Allowance For Loan Losses And Credit Quality Of Financing Receivables | ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND CREDIT QUALITY OF FINANCING RECEIVABLES The following table presents changes in the allowance for loan losses disaggregated by the class of loans receivable for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 : (Dollars in thousands) Commercial and Industrial Construction Commercial Real Estate Residential Real Estate Consumer and Other Unallocated Total Three Months Ended: March 31, 2018 Beginning balance $ 208 $ 336 $ 5,185 $ 1,032 $ 26 $ 548 $ 7,335 Charge-offs (11 ) — — (12 ) (11 ) — (34 ) Recoveries 1 — 1 10 7 — 19 Provision 191 9 615 (58 ) 9 (258 ) 508 Ending balance $ 389 $ 345 $ 5,801 $ 972 $ 31 $ 290 $ 7,828 March 31, 2017 Beginning balance $ 110 $ 359 $ 3,932 $ 899 $ 19 $ 1,377 $ 6,696 Charge-offs (13 ) — (266 ) (34 ) (5 ) — (318 ) Recoveries — — 2 8 2 — 12 Provision (5 ) 66 357 52 1 (64 ) 407 Ending balance $ 92 $ 425 $ 4,025 $ 925 $ 17 $ 1,313 $ 6,797 The following table presents the balance of the allowance of loan losses and loans receivable by class at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 disaggregated on the basis of our impairment methodology. Allowance for Loan Losses Loans Receivable (Dollars in thousands) Balance Balance Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment Balance Related to Loans Collectively Evaluated for Impairment Balance Individually Evaluated for Impairment Collectively Evaluated for Impairment March 31, 2018 Commercial and industrial $ 389 $ — $ 389 $ 57,041 $ — $ 57,041 Construction 345 — 345 57,475 105 57,370 Commercial real estate 5,801 29 5,772 655,238 4,838 650,400 Residential real estate 972 — 972 317,440 3,061 314,379 Consumer and other loans 31 — 31 2,228 — 2,228 Unallocated 290 — — — — — Total $ 7,828 $ 29 $ 7,509 $ 1,089,422 $ 8,004 $ 1,081,418 December 31, 2017 Commercial and industrial $ 208 $ — $ 208 $ 54,759 $ 20 $ 54,739 Construction 336 — 336 42,484 — 42,484 Commercial real estate 5,185 28 5,157 551,445 4,763 546,682 Residential real estate 1,032 10 1,022 171,844 2,064 169,780 Consumer and other loans 26 — 26 1,130 — 1,130 Unallocated 548 — — — — — Total $ 7,335 $ 38 $ 6,749 $ 821,662 $ 6,847 $ 814,815 An age analysis of loans receivable, which were past due as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 , is as follows: (Dollars in thousands) 30-59 Days Past Due 60-89 days Past Due Greater Than 90 Days (a) Total Past Due Current Total Financing Receivables Recorded Investment > 90 Days and Accruing March 31, 2018 Commercial and industrial $ 1,988 $ — $ — $ 1,988 $ 55,053 $ 57,041 $ — Construction — — 105 105 57,370 57,475 — Commercial real estate 10,456 488 4,996 15,940 639,298 655,238 — Residential real estate 593 42 3,995 4,630 312,810 317,440 — Consumer and other 23 4 — 27 2,201 2,228 — Total $ 13,060 $ 534 $ 9,096 $ 22,690 $ 1,066,732 $ 1,089,422 $ — December 31, 2017 Commercial and industrial $ — $ — $ 20 $ 20 $ 54,739 $ 54,759 $ — Construction — — 105 105 42,379 42,484 — Commercial real estate 4,935 126 4,314 9,374 542,071 551,445 — Residential real estate 1,304 122 1,581 3,007 168,837 171,844 — Consumer and other 8 1 — 9 1,121 1,130 — Total $ 6,247 $ 249 $ 6,020 $ 12,515 $ 809,147 $ 821,662 $ — (a) includes loans greater than 90 days past due and still accruing and non-accrual loans. Loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued, excluding PCI loans, at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were: (Dollars in thousands) March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Commercial and industrial — 20 Construction 105 105 Commercial real estate 4,996 4,314 Residential real estate 3,995 1,581 Total $ 9,096 $ 6,020 In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we estimate losses based on the identification of specific problem loans through our credit review process and also estimate losses inherent in other loans on an aggregate basis by loan type. The credit review process includes the independent evaluation of the loan officer assigned risk ratings by the Chief Credit Officer and a third party loan review company. Such risk ratings are assigned loss component factors that reflect our loss estimate for each group of loans. It is management’s and the Board of Directors’ responsibility to oversee the lending process to ensure that all credit risks are properly identified, monitored, and controlled, and that loan pricing, terms and other safeguards against non-performance and default are commensurate with the level of risk undertaken and is rated as such based on a risk-rating system. Factors considered in assigning risk ratings and loss component factors include: borrower specific information related to expected future cash flows and operating results, collateral values, financial condition and payment status; levels of and trends in portfolio charge-offs and recoveries; levels in portfolio delinquencies; effects of changes in loan concentrations and observed trends in the economy and other qualitative measurements. Our risk-rating system is consistent with the classification system used by regulatory agencies and with industry practices. Loan classifications of Substandard, Doubtful or Loss are consistent with the regulatory definitions of classified assets. The classification system is as follows: • Pass : This category represents loans performing to contractual terms and conditions and the primary source of repayment is adequate to meet the obligation. We have five categories within the Pass classification depending on strength of repayment sources, collateral values and financial condition of the borrower. • Special Mention : This category represents loans performing to contractual terms and conditions; however the primary source of repayment or the borrower is exhibiting some deterioration or weaknesses in financial condition that could potentially threaten the borrowers’ future ability to repay our loan principal and interest or fees due. • Substandard : This category represents loans that the primary source of repayment has significantly deteriorated or weakened which has or could threaten the borrowers’ ability to make scheduled payments. The weaknesses require close supervision by management and there is a distinct possibility that we could sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Such weaknesses could jeopardize the timely and ultimate collection of our loan principal and interest or fees due. Loss may not be expected or evident, however, loan repayment is inadequately supported by current financial information or pledged collateral. • Doubtfu l: Loans so classified have all the inherent weaknesses of a substandard loan with the added provision that collection or liquidation in full is highly questionable and not reasonably assured. The probability of at least partial loss is high, but extraneous factors might strengthen the asset to prevent loss. The validity of the extraneous factors must be continuously monitored. Once these factors are questionable the loan should be considered for full or partial charge-off. • Loss : Loans so classified are considered uncollectible, and of such little value that their continuance as active assets is not warranted. Such loans are fully charged off. The following tables illustrate our corporate credit risk profile by creditworthiness category as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 : (Dollars in thousands) Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Total March 31, 2018 Commercial and industrial $ 55,834 $ 478 $ 729 $ — $ 57,041 Construction 57,230 140 105 — 57,475 Commercial real estate 630,560 11,033 13,645 — 655,238 Residential real estate 308,460 477 8,503 — 317,440 Consumer and other 1,992 — 236 — 2,228 $ 1,054,076 $ 12,128 $ 23,218 $ — $ 1,089,422 December 31, 2017 Commercial and industrial $ 54,405 $ 189 $ 165 $ — $ 54,759 Construction 42,379 105 — — 42,484 Commercial real estate 537,636 3,508 10,301 — 551,445 Residential real estate 169,395 228 2,221 — 171,844 Consumer and other 1,130 — — — 1,130 $ 804,945 $ 4,030 $ 12,687 $ — $ 821,662 The following table reflects information about our impaired loans, excluding PCI loans, by class as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 : March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 (Dollars in thousands) Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Related Allowance Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Related Allowance With no related allowance recorded: Commercial and industrial $ — $ 10 $ — $ 20 $ 20 $ — Construction 105 105 — — — — Commercial real estate 3,908 4,232 — 3,834 4,158 — Residential real estate 3,061 3,105 — 1,844 1,877 — With an allowance recorded: Commercial and industrial — — — — — — Commercial real estate 930 1,393 29 929 1,392 28 Residential real estate — — — 220 223 10 Total: Commercial and industrial — 10 — 20 20 — Construction 105 105 — — — — Commercial real estate 4,838 5,625 29 4,763 5,550 28 Residential real estate 3,061 3,105 — 2,064 2,100 10 $ 8,004 $ 8,845 $ 29 $ 6,847 $ 7,670 $ 38 The following table presents the average recorded investment and income recognized for our impaired loans, excluding PCI loans, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 : For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 (Dollars in thousands) Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized With no related allowance recorded: Commercial and industrial $ 10 $ — $ 19 $ — Construction 53 — — — Commercial real estate 3,871 12 2,308 — Residential real estate 2,453 11 1,525 1 Total impaired loans without a related allowance 6,387 23 3,852 1 With an allowance recorded: Commercial real estate 930 — 2,142 8 Residential real estate 110 — 316 — Total impaired loans with an allowance 1,040 — 2,465 8 Total impaired loans $ 7,427 $ 23 $ 6,317 $ 9 We recognize interest income on performing impaired loans as payments are received. On non-performing impaired loans we do not recognize interest income as all payments are recorded as a reduction of principal on such loans. Impaired loans include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, postponement or forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. The concessions rarely result in the forgiveness of principal or accrued interest. In addition, we attempt to obtain additional collateral or guarantor support when modifying such loans. Non-accruing restructured loans may be returned to accrual status when there has been a sustained period of repayment performance (generally six consecutive months of payments) and both principal and interest are deemed collectible. The following table presents the recorded investment in troubled debt restructured loans, based on payment performance status: (Dollars in thousands) Commercial Real Estate Residential Real Estate Total March 31, 2018 Performing $ 656 $ 1,477 $ 2,133 Non-performing 2,522 373 2,895 Total $ 3,178 $ 1,850 $ 5,028 December 31, 2017 Performing $ 449 $ 483 $ 932 Non-performing 1,594 242 1,836 Total $ 2,043 $ 725 $ 2,768 Troubled debt restructured loans are considered impaired and are included in the previous impaired loans disclosures in this footnote. As of March 31, 2018 , we have not committed to lend additional amounts to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructuring. There was no troubled debt restructuring that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. The increase in troubled debt restructured loans was due to loans acquired in the Community acquisition. There was one troubled debt restructuring with an outstanding balance of $127 thousand for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the date of the restructuring for the three months ended March 31, 2018 . There was no troubled debt restructuring for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the date of the restructuring for the three months ended March 31, 2017 . We may obtain physical possession of residential real estate collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan via foreclosure on an in-substance repossession. As of March 31, 2018 , we had five foreclosed residential real estate properties with a carrying value of $1.3 million . As of December 31, 2017, we had one foreclosed residential real estate property with a carrying value of $179 thousand . In addition, as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 , respectively, we had consumer loans with a carrying value of $1.2 million and $180 thousand collateralized by residential real estate property for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process. The increases in amounts at March 31, 2018, compared to December 31, 2017, were due to loans acquired in the Community acquisition. |