UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2010
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from _________to __________________
0-21777
(Commission File Number)
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Province of British Columbia | Not Applicable |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification) |
No.) |
6411 Imperial Avenue
West Vancouver, British Columbia
V7W 2J5 Canada
(Address of principal executive offices)
Issuer’s telephone number, including area code:(604) 921-7570
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report:N/A
Check whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by sections 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Check whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Check whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filed [ ] Smaller reporting company [X]
Check whether the registrant is a shell company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:As of March 31, 2010 the registrant’s outstanding common stock consisted of89,078,380 shares.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Consolidated Interim Financial Statements |
March 31, 2010 |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
NOTICE OF NO AUDITOR REVIEW
The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared by management and approved by the Audit Committee and Board of Directors.
The Company’s independent auditors have not performed a review of these consolidated interim financial statements in accordance with the standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim statements by an entity’s auditor.
1
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Consolidated Interim Balance Sheet |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
March 31, | December 31, | |||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||
Assets (Note 1) | (Unaudited) | |||||
Current assets: | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,131,139 | $ | 2,433,202 | ||
Receivables | 30,933 | 24,604 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 12,185 | 19,490 | ||||
Total current assets | 2,174,257 | 2,477,296 | ||||
Property and equipment, net | 204,431 | 205,916 | ||||
Reclamation financial assurance | 286,653 | 286,653 | ||||
Total Assets | $ | 2,665,341 | $ | 2,969,865 | ||
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 21,811 | $ | 150,766 | ||
Accrued liabilities | 30,318 | 77,821 | ||||
Total current Liabilities | 52,129 | 228,587 | ||||
Asset retirement obligations | 181,559 | 177,564 | ||||
Total Liabilities | 233,688 | 406,151 | ||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5) | ||||||
Shareholders’ Equity: | ||||||
Preferred shares, no par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding | ||||||
Common shares, no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 89,078,383 shares issued and outstanding | 50,439,747 | 50,205,634 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital | 4,195,106 | 4,195,106 | ||||
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage | (52,203,200 | ) | (51,837,026 | ) | ||
Total Shareholders’ Equity | 2,431,653 | 2,563,714 | ||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 2,665,341 | $ | 2,969,865 |
Approved by the Directors:
“H. L. Klingmann” | “C. Shynkaryk” | |
H. Lutz Klingmann, Director | Chester Shynkaryk, Director |
See Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
2
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Consolidated Interim Statements of Loss |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | $ | 362,819 | $ | 497,360 | ||
Accretion expense | 3,995 | 3,353 | ||||
366,814 | 500,713 | |||||
Interest income | (640 | ) | (2,436 | ) | ||
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period | $ | 366,174 | $ | 498,277 | ||
Loss per share, basic and diluted | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.01 | ||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 88,911,716 | 85,640,883 |
See Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
3
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Consolidated InterimStatement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
Deficit | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Additional | Accumulated | Shareholders’ | ||||||||||||||||
From the Date of Inception (November 21, | Common | Stock | Paid-in | During the | Equity (Capital | |||||||||||||
1985) through March 31, 2010 | Shares | Amount | Subscription | Capital | Exploration Stage | Deficit) | ||||||||||||
November 21, 1985 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 1,425,001 | $ | 141,313 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 141,313 | |||||||
Net loss for the period | - | - | - | - | (15,032 | ) | (15,032 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1986 | 1,425,001 | 141,313 | - | - | (15,032 | ) | 126,281 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 550,000 | 256,971 | - | - | - | 256,971 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for mineral property | 25,000 | 13,742 | - | - | - | 13,742 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (58,907 | ) | (58,907 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1987 | 2,000,001 | 412,026 | - | - | (73,939 | ) | 338,087 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 1,858,748 | 1,753,413 | - | - | - | 1,753,413 | ||||||||||||
Net income for the year | - | - | - | - | 38,739 | 38,739 | ||||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1988 | 3,858,749 | 2,165,439 | - | (35,200 | ) | 2,130,239 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 1,328,750 | 1,814,133 | - | - | - | 1,814,133 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for mineral property | 100,000 | 227,819 | - | - | - | 227,819 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (202,160 | ) | (202,160 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1989 | 5,287,499 | 4,207,391 | - | - | (237,360 | ) | 3,970,031 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 1,769,767 | 2,771,815 | - | - | - | 2,771,815 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for mineral property | 8,875 | 14,855 | - | - | - | 14,855 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (115,966 | ) | (115,966 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1990 | 7,066,141 | 6,994,061 | - | - | (353,326 | ) | 6,640,735 | |||||||||||
Net income for the year | - | - | - | - | 28,706 | 28,706 | ||||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1991 | 7,066,141 | 6,994,061 | - | - | (324,620 | ) | 6,669,441 | |||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (157,931 | ) | (157,931 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1992 | 7,066,141 | 6,994,061 | - | - | (482,551 | ) | 6,511,510 | |||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (285,391 | ) | (285,391 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1993 | 7,066,141 | 6,994,061 | - | - | (767,942 | ) | 6,226,119 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 5,834,491 | 1,536,260 | - | - | - | 1,536,260 | ||||||||||||
Share issuance costs | - | - | - | - | (18,160 | ) | (18,160 | ) | ||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for mineral property | 128,493 | 23,795 | - | - | - | 23,795 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (158,193 | ) | (158,193 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1994 | 13,029,125 | 8,554,116 | - | - | (944,295 | ) | 7,609,821 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 648,900 | 182,866 | - | - | - | 182,866 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (219,576 | ) | (219,576 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1995 | 13,678,025 | 8,736,982 | - | - | (1,163,871 | ) | 7,573,111 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 2,349,160 | 2,023,268 | - | - | - | 2,023,268 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for debt | 506,215 | 662,282 | - | - | - | 662,282 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of 5,500,000 special warrants | - | 9,453,437 | - | - | - | 9,453,437 | ||||||||||||
Special warrants issuance costs | - | - | - | - | (100,726 | ) | (100,726 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (426,380 | ) | (426,380 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, May 31, 1996 | 16,533,400 | $ | 20,875,969 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (1,690,977 | ) | $ | 19,184,992 |
See Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
4
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Consolidated InterimStatement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
Deficit | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Additional | Accumulated | Shareholders’ | ||||||||||||||||
From the Date of Inception (November 21, | Common | Stock | Paid-in | During the | Equity (Capital | |||||||||||||
1985) through March 31, 2010 | Shares | Amount | Subscription | Capital | Exploration Stage | Deficit) | ||||||||||||
Balance carried forward from previous page | 16,533,400 | $ | 20,875,969 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (1,690,977 | ) | $ | 19,184,992 | ||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 18,000 | 10,060 | - | - | - | 10,060 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for special warrants | 5,500,000 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Special warrants issuance costs | - | - | - | - | (123,806 | ) | (123,806 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (348,948 | ) | (348,948 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 1996 | 22,051,400 | 20,886,029 | - | - | (2,163,731 | ) | 18,722,298 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 157,000 | 157,050 | - | - | - | 157,050 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of 3,500,000 special warrants | - | 5,287,315 | - | - | - | 5,287,315 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for special warrants | 3,500,000 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Options to non-employee directors | - | - | - | 70,200 | - | 70,200 | ||||||||||||
Special warrants issuance costs | - | - | - | - | (163,313 | ) | (163,313 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (1,047,869 | ) | (1,047,869 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 1997 | 25,708,400 | 26,330,394 | - | 70,200 | (3,374,913 | ) | 23,025,681 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of warrants | 1,834,300 | 857,283 | - | - | - | 857,283 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through conversion of debt | 2,017,941 | 1,000,000 | - | - | - | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||
Share issuance costs | - | - | - | - | (6,060 | ) | (6,060 | ) | ||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 5,236,000 | 2,439,753 | - | - | - | 2,439,753 | ||||||||||||
Options and re-priced options to non- employee directors | - | - | - | 107,444 | - | 107,444 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (971,595 | ) | (971,595 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 1998 | 34,796,641 | 30,627,430 | - | 177,644 | (4,352,568 | ) | 26,452,506 | |||||||||||
Issuance of 13,250,000 special warrants | - | 3,350,915 | - | - | - | 3,350,915 | ||||||||||||
Special warrants issuance costs | - | - | - | (166,620 | ) | (166,620 | ) | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for special warrants | 13,250,000 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (564,657 | ) | (564,657 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 1999 | 48,046,641 | 33,978,345 | - | 177,644 | (5,083,845 | ) | 29,072,144 | |||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting for stock options | - | - | - | (177,644 | ) | - | (177,644 | ) | ||||||||||
Stock subscription | - | - | 200,000 | - | - | 200,000 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (28,708,276 | ) | (28,708,276 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2000 | 48,046,641 | 33,978,345 | 200,000 | - | (33,792,121 | ) | 386,224 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through conversion of debt | 406,250 | 65,000 | - | - | - | 65,000 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for conversion of stock subscription | 1,538,462 | 200,000 | (200,000 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||
Share issuance costs | - | - | - | - | (3,337 | ) | (3,337 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (262,059 | ) | (262,059 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2001 | 49,991,353 | $ | 34,243,345 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (34,057,517 | ) | $ | 185,828 |
See Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
5
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Consolidated Interim Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
Deficit | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Additional | Accumulated | Shareholders’ | ||||||||||||||||
From the Date of Inception (November 21, | Common | Stock | Paid-in | During the | Equity (Capital | |||||||||||||
1985) through March 31, 2010 | Shares | Amount | Subscription | Capital | Exploration Stage | Deficit) | ||||||||||||
Balance carried forward from previous page | 49,991,353 | $ | 34,243,345 | $ | - | $ | - | $ (34,057,517 | ) | $ | 185,828 | |||||||
Issuance of common shares through exercise of options | 290,000 | 37,234 | - | - | - | 37,234 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through exercise of warrants | 1,520,836 | 243,334 | - | - | - | 243,334 | ||||||||||||
Stock option compensation | - | - | - | 21,456 | - | 21,456 | ||||||||||||
Share issuance costs | - | - | - | - | (4,216 | ) | (4,216 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (347,603 | ) | (347,603 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002 | 51,802,189 | 34,523,913 | - | 21,456 | (34,409,336 | ) | 136,033 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through exercise of options | 100,000 | 24,379 | - | - | - | 24,379 | ||||||||||||
Equity component of convertible notes | - | - | - | 375,000 | - | 375,000 | ||||||||||||
Stock option compensation | - | - | - | 127,326 | - | 127,326 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (744,516 | ) | (744,516 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 | 51,902,189 | 34,548,292 | - | 523,782 | (35,153,852 | ) | (81,778 | ) | ||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for cash | 8,000,000 | 3,036,282 | - | - | - | 3,036,282 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for convertible notes | 978,260 | 225,000 | - | - | - | 225,000 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through exercise of options | 200,000 | 55,861 | - | - | - | 55,861 | ||||||||||||
Share issuance costs | - | - | - | - | (38,975 | ) | (38,975 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (1,772,250 | ) | (1,772,250 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2004 | 61,080,449 | 37,865,435 | - | 523,782 | (36,965,077 | ) | 1,424,140 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through exercise of options | 110,000 | 21,049 | - | - | - | 21,049 | ||||||||||||
Stock option compensation | - | - | - | 48,592 | - | 48,592 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (1,476,324 | ) | (1,476,324 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 | 61,190,449 | 37,886,484 | - | 572,374 | (38,441,401 | ) | 17,457 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through private placement | 7,200,000 | 1,614,716 | - | 1,520,899 | - | 3,135,615 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through exercise of options | 100,000 | 30,853 | - | - | - | 30,853 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through exercise of warrants | 8,978,260 | 4,659,173 | - | - | - | 4,659,173 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for convertible notes | 652,174 | 150,000 | - | 39,917 | - | 189,917 | ||||||||||||
Stock option compensation | - | - | - | 814,810 | - | 814,810 | ||||||||||||
Modification of warrants | - | - | - | 889,117 | - | 889,117 | ||||||||||||
Share issuance costs | - | - | - | - | (62,888 | ) | (62,888 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (4,910,036 | ) | (4,910,036 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2006 | 78,120,883 | 44,341,226 | - | 3,837,117 | (43,414,325 | ) | 4,764,018 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for exercise of options | 290,000 | 127,652 | - | - | - | 127,652 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares for property | 30,000 | 24,600 | - | - | - | 24,600 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (2,006,482 | ) | (2,006,482 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 | 78,440,883 | 44,493,478 | - | 3,837,117 | (45,420,807 | ) | 2,909,788 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through exercise of warrants | 7,200,000 | 4,184,425 | - | - | - | 4,184,425 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (3,996,777 | ) | (3,996,777 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 | 85,640,883 | $ | 48,677,903 | $ | - | $ | 3,837,117 | $ | (49,417,584 | ) | $ | 3,097,436 |
See Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
6
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Consolidated Interim Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
Deficit | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Additional | Accumulated | Shareholders’ | ||||||||||||||||
From the Date of Inception (November 21, | Common | Stock | Paid-in | During the | Equity (Capital | |||||||||||||
1985) through March 31, 2010 | Shares | Amount | Subscription | Capital | Exploration Stage | Deficit) | ||||||||||||
Balance carried forward from previous page | 85,640,883 | $ | 48,677,903 | $ | - | $ | 3,837,117 | $ | (49,417,584 | ) | $ | 3,097,436 | ||||||
Issuance of common shares through private placement | 2,337,500 | 1,396,646 | - | - | - | 1,396,646 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through exercise of options | 400,000 | 131,085 | - | - | - | 131,085 | ||||||||||||
Stock option compensation | - | - | - | 357,989 | - | 357,989 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | (2,419,442 | ) | (2,419,442 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 | 88,378,383 | 50,205,634 | - | 4,195,106 | (51,837,026 | ) | 2,563,714 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common shares through exercise of options (Note 4) | 700,000 | 234,113 | - | - | - | 234,113 | ||||||||||||
Net loss for the period | - | - | - | - | (366,174 | ) | (366,174 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2010 | 89,078,383 | $ | 50,439,747 | $ | - | $ | 4,195,106 | $ | (52,203,200 | ) | $ | 2,431,653 |
See Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
7
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Consolidated Interim Statement of Cash Flows |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
Operating activities: | ||||||
Net loss for the period | $ | (366,174 | ) | $ | (498,277 | ) |
Amortization and depreciation | 1,485 | 1,506 | ||||
Accretion expense | 3,995 | 3,353 | ||||
Receivables | (6,329 | ) | (11,780 | ) | ||
Prepaids | 7,305 | 5,717 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (176,458 | ) | (175,633 | ) | ||
Cash used in operating activities | (536,176 | ) | (675,114 | ) | ||
Financing activity: | ||||||
Issuance of common shares upon exercise of stock options | 234,113 | - | ||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (302,063 | ) | (675,114 | ) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning balance | 2,433,202 | 3,033,771 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending balance | $ | 2,131,139 | $ | 2,358,657 |
See Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.
8
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
1. | Basis of Presentation |
These consolidated interim financial statements are presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements, and are stated in US dollars. They do not include all the note disclosures required for annual financial statements. It is suggested that these consolidated interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report. | |
The Company follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of interim reports. | |
The underlying value of the Company’s mineral properties is dependent on the existence and economic recovery of mineral reserves, confirmation of the Company’s interest in the underlying mineral claims, the ability to obtain necessary financing to complete the development, and future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition. | |
These consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair presentation of the information contained therein. | |
2. | Significant Accounting Policy |
Principles of Consolidation | |
These consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd., a British Columbia corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Golden Queen Mining Company, Inc., a United States (state of California) corporation, together (the “Company”). | |
3. | Financial Condition and Liquidity |
The Company has had no revenues from operations since inception, and a deficit of $52,203,200 accumulated during the exploration stage. Management plans to control current costs and does not anticipate requiring additional financing to fund Company activities over the next 12 months. In addition, management plans to secure equity and/or debt or joint venture financing to fund construction of the operating facility at the Soledad property (“Soledad”) once a bankable feasibility study has been concluded and a production decision has been made. The ability of the Company to obtain financing for its ongoing activities and thus maintain solvency, or to fund construction of the operating facility at Soledad, is dependent on equity market conditions, the market for precious metals, the willingness of other parties to lend the Company money or the ability to find a joint venture partner. While the Company has been successful at certain of these efforts in the past, there can be no assurance that future efforts will be successful. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. |
9
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
4. | Share Capital |
In January 2010, 700,000 stock options were exercised and the Company issued 700,000 common shares at C$0.35 per share for proceeds of $234,113 (C$245,000). |
Shares | Price Range | |||||
Options outstanding, beginning of period | 3,850,000 | C$0.26 - $0.77 | ||||
Exercised | (700,000 | ) | C$0.35 | |||
Options outstanding, end of period | 3,150,000 | C$0.26 – $0.77 |
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at March 31, 2010:
Weighted- | |||||||||
Average | Weighted- | ||||||||
Number | Contractual Life | Average | |||||||
Exercise Price | Outstanding | (Years) | Exercise Price | ||||||
C$0.77 | 1,200,000 | 1.05 | C$0.77 | ||||||
C$0.26 | 1,950,000 | 3.83 | C$0.26 | ||||||
3,150,000 | 2.77 | C$0.45 |
5. | Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company has acquired a number of mineral properties outright and has acquired exclusive rights to explore, develop and mine the Property under various agreements with landowners. | |
Agreements are typically subject to sliding scale royalties on either gross or net smelter returns ranging from 1% to 7.5%. | |
The Company ceased making property payments and advance minimum royalty payments after successfully concluding moratorium agreements with a number of the landowners in 2000. The moratorium agreements expired toward the end of 2003. The total advance minimum royalty owing from 2003 to the end of 2008 was $714,137. The Company paid advance minimum royalties of $174,176 in 2009. The advance minimum royalty owing is estimated to be $153,000 for 2010. | |
In 2007, the Company reached an agreement with a landowner to amend the terms of the lease agreement. Under the terms of the amendment, the Company has been granted an extension of twenty years and has paid $100,000 owed from 2005. In addition, the Company is not required to pay advance royalty during the two - year period until April 23, 2008 and the Company will receive a credit representing 50% of all advance minimum royalty paid and use it against the future production royalties. The Company recommenced the advance minimum royalty payment, and paid the landowner $100,000 in 2008 and $100,000 in 2009. | |
A mining lease agreement with a group of landholders expired in 2004. The Company is currently in discussions with this group of landholders in an effort to reach a new agreement. | |
The Company has agreed to issue 100,000 common shares as a finder’s fee upon commencement of commercial production on the Property in connection with certain property acquisitions. As of December 31, 2009, commercial production has not commenced and no shares have been issued. |
10
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. |
(an exploration stage company) |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
(Unaudited - Prepared by Management - US dollars) |
5. | Commitments and Contingencies (continued) |
In a prior year, the Company entered into an agreement with the President of the Company to issue 300,000 bonus shares upon the completion of certain milestones. Upon receipt by the Company of a bankable feasibility study and the decision to place the Property into commercial production, a bonus of 150,000 common shares is to be issued. Upon commencement of commercial production on the Property, a bonus of 150,000 common shares is to be issued. As at December 31, 2009, the milestones had not been reached and no accrual was made in connection with these arrangements. | |
6. | Related Party Transactions |
Except as noted elsewhere in these consolidated financial statements, related party transactions are disclosed as follows: | |
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, C$34,500 (2009 - C$34,260) was paid to Mr. H. L. Klingmann for services as President of the Company, and C$4,500 (2009 - C$4,500) was paid to Mr. Chester Shynkaryk for consulting services to the Company. | |
There were no other related party transactions during the period. | |
All of the above transactions and balances are in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties. |
11
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations
The following discussion of the operating results and financial position of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) is as at May 14, 2010 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and the notes thereto.
The information in this Management Discussion and Analysis is prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and all amounts herein are in US$ unless otherwise noted.
The Soledad Mountain Project
The Company is proposing to develop a gold-silver, open pit, heap leach operation on its Soledad Mountain property (“Property”), located just outside the town of Mojave in Kern County in southern California. Every element of the Soledad Mountain Project (“Project”) has been rethought and reengineered in the past five years in an effort to find sound technical and cost-effective solutions that will ensure a viable mining operation at foreseeable gold and silver prices. The review has been supported and complimented by a substantial amount of work done by independent engineers and contractors. This phase of the technical work was completed toward the end of 2008.
Permitting Update
A detailed review of approvals and permits required for the Project is provided in the Company’s latest Form 10-K filing with the SEC. The following is therefore only a note on the supplemental Environmental Impact Report (“SEIR”), which has been prepared for the Project.
The Company completed an Application for a revised Surface Mining and Reclamation Plan, which was submitted to the Kern County Planning Department (the “Planning Department”) in April 2007. The Planning Department completed its review of the Application and deemed the Application complete as set out in July 2007. The Planning Department noted that changes proposed for the Project constituted new information that required evaluation of potential impacts and mitigation in a SEIR. The Planning Department issued a Request for Proposal to prepare the SEIR to a total of 17 qualified consultants in October 2007. The Chambers Group was awarded the contract to prepare the SEIR. The Company signed an agreement with the Planning Department in February 2008 and made a payment of $55,000 which was 50% of the cost of preparing the SEIR. This agreement was approved by the Kern County Board of Supervisors at its regular meeting on March 11, 2008.
The kickoff meeting with the Chambers Group was held on the afternoon of March 12, 2008. The Chambers Group completed the initial review of information provided by the Planning Department and issued a draft Notice of Preparation by mid-June. The Planning Department then terminated the agreement with the Chambers Group due to a conflict of interest related to another project. The Planning Department mailed the Notice of Preparation and the supporting reports to agencies on the mailing list on August 18 with a deadline for responses by September 17. A total of 66 sets of information were mailed by the Planning Department directly plus a further 15 sets were mailed by the State Clearinghouse.
The Planning Department held an SEIR scoping meeting in their offices in Bakersfield on September 12, 2008 and there was only minimal attendance and no comments.
The State Office of Mine Reclamation (“OMR”) accompanied by the Planning Department and H.L. Klingmann, the president of the Company, held a due diligence review on site on September 16, 2008. The OMR indicated that it would require additional time beyond the deadline for a response of September 17 to prepare comments on the Project. A total of 9 responses had been received by the Planning Department by September 17 and two additional responses were received toward the end of September for a total of 11 responses.
A consultant, RGP Planning and Development Services, was selected to continue with the preparation of the SEIR and the agreement with the consultant was approved by the Kern County Board of Supervisors at its regular meeting on October 14, 2008. The cost of the work to be done by RGP Planning and Development Services was $123,800 and the Planning Department requested that the full amount be paid in a letter dated September 22, 2008 and this payment was made on September 25, 2008.
A kickoff meeting was held on site on October 29, 2008 attended by RGP Planning and Development Services, the Planning Department, legal counsel for the Company and H.L. Klingmann.
The Company submitted responses to ten of the comment letters referred to above to the Planning Department on November 27 and responses to the OMR’s comment letter on December 16, 2008.
The Company’s consulting engineers did extensive studies to confirm the feasibility of backfilling mined-out phases of the open pit in early 2009. The studies were presented to the Planning Department in a meeting in Bakersfield on March 11. The Company subsequently revised the Project Description to include the backfilling studies and the Application for the revised Surface Mining and Reclamation Plan. A final revision of the Application was in the hands of the Planning Department on May 25. The Company recognizes that the reviews by the Planning Department have added to the overall quality of the Application.
The Planning Department requested that the Air Quality Assessment and Health Risk Assessment for the Project be redone in February 2009 to provide current information for the SEIR. This study was completed and in the hands of the Planning Department and the Air Pollution Control District on July 21.
RGP Planning and Development Services submitted the draft SEIR to the Planning Department on September 9 and this was distributed by the Planning Department as lead agency under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) on January 11, 2010 to approximately 430 recipients with a notification of release to 985 recipients. This officially started the 45-day review period for the draft SEIR.
The 45-day review period for the draft SEIR concluded at 5:00 p.m. on February 25, 2010. As of the conclusion of the review period, the Planning Department had received 26 responses, including letters supporting the project, letters with project concerns, and letters from regulatory agencies designated as responsible agencies under CEQA. Comments were also received from the State of California on the reclamation plan provisions. The lead agency will respond in writing to the comments received as of February 25, 2010, as part of the final SEIR. The Company will support the lead agency’s effort by supplying any additional information that is requested. As required by CEQA, the lead agency will provide written responses to those who commented no later than 14 days prior to the project’s consideration by the Kern County Planning Commission.
The Kern County Planning Commission formally considered the Project at a public hearing held on April 8. At the hearing, the Planning Commission, consisting of a panel of three commissioners, unanimously approved the Project. The Planning Department subsequently received notice of two appeals of the April 8 decision. The appeals were filed by a regulatory agency of the State of California relating to reclamation plan provisions and by a private landholder. The Kern County Board of Supervisors is presently set to consider the appeals at its regularly scheduled meeting on May 25. The Company is actively working with the Planning Department to resolve outstanding items in preparation for the hearing.
It is important to note that the Bureau of Land Management has confirmed that its Record of Decision approving the Plan of Operations under NEPA in November 1997 remains valid and that no additional reviews or approvals are required before GQM can proceed with the Project.
Results of Operations
Following are the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009.
The Company had no revenue from operations.
The Company incurred general and administrative expenses of $362,819 (2009 - $497,360).
The following significant costs were incurred during the quarter:
- $19,750 for advance minimum royalties owing to landholders;
- $8,295 for detailed engineering for a new access road to site;
- $14,693 for ongoing permitting support in the areas of air quality and health risk and for ongoing maintenance of and data recovery from the meteorological station;
- $16,795 for quarterly water sampling and analysis and laboratory analyses on samples taken on site for a supplemental baseline soil survey;
- $58,774 for ongoing work on the occurrence of arsenic in groundwater, a review of the use of cyanide in heap leaching, a study on the occurrence of mercury; review of the draft Waste Discharge Requirements for the Project and general support required for the approvals and permitting process;
- $5,860 for ongoing work done by a registered surveyor on the status of mining claims;
- $4,309 to a local contractor for ongoing cleanup and maintenance work on site;
- $2,703 to an independent engineer for ongoing site support;
- $77,217 for legal fees incurred for ongoing work on the supplemental EIR;
- $8,723 for general corporate legal fees;
- $20,764 for ongoing work by the Kern County Planning Department and Engineering & Survey Services on the SEIR;
- $13,166 for property taxes for 2009/2010;
- $15,000 for preparing promotional material and seeking public support for the Project;
- C$21,703 for an evaluation of the power supply and initial engineering for the Project;
- $18,880 for ongoing mine design and drafting support;
- C$17,569 for general corporate legal fees;
- C$20,352 for stock exchange fees;
- C$11,550 for the preparation of financial statements and
- C$30,031 for audit fees.
Interest income of $640 (2009 - $2,436) was lower by $1,796 as there was less cash on deposit and interest rates remained low during the quarter. There was no interest expense during the quarter.
The Company incurred a net loss of $366,174 (or $0.00 per share) during the quarter as compared to a net loss of $498,277 (or $0.01 per share) during the first quarter of 2009.
Summary of Quarterly Results
Results for the eight most recent quarters are set out in the table below.
Results for the quarter ending on: | March 31, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | Sept. 30, 2009 | June 30, 2009 |
Item | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Revenue Net loss for the quarter Net loss per share | Nil 366,174 0.00 | Nil 797,335 0.01 | Nil 427,616 0.01 | Nil 696,214 0.01 |
Results for the quarter ending on: | March 31, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 | Sept. 30, 2008 | June 30, 2008 |
Item | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Revenue Net loss for the quarter Net loss per share | Nil 498,277 0.01 | Nil 1,223,439 0.02 | Nil 923,380 0.01 | Nil 1,224,663 0.01 |
The results of operations can vary from quarter to quarter depending upon the nature, timing and cost of activities undertaken during the quarter and whether or not the Company incurs gains or losses on foreign exchange, grants stock options or makes adjustments on quarterly or annual financial statements.
Reclamation Financial Assurance and Asset Retirement Obligation
The Company provided reclamation financial assurance in the form of an Irrevocable Payment Bond Certificate with Union Bank of California in the amount of $286,653 on October 21, 2009. The financial assurance is reassessed annually and the estimate for reclamation of historical disturbances on the property is $283,809 for 2010.
The asset retirement obligation accrual is estimated at $181,559 and this is shown as a liability on the consolidated balance sheet. The actual obligation could differ materially from these estimates.
Advance Minimum Royalties
Advance minimum royalties of $19,750 were paid to landholders in the first quarter of 2010.
A mining lease agreement with one group of landholders expired in 2004 and the Company has prepared a new mining lease agreement for discussion with the group of landholders.
Mining lease agreements with groups of landholders expire in June and July of 2010 and discussions are under way with these groups of landholders for an extension of the agreements.
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Stock Option Plan
The Company prepared a new stock option plan (“New Plan”) to replace its existing stock option plan. The New Plan provides a fixed number of 7,200,000 common shares of the Company that may be issued pursuant to the grant of options. The exercise price of all stock options shall be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, but it shall not be less than the last price at which the Company’s shares were issued prior to the award date or the closing price on the day immediately preceding the award date. The expiry date of the option shall be the date so fixed by the Board, unless the option holder dies or ceases to be employed as a director or as a consultant prior to the date fixed by the Board.
The Company granted 1,950,000 stock options to directors, officers and consultants of the Company pursuant to the new plan on January 28, 2009. The options are exercisable at a price of C$0.26 per share for a period of 5 years from the date of grant. The new plan and the stock options were approved by the shareholders of the Company at the 2009 annual general meeting, which was held on May 21, 2009.
Transactions with Related Parties
Mr. H. Lutz Klingmann was paid C$34,500 (2009 - C$34,260) for services as President and Mr. Chester Shynkaryk was paid C$4,500 (2009 - C$4,500) for consulting services to the Company during the quarter
There were no other related party transactions during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The company does not hold any bank or non-bank asset-backed commercial paper. The fair value of the reclamation financial assurance approximates carrying value because the stated interest rate reflects recent market conditions. It is the opinion of management that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risk arising from the use of these financial instruments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Four directors exercised a total of 700,000 options on shares for proceeds of C$245,000 during the quarter..
The Company held $2,131,139 in cash and cash equivalents on March 31, 2010.
The Company has no long-term debt.
Management plans to control costs and does not expect that additional cash will be required (prior to securing production financing) beyond cash currently on hand for ongoing work on approvals and permits for the Project, for bringing current the remaining advance minimum royalties owing to landholders, for additional property purchases, for ongoing work on site and for general corporate purposes to the end of 2010.
Outstanding Share Data
The number of shares issued and outstanding and the fully diluted share position are set out in the table below.
Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd.
No. of | |||
Item | Shares | ||
Shares issued and outstanding on Dec. 31, 2008 | 85,640,883 | ||
Shares issued pursuant to a private placement | 2,337,500 | ||
Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options | 400,000 | ||
Shares issued and outstanding on Dec. 31, 2009 | 88,378,383 | ||
Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options | 700,000 | ||
Exercise | |||
89,078,383 | Price | Expiry Date | |
C$0.35 & | 9/02/10 & | ||
Director and employee stock options | 1,200,000 | C$0.77 | 20/04/11 |
Director and employee stock options | 1,950,000 | C$0.26 | 28/01/14 |
Not | |||
Shares to be issued as a finders fee | 100,000 | Applicable | Not Applicable |
Bonus shares to be issued to H.L. Klingmann | 300,000 | None | None |
Fully diluted on March 31, 2010 | 92,628,383 |
The company's authorized capital is 100,000,000 common shares with no par value.
Outlook
The Company plans to put the Project into production as an open pit heap leach operation and to construct facilities to process ore at a rate of 4.5 million tonnes (5.0 million tons) per year and these have been reduced from the earlier planned mining rates. Projected life of the open pit heap leach operation has increased from 7 years to 12 years. The Company also plans to produce and sell aggregate for up to 30 years. These plans are subject to management making a production decision.
Management is evaluating financing options with a view to making a production decision as soon as approvals and permits have been secured.
If approvals and permits are secured for the Project and a production decision is made, the Company will need significant additional financing to develop the Project into an operating mine. Capital costs for mining projects are increasing rapidly and the Company is currently re-estimating these costs. The Company believes that financing for the Project can be secured if gold and silver prices remain at or above $600.00/oz and $12.50/oz respectively and these are the prices used for the feasibility study base case cash flow projections that were released on December 14, 2007. Gold and silver prices averaged $972.35/oz and $14.67/oz in 2009 and closing prices on May 12, 2010 were $1,238.75/oz and $19.43/oz respectively.
It is not expected that the Company will hedge any of its gold or silver production.
The ability of the Company to put the Project into production is subject to numerous risks, certain of which are disclosed in the Company’s latest Form 10-K filing with the SEC. Readers should evaluate the Company’s prospects in light of these and other risk factors.
Application of Critical Accounting Estimates
The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Because a precise determination of many assets and liabilities is dependent upon future events, the preparation of financial statements for a period necessarily involves the use of estimates which have been made using careful judgment.
The financial statements have, in management’s opinion, been properly prepared within reasonable limits of materiality and within the framework of the significant accounting policies summarized below:
Mineral Property and Exploration Costs
Exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Development costs are expensed until it has been established that a mineral deposit is commercially mineable and a production decision has been made by the Company to implement a mining plan and develop a mine, at which point the costs subsequently incurred to develop the mine on the property prior to the start of mining operations are capitalized.
The Company capitalizes the cost of acquiring mineral property interests, including undeveloped mineral property interests, until the viability of the mineral interest is determined. Capitalized acquisition costs are expensed if it is determined that the mineral property has no future economic value. Exploration stage mineral interests represent interests in properties that are believed to potentially contain (i) other mineralized material such as measured, indicated or inferred resources with insufficient drill hole spacing to qualify as proven and probable mineral reserves and (ii) other mine-related or green field exploration potential that are not an immediate part of measured or indicated resources. The Company’s mineral rights are generally enforceable regardless of whether or not proven and probable reserves have been established. The Company has the ability and intent to renew mineral rights where the existing term is not sufficient to recover undeveloped mineral interests.
Capitalized amounts (including capitalized development costs) are also written down if future cash flows, including potential sales proceeds, related to the mineral property are estimated to be less than the property’s total carrying value. Management reviews the carrying value of each mineral property periodically, and, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, makes the necessary adjustments. Reductions in the carrying value of a property would be recorded to the extent that the total carrying value of the mineral property exceeds its estimated fair value. A write down of $167,898 in mineral property interests was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Asset Retirement Obligations
In accordance with the Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, the fair value of an asset retirement cost, and corresponding liability, should be recorded as part of the cost of the related long-lived asset and subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method. The Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation to reflect its legal obligations related to future abandonment of its mineral property using estimated expected cash flow associated with the obligation and discounting the amount using a credit-adjusted, risk-free interest rate. At least annually, the Company reassesses the obligation to determine whether or not a change in any estimated obligation is necessary. The asset retirement obligation recorded as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet is $181,559 as at March 31, 2010.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
A summary of Recently Issued Accounting Standards is provided in Item 7 of the Company’s latest Form 10-K filing with the SEC.
Qualified Person and Caution With Respect to Forward-looking Statements
Mr. H. Lutz Klingmann, P.Eng., the president of the Company, is a qualified person for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the technical information in this report.
This report contains certain forward-looking statements, which relate to the intent, belief and current expectations of the Company’s management. These forward-looking statements are based upon numerous assumptions that involve risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include among other things the receipt of required approvals and permits, the costs of and availability of sufficient capital to fund the projects to be undertaken by the Company, commodity prices and other factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statements were made.
Caution to U.S. Investors
Management advises U.S. investors that while the terms “measured resources”, “indicated resources” and “inferred resources” are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize these terms. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the material in the mineral resource categories will be converted into mineral reserves.
Additional Information
Further information on Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. is available on the SEDAR web site at www.sedar.com and on the Company’s web site at www.goldenqueen.com.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, including the principal executive officer who is also our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, including those necessary to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted with the SEC (i) is recorded, processed, and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The conclusion that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective is due to the inherent limitation of a lack of segregation of duties noted above and one item noted below.
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during this period that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 using the criteria set forth inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of March 31, 2010 the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on those criteria. Based on the assessment, management has noted the following in regards to its internal controls:
a) | The Company does not have the proper procedures in place for recording and reporting changes in the U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar. |
The Company’s management has and continues to take action to correct the known deficiencies and it plans to remain vigilant and to implement improvements, as needed, to ensure that its internal control over financial reporting is effective. These efforts include formalizing the assessment process by identifying and scheduling periodic internal testing of the various systems and process involved in its internal control over financial reporting.
The Company’s annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in the annual report.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 14, 2010
GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD. | ||
(Registrant) | ||
By: | /s/ Lutz Klingmann | |
Lutz Klingmann | ||
Principle Executive Officer and | ||
Principle Financial Officer |