)
Corporate head office expenses are taken into consideration in the strategic decision-making process of the CODM and are therefore included in the disclosure here, even though they do not earn revenue.
Operating results (3)
Ore milled
-
underground
t’000 687
-
303
-
56
- 1,046
- surface
t’000 3,719
8,235
1,859
-
-
- 13,813
- total
t’000 4,406
8,235
2,162
-
56
- 14,859
Average yield
- underground
g/t 4,70
-
5,83
-
7,45
-
5,17
- surface
g/t 0.31
0.33
0.38
-
-
-
0.33
- total
g/t 1.00
0.33
1.14
-
7.45
-
0.67
Gold dispatched
-
underground
Kg 3,229
-
1,767
-
417
-
5,413
- surface
Kg 1,162
2,717
705
-
-
-
4,584
- total
Kg 4,391
2,717
2,472
-
417
-
9,997
- underground
oz 103,813
-
56,812
-
13,427
-
174,052
- surface
oz 37,359
87,354
22,667
-
-
- 147,380
- total
oz 141,172
87,354
79,479
-
13,427
- 321,432
Operating cost -
underground
R/kg 181,518
-
190,938
-
298,410
-
190,967
- surface
R/kg 90,971
133,322
138,350
-
-
- 121,321
- total
R/kg 158,798
133,322
173,242
-
298,410
-
162,794
- underground
$/oz 772
-
812
-
1,098
-
810
- surface
$/oz 387
553
588
-
-
-
516
- total
$/oz 670
553
748
-
1,098
-
692
(3) Unaudited
F-55
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
26. OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)
2008
Blyvoor
R’000
Crown
R’000
ERPM
R’000
Ergo Joint
Venture
R’000
Offshore
R’000
Corporate
Headoffice(1)
and all other
R’000
Total
R’000
Reconciliation of assets
Reportable segment assets
396,060
162,790
73,885
179,399
-
741
812,875
Other assets
131,598
180,736
107,748
41,657
133,550
854,331 1,449,620
Total assets
527,658
343,526
181,633
221,056
133,550
855,072
2,262,495
Reconciliation of liabilities
Reportable segment liabilities
Reportable segment liabilities
218,984
330,393
168,109
136,083
599
101,095
955,263
Taxation and deferred taxation
-
1,771
-
-
-
-
1,771
Total liabilities
218,984
332,164
168,109
136,083
599
101,095
957,034
Other material information
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization
(22,671)
(20,548)
(25,269)
-
(854)
(589)
(69,931)
Impairment of assets
-
-
(69,804)
-
(46,718)
5,889
(110,633)
Reconciliation of Revenues
Total revenues for reportable segments
848,230
528,625
467,057
-
89,235
- 1,933,147
- Continuing
operations
848,230
528,625
467,057
-
-
- 1,843,912
- Discontinued
operations
-
-
-
-
89,235
-
89,235
Groups revenue
848,230
528,625
467,057
-
89,235
- 1,933,147
Reconciliation of profit/(loss)
Segment working profit/(loss) before capital expenditure
150,742
156,222
30,810
(41)
(102,420)
(47,440)
187,873
- Depreciation
(22,671)
(20,548)
(25,269)
-
(854)
(589)
(69,931)
- Movement in provision for environmental rehabilitation
(958)
(20,334)
(10,976)
-
(4,019)
2,097 (34,190)
- Movement in gold in progress
14,373
1,354
(484)
-
(10,059)
-
5,184
- Loss on derivative financial instruments
-
-
-
-
(433)
-
(433)
- Impairments and reversal of impairments
-
-
(69,804)
-
(46,718)
5,889
(110,633)
- Net gain/(loss) on financial liabilities measured at
amortized cost
(64,644)
(22,169)
1,492
-
2,457
(857)
(83,721)
- Profit on realization of investments
-
-
-
-
5
12,000
12,005
- Growth in environmental rehabilitation trust funds
2,586
1,449
1,107
-
-
3,344
8,486
- Unrealized foreign exchange loss
-
-
-
-
(27,153)
(10,161)
(37,314)
- Unwinding of provision for environmental rehabilitation
(49)
(3,174)
(1,011)
-
-
(501) (4,735)
- Unwinding of discount on financial liabilities measured
at amortized cost
(1,757)
(574)
(4,063)
-
-
-
(6,394)
- Deferred tax per the statement of comprehensive income
30,752
18,299
32,512
12
108,086
- 189,661
Profit/(loss) after taxation
108,374
110,525
(45,686)
(29)
(81,108)
(36,218)
55,858
(1)
Corporate head office expenses are taken into consideration in the strategic decision-making process of the CODM and are therefore included in the disclosure here, even though they do not earn revenue.
F-56
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
26. OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)
2008
Revenues
Non-
current
assets
R’000 R’000
Geographical Information
South Africa
South Africa
1,843,912 812,875
Australia
89,235 -
Total
1,933,147 812,875
Information about major customers
The group has only one major customer regarding the sale of gold ore in each geographical which is due to regulatory authority.
F-57
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
26. OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)
2007
Blyvoor
R’000
Crown
R’000
ERPM
R’000
Offshore
R’000
Corporate
Headoffice (2)
and all other
R’000
Total
R’000
Financial performance
Segmental revenue
Segmental revenue
694,612
472,842
367,323
674,928
- 2,209,705
Operating costs
(602,871)
(343,476)
(358,716)
(719,996)
(10,063) (2,035,122)
Operating profit/(loss)
91,741
129,366
8,607
(45,068) (10,063) 174,583
Interest and other investment income
1,920
915
93
7,272
9,710 19,910
Interest expense
(1,128)
(24)
(1,183)
(84,234) (12,727) (99,296)
Retrenchment costs
-
-
(73)
(26,507)
(865)
(27,445)
Administration expenses and general costs
(436)
(1,869)
(2,448)
(112,396) (92,837) (209,986)
Taxation charge (1)
(328)
(276)
(133)
(4,792)
- (5,529)
Working profit/(loss) before capital expenditure
91,769
128,112
4,863
(265,725) (106,782) (147,763)
Capital expenditure
(68,485)
(29,978)
(40,624)
(173,606)
(341) (313,034)
Working profit/(loss) after capital expenditure
23,284
98,134
(35,761)
(439,331) (107,123) (460,797)
(1)The taxation charge excludes deferred tax.
(2) Corporate head office expenses are taken into consideration in the strategic decision-making process of the CODM and are therefore included in the disclosure here, even though they do not
earn revenue.
Operating results (3)
Ore milled
-
underground
t’000 690
-
269
1,016
- 1,975
- surface
t’000 3,694
8,405
1,753
-
- 13,852
- total
t’000 4,384
8,405
2,022
1,016
- 15,827
Average yield
- underground
g/t 4.98
-
6.71
4.37
-
4.90
- surface
g/t 0.34
0.38
0.39
-
-
0.37
- total
g/t 1.07
0.38
1.23
4.37
-
0.94
Gold dispatched
-
underground
Kg 3,436
-
1,806
4,435
-
9,677
- surface
Kg 1,269
3,204
689
-
-
5,162
- total
Kg 4,705
3,204
2,495
4,435
- 14,839
- underground
oz 110,471
-
58,063
142,661
-
311,195
- surface
oz 40,798
103,011
22,153
-
- 165,962
- total
oz 151,269
103,011
80,216
142,661
-
477,157
Operating cost -
underground
R/kg 149,114
-
151,816
162,344
-
106,821
- surface
R/kg 66,693
107,202
140,719
-
- 107,736
- total
R/kg 128,134
107,202
143,774
162,344
-
137,147
- underground
$/oz 642
-
654
645
-
645
- surface
$/oz 287
450
606
-
-
431
- total
$/oz 547
450
641
645
-
571
(3) Unaudited.
F-58
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
26. OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)
2007
Blyvoor
R’000
Crown
R’000
ERPM
R’000
Offshore
R’000
Corporate
Headoffice
and all other
R’000
Total
R’000
Other material information
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization
(21,451)
(28,080)
(13,766)
(115,027)
(608) (178,932)
Impairment of assets
-
(15,588)
(3,829)
(872,133)
13,504
(878,046)
Reconciliation of Revenues
Total revenues for reportable segments
694,612
472,842
367,323
674,928
- 2,209,705
- Continuing
operations
694,612
472,842
367,323
-
- 1,534,777
- Discontinued
operations
-
-
-
674,928
-
674,928
Groups revenue
694,612
472,842
367,323
674,928
- 2,209,705
Reconciliation of profit/(loss)
Segment working profit/(loss) before capital expenditure
91,769
128,112
4,863
(265,725)
(106,782) (147,763)
- Depreciation
(21,451)
(28,080)
(13,766)
(115,027)
(608) (178,932)
- Movement in provision for environmental rehabilitation
(5,350)
(9,198)
(1,516)
-
(3,888) (19,952)
- Movement in gold in progress
(296)
(589)
3,760
14,380
- 17,255
- Loss on derivative financial instruments
-
-
-
(50,852)
-
(50,852)
- Impairments and reversal of impairments
-
(15,588)
(3,829)
(872,133)
13,504
(878,046)
- Net gain/(loss) on financial liabilities measured at
amortized cost
(1,840)
(2,332)
(5,025)
-
644
(8,553)
- Profit on realization of investments
(171)
-
-
-
(7,573) (7,744)
- Growth in environmental rehabilitation trust funds
4,320
750
577
-
2,414
8,061
- Unrealized foreign exchange loss
-
-
-
15,994
(1,982)
14,012
- Unwinding of provision for environmental rehabilitation
-
-
(3,250)
-
-
(3,250)
- Deferred tax per the statement of comprehensive income
-
-
-
(204)
-
(204)
Profit/(loss) after taxation
66,981
73,075
(18,186)
(1,273,567)
(104,271)
(1,255,968)
Revenues
R’000
Geographical Information
South Africa
South Africa
1,534,777
Australia
674,928
Total
2,209,705
Information about major customers
The group has only one major customer regarding the sale of gold ore in each geographical are due to regulatory authority.
F-59
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended June 30, 2009
27. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The group has related party relationships with its associates, subsidiaries, and with its directors and key management personnel. Key management Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the company, directly or indirectly,activities of the company,directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or otherwise) of the company. For the year ended June 30, 2009, total directors’ remuneration (short-term benefits)amounted to R16.4 million which includes end-of-contract payments amounting to R1.4 million and key management personnel remuneration(short-term benefits) to R58.6 million.
Prior to the awarding of a contract to a related party for the supply of goods and services the group procurement manager reviews both the pricing, qualityboth the pricing, quality and the reliability of that party. The contract terms are compared to similar suppliers of goods and services to ensure that the contract is on market relatedterms.
The company’s executive directors review the terms and conditions of all loans to ensure that the terms of the loans are similar to
those offered by financial institutions.
for the year ended June 30, 2009
27. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The group has related party relationships with its associates, subsidiaries, and with its directors and key management personnel. Key management Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the company, directly or indirectly,activities of the company,directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or otherwise) of the company. For the year ended June 30, 2009, total directors’ remuneration (short-term benefits)amounted to R16.4 million which includes end-of-contract payments amounting to R1.4 million and key management personnel remuneration(short-term benefits) to R58.6 million.
Prior to the awarding of a contract to a related party for the supply of goods and services the group procurement manager reviews both the pricing, qualityboth the pricing, quality and the reliability of that party. The contract terms are compared to similar suppliers of goods and services to ensure that the contract is on market relatedterms.
The company’s executive directors review the terms and conditions of all loans to ensure that the terms of the loans are similar to
those offered by financial institutions.
Transactions with associates, joint ventures and subsidiary companies
During the year ended June 30, 2009, the company earned management fees from DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty)
Ltd (DRDGOLD SA) amounting to R15.6 million (2008: R17.5 million). Transactions with associates are priced on an arm’s
length basis.
Ltd (DRDGOLD SA) amounting to R15.6 million (2008: R17.5 million). Transactions with associates are priced on an arm’s
length basis.
Subsidiaries
The following information relates to the group’s financial interest in its subsidiaries at June 30, 2009:
ISSUED ORDINARY SHARE
CAPITAL
NUMBER OF
SHARES
% HELD
SHARES AT COST
LESS
IMPAIRMENTS
R’000
EFFECTIVE
DATE OF
ACQUISITION
INDEBTEDNESS
NET OF
IMPAIRMENTS
R’000
South Africa
Argonaut Financial Services (Pty) Limited
100
100
-
Oct 1, 1997
18,945
Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Limited
51,300,000
100
-
Sep 14, 1998
(245,316)
DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited
1
1,000,000
74
113,177
Nov 14 , 2005
1,122,891
East Champ d’Or Gold Mine Limited
7
100
-
Apr 1, 1996
-
Rand Leases (Vogelstruisfontein) Gold Mining
Company Limited
118,505,000
100
-
Jan 1, 1996
(42,092)
Roodepoort Gold Mine (Pty) Limited
1
100
-
Jan 1, 1996
-
West Witwatersrand Gold Holdings Limited
99,000,000
100
-
Apr 1, 1996
(22,996)
Guardrisk Insurance Company Limited
20
100
100
Jul 1, 2008
-
ErgoGold (1)
-
35
52,551
Mar 31, 2009
204,985
Australasia/International
Dome Resources NL
142,619,074
100
-
Apr 1, 2000
-
DRD Australia APS
130
100
-
Jan 26, 1999
-
DRD Australasia (Pty) Limited
100
100
-
Nov 15, 1999
-
DRD International APS
125
100
-
Apr 28, 1999
-
DRD (Offshore) Limited
5
100
-
Nov 4, 2005
-
Total
165,828
1,036,417
1
DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited holds the following investments: 100% of Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, 100% of East
Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, 100% of Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited and 50% of Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited (Ergo Joint Venture) and 65% of
the ErgoGold (formerly Elsburg Gold Mining Joint Venture) (unincorporated).
F-60
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
27. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
Joint Ventures
The joint ventures for which the statement of comprehensive income and statement of financial position have been
proportionately consolidated are disclosed in note 13.
Rand Refinery agreement
proportionately consolidated are disclosed in note 13.
Rand Refinery agreement
The group has entered into an agreement with Rand Refinery Limited (Rand Refinery), for the refining and sale of all of its gold
produced in South Africa. Under the agreement, Rand Refinery performs the final refining of the group’s gold and casts it into
troy ounce bars. Rand Refinery then usually sells the gold on the same day as delivery for the London afternoon fixed price on
the day the gold is sold. In exchange for this service, the group pays Rand Refinery a variable refining fee plus fixed marketing,
loan and administration fees. Mr Pretorius, CEO of DRDGOLD, is also a director of Rand Refinery and is a member of their
Audit Committee. The group currently owns 4.0% of Rand Refinery (which is jointly owned by South African mining
companies). Trade receivables to the amount of R31.0 million (2008: R58.7 million) relate to metals sold. The group received a
dividend of R4.1 million (200 8: R1.5 million) from Rand Refinery.
produced in South Africa. Under the agreement, Rand Refinery performs the final refining of the group’s gold and casts it into
troy ounce bars. Rand Refinery then usually sells the gold on the same day as delivery for the London afternoon fixed price on
the day the gold is sold. In exchange for this service, the group pays Rand Refinery a variable refining fee plus fixed marketing,
loan and administration fees. Mr Pretorius, CEO of DRDGOLD, is also a director of Rand Refinery and is a member of their
Audit Committee. The group currently owns 4.0% of Rand Refinery (which is jointly owned by South African mining
companies). Trade receivables to the amount of R31.0 million (2008: R58.7 million) relate to metals sold. The group received a
dividend of R4.1 million (200 8: R1.5 million) from Rand Refinery.
Consultancy agreement
On June 23, 2008 DRDGOLD SA approved a consultancy agreement with Khumo Gold, which owns 20% of DRDGOLD SA.
The agreement provides for a monthly retainer of R200,000.
The agreement provides for a monthly retainer of R200,000.
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
Shares at cost, less impairment loss
165,828
1,121,105
965,471
Net indebtedness, less impairment loss
(1,036,417)
(344,781)
(260,949)
Amounts owing by subsidiaries
1,622,795
997,185
962,282
Impairments
(275,974)
(233,412)
(881,116)
Amounts owing to subsidiaries
(310,404)
(1,108,554)
(342,115)
Net investment in subsidiaries
1,202,245
776,324
704,522
The non-operating entities’ loans are interest free and the operational
entities’ loans bear interest at prime minus four.
The loans are unsecured and without any fixed re-payment
arrangements.
The interest of the company in the (loss)/profit after taxation
of its subsidiaries is:
Aggregate losses
(163,271)
(84,397)
(2,444,878)
Aggregate profits
270,175
255,164
141,859
F-61
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
28. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the group’s management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectation
of future events that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances.
of future events that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances.
The resulting accounting estimates may differ from actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of
causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below:
causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below:
(a)
Recoverable amount of mining assets
The recoverable amount of mining assets is generally determined utilizing discounted future cash flows. Management
also considers such factors as the market capitalization of the group, the quality of the individual ore body and country risk in
determining the recoverable amount. During the year under review, the group calculated recoverable amount based on updated
life-of-mine business plans, a gold price of R270,000 per kilogram in year one escalating at 7.42% per year, and a discount rate of
12.5%. At a 10% lower gold price received of R243,000 per kilogram, or a 4 percentage points (32%) increase in the discount
rate to 16.5%, no further impairment would have been raised (refer note 10).
determining the recoverable amount. During the year under review, the group calculated recoverable amount based on updated
life-of-mine business plans, a gold price of R270,000 per kilogram in year one escalating at 7.42% per year, and a discount rate of
12.5%. At a 10% lower gold price received of R243,000 per kilogram, or a 4 percentage points (32%) increase in the discount
rate to 16.5%, no further impairment would have been raised (refer note 10).
The calculation of unit-of-production rate of amortization could be affected to the extent that actual production n the future is
different from current forecast production based on proved and probable Ore Reserves. This would generally arise when there are
significant changes in any of the factors or assumption used in estimating Ore Reserves. Factors could include:
different from current forecast production based on proved and probable Ore Reserves. This would generally arise when there are
significant changes in any of the factors or assumption used in estimating Ore Reserves. Factors could include:
• changes in proved and probable Ore Reserves
• the grade of Ore Reserves may vary significantly from time to time;
• differences between actual commodity prices and commodity price assumptions;
• unforeseen operational issues at mine sites;
• changes in capital, operating, mining processing and reclamation costs, discount rates and foreign exchange rates; and
• changes in Ore Reserves could similarly effect the useful lives of assets depreciated on straight-line basis, where those lives
are limited to the life of the mine.
(b)
Valuation of financial instruments
If the value of the financial instrument cannot be obtained from an active market, the group has established fair value by
using valuation techniques. These include the use of recent arm’s length transactions, reference to other instruments that are
substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models, refined to reflect the issuer’s specific
circumstances.
substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models, refined to reflect the issuer’s specific
circumstances.
(c)
Estimate of exposure and liabilities with regard to rehabilitation costs
Estimated provisions for environmental rehabilitation, comprising pollution control rehabilitation and mine closure, are
based on the group’s environmental management plans in compliance with current technological, environmental and regulatory
requirements.
requirements.
An average discount rate of 8.25%, average inflation rate of 5.7% and expected life of mines according to the life-of-
mine plans were utilized in the calculation of the estimated net present value of the rehabilitation liability (2008: discount rate of
11.0% and inflation rate of 8.9%).
11.0% and inflation rate of 8.9%).
F-62
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
28. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS (continued)
(d)
Estimate of post-retirement medical liability
An updated actuarial valuation is carried out every three years. Assumptions used to determine the liability include a
discount rate, health cost inflation rate, real discount rate, income at retirement, retirement age, spouse age gap, continuation at
retirement and proportion married at retirement (refer note 20).
retirement and proportion married at retirement (refer note 20).
(e)
Estimate of taxation
The group is subject to income tax in numerous jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the
worldwide provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is
uncertain during the ordinary course of business. The group recognizes liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on
estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that
were initially recorded, such differences will have an impact on the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which
such determination is made.
uncertain during the ordinary course of business. The group recognizes liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on
estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that
were initially recorded, such differences will have an impact on the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which
such determination is made.
(f)
Fair value of share-based compensation
The fair value of options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The significant inputs into
the model are: vested period and conditions, risk-free interest rate, volatility, price of grant. (Refer to note 20 for detail on the
share option scheme.)
share option scheme.)
(g)
Gold in lock-up
Gold in lock-up in certain plants is estimated based on the plant call factor calculated.
(h)
Assessment of contingencies
Contingencies will only realize when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The exercise of significant
judgment and estimates of the outcome of future events are required during the assessment of the impact of such contingencies.
(i)
Ore Reserves estimates
At the end of each financial year, the estimate of proved and probable Ore Reserves are updated. Depreciation of mining
assets is prospectively adjusted, based on these changes.
Ore Reserves are estimates of the amount of product that can be economically and legally extracted from the group’s properties.
In order to calculate Ore Reserves, estimates and assumptions are required about a range of geological, technical and economic
factors, including but not limited to quantities, grades, production techniques, recovery rates, production costs, transport costs,
commodity demand, commodity prices and exchange rates.
In order to calculate Ore Reserves, estimates and assumptions are required about a range of geological, technical and economic
factors, including but not limited to quantities, grades, production techniques, recovery rates, production costs, transport costs,
commodity demand, commodity prices and exchange rates.
Estimating the quantity and/or grade of Ore Reserves requires the size, shape and depth of ore bodies to be determined by
analyzing geological data such as the logging and assaying of drill samples. This process may require complex and difficult
geological judgments and calculations to interpret the data.
analyzing geological data such as the logging and assaying of drill samples. This process may require complex and difficult
geological judgments and calculations to interpret the data.
Because the economic assumptions used to estimate Ore Reserves change from period to period and because additional geological
data is generated during the course of operations, estimates of Ore Reserves may change from period to period. Changes in
reported Ore Reserves may affect the group’s financial results and financial position in a number of ways and including the
following:
data is generated during the course of operations, estimates of Ore Reserves may change from period to period. Changes in
reported Ore Reserves may affect the group’s financial results and financial position in a number of ways and including the
following:
• Assets carrying values may be affected due to changes in estimated future cash flows;
• Depreciation, depletion and amortization charges in the statement of comprehensive income may change where such
charges are determined by the units-of-production method, or where the useful economic lives of assets change;
• Decommissioning site restoration and environmental provisions may change where changes in estimated Ore Reserves
affect expectations about the timing or cost of these activities; and
• The carrying value of deferred tax assets may change due to changes in estimates of the likely recovery of the tax
benefits.
These adjustments are made prospectively where relevant.
F-63
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
28. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS (continued)
(j)
Estimate of deferred tax asset
The amount recognized as a deferred tax asset is generally determined utilizing discounted future cash flows similar to
estimates used in the calculation of depreciation and rehabilitation liabilities. Management considers all factors that could
possibly affect the probability that future taxable profit will be available against which unused tax credits can be utilized. These
factors included profitability of the operations and a higher gold price. The amount recognized as a deferred tax asset is sensitive
to the current gold spot price. The amount recognized at June 30, 2009 is based on a future gold price received of R270,000 per
kilogram (2008: R235,000 per kilogram) in year one, escalating at an average of 7.42% (2008: 11%) per annum. At a 10% lower
gold price received of R243,000 per kilogram (2008: R211,500 per kilogram) the deferred tax asset will reduce by R140.8 million
(2008: R32.5 million). ErgoGold is still a new project with no profit history and still faces some metallurgical challenges which it
must over come to achieve the forecasted recovery grade. Should these challenges not be overcome the deferred tax asset raised
will be impacted in the future.
possibly affect the probability that future taxable profit will be available against which unused tax credits can be utilized. These
factors included profitability of the operations and a higher gold price. The amount recognized as a deferred tax asset is sensitive
to the current gold spot price. The amount recognized at June 30, 2009 is based on a future gold price received of R270,000 per
kilogram (2008: R235,000 per kilogram) in year one, escalating at an average of 7.42% (2008: 11%) per annum. At a 10% lower
gold price received of R243,000 per kilogram (2008: R211,500 per kilogram) the deferred tax asset will reduce by R140.8 million
(2008: R32.5 million). ErgoGold is still a new project with no profit history and still faces some metallurgical challenges which it
must over come to achieve the forecasted recovery grade. Should these challenges not be overcome the deferred tax asset raised
will be impacted in the future.
29. CASH GENERATED BY OPERATIONS
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
Profit/(loss) before taxation
82,240
(87,853)
(1,250,235)
Adjusted for
Depreciation
Depreciation
99,217
69,931
178,932
Movement in provision for environmental rehabilitation
19,545
34,190
19,952
Movement in gold in progress
(7,018)
(5,184)
(17,255)
Loss on derivative instruments
-
433
50,852
Impairments
75,138
110,633
878,046
(Profit)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment
(10,266)
(10,054)
301
Share-based payments
7,873
6,591
12,686
Amortization of convertible loan issuance costs
-
-
5,088
Non-cash movement in provisions
-
-
1,730
Impairment/(reversal of impairment) on trade receivables
113
(5,227)
2,331
Actuarial losses on post-retirement and employee benefits
18,226
-
180
Finance income
(205,991)
(95,015)
(29,123)
Finance expenses
41,743
167,693
105,983
Operating cash flows before working capital changes
120,820
186,138
(40,532)
Working capital changes
44,113
18,979
99,225
Trade and other receivables
156,042
(117,271)
23,768
Inventories
(16,648)
(3,310)
57,733
Trade and other payables
(97,954)
142,815
(1,577)
Post-retirement and other employee benefits
2,673
(3,255)
19,301
Cash generated by operations
164,933
205,117
58,693
F-64
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
30. CASH FLOW ON ACQUISITION/DISPOSAL OF SUBSIDIARIES, NET OF CASH
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
Total net cash flow on disposal/acquisition of subsidiaries
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited
-
-
43
Vatukoula
-
-
(601)
Netgold Limited
-
(21,878)
-
Emperor Mines Limited
-
(99,883)
-
DRDGOLD Limited (Cell No. 170)
(100)
-
-
ErgoGold
(277,721)
-
-
(277,821)
(121,761)
(558)
Disposal of Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited
With effect from March 22, 2006 Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited was
liquidated.
Costs on liquidation recovered
With effect from March 22, 2006 Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited was
liquidated.
Costs on liquidation recovered
-
-
43
Cash flow on disposal of subsidiary
-
-
43
Disposal of Vatukoula mine
`
On March 28, 2007, Emperor Mines Limited disposed of the Vatukoula
mine to Westech Gold (Pty) Ltd.
The fair value of the net assets disposed of were as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents
mine to Westech Gold (Pty) Ltd.
The fair value of the net assets disposed of were as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents
-
-
601
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
-
-
(11,325)
Trade and other payables
-
-
(80,171)
Profit on disposal
-
-
90,895
Carrying value at time of disposal
-
-
-
Less: cash and cash equivalents of disposed entity
-
-
(601)
Cash flow on disposal of subsidiary net of cash disposed
-
-
(601)
Disposal of Netgold Limited
On March 30, 2008 DRDGOLD disposed of its 50.25% shareholding in
NetGold Services Limited (NetGold) and in exchange for its shareholding
in NetGold obtained a 12.3% stake in G.M. Networks Limited
(GoldMoney).
The fair value of the net assets disposed were as follows:
NetGold Services Limited (NetGold) and in exchange for its shareholding
in NetGold obtained a 12.3% stake in G.M. Networks Limited
(GoldMoney).
The fair value of the net assets disposed were as follows:
Inventories
-
21,908
-
Trade and other receivables
-
7,283
-
Cash and cash equivalents
-
21,878
-
Trade and other payables
-
(37,446)
-
Carrying value at time of disposal
-
13,623
-
Total cash consideration
-
-
-
Less: cash and cash equivalents of disposed entity
-
(21,878)
-
Cash flow on disposal of subsidiary net of cash disposed
-
(21,878)
-
Disposal of Emperor Mines Limited
DRDGOLD disposed of its 78.72% interest in Emperor on October 2007 for
a total consideration of R355.8 million.
The fair value of the net assets disposed were as follows:
Property, plant and equipment
a total consideration of R355.8 million.
The fair value of the net assets disposed were as follows:
Property, plant and equipment
-
13,469
-
Inventories
-
32,646
-
Trade and other receivables
-
62,522
-
Cash and cash equivalents
-
455,709
-
Provision for environmental rehabilitation
-
(15,535)
-
Post-retirement and other employee benefits
-
(283)
-
Amounts owing by group companies
-
31
-
Trade and other payables
-
(138,189)
-
Taxation payable
-
(6,160)
-
Carrying value at time of disposal
-
404,210
-
Total cash consideration
-
355,826
-
Less: cash and cash equivalents of disposed entity
-
(455,709)
-
Cash flow on disposal of subsidiary net of cash disposed
-
(99,883)
-
F-65
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
30. CASH FLOW ON ACQUISITION/DISPOSAL OF SUBSIDIARIES, NET OF CASH
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
Acquisition of DRDGOLD Limited (Cell No. 170)
On July 1, 2008, DRDGOLD acquired 100% of a separate class of share in
Guardrisk Insurance Company Limited known as DRDGOLD Limited (Cell
No 170).
Cash flow on acquisition of subsidiary
Guardrisk Insurance Company Limited known as DRDGOLD Limited (Cell
No 170).
Cash flow on acquisition of subsidiary
(100)
-
-
Acquisition of ErgoGold (formerly Elsburg Gold Mining Joint Venture)
On March 31, 2009, East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited and DRDGOLD
acquired 15% and 35% respectively, of ErgoGold from Mogale Gold
(Proprietary) Limited.
The fair value of the assets acquired net of non-controlling interest were as
follows:
Property, Plant and equipment
acquired 15% and 35% respectively, of ErgoGold from Mogale Gold
(Proprietary) Limited.
The fair value of the assets acquired net of non-controlling interest were as
follows:
Property, Plant and equipment
409,118
-
-
Inventories
8,236
-
-
Trade and other receivables
438
-
-
Amounts owing by group companies
13,975
-
-
Cash and cash equivalents
768
-
-
Deferred tax liability
(85,586)
-
-
Trade and other payables
(15,389)
-
-
Carrying value at time of acquisition
331,560
-
-
Less: Cash and cash equivalents acquired
(833)
-
-
Negative goodwill on acquisition
(53,006)
-
-
Cash flow on acquisition of subsidiary net of cash acquired
(277,721)
-
-
31. CASH FLOW ON (ACQUISITION)/DISPOSAL OF JOINT VENTURES, NET OF CASH
Disposal of Porgera Joint Venture
On August 17, 2007, Emperor Mines Limited disposed of its 20% interest in
the Porgera Joint Venture.
The fair value of the net assets disposed of were as follows:
the Porgera Joint Venture.
The fair value of the net assets disposed of were as follows:
Property, plant and equipment
-
500,698
-
Inventories
-
326,167
-
Trade and other receivables
-
17,616
-
Cash and cash equivalents
-
2,408
-
Trade and other payables
-
(48,133)
-
Provisions
-
(81,108)
-
Carrying value at time of disposal
-
717,648
-
Total cash consideration
-
1,939,134
-
Less: cash and cash equivalents of disposed entity
-
(2,408)
-
Cash flow on disposal of joint venture
-
1,936,726
-
F-66
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
31. CASH FLOW ON (ACQUISITION)/DISPOSAL OF JOINT VENTURE, NET OF CASH (continued)
2009
2008
2007
R’000
R’000
R’000
Acquisition of Witfontein Mining (Pty) Limited
On February 28, 2009, DRDGOLD through its subsidiary Argonaut Financial
Services (Pty) Limited acquired a 50% interest in Witfontein Mining (Pty)
Limited and entered into a joint venture agreement with Mintails SA (Pty)
Limited which owns the remaining 50%.
Cash flow on acquisition of joint venture
Services (Pty) Limited acquired a 50% interest in Witfontein Mining (Pty)
Limited and entered into a joint venture agreement with Mintails SA (Pty)
Limited which owns the remaining 50%.
Cash flow on acquisition of joint venture
(20,000)
-
-
32. CASH FLOW ON ACQUISITION OF ASSOCIATE
Acquisition of West Wits SA (Pty) Limited
In January 2009, DRDGOLD acquired a 28.33% interest in West Wits SA
(Pty) Limited.
Cash flow on investment in associate
(Pty) Limited.
Cash flow on investment in associate
(2,700)
-
-
33. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, demand deposits, and
highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.
Included in cash and cash equivalents is restricted cash in a form of a
guarantee relating to the rehabilitation of the Brakpan tailings dump, given to
AngloGold Ashanti Limited and amounting to R49.6 million.
highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.
Included in cash and cash equivalents is restricted cash in a form of a
guarantee relating to the rehabilitation of the Brakpan tailings dump, given to
AngloGold Ashanti Limited and amounting to R49.6 million.
Cash and cash equivalents
353,555
846,114
105,420
Bank overdrafts
(824)
(527)
(117,849)
352,731
845,587
(12,429)
34. CASH FLOWS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Net cash from operating activities
-
(150,703)
(139,812)
Net cash from investing activities
-
1,080,541
(112,036)
Net cash from financing activities
-
(1,046,610)
88,944
35. CASH FLOWS RELATING TO EXPLORATION ASSETS
Cash flow from investing activities
27,401
82,129
-
F-67
NOTES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
for the year ended June 30, 2009
for the year ended June 30, 2009
36. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Offer for Mintails Limited’s South African business assets
On June 29, 2009, DRDGOLD made an offer to Mintails Limited (Mintails) to acquire all of Mintails’ South African business
assets except its interest in underground explorer West Wits Mining Limited (West Wits). The purchase consideration under the
offer was to be determined by the 30-day Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) of Mintails shares over the 30 trading days
terminating on June 24, 2009, less the value of Mintails’ holding in West Wits based on the West Wits trading VWAP for the
same 30 days to June 24, 2009. DRDGOLD proposed an issue of its shares in payment for the acquisition, also calculated by a 30
trading day VWAP to June 24, 2009.
assets except its interest in underground explorer West Wits Mining Limited (West Wits). The purchase consideration under the
offer was to be determined by the 30-day Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) of Mintails shares over the 30 trading days
terminating on June 24, 2009, less the value of Mintails’ holding in West Wits based on the West Wits trading VWAP for the
same 30 days to June 24, 2009. DRDGOLD proposed an issue of its shares in payment for the acquisition, also calculated by a 30
trading day VWAP to June 24, 2009.
Mintails initially conditionally accepted the offer by DRDGOLD, however the offer was rejected by the Mintails board on July
22, 2009.
22, 2009.
Dividend
On August 20, 2009, DRDGOLD declared a dividend of 5 cents per share, which amounts to R18.9 million. Secondary tax on
companies of R1.8 million is payable on the dividend. The last day to trade ordinary shares cum dividend is October 2, 2009.
companies of R1.8 million is payable on the dividend. The last day to trade ordinary shares cum dividend is October 2, 2009.
Blyvoor right-sizing
On August 26, 2009, DRDGOLD announced that it had advised unions of its intention to right-size the Blyvoor operation.
Blyvoor proceeded with a 60-day facilitated consultation process in terms of Section 189A of the South African Labour Relations
Act to determine the future of affected employees. This had been brought about by a drop in underground production due mainly
to seismic damage to high-grade panels, a significant drop in the average rand gold price received due to rand strength and an
increase in underground cash operating costs. The Section 189A process was completed on October 26, 2009 and resulted in the
retrenchment of 330 employees at a cost of R11.7 million.
Blyvoor proceeded with a 60-day facilitated consultation process in terms of Section 189A of the South African Labour Relations
Act to determine the future of affected employees. This had been brought about by a drop in underground production due mainly
to seismic damage to high-grade panels, a significant drop in the average rand gold price received due to rand strength and an
increase in underground cash operating costs. The Section 189A process was completed on October 26, 2009 and resulted in the
retrenchment of 330 employees at a cost of R11.7 million.
Blyvoor Provisional Judicial Management
On November 9, 2009, we announced that, in a bid to save our Blyvoor mine from liquidation, we intended applying to the High
Court of South Africa for a provisional judicial management order over the operation. A provisional judicial management order was
granted by the High Court of South Africa on November 10, 2009.
Court of South Africa for a provisional judicial management order over the operation. A provisional judicial management order was
granted by the High Court of South Africa on November 10, 2009.
The application, in terms of the provisions of Section 427 of the South African Companies Act, was prompted by Blyvoor’s
inability to continue to sustain losses incurred since April 2009, which were brought about by the following circumstances:
inability to continue to sustain losses incurred since April 2009, which were brought about by the following circumstances:
• a drop in the Rand gold price received between April 1, 2009 and September 30, 2009, due to the strengthening of the
Rand against the US Dollar;
• extensive damage caused during May 2009 to higher-grade underground production areas at Blyvoor’s No. 5 Shaft by
seismic activity, restoration of which is expected to take until March 2010 to complete;
• power utility Eskom’s higher winter tariffs, compounded by a 32% price increase effective from July 1, 2009, and the
likelihood of further increases in coming months; and
• the wage strike by the National Union of Mineworkers, which lasted for almost a month and resulted in the loss of
approximately 8,000 ounces of production.
In terms of a provisional judicial management order, the court appoints a judicial manager who has a wide range of powers at his
disposal to take such actions he deems necessary to save the business. These could include giving certain creditors temporary
preference over others and agreeing compromises with creditors without the risk of committing an act of insolvency and thereby
exposing the mine to liquidation. Management believes that provisional judicial management offers the best possible prospect of
preventing Blyvoor’s liquidation and of restoring the operation to profitability, while protecting the interests of all stakeholders of
both Blyvoor and DRDGOLD.
disposal to take such actions he deems necessary to save the business. These could include giving certain creditors temporary
preference over others and agreeing compromises with creditors without the risk of committing an act of insolvency and thereby
exposing the mine to liquidation. Management believes that provisional judicial management offers the best possible prospect of
preventing Blyvoor’s liquidation and of restoring the operation to profitability, while protecting the interests of all stakeholders of
both Blyvoor and DRDGOLD.
The effect of the Blyvoor provisional judicial management order is that:
• management of Blyvoor will become the responsibility of a provisional judicial manager to be appointed by the Master
of the High Court of South Africa;
• the provisional judicial manager will manage Blyvoor until March 16, 2010 when he will present to the Court a report on
the performance of the business;
• on or prior to March 16, 2010 interested and affected parties may approach the Court and provide reasons why the order
should be dismissed or confirmed as final. If the order is confirmed, then a final judicial management order will be made
by the Court;
by the Court;
• If, at any stage prior to March 16, 2010, Blyvoor returns to profitability, any interested and affected party, including
DRDGOLD, may bring an application before the Court to lift the provisional order.
F-68
DRDGOLD expects that Blyvoor will remain under provisional judicial management until after access to the seismicity-damaged,
higher-grade areas at its No 5 Shaft have been regained, which is expected to be in March 2010. The two key factors which are
critical to Blyvoor’s future profitability are an improvement in recovered grade once the higher-grade areas have been accessed
and an increase in the rand gold price to above current costs of production. Currently the breakeven point in rand gold price terms,
for operating purposes amounts to R245,000 per kilogram and if capital expenditure is included it amounts to R278,000 per
kilogram. The breakeven point being the point where the revenue generated from production measured in rand gold price terms is
equal to the cost of production also measured in rand gold price terms.
higher-grade areas at its No 5 Shaft have been regained, which is expected to be in March 2010. The two key factors which are
critical to Blyvoor’s future profitability are an improvement in recovered grade once the higher-grade areas have been accessed
and an increase in the rand gold price to above current costs of production. Currently the breakeven point in rand gold price terms,
for operating purposes amounts to R245,000 per kilogram and if capital expenditure is included it amounts to R278,000 per
kilogram. The breakeven point being the point where the revenue generated from production measured in rand gold price terms is
equal to the cost of production also measured in rand gold price terms.
As discussed in more detail under Note 28 “Accounting estimates and judgments” management has made various estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets included in these financial statements, which include Blyvoor’s assets.
Details of assumptions and estimates which were used to determine the recoverable amount of mining assets are contained in this
note. If actual results differ from these estimates and assumptions and if Blyvoor does not regain access to its higher-grade areas,
as expected in March 2010, then Blyvoor may have to raise an impairment against its property, plant and equipment, which
amounted to R463.9 million at June 30, 2009.
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets included in these financial statements, which include Blyvoor’s assets.
Details of assumptions and estimates which were used to determine the recoverable amount of mining assets are contained in this
note. If actual results differ from these estimates and assumptions and if Blyvoor does not regain access to its higher-grade areas,
as expected in March 2010, then Blyvoor may have to raise an impairment against its property, plant and equipment, which
amounted to R463.9 million at June 30, 2009.
126
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this Annual Report:
1.1
(1)
Memorandum of Association of DRDGOLD Limited.
1.2
(7)
Articles of Association of DRDGOLD Limited, as amended on November 8, 2002.
1.3
(1)
Excerpts of relevant provisions of the South African Companies Act.
1.4
(2)
Durban Roodepoort Deep (1996) Share Option Scheme as amended.
2.1
(1)
Excerpts of relevant provisions of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listings Requirements.
2.2
(7)
Indenture between DRDGOLD Limited, as Issuer, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, dated November 12, 2002.
2.3
(7)
Purchase Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and CIBC World Markets Corp., dated November 4, 2002.
2.4
(7)
Registration Rights Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and CIBC World Markets Corp., dated
November 12, 2002.
November 12, 2002.
2.5
(7)
DRDGOLD Limited 6% Senior Convertible Note Due 2006 in the amount of $61,500,000 issued pursuant to Rule
144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
2.6
(7)
DRDGOLD Limited 6% Senior Convertible Note Due 2006 in the amount of $4,500,000 issued pursuant to
Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
4.1
(1)
Tribute Agreement, dated October 9, 1992, between DRDGOLD Limited and Rand Leases.
4.2
(1)
Service Agreement, dated July 27, 1995, between DRDGOLD Limited and Randgold.
4.3
(1)
Agreement, dated September 28, 1995, among First Westgold Mining (Proprietary) Limited, DRDGOLD Limited and
Rand Leases in respect of purchase of assets of First Westgold by Rand Leases.
Rand Leases in respect of purchase of assets of First Westgold by Rand Leases.
4.4
(2)
Pumping Assistance, dated October 14, 1997, for the 1997/1998 fiscal year from the Minister of Mineral and Energy
Affairs – Republic of South Africa to DRDGOLD Limited.
Affairs – Republic of South Africa to DRDGOLD Limited.
4.5
(3)
Deposit Agreement among DRDGOLD Limited, The Bank of New York as Depositary, and owners and holders of
American Depositary Receipts, dated as of August 12, 1996, as amended and restated as of October 2, 1996, as further
amended and restated as of August 11, 1998.
American Depositary Receipts, dated as of August 12, 1996, as amended and restated as of October 2, 1996, as further
amended and restated as of August 11, 1998.
4.6
(4)
Security Agreement, dated November 5, 1998, between The Chase Manhattan Bank, DRDGOLD Limited, Blyvoor,
Buffels and West Wits.
Buffels and West Wits.
4.7
(4)
Loan Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited, Crown
and DRDGOLD Limited.
and DRDGOLD Limited.
4.8
(4)
Lender Substitution Deed, dated August 18, 1999, between DRDGOLD Limited, DRD Australasia, NM Rothschild &
Sons (Singapore) Limited, NM Rothschild & Sons (Australia) Limited, as agent in its own capacity, and Rothschild
Nominees (Pty) Limited.
Sons (Singapore) Limited, NM Rothschild & Sons (Australia) Limited, as agent in its own capacity, and Rothschild
Nominees (Pty) Limited.
4.9
(4)
A $10m Facility Agreement, dated September 10, 1999, between DRDGOLD Limited, DRD Australasia and NM
Rothschild & Sons (Australia) Limited.
Rothschild & Sons (Australia) Limited.
4.10
(4)
Facility Agreement, dated August 9, 1996, between PT Barisan Tropical Mining, Rothschild Australia Limited and the
Participants.
Participants.
4.11
(4)
Deposit Agreement, dated September 30, 1999, between Buffels and BOE Merchant Bank, a division of BOE Bank
Limited.
Limited.
4.12
(4)
Undertaking and Security Agreement, dated November 17, 1999, between BOE Bank Limited, through its division
BOE Merchant Bank, and Buffels.
BOE Merchant Bank, and Buffels.
4.13
(4)
Guarantee and Indemnity Agreement, dated November 17, 1999, between DRDGOLD Limited, Blyvoor, Argonaut
Financial Services (Proprietary) Limited, West Wits, Crown and BOE Bank Limited, through its division BOE
Merchant Bank.
Financial Services (Proprietary) Limited, West Wits, Crown and BOE Bank Limited, through its division BOE
Merchant Bank.
4.14
(4)
Loan Security Agreement, dated November 17, 1999, between FBCF Equipment Finance (Proprietary) Limited and
Buffels.
Buffels.
4.15
(4)
Sale of Business Agreement in respect of Harties, dated August 16, 1999, between Avgold Limited, Buffels and
DRDGOLD Limited.
DRDGOLD Limited.
4.16
(4)
Form of Restraint Agreement.
4.17
(4)
Sale of Shares Agreement, dated September 29, 1997, between RMP Properties Limited, Randgold, Crown, City Deep
Limited, Consolidated Main Reef Mines and Estate Limited, Crown Mines Limited, RMP Properties SA Limited and
Industrial Zone Limited.
Limited, Consolidated Main Reef Mines and Estate Limited, Crown Mines Limited, RMP Properties SA Limited and
Industrial Zone Limited.
4.18
(5)
Form of Non-Executive Employment Agreement.
4.19
(5)
Form of Executive Employment Agreement.
4.20
(5)
Share Sale Option Agreement, dated March 12, 1993, between Newmont Proprietary Limited, Ballimore No. 56
Proprietary Limited, Clayfield Proprietary Limited and Dome Resources N.L.
Proprietary Limited, Clayfield Proprietary Limited and Dome Resources N.L.
4.21
(5)
Convertible Loan Agreement, dated November 19, 1997, between Tolukuma Gold Mines Proprietary Limited, Dome
Resources N.L. and Mineral Resources Development Company Proprietary Limited.
Resources N.L. and Mineral Resources Development Company Proprietary Limited.
4.22
(5)
First Deed of Variation of Loan Agreement, between Mineral Resources Development Company Pty Limited, Dome
Resources N.L. and Tolukuma Gold Mines Pty Limited.
Resources N.L. and Tolukuma Gold Mines Pty Limited.
4.23
(5)
Agreement, dated February 21, 2000, between DRDGOLD Limited and Western Areas Limited.
127
4.24
(5)
Independent Auditor’s Report from PricewaterhouseCoopers to the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Crown
Consolidated Gold Recoveries Limited, dated August 28, 2000.
Consolidated Gold Recoveries Limited, dated August 28, 2000.
4.25
(5)
Shareholders’ Agreement, dated September 29, 2000, between DRDGOLD Limited, Fraser Alexander Tailings
(Proprietary) Limited and Mine Waste Solutions (Proprietary) Limited.
(Proprietary) Limited and Mine Waste Solutions (Proprietary) Limited.
4.26
(5)
First Addendum to the Agreement, dated November 15, 2000, between DRDGOLD Limited and Western Areas
Limited.
Limited.
4.27
(5)
Second Addendum to the Agreement, dated December 21, 2000, between DRDGOLD Limited and Western Areas
Limited.
Limited.
4.28
(6)
Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Western Areas Limited, Consolidated African Mines Limited and JCI Gold
Limited, dated April 25, 2001.
Limited, dated April 25, 2001.
4.29
(6)
Addendum to the Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Western Areas Limited, Consolidated African Mines
Limited and JCI Gold Limited, dated August 31, 2001.
Limited and JCI Gold Limited, dated August 31, 2001.
4.30
(6)
Addendum to the Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Western Areas Limited, Consolidated African Mines
Limited and JCI Gold Limited, dated September 26, 2001.
Limited and JCI Gold Limited, dated September 26, 2001.
4.31
(6)
Guarantee and Cession in Securitatem Debiti Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited,
dated October 9, 2001.
dated October 9, 2001.
4.32
(6)
Second Deed of Variation of Loan Agreement between Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited, Dome Resources NL and
Mineral Resources Development Company Limited, dated June 28, 2001.
Mineral Resources Development Company Limited, dated June 28, 2001.
4.33
(6)
Principal Terms and Conditions for Waiving Right to Declare Default and Enforce Security Deed under 1993 Purchase
Agreement between Newmont Second Capital Corporation, Tolukuma Gold Mines (Pty.) Limited, Dome Resources
(PNG) Pty. Limited, Dome Resources NL and DRDGOLD Limited, dated July 16, 2001.
Agreement between Newmont Second Capital Corporation, Tolukuma Gold Mines (Pty.) Limited, Dome Resources
(PNG) Pty. Limited, Dome Resources NL and DRDGOLD Limited, dated July 16, 2001.
4.34
(6)
Loan Agreement between Bank of South Pacific Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited, dated November 8,
2001.
2001.
4.35
(7)
Master Finance Lease between Volvo Truck Finance Australia (Pty) Ltd and Dome Resources N.L., dated
November 1, 2000.
November 1, 2000.
4.36
(7)
Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Rand Refinery Ltd, dated October 12, 2001.
4.37
(7)
Share Purchase Agreement between Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, The Industrial Development
Corporation of South Africa Ltd, Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd and DRDGOLD Limited, dated June 12, 2002.
Corporation of South Africa Ltd, Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd and DRDGOLD Limited, dated June 12, 2002.
4.38
(7)
Shareholder’s Agreement between The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited, Khumo Bathong
Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd and DRDGOLD
Limited, dated June 12, 2002.
Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd and DRDGOLD
Limited, dated June 12, 2002.
4.39
(7)
Addendum to Shareholder’s Agreement between The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited,
Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd and
DRDGOLD Limited, dated June 14, 2002.
Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd and
DRDGOLD Limited, dated June 14, 2002.
4.40
(7)
Subscription Agreement between Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Limited and DRDGOLD Limited, dated
June 12, 2002.
June 12, 2002.
4.41
(7)
Loan Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd, dated June 12, 2002.
4.42
(7)
Memorandum of Loan Agreement No. 1 between Durban Roodepoort Deep and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd,
dated June 12, 2002.
dated June 12, 2002.
4.43
(7)
Memorandum of Loan Agreement No. 2 between DRDGOLD Limited and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, dated
June 12, 2002.
June 12, 2002.
4.44
(7)
Memorandum of Loan Agreement No. 3 between Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd and Crown Gold
Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, dated June 12, 2002.
Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, dated June 12, 2002.
4.45
(7)
Loan Agreement between Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Ltd and Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining
Company Ltd, dated July 18, 2002.
Company Ltd, dated July 18, 2002.
4.46
(7)
Agreement of Loan and Pledge between DRDGOLD Limited and East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, dated
September 12, 2002.
September 12, 2002.
4.47
(7)
Management Services Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Crown Gold
Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, dated October 1, 2002.
Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, dated October 1, 2002.
4.48
(7)
Agreement amongst DRDGOLD Limited, West Witwatersrand Gold Mines Limited and Bophelo Trading (Pty) Ltd,
dated June 12, 2002.
dated June 12, 2002.
4.49
(7)
Letter Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and The Standard Bank of South Africa, represented by its Standard
Corporate and Merchant Bank Division, dated October 7, 2002.
Corporate and Merchant Bank Division, dated October 7, 2002.
4.50
(7)
Memorandum of Agreement between Daun Et Cie A.G., Courthiel Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Khumo Bathong Holdings
(Pty) Ltd, Claas Edmond Daun, Paul Cornelis Thomas Schouten, Moltin Paseka Ncholo, Michelle Patience Baird,
Derek Sean Webbstock, as sellers, and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, as purchaser, dated October 10, 2002.
(Pty) Ltd, Claas Edmond Daun, Paul Cornelis Thomas Schouten, Moltin Paseka Ncholo, Michelle Patience Baird,
Derek Sean Webbstock, as sellers, and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, as purchaser, dated October 10, 2002.
4.51
(7)
Memorandum of Loan Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd, dated
October 10, 2002.
October 10, 2002.
4.52
(7)
Letter Agreement Relating to Consultancy Arrangement between DRDGOLD Limited and Nicolas Goodwin, dated
October 15, 2002.
October 15, 2002.
4.53
(7)
Management Services Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and East Rand Proprietary Mines Ltd, dated October
10, 2002.
10, 2002.
4.54
(7)
Agreement for sale of shares in Emperor Mines Limited, between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Kola Ventures
Limited, dated December 13, 2002.
Limited, dated December 13, 2002.
128
4.55
(8)
Confirmation, dated August 14, 2003, between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited.
4.56
(8)
Amendment to Confirmation, dated September 4, 2003, between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank (Mauritius)
Limited.
Limited.
4.57
(9)
Deed of Amalgamation for the Corporate Restructuring of Orogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited, Mineral Resources
Porgera Limited and Dome Resources (PNG) Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
Porgera Limited and Dome Resources (PNG) Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
4.58
(9)
Undertaking, between Oil Search Limited and DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
4.59
(9)
Loan Assignment Agreement between Orogen Minerals Limited, DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Orogen Minerals
(Porgera) Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
(Porgera) Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
4.60
(9)
Agreement between Orogen Minerals Limited and DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, dated October 14, 2003.
4.61
(9)
Loan Assignment Agreement, between Dome Resources (PNG) Limited, Dome Resources Pty Limited, DRD (Isle of
Man) Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited, dated November 21, 2003.
Man) Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited, dated November 21, 2003.
4.62
(9)
Memorandum of Agreement made and entered into between DRDGOLD Limited, West Witwatersrand Gold Mines
Limited, Mogale Gold (Proprietary) Limited and Luipaards Vlei Estates (Proprietary) Limited dated June 6, 2003.
Limited, Mogale Gold (Proprietary) Limited and Luipaards Vlei Estates (Proprietary) Limited dated June 6, 2003.
4.63
(10)
Porgera Joint Venture Operating Agreement between Placer (P.N.G.) Pty Limited and Highlands Gold Properties Pty.
Limited and PGC (Papua New Guinea) Pty Limited, dated November 2, 1988.
Limited and PGC (Papua New Guinea) Pty Limited, dated November 2, 1988.
4.64
(10)
Agreement of Employment between DRDGOLD Limited and Mr. D.J.M. Blackmur, dated as of October 21, 2003.
4.65
(10)
Banking Facilities Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Standard Bank of South Africa,
Limited, dated November 14, 2003.
Limited, dated November 14, 2003.
4.66
(10)
Agreement of Employment between DRDGOLD Limited and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood, dated as of December 1,
2003.
2003.
4.67
(10)
Service Agreement between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Mr. M.M. Wellesley-Wood, dated as of December 1,
2003.
2003.
4.68
(10)
Agreement of Employment between DRDGOLD Limited and Mr. I.L. Murray, dated as of December 1, 2003.
4.69
(10)
Service Agreement between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Mr. I.L. Murray, dated as of December 1, 2003.
4.70
(10)
Subscription and Option Agreement made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited, Net-Gold Services
Limited and G.M. Network Limited, dated January 26, 2004.
Limited and G.M. Network Limited, dated January 26, 2004.
4.71
(10)
Forward Bullion Transaction Agreements made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited,
dated February 4, 2004, February 6, 2004, February 10, 2004, February 11, 2004 and February 12, 2004.
dated February 4, 2004, February 6, 2004, February 10, 2004, February 11, 2004 and February 12, 2004.
4.72
(10)
Loan Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
4.73
(10)
Termination Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited, Eskom Holdings Limited and Investec Bank
Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
4.74
(10)
Novation Agreement made and entered between J Aron & Company, Eskom Holdings Limited and Investec Bank
Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
Limited, dated June 24, 2004.
4.75
(10)
Memorandum of Understanding made and entered between Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited, Buffelsfontein
Division and The National Union of Mineworkers, The United Association of South Africa, The Mine Workers
Union (Solidarity) and The South African Electrical Workers Association regarding retrenchments associated with
No. 9, 10 and 12 Shafts of Buffelsfontein Division, dated August 6, 2004.
Division and The National Union of Mineworkers, The United Association of South Africa, The Mine Workers
Union (Solidarity) and The South African Electrical Workers Association regarding retrenchments associated with
No. 9, 10 and 12 Shafts of Buffelsfontein Division, dated August 6, 2004.
4.76
(10)
CCMA Settlement Agreement made and entered between Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited and The
United Association of South Africa, South African Equity Workers’ Association, Solidarity and The National
Union of Mineworkers regarding the retrenchment of up to 2,000 employees of the Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining
Company, dated September 2, 2004.
United Association of South Africa, South African Equity Workers’ Association, Solidarity and The National
Union of Mineworkers regarding the retrenchment of up to 2,000 employees of the Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining
Company, dated September 2, 2004.
4.77
(10)
Loan Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited, dated September 15,
2004.
2004.
4.78
(10)
Subscription Agreement made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and DRDGOLD Limited, dated
September 21, 2004.
September 21, 2004.
4.79
(10)
Common Terms Agreement of Loan made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Investec Bank
(Mauritius) Limited, dated October 14, 2004.
(Mauritius) Limited, dated October 14, 2004.
4.80
(10)
Facility A Loan Agreement made and entered between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Investec Bank (Mauritius)
Limited, dated October 14, 2004.
Limited, dated October 14, 2004.
4.81
(11)
Loan Agreement made and entered between DRDGOLD Limited and Investec Bank Limited, dated December 10,
2004.
2004.
4.82
(11)
Subscription Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Baker Steel Capital Managers LLP (BSCM), dated April 7,
2005.
2005.
4.83
(11)
Underwriting Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, the Baker Steel Capital Managers LLP (BSCM) and certain
underwriters, dated April 5, 2005.
underwriters, dated April 5, 2005.
4.84
(11)
Memorandum of Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Simmer & Jack Mines Limited and Simmer & Jack
Investments (Proprietary) Limited (S&J Companies), dated August 31, 2005.
Investments (Proprietary) Limited (S&J Companies), dated August 31, 2005.
4.85
(11)
Cession Agreement entered into among The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited (IDC),
DRDGOLD Limited, Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd and Business Ventures Investment No. 751
(Pty) Ltd (the BVI Companies), dated July 13, 2005.
DRDGOLD Limited, Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd and Business Ventures Investment No. 751
(Pty) Ltd (the BVI Companies), dated July 13, 2005.
4.86
(11)
Share Sale Agreement entered into among The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited (IDC),
DRDGOLD Limited, Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 1) and Business Ventures Investment No.
751 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 2), dated July 13, 2005.
DRDGOLD Limited, Business Ventures Investment No. 750 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 1) and Business Ventures Investment No.
751 (Pty) Ltd (BVI 2), dated July 13, 2005.
129
4.87
(11)
Term Sheet concluded between DRDGOLD Limited and Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd (KBH), dated
July 6, 2005.
July 6, 2005.
4.88
(11)
Facility B Loan Agreement between Investec Bank (Mauritius) Limited and DRD (Isle of Man)
Limited (DRDIOM), dated March 3, 2005.
Limited (DRDIOM), dated March 3, 2005.
4.89
(11)
Convertible Loan Facility Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Emperor Mines Limited (Emperor), dated
July 8, 2005.
July 8, 2005.
4.90
(11)
Agreement of Employment between DRDGOLD Limited and Mr. J.W.C. Sayers, dated as of August 10, 2005.
4.91
(11)
Option Agreement entered into by and between DRDGOLD Limited and M5 Developments (Pty) Limited, dated July
21, 2005.
21, 2005.
4.92
(11)
Share Sale Agreement between DRD (Offshore) Limited, DRDGOLD Limited and Emperor Mines Limited, dated
November 16, 2005.
November 16, 2005.
4.93
(12)
Deed of Loan, Cession, Payment and Set-Off entered into between DRDGOLD Limited, East Rand Proprietary
Mines Limited, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited and Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, dated
November 7, 2005.
Mines Limited, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited and Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, dated
November 7, 2005.
4.94
(12)
Share Sale Agreement between Business Venture Investments 750 (Pty) Ltd and DRDGOLD South African
Operations (Pty) Limited, dated November 8, 2005.
Share Sale Agreement between Business Venture Investments 751 (Pty) Limited and DRGOLD South African
Operations (Pty) Limited, dated November 8, 2005.
Operations (Pty) Limited, dated November 8, 2005.
Share Sale Agreement between Business Venture Investments 751 (Pty) Limited and DRGOLD South African
Operations (Pty) Limited, dated November 8, 2005.
4.95
(12)
Subscription Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited,
dated November 9, 2005.
dated November 9, 2005.
4.96
(12)
Share Sale Agreement between Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Limited and DRDGOLD South African
Operations (Pty) Limited, dated November 14, 2005.
Operations (Pty) Limited, dated November 14, 2005.
4.97
(12)
Subscription Agreement between DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited and Khumo Gold SPV (Pty)
Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
4.98
(12)
Subscription Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited, dated
November 18, 2005.
November 18, 2005.
4.99
(12)
Cession Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and Khumo Bathong
Holdings (Pty) Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
Holdings (Pty) Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
4.100
(12)
Cession Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and The Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa
Limited and Business Venture Investments No. 750 (Pty) Limited and Business Venture Investments No. 751 (Pty)
Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
Limited and Business Venture Investments No. 750 (Pty) Limited and Business Venture Investments No. 751 (Pty)
Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
4.101
(12)
Option Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and DRDGOLD South
African Operations (Pty) Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
African Operations (Pty) Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
4.102
(12)
Offer of Class A Preference Share between Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and East Rand Proprietary Mines
Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
4.103
(12)
Offer of Class A Preference Share between Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining
Company Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
Company Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
4.104
(12)
Offer of Class A Preference Share between Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty)
Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
Limited, dated November 18, 2005.
4.105
(12)
Shareholders’ Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and DRDGOLD
South African Operations (Pty) Limited, dated November 24, 2005.
South African Operations (Pty) Limited, dated November 24, 2005.
4.106
(12)
Sale and Subscription Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and DRD (Offshore) Limited, dated
January 4, 2006.
January 4, 2006.
4.107
(12)
Share Sale Agreement between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and DRD (Offshore) Limited, dated February 22, 2006.
4.108
(12)
Restructure Deed between DRD (Offshore) Limited and DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and Emperor Mines Limited
and Emperor Gold Mining Company Limited and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited, dated
February 24, 2006.
and Emperor Gold Mining Company Limited and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited, dated
February 24, 2006.
4.109
(12)
Facility Agreement between DRD (Porgera) Limited and Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited and Australia and New
Zealand Banking Group Limited, dated March 20, 2006.
Zealand Banking Group Limited, dated March 20, 2006.
4.110
(12)
Settlement of Loans Agreement between DRD (Isle of Man) Limited and DRD (Offshore) Limited, dated March
23, 2006.
23, 2006.
4.111
(14)
Option Exercise Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited, Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and the Trustees for the
time being of the DRDSA Empowerment Trust dated October 10, 2006.
time being of the DRDSA Empowerment Trust dated October 10, 2006.
4.112
(14)
Class B Preference Share Subscription Agreement between DRDGOLD Limited and Khumo Gold SPV (Pty)
Limited dated October 24, 2006.
Limited dated October 24, 2006.
4.113
(14)
Three Class B Preference Share Subscription Agreements between Khumo Gold SPV (Pty) Limited and
Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited and East Rand Proprietary
Mines Limited, dated October 24, 2006.
Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited and East Rand Proprietary
Mines Limited, dated October 24, 2006.
4.114
(14)
Three Class C Preference Share Subscription Agreements between the Trustees for the time being of the DRDSA
Empowerment Trust and Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited
and East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, dated October 24, 2006.
Empowerment Trust and Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited, Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited
and East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited, dated October 24, 2006.
4.115
(14)
Share Sale Agreement between Emperor Mines Limited and Westech Gold (Pty) Limited, dated March 22, 2007,`
regarding the disposal of its Fijian assets.
regarding the disposal of its Fijian assets.
130
4.116
(14)
Joint Venture Interest Sale Deed – Procurement Deed between Barrick Gold Corporation, or Barrick, and Emperor
Mines Limited, dated April 12, 2007.
Mines Limited, dated April 12, 2007.
4.117
(14)
Subscription Agreement between Emperor Mines Limited and Barrick Gold Corporation, dated April 12, 2007.
4.118
(14)
Joint Venture Interest Sale Deed between Barrick Gold Corporation, Barrick (Niugini) Limited, Emperor Mines
Limited and DRD (Porgera) Limited dated July 19, 2007.
Limited and DRD (Porgera) Limited dated July 19, 2007.
4.119
(14)
Deed of Assignment and Assumption between Barrick (Niugini) Limited (“Buyer”), DRD (Porgera) Limited
(“Seller”), Barrick (Goldfields PNG Holdings) Limited (“Goldfields”) and Minerals Resources Enga Limited
(“MRE”) (collectively “the parties”) dated July 19, 2007.
(“Seller”), Barrick (Goldfields PNG Holdings) Limited (“Goldfields”) and Minerals Resources Enga Limited
(“MRE”) (collectively “the parties”) dated July 19, 2007.
4.120
(14)
Memorandum of Agreement between Anglo Gold Ashanti Limited, Friedshelf 849 (Proprietary) Limited (renamed
Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited), DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited and Mintails SA (Pty) Limited,
dated August 6, 2007.
Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited), DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty) Limited and Mintails SA (Pty) Limited,
dated August 6, 2007.
4.121
(14)
Merger Implementation Deed between Emperor Mines Limited and Intrepid Mines Limited, dated
September 18, 2007.
September 18, 2007.
4.122
(14)
Mandate for the Placement of DRD (Offshore) Limited’s 78.72% Shareholding in Emperor Mines Limited, dated
September 28, 2007.
September 28, 2007.
4.123
(14)
Term Sheet for the joint venture agreement entered into by Acorn Gold (Proprietary) Limited, DRDGOLD Limited,
Durban Roodepoort Deep (Proprietary) Limited, Friedshelf 850 (Proprietary) Limited, Geotorm Investments
Limited, Kgosi Resource Management (Proprietary) Limited, Minerals and Mining Reclamation Services
(Proprietary) Limited, Mintails SA (Proprietary) Limited, West Witwatersrand Gold Mines Limited, West
Witwatersrand Holdings Limited, West Wits Mining Limited, West Wits Mining SA (Proprietary) Limited, dated
November 9, 2007.
Durban Roodepoort Deep (Proprietary) Limited, Friedshelf 850 (Proprietary) Limited, Geotorm Investments
Limited, Kgosi Resource Management (Proprietary) Limited, Minerals and Mining Reclamation Services
(Proprietary) Limited, Mintails SA (Proprietary) Limited, West Witwatersrand Gold Mines Limited, West
Witwatersrand Holdings Limited, West Wits Mining Limited, West Wits Mining SA (Proprietary) Limited, dated
November 9, 2007.
4.124
(15)
Third Addendum to Memorandum of Agreement between AngloGold Ashanti Limited (“AGA”), Ergo Mining
(Pty) Limited (formerly called Friedshelf 849 (Pty) Limited) (“Ergo”), DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty)
(“DRDGOLD SA”) Mintails South Africa (Pty) Limited dated November 14, 2007.
(Pty) Limited (formerly called Friedshelf 849 (Pty) Limited) (“Ergo”), DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty)
(“DRDGOLD SA”) Mintails South Africa (Pty) Limited dated November 14, 2007.
4.125
(15)
Fifth Addendum to Memorandum of Agreement between AngloGold Ashanti Limited (“AGA”), Ergo Mining (Pty)
Limited (formerly called Friedshelf 849 (Pty) Limited (“Ergo”), DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty)
(“DRDGOLD SA”) Mintails South Africa (Pty) Limited dated May 22, 2008.
Limited (formerly called Friedshelf 849 (Pty) Limited (“Ergo”), DRDGOLD South African Operations (Pty)
(“DRDGOLD SA”) Mintails South Africa (Pty) Limited dated May 22, 2008.
4.126
(15)
Mining User Contract between Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited (“Crown”), East Rand Proprietary Mines
Limited (“ERPM”), Elsburg Gold Mining Joint Venture (“Elsburg JV”), Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited (“Ergo”), Ergo
Uranium (Pty) Limited (“Ergo Uranium”) and Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited (“Mogale Gold”) dated August 15, 2008
Limited (“ERPM”), Elsburg Gold Mining Joint Venture (“Elsburg JV”), Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited (“Ergo”), Ergo
Uranium (Pty) Limited (“Ergo Uranium”) and Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited (“Mogale Gold”) dated August 15, 2008
4.127
(15)
Ergo Uranium Sale Agreement of Brakpan Plants to Ergo Mining between Ergo Uranium (Pty) Limited (“Ergo
Uranium”) and Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited (“Ergo”) dated August 15, 2008.
Uranium”) and Ergo Mining (Pty) Limited (“Ergo”) dated August 15, 2008.
4.128
(15)
Ergo Mining Shareholders’ Agreement between Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited (“Crown”) and Ergo
Uranium (Pty) Limited (“Ergo Uranium”) dated August 15, 2008.
Uranium (Pty) Limited (“Ergo Uranium”) dated August 15, 2008.
4.129
(15)
Elsburg Gold Mining Joint Venture (“Elsburg JV”) Agreement between East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited
(“ERPM”) and Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited (“Mogale Gold”) dated August 15, 2008.
(“ERPM”) and Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited (“Mogale Gold”) dated August 15, 2008.
4.130
(15)
Mogale Sale of Part Venture Interest in the Elsburg Gold Mining Joint Venture (“Elsburg JV”) between East Rand
Proprietary Mines Limited (“ERPM”) and Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited (“Mogale Gold”) dated September 29, 2008.
Proprietary Mines Limited (“ERPM”) and Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited (“Mogale Gold”) dated September 29, 2008.
4.131
(16)
Heads of Agreement entered into by Mintails Limited, Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited (“Mogale Gold”), Ergo Mining
(Pty) Limited (“Ergo Joint Venture”), DRDGOLD Limited (“DRDGOLD”) and East Rand Proprietary Mines
Limited (“ERPM”), dated December 8, 2008.
(Pty) Limited (“Ergo Joint Venture”), DRDGOLD Limited (“DRDGOLD”) and East Rand Proprietary Mines
Limited (“ERPM”), dated December 8, 2008.
4.132
(16)
Loan Facility entered into by Mintails South Africa (Pty) Limited (“Borrower”), DRDGOLD Limited (“Lender”),
Mintails Limited (“Borrower’s Guarantor”), Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited (Mogale Gold”) Ergo Uranium (Pty)
Limited (“Ergo Uranium”) dated December 8, 2008.
Mintails Limited (“Borrower’s Guarantor”), Mogale Gold (Pty) Limited (Mogale Gold”) Ergo Uranium (Pty)
Limited (“Ergo Uranium”) dated December 8, 2008.
4.133
(16)
Subscription and shareholders’ Agreement entered into by Mintails SA (Proprietary) Limited (“Mintails SA”),
Witfontein Mining (Proprietary) Limited (“Witfontein”) and Argonaut Financial Services (Proprietary) Limited
(“Argonaut”) dated December 9, 2008.
Witfontein Mining (Proprietary) Limited (“Witfontein”) and Argonaut Financial Services (Proprietary) Limited
(“Argonaut”) dated December 9, 2008.
4.134
(16)
Facility Agreement between Investec Bank limited (“the Lender”) and DRDGOLD Limited (“the Borrower”) dated
March 31, 2009.
March 31, 2009.
8.1
(16)
ListofSubsidiaries.
12.1
(16)
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
12.2
(16)
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
13.1
(16)
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
13.2
(16)
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
15.1
(10)
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
15.2
(11)
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and
2003.
2003.
15.3
(13)
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Limited Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended
December 1, 2005 and the years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
December 1, 2005 and the years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
15.4
(13)
Emperor Mines Limited Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended April 6, 2006 and the years
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
16.1
(11)
Emperor Mines Limited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
___________
(1)
Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement (File No. 0-28800) on Form 20-F.
131
(2)
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997.
(3)
Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement (File No. 333-9242) on Form F-6.
(4)
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999.
(5)
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000.
(6)
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001.
(7)
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.
(8)
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 4 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.
(9)
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003.
(10)
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004.
(11)
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005.
(12)
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006.
(13)
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006.
(14)
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
(15)
Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
(16)
Filed herewith.
132
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and
authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
DRDGOLD LIMITED
By: /s/
D.J.
Pretorius
D.J. Pretorius
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/
C.C.
Barnes
C.C. Barnes
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 27, 2009