Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: JUNE 30, 2008
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 0-22387
DCB Financial Corp
Ohio | 31-1469837 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
110 Riverbend Avenue, Lewis Center, Ohio 43035
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Address of principal executive offices)
(740) 657-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yeso Noþ
As of August 8, 2008, the latest practicable date, 3,717,385 shares of the registrant’s no par value common stock were issued and outstanding.
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
FORM 10-Q
For the Six and Three Month Periods Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
FORM 10-Q
For the Six and Three Month Periods Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
2.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
Item 1.Financial Statements
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and due from financial institutions | $ | 22,796 | $ | 15,588 | ||||
Federal funds sold | 20,000 | 16,480 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 42,796 | 32,068 | ||||||
Securities available for sale | 111,185 | 89,009 | ||||||
Loans held for sale | 1,004 | 1,078 | ||||||
Loans | 516,546 | 520,493 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan losses | (7,684 | ) | (8,298 | ) | ||||
Net loans | 508,862 | 512,195 | ||||||
Real estate owned | 3,233 | 1,406 | ||||||
Investment in FHLB stock | 3,732 | 3,670 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 15,319 | 14,178 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates | 1,300 | 1,270 | ||||||
Bank owned life insurance | 15,293 | 14,963 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets | 10,009 | 10,949 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 712,733 | $ | 680,786 | ||||
LIABILITIES | ||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||
Noninterest-bearing | $ | 50,011 | $ | 53,112 | ||||
Interest-bearing | 498,523 | 457,762 | ||||||
Total deposits | 548,534 | 510,874 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings | 15,370 | 16,596 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 88,278 | 93,486 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities | 3,154 | 2,762 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 655,336 | 623,718 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Common stock, no par value, 7,500,000 shares authorized, 4,273,750 issued | 3,780 | 3,780 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 68,018 | 66,690 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 556,365 shares | (13,489 | ) | (13,489 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (912 | ) | 87 | |||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 57,397 | 57,068 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 712,733 | $ | 680,786 | ||||
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income | ||||||||||||||||
Loans | $ | 8,319 | $ | 9,947 | $ | 17,120 | $ | 19,998 | ||||||||
Taxable securities | 1,009 | 890 | 1,894 | 1,764 | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt securities | 249 | 225 | 480 | 454 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and other | 210 | 130 | 433 | 195 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income | 9,787 | 11,192 | 19,927 | 22,411 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits | 3,119 | 4,748 | 6,690 | 9,472 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings | 1,007 | 996 | 2,106 | 2,012 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 4,126 | 5,744 | 8,796 | 11,484 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | 5,661 | 5,448 | 11,131 | 10,927 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 600 | 1,069 | 1,200 | 1,684 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 5,061 | 4,379 | 9,931 | 9,243 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income | ||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 663 | 684 | 1,274 | 1,309 | ||||||||||||
Trust department income | 225 | 200 | 512 | 449 | ||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of securities | — | — | 278 | — | ||||||||||||
Net loss on sale of assets | (86 | ) | (65 | ) | (116 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||
Gains on sale of loans | 75 | 119 | 137 | 207 | ||||||||||||
Treasury management fees | 144 | 141 | 251 | 257 | ||||||||||||
Data processing servicing fees | 183 | 115 | 361 | 205 | ||||||||||||
Earnings on bank owned life insurance | 165 | 123 | 330 | 252 | ||||||||||||
Other | 147 | 129 | 267 | 318 | ||||||||||||
1,516 | 1,446 | 3,294 | 2,925 | |||||||||||||
Noninterest expense | ||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 2,561 | 2,389 | 5,110 | 4,741 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment | 1,074 | 869 | 2,065 | 1,703 | ||||||||||||
Professional services | 250 | 129 | 409 | 228 | ||||||||||||
Advertising | 99 | 104 | 208 | 203 | ||||||||||||
Postage, freight and courier | 53 | 67 | 144 | 143 | ||||||||||||
Supplies | 81 | 96 | 151 | 160 | ||||||||||||
State franchise taxes | 122 | 131 | 191 | 289 | ||||||||||||
Other | 706 | 724 | 1,519 | 1,233 | ||||||||||||
4,946 | 4,509 | 9,797 | 8,700 | |||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 1,631 | 1,316 | 3,428 | 3,468 | ||||||||||||
Federal income tax expense | 407 | 120 | 906 | 761 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,224 | $ | 1,196 | $ | 2,522 | $ | 2,707 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.72 | ||||||||
Dividends per share | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||||
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,224 | $ | 1,196 | $ | 2,522 | $ | 2,707 | ||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains, net of tax of $95 | — | — | (183 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax benefits of $699, $230, $420 and $178 for for the respective periods | (1,357 | ) | (446 | ) | (816 | ) | (345 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (133 | ) | $ | 750 | $ | 1,523 | $ | 2,362 | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (912 | ) | $ | (692 | ) | $ | (912 | ) | $ | (692 | ) | ||||
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities | $ | 3,928 | $ | 2,339 | ||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities | ||||||||
Securities available for sale | ||||||||
Purchases | (46,813 | ) | (10,634 | ) | ||||
Maturities, principal payments and calls | 23,229 | 9,436 | ||||||
Net change in loans | 2,270 | 15,297 | ||||||
Premises and equipment expenditures | (1,918 | ) | (1,441 | ) | ||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities | (23,232 | ) | 12,658 | |||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities | ||||||||
Net change in deposits | 37,660 | (4,122 | ) | |||||
Net change in federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings | (1,226 | ) | 1,831 | |||||
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances | (5,208 | ) | (682 | ) | ||||
Purchase of treasury shares, net | — | (2,250 | ) | |||||
Cash dividends paid | (1,194 | ) | (1,074 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 30,032 | (6,297 | ) | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 10,728 | 8,700 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 32,068 | 15,894 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 42,796 | $ | 24,594 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for | ||||||||
Interest on deposits and borrowings | $ | 8,786 | $ | 10,346 | ||||
Income taxes | $ | 850 | $ | 1,850 | ||||
Supplemental non-cash disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
Unrealized losses on securities designated as available for sale, net of tax benefits | $ | 816 | $ | 345 | ||||
Transfer from loans to real estate owned | $ | 2,047 | $ | 485 | ||||
Loans originated upon sale of real estate owned | $ | 190 | $ | 26 | ||||
Cash dividends declared but unpaid | $ | 595 | $ | 560 |
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
These interim financial statements are prepared without audit and reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position of DCB Financial Corp (the “Corporation”) at June 30, 2008, and its results of operations and cash flows for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. All such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not purport to contain all necessary financial disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America that might otherwise be necessary in the circumstances, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, included in its 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Refer to the accounting policies of the Corporation described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Corporation’s 2007 Annual Report. The Corporation has consistently followed these policies in preparing this Form 10-Q. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the entire year.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Delaware County Bank and Trust Company (the “Bank”), DCB Title Services LLC, Datatasx LLC and ORECO (collectively referred to here in after as the “Corporation”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Management considers the Corporation to operate within one business segment, banking.
To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect amounts reported in the financial statements and disclosures provided, and future results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, fair values of financial instruments and status of contingencies are particularly subject to change.
Income tax expense is based on the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the entire year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Earnings per share
Earnings per common share is net income divided by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed including the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares under stock options.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (basic) | 3,717,385 | 3,735,478 | 3,717,385 | 3,761,362 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of assumed exercise of stock options | — | 3,907 | — | 8,569 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (diluted) | 3,717,385 | 3,739,385 | 3,717,385 | 3,769,931 | ||||||||||||
Options to purchase 162,321 shares of common stock with a weighted-average exercise price of $24.98, respectively, for the three month and six month periods ending June 30, 2008 were outstanding, but were excluded from the computation of common share equivalents for both the three and six month periods because the exercise price was greater than the average fair value of the shares.
7.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Options to purchase 59,095 shares of common stock with a weighted-average exercise price of $24.36 and $26.26, respectively, for the three month and six month periods ending June 30, 2007 were outstanding, but were excluded from the computation of common share equivalents for both the three and six month periods because the exercise price was greater than the average fair value of the shares.
Stock option plan
The Corporation’s shareholders approved an employee share option plan (the “Plan”) in May 2004. This plan grants certain employees the right to purchase shares at a predetermined price. The plan is limited to 300,000 shares. The shares granted to employees vest 20% per year over a five year period. The options expire after ten years. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, options for 57,643 shares were granted to employees under the plan, at an exercise price of $16.90. At June 30, 2008, 32,904 shares were exercisable and 137,093 shares were available for grant under this plan.
The Corporation accounts for its stock option plan in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” The compensation cost recorded for unvested equity-based awards is based on their grant-date fair value. The fair value of each option was estimated on the date of grant using the modified Black-Scholes options pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants: dividend yield of 2.75% for both 2008 and 2007, respectively; expected volatility of 12.0% for both 2008 and 2007, respectively; risk-free interest rates of 2.25% and 4.75% for 2008 and 2007, respectively; and expected lives of 10 years for each grant. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, outstanding options had no intrinsic value.
The expected term of the options is based on evaluations of historical and expected future employee exercise behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based on the US Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life at the grant date. Volatility is based on historical volatility of the Corporation’s stock.
The Company recorded $43 and $45 in compensation cost for equity-based awards that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Corporation has $434 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested equity-based awards granted under its stock option plan as of June 30, 2008, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.5 years.
8.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
A summary of the status of the Corporation’s stock option plan as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and changes during the periods then ended are presented below:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2008 | ||||||||||||
WEIGHTED | ||||||||||||
WEIGHTED | AVERAGE REMAINING | |||||||||||
AVERAGE EXERCISE | CONTRACTUAL | |||||||||||
SHARES | PRICE | LIFE | ||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period | 108,051 | $ | 25.08 | 8.9 years | ||||||||
Granted | 57,643 | 16.90 | 9.8 years | |||||||||
Forfeited | (3,373 | ) | 23.86 | |||||||||
Outstanding at end of period | 162,321 | $ | 22.92 | 9.2 years | ||||||||
Options exercisable at period end | 32,904 | $ | 26.58 | |||||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period | $ | 1.01 | ||||||||||
Year Ended | ||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||
WEIGHTED | ||||||||||||
WEIGHTED | AVERAGE REMAINING | |||||||||||
AVERAGE EXERCISE | CONTRACTUAL | |||||||||||
SHARES | PRICE | LIFE | ||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 70,040 | $ | 27.19 | 8.0 years | ||||||||
Granted | 44,214 | 23.43 | 9.8 years | |||||||||
Exercised | (158 | ) | 28.69 | |||||||||
Forfeited | (6,045 | ) | 26.20 | |||||||||
Outstanding at end of year | 108,051 | $ | 25.80 | 8.9 years | ||||||||
Options exercisable at year end | 21,553 | $ | 26.13 | |||||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year | $ | 2.57 | ||||||||||
9.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following information applies to options outstanding at June 30, 2008:
NUMBER OUTSTANDING | RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICES | |||
105,256 | $ | 23.00 - $30.70 | ||
57,065 | $16.90 |
Recent Accounting Standards: The Corporation adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” on January 1, 2007. Previously, the Corporation had accounted for tax contingencies in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” As required by Interpretation 48, which clarifies Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” the Corporation recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. At the adoption date, the Corporation applied Interpretation 48 to all tax positions for which the stature of limitations remained open. As a result of the implementation of Interpretation 48, the Corporation was not required to record any liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007. There have been no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits since January 1, 2007.
The Corporation is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, as well as various state jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. With few exceptions, the Corporation is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2004.
The Corporation will recognize, if applicable, interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement and should be determined based on assumptions that a market participant would use when pricing an asset or liability. This Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions should include assumptions about risk as well as the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. Additionally, this Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy that provides the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, or January 1, 2008 as to the Corporation, and interim periods within those years. The Corporation adopted this Statement effective January 1, 2008, as required, without material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force’s (EITF) Issue 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” which requires companies to recognize a liability and related compensation costs for endorsement split-dollar life insurance policies that provide a benefit to an employee extending to postretirement periods. The liability should be recognized based on the substantive agreement with the employee. This Issue is effective beginning January 1, 2008.
10.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Issue can be applied as either a change in accounting principle through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption, or a change in accounting principle through retrospective application to all periods. The Corporation adopted Issue 06-4 effective January 1, 2008, as required, without material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial position or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” This Statement allows companies the choice to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with FASB’s long term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007, or January 1, 2008 as to the Corporation, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Corporation adopted SFAS No. 159 effective January 1, 2008, as required, without material effect on the consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations”,which replaces SFAS 141. The Statement applies to all transactions or other events in which one entity obtains control of one or more businesses. It requires all assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest to be measured at fair value at the acquisition date. The Statement requires certain costs such as acquisition-related costs that were previously recognized as a component of the purchase price, and expected restructuring costs that were previously recognized as an assumed liability, to be recognized separately from the acquisition as an expense when incurred.
FAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and may not be applied before that date.
Concurrent with SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), the FASB recently issued SFAS No. 160,“Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51”. SFAS No. 160 amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (formerly known as minority interest) in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. A subsidiary, as defined by SFAS No. 160, includes a variable interest entity that is consolidated by a primary beneficiary.
A noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, previously reported in the statement of financial position as a liability or in the mezzanine section outside of permanent equity, will be included within consolidated equity as a separate line item upon the adoption of SFAS No. 160. Further, consolidated net income will be reported at amounts that include both the parent
(or primary beneficiary) and the noncontrolling interest with separate disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of income of the amounts attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest.
(or primary beneficiary) and the noncontrolling interest with separate disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of income of the amounts attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest.
SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
DCB’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the financial services industry. The application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments.
11.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The most significant accounting policies followed by the Corporation are presented in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Corporation’s 2007 Annual Report. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this financial review, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined.
NOTE 2 — SECURITIES
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities available for sale were as follows:
Gross | Gross | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency obligations | $ | 31,518 | $ | 56 | $ | (440 | ) | $ | 31,134 | |||||||
State and municipal obligations | 27,484 | 104 | (184 | ) | 27,404 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 8,002 | — | (541 | ) | 7,461 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 45,506 | 168 | (574 | ) | 45,100 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities | 112,510 | 328 | (1,739 | ) | 111,099 | |||||||||||
Other securities | 57 | 43 | (14 | ) | 86 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 112,567 | $ | 371 | $ | (1,753 | ) | $ | 111,185 | |||||||
The table below indicates the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2008:
(Less than 12 months) | (12 months or longer) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Gross | Estimated | Gross | Estimated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of | Number of | Fair | Unrealized | Number of | Fair | Unrealized | Number of | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities | investments | value | losses | investments | value | losses | investments | value | losses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency obligations | 20 | $ | 19,530 | $ | (440 | ) | — | $ | — | $ | — | 20 | $ | 19,530 | $ | (440 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
State and municipal obligations | 33 | 12,094 | (184 | ) | — | — | — | 33 | 12,094 | (184 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 2 | 7,461 | (541 | ) | — | — | — | 2 | 7,461 | (541 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed and other securities | 80 | 24,674 | (540 | ) | 14 | 697 | (48 | ) | 94 | 25,371 | (588 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities | 135 | $ | 63,759 | $ | (1,705 | ) | 14 | $ | 697 | $ | (48 | ) | 149 | $ | 64,456 | $ | (1,753 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Management has the intent and ability to hold these securities for the foreseeable future. The decline in the fair value is primarily due to the effects of changes in market interest rates. The fair values are expected to recover as the securities approach maturity dates.
12.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Substantially all mortgage-backed securities are backed by pools of mortgages that are insured or guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”).
At June 30, 2008, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders’ equity.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2008, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Mortgage-backed securities are shown separately since they are not due at a single maturity date.
Available for sale | ||||||||
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
Due in one year or less | $ | 2,430 | $ | 2,437 | ||||
Due from one to five years | 15,197 | 15,130 | ||||||
Due from five to ten years | 25,131 | 24,930 | ||||||
Due after ten years | 24,246 | 23,502 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed and related securities | 45,506 | 45,100 | ||||||
Total debt securities | 112,510 | 111,099 | ||||||
Other securities | 57 | 86 | ||||||
Total | $ | 112,567 | $ | 111,185 | ||||
Securities with a carrying amount of $103,638 at June 30, 2008 were pledged to secure public deposits and other obligations.
NOTE 3 — LOANS
Loans were as follows:
June 30, | ||||
2008 | ||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 44,842 | ||
Commercial real estate | 196,006 | |||
Residential real estate and home equity | 200,981 | |||
Real estate construction and land development | 44,746 | |||
Consumer and credit card | 29,768 | |||
516,343 | ||||
Add: Net deferred loan origination costs | 203 | |||
Total loans receivable | $ | 516,546 | ||
13.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 4 — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 7,775 | $ | 5,344 | $ | 8,298 | $ | 5,442 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 600 | 1,069 | 1,200 | 1,684 | ||||||||||||
Loans charged off | (787 | ) | (1,181 | ) | (1,959 | ) | (2,011 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries | 96 | 92 | 145 | 209 | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 7,684 | $ | 5,324 | $ | 7,684 | $ | 5,324 | ||||||||
Nonperforming loans were as follows:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing | $ | 1,096 | $ | 2,740 | ||||
Nonaccrual loans | 11,832 | 10,360 | ||||||
Total | $ | 12,928 | $ | 13,100 | ||||
Impaired loans (most of which are included in nonperforming loans above) were as follows: | ||||||||
Period-end loans with no allocated allowance for loan losses | $ | — | $ | 538 | ||||
Period-end loans with allocated allowance for loan losses | 11,832 | 9,800 | ||||||
Total | $ | 11,832 | $ | 10,338 | ||||
Amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated to unconfirmed losses on impaired loans | $ | 3,692 | $ | 2,114 | ||||
Average of impaired loans during the period | $ | 11,348 | $ | 7,907 | ||||
NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurements(FAS 157). FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 has been applied prospectively as of the beginning of the period.
FAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
14.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities | ||
Level 2 | Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities | ||
Level 3 | Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities |
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Securities
Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government agency bonds and mortgage-backed securities and equity securities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. Level 2 securities include certain collateralized mortgage and debt obligations and certain municipal securities. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy and include other less liquid securities.
The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities recognized in the accompanying balance sheet measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the FAS 157 fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2008:
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||||||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Markets for | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Assets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Fair Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Available for sale securities | $ | 111,185 | $ | 5,553 | $ | 105,632 | $ | — |
15.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the FAS 157 fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at June 30, 2008.
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||||||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Markets for | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Assets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Fair Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Impaired loans | $ | 1,541 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,541 |
Item 1A.Risk Factors
DCB Financial Corp’s business and results of operations are subject to a number of risks, including economic, competitive, credit, market, liquidity, regulatory and reputational. Though many of these risks are outside the Corporations control, DCB Financial Corp has developed a risk management function which has established a framework for identifying, monitoring and controlling these risks on a corporate-wide basis. The following discussion focuses on the major business risks encountered in the Corporation’s operating environment.
The current economic environment.
The financial services industry has been operating under weaker economic conditions due to declines in the housing sector, inflationary pressures and employment instability. This has led to increased losses related to a weakening credit market, and in some cases, reduced opportunities to underwrite loans. The market in which the bank operates has generally experienced steady unemployment rates which are typically below the State of Ohio and national averages. Additionally, the real estate market has shown stable to slightly declining values for both residential and commercial real estate. If the unemployment rates were to increase, or, the values for real estate were to decline at a higher rate, the Bank could suffer additional credit losses as both consumers and business customers fail to meet their financial obligations.
Competition from other financial institutions in our markets.
The Bank faces significant competition within its market area from national, regional and local community banks. It also competes directly with credit unions for retail customers. This competition can result in increased deposit costs and reduced lending rates. Continued competition, or an increase in competition, may lead to lower margins and lower overall income as pricing for bank products is adjusted to reflect these competitive levels.
The ability to extend credit and assessing the allowance for loan losses.
Certain risks are involved in granting loans, primarily related to the borrowers’ ability and willingness to repay the debt. Before the Bank extends a new loan to a customer, these risks are assessed through a review of the borrower’s repayment capacity, past and current credit history, the collateral being used to secure the transaction in case the customer does not repay the debt, the borrower’s character and other factors. Once the decision has been made to extend credit, the Bank’s independent loan review function and credit officer monitor these factors throughout the life of the loan.
During 2007, an industry weakness within the investment property portfolio contributed to higher delinquencies, non-accrual and charge-off balances. Management is continuing to perform workout procedures related to this portfolio, and, if the environment associated with the overall decline in investment property values remains similar to its current state, the credit quality of this portfolio will likely be affected through 2008 and into 2009.
16.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses reflect our evaluation of credit risk after careful consideration of all information available to us. In developing this assessment, we must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown such as economic factors, developments affecting companies in specific industries and issues with respect to single borrowers. Depending on changes in circumstances, future assessments of credit risk may yield materially different results, which may require an increase or a decrease in the allowance for loan losses.
Asset and liability management and market risk.
The Corporation’s ALCO committee utilizes a variety of tools to measure and monitor interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is defined as the risk that the Corporation’s financial condition will be adversely affected due to sustained movements in the overall interest structure. The Corporation is also exposed to liquidity risk, or the risk that changes in cash flows could adversely affect its ability to honor its financial obligations. The ALCO committee monitors changes in the interest rate environment and changes to its lending and deposit rates, while utilizing its policies and procedures to limit exposure to market changes. In addition to funding operations and growth with core deposits, the Corporation utilizes a variety of funding sources such as correspondent banks, the FHLB and third party brokers to ensure adequate liquidity exists to support its operations.
Ability to pay cash dividends is limited.
We are dependent primarily upon the earnings of our operating subsidiaries for funds to pay dividends on our common shares. The payment of dividends by our subsidiaries is subject to certain regulatory restrictions. As a result, any payment of dividends in the future by DCB Financial Corp will be dependent, in large part, on our subsidiaries’ ability to satisfy these regulatory restrictions and our subsidiaries’ earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors. Although our financial earnings and financial condition have allowed us to declare and pay periodic cash dividends to our stockholders, there can be no assurance that our dividend policy or size of dividend distribution will continue in the future.
Legislative or regulatory changes or actions could adversely impact the financial services industry.
The financial services industry is extensively regulated. Banking laws and regulations are primarily intended for the protection of consumers, depositors and the deposit insurance funds, not to benefit our shareholders. Changes in laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact us. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection on the operation of a financial institution and the ability to determine the adequacy of an institution’s allowance for loan losses. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and policies could result in sanctions being imposed by the regulatory agencies, including the imposition of civil penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.
In light of present conditions, the Company intends to refrain from incurring additional Company debt, acquiring Company treasury stock, issuing dividends (following the dividend already declared and payable August 15, 2008, to shareholders of record on July 15, 2008), or entering into new lines of non-bank business without first providing 30 days notice and receiving prior approval from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
Risk Mitigation.
The Corporation manages its various risks through the implementation of policies and procedures by The Board of Directors and Management. These policies and procedures provide a broad oversight for the safe and sound management of the Corporation and its subsidiaries.
The Corporation utilizes a variety of functions to validate its system of internal controls. These functions include an independent internal audit function, an independent loan review function and various consultants with expertise in specific operational areas who identify risks and risk mitigation strategies.
17.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
INTRODUCTION
In the following pages, management presents an analysis of the consolidated financial condition of DCB Financial Corp (the “Corporation”) at June 30, 2008, compared to December 31, 2007, and the consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same periods in 2007. This discussion is designed to provide shareholders with a more comprehensive review of the operating results and financial position than could be obtained from reading the consolidated financial statements alone. This analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes and the selected financial data included elsewhere in this report.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such as statements relating to the financial condition and prospects, lending risks, plans for future business development and marketing activities, capital spending and financing sources, capital structure, the effects of regulation and competition, and the prospective business of both the Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary The Delaware County Bank & Trust Company (the “Bank”). Where used in this report, the word “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” and similar words and expressions, related to the Corporation or the Bank or their respective management, identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements reflect the current views of the Corporation and are based on information currently available to the management of the Corporation and the Bank and upon current expectations, estimates, and projections about the Corporation and its industry, management’s belief with respect thereto, and certain assumptions made by management. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: (i) significant increases in competitive pressure in the banking and financial services industries; (ii) changes in the interest rate environment which could reduce anticipated or actual margins; (iii) changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment; (iv) general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally (especially in central Ohio), becoming less favorable than expected resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality of assets; (v) changes occurring in business conditions and inflation; (vi) changes in technology; (vii) changes in monetary and tax policies; (viii) changes in the securities markets; and (ix) other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the filings of the Corporation with the Commission.
The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Corporation’s assets totaled $712,733 at June 30, 2008, compared to $680,786 at December 31, 2007, an increase of $31,947, or 4.7%. The increase in assets was mainly attributed to investment securities growth coupled with an increase in cash and cash equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $10,728, from December 31, 2007 to June 30, 2008, driven by an increase in Fed Funds sold and funded primarily by growth in deposits. Total securities increased $22,176, or 24.9%, from $89,009 at December 31, 2007 to $111,185 at June 30, 2008. Securities classified as available for sale at June 30, 2008 totaled $111,185, or 100% of the total securities portfolio. Management classifies securities as available for sale to provide the Corporation with the flexibility to move funds into loans if favorable economic conditions warrant. The Corporation invests primarily in U.S. Treasury notes, U.S. government agencies, municipal bonds, corporate obligations and mortgage-backed securities. The mortgage-backed securities portfolio, totaling $45,100 at June 30, 2008, provides the Corporation with a constant cash flow stream from principal repayments and interest payments.
18.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Mortgage-backed securities include Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) and Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) participation certificates. The Corporation held no structured notes during any period presented.
Total loans, including loans held for sale, decreased $4,021, or 0.8%, from $521,571 at December 31, 2007 to $517,550 at June 30, 2008. While business loan and commercial real estate activity remains good within the local market, the Bank has experienced an increase in loan balances within these segments, offset by the effects of payoffs in the commercial portfolio and a significant reduction in investment property lending. Retail loan production, including credit card and home equity loans, experienced stable activity within the branch network. The Bank has no significant loan concentration in any one industry.
Total deposits increased $37,660, or 7.4%, from $510,874 at December 31, 2007 to $548,534 at June 30, 2008. Deposit growth stems primarily from increased CDARS balances, which provide customers’ jumbo deposits increased levels of FDIC insurance coverage. The Bank had approximately $103,000 in CDARS customer deposits outstanding at June 30, 2008, primarily from public fund customers. Growth of core deposits remains difficult due to the competition’s increased new branch locations and aggressive pricing. Management intends to continue to develop new products, and to monitor the rate structure of its deposit products to encourage growth of its deposits. Noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $3,101, or 5.8%, while interest bearing deposits increased $40,761, or 8.9% during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The Corporation utilizes a variety of alternative funding sources due to competitive challenges within its primary market.
Total borrowings decreased by $6,434, or 5.8%, to $103,648 during the six month period ended June 30, 2008, compared to December 31, 2007. Typically, the Company utilizes a matched funding methodology for its borrowing and deposit activities. This is done by matching the rates, terms and expected cash flows of its loans to the various liability products. This matching principle is used to not only provide funding, but also as a means of mitigating interest rate risk associated with originating longer-term fixed-rate loans.
Continued reliance on borrowings outside of normal deposit growth may increase the Corporation’s overall cost of funds. Management intends to continue to develop new products, and to monitor the rate structure of its deposit products to encourage growth in its deposit liabilities.
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND JUNE 30, 2007
ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND JUNE 30, 2007
Net Income.Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $1,224, compared to net income of $1,196 for the same period in 2007. Earnings per share was $.33 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $.32 for the three months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of 3.1%. The increase in net income was primarily due to an increase in the Corporation’s net interest income, attributable to a decrease in interest expense on deposits, and a decrease in the provision for loan losses, which were partially offset by an increase in non-interest expenses and an increase in federal income taxes.
Net Interest Income.Net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on interest-earning assets exceeds interest paid or accrued on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is the largest component of the Corporation’s income, and is affected by the interest rate environment, the volume, and the composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest income was $5,661 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $5,448 for the same period in 2007. The $213 increase in the second quarter 2008 compared to 2007 was primarily attributable to a decline in interest expense on deposits, coupled somewhat with an increase in average earning assets. The increase in earning assets was primarily funded with growth in interest bearing accounts such as time deposits. The second quarter’s net interest margin increased to 3.50% on a fully tax equivalent basis, from 3.45% during the second quarter 2007.
19.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
This increase is due to the Bank’s ability to re-price liabilities due to a declining interest rate cycle. The margin was negatively affected somewhat by the reversal of accrued interest from loans placed on a non-performing status.
The Bank has seen deposit growth primarily in products such as time deposits and money market accounts, which generally carry higher costs compared to checking and savings products. Funding costs may further negatively impact the net interest margin in future periods if the current competitive and rising rate environment remains in effect. The Asset/Liability Management Committee, which is responsible for determining deposit rates, continues to closely monitor the Bank’s cost of funds to take advantage of pricing and cash flow opportunities.
Additionally, because of the increased competition in the Bank’s primary marketplace, management has continued to recognize the importance of offering special rates on certain deposit products. These special deposit rates tend to negatively affect the Corporation’s net interest margin.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses.The provision for loan losses represents the charge to income necessary to adjust the allowance for loan losses to an amount that represents management’s assessment of the losses known and inherent in the Bank’s loan portfolio. All lending activity contains associated risks of loan losses and the Bank recognizes these credit risks as a necessary element of its business activity.
The provision for loan losses totaled $600 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $1,069 for the same period in 2007. DCB maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level to absorb management’s estimate of probable inherent credit losses in its portfolio. The largest percentage of charge-offs during the three months ended June 30, 2008 was attributed to economic conditions that primarily affected the Columbus investment properties. Non-accrual loans at June 30, 2008 increased to $11,832 compared to $10,360 at December 31, 2007. The majority of non-accrual balances are attributed to loans in the investment real estate sector that were not generating sufficient cash flow to service the debt. However, delinquent loans over thirty days from period to period decreased to 2.91% at June 30, 2008 from 3.30% at June 30, 2007, and again are mainly attributed to the real estate investment portfolio.
Management will continue to monitor the credit quality of the loan portfolio and may recognize additional provisions in the future if needed in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level. The balance of allowance for loan losses was $7,684, or 1.49% of total loans at June 30, 2008, compared to $8,298, or 1.59% of total loans at December 31, 2007.
Noninterest Income.Total noninterest income increased $70, or 4.8%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007. The Bank’s products and services generated revenues of $1,516 for the second quarter ending June 30, 2008 compared to $1,446 for the same period in 2007. The change in non-interest revenues from period to period is mainly attributed to increases in trust revenues, earnings on bank owned life insurance and data processing services, partially offset by losses on the disposal of other real estate owned (OREO) property. The increase in trust revenues is mainly due to the number of customers served by the Corporation. In addition, new revenue sources to enhance noninterest income are being actively pursued, while management remains vigilant to contain operating expenses in this challenging and competitive period.
Noninterest Expense.Total noninterest expense increased $437, or 9.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007. The increase was attributable to salary and employee benefits expenses, occupancy expenses and other administrative expenses, primarily the result of planned staff additions and occupancy expense related to the Corporation’s branch expansion. In addition, the Corporation experienced an increase in consulting and professional fees primarily due to the management of OREO properties and non-performing loans.
Income Taxes.The provision for income taxes totaled $407, for an effective tax rate of 25.0%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and $120, for an effective tax rate of 9.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in income tax expense is primarily attributable to an increase in pre-tax income, offset by an increase in tax exempt earnings on bank owned life insurance. The 2007 period included a $227 credit for the resolution of a tax contingency.
20.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND JUNE 30, 2007
ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND JUNE 30, 2007
Net Income.Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $2,522, compared to net income of $2,707 for the same period in 2007. Earnings per share was $.68 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $.72 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in net income was primarily due to an increase in non-interest expenses and an increase in federal income taxes, which were partially offset by a decrease in interest expense on deposits, and a decrease in the provision for loan losses.
Net Interest Income.Net interest income was $11,131 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $10,927 for the same period in 2007. The $204 increase was mainly attributed to a decrease in interest expense on deposits partially offset by an increase in average earning assets.
The Bank has seen deposit growth primarily in products such as time deposits and money market accounts, which generally carry higher costs compared to checking and savings products. These higher cost deposit products and other borrowings may continue to be utilized by management, which may further negatively impact the net interest margin in future periods.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses.The provision for loan losses totaled $1,200 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $1,684 for the same period in 2007. The Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level to absorb management’s estimate of probable inherent credit losses in its portfolio.
Annualized net charge-offs for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were 0.53% compared to 0.80% at June 30, 2007. The largest percentage of charge-offs during the six months ended June 30, 2008 was attributed to economic conditions that primarily affected the Columbus investment properties, and to a lesser extent the Corporation’s commercial business portfolio. The majority of non-accrual balances are attributed to loans in the investment real estate sector that were not generating sufficient cash flow to service the debt. Delinquent loans over thirty days from period to period decreased to 2.91% at June 30, 2008 from 3.30% at June 30, 2007, and again are mainly attributed to the real estate investment portfolio. Management will continue to focus on activities related to monitoring, collection, and workout of delinquent loans. Management also continues to monitor exposure to industry segments, and believes that the loan portfolio remains adequately diversified.
Noninterest Income.Total noninterest income increased $369, or 12.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007. The change in noninterest revenues from period to period is attributable to an increase in data processing services, trust revenue and a gain on the Bank’s partial redemption of its equity interest in Visa Inc.’s initial public offering, somewhat offset by losses on the disposal of other real estate owned property. The Corporation experienced increases in trust and data processing revenues due to growth within these areas. Revenues from other services offered by the Bank generally remained at levels consistent with the prior year.
Noninterest Expense.Total noninterest expense increased $1,097, or 12.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007. The increase was primarily due to increases in salary and employee benefits expenses, occupancy, and professional services incurred. The increase in salary and employee benefits expenses and occupancy expenses is primarily the result of planned staff additions and occupancy expense related to the Corporation’s branch expansion. The salary and benefits expense increase is also somewhat associated with the additions of revenue generating staff in lending and compliance and credit personnel utilized to continue to improve the infrastructure supporting the Company’s growth. In addition, the Corporation experienced an increase in consulting and professional fees primarily due to the management of OREO properties and non-performing loans.
21.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Income Taxes.The provision for income taxes totaled $906 reflecting an effective tax rate of 26.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and $761, or an effective tax rate of 21.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in the effective tax rate period over period is attributed to a $227 credit for the resolution of a tax contingency recognized in the 2007 period.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity is the ability of the Corporation to fund customers’ needs for borrowing and deposit withdrawals. The purpose of liquidity management is to assure sufficient cash flow to meet all of the financial commitments and to capitalize on opportunities for business expansion. This ability depends on the financial strength, asset quality and types of deposit and investment instruments offered by the Corporation to its customers.
The Corporation’s principal sources of funds are deposits, loan and security repayments, maturities of securities, sales of securities available for sale and other funds provided by operations. The Bank also has the ability to borrow from the FHLB. While scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively predictable, deposit flows and early loan and mortgage-backed security prepayments are more influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions, and competition. The Corporation maintains investments in liquid assets based upon management’s assessment of (1) need for funds, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on short-term liquid assets and (4) objectives of the asset/liability management program.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $10,728, or 33.5%, to $42,796 at June 30, 2008 compared to $32,068 at December 31, 2007. Cash and equivalents represented 6.0% of total assets at June 30, 2008 and 4.7% of total assets at December 31, 2007. The Corporation has the ability to borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank and has various correspondent banking partners to purchase overnight federal funds should the Corporation need to supplement its future liquidity needs. Management believes the Corporation’s liquidity position is adequate based on its current level of cash, cash equivalents, core deposits, the stability of its other funding sources, and the support provided by its capital base.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Total shareholders’ equity increased $329 between December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008. The increase was primarily due to period earnings of $2,522, offset by the declaration of $1,194 in dividends and a $999 increase in unrealized losses on available for sale securities.
Tier 1 capital is shareholders’ equity excluding the unrealized gain or loss on securities classified as available for sale. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital plus the allowance for loan losses, not to exceed 1.25% of risk weighted assets. Risk weighted assets are the Corporation’s total assets after such assets are assessed for risk and assigned a weighting factor defined by regulation based on their inherent risk.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries meet all regulatory capital requirements. The ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets was 12.5% at June 30, 2008, while the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 11.1%. Regulatory minimums call for a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0%, at least half of which must be Tier 1 capital. The Corporation’s leverage ratio, defined as Tier 1 capital divided by average assets, was 8.3% at June 30, 2008.
22.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table sets forth the Corporation’s obligations and commitments to make future payments under contract as of June 30, 2008.
PAYMENT DUE BY YEAR | ||||||||||||||||||||
CONCTRACTUAL | Less than 1 | More than | ||||||||||||||||||
OBLIGATIONS | Total | year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | 5 years | |||||||||||||||
FHLB advances | $ | 88,278 | $ | 1,397 | $ | 4,393 | $ | 29,500 | $ | 52,988 | ||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings | 15,370 | 15,370 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 6,211 | 421 | 1,402 | 1,680 | 2,708 | |||||||||||||||
Loan and line of credit commitments | 88,134 | 88,134 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total Contractual Obligations | $ | 197,993 | $ | 105,322 | $ | 5,795 | $ | 31,180 | $ | 55,696 | ||||||||||
23.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT AND MARKET RISK
The Corporation’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, liquidity risk. Interest rate risk is defined as the possibility that the Corporation’s financial condition will be adversely affected due to movements in interest rates. The income of financial institutions is primarily derived from the excess of interest earned on interest-earning assets over the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Accordingly, the Corporation places great importance on monitoring and controlling interest rate risk. The measurement and analysis of the exposure of the Corporation’s primary operating subsidiary, The Delaware County Bank and Trust Company, to changes in the interest rate environment are referred to as asset/liability management. One method used to analyze the Corporation’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates is the “net portfolio value” (“NPV”) methodology.
NPV is generally considered to be the present value of the difference between expected incoming cash flows on interest-earning and other assets and expected outgoing cash flows on interest-bearing and other liabilities. For example, the asset/liability model that the Corporation currently employs attempts to measure the change in NPV for a variety of interest rate scenarios, typically for parallel shifts of 100 to 300 basis points in market rates.
The Corporation’s 2007 Annual Report includes a table depicting the changes in the Corporation’s interest rate risk as of December 31, 2007, as measured by changes in NPV for instantaneous and sustained parallel shifts of -100 to +300 basis points in market interest rates. Management believes that no events have occurred since December 31, 2007 that would significantly change their ratio of rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities.
The Corporation’s NPV is more sensitive to rising rates than declining rates. From an overall perspective, such difference in sensitivity occurs principally because, as rates rise, borrowers do not prepay fixed-rate loans as quickly as they do when interest rates are declining. Thus, in a rising interest rate environment, because the Corporation has fixed-rate loans in its loan portfolio, the amount of interest the Corporation would receive on its loans would increase relatively slowly as loan prepayments are expected to be reduced and new loans at higher rates are made. Moreover, the interest the Corporation would pay on its deposits would increase rapidly because the Corporation’s deposits generally have shorter periods for repricing. The Corporation can utilize various tools to reduce exposure to changes in interest rates including offering floating versus fixed rate products, or utilizing interest rate swaps. Additional consideration should also be given to the current interest rate levels. Several deposit products are within 200 basis points of zero percent and other products within 300 basis points. Should rates decline, fewer liabilities could be repriced downward to offset potentially lower yields on loans. Thus decreases could also impact future earnings and the Corporation’s NPV.
As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the NPV approach. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayment on loans and mortgage-backed securities and early withdrawal levels from certificates of deposit would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in making risk calculations.
24.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Item 4.Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2008, in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings.
There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s quarter ended June 30, 2008, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
25.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
FORM 10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2008
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
FORM 10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2008
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 — Legal Proceedings:
There are no matters required to be reported under this item.
Item 1A — Risk Factors:
There has been no material change in the nature of the risk factors set forth in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(d) | ||||||||||||||||
Maximum Number (or | ||||||||||||||||
(c) | Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of Shares | Value) of Shares | |||||||||||||||
(a) | (or Units) Purchased | (or Units) that May | ||||||||||||||
Total Number of | (b) | as Part of Publicly | Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||
Shares (or Units) | Average Price Paid | Announced Plans or | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | per Share (or Unit) | Programs(1) | Programs | ||||||||||||
Month #l 4/1/2008 to 4/30/2008 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Month #2 5/1/2008 to 5/31/2008 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Month #3 6/1/2008 to 6/30/2008 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Total | — | — | — | 184,907 |
(1) | On August 16, 2007, the Company announced a repurchase program which authorizes the repurchase of up to 200,000 of its common shares over a two year period commencing August 15, 2007. |
Item 3 — Defaults Upon Senior Securities:
There are no matters required to be reported under this item.
26.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
FORM 10-Q
Quarter ended June 30, 2008
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Quarter ended June 30, 2008
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4 — Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 22, 2008 there were 2,798,594 voting shares present in person or by proxy, which represented 75.3% of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of 3,717,385 as of the record date for the meeting. At the Annual Meeting, one proposal was submitted to the shareholders for a vote. The shareholders of the Corporation were asked to consider the Corporation’s nominees for directors and to elect four (4) directors to serve for a term of three (3) years. The Corporation’s nominees for director were: Jerome Harmeyer, Vicki J. Lewis, William R. Oberfield, and Phillip Connolly, each of whom were elected. The results of shareholder voting are as follows on these matters:
Proposal 1 — Election of Directors:
Director | Votes for | Votes withheld | ||||||
Jerome Harmeyer | 2,588,763 | 209,831 | ||||||
Vicki J. Lewis | 2,756,651 | 41,943 | ||||||
William R. Oberfield | 2,756,921 | 41,673 | ||||||
Phillip Connolly | 2,686,729 | 111,865 |
Directors continuing in office are: Jeffrey T. Benton, Gary M. Skinner, Adam Stevenson, Terry Kramer, Ed Powers, and Donald J. Wolf.
Item 5 — Other Information:
There is no pending litigation of a material nature, other than routine litigation incidental to the business of the Corporation and Bank, to which the Corporation or any of its affiliates is a party or of which any of their property is the subject. Further, there are no material legal proceedings in which any director, executive officer, principal shareholder or affiliate of the Corporation is a party or has a material interest, which is adverse to the Corporation or Bank. There is no routine litigation in which the Corporation or Bank is involved, which is expected to have a material adverse impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Corporation or Bank.
Item 6 — Exhibits:
Exhibits — The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
Exhibit No. | Exhibit | |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of DCB Financial Corp, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 14, 2003. | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of DCB Financial Corp, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 14, 2003. | |
31.1 | Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
27.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DCB FINANCIAL CORP (Registrant) | ||||
Date: August 11, 2008 | /s/ Jeffrey T. Benton | |||
Jeffrey T. Benton | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: August 11, 2008 | /s/ John A. Ustaszewski | |||
John A. Ustaszewski | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
28.
Table of Contents
DCB FINANCIAL CORP
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT | ||
NUMBER | DESCRIPTION | |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of DCB Financial Corp, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 14, 2003. | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of DCB Financial Corp, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 14, 2003. | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as enacted Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as enacted Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
29.