Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 0-22183
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 95-2988062 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
27 Hubble, Irvine, CA (Address of principal executive offices) | 92618 (Zip Code) |
(949) 451-1450
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Non-accelerated filero | Large Accelerated filero | Accelerated filero | Smaller reporting companyþ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12(b)-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
As of July 15, 2010, there were 1,167,267 outstanding shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
May 31, 2010
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
May 31, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No. | ||||||||
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
Exhibit 10.64 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
Table of Contents
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
May 31, | February 28, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 3,891 | $ | 5,055 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $413 at May 31, 2010 and $416 at February 28, 2010 | 3,322 | 2,183 | ||||||
Inventories | 6,702 | 7,494 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 445 | 273 | ||||||
Total current assets | 14,360 | 15,005 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 404 | 496 | ||||||
Acquisition-related intangible assets, net | 1,004 | 1,046 | ||||||
Other assets, net | 118 | 109 | ||||||
$ | 15,886 | $ | 16,656 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 1,781 | $ | 1,711 | ||||
Accrued liabilities | 2,211 | 2,324 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 3,992 | 4,035 | ||||||
Deferred rent | 18 | 16 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 2,500 shares authorized; 1,167 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010 | 12 | 12 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 52,378 | 52,249 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (40,514 | ) | (39,656 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 11,876 | 12,605 | ||||||
$ | 15,886 | $ | 16,656 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
2
Table of Contents
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, expect per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
May 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net sales | $ | 5,502 | $ | 4,233 | ||||
Cost of sales | 4,368 | 3,120 | ||||||
Gross profit | 1,134 | 1,113 | ||||||
Selling | 553 | 617 | ||||||
General and administrative | 1,236 | 1,424 | ||||||
Research and development | 204 | 257 | ||||||
Operating loss | (859 | ) | (1,185 | ) | ||||
Interest income, net | (1 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Loss before income taxes | (858 | ) | (1,179 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit | — | (13 | ) | |||||
Net loss | $ | (858 | ) | $ | (1,166 | ) | ||
Net loss per share—basic and diluted | $ | (0.74 | ) | $ | (1.00 | ) | ||
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted | 1,167 | 1,167 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
Table of Contents
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
May 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (858 | ) | $ | (1,166 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operations to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 131 | 123 | ||||||
Bad debt expense | (3 | ) | 74 | |||||
Stock-based compensation | 129 | 153 | ||||||
Deferred rent amortization | 2 | 4 | ||||||
Gain on sale of fixed assets | — | (3 | ) | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (1,136 | ) | (745 | ) | ||||
Inventories | 792 | 650 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (172 | ) | (182 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable | 70 | (68 | ) | |||||
Accrued lease termination fee | — | (200 | ) | |||||
Accrued liabilities | (113 | ) | (304 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (1,158 | ) | (1,664 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Reduction (investment) in restricted cash | — | 200 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets | — | 3 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (6 | ) | 202 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities | — | — | ||||||
Net decrease in cash | (1,164 | ) | (1,462 | ) | ||||
Cash at beginning of period | 5,055 | 5,890 | ||||||
Cash at end of period | $ | 3,891 | $ | 4,428 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
Table of Contents
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
A. The Consolidated Financial Statements Have Been Prepared by the Company and are Unaudited.
Meade Instruments Corp. is engaged in the design, manufacture, marketing and sale of consumer optics products, primarily telescopes, telescope accessories and binoculars. We design our products in-house or with the assistance of external consultants. Most of our entry level products are manufactured overseas by contract manufacturers in Asia, while our high-end telescopes are manufactured and assembled at our Mexico facility. Sales of our products are driven by an in-house sales force as well as a network of sales representatives throughout the U.S. We currently operate out of two primary locations: Irvine, California and Tijuana, Mexico. Our California facility serves as the Company’s corporate headquarters and U.S. distribution center; our Mexico facilities contain our manufacturing, assembly, repair, packaging, research and development, and other general and administrative functions. Our business is highly seasonal and our financial results have historically varied significantly on a quarter-by-quarter basis throughout each year.
In the opinion of the management of Meade Instruments Corp. (the “Company”), the information and amounts furnished in this report reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for the fair statement of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010.
The Company has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, substantial fluctuations in its sales, gross margins and profitability from quarter to quarter. Factors that influence these fluctuations include the volume and timing of orders received, changes in the mix of products sold, market acceptance of the Company’s products, competitive pricing pressures, the Company’s ability to meet fluctuating demand and delivery schedules, the timing and extent of research and development expenses, the timing and extent of product development costs and the timing and extent of advertising expenditures.
Historically, a substantial portion of the Company’s net sales and results from operations typically occurred in the third quarter of the Company’s fiscal year primarily due to disproportionately higher customer demand for less-expensive telescopes during the holiday season; however, net sales during its third quarter of fiscal 2010 were not substantially greater than its second quarter, due to difficult market conditions brought about by the poor general economic environment and increased competition from Asia-based manufacturers. While seasonality is not as pronounced as it was prior to the sale of Meade Europe, the Company continues to experience significant sales to mass merchandisers who, along with specialty retailers, purchase a considerable amount of their inventories to satisfy seasonal customer demand. These purchasing patterns have caused the Company to increase its level of inventory during its second and third quarters in response to such demand or anticipated demand. As a result, the Company’s working capital requirements have correspondingly increased at such times.
B. Liquidity
At May 31, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $3.9 million, as compared to $5.1 million at February 28, 2010, a decrease of $1.2 million due to the Company’s loss from operations of $0.9 million and fluctuations in working capital.
While the Company’s operations are not as seasonal as they were historically, the Company still experiences increases in accounts receivable and inventories beginning with the end of its first fiscal quarter and culminating with the end of its third fiscal quarter. Receivables and inventories then typically decrease at the end of the Company’s fiscal year.
Net cash used in operating activities was $1.7 million during the three months ended May 31, 2009 compared to $1.2 million during the three months ended May 31, 2010 — a decrease of $0.5 million or 30% primarily due to the reduction of approximately $0.3 million in the Company’s net loss during those periods and a reduction in the cash used for restructuring costs associated with officer severance and the lease termination fee associated with the relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters in February 2009. Operating loss was $1.2 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to $0.9 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 — a decrease of $0.3 million or 25% primarily due to lower operating expenses.
5
Table of Contents
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
The Company currently has in place an undrawn $10.0 million secured credit facility with First Capital. Availability of funds under this facility is based on a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory. Availability on this facility amounted to approximately $2.6 million as of May 31, 2010. While the Company’s credit facility does not contain explicit financial covenants, the Company’s lender has significant latitude in restricting, reducing or withdrawing the Company’s credit facility at its sole discretion with limited notice, as is customary with these types of arrangements.
In the event the Company requires more capital than is presently anticipated due to unforeseen factors, the Company may need to rely on its credit facility. In such an instance, if its lender restricts, reduces or eliminates the Company’s access to credit, or requires immediate repayment of the amounts outstanding under the agreement, the Company would be required to pursue additional or alternative sources of liquidity such as equity financings or a new debt agreement with other creditors, either of which may contain less favorable terms. The Company cannot assure that such additional sources of capital would be available on reasonable terms, if at all.
The Company currently anticipates that cash on hand and funds generated from operations, including cost saving measures the Company has taken and additional measures it could still take, will be sufficient to meet the Company’s anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.
C. Stock Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification No. ASC 718-10,Share-Based Payment(“ASC 718-10”), which establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee services. Under the provisions of ASC 718-10, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity grant). Share-based compensation expenses, included in general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, were approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Due to deferred tax valuation allowances provided, no net benefit was recorded against the share-based compensation charged.
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Key input assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the expected option term, forfeiture rate, the expected volatility of the Company’s stock over the option’s expected term, the risk-free interest rate over the option’s expected term, and the Company’s expected annual dividend yield. The Company believes that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of the Company’s stock options. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by persons who receive equity awards.
The Company did not grant stock options during the three months ended May 31, 2010. The fair value of the Company’s stock options granted in the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
May 31, | May 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Expected life (1) | 3.8 | 5.5 | ||||||
Expected volatility (2) | 123 | % | 103 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate (3) | 1.9 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||
Expected dividends | None | None |
(1) | The option term is expressed in years and was determined using the simplified method for estimating expected option life. |
6
Table of Contents
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
(2) | The stock volatility for each grant is measured using the weighted average of historical daily price changes of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected option life of the grant, adjusted for activity which is not expected to occur in the future. | |
(3) | The risk-free interest rate for periods equal to the expected term of the share option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. |
As of May 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $0.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2 years. At May 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $0.8 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock options.
Approximately $75,000 of unvested restricted stock was forfeited by the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, concurrent with his termination in April 2009.
D. Composition of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts
The composition of accounts receivable is as follows:
May 31, | February 28, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Due from factor | $ | 3,667 | $ | 2,359 | ||||
Accounts receivable, other | (345 | ) | (176 | ) | ||||
$ | 3,322 | $ | 2,183 | |||||
The total due from factor at May 31, 2010 included approximately $3.1 million of invoices assigned on a recourse basis. Accordingly, substantially all of the credit risk associated with the assigned invoices remained with the Company at May 31, 2010. Accounts receivable, other includes reserves for subsequent sales returns and other allowances attributable to all receivables—even invoices assigned to the factor.
The composition of inventories is as follows:
May 31, | February 28, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials | $ | 3,108 | $ | 2,957 | ||||
Work-in-process | 2,078 | 2,426 | ||||||
Finished goods | 1,516 | 2,111 | ||||||
$ | 6,702 | $ | 7,494 | |||||
The composition of acquisition-related intangible assets is as follows:
Amortization | May 31, 2010 | February 28, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Periods | Gross Carrying | Accumulated | Net Book | Gross Carrying | Accumulated | Net Book | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In Years) | Amount | Amortization | Value | Amount | Amortization | Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks | 7-15 | $ | 424 | $ | (299 | ) | $ | 125 | $ | 424 | $ | (290 | ) | $ | 134 | |||||||||||||
Completed technologies | 12 | 1,620 | (741 | ) | 879 | 1,620 | (708 | ) | 912 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,044 | $ | 1,040 | $ | 1,004 | $ | 2,044 | $ | (998 | ) | $ | 1,046 | |||||||||||||||
7
Table of Contents
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
The changes in the carrying amount of acquisition-related intangible assets for the first quarter ended May 31, 2010, are as follows:
Amortizing | ||||
Intangible | ||||
Assets | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Balance, net, February 28, 2010 | $ | 1,046 | ||
Amortization | (42 | ) | ||
Balance, net, May 31, 2010 | $ | 1,004 | ||
Amortization of trademarks completed technologies over the next five fiscal years is estimated as follows:
Amounts | ||||
Fiscal Year | (In thousands) | |||
2011 (remaining nine months) | $ | 128 | ||
2012 | 171 | |||
2013 | 171 | |||
2014 | 162 | |||
2015 | 135 | |||
Thereafter | 237 | |||
Total | $ | 1,004 | ||
The composition of property and equipment is as follows:
May 31, | February 28, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Molds and dies | $ | 7,325 | $ | 7,317 | ||||
Machinery and equipment | 4,453 | 4,455 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 256 | 256 | ||||||
Autos and trucks | 199 | 199 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements | 139 | 139 | ||||||
12,372 | 12,366 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (11,968 | ) | (11,870 | ) | ||||
$ | 404 | $ | 496 | |||||
E. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved from time to time in litigation incidental to its business. Management believes that the outcome of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
F. Reverse Stock Split and Income (Loss) Per Share
On August 7, 2009, the Company filed an amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation (i) establishing a one-for-twenty reverse split of common stock, and (ii) reducing the number of our authorized shares of common stock to Two Million Five Hundred Thousand (2,500,000). Every twenty shares of (old) common stock which were held as of August 7, 2009, the effective date, were converted into one share of (new) common stock. Accordingly, all amounts reflected in this document have been retroactively restated based upon this reverse split in order to ensure comparability, including the shares and options granted and outstanding prior to the effective date of the reverse split.
8
Table of Contents
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
Basic income (loss) per share amounts exclude the dilutive effect of potential shares of common stock. Basic income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and dilutive potential shares of common stock outstanding for each period presented. Potential shares of common stock include outstanding stock options and restricted stock, which may be included in the weighted average number of shares of common stock under the treasury stock method.
The total number of options outstanding were as follows:
May 31, | February 28, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Stock options outstanding | 78 | 78 |
A reconciliation of the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding and the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
May 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Basic weighted average number of shares | 1,167 | 1,167 | ||||||
Dilutive potential shares of common stock | — | — | ||||||
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding | 1,167 | 1,167 | ||||||
Number of options excluded from the calculation of weighted average shares because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock | 78 | 55 | ||||||
Potential shares of common stock excluded from the calculation of weighted average shares | — | — |
Weighted average shares for the three month periods ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, exclude the aggregate dilutive effect of potential shares of common stock related to stock options and restricted stock because the Company incurred a loss and the effect would be anti-dilutive.
9
Table of Contents
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
G. Product Warranties
The Company provides reserves for the estimated cost of product warranty-related claims at the time of sale, and periodically adjusts the provision to reflect actual experience related to its standard product warranty programs and its extended warranty programs. The amount of warranty liability accrued reflects management’s best estimate of the expected future cost of honoring Company obligations under its warranty plans. Additionally, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise. Meade brand products, principally telescopes and binoculars, are generally covered by a two-year limited warranty. Most of the Coronado products have limited five-year warranties. Included in the warranty accrual as of May 31, 2010, is $0.6 million and as of May 31, 2009, $0.7 million related to the Company’s former sport optics brands that were sold in 2008 and for which the Company agreed to retain certain warranty liabilities. Changes in the warranty liability, which is included as a component of accrued liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, were as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
May 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 883 | $ | 985 | ||||
Warranty accrual | 62 | (53 | ) | |||||
Labor and material usage | (86 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Ending balance | $ | 859 | $ | 901 | ||||
H. Income Taxes
In accordance with ASC 740-10,Accounting for Income Taxes, the Company has determined that there was sufficient uncertainty surrounding the future realization of its deferred tax assets to warrant the recording of a full valuation allowance. The valuation allowance was recorded based upon the Company’s determination that there was insufficient objective evidence, at the time, to recognize those assets for financial reporting purposes. For the period ended May 31, 2010, the Company has not changed its assessment regarding the recoverability of its deferred tax assets. Ultimate realization of the benefit of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company generating sufficient taxable income in future periods, including periods prior to the expiration of certain underlying tax credits.
As of May 31, 2010 and as of February 28, 2010, unrecognized tax benefits, all of which affect the effective tax rate if recognized, were $0.1 million. Management anticipates that there will be a material reduction in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. At May 31, 2010, accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were less than $0.1 million for the quarter.
The tax years 2005 through 2009 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. However, the amount of a net operating loss carryforward can be adjusted for federal tax purposes for the three years (four years for the major state jurisdictions in which the Company operates) after the net operating loss is utilized.
I. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. The Codification became effective for our first quarter ended May 31, 2010. Since the new standard did not change U.S. GAAP, there was no change to our consolidated financial statements other than to update all references to U.S. GAAP to be in conformity with the ASC.
10
Table of Contents
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
In May 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification No. ASC 855-10, “Subsequent Events” (“ASC 855-10”). ASC 855-10 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this statement sets forth:
1. | The period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements |
2. | The circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements |
3. | The disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. |
ASC 855-10 was adopted by the Company on June 15, 2009, and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
11
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. |
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Form 10-Q. This discussionmaycontain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those risks discussed in “Risk Factors” in the Company’s annual report onForm 10-K. Those risk factors expressly qualify all subsequent oral and written forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf. We do not have any intention or obligation to update forward-looking statements included in thisForm 10-Q after the date of thisForm 10-Q, except as required by law.
Overview of the Company
Meade Instruments Corp. is engaged in the design, manufacture, marketing and sale of consumer optics products, primarily telescopes, telescope accessories and binoculars. We design our products in-house or with the assistance of external consultants. Most of our entry level products are manufactured overseas by contract manufacturers in Asia, while our high-end telescopes are manufactured and assembled at our Mexico facility. Sales of our products are driven by an in-house sales force as well as a network of sales representatives throughout the U.S. We currently operate out of two primary locations: Irvine, California and Tijuana, Mexico. Our California facility serves as the Company’s corporate headquarters and U.S. distribution center; our Mexico facilities contain our manufacturing, assembly, repair, packaging, research and development, and other general and administrative functions. Our business is highly seasonal and our financial results have historically varied significantly on a quarter-by-quarter basis throughout each year.
We believe that the Company holds valuable brand names and intellectual property that provide us with a competitive advantage in the marketplace. The Meade brand name is ubiquitous in the consumer telescope market, while the Coronado brand name represents a unique niche in the area of solar astronomy.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that it believes are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The significant accounting policies which management believes are the most critical to assist users in fully understanding and evaluating the Company’s reported financial results include the following:
Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenue recognition policy complies with Revenue Recognition ASC 605. Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when title and risk of loss has passed to the customer, typically at the time of shipment, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, including a fixed price, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk of loss has passed to the customer, typically at the time of shipment, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue is not recognized at the time of shipment if these criteria are not met. Under certain circumstances, the Company accepts product returns or offers markdown incentives. Material management judgments must be made and used in connection with establishing sales returns and allowances estimates. The Company continuously monitors and tracks returns and allowances and records revenues net of provisions for returns and allowances. The Company’s estimate of sales returns and allowances is based upon several factors including historical experience, current market and economic conditions, customer demand and acceptance of the Company’s products and/or any notification received by the Company of such a return. Historically, sales returns and allowances have been within management’s estimates; however, actual returns may differ significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from management’s estimates depending on actual market conditions at the time of the return.
12
Table of Contents
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, as determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method, or market. Costs include materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. The Company evaluates the carrying value of its inventories taking into account such factors as historical and anticipated future sales compared with quantities on hand and the price the Company expects to obtain for its products in their respective markets. The Company also evaluates the composition of its inventories to identify any slow-moving or obsolete product. These evaluations require material management judgments, including estimates of future sales, continuing market acceptance of the Company’s products, and current market and economic conditions. Inventory may be written down based on such judgments for any inventories that are identified as having a net realizable value less than its cost. However, if the Company is not able to meet its sales expectations, or if market conditions deteriorate significantly from management’s estimates, reductions in the net realizable value of the Company’s inventories could have a material adverse impact on future operating results.
Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for acquisition-related intangible assets in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 805-10,Business Combinations, and ASC No. 350-20,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. A portion of the remaining difference between the purchase price and the fair value of net tangible assets at the date of acquisition is included in the balance sheet as acquisition-related intangible assets. Amortization periods for the intangible assets subject to amortization range from seven to fifteen years depending on the nature of the assets acquired. The carrying value of acquisition-related intangible assets, including the related amortization period, is evaluated in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, which is determined based upon estimated discounted future cash flows based upon our estimated cost of capital, an impairment loss is reflected in loss from operations. Such estimates are subject to change and we may be required to recognize an impairment loss in the future.
Income taxes
In accordance with ASC 740-10,Accounting for Income Taxes, the Company has determined that there was sufficient uncertainty surrounding the future realization of its deferred tax assets to warrant the recording of a full valuation allowance. The valuation allowance was recorded based upon the Company’s determination that there was insufficient objective evidence, at the time, to recognize those assets for financial reporting purposes. For the period ended May 31, 2010, the Company has not changed its assessment regarding the recoverability of its deferred tax assets. Ultimate realization of the benefit of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company generating sufficient taxable income in future periods, including periods prior to the expiration of certain underlying tax credits.
As of May 31, 2010 and as of February 28, 2010, unrecognized tax benefits, all of which affect the effective tax rate if recognized, were $0.1 million. Management anticipates that there will be a material reduction in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. At May 31, 2010, accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were less than $0.1 million for the quarter.
The tax years 2005 through 2009 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. However, the amount of a net operating loss carryforward can be adjusted for federal tax purposes for the three years (four years for the major state jurisdictions in which the Company operates) after the net operating loss is utilized.
13
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The nature of the Company’s business is highly seasonal. Historically, sales in the second and third quarter ended August 31st and November 30th each year have been significantly higher than sales achieved in each of the other two fiscal quarters of the year. Thus, expenses and to a greater extent, operating income may significantly vary by quarter. Therefore, caution is advised when appraising results for a period shorter than a full year, or when comparing any period other than to the same period of the previous year.
Three Months Ended May 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended May 31, 2009
The Company reported net sales of $5.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010, an increase of $1.3 million or 31% from net sales of $4.2 million in the same period last year. The increase in net sales was due to increases in intermediate and entry level products. These increases were partially offset by declines in sales of the Company’s sales of other products which were attributable to reduced distribution outlets, increased competition and weak demand associated with the current macro economic environment and its impact on highly discretionary consumer products such as ours.
The gross profit margin during the three months ended May 31, 2010 decreased to 21% of net sales, compared with 26% of net sales in the same period last year. This decrease in the gross profit margin was attributable primarily to lower efficiency in manufacturing, inventory clearance sales, and sales of refurbished products.
Selling expenses for the three months ended May 31, 2010 were $553 thousand, a 10% decrease from $617 thousand for the same period in the prior year. While the Company’s sales volume was higher than same period in the previous year, variable selling expenses were lower due to the Company’s product mix and reduced discretionary spending, such as advertising.
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended May 31, 2010 were $1.2 million, a decrease of $0.2 million or 14% compared to $1.4 million in the same period in the prior year. Most of the decrease in general and administrative expenses was due to reductions in insurance costs and professional fees, as well as reduced headcount and lower stock compensation expense.
Research and development expenses for the three months ended May 31, 2010 were $0.2 million, a decrease of $0.1 million or 33% compared to $0.3 million same period in the prior year primarily due to the completion of the development of the Company’s new product (ETX-LS) at the end of the three months ended May 31, 2009.
The Company earned interest income of approximately $1 thousand during the three months ended May 31, 2010, compared to $6 thousand during the three months ended May 31, 2009. The primary reason for this decrease is a lower average monthly balance and lower interest rate compared to three months ended May 31, 2009.
Seasonality
The Company has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, substantial fluctuations in its sales, gross margins, working capital requirements and results from operations from quarter to quarter. Factors that influence these fluctuations include the volume and timing of orders received, changes in the mix of products sold, market acceptance of the Company’s products, competitive pricing pressures, the Company’s ability to meet fluctuating demand and delivery schedules, the timing and extent of research and development expenses, the timing and extent of product development activities and the timing and extent of advertising expenditures. Historically, a substantial portion of the Company’s net sales and results from operations typically occurred in the third quarter of the Company’s fiscal year primarily due to the disproportionately higher sales of its discontinued operations in Europe, as well as higher customer demand for less-expensive telescopes during the holiday season. Mass merchandisers, along with specialty retailers, purchase a considerable amount of their inventories to satisfy seasonal customer demand. These purchasing patterns have caused the Company to increase its level of inventory during its second and third quarters in response to such demand or anticipated demand. As a result, the Company’s working capital requirements have correspondingly increased at such times. However, the Company’s net sales during its third quarter of fiscal 2010 were not greater than its second quarter nor do we expect them to be significantly different this fiscal year. While seasonality is not as pronounced as it was prior to the sale of Meade Europe, the Company continues to experience significant sales to mass merchandisers. Accordingly, the Company’s net sales, working capital requirements and results from operations are expected to be higher in its second and third quarters than in the first and fourth quarters of its fiscal year.
14
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At May 31, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $3.9 million, as compared to $5.1 million at February 28, 2010, a decrease of $1.2 million due to the Company’s loss from operations of $0.9 million and fluctuations in working capital.
While the Company’s operations are not as seasonal as they were historically, the Company still experiences increases in accounts receivable and inventories beginning with the end of its first fiscal quarter and culminating with the end of its third fiscal quarter. Receivables and inventories then typically decrease at the end of the Company’s fiscal year.
Net cash used in operating activities was $1.7 million during the three months ended May 31, 2009 compared to $1.2 million during the three months ended May 31, 2010 — a decrease of $0.5 million or 30% due to the reduction of approximately $0.3 million in the Company’s net loss during those periods and a reduction in cash used for restructuring costs associated with officer severance and the lease termination fee associated with the relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters in February 2009. Operating loss was $1.2 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to $0.9 million during first quarter of fiscal 2011 — a decrease of $0.3 million or 25% due to lower operating expenses.
The Company currently has in place an undrawn $10.0 million secured credit facility with First Capital. Availability of funds under this facility is based on a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory. Availability on this facility amounted to approximately $2.6 million as of May 31, 2010. While the Company’s credit facility does not contain explicit financial covenants, the Company’s lender has significant latitude in restricting, reducing or withdrawing the Company’s credit facility at its sole discretion with limited notice, as is customary with these types of arrangements.
In the event the Company requires more capital than is presently anticipated due to unforeseen factors, the Company may need to rely on its credit facility. In such an instance, if its lender restricts, reduces or eliminates the Company’s access to credit, or requires immediate repayment of the amounts outstanding under the agreement, the Company would be required to pursue additional or alternative sources of liquidity such as equity financings or a new debt agreement with other creditors, either of which may contain less favorable terms. The Company cannot assure that such additional sources of capital would be available on reasonable terms, if at all.
The Company currently anticipates that cash on hand and funds generated from operations, including cost saving measures the Company has taken and additional measures it could still take, will be sufficient to meet the Company’s anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Capital expenditures, aggregated $6 thousand and $1 thousand for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company had no material capital expenditure commitments at May 31, 2010.
Inflation
The Company does not believe that inflation has had a material effect on the results of operations during the past two years. However, there can be no assurance that the Company’s business will not be affected by inflation in fiscal 2011 and beyond.
15
Table of Contents
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. This Statement became effective for our first quarter ended May 31, 2010. Since the new standard did not change U.S. GAAP, there was no change to our consolidated financial statements other than to update all references to U.S. GAAP to be in conformity with the ASC.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification No. ASC 855-10., “Subsequent Events” (“ASC 855-10”). ASC 855-10 established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this Statement sets forth:
1. | The period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements | ||
2. | The circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements | ||
3. | The disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. |
ASC 855-10 was adopted by the Company on June 15, 2009, and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Forward-Looking Information
The preceding “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section contains various “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which represent the Company’s reasonable judgment concerning the future and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual operating results and financial position to differ materially, including the following: the Company being able to see continued progress in its restructuring efforts, the timing of such restructuring efforts, and the fact that the restructuring efforts will result in positive financial results in the future; the Company’s expectation that it will continue to experience fluctuations in its sales, gross margins and profitability from quarter to quarter consistent with prior periods; the Company’s expectation that contingent liabilities will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations; the Company’s expectation that operating cash flow and bank borrowing capacity in connection with the Company’s business should provide sufficient liquidity for the Company’s obligations for at least the next twelve months.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK |
As a smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company is not required to provide the information required by this item.
16
Table of Contents
ITEM 4T. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Company’s management (with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”,) as of the quarter ended May 31, 2010. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been or will be detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded, based on their evaluation, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the Company as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended May 31, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
17
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
Not applicable.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Title or Description | |||
10.64 | Meade Instruments Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan | |||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification — Principal Executive Officer | |||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification — Principal Financial Officer | |||
32.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — Chief Executive Officer | |||
32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — Chief Financial Officer |
18
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
MEADE INSTRUMENTS CORP. | ||||
Dated: July 15, 2010 | By: | /s/ STEVEN G. MURDOCK | ||
Steven G. Murdock | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
By: | /s/ JOHN A. ELWOOD | |||
John A. Elwood | ||||
Senior Vice President — Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer |
19
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Exhibit Title or Description | |||
10.64 | Meade Instruments Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan | |||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification — Principal Executive Officer | |||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification — Principal Financial Officer | |||
32.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — Chief Executive Officer | |||
32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — Chief Financial Officer |
20