Organization and Basis of Presentation | Organization and Basis of Presentation Organization Kilroy Realty Corporation (the “Company”) is a self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”) active in premier office and mixed-use submarkets along the West Coast. We own, develop, acquire and manage real estate assets, consisting primarily of Class A properties in the coastal regions of Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego County, the San Francisco Bay Area and Greater Seattle, which we believe have strategic advantages and strong barriers to entry. Class A real estate encompasses attractive and efficient buildings of high quality that are attractive to tenants, are well-designed and constructed with above-average material, workmanship and finishes and are well-maintained and managed. We qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company’s common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “KRC.” We own our interests in all of our real estate assets through Kilroy Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) and Kilroy Realty Finance Partnership, L.P. (the “Finance Partnership”). We generally conduct substantially all of our operations through the Operating Partnership. Unless stated otherwise or the context indicates otherwise, the terms “Kilroy Realty Corporation” or the “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Kilroy Realty Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries and the term “Operating Partnership” refers to Kilroy Realty, L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The descriptions of our business, employees and properties apply to both the Company and the Operating Partnership. Our stabilized portfolio of operating properties was comprised of the following properties at September 30, 2017 : Number of Buildings Rentable Square Feet (unaudited) Number of Tenants Percentage Occupied (unaudited) Percentage Leased (unaudited) Stabilized Office Properties 101 13,720,598 515 94.0 % 96.2 % Number of Number of Units Percentage Occupied (unaudited) Percentage Leased (unaudited) Stabilized Residential Property 1 200 72.0 % 74.5 % Our stabilized portfolio includes all of our properties with the exception of development and redevelopment properties currently under construction or committed for construction, “lease-up” properties, real estate assets held for sale and undeveloped land. We define redevelopment properties as those properties for which we expect to spend significant development and construction costs on the existing or acquired buildings pursuant to a formal plan, the intended result of which is a higher economic return on the property. We define “lease-up” properties as office properties we recently developed or redeveloped that have not yet reached 95% occupancy and are within one year following cessation of major construction activities. There were no operating properties in “lease-up” or held for sale as of September 30, 2017 . During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 , we added one development project to our stabilized office portfolio consisting of 365,359 rentable square feet in Hollywood, California. As of September 30, 2017 , the following properties were excluded from our stabilized portfolio. We did not have any redevelopment properties at September 30, 2017 . Number of Properties/Projects Estimated Rentable Square Feet (1) Development projects under construction (2) 4 1,800,000 ________________________ (1) Estimated rentable square feet upon completion. (2) Development projects under construction also include 96,000 square feet of retail space and 237 residential units in addition to the estimated office rentable square feet noted above. Our stabilized portfolio also excludes our near-term and future development pipeline, which as of September 30, 2017 was comprised of five development sites, representing approximately 47 gross acres of undeveloped land. As of September 30, 2017 , all of our properties and development projects were owned and all of our business was conducted in the state of California with the exception of twelve office properties and one development project under construction located in the state of Washington. All of our properties and development projects are 100% owned, excluding four office properties owned by three consolidated property partnerships. Two of the three property partnerships, 100 First Street Member, LLC (“100 First LLC”) and 303 Second Street Member, LLC (“303 Second LLC”), each owned one office property in San Francisco, California through subsidiary REITs. As of September 30, 2017 , the Company owned a 56% common equity interest in both 100 First LLC and 303 Second LLC. The third property partnership, Redwood City Partners, LLC (“Redwood LLC”) owned two office properties in Redwood City, California. As of September 30, 2017 , the Company owned an approximate 93% common equity interest in Redwood LLC. The remaining interests in all three property partnerships were owned by unrelated third parties. Ownership and Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the Finance Partnership, Kilroy Services, LLC (“KSLLC”), 100 First LLC, 303 Second LLC, Redwood LLC and all of our wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership include the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership, the Finance Partnership, KSLLC, 100 First LLC, 303 Second LLC, Redwood LLC and all wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. As of September 30, 2017 , the Company owned an approximate 97.9% common general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. The remaining approximate 2.1% common limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of September 30, 2017 was owned by non-affiliated investors and certain of our executive officers and directors (see Note 6). Both the general and limited common partnership interests in the Operating Partnership are denominated in common units. Generally, the number of common units held by the Company is equivalent to the number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, and the rights of all the common units to quarterly distributions and payments in liquidation mirror those of the Company’s common stockholders. The common limited partners have certain redemption rights as provided in the Operating Partnership’s Seventh Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended, the “Partnership Agreement.” Kilroy Realty Finance, Inc., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is the sole general partner of the Finance Partnership and owns a 1.0% common general partnership interest in the Finance Partnership. The Operating Partnership owns the remaining 99.0% common limited partnership interest. We conduct substantially all of our development activities through KSLLC, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership. With the exception of the Operating Partnership and our consolidated property partnerships, all of our subsidiaries are wholly-owned. The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, the interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying interim financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature that are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. However, the results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017 . The interim financial statements for the Company and the Operating Partnership should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 . Variable Interest Entities The Operating Partnership is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) of the Company as the Operating Partnership is a limited partnership in which the common limited partners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights. At September 30, 2017 , the consolidated financial statements of the Company included two VIEs in addition to the Operating Partnership: 100 First LLC and 303 Second LLC. At September 30, 2017 , the Company and the Operating Partnership were determined to be the primary beneficiaries of these two VIEs since we had the ability to control the activities that most significantly impact each of the VIE’s economic performance. As of September 30, 2017 , these two VIEs’ total assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests included on our consolidated balance sheet were approximately $429.4 million (of which $383.7 million related to real estate held for investment), approximately $151.4 million and approximately $121.8 million , respectively. Revenues, income and net assets generated by 100 First LLC and 303 Second LLC may only be used to settle its contractual obligations, which primarily consist of operating expenses, capital expenditures and required distributions. At December 31, 2016 , the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the Operating Partnership included three VIEs in which we were deemed to be the primary beneficiary: 100 First LLC, 303 Second LLC and an entity established during the fourth quarter of 2016 to facilitate a transaction intended to qualify as a like-kind exchange pursuant to Section 1031 of the Code (“Section 1031 Exchange”). In January 2017, the Section 1031 Exchange was successfully completed and the entity established for the 1031 Exchange was no longer a VIE. At December 31, 2016 , the impact of consolidating the VIEs increased the Company’s total assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheet by approximately $654.3 million (of which $588.6 million related to real estate held for investment), approximately $166.1 million and approximately $124.3 million , respectively. Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2017-01 (“ASU 2017-01”) which clarifies the framework for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business. The revised framework provides a screen for determining whether an integrated set of assets is a business combination or an asset acquisition and clarifies that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar assets, the set of assets and activities is deemed not to meet the definition of a business. As a result of our adoption of the guidance, which we adopted on a prospective basis, the Company expects that most of our future acquisitions of operating properties and development properties that were previously accounted for as business combinations will instead be accounted for as asset acquisitions under the new guidance. In addition, we expect that most of the transaction costs associated with these future acquisitions will be capitalized as part of the purchase price of the acquisition instead of being expensed as incurred to acquisition-related expenses. The Company did not have any acquisitions of operating properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 . Also effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-18 (“ASU 2016-18”) which requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 on a retrospective basis. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 . As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-18, the change in restricted cash is no longer presented as a separate line item within cash flows from investing activities on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows since such balances are now included in total cash at both the beginning and end of the reporting period. As a result, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 , the Company had net cash used in investing activities of $67.4 million instead of net cash used in investing activities of $124.2 million as previously reported since the Company had an increase in restricted cash of $56.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to $48.4 million of restricted cash that was held at qualified intermediaries to facilitate potential future Section1031 Exchanges. In addition, effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”) which simplified several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”) to amend the accounting guidance for leases. The accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged under ASU 2016-02. However, the standard requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for leases classified as operating leases on the balance sheet. Lessees will recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. If a lessee makes this election, it will recognize lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. We are currently conducting our evaluation of the impact of the guidance on our consolidated financial statements and have an active project team working on the evaluation and implementation of the guidance. We currently believe that the adoption of the standard will not significantly change the accounting for operating leases on our consolidated balance sheets where we are the lessor, and that such leases will be accounted for in a similar method to existing standards with the underlying leased asset being reported and recognized as a real estate asset. We currently expect that certain non-lease components will need to be accounted for separately from the lease components, with the lease components continuing to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease and certain non-lease components (such as common area maintenance) being accounted for under the new revenue recognition guidance in ASU 2014-09 discussed below, even when revenue for such non-lease components is not separately stipulated in the lease. In addition, under ASU 2016-02, lessors will only be permitted to capitalize and amortize incremental direct leasing costs. As a result, we expect that upon the adoption of the standard, we will no longer be able to capitalize and amortize certain leasing related costs and instead will expense these costs as incurred. We currently expect this could have a material impact to the Company’s results of operations upon adoption of the standard. For leases where we are the lessee, specifically for our ground leases, we currently believe that the adoption of the standard will significantly change the accounting on our consolidated balance sheets since both existing ground leases and any future ground leases will be required to be recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as an obligation of the Company. We currently believe that existing ground leases executed before the January 1, 2019 adoption date will continue to be accounted for as operating leases and will not have a material impact on our recognition of ground lease expense or our results of operations. However, we believe that we will be required to recognize a right of use asset and a lease liability on our consolidated balance sheets equal to the present value of the minimum lease payments required in accordance with each ground lease. As of September 30, 2017 , our future undiscounted minimum rental payments under these leases totaled $252.8 million , with several of the leases containing provisions for rental payments to fluctuate based on fair market value and operating income measurements with expirations through 2093. In addition, we currently believe that for new ground leases entered into after the adoption date of the new standard, such leases could be required to be accounted for as a financing type lease, resulting in ground lease expense recorded using the effective interest method instead of on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. This could have a significant impact on our results of operations if we enter into material new ground leases after the date of adoption since ground lease expense calculated using the effective interest method results in an increased amount of ground lease expense in the earlier years of a ground lease as compared to the current straight-line method. We will adopt the guidance on a modified retrospective basis as required by ASU 2016-02. We are in the process of evaluating whether we will elect to apply the practical expedients identified in the standard but currently believe that we may do so. ASU No. 2014-09 “ Revenue From Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue From Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). The objective of ASU 2014-09 is to establish a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue from contracts with customers and will supersede most of the existing revenue recognition guidance. On May 9, 2016 and December 21, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12 and ASU No. 2016-20, which provides practical expedients, technical corrections, and improvements for certain aspects of ASU No. 2014-09. Public business entities may elect to adopt the amendments as of the original effective date; however, adoption is required for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We have compiled an inventory of the sources of revenue that will be impacted by ASU 2014-09. Specifically, we have evaluated the impact of the guidance on timing of gain recognition for dispositions and currently do not believe there will be a material impact to our consolidated financial statements given the simplicity of the Company’s historical disposition transactions. In addition, we currently believe that certain non-lease components of revenue from leases such as common area maintenance and certain types of parking revenue may be impacted by ASU 2014-09 when we adopt ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019. We are in the process of evaluating the impact on these non-lease revenue components and currently believe the impact will be limited to the income statement presentation of revenue and not the total amount of revenue recognized. Other Recently Issued Pronouncements On May 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09 “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)” to clarify the scope of modification accounting. Under the guidance, an entity will not apply modification accounting to a share-based payment award if the award’s fair value, vesting conditions, and classification as an equity or liability instrument remain the same immediately before and after the change. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not currently anticipate that the guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. On February 22, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05 “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20)” (“ASU 2017-05”) to provide guidance and clarify the scope of the original guidance within Subtopic 610-20 “Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets” that was issued in connection with ASU 2014-09, which provided guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in transactions with noncustomers. ASU 2017-05 additionally adds guidance pertaining to the partial sales of real estate and clarifies that nonfinancial assets within the scope of Accounting Standards Codification Subtopic 610-20 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty. For example, a parent may transfer control of nonfinancial assets by transferring ownership interests in a consolidated subsidiary. ASU 2017-05 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early application permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2017-05 on our consolidated financial statements and currently do not anticipate that the guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 (“ASU 2016-15”) to provide guidance for areas where there is diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not currently anticipate that the guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 (“ASU 2016-13”) to amend the accounting for credit losses for certain financial instruments. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes its estimate of expected credit losses as an allowance, which the FASB believes will result in more timely recognition of such losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not currently anticipate that the guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01 (“ASU 2016-01”) to amend the accounting guidance on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The standard requires that all investments in equity securities, including other ownership interests, are carried at fair value through net income. This requirement does not apply to investments that qualify for equity method accounting or to those that result in consolidation of the investee or for which the entity has elected the predictability exception to fair value measurement. Additionally, the standard requires that the portion of the total fair value change caused by a change in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected would be recognized in other comprehensive income. Any accumulated amount remaining in other comprehensive income is reclassified to earnings when the liability is extinguished. ASU 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company does not currently anticipate that the guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. |