Helios and Matheson Analytics (HMNY) 10-Q 2007 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2007

OR

    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number: 0-22945

HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
New York			13-3169913
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(IRS Employer Identification No.)
200 Park Avenue South New York, New York 10003
(Address of principal executive offices)
(212) 979-8228
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes     No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of ‘‘accelerated filer and large accelerated filer’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer                         Accelerated filer                         Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes     No

As of August 8, 2007, there were 2,395,457 shares of common stock, with $.01 par value per share, outstanding.

HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.

INDEX

Part I.    Financial Information					3
Item 1.    Financial Statements					3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006					3
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006					4
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006					5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements					6
Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations					11
Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk					18
Item 4.    Controls and Procedures					18
Part II.    Other Information					18
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings					18
Item 1A.    Risk Factors					18
Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds					18
Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities					18
Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders					18
Item 5.    Other Information					19
Item 6.    Exhibits					19
SIGNATURES					20

2

Table of Contents

Part I.    Financial Information

Item 1.    Financial Statements

HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

			June 30, 2007						December 31, 2006
			(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents				$	3,363,789					$	3,849,056
Accounts receivable-less allowance for doubtful accounts of $215,103 at June 30, 2007, and $225,741 at December 31, 2006					3,388,705						3,676,869
Unbilled receivables					92,388						316,156
Prepaid expenses and other current assets					209,461						159,398
Total current assets					7,054,343						8,001,479
Property and equipment, net					416,708						457,223
Goodwill					1,140,964						1,140,964
Deposits and other assets					141,002						189,620
Total assets				$	8,753,017					$	9,789,286
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses				$	1,785,960					$	2,294,929
Deferred revenue					37,260						285,227
Total current liabilities					1,823,220						2,580,156
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006.					—						—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,388,795 issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2007; 2,382,801 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2006.					23,888						23,828
Paid-in capital					34,679,260						34,607,651
Accumulated other comprehensive income – foreign currency translation					9,176						3,949
Accumulated deficit					(27,782,527	)					(27,426,298	)
Total shareholders’ equity					6,929,797						7,209,130
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity				$	8,753,017					$	9,789,286

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

			Six Months Ended June 30,												Three Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						2007						2006
			(unaudited)						(unaudited)						(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Revenues				$	10,609,764					$	12,648,493					$	4,733,370					$	6,737,842
Cost of revenues					7,480,251						9,223,831						3,574,608						4,925,055
Gross profit					3,129,513						3,424,662						1,158,762						1,812,787
Operating expenses:
Selling, general & administrative					3,472,664						2,804,240						1,706,205						1,088,695
Depreciation & amortization					94,157						77,482						49,246						40,798
					3,566,821						2,881,722						1,755,451						1,129,493
(Loss)/Income from operations					(437,308	)					542,940						(596,689	)					683,294
Other income(expense):
Interest income-net					92,911						17,060						37,992						11,276
					92,911						17,060						37,992						11,276
(Loss)/Income before income taxes					(344,397	)					560,000						(558,697	)					694,570
Provision for income taxes					11,832						17,500						9,000						12,800
Net (loss)/income					(356,229	)					542,500						(567,697	)					681,770
Other comprehensive income/(loss) – foreign currency adjustment					5,227						(4,486	)					6,214						(2,321	)
Comprehensive (loss)/income				$	(351,002	)				$	538,014					$	(561,483	)				$	679,449
Net (loss)/income per share
Basic				$	(0.15	)				$	0.23					$	(0.24	)				$	0.29
Diluted				$	(0.15	)				$	0.23					$	(0.24	)				$	0.28

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006
			(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss)/income				$	(356,229	)				$	542,500
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash used in operating activities, net of acquired assets:
Depreciation and amortization					94,157						77,481
Provision for doubtful accounts					13,000						117,249
Stock based compensation					60,738						52,890
Write down of investment					87,059						—
Reduction of capital lease obligation					(119,758	)					—
Amortization of deferred financing cost					6,000						6,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable					275,164						(1,171,792	)
Unbilled receivables					223,768						265,642
Prepaid expenses and other current assets					(50,063	)					50,872
Deposits					(44,441	)					—
Accounts payable and accrued expenses					(389,211	)					343,432
Deferred revenue					(247,967	)					(105,950	)
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities					(447,783	)					178,324
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment					(53,642	)					(59,365	)
Deposits					—						(198	)
Net cash used in investing activities					(53,642	)					(59,563	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options					10,931						29,203
Repayment of capital lease obligation					—						(7,261	)
Net cash provided by financing activities					10,931						21,942
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents					5,227						(4,485	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents					(485,267	)					136,218
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period					3,849,056						2,156,867
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period				$	3,363,789					$	2,293,085
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest				$	—					$	2,132
Cash paid during the period for income taxes – net of refunds				$	152,610					$	18,574

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

5

Table of Contents

HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

1)    GENERAL:

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Helios & Matheson North America Inc.’s (formerly The A Consulting Team, Inc.) (‘‘Helios & Matheson’’ or the ‘‘Company’’) Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) and the accompanying financial statements and related notes thereto. The accounting policies used in preparing these financial statements are the same as those described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

2)    CONTROLLED COMPANY:

The Board of Directors has determined that Helios & Matheson is a ‘‘Controlled Company’’ for purposes of the NASDAQ listing requirements. A ‘‘Controlled Company’’ is a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company. Certain NASDAQ requirements do not apply to a ‘‘Controlled Company’’, including requirements that: (i) a majority of its Board of Directors must be comprised of ‘‘independent’’ directors as defined in NASDAQ’s rules; and (ii) the compensation of officers and the nomination of directors be determined in accordance with specific rules, generally requiring determinations by committees comprised solely of independent directors or in meetings at which only the independent directors are present. The Board of Directors has determined that Helios & Matheson is a ‘‘Controlled Company&r squo;’ based on the fact that Helios & Matheson Information Technology, Ltd. (‘‘Helios & Matheson Parent’’) holds more than 50% of the voting power of the Company.

3)    INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all the adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2007, the consolidated results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 and cash flows for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Form 10-K filed by the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The consolidated results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or for the full year.

In management’s opinion, cash flows from operations combined with cash on hand will provide adequate flexibility for funding the Company’s working capital obligations for the next twelve months.

4)    STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:

At June 30, 2007, the Company has a stock based compensation plan, which is described as follows:

The Company adopted a Stock Option Plan (the ‘‘Plan’’) that provides for the grant of stock options that are either ‘‘incentive’’ or ‘‘non-qualified’’ for federal income tax purposes. The Plan provides for the issuance of a maximum of 460,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment pursuant to customary anti-dilution provisions). Stock options vest over a period between one to four years.

The exercise price per share of a stock option is established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in its discretion but may not be less than the fair market value of a share of

6

Table of Contents

common stock as of the date of grant. The aggregate fair market value of the shares of common stock with respect to which ‘‘incentive’’ stock options first become exercisable by an individual to whom an ‘‘incentive’’ stock option is granted during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000.

Stock options, subject to certain restrictions, may be exercisable any time after full vesting for a period not to exceed ten years from the date of grant. Such period is to be established by the Company in its discretion on the date of grant. Stock options terminate in connection with the termination of employment.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the modified prospective application method as specified by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement 123 (revised 2004), Share Based Payment (Statement 123 (R), whereby compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered that are outstanding as of the adoption date will be recognized over the remaining service period. The compensation cost for that portion of awards is based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated using pro forma disclosures under Statement 123, as originally issued. All new awards and awards that are modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the adoption date will be accounted for under the provisions of Statement 123 (R). For the three month period ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded stock based compensation expense under the provisions of Statement 123 (R) of $30,327 and $21,195, respecti vely.

Information with respect to options under the Company’s Plan is as follows:

			Number of Shares						Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance – December 31, 2006					189,906					$	4.76
Exercised					2,583					$	1.73
Expired					500					$	5.90
Cancelled					500					$	5.90
Balance – March 31, 2007					186,323					$	4.80
Exercised					3,411					$	1.90
Expired					0					$	0.00
Cancelled					0					$	0.00
Balance – June 30, 2007					182,912					$	4.85

The following table summarizes the status of the stock options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2007:

Stock Options Outstanding
Exercise Price Range			Weighted Average Exercise Price						Number of Options						Weighted- Remaining Contractual Life			Number of Stock Options Exercisable
$0.00 – $4.80				$	3.149						101,162				3.4 years					74,537
$4.80 – $9.60				$	5.878						73,000				4.2 years					31,500
$9.60 – $14.40				$	9.620						500				3.1 years					500
$14.40 – $19.20				$	15.504						7,750				2.4 years					7,750
$24.00 – $28.80				$	28.000						250				1.5 years					250
$28.80 – $33.60				$	30.000						250				1.3 years					250
											182,912									114,787

At June 30, 2007, 114,787 stock options were exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $4.73.

7

Table of Contents

5)    NET INCOME/(LOSS) PER SHARE:

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the six months and the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

			Six Months Ended June 30,												Three Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						2007						2006
Numerator for basic net (loss) / income per share
Net (loss)/income				$	(356,229	)				$	542,500					$	(567,697	)				$	681,770
Net (loss)/income available to common stockholders				$	(356,229	)				$	542,500					$	(567,697	)				$	681,770
Numerator for diluted net (loss) / income per share
Net (loss)/income available to common stockholders & assumed conversion				$	(356,229	)				$	542,500					$	(567,697	)				$	681,770
Denominator:
Denominator for basic (loss)/income per share – weighted-average shares					2,386,538						2,378,817						2,388,560						2,382,301
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options					—						26,214						—						28,603
Denominator for diluted (loss)/income per share – adjusted weighted-average shares					2,386,538						2,405,031						2,388,560						2,410,904
Basic earnings (loss)/income per share:
Net (loss)/income				$	(0.15	)				$	0.23					$	(0.24	)				$	0.29
Diluted earnings (loss)/income per share:
Net (loss)/income				$	(0.15	)				$	0.23					$	(0.24	)				$	0.28

During the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2007, all options and warrants outstanding were excluded from the computation of net loss per share because the effect would be antidilutive. During the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2006, there were 129,219 and 118,594 options that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share since such options have an exercise price in excess of the Company’s stock price.

6)    CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK:

The revenues of three customers represented approximately 25%, 18% and 10% of the revenues for the six month period ended June 30, 2007. The revenues of three customers represented approximately 18%, 14% and 12% of revenues for the same period in 2006. No other customer represented greater than 10% of the Company’s revenues for such periods.

7)    CREDIT ARRANGEMENT:

The Company had a line of credit up to $4.0 million with Keltic Financial Partners, LP, (‘‘Keltic’’) based on the Company’s eligible accounts receivable balances. This line of credit expired on June 27, 2007. The Company is currently in the process of renewing its agreement with Keltic under amended terms. Proposed modifications include a reduction in the facility amount from $4.0 million to $1.0 million, a reduction in monthly fees and interest rates and financial covenants that shall apply only if the Company borrows under the facility. Under the proposed terms, the amended credit facility will be effective as of June 27, 2007 and will expire on June 27, 2009. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to enter into an agreement with Keltic or another lender under either the proposed or other commercially reasonable terms.

8

Table of Contents

The Company will be responsible for all out of pocket legal costs associated with negotiating and entering into the amended credit facility as well as a $10,000 extension fee applicable under the pre-existing credit facility.

8)    CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS:

The Company has the following commitments as of June 30, 2007: long term obligations of certain employment contracts, a capital lease obligation and operating lease obligations. One of the Company’s subsidiaries, T3 Media, which ceased operations in 2001, had entered into a series of capital lease obligations, which the Company had guaranteed. During the first and second quarters of 2007, the Company reduced this liability by approximately $73,000 and $47,000, respectively, consistent with the decrease in exposure that has diminished over time. These amounts are reflected in Selling, General and Administrative expenses. The Company has two operating leases for its corporate headquarters located in New York and its branch office in New Jersey.

The Company’s commitments at June 30, 2007, are comprised of the following:

			Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations			Total						Less Than 1 Year						1 - 3 Years						3 - 5 Years						More Than 5 Years
Long Term Obligations
Employment Contracts(1)					894,000						657,000						237,000						—						—
Capital Lease Obligations
Capital Lease – Short Term					170,758						170,758						—						—						—
Operating Leases
Rent-(2)					1,855,628						407,786						833,594						590,562						23,686
Total				$	2,920,386					$	1,235,544					$	1,070,594					$	590,562					$	23,686

(1) The Company has employment agreements with its three named Executive Officers. The agreement with Mr. BenTov, the Company’s President and CEO and Mr. Quadrino, the Company’s CFO, expire on March 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008, respectively, unless extended. Mr. BenTov has indicated he will no longer serve as the Company’s President and CEO effective with the expiration of his agreement. The employment agreement with Mr. Prude, the Company’s COO is effective July 1, 2007 and has a term of two years.

(2) The Company has a New York facility with a lease term expiring July 31, 2012 and a New Jersey facility with a lease term expiring August 31, 2010.

As of June 30, 2007, the Company does not have any ‘‘Off Balance Sheet Arrangements’’.

9)    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations varies from the expected statutory rate primarily due to the utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (‘‘Code’’) places a limitation on the utilization of Federal net operating loss and other credit carry-forwards when an ownership change, as defined by the tax law, occurs. Generally, this occurs when a greater than 50 percentage point change in ownership occurs. On September 5, 2006, Helios & Matheson Parent acquired a greater than 50 percent ownership of the Company. Accordingly, the actual utilization of the net operating loss carry-forwards for tax purposes are limited annually under Code to a percentage (currently about four and a half percent) of the fair market value of the Company at the date of this ownership change. Taxable income generated during the six months ended June 30,&nbs p;2007 is not expected to exceed this limitation. The Company maintains a valuation allowance against additional deferred tax assets arising from net operating loss carry-forwards since, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

10)    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 1, 2007, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its current Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Michael Prude (the ‘‘2007 Prude Employment Agreement’’). The 2007 Prude Employment Agreement is effective as of July 1, 2007, has a term of two (2) years, and shall

9

Table of Contents

automatically renew for subsequent one-year terms, unless and until terminated by either party upon 60 days notice. The 2007 Prude Employment Agreement provides Mr. Prude with an annual base salary of $237,000, participation in the Company’s stock option plan and performance based incentive plans subject to approval by the Board of Directors, and a monthly allowance for car related expenses in the amount of $1,000. The 2007 Prude Employment Agreement provides that during the term of the Agreement in the event of termination by the Company without cause, death or disability or by Mr. Prude for sufficient reason, as defined in the agreement, Mr. Prude will receive a severance allowance in an amount equal to nine (9) months of Mr. Prude’s then current base salary. The agreement includes a one-year non-compete covenant commencing on termination of employment.

10

Table of Contents

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of significant factors affecting the Company’s operating results, liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and related notes.

Statements included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this document that do not relate to present or historical conditions are ‘‘forward-looking statements’’ within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Additional oral or written forward-looking statements may be made by the Company from time to time, and such statements may be included in documents that are filed with the SEC. Such forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainties that could cause results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as ‘&l squo;believes,’’ ‘‘forecasts,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘possible,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘anticipates,’’ or ‘‘plans’’ and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company cautions readers that results predicted by forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those relating to the Company’s future business prospects, revenues, working capital, liquidity, capital needs, interest costs, and income are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements, due to the following factors, among other risks and factors identified from time to time in the Company’s filings with the SEC. Among the important factors on which such statements are based are assumptions concerning the antici pated growth of the information technology industry, the continued needs of current and prospective customers for the Company’s services, the availability of qualified professional staff, and price and wage inflation.

Overview

Since 1983, Helios & Matheson has provided IT services and solutions to Fortune 1000 companies and other large organizations. In 1997, Helios & Matheson became a public company headquartered in New York, New York. In addition, the Company has offices in Clark, New Jersey and Bangalore, India. The Company’s common stock is currently listed on NASDAQ Capital Market^CM under the symbol ‘‘HMNA’’. Prior to January 30, 2007, the Company’s name was The A Consulting Team, Inc.

Helios & Matheson provides clients with enterprise-wide IT consulting services and software products. The Company’s solutions cover the entire spectrum of IT needs, including applications, data, and infrastructure. Helios & Matheson provides complete project life-cycle services from application and system design, through development and implementation, to documentation and training. Strategic alliances with leading software vendors allow Helios & Matheson to provide a wide variety of business technology solutions including enterprise reporting, data warehousing, systems strategies, application and database conversions, and application development services.

When Helios & Matheson is engaged by its clients to implement IT solutions or services, it uses its SMART Approach. Helios & Matheson’s SMART Approach is a leading edge set of end-to-end solutions and services that include Strategy, Methodology, Architecture, Resources and Tools. The Strategy is developed with the client to ensure that the client’s goals and objectives are met. The Methodology is a tried and true Helios & Matheson Methodology that is followed in order to implement the Strategy. The solutions and services are built on a robust Architecture, utilize highly qualified Helios & Matheson Resources and exploits best-of-breed Tools.

Helios & Matheson is an end-to-end IT solutions and services provider focused on leveraging existing systems and data. The Company’s goal is to empower customers through the utilization of technology to reduce costs, improve services and increase revenues. The Company delivers migrations and conversions of legacy systems, web enablement of existing systems, custom development, performance optimization, migrations and conversions, outsourcing, strategic sourcing and enterprise wide IT consulting, and software solutions. While growth in IT services has become more price competitive, Helios & Matheson has established TACT Global Services Private Limited, (‘‘TGS’’) in

11

Table of Contents

order to enhance its offshore presence in its continuing effort to stay competitive in the industry. The Company’s ability to blend more offshore work into its pricing should allow it to be more price competitive.

Rapid technological advances and the wide acceptance and use of the Internet as a driving force in commerce, accelerated the growth of the IT industry. These advances, including more powerful and less expensive computer technology, fueled the transition from predominantly centralized mainframe computer systems to open and distributed computing environments and the advent of capabilities such as relational databases, imaging, software development productivity tools, and web-enabled software. These advances expand the benefits that users can derive from computer-based information systems and improve the price-to-performance ratios of such systems. As a result, an increasing number of companies are employing IT in new ways, often to gain competitive advantages in the marketplace, and IT services have become an essential component of many company’s long-term growth strategies. The same advances that have enhanced the benefits of computer systems rendered the d evelopment and implementation of such systems increasingly complex, popularizing the outsourcing of IT development and services to third party IT service providers like the Company. Many companies outsource such work because their internal personnel lack the qualifications for certain projects or they have an insufficient number of internal staff to address all of the projects being undertaken. Outsourcing also enables companies to realize cost efficiencies through reduced personnel costs. Accordingly, organizations turn to external IT services organizations such as Helios & Matheson to develop, support and enhance their internal IT systems. Beginning in 2006 and continuing through the second quarter of 2007, the Company continued to expand its sales and recruiting function in its effort to increase its revenues in both the short and long-term. Through 2006, the Company experienced a delay in the start of projects from existing customers and extended lead times in closing new projects, both of which impa cted revenue growth. This trend continued through the second quarter of 2007. Consulting revenues declined primarily due to the termination of assignments that were not replaced during the second quarter of 2007.

For the second quarter of 2007, approximately 65% of the Company’s consulting services revenues were generated from the hourly billing of its consultants’ services to its clients under time and materials engagements, with the remainder generated under fixed-price engagements. The Company has established standard-billing guidelines for consulting services based on the types of services offered. Actual billing rates are established on a project-by-project basis and may vary from the standard guidelines. The Company typically bills its clients for time and materials services on a semi-monthly basis. Arrangements for fixed-price engagements are made on a case-by-case basis. Consulting services revenues generated under time and materials engagements are recognized as those services are provided. Revenues from fixed fee contracts are recorded when work is performed on the basis of the proportionate performance method, which is based on costs incurred to da te relative to total estimated costs.

The Company has also generated revenues by selling software licenses. In addition to initial software license fees, the Company also derives revenues from the annual renewal of software licenses. Because future obligations associated with such revenue are insignificant, revenues from the sale of software licenses are recognized upon delivery of the software to a customer. The Company views software sales as ancillary to its core consulting services business. Revenue generated from software sales will vary from period to period.

The Company’s most significant operating cost is its personnel cost, which is included in cost of revenues. As a result, the Company’s operating performance is primarily based upon billing margins (billable hourly rate less the consultant’s hourly cost) and consultant utilization rates (number of days worked by a consultant during a semi-monthly billing cycle divided by the number of billing days in that cycle). Gross margins improved through 2005 primarily due to improved utilization rates and decreases in consultant costs. During the first half of 2006, gross margin decreased despite utilization rates remaining relatively constant, as a result of a change in the mix of time and material work compared to fixed price projects. During the second half of 2006 gross margin began to increase as a result of improved utilization rates and lower consultant costs in the third quarter and an increase in higher margin project revenue in the fourth quarte r. During the first half of 2007, revenue from a

12

Table of Contents

higher margin fixed price project substantially completed in the first quarter impacted gross margin to remain relatively constant despite a decline in employee utilization. Large portions of the Company’s engagements are on a time and materials basis. While most of the Company’s engagements allow for periodic price adjustments to address, among other things, increases in consultant costs, to date clients have been adverse to accepting cost increases. Helios & Matheson actively manages its personnel utilization rates by monitoring project requirements and timetables. Helios & Matheson’s utilization rate for the second quarter of 2007 is approximately 70% as compared to 88% for the second quarter of 2006. The decrease in employee utilization is consistent with the completion of a number of projects during the first half of 2007 that have not been replaced. As projects are completed, consultants either are re-deployed to new projects at the current client site or to new projects at an other client site or are encouraged to participate in Helios & Matheson’s training programs in order to expand their technical skill sets. The Company carefully monitors consultants that are not utilized. While the Company has established guidelines for the amount of non-billing time that it allows before a consultant is terminated, actual terminations vary as circumstances warrant.

On July 19, 2002, the Company acquired all of the common stock of International Object Technology, Inc. (‘‘IOT’’). The purchase price of the acquisition exceeded the fair market value of the net assets acquired, resulting in the recording of goodwill currently stated at $1,140,964 on the balance sheet. IOT provided data management and business intelligence solutions, technology consulting and project management services. During the first quarter of 2006, IOT’s operations were fully integrated into Helios & Matheson.

On April 11, 2005, the Company completed an investment in TGS, an offshore joint venture, in the amount of $250,000, which represented approximately a 68% ownership. A minority partner invested $100,000 for the remaining 32% ownership. From April 11, 2005 to September 2005, the Company recorded its proportionate ownership share of the results of TGS. In September 2005, the Company increased its ownership to 100% by purchasing the minority partners investment for $100,000. From September 2005 to June 30, 2007, the Company has consolidated the results of TGS in its financial statements.

On January 21, 2005, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the ‘‘Share Exchange Agreement’’) with Vanguard, a New Jersey corporation, the Vanguard shareholders and the authorized representative of the Vanguard shareholders named therein providing for an exchange of 7,312,796 shares of the Company’s common stock for all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Vanguard (the ‘‘Share Exchange’’). Additionally, on January 21, 2005, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the ‘‘Stock Purchase Agreement’’) with Oak Finance Investments Limited (‘‘Oak’’), a British Virgin Islands company, providing for the sale of between 625,000 and 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Oak at a cash purchase price of $8.00 per share (the ‘‘Share Issuance’’). The Company&rsquo ;s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Mr. Shmuel BenTov had also entered into an agreement under which he agreed to sell all of his shares of Company capital stock to Oak in a separate transaction at $10.25 per share. On August 4, 2005, the Company terminated the Share Exchange Agreement with Vanguard and its shareholders and the Stock Purchase Agreement with Oak, pursuant to the terms of each agreement.

As of June 1, 2006, the Company and Mr. BenTov (the ‘‘Helios & Matheson Releasors’’) entered into and delivered general releases and covenants not to sue, pursuant to which the Helios & Matheson Releasors released and covenanted not to sue Vanguard and certain Vanguard-related persons, including (without limitation) its directors, officers, agents and certain advisors of Vanguard (the ‘‘Vanguard Released Parties’’), in connection with any and all claims existing as of the date of such releases and covenants, including, without limitation, any claims that were related to the terminated Vanguard transaction. In connection therewith, the Company received an aggregate of $1,100,000 (without giving affect to the Company’s payment of $219,000 for fees and costs incurred in connection with this recovery), and the Company and certain related persons, including (without limitation) Mr. BenT ov, received general releases and covenants not to sue from certain of the Vanguard Released Parties.

13

Table of Contents

On March 30, 2006, Helios & Matheson Parent, an IT services organization with its corporate headquarters in Chennai, India, purchased 1,024,697 share of the Company’s common stock from Mr. BenTov and his family members, which represented approximately 43% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. On September 5, 2006 Helios & Matheson Parent increased their ownership to approximately 52%. Helios & Matheson Parent is a publicly listed company on three stock exchanges in India, the National Stock Exchange (NSE), the Stock Exchange, Mumbai (BSE) and Madras Stock Exchange (MSE) and is included in the Bombay Stock Exchange 500 Stock Index.

Critical Accounting Policies

The methods, estimates and judgments the Company uses in applying its most critical accounting polices have a significant impact on the results the Company reports in its consolidated financial statements. The Company evaluates its estimates and judgments on an on-going basis. Estimates are based on historical experience and on assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company’s experience and assumptions form the basis for its judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may vary from what is anticipated and different assumptions or estimates about the future could change reported results. The Company believes the following accounting policies are the most critical to it, in that they are important to the portrayal of its financial statements and they require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments in the preparation of th e consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill acquired in a purchase and determined to have an indefinite useful life is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. If it is determined by the Company that goodwill has been impaired it will be written down at that time.

Revenue Recognition

Consulting revenues are recognized as services are provided. The Company primarily provides consulting services under time and material contracts, whereby revenue is recognized as hours and costs are incurred. Customers for consulting revenues are billed on a weekly, semi-monthly or monthly basis. Revenues from fixed fee contracts are recorded when work is performed on the basis of the proportionate performance method, which is based on costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs. Any anticipated contract losses are estimated and accrued at the time they become known and estimable. Unbilled accounts receivables represent amounts recognized as revenue based on services performed in advance of customer billings. Revenue from sales of software licenses is recognized upon delivery of the software to a customer because future obligations associated with such revenue are insignificant.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company monitors its accounts receivable balances on a monthly basis to ensure that they are collectible. On a quarterly basis, the Company uses its historical experience to accurately determine its accounts receivable reserve. The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate based on specifically identified accounts as well as general reserves. The Company evaluates specific accounts where it has information that the customer may have an inability to meet its financial obligations. In these cases, management uses its judgment, based on the best available facts and circumstances, and records a specific reserve for that customer, against amounts due, to reduce the receivable to the amount that is expected to be collected. These specific reserves are reevaluated and adjusted as additional information is received that impacts the amount reserved. The Company also establishes a general reserve for all customers based on a range of percentages a pplied to aging categories. These percentages are based on historical collection and write-off experience. If circumstances change, the Company’s estimate of the recoverability of amounts due the Company could be reduced or increased by a material amount. Such a change in estimated recoverability would be accounted for in the period in which the facts that give rise to the change become known.

14

Table of Contents

Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of the Company, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company assesses the recoverability of deferred tax assets at least annually based upon the Company’s ability to generate sufficient future taxable income and the availability of effective tax planning strategies.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the percentage of revenues of certain items included in the Company’s Statements of Operations:

			Six Months Ended June 30,												Three Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						2007						2006
Revenues					100.0	%					100.0	%					100.0	%					100.0	%
Cost of revenues					70.5	%					72.9	%					75.5	%					73.1	%
Gross profit					29.5	%					27.1	%					24.5	%					26.9	%
Operating expenses					33.6	%					22.8	%					37.1	%					16.8	%
(Loss)/Income from operations					(4.1	)%					4.3	%					(12.6	)%					10.1	%
Net (loss)/income					(3.4	)%					4.3	%					(12.0	)%					10.1	%

Comparison of The Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 to The Three Months Ended June 30, 2006

Revenues.    Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007 were $4.7 million, a $2.0 million decrease from the comparable 2006 period. Consulting revenue, which began to decline during the first quarter of 2007, continued to decline through the second quarter of 2007 as assignments were completed and not replaced. In addition, software contracts anticipated to close during the second quarter were delayed until the third quarter of 2007.

Gross Profit.    The gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was approximately $1.2 million, a decrease of $654,000 from the second quarter of 2006. As a percentage of total revenues, gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2007 was 24.5% compared to 26.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Gross margin has declined as a result of a decrease in higher margin project revenue as well as a decline in employee utilization.

Operating Expenses.    Operating expenses are comprised of Selling, General and Administrative (‘‘SG&A’’) expenses, and, depreciation and amortization. SG&A expenses were $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2006 compared to $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2007. SG&A for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was reduced by $881,000 of net settlement proceeds received in connection with the release of claims related to the terminated Vanguard transaction. Excluding the Vanguard settlement proceeds, SG&A decreased $263,000 as a result of cost reduction initiatives in various areas. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $8,000.

Taxes.    Taxes decreased $4,000 from $13,000 in the second quarter of 2006 to $9,000 in the second quarter of 2007. The Company recorded a provision for minimum State taxes during the second quarter of 2007 of $9,000. The full impact of taxes associated with the pre-tax income was minimized by the utilization of the Company’s net loss carry-forward. In addition, deferred taxes were not impacted by the pre-tax income during the second quarter of 2007 since such amounts are fully reserved as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.

Net (Loss)/Income.    As a result of the above, the Company had a net loss of ($568,000) or ($0.24) per basic and diluted share in the second quarter of 2007 compared to net income of $682,000 or $0.29 per basic and $0.28 per diluted share in the second quarter of 2006.

Comparison of The Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 to The Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

Revenues.    Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were $10.6 million, a $2.0 million decrease from the comparable 2006 period. Consulting revenue, which began to decline during the

15

Table of Contents

first quarter of 2007, continued to decline through the second quarter of 2007 as assignments were completed and not replaced. In addition, software contracts anticipated to close during the second quarter were delayed until the third quarter of 2007.

Gross Profit.    The gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was approximately $3.1 million, a decrease of $295,000 from the comparable 2006 period. As a percentage of total revenues, gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was 29.5% compared to 27.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in margin percentage was impacted by the revenue from a higher margin fixed price project that was substantially completed during the first quarter of 2007 as well as the mix of higher margin project revenue compared to time & material assignments.

Operating Expenses.    Operating expenses are comprised of Selling, General and Administrative (‘‘SG&A’’) expenses, and, depreciation and amortization. SG&A expenses were $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. SG&A for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was reduced by $881,000 of net settlement proceeds received in connection with the release of claims related to the terminated Vanguard transaction. Excluding the Vanguard settlement proceeds, SG&A decreased by $212,000 as a result of cost reduction initiatives in various areas. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $17,000.

Taxes.    Taxes decreased $6,000 from $18,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $12,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2007. The Company recorded a provision for minimum State taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2007 of $25,000 which was partially offset by prior year tax refunds of $13,000. The full impact of taxes associated with the pre-tax income was minimized by the utilization of the Company’s net loss carry-forward. In addition, deferred taxes were not impacted by the pre-tax income during the six months ended June 30, 2007 since such amounts are fully reserved as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.

Net (Loss)/Income.    As a result of the above, the Company had a net loss of ($356,000) or ($0.15) per basic and diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to net income of $543,000 or $0.23 per basic and diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Liquidity

The Company had a line of credit up to $4.0 million with Keltic Financial Partners, LP, (‘‘Keltic’’) based on the Company’s eligible accounts receivable balances. This line of credit expired on June 27, 2007. The Company is currently in the process of renewing its agreement with Keltic under amended terms. Proposed modifications include a reduction in the facility amount from $4.0 million to $1.0 million, a reduction in monthly fees and interest rates and financial covenants that shall apply only if the Company borrows under the facility. Under the proposed terms, the amended credit facility will be effective as of June 27, 2007 and will expire on June 27, 2009. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to enter into an agreement with Keltic or another lender under either the proposed or other commercially reasonable terms.

The Company will be responsible for all out of pocket legal costs associated with negotiating and entering into the amended credit facility as well as a $10,000 extension fee applicable under the pre-existing credit facility.

Capital Resources

The Company acquired a 51% ownership interest in T3 Media as a result of several investments in 1998 and 1999. Due to deterioration in performance and market conditions for T3 Media’s services, the operations of T3 Media ceased in the second quarter of 2001. T3 Media had entered into a series of capital lease obligations, which the Company had guaranteed, to finance its expansion plans, covering leasehold improvements, furniture and computer-related equipment. The Company decided to reduce this liability, consistent with the decrease in exposure that diminished over time. During the first quarter of 2007, the liability was reduced by approximately $73,000 and during the second quarter of 2007 the liability was reduced further by $47,000 and is reflected in Selling, General and Administrative expenses. The amount outstanding under such leases was approximately $171,000 at

16

Table of Contents

June 30, 2007 and $291,000 at December 31, 2006, respectively, and is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the balance sheet.

The Company’s cash balances were approximately $3.4 million at June 30, 2007 and $3.8 million at December 31, 2006. Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was approximately $448,000 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $178,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Excluding $881,000 of net settlement proceeds received in connection with the release of claims related to the terminated Vanguard transaction, net cash used in operating activities, primarily related to the increase in working capital, for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was approximately $703,000.

The Company’s accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts, at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were $3.5 million and $4.0 million, respectively, representing 64 and 48 days of sales outstanding, respectively and compares to 61 days in the comparable 2006 period. The accounts receivable at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 included $92,000 and $316,000 of unbilled revenue, respectively. The Company has provided an allowance for doubtful accounts at the end of each of the periods presented. After giving effect to this allowance, the Company does not anticipate any difficulty in collecting amounts due.

Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $54,000 and $60,000 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In each of these periods, additions to property and equipment was $54,000 and $59,000, respectively.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $11,000 and $22,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

In management’s opinion, cash flows from operations combined with cash on hand will provide adequate flexibility for funding the Company’s working capital obligations for the next twelve months. The Keltic line of credit expired on June 27, 2007. While the Company is in the process of renewing the agreement with Keltic, there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to enter into an agreement with Keltic or another lender under either the proposed or other commercially reasonable terms.

For the six months ended June 30, 2007, 5,994 shares of common stock were issued pursuant to the exercise of options issued under the Company’s stock option plan. No other shares of common stock were issued pursuant to the exercise of options issued under the Company’s stock option plan.

The Company had an operating loss during the six months ended June 30, 2007 of ($437,000) and a net loss of ($356,000). During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company had operating income of $543,000 and net income of $543,000. There is no guarantee that the Company can achieve profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2007, the Company does not have any ‘‘Off Balance Sheet Arrangements’’.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The Company has the following commitments as of June 30, 2007: long term obligations of certain employment contracts, a capital lease obligation and operating lease obligations. One of the Company’s subsidiaries, T3 Media, which ceased operations in 2001, had entered into a series of capital lease obligations, which the Company had guaranteed. During the first and second quarters of 2007, the Company reduced this liability by approximately $73,000 and $47,000, respectively, consistent with the decrease in exposure that has diminished over time. These amounts are reflected in Selling, General and Administrative expenses. The Company has two operating leases for its corporate headquarters located in New York and its branch office in New Jersey. The Company’s commitments at June 30, 2007 are reflected in the Contractual Obligation table in Item 8 on this Form 10-Q. Effective July 1, 2007, the Company entered into a two year employment agreement with its Chief Operating Officer, Michael Prude. The Contractual Obligation table in Item 8 on this Form 10-Q has been updated to reflect this employment agreement.

17

Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

None.

Inflation

The Company has not suffered material adverse affects from inflation in the past. However, a substantial increase in the inflation rate in the future may adversely affect customers’ purchasing decisions, may increase the costs of borrowing, or may have an adverse impact on the Company’s margins and overall cost structure.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company has not entered into market risk sensitive transactions required to be disclosed under this item.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.    The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s ‘‘disclosure controls and procedures’’ (as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report, have concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures are effective and designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to it by others within these entities.

Changes in internal controls.    There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in connection with the evaluation that occurred during its second fiscal quarter of 2007 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting.

Part II.    Other Information

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

The Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K together with the Company’s Quarterly Report for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 include a detailed discussion of risk factors.

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

On May 23, 2007, the Company held its annual meeting of shareholders (the ‘‘Annual Meeting’’) for the following purposes:

Proposal 1.    To elect the Board of Directors of the Company to serve until the annual meeting of shareholders in 2008 and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified; and

Proposal 2.    To ratify the selection of Mercadien P.C. as the independent public accountants of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2007.

18

Table of Contents

The shareholders approved the election of Messrs. Shmuel BenTov, Rabin Dhoble, Shankar Ram, Daniel Thomas, Shri Jambunathan, Divya Ramachandran and Kishan Grama Ananthram as the directors of the Company by the following number of votes:

NAME			IN FAVOR						AGAINST						ABSTAINED						UNVOTED
Shmuel BenTov					1,276,128						0						2,900						0
Rabin Dhoble					1,277,553						0						1,475						0
Shankar Ram					1,276,128						0						2,900						0
Daniel Thomas					1,277,553						0						1,475						0
Shri Jambunathan					1,277,553						0						1,475						0
Divya Ramachandran					1,276,128						0						2,900						0
Kishan Grama Ananthram					1,276,128						0						2,900						0

The shareholders approved the ratification of the appointment of Mercadien P.C. as the independent public accountants of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 by the following number of votes:

IN FAVOR			AGAINST			ABSTAINED			UNVOTED
1,279,028			0			0			0

Item 5.    Other Information

None.

Item 6.    Exhibits

(a)    Exhibits

	3	.1				Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2001, as previously filed with the SEC on August 10, 2001.
	3	.2.1				Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated August 8, 2002 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001, as previously filed with the SEC on August 14, 2002.
	3	.2.2				Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated November 12, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2.2 to the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as previously filed with the SEC on November 14, 2002.
	3	.2.3				Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated January 5, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2.3 to the Form 8-K dated January 8, 2004, as previously filed with the SEC on January 8, 2004.
	3	.3				Second Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K, as previously filed with the SEC on June 22, 2007.
	5	.02				Prude Employment Contract.
	31	.1				Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31	.2				Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32	.1				Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32	.2				Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

19

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

			HELIOS & MATHESON NORTH AMERICA INC.
			By:			/s/ Shmuel BenTov
Date: August 10, 2007						Shmuel BenTov Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
			By:			/s/ Salvatore M. Quadrino
Date: August 10, 2007						Salvatore M. Quadrino Chief Financial Officer

20