Investments in Real Estate Ventures | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract] | ' |
Investments in Real Estate Ventures | ' |
| | | | | | |
-6 | Investments in Real Estate Ventures | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had Investments in real estate ventures of $291.8 million and $287.2 million, respectively. We account for the majority of our investments in real estate ventures under the equity method of accounting. We have elected the fair value option for certain of our direct investments. Our investments are primarily co-investments in approximately 50 separate property or commingled funds for which we also have an advisory agreement. Our investment ownership percentages in these funds generally range from less than 1% to 15%. |
|
We utilize two investment vehicles, LaSalle Investment Company I ("LIC I") and LaSalle Investment Company II ("LIC II"), to facilitate the majority of our co-investment activity when we do not invest directly into a real estate venture. LIC I and LIC II invest in certain real estate ventures that own and operate commercial real estate. We have an effective 47.85% ownership interest in LIC I, and an effective 48.78% ownership interest in LIC II; primarily institutional investors hold the remaining 52.15% and 51.22% interests in LIC I and LIC II, respectively. |
|
At March 31, 2014, LIC II has unfunded capital commitments to the underlying funds of $185.0 million and a $30.0 million revolving credit facility (the "LIC II Facility"), principally for working capital needs. At March 31, 2014, our maximum potential unfunded commitments to LIC I and LIC II combined were $123.3 million which include our share of commitments to underlying funds and our exposure to funding our proportionate share of the then outstanding balance on the LIC II Facility. LIC I's and LIC II's exposures to liabilities and losses of the ventures are limited to their existing capital contributions and remaining capital commitments. Our unfunded commitment to LIC I will remain in effect until December 31, 2014. We expect that LIC II will draw down on our commitment over the next three to five years to satisfy its existing commitments to underlying funds. |
|
The following table summarizes the discussion above relative to LIC I and LIC II at March 31, 2014 ($ in millions): |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| LIC I | | LIC II | |
|
Our effective ownership interest in co-investment vehicle | 47.85 | % | 48.78 | % |
Our maximum potential unfunded commitments | $ | 5.1 | | $ | 118.2 | |
|
Our share of unfunded capital commitments to underlying funds | 0.4 | | 90.2 | |
|
Our maximum exposure assuming facilities are fully drawn | N/A | | 14.6 | |
|
Our share of exposure on outstanding borrowings | N/A | | 6.5 | |
|
|
Exclusive of our LIC I and LIC II commitment structures, we have other potential unfunded commitment obligations, the maximum of which is $81.4 million as of March 31, 2014. |
|
Our investments in real estate ventures include investments in entities classified as variable interest entities ("VIEs") that we analyze for potential consolidation. We had investments, either directly or indirectly, of $4.9 million and $2.6 million at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, in entities classified as VIEs. We evaluate each of these VIEs to determine whether we might have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. In certain circumstances, we have determined that we either did not have the power to direct the key activities, or shared power with investors, lenders, or other actively-involved third parties. Additionally, our exposure to loss is limited to our investment in the VIEs. Therefore, we concluded that we would not be deemed to have a controlling financial interest in or be the primary beneficiary of these VIEs and therefore do not consolidate them in our Consolidated Financial Statements. In other circumstances, we have determined we are the primary beneficiary of certain other VIEs and accordingly, consolidate such entities. The assets of the consolidated VIEs are available only for the settlement of the obligations of the respective entities. The mortgage loans of the consolidated VIEs are non-recourse to JLL. |
|
Summarized balance sheets for our consolidated VIEs as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are as follows ($ in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | |
| 31-Mar-14 | | | 31-Dec-13 | |
|
Property and equipment, net | $ | 31,999 | | | 14,389 | |
|
Other assets | 1,663 | | | 1,594 | |
|
Total assets | $ | 33,662 | | | 15,983 | |
|
| | | |
Mortgage loans payable, included in other long-term liabilities | $ | 24,919 | | | 10,647 | |
|
Other liabilities | 3,404 | | | — | |
|
Total liabilities | 28,323 | | | 10,647 | |
|
| | | |
Members' equity | 5,339 | | | 5,336 | |
|
Total liabilities and members' equity | $ | 33,662 | | | 15,983 | |
|
|
Summarized statements of operations for our consolidated VIEs for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows ($ in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended | | | Three Months Ended | |
|
| 31-Mar-14 | | | 31-Mar-13 | |
|
Revenue | $ | 503 | | | 287 | |
|
| | | |
Operating and other expenses | (418 | ) | | (60 | ) |
Net income | $ | 85 | | | 227 | |
|
|
The members' equity and net income of the consolidated VIEs are allocated in total to the noncontrolling interest holders as Noncontrolling interest on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and as Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. |
|
Impairment |
We review investments in real estate accounted for under the equity method on a quarterly basis for indications of whether we may not be able to recover the carrying value of the real estate assets underlying our investments in real estate ventures and whether our investments are other than temporarily impaired. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on evaluations of regular updates to future cash flow models, and on factors such as operational performance, market conditions, major tenancy matters, legal and environmental concerns, and our ability and intent to hold, with regard to each underlying asset and investment. Future events could occur which would cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an impairment loss is warranted. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the real estate asset underlying one of our investments in real estate ventures may be impaired, we review the recoverability of the carrying amount of the real estate asset in comparison to an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the underlying asset. |
|
When the carrying amount of the real estate asset is in excess of the future undiscounted cash flows, we use a discounted cash flow approach that primarily uses Level 3 inputs to determine the fair value of the asset to compute the amount of the potential impairment. Equity earnings from real estate ventures included impairment charges of $0.8 million and $1.7 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, representing our share of the impairment charges against individual assets held by our real estate ventures. We did not recognize any impairment charges related to our equity investments during either of the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. |
|
Fair Value |
We elected the fair value option for certain investments in real estate ventures, in the ordinary course of business at the time of the initial direct investment, because we believe the fair value accounting method more accurately represents the value and performance of these investments. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $80.7 million and $78.9 million, respectively, of investments that were accounted for under the fair value method. For investments in real estate ventures for which the fair value option has been elected, we increase or decrease our investment each reporting period by the change in the fair value of these investments. We reflect these fair value adjustments as gains or losses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income within Equity earnings from real estate ventures. The fair value of these investments is based on discounted cash flow models and other assumptions that reflect our outlook for the commercial real estate market relative to these real estate assets and is primarily based on inputs that are Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. |
|
The following table shows the movements in our investments in real estate ventures that are accounted for under the fair value accounting method ($ in thousands): |
|
| |
| | | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | |
|
Balances as of January 1, | $ | 78,941 | | 63,579 | | |
|
Investments | 757 | | 71 | | |
|
Distributions | (2 | ) | (1,458 | ) | |
Net fair value gain | 1,153 | | 425 | | |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net | (154 | ) | 207 | | |
|
Balances as of March 31, | $ | 80,695 | | 62,824 | | |
|
|
We account for our investment in LIC II under the equity method of accounting. LIC II accounts for certain of its investments under the fair value method. LIC II had investments of $55.1 million and $51.1 million, at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, that were accounted for under the fair value method. |