Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-12675
KILROY REALTY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 95-4598246 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
12200 W. Olympic Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Angeles, California 90064
(Address of principal executive offices)
(310) 481-8400
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx No¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yesx No¨
As of May 5, 2004, 28,392,148 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.
Table of Contents
QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||
Item 1. | 3 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 | 3 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 | 4 | |||
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended | 5 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 | 6 | |||
7 | ||||
Item 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 16 | ||
Item 3. | 33 | |||
Item 4. | 34 | |||
Item 1. | 35 | |||
Item 2. | 35 | |||
Item 3. | 35 | |||
Item 4. | 35 | |||
Item 5. | 35 | |||
Item 6. | 35 | |||
37 |
2
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited, in thousands, except share data)
March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
REAL ESTATE ASSETS (Note 2): | ||||||||
Land and improvements | $ | 289,317 | $ | 289,730 | ||||
Buildings and improvements, net | 1,297,624 | 1,305,145 | ||||||
Undeveloped land and construction in progress, net | 124,911 | 131,411 | ||||||
Total real estate held for investment | 1,711,852 | 1,726,286 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (329,409 | ) | (321,372 | ) | ||||
Real estate held for investment, net | 1,382,443 | 1,404,914 | ||||||
Property held for sale, net (Note 9) | 18,303 | |||||||
Total real estate assets, net | 1,400,746 | 1,404,914 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 6,730 | 9,892 | ||||||
RESTRICTED CASH | 9,785 | 8,558 | ||||||
CURRENT RECEIVABLES, NET | 5,988 | 4,919 | ||||||
DEFERRED RENT RECEIVABLES, NET | 39,288 | 36,804 | ||||||
DEFERRED LEASING COSTS, NET | 36,094 | 36,651 | ||||||
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS, NET (Note 4) | 3,318 | 3,657 | ||||||
PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS | 7,416 | 7,240 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 1,509,365 | $ | 1,512,635 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Secured debt (Note 3) | $ | 617,294 | $ | 526,048 | ||||
Unsecured line of credit (Note 3) | 150,000 | 235,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities (Note 4) | 40,908 | 41,147 | ||||||
Accrued distributions (Note 11) | 16,477 | 16,369 | ||||||
Rents received in advance, tenant security deposits and deferred revenue | 19,332 | 20,904 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 844,011 | 839,468 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | ||||||||
MINORITY INTERESTS (Note 5): | ||||||||
7.45% (8.075% as of December 31, 2003) Series A Cumulative Redeemable | 73,653 | 73,716 | ||||||
9.25% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred unitholders | 44,321 | 44,321 | ||||||
Common unitholders of the Operating Partnership | 65,094 | 66,502 | ||||||
Total minority interests | 183,068 | 184,539 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Note 6): | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 25,290,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding | ||||||||
7.45% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred stock, $.01 par value, | ||||||||
Series B Junior Participating Preferred stock, $.01 par value, | ||||||||
9.25% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred stock, $.01 par value, | ||||||||
7.80% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred stock, | 38,437 | 38,437 | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, | 283 | 282 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 512,359 | 508,568 | ||||||
Deferred compensation | (2,839 | ) | (852 | ) | ||||
Distributions in excess of earnings | (61,487 | ) | (53,449 | ) | ||||
Accumulated net other comprehensive loss (Note 4) | (4,467 | ) | (4,358 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 482,286 | 488,628 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | 1,509,365 | $ | 1,512,635 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share data)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
REVENUES (Note 8): | ||||||||
Rental income | $ | 48,075 | $ | 42,917 | ||||
Tenant reimbursements | 5,479 | 5,579 | ||||||
Other property income (Note 7) | 1,020 | 4,524 | ||||||
Total revenues | 54,574 | 53,020 | ||||||
EXPENSES (Note 8): | ||||||||
Property expenses | 9,156 | 8,405 | ||||||
Real estate taxes | 4,015 | 3,784 | ||||||
Provision for bad debts | 258 | 421 | ||||||
Ground leases | 330 | 319 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | 7,249 | 3,858 | ||||||
Interest expense | 9,210 | 7,688 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 14,043 | 13,508 | ||||||
Total expenses | 44,261 | 37,983 | ||||||
OTHER INCOME | ||||||||
Interest and other income (Note 7) | 307 | 46 | ||||||
Total other income | 307 | 46 | ||||||
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE MINORITY INTERESTS | 10,620 | 15,083 | ||||||
MINORITY INTERESTS: | ||||||||
Distributions on Cumulative Redeemable Preferred units (Note 5) | (2,521 | ) | (3,375 | ) | ||||
Minority interest in earnings of Operating Partnership attributable to continuing operations | (877 | ) | (1,565 | ) | ||||
Total minority interests | (3,398 | ) | (4,940 | ) | ||||
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | 7,222 | 10,143 | ||||||
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Note 9) | ||||||||
Revenues from discontinued operations | 848 | 1,996 | ||||||
Expenses from discontinued operations | (466 | ) | (1,089 | ) | ||||
Impairment loss on property held for sale | (726 | ) | ||||||
Minority interest in earnings of Operating Partnership attributable to discontinued operations | (109 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||
Total (loss) income from discontinued operations | (453 | ) | 786 | |||||
NET INCOME | 6,769 | 10,929 | ||||||
PREFERRED DIVIDENDS | (785 | ) | ||||||
NET INCOME AVAILABLE FOR COMMON SHAREHOLDERS | $ | 5,984 | $ | 10,929 | ||||
Income from continuing operations per common share—basic (Note 10) | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.37 | ||||
Income from continuing operations per common share—diluted (Note 10) | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.37 | ||||
Net income per common share—basic (Note 10) | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.40 | ||||
Net income per common share—diluted (Note 10) | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.40 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic (Note 10) | 28,116,679 | 27,221,060 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted (Note 10) | 28,303,236 | 27,430,042 | ||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.495 | $ | 0.495 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(unaudited in thousands, except share and per share data)
Common Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | Number of Shares | Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital | Deferred Compensation | Distributions in Excess of Earnings | Accumulated Net Other Comp. Loss | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2003 | $ | 38,437 | 28,209,213 | $ | 282 | $ | 508,568 | $ | (852 | ) | $ | (53,449 | ) | $ | (4,358 | ) | $ | 488,628 | |||||||||||
Net income | 6,769 | 6,769 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive loss | (109 | ) | (109 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 6,660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock (Note 6) | 111,159 | 1 | 3,874 | (2,631 | ) | 1,244 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | 37,858 | 793 | 793 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-cash amortization of restricted stock | 644 | 644 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock (Note 6) | (36,808 | ) | (1,270 | ) | (1,270 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership (Note 5) | 6,450 | 146 | 146 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense | 7 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment for minority interest (Note 1) | 241 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends | (785 | ) | (785 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared ($0.495 per share) | (14,022 | ) | (14,022 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2004 | $ | 38,437 | 28,327,872 | $ | 283 | $ | 512,359 | $ | (2,839 | ) | $ | (61,487 | ) | $ | (4,467 | ) | $ | 482,286 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited, in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 6,769 | $ | 10,929 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities (including discontinued operations): | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of buildings and improvements and leasing costs | 13,986 | 13,705 | ||||||
Impairment loss on property held for sale | 726 | |||||||
Minority interest in earnings of Operating Partnership | 986 | 1,686 | ||||||
Non-cash amortization of restricted stock grants | 899 | 994 | ||||||
Non-cash amortization of deferred financing costs | 809 | 507 | ||||||
Decrease in provision for uncollectible tenant receivables | (23 | ) | (389 | ) | ||||
Increase in provision for uncollectible unbilled deferred rent | 284 | 824 | ||||||
Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment | 226 | 243 | ||||||
Other | 54 | 256 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Current receivables | (1,046 | ) | 642 | |||||
Deferred rent receivables | (2,768 | ) | (1,925 | ) | ||||
Deferred leasing costs | (251 | ) | (350 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (402 | ) | (2,535 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | 178 | (1,313 | ) | |||||
Rents received in advance, tenant security deposits and deferred revenue | (1,572 | ) | (4,876 | ) | ||||
Accrued distributions to Cumulative Redeemable Preferred unitholders | (63 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 18,792 | 18,398 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Expenditures for operating properties | (3,738 | ) | (4,087 | ) | ||||
Expenditures for undeveloped land and construction in progress | (5,759 | ) | (18,747 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (9,497 | ) | (22,834 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Proceeds from borrowings or issuance of secured debt | 115,218 | 9,062 | ||||||
Net (repayments) borrowings on unsecured line of credit | (85,000 | ) | 7,500 | |||||
Principal payments on secured debt | (23,972 | ) | (1,984 | ) | ||||
Distributions paid to common stockholders and common unitholders | (16,020 | ) | (15,670 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of common stock (Note 6) | (1,270 | ) | (1,714 | ) | ||||
Increase in restricted cash | (1,227 | ) | (665 | ) | ||||
Financing costs | (247 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 793 | |||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders | (732 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (12,457 | ) | (3,554 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (3,162 | ) | (7,990 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 9,892 | 15,777 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 6,730 | $ | 7,787 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest of $1,816 and $3,033 | $ | 8,123 | $ | 6,848 | ||||
Distributions paid to Cumulative Redeemable Preferred unitholders | $ | 2,555 | $ | 3,375 | ||||
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS: | ||||||||
Accrual of distributions payable (Note 11) | $ | 16,075 | $ | 15,776 | ||||
Receipt of stock (Note 7) | $ | 494 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
(unaudited)
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
Kilroy Realty Corporation (the “Company”) owns, operates and develops office and industrial real estate, primarily in Southern California. The Company operates as a self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”). As of March 31, 2004, the Company’s stabilized portfolio of operating properties consisted of 81 office buildings (the “Office Properties”) and 50 industrial buildings (the “Industrial Properties”), which encompassed an aggregate of approximately 7.2 million and 4.9 million rentable square feet, respectively, and was 90.9% occupied. The Company’s stabilized portfolio of operating properties consists of all of the Company’s Office Properties and Industrial Properties and excludes properties currently under construction or “lease-up” properties and properties reclassified as held for sale.
The Company defines “lease-up” properties as properties recently developed or redeveloped by the Company that have not yet reached 95% occupancy and are within one year following substantial completion. Lease-up properties are reclassified to land and improvements and building and improvements from construction in progress on the consolidated balance sheets upon building shell completion. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had one development office property encompassing approximately 209,000 rentable square feet and one redevelopment office property encompassing 68,000 rentable square feet, each of which was in the lease-up phase. In addition, as of March 31, 2004, the Company had one redevelopment office property under construction, which when completed is expected to encompass approximately 248,100 rentable square feet. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had one property held for sale encompassing approximately 125,000 rentable square feet.
The Company owns its interests in all of its properties through Kilroy Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) and Kilroy Realty Finance Partnership, L.P. (the “Finance Partnership”) and conducts substantially all of its operations through the Operating Partnership. The Company owned an 87.2% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of March 31, 2004. Kilroy Realty Finance, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is the sole general partner of the Finance Partnership and owns a 1.0% general partnership interest. The Operating Partnership owns the remaining 99.0% limited partnership interest of the Finance Partnership. The Company conducts substantially all of its development services through Kilroy Services, LLC (“KSLLC”) which, as of December 31, 2003, was owned 99.0% by the Operating Partnership and 1% by the Company. On January 1, 2004, KSLLC became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to the Company include the Operating Partnership, the Finance Partnership, KSLLC and all wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the Finance Partnership, KSLLC and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Net income is allocated to the common limited partners of the Operating Partnership (“Minority Interest of the Operating Partnership”) based on their ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership. The common limited partner ownership percentage is determined by dividing the number of common units held by the Minority Interest of the Operating Partnership by the total common units outstanding. The issuance of additional
7
Table of Contents
KILROY REALTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
shares of common stock or common units results in changes to the Minority Interest of the Operating Partnership percentage as well as the total net assets of the Company. As a result, all capital transactions result in an allocation between the stockholders’ equity and Minority Interest of the Operating Partnership in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets to account for the change in the Minority Interest of the Operating Partnership ownership percentage as well as the change in total net assets of the Company.
The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared by the Company’s management in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, the interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying interim financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature which are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period’s presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (“FASB”), issued FASB Staff Position FAS 129-1, “Disclosure Requirements under FASB Statement No. 129, Disclosure of Information about Capital Structure, Relating to Contingently Convertible Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 129-1”). FSP FAS 129-1 provides guidance on disclosures of contingently convertible financial instruments, including those containing contingent conversion requirements that have not been met and are not otherwise required to be included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. The statement was effective immediately, and applies to all existing and newly created securities. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
Stock Option Accounting
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company voluntarily adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) prospectively, for all employee stock option awards granted or settled after January 1, 2002. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, total compensation expense related to stock options is determined using the fair value of the stock options on the date of grant. Total compensation expense is then recognized on a straight-line basis over the option vesting period.
8
Table of Contents
KILROY REALTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Prior to 2002, the Company accounted for stock options issued under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and Related Interpretations.” The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||
Net income available for common shareholders, as reported | $ | 5,984 | $ | 10,929 | ||||
Add: Stock option expense included in reported net income | 7 | 6 | ||||||
Deduct: Total stock option expense determined under fair value recognition method for all awards | (10 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income available for common shareholders | $ | 5,981 | $ | 10,899 | ||||
Net income per common share: | ||||||||
Basic—as reported | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.40 | ||||
Basic—pro forma | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.40 | ||||
Diluted—as reported | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.40 | ||||
Diluted—pro forma | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.40 | ||||
2. Redevelopment Projects
Redevelopment
During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company completed the following redevelopment project, which was in the lease-up phase as of March 31, 2004:
Project Name / Submarket | Pre and Post Redevelopment Property Type | Completion Date | Estimated Stabilization Date(1) | Number of Buildings | Rentable Square Feet | |||||
5717 Pacific Center Blvd. Sorrento Mesa, CA | Office to Life Science | Q1 2004 | Q1 2005 | 1 | 68,000 |
(1) | Based on management’s estimation of the earlier of stabilized occupancy (95%) or one year from the date of substantial completion. |
3. Unsecured Line of Credit and Secured Debt
As of March 31, 2004, the Company had borrowings of $150.0 million outstanding under its revolving unsecured line of credit (the “Credit Facility”) and availability of approximately $147.1 million. The Credit Facility bears interest at an annual rate between LIBOR plus 1.13% and LIBOR plus 1.75% (2.60% at March 31, 2004), depending upon the Company’s leverage ratio at the time of borrowing, and matures in March 2005. The fee for unused funds ranges from an annual rate of 0.20% to 0.35% depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company expects to use the Credit Facility to finance development and redevelopment expenditures, to fund potential acquisitions and for other general corporate uses.
In February 2004, the Company borrowed $81 million under a mortgage loan that is secured by four office properties in a five-building complex and requires interest-only payments based on a variable annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% through July 2004. Beginning in August 2004 and continuing through August 2012, the scheduled maturity date, the loan requires monthly principal and interest payments based on a fixed annual
9
Table of Contents
KILROY REALTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
interest rate of 5.57%. The Company used a portion of the proceeds to repay an outstanding mortgage loan with a principal balance of $20.3 million that was scheduled to mature in June 2004. The remainder of the proceeds was used primarily to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility.
In March 2004, the Company borrowed $34 million under a mortgage loan that is secured by the fifth building in the five-building complex noted above and requires interest-only payments based on a variable annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% through September 2004. Beginning in October 2004 and continuing through August 2012, the scheduled maturity date, the loan requires monthly principal and interest payments based on a fixed annual interest rate of 4.95%. The Company used the proceeds to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility and certain other secured debt arrangements contain covenants requiring the Company to meet certain financial ratios and reporting requirements. Some of the more restrictive financial covenants include a minimum debt service coverage ratio, a maximum total liabilities to total assets ratio, a maximum total secured debt to total assets ratio, a minimum debt service coverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio, a minimum consolidated tangible net worth and a limit of development activities as compared to total assets. The Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants at March 31, 2004.
Total interest and loan fees capitalized for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 were $2.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
4. Derivative Financial Instruments
The following table sets forth the terms and fair market value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments at March 31, 2004:
Type of Instrument | Notional Amount | Index | Strike | Maturity Date | Fair Market Value | |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap | $ | 50,000 | LIBOR | 4.46 | % | January 2005 | $ | (1,315 | ) | |||||
Interest rate swap | 50,000 | LIBOR | 2.57 | November 2005 | (790 | ) | ||||||||
Interest rate swap | 25,000 | LIBOR | 2.98 | December 2006 | (544 | ) | ||||||||
Interest rate swap | 25,000 | LIBOR | 2.98 | December 2006 | (544 | ) | ||||||||
Total included in other liabilities | (3,193 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest rate cap | 50,000 | LIBOR | 4.25 | January 2005 | — | |||||||||
Interest rate cap | 50,000 | LIBOR | 4.25 | January 2005 | — | |||||||||
Total included in deferred financing costs | — | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | (3,193 | ) | |||||||||||
The instruments described above have been designated as cash flow hedges. As of March 31, 2004, the balance in accumulated net other comprehensive loss relating to derivatives was approximately $4.5 million relating to the net decrease in the fair market value of the instruments since their inception. The $1.3 million difference between the total fair value of $3.2 million and the $4.5 million balance in accumulated net other comprehensive loss primarily represents the unamortized balance of the premium the Company paid for the two interest-rate cap agreements at their inception during 2002. The $2.4 million premium is being amortized into earnings over the term of the cap agreements using the caplet value approach. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company did not record any gains or losses attributable to cash flow hedge ineffectiveness since
10
Table of Contents
KILROY REALTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
the terms of the Company’s derivative contracts and debt obligations were and are expected to continue to be effectively matched. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. During the twelve months ending March 31, 2005, the Company estimates that it will reclassify approximately $3.5 million to interest expense.
5. Minority Interests
Minority interests represent the common and preferred limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership. The Company owned an 87.2% and 86.7% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
In March 2004, the Company amended the terms of its Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred units (“Series A Preferred Units”) to reduce the distribution rate, extend the redemption date to September 30, 2009, and create a right of redemption at the option of the holders in the event of certain change of control events, certain repurchases of the Company’s publicly registered equity securities, an involuntary delisting of the Company’s common stock from the NYSE or a loss of REIT status. Commencing March 5, 2004, distributions on the Series A Preferred Units accrued at an annual rate of 7.45%. Prior to March 5, 2004, distributions on the Series A Preferred Units accrued at an annual rate of 8.075%.
During the three months ended March 31, 2004, 6,450 common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership were redeemed for shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis. Neither the Company nor the Operating Partnership received any proceeds from the issuance of the common stock to the common limited partners.
6. Stockholders’ Equity and Employee Incentive Plans
In February 2004, the Company’s Compensation Committee granted an aggregate of 111,159 restricted shares of common stock to certain executive officers and key employees. Compensation expense for the restricted shares is calculated based on the closing per share price of $34.85 on the February 10, 2004 grant date and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the performance and vesting periods. Of the shares granted, 21,234 vest at the end of a one-year period, 68,403 vest in equal annual installments over a two-year period and 21,522 vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period. The Company recorded approximately $0.4 million in compensation expense related to these restricted stock grants during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
The Company has a special long-term compensation program for the Company’s executive officers that was implemented by the Company’s Executive Compensation Committee. The program provides for cash compensation to be earned at the end of a three-year period if the Company attains certain performance measures based on annualized total shareholder returns on an absolute and relative basis. The targets for the relative component require the Company to obtain an annualized total return to stockholders that is at or above the 70th percentile of annualized total return to stockholders achieved by members of a pre-defined peer group during the same three-year period. The amount payable for the absolute component is based upon the amount by which the annualized total return to stockholders over the three-year period exceeds 10%. Amounts paid under the special long-term compensation program are payable at the discretion of the Executive Compensation Committee. Compensation expense under this program is accounted for using variable plan accounting. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company accrued approximately $3.6 million of compensation expense related to this plan.
During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company accepted the return, at the current quoted market price, of 36,808 shares of its common stock from certain key employees in accordance with the provisions of its incentive stock plan to satisfy minimum statutory tax-withholding requirements related to restricted shares that vested during this period.
11
Table of Contents
KILROY REALTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
7. Lease Termination Fee
Under the terms of a previous tenant’s plan of reorganization, the Company received shares of stock in the reorganized company in satisfaction of the Company’s creditor’s claim under the lease. This tenant had previously defaulted on its lease in 2001 and filed for bankruptcy in 2002. The Company recorded a net lease termination fee of approximately $0.5 million in January 2004, representing the fair value of the stock on the date of receipt. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company sold all of the shares, in a series of open market transactions, at an additional net gain of approximately $0.1 million. This gain is included in interest and other income on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.
12
Table of Contents
KILROY REALTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
8. Segment Disclosure
The Company’s reportable segments consist of the two types of commercial real estate properties for which management internally evaluates operating performance and financial results: Office Properties and Industrial Properties. The Company also has certain corporate level activities including legal administration, accounting, finance and management information systems, which are not considered separate operating segments.
The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based upon net operating income. Net operating income is defined as operating revenues (rental income, tenant reimbursements and other property income) less property and related expenses (property expenses, real estate taxes, ground leases and provision for bad debts) and does not include interest and other income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization and corporate general and administrative expenses. There is no intersegment activity.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Office Properties: | ||||||||
Operating revenues(1) | $ | 44,807 | $ | 43,276 | ||||
Property and related expenses | 12,450 | 11,554 | ||||||
Net operating income, as defined | 32,357 | 31,722 | ||||||
Industrial Properties: | ||||||||
Operating revenues(1) | 9,767 | 9,744 | ||||||
Property and related expenses | 1,309 | 1,375 | ||||||
Net operating income, as defined | 8,458 | 8,369 | ||||||
Total Reportable Segments: | ||||||||
Operating revenues(1) | 54,574 | 53,020 | ||||||
Property and related expenses | 13,759 | 12,929 | ||||||
Net operating income, as defined | 40,815 | 40,091 | ||||||
Reconciliation to Consolidated Net Income: | ||||||||
Total net operating income, as defined, for reportable segments | 40,815 | 40,091 | ||||||
Other unallocated revenues: | ||||||||
Interest and other income | 307 | 46 | ||||||
Other unallocated expenses: | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 7,249 | 3,858 | ||||||
Interest expense | 9,210 | 7,688 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 14,043 | 13,508 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations before minority interests | 10,620 | 15,083 | ||||||
Minority interests attributable to continuing operations | (3,398 | ) | (4,940 | ) | ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations | (453 | ) | 786 | |||||
Net income | 6,769 | 10,929 | ||||||
Preferred dividends | (785 | ) | ||||||
Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 5,984 | $ | 10,929 | ||||
(1) | All operating revenues are comprised of amounts received from third party tenants. |
13
Table of Contents
KILROY REALTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
9. Property Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
As of March 31, 2004, the Company classified one of its office properties as held for sale once it became probable that the property would be sold. The Company then recorded a $0.7 million impairment loss to reflect the property on the balance sheet at its estimated fair market value less selling costs. As of March 31, 2004 assets and liabilities attributable to the property held for sale consisted of the following:
(in thousands) | |||
ASSETS: | |||
Property held for sale, net | $ | 18,303 | |
Current receivables, net | 155 | ||
Deferred rent receivables, net | 365 | ||
Deferred leasing costs, net | 68 | ||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 29 | ||
Total assets | 18,920 | ||
LIABILITIES: | |||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | 101 | ||
Rents received in advance, tenant security deposits and deferred revenue | 84 | ||
Total liabilities | $ | 185 | |
In accordance with SFAS 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the net income and the net gain on dispositions of operating properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2001 or classified as held for sale are reflected in the consolidated statement of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. For the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, discontinued operations included the net income and impairment loss of the property held for sale. For the three months ended March 31, 2003, discontinued operations also included the net income of the seven office buildings that the Company sold in 2003. In connection with the disposition of one of the buildings sold in 2003 the Company repaid approximately $8.0 million in principal of a mortgage loan partially secured by one of the properties. The related interest expense was allocated to discontinued operations. The following table summarizes the income and expense components that comprise discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
REVENUES: | ||||||||
Rental income | $ | 801 | $ | 1,823 | ||||
Tenant reimbursements | 47 | 159 | ||||||
Other property income | 14 | |||||||
Total revenues | 848 | 1,996 | ||||||
EXPENSES: | ||||||||
Property expenses | 235 | 429 | ||||||
Real estate taxes | 59 | 150 | ||||||
Provision for bad debts | 3 | 14 | ||||||
Interest expense | 56 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 169 | 440 | ||||||
Total expenses | 466 | 1,089 | ||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before minority interests | 382 | 907 | ||||||
Impairment loss on property held for sale | (726 | ) | ||||||
Minority interest in earnings of Operating Partnership attributable to discontinued operations | (109 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||
Total (loss) income from discontinued operations | $ | (453 | ) | $ | 786 | |||
14
Table of Contents
KILROY REALTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
10. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus the number of common shares issuable assuming the exercise of all dilutive securities. The Company does not consider common units of the Operating Partnership to be dilutive since any issuance of shares of common stock upon the redemption of the common units would be on a one-for-one basis and would not have any effect on diluted earnings per share. The following table reconciles the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted per-share computations for net income.
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) | |||||||
Numerator: | |||||||
Net income from continuing operations before preferred dividends | $ | 7,222 | $ | 10,143 | |||
Discontinued operations | (453 | ) | 786 | ||||
Preferred dividends | (785 | ) | |||||
Net income available for common shareholders—numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share | $ | 5,984 | $ | 10,929 | |||
Denominator: | |||||||
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding | 28,116,679 | 27,221,060 | |||||
Effect of dilutive securities-stock options and restricted stock | 186,557 | 208,982 | |||||
Diluted weighted-average shares and common share equivalents outstanding | 28,303,236 | 27,430,042 | |||||
Basic earnings per share: | |||||||
Net income from continuing operations before preferred dividends | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.37 | |||
Discontinued operations | (0.02 | ) | 0.03 | ||||
Preferred dividends | (0.03 | ) | |||||
Net income available for common shareholders | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.40 | |||
Diluted earnings per share: | |||||||
Net income from continuing operations before preferred dividends | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.37 | |||
Discontinued operations | (0.02 | ) | 0.03 | ||||
Preferred dividends | (0.03 | ) | |||||
Net income available for common shareholders | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.40 | |||
At March 31, 2004, Company employees and directors did not hold any options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock that were antidilutive to the diluted earnings per share computation.
11. Subsequent Events
On April 16, 2004, aggregate distributions of approximately $16.1 million were paid to common stockholders and common unitholders of record on March 31, 2004.
15
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion relates to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Statements contained in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Some of the information presented is forward-looking in nature, including information concerning projected future occupancy rates, rental rate increases, project development timing and investment amounts. Although the information is based on the Company’s current expectations, actual results could vary from expectations stated in this report. Numerous factors will affect the Company’s actual results, some of which are beyond its control. These include the timing and strength of regional economic growth, the strength of commercial and industrial real estate markets, competitive market conditions, future interest rate levels and capital market conditions. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this information, which speaks only as of the date of this report. The Company assumes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent the Company is required to do so in connection with its ongoing requirements under Federal securities laws to disclose material information. For a discussion of important risks related to the Company’s business and an investment in its securities, including risks that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from results and events referred to in the forward-looking information contained in this report, see the discussion under the caption “Business Risks” in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and under the caption “Factors Which May Influence Future Results of Operations” below. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events contained in this report may not occur.
Overview and Background
Kilroy Realty Corporation (the “Company”) owns, operates, and develops office and industrial real estate, primarily in Southern California. The Company operates as a self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”). The Company owns its interests in all of its properties through Kilroy Realty, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) and Kilroy Realty Finance Partnership, L.P. (the “Finance Partnership”) and conducts substantially all of its operations through the Operating Partnership. The Company owned an 87.2% and 86.7% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
As of March 31, 2004, the Company’s stabilized portfolio was comprised of 81 office properties (the “Office Properties”) encompassing an aggregate of approximately 7.2 million rentable square feet, and 50 industrial properties (the “Industrial Properties,” and together with the Office Properties, the “Properties”), encompassing an aggregate of approximately 4.9 million rentable square feet. The Company’s stabilized portfolio of operating properties consists of all the Company’s Properties, and excludes properties classified as held for sale, properties recently developed or redeveloped by the Company that have not yet reached 95.0% occupancy and are within one year following substantial completion (“lease-up” properties) and projects currently under construction.
Factors That May Influence Future Results of Operations
Rental income. The amount of net rental income generated by the Company’s Properties depends principally on its ability to maintain the occupancy rates of currently leased space and to lease currently available space, newly developed or redeveloped properties and space available from unscheduled lease terminations. The amount of rental income generated by the Company also depends on its ability to maintain or increase rental rates in its submarkets. Negative trends in one or more of these factors could adversely affect the Company’s rental income in future periods.
16
Table of Contents
Rental rates. For leases executed during the three months ended March 31, 2004 the change in rental rate was an increase of 6.2% on a GAAP basis, and an increase of 4.9% on a cash basis. The change in rental rate on a cash basis is calculated as the change between the stated rent for a new or renewed lease and the stated rent for the expiring lease for the same space, whereas change in rental rate on a GAAP basis compares the average rents over the term of the lease for each lease. Management believes that the average rental rates for all of its Properties generally are equal to the current average quoted market rates, although individual Properties within any particular submarket presently may be leased above or below the rental rates within that submarket. In April 2004 the Company renewed one lease with The Boeing Company with a decrease in rental rate of 25% on both a GAAP and cash basis. The Company does not believe the change in rents on this deal is indicative of the change in rents the Company will experience on other rollover in this submarket as the expiring lease with the Boeing Company was executed in 1984 when rental rates in the El Segundo submarket were very strong. See additional discussion of The Boeing Company under “Recent information regarding significant tenants.” The Company cannot give any assurance that leases will be renewed or that available space will be re-leased at rental rates equal to or above the current rental rates.
Scheduled lease expirations. In addition to the 1,103,000 square feet of currently available space in the Company’s stabilized portfolio, leases representing approximately 4.2% and 12.1% of the square footage of the Company’s stabilized portfolio are scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2004 and in 2005, respectively. The leases scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2004 and the leases scheduled to expire in 2005 represent approximately 0.8 million square feet of office space, or 9.7% of the Company’s total annualized base rent, and 1.0 million square feet of industrial space, or 4.3% of the Company’s total annualized base rent, respectively. The Company’s ability to release available space depends upon the market conditions in the specific submarkets in which the Properties are located.
Los Angeles County submarket information. There have been modest signs of improvement in market conditions in the Los Angeles County submarket during the last three quarters based on reports of positive absorption and decreased levels of direct vacancy as well as an increased level of interest in leasing opportunities at the Company’s properties. At March 31, 2004, the Company’s Los Angeles stabilized office portfolio was 82.9% occupied with approximately 490,500 rentable square feet available for lease. Further, leases representing an aggregate of approximately 96,600 and 168,400 rentable square feet are scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2004 and in 2005, respectively, in this submarket.
The Los Angeles stabilized portfolio includes two office development projects, encompassing approximately 284,300 rentable square feet, that were previously in the lease-up phase and added to the stabilized portfolio during 2003, since one year had passed following substantial completion. One of the projects is located in West Los Angeles. This project encompasses approximately 151,000 rentable square feet and was 48% occupied as of March 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had executed leases or letters of intent for 87% of the rentable square feet at this project. While leasing activity in the West Los Angeles submarket continues to be irregular, management has seen increased interest at the Company’s projects and continues to make progress leasing the buildings. Overall the Company’s West Los Angeles stabilized office properties were 79% occupied as of March 31, 2004, with approximately 143,000 rentable square feet available for lease.
The other Los Angeles County office project is located in El Segundo. This project encompasses approximately 133,300 rentable square feet and was approximately 5% occupied as of March 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had executed leases or letters of intent for 32% of the rentable square feet at this project. The El Segundo submarket remains the Company’s most significant leasing challenge, although management has recently seen modest signs of improvement. In February 2004, the Company executed a seven-year lease for approximately 29,000 rentable square feet at this development project, which will commence in the second quarter of 2004. Overall the Company’s stabilized El Segundo office properties were 81% occupied as of March 31, 2004, with approximately 169,700 rentable square feet available for lease. In addition, in 2003 the Company began the redevelopment of an office building in El Segundo, encompassing approximately 248,100
17
Table of Contents
rentable square feet which was not pre-leased as of March 31, 2004. The building is located in the same complex as the stabilized development project discussed above. The Company expects to complete the redevelopment of this building in the third quarter of 2004.
San Diego County submarket information. As of March 31, 2004, the Company’s San Diego office portfolio was 93.4% occupied with approximately 200,800 rentable square feet available for lease. At March 31, 2004, the Company had one office development project in lease-up encompassing an aggregate of approximately 209,000 rentable square feet. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had executed leases or letters of intent for 100% of the rentable square feet at this project. Also as of March 31, 2004, leases representing an aggregate of approximately 50,900 and 277,200 rentable square feet were scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2004 and in 2005, respectively, in this submarket. In addition, in 2003, the Company began the redevelopment of one office building in the San Diego region, which was not pre-leased as of March 31, 2004. The Company completed this project, which encompasses approximately 68,000 rentable square feet, in January 2004.
Orange County submarket information. As of March 31, 2004, the Company’s Orange County properties were 95.3% occupied with approximately 215,200 rentable square feet available for lease. As of March 31, 2004, leases representing an aggregate of approximately 217,200 and 576,500 rentable square feet were scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2004 and in 2005, respectively, in this submarket.
Sublease space. Of the Company’s leased space at March 31, 2004, approximately 619,100 rentable square feet, or 5.1% of the square footage in the Company’s stabilized portfolio was available for sublease, of which approximately 4.1% was vacant space and the remaining 1.0% was occupied. Of the approximately 619,100 rentable square feet available for sublease, approximately 69,000 rentable square feet represents leases scheduled to expire during the remainder of 2004 and in 2005.
Negative trends or other events that impair the Company’s ability to renew or release space and its ability to maintain or increase rental rates in its submarkets could have an adverse effect on the Company’s future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Recent information regarding significant tenants
The Boeing Company. As of March 31, 2004, the Company’s largest tenant, The Boeing Company, leased an aggregate of approximately 839,100 rentable square feet of office space under eight separate leases, representing approximately 7.5% of the Company’s total annual base rental revenues. In April 2004, the Boeing Company renewed one lease for a building located in El Segundo, encompassing approximately 286,200 rentable square feet, which was scheduled to expire in July 2004. Under the terms of the amended lease, the rental rate decreased 25% on a cash and GAAP basis and the lease is now scheduled to expire in July 2007. The Boeing Company has also informed the Company that it intends to exercise its option to early terminate another lease in El Segundo, California, encompassing approximately 7,800 rentable square feet in November 2004. The other six leases are scheduled to expire at various dates between August 2005 and March 2009.
Development and redevelopment programs. Management believes that a portion of the Company’s potential growth over the next several years will continue to come from its development pipeline. However, during 2003 and 2002, the Company scaled back its development activity as result of the economic environment and its impact on the Company’s ability to lease projects within budgeted timeframes. As a result, the Company will most likely not be able to sustain historical levels of growth from development in the near future.
As of March 31, 2004, the Company had one office development property in lease-up encompassing an aggregate of approximately 209,000 rentable square feet which was 84% leased and is expected to be added to the stabilized portfolio in the third quarter of 2004. The Company did not have any development projects under construction at March 31, 2004. See additional information regarding the Company’s development portfolio under the caption “Development and Redevelopment” in this report. At March 31, 2004, the Company owned approximately 58.1 acres of undeveloped land upon which the Company currently expects to develop an aggregate of approximately 1.2 million rentable square feet of office space within the next three to five years.
18
Table of Contents
Management believes that another source of the Company’s potential growth over the next several years will come from redevelopment opportunities within its existing portfolio. Redevelopment efforts can achieve similar returns to new development with reduced entitlement risk and shorter construction periods. The Company’s in-process redevelopment portfolio includes two office projects, encompassing approximately 316,100 rentable square feet, which are expected to be added to the stabilized portfolio in the first and third quarters of 2005 and were not pre-leased as of March 31, 2004. This redevelopment portfolio includes one life science conversion project in North San Diego County and another project in which the Company is performing extensive interior refurbishments at an office building in El Segundo that had been occupied by a single tenant for approximately 30 years. See additional information regarding the Company’s in-process redevelopment portfolio under the caption “Development and Redevelopment” in this report. Depending on market conditions, the Company will continue to pursue future redevelopment opportunities in its strategic submarkets where no land available for development exists.
The Company has a proactive planning process by which it continually evaluates the size, timing and scope of its development and redevelopment programs and, as necessary, scales activity to reflect the economic conditions and the real estate fundamentals that exist in the Company’s strategic submarkets. However, the Company may be unable to lease committed development or redevelopment properties at expected rental rates or within projected timeframes or complete projects on schedule or within budgeted amounts, which could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Other Factors. The Company’s operating results are and may continue to be affected by uncertainties and problems associated with the deregulation of the utility industry in California since 94.5% of the total rentable square footage of the Company’s stabilized portfolio is located in California. Energy deregulation has resulted in higher utility costs in some areas of the state and intermittent service interruptions. In addition, primarily as a result of the events of September 11, 2001, the Company’s annual insurance costs increased across its portfolio by approximately 14% during 2002 and approximately 11% during 2003. As of the date of this report, the Company had not experienced any material negative effects arising from either of these issues because approximately 66% (based on net rentable square footage) of the Company’s current leases require tenants to pay utility costs and property insurance premiums directly, thereby limiting the Company’s exposure. The remaining 34% of the Company’s leases provide that the tenants reimburse the Company for these costs in excess of a base year amount.
Although the Company has been able to mitigate the impact of tenant defaults on its financial condition, revenues and results of operations, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows would be adversely affected if any of the Company’s other significant tenants fail to renew their leases, renew their leases on terms less favorable to the Company or if any of them become bankrupt or insolvent or otherwise unable to satisfy their lease obligations.
Incentive Compensation. The Company has long-term incentive compensation programs that provide for cash and stock compensation to be earned by the Company’s executive officers if the Company attains certain performance measures that are based on annualized shareholder returns on an absolute and a relative basis as well as certain other financial, operating and development targets. As a result, accrued incentive compensation in future periods is affected by the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock at the end of each quarter. Potential future increases in the price per share of the Company’s common stock and the resultant cumulative annualized shareholder return calculations will cause an increase to general and administrative expenses and a corresponding decrease to net income available to common shareholders. Management cannot predict the amounts that will be ultimately recorded in future periods related to these plans since they are significantly influenced by the Company’s stock price and market conditions.
19
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table reconciles the changes in the rentable square feet in the Company’s stabilized portfolio of operating properties from March 31, 2003 to March 31, 2004. Rentable square footage in the Company’s portfolio of stabilized properties increased by an aggregate of approximately 0.2 million rentable square feet, or 2.1%, to 12.1 million rentable square feet at March 31, 2004, compared to 11.9 million rentable square feet at March 31, 2003 as a result of the development and redevelopment projects completed and added to the Company’s stabilized portfolio of operating properties subsequent to March 31, 2003 net of the properties sold subsequent to March 31, 2003.
As of March 31, 2004, the Office and Industrial Properties represented 81.3% and 18.7%, respectively, of the Company’s annualized base rent. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, average occupancy in the Company’s stabilized portfolio was 90.8% compared to 92.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2003. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had approximately 1,103,000 square feet of space in its stabilized portfolio available for lease compared to 928,000 square feet as of March 31, 2003.
Office Properties | Industrial Properties | Total | |||||||||||||||
Number of Buildings | Square Feet | Number of Buildings | Square Feet | Number of Buildings | Square Feet | ||||||||||||
Total at March 31, 2003 | 84 | 7,055,061 | 50 | 4,880,963 | 134 | 11,936,024 | |||||||||||
Properties added from the Development and Redevelopment Portfolio | 5 | 555,508 | 5 | 555,508 | |||||||||||||
Dispositions and property reclassified as held for sale(1) | (8 | ) | (416,428 | ) | (8 | ) | (416,428 | ) | |||||||||
Remeasurement | (10,578 | ) | (2,360 | ) | (12,938 | ) | |||||||||||
Total at March 31, 2004 | 81 | 7,183,563 | 50 | 4,878,603 | 131 | 12,062,166 | |||||||||||
(1) | The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”) on January 1, 2002. In accordance with the implementation provisions of SFAS 144, the operating results and gains or (losses) on property sales of real estate assets sold subsequent to December 31, 2001 are included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations. The Rental Operations discussion for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 does not include operating results for properties reclassified as held for sale or disposed of subsequent to December 31, 2001. |
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2003
Management internally evaluates the operating performance and financial results of its portfolio based on Net Operating Income for the following segments of commercial real estate property: Office Properties and Industrial Properties. The Company defines Net Operating Income as operating revenues from continuing operations (rental income, tenant reimbursements and other property income) less property and related expenses from continuing operations (property expenses, real estate taxes, provision for bad debts and ground leases). The Net Operating Income segment information presented within this Management’s Discussion and Analysis consists of the same Net Operating Income segment information disclosed in Note 8 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” The following table reconciles the Company’s Net Operating Income by segment to the Company’s net income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003.
20
Table of Contents
Three Months March 31, | Dollar Change | Percentage Change | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Net Operating Income, as Defined: | |||||||||||||||
Office Properties | $ | 32,357 | $ | 31,722 | $ | 635 | 2.0 | % | |||||||
Industrial Properties | 8,458 | 8,369 | 89 | 1.1 | |||||||||||
Total portfolio | 40,815 | 40,091 | 724 | 1.8 | |||||||||||
Reconciliation to Consolidated Net Income: | |||||||||||||||
Net Operating Income, as defined for reportable segments | 40,815 | 40,091 | 724 | 1.8 | |||||||||||
Other expenses: | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 7,249 | 3,858 | 3,391 | 87.9 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | 9,210 | 7,688 | 1,522 | 19.8 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 14,043 | 13,508 | 535 | 4.0 | |||||||||||
Interest and other income | 307 | 46 | 261 | 567.4 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before minority interest | 10,328 | 15,083 | (4,463 | ) | (29.6 | ) | |||||||||
Minority interests attributable to continuing operations | (3,398 | ) | (4,940 | ) | 1,542 | (31.2 | ) | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations | (453 | ) | 786 | (1,239 | ) | (157.6 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | 6,769 | 10,929 | (4,160 | ) | (38.1 | ) | |||||||||
Preferred dividends | (785 | ) | (785 | ) | (100.0 | ) | |||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 5,984 | $ | 10,929 | $ | (4,642 | ) | (42.5 | )% | ||||||
Rental Operations
Management evaluates the operations of its portfolio based on operating property type. The following tables compare the net operating income for the Office Properties and for the Industrial Properties for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003.
Office Properties
Total Office Portfolio | Core Office Portfolio(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Dollar Change | Percentage Change | 2004 | 2003 | Dollar Change | Percentage Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 39,776 | $ | 34,304 | $ | 5,472 | 16.0 | % | $ | 35,521 | $ | 33,225 | $ | 2,296 | 6.9 | % | |||||||||
Tenant reimbursements | 4,499 | 4,551 | (52 | ) | (1.1 | ) | 4,472 | 3,971 | 501 | 12.6 | |||||||||||||||
Other property income | 532 | 4,421 | (3,889 | ) | (88.0 | ) | 530 | 157 | 373 | 237.6 | |||||||||||||||
Total | 44,807 | 43,276 | 1,531 | 3.5 | 40,523 | 37,353 | 3,170 | 8.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Property and related expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property expenses | 8,610 | 7,934 | 676 | 8.5 | 7,808 | 7,363 | 445 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes | 3,246 | 2,998 | 248 | 8.3 | 2,883 | 2,882 | 1 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts | 264 | 303 | (39 | ) | (12.9 | ) | 145 | 33 | 112 | 339.4 | |||||||||||||||
Ground leases | 330 | 319 | 11 | 3.4 | 330 | 309 | 21 | 6.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 12,450 | 11,554 | 896 | 7.8 | 11,166 | 10,587 | 579 | 5.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Net operating income, as defined | $ | 32,357 | $ | 31,722 | $ | 635 | 2.0 | % | $ | 29,357 | $ | 26,766 | $ | 2,591 | 9.7 | % | |||||||||
(1) | Office properties owned and stabilized at January 1, 2003 and still owned and stabilized at March 31, 2004. |
21
Table of Contents
Total revenues from Office Properties increased $1.5 million, or 3.5%, to $44.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $43.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Rental income from Office Properties increased $5.5 million, or 16.0% to $39.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $34.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Rental income generated by the Core Office Portfolio increased $2.3 million, or 6.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003. This increase is primarily due to an increase in occupancy in this portfolio. Average occupancy in the Core Office Portfolio increased 3.0% to 91.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to 88.6% for the same period in 2003. The remaining $3.2 million increase was attributable to a $3.7 million increase in rental income generated by the office properties developed by the Company in 2003 and 2004 (the “Office Development Properties”) which was offset by a decrease of $0.5 million attributable to the office properties that were taken out of service and moved from the Company’s stabilized portfolio to the redevelopment portfolio during the first quarter of 2003 (the “Office Redevelopment Properties”).
Tenant reimbursements from Office Properties decreased $0.1 million, or 1.1% to $4.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. An increase of $0.5 million in the Core Office Portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003 was offset by a decrease of $0.6 million attributable to the Office Redevelopment Properties. The increase from the Core Office Portfolio is primarily attributable to the reimbursement of prior year supplemental property taxes. Other property income from Office Properties decreased approximately $3.9 million to $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $4.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. During the three months ended March 31, 2003 the Company recognized a $4.3 million lease termination fee resulting from the termination of a lease at a building in San Diego, California. Other property income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 consisted primarily of lease termination fees and tenant late charges.
Total expenses from Office Properties increased $0.9 million, or 7.8% to $12.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $11.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Property expenses from Office Properties increased $0.7 million, or 8.5% to $8.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $7.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. An increase of $0.4 million, or 6.0%, was generated by the Core Office Portfolio. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in contracted janitorial services, insurance and wages. An increase of $0.5 million in property expenses was attributable to the Office Development Properties, which was primarily due to an increase in variable expenses related to leasing activity in this portfolio. This $0.9 million increase from the Core Office Portfolio and Office Development Properties was offset by a decrease of $0.2 million attributable to the Office Redevelopment Properties. Real estate taxes increased $0.3 million, or 8.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003. Real estate taxes for the Core Office Portfolio remained consistent at $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003. The increase in real estate taxes was attributable to the Office Development Properties. The provision for bad debts remained fairly consistent for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003. The Company evaluates its reserves on a quarterly basis. Ground lease expense for Office Properties remained consistent for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003.
Net operating income, as defined, from Office Properties increased $0.6 million, or 2.0% to $32.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $31.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Of this increase, $2.6 million was generated by the Core Office Portfolio and $2.7 million was generated by the Office Development Portfolio, offset by a decrease of $4.7 million attributable to the Office Redevelopment Properties.
22
Table of Contents
Industrial Properties
Total Industrial Portfolio(1) | ||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Dollar Change | Percentage Change | |||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Operating revenues: | ||||||||||||||
Rental income | $ | 8,299 | $ | 8,613 | $ | (314 | ) | (3.6 | )% | |||||
Tenant reimbursements | 980 | 1,028 | (48 | ) | (4.7 | ) | ||||||||
Other property income | 488 | 103 | 385 | 373.8 | ||||||||||
Total | 9,767 | 9,744 | 23 | 0.2 | ||||||||||
Property and related expenses: | ||||||||||||||
Property expenses | 546 | 471 | 75 | 15.9 | ||||||||||
Real estate taxes | 769 | 786 | (17 | ) | (2.2 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for bad debts | (6 | ) | 118 | (124 | ) | (105.1 | ) | |||||||
Total | 1,309 | 1,375 | (66 | ) | (4.8 | ) | ||||||||
Net operating income, as defined | $ | 8,458 | $ | 8,369 | $ | 89 | 1.1 | % | ||||||
(1) | The Total Industrial Portfolio is equivalent to the Company’s Core Industrial Portfolio at March 31, 2004 which represents properties owned and stabilized at January 1, 2003 and still owned and stabilized at March 31, 2004. |
Total revenues from Industrial Properties remained consistent at $9.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003. Rental income from Industrial Properties decreased $0.3 million, or 3.6% to $8.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to the $8.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. This decrease was primarily due to a decline in occupancy in the industrial portfolio. Average occupancy in the industrial portfolio decreased 3.5% to 94.2% at March 31, 2004 as compared to 97.7% at March 31, 2003.
Tenant reimbursements from Industrial Properties remained consistent during the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003. Other property income from Industrial Properties increased $0.4 million, or 373.8% to $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. This increase is primarily attributable to a $0.5 million lease termination fee the Company recorded in 2004 resulting from an early lease termination at a building in El Segundo.
Total expenses from Industrial Properties decreased $0.1 million, or 4.8% to $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Property expenses from Industrial Properties increased $0.1 million, or 15.9% to $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to repairs and maintenance expenses. Real estate taxes for the Industrial Properties remained consistent at approximately $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003. The provision for bad debts decreased $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003. During the three months ended March 31, 2004 the Company’s reserve requirement decreased due to the collection of outstanding receivables. The Company evaluates its reserve levels on a quarterly basis.
Net operating income, as defined, from Industrial Properties increased $0.1 million, or 1.1% to $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $8.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003.
Non-Property Related Income and Expenses
Interest and other income increased approximately $0.3 million, or 567.4% to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $46,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. This increase
23
Table of Contents
was partially due to a $0.1 million net realized gain from the sale of stock that the Company received in satisfaction of a creditor’s claim under a lease that was terminated early. (See Note 7 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.) Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company recorded $0.1 million in non-recurring interest income in connection with a reimbursement of prior year supplemental property taxes.
General and administrative expenses increased $3.4 million, or 87.9%, to $7.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. This increase was primarily due to an increase in accrued incentive compensation and was driven by a special long-term incentive plan for the Company’s executives for which the amount payable under the plan is based on the Company’s absolute and relative shareholder returns. (See note 6 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for further discussion about the program.) The plan is accounted for using variable plan accounting, which requires the Company to record the cumulative charge to the income statement based on the closing share price for the period. The quoted share price of the Company’s common stock reached its highest quarter-end closing price at March 31, 2004. The total compensation expense related to this award will be recorded over the three-year performance period and will be paid out if the specified performance measures are attained at the end of this period in December 2005. The amounts recorded in future periods related to this plan will increase and decrease as the Company’s closing quarterly stock price increases and decreases.
Net interest expense increased $1.5 million, or 19.8% to $9.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $7.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Gross interest and loan fee expense, before the effect of capitalized interest and loan fees, remained relatively consistent at $11.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as compared to $11.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Total capitalized interest and loan fees decreased $1.3 million, or 39.6% to $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, due to lower average balances eligible for capitalization during the three months ended March 31, 2004 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003.
Depreciation and amortization increased $0.5 million, or 4.0% to $14.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $13.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The increase was attributable primarily to the Office Development Properties partially offset by a decrease attributable to the Office Redevelopment Properties taken out of service in 2003.
Building and Lease Information
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the Company’s Office Properties and Industrial Properties at March 31, 2004:
Occupancy by Segment Type
Number of Buildings | Total Square Feet | Occupancy | |||||
Office Properties: | |||||||
Los Angeles | 26 | 2,873,060 | 82.9 | % | |||
Orange County | 7 | 387,327 | 91.0 | ||||
San Diego | 40 | 3,044,216 | 93.4 | ||||
Other | 8 | 878,960 | 90.5 | ||||
Total Office | 81 | 7,183,563 | 88.7 | ||||
Industrial Properties: | |||||||
Los Angeles | 4 | 388,805 | 70.7 | ||||
Orange County | 44 | 4,194,381 | 95.7 | ||||
Other | 2 | 295,417 | 100.0 | ||||
Total Industrial | 50 | 4,878,603 | 94.0 | ||||
Total Portfolio | 131 | 12,062,166 | 90.9 | % | |||
24
Table of Contents
Lease Expirations by Segment Type
Year of Lease Expiration | Number of Expiring Leases(1) | Total Square Footage of Expiring Leases | Percentage of Total Leased Square Feet Represented by Expiring Leases(2) | Annual Base Leases | ||||||
Office Properties: | ||||||||||
Remaining 2004(4) | 31 | 160,759 | 2.6 | % | $ | 4,330 | ||||
2005 | 57 | 628,735 | 10.0 | 12,670 | ||||||
2006 | 56 | 698,073 | 11.1 | 15,690 | ||||||
2007 | 52 | 1,145,962 | 18.2 | 20,556 | ||||||
2008 | 41 | 1,029,004 | 16.3 | 21,555 | ||||||
2009 | 29 | 888,083 | 14.1 | 19,721 | ||||||
Total Office | 266 | 4,550,616 | 72.3 | 94,518 | ||||||
Industrial Properties: | ||||||||||
Remaining 2004(4) | 8 | 291,776 | 6.4 | 1,950 | ||||||
2005 | 14 | 693,060 | 15.1 | 5,612 | ||||||
2006 | 15 | 582,629 | 12.7 | 4,193 | ||||||
2007 | 12 | 578,591 | 12.6 | 4,001 | ||||||
2008 | 9 | 1,021,388 | 22.3 | 6,977 | ||||||
2009 | 10 | 663,890 | 14.5 | 4,160 | ||||||
Total Industrial | 68 | 3,831,334 | 83.6 | 26,893 | ||||||
Total | 334 | 8,381,950 | 77.0 | % | $ | 121,411 | ||||
(1) | Represents the total number of tenants. Some tenants have multiple leases. Excludes leases for amenity, retail, parking and month-to-month tenants. |
(2) | Based on total leased square footage for the respective portfolios as of March 31, 2004. |
(3) | Determined based on monthly GAAP rent at March 31, 2004, multiplied by 12, including all leases executed on or before March 31, 2004. |
(4) | Represents leases expiring in 2004 that have not been renewed as of March 31, 2004. |
Leasing Activity by Segment Type
Number of Leases(1) | Rentable Square Feet(1) | Change in Rents(2) | Change in Cash Rents(3) | Retention Rates(4) | Weighted Average Lease Term (in months) | ||||||||||||||
New | Renewal | New | Renewal | ||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004: | |||||||||||||||||||
Office Properties | 15 | 9 | 118,739 | 51,997 | 10.5 | % | 10.6 | % | 59.7 | % | 58 | ||||||||
Industrial Properties | 1 | 3 | 4,000 | 84,900 | (3.8 | )% | (10.3 | )% | 76.8 | % | 34 | ||||||||
Total | 16 | 12 | 122,739 | 136,897 | 6.2 | % | 4.9 | % | 69.2 | % | 50 | ||||||||
(1) | Represents leasing activity for leases commencing during the period shown, including first and second generation space net of month-to-month leases. Excludes leasing on new construction. |
(2) | Calculated as the change between GAAP rents for new/renewed leases and the expiring GAAP rents for the same space. |
(3) | Calculated as the change between stated rents for new/renewed leases and the expiring stated rents for the same space. The change in cash rents for two of the leases that commenced during the quarter was calculated using the leases’ stabilized stated rent. The starting stated rents for these two leases was discounted for the first six months. |
(4) | Calculated as the percentage of space either renewed or newly leased by existing tenants at lease expiration. |
25
Table of Contents
Development and Redevelopment
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the Company’s lease-up and in-process office development and redevelopment projects as of March 31, 2004. See further discussion regarding the Company’s projected development and redevelopment trends under the caption “Factors Which May Influence Future Results of Operations—Development and redevelopment programs.”
Development Projects
Project Name/ Submarket | Completion Date | Estimated Stabilization Date(1) | Projected | Total Costs as of March 31, 2004 | Percentage as of | ||||||||||
Square Feet Upon Completion | Total Estimated Investment(2) | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Projects in Lease-Up: | |||||||||||||||
12400 High Bluff | 3rd Qtr 2003 | 3rd Qtr 2004 | 208,961 | $ | 62,495 | $ | 58,859 | 100 | % |
(1) | Based on management’s estimation of the earlier of stabilized occupancy (95.0%) or one year from the date of substantial completion. |
(2) | Represents total projected development costs at March 31, 2004. |
(3) | Percentage committed includes executed leases and letters of intent, calculated on a square footage basis. |
Redevelopment Projects
Project Name/Submarket | Pre and Post Redevelop- ment Type | Estimated Completion Date | Estimated Stabilization Date(1) | Square Feet Upon completion | Existing Invest- ment(2) | Estimated Redevel- opment Costs | Total Estimated. Investment | Total Costs as of March 31, 2004 | Percent Committed(3) as of Mar. 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Projects in Lease-Up: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5717 Pacific Centre Blvd. | Office to Life Science | 1st Qtr 2004 | 1st Qtr 2005 | 67,995 | $ | 8,790 | $ | 10,010 | $ | 19,204 | $ | 10,395 | — | ||||||||||
Projects Under Construction: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
909 Sepulveda Blvd. | Office | 3rd Qtr 2004 | 3rd Qtr 2005 | 248,148 | 37,799 | 25,944 | 65,026 | 46,671 | 18 | % | |||||||||||||
Total Redevelopment Projects | 316,143 | $ | 46,589 | $ | 35,954 | $ | 84,230 | $ | 57,066 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | Based on management’s estimation of the earlier of stabilized occupancy (95.0%) or one year from the date of substantial completion. |
(2) | Represents total capitalized costs at the commencement of redevelopment. |
(3) | Percentage committed includes executed leases and letters of intent, calculated on a square footage basis. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Current Sources of Capital and Liquidity
The Company seeks to create and maintain a capital structure that allows for financial flexibility and diversification of capital resources. The Company’s primary source of liquidity to fund distributions, debt service, leasing costs and capital expenditures is net cash from operations. The Company’s primary sources of liquidity to fund development and redevelopment costs, potential undeveloped land and property acquisitions, temporary working capital and unanticipated cash needs are the Company’s $425 million unsecured revolving line of credit, proceeds received from the Company’s disposition program and construction loans. As of March 31, 2004, the Company’s total debt as a percentage of total market capitalization (presented below) was 37.0%. As of March 31, 2004, the Company’s total debt plus preferred equity as a percentage of total market capitalization was 44.7%.
As of March 31, 2004, the Company had borrowings of $150.0 million outstanding under its unsecured revolving line of credit (the “Credit Facility”) and availability of approximately $147.1 million. The Credit
26
Table of Contents
Facility bears interest at an annual rate between LIBOR plus 1.13% and LIBOR plus 1.75% (2.60% at March 31, 2004), depending upon the Company’s leverage ratio at the time of borrowing, and matures in March 2005. The fee for unused funds ranges from an annual rate of 0.20% to 0.35% depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company expects to use the Credit Facility to finance development and redevelopment expenditures, to fund potential acquisitions and for other general corporate uses.
Factors That May Influence Future Sources of Capital and Liquidity
The Company has a fixed-rate mortgage loan with a principal balance of $74.4 million as of March 31, 2004. After January 2005, this mortgage loan is subject to increases in the effective annual interest rate to the greater of 10.35% or the sum of the interest rate for U.S. Treasury Securities maturing 15 years from the reset date plus 2.00%. The contractual maturity date of this loan is February 2022, however the Company intends to refinance the debt in the second half of 2004 without any prepayment penalty. The Company has restricted cash balances, which totaled an aggregate of $9.2 million as of March 31, 2004, that are held as credit enhancements and as reserves for property taxes, capital expenditures and capital improvements in connection with this loan. When the Company repays the loan, the restricted balances that are outstanding at that time will become available as unrestricted funds to the Company.
In 2003 and 2002, the Company used proceeds from dispositions of operating properties of approximately $34.1 million and $46.5 million, respectively, to fund a portion of its development and redevelopment activities and its share repurchase program. The Company currently expects that it could dispose of approximately $20 million to $50 million of non-strategic assets in 2004; however management is also evaluating other financing sources to fund its development and redevelopment activities.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s aggregate debt composition at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003:
Percentage of Total Debt | Weighted-Average Interest Rate | |||||||||||
March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||
Secured vs. unsecured: | ||||||||||||
Secured | 80.5 | % | 69.1 | % | 5.8 | % | 5.8 | % | ||||
Unsecured | 19.5 | % | 30.9 | % | 4.8 | % | 4.2 | % | ||||
Fixed rate vs. variable rate: | ||||||||||||
Fixed rate(1)(2)(3)(5) | 86.5 | % | 72.6 | % | 6.1 | % | 6.3 | % | ||||
Variable rate(4) | 13.5 | % | 27.4 | % | 2.7 | % | 2.8 | % | ||||
Total Debt | 5.6 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||||||
Total Debt Including Loan Fees | 6.2 | % | 5.9 | % |
(1) | At March 31, 2004, the Company had an interest-rate swap agreement, which expires in January 2005, to fix LIBOR on $50 million of its variable rate debt at 4.46%. |
(2) | At March 31, 2004, the Company had an interest-rate swap agreement, which expires in November 2005, to fix LIBOR on $50 million of its variable rate debt at 2.57%. |
(3) | At March 31, 2004, the Company had two interest-rate swap agreements, which expire in December 2006, to fix LIBOR on $50 million of its variable rate debt at 2.98%. |
(4) | At March 31, 2004, the Company had two interest-rate cap agreements, which expire in January 2005, to cap LIBOR on $100 million of its variable rate debt at 4.25%. |
(5) | As of March 31, 2004, the fixed rate debt includes the Company’s $81.0 million and $34.0 million secured loans that require monthly interest-only payments based on a variable annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 175 basis points through July 2004 and September 2004, respectively. The weighted average interest for the Company’s fixed rate debt was calculated using the respective fixed annual interest rates of 5.57% and 4.95% for these loans that are effective in August 2004 and October 2004. |
27
Table of Contents
Following is the Company’s total market capitalization as of March 31, 2004:
Shares/Units at March 31, 2004 | Aggregate Principal Amount or $ Value Equivalent | % of Total Market Capitalization | ||||||
Debt: | ||||||||
Secured debt | $ | 617,294 | 29.8 | % | ||||
Unsecured line of credit | 150,000 | 7.2 | ||||||
Total debt | $ | 767,294 | 37.0 | |||||
Equity: | ||||||||
7.450% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units(1) | 1,500,000 | $ | 75,000 | 3.6 | ||||
9.250% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units(1) | 900,000 | 45,000 | 2.2 | |||||
7.800% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock(2) | 1,610,000 | 40,250 | 1.9 | |||||
Common units outstanding(3) | 4,147,863 | 147,249 | 7.1 | |||||
Common shares outstanding(3) | 28,327,872 | 1,005,640 | 48.2 | |||||
Total equity | $ | 1,313,139 | 63.0 | |||||
Total Market Capitalization | $ | 2,080,433 | 100.0 | % | ||||
(1) | Value based on $50.00 per share liquidation preference. |
(2) | Value based on $25.00 per share liquidation preference. |
(3) | Value based on closing share price of $35.50 at March 31, 2004. |
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides information with respect to the maturities and scheduled principal repayments of the Company’s secured debt and Credit Facility and scheduled interest payments of the Company’s fixed-rate debt and interest-rate swap agreements at March 31, 2004 and provides information about the minimum commitments due in connection with the Company’s ground lease obligations and capital commitments at March 31, 2004. The table does not reflect available maturity extension options.
Payment Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Remainder of 2004 | 2005-2006 | 2007-2008 | After 2008 | Total | |||||||||||
Principal payments—secured debt | $ | 51,832 | $ | 163,402 | $ | 114,970 | $ | 287,090 | $ | 617,294 | |||||
Principal payments—Credit Facility | 150,000 | 150,000 | |||||||||||||
Interest payments—fixed-rate debt(1)(2)(3) | 21,673 | 50,963 | 44,291 | 48,056 | 164,983 | ||||||||||
Interest payments—interest-rate swaps(1)(4) | 3,824 | 2,987 | 6,811 | ||||||||||||
Ground lease obligations(5) | 1,400 | 3,177 | 3,184 | 75,427 | 83,188 | ||||||||||
Capital commitments(6) | 17,036 | 17,036 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 95,765 | $ | 370,529 | $ | 162,445 | $ | 410,573 | $ | 1,039,312 | |||||
(1) | As of March 31, 2004, 86.5% of the Company’s debt was contractually fixed or constructively fixed through interest-rate swap agreements. The information in the table above reflects the Company’s projected interest rate obligations for these fixed-rate payments based on the contractual interest rates, interest payment dates and scheduled maturity dates. The remaining 13.5% of the Company’s debt bears interest at variable rates and the variable interest rate payments are based on LIBOR plus a spread that ranges from 1.40% to 1.75%. Management cannot reasonably determine the future interest obligations on its variable-rate debt as management cannot predict what LIBOR rates will be in the future. As of March 31, 2004, one-month LIBOR was 1.09%. |
(2) | This table reflects the scheduled interest payments for the Company’s $81.0 million and $34.0 million secured fixed-rate loans beginning in August 2004 and October 2004. Prior to this time these loans require monthly interest-only payments based on a variable annual interest rate of LIBOR plus 175 basis points. |
(3) | The Company has a fixed-rate mortgage with a principal balance of $74.4 million as of March 31, 2004 that it intends to refinance in the second half of 2004. This schedule includes the scheduled interest payments for this loan through January 2005 and does not reflect this potential prepayment. For further discussion on this loan see “Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Factors That May Influence Future Sources of Capital and Liquidity.” |
28
Table of Contents
(4) | Represents the scheduled interest payments for the Company’s total outstanding interest-rate swap agreements as of March 31, 2004, based on the contractual interest rates, interest payment dates and maturity dates. The interest payments are reported at the gross amount and do not reflect the offsetting variable payment to be received from the counterparty. The Company employs derivative instruments for hedging purposes only and does not hold interest-rate swaps for speculative purposes. These cash flow hedges effectively convert a portion of the Company’s variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. The Company had interest-rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $150 million as of March 31, 2004. |
(5) | The Company has noncancelable ground lease obligations for the SeaTac Office Center in Seattle, Washington expiring in December 2032, with an option to extend the lease for an additional 30 years; and Kilroy Airport Center in Long Beach, California with a lease period for Phases I, II, III and IV expiring in July 2084. |
(6) | See discussion under “Capital Commitments.” |
The Credit Facility and certain other secured debt agreements contain covenants and restrictions requiring the Company to meet certain financial ratios and reporting requirements. Some of the more restrictive covenants include minimum debt service coverage ratios, a maximum total liabilities to total assets ratio, a maximum total secured debt to total assets ratio, minimum debt service coverage and fixed charge coverage ratios, a minimum consolidated tangible net worth and a limit of development activities as compared to total assets. Non-compliance with one or more of the covenants and restrictions could result in the full or partial principal balance of the associated debt becoming immediately due and payable. The Company was in compliance with all its covenants at March 31, 2004. In addition, the Company’s construction loan, which is due September 2004, has a limited recourse provision that holds the Company liable up to approximately $14.3 million plus any unpaid accrued interest.
Capital Commitments
As of March 31, 2004, the Company had one development project and two redevelopment projects that were either in lease-up or under construction. These projects have a total estimated investment of approximately $147 million. The Company has incurred an aggregate of approximately $116 million on these projects as of March 31, 2004, and currently projects it could spend approximately $25 million of the remaining $31 million of presently budgeted development costs during 2004, depending on leasing activity. In addition, the Company had two development projects and one redevelopment project that were added to the Company’s stabilized portfolio of operating properties in the second and third quarters of 2003, which had not yet reached stabilized occupancy as of March 31, 2004. Depending on leasing activity, the Company currently projects it could spend approximately $7 million for these projects during 2004. The Company also estimates it could spend an additional $8 million on other development projects in 2004, depending upon market conditions. See additional information regarding the Company’s in-process development and redevelopment portfolio under the caption “Development and Redevelopment Programs” in this report.
As of March 31, 2004, the Company had executed leases that committed the Company to $15 million in unpaid leasing costs and tenant improvements and the Company had contracts outstanding for approximately $2 million in capital improvements at March 31, 2004. In addition, during the remainder of 2004, the Company plans to spend approximately $15 million to $16 million in capital improvements, tenant improvements, and leasing costs for properties within the Company’s stabilized portfolio, depending on leasing activity. Capital expenditures may fluctuate in any given period subject to the nature, extent and timing of improvements required to maintain the Company’s properties. Tenant improvements and leasing costs may also fluctuate in any given period depending upon factors such as the type of property, the term of the lease, the type of lease, the involvement of external leasing agents and overall market conditions.
Other Liquidity Needs
The Company is required to distribute 90% of its REIT taxable income (excluding capital gains) on an annual basis in order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Company intends to continue to make, but has not contractually bound itself to make, regular quarterly distributions to common stockholders and common unitholders from cash flow from operating activities. All distributions are at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company may be required to use borrowings under the Credit Facility, if necessary, to meet REIT distribution requirements and maintain its REIT status. The Company has historically distributed amounts in excess of its taxable income resulting in a return of capital to its stockholders,
29
Table of Contents
and currently has the ability to not increase its distributions to meet its REIT requirements for 2004. The Company considers market factors and Company performance in addition to REIT requirements in determining its distribution levels. Amounts accumulated for distribution to shareholders are invested primarily in interest-bearing accounts and short-term interest-bearing securities, which are consistent with the Company’s intention to maintain its qualification as a REIT. Such investments may include, for example, obligations of the Government National Mortgage Association, other governmental agency securities, certificates of deposit and interest-bearing bank deposits. On February 10, 2004, the Company declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.495 per common share payable on April 16, 2004 to stockholders of record on March 31, 2004. This dividend is equivalent to an annual rate of $1.98 per share. In addition the Company is required to make quarterly distributions to its Series A and Series D Preferred unitholders and Series E Preferred Stockholders, which in aggregate total approximately $13 million of annualized preferred dividends and distributions.
The Company’s Board of Directors has approved a share repurchase program, pursuant to which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to an aggregate of four million shares of its outstanding common stock. An aggregate of 1,227,500 shares currently remain eligible for repurchase under this program. The Company may opt to repurchase shares of its common stock in the future depending upon market conditions.
The Company believes that it will have sufficient capital resources to satisfy its liquidity needs over the remainder of 2004. The Company estimates it will have a range of approximately $271 million to $307 million of available sources to meet its short-term cash needs as follows: estimated availability of approximately $147 million under its Credit Facility, estimated operating cash flow ranging from $95 million to $101 million, anticipated proceeds from dispositions of non-strategic assets ranging from approximately $20 million to $50 million, and approximately $9 million from the release of restricted cash during 2004. The Company estimates it will have a range of approximately $174 million to $183 million of commitments and capital expenditures during the remainder of 2004 comprised of the following: $52 million in scheduled secured debt principal repayments; planned expenditures for in-process development, stabilized development and new development projects ranging from $32 million to $40 million; $17 million of committed costs for executed leases and capital expenditures; and budgeted capital improvements, tenant improvements and leasing costs for the Company’s stabilized portfolio ranging from approximately $15 million to $16 million, depending on leasing activity. In addition, based on the Company’s annualized dividends for the first quarter of 2004, the Company may distribute approximately $58 million to common and preferred stockholders and common and preferred unitholders during the remainder of 2004. There can be, however, no assurance that the Company will not exceed these estimated expenditure and distribution levels or be able to obtain additional sources of financing on commercially favorable terms, or at all.
The Company expects to meet its long-term liquidity requirements, which may include property and undeveloped land acquisitions and additional future development and redevelopment activity, through retained cash flow, borrowings under the Credit Facility, additional long-term secured and unsecured borrowings, dispositions of non-strategic assets, issuance of common or preferred units of the Operating Partnership, and the potential issuance of debt or equity securities. The Company does not intend to reserve funds to retire existing debt upon maturity. The Company will instead seek to refinance such debt at maturity or retire such debt through the issuance of equity securities, as market conditions permit.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2004, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations, including contingent liabilities.
Historical Cash Flows
The principal sources of funding for development, redevelopment, acquisitions and capital expenditures are cash flows from operating activities, the Credit Facility, secured and unsecured debt financing and proceeds from the Company’s dispositions. The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities remained consistent at $18.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $18.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003.
30
Table of Contents
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $13.3 million, or 58.4% to $9.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $22.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in development spending. The Company scaled back its development activity during the last two years as a result of the economic environment and the related impact on leasing. Management will continue to position the Company to take advantage of development, redevelopment, acquisition and disposition opportunities as they arise. Development spending for future periods will depend on economic conditions and opportunities to commit to new development projects on a pre-leased basis.
Net cash used in financing activities increased $8.9 million, or 250.5% to $12.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to a $8.3 million decrease in net borrowing activity in the first quarter of 2004 as compared to the first quarter of 2003, which was mainly due to the Company scaling back its development activity as discussed in the paragraph above.
Non-GAAP Supplemental Financial Measure: Funds From Operations
Management believes that Funds From Operations (“FFO”) is a useful supplemental measure of the Company’s operating performance. The Company computes FFO in accordance with the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), excluding extraordinary items, as defined by GAAP, and gains and losses from sales of depreciable operating property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs and depreciation of non-real estate assets), and after adjustment for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating FFO, and accordingly, the Company’s FFO may not be comparable to other REITs.
Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization, gains and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities, general and administrative expenses and interest costs, providing perspective on operating performance not immediately apparent from net income. In addition, management believes that FFO provides useful information to the investment community about the Company’s operating performance when compared to other REITs since FFO is generally recognized as the industry standard for reporting the operations of REITs.
However, FFO should not be viewed as an alternative measure of the Company’s operating performance since it does not reflect either depreciation and amortization costs or the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of the Company’s properties, which are significant economic costs and could materially impact the Company’s results from operations.
The following table reconciles the Company’s FFO to the Company’s GAAP net income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||
(in thousands) | ||||||
Net income available for common shareholders | $ | 5,984 | $ | 10,929 | ||
Adjustments: | ||||||
Minority interest in earnings of Operating Partnership | 986 | 1,686 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 13,986 | 13,705 | ||||
Funds From Operations(1) | $ | 20,956 | $ | 26,320 | ||
(1) | Reported amounts are attributable to common shareholders and common unitholders. |
31
Table of Contents
Inflation
The majority of the Company’s tenant leases require tenants to pay most operating expenses, including real estate taxes, utilities, insurance and increases in common area maintenance expenses, which reduces the Company’s exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
32
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The primary market risk faced by the Company is interest rate risk. The Company mitigates this risk by maintaining prudent amounts of leverage, minimizing capital costs and interest expense while continuously evaluating all available debt and equity resources and following established risk management policies and procedures, which include the periodic use of derivatives. The Company’s primary strategy in entering into derivative contracts is to minimize the variability that changes in interest rates could have on its future cash flows. The Company generally employs derivative instruments that effectively convert a portion of its variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
Information about the Company’s changes in interest rate risk exposures from December 31, 2003 to March 31, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference to “Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” above.
Tabular Presentation of Market Risk
The tabular presentation below provides information about the Company’s interest-rate sensitive financial and derivative instruments at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003. All of the Company’s interest-rate sensitive financial and derivative instruments are held for purposes other than trading. For debt obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates or the interest rate index by contractual maturity dates. The interest rate spreads on the Company’s variable-rate debt ranged from LIBOR plus 1.40% to LIBOR plus 1.75% at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003. For the interest-rate cap and swap agreements, the table presents the aggregate notional amount and weighted average interest rates or strike rates by contractual maturity date. The notional amounts are used solely to calculate the contractual cash flow to be received under the contract and do not reflect outstanding principal balances at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003. The table also presents comparative summarized information for financial and derivative instruments held at December 31, 2003.
Interest Rate Risk Analysis—Tabular Presentation
(in millions)
Maturity Date | March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | There- after | Total | Fair Value | Total | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unsecured line of credit: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable-rate | $ | 150.0 | $ | 150.0 | $ | 150.0 | $ | 235.0 | $ | 235.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable-rate index | LIBOR | LIBOR | LIBOR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured debt: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable-rate | $ | 43.8 | $ | 29.0 | $ | 31.0 | $ | 103.8 | $ | 103.8 | $ | 123.8 | $ | 123.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable-rate index | LIBOR | LIBOR | LIBOR | LIBOR | LIBOR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed-rate | $ | 8.0 | $ | 93.0 | $ | 10.4 | $ | 32.0 | $ | 83.0 | $ | 287.1 | $ | 513.5 | $ | 519.3 | $ | 402.2 | $ | 414.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 7.00 | % | 8.17 | % | 6.50 | % | 6.60 | % | 4.17 | % | 6.44 | % | 6.40 | % | 6.72 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Derivatives Used to Hedge Variable Rate Debt: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-rate swap agreements: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notional amount | $ | 100.0 | $ | 50.0 | $ | 150.0 | $ | (3.2 | ) | $ | 150.0 | $ | (2.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed pay interest rate | 3.52 | % | 2.98 | % | 3.34 | % | 3.34 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable receive rate index | LIBOR | LIBOR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-rate cap agreements: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notional amount | $ | 100.0 | $ | 100.0 | $ | — | $ | 100.0 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cap rate | 4.25 | % | 4.25 | % | 4.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forward rate index | LIBOR |
33
Table of Contents
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As of March 31, 2004, the end of the quarter covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There have been no significant changes that occurred during the quarter covered by this report in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation referenced above that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
34
Table of Contents
As previously reported, in March 2003, one of the Company’s former tenants, EBC I, formerly known as eToys, Inc. (“eToys”) filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California against the Company, seeking return of the proceeds from two letters of credit previously drawn down by the Company. The tenant originally caused its lenders to deliver an aggregate of $15 million in letters of credit to secure its obligations under its lease with the Company and also to secure its obligations to repay the Company for certain leasing and tenant improvement costs. eToys defaulted on its lease and other obligations to the Company in January 2001 and subsequently filed for bankruptcy in March 2001. Management strongly disagrees with the points outlined in the suit and is vigorously defending the claim. However, if eToys were to prevail in this action, it could have a material adverse effect upon the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.
Other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, the Company is not a party to, and its properties are not subject to, any legal proceedings which if determined adversely to the Company, would have a material adverse effect upon the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company.
During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company redeemed 6,450 common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership in exchange for shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis. The 6,450 common shares issued in connection with these redemptions were issued pursuant to an effective registration statement.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES—None
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS—None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION—None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit Number | Description | |
3(i).3 | Articles Supplementary of the Registrant designating its 7.45% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (1) | |
3(i).8* | Articles Supplementary of the Registrant designating its 8.075% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock | |
4.3 | Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 5, 2004 (1) | |
10.1 | Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Kilroy Realty, L.P. dated as of March 5, 2004 (1) | |
10.72* | Secured Promissory Notes and Deeds of Trust Aggregating $115 Million Payable to Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America | |
31.1* | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
35
Table of Contents
Exhibit Number | Description | |
31.2* | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |
32.1* | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
32.2* | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
* | Filed herewith |
(1) | Previously filed as an exhibit on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 2, 2004, under Items 9 and 12, in connection with its fourth quarter 2003 earnings release and attached to such report its fourth quarter 2003 Supplemental Financial Report.
36
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on May 6, 2004.
KILROY REALTY CORPORATION | ||
By: | /s/ John B. Kilroy, Jr. | |
John B. Kilroy, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | ||
By: | /s/ Richard E. Moran Jr. | |
Richard E. Moran Jr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | ||
By: | /s/ Ann Marie Whitney | |
Ann Marie Whitney Senior Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
37