Cover Page
Cover Page | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021shares | |
Cover [Abstract] | |
Document Type | 10-Q |
Document Quarterly Report | true |
Document Period End Date | Sep. 30, 2021 |
Document Transition Report | false |
Entity File Number | 333-21011 |
Entity Registrant Name | FIRSTENERGY CORP |
Entity Incorporation, State or Country Code | OH |
Entity Address, Address Line One | 76 South Main Street |
Entity Address, City or Town | Akron |
Entity Address, State or Province | OH |
Entity Address, Postal Zip Code | 44308 |
City Area Code | (800) |
Local Phone Number | 736-3402 |
Entity Tax Identification Number | 34-1843785 |
Title of 12(b) Security | Common Stock, $0.10 par value |
Trading Symbol | FE |
Security Exchange Name | NYSE |
Entity Current Reporting Status | Yes |
Entity Interactive Data Current | Yes |
Entity Filer Category | Large Accelerated Filer |
Entity Small Business | false |
Entity Emerging Growth Company | false |
Entity Shell Company | false |
Entity Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 544,419,619 |
Amendment Flag | false |
Entity Central Index Key | 0001031296 |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2021 |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 |
Consolidated Statements of Inco
Consolidated Statements of Income - USD ($) shares in Millions, $ in Millions | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||
Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | ||
REVENUES: | |||||
Revenues | [1] | $ 3,124 | $ 3,022 | $ 8,472 | $ 8,253 |
OPERATING EXPENSES: | |||||
Fuel | 132 | 101 | 362 | 276 | |
Purchased power | 874 | 766 | 2,206 | 2,073 | |
Other operating expenses | 856 | 937 | 2,326 | 2,416 | |
Provision for depreciation | 326 | 316 | 972 | 954 | |
Amortization (deferral) of regulatory assets, net | 30 | (91) | 171 | (26) | |
General taxes | 275 | 272 | 812 | 792 | |
DPA penalty (Note 9) | 0 | 0 | 230 | 0 | |
Gain on sale of Yards Creek (Note 8) | 0 | 0 | (109) | 0 | |
Total operating expenses | 2,493 | 2,301 | 6,970 | 6,485 | |
OPERATING INCOME | 631 | 721 | 1,502 | 1,768 | |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | |||||
Miscellaneous income, net | 136 | 100 | 379 | 303 | |
Pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment (Note 5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (423) | |
Interest expense | (283) | (266) | (855) | (792) | |
Capitalized financing costs | 20 | 21 | 54 | 57 | |
Total other expense | (127) | (145) | (422) | (855) | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 504 | 576 | 1,080 | 913 | |
INCOME TAXES | 88 | 116 | 271 | 122 | |
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | 416 | 460 | 809 | 791 | |
Discontinued operations (Note 3) | [2] | 47 | (6) | 47 | 46 |
NET INCOME | $ 463 | $ 454 | $ 856 | $ 837 | |
EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK (Note 4): | |||||
Basic - Continuing Operations (in dollars per share) | $ 0.76 | $ 0.85 | $ 1.48 | $ 1.46 | |
Basic - Discontinued Operations (in dollars per share) | 0.09 | (0.01) | 0.09 | 0.08 | |
Basic - Earnings Per Share of Common Stock (in dollars per share) | 0.85 | 0.84 | 1.57 | 1.54 | |
Diluted - Continuing Operations (in dollars per share) | 0.76 | 0.85 | 1.48 | 1.46 | |
Diluted - Discontinued Operations (in dollars per share) | 0.09 | (0.01) | 0.09 | 0.08 | |
Diluted - Earnings Per Share to Common Stock (in dollars per share) | $ 0.85 | $ 0.84 | $ 1.57 | $ 1.54 | |
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: | |||||
Basic, in shares | 544 | 542 | 544 | 542 | |
Diluted, in shares | 545 | 543 | 545 | 543 | |
Distribution Services and Retail Generation | |||||
REVENUES: | |||||
Revenues | $ 2,550 | $ 2,470 | $ 6,882 | $ 6,624 | |
Transmission | |||||
REVENUES: | |||||
Revenues | 411 | 408 | 1,223 | 1,185 | |
Other | |||||
REVENUES: | |||||
Revenues | $ 163 | $ 144 | $ 367 | $ 444 | |
[1] | Includes excise and gross receipts tax collections of $103 million and $100 million during the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $283 million and $276 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. | ||||
[2] | Net of income tax expense (benefits) of $(47) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, and $6 million and $(29) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively. |
Consolidated Statements of In_2
Consolidated Statements of Income (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Millions | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | |
Income Statement [Abstract] | ||||
Excise taxes collected | $ 103 | $ 100 | $ 283 | $ 276 |
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ (47) | $ 6 | $ (47) | $ (29) |
Consolidated Statements of Comp
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - USD ($) $ in Millions | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | |
Statement of Comprehensive Income [Abstract] | ||||
NET INCOME | $ 463 | $ 454 | $ 856 | $ 837 |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS: | ||||
Pension and OPEB prior service costs | (3) | (3) | (10) | (30) |
Amortized losses on derivative hedges | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Other comprehensive loss | (3) | (3) | (9) | (29) |
Income tax benefits on other comprehensive loss | (1) | (1) | (3) | (7) |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (2) | (2) | (6) | (22) |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | $ 461 | $ 452 | $ 850 | $ 815 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($) $ in Millions | Sep. 30, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2020 |
CURRENT ASSETS: | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 577 | $ 1,734 |
Restricted cash | 107 | 67 |
Receivables- | ||
Other, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $12 in 2021 and $26 in 2020 | 250 | 236 |
Materials and supplies, at average cost | 245 | 317 |
Prepaid taxes and other | 239 | 157 |
Total current assets | 2,532 | 3,714 |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: | ||
In service | 45,032 | 43,654 |
Less — Accumulated provision for depreciation | 12,460 | 11,938 |
Property, plant and equipment in service net of accumulated provision for depreciation | 32,572 | 31,716 |
Construction work in progress | 1,733 | 1,578 |
Total net property, plant and equipment | 34,305 | 33,294 |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET - HELD FOR SALE (NOTE 8) | 0 | 45 |
INVESTMENTS AND OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS: | ||
Goodwill | 5,618 | 5,618 |
Investments (Note 7) | 632 | 605 |
Regulatory assets | 90 | 82 |
Other | 677 | 1,106 |
Total deferred charges and other assets | 7,017 | 7,411 |
Total assets | 43,854 | 44,464 |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||
Currently payable long-term debt | 1,230 | 146 |
Short-term borrowings | 0 | 2,200 |
Accounts payable | 876 | 827 |
Accrued interest | 291 | 282 |
Accrued taxes | 641 | 640 |
Accrued compensation and benefits | 369 | 349 |
Other | 687 | 560 |
Total current liabilities | 4,094 | 5,004 |
Stockholders’ equity- | ||
Common stock | 54 | 54 |
Other paid-in capital | 9,468 | 10,076 |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (11) | (5) |
Accumulated deficit | (2,032) | (2,888) |
Total stockholders’ equity | 7,479 | 7,237 |
Long-term debt and other long-term obligations | 22,503 | 22,131 |
Total capitalization | 29,982 | 29,368 |
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||
Accumulated deferred income taxes | 3,366 | 3,095 |
Retirement benefits | 3,124 | 3,345 |
Regulatory liabilities | 2,015 | 1,826 |
Other | 1,273 | 1,826 |
Total noncurrent liabilities | 9,778 | 10,092 |
COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 9) | ||
Total liabilities and capitalization | 43,854 | 44,464 |
Customer | ||
Receivables- | ||
Customers | 1,273 | 1,367 |
Less — Allowance for uncollectible customer receivables | 159 | 164 |
Customers | $ 1,114 | $ 1,203 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Pa
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Millions | Sep. 30, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2020 |
Stockholders’ equity- | ||
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ 0.10 | $ 0.10 |
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares) | 700,000,000 | 700,000,000 |
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares) | 544,419,619 | 543,117,533 |
Other | ||
Receivables- | ||
Allowance for uncollectible accounts | $ 12 | $ 26 |
Consolidated Statements of Stoc
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - USD ($) $ in Millions | Total | Common Stock | OPIC | AOCI | Accumulated Deficit |
Beginning balance, (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2019 | 541,000,000 | ||||
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2019 | $ 6,975 | $ 54 | $ 10,868 | $ 20 | $ (3,967) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Net income | 74 | 74 | |||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (18) | (18) | |||
Stock Investment Plan and share-based benefit plans (in shares) | 1,000,000 | ||||
Stock Investment Plan and share-based benefit plans | (6) | (6) | |||
Cash dividends declared on common stock | (211) | (211) | |||
Ending balance (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2020 | 542,000,000 | ||||
Ending balance at Mar. 31, 2020 | $ 6,814 | $ 54 | 10,651 | 2 | (3,893) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Declared | $ 0.39 | ||||
Beginning balance, (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2019 | 541,000,000 | ||||
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2019 | $ 6,975 | $ 54 | 10,868 | 20 | (3,967) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Net income | 837 | ||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (22) | ||||
Ending balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2020 | 543,000,000 | ||||
Ending balance at Sep. 30, 2020 | 7,188 | $ 54 | 10,266 | (2) | (3,130) |
Beginning balance, (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2020 | 542,000,000 | ||||
Beginning balance at Mar. 31, 2020 | 6,814 | $ 54 | 10,651 | 2 | (3,893) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Net income | 309 | 309 | |||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (2) | (2) | |||
Stock Investment Plan and share-based benefit plans | 22 | 22 | |||
Ending balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2020 | 542,000,000 | ||||
Ending balance at Jun. 30, 2020 | 7,143 | $ 54 | 10,673 | 0 | (3,584) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Net income | 454 | 454 | |||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (2) | (2) | |||
Stock Investment Plan and share-based benefit plans | 17 | $ 1 | 17 | ||
Cash dividends declared on common stock | (424) | (424) | |||
Ending balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2020 | 543,000,000 | ||||
Ending balance at Sep. 30, 2020 | $ 7,188 | $ 54 | 10,266 | (2) | (3,130) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Declared | $ 0.39 | ||||
Beginning balance, (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2020 | 543,117,533 | 543,000,000 | |||
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2020 | $ 7,237 | $ 54 | 10,076 | (5) | (2,888) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Net income | 335 | 335 | |||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (2) | (2) | |||
Share-based benefit plans (in shares) | 1,000,000 | ||||
Share-based benefit plans | 2 | 2 | |||
Cash dividends declared on common stock | (212) | (212) | |||
Ending balance (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2021 | 544,000,000 | ||||
Ending balance at Mar. 31, 2021 | $ 7,360 | $ 54 | 9,866 | (7) | (2,553) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Declared | $ 0.39 | ||||
Beginning balance, (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2020 | 543,117,533 | 543,000,000 | |||
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2020 | $ 7,237 | $ 54 | 10,076 | (5) | (2,888) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Net income | 856 | ||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | $ (6) | ||||
Ending balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2021 | 544,419,619 | 544,000,000 | |||
Ending balance at Sep. 30, 2021 | $ 7,479 | $ 54 | 9,468 | (11) | (2,032) |
Beginning balance, (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2021 | 544,000,000 | ||||
Beginning balance at Mar. 31, 2021 | 7,360 | $ 54 | 9,866 | (7) | (2,553) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Net income | 58 | 58 | |||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (2) | (2) | |||
Share-based benefit plans | 14 | 14 | |||
Ending balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2021 | 544,000,000 | ||||
Ending balance at Jun. 30, 2021 | 7,430 | $ 54 | 9,880 | (9) | (2,495) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Net income | 463 | 463 | |||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (2) | (2) | |||
Share-based benefit plans (in shares) | |||||
Share-based benefit plans | 13 | 13 | |||
Cash dividends declared on common stock | $ (425) | (425) | |||
Ending balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2021 | 544,419,619 | 544,000,000 | |||
Ending balance at Sep. 30, 2021 | $ 7,479 | $ 54 | $ 9,468 | $ (11) | $ (2,032) |
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward] | |||||
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Declared | $ 0.39 |
Consolidated Statements of St_2
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Parenthetical) - $ / shares | 3 Months Ended | |||
Sep. 30, 2021 | Mar. 31, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Mar. 31, 2020 | |
Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract] | ||||
Dividends declared (in dollars per share) | $ 0.39 | $ 0.39 | $ 0.39 | $ 0.39 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($) $ in Millions | 9 Months Ended | |
Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||
Net income | $ 856 | $ 837 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities- | ||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,162 | 804 |
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, net | 255 | 124 |
Retirement benefits, net of payments | (310) | (218) |
Pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment | 0 | 423 |
Settlement agreement and tax sharing payments to the FES Debtors | 0 | (978) |
Transmission revenue collections, net | 120 | 1 |
Gain on sale of Yards Creek (Note 8) | (109) | 0 |
Gain on disposal, net of tax (Note 3) | (47) | (46) |
Changes in current assets and liabilities- | ||
Receivables | 76 | (33) |
Materials and supplies | 73 | (23) |
Prepaid taxes and other current assets | (34) | (57) |
Accounts payable | 49 | (72) |
Accrued taxes | (124) | 4 |
Accrued interest | 9 | 34 |
Accrued compensation and benefits | (2) | 65 |
Other current liabilities | (19) | (16) |
Collateral, net | 101 | 22 |
Other | 48 | (20) |
Net cash provided from operating activities | 2,104 | 851 |
New financing- | ||
Long-term debt | 1,500 | 3,425 |
Redemptions and repayments- | ||
Long-term debt | (58) | (1,110) |
Short-term borrowings, net | (2,200) | (700) |
Common stock dividend payments | (636) | (634) |
Other | (16) | (44) |
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities | (1,410) | 937 |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||
Property additions | (1,768) | (1,979) |
Proceeds from sale of Yards Creek | 155 | 0 |
Sales of investment securities held in trusts | 29 | 45 |
Purchases of investment securities held in trusts | (37) | (63) |
Asset removal costs | (178) | (175) |
Other | (12) | 1 |
Net cash used for investing activities | (1,811) | (2,171) |
Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | (1,117) | (383) |
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period | 1,801 | 679 |
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period | $ 684 | $ 296 |
Organization and Basis of Prese
Organization and Basis of Presentation | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION | ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION Unless otherwise indicated, defined terms and abbreviations used herein have the meanings set forth in the accompanying Glossary of Terms. FE was incorporated under Ohio law in 1996. FE’s principal business is the holding, directly or indirectly, of all of the outstanding equity of its principal subsidiaries: OE, CEI, TE, Penn (a wholly owned subsidiary of OE), JCP&L, ME, PN, FESC, MP, AGC (a wholly owned subsidiary of MP), PE, WP, and FET and its principal subsidiaries (ATSI, MAIT and TrAIL). In addition, FE holds all of the outstanding equity of other direct subsidiaries including: AE Supply, FirstEnergy Properties, Inc., FEV, FirstEnergy License Holding Company, GPUN, Allegheny Ventures, Inc., and Suvon, LLC, doing business as both FirstEnergy Home and FirstEnergy Advisors. FE and its subsidiaries are principally involved in the transmission, distribution and generation of electricity. FirstEnergy’s ten utility operating companies comprise one of the nation’s largest investor-owned electric systems, based on serving over six million customers in the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions. FirstEnergy’s transmission operations include approximately 24,000 miles of lines and two regional transmission operation centers. AGC and MP control 3,580 MWs of total capacity. PN, as lessee of the property of its subsidiary, the Waverly Electric Light & Power Company, serves approximately 4,000 customers in the Waverly, New York vicinity. On February 10, 2021, PN entered into an agreement to transfer its customers and the related assets in Waverly, New York to Tri-County Rural Electric Cooperative; the completion of such transfer is subject to several closing conditions including regulatory approval, which are ongoing. These interim financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements and notes prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. FE and its subsidiaries follow GAAP and comply with the related regulations, orders, policies and practices prescribed by the SEC, FERC, and, as applicable, the PUCO, the PPUC, the MDPSC, the NYPSC, the WVPSC, the VSCC and the NJBPU. The accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited, but reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make periodic estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The reported results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for any future period. FE and its subsidiaries have evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued. FE and its subsidiaries consolidate all majority-owned subsidiaries over which they exercise control and, when applicable, entities for which they have a controlling financial interest. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation as appropriate and permitted pursuant to GAAP. FE and its subsidiaries consolidate a VIE when it is determined that it is the primary beneficiary. Investments in affiliates over which FE and its subsidiaries have the ability to exercise significant influence, but do not have a controlling financial interest, follow the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the interest in the entity is reported as an investment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the percentage of FE’s ownership share of the entity’s earnings is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Capitalized Financing Costs For each of the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, capitalized financing costs on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income include $13 million of allowance for equity funds used during construction and $7 million and $8 million, respectively, of capitalized interest. For each of the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, capitalized financing costs on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income include $34 million and $36 million, respectively, of allowance for equity funds used during construction and $20 million and $21 million, respectively, of capitalized interest. COVID-19 FirstEnergy is continuously evaluating the global COVID-19 pandemic and taking steps to mitigate known risks. FirstEnergy is actively monitoring the continued impact COVID-19 is having on its customers’ receivable balances, which include increasing arrears balances since the pandemic has begun. FirstEnergy has incurred, and it is expected to incur for the foreseeable future, COVID-19 pandemic related expenses. COVID-19 related expenses consist of additional costs that FirstEnergy is incurring to protect its employees, contractors and customers, and to support social distancing requirements. These costs include, but are not limited to, new or added benefits provided to employees, the purchase of additional personal protection equipment and disinfecting supplies, additional facility cleaning services, initiated programs and communications to customers on utility response, and increased technology expenses to support remote working, where possible. The full impact on FirstEnergy’s business from the COVID-19 pandemic, including the governmental and regulatory responses, is unknown at this time and difficult to predict. FirstEnergy provides a critical and essential service to its customers and the health and safety of its employees, contractors and customers is its first priority. FirstEnergy is continuously monitoring its supply chain and is working closely with essential vendors to understand the continued impact the COVID-19 pandemic is having on its business; however, FirstEnergy does not currently expect disruptions in its ability to deliver service to customers or any material impact on its capital spending plan. FirstEnergy continues to effectively manage operations during the pandemic in order to provide critical service to customers and believes it is well positioned to manage through the economic slowdown. FirstEnergy Distribution and Transmission revenues benefit from geographic and economic diversity across a five-state service territory, which also allows for flexibility with capital investments and measures to maintain sufficient liquidity over the next twelve months. However, the situation remains fluid and future impacts to FirstEnergy that are presently unknown or unanticipated may occur. Furthermore, the likelihood of an impact to FirstEnergy, and the severity of any impact that does occur, could increase the longer the global pandemic persists. Customer Receivables Receivables from customers include distribution services and retail generation sales to residential, commercial and industrial customers of the Utilities. The allowance for uncollectible customer receivables is based on historical loss information comprised of a rolling 36-month average net write-off percentage of revenues, in conjunction with a qualitative assessment of elements that impact the collectability of receivables to determine if allowances for uncollectible accounts should be further adjusted in accordance with the accounting guidance for credit losses. FirstEnergy reviews its allowance for uncollectible customer receivables utilizing a quantitative and qualitative assessment. Management contemplates available current information such as changes in economic factors, regulatory matters, industry trends, customer credit factors, amount of receivable balances that are past-due, payment options and programs available to customers, and the methods that the Utilities are able to utilize to ensure payment. This analysis includes consideration of the outbreak of COVID-19 and the impact on customer receivable balances outstanding and write-offs since the pandemic began. Beginning March 13, 2020, FirstEnergy temporarily suspended customer disconnections for nonpayment and ceased collection activities as a result of the ongoing pandemic and in accordance with state regulatory requirements. The temporary suspension of disconnections for nonpayment and ceasing of collection activities extended into the fourth quarter of 2020 but resumed for many customers before the end of 2020, except in New Jersey where the moratorium was extended until the end of 2021. Customers are subject to each state's applicable regulations on winter moratoriums for residential customers, which begin as early as November 1, 2020, and were in effect until April 15, 2021. During 2021, FirstEnergy has experienced a reduction in the amount of receivables that are past due by greater than 30 days since the end of 2020. While total customer arrears balances continue to decrease in 2021, balances that are over 120 days past due continue to be elevated. Furthermore, FirstEnergy also considered other factors as part of this qualitative assessment, such as certain federal stimulus and state funding being made available to assist with past due utility bills. As a result of this qualitative analysis, FirstEnergy did not recognize any incremental uncollectible expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2021. Receivables from customers also include PJM receivables resulting from transmission and wholesale sales. FirstEnergy’s uncollectible risk on PJM receivables is minimal due to the nature of PJM’s settlement process whereby members of PJM legally agree to share the cost of defaults and as a result there is no allowance for doubtful accounts. Activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts on customer receivables for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and for the year ended December 31, 2020 are as follows: (In millions) Balance, January 1, 2020 $ 46 Charged to income (1) 174 Charged to other accounts (2) 46 Write-offs (102) Balance, December 31, 2020 $ 164 Charged to income (3) 30 Charged to other accounts (2) 34 Write-offs (69) Balance, September 30, 2021 $ 159 (1) $103 million of which was deferred for future recovery in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020. (2) Represents recoveries and reinstatements of accounts written off for uncollectible accounts. (3) $8 million of which was deferred for future recovery in the nine months ended September 30, 2021. Goodwill FirstEnergy evaluates goodwill for impairment annually on July 31 and more frequently if indicators of impairment arise. For 2021, FirstEnergy performed a qualitative assessment of the Regulated Distribution and Regulated Transmission reporting units' goodwill, assessing economic, industry and market considerations in addition to the reporting units' overall financial performance. Key factors used in the assessment included: growth rates, interest rates, expected capital expenditures, utility sector market performance, regulatory and legal developments, and other market considerations. It was determined that the fair values of these reporting units were, more likely than not, greater than their carrying values and a quantitative analysis was not necessary. Short-Term Borrowings/ Revolving Credit Facilities On October 18, 2021, FE, FET, the Utilities, and the Transmission Companies entered into six separate senior unsecured five-year syndicated revolving credit facilities with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Mizuho Bank, Ltd. and PNC Bank, National Association (collectively, the “2021 Credit Facilities”), which replace the FE Revolving Facility and the FET Revolving Facility, and provide for aggregate commitments of $4.5 billion. The 2021 Credit Facilities are available until October 18, 2026, as follows: • FE and FET, $1.0 billion revolving credit facility • Ohio Companies, $800 million revolving credit facility • Pennsylvania Companies, $950 million revolving credit facility • JCP&L, $500 million revolving credit facility • MP and PE, $400 million revolving credit facility • Transmission Companies, $850 million credit facility Under the 2021 Credit Facilities, an aggregate amount of $4.5 billion is available to be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed, subject to each borrower’s respective sublimit for each borrower under the respective facilities. These new credit facilities provide substantial liquidity to support the Regulated Distribution and Regulated Transmission businesses, and each of the operating companies within the businesses. New Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted Pronouncements ASU 2019-12, " Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes" (Issued in December 2019): ASU 2019-12 enhances and simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance, including the elimination of certain exceptions related to the approach for intra-period tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The new guidance also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. FirstEnergy adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2021, with no material impact to the financial statements. Recently Issued Pronouncements - FirstEnergy has assessed new authoritative accounting guidance issued by the FASB that has not yet been adopted and none are currently expected to have a material impact to the financial statements. |
Revenue
Revenue | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Revenue from Contract with Customer [Abstract] | |
REVENUE | REVENUE FirstEnergy accounts for revenues from contracts with customers under ASC 606, “ Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ” Revenue from leases, financial instruments, other contractual rights or obligations and other revenues that are not from contracts with customers are outside the scope of the standard and accounted for under other existing GAAP. FirstEnergy has elected to exclude sales taxes and other similar taxes collected on behalf of third parties from revenue as prescribed in the standard. As a result, tax collections and remittances are excluded from recognition in the income statement and instead recorded through the balance sheet. Excise and gross receipts taxes that are assessed on FirstEnergy are not subject to the election and are included in revenue. FirstEnergy has elected the optional invoice practical expedient for most of its revenues and utilizes the optional short-term contract exemption for transmission revenues due to the annual establishment of revenue requirements, which eliminates the need to provide certain revenue disclosures regarding unsatisfied performance obligations. FirstEnergy’s revenues are primarily derived from electric service provided by the Utilities and Transmission Companies. The following tables represent a disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, by type of service from each reportable segment: For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 Revenues by Type of Service Regulated Distribution Regulated Transmission Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments (1) Total (In millions) Distribution services $ 1,534 $ — $ (25) $ 1,509 Retail generation 1,054 — (13) 1,041 Wholesale sales 117 — 5 122 Transmission — 411 — 411 Other 30 — — 30 Total revenues from contracts with customers $ 2,735 $ 411 $ (33) $ 3,113 ARP — — — — Other non-customer revenue 24 4 (17) 11 Total revenues $ 2,759 $ 415 $ (50) $ 3,124 (1) Includes eliminations and reconciling adjustments of inter-segment revenues. For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 Revenues by Type of Service Regulated Distribution Regulated Transmission Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments (1) Total (In millions) Distribution services (2) $ 1,503 $ — $ (22) $ 1,481 Retail generation 1,005 — (16) 989 Wholesale sales 67 — 3 70 Transmission (2) — 408 — 408 Other 35 — — 35 Total revenues from contracts with customers $ 2,610 $ 408 $ (35) $ 2,983 ARP (3) 25 — — 25 Other non-customer revenue 26 5 (17) 14 Total revenues $ 2,661 $ 413 $ (52) $ 3,022 (1) Includes eliminations and reconciling adjustments of inter-segment revenues. (2) Includes reductions to revenue related to amounts subject to refund resulting from the Tax Act ($1 million at Regulated Distribution and $3 million at Regulated Transmission). (3) ARP revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2020, is primarily related to the reconciliation of Ohio decoupling rates that became effective on February 1, 2020. See Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” for further discussion on Ohio decoupling rates. Other non-customer revenue includes revenue from late payment charges of $9 million and $6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Other non-customer revenue also includes revenue from derivatives of $3 million and $8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 Revenues by Type of Service Regulated Distribution Regulated Transmission Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments (1) Total (In millions) Distribution services $ 4,177 $ — $ (77) $ 4,100 Retail generation 2,820 — (38) 2,782 Wholesale sales 260 — 12 272 Transmission — 1,223 — 1,223 Other 89 — — 89 Total revenues from contracts with customers $ 7,346 $ 1,223 $ (103) $ 8,466 ARP (2) (27) — — (27) Other non-customer revenue 68 10 (45) 33 Total revenues $ 7,387 $ 1,233 $ (148) $ 8,472 (1) Includes eliminations and reconciling adjustments of inter-segment revenues. (2) Reflects amounts the Ohio Companies refunded to customers that was previously collected under decoupling mechanisms, with interest. See Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” for further discussion on Ohio decoupling rates. For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 Revenues by Type of Service Regulated Distribution Regulated Transmission Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments (1) Total (In millions) Distribution services (2) $ 4,000 $ — $ (65) $ 3,935 Retail generation 2,735 — (46) 2,689 Wholesale sales 188 — 6 194 Transmission (2) — 1,185 — 1,185 Other 102 — — 102 Total revenues from contracts with customers $ 7,025 $ 1,185 $ (105) $ 8,105 ARP (3) 108 — — 108 Other non-customer revenue 74 13 (47) 40 Total revenues $ 7,207 $ 1,198 $ (152) $ 8,253 (1) Includes eliminations and reconciling adjustments of inter-segment revenues. (2) Includes reductions to revenue related to amounts subject to refund resulting from the Tax Act ($2 million at Regulated Distribution and $6 million at Regulated Transmission). (3) ARP revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, is primarily related to the reconciliation of Ohio decoupling rates. See Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” for further discussion on Ohio decoupling rates. Other non-customer revenue includes revenue from late payment charges of $27 million and $22 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Other non-customer revenue also includes revenue from derivatives of $5 million and $14 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Regulated Distribution The Regulated Distribution segment distributes electricity through FirstEnergy’s ten utility operating companies and also controls 3,580 MWs of regulated electric generation capacity located primarily in West Virginia and Virginia. Each of the Utilities earns revenue from state-regulated rate tariffs under which it provides distribution services to residential, commercial and industrial customers in its service territory. The Utilities are obligated under the regulated construct to deliver power to customers reliably, as it is needed, which creates an implied monthly contract with the end-use customer. See Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information on rate recovery mechanisms. Distribution and electric revenues are recognized over time as electricity is distributed and delivered to the customer and the customers consume the electricity immediately as delivery occurs. Retail generation sales relate to POLR, SOS, SSO and default service requirements in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland, as well as generation sales in West Virginia that are regulated by the WVPSC. Certain of the Utilities have default service obligations to provide power to non-shopping customers who have elected to continue to receive service under regulated retail tariffs. The volume of these sales varies depending on the level of shopping that occurs. Supply plans vary by state and by service territory. Default service for the Ohio Companies, Pennsylvania Companies, JCP&L and PE’s Maryland jurisdiction are provided through a competitive procurement process approved by each state’s respective commission. Retail generation revenues are recognized over time as electricity is delivered and consumed immediately by the customer. The following table represents a disaggregation of the Regulated Distribution segment revenue from contracts with distribution service and retail generation customers for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, by class: For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30, Revenues by Customer Class 2021 2020 2021 2020 (In millions) Residential $ 1,666 $ 1,621 $ 4,410 $ 4,220 Commercial 619 589 1,722 1,640 Industrial 284 278 810 814 Other 19 20 55 61 Total Revenues $ 2,588 $ 2,508 $ 6,997 $ 6,735 Wholesale sales primarily consist of generation and capacity sales into the PJM market from FirstEnergy’s regulated electric generation capacity and NUGs. Certain of the Utilities may also purchase power in the PJM markets to supply power to their customers. Generally, these power sales from generation and purchases to serve load are netted hourly and reported as either revenues or purchased power on the Consolidated Statements of Income based on whether the entity was a net seller or buyer each hour. Capacity revenues are recognized ratably over the PJM planning year at prices cleared in the annual PJM Reliability Pricing Model Base Residual Auction and Incremental Auctions. Capacity purchases and sales through PJM capacity auctions are reported within revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Certain capacity income (bonuses) and charges (penalties) related to the availability of units that have cleared in the auctions are unknown and not recorded in revenue until, and unless, they occur. The Utilities’ distribution customers are metered on a cycle basis. An estimate of unbilled revenues is calculated to recognize electric service provided from the last meter reading through the end of the month. This estimate includes many factors, among which are historical customer usage, load profiles, estimated weather impacts, customer shopping activity and prices in effect for each class of customer. In each accounting period, the Utilities accrue the estimated unbilled amount as revenue and reverse the related prior period estimate. Customer payments vary by state but are generally due within 30 days. ASC 606 excludes industry-specific accounting guidance for recognizing revenue from ARPs as these programs represent contracts between the utility and its regulators, as opposed to customers. Therefore, revenues from these programs are not within the scope of ASC 606 and regulated utilities are permitted to continue to recognize such revenues in accordance with existing practice but are presented separately from revenue arising from contracts with customers. FirstEnergy had ARPs in Ohio primarily for decoupling revenue in 2020, and has reflected refunds of decoupling revenue owed to customers as reductions to ARPs in 2021. Please see Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” for further discussion on decoupling revenues in Ohio. Regulated Transmission The Regulated Transmission segment provides transmission infrastructure owned and operated by the Transmission Companies and certain of FirstEnergy's utilities (JCP&L, MP, PE and WP) to transmit electricity from generation sources to distribution facilities. The segment's revenues are derived from forward-looking formula rates. See Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information. Forward-looking formula rates recover costs that the regulatory agencies determine are permitted to be recovered and provide a return on transmission capital investment. Under forward-looking formula rates, the revenue requirement is updated annually based on a projected rate base and projected costs, which is subject to an annual true-up based on actual costs. Revenues and cash receipts for the stand-ready obligation of providing transmission service are recognized ratably over time. The following table represents a disaggregation of revenue from contracts with regulated transmission customers for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, by transmission owner: For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30, Transmission Owner 2021 2020 2021 2020 (In millions) ATSI $ 206 $ 202 $ 604 $ 598 TrAIL 59 61 176 182 MAIT 75 68 222 183 JCP&L 41 43 126 122 MP, PE and WP 30 34 95 100 Total Revenues $ 411 $ 408 $ 1,223 $ 1,185 |
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued Operations | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Discontinued Operations and Disposal Groups [Abstract] | |
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS FES and FENOC Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing On March 31, 2018, the FES Debtors announced that, in order to facilitate an orderly financial restructuring, they filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code with the Bankruptcy Court. On February 27, 2020, the FES Debtors effectuated their plan, emerged from bankruptcy and FirstEnergy tendered the bankruptcy court approved settlement payments totaling $853 million and a $125 million tax sharing payment to the FES Debtors. By eliminating a significant portion of its competitive generation fleet with the deconsolidation of the FES Debtors, FirstEnergy has concluded the FES Debtors meet the criteria for discontinued operations, as this represents a significant event in management’s strategic review to exit commodity-exposed generation and transition to a fully regulated company. Summarized Results of Discontinued Operations Summarized results of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, were as follows: For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30, (In millions) 2021 2020 2021 2020 Revenues $ — $ — $ — $ 7 Fuel — — — (6) Other operating expenses — — — (6) Other income — — — 5 Income from discontinued operations, before tax — — — — Income tax expense — — — — Income from discontinued operations, net of tax — — — — Settlement consideration — — — (1) Accelerated net pension and OPEB prior service credits — — — 18 Gain on disposal of FES and FENOC, before tax — — — 17 Income taxes (benefits), including worthless stock deduction (47) 6 (47) (29) Gain on disposal of FES and FENOC, net of tax 47 (6) 47 46 Income from discontinued operations $ 47 $ (6) $ 47 $ 46 FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows combine cash flows from discontinued operations with cash flows from continuing operations within each cash flow category. For the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, cash flows from operating activities includes income from discontinued operations of $47 million and $46 million, respectively. There were no cash flows from investing or financing activities from discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 or 2020. Income Taxes For U.S. federal income taxes, the FES Debtors were included in FirstEnergy’s consolidated tax return until emergence from bankruptcy on February 27, 2020. As a result of the FES Debtors’ tax return deconsolidation, FirstEnergy recognized a worthless stock deduction, of approximately $4.9 billion, net of unrecognized tax benefits of $316 million, for the remaining tax basis in the stock of the FES Debtors. Tax-effected, the worthless stock deduction is approximately $1.0 billion, net of valuation allowances recorded against the state tax benefit ($19 million) and the aforementioned unrecognized tax benefits ($68 million). In conjunction with filing the 2020 consolidated federal income tax return during the third quarter of 2021, FirstEnergy computed a final federal NOL allocation between the FES Debtors and FirstEnergy consolidated that resulted in FirstEnergy recording an increase to the consolidated NOL carryforward of approximately $289 million ($61 million tax-effected). |
Earnings Per Share Of Common St
Earnings Per Share Of Common Stock | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Earnings Per Share [Abstract] | |
EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK | EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the relevant period as the denominator. The denominator for diluted EPS of common stock reflects the weighted average of common shares outstanding plus the potential additional common shares that could result if dilutive securities and other agreements to issue common stock were exercised. Diluted EPS reflects the dilutive effect of potential common shares from share-based awards. The dilutive effect of outstanding share-based awards was computed using the treasury stock method, which assumes any proceeds that could be obtained upon the exercise of the award would be used to purchase common stock at the average market price for the period. The following table reconciles basic and diluted EPS of common stock: For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30, Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted EPS 2021 2020 2021 2020 (In millions, except per share amounts) Income from continuing operations $ 416 $ 460 $ 809 $ 791 Discontinued operations, net of tax 47 (6) 47 46 Net Income $ 463 $ 454 $ 856 $ 837 Share count information: Weighted average number of basic shares outstanding 544 542 544 542 Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options and awards 1 1 1 1 Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding 545 543 545 543 Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock: Income from continuing operations, basic $ 0.76 $ 0.85 $ 1.48 $ 1.46 Discontinued operations, basic 0.09 (0.01) 0.09 0.08 Basic earnings per share of common stock $ 0.85 $ 0.84 $ 1.57 $ 1.54 Income from continuing operations, diluted $ 0.76 $ 0.85 $ 1.48 $ 1.46 Discontinued operations, diluted 0.09 (0.01) 0.09 0.08 Diluted earnings per share of common stock $ 0.85 $ 0.84 $ 1.57 $ 1.54 |
Pension and Other Post-Employme
Pension and Other Post-Employment Benefits | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Retirement Benefits [Abstract] | |
PENSIONS AND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS | PENSION AND OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS The components of the consolidated net periodic costs (credits) for pension and OPEB were as follows: Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs (Credits) Pension OPEB For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 2020 2021 2020 (In millions) Service costs $ 48 $ 47 $ 1 $ 1 Interest costs 57 71 3 4 Expected return on plan assets (163) (156) (10) (9) Amortization of prior service costs (credits) (1) 1 1 (4) (4) Net periodic credits, including amounts capitalized $ (57) $ (37) $ (10) $ (8) Net periodic credits, recognized in earnings $ (80) $ (56) $ (10) $ (8) (1) The income tax benefits associated with pension and OPEB prior service costs amortized out of AOCI were $1 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs (Credits) Pension OPEB For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 2020 2021 2020 (In millions) Service costs $ 145 $ 147 $ 3 $ 3 Interest costs 170 216 8 12 Expected return on plan assets (489) (464) (27) (25) Amortization of prior service costs (credits) (1) (2) 3 12 (13) (42) One-time termination benefit (3) — 8 — — Pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment — 386 — 37 Net periodic costs (credits), including amounts capitalized $ (171) $ 305 $ (29) $ (15) Net periodic costs (credits), recognized in earnings $ (243) $ 240 $ (30) $ (15) (1) 2020 includes the acceleration of $18 million in net credits as a result of the FES Debtors’ emergence during the first quarter of 2020 and is a component of discontinued operations in FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income. (2) The income tax benefits associated with pension and OPEB prior service costs amortized out of AOCI were $3 million and $7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. (3) Costs represent additional benefits provided to FES and FENOC employees under the approved settlement agreement and are a component of discontinued operations in FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income. FirstEnergy recognizes a pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment for the change in fair value of plan assets and net actuarial gains and losses annually in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and whenever a plan is determined to qualify for remeasurement. Under the approved bankruptcy settlement agreement discussed above, upon emergence, FES and FENOC employees ceased earning years of service under the FirstEnergy pension and OPEB plans. The emergence on February 27, 2020, triggered a remeasurement of the affected pension and OPEB plans and as a result, FirstEnergy recognized a non-cash, pre-tax pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment of approximately $423 million in the first quarter of 2020. On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which among other things, extended shortfall amortization periods and modification of the interest rate stabilization rules for single-employer plans thereby impacting funding requirements. As a result, FirstEnergy does not currently expect to have a required contribution to the pension plan based on various assumptions including annual expected rate of returns for assets of 7.5%. However, FirstEnergy may elect to contribute to the pension plan voluntarily. Service costs, net of capitalization, are reported within Other operating expenses on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Non-service costs, other than the pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment, which is separately shown, are reported within Miscellaneous income, net, within Other Income (Expense) on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income. |
Income Taxes
Income Taxes | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract] | |
INCOME TAXES | INCOME TAXES FirstEnergy’s interim effective tax rates reflect the estimated annual effective tax rates for 2021 and 2020. These tax rates are affected by estimated annual permanent items, such as AFUDC equity and other flow-through items, as well as discrete items that may occur in any given period but are not consistent from period to period. FirstEnergy’s effective tax rate on continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, was 17.5% and 20.1%, respectively. The change in effective tax rate was primarily due to a $29 million decrease in the reserve for unrecognized tax benefits primarily related to positions on nondeductible interest under Section 163(j) that were effectively settled with the IRS in closing out audits of the 2018 and 2019 consolidated federal income tax returns. FirstEnergy’s effective tax rate on continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, was 25.1% and 13.4%, respectively. In addition to the items mentioned above, the change in effective tax rate was primarily due to: • The non-deductibility of the DPA penalty and $9 million of tax expense recorded in the second quarter of 2021 related to the remeasurement of West Virginia deferred income taxes resulting from a state tax law change (as discussed further below). • The absence of a $10 million benefit from accelerated amortization of certain investment tax credits recorded in the second quarter of 2020. • The absence of a $52 million benefit for reduction in valuation allowances in the first quarter of 2020 from the recognition of deferred gains on prior intercompany generation asset transfers triggered by the FES Debtors’ emergence from bankruptcy and deconsolidation from FirstEnergy’s consolidated federal income tax group. See Note 3, “Discontinued Operations,” for other tax matters relating to the FES Bankruptcy that were recognized in discontinued operations. During the three months ended September 30, 2021, FirstEnergy recorded a net $25 million decrease to the reserve for uncertain tax positions primarily due to the effectively settled positions discussed previously, partially offset by a $4 million increase in the reserve related to certain federal tax credits claimed on FirstEnergy’s 2020 federal income tax return. During the nine months ended September 30, 2021, FirstEnergy recorded a net $21 million decrease in its reserve for uncertain tax positions. The decrease primarily resulted from the effectively settled positions discussed previously and remeasurement for West Virginia deferred taxes (as discussed further below), partially offset by an increase of $15 million for benefits related to certain federal tax credits. As of September 30, 2021, it is reasonably possible that within the next twelve months FirstEnergy could record a net decrease of approximately $26 million to its reserve for uncertain tax positions due to the expiration of the statute of limitations or resolution with taxing authorities, of which approximately $24 million would impact FirstEnergy’s effective tax rate. On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. While the Act is primarily an economic stimulus package, it also, among other changes, expanded the scope of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code that limits deductions on certain executive officer compensation. FirstEnergy does not currently expect these changes to have a material impact. On April 9, 2021, West Virginia enacted legislation changing the state’s corporate income tax apportionment rules, including adopting a single sales factor formula and market-based sourcing for sales of services and intangibles, effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2022. Enactment of this law triggered a remeasurement of state deferred income taxes for entities included in FirstEnergy’s West Virginia combined unitary return, resulting in a net impact of approximately $9 million in additional tax expense in the second quarter of 2021. In August 2021, the IRS completed its examination of FirstEnergy’s 2018 and 2019 federal income tax returns and issued Full Acceptance Letters with no adjustments to FirstEnergy’s taxable income in either year. Tax year 2020 is currently under review by the IRS. |
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] | |
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS Authoritative accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 measurements and the lowest priority to Level 3 measurements. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy and a description of the valuation techniques are as follows: Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active market. Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active market. - Quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active. - Model-derived valuations for which all significant inputs are observable market data. Models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Level 3 - Valuation inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. FirstEnergy produces a long-term power and capacity price forecast annually with periodic updates as market conditions change. When underlying prices are not observable, prices from the long-term price forecast are used to measure fair value. FTRs are financial instruments that entitle the holder to a stream of revenues (or charges) based on the hourly day-ahead congestion price differences across transmission paths. FTRs are acquired by FirstEnergy in the annual, monthly and long-term PJM auctions and are initially recorded using the auction clearing price less cost. After initial recognition, FTRs’ carrying values are periodically adjusted to fair value using a mark-to-model methodology, which approximates market. The primary inputs into the model, which are generally less observable than objective sources, are the most recent PJM auction clearing prices and the FTRs’ remaining hours. The model calculates the fair value by multiplying the most recent auction clearing price by the remaining FTR hours less the prorated FTR cost. Significant increases or decreases in inputs in isolation may have resulted in a higher or lower fair value measurement. NUG contracts represent PPAs with third-party non-utility generators that are transacted to satisfy certain obligations under PURPA. NUG contract carrying values are recorded at fair value and adjusted periodically using a mark-to-model methodology, which approximates market. The primary unobservable inputs into the model are regional power prices and generation MWH. Pricing for the NUG contracts is a combination of market prices for the current year and next two years based on observable data and internal models using historical trends and market data for the remaining years under contract. The internal models use forecasted energy purchase prices as an input when prices are not defined by the contract. Forecasted market prices are based on Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. quotes and management assumptions. Generation MWH reflects data provided by contractual arrangements and historical trends. The model calculates the fair value by multiplying the prices by the generation MWH. Significant increases or decreases in inputs in isolation may have resulted in a higher or lower fair value measurement. FirstEnergy primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements using the best information available. Accordingly, FirstEnergy maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. There were no changes in valuation methodologies used as of September 30, 2021, from those used as of December 31, 2020. The determination of the fair value measures takes into consideration various factors, including but not limited to, nonperformance risk, counterparty credit risk and the impact of credit enhancements (such as cash deposits, LOCs and priority interests). The impact of these forms of risk was not significant to the fair value measurements. The following tables set forth the recurring assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy: September 30, 2021 December 31, 2020 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets (In millions) Derivative assets FTRs (1) $ — $ — $ 10 $ 10 $ — $ — $ 3 $ 3 Equity securities 2 — — 2 2 — — 2 U.S. state debt securities — 271 — 271 — 276 — 276 Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (2) 684 — — 684 1,801 — — 1,801 Other (3) — 43 — 43 — 41 — 41 Total assets $ 686 $ 314 $ 10 $ 1,010 $ 1,803 $ 317 $ 3 $ 2,123 Liabilities Derivative liabilities FTRs (1) $ — $ — $ (1) $ (1) $ — $ — $ — $ — Total liabilities $ — $ — $ (1) $ (1) $ — $ — $ — $ — Net assets (liabilities) (4) $ 686 $ 314 $ 9 $ 1,009 $ 1,803 $ 317 $ 3 $ 2,123 (1) Contracts are subject to regulatory accounting treatment and changes in market values do not impact earnings. (2) Restricted cash of $107 million and $67 million as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 respectively, primarily relates to cash collected from JCP&L, MP, PE and the Ohio Companies’ customers that is specifically used to service debt of their respective funding companies. (3) Primarily consists of short-term investments. (4) Excludes $1 million as of December 31, 2020, of net receivables, payables, taxes and accrued income associated with financial instruments reflected within the fair value table. Level 3 Quantitative Information The following table provides quantitative information for FTRs contracts that are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the period ended September 30, 2021: Fair Value, Net (In millions) Valuation Significant Input Range Weighted Average Units FTRs $ 9 Model RTO auction clearing prices $ 0.50 to $ 3.30 $1.40 Dollars/MWH INVESTMENTS All temporary cash investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less are reported as cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost, which approximates their fair market value. Investments other than cash and cash equivalents include equity securities, AFS debt securities and other investments. FirstEnergy has no debt securities held for trading purposes. Generally, unrealized gains and losses on equity securities are recognized in income whereas unrealized gains and losses on AFS debt securities are recognized in AOCI. However, the spent nuclear fuel disposal trusts of JCP&L, ME and PN are subject to regulatory accounting with all gains and losses on equity and AFS debt securities offset against regulatory assets. Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Trusts JCP&L holds debt securities within the spent nuclear fuel disposal trust, which are classified as AFS securities, recognized at fair market value. The trust is intended for funding spent nuclear fuel disposal fees to the DOE associated with the previously owned Oyster Creek and TMI-1 nuclear power plants. The following table summarizes the amortized cost basis, unrealized gains, unrealized losses and fair values of investments held in spent nuclear fuel disposal trusts as of September 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020: September 30, 2021 (1) December 31, 2020 (2) Cost Basis Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value Cost Basis Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value (In millions) Debt securities $ 277 $ 2 $ (8) $ 271 $ 275 $ 7 $ (6) $ 276 (1) Excludes short-term cash investments of $12 million. (2) Excludes short-term cash investments of $9 million. Proceeds from the sale of investments in AFS debt securities, realized gains and losses on those sales and interest and dividend income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, were as follows: For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 2020 (1) 2021 2020 (1) (In millions) Sale proceeds $ 16 $ 6 $ 29 $ 45 Realized gains — — — 4 Realized losses (1) — (2) (7) Interest and dividend income 3 4 8 18 (1) Includes amounts associated with NDTs that were previously held by JCP&L, ME, and PN. See above for additional information. Other Investments Other investments include employee benefit trusts, which are primarily invested in corporate-owned life insurance policies and equity method investments. Other investments were $349 million and $322 million as of September 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020, respectively, and are excluded from the amounts reported above. LONG-TERM DEBT AND OTHER LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS All borrowings with initial maturities of less than one year are defined as short-term financial instruments under GAAP and are reported as Short-term borrowings on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost. Since these borrowings are short-term in nature, FirstEnergy believes that their costs approximate their fair market value. The following table provides the approximate fair value and related carrying amounts of long-term debt, which excludes finance lease obligations and net unamortized debt issuance costs, unamortized fair value adjustments, premiums and discounts as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020: September 30, 2021 December 31, 2020 (In millions) Carrying value $ 23,819 $ 22,377 Fair value $ 27,018 $ 25,465 The fair values of long-term debt and other long-term obligations reflect the present value of the cash outflows relating to those securities based on the current call price, the yield to maturity or the yield to call, as deemed appropriate at the end of each respective period. The yields assumed were based on securities with similar characteristics offered by corporations with credit ratings similar to those of FirstEnergy. FirstEnergy classified short-term borrowings, long-term debt and other long-term obligations as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020. |
Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Matters | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Regulated Operations [Abstract] | |
REGULATORY MATTERS | REGULATORY MATTERS STATE REGULATION Each of the Utilities' retail rates, conditions of service, issuance of securities and other matters are subject to regulation in the states in which it operates - in Maryland by the MDPSC, in New Jersey by the NJBPU, in Ohio by the PUCO, in Pennsylvania by the PPUC, in West Virginia by the WVPSC and in New York by the NYPSC. The transmission operations of PE in Virginia, ATSI in Ohio, and the Transmission Companies in Pennsylvania are subject to certain regulations of the VSCC, PUCO and PPUC, respectively. In addition, under Ohio law, municipalities may regulate rates of a public utility, subject to appeal to the PUCO if not acceptable to the utility. Further, if any of the FirstEnergy affiliates were to engage in the construction of significant new transmission facilities, depending on the state, they may be required to obtain state regulatory authorization to site, construct and operate the new transmission facility. MARYLAND PE operates under MDPSC approved base rates that were effective as of March 23, 2019. PE also provides SOS pursuant to a combination of settlement agreements, MDPSC orders and regulations, and statutory provisions. SOS supply is competitively procured in the form of rolling contracts of varying lengths through periodic auctions that are overseen by the MDPSC and a third-party monitor. Although settlements with respect to SOS supply for PE customers have expired, service continues in the same manner until changed by order of the MDPSC. PE recovers its costs plus a return for providing SOS. The EmPOWER Maryland program requires each electric utility to file a plan to reduce electric consumption and demand 0.2% per year, up to the ultimate goal of 2% annual savings, for the duration of the 2018-2020 and 2021-2023 EmPOWER Maryland program cycles, to the extent the MDPSC determines that cost-effective programs and services are available. PE's approved 2018-2020 EmPOWER Maryland plan continues and expands upon prior years' programs, and adds new programs, for a projected total investment of $116 million over the three-year period. PE recovers program investments with a return through an annually reconciled surcharge, with most costs subject to recovery over a five-year period with a return on the unamortized balance. Maryland law only allows for the utility to recover lost distribution revenue attributable to energy efficiency or demand reduction programs through a base rate case proceeding, and to date, such recovery has not been sought or obtained by PE. On September 1, 2020, PE filed its proposed plan for the 2021-2023 EmPOWER Maryland program cycle. The new plan largely continues PE’s existing programs with an estimated investment of approximately $148 million over the three-year period with similar recovery. The MDPSC approved the plan on December 18, 2020. On March 22, 2019, MDPSC issued an order approving PE’s 2018 base rate case filing, which among other things, approved an annual rate increase of $6.2 million, approved three of the four EDIS programs for four years to fund enhanced service reliability programs, directed PE to file a new depreciation study within 18 months, and ordered the filing of a new base rate case in four years to correspond to the ending of the approved EDIS programs. On September 22, 2020, PE filed its depreciation study reflecting a slight increase in expense and is seeking the difference to be deferred for future recovery in PE’s next base rate case. On January 29, 2021, the Maryland Office of People's Counsel filed testimony recommending an annual reduction in depreciation expense of $10.8 million, and the staff of the MDPSC filed testimony recommending an annual reduction of $9.6 million. On May 26, 2021, the judge issued a Proposed Order which would reduce PE’s base rates by $2.1 million. PE filed an appeal of the Proposed Order to the MDPSC on June 25, 2021, which the MDPSC denied on October 26, 2021. Maryland’s Governor issued an order on March 16, 2020, forbidding utilities from terminating residential service or charging late fees for non-payment for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. On April 9, 2020, the MDPSC issued an order allowing utilities to track and create a regulatory asset for future recovery of all prudently incurred incremental costs arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, including incremental uncollectible expense, incurred from the date of the Governor’s order (or earlier if the utility could show that the expenses related to suspension of service terminations). In July 2020, the MDPSC subsequently issued orders allowing Maryland electric and gas utilities to resume residential service terminations for non-payment on November 15, 2020, subject to various restrictions, and clarifying that utilities could resume charging late fees on October 1, 2020. On June 16, 2021, the MDPSC provided PE with approximately $4 million of COVID-19 relief funds that was allocated by the Maryland General Assembly to be used to reduce certain residential customer utility account receivable arrearages. NEW JERSEY JCP&L operates under NJBPU approved rates that were effective as of January 1, 2017. JCP&L provides BGS for retail customers who do not choose a third-party EGS and for customers of third-party EGSs that fail to provide the contracted service. All New Jersey EDCs participate in this competitive BGS procurement process and recover BGS costs directly from customers as a charge separate from base rates. In December 2017, the NJBPU issued proposed rules to modify its current CTA policy in base rate cases to: (i) calculate savings using a five-year look back from the beginning of the test year; (ii) allocate savings with 75% retained by the company and 25% allocated to ratepayers; and (iii) exclude transmission assets of electric distribution companies in the savings calculation, which were published in the NJ Register in the first quarter of 2018. JCP&L filed comments supporting the proposed rulemaking. On January 17, 2019, the NJBPU approved the proposed CTA rules with no changes. On May 17, 2019, the NJ Rate Counsel filed an appeal with the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey and on June 7, 2021, the court issued an Order reversing the NJBPU’s CTA rules and remanded the case back to the NJBPU. Specifically, the court’s ruling requires 100% of the CTA savings to be credited to customers in lieu of the NJBPU’s current policy requiring 25%. The court’s ruling will be applied on a prospective basis. On February 18, 2020, JCP&L submitted a filing with the NJBPU requesting a distribution base rate increase. On October 28, 2020, the NJBPU approved a stipulated settlement between JCP&L and various parties, providing for, among other things, a $94 million annual base distribution revenues increase for JCP&L based on an ROE of 9.6%, which will become effective for customers on November 1, 2021. Until the rates become effective, and starting on January 1, 2021, JCP&L began to amortize an existing regulatory liability totaling approximately $86 million to offset the base rate increase that otherwise would have occurred in this period. The parties also agreed that the actual net gain from the sale of JCP&L’s interest in the Yards Creek pumped-storage hydro generation facility in New Jersey (210 MWs), as further discussed below, be applied to reduce JCP&L’s existing regulatory asset for previously deferred storm costs. Lastly, the parties agreed that approximately $95 million of Reliability Plus capital investment for projects through December 31, 2020, is included in rate base effective December 31, 2020, with a final prudence review of only those capital investment projects from July 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020, to occur in January 2021. During the first quarter of 2021, JCP&L submitted its review of storm costs, filed a written report for its Reliability Plus projects placed in service from July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, and submitted the vegetation management report, all required under the stipulation of settlement. On March 24, 2021, JCP&L, NJ Rate Counsel and the NJBPU Staff submitted a stipulation of settlement to the NJBPU, which was approved on April 7, 2021, providing that the Reliability Plus projects placed into service from July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 were reasonable and prudent. On April 6, 2020, JCP&L signed an asset purchase agreement with Yards Creek Energy, LLC, a subsidiary of LS Power to sell its 50% interest in the Yards Creek pumped-storage hydro generation facility. Subject to terms and conditions of the agreement, the base purchase price is $155 million. As of December 31, 2020, assets held for sale on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets associated with the transaction consist of property, plant and equipment of $45 million, which is included in the regulated distribution segment. On July 31, 2020, FERC approved the transfer of JCP&L’s interest in the hydroelectric operating license. On October 8, 2020, FERC issued an order authorizing the transfer of JCP&L’s ownership interest in the hydroelectric facilities. On October 28, 2020, the NJBPU approved the sale of Yards Creek. With the receipt of all required regulatory approvals, the transaction was consummated on March 5, 2021 and resulted in a $109 million gain within the regulated distribution segment. As further discussed above, the gain from the transaction was applied against and reduced JCP&L’s existing regulatory asset for previously deferred storm costs and, as a result, was offset by expense in the “Amortization of regulatory assets, net”, line on the Consolidated Statements of Income, resulting in no earnings impact to FirstEnergy or JCP&L. On August 27, 2020, JCP&L filed an AMI Program with the NJBPU, which proposes the deployment of approximately 1.2 million advanced meters over a three-year period beginning on January 1, 2023, at a total cost of approximately $418 million, including the pre-deployment phase. The 3-year deployment is part of the 20-year AMI Program that is expected to cost a total of approximately $732 million and proposes a cost recovery mechanism through a separate AMI tariff rider. On February 26, 2021, JCP&L filed a letter requesting a suspension of the procedural schedule to allow for settlement discussions, which was granted on March 5, 2021. On September 14, 2021, JCP&L submitted a supplemental filing, which reflects increases in the AMI Program’s costs. Under the revised AMI Program, during the first six years of the AMI Program, JCP&L estimates cost of $494 million, consisting of capital expenditures of approximately $390 million, operations and maintenance expenses of approximately $73 million and cost of removal of $31 million. JCP&L expects a NJBPU order by the end of 2021. On June 10, 2020, the NJBPU issued an order establishing a framework for the filing of utility-run energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs in accordance with the New Jersey Clean Energy Act. Under the established framework, JCP&L will recover its program investments with a return over a ten-year amortization period and its operations and maintenance expenses on an annual basis, be eligible to receive lost revenues on energy savings that resulted from its programs and be eligible for incentives or subject to penalties based on its annual program performance, beginning in the fifth year of its program offerings. On September 25, 2020, JCP&L filed its energy efficiency and peak demand reduction program. JCP&L’s program consists of 11 energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs and subprograms to be run from July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2024. On April 23, 2021, JCP&L filed a Stipulation of Settlement with the NJBPU for approval of recovery of lost revenues resulting from the programs and a three-year plan including total program costs of $203 million, of which $158 million of investment is recovered over a ten year amortization period with a return as well as operations and maintenance expenses and financing costs of $45 million recovered on an annual basis. On April 27, 2021, the NJBPU issued an Order approving the Stipulation of Settlement. On July 2, 2020, the NJBPU issued an order allowing New Jersey utilities to track and create a regulatory asset for future recovery of all prudently incurred incremental costs arising from the COVID-19 pandemic beginning March 9, 2020 through September 30, 2021, or until the Governor issues an order stating that the COVID-19 pandemic is no longer in effect. New Jersey utilities can request recovery of such regulatory asset in a stand-alone COVID-19 regulatory asset filing or future base rate case. On October 28, 2020, the NJBPU issued an order expanding the scope of the proceeding to examine all pandemic issues, including recovery of the COVID-19 regulatory assets, by way of a generic proceeding. Through various Executive Orders issued by Governor Murphy, the moratorium period is extended to December 31, 2021. The recent credit rating actions taken on October 28, 2020, by S&P and Fitch triggered a requirement from various NJBPU orders that JCP&L file a mitigation plan, which was filed on November 5, 2020, to demonstrate that JCP&L has sufficient liquidity to meet its BGS obligations. On December 11, 2020, the NJBPU held a public hearing on the mitigation plan. Written comments on JCP&L’s mitigation plan were submitted on January 8, 2021. On September 23, 2020, the NJBPU issued an Order requiring all New Jersey electric distribution companies to file electric vehicle programs. JCP&L filed its electric vehicle program on March 1, 2021, which consists of six sub-programs, including a consumer education and outreach initiative that would begin on January 1, 2022, and continue over a four-year period. The total proposed budget for the electric vehicle program is approximately $50 million, of which $16 million is capital expenditures and $34 million is for operations and maintenance expenses. JCP&L is proposing to recover the electric vehicle program costs via a non-bypassable rate clause applicable to all distribution customer rate classes, which would become effective on January 1, 2022. On May 26, 2021, a procedural schedule was set to include evidentiary hearings the week of October 18, 2021. On July 16, 2021, the procedural schedule was extended by thirty days as requested by JCP&L to continue settlement discussions. On August 19, 2021, the presiding commissioner issued an order modifying the procedural schedule by extending the procedural schedule by ninety days as requested by JCP&L to continue settlement discussions. On October 28, 2020, the NJBPU approved a settlement in JCP&L’s distribution rate, and voted that JCP&L will be subject to an upcoming management audit. The management audit began at the end of May 2021 and is currently ongoing. OHIO The Ohio Companies operate under base distribution rates approved by the PUCO effective in 2009. The Ohio Companies currently operate under ESP IV effective June 1, 2016, and continuing through May 31, 2024, that continues the supply of power to non-shopping customers at a market-based price set through an auction process. ESP IV also continues the Rider DCR, which supports continued investment related to the distribution system for the benefit of customers, with increased revenue caps of $20 million per year from June 1, 2019 through May 31, 2022; and $15 million per year from June 1, 2022 through May 31, 2024. In addition, ESP IV includes: (1) continuation of a base distribution rate freeze through May 31, 2024; (2) a goal across FirstEnergy to reduce CO 2 emissions by 90% below 2005 levels by 2045; and (3) contributions, totaling $51 million to: (a) fund energy conservation programs, economic development and job retention in the Ohio Companies’ service territories; (b) establish a fuel-fund in each of the Ohio Companies’ service territories to assist low-income customers; and (c) establish a Customer Advisory Council to ensure preservation and growth of the competitive market in Ohio. ESP IV further provided for the Ohio Companies to collect DMR revenues, but the SCOH reversed the PUCO’s decision to include DMR in ESP IV. Subsequently, the PUCO entered an order directing the Ohio Companies to cease further collection through the DMR and credit back to customers a refund of the DMR funds collected since July 2, 2019. On July 15, 2019, the OCC filed an appeal with the SCOH, challenging the PUCO’s exclusion of DMR revenues from the determination of the existence of significantly excessive earnings under ESP IV for OE for calendar year 2017, and claiming a $42 million refund is due to OE customers. On December 1, 2020, the SCOH reversed the PUCO’s exclusion of the DMR revenues from the determination of the existence of significantly excessive earnings under ESP IV for OE for calendar year 2017, and remanded the case to the PUCO with instructions to conduct new proceedings which include the DMR revenues in the analysis, determine the threshold against which the earned return is measured, and make other necessary determinations. FirstEnergy is unable to predict the outcome of these proceedings but has not deemed a liability probable as of September 30, 2021. On July 23, 2019, Ohio enacted HB 6, which included provisions supporting nuclear energy, authorizing a decoupling mechanism for Ohio electric utilities and ending current energy efficiency program mandates. Under HB 6 the energy efficiency program mandates would have ended on December 31, 2020, provided that statewide energy efficiency mandates are achieved as determined by the PUCO. On February 24, 2021, the PUCO found that statewide energy efficiency mandates had been achieved, and ordered that Ohio electric utilities’ energy efficiency and peak demand reduction cost recovery riders terminate. Third-parties have challenged the Ohio Companies’ authorization to recover all lost distribution revenue under energy efficiency and peak demand reduction cost recovery riders. On October 18, 2021, the attorney examiner issued a procedural schedule setting hearings for December 22, 2021, on that issue. FirstEnergy is unable to predict the outcome of this proceeding. On March 31, 2021, Governor DeWine signed HB 128, which, among other things, repealed parts of HB 6, the legislation that established support for nuclear energy supply in Ohio, provided for a decoupling mechanism for Ohio electric utilities, and provided for the ending of current energy efficiency program mandates. HB 128 was effective June 30, 2021. As FirstEnergy would not have financially benefited from the mechanism to provide support to nuclear energy in Ohio, there is no expected additional impact to FirstEnergy due to the repeal of that provision in HB 128. As further discussed below, in connection with a partial settlement with the OAG and other parties, the Ohio Companies filed an application with the PUCO on February 1, 2021, to set the respective decoupling riders (CSR) to zero. On February 2, 2021, the PUCO approved the application. While the partial settlement with the OAG focused specifically on decoupling, the Ohio Companies elected to forego recovery of lost distribution revenue. FirstEnergy is committed to pursuing an open dialogue with stakeholders in an appropriate manner with respect to the numerous regulatory proceedings currently underway as further discussed herein. As a result of the partial settlement, and the decision to not seek lost distribution revenue, FirstEnergy recognized a $108 million pre-tax charge ($84 million after-tax) in the fourth quarter of 2020, and $77 million (pre-tax) of which is associated with forgoing collection of lost distribution revenue. On March 31, 2021, FirstEnergy announced that the Ohio Companies would proactively refund to customers amounts previously collected under decoupling, with interest, which total approximately $27 million. On April 22, 2021, in anticipation of the effective date of HB 128 and in accordance with HB 128’s provisions regarding the prompt refund of decoupling funds, the Ohio Companies filed an application with the PUCO to modify CSR to return such amount over twelve months commencing June 1, 2021. On June 17, 2021, the Ohio Companies agreed to modify their proposal to return such amount in a single lump sum to customers, beginning on July 1, 2021, or promptly upon obtaining PUCO approval. On July 7, 2021, the PUCO issued an order approving the Ohio Companies’ modified application and directed that all funds collected through CSR be refunded to customers over a single billing cycle beginning August 1, 2021. On July 17, 2019, the PUCO approved, with no material modifications, a settlement agreement that provides for the implementation of the Ohio Companies’ first phase of grid modernization plans, including the investment of $516 million over three years to modernize the Ohio Companies’ electric distribution system, and for all tax savings associated with the Tax Act to flow back to customers. The settlement had broad support, including PUCO staff, the OCC, representatives of industrial and commercial customers, a low-income advocate, environmental advocates, hospitals, competitive generation suppliers and other parties. In March 2020, the PUCO issued entries directing utilities to review their service disconnection and restoration policies and suspend, for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, otherwise applicable requirements that may impose a service continuity hardship or service restoration hardship on customers. The Ohio Companies are utilizing their existing approved cost recovery mechanisms where applicable to address the financial impacts of these directives. On July 31, 2020, the Ohio Companies filed with the PUCO their transition plan and requests for waivers to allow for the safe resumption of normal business operations, including service disconnections for non-payment. On September 23, 2020, the PUCO approved the Ohio Companies’ transition plan, including approval of the resumption of service disconnections for non-payment, which the Ohio Companies began on October 5, 2020. On July 29, 2020, the PUCO consolidated the Ohio Companies’ applications for determination of the existence of significantly excessive earnings, or SEET, under ESP IV for calendar years 2018 and 2019, which had been previously filed on July 15, 2019, and May 15, 2020, respectively. On September 4, 2020, the PUCO opened its quadrennial review of ESP IV, consolidated it with the Ohio Companies’ 2018 and 2019 SEET Applications, and set a procedural schedule for the consolidated matters. On January 12, 2021, the PUCO consolidated these matters with the determination of the existence of significantly excessive earnings under ESP IV for calendar year 2017, which the SCOH had remanded to the PUCO. On March 1, 2021, the Ohio Companies filed testimony in the quadrennial review and supplemental testimony in the SEET cases for calendar years 2017 through 2019. The calculations included in the quadrennial review for 2020 through 2024 demonstrate that the prospective effect of ESP IV is not substantially likely to provide the Ohio Companies with significantly excessive earnings during the balance of ESP IV. In addition, the Ohio Companies’ quadrennial review testimony demonstrated that ESP IV continues to be more favorable in the aggregate and during the remaining term of ESP IV as compared to the expected results of a market rate offer. Further, the revised calculations included in the Ohio Companies’ supplemental SEET testimony for calendar years 2017 through 2019 demonstrated that the Ohio Companies did not have significantly excessive earnings, on an individual company basis or on a consolidated basis. On March 31, 2021, Governor DeWine signed House Bill 128, which repeals legislation passed in 2019 that permitted the Ohio Companies to file their SEET results on a consolidated basis instead of on an individual company basis. HB 128 was effective June 30, 2021. Further, the OCC and another party filed testimony on April 5, 2021, recommending refunds for one or more of the Ohio Companies for calendar years 2017 through 2019. On April 20, 2021, the Ohio Companies filed supplemental testimony in the quadrennial review providing prospective SEET values on an individual company basis, which demonstrate that the Ohio Companies are not projected to have significantly excessive earnings, on an individual company basis, during the balance of ESP IV. On October 18, 2021, the attorney examiner issued a procedural schedule setting hearings for December 13, 2021, to allow time for settlement negotiations. As of September 30, 2021, no contingency has been reflected in FirstEnergy’s consolidated financial statements with respect to these matters as a loss is neither probable, nor is a loss or range of a loss reasonably estimable. On May 17, 2021, the Ohio Companies filed their application for the determination of significantly excessive earnings for calendar year 2020. The calculations included in the application demonstrated that the Ohio Companies, on an individual company basis, did not have significantly excessive earnings. In connection with the audit of the Ohio Companies’ Rider DCR for 2017, the PUCO issued an order on June 16, 2021, directing the Ohio Companies to prospectively discontinue capitalizing certain vegetation management costs and reduce the 2017 Rider DCR revenue requirement by $3.7 million associated with these costs. On September 8, 2020, the OCC filed motions in the Ohio Companies’ corporate separation audit and DMR audit dockets, requesting the PUCO to open an investigation and management audit, hire an independent auditor, and require FirstEnergy to show it did not improperly use money collected from consumers or violate any utility regulatory laws, rules or orders in its activities regarding HB 6. On December 30, 2020, in response to the OCC's motion, the PUCO reopened the DMR audit docket, and directed PUCO staff to solicit a third-party auditor and conduct a full review of the DMR to ensure funds collected from ratepayers through the DMR were only used for the purposes established in ESP IV. On June 2, 2021, the PUCO selected an auditor, and a final audit report is to be filed by December 16, 2021. On September 15, 2020, the PUCO opened a new proceeding to review the political and charitable spending by the Ohio Companies in support of HB 6 and the subsequent referendum effort, directing the Ohio Companies to show cause, demonstrating that the costs of any political or charitable spending in support of HB 6, or the subsequent referendum effort, were not included, directly or indirectly, in any rates or charges paid by ratepayers. The Ohio Companies filed a response on September 30, 2020, stating that any political and charitable spending in support of HB 6 or the subsequent referendum were not included in rates or charges paid for by its customers. Several parties requested that the PUCO broaden the scope of the review of political and charitable spending. On August 6, 2021, the Ohio Companies filed a supplemental response explaining that, in light of the new facts revealed by the DPA between FE and the U.S Attorney’s Office for the S.D. Ohio, and the findings of the Rider DCR audit report, the Ohio Companies concluded that political or charitable spending in support of HB 6, or the subsequent referendum effort, affected pole attachment rates paid by approximately $15 thousand, which will be refunded to those customers. On October 26, 2021, the OCC filed a motion requesting the PUCO to order an independent external audit to investigate FE’s political and charitable spending related to HB 6, and to appoint an independent review panel to retain and oversee the auditor. In connection with an ongoing audit of the Ohio Companies’ policies and procedures relating to the code of conduct rules between affiliates, on November 4, 2020, the PUCO initiated an additional corporate separation audit as a result of the FirstEnergy leadership transition announcement made on October 29, 2020, as further discussed below. The additional audit is to ensure compliance by the Ohio Companies and their affiliates with corporate separation laws and the Ohio Companies’ corporate separation plan. The additional audit is for the period from November 2016 through October 2020. The final audit report was filed on September 13, 2021. The audit report makes no findings of major non-compliance with Ohio corporate separation requirements, minor non-compliance with eight requirements, and findings of compliance with 23 requirements. A PUCO attorney examiner has issued a procedural schedule for the filing of comments and reply comments and testimony, as well as an evidentiary hearing on February 10, 2022. On November 24, 2020, the Environmental Law and Policy Center filed motions to vacate the PUCO’s orders in proceedings related to the Ohio Companies’ settlement that provides for the implementation of the first phase of grid modernization plans and for all tax savings associated with the Tax Act to flow back to customers, the Ohio Companies’ energy efficiency portfolio plans for the period from 2013 through 2016, and the Ohio Companies’ application for a two-year extension of the DMR, on the grounds that the former Chairman of the PUCO should have recused himself in these matters. On December 30, 2020, the PUCO denied the motions, and reinstated the requirement under ESP IV that the Ohio Companies file a base distribution rate case by May 31, 2024, the end of ESP IV, which the Ohio Companies had indicated they would not oppose. In the fourth quarter of 2020, motions were filed with the PUCO requesting that the PUCO amend the Ohio Companies’ riders for collecting the OVEC related charges required by HB 6, which the Ohio Companies are further required to remit to other Ohio electric distribution utilities or to the State Treasurer, to provide for refunds in the event such provisions of HB 6 are repealed. The Ohio Companies contested the motions, which are pending before the PUCO. On December 7, 2020, the Citizens’ Utility Board of Ohio filed a complaint with the PUCO against the Ohio Companies. The complaint alleges that the Ohio Companies’ new charges resulting from HB 6, and any increased rates resulting from proceedings over which the former PUCO Chairman presided, are unjust and unreasonable, and that the Ohio Companies violated Ohio corporate separation laws by failing to operate separately from unregulated affiliates. The complaint requests, among other things, that any rates authorized by HB 6 or authorized by the PUCO in a proceeding over which the former Chairman presided be made refundable; that the Ohio Companies be required to file a new distribution rate case at the earliest possible date; and that the Ohio Companies’ corporate separation plans be modified to introduce institutional controls. The Ohio Companies are contesting the complaint. In connection with an ongoing annual audit of the Ohio Companies’ Rider DCR for 2020, and as a result of disclosures in FirstEnergy’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (filed on February 18, 2021), the PUCO expanded the scope of the audit on March 10, 2021, to include a review of certain transactions that were either improperly classified, misallocated, or lacked supporting documentation, and to determine whether funds collected from ratepayers were used to pay the vendors, and if so, whether or not the funds associated with those payments should be returned to ratepayers through Rider DCR or through an alternative proceeding. The final audit report was filed on August 3, 2021. The audit report recommends that approximately $6.6 million be refunded to customers associated with certain vendor transactions that were either improperly classified, misallocated, or lacked supporting documentation. On September 29, 2021, the PUCO further expanded the scope of the audit, and directed the auditor to determine if the costs of the naming rights for FirstEnergy Stadium have been recovered from ratepayers by the Ohio Companies, with a final audit report to be filed by November 19, 2021. On October 4, 2021, the Ohio Companies and other parties filed comments on the August 3, 2021 audit report’s recommendations regarding the transactions disclosed in FirstEnergy’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. On October 14, 2021, the Ohio Companies and other parties filed reply comments. See Note 9, "Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies" for additional details on the government investigations and subsequent litigation surroun |
Commitments, Guarantees and Con
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |
COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES | COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES GUARANTEES AND OTHER ASSURANCES FirstEnergy has various financial and performance guarantees and indemnifications, which are issued in the normal course of business. These contracts include performance guarantees, stand-by letters of credit, debt guarantees, surety bonds and indemnifications. FirstEnergy enters into these arrangements to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties by enhancing the value of the transaction to the third party. As of September 30, 2021, outstanding guarantees and other assurances aggregated approximately $1.1 billion, consisting of parental guarantees on behalf of its consolidated subsidiaries ($586 million), other guarantees ($68 million) and other assurances ($469 million). COLLATERAL AND CONTINGENT-RELATED FEATURES In the normal course of business, FE and its subsidiaries may enter into physical or financially settled contracts for the sale and purchase of electric capacity, energy, fuel and emission allowances. Certain agreements contain provisions that require FE or its subsidiaries to post collateral. This collateral may be posted in the form of cash or credit support with thresholds contingent upon FE’s or its subsidiaries’ credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies. The collateral and credit support requirements vary by contract and by counterparty. As of September 30, 2021, $55 million of collateral has been posted by FE or its subsidiaries, all of which was posted as a result of the credit rating downgrades in the fourth quarter of 2020, and is included in Prepaid taxes and other current assets on FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. These credit-risk-related contingent features stipulate that if the subsidiary were to be downgraded or lose its investment grade credit rating (based on its senior unsecured debt rating), it would be required to provide additional collateral. The following table discloses the potential additional credit rating contingent contractual collateral obligations as of September 30, 2021: Potential Collateral Obligations Utilities and FET FE Total (In millions) Contractual Obligations for Additional Collateral Upon Further Downgrade $ 32 $ — $ 32 Surety Bonds (Collateralized Amount) (1) 56 258 314 Total Exposure from Contractual Obligations $ 88 $ 258 $ 346 (1) Surety Bonds are not tied to a credit rating. Surety Bonds’ impact assumes maximum contractual obligations, which is ordinarily 100% of the face amount of the surety bond except with the respect to $39 million of surety bond obligations for which the collateral obligation is capped at 60% of the face amount, and typical obligations require 30 days to cure. OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES FE is a guarantor under a $120 million syndicated senior secured term loan facility due November 12, 2024, under which Global Holding’s outstanding principal balance was $68 million as of September 30, 2021. Signal Peak, Global Rail, Global Mining Group, LLC and Global Coal Sales Group, LLC, each being a direct or indirect subsidiary of Global Holding, and FE continue to provide their joint and several guaranties of the obligations of Global Holding under the facility. In connection with the facility, 69.99% of Global Holding’s direct and indirect membership interests in Signal Peak, Global Rail and their affiliates along with FEV’s and WMB Marketing Ventures, LLC’s respective 33-1/3% membership interests in Global Holding, are pledged to the lenders under the current facility as collateral. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS Various federal, state and local authorities regulate FirstEnergy with regard to air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal, and other environmental matters. While FirstEnergy’s environmental policies and procedures are designed to achieve compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, such laws and regulations are subject to periodic review and potential revision by the implementing agencies. FirstEnergy cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of any of these reviews or how any future actions taken as a result thereof may materially impact its business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Clean Air Act FirstEnergy complies with SO 2 and NOx emission reduction requirements under the CAA and SIP(s) by burning lower-sulfur fuel, utilizing combustion controls and post-combustion controls and/or using emission allowances. CSAPR requires reductions of NOx and SO 2 emissions in two phases (2015 and 2017), ultimately capping SO 2 emissions in affected states to 2.4 million tons annually and NOx emissions to 1.2 million tons annually. CSAPR allows trading of NOx and SO 2 emission allowances between power plants located in the same state and interstate trading of NOx and SO 2 emission allowances with some restrictions. On July 28, 2015, the D.C. Circuit ordered the EPA to reconsider the CSAPR caps on NOx and SO 2 emissions from power plants in 13 states, including West Virginia. This followed the 2014 U.S. Supreme Court ruling generally upholding the EPA’s regulatory approach under CSAPR but questioning whether the EPA required upwind states to reduce emissions by more than their contribution to air pollution in downwind states. The EPA issued a CSAPR Update on September 7, 2016, reducing summertime NOx emissions from power plants in 22 states in the eastern U.S., including West Virginia, beginning in 2017. Various states and other stakeholders appealed the CSAPR Update to the D.C. Circuit in November and December 2016. On September 13, 2019, the D.C. Circuit remanded the CSAPR Update to the EPA citing that the rule did not eliminate upwind states’ significant contributions to downwind states’ air quality attainment requirements within applicable attainment deadlines. Also, during this time, in March 2018, the State of New York filed a CAA Section 126 petition with the EPA alleging that NOx emissions from nine states (including West Virginia) significantly contribute to New York’s inability to attain the ozone NAAQS. The petition sought suitable emission rate limits for large stationary sources that are allegedly affecting New York’s air quality within the three years allowed by CAA Section 126. On September 20, 2019, the EPA denied New York’s CAA Section 126 petition. On October 29, 2019, the State of New York appealed the denial of its petition to the D.C. Circuit. On July 14, 2020, the D.C. Circuit reversed and remanded the New York petition to the EPA for further consideration. On March 15, 2021, the EPA issued a revised CSAPR Update that addresses, among other things, the remands of the CSAPR Update and the New York Section 126 Petition. Depending on the outcome of any appeals and how the EPA and the states ultimately implement the revised CSAPR Update, the future cost of compliance may materially impact FirstEnergy's operations, cash flows and financial condition. In February 2019, the EPA announced its final decision to retain without changes the NAAQS for SO 2 , specifically retaining the 2010 primary (health-based) 1-hour standard of 75 PPB. As of March 31, 2020, FirstEnergy has no power plants operating in areas designated as non-attainment by the EPA. Climate Change There are several initiatives to reduce GHG emissions at the state, federal and international level. Certain northeastern states are participating in the RGGI and western states led by California, have implemented programs, primarily cap and trade mechanisms, to control emissions of certain GHGs. Additional policies reducing GHG emissions, such as demand reduction programs, renewable portfolio standards and renewable subsidies have been implemented across the nation. In September 2016, the U.S. joined in adopting the agreement reached on December 12, 2015, at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change meetings in Paris to reduce GHG. The Paris Agreement’s non-binding obligations to limit global warming to below two degrees Celsius became effective on November 4, 2016. On June 1, 2017, the Trump Administration announced that the U.S. would cease all participation in the Paris Agreement. On January 20, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order re-adopting the agreement on behalf of the U.S. In November 2020, FirstEnergy published its Climate Story which includes its climate position and strategy, as well as a new comprehensive and ambitious GHG emission goal. FirstEnergy pledged to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 and set an interim goal for a 30% reduction in GHG within FirstEnergy’s direct operational control by 2030, based on 2019 levels. Future resource plans to achieve carbon reductions, including any determination of retirement dates of the regulated coal-fired generating facilities, will be developed by working collaboratively with regulators in West Virginia. Determination of the useful life of the regulated coal-fired generating facilities could result in changes in depreciation, and/or continued collection of net plant in rates after retirement, securitization, sale, impairment, or regulatory disallowances. If MP is unable to recover these costs, it could have a material adverse effect on FirstEnergy’s and/or MP’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow. Furthermore, FirstEnergy cannot currently estimate the financial impact of climate change policies, although potential legislative or regulatory programs restricting CO 2 emissions, or litigation alleging damages from GHG emissions, could require material capital and other expenditures or result in changes to its operations. In December 2009, the EPA released its final “Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for GHG under the Clean Air Act,” concluding that concentrations of several key GHGs constitute an "endangerment" and may be regulated as "air pollutants" under the CAA and mandated measurement and reporting of GHG emissions from certain sources, including electric generating plants. Subsequently, the EPA released its final CPP regulations in August 2015 to reduce CO 2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired EGUs and finalized separate regulations imposing CO 2 emission limits for new, modified, and reconstructed fossil fuel-fired EGUs. Numerous states and private parties filed appeals and motions to stay the CPP with the D.C. Circuit in October 2015. On February 9, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the rule during the pendency of the challenges to the D.C. Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court. On March 28, 2017, an executive order, entitled “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth,” instructed the EPA to review the CPP and related rules addressing GHG emissions and suspend, revise or rescind the rules if appropriate. On June 19, 2019, the EPA repealed the CPP and replaced it with the ACE rule that established guidelines for states to develop standards of performance to address GHG emissions from existing coal-fired power plants. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded the ACE rule declaring that the EPA was “arbitrary and capricious” in its rule making and, as such, the ACE rule is no longer in effect and all actions thus far taken by states to implement the federally mandated rule are now null and void. The D.C. Circuit decision is subject to legal challenge. Depending on the outcomes of further appeals and how any final rules are ultimately implemented, the future cost of compliance may be material. Clean Water Act Various water quality regulations, the majority of which are the result of the federal CWA and its amendments, apply to FirstEnergy’s facilities. In addition, the states in which FirstEnergy operates have water quality standards applicable to FirstEnergy’s operations. On September 30, 2015, the EPA finalized new, more stringent effluent limits for the Steam Electric Power Generating category (40 CFR Part 423) for arsenic, mercury, selenium and nitrogen for wastewater from wet scrubber systems and zero discharge of pollutants in ash transport water. The treatment obligations were to phase-in as permits are renewed on a five-year cycle from 2018 to 2023. However, on April 13, 2017, the EPA granted a Petition for Reconsideration and on September 18, 2017, the EPA postponed certain compliance deadlines for two years. On August 31, 2020, the EPA issued a final rule revising the effluent limits for discharges from wet scrubber systems, retaining the zero-discharge standard for ash transport water, (with some limited discharge allowances), and extending the deadline for compliance to December 31, 2025 for both. In addition, the EPA allows for less stringent limits for sub-categories of generating units based on capacity utilization, flow volume from the scrubber system, and unit retirement date. The EPA is reconsidering the ELG rule with a publicly announced target of issuing a proposed revised rule in the Fall of 2022 and a final rule by the Spring of 2023. In the interim, the rule issued on August 31, 2020, remains in effect. Depending on the outcome of appeals, how final rules are ultimately implemented and the compliance options MP elects to take with the new rules, the compliance with these standards, which could include capital expenditures at the Ft. Martin and Harrison power stations, may be substantial and changes to MP’s operations at those power stations may also result. On September 29, 2016, FirstEnergy received a request from the EPA for information pursuant to CWA Section 308(a) for information concerning boron exceedances of effluent limitations established in the NPDES Permit for the former Mitchell Power Station’s Mingo landfill, owned by WP. On November 1, 2016, WP provided an initial response that contained information related to a similar boron issue at the former Springdale Power Station’s landfill, also owned by WP. The EPA requested additional information regarding the Springdale landfill and on November 15, 2016, WP provided a comprehensive response for both facilities and has fully complied with the Section 308(a) information request. On March 3, 2017, WP proposed to the PA DEP a re-route of its wastewater discharge to eliminate potential boron exceedances at the Springdale landfill and on January 29, 2018, WP submitted an NPDES permit renewal application to PA DEP proposing to re-route its wastewater discharge to eliminate potential boron exceedances at the Mingo landfill. On February 20, 2018, the Department of Justice issued a letter and tolling agreement to WP on behalf of the EPA alleging violations of the CWA at the Springdale and Mingo landfills and seeking to enter settlement negotiations in lieu of filing a complaint. To settle alleged past boron exceedances at both facilities, WP has agreed to a penalty amount of $610 thousand to be paid over two years. It is expected that WP will sign a Consent Decree memorializing the pipeline construction milestones and the civil penalty payments in the fourth quarter of 2021. Regulation of Waste Disposal Federal and state hazardous waste regulations have been promulgated as a result of the RCRA, as amended, and the Toxic Substances Control Act. Certain CCRs, such as coal ash, were exempted from hazardous waste disposal requirements pending the EPA’s evaluation of the need for future regulation. In April 2015, the EPA finalized regulations for the disposal of CCRs (non-hazardous), establishing national standards for landfill design, structural integrity design and assessment criteria for surface impoundments, groundwater monitoring and protection procedures and other operational and reporting procedures to assure the safe disposal of CCRs from electric generating plants. On September 13, 2017, the EPA announced that it would reconsider certain provisions of the final regulations. On July 17, 2018, the EPA Administrator signed a final rule extending the deadline for certain CCR facilities to cease disposal and commence closure activities, as well as, establishing less stringent groundwater monitoring and protection requirements. On August 21, 2018, the D.C. Circuit remanded sections of the CCR Rule to the EPA to provide for additional safeguards for unlined CCR impoundments that are more protective of human health and the environment. On December 2, 2019, the EPA published a proposed rule accelerating the date that certain CCR impoundments must cease accepting waste and initiate closure to August 31, 2020. The proposed rule allowed for an extension of the closure deadline based on meeting proscribed site-specific criteria. On July 29, 2020, the EPA published a final rule again revising the date that certain CCR impoundments must cease accepting waste and initiate closure to April 11, 2021. The final rule also allows for an extension of the closure deadline based on meeting proscribed site-specific criteria. On November 30, 2020, AE Supply submitted a closure deadline extension request to the EPA seeking to extend the closure date of McElroy's Run CCR impoundment facility until 2024. AE Supply continues to operate McElroy’s Run as a disposal facility for FG’s Pleasants Power Station. FE or its subsidiaries have been named as potentially responsible parties at waste disposal sites, which may require cleanup under the CERCLA. Allegations of disposal of hazardous substances at historical sites and the liability involved are often unsubstantiated and subject to dispute; however, federal law provides that all potentially responsible parties for a particular site may be liable on a joint and several basis. Environmental liabilities that are considered probable have been recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2021, based on estimates of the total costs of cleanup, FirstEnergy’s proportionate responsibility for such costs and the financial ability of other unaffiliated entities to pay. Total liabilities of approximately $101 million have been accrued through September 30, 2021, of which, approximately $67 million are for environmental remediation of former MGP and gas holder facilities in New Jersey, which are being recovered by JCP&L through a non-bypassable SBC. FE or its subsidiaries could be found potentially responsible for additional amounts or additional sites, but the loss or range of losses cannot be determined or reasonably estimated at this time. OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDINGS United States v. Larry Householder, et al. On July 21, 2020, a complaint and supporting affidavit containing federal criminal allegations were unsealed against the now former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder and other individuals and entities allegedly affiliated with Mr. Householder. Also, on July 21, 2020, and in connection with the investigation, FirstEnergy received subpoenas for records from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the S.D. Ohio. FirstEnergy was not aware of the criminal allegations, affidavit or subpoenas before July 21, 2020. On July 21, 2021, FE entered into a three-year DPA with the U.S. Attorney’s Office that, subject to court proceedings, resolves this matter. Under the DPA, FE has agreed to the filing of a criminal information charging FE with one count of conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud. The DPA requires that FirstEnergy, among other obligations: (i) continue to cooperate with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in all matters relating to the conduct described in the DPA and other conduct under investigation by the U.S. government; (ii) pay a criminal monetary penalty totaling $230 million within sixty days, which shall consist of (x) $115 million paid by FE to the United States Treasury and (y) $115 million paid by FE to the ODSA to fund certain assistance programs, as determined by the ODSA, for the benefit of low-income Ohio electric utility customers; (iii) publish a list of all payments made in 2021 to either 501(c)(4) entities or to entities known by FirstEnergy to be operating for the benefit of a public official, either directly or indirectly, and update the same on a quarterly basis during the term of the DPA; (iv) issue a public statement, as dictated in the DPA, regarding FE’s use of 501(c)(4) entities; and (v) continue to implement and review its compliance and ethics program, internal controls, policies and procedures designed, implemented and enforced to prevent and detect violations of the U.S. laws throughout its operations, and to take certain related remedial measures. The $230 million payment will neither be recovered in rates or charged to FirstEnergy customers nor will FirstEnergy seek any tax deduction related to such payment. The entire amount of the monetary penalty was recognized as expense in the second quarter of 2021, and paid in the third quarter of 2021. Under the terms of the DPA, the criminal information will be dismissed after FirstEnergy fully complies with its obligations under the DPA. Legal Proceedings Relating to United States v. Larry Householder, et al. On August 10, 2020, the SEC, through its Division of Enforcement, issued an order directing an investigation of possible securities laws violations by FE, and on September 1, 2020, issued subpoenas to FE and certain FE officers. On April 28, 2021, the SEC issued an additional subpoena to FE. While no contingency has been reflected in its consolidated financial statements, FE believes that it is probable that it will incur a loss in connection with the resolution of the SEC investigation. Given the ongoing nature and complexity of the review, inquiries and investigations, FE cannot yet reasonably estimate a loss or range of loss that may arise from the resolution of the SEC investigation. In addition to the subpoenas referenced above under “—United States v. Larry Householder, et. al.” and the SEC investigation, certain FE stockholders and FirstEnergy customers filed several lawsuits against FirstEnergy and certain current and former directors, officers and other employees, and the complaints in each of these suits is related to allegations in the complaint and supporting affidavit relating to HB 6 and the now former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder and other individuals and entities allegedly affiliated with Mr. Householder. The plaintiffs in each of the below cases seek, among other things, to recover an unspecified amount of damages (unless otherwise noted). No contingency has been reflected in FirstEnergy’s consolidated financial statements with respect to these lawsuits as a loss is neither probable, nor is a loss or range of a loss reasonably estimable. • Owens v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al. and Frand v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al. (Federal District Court, S.D. Ohio); on July 28, 2020 and August 21, 2020, purported stockholders of FE filed putative class action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal securities laws. Those actions have been consolidated and a lead plaintiff, the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association, has been appointed by the court. A consolidated complaint was filed on February 26, 2021. The consolidated complaint alleges, on behalf of a proposed class of persons who purchased FE securities between February 21, 2017 and July 21, 2020, that FE and certain current or former FE officers violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by issuing misrepresentations or omissions concerning FE’s business and results of operations. The consolidated complaint also alleges that FE, certain current or former FE officers and directors, and a group of underwriters violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 as a result of alleged misrepresentations or omissions in connection with offerings of senior notes by FE in February and June 2020. • Gendrich v. Anderson, et al. and Sloan v. Anderson, et al. (Common Pleas Court, Summit County, OH); on July 26, 2020 and July 31, 2020, respectively, purported stockholders of FE filed shareholder derivative action lawsuits against certain FE directors and officers, alleging, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duty. These actions have been consolidated. • Miller v. Anderson, et al. (Federal District Court, N.D. Ohio); Bloom, et al. v. Anderson, et al.; Employees Retirement System of the City of St. Louis v. Jones, et al.; Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W. v. Anderson et al.; Massachusetts Laborers Pension Fund v. Anderson et al.; The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement v. Anderson et al.; Atherton v. Dowling et al.; Behar v. Anderson, et al. (U.S. District Court, S.D. Ohio, all actions have been consolidated); beginning on August 7, 2020, purported stockholders of FE filed shareholder derivative actions alleging the FE Board and officers breached their fiduciary duties and committed violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The cases in the S.D. Ohio have been consolidated and co-lead plaintiffs have been appointed by the court. On May 11, 2021, the court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss in the consolidated derivative proceedings in the S.D. Ohio. As previously disclosed, on June 29, 2021, the FE Board established a SLC, effective July 1, 2021. The SLC has been delegated full authority by the FE Board to take all actions as the SLC deems advisable, appropriate, and in the best interests of FirstEnergy and its shareholders with respect to pending shareholder derivative litigation and demands. On July 20, 2021, the SLC filed motions to stay proceedings in each of the shareholder derivative actions pending in the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio and in Summit County, Ohio, while the SLC investigates the matters asserted in the lawsuits. On September 17, 2021, the court in the N.D. Ohio issued an order denying the individual defendants’ motions to dismiss and denying the SLC’s motion to stay. On October 20, 2021, the court in the S.D. Ohio also issued an order denying the SLC’s motion to stay. The SLC appealed the court’s decision in the Northern District of Ohio, denying the SLC’s motion to stay, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Court. • Smith v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al., Buldas v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al., and Hudock and Cameo Countertops, Inc. v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al. (Federal District Court, S.D. Ohio); on July 27, 2020, July 31, 2020, and August 5, 2020, respectively, purported customers of FirstEnergy filed putative class action lawsuits against FE and FESC, as well as certain current and former FirstEnergy officers, alleging civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act violations and related state law claims. These actions have been consolidated, and the court denied FirstEnergy’s motions to dismiss and stay discovery on February 10 and 11, 2021, respectively. The defendants submitted answers to the complaint on March 10, 2021. A motion for leave to amend the complaint and add FES as a defendant was filed on September 27, 2021 and remains pending. Discovery is proceeding. • State of Ohio ex rel. Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General v. FirstEnergy Corp., et al. and City of Cincinnati and City of Columbus v. FirstEnergy Corp. (Common Pleas Court, Franklin County, OH); on September 23, 2020 and October 27, 2020, the OAG and the cities of Cincinnati and Columbus, respectively, filed complaints against several parties including FE (the OAG also named FES as a defendant), each alleging civil violations of the Ohio Corrupt Activity Act in connection with the passage of HB 6. On January 13, 2021, the OAG filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against FirstEnergy seeking to enjoin FirstEnergy from collecting the Ohio Companies' decoupling rider. On January 31, 2021, FE reached a partial settlement with the OAG and the cities of Cincinnati and Columbus with respect to the temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction request and related issues. In connection with the partial settlement, the Ohio Companies filed an application on February 1, 2021, with the PUCO to set their respective decoupling riders (CSR) to zero. On February 2, 2021, the PUCO approved the application of the Ohio Companies setting the rider to zero and no additional customer bills will include new decoupling rider charges after February 8, 2021. These actions have been consolidated. The cases are stayed pending final resolution of the United States v. Larry Householder, et al. criminal proceeding described above, although on August 13, 2021, new defendants were added to the complaint, including two former officers of FirstEnergy. • Emmons v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al. (Common Pleas Court, Cuyahoga County, OH); on August 4, 2020, a purported customer of FirstEnergy filed a putative class action lawsuit against FE, FESC, OE, TE and CEI, along with FES, alleging several causes of action, including negligence and/or gross negligence, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and unfair or deceptive consumer acts or practices. On October 1, 2020, plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint, adding as a plaintiff a purported customer of FirstEnergy and alleging a civil violation of the Ohio Corrupt Activity Act and civil conspiracy against FE, FESC and FES. On May 4, 2021, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims and denied the remainder of the motions to dismiss. The defendants submitted answers to the complaint on June 1, 2021. Discovery is proceeding. In letters dated January 26, and February 22, 2021, staff of FERC's Division of Investigations notified FirstEnergy that the Division is conducting an investigation of FirstEnergy’s lobbying and governmental affairs activities concerning HB 6, and staff directed FirstEnergy to preserve and maintain all documents and information related to the same as such have been developed as part of an ongoing non-public audit being conducted by FERC's Division of Audits and Accounting. While no contingency has been reflected in its consolidated financial statements, FirstEnergy believes that it is probable that it will incur a loss in connection with the resolution of the FERC investigation. Given the ongoing nature and complexity of the review, inquiries and investigations, FirstEnergy cannot yet reasonably estimate a loss or range of loss that may arise from the resolution of the FERC investigation. The outcome of any of these lawsuits, governmental investigations and audit are uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on FE’s or its subsidiaries’ reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and cash flows. Internal Investigation Relating to United States v. Larry Householder, et al. As previously disclosed, a committee of independent members of the FE Board has been directing an internal investigation related to ongoing government investigations. In connection with FirstEnergy’s internal investigation, such committee determined on October 29, 2020, to terminate FirstEnergy’s Chief Executive Officer, Charles E. Jones, together with two other executives: Dennis M. Chack, Senior Vice President of Product Development, Marketing, and Branding; and Michael J. Dowling, Senior Vice President of External Affairs. Each of these terminated executives violated certain FirstEnergy policies and its code of conduct. These executives were terminated as of October 29, 2020. Such former members of senior management did not maintain and promote a control environment with an appropriate tone of compliance in certain areas of FirstEnergy’s business, nor sufficiently promote, monitor or enforce adherence to certain FirstEnergy policies and its code of conduct. Furthermore, certain former members of senior management did not reasonably ensure that relevant information was communicated within our organization and not withheld from our independent directors, our Audit Committee, and our independent auditor. Among the matters considered with respect to the determination by the committee of independent members of the FE Board that certain former members of senior management violated certain FirstEnergy policies and its code of conduct related to a payment of approximately $4 million made in early 2019 in connection with the termination of a purported consulting agreement, as amended, which had been in place since 2013. The counterparty to such agreement was an entity associated with an individual who subsequently was appointed to a full-time role as an Ohio government official directly involved in regulating the Ohio Companies, including with respect to distribution rates. Additionally, on November 8, 2020, the Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, and the Vice President, General Counsel, and Chief Ethics Officer, were separated from FirstEnergy due to inact |
Segment Information
Segment Information | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Segment Reporting [Abstract] | |
SEGMENT INFORMATION | SEGMENT INFORMATION FE and its subsidiaries are principally involved in the transmission, distribution and generation of electricity through its reportable segments, Regulated Distribution and Regulated Transmission. The Regulated Distribution segment distributes electricity through FirstEnergy’s ten utility operating companies, serving approximately six million customers within 65,000 square miles of Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey and New York, and purchases power for its POLR, SOS, SSO and default service requirements in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland. This segment also controls 3,580 MWs of regulated electric generation capacity located primarily in West Virginia and Virginia. The segment’s results reflect the costs of securing and delivering electric generation from transmission facilities to customers, including the deferral and amortization of certain related costs. Included within the segment is $45 million of assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2020, associated with the asset purchase agreement with Yards Creek; see Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information. The Regulated Transmission segment provides transmission infrastructure owned and operated by the Transmission Companies and certain of FirstEnergy’s utilities (JCP&L, MP, PE and WP) to transmit electricity from generation sources to distribution facilities. The segment’s revenues are derived from forward-looking formula rates. Forward-looking rates recover costs that FERC determines are permitted to be recovered and provide a return on transmission capital investment. Under forward-looking formula rates, the revenue requirement is updated annually based on a projected rate base and projected costs, which is subject to an annual true-up based on actual costs. The segment’s results also reflect the net transmission expenses related to the delivery of electricity on FirstEnergy’s transmission facilities. Corporate/Other reflects corporate support and other costs not charged or attributable to the Utilities or Transmission Companies, including FE’s retained Pension and OPEB assets and liabilities of the FES Debtors, interest expense on FE’s Financial information for each of FirstEnergy’s reportable segments is presented in the tables below: Segment Financial Information For the Three Months Ended Regulated Distribution Regulated Transmission Corporate/ Other Reconciling Adjustments FirstEnergy Consolidated (In millions) September 30, 2021 External revenues $ 2,708 $ 411 $ 5 $ — $ 3,124 Internal revenues 51 4 — (55) — Total revenues $ 2,759 $ 415 $ 5 $ (55) $ 3,124 Depreciation 229 82 (1) 16 326 Amortization of regulatory assets, net 29 1 — — 30 Miscellaneous income (expense), net 102 12 23 (1) 136 Interest expense 133 62 89 (1) 283 Income taxes (benefits) 108 23 (43) — 88 Income (loss) from continuing operations 416 70 (70) — 416 Property additions $ 326 $ 202 $ 14 $ — $ 542 September 30, 2020 External revenues $ 2,611 $ 408 $ 3 $ — $ 3,022 Internal revenues 50 5 — (55) — Total revenues $ 2,661 $ 413 $ 3 $ (55) $ 3,022 Depreciation 223 79 — 14 316 Deferral of regulatory assets, net (91) — — — (91) Miscellaneous income (expense), net 81 7 13 (1) 100 Interest expense 124 55 88 (1) 266 Income taxes (benefits) 109 35 (28) — 116 Income (loss) from continuing operations 413 115 (68) — 460 Property additions $ 391 $ 278 $ 18 $ — $ 687 For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 External revenues $ 7,237 $ 1,223 $ 12 $ — $ 8,472 Internal revenues 150 10 — (160) — Total revenues $ 7,387 $ 1,233 $ 12 $ (160) $ 8,472 Depreciation 684 240 1 47 972 Amortization of regulatory assets, net 159 12 — — 171 DPA penalty — — 230 — 230 Miscellaneous income (expense), net 297 34 59 (11) 379 Interest expense 392 186 288 (11) 855 Income taxes (benefits) 261 93 (83) — 271 Income (loss) from continuing operations 1,003 295 (489) — 809 Property additions $ 993 $ 732 $ 43 $ — $ 1,768 September 30, 2020 External revenues $ 7,062 $ 1,185 $ 6 $ — $ 8,253 Internal revenues 145 13 — (158) — Total revenues $ 7,207 $ 1,198 $ 6 $ (158) $ 8,253 Depreciation 672 233 2 47 954 Amortization (deferral) of regulatory assets, net (32) 6 — — (26) Miscellaneous income (expense), net 246 21 45 (9) 303 Interest expense 374 162 265 (9) 792 Income taxes (benefits) 144 103 (125) — 122 Income (loss) from continuing operations 800 346 (355) — 791 Property additions $ 1,115 $ 817 $ 47 $ — $ 1,979 As of September 30, 2021 Total assets $ 30,546 $ 12,660 $ 648 $ — $ 43,854 Total goodwill $ 5,004 $ 614 $ — $ — $ 5,618 As of December 31, 2020 Total assets $ 30,855 $ 12,592 $ 1,017 $ — $ 44,464 Total goodwill $ 5,004 $ 614 $ — $ — $ 5,618 |
Organization and Basis of Pre_2
Organization and Basis of Presentation (Policies) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
Basis of Accounting | These interim financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements and notes prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. FE and its subsidiaries follow GAAP and comply with the related regulations, orders, policies and practices prescribed by the SEC, FERC, and, as applicable, the PUCO, the PPUC, the MDPSC, the NYPSC, the WVPSC, the VSCC and the NJBPU. The accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited, but reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make periodic estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The reported results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for any future period. FE and its subsidiaries have evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued. |
Consolidation Policy | FE and its subsidiaries consolidate all majority-owned subsidiaries over which they exercise control and, when applicable, entities for which they have a controlling financial interest. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation as appropriate and permitted pursuant to GAAP. FE and its subsidiaries consolidate a VIE when it is determined that it is the primary beneficiary. Investments in affiliates over which FE and its subsidiaries have the ability to exercise significant influence, but do not have a controlling financial interest, follow the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the interest in the entity is reported as an investment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the percentage of FE’s ownership share of the entity’s earnings is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. |
Customer Receivables | Customer Receivables Receivables from customers include distribution services and retail generation sales to residential, commercial and industrial customers of the Utilities. The allowance for uncollectible customer receivables is based on historical loss information comprised of a rolling 36-month average net write-off percentage of revenues, in conjunction with a qualitative assessment of elements that impact the collectability of receivables to determine if allowances for uncollectible accounts should be further adjusted in accordance with the accounting guidance for credit losses. FirstEnergy reviews its allowance for uncollectible customer receivables utilizing a quantitative and qualitative assessment. Management contemplates available current information such as changes in economic factors, regulatory matters, industry trends, customer credit factors, amount of receivable balances that are past-due, payment options and programs available to customers, and the methods that the Utilities are able to utilize to ensure payment. This analysis includes consideration of the outbreak of COVID-19 and the impact on customer receivable balances outstanding and write-offs since the pandemic began. Beginning March 13, 2020, FirstEnergy temporarily suspended customer disconnections for nonpayment and ceased collection activities as a result of the ongoing pandemic and in accordance with state regulatory requirements. The temporary suspension of disconnections for nonpayment and ceasing of collection activities extended into the fourth quarter of 2020 but resumed for many customers before the end of 2020, except in New Jersey where the moratorium was extended until the end of 2021. Customers are subject to each state's applicable regulations on winter moratoriums for residential customers, which begin as early as November 1, 2020, and were in effect until April 15, 2021. During 2021, FirstEnergy has experienced a reduction in the amount of receivables that are past due by greater than 30 days since the end of 2020. While total customer arrears balances continue to decrease in 2021, balances that are over 120 days past due continue to be elevated. Furthermore, FirstEnergy also considered other factors as part of this qualitative assessment, such as certain federal stimulus and state funding being made available to assist with past due utility bills. As a result of this qualitative analysis, FirstEnergy did not recognize any incremental uncollectible expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2021. |
Goodwill | GoodwillFirstEnergy evaluates goodwill for impairment annually on July 31 and more frequently if indicators of impairment arise. For 2021, FirstEnergy performed a qualitative assessment of the Regulated Distribution and Regulated Transmission reporting units' goodwill, assessing economic, industry and market considerations in addition to the reporting units' overall financial performance. Key factors used in the assessment included: growth rates, interest rates, expected capital expenditures, utility sector market performance, regulatory and legal developments, and other market considerations. It was determined that the fair values of these reporting units were, more likely than not, greater than their carrying values and a quantitative analysis was not necessary. |
New Accounting Pronouncements | New Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted Pronouncements ASU 2019-12, " Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes" (Issued in December 2019): ASU 2019-12 enhances and simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance, including the elimination of certain exceptions related to the approach for intra-period tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The new guidance also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. FirstEnergy adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2021, with no material impact to the financial statements. Recently Issued Pronouncements - FirstEnergy has assessed new authoritative accounting guidance issued by the FASB that has not yet been adopted and none are currently expected to have a material impact to the financial statements. |
Revenue | FirstEnergy accounts for revenues from contracts with customers under ASC 606, “ Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ” Revenue from leases, financial instruments, other contractual rights or obligations and other revenues that are not from contracts with customers are outside the scope of the standard and accounted for under other existing GAAP. FirstEnergy has elected to exclude sales taxes and other similar taxes collected on behalf of third parties from revenue as prescribed in the standard. As a result, tax collections and remittances are excluded from recognition in the income statement and instead recorded through the balance sheet. Excise and gross receipts taxes that are assessed on FirstEnergy are not subject to the election and are included in revenue. FirstEnergy has elected the optional invoice practical expedient for most of its revenues and utilizes the optional short-term contract exemption for transmission revenues due to the annual establishment of revenue requirements, which eliminates the need to provide certain revenue disclosures regarding unsatisfied performance obligations. |
Earnings Per Share | Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the relevant period as the denominator. The denominator for diluted EPS of common stock reflects the weighted average of common shares outstanding plus the potential additional common shares that could result if dilutive securities and other agreements to issue common stock were exercised. Diluted EPS reflects the dilutive effect of potential common shares from share-based awards. The dilutive effect of outstanding share-based awards was computed using the treasury stock method, which assumes any proceeds that could be obtained upon the exercise of the award would be used to purchase common stock at the average market price for the period. |
Investments | INVESTMENTS All temporary cash investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less are reported as cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost, which approximates their fair market value. Investments other than cash and cash equivalents include equity securities, AFS debt securities and other investments. FirstEnergy has no debt securities held for trading purposes. |
Long-Term Debt and Other Long-Term Obligations | LONG-TERM DEBT AND OTHER LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONSAll borrowings with initial maturities of less than one year are defined as short-term financial instruments under GAAP and are reported as Short-term borrowings on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost. Since these borrowings are short-term in nature, FirstEnergy believes that their costs approximate their fair market value. |
Organization and Basis of Pre_3
Organization and Basis of Presentation (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
Activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts on customer receivables | Activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts on customer receivables for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and for the year ended December 31, 2020 are as follows: (In millions) Balance, January 1, 2020 $ 46 Charged to income (1) 174 Charged to other accounts (2) 46 Write-offs (102) Balance, December 31, 2020 $ 164 Charged to income (3) 30 Charged to other accounts (2) 34 Write-offs (69) Balance, September 30, 2021 $ 159 (1) $103 million of which was deferred for future recovery in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020. (2) Represents recoveries and reinstatements of accounts written off for uncollectible accounts. (3) $8 million of which was deferred for future recovery in the nine months ended September 30, 2021. |
Revenue (Tables)
Revenue (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Revenue from Contract with Customer [Abstract] | |
Disaggregation of Revenue | The following tables represent a disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, by type of service from each reportable segment: For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 Revenues by Type of Service Regulated Distribution Regulated Transmission Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments (1) Total (In millions) Distribution services $ 1,534 $ — $ (25) $ 1,509 Retail generation 1,054 — (13) 1,041 Wholesale sales 117 — 5 122 Transmission — 411 — 411 Other 30 — — 30 Total revenues from contracts with customers $ 2,735 $ 411 $ (33) $ 3,113 ARP — — — — Other non-customer revenue 24 4 (17) 11 Total revenues $ 2,759 $ 415 $ (50) $ 3,124 (1) Includes eliminations and reconciling adjustments of inter-segment revenues. For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 Revenues by Type of Service Regulated Distribution Regulated Transmission Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments (1) Total (In millions) Distribution services (2) $ 1,503 $ — $ (22) $ 1,481 Retail generation 1,005 — (16) 989 Wholesale sales 67 — 3 70 Transmission (2) — 408 — 408 Other 35 — — 35 Total revenues from contracts with customers $ 2,610 $ 408 $ (35) $ 2,983 ARP (3) 25 — — 25 Other non-customer revenue 26 5 (17) 14 Total revenues $ 2,661 $ 413 $ (52) $ 3,022 (1) Includes eliminations and reconciling adjustments of inter-segment revenues. (2) Includes reductions to revenue related to amounts subject to refund resulting from the Tax Act ($1 million at Regulated Distribution and $3 million at Regulated Transmission). (3) ARP revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2020, is primarily related to the reconciliation of Ohio decoupling rates that became effective on February 1, 2020. See Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” for further discussion on Ohio decoupling rates. For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 Revenues by Type of Service Regulated Distribution Regulated Transmission Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments (1) Total (In millions) Distribution services $ 4,177 $ — $ (77) $ 4,100 Retail generation 2,820 — (38) 2,782 Wholesale sales 260 — 12 272 Transmission — 1,223 — 1,223 Other 89 — — 89 Total revenues from contracts with customers $ 7,346 $ 1,223 $ (103) $ 8,466 ARP (2) (27) — — (27) Other non-customer revenue 68 10 (45) 33 Total revenues $ 7,387 $ 1,233 $ (148) $ 8,472 (1) Includes eliminations and reconciling adjustments of inter-segment revenues. (2) Reflects amounts the Ohio Companies refunded to customers that was previously collected under decoupling mechanisms, with interest. See Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” for further discussion on Ohio decoupling rates. For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 Revenues by Type of Service Regulated Distribution Regulated Transmission Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments (1) Total (In millions) Distribution services (2) $ 4,000 $ — $ (65) $ 3,935 Retail generation 2,735 — (46) 2,689 Wholesale sales 188 — 6 194 Transmission (2) — 1,185 — 1,185 Other 102 — — 102 Total revenues from contracts with customers $ 7,025 $ 1,185 $ (105) $ 8,105 ARP (3) 108 — — 108 Other non-customer revenue 74 13 (47) 40 Total revenues $ 7,207 $ 1,198 $ (152) $ 8,253 (1) Includes eliminations and reconciling adjustments of inter-segment revenues. (2) Includes reductions to revenue related to amounts subject to refund resulting from the Tax Act ($2 million at Regulated Distribution and $6 million at Regulated Transmission). (3) ARP revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, is primarily related to the reconciliation of Ohio decoupling rates. See Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” for further discussion on Ohio decoupling rates. The following table represents a disaggregation of the Regulated Distribution segment revenue from contracts with distribution service and retail generation customers for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, by class: For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30, Revenues by Customer Class 2021 2020 2021 2020 (In millions) Residential $ 1,666 $ 1,621 $ 4,410 $ 4,220 Commercial 619 589 1,722 1,640 Industrial 284 278 810 814 Other 19 20 55 61 Total Revenues $ 2,588 $ 2,508 $ 6,997 $ 6,735 The following table represents a disaggregation of revenue from contracts with regulated transmission customers for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, by transmission owner: For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30, Transmission Owner 2021 2020 2021 2020 (In millions) ATSI $ 206 $ 202 $ 604 $ 598 TrAIL 59 61 176 182 MAIT 75 68 222 183 JCP&L 41 43 126 122 MP, PE and WP 30 34 95 100 Total Revenues $ 411 $ 408 $ 1,223 $ 1,185 |
Discontinued Operations (Tables
Discontinued Operations (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Discontinued Operations and Disposal Groups [Abstract] | |
Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations | Summarized results of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, were as follows: For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30, (In millions) 2021 2020 2021 2020 Revenues $ — $ — $ — $ 7 Fuel — — — (6) Other operating expenses — — — (6) Other income — — — 5 Income from discontinued operations, before tax — — — — Income tax expense — — — — Income from discontinued operations, net of tax — — — — Settlement consideration — — — (1) Accelerated net pension and OPEB prior service credits — — — 18 Gain on disposal of FES and FENOC, before tax — — — 17 Income taxes (benefits), including worthless stock deduction (47) 6 (47) (29) Gain on disposal of FES and FENOC, net of tax 47 (6) 47 46 Income from discontinued operations $ 47 $ (6) $ 47 $ 46 |
Earnings Per Share Of Common _2
Earnings Per Share Of Common Stock (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Earnings Per Share [Abstract] | |
Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share | The following table reconciles basic and diluted EPS of common stock: For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30, Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted EPS 2021 2020 2021 2020 (In millions, except per share amounts) Income from continuing operations $ 416 $ 460 $ 809 $ 791 Discontinued operations, net of tax 47 (6) 47 46 Net Income $ 463 $ 454 $ 856 $ 837 Share count information: Weighted average number of basic shares outstanding 544 542 544 542 Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options and awards 1 1 1 1 Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding 545 543 545 543 Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock: Income from continuing operations, basic $ 0.76 $ 0.85 $ 1.48 $ 1.46 Discontinued operations, basic 0.09 (0.01) 0.09 0.08 Basic earnings per share of common stock $ 0.85 $ 0.84 $ 1.57 $ 1.54 Income from continuing operations, diluted $ 0.76 $ 0.85 $ 1.48 $ 1.46 Discontinued operations, diluted 0.09 (0.01) 0.09 0.08 Diluted earnings per share of common stock $ 0.85 $ 0.84 $ 1.57 $ 1.54 |
Pension and Other Post-Employ_2
Pension and Other Post-Employment Benefits (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Retirement Benefits [Abstract] | |
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs | The components of the consolidated net periodic costs (credits) for pension and OPEB were as follows: Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs (Credits) Pension OPEB For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 2020 2021 2020 (In millions) Service costs $ 48 $ 47 $ 1 $ 1 Interest costs 57 71 3 4 Expected return on plan assets (163) (156) (10) (9) Amortization of prior service costs (credits) (1) 1 1 (4) (4) Net periodic credits, including amounts capitalized $ (57) $ (37) $ (10) $ (8) Net periodic credits, recognized in earnings $ (80) $ (56) $ (10) $ (8) (1) The income tax benefits associated with pension and OPEB prior service costs amortized out of AOCI were $1 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs (Credits) Pension OPEB For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 2020 2021 2020 (In millions) Service costs $ 145 $ 147 $ 3 $ 3 Interest costs 170 216 8 12 Expected return on plan assets (489) (464) (27) (25) Amortization of prior service costs (credits) (1) (2) 3 12 (13) (42) One-time termination benefit (3) — 8 — — Pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment — 386 — 37 Net periodic costs (credits), including amounts capitalized $ (171) $ 305 $ (29) $ (15) Net periodic costs (credits), recognized in earnings $ (243) $ 240 $ (30) $ (15) (1) 2020 includes the acceleration of $18 million in net credits as a result of the FES Debtors’ emergence during the first quarter of 2020 and is a component of discontinued operations in FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income. (2) The income tax benefits associated with pension and OPEB prior service costs amortized out of AOCI were $3 million and $7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. (3) Costs represent additional benefits provided to FES and FENOC employees under the approved settlement agreement and are a component of discontinued operations in FirstEnergy’s Consolidated Statements of Income. |
Fair Value Measurements (Tables
Fair Value Measurements (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] | |
Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis | The following tables set forth the recurring assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy: September 30, 2021 December 31, 2020 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets (In millions) Derivative assets FTRs (1) $ — $ — $ 10 $ 10 $ — $ — $ 3 $ 3 Equity securities 2 — — 2 2 — — 2 U.S. state debt securities — 271 — 271 — 276 — 276 Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (2) 684 — — 684 1,801 — — 1,801 Other (3) — 43 — 43 — 41 — 41 Total assets $ 686 $ 314 $ 10 $ 1,010 $ 1,803 $ 317 $ 3 $ 2,123 Liabilities Derivative liabilities FTRs (1) $ — $ — $ (1) $ (1) $ — $ — $ — $ — Total liabilities $ — $ — $ (1) $ (1) $ — $ — $ — $ — Net assets (liabilities) (4) $ 686 $ 314 $ 9 $ 1,009 $ 1,803 $ 317 $ 3 $ 2,123 (1) Contracts are subject to regulatory accounting treatment and changes in market values do not impact earnings. (2) Restricted cash of $107 million and $67 million as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 respectively, primarily relates to cash collected from JCP&L, MP, PE and the Ohio Companies’ customers that is specifically used to service debt of their respective funding companies. (3) Primarily consists of short-term investments. (4) Excludes $1 million as of December 31, 2020, of net receivables, payables, taxes and accrued income associated with financial instruments reflected within the fair value table. |
Quantitative Information for Level 3 Valuation | The following table provides quantitative information for FTRs contracts that are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the period ended September 30, 2021: Fair Value, Net (In millions) Valuation Significant Input Range Weighted Average Units FTRs $ 9 Model RTO auction clearing prices $ 0.50 to $ 3.30 $1.40 Dollars/MWH |
Amortized Cost Basis, Unrealized Gains and Losses and Fair Values of Investments in Available-for-sale Securities | The following table summarizes the amortized cost basis, unrealized gains, unrealized losses and fair values of investments held in spent nuclear fuel disposal trusts as of September 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020: September 30, 2021 (1) December 31, 2020 (2) Cost Basis Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value Cost Basis Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value (In millions) Debt securities $ 277 $ 2 $ (8) $ 271 $ 275 $ 7 $ (6) $ 276 (1) Excludes short-term cash investments of $12 million. (2) Excludes short-term cash investments of $9 million. |
Proceeds from the Sale of Investments in Available-for-sale Securities, Realized Gains and Losses on Those Sales, and Interest and Dividend Income | Proceeds from the sale of investments in AFS debt securities, realized gains and losses on those sales and interest and dividend income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, were as follows: For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 2020 (1) 2021 2020 (1) (In millions) Sale proceeds $ 16 $ 6 $ 29 $ 45 Realized gains — — — 4 Realized losses (1) — (2) (7) Interest and dividend income 3 4 8 18 |
Fair Value and Related Carrying Amounts of Long-term Debt and Other Long-term Obligations | The following table provides the approximate fair value and related carrying amounts of long-term debt, which excludes finance lease obligations and net unamortized debt issuance costs, unamortized fair value adjustments, premiums and discounts as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020: September 30, 2021 December 31, 2020 (In millions) Carrying value $ 23,819 $ 22,377 Fair value $ 27,018 $ 25,465 |
Schedule of Long-term Debt Instruments | During the nine months ended September 30, 2021, the following long-term debt was issued: Company Issuance Date Interest Rate Maturity Amount Use of proceeds FET 3/19/2021 2.866% 2028 $500 million Repay short-term borrowings under the former FET Revolving Facility. MP 4/9/2021 3.55% 2027 $200 million Fund MP’s ongoing capital expenditures, for working capital needs and for other general corporate purposes. TE 5/6/2021 2.65% 2028 $150 million Repay short-term borrowings, fund TE’s ongoing capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. MAIT 5/24/2021 4.10% 2028 $150 million Repay borrowings outstanding under FirstEnergy’s regulated company money pool, fund MAIT’s ongoing capital expenditures, to fund working capital and for other general corporate purposes. JCP&L 6/10/2021 2.75% 2032 $500 million Repay $450 million of short-term debt under the former FE Revolving Facility, storm recovery and restoration costs and expenses, to fund JCP&L’s ongoing capital expenditures, working capital requirements and for other general corporate purposes. |
Commitments, Guarantees and C_2
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Schedule of Guarantor Obligations | These credit-risk-related contingent features stipulate that if the subsidiary were to be downgraded or lose its investment grade credit rating (based on its senior unsecured debt rating), it would be required to provide additional collateral. The following table discloses the potential additional credit rating contingent contractual collateral obligations as of September 30, 2021: Potential Collateral Obligations Utilities and FET FE Total (In millions) Contractual Obligations for Additional Collateral Upon Further Downgrade $ 32 $ — $ 32 Surety Bonds (Collateralized Amount) (1) 56 258 314 Total Exposure from Contractual Obligations $ 88 $ 258 $ 346 |
Segment Information (Tables)
Segment Information (Tables) | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | |
Segment Reporting [Abstract] | |
Segment Financial Information | Financial information for each of FirstEnergy’s reportable segments is presented in the tables below: Segment Financial Information For the Three Months Ended Regulated Distribution Regulated Transmission Corporate/ Other Reconciling Adjustments FirstEnergy Consolidated (In millions) September 30, 2021 External revenues $ 2,708 $ 411 $ 5 $ — $ 3,124 Internal revenues 51 4 — (55) — Total revenues $ 2,759 $ 415 $ 5 $ (55) $ 3,124 Depreciation 229 82 (1) 16 326 Amortization of regulatory assets, net 29 1 — — 30 Miscellaneous income (expense), net 102 12 23 (1) 136 Interest expense 133 62 89 (1) 283 Income taxes (benefits) 108 23 (43) — 88 Income (loss) from continuing operations 416 70 (70) — 416 Property additions $ 326 $ 202 $ 14 $ — $ 542 September 30, 2020 External revenues $ 2,611 $ 408 $ 3 $ — $ 3,022 Internal revenues 50 5 — (55) — Total revenues $ 2,661 $ 413 $ 3 $ (55) $ 3,022 Depreciation 223 79 — 14 316 Deferral of regulatory assets, net (91) — — — (91) Miscellaneous income (expense), net 81 7 13 (1) 100 Interest expense 124 55 88 (1) 266 Income taxes (benefits) 109 35 (28) — 116 Income (loss) from continuing operations 413 115 (68) — 460 Property additions $ 391 $ 278 $ 18 $ — $ 687 For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 External revenues $ 7,237 $ 1,223 $ 12 $ — $ 8,472 Internal revenues 150 10 — (160) — Total revenues $ 7,387 $ 1,233 $ 12 $ (160) $ 8,472 Depreciation 684 240 1 47 972 Amortization of regulatory assets, net 159 12 — — 171 DPA penalty — — 230 — 230 Miscellaneous income (expense), net 297 34 59 (11) 379 Interest expense 392 186 288 (11) 855 Income taxes (benefits) 261 93 (83) — 271 Income (loss) from continuing operations 1,003 295 (489) — 809 Property additions $ 993 $ 732 $ 43 $ — $ 1,768 September 30, 2020 External revenues $ 7,062 $ 1,185 $ 6 $ — $ 8,253 Internal revenues 145 13 — (158) — Total revenues $ 7,207 $ 1,198 $ 6 $ (158) $ 8,253 Depreciation 672 233 2 47 954 Amortization (deferral) of regulatory assets, net (32) 6 — — (26) Miscellaneous income (expense), net 246 21 45 (9) 303 Interest expense 374 162 265 (9) 792 Income taxes (benefits) 144 103 (125) — 122 Income (loss) from continuing operations 800 346 (355) — 791 Property additions $ 1,115 $ 817 $ 47 $ — $ 1,979 As of September 30, 2021 Total assets $ 30,546 $ 12,660 $ 648 $ — $ 43,854 Total goodwill $ 5,004 $ 614 $ — $ — $ 5,618 As of December 31, 2020 Total assets $ 30,855 $ 12,592 $ 1,017 $ — $ 44,464 Total goodwill $ 5,004 $ 614 $ — $ — $ 5,618 |
Organization and Basis of Pre_4
Organization and Basis of Presentation - Narrative (Details) mi in Thousands, customer in Thousands | Oct. 18, 2021USD ($)agreement | Sep. 30, 2021USD ($)companytransmissionCenterMW | Sep. 30, 2020USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2021USD ($)companycustomertransmissionCentermiMW | Sep. 30, 2020USD ($) |
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Length of transmission lines | mi | 24 | ||||
Number of regional transmission centers | transmissionCenter | 2 | 2 | |||
Capitalized cost of equity | $ 13,000,000 | $ 13,000,000 | $ 34,000,000 | $ 36,000,000 | |
Capitalized interest | $ 7,000,000 | $ 8,000,000 | $ 20,000,000 | $ 21,000,000 | |
Revolving Credit Facility | Line of Credit | Subsequent Event | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Number of agreements | agreement | 6 | ||||
Maximum amount borrowed under revolving credit facility | $ 4,500,000,000 | ||||
Revolving Credit Facility | Line of Credit | First Energy and FET | Subsequent Event | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Maximum amount borrowed under revolving credit facility | $ 1,000,000,000 | ||||
PN | Waverly, New York | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Number of customers served by utility operating companies | customer | 4 | ||||
Parent, the Utilities, FET and Certain Subsidiaries | Revolving Credit Facility | Line of Credit | Subsequent Event | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Debt term | 5 years | ||||
The Ohio Companies | Revolving Credit Facility | Line of Credit | Subsequent Event | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Maximum amount borrowed under revolving credit facility | $ 800,000,000 | ||||
The Pennsylvania Companies | Revolving Credit Facility | Line of Credit | Subsequent Event | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Maximum amount borrowed under revolving credit facility | 950,000,000 | ||||
JCP&L | Revolving Credit Facility | Line of Credit | Subsequent Event | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Maximum amount borrowed under revolving credit facility | 500,000,000 | ||||
MP and PE | Revolving Credit Facility | Line of Credit | Subsequent Event | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Maximum amount borrowed under revolving credit facility | 400,000,000 | ||||
Transmission Companies | Revolving Credit Facility | Line of Credit | Subsequent Event | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Maximum amount borrowed under revolving credit facility | $ 850,000,000 | ||||
Regulated Distribution | |||||
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items] | |||||
Number of existing utility operating companies | company | 10 | 10 | |||
Number of customers served by utility operating companies | customer | 6,000 | ||||
Plant capacity (in MW's) | MW | 3,580 | 3,580 |
Organization and Basis of Pre_5
Organization and Basis of Presentation - Activity in Uncollectable Accounts (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2020 | |
Accounts Receivable, Allowance for Credit Loss [Roll Forward] | ||
Beginning balance | $ 164 | $ 46 |
Charged to income | 30 | 174 |
Charged to other accounts | 34 | 46 |
Write-offs | (69) | (102) |
Ending balance | 159 | 164 |
Deferred for recovery | $ 8 | $ 103 |
Revenue (Details)
Revenue (Details) $ in Millions | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||
Sep. 30, 2021USD ($)companyMW | Sep. 30, 2020USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2021USD ($)companyMW | Sep. 30, 2020USD ($) | ||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | $ 3,113 | $ 2,983 | $ 8,466 | $ 8,105 | |
Total revenues | [1] | 3,124 | 3,022 | 8,472 | 8,253 |
Other Non-Customer Revenue | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Late payment charges | 9 | 6 | 27 | 22 | |
Distribution services | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 1,509 | 1,481 | 4,100 | 3,935 | |
Retail generation | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 1,041 | 989 | 2,782 | 2,689 | |
Wholesale sales | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 122 | 70 | 272 | 194 | |
Transmission | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 411 | 408 | 1,223 | 1,185 | |
Other | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 30 | 35 | 89 | 102 | |
ARP | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues | 0 | 25 | (27) | 108 | |
Other non-customer revenue | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues | 11 | 14 | 33 | 40 | |
Derivative revenue | Other Non-Customer Revenue | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Late payment charges | 3 | 8 | 5 | 14 | |
Regulated Distribution | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | $ 2,588 | 2,508 | $ 6,997 | 6,735 | |
Refund of revenue | 1 | 2 | |||
Number of existing utility operating companies | company | 10 | 10 | |||
Megawatts of net demonstrated capacity of competitive segment | MW | 3,580 | 3,580 | |||
Utility customer payment period | 30 days | ||||
Regulated Distribution | Residential | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | $ 1,666 | 1,621 | $ 4,410 | 4,220 | |
Regulated Distribution | Commercial | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 619 | 589 | 1,722 | 1,640 | |
Regulated Distribution | Industrial | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 284 | 278 | 810 | 814 | |
Regulated Distribution | Other | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 19 | 20 | 55 | 61 | |
Regulated Transmission | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 411 | 408 | 1,223 | 1,185 | |
Refund of revenue | 3 | 6 | |||
Regulated Transmission | ATSI | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 206 | 202 | 604 | 598 | |
Regulated Transmission | TrAIL | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 59 | 61 | 176 | 182 | |
Regulated Transmission | MAIT | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 75 | 68 | 222 | 183 | |
Regulated Transmission | JCP&L | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 41 | 43 | 126 | 122 | |
Regulated Transmission | MP, PE and WP | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 30 | 34 | 95 | 100 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 2,735 | 2,610 | 7,346 | 7,025 | |
Total revenues | 2,759 | 2,661 | 7,387 | 7,207 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | Distribution services | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 1,534 | 1,503 | 4,177 | 4,000 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | Retail generation | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 1,054 | 1,005 | 2,820 | 2,735 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | Wholesale sales | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 117 | 67 | 260 | 188 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | Transmission | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | Other | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 30 | 35 | 89 | 102 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | ARP | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues | 0 | 25 | (27) | 108 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | Other non-customer revenue | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues | 24 | 26 | 68 | 74 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 411 | 408 | 1,223 | 1,185 | |
Total revenues | 415 | 413 | 1,233 | 1,198 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | Distribution services | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | Retail generation | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | Wholesale sales | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | Transmission | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 411 | 408 | 1,223 | 1,185 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | Other | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | ARP | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | Other non-customer revenue | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues | 4 | 5 | 10 | 13 | |
Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | (33) | (35) | (103) | (105) | |
Total revenues | (50) | (52) | (148) | (152) | |
Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments | Distribution services | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | (25) | (22) | (77) | (65) | |
Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments | Retail generation | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | (13) | (16) | (38) | (46) | |
Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments | Wholesale sales | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 5 | 3 | 12 | 6 | |
Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments | Transmission | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments | Other | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues from contracts with customers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments | ARP | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Corporate/Other and Reconciling Adjustments | Other non-customer revenue | |||||
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items] | |||||
Total revenues | $ (17) | $ (17) | $ (45) | $ (47) | |
[1] | Includes excise and gross receipts tax collections of $103 million and $100 million during the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $283 million and $276 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. |
Discontinued Operations - Narra
Discontinued Operations - Narrative (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | Feb. 27, 2020 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 |
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items] | ||||
Cash provided by investing activities from discontinued operations | $ 0 | $ 0 | ||
Cash provided by financing activities from discontinued operations | 0 | 0 | ||
Worthless stock deduction | $ 4,900 | |||
Unrecognized tax benefits from worthless stock deduction | 316 | |||
Worthless stock deduction, net of tax | 1,000 | |||
Unrecognized tax benefits from worthless stock deduction, net of tax | 68 | |||
Increase in NOL allocation | $ 289 | |||
Increase in NOL allocation tax effected | $ 61 | |||
Discontinued Operations, Disposed of by Means Other than Sale | FES and FENOC | ||||
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items] | ||||
Cash flows from operating activities, discontinued operations | $ 47 | $ 46 | ||
FES Key Creditor Groups | Affiliated Companies | FES | ||||
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items] | ||||
Settlement of claims upon emergence | 853 | |||
IT Access Agreement | Affiliated Companies | FES | ||||
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items] | ||||
Settlement of claims upon emergence | 125 | |||
State and Local Jurisdiction | ||||
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items] | ||||
Worthless stock deduction, net of tax | $ 19 |
Discontinued Operations - Summa
Discontinued Operations - Summarized Results (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||
Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | ||
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items] | |||||
Income tax expense | $ (47) | $ 6 | $ (47) | $ (29) | |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | 47 | 46 | |||
Income from discontinued operations | [1] | 47 | (6) | 47 | 46 |
FES and FENOC | Discontinued Operations, Disposed of by Means Other than Sale | |||||
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items] | |||||
Revenues | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
Fuel | 0 | 0 | 0 | (6) | |
Other operating expenses | 0 | 0 | 0 | (6) | |
Other income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
Income from discontinued operations, before tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Income tax expense | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Settlement consideration | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1) | |
Accelerated net pension and OPEB prior service credits | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | |
Gain on disposal of FES and FENOC, before tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | |
Income taxes (benefits), including worthless stock deduction | (47) | 6 | (47) | (29) | |
Gain on disposal of FES and FENOC, net of tax | 47 | (6) | 47 | 46 | |
Income from discontinued operations | $ 47 | $ (6) | $ 47 | $ 46 | |
[1] | Net of income tax expense (benefits) of $(47) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, and $6 million and $(29) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively. |
Earnings Per Share Of Common _3
Earnings Per Share Of Common Stock (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, shares in Millions, $ in Millions | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||
Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | ||
EPS of Common Stock | |||||
Income from continuing operations | $ 416 | $ 460 | $ 809 | $ 791 | |
Discontinued operations, net of tax | [1] | 47 | (6) | 47 | 46 |
Net Income | $ 463 | $ 454 | $ 856 | $ 837 | |
Share count information: | |||||
Weighted average number of basic shares outstanding (in shares) | 544 | 542 | 544 | 542 | |
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options and awards (in shares) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding | 545 | 543 | 545 | 543 | |
Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock: | |||||
Income from continuing operations, basic (in dollars per share) | $ 0.76 | $ 0.85 | $ 1.48 | $ 1.46 | |
Discontinued operations, basic (in dollars per share) | 0.09 | (0.01) | 0.09 | 0.08 | |
Basic - Earnings Per Share of Common Stock (in dollars per share) | 0.85 | 0.84 | 1.57 | 1.54 | |
Income from continuing operations, diluted (in dollars per share) | 0.76 | 0.85 | 1.48 | 1.46 | |
Discontinued operations, diluted (in dollars per share) | 0.09 | (0.01) | 0.09 | 0.08 | |
Diluted - Earnings Per Share to Common Stock (in dollars per share) | $ 0.85 | $ 0.84 | $ 1.57 | $ 1.54 | |
[1] | Net of income tax expense (benefits) of $(47) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, and $6 million and $(29) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively. |
Pension and Other Post-Employ_3
Pension and Other Post-Employment Benefits (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | Mar. 11, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Mar. 31, 2020 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 |
Defined Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Table Text Block [Line Items] | ||||||
Pension and OPEB prior service costs amortized out of AOCI | $ 1 | $ 1 | $ 3 | $ 7 | ||
Mark-to-market adjustment | $ 423 | |||||
Pension | ||||||
Defined Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Table Text Block [Line Items] | ||||||
Service costs | 48 | 47 | 145 | 147 | ||
Interest costs | 57 | 71 | 170 | 216 | ||
Expected return on plan assets | (163) | (156) | (489) | (464) | ||
Amortization of prior service costs (credits) | 1 | 1 | 3 | 12 | ||
One-time termination benefit | 0 | 8 | ||||
Pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment | 0 | 386 | ||||
Net periodic credits, including amounts capitalized | (57) | (37) | (171) | 305 | ||
Net periodic credits, recognized in earnings | (80) | (56) | (243) | 240 | ||
Net accelerated credits | $ 18 | |||||
Estimated return | 7.50% | |||||
OPEB | ||||||
Defined Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Table Text Block [Line Items] | ||||||
Service costs | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||
Interest costs | 3 | 4 | 8 | 12 | ||
Expected return on plan assets | (10) | (9) | (27) | (25) | ||
Amortization of prior service costs (credits) | (4) | (4) | (13) | (42) | ||
One-time termination benefit | 0 | 0 | ||||
Pension and OPEB mark-to-market adjustment | 0 | 37 | ||||
Net periodic credits, including amounts capitalized | (10) | (8) | (29) | (15) | ||
Net periodic credits, recognized in earnings | $ (10) | $ (8) | $ (30) | $ (15) |
Income Taxes (Details)
Income Taxes (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||
Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Mar. 31, 2020 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | |
Income Tax Examination [Line Items] | |||||
Effective tax rate (percent) | 17.50% | 20.10% | 25.10% | 13.40% | |
Unrecognized tax benefits, decrease resulting from prior period tax positions | $ 29 | ||||
Benefits from accelerated amortization of certain investment tax credits | $ 10 | ||||
Change in amount of valuation allowance | $ 52 | ||||
Unrecognized tax benefits period increase (decrease) | (25) | $ 21 | |||
Unrecognized tax benefits, increase resulting from certain federal tax credits | 4 | 15 | |||
Unrecognized tax benefits, portion expected to be resolved in the next fiscal year | 26 | 26 | |||
Unrecognized tax benefits that would impact effective tax rate | 24 | $ 24 | |||
State and Local Jurisdiction | West Virginia | |||||
Income Tax Examination [Line Items] | |||||
Change in enacted tax rate | $ 9 |
Fair Value Measurements - Recur
Fair Value Measurements - Recurring Assets and Liabilities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | Sep. 30, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2020 |
Liabilities | ||
Investment excludes receivables, payables and accrued income | $ 1 | |
Recurring | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | $ 1,010 | 2,123 |
Liabilities | ||
Fair value, liabilities | (1) | 0 |
Net assets (liabilities) | 1,009 | 2,123 |
Recurring | FTRs | Derivative Liabilities | ||
Liabilities | ||
Fair value, liabilities | (1) | 0 |
Recurring | FTRs | Derivative Assets | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 10 | 3 |
Recurring | Equity securities | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 2 | 2 |
Recurring | U.S. state debt securities | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 271 | 276 |
Recurring | Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 684 | 1,801 |
Recurring | Other | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 43 | 41 |
Recurring | Level 1 | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 686 | 1,803 |
Liabilities | ||
Fair value, liabilities | 0 | 0 |
Net assets (liabilities) | 686 | 1,803 |
Recurring | Level 1 | FTRs | Derivative Liabilities | ||
Liabilities | ||
Fair value, liabilities | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 1 | FTRs | Derivative Assets | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 1 | Equity securities | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 2 | 2 |
Recurring | Level 1 | U.S. state debt securities | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 1 | Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 684 | 1,801 |
Recurring | Level 1 | Other | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 2 | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 314 | 317 |
Liabilities | ||
Fair value, liabilities | 0 | 0 |
Net assets (liabilities) | 314 | 317 |
Recurring | Level 2 | FTRs | Derivative Liabilities | ||
Liabilities | ||
Fair value, liabilities | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 2 | FTRs | Derivative Assets | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 2 | Equity securities | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 2 | U.S. state debt securities | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 271 | 276 |
Recurring | Level 2 | Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 2 | Other | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 43 | 41 |
Recurring | Level 3 | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 10 | 3 |
Liabilities | ||
Fair value, liabilities | (1) | 0 |
Net assets (liabilities) | 9 | 3 |
Recurring | Level 3 | FTRs | Derivative Liabilities | ||
Liabilities | ||
Fair value, liabilities | (1) | 0 |
Recurring | Level 3 | FTRs | Derivative Assets | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 10 | 3 |
Recurring | Level 3 | Equity securities | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 3 | U.S. state debt securities | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 3 | Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | 0 | 0 |
Recurring | Level 3 | Other | ||
Assets | ||
Fair value, assets | $ 0 | $ 0 |
Fair Value Measurements - Level
Fair Value Measurements - Level 3 Quantitative Information (Details) - Model - Level 3 - FTRs $ in Millions | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021USD ($)$ / MWh | |
Fair Value Inputs, Assets and Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items] | |
Fair Value | $ | $ 9 |
Minimum | |
Fair Value Inputs, Assets and Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items] | |
Fair Value Inputs, RTO Auction Clearing Prices (in $/MWH) | 0.50 |
Maximum | |
Fair Value Inputs, Assets and Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items] | |
Fair Value Inputs, RTO Auction Clearing Prices (in $/MWH) | 3.30 |
Weighted Average | |
Fair Value Inputs, Assets and Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items] | |
Fair Value Inputs, RTO Auction Clearing Prices (in $/MWH) | 1.40 |
Fair Value Measurements - Inves
Fair Value Measurements - Investments Held in Trusts (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | Sep. 30, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2020 |
Debt Securities, Available-for-sale [Line Items] | ||
Short-term cash investments | $ 12 | $ 9 |
Debt securities | ||
Debt Securities, Available-for-sale [Line Items] | ||
Cost Basis | 277 | 275 |
Unrealized Gains | 2 | 7 |
Unrealized Losses | (8) | (6) |
Fair Value | $ 271 | $ 276 |
Fair Value Measurements - Proce
Fair Value Measurements - Proceeds from the Sale of Investments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | |
Proceeds from the sale of investments in available-for-sale securities, realized gains and losses on those sales, and interest and dividend income | ||||
Sale proceeds | $ 16 | $ 6 | $ 29 | $ 45 |
Realized gains | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Realized Losses | (1) | 0 | (2) | (7) |
Interest and dividend income | $ 3 | $ 4 | $ 8 | $ 18 |
Fair Value Measurements - Carry
Fair Value Measurements - Carrying Amounts of Long-term Debt (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | Sep. 30, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2020 |
Carrying Value | ||
Fair value and related carrying amounts of long-term debt and other long-term obligations | ||
Long-term debt and other long-term obligations | $ 23,819 | $ 22,377 |
Fair Value | ||
Fair value and related carrying amounts of long-term debt and other long-term obligations | ||
Long-term debt and other long-term obligations | $ 27,018 | $ 25,465 |
Fair Value Measurements - Sched
Fair Value Measurements - Schedule of Long Term Debt (Details) | Sep. 30, 2021USD ($) |
FET | Promissory Notes | 2.866%, 500 Million Notes Maturing 2028 | |
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |
Face amount of debt | $ 500,000,000 |
Interest Rate | 2.866% |
MP | Promissory Notes | 3.55%, 200 Million Notes Maturing 2027 | |
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |
Face amount of debt | $ 200,000,000 |
Interest Rate | 3.55% |
TE | Promissory Notes | 2.65%, 150 Million Notes Maturing 2028 | |
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |
Face amount of debt | $ 150,000,000 |
Interest Rate | 2.65% |
MAIT | Promissory Notes | 4.10%, 150 Million Notes Maturing 2028 | |
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |
Face amount of debt | $ 150,000,000 |
Interest Rate | 4.10% |
JCP&L | Promissory Notes | 2.75%, 500 Million Notes Maturing 2032 | |
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |
Face amount of debt | $ 500,000,000 |
Interest Rate | 2.75% |
JCP&L | Line of Credit | Revolving Credit Facility | |
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | |
Amount outstanding | $ 450,000,000 |
Fair Value Measurements - Narra
Fair Value Measurements - Narrative (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | 9 Months Ended | |
Sep. 30, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2020 | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Line Items] | ||
Investments not required to be disclosed | $ 349 | $ 322 |
NUG contracts | ||
Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Line Items] | ||
Period of future observable data to determine contract price | 2 years |
Regulatory Matters - Maryland a
Regulatory Matters - Maryland and New Jersey (Details) meter in Millions, $ in Millions | Nov. 01, 2021 | Sep. 14, 2021USD ($) | Jun. 16, 2021USD ($) | May 26, 2021USD ($) | Apr. 23, 2021USD ($) | Mar. 05, 2021USD ($) | Mar. 01, 2021USD ($)program | Jan. 29, 2021USD ($) | Jan. 01, 2021USD ($) | Dec. 18, 2020USD ($) | Oct. 28, 2020USD ($) | Sep. 25, 2020program | Aug. 27, 2020USD ($)meter | Jun. 10, 2020 | Apr. 06, 2020USD ($)MW | Mar. 22, 2019USD ($)program | Sep. 30, 2021USD ($)MW | Sep. 30, 2020USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2021USD ($)MW | Sep. 30, 2020USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2020USD ($) |
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of Yards Creek (Note 8) | $ 0 | $ 0 | $ 109 | $ 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Regulated Distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Plant capacity (in MW's) | MW | 3,580 | 3,580 | |||||||||||||||||||
PE | Maryland | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Incremental energy savings goal per year (percent) | 0.20% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Incremental energy savings goal thereafter (percent) | 2.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recovery period for expenditures for cost recovery program | 3 years | 3 years | |||||||||||||||||||
Expenditures for cost recovery program | $ 116 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization period | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of requested rate increase (decrease) | $ 148 | ||||||||||||||||||||
PE | MPSC | Maryland | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of approved annual rate increase | $ 6.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number of enhanced service reliability programs | program | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Enhanced service reliability program term | 4 years | ||||||||||||||||||||
Period to file new depreciation study | 18 months | ||||||||||||||||||||
Enhanced service reliability program renewal period | 4 years | ||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution reporting of COVID relief funds | $ 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
PE | MPSC | Depreciation Expense Study | Maryland | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of requested rate increase (decrease) | $ (9.6) | ||||||||||||||||||||
PE | Maryland Office of People's Counsel | Depreciation Expense Study | Maryland | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of requested rate increase (decrease) | $ (10.8) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Approved amount of annual increase | $ (2.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | New Jersey | Yard's Creek Energy | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Plant capacity (in MW's) | MW | 210 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase price | $ 155 | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | New Jersey | Regulated Distribution | Yard's Creek Energy | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Book value | $ 45 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of Yards Creek (Note 8) | $ 109 | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | Advanced Metering Infrastructure | New Jersey | Regulated Distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of requested rate increase (decrease) | $ 732 | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | Advanced Metering Infrastructure Supplemental Filing | New Jersey | Regulated Distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
First period of the program | 6 years | ||||||||||||||||||||
Costs associated with program | $ 494 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of capital expenditures | 390 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of maintenance expense | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of removal | $ 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | NJBPU | New Jersey | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of revenue increase | $ 94 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease in regulatory liability | $ 86 | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | NJBPU | New Jersey | Forecast | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested increase to ROE | 9.60% | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | NJBPU | New Jersey | Yard's Creek Energy | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership interest acquired | 50.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | NJBPU | JCP&L Reliability Plus | New Jersey | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Approved amount of annual increase | $ 95 | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | NJBPU | Advanced Metering Infrastructure | New Jersey | Regulated Distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Meter deployment period | 3 years | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number of meters to be deployed | meter | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Expected cost of the program | $ 418 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Time period of the program | 20 years | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | NJBPU | Energy Efficiency and Peak Demand Reduction | New Jersey | Regulated Distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization period | 10 years | 10 years | |||||||||||||||||||
Number of programs | program | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | NJBPU | Electrical Vehicle Program | New Jersey | Regulated Distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of requested rate increase (decrease) | $ 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number of programs | program | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Electric vehicle program period | 4 years | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of requested return on capital | $ 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Requested amount for operations and maintenance expense | $ 34 | ||||||||||||||||||||
JCP&L | NJBPU | Energy Efficiency and Peak Demand Reduction Stipulation Settlement | New Jersey | Regulated Distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of requested rate increase (decrease) | $ 203 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Approved period of rate plan | 3 years | ||||||||||||||||||||
Approved investment recovery | $ 158 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Approved amount of operation and maintenance recovery | $ 45 |
Regulatory Matters - Ohio (Deta
Regulatory Matters - Ohio (Details) - OHIO - PUCO $ in Thousands | Aug. 03, 2021USD ($) | Jun. 16, 2021USD ($) | Nov. 24, 2020 | Jul. 17, 2019USD ($) | Jul. 15, 2019USD ($) | Jun. 01, 2016USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2021USD ($) | Sep. 13, 2021requirement | Aug. 06, 2021USD ($) | Dec. 31, 2020USD ($) |
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Proposed goal to reduce CO2 pollution (percent) | 90.00% | |||||||||
Energy Conservation, Economic Development and Job Retention | ||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Contribution amount | $ 51,000 | |||||||||
Distribution Modernization Rider | ||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Requested plan extension period | 2 years | |||||||||
Delivery Capital Recovery Rider | ||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Annual revenue cap for rider for years three through six | 20,000 | |||||||||
Annual revenue cap for rider for years six through eight | $ 15,000 | |||||||||
OCC DMR Refund | The Ohio Companies | ||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Loss contingency, damages sought | $ 42,000 | |||||||||
Distribution Platform Modernization Plan | ||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Approved amount of annual increase (decrease) | $ 516,000 | |||||||||
Period of grid modernization plan | 3 years | |||||||||
Decoupling Rider | The Ohio Companies | ||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Amount of refunds announced | $ 27,000 | |||||||||
Rider CSR | The Ohio Companies | ||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Pre-tax impairment of regulatory asset | $ 108,000 | |||||||||
Impairment of regulatory asset, net | 84,000 | |||||||||
Lost distribution revenue | $ 77,000 | |||||||||
Rider DCR | The Ohio Companies | ||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Approved amount of annual increase (decrease) | $ (3,700) | |||||||||
Rider DCR Audit Report | The Ohio Companies | ||||||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||||||
Amount of refunds announced | $ 6,600 | |||||||||
Refund to customer of pole attachment sates | $ 15 | |||||||||
Number of requirements with minor non-compliance | requirement | 8 | |||||||||
Number of requirements | requirement | 23 |
Regulatory Matters - Pennsylvan
Regulatory Matters - Pennsylvania and West Virginia (Details) $ in Millions | Aug. 27, 2021USD ($) | Dec. 30, 2020USD ($) | Jan. 16, 2020USD ($) | Mar. 31, 2016USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2021USD ($)proposal | Jun. 18, 2020 |
FERC | Transmission Related Vegetation Management Programs | Other Nonoperating Income (Expense) | FirstEnergy | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Pre-tax impairment of regulatory asset | $ 21 | |||||
ATSI | FERC | Transmission Related Vegetation Management Programs | Regulated Transmission | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Pre-tax impairment of regulatory asset | 48 | |||||
ATSI | FERC | Transmission Related Vegetation Management Programs | Regulated Distribution | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Pre-tax impairment of regulatory asset | $ 27 | |||||
Pennsylvania | DSP June 2019- May 2023 | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Number of RFP's | proposal | 2 | |||||
RFP term | 2 years | |||||
Pennsylvania | Three month period | DSP June 2019- May 2023 | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Term of energy contract | 3 months | |||||
Pennsylvania | Twelve month period | DSP June 2019- May 2023 | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Term of energy contract | 12 months | |||||
Pennsylvania | Twenty-four month period | DSP June 2019- May 2023 | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Term of energy contract | 24 months | |||||
Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania Companies | PPUC | EE&C Phase III | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Approved amount of annual increase | $ 390 | |||||
Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania Companies | PPUC | New LTIIPs | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Amount of requested rate increase (decrease) | $ 572 | |||||
Recovery period | 5 years | |||||
Pennsylvania | ME | PPUC | EE&C Phase IV | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Demand reduction targets | 2.90% | |||||
Energy consumption reduction targets | 3.10% | |||||
Pennsylvania | PN | PPUC | EE&C Phase IV | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Demand reduction targets | 3.30% | |||||
Energy consumption reduction targets | 3.00% | |||||
Pennsylvania | Penn | PPUC | EE&C Phase IV | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Demand reduction targets | 2.00% | |||||
Energy consumption reduction targets | 2.70% | |||||
Pennsylvania | WP | PPUC | EE&C Phase IV | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Demand reduction targets | 2.50% | |||||
Energy consumption reduction targets | 2.40% | |||||
West Virginia | MP and PE | WVPSC | ENEC | ||||||
Regulatory Matters [Line Items] | ||||||
Approved amount of annual increase | $ (7.7) | |||||
Amount of requested rate increase (decrease) | $ 19.6 | $ (2.6) | ||||
Amount of requested rate increase (decrease) (percent) | 1.50% | |||||
Supplemental requested decrease | $ (7.7) |
Commitments, Guarantees and C_3
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies - Potential Collateral Obligations (Details) $ in Millions | 9 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2021USD ($) | |
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | |
Guarantor obligations | $ 346 |
Percent of face amount of debt | 100.00% |
Curing period | 30 days |
Upon Further Downgrade | |
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | |
Guarantor obligations | $ 32 |
Surety Bond (Collateralized Amount) | |
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | |
Guarantor obligations | $ 314 |
Percent of face amount of debt | 60.00% |
Capped portion of surety bond obligations | $ 39 |
Utilities and FET | |
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | |
Guarantor obligations | 88 |
Utilities and FET | Upon Further Downgrade | |
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | |
Guarantor obligations | 32 |
Utilities and FET | Surety Bond (Collateralized Amount) | |
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | |
Guarantor obligations | 56 |
FirstEnergy | |
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | |
Guarantor obligations | 258 |
FirstEnergy | Upon Further Downgrade | |
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | |
Guarantor obligations | 0 |
FirstEnergy | Surety Bond (Collateralized Amount) | |
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | |
Guarantor obligations | $ 258 |
Commitments, Guarantees and C_4
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies - Narrative (Details) T in Millions | Jul. 21, 2021USD ($) | Feb. 20, 2018USD ($) | Sep. 30, 2021USD ($)phaseT | Dec. 31, 2019USD ($) |
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Outstanding guarantees and other assurances aggregated | $ 1,100,000,000 | |||
Company posted collateral related to net liability positions | $ 55,000,000 | |||
Goal to reduce in GHG emissions | 30.00% | |||
Amount of code of conduct payment | $ 4,000,000 | |||
Regulation of Waste Disposal | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Accrual for environmental loss contingencies | $ 101,000,000 | |||
Environmental liabilities former gas facilities | $ 67,000,000 | |||
National Ambient Air Quality Standards | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Capping of SO2 Emissions Under CSAPR | T | 2.4 | |||
Capping of NOx emissions under CSAPR | T | 1.2 | |||
National Ambient Air Quality Standards | CSAPR | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Number of phases under the EPA’s CAIR for reductions of Sulfur Dioxide and Mono-Nitrogen Oxides | phase | 2 | |||
Global Holding | Senior Secured Term Loan | Senior Loans | Signal Peak, Global Rail and Affiliates | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Investment ownership percentage | 69.99% | |||
FEV | Senior Secured Term Loan | Senior Loans | Signal Peak | Global Holding | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Investment ownership percentage | 33.33% | |||
WMB Marketing Ventures, LLC | Senior Secured Term Loan | Senior Loans | Signal Peak | Global Holding | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Investment ownership percentage | 33.33% | |||
FE | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Outstanding guarantees and other assurances aggregated | $ 586,000,000 | |||
Other Guarantee | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Outstanding guarantees and other assurances aggregated | 68,000,000 | |||
Other Assurances | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Outstanding guarantees and other assurances aggregated | 469,000,000 | |||
Term Loan Facility due November 2024 | Line of Credit | Global Holding | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Face amount of debt | $ 120,000,000 | |||
EPA | Clean Water Act | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Amount awarded to other party | $ 610,000 | |||
Term of payments | 2 years | |||
U.S. Attorney's Office | United States v. Householder, et al. | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Term of payments | 60 days | |||
Term of DPA | 3 years | |||
Loss in period | $ 230,000,000 | |||
United States Treasury | United States v. Householder, et al. | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Amount awarded to other party | 115,000,000 | |||
Ohio Development Service | United States v. Householder, et al. | ||||
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items] | ||||
Amount awarded to other party | $ 115,000,000 |
Segment Information - Narrative
Segment Information - Narrative (Details) mi² in Thousands, customer in Millions, $ in Millions | 9 Months Ended | |
Sep. 30, 2021USD ($)mi²customercompanyMW | Dec. 31, 2020USD ($) | |
Regulated Distribution | ||
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items] | ||
Number of existing utility operating companies | company | 10 | |
Number of customers served by utility operating companies | customer | 6 | |
Number of square miles in service area | mi² | 65 | |
Megawatts of net demonstrated capacity of competitive segment | MW | 3,580 | |
Other/Corporate | OVEC | ||
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items] | ||
Megawatts of net demonstrated capacity of competitive segment | MW | 67 | |
FirstEnergy | Other/Corporate | ||
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items] | ||
Long-term debt and other long-term obligations | $ | $ 7,400 | |
Held-for-sale | Yard Creek Generating Facility | Regulated Distribution | ||
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items] | ||
Investments - held for sale | $ | $ 45 |
Segment Information - Financial
Segment Information - Financial Data (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||||
Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Sep. 30, 2021 | Sep. 30, 2020 | Dec. 31, 2020 | ||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | [1] | $ 3,124 | $ 3,022 | $ 8,472 | $ 8,253 | |
Depreciation | 326 | 316 | 972 | 954 | ||
Amortization (deferral) of regulatory assets, net | 30 | (91) | 171 | (26) | ||
DPA penalty (Note 9) | 0 | 0 | 230 | 0 | ||
Miscellaneous income (expense), net | 136 | 100 | 379 | 303 | ||
Interest expense | 283 | 266 | 855 | 792 | ||
Income taxes (benefits) | 88 | 116 | 271 | 122 | ||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 416 | 460 | 809 | 791 | ||
Property additions | 542 | 687 | 1,768 | 1,979 | ||
Total assets | 43,854 | 43,854 | $ 44,464 | |||
Goodwill | 5,618 | 5,618 | 5,618 | |||
External Customers | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 3,124 | 3,022 | 8,472 | 8,253 | ||
Internal Customers | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 2,759 | 2,661 | 7,387 | 7,207 | ||
Depreciation | 229 | 223 | 684 | 672 | ||
Amortization (deferral) of regulatory assets, net | 29 | (91) | 159 | (32) | ||
DPA penalty (Note 9) | 0 | |||||
Miscellaneous income (expense), net | 102 | 81 | 297 | 246 | ||
Interest expense | 133 | 124 | 392 | 374 | ||
Income taxes (benefits) | 108 | 109 | 261 | 144 | ||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 416 | 413 | 1,003 | 800 | ||
Property additions | 326 | 391 | 993 | 1,115 | ||
Total assets | 30,546 | 30,546 | 30,855 | |||
Goodwill | 5,004 | 5,004 | 5,004 | |||
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | External Customers | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 2,708 | 2,611 | 7,237 | 7,062 | ||
Operating Segments | Regulated Distribution | Internal Customers | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 51 | 50 | 150 | 145 | ||
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 415 | 413 | 1,233 | 1,198 | ||
Depreciation | 82 | 79 | 240 | 233 | ||
Amortization (deferral) of regulatory assets, net | 1 | 0 | 12 | 6 | ||
DPA penalty (Note 9) | 0 | |||||
Miscellaneous income (expense), net | 12 | 7 | 34 | 21 | ||
Interest expense | 62 | 55 | 186 | 162 | ||
Income taxes (benefits) | 23 | 35 | 93 | 103 | ||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 70 | 115 | 295 | 346 | ||
Property additions | 202 | 278 | 732 | 817 | ||
Total assets | 12,660 | 12,660 | 12,592 | |||
Goodwill | 614 | 614 | 614 | |||
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | External Customers | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 411 | 408 | 1,223 | 1,185 | ||
Operating Segments | Regulated Transmission | Internal Customers | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 4 | 5 | 10 | 13 | ||
Corporate/Other | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 5 | 3 | 12 | 6 | ||
Depreciation | (1) | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||
Amortization (deferral) of regulatory assets, net | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
DPA penalty (Note 9) | 230 | |||||
Miscellaneous income (expense), net | 23 | 13 | 59 | 45 | ||
Interest expense | 89 | 88 | 288 | 265 | ||
Income taxes (benefits) | (43) | (28) | (83) | (125) | ||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | (70) | (68) | (489) | (355) | ||
Property additions | 14 | 18 | 43 | 47 | ||
Total assets | 648 | 648 | 1,017 | |||
Goodwill | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Corporate/Other | External Customers | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 5 | 3 | 12 | 6 | ||
Corporate/Other | Internal Customers | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Reconciling Adjustments | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | (55) | (55) | (160) | (158) | ||
Depreciation | 16 | 14 | 47 | 47 | ||
Amortization (deferral) of regulatory assets, net | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
DPA penalty (Note 9) | 0 | |||||
Miscellaneous income (expense), net | (1) | (1) | (11) | (9) | ||
Interest expense | (1) | (1) | (11) | (9) | ||
Income taxes (benefits) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Property additions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Total assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Goodwill | 0 | 0 | $ 0 | |||
Reconciling Adjustments | External Customers | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Reconciling Adjustments | Internal Customers | ||||||
Segment Financial Information | ||||||
Revenues | $ (55) | $ (55) | $ (160) | $ (158) | ||
[1] | Includes excise and gross receipts tax collections of $103 million and $100 million during the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $283 million and $276 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. |