License fees decreased $1.4 million to $2.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $4.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2000. As a percentage of net sales, license fees decreased from 8.2% to 6.0%. The decrease in license fees is directly related to the termination of the Company’s royalty obligations under the BOSS License Agreement, the associated expense of which was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2000.
Operating loss decreased $1.3 million to $0.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $2.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2000. The improvement was due to the reduction of selling and administrative expenses and the elimination of the licensing fees associated with the termination of the Company’s royalty obligations under the BOSS License Agreement in the fourth quarter of 2000 partially offset by lower gross profit and an increase in severance provisions.
Interest expense increased $0.2 million to $0.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2001 from $0.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2000. The increase in interest expense is related to interest on the note payable to Ambra.
The Company has estimated its annual effective tax rate at 0% based on its estimate of pre–tax income for 2001. Also, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $30.9 million, which begin to expire in 2013 for income tax reporting purposes, for which no income tax benefit has been recorded due to the uncertainty over the level of future taxable income.
The Company has relied primarily on internally generated funds, trade credit and asset–based borrowings to finance its operations. The Company's capital requirements primarily result from working capital needed to support increases in inventory and accounts receivable. The Company's working capital decreased significantly during the first six months of 2001 compared to the first six months of 2000, primarily due to a cumulative net loss of $14.0 million over the four quarters ended June 30, 2001. As of June 30, 2001, the Company had cash and cash equivalents, including temporary investments, of $1.0 million and working capital of $14.5 million compared to $1.1 million and $20.1 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2000.
Cash provided by operations totaled $1.4 million for the first six months of 2001, compared with cash used in operations of $4.9 million for the same period of 2000. This is primarily due to a decrease of $1.0 million in the net loss of the comparable periods, and decreases in inventories and an increase in accounts payable, partially offset by increases in accounts receivable and other assets and a decrease in accrued expenses. Cash used for investing activities for the first six months of 2001 was $0.1 million. Cash used in financing activities totaled $1.1 million for the first six months of 2001, resulting primarily from repayments on the Company's revolving line of credit.
Accounts receivable increased $1.5 million from December 31, 2000 to June 30, 2001 compared to an increase of $6.1 million from December 31, 1999 to June 30, 2000. Inventory decreased $4.0 million from December 31, 2000 to June 30, 2001 compared to a decrease of $2.5 million from December 31, 1999 to June 30, 2000.
Capital expenditures were $0.2 million for the first six months of 2001 compared to $0.4 million for the first six months of 2000.
Credit Facilities
The Company has an asset-based revolving line of credit (the "Agreement") with Congress Financial Corporation ("Congress"). As of June 30, 2001 the Company had $6.9 million in outstanding borrowings under the Agreement compared to $8.0 million as of June 30, 2000. In March 2001, the Agreement was amended to extend the term through December 31, 2002. The amended Agreement provides that the Company may borrow up to (i) 80.0% of net eligible accounts receivable and a portion of inventory, as defined in the agreement less (ii) a $1.0 million special availability reserve. Borrowings under the Agreement may not exceed $25.0 million (including outstanding letters of credit which are limited to $6.0 million from May 1 to September 30 of each year and $4.0 million for the remainder of each year) and bear interest at the lenders prime rate of interest plus 1.0%. Outstanding letters of credit approximated $1.8 million at June 30, 2001. In connection with the March 2001 amendment, the Company will pay Congress a financing fee of $150,000, one half of which was paid at the time of closing and the other half of which is payable on September 1, 2001. Under the terms of the Agreement, as amended, the Company is required to maintain minimum levels of working capital and tangible net worth. The Company was in violation of its working capital covenant at June 30, 2001 and has obtained a waiver through August 31, 2001. There can be no assurances that the Company will not be in violation of these covenants during 2001 or thereafter.
The Company extends credit to its customers. Accordingly, the Company may have significant risk in collecting accounts receivable from its customers. The Company has credit policies and procedures which it uses to minimize exposure to credit losses. The Company's collection personnel regularly contact customers with receivable balances outstanding beyond 30 days to expedite collection. If these collection efforts are unsuccessful, the Company may discontinue merchandise shipments until the outstanding balance is paid. Ultimately, the Company may engage an outside collection organization to collect past due accounts. Timely contact with customers has been effective in reducing credit losses. In the first half of 2001 and 2000, the Company's credit losses were $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively and the Company's actual credit losses as a percentage of net sales were 0.5% and 0.8%, respectively. The Company believes that current levels of cash and cash equivalents ($1.0 million at June 30, 2001) together with cash from operations and funds available under its Agreement, will be sufficient to meet its capital requirements for the next 12 months.
Backlog and Seasonality
The Company's business is impacted by the general seasonal trends that are characteristic of the apparel and retail industries. In the Company's segment of the apparel industry, sales are generally higher in the first and third quarters. Historically, the Company has taken greater markdowns in the second and fourth quarters. The Company generally receives orders for its products three to five months prior to the time the products are delivered to stores. As of June 30, 2001 the Company has unfilled orders of approximately $34 million, compared to $44 million of such orders as of June 30, 2000. The decrease is attributable to the BOSS and Beverly Hills Polo Club lines. The backlog of orders at any given time is affected by a number of factors, including seasonality, weather conditions, scheduling of manufacturing and shipment of products. As the time of the shipment of products may vary from year to year, the results for any particular quarter may not be indicative of the results for the full year.
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments" ("SFAS 133"). SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities. SFAS 133 requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure those instruments at fair market value. Under certain circumstances, a portion of the derivative's gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into income when the transaction affects earnings. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is recognized in income in the period of change. SFAS 133 is effective for fiscal quarters of years beginning after June 15, 2000 and requires application prospectively. Presently, the Company does not use derivative instruments either in hedging activities or as investments. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS 133 had no impact on the financial position or results of operations.
In March 2000, the FASB issued interpretation No. 44 ("FIN 44"), "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, an Interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25". FIN 44 clarifies the application of APB Opinion No. 25 for (a) the definition of employee for purposes of applying APB Opinion No. 25, (b) the criteria for determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory plan, (c) the accounting consequences of various modifications to the previously fixed stock option or award, and (d) the accounting for an exchange of stock compensation awards in a business combination. FIN 44 is effective July 2, 2000 but certain conclusions cover specific events that occur after either December 15, 1998 or January 12, 2000. The adoption of FIN 44 did not have an effect on the Company's financial statements.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 which summarizes certain of the SEC staff’s views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements. The Company adopted Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 effective October 1, 2000. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position, however, the guidance may impact the way in which the Company will account for future transactions.
In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Standards No. 142, “Accounting for Goodwill” (“SFAS 142”). SFAS 142 establishes accounting standards for existing goodwill related to purchase business combinations. Under the Statement, the Company would discontinue the periodic amortization of goodwill effective with adoption of the new Statement. Also, the Company would have to test any remaining goodwill for possible impairment within six months of adopting the Statement, and periodically thereafter, based on new valuation criteria set forth in the Statement. Further, the Statement has new criteria for purchase price allocation. The Statement becomes effective January 1, 2002. The Company believes that adoption of the new Statement will have no impact on the financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company's principal market risk results from changes in floating interest rates on short–term debt. The Company does not use interest rate swap agreements to mitigate the risk of adverse changes in the prime interest rate. However, the impact of a 100 basis point change in interest rates affecting the Company's short–term debt would not be material to the net loss, cash flow or working capital. The Company does not hold long–term interest sensitive assets and therefore is not exposed to interest rate fluctuations for its assets. The Company does not hold or purchase any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 19, 2001, the Company reached a tentative agreement to settle a putative class action filed on November 10, 1999 against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The action purported to have been brought on behalf of all persons (other than the defendants and their affiliates) who purchased the Company’s Common Stock between December 17, 1997 and November 11, 1998. The plaintiffs alleged that the registration statement and prospectus used in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, completed in December 1997, contained materially false and misleading statements, which artificially inflated the price of the Company’s Common Stock during the class period. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The plaintiffs sought recission, damages, costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees, and such other relief as may be just and proper. Under the terms of the settlement, which is subject to court approval, all claims against the Company and all of the other defendants will be dismissed without admission of liability or wrongdoing of any party. The Company expects that settlement will be funded entirely by the Company’s insurance carrier, and that the settlement payment will not have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
On July 19, 2001, the Company’s securities were delisted from the Nasdaq National Market. Shares of the Company's Common Stock are now traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the ticker symbol "ISAC''.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8–K.
| (a) | Exhibits. |
| | |
| | None. |
| | |
| (b) | Reports on Form 8–K. |
| | |
| | None. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | I.C. ISAACS & COMPANY, INC. |
| | |
| By: | /s/ ROBERT J. ARNOT |
| |
|
| | Robert J. Arnot Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Dated: August 14, 2001
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name | | Capacity | | Date |
| |
| |
|
/s/ ROBERT J. ARNOT | | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | | August 14, 2001 |
| | | | |
Robert J. Arnot | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ EUGENE C.WIELEPSKI | | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | | August 14, 2001 |
| | | | |
Eugene C. Wielepski | | | | |