Organization, Ownership and Basis of Presentation | Organization, Ownership and Basis of Presentation Organization and Ownership Kilroy Realty Corporation (the “Company”) is a self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”) active in premier office and mixed-use submarkets along the West Coast. We own, develop, acquire and manage real estate assets, consisting primarily of Class A properties in the coastal regions of Greater Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego County, the San Francisco Bay Area and Greater Seattle, which we believe have strategic advantages and strong barriers to entry. Class A real estate encompasses attractive and efficient buildings of high quality that are attractive to tenants, are well-designed and constructed with above-average material, workmanship and finishes and are well-maintained and managed. We qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company’s common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “KRC.” We own our interests in all of our real estate assets through Kilroy Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) and Kilroy Realty Finance Partnership, L.P. (the “Finance Partnership”). We generally conduct substantially all of our operations through the Operating Partnership. Unless stated otherwise or the context indicates otherwise, the terms “Kilroy Realty Corporation” or the “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Kilroy Realty Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries and the term “Operating Partnership” refers to Kilroy Realty, L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The descriptions of our business, employees and properties apply to both the Company and the Operating Partnership. Our stabilized portfolio of operating properties was comprised of the following properties at March 31, 2018 : Number of Buildings Rentable Square Feet (unaudited) Number of Tenants Percentage Occupied (unaudited) Percentage Leased (unaudited) Stabilized Office Properties 104 13,866,127 515 94.3 % 96.7 % Number of Number of Units 2018 Average Occupancy (unaudited) Stabilized Residential Property 1 200 83.0 % Our stabilized portfolio includes all of our properties with the exception of development and redevelopment properties currently under construction or committed for construction, “lease-up” properties, real estate assets held for sale and undeveloped land. We define redevelopment properties as those properties for which we expect to spend significant development and construction costs on the existing or acquired buildings pursuant to a formal plan, the intended result of which is a higher economic return on the property. We define “lease-up” properties as office and retail properties we recently developed or redeveloped that have not yet reached 95% occupancy and are within one year following cessation of major construction activities. There were no operating properties in “lease-up” or held for sale as of March 31, 2018 . As of March 31, 2018 , the following properties were excluded from our stabilized portfolio. We did not have any redevelopment properties at March 31, 2018 . Number of Properties/Projects Estimated Rentable Square Feet (1) Development projects under construction (2) 5 2,106,000 ________________________ (1) Estimated rentable square feet upon completion. (2) Includes 86,000 square feet of Production, Distribution, and Repair (“PDR”) space. In addition to the estimated office rentable square feet noted above, development projects under construction also include 120,000 square feet of retail space and 237 residential units. Our stabilized portfolio also excludes our future development pipeline, which as of March 31, 2018 was comprised of six potential development sites, representing approximately 46 gross acres of undeveloped land. As of March 31, 2018 , all of our properties and development projects were owned and all of our business was conducted in the state of California with the exception of twelve office properties and one development project under construction located in the state of Washington. All of our properties and development projects are 100% owned, excluding four office properties owned by three consolidated property partnerships and an office project held by a consolidated variable interest entity for future transactions intended to qualify as like-kind exchanges pursuant to Section 1031 of the Code (“Section 1031 Exchanges”). Two of the three property partnerships, 100 First Street Member, LLC (“100 First LLC”) and 303 Second Street Member, LLC (“303 Second LLC”), each owned one office property in San Francisco, California through subsidiary REITs. As of March 31, 2018 , the Company owned a 56% common equity interest in both 100 First LLC and 303 Second LLC. The third property partnership, Redwood City Partners, LLC (“Redwood LLC”) owned two office properties in Redwood City, California. As of March 31, 2018 , the Company owned an approximate 93% common equity interest in Redwood LLC. The remaining interests in all three property partnerships were owned by unrelated third parties. Ownership and Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the Finance Partnership, Kilroy Services, LLC (“KSLLC”), 303 Second LLC, 100 First LLC, Redwood LLC and all of our wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership include the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership, the Finance Partnership, KSLLC, 303 Second LLC, 100 First LLC, Redwood LLC and all of our wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. As of March 31, 2018 , the Company owned an approximate 97.9% common general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. The remaining approximate 2.1% common limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of March 31, 2018 was owned by non-affiliated investors and certain of our executive officers and directors. Both the general and limited common partnership interests in the Operating Partnership are denominated in common units. Generally, the number of common units held by the Company is equivalent to the number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, and the rights of all the common units to quarterly distributions and payments in liquidation mirror those of the Company’s common stockholders. The common limited partners have certain redemption rights as provided in the Operating Partnership’s Seventh Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended, the “Partnership Agreement.” Kilroy Realty Finance, Inc., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is the sole general partner of the Finance Partnership and owns a 1.0% common general partnership interest in the Finance Partnership. The Operating Partnership owns the remaining 99.0% common limited partnership interest. With the exception of the Operating Partnership and our consolidated property partnerships, all of our subsidiaries are wholly-owned. The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, the interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying interim financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature that are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. However, the results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018 . The interim financial statements for the Company and the Operating Partnership should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 . Variable Interest Entities The Operating Partnership is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) of the Company as the Operating Partnership is a limited partnership in which the common limited partners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights. At March 31, 2018 , the consolidated financial statements of the Company included three VIEs in addition to the Operating Partnership: 100 First LLC, 303 Second LLC, and an entity established during the first quarter of 2018 to facilitate potential future Section 1031 Exchanges. At March 31, 2018 , the Company and the Operating Partnership were determined to be the primary beneficiaries of these three VIEs since we had the ability to control the activities that most significantly impact each of the VIE’s economic performance. As of March 31, 2018 , the three VIEs’ total assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests included on our consolidated balance sheet were approximately $543.5 million (of which $489.4 million related to real estate held for investment), approximately $31.5 million and approximately $177.2 million , respectively. Revenues, income and net assets generated by 100 First LLC and 303 Second LLC may only be used to settle their contractual obligations, which primarily consist of operating expenses, capital expenditures and required distributions. At December 31, 2017 , the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the Operating Partnership included two VIEs in which we were deemed to be the primary beneficiary: 100 First LLC and 303 Second LLC. At December 31, 2017 , the impact of consolidating the VIEs increased the Company’s total assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheet by approximately $426.5 million (of which $382.1 million related to real estate held for investment), approximately $27.3 million and approximately $175.4 million , respectively. Accounting Pronouncements Adopted January 1, 2018 Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASU No. 2014-09 “Revenue From Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”) and the related FASB ASU Nos. 2016-12 and 2016-20, which provide practical expedients, technical corrections, and improvements for certain aspects of ASU 2014-09, on a modified retrospective basis. ASU 2014-09 establishes a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue from contracts with customers and supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance. We evaluated each of the Company’s revenue streams to determine the sources of revenue that are impacted by ASU 2014-09 and concluded that two revenue streams, sales of real estate and revenue from our multi-tenant parking arrangements, fall within the scope of Topic 606. We evaluated the impact of the adoption of the guidance on the timing of gain recognition for our historical dispositions and concluded there was no impact to our consolidated financial statements given the simplicity and straight forward nature of our historical disposition transactions. We also evaluated the impact of the guidance on the timing and pattern of revenue recognition for our multi-tenant parking arrangements and determined there was no impact to our consolidated financial statements. We generally provide parking for our multi-tenant properties based on the prevailing market rate per parking space, which adjusts based on prevailing market rates during the tenant’s occupancy, and we recognize parking revenue as parking spaces are utilized by the tenant. Given the structure of these arrangements whereby the amount of parking revenue we recognize corresponds directly to the tenant’s use, we were able to apply the practical expedient provided in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606-10-50-14(b) (the “right to invoice” practical expedient). As a result of applying this practical expedient, we are not required to disclose the transaction price allocated to future performance obligations for multi-tenant parking since we cannot predict or estimate the use of such parking spaces. During the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 , we recognized $6.6 million and $6.7 million , respectively, of parking revenue for arrangements that are within the scope of Topic 606, which is included in rental revenues on our consolidated statements of operations. We concluded that the adoption of Topic 606 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or a material impact on the notes to our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted FASB ASU No. 2017-09 “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)” on a prospective basis. Under the guidance, an entity will not apply modification accounting to a share-based payment award if the award’s fair value, vesting conditions, and classification as an equity or liability instrument remain the same immediately before and after the change. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted FASB ASU No. 2017-05 “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20)” (“ASU 2017-05”) on a retrospective basis. This standard clarifies the scope of the original guidance within Subtopic 610-20 “Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets” that was issued in connection with ASU 2014-09 which provided guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in transactions with noncustomers. Additionally, ASU 2017-05 adds guidance pertaining to the partial sales of real estate and clarifies that nonfinancial assets within the scope of ASC 610-20 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty. For example, a parent may transfer control of nonfinancial assets by transferring ownership interests in a consolidated subsidiary. We evaluated the impact of the new amendments on our historical transactions and concluded that there was no impact. As such, the adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted FASB ASU No. 2016-15 (“ASU 2016-15”) which provides guidance where there is diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows, on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted FASB ASU No. 2016-01 (“ASU 2016-01”) which amends the accounting guidance on the classification and measurement of financial instruments and FASB ASU No. 2018-03 (“ASU 2018-03”) which provides technical corrections and improvements to ASU 2016-01, on a modified retrospective basis. The amendments require that all investments in equity securities, including other ownership interests, are reported at fair value with changes in fair value reported in net income. This requirement does not apply to investments that qualify for equity method accounting or to those that result in consolidation of the investee or for which the entity has elected the predictability exception to fair value measurement. Additionally, the amendments require that the portion of the total fair value change caused by a change in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected would be recognized in other comprehensive income. Any accumulated amount remaining in other comprehensive income is reclassified to earnings when the liability is extinguished. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements since our only financial instruments within the scope of ASU 2016-01 and 2018-03 are the marketable securities related to our deferred compensation plan which are classified as trading securities and marked to market at fair value through earnings each reporting period. Accounting Pronouncements Effective January 1, 2019 ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”) to amend the accounting guidance for leases. The accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged under ASU 2016-02. However, the standard requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for leases classified as operating leases on the balance sheet. Lessees will recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. If a lessee makes this election, it will recognize lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We continue to have an active project team, led by senior accounting management, that is proactively working to analyze and evaluate the impact of the guidance on our consolidated financial statements. In January 2018, the FASB released an exposure draft to amend ASU No. 2016-02 that would (1) simplify transition requirements for both lessees and lessors by adding an option that would permit an organization to apply the transition provisions of the new standard at its adoption date instead of at the earliest comparative period presented in its financial statements and (2) provide a practical expedient for lessors that would permit lessors to make an accounting policy election to not separate nonlease components from the associated lease components if certain criteria are met. In March 2018, the FASB decided to finalize the changes with respect to optional transition relief and approved a practical expedient for lessors that would permit lessors to make an accounting policy election to not separate nonlease components from the associated lease components, by class of underlying asset, if the following two criteria are met: (1) the timing and pattern of transfer of the lease and nonlease components are the same and (2) the lease component would be classified as an operating lease if accounted for separately. For leases where we are the lessor, we currently believe that we will elect the optional transition relief and that we will meet the noted criteria to not be required to bifurcate and separately report nonlease components, such as common area maintenance revenue, for operating leases on our consolidated statements of operations. As a result, we currently believe that leases where we are the lessor will be accounted for in a similar method to existing standards with the underlying leased asset being reported and recognized as a real estate asset. The FASB is expected to issue an Accounting Standards Update codifying these changes in the coming months. We currently expect to adopt ASU 2016-02 using the practical expedients proposed in the standard and the changes approved by the FASB. ASU 2016-02 also specifies that upon adoption, lessors will no longer be able to capitalize and amortize certain leasing related costs and instead will only be permitted to capitalize and amortize incremental direct leasing costs. As a result, we have concluded that upon the adoption of the standard, we will be required to expense as incurred certain leasing costs we are currently able to capitalize and amortize as deferred leasing costs under existing guidance. We are currently in the process of analyzing the impact of this change in the guidance and we currently believe this change will have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and results of operations upon adoption of the standard. For leases where we are the lessee, specifically for our ground leases, we currently believe that the adoption of the standard will significantly change the accounting on our consolidated balance sheets since both existing ground leases and any future ground leases will be required to be recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as an obligation of the Company. We currently believe that existing ground leases executed before the January 1, 2019 adoption date will continue to be accounted for as operating leases and the new guidance will not have a material impact on our recognition of ground lease expense or our results of operations. However, we believe that we will be required to recognize a right of use asset and a lease liability on our consolidated balance sheets equal to the present value of the minimum lease payments required in accordance with each ground lease. As of March 31, 2018 , our future undiscounted minimum rental payments under these leases totaled $250.2 million , with several of the leases containing provisions for rental payments to fluctuate based on fair market value and operating income measurements with expirations through 2093. In addition, we currently believe that for new ground leases entered into after the adoption date of the new standard, such leases could be required to be accounted for as financing type leases, resulting in ground lease expense recorded using the effective interest method instead of on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. This could have a significant impact on our results of operations if we enter into material new ground leases after the date of adoption since ground lease expense calculated using the effective interest method results in an increased amount of ground lease expense in the earlier years of a ground lease as compared to the current straight-line method. Accounting Pronouncements Effective in 2020 and Beyond ASU No. 2016-13 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326)” On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 (“ASU 2016-13”) to amend the accounting for credit losses for certain financial instruments. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes its estimate of expected credit losses as an allowance, which the FASB believes will result in more timely recognition of such losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not currently anticipate that the guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. |