SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE | ||
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 | ||
Commission File Number: 0-28860 |
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Net Communications Services Inc. | The Federative Republic of Brazil |
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English) | (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
Rua Verbo Divino, 1356
São Paulo-SP-04719-002
Brazil
(Telephone: +55-11-2111-2785)
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered |
American Depositary Shares, evidenced by American Depositary | |
Receipts, each representing ten preferred shares, no par value | Nasdaq National Market |
Preferred shares, no par value | Nasdaq National Market* |
*Not for trading but only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares.
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:110,675,783 | Common Shares, as of December 31, 2006 | |
181,564,205 | Preferred Shares, as of December 31, 2006 |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Act.
Indicate by check mark which financial statements item the registrant has elected to follow:
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Table of Contents
i
ii
iii
Certain References and Information
In this Form 20-F, references to “Net Serviços,” “we,” “us” and “our” are to Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. and, unless the context requires otherwise, include the consolidated subsidiaries of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. References to our “ADSs” are to our American Depositary Shares, each of which represents one of our preferred shares.
All references in this Form 20-F to “U.S. dollars,” “$” or “US$” are to United States dollars, and all references to “reais,” “real” or “R$” are to Brazilian reais. The accounts of Net Serviços, which are maintained in reais, were adjusted to conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or US GAAP, and translated into U.S. dollars on the basis set forth in note 2 to our consolidated financial statements as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006. Unless otherwise specified, certain amounts stated in this Form 20-F in U.S. dollars (other than as set forth in our consolidated financial statements and financial information derived therefrom) have been translated, for the convenience of the reader, from reais at the rate in effect on December 31, 2006 of R$2.1380 per US$1.00. These translations should not be construed as a representation that reais could have been converted into U.S. dollars at that rate on that date or on any other date. On February 28, 2007, the rate of exchange was R$2.1182 per US$1.00. See “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rate Information.”
Unless otherwise specified and other than with respect to historical financial statement information, we present all operating statistics and subscriber information concerning Net Serviços as of December 31, 2006.
Forward-Looking StatementsThis Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that are intended to enhance your ability to assess our future financial performance. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that represent our beliefs concerning future operations, strategies, financial results and other developments, and contain words such as “may,” “might,” “should,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan” and similar expressions. Because these forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions that are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control or are subject to change, our actual results could be materially different from the beliefs we express in our forward-looking statements.
The following factors, among others, may have such an impact: competition from other cable operating systems and other service providers; failure to keep pace with developments in technology; high churn rates; increases in programming costs; substantial additional expenses on our network; piracy; inability to renew licenses; interference with our ability to provide our services; government regulations and changes therein; factors pertaining to the Internet access portion of our business; legal proceedings; substantial, additional taxes on our network; interests of our current major shareholders that may differ from yours; dependence on key members of senior management; acquisition of control of Vivax S.A., or Vivax, subject to approval by the Brazilian National Telecommunications Agency (Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações), or Anatel; difficulties in integrating companies we acquire; economic and political instability due to allegations of political corruption; a downturn or increased volatility in the Brazilian economy or depreciation of the real; Brazilian political and economic conditions and interventions by the Brazilian government; inflation; developments in, and the perception of risk in, emerging market economies; restrictions on the movement of capital out of Brazil; fewer and less well defined
1
shareholders’ rights than comparable securities of an U.S. issuer related to our ADSs; difficulties in proceedings with respect to your interests as a shareholder; risk of losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and unfavorable tax treatment if you exchange your ADSs for preferred shares; potential inability to exercise preemptive rights with respect to preferred shares; difficulty in exercising certain rights related to our ADSs; no dividend entitlement; holdings of preferred shares and ADSs subject to dilution; greater volatility and less liquidity in Brazilian securities and debts compared to U.S. securities markets; limited liquidity of the trading market for ADSs in the U.S.
Developments in any of these areas, which are more fully described elsewhere in this Form 20-F and which descriptions are incorporated into this section by reference, could cause our results to differ materially from results that have been or may be projected by us or on our behalf.
We caution that the foregoing list of factors is not exclusive. We urge you not to unduly rely on forward-looking statements contained in this Form 20-F.
Exchange Rate InformationThe information set forth below with respect to exchange rates is based on the official exchange rate of the Central Bank of Brazil, or the Central Bank. These rates are provided solely for your convenience and are not the exchange rates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 20-F.
The following table shows the commercial selling rate in reais per U.S. dollar for the periods and dates indicated:
Exchange Rate of Brazilian Currency per U.S. Dollar
Low | High | Average(1) | Period-end | |||||
(Reais per US$1.00) | ||||||||
Year | ||||||||
2002 | 2.2709 | 3.9552 | 2.9983 | 3.5333 | ||||
2003 | 2.8219 | 3.6623 | 3.0599 | 2.8892 | ||||
2004 | 2.6544 | 3.2051 | 2.9171 | 2.6544 | ||||
2005 | 2.2070 | 2.6662 | 2.4125 | 2.3407 | ||||
2006 | 2.0586 | 2.3711 | 2.1679 | 2.1380 | ||||
2007 (through February 28) | 2.0766 | 2.1556 | 2.1215 | 2.1182 |
Low | High | |||
(Reais per US$1.00) | ||||
Month | ||||
September 2006 | 2.1282 | 2.2188 | ||
October 2006 | 2.1331 | 2.1676 | ||
November 2006 | 2.1353 | 2.1870 | ||
December 2006 | 2.1380 | 2.1693 | ||
January 2007 | 2.1247 | 2.1556 | ||
February 2007 | 2.0766 | 2.1182 |
____________________________
Source: Central Bank
(1) Calculated by using the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the relevant period.
2
On December 31, 2006, the commercial selling rate was R$2.1380 per U.S. dollar. On February 28, 2007, the commercial selling rate was R$2.1182 per U.S. dollar.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the real and the U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar equivalent of the real-denominated prices of our shares and, as a result, will affect the market prices of our ADSs in the United States.
3
Part I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS.
Not applicable.ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE.
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION.
Selected Financial DataThe selected consolidated statement of income data for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 set forth below are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 20-F. Statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are derived from our previously published audited consolidated financial statements, which are not included in this Form 20-F. All of our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 20-F.
We maintain our financial records in Brazilian reais. However, our audited consolidated financial statements and the selected financial data set forth below are presented in U.S. dollars, our reporting currency. In order to prepare our consolidated financial statements, we translated our accounts from reais to U.S. dollars, on the basis described in note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. In comparing amounts in U.S. dollars in different periods, you should consider the historical fluctuations in the Brazilian rate of inflation and in the rate of exchange between the real and the U.S. dollar. See note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |||||||||||
(US$ in thousands, except per share and share amounts) | |||||||||||||||
Total Revenues (1): | US$ | 469,754 | US$ | 484,287 | US$ | 574,329 | US$ | 815,941 | US$ | 1,144,671 | |||||
Taxes and other deductions from revenues(2) | (82,597) | (91,972) | (107,125) | (155,276) | (243,768) | ||||||||||
Net operating revenues | 387,157 | 392,315 | 467,204 | 660,665 | 900,903 | ||||||||||
Operating cost and expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Programming and other direct operating costs | (225,585) | (214,240) | (234,370) | (329,705) | (435,981) | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (69,517) | (77,163) | (109,761) | (148,264) | (227,878) | ||||||||||
Depreciation and | |||||||||||||||
amortization | (74,170) | (63,727) | (56,736) | (68,160) | (74,985) | ||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill | (2,773) | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||
Other | (22,159) | (2,364) | 4,430 | 2,990 | 10,611 | ||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | (394,204) | (357,494) | (396,437) | (543,139) | (728,233) | ||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | (7,047) | 34,821 | 70,767 | 117,526 | 172,670 |
4
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |||||||||||
(US$ in thousands, except per share and share amounts) | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): | |||||||||||||||
Monetary indexation expense, net; Gain (loss) | |||||||||||||||
on exchange rate, net | (158,661) | 35,889 | 25,650 | 29,869 | 9,051 | ||||||||||
Interest expense; Financial expense, net; | |||||||||||||||
Interest income | (150,632) | (108,239) | (143,482) | (51,035) | (17,815) | ||||||||||
Other income (expenses) | (5,912) | (3,240) | 1,055 | 2,081 | (37) | ||||||||||
Total other income | |||||||||||||||
(expenses), net | (315,205) | (75,590) | (116,777) | _(19,085) | _8,801 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | |||||||||||||||
before income taxes (expenses) | (322,252) | (40,769) | (46,010) | 98,441 | 163,869 | ||||||||||
Income taxes (expenses) | (1,106) | (5,089) | (41,948) | (42,027) | 40,812 | ||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change(3) | (367,733) | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||
Total discontinued operations(4) | (9,914) | 455 | (7,860) | – | – | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | US$ | (701,005) | US$ (45,403) | US$ | (95,818) | US$ 56,414 | 204,681 | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share, basic and | |||||||||||||||
diluted | |||||||||||||||
- Continuing operations | US$ | (12.37) | US$ | (0.64) | US$ | (1.24) | US$ | 0.22 | US$ | 0.72 | |||||
- Discontinued operations | - | - | US$ | (0.11) | - | - | |||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per common share, basic | |||||||||||||||
and diluted | US$ | (12.37) | US$ | (0.64) | US$ | (1.35) | US$ | 0.22 | US$ | 0.72 | |||||
Net earnings per preferred share, basic and | |||||||||||||||
diluted | US$ | - | US$ | - | US$ | - | US$ | 0.25 | US$ | 0.79 | |||||
Weighted average number of common shares | |||||||||||||||
outstanding (5) (6) | 22,698,298 | 71,142,536 | 71,142,536 | 97,962,719 | 108,768,946 | ||||||||||
Weighted average number of preferred shares | |||||||||||||||
outstanding (5) (6) | 30,890,589 | 102,808,812 | 102,808,812 | 139,473,358 | 159,536,115 | ||||||||||
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA: | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities | 107,715 | 52,125 | 25,627 | 26,827 | 189,456 | ||||||||||
Cash flows used in investing activities | (35,199) | (19,440) | (23,269) | (73,417) | (223,700) | ||||||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing | |||||||||||||||
activities | (70,503) | (39) | (193) | 4,486 | 19,543 |
As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |||||||||||
(US$ in thousands, except operating data) | |||||||||||||||
BALANCE SHEET DATA | |||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Current assets | US$ | 52,550 | US$ | 115,151 | US$ | 228,672 | US$ | 306,846 | US$ | 401,485 | |||||
Property and equipment, net | 349,914 | 373,528 | 367,367 | 420,323 | 610,552 | ||||||||||
Investments in affiliated companies | 857 | 2,403 | 1,973 | 2,697 | 54,786 | ||||||||||
Goodwill on acquisition of | |||||||||||||||
consolidated subsidiaries, net | 221,687 | 268,639 | 270,821 | 268,374 | 473,769 | ||||||||||
Other assets(7) | 19,459 | 41,970 | 119,167 | 191,875 | 270,433 | ||||||||||
Total assets | US$ | 644,467 | US$ | 801,691 | US$ | 988,000 | US$ | 1,190,115 | US$ | 1,811,025 | |||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Current liabilities(8) | US$ | 477,954 | US$ | 582,222 | US$ | 439,369 | US$ | 221,487 | US$ | 257,097 | |||||
Long-term debt, less current | |||||||||||||||
portion(8) | – | – | 330,554 | 313,108 | 421,283 | ||||||||||
Deferred sign-on and hook-up fee | |||||||||||||||
revenues | 19,980 | 23,899 | 26,029 | 20,842 | 22,987 | ||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other | |||||||||||||||
liabilities | 110,283 | 198,461 | 188,397 | 269,689 | 270,601 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities | 608,217 | 804,582 | 984,349 | 825,126 | 971,968 | ||||||||||
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit): | US$ | 36,250 | US$ | (2,891) | US$ | 3,651 | US$ | 364,989 | US$ | 839,057 | |||||
5
As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |||||||||||
(US$ in thousands, except operating data) | |||||||||||||||
OPERATING DATA: | |||||||||||||||
(at end of period, except for | |||||||||||||||
average) | |||||||||||||||
Total homes passed by cable, | |||||||||||||||
excluding optical network | 6,512,936 | 6,600,797 | 6,681,574 | 6,787,315 | 7,191,007 | ||||||||||
Total connected pay-television | |||||||||||||||
subscribers | 1,323,267 | 1,352,474 | 1,418,870 | 1,540,227 | 1,811,995 | ||||||||||
Cable penetration(9) | 20.3% | 20.5% | 21.2% | 22.7% | 25,2% | ||||||||||
Average monthly revenue per | |||||||||||||||
subscriber(10) | US$ | 27 | US$ | 29 | US$ | 33 | US$ | 44 | US$ | 57 |
______________________
(1) Sum of monthly subscription, sign-on and hook-up fees, pay-per-view and other revenues.
(2) Taxes and other deductions from revenues consist primarily of:
- ICMS value-added tax – In São Paulo, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul and Distrito Federal, the ICMS tax is levied at a rate of 25%. In Minas Gerais, Paraná, Goiás and Rio de Janeiro, the ICMS tax is levied at a rate of 18%, 27%, 29% and 30%, respectively. However, for pay-television subscription revenues, pay-television sign-on and hook-up fees and pay-per-view revenues in each of the Brazilian states in which we operate, the ICMS tax is levied at a rate of 10%, except Rio Grande do Sul, where the rate is 12%.
- ISS municipal tax - The ISS tax is a municipal tax on services that is levied at a maximum rate of 5.0% (some municipalities have lower rates) on certain services, such as maintenance and other technical activities.
- PIS-related federal tax - A federal tax related to the PIS is levied at a rate of 0.65% on revenues derived from pay-television, telecommunication and broadband services and at a rate of 1.65% on revenues derived from all other services.
- COFINS federal social security tax - The COFINS is a federal social security tax that is levied at a rate of 3.0% on revenues derived from pay television, telecommunication and broadband services and at a rate of 7.6% on revenues derived from all other services.
- FUST and FUNTEL taxes - The FUST and FUNTEL are taxes based on gross service revenues, excluding canceled sales and other taxes, over the amounts charged to our subscribers. The FUST and FUNTEL are levied at the rates of 1.0% and 0.5%, respectively.
(3) Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142 in 2002, we recorded this non-cash charge to reduce the carrying value of goodwill. Since this charge was recorded for the first time in 2002, reflecting a change in accounting principles, the impairment losses were recognized as non-operational.
(4) To comply with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” as a result of the sale of Vicom Ltda., or Vicom, on August 30, 2004, Vicom’s results from operations are reported as “discontinued operations.” Prior years’ results were restated to comply with SFAS No. 144.
(5) In June 2004, we adopted provision 03-6 (“Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128,Earnings per Share”), of the Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, and restated the prior period’s earnings per share to account for the effect of this provision. The EITF consensus on Issue 4 thereto states that an entity would allocate losses to
6
a nonconvertible participating security in periods of net loss if, based on the contractual losses of the security, the security had not only the right to participate in the earnings of the issuer, but also a contractual obligation to share losses of the issuing entity on a basis that was objectively determinable. The holder of a participating security would have a contractual obligation to share losses if either (a) the holder is obligated to fund the losses of the issuer or (b) the contractual principal or mandatory redemption amount of the participating security is reduced as a result of losses incurred by the issuer. Our preferred shares do not have an obligation to share losses, due to their liquidation preference and based upon the above conditions. Accordingly, the weighted average number of shares used for purposes of computing earnings per share in periods of net loss exclude the preferred shares.
(6) Reflects the 15:1 reverse split effective on August 1, 2006.
(7) Includes judicial deposits, deferred and recoverable income taxes and other assets.
(8) For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, our long-term debt was classified as “current” as a result of our failure to make any interest or principal payments on our debt. Long-term debt included in current liabilities was US$323.7 million and US$349.9 million as of December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively.
(9) Period-end connected subscribers divided by homes passed.
(10) Average monthly revenue per subscriber is calculated by dividing our subscription revenues for the period presented by the average number of connected subscribers for that period.
7
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this Form 20-F, including the discussions set forth in “Item 4. Information on the Company” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” as well as our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 20-F.
Risks Related to Our BusinessWe operate our cable systems under licenses that are non-exclusive, and the industry in which we operate is highly competitive, so that an increase in overbuild and/or competition can adversely impact our business and results of operations.
Our subsidiaries provide cable television services pursuant to the terms and conditions of licenses granted and supervised by Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações, or Anatel, the Brazilian telecommunication agency, under the applicable legislation. Anatel has the power to grant licenses to competitors in the same geographic areas in which we already operate. As a result, competing operators may build systems and provide services in areas in which we hold licenses. The existence of more than one cable system operating in the same territory is referred to as an “overbuild.” Overbuilds could adversely affect our growth, financial condition and results of operations by increasing competition or creating competition where none existed previously. We experience overbuild in six of the 44 cities in which we operate. In addition, our broadband and voice services compete with the telecommunications companies in all cities in which we operate.
We currently compete with:- cable systems in six of the 44 cities in which we operate, including systems in the cities of São Paulo, Curitiba and Florianópolis;
- direct-to-home, or DTH, services offered in Brazil by Brazilian and international media consortia and by a large telecommunication company that operates primarily in the State of São Paulo;
- Brazilian broadcast networks and their local affiliates;
- multi-channel multi-point distribution systems, or MMDS, in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro; and
- telecommunications companies in all cities in which we offer video, broadband and voice services.
We also compete with movie theaters, video rental stores and other entertainment and leisure activities generally.
We cannot assure you that demand for our new services, such as digital cable television, near video-on-demand and voice, will be sufficient to recover our costs of developing and marketing such services.
We may not be able to keep pace with developments in technology.
Technology in the communications industry is changing rapidly, which means it is possible that the technology in which we invest for purposes of delivering our new services could be
8
rendered obsolete by the advent of superior and/or cheaper technology. It is also likely that many of the services we will offer in the future will also be offered by our competitors. Therefore, our failure to introduce these new services rapidly and efficiently to the marketplace and to sell them as effectively as our competitors could significantly harm our ability to generate sufficient revenues from such services. Technological advances could require us to expend substantial financial resources in the development or implementation of new technologies in order to prevent our services from becoming obsolete, and there is no assurance that sufficient financial resources will be available in order to fund new technology, especially in light of our debt service obligations and restrictive covenants. We are unable to assure you as to the ultimate effect on us of possible technological changes.
High rates of churn could negatively affect our revenues and profitability.
Subscriber “churn” is the total number of net disconnected subscribers (excluding temporarily blocked subscribers) for a period as a percentage of the average number of subscribers for the same period. Our ability to generate pay-television subscription revenues is dependent on our ability to attract and retain subscribers, which entails significant costs such as marketing expenses and the programming fees we must pay in order to assemble attractive programming packages and keep an adequate level of customer satisfaction, which may be temporarily affected due to expected higher growth rates. In addition, we incur certain unrecoverable costs, particularly equipment installation costs, sales commissions and marketing costs, for every new subscriber we connect to our cable network. The fact that we experience a variety of significant fixed costs for each new subscriber means that high rates of subscriber churn could have a material adverse effect on our operating expenses and profitability. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Pay-Television Customer Care—Customer Service and Management of Churn.”
Increases in our programming costs would adversely affect our cash flow and operating margins.
Programming has been, and is expected to continue to be, our largest operating expense, representing 30.2% and 28.0% of our net operating revenues in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Under Brazilian currency rules, our contracts with our current subscribers allow us to increase subscription fees only once every 12 months and then only in proportion to inflation. Accordingly, these subscriber contracts, along with market constraints, limit our ability to pass along increases in programming costs to our subscribers. Any increase in programming costs that we are unable to pass on to subscribers could adversely affect our cash flows and operating margins.
Historically, the amounts charged to us under our programming agreements had been denominated in U.S. dollars. During 2003, we entered into negotiations with our programmers through Net Brasil S.A., or Net Brasil, to amend our programming agreements to provide that we are charged for programming in reais instead of in U.S. dollars, so as to reduce the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our programming costs. As of December 31, 2006, substantially all of our programmers were accepting payment as if our programming costs were denominated in reais instead of in U.S. dollars.
We have agreed with one of the programmers to guarantee a certain level of subscribers to be charged. If we do not achieve this level of subscribers, we must pay a fixed amount, which is denominated in U.S. dollars, to this programmer. In addition, we have only entered into definitive agreement, which provide that we are charged for programming in reais instead of in U.S. dollars, with programmers representing approximately 75% of our total programming costs. We remain in the process of formalizing an agreement relating to the remaining 25% of our programming costs.
9
Until this agreement is finalized, we cannot assure you that the programmer with which we have not entered into definitive agreements will continue to charge us for programming in reais instead of in U.S. dollars.
If the programmer with which we have not entered into definitive agreement was to charge us for programming in U.S. dollars instead of reais, or if we do not achieve the agreed level of subscribers with the programmer with which we have agreed to guarantee this level of subscribers, and if the real were to depreciate significantly against the U.S. dollar, our cash flows and operating margins could be materially adversely affected.
We may be subject to substantial additional expenses on our network, which would have a material adverse impact on results of operations.
The legislative branch of the municipal government of São Paulo passed a bill which would require all cable networks installed in the city of São Paulo on poles belonging to power and telephone utilities and cable companies to be moved to underground facilities within five years. The bill is still subject to approval by the mayor of São Paulo. Should the law be enacted, all cable installations would be required to be underground. Presently, 100% of our network in the city of São Paulo is installed on poles. Our network in the city of São Paulo represents approximately 36% of our total network. Should the mayor approve the bill, we would have to incur significant costs in order to comply with its terms. This would materially and negatively impact our results of operations.
Piracy could negatively affect our revenues.“Piracy” refers to a household purposely receiving a provider’s services without paying for such services. Brazilian pay-television service providers experience a high rate of piracy, mainly due to Brazil’s economic environment. If we are not able to control levels of piracy under our network, our revenues could be negatively affected.
We operate our cable systems under licenses that are subject to conditional renewal.
Our cable licenses are subject to periodic renewal, which is conditioned upon, among other things, our having met certain requirements concerning our ownership, system build-out and technical, financial and legal ability to operate the system. Anatel may seek a judgment allowing it to revoke the license of a cable television licensee that, due to the lack of technical, financial or legal capacity, fails to render cable television services on a regular basis. Our cable licenses begin to expire in 2010. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain the technical and financial capacity necessary to render regular cable television services. Anatel could refuse to renew one or more of our licenses if we fail to provide such regular cable television services. If we were to lose one or more of our licenses, such loss could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We depend upon third parties to provide certain sales and customer services
We rely on third-party vendors to provide cost-effective and efficient customer services. Among other activities, these outsourced services relate to direct sales and customer relations, including call center, installation workforce and sales people. If one of our third party service providers were to discontinue services for us or were to provide poor service quality, our ability to respond to our customers timely, cost effectively, or at all, would be hindered, which could in turn harm our business.
10
Unforeseen events could interfere with our ability to provide our services.
Unforeseen events, such as a fire in our control center or a fissure in our cable network, could temporarily prevent us from sending and receiving broadcast signals. Although we have contingency plans in place, we cannot assure you that should such events occur we would be able to implement such plans in the manner or timeframe necessary to prevent interruptions in our services. Extended interruptions in service may have a negative effect on our revenues to the extent that such interruptions cause customers to cancel services or require significant capital resources to correct.
We are subject to extensive government regulations and changes in such regulations could adversely affect our operations.
Substantially all of our cable television activities are regulated by Anatel. Regulations cover all facets of the Brazilian cable industry and relate to, among other things, licensing, local access, commercial advertising and foreign investment. For example, Brazilian cable regulations:
- require that 51% of the voting rights of the cable television companies have to be held by Brazilian-born persons or persons that have held Brazilian citizenship for over 10 years, or by companies controlled by Brazilian-born persons or persons that have held Brazilian citizenship for over 10 years;
- place limits on the number of licenses that may be held by any single cable television operator and its affiliates;
- provide that cable television licenses may not be transferred without the approval of Anatel; and
- require cable television operators to carry certain channels or content.
In addition, under Brazilian currency rules, our contracts with our current subscribers allow us to increase subscription fees only once every 12 months and then only in proportion to inflation.
The Brazilian Congress, from time to time, considers revisions to one or more aspects of the regulations applicable to us. The following legislative proposals are currently under consideration:
- Proposed Constitutional Amendment No. 55, or PCA 55, would amend Article 222 of the Brazilian Constitution and would require all Internet service providers and companies “engaging in the production, programming or provision of content of electronic social communication directed to the Brazilian public, by any means” to be owned solely by (i) native-born Brazilians or those naturalized in Brazil for over 10 years or (ii) legal entities organized under Brazilian law and headquartered in Brazil in which at least 70% of the total and voting capital stock is directly or indirectly held by native-born Brazilians or those naturalized in Brazil for over 10 years. We believe that this amendment, if adopted, would not apply to us, but we cannot assure you that this would be the case. If the amendment were to be adopted and interpreted in a manner as to apply to us, we would have two years to adjust our capital structure so as to comply with the amendment’s requirements. Such amendment would have an adverse effect on us. See “Item 4. Information on the Company– Regulation.”
11
- Bill No. 4,209 proposes changes similar to PCA 55. We believe that this bill, if adopted, also would not apply to us, but we cannot assure you that this would be the case. Similarly to PCA 55, if Bill 4,209 were to be adopted and interpreted in a manner as to apply to us, we would have two years to adjust our capital structure so as to comply with the bill’s requirements. Such bill would have an adverse effect on us. See “Item 4.
Information on the Company – Regulation.”
Changes to the current Brazilian regulatory framework could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
The Internet access portion of our business is subject to a number of factors that could adversely affect its growth and performance.
Our business plan depends in part on the continued growth of our broadband Internet service, NET Virtua. Only a limited number of households currently use the Internet in Brazil. If Internet usage, and specifically broadband Internet usage, does not increase, declines or evolves away from the technologies in which we invest, our business plan could be adversely affected.
The Internet industry in Brazil faces a number of uncertainties. These include but are not limited to the following:
- a lack of access to computers;
- a lack of reliable security technologies;
- privacy concerns;
- excessive or unduly restrictive government regulation;
- network infrastructure and risk of system failure, such as viruses;
- uncertainty regarding intellectual property rights and other legal issues; and
- the failure of the Internet infrastructure, such as servers and modems, to support current levels of usage growth.
Any of these and other factors could negatively affect our ability to sell our broadband Internet service or any other Internet-based services we may introduce in the future.
We and our subsidiaries are party to several legal proceedings arising out of the regular course of our business. If we receive unfavorable outcomes in these proceedings, our cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
We and our subsidiaries are party to several legal proceedings arising out of the regular course of our business. Such legal proceedings relate predominantly to tax matters and civil and labor disputes.
We cannot assure you that we will obtain a final favorable court decision with regard to any particular proceeding. In addition, we cannot assure you that, should a final judgment be entered against us, the plaintiff body will permit, or applicable law will allow, us to pay the imposed
12
judgment over time. If we obtain unfavorable outcomes in such proceedings and/or if we are forced to pay a large judgment over a short period of time, our cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Legal Proceedings.”
We may be subject to substantial, additional taxes on our network, which would have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
We may be subject to substantial, additional taxes on our network, which would have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations. The most significant of these potential additional taxes on our network is the tax on the use of public thoroughfares (which includes the installation and passage of cables), or “shadow” tax. Since 1999, several Brazilian municipalities, which currently contain approximately 75% of our subscribers, passed legislation imposing a shadow tax. This tax is assessed per meter of cable installed in the relevant municipality and the tax rate itself varies widely by municipality. We have approximately 19,000 kilometers of installed cable in the municipalities where this tax exists.
We have not made any reserves for the payment of the shadow tax. If the courts rule that the collection of this tax by the municipalities is valid, the tax would have to be paid retroactively. In addition, if the municipalities which currently impose the tax were successful in implementing and collecting this tax, additional municipalities may seek to impose it. If we are required to pay this tax, our operating results would be materially and adversely affected. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Legal Proceedings—Judicial Tax Proceedings—Shadow tax.”
Our current major shareholders control most of our corporate transactions and their interests may differ from yours.
Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A., or Globo, Distel Holdings S.A., or Distel, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Globo, and Teléfonos de México, S.A. de C.V., or Telmex, through its subsidiary Embratel Participações S.A., or Embratel, own, directly or indirectly, approximately 99% of our common shares. We are indirectly controlled by Grupo Globo (as defined below), but Telmex has significant approval rights under the new shareholders’ agreement by and among Grupo Globo, Embratel, GB Empreendimentos e Participações S.A., or GB, a special purpose company, and Telmex. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—New Shareholders’ Agreements.”
Telmex could have significantly different interests in Net Serviços and our operations than Globo and Distel (which we refer to collectively as “Grupo Globo” in this Form 20-F), and/or may not be willing or able to provide us with the financial and other support that Globo and our other previous major shareholders have provided to us historically. Also, Grupo Globo may not be willing or able to provide us with the financial and other support that it provided to us in the past. Grupo Globo has interests in companies that currently or may in the future compete with us, including its interests, and those of the Marinho family, in Sky Brasil, a satellite pay-television provider, and in several broadcast television stations. Telmex has interests in companies that currently compete or may in the future compete with us, including its interests in Embratel, a telecommunications carrier that offers a wide range of telecommunications services over its network, including high-speed data transmission and Internet services.
Furthermore, common shares are our only shares of capital stock that hold full voting rights. In accordance with Brazilian corporate law and our by-laws, holders of the preferred shares, and thus of the ADSs, are entitled to vote at meetings of our shareholders in only limited
13
circumstances. This means, among other things, that you, as a holder of preferred shares or ADSs, are entitled to vote only on the following matters:
- our transformation, consolidation, merger or spin-off;
- valuation of assets used in increases in our capital;
- approval of certain specified agreements between us and our controlling shareholders or their affiliates;
- selection of a specialized firm skilled in determining our fair market value, in relation to a public offering of our shares; and
- a change or repeal of provisions of our by-laws that alter or modify anyBolsa de Valores de São Paulo, or Bovespa (the Brazilian stock exchange), requirements.
Accordingly, the interests of our major shareholders Grupo Globo and Telmex may conflict with the interests of holders of our preferred shares, and Grupo Globo and/or Telmex may cause us to act in a manner divergent with the interests of such holders.
We depend on key members of our senior management. Any difficulty in hiring new managers could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.
Our business is managed by a small number of key senior managers. The loss of any of these individuals could materially affect our business. In addition, our success depends on our ability to continue to attract and recruit qualified scientific, technical, managerial and administrative personnel. Competition for qualified personnel in Brazil is strong, and there are generally a limited number of professionals with the requisite experience in the sectors in which we operate. We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain such managers, nor can we assure you that we will be able to find new qualified senior managers, should the need arise. A failure to either retain or to hire new qualified senior managers could adversely affect our business.
Risks Relating to Our Acquisition of VivaxOur acquisition of control of Vivax is subject to approval by Anatel.
The second step of our acquisition of Vivax, the acquisition of the controlling interest, is subject to the prior regulatory approval of Anatel. We cannot assure you that Anatel will approve our acquisition of control of Vivax. If Anatel fails to approve the acquisition, we will own a minority interest in Vivax (approximately 36.7%) and therefore will not have the ability to integrate Vivax with our operations or to otherwise control its business operations.
The acquisition of Vivax, or any other company we acquire may expose us to unforeseen liabilities.
We have entered into agreements to acquire Vivax, the second largest cable television service provider in Brazil and a leading Brazilian provider of high-speed data services. In addition, as part of our long term growth strategy, we continue to evaluate potential acquisitions of other Brazilian companies. Any such acquisitions involve numerous risks, including diversion of
14
management attention from existing operations, and assumption of liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies, including liabilities for their failure to comply with applicable telecommunications regulations.
Risks Related to BrazilA downturn or increased volatility in the Brazilian economy or the depreciation of the real could adversely affect our revenues, cash flows and profitability.
All of our operations and customers are located in Brazil. Therefore, our results of operations and financial condition depend upon the level of economic growth in Brazil, and, consequently, upon customer demand for our services. Currently, the Brazilian economy continues to face weaker economic growth compared to other emerging markets. There can be no assurance that such economic weakness will not be prolonged or become more severe in the future. Weakness in the Brazilian economy has adversely affected our subscriber and revenue growth in the past. Continued economic weakness would lead to shortfalls in our revenues and subscriber levels and could have an adverse impact on the market price of our preferred shares and ADSs.
Although the real increased in value by approximately 8.7% against the U.S. dollar in 2006, from an exchange rate of R$2.3407 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2005 to an exchange rate of R$2.1380 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2006, the real has historically suffered several major depreciations against the U.S. dollar and has generally decreased against the U.S. dollar since it was first allowed to float by the Brazilian government in 1999. Within this general trend of depreciation, Brazilian currency has shown high volatility. Given the current state of the Brazilian currency market, we do not attempt to hedge this risk over the medium or long term. Accordingly, depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar could negatively impact the market price of our preferred shares and ADSs.
Our revenues are in reais and a significant percentage of our capital expenditures, including network equipment costs, are denominated in or indexed to U.S. dollars. Accordingly, depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar would result in decreased cash flows.
Brazilian political and economic conditions have a direct impact on our business, and the Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy.
Our financial condition and results of operations are substantially dependent on the Brazilian economy. The Brazilian government frequently intervenes in the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes drastic changes in monetary, fiscal, taxation, credit, tariff, wage and price controls and other policies in order to influence the course of the economy. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by such changes in policy as well as by other factors outside of our control, such as:
- currency fluctuations;
- inflation;
- price instability;
- interest rates;
15
- monetary policy;
- the liquidity of Brazilian capital markets;
- general economic growth;
- tax policy; and
- other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.
Inflation could threaten our costs, contribute significantly to economic uncertainty in Brazil and cause heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets.
Brazil has, from time to time, experienced extremely high rates of inflation, with annual rates of inflation during the last twelve years reaching as high as 1,174.7% in 1992, 2,567.3% in 1993 and 1,246.6% in 1994, according to theIndice Geral de Preços do Mercado, or IGP-M, a widely used monthly indicator of inflation in Brazil published by the Getúlio Vargas Foundation. Since the introduction of the real in July 1994, Brazil’s inflation rate has been substantially lower than in previous periods. Brazil’s rate of inflation, according to the IGP-M, was 25.3% in 2002, 8.7% in 2003, 12.4% in 2004, 1.2% in 2005 and 3.8% in 2006. Inflation itself and governmental measures to combat inflation have, in the past, had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy. Since 1999, governmental actions to combat inflation, including interest rate increases and intervention in the foreign exchange market through the sale of U.S. dollars and government bonds linked to the U.S. dollar and public speculation about possible future actions, have also contributed to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets. Should Brazil experience substantial inflation in the future, our costs may increase and our operating and net margins may decrease, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Inflationary pressures may also curtail our ability to access foreign financial markets and may lead to further government intervention in the economy, including the introduction of government policies that may adversely affect the overall performance of the Brazilian economy and stall or reverse growth.
Developments in, and the perception of risk in, emerging market economies may impede our access to international capital markets and adversely affect the market price of our preferred shares and ADSs.
International investors generally consider Brazil to be an emerging market. Historically, adverse developments in the economies of emerging markets have resulted in investors’ perception of greater risk from investments in such markets. Such perceptions regarding emerging market countries have significantly affected the Brazilian securities markets and the availability of credit in Brazil, from both domestic and international sources of capital. Furthermore, although economic conditions are different in each country, investors’ reactions to developments in one country can impact the prices of securities in other countries, including those in Brazil. Negative economic and market conditions in other emerging market countries, especially those in Latin America and Asia, have at times resulted in considerable outflows of funds from, and declines in the amount of foreign investment in, Brazil. This caused Brazilian companies to face higher costs of raising funds and adversely affected the market price of Brazilian companies’ securities. Examples of such events include the depreciation of the Mexican peso in December 1994, the Asian economic crisis of 1997 and the Russian currency crisis of 1998. The repercussions of these events were exacerbated in
16
Brazil by Brazil’s 1999 currency depreciation and related economic developments. More recently, Argentina’s instability in 2001 and 2002 increased international financial markets volatility.
To the extent that economic problems in emerging market countries or elsewhere negatively impact Brazil and/or adversely affect Brazilian securities markets, our business and the market price of the preferred shares and ADSs may be adversely affected.
Furthermore, we cannot assure you that, in the event of adverse developments in emerging market economies, the international capital markets will remain open to Brazilian companies or that the resulting interest rates in such markets will be advantageous to us. Decreased foreign investment in Brazil could negatively affect growth and liquidity in the Brazilian economy, which in turn could have a negative impact on our business.
Restrictions on the movement of capital out of Brazil may hinder your ability to receive distributions on, and the proceeds of any sale of, the preferred shares or ADSs.
Brazilian law permits the Brazilian government to impose restrictions on the conversion of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies and on the remittance to foreign investors of proceeds from their investments in Brazil. The government may impose such restrictions whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or there are reasons to foresee a serious imbalance. For example, the Brazilian government imposed remittance restrictions for approximately six months in 1989 and early 1990. The likelihood that the Brazilian government would impose such restrictions again may depend on the extent of Brazil’s foreign currency reserves, the availability of foreign currency in the foreign exchange markets on the date a payment is due, the size of Brazil’s debt service burden relative to the economy as a whole, Brazil’s policy toward the International Monetary Fund and other factors.
If reintroduced, these restrictions would hinder or prevent the conversion of distributions or the proceeds from any sale of the preferred shares or ADSs, as the case may be, from reais into U.S. dollars and the remittance of U.S. dollars abroad. In the case of ADSs, the custodian, acting on behalf of the depositary for the ADSs, will hold the reais it cannot convert for the accounts of the ADR holders who have not been paid as a result of the restrictions. The depositary will not reinvest the reais and will not be liable for any interest on the monies held. In addition, any reais so held will be subject to depreciation risk.
We cannot assure you that the Brazilian government will not impose restrictions on the conversion of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies in the future, temporarily or otherwise.
Allegations of political corruption against the Brazilian federal government could create economic and political instability.
In 2005 and 2006, the federal government faced allegations of political corruption. Several politicians were accused of influencing other government officials in exchange for political support. As a result, a number of politicians, including President Luis Inácio Lula da Silva’s chief of staff and the Minister of Finance, resigned. These allegations appeared to weaken President Luis Inácio Lula da Silva and threatened to endanger his economic and political reforms. In addition, members of the Brazilian executive and legislative branches of government have been investigated as a result of allegations of unethical or illegal conduct. It is impossible to foresee the possible conclusions of these investigations and whether these conclusions will adversely affect the Brazilian economy. As a result, these uncertainties, allegations of unethical or illegal conduct or other future developments in the Brazilian economy may adversely affect us and our business and results of operations. We
17
cannot predict whether these allegations will lead to further instability or whether new allegations against key Brazilian government officials will arise in the future. In addition, we cannot predict the outcome of any such allegations and their effect on the Brazilian economy.
Risks Related to Our SecuritiesWe are subject to different corporate rules and regulations as a Brazilian company, and the preferred shares and ADSs have fewer and less well defined shareholders’ rights.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our by-laws and Brazilian corporate law, which differs from the legal principles that would apply if we were incorporated in a United States jurisdiction, such as Delaware or New York, or in other jurisdictions outside Brazil. Under Brazilian corporate law, the rights of those holding preferred shares or ADSs may be fewer and based on less precedent than they would be under the laws of other jurisdictions outside Brazil.
The Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated or supervised as the United States securities markets or markets in certain other countries. Rules and policies with respect to the preservation of minority shareholder interests and against self-dealing may not be enforced in Brazil to the same extent as such rules are enforced in the United States, and the law may be less developed in such areas, putting holders of the preferred shares and ADSs at a potential disadvantage.
Because we are a Brazilian company, you may face difficulties in proceedings with respect to your interests as a shareholder.
We are asociedade anônima, or corporation, organized under the laws of Brazil and all of our directors and officers reside in Brazil. Substantially all of our assets and those of our directors and officers are located in Brazil. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process upon us or our directors and officers within the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil or to enforce against us or our directors and officers judgments obtained in the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil. Because judgments of U.S. courts for civil liabilities based upon the U.S. federal securities laws may only be enforced in Brazil if certain requirements are met, you may face greater difficulties in protecting your interests, in the case of actions against our directors or officers, than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a state, or other jurisdiction, of the United States.
If you exchange ADSs for preferred shares, you risk losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and you risk unfavorable tax treatment.
The Brazilian custodian for the preferred shares must obtain an electronic certificate of registration from the Central Bank to be entitled to remit U.S. dollars abroad for distributions relating to the preferred shares or upon the disposition of the preferred shares. If you decide to exchange your ADSs for the underlying preferred shares, you will be entitled to continue to rely—for five business days from the date of the exchange—on the custodian’s electronic certificate of registration. Thereafter, you may not be able to obtain, and the custodian may not be able to remit, U.S. dollars abroad upon the disposition of the preferred shares unless you obtain your own electronic certificate of registration or register your investment in the preferred shares under specified regulations that entitle foreign investors to buy and sell securities on the Bovespa. If you obtain an electronic certificate of registration, you may be subject to unfavorable tax treatment on gains with respect to the preferred shares unless you are resident in a tax haven jurisdiction. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Material Brazilian Taxation Considerations.” If you
18
attempt to obtain your own electronic certificate of registration, you may incur expenses or suffer delays in the application process, which could delay your ability to receive dividends or distributions relating to the preferred shares or the return of your capital in a timely manner.
We cannot assure you that the custodian’s electronic certificate of registration or any certificate of foreign capital registration obtained by you may not be affected by future legislative changes, or that additional restrictions applicable to you, the disposition of the underlying preferred shares or the repatriation of the proceeds from any disposition will not be imposed in the future. In addition, if you exchange your ADSs for the underlying preferred shares, you may be subject to a Brazilian tax (currently imposed at the rate of 0.38%) upon the withdrawal of funds from any Brazilian account in connection with the payment of dividends by Net Serviços or the remittance from Brazil of the proceeds of the sale of preferred shares.
You might be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to the preferred shares.
You may not be able to exercise the preemptive rights relating to the preferred shares, including preferred shares underlying the ADSs, unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements is available. We are not obligated to file a registration statement with respect to the preferred shares or other securities relating to these preemptive rights, and we cannot assure you that we will file any such registration statement. Unless we file a registration statement or an exemption from the registration requirements is available, you will receive only the net proceeds from the sale of your preemptive rights by the depositary or, if the preemptive rights cannot be sold by the depositary, they will be allowed to lapse.
Holders of ADSs, as opposed to holders of preferred shares, may encounter difficulty in exercising certain rights.
As a holder of ADSs, you may find it difficult to exercise some of your rights. For instance, if we fail to timely provide the depositary with voting materials, you may not be able to give instructions to the depositary on how it should vote your ADSs.
The preferred shares and ADSs do not entitle you to a fixed or minimum dividend.
We are a holding company and our ability to obtain funds for the payment of cash dividends depends entirely on our ability to obtain funds from our subsidiaries and investees.
Our by-laws, in accordance with Brazilian corporate law, require that, for any year in which we have “adjusted net profits” (as defined in Brazilian corporate law), we will be required to pay, subject to certain exceptions, a yearly minimum dividend equal to not less than 25% of adjusted net profits, referred to as the “mandatory distribution.” Brazilian corporate law, however, permits publicly held companies, such as the Company, to suspend the mandatory distribution of dividends if the board of directors and the audit committee report to the shareholders’ meeting that the distribution would be inadvisable in view of the company’s financial condition. If the board of directors and audit committee so report, the board of directors must file a justification for such suspension with theComissão de Valores Mobiliários (the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission), or the CVM, within five days of the shareholders’ meeting. Profits not distributed by virtue of this suspension shall be attributed to a special reserve and, if not absorbed by subsequent losses, shall be paid as dividends as soon as the financial condition of the company permits such payments. Due to our accumulated net loss, historically, we have never declared or paid any cash dividends, nor made any cash distribution on our shares, including the preferred shares underlying
19
our ADSs. In addition, due to the fact that we are seeking new growth opportunities, we do not expect to make any cash distribution in the near future.
The issuance by us or our major shareholders of a substantial number of preferred or common shares could decrease the market price of preferred shares and ADSs and could significantly dilute your holdings.
The issuance by us or our major shareholders of a substantial number of preferred or common shares could decrease the market price of preferred shares in general and ADSs. In the future, subject to the restrictions of our debt facilities and debt instruments, we may choose to raise further capital by issuing additional preferred shares, convertible securities or other equity-related securities. The timing, terms, size and pricing of any such transaction will depend on investor interest and market conditions. Any issuance of equity or equity-related securities, however, would dilute your holdings and possibly substantially to the extent that preemptive rights are not made available to you or exercised by you.
Brazilian securities markets are volatile and less liquid than U.S. securities markets, which could negatively affect the market value of your ADSs.
The Brazilian securities markets are substantially smaller, less liquid and more volatile than the major securities markets in the United States and are not as highly regulated or supervised as U.S. markets. The relatively small market capitalization and illiquidity of Brazilian equity markets may cause the price of securities of Brazilian issuers to fluctuate, whether such securities trade in the domestic or an international market. This may substantially limit your ability to sell the preferred shares underlying your ADSs at a price and time at which you wish to do so. The Bovespa, which is the principal Brazilian stock exchange and which accounted for substantially all of Brazil’s 2006 share trading volume, had a market capitalization of approximately US$722.3 billion as of December 31, 2006 and an average daily trading volume of approximately US$2,049.1 million for 2006. In comparison, the Nasdaq Global Market had a market capitalization of US$4.1 trillion as of December 31, 2006 and an average daily trading volume of approximately US$29.9 billion for 2006.
The market for our preferred shares and our ADSs has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. In 2003, the prices of our ADSs increased 169%. In 2004, the prices of the ADSs decreased 21%. In 2005 and 2006, the prices of our ADSs increased 102% and 75%, respectively.
The liquidity of the trading market for ADSs in the United States is limited; this could lead to price volatility and a lack of buyers for ADSs.
As of February 28, 2007, there were approximately 11.2 million of our ADSs outstanding. The average daily trading volume for our ADSs on the Nasdaq Global Market during 2006 was approximately 127,000 ADSs per day, equivalent to approximately US$1.1 million per day. Securities that trade at similar volumes and with a similar float typically have much lower levels of liquidity than other equity securities traded in the United States. This means there tends to be fewer willing buyers and sellers and fewer trades for our ADSs than for other equity securities. As a result, the price quoted for an ADS may be less reliable and more volatile than that quoted for another equity security traded in the United States.
20
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY.
Business OverviewWe are a leading multiservice company in the pay-television and broadband Internet industries in Brazil. Currently, we are the largest cable television operator in Brazil and one of the largest pay-television operators in Latin America, based upon the number of subscribers and homes passed. As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately 1.8 million connected subscribers in 44 cities in Brazil, including São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, the two largest Brazilian cities. We are the leading provider of high-speed cable modem Internet access in Brazil through our NET Virtua service, which had approximately 727,000 subscribers as of December 31, 2006. We also provide voice product through our NET Fone via Embratel service, which had approximately 182,000 subscribers as of December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2006, our advanced network of coaxial and fiber-optic cable covered over 36,000 kilometers and passed approximately 7.2 million homes of which 4.1 million belong to high and middle income classes and approximately 42% of such network had two-way communication capability. Most of our customers belong to high social income class, which helps to reduce bad debt expense. In 2006, we had total revenues of US$1,144.7 million.
Currently, our principal services include pay-television and pay-per-view programming under the “NET” brand name, digital cable under the “NET Digital” brand name, broadband Internet service under the “NET Virtua” brand name and voice service under the “NET Fone Via Embratel” brand name.
In 2004, we began to offer digital cable services to our subscribers in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. In 2006, we began to offer digital cable services to our subscribers in Porto Alegre. We expect to expand the digital offer to an additional 6 Brazilian cities during 2007. Through providing digital cable services, we are able to offer subscribers additional channels and more value-added programming options and services, such as audio channels containing a variety of music packages, near video-on-demand and interactive services.
In 2005, we launched the Mega Portfolio for our broadband service, offering speeds of 2Mgps, 4Mgps and 8Mgps to the subscribers to our broadband service. Through this portfolio, we are able to offer subscribers high-speed connections to the Internet.
During 2006, we, in partnership with Embratel, launched a voice service, which marked our entry in the triple play market (joint offering of video, voice and data services). The new product, which uses voice over internet protocol technology, works like a conventional phone line and allows the user to make local, long distance and international calls to any telephone or handset, which calls are charged per minute and not by pulse. In addition, subscribers can apply their minimum monthly fee to make any type of call, including local and long distance calls and calls to mobile phones. Initially, subscribers will have the benefit of making calls between NET Fone subscribers, for free within the same city and at the cost of a local call for long distance calls. This service is primarily directed to the residential market and complements our existing services, by offering to its subscribers another quality service option.
As described further below, we recently entered into agreements with certain shareholders of Vivax, the second largest cable operator in Brazil, that provide for our acquisition of control of Vivax, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the approval of Anatel. We will pay for this acquisition through the issuance of new preferred shares (or cash solely to the extent that our existing shareholders exercise preemptive rights with respect to such issuance).
21
Globo, through GB, is our controlling shareholder. Telmex, through Embratel, holds a significant equity stake in us and has significant approval rights under a shareholders’ agreement with Globo. Together, Globo and Telmex directly and indirectly own approximately 99% of our common shares and approximately 15% of our preferred shares.
StrategyOur goal is to become a multiservice company that is the leading provider of entertainment and communications services in the Brazilian residential market. Our strategy to achieve our goal is providing triple play offerings (joint offerings of video, voice and data services) in the marketplace. In order to execute such a strategy, we have focused our attention and resources on (i) maintaining our position as Brazil’s leading provider of pay-television services, (ii) pursuing the continuing growth of our broadband business, (iii) further developing our offering of voice service under the “NET Fone Via Embratel” brand name, and (iv) making strategic acquisitions of other cable television and broadband providers, including the acquisition of Vivax, described above. We are undertaking the following business and financial initiatives to support our strategy:
Business Initiatives- Pursue accelerated growth in the short term.We focus our marketing and sales efforts on our existing customer base and on the potential customers already within our network. Through this two-fold, targeted marketing approach, we hope to encourage existing customers to migrate to higher- end programming packages and to purchase value-added services, while at the same time encouraging those who do not yet subscribe to our services to join our subscription base.
- Continue the growth of NET Virtua, our broadband Internet service. Since 2003, we have increased our investments in our broadband Internet service. Broadband Internet has an attractive marginal return. The main processes involved in NET Virtua’s operating structure, including the cost of its link, customer service center and cable modem technology, are regularly reviewed. Since its launch, NET Virtua’s Mega Portfolio has been an important driver to support this growth.
- Continue to rollout digital cable. Since 2004, we have offered digital cable services to our subscribers. We expect to expand the digital offer to an additional 6 Brazilian cities during 2007. This service allows us to increase the number of pay-per-view channels and to offer new services such as audio channels, near video-on-demand and an interactive programming guide.
- Enhance the triple play offer.In 2006, we began to offer voice services, which marked our entry in the triple play market (joint offering of video, voice and data services). We aim to increase the number of subscribers that are using a higher number of our services, and thereby to increase our share of wallet with respect to our customers’ spending on entertainment and communication.
- Provide reliable, high quality products and responsive customer service. We view our business as a service business, and, therefore, we have been working hard to provide high quality products and services and achieve certain levels of customer satisfaction, both in terms of our cable and broadband Internet products and in our responsiveness to our customer inquiries.
22
- Make strategic acquisitions.We seek opportunistically to acquire other cable television and broadband providers and to integrate their operations into our network. As described above, we recently entered into share purchase agreements providing for the acquisition by us, subject to regulatory approval, of Vivax, the second largest cable television provider in Brazil. We expect to make further acquisitions, subject to the availability of suitable targets and the receipt of regulatory approval.
- Initiatives to fund our business growth. Our organic growth is expected to be funded in the near term through our own cash flow generation.
- Optimize capital expenditures by making targeted investments. Our capital spending plan targets our capital expenditures on services where we believe we can achieve better returns on our investments. Pursuant to this plan, we target our capital spending on subscriber acquisition, principally in high and middle income, urban areas, where we anticipate greater demand for broadband, basic and digital cable and advanced services.
- Continue to focus on corporate governance. Since June 2002, our shares have been listed on the Bovespa’s Special Corporate Governance Level 2, or Level 2, which provides enhanced shareholder protections. We believe that trading our shares on Level 2 brings several benefits to shareholders, including greater transparency and more effective corporate governance.
Consistent with this approach, we have established certain voting rights with regard to our preferred shares, and we offer 100% tag-along rights to holders of our common and preferred shares. See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—Trading Markets—Level 2 of the Bovespa.” As of December 31, 2006, we were in full compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Under our previous name, Multicanal Participações S.A., or Multicanal, we first listed our ADSs on the Nasdaq Global Market in October 1996. In late 1997, our major shareholders at the time sold their interests in us to Globo. Following that transaction, the principal shareholders of Multicanal were Globo and União Comércio e Participações, the latter of which was at the time a wholly-owned subsidiary of Banco Bradesco S.A.
In September 1998, Multicanal acquired certain cable assets and related liabilities of Globo and changed its name to Globo Cabo S.A. The assets we acquired from Globo included a 50% interest in Unicabo and controlling interests in three significant metropolitan-area cable operators: Net São Paulo Ltda., Net Rio S.A., or Net Rio, and Net Brasília Ltda.
In May 2000, we acquired the remaining 50% of Unicabo that we did not already own. In September 2000, we completed the acquisition of Net Sul Holding S.A., the then 99.99% owner of
23
Net Sul, what was then the second largest cable television operator in Brazil. The Net Sul acquisition significantly increased our subscriber base and provided us access to markets in southern Brazil, a region we historically had not served.
Consistent with our strategy of focusing our resources towards the residential market, in August 2004, we sold Vicom, a company that we acquired in July 2000, which offers corporate customers data transmission services via satellite, hybrid fiber-coax, or HFC, network and radio circuits.
In May 2002, we changed our name from Globo Cabo S.A. to Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. In December 2002, we ceased making payments on our outstanding debt. In March 2003, we started negotiations with our creditors and in March 2005, we completed the restructuring of our outstanding indebtedness. Through the restructuring, we achieved our objective of having a debt amortization schedule compatible with our cash generation and that would allow us to sustain growth from our own cash generation, making us independent of capital markets conditions.
Since these acquisitions were made, we have been working towards the integration of our various operations. During 2002 and 2003, we worked to improve and integrate the systems to these operations. Since 2003, we have resumed media advertising, improved our sales infrastructure with the creation of local points of sale, and changed both the supplier of our call center services and the way we compensate our telemarketers. During 2004, we continued to use media advertising and the local points of sale strategies implemented in 2003, and our sales through a passive call center remained in place. Since 2005, we have started seeking new growth opportunities. As a consequence, we have developed new sales channels and coordinated marketing techniques, including telemarketing, the Internet, door-to-door sales, direct mail, retail sales, condominium sales channels and outsourced customer service centers.
As a result of the stability and strength of the Brazilian economy, as well as an increase in the use of the Internet by Brazilian consumers and the consolidation of digital technology in Brazil, we started to increase the scope of our bi-directional network and to expand the geographic scope of our digital-based services. As a result, we expect to expand our digital-based services to an additional 6 Brazilian cities and increase the number of homes within our bi-directional network from 3.0 million homes as of December 31, 2006 to 4.5 million homes, reaching almost every A and B class home within our coverage area. As a result of such investments, we expect to continue our current growth on a sustainable basis.
Acquisition of VivaxOn October 11, 2006, we and certain shareholders of Vivax entered into a share purchase agreement and related agreements pursuant to which we initially acquired a minority interest and a second share purchase agreement and related agreements by which we will subsequently (subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions) acquire a controlling interest in Vivax. Vivax is the second largest cable television service provider in Brazil and a leading Brazilian provider of high-speed data services. According to its public securities filings in Brazil, Vivax had approximately 328,000 cable television subscribers and 134,000 high speed data subscribers as of December 31, 2006. Vivax operates primarily in the State of São Paulo (outside of the city of São Paulo), the largest state in Brazil, which accounted for approximately 33% of Brazil’s gross domestic product in 2005. Vivax currently operates 34 concessions, 31 of which are located in the State of São Paulo, two of which are located in the State of Rio de Janeiro, on the border of São Paulo, and one of which is located in the state of Amazonas.
24
The table below summarizes certain key operating and financial information regarding Vivax, solely on the basis of Vivax’s public securities filings in Brazil, which were prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP:
As of and For the Year | ||||||||
Ended December 31 | ||||||||
Operating Data | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | ||||
in thousands of US$ (except subscriber and user data) | ||||||||
Homes passed | 419,907 | 1,100,944 | 1,174,077 | 1,217,055 | ||||
Cable subscribers | 91,381 | 270,270 | 293,969 | 328,297 | ||||
Broadband subscribers | 21,236 | 54,016 | 83,010 | 134,750 | ||||
Average revenue per user | — | 38.56 | 42.00 | 47.82 | ||||
Financial Data (1) | ||||||||
Revenue | 29,341 | 105,325 | 125,926 | 150,370 | ||||
Net income (loss) | (12,652) | (24,562) | 18,127 | 36,858 | ||||
Gross debt | — | 193,079 | 145,030 | 104,687 | ||||
Net debt | — | 173,758 | 142,474 | 59,599 | ||||
Shareholders’ equity | 43,701 | 17,112 | 40,020 | 160,556 | ||||
Total assets | 291,593 | 256,361 | 226,658 | 297,864 |
(1) According to publicly available sources, Vivax prepares its financial statements in Brazilian reaisand in accordance with Brazilian GAAP. Brazilian GAAP differs materially from US GAAP. The data presented in this chart has been converted into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate on December 31, 2006 of R$2.1380 per US$1.00.
On November 30, 2006, pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated October 11, 2006, we acquired all the shares of Vivax and Brasil TV a Cabo Participações S.A., or BTVC held by Horizon Telecom International LLC, or HTI, becoming a minority shareholder in both companies. As a result, we currently own a minority interest of 36.7% in Vivax: 22.1% indirectly through our minority interest in BTVC, and 14.6% directly. As of December 31, 2006, our investment in Vivax, in the total amount of US$51.6 million, was accounted for under the equity method. We funded this acquisition through the issue of 1,355,713 of our common shares in the amount of US$13.7 million and 23,010,140 of our preferred shares with a market value of US$226.4 million at the date the Vivax transaction was completed pursuant to the acquisition of its minority interest in Vivax.
Our common shareholders paid cash for all of the common shares issued through the exercise of their pre-emptive rights. Our preferred shareholders paid cash for 2,988,032 of the preferred shares issued, corresponding to 12.98% of the total preferred shares issued. HTI paid for the remaining preferred shares with Vivax and BTVC shares pursuant to the terms of the share purchase agreement. As part of the transaction, Globo, Embratel and their respective subsidiaries waived their preemptive rights with respect to their holding of our preferred shares. As a result, HTI received 20,022,108 preferred shares and R$65.9 million (US$30.8 million) in cash in exchange for its interest in Vivax and BTVC. The cash received by HTI was funded exclusively by proceeds from the subscription of preferred shares by our shareholders exercising their preemptive rights.
Vivax is currently controlled by BTVC, a privately-held company controlled by Fernando Norbert. The remainder of the shares of BTVC not owned by Fernando Norbert are currently owned by us.
We will acquire control of Vivax by exchanging 0.5678 shares of our preferred shares for each common or preferred share of Vivax currently held by BTVC, pursuant to a second share purchase agreement dated October 11, 2006, between us, Fernando Norbert and BTVC (the “Control Interest Acquisition”). As of February 28, 2007, BTVC held 29,508,429 common shares of Vivax. The Control Interest Acquisition is subject to the prior approval of Anatel.
25
Upon the consummation of the Control Interest Acquisition, the remaining shareholders of Vivax will have the right to tender each of their shares (preferred or common) of Vivax in exchange for 0.5678 shares of our preferred shares. As of February 28, 2007, the minority shareholders of Vivax held 26,633,589 common shares and 54,256,305 preferred shares of Vivax. This ratio was approved by our board of directors and the board of directors of Vivax, and was calculated based on market prices and economic valuations. At the time we announced the transaction, the market ratio was at 0.5579 and it has remained fairly stable at this level since then.
As part of our long term growth strategy, we continue to evaluate potential acquisitions of other Brazilian companies. As the largest player in the Brazilian cable market, we intend to be a leader in any further consolidation of the industry.
The RestructuringIn 2005, we completed the restructuring of our outstanding indebtedness. The restructuring culminated a process that began in December 2002, when we ceased making payments on our outstanding debt.
In the restructuring, we repaid 40% of the principal amount of our outstanding debt plus accrued interest thereon as of June 30, 2004 for the period between July 1, 2004 and March 21, 2005 at LIBOR plus 3% per year for our U.S. dollar denominated debt, and CDI plus 2% per year for our real denominated debt. We funded this repayment using approximately R$142.0 million (US$52.5 million) of our own cash, approximately R$200.0 million (US$74.0 million) of proceeds from a bridge loan from a Brazilian financial institution and approximately R$255.0 million (US$94.0 million) from the proceeds of Grupo Globo’s and Telmex’s share subscription in connection with the private offering discussed below. Additionally, Grupo Globo used R$64.0 million (US$23.8 million) of indebtedness which we owed to them to subscribe for shares in the private offering. The remaining amount received by us through the issuance of common and preferred shares in the private offering was used to pay off the bridge loan on April 22, 2005 and to improve our cash position.
Our ServicesWe offer our customers traditional pay-television services and programming, as well as new and advanced high bandwidth services such as our broadband Internet service and telephony service. We plan to continue to enhance and upgrade the services we offer by selectively adding new programming and more advanced products and services as they become available. As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately 1.8 million pay-television subscribers, 727,000 broadband Internet subscribers and 182,000 voice subscribers.
Pay-TelevisionCurrently, most of our operations relate to providing pay-television services, including cable television and pay-per-view services. We offer our pay-television services through the “NET” brand name using our cable television network and, to a lesser extent, through MMDS. We operate in 44 cities in Brazil, including some of Brazil’s most populated metropolitan areas, such as São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte, Porto Alegre, Recife, Brasília, Goiânia, Curitiba and Florianópolis. In order to attract and retain pay-television subscribers, we are committed to offering a broad variety of quality programming coupled with a range of programming packages.
According to Pay-TV Survey No. 118, published in December 2006, we provided service to approximately 38% of Brazil’s pay-television subscribers as of September 30, 2006.
26
Our Programming Packages
We offer our pay-television service through various programming packages that provide our customers with a variety of price points and channel selection. Our prices range from R$49.90 (US$23.34) to R$179.90 (US$84.14) per month. We divide our packages into three major categories: top, which includes the Digital, Premium, Advanced and Plus packages; intermediate, which is represented by the Master package; and basic, which is represented by the Standard package.
We offer digital cable services to our subscribers in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Porto Alegre. Our digital cable services carry significantly more channels than our analog programming packages. In addition, digital cable allows for high-quality broadcasting and enables us to offer near video-on-demand, a service that offers movies at pre-determined times.
Our programming packages include the programming we purchase, as well as other channels that we are required to provide. These required channels include free broadcast television stations generally available in the service area in which a subscriber resides and six government public service channels that are available nationwide.
Pay-Per-View AlternativesIn addition to the programming packages described above, we also offer pay-per-view alternatives. These include a variety of sporting events, musical concerts by national and international artists, and movies. The sporting events include exclusive broadcast rights to the Brazilian Soccer Championship and certain popular State Soccer Championships, such as the Rio de Janeiro Soccer Championship.
Our revenues from pay-per-view events are seasonal, based largely on the soccer season, and accounted for approximately 3% of our total gross revenues for 2006.
Programming SourcesHistorically, we obtained all of our programming from Brazilian and international sources through Net Brasil. On June 27, 2004, we entered into an amended and restated programming agreement with a term of 10 years with Net Brasil whereby we now obtain all of our programming from Brazilian sources through Net Brasil and all new international content from sources outside of Brazil, for our own account and benefit. On June 27, 2004, we also entered into a licensing agreement with Net Brasil, whereby Net Brasil grants us the right to use the “NET” brand name for 10 years from the date of effectiveness and, in the case of termination, for an additional 30 months from the date of termination. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Material Transactions with Affiliates—Net Brasil Programming Agreement.”
We have agreed with one of the programmers to guarantee a certain level of subscribers to be charged. If we do not achieve this level of subscribers, we must pay a fixed amount, which is denominated in U.S. dollars, to this programmer. Historically, our subscriber base has never been below this level and we have been charged as if this programming cost is fixed in reais.
27
Broadband
In April 2000, we launched NET Virtua. NET Virtua is the fourth largest broadband Internet service provider and the largest high-speed cable Internet access service provider in Brazil, both by number of subscribers. As of December 31, 2006, NET Virtua was available in the following twelve Brazilian cities: São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasília, Belo Horizonte, Santos, Sorocaba, Curitiba, Porto Alegre, Campinas, Florianópolis, Campo Grande and Goiânia, reaching approximately 3.0 million homes and serving 727,000 residential subscribers. Until 2004, we offered broadband Internet service only to subscribers of our pay-television service, in accordance with regulations. During 2004, we acquired new licenses, which allow us to sell broadband separately from other services.
According to www.teleco.com.br, a website that furnishes telecommunications data, as of September 30, 2006, we provided broadband Internet service to approximately 14.4% of Brazil’s broadband subscribers.
Our Service PackagesAs with our pay-television offerings, we tailor our Internet access offerings to our subscribers’ needs. Toward that end, we currently offer through NET Virtua Internet connection speeds ranging from 200 Kbps to 8 Mbps with monthly subscription fees that range in price from R$44.90 (US$21.00) to R$219.90 (US$102.85) per month, as of December 31, 2006.
VoiceIn March 2006, we launched, in partnership with Embratel, our voice product, NET Fone Via Embratel. NET Fone Via Embratel is primarily directed to the residential market and complements our existing video and data services by offering to its subscribers an alternative voice service option. As of December 31, 2006, the service is available in the cities of São Paulo, Campinas, Santos, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre, Curitiba, Florianópolis, Belo Horizonte and Brasília, serving approximately 182,000 residential subscribers.
Our Service PackagesWe currently offer through NET Fone Via Embratel a voice service with a minimum monthly subscription fee of R$34.90 (US$16.32) per month.
OperationsSubscriber and Operational Data
In building our network and marketing our services, we have focused primarily on high and middle income households, which have the largest percentage of disposable income available to purchase our services, particularly value-added services. The table below provides certain information about our network and subscribers.
28
As of December 31, 2006 | ||
Total connected pay-television subscribers | 1,811,995 | |
Total connected broadband subscribers | 727,024 | |
Total connected voice subscribers | 181,938 | |
Total kilometers of cable network | 36,067 | |
Total kilometers of bi-directional cable network | 11,967 | |
Total homes passed | 7,191,007 | |
Total bi-directional homes passed | 2,993,875 | |
Average pay-television penetration(1) | 25.2% | |
Average broadband penetration(2) | 24.3% |
(1) Defined as total connected pay-television subscribers divided by total homes passed.
(2) Defined as total connected broadband subscribers divided by total bi-directional homes passed.
Regional Data
In 2005, we reorganized our operations to facilitate operational review. As of December 31, 2006, we managed our operations as six regional clusters as follows:
Region 1.This cluster covers São Paulo, the largest pay-television market in Brazil (measured in terms of homes passed and active subscribers).
Region 2. This cluster covers the city of Rio de Janeiro.
Region 3. This cluster covers Porto Alegre, Curitiba, Florianópolis and the Litoral and Interior of Southern region.
Region 4. This cluster covers Campinas, Indaiatuba, Jundiaí, Piracicaba, Sorocaba and Santos.
Region 5. This cluster covers Belo Horizonte, Recife, Anápolis, Goiânia and Brasília.
Region 6. This cluster covers Arapongas, Baurú, Campo Grande, Franca, Londrina, Maringá, Ribeirão Preto, São Carlos and São José do Rio Preto.
Network TechnologyGeneral
Cable television utilizes a broadband network employing radio frequency transmission over fiber-optic and/or coaxial cable lines to transmit multiple channels carrying images, sound, voice and data between a central facility and the subscriber’s television set. A cable system consists of three major parts:
- A headend, which is a point from which a programming or other signal originates along a network. A headend typically includes a satellite dish, satellite receivers, modulators, amplifiers and video cassette playback machines. Our headends typically receive programming content via satellite and then amplify, process and feed this signal into a distribution path that reaches the subscriber.
29
- A distribution network, which consists of fiber-optic cable and coaxial cable. A signal generally travels most of its distance over fiber-optic cable and is transferred to coaxial cable at a “node.” As it approaches the subscriber, the network carries the signal over progressively smaller cables, terminating with the drop cable that connects to the subscriber’s television receiver.
- A home terminal, or set-top box, which allows an individual subscriber to receive the cable signal.
Our current network architecture utilizes advanced technologies, including a significant use of fiber-optic cable. Our headends send content via light signals through our optical cable to an optical node where an optical receiver translates the signals into an electric signal that is transmitted over our coaxial cable. The coaxial cable is then divided into individual cables that terminate in individual subscriber households, each of which has been equipped with a set-top box and/or a cable modem. Our network consists of cables having bandwidth capacities of 450 MHz, 550 MHz, and 750 MHz or above. Most of our network has a capacity of at least 550 MHz. This capacity allows subscribers to access numerous premium services, including pay-per-view services, digital cable, voice service and Internet access.
At December 31, 2006, our cable network totaled 36,067 kilometers. The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2006, the percentage of homes passed by our cable network with the bandwidth capacity indicated:
Percentage | Bandwidth Capacity | |
26% | 750 MHz or above | |
59% | 550 MHz | |
15% | 450 MHz or less |
As of December 31, 2006, we had coded, or “scrambled,” the signal of 58% of the homes we passed, with the objective of reducing piracy.
As of December 31, 2006, we had activated two-way, or bi-directional, technology for 3.0 million homes passed. This technology permits us to offer broadband Internet and voice services. Bi-directionality also supports our interactive services by allowing the subscriber to use their remote control to request programming from, and to respond to, the cable operator and allowing a cable operator to transmit to a subscriber specific programs the subscriber has ordered.
At December 31, 2006, our network consisted of 2,998 fiber nodes that we estimate fed on average 2,399 homes each. Each node is fed with sixteen fibers. This architecture allows for future migration to 500 homes per fiber node design and is designed to create a platform to support services such as pay-per-view television and near video-on-demand. The platform may be used to support additional services as they become commercially viable and is already being used to provide broadband Internet service through NET Virtua and voice service through NET Fone Via Embratel.
A substantial portion of our network consists of aerial cables (as opposed to buried cables) often strung on electrical utility poles. We gain access to the utility poles by pole attachment rental
30
agreements with local electrical utilities, which are generally required to provide us this access for a negotiated fee.
In Belo Horizonte, our cable network incorporates fiber-optic trunk line distribution capacity leased from Telemar Norte Leste S.A., or Telemar, one of the three Brazilian fixed-line telephone utilities. We are required to pay Telemar a monthly fee in Belo Horizonte under this lease.
We believe that using aerial cables makes outages easier to locate and repair. The most frequent problems we have experienced with our network relate to damage due to automobile accidents in urban areas. We maintain our network by employing a maintenance crew, as of December 31, 2006, of 2,178 employees, as well as by employing independent contractors.
MMDSIn addition to our traditional cable network, we have MMDS licenses in Recife, Porto Alegre and Curitiba, with approximately 30,000 subscribers. MMDS is a microwave transmission system whereby programming is sent by microwave transmitters from an antenna located on a tower or a building to a small receiving antenna located at a subscriber’s premises where the encoded microwave signals are decoded. See “—Pay-Television Customer Care—MMDS.”
Pay-Television Customer CareCustomer Service and Management of Churn
In November 2003, we changed our outsourced customer service suppliers to TNL Contax S.A., or Contax, which started to operate our customer service centers, with aggressive targets for service quality. We have seen improvement in customer service resulting from our change to Contax.
We believe that, by continuing to focus on customer service, we will be able to maintain our low churn rate and limit bad debt expense. We calculate churn by taking the total number of net disconnected subscribers for a period as a percentage of the average number of paying subscribers for the same period. We include as disconnected only those subscribers whose payment has been in arrears for more than 30 days. When a subscriber becomes reconnected, that subscriber is netted against the number of disconnected subscribers in that period. Our annual churn rate has been stable in the range of 13% to 14% since 2003, as indicated in the table below:
Year | Churn Rate | |
2006 | 13.4% | |
2005 | 13.8% | |
2004 | 12.8% | |
2003 | 13.8% |
In order to maintain low levels of bad debt, we have adopted a past due disconnection policy whereby we temporarily block the signal of subscribers whose payments are past due and, if the subscriber continues to fail to make payment, we collect the subscriber’s set-top box. Our annual bad debt expense, as a percentage of revenue, has been stable since 2003, as indicated in the table below:
31
Bad Debt as a Percentage of Net | ||
Year | Revenues | |
2006 | 1.2% | |
2005 | 1.2% | |
2004 | 1.2% | |
2003 | 1.4% |
Sales and Marketing
We have a centralized sales and marketing team responsible for overseeing our sales and marketing. In addition, we have marketing specialists dedicated specifically to each region and committed to building a detailed action plan for each of our main operations. For each region, we continuously monitor subscriber perception, competition, pricing and service preferences to increase our responsiveness to subscribers.
Among our long-term marketing objectives is to increase our market penetration, subscriber loyalty and our growth in revenue per household. Over time, we expect our subscribers to view their cable connection as the best “pipeline” to the home. To achieve this objective, we are pursuing the following strategies:
- introducing new value-added services;
- designing offerings to enable greater opportunities for subscriber entertainment choices;
- packaging product offerings to promote the sale of premium services and niche programming and to provide attractive price/value options;
- targeting marketing opportunities based on demographic data; and
- employing the “NET”, “NET Virtua”, “NET Digital” and “NET Fone Via Embratel” brand names to promote subscriber awareness and loyalty.
To increase subscriber penetration and the level of services used by our customers, we use coordinated marketing techniques, including telemarketing, the Internet, door-to-door sales, direct mail, retail sales, condominium sales channels and outsourced customer service centers. Each of these marketing techniques focuses on minimizing our cost of acquisition of new customers.
The Social Responsibility ProjectWe have an ongoing social responsibility project in which we participate in community projects in areas in which we operate. One of these programs is “Net Educação” (Net Education), a broad social responsibility project emphasizing the training of public schoolteachers throughout Brazil. Net Educação was implemented in January 2004 and is backed by the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the São Paulo State Education Secretary. Net Educação oversees the installation of pay-television stations in schools that join the project and provides academic support through the Internet portal www.neteducacao.tv.br. Net Educação also transmits an educational program through one of our cable channels.
32
Competition
According to Pay-TV Survey No. 118, published in December 2006, we provided service to approximately 38% of Brazil’s pay-television subscribers as of September 30, 2006. In addition to other pay-television providers, such as satellite direct-to-home, or DTH, we compete with broadcast television and sources of home entertainment generally, including the Internet. We compete with these organizations on the basis of price, service offerings and service reliability. Furthermore, new sources of competition may emerge as a result of changing technology. In addition, to the extent we expand into additional services such as interactive services, we will face competition from other providers of each type of service.
The following describes our key sources of competition:
Broadcast TelevisionFree broadcast television remains the dominant media provider in Brazil. Brazil represents the largest free broadcast television market in Latin America, with approximately 30 million urban television households as of December 31, 2003, according to the Brazilian Association of Pay TV, or ABTA. The majority of free television services are broadcast by six privately-owned national broadcast television networks and a government-owned national public television network. These national television networks utilize one or more satellites to retransmit their signals.
DTHDTH systems use medium- or high-power satellites to deliver signals to satellite dish antennas installed at residences, hotels and other buildings.
DTH systems are less capital intensive than constructing cable television networks. This competitive advantage, however, may be offset by several factors. Among these is that DTH tends to entail higher monthly subscription fees than cable. In addition, DTH requires the subscriber to own a special receiver targeted at the satellite, which is not always possible in densely populated areas.
On March 7, 2006, a large telecommunication company that operates primarily in the State of São Paulo was granted a license to provide DTH services. Although this telecommunication company will use two different infra-structures to provide a combined package of video, broadband and voice, it will be seen as a triple-play provider and consequently a competitor in this marke
Cable OverbuildsAccording to Pay-TV Survey No. 118, as of September 30, 2006, the Brazilian cable industry consisted of 47 cable operators in approximately 190 municipalities, serving an estimated 2.7 million subscribers. Under Brazilian law, cable television service licenses in a specific service area are nonexclusive licenses. In certain markets our licensed service areas overlap completely with the service areas of other licensees. There are overbuilt cable systems in the cities of São Paulo, Curitiba, Florianópolis, Pelotas, Santos and Belo Horizonte. In 2006, two major telecommunications companies announced their intention to acquire cable companies, which are pending Anatel approval. In the case that Anatel approves these acquisitions, we may face competion in the triple play market from telecommunications companies.
MMDSPay-television utilizing MMDS technology became available in Brazil in 1991, initially targeting the largest urban areas of the country. According to Pay-TV Survey No. 118, as of September 31, 2006, it was estimated that MMDS accounted for approximately 6% of pay-
33
television services in Brazil. We accounted for approximately 12% of all MMDS subscribers in Brazil.
Establishing an MMDS system is less capital intensive than constructing a cable television network. While this cost differential may give an MMDS operator some competitive advantage in providing pay-television services, this advantage may be offset by several factors. Among these is that MMDS generally requires a clear line-of-sight because microwave signals will not pass through obstructions. MMDS, therefore, can generally not be received in “shadowed” areas where microwave transmission is blocked by terrain, buildings or other physical objects, though sometimes blocked signals can be retransmitted by low-power repeaters that can send an otherwise blocked signal over a limited area. Moreover, MMDS has the disadvantages of limited channel capacity, lower reliability and lower quality of signal. In key cities such as São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte, where there are a high concentration of tall buildings and topographical barriers, MMDS is at a disadvantage to cable.
BroadbandBroadband Internet access is currently being offered in Brazil primarily by telecommunications companies and cable television operators. Cable technology has a competitive advantage over ADSL technology. In addition to higher speeds, broadband cable modem subscribers can download and upload at the same speed while ADSL subscribers experience asymmetrical speeds between download and upload.
VoiceVoice services are currently being offered in Brazil primarily by fixed line and wireless telecommunications companies. In addition, our voice product competes with other voice over IP providers.
LicensesWe currently hold 46 licenses to operate pay-television systems in 44 cities. Three of these licenses are for MMDS service and the remaining 43 are for cable services.
The licenses are issued on a non-exclusive basis by Anatel, the national communications agency. The licenses are for a term of 15 years and are automatically renewable, subject to:
- satisfactory fulfillment of all technical and financial requirements for establishing a network and operating the business;
- compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and
- the payment of a fee.
We own most of the fixed assets essential to our operations. As of December 31, 2006, our major fixed assets were:
- 36,067 kilometers of coaxial cable, of which 6,221 kilometers have fiber-optic capability;
34
- set-top boxes and cable modems for subscribers’ homes;
- electronic transmission, receiving, processing and distribution equipment;
- microwave equipment; and
- antennas.
We lease some of our distribution facilities from third parties. These facilities include space on utility poles and underground ducts where we place portions of our cable systems, roof rights and land leases which we use to place some of our hub sites and headends and certain portions of the fiber-optic network of the Minas Gerais state telecommunication company.
We lease most of our office space, including our headquarters located in São Paulo, which consists of approximately 3,200 square meters, and data processing equipment from third parties. We generally own our service vehicles, data processing facilities and test equipment. We anticipate that, upon the expiration of any of our current leasing arrangements, we will be able to renew those arrangements or enter into alternative leasing arrangements at comparable costs.
RegulationCable Television Services
Cable television services in Brazil are licensed and regulated by Anatel pursuant to Law No. 8,977, enacted by the Brazilian Congress on January 6, 1995; Decree No. 2,206, enacted by the President of Brazil on April 14, 1997; Ordinance No. 256, issued by the Ministry of Communications on April 18, 1997; and the General Law of Telecommunications No. 9,472, enacted on July 16, 1997. Prior to the enactment of Law No. 8,977 in 1995, the Brazilian cable industry had been governed by two principal regulatory measures since its inception in 1989: Ordinance No. 250, issued by the Ministry of Communications on December 13, 1989; and Ordinance No. 36, issued by the Ministry of Communications on March 21, 1991.
Ordinance No. 250, which was suspended by Ordinance No. 36 approximately 15 months after its enactment, regulated the distribution of television signals, or DISTV, by physical means (i.e., by cable television) to end-users. DISTV services generally are limited only to the reception and transmission of signals without any interference by a DISTV operator with the signal content. Under Ordinance No. 250, the Ministry of Communications granted 101 authorizations to local operators to commercially exploit DISTV services. Although Ordinance No. 250 did not specifically address cable television services, a number of DISTV operators, including our own cable operating subsidiaries, began to offer cable television services based on DISTV authorizations. With the issuance of Ordinance No. 36 in March 1991, the Ministry of Communications suspended Ordinance No. 250; however, the DISTV authorizations issued during the preceding 15 months remained valid. Proposed regulations relating to cable services were submitted for public comment by the Ministry of Communications at the same time Ordinance No. 36 was issued, but were never adopted and no further regulatory action was taken until the enactment of Law No. 8,977 in 1995. Law No. 8,977, together with Decree No. 2,206 and Ordinance No. 256, which provide detailed procedures for the implementation of Law No. 8,977, constitute the current regulatory framework for cable television services in Brazil.
Under Law No. 8,977 and Decree No. 2,206, a cable operator must obtain a license from Anatel in order to provide cable television services in Brazil. All cable licenses are non-exclusive
35
licenses to provide cable television services in a service area. Cable television licenses are granted by Anatel for a period of 15 years and are renewable for equal and successive periods. Renewal of the cable television license by Anatel is assured if the cable system operator has (i) complied with the terms of the license grant and applicable governmental regulations, (ii) agreed to meet certain technical and economic requirements relating to the furnishing of adequate service to subscribers, including system modernization standards, and (iii) requested the renewal of such license at least 24 months prior to the expiration date of the license. The renewal of the cable television license may also be subject to the payment of a renewal fee in an amount agreed upon by the licensee and Anatel.
Only private legal entities which provide cable television services as their main business activity are headquartered in Brazil and at least 51% of their voting capital is controlled by Brazilian citizens or naturalized Brazilian citizens for over ten years, or by companies incorporated in Brazil controlled by Brazilian citizens, are eligible to receive a license to operate cable television systems in Brazil. In the event that no private entity displays an interest in providing cable television services in a particular service area, Anatel may grant the local incumbent telephone operator a license to provide cable television services.
Cable operators that provided cable television services under a DISTV authorization granted under Ordinance No. 250 were required under Law No. 8,977 to file applications to have their DISTV authorizations converted into cable television licenses. DISTV authorizations covering all of our service areas were converted into cable television licenses in December 1996.
Decree No. 2,206 establishes specific guidelines related to bids for cable licenses. In general, cable television licenses will be granted pursuant to a public bidding process currently being administered by Anatel. In order to submit a bid for a license, a bidder must meet certain financial, technical and legal prerequisites. After such prerequisites are met, a bidder then must submit a detailed bid describing its plan to provide cable television services in the service area and the intended price for the license.
Once a cable television license is granted, the licensee has an 18-month period from the date of the license grant to complete the initial stage of the installation of the cable system and to commence providing cable services to subscribers in the service area. The 18-month period is subject to a single 12-month extension at the request of the licensee, with such extension granted at the discretion of Anatel.
Any transfer of a cable television license is subject to the prior approval of Anatel. A licensee may not transfer its license until it has commenced the commercial operation of its services in its service area. The license may, however, be transferred to a subsidiary company controlled by the licensee, by hereditary succession or by a spin-off transaction before the commencement of cable television services. Transfers of shares causing a change in the control of a licensee or the legal entity that controls a licensee are also subject to the prior approval of Anatel. Anatel must receive notice of any change in the capital structure of a licensee within 60 days, including any transfer of shares or increase of capital, which does not result in a change of control.
Law No. 8,977 and Decree No. 2,206 regulate programming content and access to cable systems. In addition to channels allocated for unrestricted programming, a cable television operator is required to make available in its service area channels in the following categories: (i) basic channels for use free of charge; (ii) channels devoted to occasional services; and (iii) channels devoted to permanent services. A cable operator must provide access free of charge for the following basic channels:
36
- channels for the distribution of programming by local uncodified VHF and UHF broadcast stations;
- a channel for transmitting the sessions and proceedings of state and municipal legislatures;
- a channel for transmitting the sessions and proceedings of the federal House of Representatives;
- a channel for transmitting the sessions and proceedings of the federal Senate;
- a channel for use by local universities;
- a channel for use by federal, state and municipal bodies for cultural and educational purposes;
- a community channel for use by local non-profit private institutions; and
- a channel for use by the Brazilian Supreme Court.
A cable operator must reserve at least two channels for occasional services, which are dedicated for the transmission of seminars, public protests and demonstrations, meetings of Congress and similar events of public interest. Thirty percent of a cable system’s available channels must be reserved for “permanent services.” Permanent services are dedicated to the transmission of programming produced by companies which are not affiliated with the cable television operator. Channels for occasional or permanent services must be publicly offered by the operator, and compensation of the operator is to be established pursuant to market practices and costs involved in the rendering of such services.
Law No. 8,977 and Decree No. 2,206 also limit the use by a cable operator of its channels reserved for the unrestricted programming. A cable television operator may not (i) impose conditions that result in participation in the control or require any financial interest in the entity providing programming; (ii) compel the programming entity to provide for exclusivity rights as a condition to the programming agreement; or (iii) restrict the unaffiliated programming entity’s market competition capacity. Further, a cable television operator may acquire programming produced outside of Brazil only through a company located in Brazil. Cable television operators are also required to offer at least one channel consisting exclusively of independently produced Brazilian motion pictures and features. Decree No. 2,206 also specifies that cable system operators should make available to subscribers, upon their request and at their expense, a device that blocks reception of certain subscription programming.
Cable system operators are permitted under Ordinance No. 256 to offer commercial advertising on channels other than the public basic channels for use free of charge, as discussed above.
Access to basic television services is guaranteed to all those located within the relevant service area upon the payment of an installation fee and a periodic subscription fee established by the cable television operator. Anatel is empowered to regulate installation and subscription fees. Under Law No. 8,977 and Decree No. 2,206, the fees shall be reasonable and fair.
37
Anatel may revoke a license upon the issuance of a judicial decision, after due process, if the licensee:
- lacks the technical, financial or legal capacity to continue to operate a cable system;
- is under the management of individuals, or under the control of individuals or corporations, who, according to Law No. 8,977, do not qualify for such positions;
- has its license transferred, either directly or by virtue of a change in control, without the prior consent of Anatel;
- does not start to provide cable services within the time limit specified by Law No. 8,977; or
- suspends its activities for more than 30 consecutive days without justification, unless previously authorized by Anatel.
In September 1996, the Ministry of Communications issued Ordinance No. 1,086. This ordinance established Cable Television Rule No. 13/96. Cable Television Rule No. 13/96 subsequently was amended by, and republished as, Ordinance No. 256. Ordinance No. 256 imposes restrictions on the number of areas that can be served by a single cable television system operator, including its affiliates. According to Ordinance No. 256, a single cable system operator, including its affiliates, may only hold licenses with respect to (i) a maximum of seven areas with a population of 700,000 and above and (ii) a maximum of 12 areas with a population of 300,000 or more and less than 700,000. The restrictions only apply to areas in which the cable system operator, including its affiliates, faces no competition from other pay-television services, excluding services that utilize satellites to transmit their signal. Ordinance No. 256 grants Anatel full discretion to alter or eliminate these ownership restrictions. The term “affiliate” is defined by Federal Decree No. 2,206 as any legal entity that, directly or indirectly, holds at least 20% of the voting capital of another legal entity, or any of two legal entities with common ownership of at least 20% of their respective voting capital.
Rule No. 13/96 granted a one-year period from the date a DISTV authorization is converted into a cable television license for any cable system operator to comply with such restrictions, and a six-month period to make the basic channels for use free of charge, and channels devoted to occasional or permanent services to the public. We believe that we are in compliance with the terms of the ordinance.
The Brazilian Congress is currently discussing a series of bills, which, if accepted, may modify the current regulatory framework. These legislative discussions are at a preliminary stage, and it is unclear what modifications, if any, may ultimately be enacted.
Among such bills is Senate Bill No. 175, proposed in September of 2001. Senate Bill No. 175 aims at excluding the requirement that 51% of the voting rights of companies holding licenses to provide cable television be held by Brazilian citizens or by companies that themselves have 51% of their voting rights held by Brazilian citizens. Senate Bill No. 175 states that there is no longer the need for the 51% requirement and that no other telecommunication service has any limitation with respect to foreign participation, including (i) those services which compete with cable television services, such as MMDS and DTH, and (ii) the switched fixed telephone services, which are
38
considered of strategic interest to national development and consequently offered under a public concession.
On November 10, 2004, Proposed Constitutional Amendment No. 55, or PCA 55, was submitted to the Brazilian Senate. PCA 55 would amend Article 222 of the Brazilian Constitution and would require all Internet service providers and companies “engaging in the production, programming or provision of content of electronic social communication directed to the Brazilian public, by any means” to be owned solely by (i) native-born Brazilians or those naturalized in Brazil for over 10 years or (ii) legal entities organized under Brazilian law and headquartered in Brazil in which at least 70% of the total and voting capital stock is directly or indirectly held by native-born Brazilians or those naturalized in Brazil for over 10 years. We believe that this amendment, if adopted, would not apply to us, but we cannot assure you that this would be the case. If the amendment were found to apply to us, our business could be adversely affected. If the amendment were to be adopted and interpreted in a manner as to apply to us, we would have two years in which to adjust our capital structure so as to comply with the amendment’s requirements.
In addition, Bill 4,209, proposed on October 6, 2004 and sponsored by Federal Representative Luiz Piauhylino, proposes changes similar to PCA 55. Bill 4,209 is now before the Brazilian House of Representatives. We believe that this bill, if adopted, also would not apply to us, but we cannot assure you that this would be the case. If the bill were found to apply to us, our business could be adversely affected. Similarly to the PCA 55, if Bill 4,209 were to be adopted and interpreted in a manner as to apply to us, we would have two years in which to adjust our capital structure so as to comply with the bill’s requirements.
Law No. 3,449, enacted on September 30, 2004, and effective as from October 7, 2004, provides that consumers are not required to pay any minimum usage or enrollment fees charged in Distrito Federal by, among other service providers, cable television operators. Law 3,449 is currently being challenged in court by several telecommunications companies, all of whom have obtained favorable preliminary injunctions. We believe that such law is not applicable to our business since the services offered by us have fixed prices and do not vary according to the usage. We intend to challenge Law 3,449 in court, if necessary.
Anatel Resolution 411, issued on July 14, 2005, and effective as from January 2006, established mandatory goals for pay-television services in Brazil known as the General Plan of Quality Goals for Pay-Television Services, or PGMQ. The PGMQ establishes a total of ten goals, which are divided into four different groups:
• | Service Quality Goals. We are required to comply with the following three goals: | |
1. | Do not exceed certain levels of total received complaints to total connected subscribers; | |
2. | Achieve certain levels of total requested installations; and | |
3. | Achieve certain levels of not charging subscribers 24 hours after a disconnection request. | |
• | Costumer Service Goals. We are required to comply with the following four goals: | |
1. | Respond to complaints from subscribers within 7 business days; | |
39
2. | Reduce subscriber wait time to less than 20 minutes at our customer relations departments; | |
3. | Achieve certain levels of total received subscriber calls; and | |
4. | Respond to subscriber calls received at our call centers within 20 seconds. | |
• | Billing Goal. We are required to comply with the following goal; | |
1. | Do not exceed certain levels of incorrect bills. | |
• | Service Continuity Goals. We are required to comply with the following two goals; | |
1. | Solve any service interruption within 24 hours; and | |
2. | Solve subscriber requests for necessary equipment repairs within 24 hours. |
In addition, if we do not comply with PGMQ goals, Anatel may impose on us several penalties, such as warnings, fines, temporary suspensions and revocation of our licenses. We are in compliance with this resolution since it took effect in July 2006.
MMDS ServicesMMDS services are regulated pursuant to Decree No. 2,196, enacted by the President of Brazil on April 8, 1997, and Ordinance No. 254, issued by the Ministry of Communications on April 16, 1997. MMDS services differ from cable services in that consent to render services is given by an authorization, not through a license, and only to companies incorporated under Brazilian law and headquartered in Brazil that are either controlled by a company incorporated under Brazilian law and headquartered in Brazil or by Brazilian born individuals. There is also no regulation with respect to MMDS programming content.
Since their establishment in Brazil, MMDS services have been operated on two frequency ranges: 2,500-2,690 MHz and 2,170-2,182 MHz. Anatel Resolution 429, issued and effective on February 13, 2006, provided that the latter frequency range (2,170-2,182 MHz, or the “SCM Range”) will no longer be available for MMDS services. Instead, the SCM Range will be used primarily for multimedia communications services, or SCM. Authorizations for the operation of MMDS services on the SCM Range that were granted by Anatel prior to February 13, 2006 will remain valid until their respective expiration dates. We have requested from Anatel extensions for the maximum period available for our authorizations to operate MMDS services on the SCM Range. We do not expect Anatel Resolution 429 to have a material impact on our operations in the near term.
Cable-Related ServicesGeneral
Prior to the enactment of Amendment No. 8 in 1995, Article 21 of the Federal Constitution required the Brazilian government to operate directly, or through concession, permissions or authorizations granted to companies whose shares were controlled by the Brazilian government, all telephone, telegraph, data transmission or other public telecommunications services. This constitutional requirement was the basis for the establishment of the state-owned telephone
40
monopoly, Telebrás, which held controlling interests in 27 regional telephone operating companies. With the adoption of Amendment No. 8/95, Article 21 was modified to permit the Brazilian government to operate telecommunications services either directly or though authorizations, concessions or permissions granted to private entities. Since the enactment of Amendment No. 8, the government has implemented structural reform in the telecommunications sector. The main purpose of this reform was the transfer of the control and operation of the services from the state to private companies.
On July 16, 1997, Congress approved Law No. 9,472, known as the General Telecommunications Law, or LGT, which provided the legislative framework and is the basis for telecommunications regulation in Brazil. The LGT governs the regulation of all telecommunications services, with the exception of radio and television broadcasting services.
The adoption of the LGT, as well as the privatization of switched fixed telephone and cellular services, has led to sweeping changes in the operating, regulatory and competitive environments of the Brazilian telecommunications sector. The changes include: (i) the establishment of an independent regulator, Anatel, and the development and implementation of comprehensive regulation for the telecommunications sector; (ii) the break up of the previously existing state-owned telephone monopoly; and (iii) the introduction of prevalent competition in the rendering of all telecommunications services.
The telecommunications sectorAs part of the restructuring and privatization of the state-owned telecommunications companies, the Brazilian government approved Decree No. 2,534 of April 2, 1998, which established the General Plan of Concessions, also known as Plano Geral de Outorgas, or PGO, for switched fixed telephone carriers. Among other things, the PGO imposed limitations on competition in the rendering of switched fixed telephone services through December 31, 2001.
The PGO divided Brazil into four geographic regions, each of which had two switched fixed telephone carriers, one of which held a license to operate a telephone network and the other holding an authorization to do so. The passage of the PGO was the first step toward increased competition within the telecommunications sector.
With Anatel Resolution 283, which went into effect on November 29, 2001, Anatel began auctioning off new licenses for the rendering of switched fixed telephone services. This was the second step toward increased competition within the telecommunications sector.
With respect to cable television services, although the PGO permitted the switched fixed telephone operators to provide other telecommunications services, they were and remain subject to certain limitations. For instance, the license agreement among União Federal and the local fixed-line telephone carriers prohibits such carriers from providing cable television services or owning interests in cable television carriers in the same switched fixed telephone services license areas. According to Law 8,977, the carriers may only provide such cable television services where there is a clear of lack of interest by other private companies to provide such services.
High-speed cable data servicesLaw No. 8,977, Decree No. 2,206 and Anatel Resolution 190, issued in November 1999, authorize cable television operators such as Net Serviços to:
41
- furnish video and audio signals on their cable networks; and
- utilize their networks to provide value-added services, including high-speed access to Internet service providers that enable the transmission of meteorological, banking, financial, cultural, price and other data.
Anatel issued the SCM Regulation, Resolution No. 272 of August 9, 2001, which permits the offering of capacity for transmission, emission and reception of multimedia information in the format of audio signals, video, data, voice and other sounds, images, texts and other information of any nature, to subscribers within the same area of service, using any means.
The SCM is a fixed telecommunication service rendered for the collective interest on a domestic or international basis, excluding fixed telephony, Mass Electronic Communication Services (cable television, MMDS and DTH), and Broadcast Service. According to Resolution No. 272, SCM providers can offer their services to any residential subscriber. Therefore, cable television operators could request an Anatel authorization to offer SCM and then offer high-speed cable data service, not only to their cable television subscribers, but to any user of this service located in the licensed area of the cable television operator.
Legal ProceedingsWe are party to several tax, civil and labor proceedings, both administrative and judicial, arising out of our regular course of business. In some cases, we have reserved certain amounts to cover potential losses with respect to such proceedings, based on the opinion provided by our independent legal consultants. With respect to labor proceedings, provisions are based on the monthly average of payments, including all taxes and charges payable, corresponding to the labor proceedings settled over the past 24 months. The table below sets forth the reserves established for administrative and judicial tax proceedings, civil litigations and labor proceedings as of December 31, 2006:
(US$ in millions) | ||
Tax related matters | $ 249.1 | |
Labor related matters | 8.3 | |
Civil related matters | 12.2 | |
Total | $ 269.6 |
Of the US$269.6 million of provisions listed above, US$140.7 million is currently being disputed in court and US$128.9 million relates to potential losses regarding administrative proceedings, which have been brought against us and judicial or administrative proceedings which may be brought against us in the future. As of December 31, 2006, we have made judicial deposits in an aggregate amount of US$64.3 million.
Administrative tax proceedingsIOF
We and our subsidiaries carried out commercial current account transactions reflecting monetary transfers between ourselves and our subsidiaries. The Federal Internal Revenue may deem
42
such transfers to be inter-company loans. In the event such transfers are deemed to be inter-company loans, we may be subject to Financial Transactions Tax,Imposto sobre Operações Financeiras, or IOF, on the amount of the loans. IOF applies to loans between non-financial entities at a maximum rate of 1.5% per year where the principal amount and the term for repayment is fixed, and at a daily rate of 0.0041% on the outstanding balance, without limit on the total amount of tax payable, if the principal amount of the loan is not fixed. We have made provisions in the amount of US$47.1 million with respect to these potential income tax and IOF assessments. If we are assessed income tax and IOF on the transfers by the Federal Internal Revenue, the assessments could materially and adversely affect our operating results.
IRPJ and CSLLIn December 2003, the Federal Public Administration issued a tax assessment notice against our subsidiary Cabodinâmica TV Cabo São Paulo S.A., which was incorporated by Net São Paulo in 2004, alleging that Cabodinâmica owes federal corporate income tax, or IRPJ, andContribuição Social sobre o Lucro Líquido, or CSLL, a tax levied upon a company’s net profits, as a result of a 1998 loan transaction between Cabodinâmica and Preferential Holdings Ltda. At the time of the loan transaction, IRPJ and CSLL were imposed only on domestic transactions. Cabodinâmica has presented a defense against the fine on the basis that the loan transaction with Preferential Holdings Ltd. was not a domestic transaction and Cabodinâmica is, therefore, exempt from paying IRPJ and CSLL on the transaction. Currently, Net São Paulo is awaiting a decision on its defense, and it has made provisions of approximately US$5.2 million with respect to this matter.
ICMSThe Secretary of the State of Rio de Janeiro Internal Revenue Service, or State Internal Revenue, has issued several tax assessment notices against Net Rio S.A. claiming that Net Rio S.A. has excluded subscription fee payments from the ICMS tax basis. The aggregate amount Net Rio S.A. allegedly owes is approximately US$3.4 million. In its defense, Net Rio S.A. has argued that it adopted procedures in accordance with Resolution 2585/95 of the State Internal Revenue of the State of Rio de Janeiro, which provides that subscription fee payments should not be deemed program-providing, and therefore, the subscription fee payments should not be considered as ICMS taxable income. Net Rio S.A. has made provisions in the amount of approximately US$3.0 million through December 31, 2006 with respect to the tax assessment notices. The provisions were made assuming an ICMS tax rate of 5%, which is the tax rate charged on cable television services. Tax authorities assume an ICMS tax rate of 25%. Five of these ICMS-related administrative proceedings have resulted in unfavorable decisions and, as a result, Net Rio S.A. deposited with the court US$4.0 million and has provided a guarantee of approximately US$10.4 million.
Net Rio S.A. also received a tax assessment notice from the State Internal Revenue of the State of Rio de Janeiro in the amount of approximately US$24.1 million relating to the ICMS tax. The State Tax Authority alleged that as a result of delays in the payment of its ICMS tax during the period from September 2001 through October 2002, Net Rio S.A. lost its rate reduction benefit. Supported by the opinion of external legal counsel, Net Rio S.A. presented to the State Internal Revenue of the State of Rio de Janeiro its administrative defense. Net Rio S.A. obtained an unfavorable decision with respect to the administrative defense. Net Rio S.A. has filed an appeal to this decision.
Additionally, Net Rio S.A. filed a writ of mandamus before the judicial court with regards to the tax assessment. With respect to the writ of mandamus, Net Rio S.A. obtained an unfavorable decision by the lower and higher judicial court for the assessed period, with the exception of the
43
period between October and December, 2001, for which Net Rio S.A. has made provisions in the amount of approximately US$12.4 million.
IRRFIn September 2003, the Federal Internal Revenue imposed a tax assessment of approximately US$11.8 million on Net Rio S.A., alleging that it owes withholding income tax, or IRRF, as a result of an alleged inter-company loan between it and us. Net Rio S.A. has appealed this tax assessment on the basis that it did not engage in an inter-company loan with us but under a central cash management agreement. Net Rio S.A has made provisions in the amount of approximately US$5.5 million with respect to this tax assessment through December 31, 2006. In March 2006, the lower court decided that Net Rio S.A. should pay only for the fines. After this decision, Net Rio S.A. has appealed again on the same basis.
OtherIn addition to the administrative tax proceedings discussed above, we and our subsidiaries are involved in administrative tax proceedings relating to, among other things: (i) tax assessment notices from theInstituto Nacional do Seguro Social, the Social Security National Institute, alleging amounts owed relating to social contributions; (ii) additional amounts allegedly owed with respect to income tax, including the withholding of income tax on the Multicanal Notes and the Net Sul Floating Rate Notes, both of which have been fully repaid; (iii) additional amounts alleged owed relating to IRPJ and CSLL; and (iv) amounts allegedly due relating toContribuição ao Programa de Integração Social, or PIS, andContribuição para Financiamento da Seguridade Social, or COFINS, taxes relating to wire transfers. We do not expect losses from any of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, our consolidated financial condition or our results of operations.
Judicial Tax ProceedingsShadow tax
Since 1999, several Brazilian municipalities, which currently represent approximately 75% of our subscribers, passed legislation imposing a tax on the use of public thoroughfares, including the installation and passage of cables. This municipal tax is assessed per meter of cable installed in the relevant municipality and the tax rate itself varies widely by municipality. The municipalities currently imposing such a “shadow” tax include São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Caxias do Sul, Anápolis, Campinas, Florianópolis, Criciúma, São Carlos, Indaiatuba, Brasília, Curitiba, Porto Alegre and Campo Grande. The tax generally applies to power companies and telecommunication companies, among others.
We have filed lawsuits in each of these municipalities to challenge the constitutionality and legality of this tax. In these lawsuits, we argue that (i) the tax intrudes upon the exclusive authority of the Brazilian federal government to legislate on telecommunications; and (ii) the legal nature of the tax is not that of a public price, fee or contribution, as defined under Brazilian law. Furthermore, we believe the shadow tax is unconstitutional since it is not included in the list of taxes within the jurisdictional authority of municipalities, as established by the Brazilian federal constitution.
In Rio de Janeiro, we won our case in the lower court. However, this decision was reversed on appeal. We are still awaiting a decision on our appeal from a higher court.
44
In São Paulo, there have been three different decrees imposing a shadow tax. We filed an injunction in the lower court opposing the first decree and were met with an unfavorable decision. We appealed and are currently awaiting the decision on our appeal. We also filed an injunction in the lower court against this second decree, where we received a favorable decision. We are now awaiting the decision on the government’s appeal. The second decree, however, has since been modified by a third decree. We thus filed another injunction in the lower court against this third decree, where we also received a favorable decision. In April 2006, we received an unfavorable decision by a higher court. We plan to appeal this decision.
With respect to other municipalities, we have obtained six favorable decisions, which have been appealed by the municipalities, and three unfavorable decisions, which we have appealed.
We have not made any reserves for the payment of the shadow tax. The tax varies in each municipality and it is calculated per meter of installed cable. We have approximately 19,000 kilometers of installed cable in the municipalities where this tax exists. If the courts rule that the collection of this tax by the municipalities is valid, the tax would have to be paid retroactively. In addition, if the municipalities which currently impose the tax were successful in implementing and collecting this tax, additional municipalities may seek to impose it. If our appeals fail and we are required to pay this tax, our operating results would be materially and adversely affected.
Income tax retained on earningsWe have brought actions against the Federal Internal Revenue to dispute income tax retained on earnings under certain of our hedge transactions. In accordance with preliminary injunctions obtained in these actions, we have not collected or remitted a total amount of approximately US$17.0 million on those transactions. Of this amount, approximately US$5.4 million has been deposited into court by the financial institution which liquidated the transactions and is responsible for withholding the income tax. We have not made reserves for the remaining US$11.6 million. In the event of an unfavorable decision, the remaining US$11.6 million will be accounted for as a tax credit.
ICMSThe ICMS tax is a value-added tax levied at rate of 10% on pay-television subscription revenues, pay-television sign-on and hook-up fees and pay-per-view revenues in each of the Brazilian states in which we operate, except Rio Grande do Sul, where the rate is 12%. Based on Agreement No. 57/59, the rate of the ICMS tax on sales and services for the year ended December 31, 2000 was 7.5%, which rate increased to 10% as of January 1, 2001. All states in which we operate other than the State of Rio Grande do Sul adhere to this 10% rate. The State of Rio Grande do Sul is applying the ICMS tax to us at a rate of 12%, the legality of which we are contesting. Pending the outcome of this dispute, we have fully accrued and paid into escrow amounts at the rates of 7.5% for 2000 and 10% since 2001. As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately US$17.2 million set aside through court deposits and reserves with respect to this matter.
The State of São Paulo Internal Revenue Service has brought an action against our subsidiary Net São José do Rio Preto Ltda. in the amount of approximately US$700,000 to enforce the payment of the ICMS tax, three installments of which the Internal Revenue Service alleges the subsidiary failed to pay. During 2006, Net São José do Rio Preto Ltda. settled this action and paid the amount due.
45
The State of São Paulo Internal Revenue Service also issued a tax assessment against our subsidiary Net Campinas Ltda., alleging that the subsidiary failed to pay certain ICMS installments. During 2006, Net Campinas Ltda. settled this action and paid the amount due.
PIS and COFINSIn 1995 and 1996, we filed lawsuits questioning the imposition of the PIS and the COFINS on revenues derived from the rendering of telecommunication services. With respect to these lawsuits, we made deposits into court of approximately US$28.7 million, reflecting the amounts in dispute. In 1999, we withdrew our lawsuits and directed the amounts previously deposited into court to revert to the federal government.
During 1999, several of our subsidiaries filed lawsuits questioning the constitutionality of the 1998 legislation which increased the calculation basis for the PIS and the COFINS. Previous court decisions relating to these lawsuits have been unfavorable to us, and we have withdrawn our lawsuit. We directed provisions originally made in respect of these suits in the amount of approximately US$65.2 million to revert to the federal government.
IPIThe Federal Internal Revenue has imposed a tax assessment of approximately US$9.9 million on our subsidiary Reyc Comércio e Participações Ltda., or Reyc, alleging that, for the purpose of the Tax on Import, or Imposto sobre Produtos Importados, or IPI, payment, Reyc did not correctly classify transactions related to the import of our analog decoders. Reyc filed three lawsuits against the imposition of the tax assessment and is awaiting the lower court’s decision in connection with two of these lawsuits. In May 2005, the court decision was favorable to Reyc but the Federal Internal Revenue made an appeal against the decision with a higher court. Reyc has made provisions in the amount of approximately US$4.3 million with respect to this tax assessment.
OtherIn addition to the judicial tax proceedings discussed above, we and our subsidiaries are involved in judicial tax proceedings relating to, among other things: (i) theInstituto Nacional do Seguro Social, the Social Security National Institute, with respect to the collection and offsetting of social security contributions; and (ii) theImposto Sobre Serviços, or ISS, a tax levied by municipal governments on revenues derived from the provision of services. We do not expect losses from any of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, our consolidated financial condition or our results of operations.
Civil LitigationIncrease in monthly subscription rates
Since April 1999, 20 lawsuits have been filed against our subsidiaries as a result of increases in monthly subscription rates by state public attorneys or by consumer protection organizations.
The plaintiffs in each lawsuit allege that the increases in monthly subscription rates were abusive and unjustified and violate principles of the Brazilian Consumer Defense Code and legislation establishing that contractual payment increases shall only occur once a year. The plaintiffs further argue that the increases were illegal, that the amounts paid should be reimbursed to
46
subscribers and that the clause in our standard subscription contract, which provides for an increase in monthly subscription rates in the event that the cost of providing services increases, should be declared null and void.
We made a provision of approximately US$2.4 million for 12 of the 20 lawsuits. If we obtain unfavorable final decisions in these and similar lawsuits, our operating results would be materially and adversely affected.
Lawsuits related to signal scrambling and Internet access
An action was brought in August 2002 by the consumer defense organizationAssociação Brasileira de Defesa do Consumidor, or ANADEC, against Net São Paulo Ltda., Net Sorocaba Ltda., Net São José do Rio Preto Ltda., Net São Carlos S.A., Net Piracicaba Ltda., Net Indaiatuba Ltda., Net Franca Ltda., Net Campinas Ltda. and Net Baurú Ltda., all of which are located in the State of São Paulo, whereby plaintiffs seek to prevent the subsidiaries from scrambling their cable signals. Plaintiffs claim that while such scrambling may help prevent piracy, it interferes with picture-in-picture television viewing and with the recording of programs when using a VCR, specifically when the viewer is watching one program while trying to record a second program. In February 2005, our subsidiaries obtained a favorable decision regarding this action. This action is currently before the appeals court, and no provision has been made with respect to this action.
An action was brought in October 2002 and April 2004 by the consumer defense organization,Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Comsumidor, or IDEC, and a federal public attorney, respectively, against Net Belo Horizonte Ltda. and in November 2002 by the consumer defense organization IDEC against Net São Paulo Ltda. whereby plaintiffs seek to prevent the subsidiary from requiring that subscribers connecting to the Internet through NET Virtua also maintain a contract with an Internet service provider. These actions are currently before the lower courts of Minas Gerais and São Paulo, respectively, and no provisions have been made with respect to these actions.
ECAD settlementIn 1996, theEscritório Central de Arrecadação e Distribuição, or ECAD, filed separate lawsuits against each member of the Brazilian pay-television trade association, including separate suits against Net Serviços and each of our cable operating subsidiaries. ECAD is an organization which acts as the legal representative of artists and authors in collecting on behalf of and distributing to such artists and authors royalty payments resulting from the public broadcast of musical compositions in Brazil. ECAD’s complaints sought injunctions and damages on the grounds that the defendant pay-television companies had been using copyrighted musical material in their programming without prior approval and without paying royalties. As of December 31, 2006, our subsidiaries have deposited into court the aggregate amount of approximately US$17.0 million.
Labor ProceedingsWe and our subsidiaries are party to 827 judicial labor proceedings. We estimate that contingencies with respect to these labor proceedings total approximately US$8.3 million, and we have established a provision in this amount. We have made deposits into court in the amount of approximately US$2.5 million. The majority of these claims relate to overtime pay, wage disparity and failure to pay commissions. We have also been named as a co-defendant in complaints filed by employees of companies with which we contract for services on the theory that we should be held
47
responsible for the obligations of such companies to their employees when the companies fail to meet their obligations. In the majority of such actions, we have been found secondarily liable. As of December 31, 2006, we had 481 complaints filed against us by our former employees and 346 complaints filed against us by employees of other companies.
GeneralIn addition, we are party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business, including disputes regarding taxation, additional pay-television subscription outlets, contracts and labor law. However, we do not expect losses from these actions, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity or on our consolidated financial condition or our results of operations.
Organizational StructureWe were incorporated in 1994 as a sociedade anônima, or corporation, under Law 6,404/76 of the Federative Republic of Brazil. We are registered in the commercial registry of the State of São Paulo under number 35.300.177.240. Our registered office is located at Rua Verbo Divino, 1356, São Paulo-SP-04719-002, Brazil, telephone +55 11 2111-2785.
We conduct our cable television and related activities through a group of companies that we have acquired and developed over the past decade. Set forth in the table below is a list of our direct and indirect subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2006:
Jurisdiction of | ||||||
Incorporation or | Direct | |||||
Name of Subsidiary | Organization | Interest | Total Interest | |||
(percent) | (percent) | |||||
Consolidated entities | ||||||
Multicanal Telecomunicações S.A. (*) | Brazil | - | - | |||
Net Belo Horizonte Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
CMA Participações Ltda. (*) | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Jonquil Ventures Ltda. | British Virgin Islands | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
Net Brasília Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Rio Ltda. | Brazil | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
Net Recife Ltda. | Brazil | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
Net São Paulo Ltda. | Brazil | 97.40 | 100.00 | |||
Net Campinas Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Indaiatuba Ltda. | Brazil | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
Net São Carlos Ltda. | Brazil | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
Net Franca Ltda. | Brazil | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
Net Sul Comunicações Ltda. | Brazil | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
Reyc Comércio e Participação Ltda. | Brazil | 26.94 | 100.00 | |||
Net Anápolis Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Bauru Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Campo Grande Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Goiania Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Piracicaba Ltda. | Brazil | 100.00 | 100.00 | |||
Net Ribeirão Preto Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net São José do Rio Preto Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Sorocaba Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Horizonte Sul Comunicações Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
DR – Empresa de Distribuição e Recepção de TV Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Antenas Comunitárias Brasileiras Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 |
48
Jurisdiction of | ||||||
Incorporation or | Direct | |||||
Name of Subsidiary | Organization | Interest | Total Interest | |||
Net Paraná Comunicações Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Joinville Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Florianópolis Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Maringá Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Arapongas Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
TV Cabo Criciúma Ltda. | Brazil | - | 60.00 | |||
Net Curitiba Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Net Londrina Ltda. | Brazil | - | 100.00 | |||
Equity investees | ||||||
TV Cabo e Comunicações Jundiaí S.A. (Jointly controlled) | Brazil | 50.00 | 50.00 | |||
Brasil TV Cabo Participações S.A. (**) | Brazil | 82.81 | 82.81 | |||
Vivax S.A. | Brazil | 14.57 | 36.71 |
(*) As part of its ongoing corporate restructuring plan, certain dormant companies identified in the table above were merged.
(**) BTVC is controlled by Mr. Fernando Norbert, who holds 51% of its voting shares.
We are in the process of combining a number of our operating and non-operating subsidiaries for administrative reasons, and to contain costs associated with the operations of our subsidiaries. In connection with our restructuring, we have committed to continue and complete the consolidation of our subsidiaries.
49
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
We have no unresolved comments from the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 20-F. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors that include, but are not limited to, those set forth under “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 20-F.
OverviewWe are a leading multiservice company in the pay-television and broadband Internet industries in Brazil. Currently, we are the largest cable television operator in Brazil and one of the largest pay-television operators in Latin America, based upon the number of subscribers and homes passed. As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately 1.8 million connected subscribers in 44 cities in Brazil, including São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, the two largest Brazilian cities. We are the leading provider of high-speed cable modem Internet access in Brazil through our NET Virtua service, which had approximately 727,000 subscribers as of December 31, 2006. We also provide voice product through our NET Fone via Embratel service, which had approximately 182,000 subscribers as of December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2006, our advanced network of coaxial and fiber-optic cable covered over 36,000 kilometers and passed approximately 7.2 million homes and approximately 42% of such network had two-way communication capability. In 2006, we had total revenues of US$1,144.7 million. Our network currently operates in major cities located throughout Brazil, including six of Brazil’s largest cities. We substantially completed the build-out of our network in 1998. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company.”
Beginning in 2001, our financial condition and results of operations were significantly and adversely affected by foreign and Brazilian economic factors and the depreciation of the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar. Because all of our revenue is denominated in reais, the depreciation of the real in 2001 and 2002 resulted in a lower amount of funds in dollar terms being available to us to support our significant U.S. dollar-denominated debt service obligations.
We initially responded to these developments through a recapitalization, completed in the third quarter of 2002, in which our major shareholders converted certain debt obligations into equity and subscribed for new equity shares in an aggregate amount of approximately R$1.2 billion (US$561.3 million). However, as a result of the continuing depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar and the high real interest rates in the second half of 2002, we determined that, despite the recapitalization, we would be unable to meet our interest and scheduled principal payment obligations in the then near and medium-term. As a result, we ceased to pay interest or scheduled principal on our financial debt in December 2002, and in early 2003, we commenced negotiations with an informal steering committee of our various lenders and debt holders. This process culminated on March 22, 2005 with the conclusion of the restructuring of our outstanding
50
indebtedness. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—The Restructuring” for a discussion of the restructuring.
We also took a number of steps relating to our operations in response to the adverse economic developments noted above. During 2003, we entered into negotiations with our programmers through Net Brasil to amend our programming agreements to provide that we are charged for programming in reais instead of in U.S. dollars, thereby reducing the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our programming costs. This has had a positive impact on our financial performance since 2003.
During 2002, due to weaknesses in our business and liquidity positions, we deferred to 2003 a significant amount of payments due equipment suppliers and to 2004 and 2005 a significant amount of fees due programmers. During 2003, we paid all of the deferred payments due the equipment suppliers. During 2004 and 2005, we paid all of the deferred programming fees to programmers, except for one programmer with which we have not yet formalized the agreement.
In 2003 and 2004, we reduced our capital expenditures to reflect a more targeted investment strategy. In 2005 and 2006, as a consequence of higher subscriber growth, we increased our capital expenditures. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures.”
In 2006, we issued new debt instruments with longer maturities and lower costs than our existing debt. Following the completion of this process, our debt is comprised of (i) the perpetual bonds in a principal amount of US$150 million; and (ii) US$271.3 million (R$580 million) in principal amount of new debentures issued in Brazilian reais, the proceeds of which offering were used to prepay existing debt. For a discussion of these and other steps we have taken to address our financial condition, as well as details of our outstanding debt, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
In 2007, we intend to work to keep our growth at the level achieved in 2006. Key factors that will influence our ability to achieve these objectives include:
- Competition. Our pay-television, broadband and voice services face a growing number of competitors. We are pursuing a marketing strategy to attract and retain customers. We are working on developing new packages of bundle products to better match customer expectations and we are working to improve customer satisfaction.
- Cost control. To maintain our profitability in the increasingly competitive Brazilian environment, we must continue to implement strategies to improve operating efficiency. We plan to do this by keeping operating costs, general and administrative expenses and bad debt expenses under control.
- New opportunities. Our ability to expand our revenues will depend, in large part, on the success of our strategy for accelerated growth and increased triple play (video, data and voice) sales.
- Disposable income. Pay-television is still seen in Brazil as a luxury product and faces strong competition from free broadcast television.
51
Disposition and Acquisition
Sale of Vicom
Prior to August 30, 2004, we owned Vicom, which charged corporate customers a fee for the provision of data transmission services via satellite, hybrid fiber coax, or HFC, network and radio circuits. On November 4, 2003, we entered into an agreement with Comsat International for the sale of Vicom, and on August 30, 2004, the sale of Vicom was completed. As a result of the sale and according to SFAS No. 144, all results of operations attributable to Vicom have been recorded as “discontinued operations.”
Acquisition of our interest in VivaxSee “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—Vivax Acquisition.”
Critical Accounting PoliciesThe SEC considers an accounting policy to be critical if it is important to a company’s financial condition and results and it requires significant judgments and estimates on the part of management in its application. The development and selection of these critical accounting policies have been determined and reviewed by our management. The following accounting policies are the most critical to us. For a summary of all of our significant accounting policies, including the critical accounting policies discussed below, see note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, included elsewhere in this Form 20-F.
Estimated liability for tax, labor and civil claims and assessments
The estimated liability for tax, labor and civil claims and assessments involves considerable judgment on the part of management. As prescribed by SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” a contingency is “an existing condition, situation, or set of circumstances involving uncertainty as to possible gain or loss to an enterprise that will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.”
We are subject to various claims as well as tax, civil, labor and other proceedings covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of our business activities. We establish reserves for legal proceedings to which we and our subsidiaries are party when we determine that losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Our judgment is always based on the opinion of our internal and external legal advisors. Reserve balances are adjusted to account for changes in circumstances in ongoing issues and the establishment of additional reserves for emerging issues. While we believe that our current level of reserves is adequate, changes in the future could impact these determinations.
Impairment of goodwillEffective January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” In accordance with SFAS No. 142, on January 1, 2002, we ceased to amortize goodwill arising from acquisitions completed prior to July 1, 2001. In lieu of amortization, we are required to perform an annual impairment review of our goodwill.
52
In determining impairments, management must make significant judgments and estimates to calculate the fair value of an investment. Fair value is the amount at which an asset could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties and may be estimated using a number of techniques, including quoted market prices or valuations by third parties, comparison to market multiples, comparison of similar recent sales transactions and discounted cash flows. Discounted cash flow is calculated by estimating future cash flow streams, applying appropriate market discount rates to determine the present values of cash flow streams, and then assigning probabilities to the various cash flow scenarios. The fair value of an asset may differ depending upon the estimates and assumptions used in these valuation techniques.
During 2002, we completed the required tests for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. We established four reporting units for the purposes of this evaluation. These tests indicated that an impairment loss must be recognized as goodwill for both the Net Sul and Vicom acquisitions in an amount of US$367.7 million. The evaluation process was validated and the assumptions and procedures in the model were considered acceptable and properly constructed by our external consultants.
Our annual impairment analysis, which was performed during the fourth quarter of 2004, 2005 and 2006, did not result in an impairment charge for 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
Depreciation and impairment of property and equipment
At December 31, 2006, the carrying value of our property and equipment and other cable-related long-term assets, net, totaled US$610.6 million, which represented 33.7% of our total assets. This carrying value included costs capitalized for labor and overhead incurred in connection with the installation of cable systems and is stated at cost. The application of our property and equipment accounting policies incorporates estimates, assumptions and judgments by management relative to the capitalized costs and useful lives. In 2006, we depreciated our cable assets using the straight-line method over an estimated remaining economic useful life of the assets ranging from 12 to 15 years, resulting in a depreciation rate ranging from 6.7% to 8.3% .
Changes in circumstances, such as technological advances, changes to our business model or changes in our capital and investment strategy can result in the actual useful lives differing from our estimates, leading management to revise useful lives that can be shortened for certain asset categories and extended for others depending on technological decisions made by us. Set top boxes are an example of an asset item subject to significant technological changes. New set top boxes associated with new equipment allowing signal compression may allow us to provide new value added services and extend the remaining useful lives of our fiber optic assets. In cases where we determine that the useful life of property and equipment should be reviewed, we depreciate the net book value over its revised remaining useful lives, thereby increasing or decreasing depreciation expenses. The carrying value of fixed assets is reviewed if facts and circumstances suggest that they may be impaired. If this review indicates that the carrying value of the fixed assets will not be recovered from undiscounted cash flows generated from such assets, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. No impairment of fixed assets existed as of December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006.
The estimated useful lives of individual items of our cable transmission network are as follows:
53
Description | Useful life (years) | |
Cable network | 12 - 15 | |
Optic fiber | 15 | |
Decoders | 10 | |
Cable modem | 10 |
Income taxes
Income taxes are provided using the liability method prescribed by Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under the liability method, deferred income taxes reflect the tax effect of net operating loss carry forwards, the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities recognized in the financial statements and the tax basis, as well as the effects of adjustments made to reflect the requirements of US GAAP, determined under enacted tax laws and rates. The financial effect of changes in tax laws or rates is accounted for in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when management determines that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized. Establishing valuation allowances requires management to make significant estimates of future taxable income.
Sources of Revenues
Monthly subscription fee revenues represent the dominant portion of our net revenues, and sign-on and hook-up fees constitute a relatively minor portion of our net revenues. All of our revenues are denominated in reais. Under Brazilian currency rules, our contracts with our current subscribers allow us to increase subscription fees only once every 12 months and then only in proportion to the IGP-M inflation rate.
- Monthly subscription revenues.Monthly subscription revenues consist of monthly subscription fees paid by subscribers. Subscription fees are recorded in the month the service is provided. Substantially all of our revenues come from monthly subscription fees.
- Sign-on and hook-up fee revenues.We charge subscribers a fee for the installation of the equipment necessary to receive our pay-television service. Sign- on and hook-up fees billed to new subscribers are deferred to the extent that they exceed related direct selling costs. The deferred fees were amortized to revenue over a period of ten years until December 31, 2005. Since January 1, 2006, the deferred fees are amortized to revenue over a period of six years, which better represents the estimated average period during which we expect subscribers will remain connected to our cable network.
- Pay-per-view revenues.Pay-per-view revenues consist of revenues from pay-per- view programming services (such as sporting events, musical concerts and movies).
A substantial part of our pay-per-view revenues each year is derived from our transmission of the state and national soccer championships. Because the dates of these championships vary from year to year, our pay-per-view revenues tend to be seasonal, with a disproportionate percentage recorded during the periods in which these events are televised. Pay-per-view revenues are recorded in the month the service is provided.
54
- Other services revenues.Other services revenues consist of sales of our programming guide, programming package upgrades, technical support services, disconnection/reconnection services, voice services, fiber optic rental services and other services. Other services revenues are recorded in the month the service is provided.
The following are the main factors that influence our revenues:
- Subscriber base.Most of our revenues are recurring monthly revenues from our subscribers. Thus, key factors to maintain profitability of our business include controlling the churn rate, increasing sales to existing customers, bundling our services and acquiring new customers.
- Subscription fee levels.Our strategy is to maintain competitive prices compared to our main competitors and at the same time increase average revenue per user by providing bundled products to our premium clients.
Taxes and other deductions from revenues are directly linked to our volume of subscription sales. Except for theFundo de Universalização dos Serviços de Telecomunicações, or FUST, and theFundo para o Desenvolvimento Tecnológico das Telecomunicações, or FUNTEL, each of the taxes described below is passed on to our subscribers as part of their subscription fee. Taxes and other deductions from revenues consist of:
- ICMS value-added tax. In São Paulo, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Sul and Distrito Federal, the ICMS tax is levied at a rate of 25%. In Minas Gerais, Paraná, Goiás and Rio de Janeiro, the ICMS tax is levied at a rate of 18%, 27%, 29% and 30%, respectively. However, for pay-television subscription revenues, pay- television sign-on and hook-up fees and pay-per-view revenues in each of the Brazilian states in which we operate, the ICMS tax is levied at a rate of 10%, except the state of Rio Grande do Sul, where the rate is 12%.
- ISS municipal tax. The ISS tax is a municipal tax on services that is levied at a maximum rate of 5.0% (some municipalities have lower rates) on certain services, such as maintenance and other technical activities.
- PIS-related federal tax. The PIS is a federal social security tax that is levied at a rate of 0.65% on revenues derived from pay-television, telecommunication and broadband services and at a rate of 1.65% on revenues derived from all other services.
- COFINS federal social security tax. The COFINS is a federal social security tax that is levied at a rate of 3.0% on revenues derived from pay-television, telecommunication and broadband services and at a rate of 7.6% on revenues derived from all other services.
- FUST and FUNTEL taxes. The FUST and FUNTEL are taxes based on gross service revenues, excluding canceled sales and other taxes, over the amounts charged to our subscribers. The FUST and FUNTEL are levied at the rates of 1.0% and 0.5%, respectively.
55
Operating Costs and Expenses
Our most significant operating expenses are:
- Programming costs.Programming has been, and is expected to continue to be, our largest operating expense, representing in 2006, 28.1% of our net operating revenues. Programming purchase costs consist of programming fees paid by our operating subsidiaries directly to certain international programmers for the acquisition of new international content from sources outside of Brazil and to Net Brasil primarily in relation to programming produced in Brazil. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions— Material Transactions with Affiliates—Net Brasil Programming Agreement.”
The programming fees we pay are generally highest with respect to the programs obtained for our digital programming packages and for our Premium and Advanced analog programming packages. - Other direct operating costs.Other direct operating costs include: expenses for utility pole rentals paid to utility companies, electricity, maintenance and other costs that increase as a function of the development of our network; payroll and related charges, and costs related to our customer service, billing and information systems. A substantial portion of our network consists of aerial cables (as opposed to buried cables) often strung on electrical utility poles. We gain access to the utility poles by pole attachment rental agreements with local electrical utilities, which are generally required to provide us this access for a negotiated fee.
- Selling, general and administrative expenses.Selling, general and administrative expenses includes expenses related to payroll, benefits, sales commissions and consulting, financial advisory and computer software maintenance, as well as expenses related to advertising, estimated liability for tax, labor and civil claims and assessments and allowance for doubtful accounts.
- Depreciation of cable network.Due to the investments we have made in our cable and broadband networks and the increased size of our network resulting from the Net Sul acquisition in September 2000, we face significant annual depreciation costs. Our depreciation costs are affected by changes in the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate. We maintain all accounting records in our functional currency, reais, and we translate the amounts to U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Appreciation of the real will result in higher depreciation amounts when expressed in U.S. dollars.
See “—Depreciation and Amortization” directly below.
The following are the principal factors that influence our operating costs:
- Programming costs. We pay programming costs on a per subscriber base. We expect programming costs to remain as our main cost. Our ability to maintain a good relationship with our programming suppliers and keep prices at attractive levels are important factors for the profitability of our business.
- Selling expenses. In 2006, due to our accelerated growth in our subscriber base, selling expenses increased significantly compared to 2005 levels. In 2007, we expect to maintain the growth level presented in 2006 and at same time be more efficient in selling triple play, which would lead to lower per unit acquisition cost and increase our profitability.
56
Depreciation and Amortization
We depreciate our cable network and fiber optic cable assets using the straight line method, over the estimated economic useful life of the assets. We estimate the useful life of our cable plant from 12 to 15 years for our cable network and 15 years for our fiber optic cable, resulting in annual depreciation rates of 8.3% to 6.7% and 6.7%, respectively.
As of January 1, 2006, based on the estimated average period that subscribers are expected to remain connected to our system, we have revised the estimated economic useful lives of sign-on and hook-up fee revenue and related direct selling expenses from ten to six years.
Other Income and Expenses
Other income and expenses consist of:
- Monetary indexation income (expense), net; Gain (loss) on exchange rate, net. Monetary indexation expense, net, consists of monetary correction charges on reais-denominated debt. Gain (loss) on exchange rate, net, consists of foreign exchange gains and losses on U.S. dollar-denominated debt. We record foreign exchange losses or gains on our U.S. dollar-denominated debt as a function of the U.S. dollar’s appreciation or depreciation in relation to the real.
- Interest expenses. Interest expenses consist principally of interest payable on our outstanding debt.
- Financial expenses, net. Financial expenses consist principally of theContribuiçãoProvisória sobre Movimentações Financeiras, or CPMF, a federal tax on financial transactions levied at a rate of 0.38% on withdrawals from checking accounts; IOF tax on financial operations; and losses from hedge positions.
- Interest income. Interest income consists of interest on short-term investments and gain on extinguishment of liabilities, as well as monies collected in the form of penalty and interest payments from late payments of monthly subscription fees.
- Income taxes (expenses). Income taxes (expenses) have been accounted for in accordance with the liability method. Valuation allowances are established when we determine it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Functional and reporting currencies and exchange rate variations
While we maintain our financial records in reais, our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Changes in the value of the real against the U.S. dollar have had and will continue to have material effects on our results of operations and the value of our assets and liabilities denominated in reais. We discuss these effects in detail under “—Brazilian Economic Environment—Effects of Inflation and Exchange Rate Fluctuations.”
57
Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2005
The Company’s accounts are maintained in Brazilian reais, which have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards “SFAS” 52 “Foreign Currency Translation” using the real as the functional currency and the U.S. dollar as the reporting currency. In accordance with US GAAP, revenues, expenses, gains and losses are translated from Brazilian reais to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate for the period, which for the twelvemonth period ended on December 31, 2005 was R$2.4357 per US$1.00 and for the twelve-month period ended on December 31, 2006 was R$2.1751 per US$1.00. Based on a comparison of such average exchange rates, the real appreciated 10.7% against the U.S. dollar in 2006 versus 2005, which we refer to as the “real appreciation” in the following discussion. All of our operating revenues and substantially all of our operating costs and expenses are denominated in Brazilian reais. As a result, the real appreciation materially impacted each of the line items described below.
Total revenuesTotal revenues increased by 40.3% to US$1,144.7 million in 2006 compared to US$815.9 million in 2005. This increase was principally due to our pay-television and broadband subscriber base growth by 18% and 98% in 2006 versus 2005, respectively, higher sales from our pay-per-view alternatives and the real appreciation.
Taxes and other deductions from revenuesIn 2006, services and other taxes totaled US$243.8 million, an increase of 57.0% compared to US$155.3 million in 2005. This increase is related to the increase in taxes resulting from higher revenues and due to the real appreciation. Additionally, this increase reflects the increase in taxes due to broadband revenue growth, where the ICMS (tax on distribution of goods and services) rate is higher. See “—Overview—Critical Accounting Policies—taxes and others deductions from revenues” for a discussion of ICMS rates applicable to the individual services and products. As a percentage of total revenues, taxes and other deductions from revenues increased to 21% in 2006 from 19% in 2005.
Programming costsIn 2006, programming expenses totaled US$252.7 million, an increase of 26.7% compared to US$199.5 million recorded in 2005. This increase was due to the increase in our subscriber base, the increase in programming costs reflecting the price adjustment by the IGP-M inflation rate and the real appreciation. As a percentage of net operating revenues, programming costs decreased to 28.1% in 2006 compared to 30.2% in 2005.
Other direct operating costsOther direct operating costs increased by 40.8% to US$183.3 million in 2006 compared to US$130.2 million in 2005, primarily due to higher network expenses, such as electricity, and expenses incurred in contracting with third parties for additional bandwidth to support our broadband Internet services growth and due to the real appreciation. As a percentage of net operating revenues, other direct operating costs increased to 20.3% in 2006 compared to 19.7% in 2005.
Selling, general, administrative and other expenses
Selling, general, administrative and other expenses increased by 53.7% to US$227.9 million in 2006, compared to US$148.3 million in 2005. The increase was primarily due to higher selling
58
expenses, which increased to US$81.4 million in 2006 from US$42.9 million in 2005, principally due to higher sales commissions, marketing and active telemarketing activities, as a consequence of an increase in accomplished sales and the real appreciation. In addition, in 2006, the number of employees increased by 22% when compared to 2005. As a percentage of net operating revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased from 22.4% in 2005 to 25.3% in 2006.
Depreciation and amortizationIn 2006, depreciation and amortization expenses increased 10.0% to US$75.0 million, compared to US$68.2 million recorded in 2005. Based on a technical study performed by our management, we changed our subscribers’ estimated useful life (i.e., the estimated average period that subscribers are expected to remain connected to our network) from 10 to 6 years, which increased amortization expenses related to residential hook-up costs in an amount of US$2.6 million.
Monetary indexation income (expense), net; gain (loss) on exchange rate, net
Our combined monetary indexation expense, net, and gain (loss) on exchange rate, net, decreased by 69.6% to a gain of US$9.1 million in 2006, from a gain of US$29.9 million in 2005. This result was mainly due to the decrease in our foreign exchange exposure, as a result of the repayment of all our U.S. dollar denominated debt with the proceeds from the issuance of local Brazilian realdenominated debentures in September 2005.
Interest expenses, financial expenses, net and interest income
Interest expenses, financial expenses, net and interest income decreased by 65.1% to US$17.8 million in 2006, compared to US$51.0 million in 2005. This decrease was primarily due to the lower costs and debt levels as a consequence of the conclusion of our debt restructuring and debt refinancing in 2005, the gain on the extinguishment of liabilities, the lower hedge losses and the lower IOF tax on intercompany transactions.
Income taxes (expenses)In 2006, income taxes amounted to a credit of US$40.8 million compared to tax expense of US$42.0 million in 2005. Under Brazilian tax law, income tax is computed for each subsidiary entity and not on a consolidated basis. Although substantially all of our operating subsidiaries experienced increased operating income in 2006 compared to 2005, and consequently higher current income tax expense, this increase was offset in large part by our corporate restructuring activities in merging profitable entities into entities with net operating losses. In addition, the tax credit results from partial reversal of valuation allowances on net operating loss carryfowards whose realization became more likely than not in 2006 due to our improved profitability also contributed to this offset.
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2004
The Company’s accounts are maintained in Brazilian reais, which have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards “SFAS” 52 “Foreign Currency Translation” using the real as the functional currency and the U.S. dollar as the reporting currency. In accordance with US GAAP, revenues, expenses, gains and losses are translated from reais to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate for the period, which for the twelve-month period ended on December 31, 2004 was R$2.9263 per US$1.00 and for the twelve-month period ended on December 31, 2005 was R$2.4357 per US$1.00. Based on a comparison of such average exchange rates, the real appreciated 16.8% against the U.S. dollar in 2005 versus 2004, which we
59
refer to as the “real appreciation” in the following discussion. All of our operating revenues and substantially all of our operating costs and expenses are denominated in reais. As a result, the real appreciation materially impacted each of the line items described below.
Total revenuesTotal revenues increased by 42.1% to US$815.9 million in 2005 as compared to US$574.3 million in 2004. This increase was mostly due to the real appreciation, the growth in our pay-televison and broadband subscriber base by 9% and 94%, respectively, and also to the monthly fee readjustment at the IGP-M inflation rate.
Taxes and other deductions from revenuesTaxes and other deductions from revenues totaled US$155.3 million in 2005, an increase of 44.9% as compared to US$107.1 million in 2004, due to higher revenues, which is the base for the computation of taxes. As a percentage of total revenues, taxes and other deductions from revenues remained stable at approximately 19%.
Programming costsProgramming costs increased by 30.7% to US$199.5 million in 2005, as compared to US$152.6 million in 2004. This increase was mostly due to the real appreciation, higher programming fees related to the inclusion of HBO channels on our line-up and in connection with the increase in the “Premium” and “Digital” subscriber base. In addition, there was an increase in our overall pay-television subscriber base and readjustments of our programming agreements by the IGP-M inflation rate.
Other direct operating costsOther direct operating costs increased by 59.2% to US$130.2 million in 2005 as compared to US$81.8 million in 2004. This increase was primarily due to the real appreciation, higher costs related to material, technical services and pay-television analog boxes repair and recovery. In addition, the increase was impacted by the increase in the number of employees, higher costs related to our call center and an increase in NET Virtua links costs as a result of growth in our broadband subscriber base.
Selling, general and administrative expensesSelling, general and administrative expenses increased by 35.1% to US$148.3 million in 2005 as compared to US$109.8 million in 2004. The increase was mostly due to the real appreciation, higher marketing expenses related to pay-television and broadband marketing campaigns, higher sales commission expenses and an increase in the number of employees.
Depreciation and amortizationDepreciation and amortization expenses increased by 20.1% to US$68.2 million in 2005 as compared to the US$56.7 million in 2004, mostly due to the real appreciation.
60
Monetary indexation income (expense), net and gain (loss) on exchange rate, net
Monetary indexation expense net and gain (loss) on exchange rate, net increased by 16.4% to US$29.9 million in 2005 as compared to US$25.7 million in 2004. This is a result of lower monetary indexation expense, due to the decrease in the IGP-M inflation rate and the conclusion of the debt restructuring process, which reduced our level of debt, in the first quarter of 2005, combined with lower gain on exchange rate.
Interest expenses, financial expenses, net and interest income
Interest expenses, financial expenses, net and interest income decreased by 64.4% to US$51.0 million in 2005 as compared to US$143.5 million in 2004. This decrease was mostly due to our lower indebtedness level and a decrease in IOF (Financial Operations Tax) on intercompany transactions, which were in part, offset by the real appreciation and losses on swap contracts during 2005.
Income tax expensesIn 2005, we recorded income tax expenses of US$42.0 million as compared to income tax expenses of US$41.9 million in 2004. Under Brazilian tax law, we are charged income tax at the subsidiary level and not at the consolidated level. Some of our operating subsidiaries experienced increased operating income in 2005, and consequently higher income tax expense. This increase was offset in large part by a decrease in deferred tax expenses in 2005 compared to 2004.
Liquidity and Capital ResourcesWe broadly define liquidity as our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operating activities to meet our obligations and commitments. In addition, liquidity includes the ability to obtain appropriate debt and equity financing and to convert into cash those assets that are no longer required to meet our strategic and financial objectives. Accordingly, liquidity cannot be considered separately from capital resources that consist of current or potentially available future funds for use in meeting debt service requirements and long-range business objectives.
Our liquidity situation has improved significantly since we completed the restructuring of our outstanding indebtedness. As of December 31, 2005 and 2006, our net debt, calculated as the sum of “current portion of long-term debt” and “long-term debt” minus the sum of “cash and cash equivalents”, “short-term investments” and “restricted cash”, amounted to US$187.3 million and US$187.2 million, respectively. In general, we hold our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments in Brazilian reais. Additionally, as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 our current assets were US$85.4 million and US$144.4 million greater than our current liabilities, respectively.
Given the level of our operating cash flows, the expected level of capital expenditures needed to support our growth and the grace period for principal debt amortization, we believe that our cash generation in addition to our current position in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient in the near term to cover all expected cash outflows.
61
Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2005
We had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of US$234.0 million as of December 31, 2006, an increase of 83.5% from US$127.5 million as of December 31, 2005.
Cash flows from operating activities. Net cash from operating activities was US$189.5 million in 2006 as compared to US$26.8 million in 2005. This increase is a result of higher operating income, the payment to the holders of Net Sul Notes, which used the funds of US$33.7 million deposited in an escrow account, the purchase of short-term investments in an amount of US$107.3 million and a temporary decrease in working capital, as a significant amount of equipment required to upgrade our network was acquired late in the fourth quarter of 2006 and, consequently, payments shall occur only in 2007.
Cash flows from investing activities. We used US$223.7 million in cash in investing activities in 2006, an increase of 204.7% as compared to the US$73.4 million used in investing activities in 2005. This increase was primarily due to investments in equipment related to the growth in our broadband Internet and pay-television subscriber bases and investments related to the upgrade in our network and digital services.
Cash flows from financing activities. Net cash from financing activities was US$19.5 million in 2006, an increase of 335.6% as compared to US$4.5 million in 2005. In2006, our common shareholders subscribed to newly issued shares of our common stock in the total amount of US$13.8 million as they exercised their preemptive rights in connection with the Vivax acquisition. During 2006, we repaid outstanding debt in a principal amount of US$418.0 million and issued new debt in a principal amount of US$421.4 million. In 2005, in connection with the debt restructuring plan, the cash capital contribution in a total amount of US$223.1 million was fully used to pay down existing debt.
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2004
We had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of US$127.5 million as of December 31, 2005, an increase of 5.3% from US$121.1 million as of December 31, 2004.
Cash flows from operating activities. Net cash from operating activities was US$26.8 million in 2005 as compared to US$25.6 million in 2004. Although we experienced an increase in our operating income, this increase was offset in part by the deposit of funds in an escrow account, as a pledge for holders of Net Sul Notes.
Cash flows from investing activities. We used US$73.4 million in cash in investing activities in 2005, an increase of 215.5% as compared to the US$23.3 million used in investing activities in 2004. This increase was primarily due to investments in equipment related to the growth in our broadband Internet and pay-television subscriber bases.
Cash flows from financing activities. Net cash from financing activities was US$4.5 million in 2005. In connection with our debt restructuring plan, a substantial portion of the net proceeds of our issuance in September 2005 of the Debenture 5th Public Issuance was used to pay down existing debt.
62
Liquidity requirements and sources
Most of our capital expenditures are related to customer acquisition activity, being part of our ongoing operations. If we continue at our current rate of growth and consequently continue to increase the number of our pay-television and broadband subscribers, we will need significant cash to fund capital expenditures. Also, we have to make interest payments on our debt and scheduled principal payments, which will start in 2010. We have historically funded these liquidity requirements through operating cash flows, borrowings under credit facilities, the proceeds of debt and equity financings and capital advances and loans from our shareholders. As a result of the consummation of our debt restructuring, after taking into consideration the range of projections of cash flows from operations, anticipated capital expenditures and debt principal and interest repayment requirements, we expect to have adequate financial resources to meet our anticipated cash requirements in 2007 and the foreseeable future.
The amount of our anticipated operating cash flows in 2007 and future periods could be adversely affected by a number of factors, however, many of which are not within our control. Weakness of the Brazilian economy could result in a decline in the number of our subscribers, which would lower subscription revenues. Depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar would decrease our revenue per subscriber in U.S. dollar terms, unless we were able to implement corresponding increases in subscription fees in reais, which we do not believe is likely. Depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar would also decrease the amount of cash that we have available to cover our U.S. dollar-denominated or U.S. dollar-indexed expenses. Most of these expenses are related to a significant percentage of our equipment expenses. Our ability to raise short-term or long-term debt financing or equity financing in the future will depend on a number of factors outside of our control, including conditions in Brazil and in international financial markets. We cannot assure you that in the future we will be able to raise debt financing in sufficient amounts or at all.
We had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of US$234.0 million as of December 31, 2006, an increase of 83.5% from US$127.5 million as of December 31, 2005. This increase is mainly due to the issuance of the perpetual bond. Excluding the effects of: (i) the proceeds from perpetual bonds in the amount of US$150.0 million; (ii) US$18.7 million net amortization on capital markets operations; and (iii) payment of the US$58.8 million as Capex aimed at the new projects, we would have ended the year with R$164.5 million as cash and cash equivalents. This cash level is above the US$127.5 million recorded at the end of 2005, showing that our current cash generation level has been sufficient to effect the necessary investments to sustain its organic growth, even with our accelerated growth.
Corporate Credit RatingsAs a result of our restructuring, Standard & Poor’s rated our U.S. dollar-denominated senior debt and our real-denominated senior debt issued in the restructuring B+ and brBBB, respectively, and assigned us the global scale issuer credit rating and outlook of B+/stable and the national scale issuer credit rating and outlook of brBBB/stable. On May 31, 2005 Standard & Poor’s upgraded our real-denominated senior debt issued in the restructuring from brBBB to brBBB+, and assigned us the global scale issuer credit rating and outlook of B+/positive and the national scale issuer credit rating and outlook of brBBB+/positive. On March 13, 2006 Standard & Poor’s upgraded our real-denominated senior debt issued in the restructuring from brBBB+ to brA, and upgraded our global scale issuer credit rating and outlook from B+/positive to BB-/stable and the national scale issuer credit rating and outlook from brBBB+/positive to brA/stable. On November 6, 2006, Standard & Poor’s upgraded our real-denominated senior debt issued in the restructuring from brA to
63
brA+/positive and changed our global scale issuer outlook from stable to positive. Moody’s Investors Service rated our U.S. dollar-denominated senior debt issued in the restructuring and our global scale issuer to B3. On May 9, 2006 Moody’s Investors Service upgraded our global scale issuer credit rating from B3 to B1. On May 22, 2006, Moody’s Investors Service assigned our national scale credit rating as Baa2.br.
Contractual ObligationsThe following table sets out our major contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006:
Payments due by period | ||||||||||
Less than | 1 – 3 Years | 3 – 5 | More than | Total | ||||||
1 Year | Years | 5 Years | ||||||||
(US$; in millions) | ||||||||||
Debt | – | – | 203.5 | 217.8 | 421.3 | |||||
Lease of Utility Poles (1) | 19.5 | 41.5 | – | – | 61.0 | |||||
Lease of Office Space | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.0 | – | 11.4 | |||||
Total | 23.1 | 45.3 | 207.5 | 217.8 | 493.7 | |||||
(1) | In addition to the amounts listed in the table above, we are contractually obligated to make lease payments under our utility pole lease arrangements from the time the lease expires until our equipment is removed from such poles. Those fees will be based on the amounts we were paying at the time those arrangements expired. |
Capital Expenditures
A description of our capital expenditures, identified by major category, is as follows:
- subscriber installation, including purchases of set top boxes and cable modems;
- cable network construction and rebuilding, which primarily includes construction costs related to installing cable system infrastructure in multiple dwelling units, or MDUs, rebuilding portions of our cable network and, to a very limited extent, the growth or build-out of our cable network;
- broadband network construction and rebuilding, which primarily includes construction costs related to cable modem installation, installing broadband infrastructure in MDUs, rebuilding portions of our broadband network to permit two-way communication and the build-out of our broadband network, including our data center; and
- upgrading existing systems, the purpose of which is principally to improve technical quality, further improve management controls and support subscriber growth.
We have historically made significant capital expenditures relating to the encoding of our network, principally to reduce piracy. We have not made substantial capital expenditures for
64
encoding since 2002, and we do not expect to make material capital expenditures for this purpose in 2006 and beyond.
We reduced our level of capital expenditures in 2003 as compared to 2002, as we were able to better target our investments on a selective basis. In 2004, we made total capital expenditures of US$43.4 million relating primarily to subscriber installation, upgrading existing systems and cable network construction and rebuilding, an increase of 90% from US$22.8 million in 2003. In 2005, we made total capital expenditures of approximately US$86.2 million relating primarily to subscriber installation, upgrading existing systems and decoders for digital cable, compared to US$43.4 million in 2004.
After the conclusion of our debt restructuring, we decided to assess new growth opportunities. As we were successful in developing new sales channels, our growth rates have increased since the middle of 2005. During 2006 we announced an additional investment of approximately US$140.3 million directed to investments in the bidirectional network and digital service expansion. Total investments directed to these new projects reached US$58.8 million in 2006. The remaining amount will be done in 2007. Our direct day-to-day investments totaled US$169.4 million, and the variable portion represented over 93%. The 2006 Capex level, which was above to the US$150 million initially expected, was supported by our operational cash generation, with extremely attractive payback period. For 2007, we expect this growth momentum to continue and consequently increase the number of our pay-television and broadband subscribers. As most of our capital expenditures are related to subscriber acquisition and installation, we expect to maintain our annual capital expenditures at US$170.0 million in 2007. We do not plan on making substantial capital expenditures for the encoding of our network. We expect to be able to fund our day-to-day capital expenditures in 2007 from funds from operations.
Debt FinancingOn December 27, 2006, we issued the Non-Convertible Debentures - 6th Public Issuance, amounting to US$271.3 million (R$580.0 million), which net proceeds were used to prepay Non-Convertible Debentures - - 5th Public Issuance.
As of December 31, 2006, we had the following debt outstanding:
(US$; in | ||
thousands) | ||
U.S. dollar-denominated debt: | ||
Perpetual bonds | 150,000 | |
Reais-denominated debt (1): | ||
Non-convertible Debentures – 6thPublic Issuance | 271,283 | |
Total | 421,283 | |
(1) Calculated using the December 31, 2006 exchange rate of R$2.1380 per US$1.00
The rate used to determine the interest rate of our reais-denominated debt at December 31, 2006 was as follows:
CDI | 13.2% |
65
At December 31, 2006 the principal maturities of our debt issued in connection with the restructuring were as follows:
(US$; in | ||
Principal Amortization Schedule: | thousands) | |
2010 | 67,821 | |
2011 | 67,821 | |
2012 | 67,821 | |
2013 | 67,820 | |
Total | 271,283 | |
Total Short Term Debt | - | |
Total Long-term debt(1) | 421,283 |
(1) | Includes principal amount with respect to the perpetual bonds in total amount of US$150 million, which has no scheduled maturity. |
On November 28, 2006, we issued 9.25% Guaranteed Perpetual Notes, or perpetual bonds, amounting to US$150.0 million. These notes may be redeemed at our option, in whole but not in part, on any interest payment date on or after November 27, 2009 at 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest and any additional amounts payable. We will pay interest quarterly in arrears on each interest payment date of each year commencing February 28, 2007.
The perpetual bonds are jointly guaranteed by all our wholly-owned subsidiaries, except for Jonquil Ventures Ltda. TV Cabo Criciúma Ltda., in which we have 60% ownership, is also a non-guarantor consolidated subsidiary.
Non-Convertible Debentures - 6th Public Issuance
The Non-Convertible Debentures - 6th Public Issuance bear interest at the CDI rate plus 0.70%, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1and December 1. The CDI rate is a Brazilian interest reference rate published by the Brazilian Securities Custody and Settlement Center (Central de Custódia e Liquidação Financeira de Títulos) and is subject to change on a daily basis. The principal amount of these debentures will be repayable in four annual installments commencing on December 1, 2010, with the final installment of principal due in August 2013. Subject to an optional prepayment provision, we may prepay the debentures at any time, with a premium no greater than 0.50%, which premium shall decrease linearly to zero at maturity of the Non-Convertible Debentures - 6th Public Issuance.
Non-Convertible Debentures - 5th Public Issuance
The Non-Convertible Debentures - 5th Public Issuance bore interest at the CDI rate plus 1.50%, payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15and August 15. The principal amount of these debentures was repayable in four annual installments commencing on August 15, 2008, with the final installment of principal due in August 2011. Subject to an optional prepayment provision, we could prepay the debentures at any time, with a premium no greater than 0.60%, which premium decreased linearly to zero at maturity of the Non-Convertible Debentures - 5th Public Issuance.
66
In connection with the issuance of the Non-Convertible Debentures - 6th Public Issuance, the Non-Convertible Debentures - 5th Public Issuance were fully prepaid on December 27, 2006.
Net Sul NotesIn connection with our September 2000 acquisition of Net Sul Ltda., we guaranteed all obligations associated with Net Sul’s October 1997 issuance of US$80.0 million principal amount of floating rate notes due October 2005, or the Net Sul notes. The Net Sul notes consisted of US$48.0 million Series A floating rate notes, US$11.0 million Series B floating rate notes and US$21.0 million Series C floating rate notes. The Net Sul notes bore interest at LIBOR plus a spread that varied with our total consolidated debt to consolidated operating cash flow ratio. The spread on the Series A, Series B and Series C floating rate notes ranged from 3.125% to 4.0%, 2.5% to 3.375% and 2.5% to 3.375%, respectively. During 2003 and 2004, the interest rate on the Series A, Series B and Series C floating rate notes ranged from LIBOR plus 3.125% to 3.625%, 2.50% to 3.00% and 2.50% to 3.00%, respectively. Interest was payable quarterly, in arrears.
The Net Sul notes were guaranteed by us and a substantial number of our subsidiaries. On August 30, 2002, the deadline for the exercise of put options on the Series B and Series C floating rate notes, holders of US$7.7 million principal amount of such notes exercised their put option, representing 24% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount that was entitled to be put.
Net Sul notes having an aggregate principal amount of US$48.0 million were subject to redemption at the option of the holders in October 2003. To facilitate our restructuring, we entered into a series of letter agreements for the benefit of those holders of our Net Sul notes that did not elect to require us to redeem their Series A Net Sul notes in October 2003. None of the holders of Net Sul notes exercised their rights under such letter agreements.
Prior to our restructuring, we did not make any scheduled interest payments on the Net Sul notes from the period beginning January 2003.
As part of our restructuring, Net Sul conducted an exchange offer and consent solicitation with respect to the outstanding Net Sul notes, the effect of which was to extend the maturity date of the Net Sul notes for those holders who participated in the exchange offer, and to eliminate most covenants in the indenture relating to the Net Sul notes not exchanged in the exchange offer and consent solicitation. On March 22, 2005, Net Sul issued US$32.5 million aggregate principal amount of 7.0% senior secured notes due 2009 and US$9.7 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured floating rate notes due December 2009, which bear interest at LIBOR plus 3.0% per annum, together, the “Restructured Net Sul notes.” We also entered into a bank loan with a Brazilian financial institution in the principal amount of US$4.6 million and paid US$39.1 million in cash in exchange for US$72.3 million aggregate principal amount of the Net Sul notes. Holders representing 100% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of Net Sul notes participated in the exchange offer and consent solicitation.
The principal amount of the Restructured Net Sul notes issued in the exchange offer was repayable in installments commencing in March 2006, with the final installment of principal due no later than December 2009, subject to mandatory and optional prepayment provisions that could result in such debt being fully repaid prior to December 2009. On June 16, 2005, pursuant to a mandatory pre-payment provision, we paid US$3.3 million principal amount of the Restructured Net Sul notes.
67
Considering that the Restructured Net Sul notes were scheduled to remain outstanding until their effective liquidation, we carried out a consent solicitationto the holders of the Restructured Net Sul notes in order to eliminate certain of our obligations, including the investment limitation of US$50.0 million per year; and release the previous pledge from us to the holders of the Restructured Net Sul Notes. On September 26, 2005, in connection with the consent solicitation made by us, 91.2% of the holders accepted our proposition and approved the addendum regarding the Restructured Net Sul Notes. Holders who elected to participate in the consent would each be paid an amount in cash equal to 1% of the principal amount. On October 17, 2005, we paid approximately US$350,000 to the holders of the Restructured Net Sul notes in connection with the consent fee.
In connection with the consent solicitation and according to the terms and conditions of the indenture, we deposited funds corresponding to US$44.2 million at that date in an escrow account held by Net Sul in Brazil, recorded as restricted cash, which amount as of December 31, 2005 of US$43.3 million was sufficient to make the payment of principal plus accrued interest at the vesting date. On April 5, 2006, the Restructured Net Sul notes were fully prepaid.
Off-balance sheet arrangementsWe are a party to certain swap agreements, as part of a program to hedge part of our capital expenditures and interest expenses linked to the U.S. dollar. The following table summarizes the position of these agreements, as of December 31, 2006:
Payments due by period (US$; in millions) | ||||||||||||
Nature | Notional | Less than | 1 – 3 Years | 3 – 5 | More than | Total | ||||||
amount | 1 Year | Years | 5 Years | |||||||||
Hedge on Capital Expenditures and | ||||||||||||
Interests Expenses on | ||||||||||||
Perpetual Notes | 90.2 | 5.7 | – | – | – | 5.7 | ||||||
Brazilian Economic Environment
General
Historically, the Brazilian economy has been subject to periodic and occasionally significant intervention by the Brazilian government. The Brazilian government has often changed monetary, credit, tariff, exchange rate and other policies, with the goal of influencing the economy. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and effect other policies have involved wage and price controls, as well as other interventionist measures, such as freezing bank accounts and imposing capital controls. Although the stated intention of the present Brazilian government is to gradually reduce governmental intervention in the economy, it remains possible that future government economic policies could adversely affect our business and financial condition, as could the government’s response to certain political or social developments.
Historically, inflation, government actions taken to combat inflation and public speculation about possible future government actions have also contributed significantly to economic uncertainty in Brazil and heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets. Beginning in December 1993, the Brazilian government launched an economic stabilization plan, known as the Real Plan, which was intended to reduce inflation by reducing certain public expenditures,
68
collecting liabilities owed to the Brazilian government, increasing tax revenues, continuing a privatization program and introducing into circulation in June 1994 a new currency, the real. Following the implementation of the Real Plan, inflation dropped significantly from previous levels (which at times had exceeded 40% per month) to monthly rates of lower than 1%. In addition, the Brazilian government demonstrated a commitment to instituting conservative fiscal policy. Early in 2000, the Brazilian Congress passed the Fiscal Responsibility Law, which limited public payroll expenditures. The Brazilian gross domestic product, in U.S. dollar terms, increased 4.2% in 2000. A somewhat lower growth rate occurred for 2001 as a result of a Brazilian electricity shortage and the subsequent limitations imposed by the Brazilian government on energy consumption.
Emerging markets volatility and the 2002 elections in Brazil caused considerable outflows of funds and a decline in the amount of foreign investment in Brazil. These factors adversely affected the Brazilian trading markets and, in October 2002, the real depreciated to its lowest ever value against the U.S. dollar at R$3.9552 per US$1.00.
Since taking office in January 2003, President Luis Inácio Lula da Silva has continued to follow the policies implemented by the previous administration, causing a reduction in market volatility. On December 31, 2006, the real was quoted at R$2.1380 per US$1.00, corresponding to an appreciation of 8.7% in 2006 when compared to December 31, 2005. The real was quoted at R$2.3407 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2005, an appreciation of 11.8% as compared to R$2.6544 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2004. The inflation rate, as measured by the IGP-M was 12.4% in 2004, 1.2% in 2005 and 3.8% in 2006. Effective interest rates, as measured by the CDI rate, were 16.2% in 2004, 19.0% in 2005 and 15.0% in 2006. There can be no assurance that the government will not change its economic stabilization policies in the future or that any such policies will be successful. Furthermore, continued economic stability remains subject to a variety of domestic and external pressures.
Effects of Inflation and Exchange Rate Fluctuations
Until July 1994, Brazil had experienced high and generally unpredictable rates of inflation for many years, as well as a steady depreciation of its currency relative to the U.S. dollar. The following table sets forth Brazilian inflation, as measured by the IGP-M, and the depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar for the periods shown:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | ||||||
Inflation (IGP-M Index) | 25.3% | 8.7% | 12.4% | 1.2% | 3.8% | |||||
Currency (depreciation) appreciation | (52.3)% | 18.2% | 8.1% | 11.8% | 8.7% |
As a result of the Real Plan, the rate of inflation and the rate of depreciation have been reduced considerably since July 1, 1994. In the first nine months of 2002, due to market instability driven by international factors, the real experienced a depreciation of 67.9% . However, in the last quarter of 2002, the Brazilian currency partially recovered and ended the year with a depreciation of 52.3% . In 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 the real appreciated by 18.2%, 8.1%, 11.8% and 8.7%, respectively.
Despite the principles adopted for translating our reais-denominated financial statements into U.S. dollars, significant distortions to our reported results for the affected periods may remain as a result of the inability of accounting conventions to fully reflect actual economic conditions prevailing during the relevant fiscal periods. While our financial records have been maintained in reais, our reporting currency for all periods is the U.S. dollar.
69
Because of the differences between the evolution of the rates of inflation in Brazil and changes in the exchange rates, as well as the effects of the change of our functional currency, amounts presented in U.S. dollars may show distortions when compared on a period-to-period basis. The appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar has had the following effects on our results of operations:
- The translation effects of our U.S. dollar transactions, primarily represented by loans, are recorded as gain on exchange rate, net, in our statement of income.
- Our non-monetary assets, consisting primarily of property and equipment, goodwill on the acquisition of consolidated subsidiaries and certain other long-term assets, are not translated upon acquisition using historical U.S. dollar rates and fixed in U.S. dollars. Therefore, any appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar is reflected directly in stockholders’ equity, including through the increase in reais- denominated book value of property, plant and equipment when translated into U.S. dollars. These currency translation effects are beyond our management’s control.
For further information on the presentation of our financial information, see notes 1 and 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Inflation has affected and will continue to affect our results of operations. As expressed in U.S. dollars, exchange rate variations have affected and will continue to affect our statement of income, as they are expressed in reais and translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate for the period in question. A portion of our operating expenses (e.g., maintenance, selling, general and administrative expenses) tends to increase with Brazilian inflation.
Additionally, a substantial portion of our capital expenditures, primarily network equipment costs, is denominated in or indexed to U.S. dollars. Any changes in exchange rates can result in a relative increase or decrease in the expenses related to such capital expenditures.
Another significant effect of inflation and exchange rate variations concerns our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in reais. The value of such assets and liabilities as expressed in U.S. dollars declines when the real depreciates against the U.S. dollar, and increases when the real appreciates against the U.S. dollar. Many financial instruments denominated in reais are indexed according to a contractual index. In periods of appreciation of the real we report:
- translation gains on reais-denominated monetary assets, which are generally increased, at least in part, by the contractual indexation of reais-denominated financial instruments; and
- translation losses on reais-denominated monetary liabilities which are generally offset, at least in part, by contractual indexation of reais-denominated financial instruments.
We record translation gains and losses directly in the “cumulative translation adjustments” component of stockholders’ equity. Interest on indexed financial instruments is included in our statement of income under “Interest income” and “Financial expenses.”
In 2005, we reported exchange gains of US$30.8 million and a decrease in the foreign currency translation, a component of stockholders’ equity, of US$22.9 million, resulting from the 11.8% appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar that occurred in 2005. In 2006, we reported
70
exchange gains of US$8.6 million and a further reduction of the foreign currency translation of US$31.3 million, resulting from the 8.7% appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar that occurred in 2006.
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES.
Directors and Board PracticesBoard of Directors
We are managed by ourConselho de Administração, or board of directors, and ourDiretoria, or board of executive officers. In accordance with our by-laws, our directors are elected at a general meeting of shareholders, each to serve for a one year term, with the option for reelection. The existing tenure of the directors will end upon the election of the new members at our 2007 annual shareholders’ meeting, which must be held in the first four months of 2007.
Our by-laws provide that the board of directors shall be composed of no fewer than nine and no more than twelve members. According to our by-laws and Brazilian corporate law, each member of our board of directors must be a Net Serviços shareholder.
In addition, under Brazilian law, non-voting, non-controlling shareholders representing at least 10% of the total capital shares of a company have the right to elect by separate vote one member of a company’s board of directors.
Our by-laws provide that for each member appointed to our board of directors, an alternate member, or deputy member, shall be appointed to act in place of the permanent director when such director is not available for conducting board business. The term of such deputy member mirrors the term of his or her corresponding member director.
Our by-laws provide that our board of directors shall hold a meeting at least once every quarter or as called by any director. Its responsibilities include, among other things, the establishment of the policy and general strategy of the business and the appointment and supervision of our executive officers.
Pursuant to a new shareholders’ agreement discussed under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—New Shareholders’ Agreements,” our board of directors is comprised of eleven sitting members and an equal number of deputy members. Of these eleven sitting members and eleven deputy members, one sitting member and one respective deputy member was appointed directly by Grupo Globo, six sitting members and six respective deputy members were appointed by GB, which is controlled by Grupo Globo, and four sitting members and four respective deputy members were appointed by Telmex. Additionally, in accordance with Brazilian law, one sitting member and one respective deputy member may be appointed by a non-controlling holder of our preferred shares. Mr. Ivan Magalhães Júnior was appointed in this manner.
Following the Level 2 of Bovespa’s Corporate Governance requirements, since April 28, 2006, 20% the members of our board of directors are independent.
71
Net Serviços’ current directors are:
Current Term | ||||||
Name | Position | Position Held Since | Expires | |||
Roberto Irineu Marinho | Chairman, Board of Directors | February 22, 2000 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Stefan Alexander | Director | September 18, 2000 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Rossana Fontenele Berto | Director | April 30, 2003 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Juarez de Queiroz Campos Júnior | Director | April 19, 2004 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Marcos da Cunha Carneiro | Director | April 19, 2004 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Carlos Henrique Moreira | Director | April 29, 2005 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Jose Formoso Martínez | Director | April 29, 2005 | April 30, 2007 | |||
João Adalberto Elek Júnior | Director | April 29, 2005 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Sérgio Lourenço Marques | Director | April 28, 2006 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Augusto Cesar Roxo de Urzedo Rocha Filho | Director | April 28, 2006 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Ivan Magalhães Júnior | Director | April 28 ,2006 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Mauro Szwarcwald | Director | April 28, 2006 | April 30, 2007 |
Biographies of Our Board of Directors
Roberto Irineu Marinho has been a member of our board of directors since February 2000 and has served as Chairman of the board of directors since that time. He is also the President and Chief Executive Officer of Organizações Globo, a conglomerate of companies in the Brazilian media and entertainment industries. Mr. Marinho began his career at the newspaper O Globo, where he served in a variety of assignments culminating in his appointment as the newspaper’s director. In 1978, Mr. Marinho was appointed Executive Vice President of Globo TV Network and in 1990 he became Executive Vice President of Organizações Globo. Mr. Marinho is a member of the boards of Amparo Agropecuária S.A., Centropec-Agropecuária do Centro-Oeste S.A., Editora Globo S.A., Globo Agropecuária S.A. and Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A He received a degree in Business Administration from Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
Jorge Luiz De Barros Nóbrega is the deputy member of the Chairman of our board of directors. Mr. Nóbrega is Director of the Corporate Center at Organizações Globo and New Media, Radio and Publishing Director. He joined Organizações Globo in 1998 as Strategic Coordination Director. Previously, he held executive positions at Mesbla, a Brazilian retailing group, and Xerox and headed his own consulting firm for 4 years. He graduated in Business Administration from EBAP/Fundação Getúlio Vargas and holds a M.Sc. Degree in Industrial Engineering /Corporate Planning from Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.
Stefan Alexander has been a member of our board of directors since September 2000. Currently, he is the Director of Corporate Finance and Investor Relations at Globo. Previously, Mr. Alexander held other positions relating to finance planning and investor relations at Globo. Prior to joining Globo, he was the Director of Corporate Finance in Brazil at Bank of America/Nations Bank. He has also worked at Banco BBA Creditanstalt and Unibanco. Mr. Alexander is Chairman of the Board of Seguradora Roma S.A. He holds a Master’s degree in Economics from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.
Rossana Fontenele Berto has been a member of our board of directors since April 30, 2003. Ms. Berto has been Director of Strategic Planning of Globo (and prior to their restructuring, of TV Globo and Globopar) since 2002. Prior to that, Ms. Berto was the Managing Director of Sky Brasil from 1999 to February 2002, General Director of Net Rio from 1998 to 1999 and Controller of Multicanal from 1993 to 1998. She is also a board member of Sky Brasil. She holds a B.A.
72
degree from Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro and an MBA degree from Coppead/UFRJ (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).
Juarez de Queiroz Campos Júnior has been a member of our board of directors since April 19, 2004. In February 2001, he was appointed to the position of Managing Director of Globo.com, and in July 2003 of Globo Filmes. Previously, Mr. Queiroz was Tele Norte Leste Participações S.A.’s Marketing & Corporate Vice President and the Marketing Officer of Souza Cruz S.A. Mr. Juarez Queiroz has a bachelor’s degree in Law from USP/PUC and a degree in Business Administration from EAESP/FGV.
Marcos da Cunha Carneirohas been a member of our board of directors since April 19, 2004. He is currently the Director of Tax and Accounting of Globo. In February 1999, he was appointed to the position of Executive Director of Globo. Previously, he worked as a Corporate Relations Officer and Tax Planning Manager at Globo since 1991. He has also worked as a Manager at Arthur Andersen’s Tax Division. He graduated in with a degree in Economics from Sociedade Unificada de ensino Superior e Cultura.
Carlos Henrique Moreirahas been a member of our board of directors since April 29, 2005. Currently he is Embratel’s chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. Previously he held the positions of Chief Executive Officer at Algar Telecom Leste, Vice-President at Xerox, Vice President at IBM, Operations Executive Officer at Empresa Brasileira de Telecomunicações S.A., member of TELERJ’s board of directors, member of TELESP’s board of directors and Operations Executive Officer at Standard Eléctrica S.A. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Electronic Engineering from the Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica.
Jose Formoso Martínez has been a member of our board of directors since April 29, 2005. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Universidad La Salle, Mexico and a post-graduate degree in Corporate Management from the Instituto Panamericano de Alta Dirección de Empresas, Mexico. Currently, he is the Vice Chairman of Embratel’s board of directors. His previous positions include Executive Officer at Telguas S.A, Managing Director at Cablevisión and operations manager and sales manager at Condumex.
João Adalberto Elek Júnior has been a member of our board of directors since April 29, 2005. He has been the Chief Executive Officer for Telmex do Brasil since March 2004. He joined AT&T Latin América do Brasil as Financial Vice President. In the second half of 2001 and in 2002 he was the Chief Executive Officer for AT&T Latin América do Brasil. Prior to that, he was the Consumer Business’ CFO at Citibank. He graduated in Electronic Engineering from Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, and received a MBA in Marketing Planning from COPPE-AD/UFRJ and is a graduate of Columbia Business School Mergers and Acquisitions post-graduate program.
Sérgio Lourenço Marques has been a member of our board of directors since April 28, 2006. He has been Globo’s Treasury Director since February 2000. Previously, he worked as controller and portfolio manager at Banco Pactual for five years. He also worked at Atlantic Petróleo and Companhia Brasileira de Petróleo Ipiranga. He graduated with a degree in Computer Engineering from Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro and received a MBA in Finance from IBMEC.
Augusto Cesar Roxo de Urzedo Rocha Filho has been a member of our board of directors since April 28, 2006. He graduated in Civil Engineering at Universidade Fluminense in 1988 and received a MBA from NYU in 1992. Currently he is Globo’s Financial Planning and Business
73
Account Director. Previously, he worked at Net Serviços de Comunicação as Treasury and Capital Markets Director for six years and as Capital Markets Analyst at Banco Bozano Simonsen for five years.
Ivan Magalhães Júnior has been a member of our board of directors since April 28, 2006. He graduated in Engineering from the Instituto Militar de Engenharia (IME) and holds a postgraduate degree in Economic Engineering from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. He received a Masters in Business Administration from COPPEAD/UFRJ and in Economics from FGV/RJ. He has worked at BNDES since 2003. Previously he worked as an investment consultant at ASM Asset Management, Equity Portfolio Manager at Banco ABN AMRO, Assistant Resource Management Officer at Fleming Graphus Asset Management, Head of Investment Analysis at Arbi Assets, Research Manager at Banco Nacional, Head of Planning at Facilita Crédito Financiamento e Investimento and an engineer at Esso Brasileira de Petróleo.
Mauro Szwarcwald has been a member of our board of directors since April 28, 2006. Currently he is Partner Director at Aplus Consultoria. Previously, he worked as Marketing Vice President at Oracle and Telemar. He also worked as Commercial Operations Executive Director at Xerox do Brasil. Mauro Szwarcwald has a Masters of Science in Mathematics and Statistics from the University of Rochester.
Fiscal BoardWe maintain a permanent Fiscal Board, orConselho Fiscal, that acts as an Audit Committee and complies with Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Nasdaq corporate governance rules. Under Brazilian corporate law, theConselho Fiscal is a corporate body independent of the board of directors and independent auditors. TheConselho Fiscal’s primary responsibilities are to review management’s activities and the company’s financial statements and to report its findings to shareholders. See also “Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert.”
Our by-laws provide that the fiscal board shall be composed of no fewer than three and no more than five members.
In addition, if we did not maintain a permanent Fiscal Board, in accordance with Article 161 of the Brazilian corporate law, shareholders representing at least 10% of the voting shares have the right to demand appointment of the fiscal board at a general shareholders’ meeting.
Current Term | ||||||
Name | Position | Position Held Since | Expires | |||
Martin Roberto Glogowsky | Chairman, Fiscal Board | July 12, 2005 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Charles Barnsley Holland | Director | July 12, 2005 | April 30, 2007 | |||
Antonio José Alves Júnior | Director | July 12, 2005 | April 30, 2007 |
Martin Roberto Glogowskyhas been a member of our fiscal board since July 2005. He joined Fundaçao Cesp in 1999 and he has been the CEO since May 2005. Previously, Mr. Glogowsky worked at Banco BBA and Banco Schahin Cury in the capital market department. Currently he is also member of several Boards of Directors, Fiscal Boards and Audit Committees for Bovespa’s Novo Mercado companies. He holds a B.A. degree in Law from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo and a Business Administration degree from the Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
74
Charles Barnsley Hollandhas been a member of our fiscal board since July 2005. He is a registered accountant, with a MBA degree from Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Currently, he is a partner at Holland & Associados. Until 2001, for twenty years he was an audit partner at Ernst & Young serving as a member of the Partners Administrative Committee, member of the Executive Committee and in charge of the Audit Division. In 1979, he was CFO at American Medical International, and before that date Senior Auditor of another leading public accounting firm. In compliance with American rules, he is the financial expert due to his knowledge in US GAAP and US GAAS.
Antonio José Alves Júniorhas been a member of our fiscal board since July 2005. He is head of the Special Advisory of the Civilian Household,university lecturer at Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, researcher of CNPq and he was Chief of Economic Department at the Ministry of Planning, Budgeting and Managing until June 2005. He holds a B.A. degree in Economics from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Masters’ degree in Industry and Technologic’s Economy from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and, Ph.D. in Economics from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Compensation CommitteeWe are currently not required to, and do not, maintain a compensation committee.
Executive Officers and Senior ManagersOur by-laws provide for a minimum of two and a maximum of four executive officers appointed by our board of directors for renewable two-year terms. Our executive officers are responsible for all matters concerning our day-to-day management and operations. Our executive officers must be residents of Brazil and may or may not be shareholders of Net Serviços. Currently, we employ three executive officers. In addition, we currently employ two senior managers that make significant contributions to our business.
Net Serviços’ executive officers and senior managers are:
Current Term | ||||||
Name | Position | Position Held Since | Expires | |||
Francisco Tosta Valim Filho(1) | Chief Executive Officer | February 2003 | February 2, 2009 | |||
Leonardo P. Gomes Pereira(1) | Chief Financial Officer | April 2000 | February 2, 2009 | |||
José Antônio Guaraldi Félix(1) | Chief Operating Officer | May 2003 | February 2, 2009 | |||
André Müller Borges(2) | Chief Legal Counsel | January 2002 | N/A | |||
José Paulo de Freitas(2) | Chief Human Resources Officer | July 2003 | N/A |
(1) | Executive Officers |
(2) | Senior Managers |
Francisco Tosta Valim Filho became Chief Executive Officer of Net Serviços in February 2003. Before joining Net Serviços, Mr. Valim was the Chief Financial Officer of Telemar for one year. Prior to that, he served as the Vice President and as Chief Financial Officer of RBS Participações S.A., or RBS. Mr. Valim also served as Executive Director of Net Sul. He has a degree in Business Administration from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) and a post-graduate degree in Finance from Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV-SP) and in Strategic and Organizational Planning from UFRGS. He also holds an MBA in Finance and Administration of Multinational Companies from the University of Southern California.
75
Leonardo P. Gomes Pereira has been our Chief Financial Officer since April 2000. Previously, he was the Director of Financial Planning at Globo for four years. Mr. Pereira worked at Citibank from 1982 to 1995, holding various positions in the corporate banking and corporate finance areas in several countries, including Brazil, Thailand, Venezuela and the United States. He sits on the corporate governance committee of the São Paulo American Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Pereira received a BSC in Engineering from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro and a BSC in Economics from Candido Mendes University in Rio de Janeiro. Mr. Pereira also received an MBA from Warwick University in the United Kingdom, completed post-graduate work at Wharton Business School at the University of Pennsylvania and graduated from the Columbia Senior Executive Program. On March 1, 2007, Mr. Pereira announced his decision to leave the company as of March 12, 2007. On March 7, 2007, we announced that Mr. João Adalberto Elek Júnior, who is currently member of our Board of Directors, will become our new Chief Financial Officer on March 12, 2007.
José Antônio Guaraldi Félix has been our Chief Operating Officer since May 2003. Previously, he was a regional officer at Net Serviços for two years. Prior to that he was an officer of Net Sul, where he headed 16 operations in Southern Brazil. Mr. Félix worked at RBS from 1980 to 1990, holding various positions in the operational area. Mr. Felix has a degree in Telecommunication Engineering from Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Mr. Felix also graduated in Strategic Business Management from Fundação Dom Cabral, from Kellogg School of Management in Chicago, and from Insead Business School in France.
André Müller Borges has been our Chief Legal Counsel since January 2002. Mr. Borges joined Grupo Globo in 1999 as Chief Legal Counsel of Distribution and Telecommunications, in which position he served until 2001, when he joined Net Serviços as a Corporate Officer, responsible for its legal, corporate and regulatory obligations. Previously, he was a law partner at the law firm Tozzini, Freire, Teixeira e Silva Advogados. Mr. Borges holds a degree in Law from the Faculdade Paulista de Direito of the Pontifícia Universidade Católica of São Paulo.
José Paulo de Freitas has been our Chief Human Resources Officer since July 2003. He is responsible for Human Resources, Quality and Change Managing. He joined Net Serviços as the Regional Officer for the São Paulo region in September 2000. Previously, he worked at Vanity Fair as the Chief Operating Officer for the Brazilian branch from 1999 to 2000, where he was responsible for the Structuring, Sourcing and Operations Division (customer service, planning, purchasing, engineering, quality, distribution center and human resources). Before this, he held several positions at Grupo Algar, culminating in his serving as Chief Executive Officer. He holds an administration degree from Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV-SP), São Paulo and a degree in Economics from Universidade de São Paulo.
IndemnificationWe currently provide insurance for our directors, executive officers and senior managers for indemnification by us or our subsidiaries against any liabilities incurred by the directors, executive officers and senior managers in their official capacity as such.
Compensation of Directors and Principal Executive Officers
All members of our board of directors and of our fiscal board are entitled to receive compensation in connection with their serving on our boards. Currently, one of the independent members of our board of directors and all members of our fiscal board receive compensation in connection with their serving on our boards.
76
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the aggregate compensation paid and benefits in kind granted by us to our principal executive officers for services in all capacities was approximately US$7.6 million. This includes all contingent or deferred compensation accrued during 2006 and the monies paid to our principal executive officers pursuant to the long-term incentive plans discussed below.
Directors’ Service ContractsOur directors and deputy members are not subject to any service contracts with us or any of our subsidiaries.
EmployeesAll of our employees are located in Brazil. At December 31, 2006, we had 5,108 employees. At December 31, 2006, approximately 43% of our employees were working in installation, repair and network maintenance, 26% were working in sales related activities and 31% were working in administrative functions. We believe that our relations with our employees and the labor union Sindicato Nacional dos Trabalhadores em Empresas Prestadoras de Serviços e Operadoras de Sistemas de Televisão por Assinatura, a Cabo e MMDS are generally good.
Share OwnershipUnder Brazilian corporate law, each member of our board of directors is required to be a shareholder of Net Serviços. No director, executive officer or senior manager of Net Serviços is the record owner of more than 1.0% of our shares. For certain information on the beneficial ownership of our shares, including shares held by affiliates of our directors; see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”
Long-Term Incentive PlansVariable Compensation Plan - “Plano de Participação nos Resultados”
We currently have a variable compensation plan, the “Plano de Participação nos Resultados,” or PPR, pay-outs under which are linked to certain financial and operational goals. The PPR establishes financial and operational goals relating to cash generation, adjusted EBITDA, capital expenditures, number of installations and disconnections and degree of customer satisfaction. Depending on the level at which each goal is met, employees under the PPR may receive a maximum annual bonus of the equivalent of two months’ salary.
Also, for a select number of our executive officers, senior managers and managers, we add to this bonus an additional complementary bonus, determined by such employee’s contribution toward meeting the financial and operational goals established under the PPR, as well as by their meeting additional individual financial goals. For any given fiscal year, no complementary bonuses are paid if the annual financial and operational goals under the PPR for that year are not achieved.
In July 2005, we started a new PPR with new goals, reflecting new growth opportunities. As was the case under the previous PPR, for a select number of our executive officers, senior managers and managers, we add to this bonus an additional complementary bonus, determined by such employee’s contribution toward meeting the financial and operational goals established under the PPR, as well as by their meeting additional individual financial goals. This additional bonus was to remain in effect through December 31, 2006 and was fully paid on February 5, 2007.
77
Pension, Retirement and Similar Benefits
We currently do not have any pension or retirement plans for our employees.
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.
Major ShareholdersWe have two classes of capital stock authorized and outstanding: common shares and preferred shares. Our common shares have full voting rights. Our preferred shares have voting rights in only limited circumstances. As of February 28, 2007, none of our outstanding common shares and approximately 28% of our outstanding preferred shares, including in the form of ADSs, were held in the United States. On February 28, 2007, there were approximately 9,000 record holders of preferred shares, including in the form of ADSs, in the United States.
Together, Globo (as defined below) and Telmex directly or through their respective affiliates, currently own 99% of our common shares, with Globo continuing to control, through GB, a majority of our outstanding voting shares, although Telmex has significant approval rights under our new shareholders’ agreement. Under current Brazilian law, as a non-Brazilian entity, Telmex is not permitted to own a controlling interest in us.
Globo is a Brazilian holding company controlled by the Marinho family with operations in broadcast television, pay television programming, magazine publishing and printing and interests in cable and satellite television. Distel is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Globo. We refer to Globo and Distel collectively as “Grupo Globo” in this Form 20-F.
Telmex owns and operates the largest telecommunications system in Mexico. It is the sole provider of fixed-line telephony services in Mexico and the leading provider of fixed local and long distance telephony services and Internet access in Mexico.
In the event Brazilian law changes so that a non-Brazilian entity is permitted to own a controlling interest in a Brazilian company, Telmex would have the right to acquire from Grupo Globo, and Grupo Globo would have the right to cause Telmex to purchase from Grupo Globo, subject to certain conditions, an additional interest in the voting capital of GB that would give Telmex, through GB, control over 51% of our voting common shares. The additional interest in GB’s voting capital would be equal to the greater of (i) 2% of the voting capital of GB or such amount of voting capital as would give Telmex voting control of GB and (ii) the percentage of GB’s total equity capital equal to the percentage that 16,162,799 common shares represent of the total voting capital of Net Serviços held by GB at the time. The benchmark price for this transaction would be equivalent to R$0.6277, which corresponds to the price per share Telmex has paid to Grupo Globo for our common shares in the transactions described above.Following such a transfer, Grupo Globo would continue to hold a significant minority stake in us, directly and through its stake in GB, and so long as Grupo Globo held directly or indirectly a specified minimum level of our common shares, it would continue to have the consent and other rights under the new shareholders’ agreement described below under “—New Shareholders’ Agreements.”
We believe that the acquisition by Telmex of this additional interest in voting capital of GB would constitute an acquisition of a controlling interest in Net Serviços that, pursuant to our bylaws, would require Telmex to make an offer to purchase all of our outstanding common shares and preferred shares at a price equal to 100% of the price paid by Telmex for such controlling interest.
78
As of February 28, 2007, GB is our controlling shareholder, holding 822,744,800 common shares, representing 51% of our common shares. Grupo Globo, in turn, holds a controlling interest in GB. Grupo Globo has agreed, subject to its fiduciary duties, not to vote to approve certain changes in our capital structure or certain extraordinary compensation arrangements or to vote in favor of any increases to our officers’ severance arrangements. Furthermore, Grupo Globo has agreed not to enter into any new transactions with us other than in the ordinary course, subject to certain exceptions.
The following table sets forth, as of February 28, 2007, information regarding the beneficial ownership of common shares and preferred shares by each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of any class of our equity securities. None of our major shareholders identified in this table has special voting rights.
Common Shares | Preferred Shares | Total Equity | ||||||||||
Percentage of | ||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||
Name | Number | Outstanding | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | ||||||
Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A. | 1,655,537 | 1.5% | – | – | 1,655,537 | 0.6% | ||||||
Distel Holding S.A.(1) | 9,785,171 | 8.8% | – | – | 9,785,171 | 3.3% | ||||||
GB Empreendimentos e Participações | ||||||||||||
S.A.(2) | 56,444,650 | 51.0% | – | – | 56,444,650 | 19.3% | ||||||
Empresa Brasileira de Telecomunicações | 2,060,249 | 1,9% | 15,661,460 | 17,721,709 | ||||||||
S.A.(3) | 8.6% | 6.1% | ||||||||||
Embratel Participações S.A.(4) | 40,010,455 | 36.2% | 11,966,996 | 6.6% | 51,977,451 | 17.8% |
(1) | Distel Holding S.A. is controlled by Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A., which is controlled by the Marinho Family. |
(2) | Grupo Globo holds 51% of the voting interests of GB Empreendimentos e Participações S.A., a special purpose company, and Teléfonos de México, S.A. de C.V., or Telmex, holds 49% of the voting interests of GB and 100% of the non-voting interests of GB. |
(3) | Empresa Brasileira de Telecomunicações S.A. is controled by Teléfonos de México, S.A. de C.V. |
(4) | Embratel Participações S.A. is controled by Teléfonos de México, S.A. de C.V. |
In addition, as of February 28, 2007, the public owned 0.6% of our common shares and 84.8% of our preferred shares, representing 52.9% of our total capital stock.
New Shareholders’ AgreementsIn connection with the Grupo Globo/BNDESPar share transfer, as further described under “—Related Party Transactions—Financing Arrangements with Affiliates—Grupo Globo/BNDESPar Share Transfer,” on February 1, 2005, our old shareholders’ agreement terminated. In connection with the closing of the sale of our common and preferred shares to Grupo Globo and Telmex and the other transactions described under “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Restructuring,” Grupo Globo, Embratel (as successor to Latam subsequent to Embratel’s acquisition of Latam in 2005) and GB, together with Telmex, entered into a new shareholders’ agreement, and Grupo Globo and Telmex entered into a separate shareholders’ agreement with respect to GB, which we refer to as the GB shareholders’ agreement. We refer to these shareholders’ agreements together as the “new shareholders’ agreements.” The new shareholders’ agreements contain provisions relating to, among other things, the transfer of our shares and of the shares issued by GB, rights of first refusal, and governance, including the right of each of Grupo Globo, Telmex and GB to appoint members to our board of directors and board of officers.
79
Right of first refusal and transfer of shares.The new shareholders’ agreements establish specific rules for the transfer of our shares and GB shares. In the event that one of the shareholders party to the new shareholders’ agreements intends to transfer its shares, such shareholder is required to notify in writing the other shareholders party to the new shareholders’ agreements in order to enable them to exercise their right of first refusal.
Under the new shareholders’ agreements, transfers to our competitors, as defined in the new shareholders’ agreements, are not permitted. Furthermore, the shareholders party to the new shareholders’ agreements may not encumber or otherwise create any liens on our shares or the shares of GB, except under limited circumstances.
Previous meetings.The new shareholders’ agreements provide that a previous meeting of the representatives of Grupo Globo and Telmex must be held prior to each of our, or any of our subsidiaries’, general shareholders meetings or board of directors meetings at which a material matter is to be considered. The previous meeting is to establish the position that will be adopted at the general shareholders meeting or board of directors meeting, as the case may be, by the shareholders party to the new shareholders’ agreements. Relevant matters (as described below) must be approved at a previous meeting by the affirmative vote of shareholders party to the new shareholders’ agreements. The shareholders are then required to vote or instruct their respective directors to vote, as the case may be, in accordance with the outcome of the vote at such previous meeting.
Material matters. The new shareholders’ agreements require the approval of Telmex, or if Telmex has control over a majority of our common shares, the approval of Grupo Globo, at a previous meeting as described above for specified material matters. These material matters include certain extraordinary corporate transactions relating to us, including certain business combinations, the disposition or acquisition of assets in excess of specified thresholds and dissolving or liquidating us; changes to specified commercial arrangements to which we are party, including certain programming and network arrangements, affiliate transactions and pay television concession matters; and other matters such as deregistering us as a public company, changing our corporate purpose and determining the compensation and benefits of our key employees. The approval rights are subject to maintaining specified minimum levels of shareholdings in Net Serviços.
Tag-along rights.Under the new shareholders’ agreements, in the event of a sale of control of us by any shareholder party to the new shareholders’ agreements, the purchaser must agree to undertake a public offering to purchase the shares of the remaining shareholders within a period of no more than 90 days at the same price and under the payment conditions offered to the selling shareholder.
Furthermore, in the event that one of the shareholders party to the new shareholders’ agreements disposes of all or any part of its common shares or its GB shares, as the case may be, the other shareholders party to the new shareholders’ agreements will have the right to require such selling shareholder to include in the sale such other shareholders’ common shares or GB shares, subject to the same price and payment conditions; provided that, if the number of common shares exceeds the number of shares the purchaser is willing to acquire, the number of shares sold will be reduced proportionately for each selling shareholder.
Capital increases.The new shareholders’ agreements provide that, among other things, subject to its fiduciary duties, Grupo Globo will, upon Telmex’s request during the period that is two years from the date of the new shareholders’ agreements, or through March 21, 2007, vote its shares in support of future issuances of preferred shares in public offerings, and Telmex will
80
provide a standby underwriting commitment to purchase such preferred shares at a price of not less than R$0.70 per share (adjusted annually by an inflation index after the first year), with the proceeds from any such issuance to be applied toward repayment of our debt.
Board of directors (Conselho de Administração).The new shareholders’ agreements require that our board of directors initially be comprised of eleven sitting members and an equal number of deputy members, all of whom must, as required by Brazilian law, be shareholders of Net Serviços. Of these eleven sitting members and eleven deputy members, one sitting member and one respective deputy member are appointed directly by Grupo Globo, six sitting members and six respective deputy members are appointed by GB, which is controlled by Grupo Globo, and four sitting members and four respective deputy members are appointed by Telmex. Additionally, in accordance with Brazilian law, one sitting member and one respective deputy member may be appointed by a non-controlling preferred shareholder.
Additionally, in the event that shareholders that are not parties to the new shareholders’ agreement become entitled to representation on our board of directors, the total number of members of our board of directors will be redetermined, but in no event shall our board of directors be comprised of fewer than eleven members. Furthermore, shareholders owning more than 50% of the common shares subject to the new shareholders’ agreements will always be entitled to appoint (and remove) at least a majority of the members of our board of directors.
Board of officers (Diretoria).The new shareholders’ agreements provide that our board of officers and the board of officers of each company controlled by us will be comprised, except under certain circumstances, of the following three executive officers: (i) Chief Executive Officer, (ii) Chief Operating Officer and (iii) Chief Financial Officer. Telmex has the right to appoint and remove the Chief Operating Officer. Otherwise these officers are appointed, and may be removed by, any shareholder that has control of over 50% of the total amount of our common stock governed by the new shareholders’ agreements.
Business covenants.Under the new shareholders’ agreements and subject to certain ownership requirements, Telmex will agree not to, and not to cause a related party to, own, conduct or participate in the management of any broadcast television or pay-television distribution platform (other than ours and except under certain circumstances) or content production businesses (other than those specified in the new shareholders’ agreements) in Brazil.
Term.The new shareholders’ agreements shall be valid and effective so long as each of Grupo Globo and Telmex owns (including through GB according to a formula incorporating adjusted interest), directly or indirectly, at least 153,759,717 of our common shares, irrespective of the percentage ownership represented by such common shares.
Other. Under certain circumstances, Grupo Globo may exchange our common shares or its GB shares for preferred shares issued by us. In the case of an exchange of our common shares, the ratio for exchange will be one common share to one preferred share. In the case of an exchange of GB shares, the number of preferred shares to be delivered to Grupo Globo will be determined according to a formula incorporating adjusted interest. In either type of exchange, all shareholders party to the new shareholders’ agreements are required to waive their rights of first refusal and tag-along rights, as the case may be.
81
Related Party Transactions
We have engaged in a variety of related party transactions, including the transactions described below. We cannot state with any certainty the extent to which such transactions are comparable to those which might have been obtained from a non-affiliated third party. We intend to enter into any future material related party transactions on terms that are fair and reasonable to us.
Material Transactions with AffiliatesNet Brasil Programming Agreement
Net Brasil is wholly owned by Grupo Globo. Prior to June 27, 2004, Net Brasil acted as our intermediary in purchasing programming from both Brazilian and certain international sources. On June 27, 2004, we entered into an amended and restated programming agreement with Net Brasil whereby we now obtain all of our programming from Brazilian sources through Net Brasil. We obtain directly, for our own account and benefit, all new international content from sources outside of Brazil. On June 27, 2004 we also entered into a licensing agreement with Net Brasil, whereby Net Brasil grants us the right to use the “NET” brand name for 10 years from the date of effectiveness and, in the case of termination, for an additional 30 months from the date of termination. On December 16, 2005 we entered into an amended agreement with Net Brasil whereby we extended the term of the current agreement until 2015.
Although with respect to such programming Net Brasil provides us with exclusive cable-television rights in our licensed areas, it also provides programming to Sky Brasil, a satellite-television provider that competes directly with us and in which Globo owns a significant interest. In addition, much of the programming that we purchase through Net Brasil is produced by Globosat Programadora Ltda., or Globosat, which is wholly-owned by Globo, and its affiliates.
We pay Net Brasil a fixed amount equal to R$104,000 (US$48,644) per month, adjusted by the Consumer Price Index. For each month of 2006 subsequent to our entering into the amended and restated programming agreement, we also paid to Net Brasil an additional monthly fee of R$16,000 (US$7,484) for the administration of existing international content agreements. This latter fee decreases in the coming years to R$3,000 (US$1,403) per month in 2007 and R$1,500 (US$702) per month in 2008. We will cease paying the additional monthly fee for the administration of existing international content agreements once all international agreements have been assigned to us or upon their expiration, whichever occurs first. The amended and restated programming agreement has a term of ten years but will be automatically renewed unless one party notifies the other of its intent to terminate the agreement at least six months prior to the ten year anniversary of the agreement.
The new shareholders’ agreement between Grupo Globo, Embratel (as successor to Latam), GB and Telmex provides that our board of directors must approve alterations in certain of our programming arrangements and transactions with affiliates. Furthermore, if Grupo Globo and Telmex are entitled to elect at least one member to our board of directors, any alterations in these same programming arrangements and transactions with affiliates must also be approved by such directors. See “—New Shareholders’ Agreements.”
Pursuant to our past and present programming agreements with Net Brasil, we paid US$683,000 as broker commission to Net Brasil. We also made a payment of US$88.0 million to Globosat for programming during 2006.
82
Our liabilities to Net Brasil are considered normal trading transactions and are classified as “accounts payable to programmers” under current liabilities.
Programming GuideOur programming guide is produced by Editora Globo S.A., or Editora, a publishing company affiliated with Globo. In 2004, 2005 and 2006, we paid Editora US$4.8 million, US$5.6 million and US$5.9 million, respectively, for the publication of our program guide.
Voice Offer AgreementWe and our shareholder Embratel entered into a partnership model in 2006 to offer voice services. With this service, we can offer the triple play (video, broadband and voice) service for potential clients that are covered by our bidirectional network, optimizing synergies and increasing the utilization and profitability of the existing infrastructure.
According to this agreement, we are responsible for managing the operation, which should strengthen our video and broadband businesses. Embratel, which owns the licenses to provide the voice service, is responsible for investments in infrastructure to offer the service and is bringing its customer service expertise for the voice business. Pursuant to the partnership model, we will share the voice services’ operating results, calculated by subtracting taxes on revenues and interconnection fees from gross voice revenues. Revenue arising from this service amounted to US$3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we received an advance payment from Embratel in the amount of US$8.7 million for the rental of fiber optics. We deferred this rental revenue and it will be recognized monthly based on the rental terms of 10 years.
Other transactions involving us and companies related to Embratel, such as: (i) Internet link; (ii) voice channel; (iii) fixed telephone; and (iv) click 21 are registered at prices believed to be at market conditions. The amount paid to Embratel for these services totaled US$20.7 million in 2006 and US$4.9 million in 2005. The increase is primarily due to higher cost related to the Internet link.
Financing Arrangements with AffiliatesGrupo Globo/BNDESPar Share Transfer
In September 2004, Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social Participações, or BNDESPar agreed to sell to Grupo Globo a total of 60,138,289 shares of our common stock held by BNDESPar at a price of R$0.90 per share (subject to adjustment by an inflation index), representing all shares of our common stock held by BNDESPar. On December 27, 2004, Grupo Globo and BNDESPar entered into an agreement governing the share transfer. On January 26, 2005, Grupo Globo agreed to exercise its right to acquire all such common shares, representing approximately 7.3% of our voting capital, at the total price of approximately R$54.7 million (US$25.6 million). This share transfer closed on February 1, 2005 at a price of R$0.91, equivalent to R$13.65 per share after the reverse split effective on August 1, 2006 (after an adjustment for inflation per share). As a result of this share transfer, BNDESPar no longer owns any shares of our common stock, however, it continues to hold certain of our preferred shares. In addition, in connection with the share transfer, Grupo Globo and BNDESPar, together with us and GB as intervening parties, entered into an agreement with respect to our preferred shares held by
83
BNDESPar, assuring BNDESPar the right to register such preferred shares in any public offering of our preferred shares and granting BNDESPar the right once every twelve months to demand we undertake a public offering of such preferred shares in Brazil. See “—Major Shareholders.”
Telmex/Grupo Globo Share TransferOn February 1, 2005, Latam, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Telmex, purchased from Grupo Globo 60,138,289 of our common shares at a total price of approximately R$54.1 million (US$25.3 million). In October, 2005, as a consequence of Latam’s acquisition by Embratel, Embratel became the holder of such shares. On May 18, 2006, Embratel purchased from Grupo Globo 200,000,000 of our preferred shares at a total price of approximately R$228.0 million (US$106.6 million).
Globotel Participações S.A.As a result of certain ownership reorganization among companies controlled by Grupo Globo, on August 31, 2001, our extraordinary shareholder meeting approved the down-stream merger of Globotel Participações S.A., a subsidiary of Roma Participações Ltda., or Romapar, with us. With this merger, we succeeded the merged company in the right of amortizing for Brazilian local statutory and tax purposes a premium of US$156,515 generated at the acquisition of its ownership in us and certain of our subsidiaries. The amortization of this premium for local statutory purposes results in future tax benefits for us and our subsidiaries over an estimated period of up to six years. On May 18, 2006, we issued to Romapar, as compensation for benefits realized, 1,771,730 common and 2,571,494 preferred shares, at a price corresponding to US$7.31 per share totaling US$31,730. On December 9, 2005, 2,647,107 common and 3,842,018 preferred shares, at a price corresponding to approximately US$4.91 per share, were issued to Romapar in respect of the previously contributed tax benefits realized. On February 1, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a capital increase of 1,146,354 common and 1,881,774 preferred shares in the amount of US$ 33,378 as compensation for the fiscal benefit contributed by Romapar in respect of the previously contributed tax benefits realized.
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL INFORMATION.Our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 are included elsewhere in this Form 20-F.
See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Legal Proceedings” for a discussion of our legal proceedings.
See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Liquidity requirements and sources” for a discussion of our financial position.
See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Financing Arrangements with Affiliates—Globotel Participações S.A.” for a discussion of the capital increase approved on February 1, 2007.
See “Item 10. Additional Information—Dividend Policy” for a discussion of our policy on dividend distributions.
84
ITEM 9.THE OFFER AND LISTING.
General
The principal non-United States market for our preferred shares is the Bovespa. Until May 2, 2005, our preferred shares were traded on the Bovespa under the symbol “PLIM4.” Since May 2, 2005, our preferred shares have been traded on the Bovespa under the symbol “NETC4.” We changed the symbol from “PLIM4” to “NETC4” so that the shares are more readily identifiable with the Net Serviços name.
In June 2002, we complied with the requirements of Corporate Governance Level 2, or Level 2, of the Bovespa. Level 2 is a listing segment created for the trading of shares issued by companies that voluntarily undertake to comply with certain corporate governance practices and disclosure requirements that are in addition to those imposed by Brazilian law. The inclusion of an issuer in Level 2 signifies the issuer’s compliance with a series of corporate rules, known as good practices of corporate governance, which are more rigid than those required by the Brazilian legislation. These rules increase the rights of the shareholders as well as improve the quality of information we provide to the market.
Our predecessor company, Multicanal, conducted an offering of ADSs in October 1996. Each ADS represents one preferred share. The ADSs trade in the United States on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “NETC” and are evidenced by ADRs. The ADSs are outstanding under an amended and restated deposit agreement dated as of December 17, 2001 among us, JPMorgan Chase Bank as depositary, and the owners and holders from time to time of the ADSs. On December 17, 2001, JPMorgan Chase Bank succeeded The Bank of New York as depositary for the ADSs. An ADR may represent any number of ADSs. Only persons in whose names ADSs are registered on the books of the depositary are treated as owners of ADSs under the deposit agreement.
On August 1, 2006, we made a reverse split on the common and preferred shares converting each lot of fifteen shares to one share. Effective from this date, each of our ADSs was changed to represent one of our preferred shares.
The table below sets forth, for each period indicated, the high and low closing prices in reais for the preferred shares on the Bovespa and the high and low closing prices of the ADSs in U.S. dollars as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market.
Bovespa(1) (2) | Nasdaq (2) (3) | |||||||
R$ per preferred share | US$ per ADS | |||||||
Year | Low | High | Low | High | ||||
2002 | 1.99 | 89.21 | 0.63 | 55.50 | ||||
2003 | 2.62 | 13.33 | 0.98 | 6.54 | ||||
2004 | 5.14 | 11.54 | 2.46 | 5.40 | ||||
2005 | 6.40 | 17.52 | 3.18 | 8.22 | ||||
2006 | 14.68 | 24.47 | 6.30 | 12.09 | ||||
Quarter | ||||||||
1Q/05 | 6.40 | 10.75 | 3.34 | 5.62 | ||||
2Q/05 | 7.91 | 10.90 | 3.18 | 5.94 | ||||
3Q/05 | 7.77 | 15.38 | 3.24 | 6.93 | ||||
4Q/05 | 12.84 | 17.52 | 5.25 | 8.22 |
85
Bovespa(1) (2) | Nasdaq (2) (3) | |||||||
R$ per preferred share | US$ per ADS | |||||||
1Q/06 | 14.68 | 19.32 | 6.30 | 8.85 | ||||
2Q/06 | 14.98 | 19.77 | 6.47 | 9.57 | ||||
3Q/06 | 16.48 | 20.75 | 7.50 | 9.70 | ||||
4Q/06 | 19.53 | 24.47 | 9.05 | 12.09 |
Month | ||||||||
September 2006 | 18.20 | 20.75 | 8.36 | 9.70 | ||||
October 2006 | 19.53 | 22.77 | 9.05 | 11.00 | ||||
November 2006 | 21.28 | 23.44 | 9.78 | 10.98 | ||||
December 2006 | 21.79 | 24.47 | 10.09 | 12.09 | ||||
January 2007 | 23.08 | 25.77 | 10.76 | 12.30 | ||||
February 2007 | 24.90 | 28.94 | 11.65 | 13.70 |
(1) | Adjusted reais per share. |
(2) | Reflects the fifteen to one reverse split effective on August 1, 2006. |
(3) | Reflects the ratio change effective on August 1, 2006. One preferred share represents one ADS. |
Trading Markets
Nasdaq Global Market
The primary market for our preferred shares held in the form of ADSs is the Nasdaq Global Market. On December 31, 2006, there were 11,197,024 ADSs outstanding, representing 4% of the total amount of preferred shares held by public shareholders (which are all preferred shares not owned by our major shareholders discussed in “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders”). The average daily trading volume of the ADSs on the Nasdaq Global Market during 2006 was approximately US$1.1 million, or 127,000 ADSs.
Compliance with Certain Nasdaq Corporate Governance Rules
Under the Nasdaq Marketplace rules, a foreign private issuer may follow its home country corporate governance practices in lieu of certain Nasdaq corporate governance rules subject to certain requirements. The practices we follow in lieu of certain Nasdaq rules are described below.
Independent directors. Rule 4350(c)(1) requires that a majority of a listed company’s board of directors be comprised of independent directors. In lieu of complying with Rule 4350(c)(1), we follow Brazilian corporate law, which does not require us to have independent directors on our board of directors. However, as required by Level 2 of Bovespa’s Corporate Governance requirements, 20% of the members of our board of directors are independent.
Executive Sessions. Rule 4350(c)(2) requires that a listed company’s independent directors have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present. In lieu of complying with Rule 4350(c)(2), we follow Brazilian corporate law, which does not require our independent directors to have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present.
Compensation of Officers. Rule 4350(c)(3) requires that the compensation of a listed company’s executive officers be determined, or recommended to the board of directors for determination, either by (i) a majority of the independent directors, or (ii) a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors. In lieu of complying with Rule 4350(c)(3),
86
we follow Brazilian corporate law, which does not require us to have either a compensation committee or independent directors on our board of directors. Compensation of our executive officers is determined by our board of directors.
Nomination of Directors.Rule 4350(c)(4)(A) requires that a listed company’s director nominees be selected, or recommended to the board of directors for selection, either by (i) a majority of the independent directors, or (ii) a nominations committee comprised solely of independent directors. In lieu of complying with Rule 4350(c)(4)(A), we follow Brazilian corporate law, which does not require us to have either a nominations committee or independent directors on our board of directors. Instead, our directors are appointed as described under “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—New Shareholders’ Agreements—Board of directors (Conselho de Administração).”
Nominating Committee Charter. Rule 4350(c)(4)(B) requires that a listed company adopt a formal written charter or board resolution addressing the director nomination process. In lieu of complying with Rule 4350(c)(4)(B), we follow Brazilian corporate law, which does not require us to adopt a formal written charter or board resolution addressing the process for nomination of directors.
Audit committee composition. Rule 4350(d) requires, among other things, that a listed company maintain an audit committee comprised of at least three members, each of whom must be independent as defined in the Nasdaq rules. In lieu of complying with Rule 4350(d), we follow Brazilian corporate law and we maintain a permanent fiscal board, orConselho Fiscal. OurConselho Fiscal complies with the requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Board Practices.”
Quorum. Rule 4350(f) requires that a listed company’s by-laws provide for a quorum for any meeting of the holders of common stock of at least 33 1/3% of the outstanding shares of the listed company’s common voting stock. In lieu of complying with Rule 4350(f), we follow Brazilian corporate law, which requires a minimum quorum for a shareholders’ meeting of 25% of the outstanding shares of common voting stock on a first summoning of shareholders. Under Brazilian corporate law, however, there is no minimum quorum requirement in the event that a first summoning of shareholders does not elicit a quorum and a second summoning of shareholders is made.
Shareholder Approval. Rule 4350(i)(1) generally requires that a listed company obtain shareholder approval at or prior to the issuance of securities in connection with (a) the establishment or amendment of a compensation arrangement pursuant to which stock may be acquired by officers, directors, employees, or consultants; (b) certain acquisitions of stock of another company; (c) an issuance of securities that will result in a change of control of the issuer; or (d) certain transactions other than a public offering. In lieu of complying with Rule 4350(i)(1), we follow Brazilian corporate law, which does not require us to obtain shareholder approval at or prior to the issuance of securities in connection with the above mentioned topics.
Code of Ethics. Rule 4350(n) requires that a listed company adopt a code of conduct applicable to all directors, officers and employees, which is publicly available. In lieu of complying with Rule 4350(n) with respect to our directors, we follow Brazilian corporate law, which does not require us to adopt a code of ethics, such as that required by the Nasdaq rules, for our directors. However, pursuant to applicable Brazilian corporate and securities laws, our directors and officers are required to publicly disclose certain facts and information, including trading in our securities.
87
Brazilian Stock Exchanges
In 2000, Brazilian stock exchanges were reorganized through the execution of a memorandum of understanding. Pursuant to the memorandum, all securities are now traded only on the Bovespa, with the exception of electronically traded public debt securities and privatization auctions, which are traded on the Rio de Janeiro Stock Exchange. In 2006, the Bovespa accounted for 100% of the trading volume of equity securities. The Bovespa is a non-profit entity owned by its member brokerage firms. Trading on the Bovespa is limited to member brokerage firms and a limited number of authorized non-members.
Trading. Trading is conducted between 11:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., or between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. during daylight savings time in the United States, on an automated system known as the Computer Assisted Trading System on the Bovespa and on the National Electronic Trading System. This system is a computerized system which links electronically with the seven smaller regional exchanges.
The Bovespa also permits trading from 6:45 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. on an online system connected to traditional and Internet brokers called the “After Market.” Trading on the After Market is subject to regulatory limits on price volatility and on the volume of shares transacted through Internet brokers. There are no specialists or officially recognized market makers on the Bovespa. Trading in securities listed on the Brazilian stock exchanges may be effected off the exchanges in certain circumstances, although such trading is very limited.
In order to better control volatility, the Bovespa adopted a “circuit breaker” system pursuant to which trading sessions may be suspended for a period of 30 minutes or one hour whenever the Ibovespa falls 10% or 15%, respectively, in relation to the index registered in the previous trading session.
Settlement of transactions is effected three business days after the trade date without adjustment of the purchase price for inflation. Delivery of and payment for shares are made through the facilities of a clearinghouse, orCâmara Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia S.A., which maintains accounts for member brokerage firms. The seller is ordinarily required to deliver shares to the exchanges on the second business day following the trade date.
Market Size. As of December 31, 2006, the aggregate market capitalization of all the companies listed on the Bovespa was equivalent to approximately US$722.6 billion. Although any of the outstanding shares of a listed company may trade on a Brazilian stock exchange, in most cases fewer than half of the listed shares are actually available for public trading. The remaining shares are held by small groups of controlling persons, by governmental entities or by one principal shareholder. As of December 31, 2006, we accounted for approximately 1.0% of the market capitalization of all listed companies on the Bovespa.
Although at December 31, 2006 the Brazilian equity market was Latin America’s largest in terms of market capitalization expressed in U.S. dollars, it remains relatively small and less liquid compared to major world markets. In 2006, the average daily trading value on the Bovespa was approximately US$2,049.1 million.
Index. Net Serviços has been included as part of the Bovespa index, or the Ibovespa, since May 2000. The Ibovespa is the most representative indicator of the performance of the Brazilian stock market. On December 31, 2006, the weighting of our preferred shares in the index was 1.9% as compared to our weighting of 1.1% on December 31, 2005. Our securities also trade on several
88
additional markets, including the Chicago, Pacific and American option exchanges, on which our options on ADSs began trading in February 2000, and Latibex, the trading market for Latin American companies that trade on the Madrid Stock Exchange, on which our shares began trading in July 2000.
Tax Matters. Trading on Brazilian stock exchanges by a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes, or a non-Brazilian holder, is subject to certain limitations under Brazilian foreign investment legislation. With limited exceptions, non-Brazilian holders may only trade on Brazilian stock exchanges in accordance with the requirements of Resolution No. 2,689, of January 26, 2000, of the National Monetary Council. Resolution No. 2,689 requires that securities held by non-Brazilian holders be maintained in the custody of, or in deposit accounts with, financial institutions duly authorized by the Central Bank and the Brazilian securities commission. In addition, Resolution No. 2,689 requires non-Brazilian holders to restrict their securities trading to transactions on Brazilian stock exchanges or qualified over-the-counter markets. With limited exceptions, non-Brazilian holders may not transfer the ownership of investments made under Resolution No. 2,689 to other non-Brazilian holders through a private transaction. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Material Brazilian Taxation Considerations—Taxation of Gains” for a description of certain tax benefits extended to non-Brazilian holders who qualify under Resolution No. 2,689.
Level 2 of the BovespaOn December 11, 2000, the Bovespa launched three new listing segments designed for the trading of shares issued by publicly held companies: the Special Corporate Governance Level 1, the Special Corporate Governance Level 2 and theNovo Mercado of Bovespa. These listing segments were designed for the trading of shares issued by companies that voluntarily undertake to abide by corporate governance practices and disclosure requirements in addition to those required under Brazilian corporate law.
The inclusion of a company in any one of the segments implies the adherence to a series of corporate rules, known generally as good corporate governance practices. These rules are designed to increase shareholders’ rights and enhance the quality of information provided by Brazilian corporations to shareholders.
Our shares have been listed in Bovespa’s Special Corporate Governance Level 2, or Level 2, since June 2002. Pursuant to Level 2 requirements, we are required to adopt certain practices as part of our corporate structure. We have adopted such practices as follows:
Preferred Shares with Voting Rights. In accordance with Level 2 rules, we have established, voting rights in relation to our preferred shares with respect to:
- our transformation, consolidation, merger or spin-off;
- valuation of assets used in increases in our share capital;
- approval of certain specified agreements between us and our controlling shareholders or their affiliates;
- selection of a specialized firm skilled in determining our fair market value, in relation to a public offering of our shares; and
89
- change or repeal of provisions of our by-laws that alter or modify any Bovespa requirements.
Tag-Along Rights. Upon the acquisition of a controlling interest in us, pursuant to Level 2 requirements, the purchaser must offer tag-along rights to the remaining shareholders in an amount equivalent to 100% of the price paid for each share in the controlling stake, in the case of holders of common shares, and at least 70% of the price paid for each share in the controlling stake, in the case of holders of preferred shares. Our by-laws require the purchaser to offer 100% of the price paid for each share in the controlling stake to holders of our common and preferred shares.
Establishment of a single one year mandate for the entire board of directors. Level 2 requires that directors are reelected annually for one year terms. Our by-laws provide that our board of directors shall be composed of no fewer than nine and no more than twelve members elected at an annual general meeting of shareholders, each to serve for a one year term, with the option for reelection. Furthermore, according to Level 2, 20% of the members of our board of directors must be, and currently are, independent.
Free float. Level 2 requires that at all times at least 25% of an issuer’s total capital stock be held by persons or entities other than those party to a shareholders’ agreement. We have been in compliance with this requirement since July 2004.
Independent Board members. Level 2 requires that at at least 20% of our board members be independent. We have been in compliance with this requirement since this requirement was implemented.
Public offers of shares through mechanisms intending to favor capital dispersion and broader retail access. In any and all public distributions of stock, Level 2 requires us to exert our best efforts towards shareholding dispersion. Toward this end, we have adopted special procedures to ensure, in any public offer of our shares by us, (i) access to all interested investors and (ii) allocation of at least 10% of the total distribution to individuals or non-institutional investors.
Improvements, in addition to quarterly information statements. In addition to the information to be included in quarterly information statements as required by law, Level 2 requires us to, and we do:
- present a consolidated balance sheet, a consolidated statement of results, a consolidated cash flow statement and a consolidated performance report, whenever we are required to submit year-end consolidated financial statements;
- disclose any direct or indirect ownership interest exceeding 5% of our voting capital;
- inform, on a consolidated basis, the quantity and class of those of our securities held, directly or indirectly, by our controlling shareholders, by members of our board of directors, by our executive officers and by the members of our fiscal board;
- report any trades of securities held by our controlling shareholders, by members of our board of directors, by our executive officers and by the members of our fiscal board within the immediately preceding twelve months;
90
- include, in explanatory notes, our cash flow statements; and
- disclose the quantity of our outstanding shares and the percentage expressed in relation to the total amount of shares issued.
Furthermore, under Level 2, each fiscal quarter a quarterly information statement must be filed with CVM. The quarterly information statement must include a special report issued by an independent auditor duly registered with CVM, in accordance with CVM regulations.
Trading of securities and derivatives by members of our board of directors and fiscal board, executive officers and controlling shareholders. Pursuant to Level 2 requirements, members of our board of directors and fiscal board, executive officers and controlling shareholders are obligated to report to Bovespa the volume and the class of our securities held by them, directly or indirectly, including any related derivatives. Any trades in securities and derivatives by such persons are reported in detail to Bovespa within ten days as of the last day of the month in which such trade occurs.
Self-regulatory procedures. We have an internal self-regulatory management committee that adopts internal policies with respect to trading in our securities and related derivatives. This committee has passed the following resolutions:
- from one month before the end of each fiscal year until the publication of the notice to shareholders regarding the availability of our financial statements for such year, our senior managers and controlling shareholders are obligated to abstain from trading in our securities and related derivatives;
- following a decision to raise capital, distribute dividends to shareholders, distribute bonuses in shares and/or related derivatives or adopt a share split, until the publication of the notice announcing such decision, our senior managers and controlling shareholders are obligated to abstain from trading in our securities and related derivatives; and
- our senior managers and controlling shareholders are obligated to periodically inform Bovespa and us of their plan to trade in our securities and related derivatives, and if such plan changes, they are required to notify Bovespa and us of the change.
Shareholder agreement, stock option program and contracts with the same economic group. Upon the signature of a new shareholders’ agreement with us, Level 2 mandates that within five days of such signature, we file with Bovespa a copy of the agreement. Similarly, a copy of all option plans for our employees and administrators are also to be filed with Bovespa within five days.
In addition, whenever a single contract or a series of related contracts within any twelve month period, between ourselves and a subsidiary, senior manager or controlling shareholder, involves an amount equal to or greater than R$200,000 (US$93,545) or involves an amount equal to or greater than 1% of our net worth, we are required to notify Bovespa of this fact and make a public disclosure of such contract or series of contracts.
Resolution of corporate conflicts through arbitration. Under Level 2, we, our controlling shareholders, senior managers and, to the extent we establish aConselho Fiscal, the members of
91
suchConselho Fiscal are required to refer to arbitration any and all disputes or controversies arising out of the listing segment rules, CVM rules, Central Bank rules, National Monetary Council Rules or any other corporate matters.
Regulation of Brazilian Securities MarketsThe Brazilian securities markets are principally governed by (i) Law No. 6,385, of December 7, 1976, and Law No. 6,404, of December 15, 1976, which together, as amended and supplemented, comprise Brazilian corporate law and (ii) regulations issued by (x) the Brazilian securities commission, which has regulatory authority over the stock exchanges and securities markets, generally, (y) the National Monetary Council and (z) the Central Bank, which has licensing authority over brokerage firms and regulates foreign investment and foreign exchange transactions. Such regulations, among others, relate in part to disclosure requirements applicable to issuers of publicly traded securities, the protection of minority shareholders and criminal penalties for insider trading and market manipulation. They also provide for the licensing and oversight of brokerage firms and the governance of the Brazilian stock exchanges.
Under the Brazilian corporate law, a company is eithercompanhia aberta, or public, as we are, orcompanhia fechada, or closely held. All public companies, including us, are registered with the Brazilian securities commission and are subject to certain reporting requirements. A company registered with the Brazilian securities commission may have its securities trade on the Brazilian stock exchanges or in the Brazilian over-the-counter market. Our preferred shares are listed and traded on the Bovespa and may be traded privately, subject to some limitations.
In anticipation of a material announcement, issuers have the option to request that trading in their securities on the Bovespa be suspended. Trading may also be suspended at the discretion of the Bovespa or the Brazilian securities commission due to, among other things, a belief that an issuer has provided inadequate information regarding a material event or has provided inadequate responses to inquiries by the Bovespa or the Brazilian securities commission.
The Brazilian over-the-counter market consists of direct trades between individuals wherein a financial institution registered with the Brazilian securities commission serves as an intermediary. No special application, other than registration with the Brazilian securities commission, is necessary for securities of a public company to be traded in this market. The Brazilian securities commission requires it be given notice of all trades carried out in the Brazilian over-the-counter market by the respective intermediaries.
Trading on the Bovespa by non-residents of Brazil is subject to limitations under Brazilian foreign investment and tax legislation. To remit U.S. dollars abroad for the payment of dividends, other cash distributions or upon the disposition of shares and sales proceeds, the Brazilian custodian for the preferred shares which underlie our ADSs must, on behalf of the depositary for the ADSs, register with the Central Bank. In the event that a holder of ADSs exchanges ADSs for preferred shares, the holder will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodian’s registration for five business days after such exchange. Thereafter, the holder may not be able to obtain and remit U.S. dollars abroad upon the disposition of their preferred shares, or distributions relating to the preferred shares, unless the holder obtains their own registration.
Trading in Brazilian securities markets is not as highly regulated or supervised as it is in the United States and some other markets. Brazilian securities market laws and regulations prohibit market manipulation and insider trading, and it requires a company’s insiders, including directors, officers and major shareholders, as defined under Brazilian corporate law, to disclose all of their
92
transactions in a given issuer’s securities. Brazilian corporate law also prohibits an issuer from trading in its own shares, subject to very limited exceptions. The enforcement of these legal provisions and the supervision of trading markets, however, are not as well developed as they are in the United States.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
Memorandum and Articles of AssociationOrganization, Register and Entry Number
We are a publicly held corporation registered with CVM and organized under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil. We are registered in the commercial registry of the State of São Paulo under the entry number 35.300.177.240 and in the Taxpayers’ General Registry of the Ministry of Finance under registration number 00.108.786/0001 -65.
Our constituent document is ourEstatuto Social, which we refer to in this Form 20-F as our by-laws.
Object and PurposeOur corporate object and purpose, described in Article Three of our by-laws, are those of a holding company. Our operating subsidiaries have as their corporate purpose the distribution of our pay-television and other value-added services to subscribers; the provision of telecommunication services; the distribution of signals of any kind, through local cable networks; and the dissemination of information on local channels. We also provide our operating subsidiaries with administrative, financial and consulting support. We may, without restriction, acquire or hold quotas or shares in other companies which carry on activities similar to ours and to those of our subsidiaries, or which engage in trade commerce and representation.
Voting Rights Relating to Our Common and Preferred Shares
Each holder of our common shares is entitled to one vote per common share at our general shareholders’ meetings; each holder of our preferred shares is entitled to one vote per preferred share at our general shareholders’ meetings exclusively on the following corporate resolutions in accordance with Bovespa’s Corporate Governance Listing Rules for Level 2:
- our transformation, consolidation, merger or spin-off;
- valuation of assets used in determining increases in our capital;
- approval of certain specified agreements between us and our controlling shareholders or their affiliates;
- selection of a specialized firm skilled in determining our fair market value, in relation to a public offering of our shares; and
- change or repeal of provisions of our by-laws that alter or modify any Bovespa requirements.
93
According to Article 111 of the Brazilian corporate law, if a company is required but fails to pay dividends for three consecutive years, the preferred shares acquire voting rights. However, since our preferred shares do not have rights to fixed or minimum dividends, Article 111 is not applicable to us.
According to the Brazilian corporate law, the resolutions of a general shareholders’ meeting shall be passed by a simple majority of those present. Nevertheless, according to Brazilian corporate law, the approval of shareholders representing at least one-half of our outstanding voting shares shall be necessary for a resolution which:
- creates preferred shares or increases an existing class of shares without maintaining its ratio to the other classes of shares;
- alters a preference, a privilege or a condition of redemption or amortization conferred upon one or more classes of preferred shares, or creates a new, more favored class;
- reduces a compulsory dividend;
- merges the corporation with another corporation or consolidates the corporation;
- participates in a group of corporations;
- changes the corporate purpose;
- terminates a state of liquidation of the corporation;
- creates founders’ shares;
- spins-off the corporation; or
- dissolves the corporation.
Shareholders participating in a general shareholders’ meeting have the powers to decide the following:
- the grant of guaranties and other security in favor of third parties;
- cancellation of our registration as a public company;
- cancellation of our registration for trading of shares on Level 2 of the Bovespa; and
- selection of a specialized firm skilled in determining our fair market value, in relation to a public offering of our shares.
According to Brazilian corporate law, any shareholder, with or without a right to vote, may attend a general meeting and take part in the discussion of matters submitted for consideration. Generally, apart from the exceptions provided by law, a general meeting shall be opened on first
94
call with the presence of shareholders representing at least one-quarter of the voting capital; on the second call, it shall be opened with the presence of any number of shareholders.
Each of our ADSs represents one preferred share. Since voting rights are restricted on our preferred shares, the holders of ADSs are only entitled to vote at our shareholders’ meetings on the corporate resolutions discussed above.
Conversion RightsUnder Brazilian corporate law, the conversion of a class of shares into another class of shares must be expressly authorized in the by-laws of the company. Our by-laws do not contain any such provisions, and therefore unless a shareholders’ meeting expressly approves the amendment of the by-laws, our common shares cannot be converted into preferred shares and our preferred shares cannot be converted into common shares.
Preemptive RightsUnder Brazilian corporate law, upon the issuance of new common or preferred shares, as the case may be, or securities convertible into shares, all existing shareholders of a particular class have the right to subscribe for new shares of the same class, in proportion to the shares they already own. If, in effecting such preemptive rights, an insufficient amount of new shares exist to assure that all existing shareholders of a certain class are able to exercise their full preemptive rights, the rights may be extended on a pro rata basis to another class of shares so as to enable all existing shareholders who wish to exercise their preemptive rights to do so. Preemptive rights are freely transferable. A minimum period of 30 days following the publication of a notice of a capital increase new share issuance must be allowed for the exercise of preemptive rights. Brazilian corporate law and our by-laws authorize us to issue shares, or securities convertible into shares, without preemptive rights so long as such shares are sold on a stock exchange, through public subscription or by an exchange of shares in a public tender offer.
In the event of a new share issuance, holders of ADSs have preemptive rights to the extent described above. However, holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise their preemptive rights relating to the preferred shares underlying their ADSs unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available.
In addition, our new shareholders’ agreements establish certain rules in relation to preemptive rights among our major shareholders. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—New Shareholders’ Agreements.”
Liquidation RightsIn the event of our liquidation, our common and preferred shares have pro rata rights to share in our assets. Preferred shares, however, have priority over common shares in the distribution of capital.
Redemption ProvisionOur by-laws do not contain a redemption provision. However, our shareholders, acting at a general shareholders’ meeting, may elect to effect a redemption of our outstanding shares.
95
Rights of Withdrawal
Brazilian corporate law provides that, under certain circumstances, a shareholder has the right to withdraw his or her equity interest from a company in exchange for payment for such shares by the company. In our case, this right of withdrawal may be exercised by dissenting shareholders in the event that at least half of all holders of our outstanding voting shares authorize us to:
- create new preferred shares or increase the amount of preferred shares already existing without maintaining such existing preferred shares’ ratio to the other classes of existing shares, unless otherwise provided by our by-laws;
- reduce the mandatory distribution of dividends;
- change our corporate purpose;
- merge with another company or consolidate with another company subject to the conditions set forth under Brazilian corporate law;
- transfer all of our shares to another company in order to make us a wholly-owned subsidiary of such company, known as anincorporação de ações;
- participate in a centralized group of companies as defined under Brazilian corporate law and subject to the conditions set forth therein;
- alter a preference, privilege or condition of redemption or amortization conferred upon one or more classes of preferred shares, or create a new, more favored class; or
- spin-off.
The right of withdrawal lapses 30 days after the publication of the minutes of the shareholders’ meeting that approved the corporate actions described above. We would be entitled to reconsider any action giving rise to withdrawal rights within ten days following the expiration of such rights if the withdrawal of shares of dissenting shareholders would jeopardize our financial stability. With respect to the first and seventh bullet points above, only shareholders affected by such actions have the right to withdraw from the corporation. In addition, shareholders may only exercise the rights of withdrawal with respect to the fourth and seventh bullet points above if such shares are not part of the Ibovespa or any other stock exchange index and if less than 50% of the shares issued by the company are outstanding. Our preferred shares are included in the Ibovespa.
This right of withdrawal may also be exercised in the event that the entity resulting from a merger, consolidation or spin-off of us fails then itself to become a listed company within 120 days of the shareholders’ meeting at which such decision to merge, consolidate or spin-off, as the case may be, was made.
Changes in Rights of ShareholdersUnder Brazilian corporate law, the rights of our shareholders may only be changed by a shareholder resolution amending our by-laws. A resolution to amend the by-laws requires the approval of an absolute majority of votes cast at a shareholders’ meeting. A quorum of not less than two-thirds of the share capital entitled to vote must be present. If the quorum requirement is not met
96
at the initial meeting, the resolution may be approved at a later date by the majority of any number of holders of voting shares present at a second call of the shareholders’ meeting.
Shareholders’ MeetingsShareholders’ meetings are typically held at our principal office. Shareholders’ meetings are called by publication of a notice in the Diário Oficial, the Brazilian official gazette, and in the Brazilian newspaper Valor Econômico. Our annual shareholders’ meeting must be held during the first four months after the closing of the fiscal year and must be convened on not less than fifteen days’ notice. At the annual shareholders’ meeting, the annual accounts, including a report on our activities during the previous year and our financial statements, are presented to the shareholders for examination, discussion and approval. Brazilian corporate law and our by-laws require that if the board of directors fails to call a shareholders’ meeting within eight days after the receipt of a legitimate request for such a meeting, an extraordinary meeting may be called upon the request of the audit committee (if any) or shareholders holding at least 5% of our share capital. If the board of directors fails to call a shareholders’ meeting within 60 days after the receipt of a legitimate request for such a meeting, any shareholder may call an extraordinary meeting.
Pursuant to our new shareholders’ agreements, our major shareholders are required to vote in accordance with voting decisions made in previous meetings. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—New Shareholders’ Agreements.”
In accordance with Article 126 of the Brazilian corporate law only shareholders of Net Serviços and attorneys-in-fact of such shareholders may attend a shareholders’ meeting. Attorneys-in-fact must (1) have a power-of-attorney issued at maximum a year before the date of the shareholders’ meeting and (2) be (i) a shareholder of Net Serviços; or (ii) a lawyer or a business administrator of a Net Serviços shareholder.
Transfer of Shares; Limitations on Shareholdings
There are no restrictions on the transferability of our common shares, except as provided under applicable law, in our by-laws or in our new shareholders’ agreements. CVM has issued rules providing that whenever a controlling shareholder makes a purchase of any class of shares (or securities convertible into shares) that results in an increase (or a potential increase) by at least 5% of a company’s share capital, the controlling shareholder must immediately provide notice of such purchase to CVM, the stock exchange and the over-the-counter market in which the company’s securities trade.
Current CVM regulations require that the controlling shareholder must effect a public offer whenever it purchases shares representing more than one-third of the total capital stock of a company, if such acquisition of shares was not already effected through a public offering.
Under the Brazilian telecommunications regulatory framework, only private legal entities headquartered in Brazil and controlled as to 51% of their voting capital by Brazilian-born citizens or persons who have held Brazilian citizenship for more than ten years are eligible to receive a license from Anatel to operate cable television systems in Brazil. Therefore, presently, it is not legally possible for a person or a legal entity other than those mentioned to acquire control of Net Serviços. See also “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders” for a discussion of this law in relation to Telmex’s investment in us.
97
Change of Control Provisions
According to the Corporate Governance Listing Rules for Level 2 of the Bovespa, in the event of an acquisition of a controlling interest in us, the purchaser must offer tag-along rights to all of our remaining shareholders in an amount equal to, in the case of holders of common shares, 100% of the price paid for each share of the controlling stake and, in the case of holders of preferred shares, at least 70% of the price paid for each share of the controlling stake. Our by-laws, however, as allowed by Level 2, require the purchaser to offer to holders of both common and preferred shares 100% of the price paid for each share in the controlling stake.
CVM also requires that whenever a publicly held company experiences a change of control, the new controlling shareholder must immediately disclose the transaction to CVM, the stock exchange and the over-the-counter market in which the company’s securities trade.
CapitalizationAs of December 31, 2006, our corporate capital amounted to R$4.1 billion, of which R$12.9 million has not been paid in. As of December 31, 2006, our corporate capital consisted of 110,675,783 common shares and 181,564,205 preferred shares. Pursuant to our by-laws, the board of directors may increase our corporate capital up to a maximum amount of R$5.0 billion. This capital increase may be effected without amending our by-laws or obtaining prior shareholder approval and without maintaining the existing proportion among our classes of shares, subject to the applicable limitations under Brazilian law.
Changes to Brazilian Corporate Law and Rules Enacted by CVM
On October 31, 2001, Law No. 10,303 was passed by the Brazilian legislature amending Brazilian corporate law. Throughout 2001 and 2002, CVM also enacted new rules affecting Brazilian companies. As a result, companies are now required to, and we, adhere to the following:
- disputes among shareholders are subject to arbitration if so provided by the by-laws of the company. Our by-laws provide that disputes arising or related to (i) our by- laws, (ii) rules enacted by CVM, Bovespa, the Brazilian Central Bank or the National Monetary Council, (iii) rules applicable to the Brazilian capital markets or (iv) Brazilian corporate law are subject to arbitration which shall occur in accordance with the Market Arbitration Chamber Created by Bovespa;
- upon a delisting or a substantial reduction in the liquidity of shares resulting from purchase(s) by controlling shareholder(s), a company must engage in a tender offer for all outstanding shares, at a purchase price equal to the fair market value for such shares. If less than 5% of all shares issued and outstanding have not been purchased by such controlling shareholder(s) after the expiration of such tender offer, holders of such shares may decide at a general meeting to redeem those shares for the offering price;
- non-controlling shareholders representing at least 15% of voting shares will have the right to elect by separate vote one member of the board of directors;
- non-voting, non-controlling shareholders representing at least 10% of the total capital shares will have the right to elect by separate vote one member of the board of directors;
98
- in the event of a sale of control, the purchaser must offer tag-along rights to all remaining holders of common shares in an amount equal to at least 80% of the price paid for each share of the controlling stake. Our by-laws, as allowed under Brazilian corporate law, require the purchaser to offer to holders of both common and preferred shares 100% of the price paid for each share in the controlling stake;
- shareholders are entitled to effect a spin-off only if the spin-off reflects a change in the company’s corporate purpose, a reduction in mandatory dividends or the participation by the company in a centralized group of companies;
- controlling shareholders, the shareholders that elect members to the board of directors and audit committee, if any, the members of the board of directors and audit committee, if any, and executive officers are required to disclose any purchase or sale of a company’s shares to CVM and Bovespa;
- the chairman of any shareholders’ meeting or board of directors or executive officers’ meeting is entitled to enforce the voting provisions of any shareholders’ agreement which has been duly filed with the company; and
- the first and second calls for shareholders’ meetings must be made fifteen and eight days, respectively, before such meeting, except that the Brazilian securities commission may also require the first call 30 days before a shareholders’ meeting.
Shareholders Agreement
Our major shareholders are party to two shareholders’ agreements with respect to their ownership of our shares. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—New Shareholders’ Agreements” for additional details about the shareholders’ agreements.
Net Brasil Programming AgreementHistorically, we obtained all of our programming from Brazilian and international sources through Net Brasil. On June 27, 2004, we entered into an amended and restated programming agreement with Net Brasil whereby we now obtain all of our programming from Brazilian sources through Net Brasil whereas we obtain directly all new international content from non-Brazilian sources. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Material Transactions with Affiliates—Net Brasil Programming Agreement.”
Vivax Acquisiton AgreementsSee “Item 4. Information on the Company—History and Development of the Company—Acquisition of Vivax.”
Exchange ControlsUntil March 2005, there were two legal foreign exchange markets in Brazil, the commercial rate exchange market (the “Commercial Market”) and the floating rate exchange market (the “Floating Market”). The Commercial Market was reserved primarily for foreign trade transactions and transactions that generally required prior approval from Brazilian monetary
99
authorities, such as the purchase and sale of registered investments by foreign persons and related remittances of funds abroad. The Floating Market rate generally applied to specific transactions for which Central Bank approval was not required. Both the Commercial Market rate and the Floating Market rate were reported by the Central Bank on a daily basis.
On March 4, 2005, the Brazilian National Monetary Council issued Resolution 3,265, introducing several changes in the Brazilian foreign exchange regime, including: (i) the unification of the foreign exchange markets into a single foreign exchange market, called the foreign exchange market, for all transactions effective as of March 14, 2005; (ii) the easing of several rules for the acquisition of foreign currency by Brazilian residents; and (iii) the extension of the term for converting foreign currency derived from Brazilian exports. It is expected that the Central Bank will provide further easing of regulations in relation to foreign exchange transactions as well as on payments and transfers of Brazilian currency between Brazilian residents and non-residents (such transfers being commonly known as the international transfer of reais), including those made through the so-called non-resident accounts (also known as CC5 accounts).
Additionally, on March 9, 2005, the Central Bank issued Circular 3,280, containing the regulations for the foreign exchange market and for international investments, which governs the Brazilian foreign exchange market, Brazilian investments abroad and foreign investment in Brazil.
Foreign currencies may be purchased only through a Brazilian bank authorized to operate in the foreign exchange market. Foreign exchange rates are freely negotiated, but may be strongly influenced by Central Bank intervention. The recent changes to the foreign exchange regulation introduced by the Brazilian authorities are intended to make foreign exchange transactions simpler and more efficient.
From its introduction on July 1, 1994 through January 1995, the real appreciated against the U.S. dollar. In 1995, the Central Bank announced that it would intervene in the market and buy or sell U.S. dollars, establishing a band within which the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate could fluctuate. This policy resulted in a gradual devaluation of the real against the U.S. dollar. On January 13, 1999, due to monetary pressure, the band was set at R$1.20 and R$1.32 per US$1.00, respectively. Two days later, on January 15, 1999, due to market pressure, the Central Bank abolished the band system and allowed the real-U.S. dollar exchange rate to float freely.
Since January 15, 1999, the Central Bank has allowed the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate to float freely and, consequently, since that time, the exchange rate has fluctuated considerably, with the Central Bank intervening only occasionally to control unstable movements. From January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, the real appreciated by approximately 8.1% . From January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, the real appreciated by approximately 11.8% . From January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006, the real appreciated by approximately 8.7% .
It is not possible to predict whether the exchange markets will continue their volatility, whether the Central Bank will continue to let the real float freely, nor whether the real will remain at its present level as compared to the U.S. dollar. Accordingly, it is not possible to predict what impact the Brazilian government’s exchange rate policies may have on us. The Brazilian government could impose a currency band system in the future and/or the real could devalue substantially.
100
Dividend Policy
General
We have never paid cash dividends on our preferred shares or ADSs. We are a holding company and our ability to obtain funds for the payment of cash dividends depends entirely on our ability to obtain funds from our subsidiaries and investees. In addition, several of our debt agreements limit our ability to pay dividends.
Our by-laws, in accordance with Brazilian corporate law, require that, for any year in which we have “adjusted net profits” (as defined in Brazilian corporate law), we will be required to pay, subject to certain exceptions, a yearly minimum dividend equal to not less than 25% of adjusted net profits, referred to as the “mandatory distribution.” Brazilian corporate law, however, permits publicly held companies, such as us, to suspend the mandatory distribution of dividends if the board of directors and the audit committee report to the shareholders’ meeting that the distribution would be inadvisable in view of the company’s financial condition. If the board of directors and audit committee so report, the board of directors must file a justification for such suspension with CVM within five days of the shareholders’ meeting. Profits not distributed by virtue of this suspension shall be attributed to a special reserve and, if not absorbed by subsequent losses, shall be paid as dividends as soon as the financial condition of the company permits such payments.
We have never reported adjusted net profits and consequently have never paid the mandatory distribution. We do not anticipate reporting adjusted net profits in the near-term. We intend to retain any profits in excess of any mandatory distribution in a supplementary reserve for use in the operation and expansion of our business, and therefore we do not anticipate paying any dividends in excess of any mandatory distribution for the foreseeable future.
To the extent that we declare and pay dividends on the preferred shares, holders of ADSs on the applicable record date will be entitled to any dividend declared as of such record date in respect of the preferred shares underlying the ADSs, subject to the terms of the amended and restated deposit agreement. We would pay any cash dividend in reais, so that the exchange rate in effect at the time of payment would determine the dollar value of the dividend received by the depositary, and hence the amount in dollars paid by the depositary to ADS holders upon the depositary’s conversion of the dividend amounts into U.S. dollars.
Dividends on Our Common Shares and Our Preferred Shares
In accordance with Brazilian corporate law, our common and preferred shares each carry the right to receive mandatory dividends. The preferred shares carry the right to receive in cash a dividend amount of 10% or more over the dividend amount available for distribution on the common shares. In addition, in the event of our liquidation, preferred shares have priority over common shares in the distribution of capital.
In the event that we pay dividends to our shareholders in the future, the owner of our shares on the record date, as identified in our shareholder registry, will be the holder entitled to receive the payment.
Amounts Available for DistributionAt each annual general shareholders’ meeting, shareholders must determine how to allocate net profits from the preceding fiscal year. The board of directors must then approve the decision of
101
the shareholders. For purposes of Brazilian corporate law, net profits are defined as net income after payment of income taxes and social contribution taxes for a given fiscal year, net of any accumulated losses from prior fiscal years and any amounts allocated to employees’ and managements’ participation in the profits. In accordance with Brazilian corporate law and our bylaws, the amount available for dividend distribution is equal to our net profits less any amounts allocated from such net profits to:
- the legal reserve;
- a contingency reserve for anticipated losses; and
- an unrealized revenue reserve.
We are required to maintain a legal reserve, to which we must allocate each fiscal year 5% of net profits for such year until the amount reserved equals 20% of our paid-in capital. However, we are not required to make any allocations to our legal reserve in any fiscal year in which the legal reserve, when added to our other established capital reserves, would exceed 30% of our capital. Net losses, if any, may be charged against the legal reserve. At December 31, 2005, our legal reserve had a zero balance.
Brazilian corporate law also provides for two additional discretionary allocations of net profits subject to approval by the shareholders at the annual general meeting. First, a percentage of net profits may be allocated to a contingency reserve for anticipated losses deemed probable in future years. Any amount so allocated in a prior year must be (i) reversed, if the loss does not occur, in the fiscal year in which the loss was anticipated or (ii) written-off, if the anticipated loss occurs.
Second, if the amount of unrealized revenue exceeds the sum of:
- the legal reserve;
- retained earnings; and
- the contingency reserve for anticipated losses,
such excess may be allocated to an unrealized revenue reserve. Under Brazilian corporate law, unrealized revenue is defined as the sum of:
- the share of equity earnings of affiliated companies; and
- profits from installment sales to be received after the end of the next succeeding fiscal year.
With respect to unrealized revenue reserve, effective as of March 5, 2002, the amount of mandatory dividend exceeding the amount of the realized net profits in a given fiscal year may be allocated in an unrealized revenue reserve. Under Brazilian corporate law, realized revenues shall be the amount exceeding the sum of:
- the net positive result of equity adjustments; and
- profits or revenues from operations with financial results after the end of the next succeeding fiscal year.
102
Under Brazilian corporate law, the by-laws of any company may authorize the creation of a discretionary reserve. By-laws which authorize the allocation of a percentage of a company’s net income to a discretionary reserve must also indicate the purpose of the reserve and the criteria for allocation of, and the maximum amount of, the reserve. Our by-laws require that, after the creation of a reserve as provided under Brazilian corporate law and the distribution of the applicable dividends, the remaining balance shall, upon a proposal submitted by the board of directors and approved by the shareholders in a general meeting, be allocated to a supplementary reserve so as to support the existence of working capital and for future capital appropriations. The amount of such supplementary reserve shall not exceed the capital of Net Serviços.
The amounts available for distribution may be further increased by a reversion of the contingency reserve for anticipated losses constituted in prior years but not realized, or further increased or reduced, as the case may be, as a result of allocations of revenue to or from the unrealized reserve. The amounts available for distribution are determined on the basis of financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian corporate law.
At December 31, 2006, we had no investment reserve.
Mandatory DistributionBrazilian corporate law generally requires that the by-laws of a Brazilian company specify for each fiscal year a minimum percentage of net income available for distribution, in the form of dividends, by such company to shareholders. Under our by-laws, such mandatory distribution has been fixed as an amount equal to not less than 25% of net income, to the extent that such amounts are available for distribution. See “—General,” above.
Under Brazilian corporate law, the mandatory distribution is based on a percentage of adjusted net income, not lower than 25%, rather than a fixed monetary amount per share. Brazilian corporate law, however, permits publicly held companies, such as our company, to suspend the mandatory distribution of dividends if the board of directors and the audit committee report to the shareholders’ meeting that the distribution would be inadvisable in view of the company’s financial condition. If the board of directors and audit committee so report, the board of directors must file a justification for such suspension with CVM within five days of the shareholders’ meeting. Profits not distributed by virtue of this suspension shall be attributed to a special reserve and, if not absorbed by subsequent losses, shall be paid as dividends as soon as the financial condition of the company permits such payments.
Payment of DividendsBrazilian corporate law and our by-laws require us to hold an annual shareholders’ meeting by the fourth month after the end of each fiscal year at which, among other things, shareholders must decide whether or not to we pay an annual dividend. The decision as to whether to pay an annual dividend is based on the financial statements for the relevant fiscal year. Under Brazilian corporate law, dividends are generally required to be paid within 60 days following the date the dividend is declared, unless a shareholders’ resolution sets forth another date of payment, which, in either case, must occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared. A shareholder has a three-year period from the dividend payment date to claim unpaid dividends in respect of his or her shares.
103
Our by-laws permit us, upon the approval of our board of directors, to pay interim dividends out of pre-existing and accumulated profits for the preceding fiscal year or preceding two fiscal quarters.
In general, shareholders who are not residents of Brazil must register their Brazilian investments with the Central Bank in order to receive dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to their foreign investments outside of Brazil. The preferred shares underlying the ADSs are held by Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, also known as the custodian, as agent for the depositary and JP Morgan Chase Bank is the registered owner of our preferred shares. The depositary electronically registers the preferred shares underlying the ADSs with the Central Bank and, therefore, is able to have dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to those shares eligible to be remitted outside Brazil.
Payments of cash dividends and distributions, if any, will be made in Brazilian currency to the custodian on behalf of the depositary, which will then convert such proceeds into U.S. dollars and will cause such U.S. dollars to be delivered to the depositary for distribution to holders of ADSs. Under current Brazilian law, dividends paid to shareholders who are not Brazilian residents, including holders of ADSs, will not be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax, except for dividends based on profits generated prior to December 31, 1995.
According to Brazilian corporate law, preferred shares without voting rights acquire such a right if, during a period provided for in a company’s by-laws (which must not exceed three consecutive fiscal years), such company fails to pay the fixed or minimum dividend to which the preferred shares are entitled. Such voting right shall continue until payment has been made if the dividend is not cumulative, or until all cumulative dividends in arrears have been paid. Pursuant to our by-laws, our preferred shares are not entitled to fixed or minimum dividends; thus, they will not acquire voting rights if we fail to pay dividends.
We have not paid dividends to our shareholders in the past, nor do we expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.
Record of Dividend Payments and Interest Attributed to Shareholders’ Equity
Law No. 9,249, dated December 26, 1995, as amended, provides for the distribution of interest attributed to shareholders’ equity as an alternative form of dividend payment to shareholders. Such interest is limited to the daily pro ratavariation of the TJLP, a long-term interest rate that includes an inflation factor reset quarterly. Companies may treat such payments as a deductible expense for corporate income tax and social contribution purposes but the deduction may not exceed the greater of:
- 50% of net income for the period in respect of which the payment is made (net income does not include the distribution or income tax deductions); or
- 50% of retained earnings.
Under Brazilian corporate law, dividend distributions are generally not deductible. However, a Brazilian company may elect to treat dividend distributions as “Interest Distributions,” in which case such distributions will be deductible, subject to certain limitations. Any payment of interest on shareholders’ equity to holders of ADSs or preferred shares, whether or not they are Brazilian residents, is subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at the rate of 15% or 25% if the beneficiary is a resident in a tax haven. We have not made any such payments of interest to-date.
104
Taxation
Material Brazilian Taxation Considerations
The following discussion summarizes the material Brazilian tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of ADSs or preferred shares by a holder that is not domiciled in Brazil for purposes of Brazilian taxation, or a non-Brazilian holder. The discussion is based upon Brazilian law as currently in effect; any change in such law may change the consequences described below. This discussion does not specifically address all of the Brazilian tax considerations applicable to any particular non-Brazilian holder, and each non-Brazilian holder should consult his or her own tax adviser concerning the Brazilian tax consequences of an investment in ADSs or preferred shares.
There is no income tax treaty between Brazil and the United States.
Taxation of Dividends. In general, dividends paid by us to non-Brazilian holders or the depositary in respect of the preferred shares underlying the ADSs out of profits generated on or after January 1, 1996 will not be subject to withholding income tax in Brazil. However, dividends paid from profits generated on or before December 31, 1995 may be subject to Brazilian withholding tax at varying rates.
Taxation of Gains. Brazilian law distinguishes between, on the one hand, direct foreign investments in Brazilian companies and, on the other hand, foreign investments in securities issued by Brazilian companies through the Brazilian capital markets. Under Resolution No. 2,689, which became effective on March 31, 2000, superseding previous regulations known as Annex IV, foreign investors may invest directly in the Brazilian financial and capital markets, as long as they meet certain requirements.
Gains realized outside Brazil by a non-Brazilian holder on the disposition of assets located in Brazil, including preferred shares, are subject to Brazilian tax as of February 2004. Gains are subject to a 15% withholding tax rate, unless such non-Brazilian holder is located in a low tax jurisdiction (a “Low Tax Jurisdiction”), as defined by Brazilian law, in which case the applicable rate would be 25%. A Low Tax Jurisdiction is defined as a jurisdiction which does not tax income or which has an income tax rate lower than 20%. Brazilian tax authorities regularly issues a list of jurisdictions which are considered Low Tax Jurisdictions.
We understand that ADSs are not assets located in Brazil for the purposes of the abovementioned tax. However, we are unable to predict whether Brazilian courts would concur with our understanding that ADSs are not assets located in Brazil. To date there is no judicial or administrative precedent on this specific matter.
Neither the deposit of preferred shares in exchange for ADSs (provided that the preferred shares are registered under Resolution No. 2,689 and the investor is not located in a Low Tax Jurisdiction) nor the withdrawal of preferred shares upon the cancellation of ADSs are subject to Brazilian tax.
Gains realized by non-Brazilian holders on dispositions of preferred shares in Brazil or in transactions with Brazilian residents, if in accordance with the requirements of Resolution No. 2,689, are exempted from withholding income tax in Brazil, unless the foreign investor is located in a Low Tax Jurisdiction, in which case the foreign investor will be subject to the same general taxation rules applicable to Brazilian residents.
105
Gains on the disposition of preferred shares obtained upon cancellation of ADSs are not taxed in Brazil if such disposition is made in a Brazilian stock exchange by an investor that is not located in a Low Tax Jurisdiction and the proceeds are remitted abroad within five business days after cancellation.
Any gains realized by a non-Brazilian resident upon the redemption of preferred shares will be treated as gains from the disposition of such preferred shares to a Brazilian resident occurring off of a stock exchange and will accordingly be subject to tax at a rate of 15%, except for gains realized by a non-Brazilian resident located in a Low Tax Jurisdiction, in which case such gain will be subject to tax at a rate of 25%.
Gain is measured by the difference between the amount in Brazilian currency realized on the sale or exchange and the acquisition cost of the shares sold, measured in Brazilian currency without any correction for inflation. The acquisition cost of shares registered as a direct investment, in accordance with law 4,131/62, with the Brazilian Central Bank is calculated on the basis of the foreign currency amount registered with the Brazilian Central Bank.
There can be no assurance that the current preferential treatment for holders of ADSs and non-Brazilian holders of preferred shares will be maintained.
Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to our preferred shares or ADSs will not be subject to Brazilian taxation. Gains on the sale or assignment of preemptive rights relating to our preferred shares will be treated differently for Brazilian tax purposes depending on whether (i) the sale or assignment is made by the depositary or by the shareholder and (ii) the transaction takes place on a Brazilian stock exchange. Gains on sales or assignments made by the depositary on a Brazilian stock exchange are not taxed in Brazil, but gains on other sales or assignments may be subject to tax at rates up to 20%.
Interest on Capital Distributions. Dividend distributions are generally not deductible by Net Serviços under Brazilian law. However, Brazilian corporations may make payments to shareholders characterized as interest on capital, or interest on capital distributions as an alternative form of making dividend distributions, in which case such a distribution will be deductible for Brazilian corporate income tax purposes, subject to certain limitations. Our charter does not presently contemplate the payment of interest on capital distributions to shareholders. If we were to make such an interest on capital distribution, non-Brazilian holders would incur a 15% withholding income tax with respect to such a distribution. Such withholding would be increased to a rate of 25% for any non-Brazilian holders that are residents of a Low Tax Jurisdiction.
Other Brazilian Taxes. There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of ADSs or preferred shares by a non-Brazilian holder except that certain Brazilian states may impose such taxes in the case of recipients of gifts or inheritances who are domiciliaries or residents of such states. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration, or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of ADSs or preferred shares. Financial transfers are taxed by the Temporary Contribution Over Financial Transactions, or CPMF, at the rate of 0.38% on the amount of the bank account withdrawal. Transactions conducted through the Brazilian stock exchanges in special checking accounts opened for the sole purpose to enable foreign investors to carry out transactions in a Brazilian stock exchange are exempt from the CPMF tax.
Taxation of Foreign Exchange Transactions. The conversion by a non-Brazilian holder of Brazilian currency into non-Brazilian currency is subject to a tax on exchange transactions known
106
as IOF/Câmbio. The rate of this tax is currently zero, but the rate may be increased by the Minister of Finance to as high as 25%.
Taxation on Bonds and Securities Transactions. IOF/Títulos may be imposed upon the acquisition, sale or other disposition of preferred shares, even if such transactions are performed on the Bovespa. The rate of this tax is currently zero but may be increased at the discretion of the executive branch.
Documents on DisplayStatements contained in this Form 20-F as to the contents of any contract or other document filed as an exhibit to this Form 20-F summarize their material terms, but are not necessarily complete. We are also subject to the informational reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, which requires that we file periodic reports and other information with the SEC. As a foreign private issuer, we file annual reports on Form 20-F as opposed to Form 10-K. We do not file quarterly reports on Form 10-Q but file reports in relation to material events on Form 6-K.
Our reports and other information filed by us with the SEC may be inspected and copied by the public at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a website www.sec.gov where those documents electronically filed with the SEC may be found.
We furnish JPMorgan Chase Bank, as the depositary in connection with our ADSs, annual reports in English, which include a review of operations and annual audited consolidated financial statements prepared under Brazilian GAAP. We also furnish the depositary six-month reports in English which include audited semi-annual consolidated financial information prepared under Brazilian GAAP. Upon our request, the depositary will promptly mail such reports to all record holders of our ADSs. We also furnish to the depositary, in English, all notices of shareholders’ meetings and other reports and communications that are made generally available to our shareholders. Upon our request, the depositary will make such notices, reports and communications available to holders of our ADSs and will mail to all record holders of our ADSs a notice containing a summary of the information contained in any notice of a shareholders’ meeting it receives. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements and from the rules under the Exchange Act relating to short-swing profit disclosure and liability.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Foreign Exchange RiskOur foreign currency exposure gives rise to market risks associated with exchange rate movements against the U.S. dollar.
A substantial portion of capital expenditures, including network equipment costs, and approximately 35% of our indebtness is denominated in or indexed to the U.S. dollar. Substantially all of our revenues are denominated in Brazilian reais. As a result, we are exposed to currency exchange risks, which may adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations. As part of a program to hedge part of our capital expenditures and interest expenses linked to the U.S. dollar, as of December 31, 2006, we were a party to certain swap agreements.See
107
also “Item 10. Additional Information—Exchange Controls.” Based on the level and characteristics of our debt indexed to the U.S. dollar, the result from a hypothetical depreciation of the Brazilian real to R$2.50 per US$1.00, or 17% depreciation compared to the exchange rate as of December 31, 2006, would have a decrease of R$54.3 million on our earnings before income tax. The results of this analysis, which may differ from actual results, are as follows:
Total U.S. Linked | Total U.S. Linked Debt | Market risk – Impact | ||||
Debt as of | at Exchange Rate of | on Loss on Exchange | ||||
December 31, 2006 | R$2.50 per US$1.00 | Rate, net | ||||
(R$ in millions) | (R$ in millions) | (R$ in millions) | ||||
U.S. Linked Debt | ||||||
Perpetual Bonds | 320.7 | 375.0 | (54.3) | |||
Total | 320.7 | 375.0 | (54.3) |
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the effect on our financial results resulting from an increase in interest rates on our floating rate debt indexed to CDI. Based on the level and characteristics of our debt, the result from a hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates would have a decrease of R$7.7 million on our earnings before income tax. The results of this analysis, which may differ from actual results, are as follows:
Market risk – | ||||||
Total Debt as of | 10% Interest | Impact on Net | ||||
December 31, 2006 | Rate Increase | Financial Expenses | ||||
(R$; in millions) | (basis points) | (R$; in millions) | ||||
Floating rate debt(1): | ||||||
Debenture-6thPublic Issuance(2) | 580.0 | 132 | (7.7) | |||
Total | 580.0 | 132 | (7.7) |
(1) | Floating rate debt that affects our cash flow. |
(2) | Floating rate debt indexed to CDI plus a spread of 0.7% per year. CDI was at 13.2% per year as of Decemberh 31, 2006. |
The percentages and amounts of our debt subject to floating interest rates as of December 31, 2006 were as follows:
Percentage of total debt | Amount in US$ millions | |||
Floating rate debt: | ||||
Denominated in U.S. dollars | 36% | 150.0 | ||
Denominated in reais | 64% | 271.3 | ||
Total | 100% | 421.3 |
Our floating interest rate exposure is primarily subject to the variations of CDI, with respect to the majority of our outstanding local currency denominated debt.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES.
Not applicable.108
Part II
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES.
Not applicable.ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Disclosure Controls and ProceduresOur management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2006. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2006 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006. Our management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S.S., an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its attestation report which is included under Item 18 in this annual report on Form 20-F.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
109
Our management identified no change in our internal control during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16 [RESERVED]
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
In lieu of complying with Rule 4350(d), we follow Brazilian corporate law and we maintain a permanent fiscal board, orConselho Fiscal. OurConselho Fiscal complies with the requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors and Board Practices.” OurConselho Fiscal has one “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act. Our financial expert is Mr. Charles Barnsley Holland, and he is independent as defined by Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.
ITEM 16B.CODE OF ETHICS.We presently have a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller. Our code of ethics appears in both English and Portuguese on our website at www.ir.netservicos.com.br.
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S.S. acted as our independent auditor for 2006 and 2005 in connection with our US GAAP financial statements. The chart below sets forth the fees for services performed by Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S.S. for those years and breaks down the amounts by category of service in U.S. dollars, calculated by using the average exchange rate for the period:
Total Fees | ||||
(US$ in thousands) | ||||
2006 | 2005 | |||
Audit-Fees(1) | 868.9 | 412.0 | ||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | 610.7 | - | ||
Tax Fees(3) | 48.3 | 117.7 | ||
All Other Fees(4) | 597.7 | - | ||
Total(5) | 2,125.6 | 529.7 | ||
(1) | Audit Fees |
Audit fees include fees for the audit of our annual financial statements and internal controls, review of our quarterly financial information and required subsidiary statutory audit. | |
(2) | Audit-Related Fees |
Audit-related fees include fees for the preparation and issuance of comfort letters in connection with our offering of Debentures 6thPublic Issuance and Perpetual Notes and fees for review of documentation of internal controls implemented by us associated with Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance. |
110
(3) Tax Fees
Tax fees include fees for the review of income tax returns in 2006 and fees related to review of our legal restructuring plan for compliance with local legislation in 2005.
(4) All Other Fees
Other fees include fees for the due diligence related to the Vivax acquisition.
(5) Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
During 2006, our fiscal board served as our audit committee for the purposes of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Accordingly, our fiscal board established pre-approval procedures for the engagement of Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S.S. as our independent auditor for audit and permitted non-audit services.
Our fiscal board reviews the scope of each service to be provided by our independent auditors before the commencement of such service in order to ensure that independence is and will be maintained and that the provision of the service is not prohibited under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Each service is approved prior to commencement of work related to such service.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES.
See “Item 9. The Offer and Listing—Trading Markets—Nasdaq Global Market.”
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.Part III
ITEM 17.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
See “Item 18. Financial Statements.”
ITEM 18.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
The following financial statements are filed as part of this Form 20-F, together with the report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. Consolidated Financial Statements | Page | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | F-1 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 | F-4 | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended December 2006, 2005 and 2004 | F-6 | |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 | F-7 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 | F-8 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-9 |
111
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS.
Exhibit | |
Number | Description |
1.1 | By-laws of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A., as amended on April 28, 2006. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A.’s annual report on Form 20-F (No. 0-28866) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 filed with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. |
2.1 | Indenture, dated as of March 22, 2005, among Net Sul Comunicações Ltda., as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, with respect to Net Sul Comunicações Ltda.’s 7.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2009 and Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2009. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A.’s annual report on Form 20-F (No. 0-28860) for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. |
2.2 | 7.0% Senior Secured Note due 2009 of Net Sul Comunicações Ltda. (included in Exhibit 2.5 hereof). |
2.3 | Senior Secured Floating Rate Note due 2009 of Net Sul Comunicações Ltda. (included in Exhibit 2.5 hereof). |
2.4 | |
4.1 | Shareholders’ Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2005, among Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A., Distel Holdings S.A, Embratel do Brasil Participações S.A., GB Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. and Teléfonos de México, S.A. de C.V., as an intervening party (incorporated by reference to Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A.’s Form 6-K (No. 0-28860), dated April 8, 2005). |
4.2 | Programming Agreement (Contrato de Comissão), dated as of June 27, 2004, between Net Brasil S.A., Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. and its Subsidiaries named therein (English-language translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A.’s annual report on Form 20-F (No. 0-28860) for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission). |
4.3 |
112
We hereby agree to furnish to the SEC copies of any of our other long term debt instruments and agreements as the SEC requests.
113
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A. | ||
/s/ Francisco Tosta Valim Filho | ||
Name: | Francisco Tosta Valim Filho | |
Title: | Chief Executive Officer | |
/s/ Leonardo Porciúncula Gomes Pereira | ||
Name: | Leonardo Porciúncula Gomes Pereira | |
Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
Date: March 8, 2007
114
Consolidated Financial Statements | |
Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. | |
Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 | |
with Report of Independent Registered Public | |
Accounting Firm |
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A.
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Comission (the COSO criteria). Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A.’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
1
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and related consolidated statements of income, stockholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. and our report dated February 1, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
ERNST & YOUNG
Auditores Independentes S.S.
Maria Helena Pettersson
São Paulo, Brazil
February 1, 2007
2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of VIVAX S.A., an investee company, acquired in November, 2006 and accounted for using the equity method. The investment in VIVAX S.A. amounted to US$51,597 thousands at December 31, 2006. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for VIVAX S.A. is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 1, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
ERNST & YOUNG
Auditores Independentes S.S.
Maria Helena Pettersson
São Paulo, Brazil
February 1, 2007
3
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2006 and 2005
(Thousands of United States dollars, except share amounts)
2006 | 2005 | |||
Assets | ||||
Current assets | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | US$ 11,826 | US$ 23,865 | ||
Short-term investments | 222,209 | 103,624 | ||
Restricted cash | - | 43,309 | ||
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for | ||||
doubtful accounts of $11,618 in 2006 and $11,253 in | ||||
2005 | 95,625 | 70,921 | ||
Deferred income taxes | 39,271 | 34,313 | ||
Recoverable income taxes | 14,110 | 20,942 | ||
Prepaid expenses | 8,310 | 4,801 | ||
Other current assets | ||||
(2006 includes US$5,184 due from related party) | 10,134 | 5,071 | ||
Total current assets | 401,485 | 306,846 | ||
Non-current assets | ||||
Property and equipment, net | 610,552 | 420,323 | ||
Investments in affiliated companies | 54,786 | 2,697 | ||
Goodwill | 473,769 | 268,374 | ||
Deferred income taxes | 175,586 | 123,281 | ||
Judicial deposits | 64,307 | 48,623 | ||
Recoverable income taxes | 14,921 | 8,288 | ||
Other non-current assets | 15,619 | 11,683 | ||
Total non-current assets | 1,409,540 | 883,269 | ||
Total assets | 1,811,025 | 1,190,115 | ||
4
2006 | 2005 | |||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | ||||
Current liabilities | ||||
Trade accounts payable | US$ 64,281 | US$ 22,564 | ||
Accounts payable to programmers, | ||||
(inclusive of US$33,786 and US$30,877 due to related | ||||
parties as of December 31, 2006 and 2005) | 41,931 | 34,254 | ||
Income taxes payable | 10,878 | 14,617 | ||
Sales taxes payable | 21,947 | 15,494 | ||
Payroll and related charges | 30,578 | 12,649 | ||
Current portion of long-term debt | - | 44,961 | ||
Interest payable | 4,045 | 17,594 | ||
Deferred revenue | 52,043 | 40,261 | ||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 31,394 | 19,093 | ||
Total current liabilities | 257,097 | 221,487 | ||
Non-current liabilities | ||||
Long-term debt, less current portion | 421,283 | 313,108 | ||
Deferred sign-on,hook-up fee and programming benefits | 22,987 | 20,842 | ||
Estimated liability for tax, labor and civil claims and assessments | 269,616 | 264,671 | ||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 985 | 5,018 | ||
Total non-current liabilities | 714,871 | 603,639 | ||
Total liabilities | 971,968 | 825,126 | ||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||
Stockholders’ equity | ||||
Preferred stock, no par value, shares authorized, | ||||
Issued and outstanding (2006 – 181,564,205 and 2005 | ||||
– 155,982,571) | 1,904,876 | 1,659,711 | ||
Common stock, no par value, shares issued and | ||||
Outstanding (2006 – 110,675,783 and 2005 – | ||||
107,548,340) | 947,175 | 920,514 | ||
Additional paid-in capital | 106,469 | 140,222 | ||
Accumulated deficit | (1,926,755) | (2,131,436) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net | (192,708) | (224,022) | ||
Total stockholders’ equity | 839,057 | 364,989 | ||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | US$ 1,811,025 | US$ 1,190,115 | ||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Thousands of United States dollars, except per share and share amounts)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||
Total revenue | US$ 1,144,671 | US$ 815,941 | US$ 574,329 | |||
Taxes and other deductions from revenues | (243,768) | (155,276) | (107,125) | |||
Net operating revenue | 900,903 | 660,665 | 467,204 | |||
Programming and other operating costs (exclusive of | ||||||
depreciation and amortization shown below) including | ||||||
programming costs of US$252,704 in 2006 (US$199,498 | ||||||
in 2005 and US$152,590 in 2004); and | ||||||
US$214,098, US$191,698 and US$145,580 of programming | ||||||
expense with related parties during 2006, 2005 and 2004 | (435,981) | (329,705) | (234,370) | |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | (227,878) | (148,264) | (109,761) | |||
Depreciation and amortization | (74,985) | (68,160) | (56,736) | |||
Other | 10,611 | 2,990 | 4,430 | |||
Total operating costs and expenses | (728,233) | (543,139) | (396,437) | |||
Operating income | 172,670 | 117,526 | 70,767 | |||
Other income (expenses): | ||||||
Monetary indexation, net | 475 | (952) | (5,955) | |||
Gain on exchange rate, net | 8,576 | 30,821 | 31,605 | |||
Interest expense | (47,651) | (57,629) | (101,251) | |||
Interest income, (including gain on extinguishment of | ||||||
liabilities of US$32,951 in 2006 and US$27,168 in 2005) | 56,256 | 43,617 | 8,587 | |||
Financial expense, net | (26,420) | (37,023) | (50,818) | |||
Other income (expenses) | (37) | 2,081 | 1,055 | |||
Total other income (expenses), net | (8,801) | (19,085) | (116,777) | |||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | 163,869 | 98,441 | (46,010) | |||
Income taxes (expense) | 40,812 | (42,027) | (41,948) | |||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 204,681 | 56,414 | (87,958) | |||
Discontinued operations, net of tax: | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | - | - | (2,040) | |||
Loss from sale | - | - | (5,820) | |||
Total discontinued operations | - | - | (7,860) | |||
Net income (loss) | US$ 204,681 | US$ 56,414 | US$ (95,818) | |||
Earnings (loss) per common share, basic and diluted: | ||||||
- Continuing operations | US$ 0.72 | US$ 0.22 | US$ (1.24) | |||
- Discontinued operations | - | - | (0.11) | |||
Net earnings (loss) per common share basic and diluted | US$ 0.72 | US$ 0.22 | US$ (1.35) | |||
Earnings per preferred share, basic and diluted: | ||||||
- Continuing operations | US$ 0.79 | US$ 0.25 | US$ - | |||
- Discontinued operations | - | - | - | |||
Net earnings per preferred share, basic and diluted | US$ 0.79 | US$ 0.25 | US$ - | |||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 108,768,946 | 97,962,719 | 71,142,536 | |||
Weighted average number of preferred shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 159,536,115 | 139,473,358 | 102,808,812 | |||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
NETSERVIÇOS DECOMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(Thousands of United States dollars, except share amounts)
Additional | Accumulated other | ||||||||
Number of shares issued | Capital stock | paid-in | Accumulated | comprehensive | |||||
Preferred | Common | Preferred | Common | Total | capital | deficit | loss | Total | |
Balance at December 31, 2003 | 79,918,946 | 55,224,756 | US$ 1,493,279 | US$ 811,737 | US$ 2,305,016 | US$ 15,027 | US$ (2,092,032) | US$ (230,902) | US$ (2,891) |
Tax benefit contributed by stockholders | - | - | - | - | - | 118,413 | - | - | 118,413 |
Foreign currency translation | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (16,053) | (16,053) |
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | - | - | (95,818) | - | (95,818) |
Balance at December 31, 2004 | 79,918,946 | 55,224,756 | US$ 1,493,279 | US$ 811,737 | US$ 2,305,016 | US$ 133,440 | US$ (2,187,850) | US$ (246,955) | US$ 3,651 |
Issuance of shares for cash at March 21, 2005 | 11,994,425 | 36,716,406 | 23,075 | 70,640 | 93,715 | - | - | - | 93,715 |
Exchange of payable for common shares at March 21, 2005 | - | 12,330,396 | - | 23,802 | 23,802 | - | - | - | 23,802 |
Issuance of shares for cash at April 20, 2005 | 58,284,947 | - | 120,336 | - | 120,336 | - | - | - | 120,336 |
Issuance of shares for cash at May 10, 2005 | 1,712,283 | 629,675 | 3,647 | 1,341 | 4,988 | 3,531 | - | - | 8,519 |
Exercise of stock options in August and September, 2005 | 229,952 | - | 512 | - | 512 | - | - | - | 512 |
Exchange of tax benefit contributed by Stockholders for shares November 8, 2005 | 3,842,018 | 2,647,107 | 18,862 | 12,994 | 31,856 | (31,856) | - | - | - |
Tax benefit contributed by stockholders | - | - | - | - | - | 35,107 | - | - | 35,107 |
Foreign currency translation | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 22,933 | 22,933 |
Net income for the year | - | - | - | - | - | - | 56,414 | - | 56,414 |
Balance at December 31, 2005 | 155,982,571 | 107,548,340 | US$ 1,659,711 | US$ 920,514 | US$ 2,580,225 | US$ 140,222 | US$ (2,131,436) | US$ (224,022) | US$ 364,989 |
Exchange of tax benefit contributed by stockholders for shares May 18, 2006 | 2,571,494 | 1,771,730 | 18,786 | 12,944 | 31,730 | (31,730) | - | - | - |
Tax benefit contributed by stockholders | - | - | - | - | - | (2,023) | - | - | (2,023) |
Capital increase November 29, 2006 | - | 1,346,784 | - | 13,627 | 13,627 | - | - | - | 13,627 |
Capital increase November 30, 2006 | 23,010,140 | - | 226,379 | - | 226,379 | - | - | - | 226,379 |
Capital increase December 4, 2006 | 8,929 | - | 90 | 90 | - | - | - | 90 | |
Foreign currency translation | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 31,314 | 31,314 |
Net income for the year | - | - | - | - | - | - | 204,681 | - | 204,681 |
Balance at December 31, 2006 | 181,564,205 | 110,675,783 | US$ 1,904,876 | US$ 947,175 | US$ 2.852,051 | US$ 106,469 | US$ (1,926,755) | US$ (192,708) | US$ 839,057 |
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Net income (loss) for the year | US$ 204,681 | US$ 56,414 | US$ (95,818) | ||||||
Foreign currency translation | 31,314 | 22,933 | (16,053) | ||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | US$ 235,995 | US$ 79,347 | US$ (111,871) | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Thousands of United States dollars)
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||
Operating activities | ||||||
Net income (loss) for the year | US$ 204,681 | US$ 56,414 | US$ (95,818) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by | ||||||
Operating activities: | ||||||
Deferred sign-on and hook-up fee revenues | 5,947 | 360 | 695 | |||
Amortization of deferred sign-on and hook-up fee revenues | (18,437) | (10,704) | (7,908) | |||
Equity in results of investees | (1,613) | (513) | (1,640) | |||
Non-cash compensation expense | - | - | 112 | |||
Exchange losses, monetary indexation and interest expense, net | 16,293 | 19,756 | 115,276 | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 74,985 | 68,160 | 56,736 | |||
Deferred income taxes | (83,703) | 28,023 | 9,082 | |||
Write off and disposal of assets, net | - | 46 | 7,721 | |||
Estimated liability for tax, labor and civil claims and assessments | (38,759) | (15,992) | (9,859) | |||
Increase/decrease in operating assets and liabilities | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable | (17,732) | (7,598) | (14,915) | |||
Recoverable income taxes | 32,729 | (6,884) | (4,137) | |||
Restricted cash | 33,690 | (42,020) | - | |||
Short-term investments | (107,261) | (33,891) | (40,548) | |||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (1,497) | (10,776) | (9,952) | |||
Accounts payable to suppliers and programmers | 36,740 | (22,063) | (20,875) | |||
Income taxes payable | (679) | 6,872 | 30,342 | |||
Payroll and related charges | 12,671 | (5,100) | 4,466 | |||
Sales taxes, accrued expenses and other liabilities | 41,401 | 2,737 | 6,849 | |||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 189,456 | 26,827 | 25,627 | |||
Investing activities | ||||||
Acquisition of investments | ||||||
and advances to related companies, net of repayments | (1,952) | - | 79 | |||
Acquisition of property and equipment | (235,634) | (86,222) | (43,377) | |||
Proceeds from sale of equipment | 13,886 | 12,805 | 20,029 | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | (223,700) | (73,417) | (23,269) | |||
Financing activities | ||||||
Short-term debt | ||||||
Issuances | 2,383 | 75,633 | - | |||
Repayments | (201,103) | (84,859) | (193) | |||
Long-term debt | ||||||
Issuances | 421,406 | 200,571 | - | |||
Repayments | (216,954) | (409,941) | - | |||
Capital contributions in cash | 13,811 | 223,082 | - | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 19,543 | 4,486 | (193) | |||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 2,662 | 5,483 | 9,537 | |||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | (12,039) | (36,621) | 11,702 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year | 23,865 | 60,486 | 48,784 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year | US$ 11,826 | US$ 23,865 | US$ 60,486 | |||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | ||||||
Cash paid for income taxes | US$ 18,378 | US$ 10,586 | US$ 4,775 | |||
Cash paid for interest | US$ 47,999 | US$ 61,841 | US$ - |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Thousands of United States dollars)
1. The Company and its Principal Operations
Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. and its subsidiaries referred to as “Net Serviços” or “the Company” is a publicly held corporation organized under the laws of Brazil. The Company controls a group of cable subscription television companies and is the leading cable television Multiple System Operator (MSO) in Brazil. Net Serviços’ shares are traded on the São Paulo and Madrid Stock Exchanges, and Net Serviços’ American Depositary Share receipts or ADS are traded on the NASDAQ National Market.
The Company provides cable television services under the “NET” brand name and high-speed Internet access under the “NET VIRTUA” brand name through several cable networks located in the country’s largest cities. The Company and Empresa Brasileira de Telecomunicações S.A. – Embratel (Embratel), a subsidiary of Teléfonos del México S.A. de C.V. (Telmex), jointly provides voice service under the “NET FONE” brand name.
Acquisition of a minority interest in Vivax
On October 11, 2006, the Company and certain shareholders of Vivax S.A. (“Vivax”) entered into agreements, whereby the Company initially acquired a minority interest and subsequently intends to acquire control of Vivax.
This transaction is subject to the prior approval of the Brazilian National Telecommunications Agency – ANATEL.
On November 30, 2006, the Company consummated the acquisition of a 36.7% minority interest in Vivax. As consideration for this acquisition Net issued 23,010,140 preferred shares to Horizon Telecom International LLC (HTI), out of which 2,988,032 shares were transferred to minority stockholders of NET upon their exercise of the preference rights. As part of the transaction, Globo, Embratel and their respective subsidiaries have agreed to waive their preemptive rights in respect to the preferred shares.
Upon completion of this initial step, the Company currently holds 22.1% indirect ownership interest in Vivax through Brasil TV Cabo Participações S.A. (BTVC), and 14.6% direct interest in Vivax. Mr. Fernando Norbert continues to indirectly control Vivax through BTVC, until the effective approval by Anatel and the consummation of the transfer of control.
The acquisition cost totaled US$231,403 based on the market price of the Company’s preferred shares at the date the transaction was announced. The transaction resulted in the recognition of goodwill in the amount of US$180,602 largely attributed to expected future profits.
9
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
1. The Company and its Principal Operations(Continued)
Acquisition of a minority interest in Vivax (Continued)
Globo and Embratel and their respective subsidiaries have their preemptive rights in respect to the preferred shares.
The Company holds the following direct and indirect subsidiaries and equity investees in ownership percentages at December 31:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Direct | Indirect | Direct | Indirect | |||||
Consolidated entities | ||||||||
Multicanal Telecomunicações S.A. (*) | - | - | 99.96 | 0.04 | ||||
Net Belo Horizonte Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
CMA Participações Ltda. (*) | - | - | 100.00 | - | ||||
Jonquil Ventures Ltda. | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | - | ||||
Net Brasília Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Rio Ltda. | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | - | ||||
Net Recife Ltda. | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | - | ||||
Net São Paulo Ltda. | 97.40 | 2.60 | 97.87 | 2.13 | ||||
Net Campinas Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Indaiatuba Ltda. | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | - | ||||
Net São Carlos Ltda. | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | - | ||||
Net Franca Ltda. | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | - | ||||
Net Sul Comunicações Ltda. | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | - | ||||
Reyc Comércio e Participação Ltda. | 26.94 | 73.06 | 26.94 | 73.06 | ||||
Net Anápolis Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Bauru Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Campo Grande Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Goiania Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Piracicaba Ltda. | 100.00 | - | 0.08 | 99.92 | ||||
Net Ribeirão Preto Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net São José do Rio Preto Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Sorocaba Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Horizonte Sul Comunicações Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
DR – Empresa de Distribuição e Recepção de TV Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Antenas Comunitárias Brasileiras Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Paraná Comunicações Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Joinville Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Florianópolis Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Maringá Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Arapongas Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
TV Cabo Criciúma Ltda. | - | 60.00 | - | 60.00 | ||||
Net Curitiba Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Net Londrina Ltda. | - | 100.00 | - | 100.00 | ||||
Equity investees: | ||||||||
TV Cabo e Comunicações Jundiaí S.A. (Jointly controlled) | 50.00 | - | 50.00 | - | ||||
Brasil TV Cabo Participações S.A. (**) | 82.81 | - | - | - | ||||
Vivax S.A. | 14.57 | 22.14 | - | - |
(*) As part of its ongoing corporate restructuring plan, certain dormant companies identified with in the table above were merged.
(**) BTVC is controlled by Mr. Fernando Norbert who holds 51% of its voting shares.
10
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
2.Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of Net Serviços, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP), using the U.S dollar as the reporting currency.
The accounting principles adopted under USGAAP differ in certain respects from those required under Brazilian GAAP (BRGAAP), used to prepare the statutory financial statements as filed with the “Comissão de Valores Mobiliários” (Brazilian Securities Commission or “CVM”).
The accounts of the Company are maintained in Brazilian reais, which have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards “SFAS” 52 “Foreign Currency Translation” using the real as the functional currency. The assets and liabilities are translated from reais to U.S. dollars using the official exchange rates reported by the Brazilian Central Bank at the balance sheet date and revenues, expenses, gains and losses are translated using the average exchange rates for the period. The translation gain or loss is included in the Cumulative Translation Adjustments (CTA) component of stockholders’ equity, and in the statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the period in accordance with the criteria established in SFAS 130 “Reporting Comprehensive Income”.
The exchange rate of the Brazilian Real (R$) to the US$ was R$2.1380:US$ 1.00 at December 31, 2006, R$2.3407:US$ 1.00 at December 31, 2005 and R$2.6544:US$ 1.00 at December 31, 2004. At February 1, 2007 the exchange rate was R$2.1093:US$ 1.00.
11
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
3. Significant Accounting Policies
a)Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Net Serviços and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as listed in Note 1. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
b)Use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject to these estimates and assumptions include the residual value and estimated useful lives of property and equipment, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, recoverability of deferred income tax assets, provision for contingencies, goodwill impairment testing and valuation of derivative instruments. Actual results could differ from estimates. The Company reviews the estimates and assumptions quarterly.
c)Revenue recognition
Revenue includes fees from subscription service, connection fees, pay-per-view, high-speed data and phone services. Revenue is recorded in the month the services are provided. The sign-on and hook-up revenue and the related direct selling expenses are deferred and amortized over six years, which represents the estimated average period that subscribers are expected to remain connected to the system.
Taxes and other deductions from revenues consist primarily of:
- ICMS value-added tax - The ICMS tax is a value-added tax levied at a rate of 25%. However, for subscription revenues and sign-on and hook-up fees in each of the Brazilian states in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate, the ICMS tax is levied at a rate of 10%, except Rio Grande do Sul, where the rate is 12%.
12
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
3. Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
c)Revenue recognition (Continued)
- ISS municipal tax - The ISS tax is a municipal tax on services that is levied at a maximum rate of 5.0% (some municipalities have lower rates) on certain services, such as maintenance and other technical activities.
- PIS-related federal tax - A federal tax related to the PIS is levied at a rate of 0.65% on revenues derived from pay-television, telecommunication and broadband services and at a rate of 1.65% on revenues derived from all other services.
- COFINS federal social security tax - The COFINS is a federal social security tax that is levied at a rate of 3.0% on revenues derived from pay-television, telecommunication and broadband services and at a rate of 7.6% on revenues derived from all other services.
- FUST and FUNTEL taxes - The FUST and FUNTEL are taxes based on gross service revenues, excluding canceled sales and other taxes, over the amounts charged to our subscribers. The FUST and FUNTEL are levied at the rates of 1.0% and 0.5%, respectively.
d)Advertising and marketing expenses
Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to US$51,320, US$46,070 and US$29,055 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which are reflected in the consolidated statement of operations under “selling, general and administrative expenses”.
e)Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The cost of these investments approximates fair value.
13
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
3. Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
e)Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments (Continued)
Short-term investments
The Company accounts for its investment securities having a quoted market price (other than those accounted for under the equity method) in accordance with SFAS 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”.
f)Trade accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at estimated net realizable value and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded at an amount considered sufficient to cover estimated losses arising on collection of accounts receivable.
g)Investments
Investments in which the Company has ownership interests of 50% or less are accounted for by the equity method. The Company adopts the equity method of accounting for investments in TV Cabo e Comunicações de Jundiaí S.A., Vivax S.A. and Brasil TV a Cabo Participações S.A.. The Company makes advances to its equity investee under stockholder agreements whereby the Company is committed to finance its share of the development of the investee’s operations. Periodically these advances are capitalized.
h)Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Cable plant includes amounts capitalized for direct labor, overhead and financial expenses attributed to the construction of the network during the prematurity and construction period phase. Cable plant costs also include hook-up costs and installations at subscribers’ residences including those of providing high-speed Internet and phone services. Materials to be used for the construction of the cable plant are recorded under property and equipment.
Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method, over estimated economic useful lives as follows: Cable network – 12 to 15 years; Decoders and Cable modem – 10 years; Optic fiber – 15 years; Buildings - - 25 years; Leasehold improvements, Installations, Fixtures and fittings and Other equipment - 5 to 10 years; Vehicles and Data processing equipment - 5 years.
14
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
3. Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
i)Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
j)Goodwill and impairment testing of goodwill
The Company annually evaluates the carrying value of goodwill using a consistent discounted cash flow model. The use of a discounted cash flow model involves significant judgmental assumptions and estimates about future cash flows, growth rates and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on Company’s budget and business plans, as approved by its Board of Directors, as well as on comparable market analyses. The discount rate assumption is based on the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not deemed impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not performed.
If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined based on the allocated fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit.
The Company’s evaluation of goodwill resulted in no impairment losses for all periods presented.
15
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
3. Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
k)Estimated liability for tax, labor and civil claims and assessment
The accrual for estimated liability for tax, labor and civil claims and assessments involves considerable judgment on the part of management. The Company is subject to various claims, legal, civil and labor proceedings covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of business activities. The Company accrues such liabilities when it determines that losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company’s judgment is based on the opinion of its internal and external legal advisors. The balances are adjusted to account for changes in circumstances in ongoing issues and the establishment of additional reserves for emerging issues. Actual results could differ from estimates.
l)Income taxes
Income taxes are provided using the liability method prescribed by SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Under the liability method, deferred income taxes reflect the tax effect of net operating loss carryforwards, the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities recognized in the financial statement and the tax basis, as well as the effects of adjustments made to reflect the requirements of US GAAP, determined under enacted tax laws and rates.
The financial effect of changes in tax laws or rates is accounted for in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when management determines that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of net operating loss carry forwards acquired in business combinations accounted for using the purchase method of accounting is recorded as a reduction of goodwill. The realization of tax benefit contributed by stockholders, as described in Note 10, is recorded as additional paid-in capital.
16
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
3. Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
m)Derivative contracts
To help mitigate overall foreign currency risk, the Company primarily uses foreign exchange contracts. The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as non-hedge transactions. The derivative instruments are measured at fair value and the gains or losses resulting from the changes in fair value of the instruments are recorded in financial expense, net.
n)Earnings (loss) per share calculations
Preferred stock participates with a 10% premium over common stock in the distribution of earnings and has preference over common shares upon liquidation; thus, preferred stock is considered not to be a common stock equivalent in sharing loss. Per share calculations reflect the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, retroactive effect being given for all periods presented for share conversions, splits and reverse splits. Employee options to purchase shares of the Company, equal to 3,449,275 shares were fully exercised during the third quarter 2005; and were excluded from the calculation of diluted income (loss) per share, since they would be anti-dilutive. The Company computed earnings per share in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under SFAS 128 (Earnings per Share). The EITF consensus on Issue 4 thereto states that an entity would allocate losses to a nonconvertible participating security in periods of net loss if, based on the contractual losses of the security, the security had not only the right to participate in the earnings of the issuer, but also a contractual obligation to share losses of the issuing entity on a basis that was objectively determinable.
The holder of a participating security would have a contractual obligation to shares losses if either (a) the holder is obligated to fund the losses of the issuer or (b) the contractual principal or mandatory redemption amount of the participating security is reduced as a result of losses incurred by the issuer.
The Company’s preferred shares do not have an obligation to share losses, due to their liquidation preference and based upon the above conditions. Accordingly, the weighted average number of shares used for purposes of computing earnings per share in periods of net loss would exclude the preferred shares.
17
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
3. Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)
n) Earnings (loss) per share calculations (Continued)
In connection with the Company’s private offering described in Note 10, the Company offered all existing stockholders to purchase shares at a price of R$0.35 per share, which was below the fair value of those shares at the date of the offer. The offer to stockholders to purchase securities below fair value of the shares constitutes a rights issue, which is somewhat similar to a stock dividend, as stated by SFAS 128. As the rights issue was offered to all existing stockholders, basic and diluted earnings per share amounts presented for comparative purposes have been restated to give recognition to the bonus element embedded in the offer in compliance with SFAS 128.
o)Comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is recorded in accordance with SFAS 130 and presented in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss). The comprehensive income (loss) includes the translation adjustments included in the “CTA” component of stockholders’ equity.
p)Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. In addition, FIN 48 clearly scopes out income taxes from Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.
The adoption of FIN 48 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
18
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
4. Recoverable Income Tax
2006 | 2005 | |||
Withholding income taxes | US$ 29,031 | US$ 29,230 | ||
Current portion | US$ (14,110) | US$ (20,942) | ||
Non-current portion | US$ 14,921 | US$ 8,288 | ||
Recoverable income tax comprises income tax withheld on financial investments and is available to be offset against other similar income taxes payable. The Company and its operating subsidiaries offset recoverable income taxes against liabilities related to payroll tax withheld from employees.
5. Investments and Advances to Equity Investee
Investments in affiliated companies consists of the following:
Ownership | ||||||
interest | ||||||
(Direct) | December, 31 | |||||
2006 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
TV Cabo e Comunicações Jundiaí S.A. | 50% | US$ 3,189 | US$ 2,697 | |||
Vivax S.A. | 14.57% | 20,484 | - | |||
Brasil TV Cabo Participações S.A. | 82.81% | 31,113 | - | |||
US$ 54,786 | US$ 2,697 | |||||
The Company accounts for its investments in Vivax and BTVC using the equity method of accounting. As described in note 1, BTVC continue to be controlled by Mr. Fernando Norbert who holds 51% of its voting shares. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s direct and indirect investment in Vivax amounted to US$51,597 and included an equity gain of US$796. The transaction resulted in the recognition of goodwill in the amount of US$180,602 largely attributed to expected future profits.
The aggregate value of Company´s investment on Vivax based on quoted market price as at December 31, 2006 is US$246,397.
19
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
5. Investments and Advances to Equity Investee(Continued)
The summarized financial information of Vivax and BTVC as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
BTVC | Vivax | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||
Current assets | US$ 18 | US$ - | US$ 61,788 | US$ 9,259 | ||||
Non-current assets | 36,977 | 6,300 | 230,359 | 197,042 | ||||
Current liabilities | 6 | 32 | 21,773 | 27,120 | ||||
Non-current liabilities | 42 | 26,452 | 131,635 | 155,613 |
BTVC | Vivax | |||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Gross revenues | US$ - | US$ - | US$ - | US$ 172,242 | US$ 128,855 | US$ 91,026 | ||||||
Gross profit | - | - | - | 57,408 | 42,021 | 18,722 | ||||||
Net income (loss) | 10,548 | 4,742 | (4,844) | 28,763 | 8,061 | (24,729) |
6. Goodwill
On December 31, 2006 and 2005, the annual dates on which the Company performed its annual impairment test, the Company concluded that no impairment charges were required.
A summary of changes in the Company’s goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2004 | US$ 270,821 | |||
Deferred income tax | (36,276) | |||
Currency translation | 33,829 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | 268,374 | |||
Deferred income tax | (664) | |||
Currency translation | 25,457 | |||
Acquisition of Vivax / BTVC | 180,602 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2006 | US$ 473,769 | |||
20
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
6. Goodwill(Continued)
The deferred income tax amounts represent the tax benefit of the pre-acquisition net operating loss carry forwards of acquired businesses accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, which has the impact of reducing goodwill.
The translation results were included in the Cumulative Translation Adjustment (CTA) component of stockholders’ equity and in the statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the years.
The initial allocation of the purchase price of Vivax resulted in the recognition of goodwill in the amount of US$180,602 represented by the excess of the purchase price of the acquired business over the fair value of underlying tangible and intangible assets that is attributed to expected future profits.
7. Property and Equipment, Net
At December 31, property and equipment consisted of:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Accumulated | Net book | Net book | ||||||
Cost | depreciation | value | value | |||||
Cable network | 1,342,533 | (839,935) | 502,598 | US$ 347,329 | ||||
Data processing equipment | 136,726 | (101,736) | 34,990 | 31,227 | ||||
Buildings and improvements | 12,386 | (8,770) | 3,616 | 2,413 | ||||
Fixtures, fittings and installations | 13,871 | (10,018) | 3,853 | 3,742 | ||||
Vehicles | 2,332 | (2,127) | 205 | 139 | ||||
Other | 61,348 | (32,466) | 28,882 | 10,211 | ||||
1,569,196 | (995,052) | 574,144 | 395,061 | |||||
Cable construction materials | 35,016 | - | 35,016 | 24,020 | ||||
Land | 1,392 | - | 1,392 | 1,242 | ||||
Total property and equipment, net | 1,605,604 | (995,052) | 610,552 | US$ 420,323 | ||||
Total depreciation expense for property and equipment was US$86,172, US$67,845 and US$56,171 for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2005 was US$869,722.
The Company has capitalized US$ 4,643 related to in house software development.
21
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
7. Property and Equipment, Net(Continued)
Company management, based on the estimated average period that subscribers are expected to remain connected to the system, has revised the amortization of sign-on and hook-up fee revenue and related direct selling expenses as of January 1, 2006 reducing the amortization period from ten to six years. The impact of this change in estimate was a net increase in sign-on and hook-up fee revenue of approximately US$1,366 in the Company’s net income for the year ended December 31, 2006.
8. Related Party Transactions
On February 8, 2006, the Company and Embratel, executed a Memorandum of Understanding that outlines the business model for offering an Embratel voice product to current and potential Company’s subscribers under revenue sharing for using the Company's bidirectional network. On implementing this business model, the Company is providing integrated video, broadband and voice (triple play) services. Revenue arising from this service amounted to US$3,133 for the year ended December 31, 2006.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company received an advance payment from Embratel – Empresa Brasileira de Telecomunicações S.A. in the amount of US$8,654for the rental of fiber optics. The deferred rental revenue is recognized monthly based on the rental terms of 10 years.
Other transactions involving the Company and companies related to Embratel Participações S.A, such as: link vírtua, voice channel, fixed telephone and click 21, are registered at prices believed to be at market conditions. The amounts paid to Embratel Participações S.A. for these services during 2006 totaled US$20,740 and US$4,900 in 2005.
The Company’s programming guide is produced by Editora Globo S.A., a publishing company related to Globo at rates believed to be at market value. The amounts paid to Editora Globo S.A. during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were US$5,887, US$5,574 and US$4,816, respectively.
22
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
9. Long-term Debt
Debt is comprised of:
December 31, | December 31, | |||
2006 | 2005 | |||
Debentures - 6thpublic issuance | US$ 271,283 | US$ - | ||
Senior facilities – SFAS 15 | - | 78,798 | ||
Senior secured debentures – SFAS 15 | - | 41,397 | ||
Net Sul notes – SFAS 15 | - | 38,605 | ||
Non-convertible debentures – 5thpublic issuance | - | 199,269 | ||
271,283 | 358,069 | |||
Perpetual notes | 150,000 | - | ||
Less current portion | - | (44,961) | ||
Long-term debt | US$ 421,283 | US$ 313,108 | ||
Perpetual notes
On November 28, 2006 the Company issued 9.25% (guaranteed Perpetual notes (Perpetual notes) amounting to US$150,000. The Perpetual notes were issued in fully registered certificated form without coupons, and only in denominations of US$100 and integral multiples of US$1. These notes may be redeemed at the option of the Company, in whole but not in part, on any interests payment date on or after November 27, 2009 at 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest and any additional amounts payable. The Company will pay interest quarterly in arrears on each interest payment date of each year commencing February 28, 2007.
The Perpetual notes are jointly guaranteed by all Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries except for Jonquil Ventures Ltda.. TV Cabo Criciúma Ltda., in which the Company has 60% ownership is also a non-guarantor consolidated subsidiary. The separate guarantors financial statements have not been presented as the amounts for these subsidiaries are immaterial.
Debentures program
On December 27, 2006, the Company completed its 6th debenture issue by offering 58,000 simple debentures, of the nominal book entry, single series, par value, non-secured and subordinated type in the amount of US$ 271,283 (R$580,000). The costs of issuance of the debentures in the amount of US$ 1,731, were capitalized and will be amortized over the seven year-term of the debentures.
23
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
9. Long-term Debt(Continued)
Debentures program (Continued)
The 6th debenture bear interest at the CDI rate plus 0.7%, payable semi-annually in arrears annually on June 1 and December 1. The CDI rate is a Brazilian interest reference rate published by the Brazilian Securities Custody and Settlement Center (Central de Custódia e Liquidação Financeira de Títulos) and is subject to change on a daily basis. The principal amount of these debentures will be repayable in four annual installments commencing on December 1, 2010, with the final installment of principal due in December 2013. Subject to an optional prepayment provision, the Company may prepay the debentures at any time, with a premium no greater than 0.50%, which premium shall decrease linearly to zero at its maturity.
The Company is in compliance with all terms and conditions of its debt instruments.
The long-term debt maturities, excluding the Perpetual notes, which have no scheduled maturity, are as follows:
Year falling due: | Consolidated | |
2010 | US$ 67,821 | |
2011 | 67,821 | |
2012 | 67,821 | |
2013 | 67,820 | |
Total | US$ 271,283 | |
Debt prepayment
As part of management liquidity strategy, in December 26, the Company prepaid the debentures issued in September 2005 at a premium to holders of US$1,484, which was recognized in current earnings as interest expense.
24
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
9. Long-term Debt(Continued)
Debt prepayment (Continued)
The restructured debt held by creditors who directly or indirectly participated in the issuance of the 5th public debentures (i.e. Banco ItaúBBA, Unibanco, Banco Bradesco and other restructured debenture holders), was accounted for according to EITF 96-19 “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments”. According to EITF 96-19, if it is determined that the original and new debt instruments are not substantially different (being such limit calculated as a difference in the present value of future cash flows greater than 10%), then a new effective interest rate is to be determined based on the carrying amount of the original debt instrument and the revised cash flows.
The Company determined that the instruments were not substantially different, accordingly such debt continued to be accounted for according to SFAS 15, using revised estimates of future cash flows. The pre-payment of the restructured debt related to the 5th public debentures, which occurred on December 27, 2006, resulted in a gain on debt extinguishment in the amount of US$32,951.
Restructured debt
On March 22, 2005, the Company’s debt restructuring was consummated, with creditors representing 98% of the total outstanding debt accepting the Company’s proposal (100% as of December 31, 2005).
The debt restructuring terms included concessions by holders of the Company’s debt, who agreed to exchange their debt for new debt with extended maturity dates, more favorable interest rates and lower currency exposure for the Company; and also included a waiver of the default penalties and additional interest due under the Company’s previous debt instruments. Accordingly, the debt restructuring was accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring in accordance with SFAS 15, “Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings.”
On September 14, 2005, the Company issued Non-Convertible Debentures 5th Public Issuance amounting to US$279,000 (R$650,000 equivalent at that date), the proceeds from which were used to prepay the restructured debt.
In September and October 2005, using the resources obtained from the new debt, the Company prepaid a total principal amount of US$234,172 and paid the scheduled interest of US$6,092 related to the restructured debt.
25
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
9. Long-term Debt(Continued)
Restructured debt (Continued)
Such prepayment has been accomplished within a schedule designed by the Company, respecting the characteristics of each debt, and was concluded on April 5, 2006, when the Net Sul Senior Secured Fixed and Floating RateNotes in the amount of US$37,540 were liquidated.
10. Stockholders’ Equity
The Company is a stock corporation incorporated under the laws of Brazil. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had 110,675,783 shares of voting common stock and 181,564,205 shares of preferred stock authorized, issued and outstanding. According to the Company’s bylaws, the capital can be increased up to R$5,000,000 through the issuance of common or preferred shares.
The preferred shares outstanding have no class designation, are not convertible into any other security and are non-voting, except under the limited circumstances provided under Brazilian law. Upon liquidation, holders of preferred shares are entitled to receive distributions prior to the holders of our common shares. In addition, the Bovespa Level 2 of Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices, which the Company comply with, provides for the granting of voting rights to holders of preferred shares in connection with certain matters, including corporate restructurings, mergers and related party transactions and changes in control. The Company’s by-laws require the purchaser to offer to holders of both common and preferred shares 100% of the price paid for each share in the controlling stake.
Stockholders of common and preferred shares are entitled by Brazilian law to a minimum dividend, payable in Brazilian reais, equivalent to 25% of local currency net income calculated in accordance with Brazilian Corporation Law. The preferred shares carry the right to receive in cash a dividend amount of 10% over the dividend available for distribution on the common shares. The Company’s local Brazilian Statutory Financial Statements presented a net income corresponding to US$ 38,322 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and accumulated losses of US$1,491,272 as of December 31, 2006.
The Company is controlled by Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A. “Globo”, through GB Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. “GB”, which holds 51% of the common shares of the Company.
26
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
10. Stockholders’ Equity(Continued)
The following table sets forth the ownership and the percentages of the Company’s voting (common) and non-voting (preferred) shares at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||
Common | Preferred | Total | Common | Preferred | Total | |||||||
Globo Group: | ||||||||||||
GB Empreendimentos | ||||||||||||
e Participações S.A. | 26.0% | - | 9.8% | 26.0% | - | 10.6% | ||||||
Distel Holding S.A. | 8.8% | - | 3.3% | 9.4% | - | 3.8% | ||||||
Roma Participações | ||||||||||||
Ltda. | - | - | - | 1.5% | 8.8% | 5.8% | ||||||
Globo Comunicação e | ||||||||||||
Participações S.A. | 1.5% | - | 0.6% | - | - | - | ||||||
Telmex Group: | ||||||||||||
GB Empreendimentos | ||||||||||||
E Participações S.A. | 25.0% | - | 9.5% | 25.0% | - | 10.2% | ||||||
Empresa Brasileira de | ||||||||||||
Telecomunicações S.A | 1.9% | 8.6% | 6.1% | - | - | - | ||||||
Embratel Participações | ||||||||||||
S.A. | 36.2% | 6.6% | 17.8% | 37.4% | 7.7% | 19.8% | ||||||
Public Market | 0.6% | 84.8% | 52.9% | 0.7% | 83.5% | 49.8% | ||||||
100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |||||||
Number of shares | 110,675,783 | 181,564,205 | 292,239,988 | 107,548,340 | 155,982,571 | 263,530,911 | ||||||
Until February 1, 2005, the relationship among controlling stockholders of Net Serviços was defined in the stockholders’ agreement entered on July 11, 2002. In 2005, in connection with the Company’s debt restructuring, a series of transactions among shareholders resulted in the celebration of a new shareholders agreement between Globo Comunicação e Participações S.A. and Teléfonos de México, S.A. de C.V. (Telmex).
On April 28, 2006, at the Extraordinary General Meeting, the shareholders approved the reverse split of each common and preferred share lot of 15 shares to 1 share. In conjunction with this reverse split on the preferred shares, the ADR ratio changed from 1 ADR to 10 preferred shares to a new ratio of 1 ADR to 1 preferred share, effective on August 1, 2006. All references to shares and per share amounts have been restated to reflect this reverse split.
On November 29 and December 4, 2006, the Company issued 1,355,713 common shares in the amount US$13,717 and on November 30, 2006 issued 23,010,140 preferred shares with a market value of US$226,379 at the date the Vivax transaction was completed pursuant to the acquisition of its minority interest in Vivax.
27
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
10. Stockholders’ Equity(Continued)
2005 transactions
On March 21, 2005, the Company issued 45,440,344 common shares to Globopar, Distel Holding S.A. (Distel), Roma Participações Ltda. (Romapar), and UGB Participações S.A. (collectively referred to as Globo) and 3,606,424 common and 11,993,770 preferred shares to Latam do Brasil Participações S.A. (Latam), indirectly controlled by Telmex at a price of US$1.93 per share (equivalent to R$5.27 at March 21, 2005). At the same date, Globopar and Telmex through Latam, announced that Latam acquired 4,009,219 common shares issued by the Company from Globopar, representing 7.26% of Company’s voting capital, at the total price of R$54,124.
On April 20, 2005, the Company completed a private offering of shares in connection with its debt restructuring with 49,046,802 common shares and 70,279,372 preferred shares subscribed. The remaining 629,675 common shares and 1,712,283 preferred shares not subscribed as part of the private offering were subsequently subscribed through a public offering at the Bovespa (Brazilian Stock Exchange) on May 9, 2005 at a price of US$3.15 per share (equivalent to R$7.73 at that date) and US$3.90 (equivalent to R$9.57 at that date), respectively.
As approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, a group of the Company’s top executives directly involved with the debt renegotiation process was granted stock-options for 229,952 shares of the Company’s shares that fully vested upon the successful completion of the debt restructuring. The exercise price of the stock-options was the same price of US$2.23 per share (equivalent to R$5.22 at December 31, 2005) agreed with creditors in connection with the shares issued as part of the debt restructuring. The exercise period was determined to be two years as from May 10, 2005. During the third quarter 2005 the executives entitled to the benefit fully exercised their rights.
28
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
10. Stockholders’ Equity(Continued)
As a result of certain ownership reorganization at its controlling stockholder level, on August 31, 2001, the Extraordinary Stockholders meeting approved the down-stream merger of Globotel Participações S.A. With this merger, Net Serviços succeeded the merged Company in the right of amortizing for Brazilian local statutory and tax purposes a premium of US$156,515 generated at the acquisition of its ownership in Net Serviços and certain of its subsidiaries. The amortization of this premium for local statutory purposes results in future tax benefit for Net Serviços and its subsidiaries over an estimated period of up to six years. On May 18, 2006, the Company issued, as compensation for benefits realized, 1,771,730 common and 2,571,494 preferred shares, at a price corresponding to US$7.31 per share totaling US$31,730. On December 9, 2005, additional 2,647,107 common and 3,842,018 preferred shares at price corresponding to US$7.31 per share totaling US$31,730. On December 9, 2005, additional 2,647,107 common and 3,842,018 preferred shares, at a price corresponding to approximately US$4.91 per share were issued in respect to the previously contributed tax benefits realized.
11. Income Taxes
Income taxes in Brazil include federal income tax and social contribution.
Years ended December 31, | ||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||
Current income tax | US$ (11,122) | US$ (14,004) | US$ (6,343) | |||
Deferred income tax | 51,934 | (28,023) | (35,605) | |||
Income tax (expense) credit | US$ 40,812 | US$ (42,027) | US$ (41,948) | |||
The statutory rates applicable for federal income tax and social contribution are 25% and 9%, respectively, which represent an aggregate rate of 34%, for 2006, 2005 and 2004.The amounts reported as income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations are reconciled to the statutory rates as follows:
Income (loss) from continuing operations | US$ 163,869 | US$ 98,441 | US$ (46,010) | |||
Statutory composite tax rates | 34.00% | 34.00% | 34.00% | |||
Tax benefit (expense) at statutory rates | (55,715) | (33,469) | 15,643 | |||
Adjustments to derive effective rate: | ||||||
Adjustments from BRGAAP to USGAAP | ||||||
Income and social tax on permanent differences USGAAP | 19,730 | (6,415) | (34,923) | |||
Income and social tax on permanent differences BRGAAP | 24,863 | 8,576 | 70,153 | |||
Tax benefit of transaction with stockholder | (33,735) | (32,044) | 27,186 | |||
Differences between US GAAP x BR GAAP | 40,796 | (55,861) | 47,197 | |||
Other | 39 | (1,120) | (556) | |||
Decrease (increase) in valuation allowance | 44,834 | 78,306 | (166,648) | |||
Income tax (expense) credit | US$ 40,812 | US$ (42,027) | US$ (41,948) | |||
29
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
11. Income Tax(Continued)
The net deferred tax asset is comprised as follows:
2006 | 2005 | |||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||
Tax loss carryforwards | US$ 531,565 | US$ 469,866 | ||
Tax benefit of transaction with stockholder | 59,613 | 99,368 | ||
Accrued expenses – not currently deductible | 20,434 | 17,459 | ||
Change in functional currency | (2,385) | 13,702 | ||
Deferred hook-up revenue charges | 4,267 | 6,674 | ||
613,494 | 607,069 | |||
Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||
Property and equipment | 44,337 | (3,910) | ||
44,337 | (3,910) | |||
Net deferred tax assets | 657,831 | 603,159 | ||
Valuation allowance | (442,974) | (445,565) | ||
Net deferred tax asset | 214,857 | 157,594 | ||
Current assets | (39,271) | (34,313) | ||
Non-current assets | US$ 175,586 | US$ 123,281 | ||
Brazilian tax law allows tax losses to be carried forward indefinitely to be utilized to offset future taxable income. Tax legislation enacted in 1995 limits the utilization of tax loss carry forwards in a given year to 30% of taxable income. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company and its subsidiaries had tax loss carry forwards of US$1,720,281and US$1,338,456, respectively.
30
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
11. Income Tax(Continued)
The valuation allowance related to the tax loss carry forwards and temporary differences was established for the portions or all of deferred tax assets whose realization can not be assessed as more likely than not.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
a)Commitments
The Company and some of its subsidiaries entered into long-term rental agreements for the office space of their corporate offices and use of lamp poles. Future minimum rental payments required under operating leases as of December 31, 2006 are as follows:
Office | Lamp | |||||
Spaces | Poles | Total | ||||
2007 | US$ 3,640 | US$ 19,518 | US$ 23,158 | |||
2008 | 3,786 | 20,303 | 24,089 | |||
2009 | 3,956 | 21,215 | 25,171 | |||
Total | US$ 11,382 | US$ 61,036 | US$ 72,418 | |||
Rental expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were US$24,347, US$20,933 and US$16,974, respectively.
The Company and some of its consolidated subsidiaries listed below provided guarantees to the State and Federal tax authorities in form of letters of credit, under tax claims being litigated.
The guarantees letters are as follows:
2006 | 2005 | |||
Net Rio Ltda. | 27,597 | 14,617 | ||
Net Campinas Ltda. | 6,793 | 6,205 | ||
Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. | 3,493 | 1,015 | ||
Net São Paulo Ltda. | 1,104 | - | ||
Other | 890 | 441 | ||
39.877 | 22.278 | |||
31
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
12. Commitments and Contingencies(Continued)
b)Contingencies
Taxes and contributions, determined and withheld by the Company and its subsidiaries, as well as their tax, and corporate records and tax returns, are subject to examination by tax authorities during different expiration periods, pursuant to applicable legislation.
The Company and its subsidiaries are party to certain legal proceedings involving tax, labor, civil and other claims, arising in the ordinary course of business.
While it is impossible to determine with certainty the ultimate outcome of these matters, management has established reserves when it can reasonably estimate probable losses based on its analysis of the pending disputes and on the opinion of its legal counsel.
At December 31, estimated liability for tax, labor and civil claims and assessments is comprised as follows:
December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||
Tax related matters | US$ 249,081 | US$ 242,289 | ||
Labor related claims | 8,327 | 12,852 | ||
Civil related claims | 12,208 | 9,530 | ||
Total | US$ 269,616 | US$ 264,671 | ||
In connection with certain proceedings, the Company was required to place deposits with the related judicial court. These judicial deposits will only be released upon a favorable final court decision. The aggregated amount of deposits made related thereto is US$64,307 (US$48,623 in 2005), which is available to offset payments required under ultimate unfavorable court decisions.
Labor proceedings arise primarily from employees of subcontractors, in conjunction with the high turnover in the industry. Management has recorded estimated probable losses arising from these proceedings.
Civil proceedings arise in the normal course of business corresponding mainly to indemnifications for moral and material damages sought by subscribers, as well as public lawsuits related to the revision of certain provisions of the cable subscription agreement and subscription price realignment. Management has recorded estimated probable losses on civil proceedings.
Following is a description of the Company’s major tax related matters:
32
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
12. Commitments and Contingencies(Continued)
b)Contingencies(Continued)
The Company and its subsidiaries have centralized cash management and cash transfers made under a current intercompany account. Based on the opinion of its external legal counsel, management understands that such transfers are not subject to Financial Operations Tax (IOF) charges. However, in view of certain adverse court decisions as to the applicability of this law, management has recorded estimated liabilities of approximately US$47,111 (US$64,944 in 2005).
The Company and its subsidiaries have questioned, in court, the incidence of PIS and COFINS social fund contributions on their revenues. At December 31, 2006, US$65,239 (US$55,149 in 2005) refer to amounts recorded under litigation.
The subsidiary Net Rio Ltda. received a tax assessment notice from the State Tax Authority in the amount of US$24,149 (US$26,487 in 2005) relating to the state sales tax (ICMS). The assessment is based on the Tax Authorities understanding that as a result of delaying the payment of the ICMS tax during the period from November 2001 to October 2002, the Company lost its rate reduction benefit. Management, supported by the opinion of its external legal counsel, has presented its defense against the assessment. Management understands that the Company has meritorious and substantial defense arguments. Estimated losses related to this assessment amounts to US$12,439 (US$10,288 in 2005).
All states in which Net Serviços subsidiaries operate, except for the State of Rio Grande do Sul, adhered to the provisions in the ICMS Agreement 57/99, which authorized a reduction in the ICMS tax rate on subscription television services as compared to the ICMS tax rate on other telecommunication services of 25%. The current ICMS tax rate under this Agreement is 10%. The State of Rio Grande do Sul is taxing such services at the rate of 12%. The Company is judicially challenging the rate of 12% and is making judicial deposits of the amounts in excess of the rates in effect under the ICMS Agreement 57/99. At December 31, 2005, court deposits and accrued liabilities under litigation amounts to US$17,249 (US$13,883 in 2005).
The subsidiary Net Rio Ltda. is challenging in court the collection of ICMS in the period from December 1996 to September 1999 and offered as a guarantee its cable network. Management has recorded estimated losses arising from this dispute in the amount of US$3,045 (US$1,844 in 2005).
33
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
12. Commitments and Contingencies(Continued)
b)Contingencies(Continued)
Certain operating subsidiaries are challenging in court the taxation of their broadband Internet access services, claiming that this activity integrates the subscriptions TV services as regulated by Anatel and therefore should be subject to the same ICMS tax rate reduction benefits. The Company has been depositing in court the tax amounts due and made reserves in the amount of US$10,864 (US$10,014 in 2005).
The subsidiary Net São Paulo Ltda. is defending itself from two federal tax assessments related to the deductibility of expenses in 2003. The Company has recorded estimated losses in the amount of US$5,204 (US$4,292 in 2005) related to these assessments.
Actions have been brought against the Company and some of its subsidiaries relating to amounts allegedly due with respect to the full offsetting of net operating losses obtained prior to the limitation to 30% was established. Management has recorded estimated losses in the amount of US$4,078 (US$3,388 in 2005).
In 1999, the Company has requested injunctions aiming the non-collection of Withholding Tax over hedge gains in the amount of US$11,605 (US$10,600 in 2005). All injunctions have so far been accepted in court, authorizing the non-collection of said tax. The Company does not record such potential obligation in view that, in case of an unfavorable decision, the withheld amount will be accounted for as tax credit.
The subsidiary DR Empresa de Distribuição e Recepção de TV Ltda. is defending itself from a federal tax notice related to divergences in the classification in the table of excise tax incidence applied on imported products. Management has recorded potential losses of US$3,104 (US$1,400 in 2005).
In September 2003, the subsidiary Net Rio Ltda. received a tax assessment notice from the Brazilian Federal Internal Revenue Service in the amount of US$11,847 (US$10,821 in 2005). The assessment is alleging that interest accrued under the current intercompany accounts is subject to withholding tax. Net Rio Ltda. is defending itself and recorded potential losses related to this assessment in the amount of US$5,541 (US$4,570 in 2005).
34
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
12. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)
b)Contingencies (Continued)
The subsidiaries Net Rio and Net São Paulo received several fiscal notifications from the National Institute of Social Security (INSS), based on lack of support of payments. The Company reserved an amount of US$2,801 (US$1,841 in 2005).
The subsidiary Net São Paulo is the defendant related to three fiscal executions for the Municipality of São Paulo, charging Services Tax (ISS) over hook up fees. The Company reserved the amount of US$1,490 (US$1,283 in 2005).
The Senior Notes and Floating Rate Notes (Notes) are not subject to Withholding Tax (IRRF) and Tax on Financial Operations (IOF), as long as the average term is not less than 96 months. As result of the fact that some noteholders exercised their rights in advance the Company established a reserve of US$58,344 (US$49,367 in 2005) related to these taxes.
The Federal Internal Revenue has imposed a tax assessment of US$9,894 million on the Company’s subsidiary Reyc Comércio e Participações Ltda., or Reyc, alleging that, for the purpose of the Tax on Import, or Imposto sobre Produtos Importados, or IPI, payment, Reyc did not correctly classify transactions related to the import of Company’s analog decoders. Reyc filed three lawsuits against the imposition of the tax assessment and is awaiting the lower court’s decision in connection with two of these lawsuits. Reyc has recorded a provision in the amount of U$4,251 (US$3,883 in 2005) to cover any potential losses.
The Company’s operating subsidiaries are challenging in court the collection, by municipalities of various locations in which it operates, of taxes for the use of land on which poles are placed for sustaining signal transmission cables. Management believes that the collection of such taxes presents various constitutional and legal irregularities and is not recording reserves related to these taxes.
35
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
13. Financial Instruments
a)Concentration of risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, debt and payables to programmers. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with various financial institutions and as a policy limits exposure to any one institution. Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited due to large number of subscribers comprising the customer base.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005 the Company’s U.S. dollar exposure was comprised as follows:
2006 | 2005 | |||
Debt | US$ - | US$ 39,025 | ||
Perpetual notes | 151,366 | - | ||
Equipment suppliers | 20,231 | - | ||
US$ 171,597 | US$ 39,025 | |||
b)Fair value
The Company considers that the carrying amount of its financial instruments generally approximates fair market value. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Fair value methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair value disclosures for financial instruments are as follows:
(i) Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments.
(ii) Cash equivalents are represented principally by short-term investments and their fair value is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities and approximates its carrying value. The carrying amount of cash is reasonable estimate of its fair value.
36
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
13. Financial Instruments(Continued)
b)Fair value (continued)
(iii) Debt
Based on the new terms negotiated with creditors, management estimates that the fair value of the debentures approximates its their book value. Management believes that the market price of the Perpetual notes is a reasonable approximation of its fair value.
(iv) Derivatives instruments
In order to manage the risk of the effects of a major devaluation of the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar, the Company entered into foreign exchange swaps contracts. On December 31, 2006 the total notional amount of these contracts was US$90,180 (US$ 104,041 as of December 31, 2005).
14. Benefits to Employees
a)Benefits
The Company and its subsidiaries provide certain fringe benefits, such as: medical and odontological assistance and group life insurance, whose actuarial risks are not taken by the Company. The expenses with the fringe benefits during the years ended, December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were US$7,409, US$4,685 and US$3,265, respectively.
b)Variable compensation
The Company has two complementary plans of remuneration as described below:
(i) Profit sharing plan (PPR): In accordance with a labor agreement, the Company will remunerate its employees up to 2 monthly wages if the Company achieves its predetermined performance goals established in accordance with the annual goals approved by the Board of Directors. For a selected number of administrative members, directors and managers the Company has individual agreements based on individual established goals. The main goals for this new plan are focused on reaching a certain target number of base pay TV subscribers – (weight: twenty - five percent), increase in the subscribers of broad band base (weight: twenty - five percent), generation of free cash flow (weight: twenty - five percent), and customer satisfaction (weight: twenty - five percent).
37
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(Thousands of United States dollars)
14. Benefits to Employees(Continued)
(ii) A retention plan was offered to a selected number of administrative members, directors and managers of the Company, with the objective of retention until at a minimum the end of the year 2006. The expenses related to this plan have been accrued since its inception in 2004 up to December 31, 2006. A new long-term incentive plan was immediately implemented in function of the changes of the goals of the Company, described above, in accordance with the Company’s executive retention plans. Expenses are recognized on the accrual basis and payments are expected to occur in 2007.
15. Supplementary Information
Year ended December 31, 2006 | ||||||||
Balance at | Credits (charges) | Effect of | Balance | |||||
beginning | to | currency | at end | |||||
Descriptions | of the year | Expense | variation | of the year | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | US$ (11,253) | US$ (10,829) | US$ 10,464 | US$ (11,618) | ||||
Income tax valuation allowance | US$ (445,565) | US$ 44,834 | US$ (42,243) | US$ (442,974) | ||||
Year ended December 31, 2005 | ||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | US$ (13,367) | US$ (7,990) | US$ 10,104 | US$ (11,253) | ||||
Income tax valuation allowance | US$ (500,915) | US$ 78,306 | US$ (22,956) | US$ (445,565) | ||||
Year ended December 31, 2004 | ||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | US$ (14,951) | US$ (7,226) | US$ 8,810 | US$ (13,367) | ||||
Income tax valuation allowance | US$ (322,730) | US$ (166,648) | US$ (11,537) | US$ (500,915) | ||||
38
NET SERVIÇOS DE COMUNICAÇÃO S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Thousands of United States dollars)
16. Subsequent Event
On February 01, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a capital increase with the subscription of 1,146,354 common and 1,881,774 preferred shares in the amount of US$ 33,378 as compensation to the fiscal benefit contributed by the stockholders originating from the merger of Globotel Participações S.A., as detailed in note 10, subject to the non-controlling pre-emptive stockholders rights.
39