In addition, we have continued to work to reduce project-related operating and carrying costs. We have further reduced the real estate staff, salaries and other costs as we complete the sellout of Gold Peak and minimize operating activities at the other two projects. The effects of these reductions, which I will quantify later in my presentation, will be reflected in lower property operating and maintenance costs and general and administrative expenses throughout the remainder of 2009.
I will now briefly discuss our consolidated financial results for the second quarter, and six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the results of the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008, and the trailing quarter ended March 31, 2009. Consolidated revenue for the second quarter ‘09 aggregated $10.2 million, which is comprised of subscription revenue of $5.9 million and revenue from residential development activities of $4.3 million.
During the comparable 2008 quarter, consolidated revenue was $12.9 million, which was comprised of subscription revenue of $6.5 million and revenue from residential development activities of $6.4 million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, consolidated revenue aggregated $18.1 million, of which 12.3 million was subscription revenue and 5.8 million was revenue from residential development activities.
During the comparable 2008 six-month period consolidated revenue was $27.7 million, which was comprised of subscription revenue of 12.9 million, and sales revenue from residential development activities of $14.8 million.
The company had consolidated net income of $532,000 for the second quarter of ’09, or $0.05 per basic and fully diluted share. This compares to net income of $1,025,000 for the second quarter of 2009, or $0.09 per basic and fully diluted share.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the company had consolidated net income of $808,000, or $0.07 per basic and fully diluted share. This compares to net income of $1,472,000, or $0.13 per basic share and $0.10 per fully diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Following are additional performance metrics for the Reis Services segment, including EBITDA. We believe EBITDA is a useful measure to understand the financial performance of this segment. Since EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure, I must caution you, as I do each call, about its limitations.
In MD&A of our June 30, 2009 quarterly report on Form 10-Q and in our earnings release, both issued earlier today, we include cautionary language about the use of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA as non-GAAP measures, and present reconciliations of net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA for the appropriate periods. Both our 10-Q and press release are available at the Investor Relations portion of our website at www.reis.com/investors.
EBITDA for Reis Services was $2,740,000 for the second quarter of 2009 as compared to $2,858,000 for the second quarter 2008. The EBITDA margin improved to 46.4% in the current quarter from 43.9% in the 2008 second quarter. Revenue was $5,909,000 for the second quarter of 2009 as compared to $6,505,000 for the 2008 period.
For the six months, EBITDA was $5,756,000, as compared to $5,550,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The EBITDA margin improved to 46.9% in the current period from 43% in the 2008 six month period.