UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|
|
FORM N-CSR |
|
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
|
Investment Company Act file number 811-8211 |
|
DREYFUS INSTITUTIONAL PREFERRED MONEY MARKET FUNDS |
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter) |
|
|
c/o The Dreyfus Corporation |
200 Park Avenue |
New York, New York 10166 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
|
Mark N. Jacobs, Esq. |
200 Park Avenue |
New York, New York 10166 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 922-6000 |
Date of fiscal year end: | | 03/31 |
Date of reporting period: | | 09/30/04 |
| | | | FORM N-CSR |
Item 1. | | Reports to Stockholders. | | |
Dreyfus |
Institutional Preferred |
Money Market Fund |
SEMIANNUAL REPORT September 30, 2004
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2f58/e2f586d260876c767b50ea5c3c7e9e47c14d2944" alt=""
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents |
|
| | THE FUND |
| |
|
2 | | Letter to Shareholders |
5 | | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
5 | | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses |
With Those of Other Funds |
6 | | Statement of Investments |
9 | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
10 | | Statement of Operations |
11 | | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
12 | | Financial Highlights |
13 | | Notes to Financial Statements |
FOR MORE INFORMATION |
|
| | Back Cover |
The Fund
Dreyfus Institutional |
Preferred Money Market Fund |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dadf9/dadf9e0026a948c282cfc862acec82f1552acfe8" alt=""
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Money Market Fund for the six-month period ended September 30, 2004. During the reporting period, the fund produced an annualized yield of 1.18% which, taking into account the effects of compounding, created an annualized effective yield of 1.19% .1
Despite signs of renewed economic growth when the reporting period began, money market yields remained anchored by the 1% federal funds rate. While economic data at the time confirmed that an economic recovery was well underway, the number of new jobs continued to disappoint, reinforcing the perception that inflation would remain low and the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) still had a great deal of flexibility in the conduct of monetary policy.
In April, however, the U.S. Department of Labor released an unexpectedly strong employment report that quickly fueled investors’ concerns that long-dormant inflationary pressures might finally have begun to resurface. As the spring progressed, higher energy and commodity prices appeared to lend credence to investors’ renewed inflation concerns, and money market yields began to rise at the longer end of the maturity spectrum.
While the Fed again left interest rates unchanged in May, it no longer suggested that it could be “patient” before raising rates. Instead, it indicated in its public comments that future rate hikes were likely to be “measured.” Soon after the Fed’s May meeting, employment data showed a second consecutive month of robust job gains, causing investors to anticipate that the Fed might begin to tighten monetary policy as early as its next meeting in June. Indeed, on June 30, the Fed
raised the overnight federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 1.25% . Because most investors had anticipated the Fed’s move, the money markets already had reflected the impact of the increase.
In its June 30th statement, the Fed again noted that “policy accommodation can be removed at a pace that is likely to be measured.” Consequently, most analysts believed that the rate hike was the first in a series of increases designed to forestall inflationary pressures without derailing the economic recovery.This view was reinforced when it was later estimated that the U.S. economy grew at an annualized 2.8% rate during the second quarter of 2004, despite headwinds resulting from higher energy prices and ongoing terrorism fears.
However, the economy appeared to hit a new “soft patch” in the summer as the number of jobs created in June and July failed to match previous months’ totals. In addition, consumer spending waned as 2003’s tax cuts and low mortgage refinancing rates became a thing of the past. Nonetheless, most investors expected the Fed to increase the federal funds rate at its next meeting in August, and money market yields reflected those expectations. Indeed, the Fed raised short-term rates on August 10 by another 25 basis points to 1.5% .
In September, the Fed implemented its third consecutive increase in short-term interest rates, raising the federal funds rate by another 25 basis points to 1.75% . The Fed cited an easing of inflation expectations and further productivity gains in its decision. Subsequent comments by Chairman Alan Greenspan and other Fed members have suggested that rates must continue to move higher to reach a “balanced” posture with respect to the countervailing forces of economic growth and inflation. Indeed, the Fed has raised interest rates during a time of subdued employment growth and all-time highs in oil prices. While higher oil prices can act as a tax on the economy, helping to slow growth, it also can produce higher inflation as costs are passed along the supply chain.
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS (continued)
Portfolio Focus
Early in the reporting period, we generally maintained the fund’s weighted average maturity in a range that was longer than industry averages. In the spring, however, when inflationary pressures became more apparent and investors revised their expectations regarding the timing of interest-rate increases, we began to adopt a more defensive posture, allowing the fund’s weighted average maturity to fall toward a position we consider shorter than industry averages.
In our view, the Fed remains intent on reversing at least some of the monetary easing it initiated after September 11, 2001, and it so far has been relatively open about its intentions to do so. In addition, as of the end of the reporting period, the fed funds futures market has indicated that investors expect short-term interest rates to reach at least 2% by year-end. Accordingly, as of the end of the reporting period, we have maintained a relatively defensive investment posture in anticipation of further rate hikes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9f07/c9f074bcb3ed714db874d9142d1a8b1e55fa3390" alt=""
1 Annualized effective yield is based upon dividends declared daily and reinvested monthly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.Yields fluctuate.An investment in the fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency.Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.Yield provided reflects the absorption of fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect that may be extended, terminated or modified at any time. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s annualized yield and annualized effective yield would have been 1.08% and 1.09%, respectively.
4
| UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND ’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
|
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Money Market Fund from April 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended September 30, 2004 |
|
|
Expenses paid per $1,000 † | | $ .50 |
Ending value (after expenses) | | $1,005.90 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended September 30, 2004 |
|
|
Expenses paid per $1,000 † | | $ .51 |
Ending value (after expenses) | | $1,024.57 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .10%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS September 30, 2004 (Unaudited)
|
| | Principal | | |
Negotiable Bank Certificates of Deposit—38.4% | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
|
ABN-AMRO Bank (Yankee) | | | | |
1.84%, 11/30/2004 | | 100,000,000 a | | 99,995,865 |
Barclays Bank PLC (London) | | | | |
1.60%-2.02%, 10/18/2004-3/10/2005 | | 450,000,000 | | 450,000,000 |
Calyon (London) | | | | |
1.91%, 12/29/2004 | | 40,000,000 | | 40,000,000 |
Credit Lyonnais N.A. Inc. (Yankee) | | | | |
1.19%, 12/27/2004 | | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
Credit Lyonnais N.A. Inc. (Yankee) | | | | |
1.81%, 10/14/2004 | | 200,000,000 a | | 199,999,106 |
Credit Suisse First Boston (Yankee) | | | | |
1.60%, 10/12/2004 | | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
First Tennessee Bank N.A. | | | | |
1.53%, 10/8/2004 | | 237,000,000 | | 237,000,000 |
HBOS PLC (London) | | | | |
1.61%, 11/12/2004 | | 400,000,000 | | 400,000,000 |
HSBC Bank USA (Yankee) | | | | |
1.60%, 11/12/2004 | | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen Girozentrale (London) | | | | |
1.88%-2.02%, 12/24/2004-3/10/2005 | | 300,000,000 | | 300,004,523 |
Northern Rock PLC (London) | | | | |
2.02%, 3/9/2005 | | 100,000,000 | | 100,000,000 |
Societe Generale (Yankee) | | | | |
1.58%, 10/13/2004 | | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
UniCredito Italiano SpA (London) | | | | |
1.52%, 10/8/2004 | | 150,000,000 | | 150,000,000 |
UniCredito Italiano SpA (Yankee) | | | | |
1.59%, 11/10/2004 | | 75,000,000 | | 75,000,000 |
Washington Mutual Bank | | | | |
1.65%, 11/9/2004 | | 200,000,000 | | 200,002,158 |
WestLB AG (Yankee) | | | | |
1.83%, 10/4/2004 | | 300,000,000 a | | 299,999,628 |
Total Negotiable Bank Certificates of Deposit | | | | |
(cost $3,352,001,280) | | | | 3,352,001,280 |
| |
| |
|
|
Commercial Paper—24.7% | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Amstel Funding | | | | |
1.88%, 12/21/2004 | | 400,000,000 b | | 398,317,000 |
BNP Paribas Finance Inc. | | | | |
1.87%, 10/1/2004 | | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
Bank of America Corp. | | | | |
1.59%-1.88%, 11/9/2004-12/20/2004 | | 305,000,000 | | 304,403,135 |
6 | | | | |
| | Principal | | |
Commercial Paper (continued) | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
|
Concord Minutemen Capital Co. LLC | | | | |
1.62%, 11/9/2004 | | 117,000,000 b | | 116,795,932 |
Depfa Bank PLC | | | | |
1.65%, 11/4/2004-11/5/2004 | | 156,150,000 | | 155,904,159 |
Deutsche Bank Financial LLC | | | | |
1.90%, 10/1/2004 | | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
Natexis Banques Populaires U.S. Finance Co. LLC | | |
1.60%-1.88%, 11/8/2004-12/27/2004 | | 300,000,000 | | 298,928,333 |
Norddeutsche Landesbank Luxembourg S.A. | | | | |
1.59%, 10/12/2004 | | 150,000,000 | | 149,927,354 |
Stadshypotek Delaware Inc. | | | | |
1.65%, 11/9/2004 | | 130,500,000 | | 130,268,146 |
UBS Finance Delaware LLC | | | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
Total Commercial Paper | | | | |
(cost $2,154,544,059) | | | | 2,154,544,059 |
| |
| |
|
|
Corporate Notes—3.4% | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Sigma Finance Inc. | | | | |
1.82%-1.83%, 1/27/2005-3/7/2005 | | | | |
(cost $299,989,392) | | 300,000,000 a,b | | 299,989,392 |
| |
| |
|
|
Promissory Notes—6.1% | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. | | | | |
1.29%-1.50%, 10/1/2004-4/7/2005 | | | | |
(cost $530,000,000) | | 530,000,000 c | | 530,000,000 |
| |
| |
|
|
Short-Term Bank Notes—1.8% | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Bank of America N.A. | | | | |
1.80%, 3/15/2005 | | | | |
(cost $150,000,000) | | 150,000,000 a | | 150,000,000 |
| |
| |
|
|
U.S. Government Agencies—14.9% | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Federal Home Loan Banks, Floating Rate Notes | | |
1.81%, 8/4/2005-4/11/2006 | | 600,000,000 a | | 599,625,726 |
Federal Home Loan Banks, Notes | | | | |
1.32%-1.42%, 3/11/2005-4/29/2005 | | 300,000,000 | | 300,000,000 |
Federal National Mortgage Association, Notes | | |
1.35%-1.37%, 2/11/2005-2/25/2005 | | 400,000,000 | | 400,000,000 |
Total U.S. Government Agencies | | | | |
(cost $1,299,625,726) | | | | 1,299,625,726 |
S T A T E M E N T O F I N V E S T M E N T S ( U n a u d i t e d ) (continued)
| | Principal | | |
Time Deposit—13.4% | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
|
Chase Manhattan Bank USA (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
Danske Bank A/S (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.87%, 10/1/2004 | | 100,000,000 | | 100,000,000 |
Key Bank N.A. (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 150,000,000 | | 150,000,000 |
Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. (Grand Cayman) | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 300,000,000 | | 300,000,000 |
Regions Bank (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
State Street Bank & Trust Co. (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.94%, 10/1/2004 | | 220,000,000 | | 220,000,000 |
Total Time Deposits | | | | |
(cost $1,170,000,000) | | | | 1,170,000,000 |
| |
| |
|
|
Total Investments (cost $8,956,160,457) | | 102.7% | | 8,956,160,457 |
Liabilities Less, Cash and Receivables | | (2.7%) | | (236,793,780) |
Net Assets | | 100.0% | | 8,719,366,677 |
a Variable interest rate—subject to periodic change.
b Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Secutities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.These securities have been determined to be liquid by the Board of Trustees. At September 30, 2004, these securities amounted to $815,102,324 or 9.3% of net assets.
c These notes were acquired for investment, not with the intent to distribute or sell. Securities restricted as to public resale.These securities were acquired between 1/16/04 and 4/14/2004 at a cost of $530,000,000. At September 30, 2004, the aggregate value of these securities were $530,000,000 representing approximately 6.1% of net assets and are valued at amortized cost.
Portfolio Summary | | (Unaudited)† | | | | |
|
| | Value (%) | | | | Value (%) |
| |
| |
| |
|
Banking | | 71.3 | | Asset Backed-Multi-Seller | | 5.9 |
U.S. Government Agencies/ | | Asset Backed-Structured Investment | | 3.4 |
Mortgage-Backed | | 14.9 | | Building and Construction | | 1.1 |
Brokerage | | 6.1 | | | | 102.7 |
|
† Based on net assets. | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | |
8
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
September 30, 2004 (Unaudited)
| | Cost | | Value |
| |
| |
|
Assets ($): | | | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments | | 8,956,160,457 | | 8,956,160,457 |
Interest receivable | | | | 15,966,473 |
| | | | 8,972,126,930 |
| |
| |
|
Liabilities ($): | | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 2(a) | | | | 768,453 |
Cash overdraft due to Custodian | | | | 503,875 |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | | | 249,773,450 |
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | | | | 1,714,475 |
| | | | 252,760,253 |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($) | | | | 8,719,366,677 |
| |
| |
|
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | | 8,719,390,242 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | | (23,565) |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($) | | | | 8,719,366,677 |
| |
| |
|
Shares Outstanding | | | | |
(unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest authorized) | | 8,719,390,242 |
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($) | | 1.00 |
See notes to financial statements.
|
| STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Six Months Ended September 30, 2004 (Unaudited)
|
Investment Income ($): | | |
Interest Income | | 67,975,818 |
Expenses: | | |
Management fee—Note 2(a) | | 5,375,856 |
Investment Income—Net, representing net increase | | |
in net assets resulting from operations | | 62,599,962 |
See notes to financial statements.
10
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | Six Months Ended | | |
| | September 30, 2004 | | Year Ended |
| | (Unaudited) | | March 31, 2004 |
| |
| |
|
Operations ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net | | 62,599,962 | | 114,078,599 |
Net realized gain (loss) from investments | | — | | (30,702) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | |
Resulting from Operations | | 62,599,962 | | 114,047,897 |
| |
| |
|
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net | | (62,599,962) | | (114,078,599) |
| |
| |
|
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($1.00 per share): | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold | | 23,010,158,826 | | 50,028,772,705 |
Dividends reinvested | | 47,849,539 | | 81,882,238 |
Cost of shares redeemed | | (25,055,616,179) | | (48,978,403,231) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | |
from Beneficial Interest Transactions | | (1,997,607,814) | | 1,132,251,712 |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | (1,997,607,814) | | 1,132,221,010 |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Beginning of Period | | 10,716,974,491 | | 9,584,753,481 |
End of Period | | 8,719,366,677 | | 10,716,974,491 |
See notes to financial statements.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2004 | | | | Year Ended March 31, | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | (Unaudited) | | 2004 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
beginning of period | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net | | .006 | | .010 | | .017 | | .033 | | .063 | | .054 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from | | | | | | | | | | | | |
investment income—net | | (.006) | | (.010) | | (.017) | | (.033) | | (.063) | | (.054) |
Net asset value, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
end of period | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) | | 1.18a | | 1.05 | | 1.67 | | 3.30 | | 6.51 | | 5.48 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | .10a | | .10 | | .10 | | .10 | | .10 | | .10 |
Ratio of net investment | | | | | | | | | | | | |
income to average | | | | | | | | | | | | |
net assets | | 1.16a | | 1.04 | | 1.65 | | 3.23 | | 6.28 | | 5.43 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | |
($ x 1,000) | | 8,719,367 10,716,974 | | 9,584,753 | | 9,804,771 | | 8,854,953 | | 4,430,839 |
a Annualized.
See notes to financial statements.
12
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Money Market Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Money Market Funds (the “Company”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering two series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is to provide investors with as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”) serves as the fund’s investment adviser.The Manager is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon Bank, N.A., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon Financial Corporation (“Mellon Financial”). Dreyfus Service Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
It is the fund’s policy to maintain a continuous net asset value per share of $1.00; the fund has adopted certain investment, portfolio valuation and dividend and distribution policies to enable it to do so.There is no assurance, however, that the fund will be able to maintain a stable net asset value per share of $1.00.
The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 of the Act, which has been determined by the Board of Trustees to represent the fair value of the fund’s investments.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gain and loss from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of discount and premium on investment, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Cost of investments represents amortized cost.
(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gain, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that a net realized capital gain can be offset by capital loss carryovers, if any, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gain.
(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $23,565 available to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to March 31, 2004. If not applied, the carryover expires in fiscal 2012.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 was all ordinary income.The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
14
At September 30, 2004, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
NOTE 2—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .10 of 1% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. The Manager has agreed to pay all of the fund’s expenses except the management fee.
The components of Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $768,453.
(b) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
Two class actions have been filed against Mellon Financial, Mellon Bank, N.A., Dreyfus, Founders Asset Management LLC and the directors of all or substantially all of the Dreyfus Funds, on behalf of a purported class and derivatively on behalf of said funds, alleging violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and the common law. The complaints alleged, among other things, (i) that 12b-1 fees and directed brokerage were improperly used to pay brokers to recommend Dreyfus funds over other funds, (ii) that such payments were not disclosed to investors, (iii) that economies of scale and soft-dollar benefits were not passed on to investors, and (iv) that 12b-1 fees charged to certain funds that were closed to new
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
investors were also improper. The complaints sought compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the advisory contracts and an accounting and restitution of any unlawful fees, as well as an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses. On April 22, 2004, the actions were consolidated under the caption In re Dreyfus Mutual Funds Fee Litigation, and a consolidated amended complaint was filed on September 13, 2004.While adding new parties and claims under state and federal law, the allegations in the consolidated amended complaint essentially track the allegations in the prior complaints pertaining to 12b-1 fees, directed brokerage, soft dollars and revenue sharing. Dreyfus and the funds believe the allegations to be totally without merit and intend to defend the action vigorously.
Additional lawsuits arising out of these circumstances and presenting similar allegations and requests for relief may be filed against the defendants in the future. Neither Dreyfus nor the Dreyfus funds believe that any of the pending actions will have a material adverse effect on the Dreyfus funds or Dreyfus’ ability to perform its contracts with the Dreyfus funds.
16
For More Information
Dreyfus Institutional | | Transfer Agent & |
Preferred Money Market Fund | | Dividend Disbursing Agent |
200 Park Avenue | | |
| | Dreyfus Transfer, Inc. |
New York, NY 10166 | | |
| | 200 Park Avenue |
Manager | | New York, NY 10166 |
The Dreyfus Corporation | | Distributor |
200 Park Avenue | | |
| | Dreyfus Service Corporation |
New York, NY 10166 | | |
| | 200 Park Avenue |
Custodian | | New York, NY 10166 |
The Bank of New York | | |
One Wall Street | | |
New York, NY 10286 | | |
Telephone 1-800-645-6561
Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 E-mail Send your request to info@dreyfus.com Internet Information can be viewed online or downloaded at: http://www.dreyfus.com A description of the policies and procedures that the fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities, and information regarding how the fund voted these proxies for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2004, is available through the fund’s website at http://www.dreyfus.com and on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The description of the policies and procedures is also available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-645-6561.
Beginning with the fund’s fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2004, the fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q will be available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fa48/9fa484d3bfdb39990a501583bc2551ac3165bbf8" alt=""
© 2004 Dreyfus Service Corporation
Dreyfus |
Institutional Preferred |
Plus Money Market Fund |
SEMIANNUAL REPORT September 30, 2004
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9b85/d9b854a78048f09e2266ed4a2b5d2a6530e5af8d" alt=""
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents |
|
| | THE FUND |
| |
|
2 | | Letter to Shareholders |
5 | | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
5 | | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses |
With Those of Other Funds |
6 | | Statement of Investments |
8 | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
9 | | Statement of Operations |
10 | | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
11 | | Financial Highlights |
12 | | Notes to Financial Statements |
FOR MORE INFORMATION |
|
| | Back Cover |
The Fund
Dreyfus Institutional |
Preferred Plus Money Market Fund |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e752/4e752db29bde383157263e246ad0d13f798e57e9" alt=""
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Plus Money Market Fund for the six-month period ended September 30, 2004. During the reporting period, the fund produced an annualized yield of 1.19% which, taking into account the effects of compounding, created an annualized effective yield of 1.20% .1
The Economy
Despite signs of renewed economic growth when the reporting period began, money market yields remained anchored by the 1% federal funds rate. While economic data at the time confirmed that an economic recovery was well underway, the number of new jobs continued to disappoint, reinforcing the perception that inflation would remain low and the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) still had a great deal of flexibility in the conduct of monetary policy.
In April, however, the U.S. Department of Labor released an unexpectedly strong employment report that quickly fueled investors’ concerns that long-dormant inflationary pressures might finally have begun to resurface. As the spring progressed, higher energy and commodity prices appeared to lend credence to investors’ renewed inflation concerns, and money market yields began to rise at the longer end of the maturity spectrum.
While the Fed again left interest rates unchanged in May, it no longer suggested that it could be “patient” before raising rates. Instead, it indicated in its public comments that future rate hikes were likely to be “measured.” Soon after the Fed’s May meeting, employment data showed a second consecutive month of robust job gains, causing investors to anticipate that the Fed might begin to tighten monetary policy as early as its next meeting in June. Indeed, on June 30, the Fed
2
raised the overnight federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 1.25% . Because most investors had anticipated the Fed’s move, the money markets already had reflected the impact of the increase.
In its June 30th statement, the Fed again noted that “policy accommodation can be removed at a pace that is likely to be measured.” Consequently, most analysts believed that the rate hike was the first in a series of increases designed to forestall inflationary pressures without derailing the economic recovery.This view was reinforced when it was later estimated that the U.S. economy grew at an annualized 2.8% rate during the second quarter of 2004, despite headwinds resulting from higher energy prices and ongoing terrorism fears.
However, the economy appeared to hit a new “soft patch” in the summer as the number of jobs created in June and July failed to match previous months’ totals. In addition, consumer spending waned as 2003’s tax cuts and low mortgage refinancing rates became a thing of the past. Nonetheless, most investors expected the Fed to increase the federal funds rate at its next meeting in August, and money market yields reflected those expectations. Indeed, the Fed raised short-term rates on August 10 by another 25 basis points to 1.5% .
In September, the Fed implemented its third consecutive increase in short-term interest rates, raising the federal funds rate by another 25 basis points to 1.75% . The Fed cited an easing of inflation expectations and further productivity gains in its decision. Subsequent comments by Chairman Alan Greenspan and other Fed members have suggested that rates must continue to move higher to reach a “balanced” posture with respect to the countervailing forces of economic growth and inflation. Indeed, the Fed has raised interest rates during a time of subdued employment growth and all-time highs in oil prices.While higher oil prices can act as a tax on the economy, helping to slow growth, it also can produce higher inflation as costs are passed along the supply chain.
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS (continued)
Portfolio Focus
In our view, the Fed remains intent on reversing at least some of the monetary easing it initiated after September 11, 2001, and it so far has been relatively open about its intentions to do so. In addition, as of the end of the reporting period, the fed funds futures market has indicated that investors expect short-term interest rates to reach at least 2% by year-end. Accordingly, as of the end of the reporting period, we have maintained a defensive investment posture in anticipation of further rate hikes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/508bf/508bfe7bf279822b157559e87d8b7190f4ae144f" alt=""
October 15, 2004 |
New York, N.Y. |
1 Annualized effective yield is based upon dividends declared daily and reinvested monthly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.Yields fluctuate.An investment in the fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency.Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.Yield provided reflects the absorption of fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect that may be extended, terminated or modified at any time. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s annualized yield and annualized effective yield would have been 1.09% and 1.10%, respectively.
4
| UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
|
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Plus Money Market Fund from April 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended September 30, 2004 |
|
|
Expenses paid per $1,000 † | | $ — |
Ending value (after expenses) | | $1,006.00 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES |
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended September 30, 2004 |
|
|
Expenses paid per $1,000 † | | $ — |
Ending value (after expenses) | | $1,025.07 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .00%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period)
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
September 30, 2004 (Unaudited)
| | Principal | | |
Commercial Paper—5.9% | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
|
Deutsche Bank Financial LLC | | | | |
1.90%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
UBS Finance Delaware LLC | | | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
Total Commercial Paper | | | | |
(cost $30,000,000) | | | | 30,000,000 |
| |
| |
|
|
Corporate Notes—1.0% | | | | |
| |
| |
|
WestLB AG | | | | |
1.83%, 1/14/2005 | | | | |
(cost $4,999,783) | | 5,000,000 a | | 4,999,783 |
| |
| |
|
|
U.S. Government Agencies—66.8% | | |
| |
|
Federal Home Loan Banks, Notes | | | | |
1.65%, 10/1/2004 | | | | |
(cost $341,700,000) | | 341,700,000 | | 341,700,000 |
| |
| |
|
|
Time Deposits—26.5% | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Calyon (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.87%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
Chase Manhattan Bank USA (Grand Cayman) | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
Dresdner Bank AG (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
Fortis Bank (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. | | | | |
(Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
Nordea Bank Finland PLC (Grand Cayman) | | |
1.90%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
Regions Bank (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
6
| | Principal | | |
Time Deposits (continued) | | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
| |
| |
|
Royal Bank of Canada (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.85%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
Societe Generale (Grand Cayman) | | | | |
1.88%, 10/1/2004 | | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
Total Time Deposits | | | | |
(cost $135,000,000) | | | | 135,000,000 |
| |
| |
|
Total Investments (cost $511,699,783) | | 100.2% | | 511,699,783 |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | | (.2%) | | (781,400) |
Net Assets | | 100.0% | | 510,918,383 |
a Variable interest rate—subject to periodic change.
|
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited) † | | |
|
| | Value (%) |
| |
|
Banking | | 33.3 |
U.S. Government Agencies/Mortgage-Backed | | 66.9 |
| | 100.2 |
|
† Based on net assets. | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) |
| | Cost | | Value |
| |
| |
|
Assets ($): | | | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments | | 511,699,783 | | 511,699,783 |
Interest receivable | | | | 23,486 |
Due from the Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 2(a) | | 2,130 |
| | | | 511,725,399 |
| |
| |
|
Liabilities ($): | | | | |
Cash overdraft due to Custodian | | | | 807,016 |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($) | | | | 510,918,383 |
| |
| |
|
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | | 510,922,793 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | | (4,410) |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($) | | | | 510,918,383 |
| |
| |
|
Shares Outstanding | | | | |
(unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest authorized) | | 510,922,793 |
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($) | | 1.00 |
See notes to financial statements.
8
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Six Months Ended September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) |
Investment Income ($): | | |
Interest Income | | 2,971,238 |
Expenses: | | |
Management fee—Note 2(a) | | 227,034 |
Less—reduction in management fee due to | | |
undertaking—Note 2(a) | | (227,034) |
Net Expenses | | — |
Investment Income—Net, representing net increase | | |
in net assets resulting from operations | | 2,971,238 |
See notes to financial statements.
|
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | Six Months Ended | | |
| | September 30, 2004 | | Year Ended |
| | (Unaudited) | | March 31, 2004 |
| |
| |
|
Operations ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net | | 2,971,238 | | 2,727,806 |
Net realized gain (loss) from investments | | — | | (627) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | |
Resulting from Operations | | 2,971,238 | | 2,727,179 |
| |
| |
|
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net | | (2,971,238) | | (2,727,806) |
| |
| |
|
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($1.00 per share): | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold | | 4,144,723,162 | | 4,740,702,285 |
Dividends reinvested | | 651 | | 1,153 |
Cost of shares redeemed | | (3,856,974,860) | | (4,749,910,723) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | |
from Beneficial Interest Transactions | | 287,748,953 | | (9,207,285) |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | 287,748,953 | | (9,207,912) |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Beginning of Period | | 223,169,430 | | 232,377,342 |
End of Period | | 510,918,383 | | 223,169,430 |
See notes to financial statements.
10
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2004 | | | | Year Ended March 31, | | |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | (Unaudited) | | 2004 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 a |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment income—net | | .006 | | .011 | | .016 | | .030 | | .027 |
Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from investment income—net | | (.006) | | (.011) | | (.016) | | (.030) | | (.027) |
Net asset value, end of period | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Return (%) | | 1.20b | | 1.07 | | 1.59 | | 3.08 | | 6.11b |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | .10b | | .10 | | .10 | | .10 | | .10b |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | — | | — | | .00c | | .10 | | .10b |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
to average net assets | | 1.31b | | 1.07 | | 1.45 | | 2.96 | | 6.04b |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | | 510,918 | | 223,169 | | 232,377 | | 106 | | 103 |
a | | From October 16, 2000 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2001. |
b | | Annualized. |
c | | Amount represents less than .01%. |
See notes to financial statements.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Plus Money Market Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Money Market Funds (the “Company”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering two series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is to provide investors with as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity. The fund serves an investment vehicle for certain other Dreyfus funds as well as for other institutional investors. At September 30, 2004, 100% of the funds oustanding shares were held by other Dreyfus funds.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”) serves as the fund’s investment adviser. The Manager is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon Financial Corporation (“Mellon Financial”). Dreyfus Service Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
It is the fund’s policy to maintain a continuous net asset value per share of $1.00; the fund has adopted certain investment, portfolio valuation and dividend and distribution policies to enable it to do so.There is no assurance, however, that the fund will be able to maintain a stable net asset value per share of $1.00.
The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
12
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 of the Act, which has been determined by the Board of Trustees to represent the fair value of the fund’s investments.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gain and loss from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of discount and premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Cost of investments represents amortized cost.
(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gain, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that a net realized capital gain can be offset by capital loss carryovers, if any, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gain.
(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $4,410 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities prof-
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
its, if any, realized subsequent to March 31, 2004. If not applied, $3,783 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2011 and $627 expires in fiscal 2012.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 was all ordinary income.The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
At September 30, 2004, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).
NOTE 2—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .10 of 1% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. The Manager has agreed to pay all of the fund’s expenses except the management fee.The Manager had undertaken from April 1, 2004 through September 30, 2004 to waive its management fee. The reduction in management fee, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $227,034 during the period ended September 30, 2004.
The components of Due from The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $50,003, which is offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $52,133.
(b) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 3—Legal Matters:
Two class actions have been filed against Mellon Financial, Mellon Bank, N.A., Dreyfus, Founders Asset Management LLC and the directors of all or substantially all of the Dreyfus Funds, on behalf of a pur-
14
ported class and derivatively on behalf of said funds, alleging violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and the common law. The complaints alleged, among other things, (i) that 12b-1 fees and directed brokerage were improperly used to pay brokers to recommend Dreyfus funds over other funds, (ii) that such payments were not disclosed to investors, (iii) that economies of scale and soft-dollar benefits were not passed on to investors, and (iv) that 12b-1 fees charged to certain funds that were closed to new investors were also improper. The complaints sought compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the advisory contracts and an accounting and restitution of any unlawful fees, as well as an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses. On April 22, 2004, the actions were consolidated under the caption In re Dreyfus Mutual Funds Fee Litigation, and a consolidated amended complaint was filed on September 13, 2004.While adding new parties and claims under state and federal law, the allegations in the consolidated amended complaint essentially track the allegations in the prior complaints pertaining to 12b-1 fees, directed brokerage, soft dollars and revenue sharing. Dreyfus and the funds believe the allegations to be totally without merit and intend to defend the action vigorously.
Additional lawsuits arising out of these circumstances and presenting similar allegations and requests for relief may be filed against the defendants in the future. Neither Dreyfus nor the Dreyfus funds believe that any of the pending actions will have a material adverse effect on the Dreyfus funds or Dreyfus’ ability to perform its contracts with the Dreyfus funds.
NOTES
For More Information
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | | Transfer Agent & |
Plus Money Market Fund | | Dividend Disbursing Agent |
200 Park Avenue | | Dreyfus Transfer, Inc. |
New York, NY 10166 | | 200 Park Avenue |
Manager | | New York, NY 10166 |
The Dreyfus Corporation | | Distributor |
200 Park Avenue | | Dreyfus Service Corporation |
New York, NY 10166 | | 200 Park Avenue |
Custodian | | New York, NY 10166 |
The Bank of New York | | |
One Wall Street | | |
New York, NY 10286 | | |
Telephone 1-800-645-6561
Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 E-mail Send your request to info@dreyfus.com Internet Information can be viewed online or downloaded at: http://www.dreyfus.com A description of the policies and procedures that the fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities, and information regarding how the fund voted these proxies for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2004, is available through the fund’s website at http://www.dreyfus.com and on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The description of the policies and procedures is also available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-645-6561.
Beginning with the fund’s fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2004, the fund will file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q will be available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae6cc/ae6ccaecb0bbd8843d5f7e2d128b37aa48fad2c5" alt=""
© 2004 Dreyfus Service Corporation
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not Applicable.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recently ended fiscal half-year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 11. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DREYFUS INSTITUTIONAL PREFERRED MONEY MARKET FUNDS
By: | | /s/ Stephen E. Canter |
| | Stephen E. Canter |
| | President |
|
Date: | | November 23, 2004 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: | | /s/ Stephen E. Canter |
| | Stephen E. Canter |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
|
Date: | | November 23, 2004 |
|
By: | | /s/ James Windels |
James Windels |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
|
Date: | | November 23, 2004 |
EXHIBIT INDEX
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT)
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT)