Hopfed Bancorp (HFBC) 10-Q 2013 Q2 Quarterly report

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number:000-23667

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	61-1322555
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4155 Lafayette Road, Hopkinsville, Kentucky	42240
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(270) 885-1171

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (subsection 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated file or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act: (Check one)

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company filer	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x.

As of August 12, 2013, the Registrant had outstanding 7,524,371 shares of the Registrant’s Common stock.

CONTENTS

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

		PAGE
PART I.FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of the Registrant and its wholly owned subsidiaries are as follows:
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012		2
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for the Three and Six-Month Periods Ended June  30, 2013, and June 30, 2012 (unaudited)		4
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 (unaudited)		6
	Consolidated Condensed Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six-Month Period Ended June  30, 2013 (unaudited)		7
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Six-Month Periods Ended June  30, 2013, and June 30, 2012 (unaudited)		8
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements		9
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		43
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		55
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		56
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		57
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		57
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		57
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		57
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure		57
Item 5.	Other Information		57
Item 6.	Exhibits		58
SIGNATURES			59

1

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Financial Condition

(Dollars in Thousands)

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	20,070		31,563
Interest-earning deposits		9,633		5,613
Cash and cash equivalents		29,703		37,176
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		4,428		4,428
Securities available for sale		338,936		356,345
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $9,399 at June 30, 2013, and $10,648 at December 31, 2012		528,282		524,985
Accrued interest receivable		4,919		5,398
Real estate and other assets owned		1,632		1,548
Bank owned life insurance		9,486		9,323
Premises and equipment, net		21,853		22,557
Deferred tax assets		3,383		—
Intangible asset		195		292
Other assets		6,578		5,637
Total assets	$	949,395		967,689
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing	$	94,426		94,083
Interest-bearing checking		154,444		147,047
Savings and money market accounts		85,735		81,643
Time deposits		408,059		437,092
Total deposits		742,664		759,865
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances		45,768		43,741
Repurchase agreements		47,072		43,508
Subordinated debentures		10,310		10,310
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		697		396
Dividends payable		177		180
Deferred tax liability		—		568
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		4,634		4,122
Total liabilities		851,322		862,690

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

2

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Financial Condition, Continued

(Dollars in Thousands)

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(unaudited)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized - 500,000 shares; 18,400 shares issued and no shares outstanding at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012.	$	—			—
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized 15,000,000 shares; 7,905,955 issued and 7,503,039 outstanding at June 30, 2013, and 7,905,728 issued and 7,502,812 outstanding at December 31, 2012		79			79
Common stock warrant		—			556
Additional paid-in-capital		76,634			76,288
Retained earnings		43,679			41,829
Treasury stock- preferred (at cost, 18,400 shares at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012)		(18,400	)		(18,400	)
Treasury stock- common (at cost, 402,916 shares at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012)		(5,076	)		(5,076	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes		1,157			9,723
Total stockholders’ equity		98,073			104,999
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	949,395			967,689

The consolidated condensed statement of financial condition at December 31, 2012, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

3

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Month Periods				For the Six Month Periods
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Interest income:
Loans receivable	$	6,676		7,413		13,558		15,214
Securities available for sale - taxable		1,764		2,434		3,596		4,809
Securities available for sale - nontaxable		547		547		1,132		1,122
Interest-earning deposits		7		6		13		14
Total interest income		8,994		10,400		18,299		21,159
Interest expense:
Deposits		1,936		2,755		3,982		5,639
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		446		565		890		1,138
Repurchase agreements		230		237		472		485
Subordinated debentures		182		181		364		368
Total interest expense		2,794		3,738		5,708		7,630
Net interest income		6,200		6,662		12,591		13,529
Provision for loan losses		406		400		782		1,269
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		5,794		6,262		11,809		12,260
Non-interest income:
Service charges		937		973		1,790		1,911
Merchant card income		259		212		482		408
Mortgage origination revenue		212		263		412		466
Gain on sale of securities		789		630		1,416		674
Income from bank owned life insurance		87		79		162		158
Financial services commission		347		271		644		498
Other operating income		197		211		405		441
Total non-interest income		2,828		2,639		5,311		4,556

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

4

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income, Continued

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Month Periods				For the Six Month Periods
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Non-interest expenses:
Salaries and benefits		3,714		3,561		7,562		7,068
Occupancy		882		884		1,727		1,739
Data processing		646		627		1,296		1,252
State bank tax		147		162		289		324
Intangible amortization		48		65		97		130
Professional services		549		498		942		886
Deposit insurance and examination		179		434		411		853
Advertising		308		324		641		628
Postage and communications		139		157		278		298
Supplies		93		105		229		216
Loss on disposal of equipment		—		2		—		8
Loss on real estate owned		12		72		47		219
Real estate owned expenses		32		25		108		71
Other operating expenses		375		523		771		846
Total non-interest expense		7,124		7,439		14,398		14,538
Income before income tax		1,498		1,462		2,722		2,278
Income tax expense		332		300		572		389
Net income		1,166		1,162		2,150		1,889
Less:
Dividend on preferred shares		—		231		—		460
Accretion dividend on preferred shares		—		28		—		56
Net income available to common shareholders	$	1,166	$	903	$	2,150	$	1,373
Net income available to common shareholders
Per share, basic	$	0.16	$	0.12	$	0.29	$	0.18
Per share, diluted	$	0.16	$	0.12	$	0.29	$	0.18
Dividend per share	$	0.02	$	0.02	$	0.04	$	0.04
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic		7,488,906		7,485,283		7,488,788		7,484,498
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted		7,488,906		7,485,283		7,488,788		7,484,498

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

5

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Month						For the Six Month
	Periods Ended June 30,						Periods Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net income	$	1,166			1,162			2,150			1,889
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available for sale, net of tax effect of $3,405 and ($1,023) for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, respectively; and $4,003 and ($1,096) for the six month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, respectively;		(6,610	)		1,985			(7,771	)		2,127
Unrealized gain on derivatives, net of tax effect of ($40) and ($3) for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, respectively; and of ($72) and ($20) for the six month periods ending June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, respectively;		77			7			140			40
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax effect of $268 and $214 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, respectively; and $482 and $229 the six month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, respectively;		(521	)		(416	)		(935	)		(445	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	($	5,888	)		2,738			(6,416	)		3,611

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

6

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

For the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2013

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

																					Accumulated
	Shares						Common			Additional					Treasury			Treasury			Other			Total
	Common Stock		Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Stock Warrants			Capital Surplus		Retained Earnings			Stock Preferred			Stock Common			Comprehensive Income			Stockholders Equity
Balance at December 31, 2012		7,502,812		18,400	$	79		556			76,288		41,829			(18,400	)		(5,076	)		9,723			104,999
Restricted stock awards		227		—		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—
Consolidated net income		—		—		—		—			—		2,150			—			—			—			2,150
Compensation expense, restricted stock awards		—		—		—		—			47		—			—			—			—			47
Net change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of income tax benefit of $4,485		—		—		—		—			—		—			—			—			(8,706	)		(8,706	)
Net change in unrealized loss on derivatives, net of income taxes of $72		—		—		—		—			—		—			—			—			140			140
Repurchase of warrant		—		—		—		(556	)		299		—			—			—			—			(257	)
Cash dividend to common stockholders		—		—		—		—			—		(300	)		—			—			—			(300	)
Balance June 30, 2013		7,503,039		18,400	$	79		—			76,634		43,679			(18,400	)		(5,076	)		1,157			98,073

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

7

HOPFED BANCORP, INC.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	For the Six Month Periods Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	4,484		$	5,980
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of securities available for sale		73,375			85,553
Purchase of securities available for sale		(69,182	)		(92,013	)
Net (increase) decrease in loans		(4,672	)		13,915
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets		462			1,573
Purchase of premises and equipment		(74	)		(301	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(91	)		8,727
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in demand deposits		343			4,388
Net increase (decrease) in time and other deposits		(17,544	)		(18,574	)
Increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		301			394
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		8,000			3,000
Repayment of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(5,973	)		(1,835	)
Net increase (decrease) in repurchase agreements		3,564			(5,348	)
Cash used to repurchase warrant		(257	)		—
Dividend paid on preferred stock		—			(460	)
Dividends paid on common stock		(300	)		(299	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(11,866	)		(18,734	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(7,473	)		(4,027	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		37,176			48,760
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	29,703			44,733
Supplemental disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid	$	2,932			3,525
Income taxes paid	$	495			990
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Loans charged off	$	2,370			2,428
Foreclosures and in substance foreclosures of loans during period	$	593			873
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities classified as available for sale	($	13,191	)		2,548
Increase (decrease) in deferred tax asset related to unrealized gains on investments	$	4,485			(866	)
Dividends declared and payable	$	150			150
Issue of unearned restricted stock	$	2			74

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

8

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed at the direction of Heritage Bank, formerly Hopkinsville Federal Savings Bank (the “Bank”), to become the holding company of the Bank upon the conversion of the Bank from a federally chartered mutual savings bank to a federally chartered stock savings bank. The conversion was consummated on February 6, 1998.

On June 5, 2013, Heritage Bank changed its legal name to Heritage Bank USA, Inc. and became a Kentucky state chartered commercial bank regulated by the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. On June 5, 2013, HopFed Bancorp, Inc, become a commercial bank holding company regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“the FED”). The Company’s primary assets are the outstanding capital stock of the converted Bank, and its sole business is that of the converted Bank. The Bank owns 100% of the stock of Fall and Fall Insurance Agency (“Fall & Fall”) of Fulton, Kentucky. Fall & Fall sells life and casualty insurance to both individuals and businesses. The majority of Fall & Fall’s customer base is within the geographic footprint of the Bank.

The Bank operates a mortgage division, Heritage Mortgage Services, in Clarksville, Tennessee with agents located in several of its markets. The Bank has a financial services division, Heritage Wealth Management, with offices in Murray, Kentucky, Kingston Springs, Tennessee and Pleasant View, Tennessee. Agents of Heritage Wealth Management travel throughout western Kentucky and middle Tennessee offering fixed and variable annuities, mutual funds and brokerage services.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted (“GAAP”) in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary for fair representation have been included. The results of operations and other data for the six month period ended June 30, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2013.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. The accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company’s December 31, 2012, Consolidated Financial Statements.

9

(2) INCOME PER SHARE

The following schedule reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted income per share (“IPS”) computations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012. Diluted common shares arise from the potentially dilutive effect of the Company’s stock options and warrant outstanding.

	Three Month Periods Ended
	June 30,
	2013		2012
Basic IPS:
Net income available to common stockholders	$	1,166,000	$	903,000
Average common shares outstanding		7,488,906		7,485,283
Net income per share available to common shareholders, basic	$	0.16	$	0.12
Diluted IPS
Net income available to common stockholders	$	1,166,000	$	903,000
Average common shares outstanding		7,488,906		7,485,283
Dilutive effect of stock options		—		—
Average diluted shares outstanding		7,488,906		7,485,283
Net income per share available to common shareholders, diluted	$	0.16	$	0.12

	Six Month Periods Ended
	June 30,
	2013		2012
Basic IPS:
Net income available to common stockholders	$	2,150,000	$	1,373,000
Average common shares outstanding		7,488,788		7,484,498
Net income per share available to common shareholders, basic	$	0.29	$	0.18
Diluted IPS
Net income available to common stockholders	$	2,150,000	$	1,373,000
Average common shares outstanding		7,488,788		7,484,498
Dilutive effect of stock options		—		—
Average diluted shares outstanding		7,488,788		7,484,498
Net income per share available to common shareholders, diluted	$	0.29	$	0.18

10

(3) STOCK COMPENSATION

The Company incurred compensation cost related to the HopFed Bancorp, Inc. 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan of $25,000 and $47,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, and $27,000 and $54,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The Company issued 227 shares of restricted stock during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, and 8,826 and 10,392 shares of restricted stock for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The table below provides a detail of the Company’s future compensation expense related to restricted stock vesting at June 30, 2013:

Year Ending December 31,	Future Expense
2013	$	31,156
2014		49,481
2015		27,062
2016		7,791
Total	$	115,490

The compensation committee may make additional awards of restricted stock, thereby increasing the future expense related to this plan. In addition, award vesting may be accelerated due to certain events as outlined in the restricted stock award agreement. Any acceleration of vesting will change the timing of, but not the aggregate amount of, compensation expense incurred.

At the 2013 HopFed Bancorp, Inc. Annual Shareholder Meeting, shareholders approved a management recommendation to create the HopFed Bancorp, Inc. 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan (“the 2013 Plan”). The 2013 Plan provides for up to 300,000 shares to be granted to Directors and employees of the Company and the Bank. The details of the plan are discussed in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement dated April 5, 2013, and SEC Form S-8 dated June 28, 2013. The 2013 Plan replaces the Company’s 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan. The Company will not issue additional awards under the 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan.

11

(4) SECURITIES

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluations. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

At June 30, 2013, the Company has 87 securities with unrealized losses. The carrying amount of securities and their estimated fair values at June 30, 2013, were as follows:

	June 30, 2013
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Restricted:
FHLB stock	$	4,428		—		—			4,428
Unrestricted:
U.S. government and agency securities:
Agency debt securities	$	119,837		3,007		(1,427	)		121,417
Corporate bonds		2,000		—		(16	)		1,984
Taxable municipal bonds		19,395		339		(334	)		19,400
Tax free municipal bonds		65,395		2,550		(772	)		67,173
Trust preferred securities		2,000		—		(511	)		1,489
Mortgage-backed securities:
GNMA		20,167		768		(117	)		20,818
FNMA		77,307		927		(1,369	)		76,865
FHLMC		3,441		88		—			3,529
NON-AGENCY CMOs		13,931		—		(487	)		13,444
AGENCY CMOs		12,795		189		(167	)		12,817
	$	336,268		7,868		(5,200	)		338,936

12

The carrying amount of securities and their estimated fair values at December 31, 2012, was as follows:

	December 31, 2012
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Restricted:
FHLB stock	$	4,428		—		—			4,428
Unrestricted:
U.S. government and agency securities:
Agency debt securities	$	147,659		5,202		(83	)		152,778
Taxable municipal bonds		12,535		1,209		(8	)		13,736
Tax free municipal bonds		68,331		5,756		(40	)		74,047
Trust preferred securities		2,000		—		(511	)		1,489
Mortgage-backed securities:
GNMA		19,172		1,244		(19	)		20,397
FNMA		64,805		2,558		(58	)		67,305
FHLMC		4,519		153		—			4,672
SLMA CMO		5,412		80		—			5,492
AGENCY CMOs		16,055		426		(52	)		16,429
	$	340,488		16,628		(771	)		356,345

13

The scheduled maturities of debt securities available for sale at June 30, 2013, were as follows:

			Estimated
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Due within one year	$	951	$	925
Due in one to five years		14,375		14,586
Due in five to ten years		35,929		35,566
Due after ten years		51,913		52,526
		103,168		103,603
Amortizing agency bonds		105,459		107,860
Mortgage-backed securities		127,641		127,473
Total unrestricted securities available for sale	$	336,268	$	338,936

The scheduled maturities of debt securities available for sale at December 31, 2012, were as follows:

			Estimated
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Due within one year	$	345	$	346
Due in one to five years		11,499		11,682
Due in five to ten years		30,007		32,316
Due in more than ten years		53,222		57,290
		95,073		101,634
Amortizing agency bonds		135,452		140,416
Mortgage-backed securities		109,963		114,295
Total unrestricted securities available for sale	$	340,488	$	356,345

14

The estimated fair value and unrealized loss amounts of temporarily impaired investments as of June 30, 2013, are as follows:

	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Available for sale
U.S. government and agency securities:
Agency debt securities	$	30,007		(1,427	)		—		—			30,007		(1,427	)
Corporate bonds		1,984		(16	)		—		—			1,984		(16	)
Taxable municipals		8,451		(334	)		—		—			8,451		(334	)
Tax free municipals		13,329		(772	)		—		—			13,329		(772	)
Trust preferred securities		—		—			1,489		(511	)		1,489		(511	)
Mortgage-backed securities:
GNMA		4,513		(93	)		1,005		(24	)		5,518		(117	)
FNMA		44,606		(1,369	)		—		—			44,606		(1,369	)
FHLMC		—		—			—		—			—		—
NON-AGENCY CMOs		5,304		(459	)		5,166		(28	)		10,470		(487	)
AGENCY CMOs		1,878		(167	)		—		—			1,878		(167	)
Total Available for Sale	$	110,072		(4,637	)		7,660		(563	)		117,732		(5,200	)

The estimated fair value and unrealized loss amounts of temporarily impaired investments as of December 31, 2012, were as follows:

	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Available for sale
U.S. government and agency securities:
Agency debt securities	$	12,317		(83	)		—		—			12,317		(83	)
Taxable municipal bonds		885		(8	)		—		—			885		(8	)
Tax free municipal bonds		5,315		(40	)		—		—			5,315		(40	)
Trust preferred securities		—		—			1,489		(511	)		1,489		(511	)
Mortgage-backed securities:
GNMA		—		—			1,415		(19	)		1,415		(19	)
FNMA		7,077		(58	)		—		—			7,077		(58	)
FHLMC		—		—			—		—			—		—
NON-AGENCY CMOs		—		—			—		—			—		—
AGENCY CMOs		3,691		(52	)		—		—			3,691		(52	)
Total Available for Sale	$	29,285		(241	)		2,904		(530	)		32,189		(771	)

15

At June 30, 2013, securities with a book value of approximately $151.6 million and a market value of approximately $152.0 million were pledged to various municipalities for deposits in excess of FDIC limits as required by law. The Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati has issued letters of credit in the Bank’s name totaling $13.5 million secured by the Bank’s loan portfolio to secure additional municipal deposits.

At June 30, 2013, securities with a book and market value of $31.1 million were sold under agreements to repurchase from various customers. Furthermore, the Company has two wholesale repurchase agreements with third parties secured by investments with a combined book value of $16.9 million and a market value of $16.6 million. One repurchase agreement is in the amount of $6.0 million and has a maturity of September 18, 2016 and is currently callable on a quarterly basis and has a fixed rate of interest of 4.36%. The second repurchase agreement, in the amount of $10.0 million, has a maturity of September 5, 2014, is currently callable quarterly and has a fixed rate of interest of 4.28%.

16

(5) LOANS

Set forth below is selected data relating to the composition of the loan portfolio by type of loan at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total loans other than as disclosed below:

	June 30, 2013			June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012			December 31, 2012
	Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
	(Dollars in thousands, except percentages)
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family (closed end) first mortgages	$	157,880			29.4	%	$	162,335			30.3	%
Second mortgages (closed end)		3,912			0.7	%		4,336			0.8	%
Home equity lines of credit		35,982			6.7	%		37,083			6.9	%
Multi-family		29,965			5.6	%		33,056			6.2	%
Construction		8,994			1.7	%		18,900			3.5	%
Land		39,145			7.3	%		45,906			8.6	%
Farmland		50,300			9.4	%		46,799			8.7	%
Non-residential real estate		147,491			27.4	%		122,637			22.9	%
Total mortgage loans		473,669			88.2	%		471,052			87.9	%
Consumer loans		12,832			2.4	%		13,886			2.6	%
Commercial loans		51,155			9.4	%		50,549			9.5	%
Total other loans		63,987			11.8	%		64,435			12.1	%
Total loans, gross		537,656			100.0	%		535,487			100.0	%
Deferred loan cost, net of income		25						146
Less allowance for loan losses		(9,399	)					(10,648	)
Total loans	$	528,282					$	524,985

17

The Company assigns an industry standard NAICS code to each loan in the Company’s portfolio. By assigning a standard code to each type of loan, management can more readily determine concentrations in risk by industry, location and loan type. This information is most useful when analyzing the Company’s non-residential real estate loan portfolio. At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the Company’s non-residential real estate loan portfolio was made up of the following loan types:

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Land	$	39,145		45,906
Manufacturing		4,191		3,856
Professional, Technical		2,243		2,025
Retail Trade		11,713		12,391
Other Services		19,417		18,303
Finance & Insurance		1,855		386
Agricultural, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting		46,862		42,420
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing		54,354		48,249
Wholesale Trade		19,718		8,891
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation		3,153		3,461
Accommodations / Food Service		20,323		17,152
Healthcare and Social Assistance		7,696		7,932
Transportation & Warehousing		1,238		1,295
Information		2,548		2,488
Non-industry		2,105		46
Admin Support / Waste Mgmt		375		541
Total	$	236,936		215,342

The allowance for loan losses totaled $9.4 million at June 30, 2013, and $10.6 million at December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.75% at June 30, 2013, 1.99% at December 31, 2012, and 1.92% at June 30, 2012.

The following table indicates the type and level of non-accrual loans at the dates indicated below:

	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012		June 30, 2012
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family mortgages	$	1,131		2,243		2,577
Home equity line of credit		22		66		91
Junior lien		37		4		107
Multi-family		—		38		190
Construction		—		—		—
Land		2,255		2,768		4,290
Non-residential real estate		7,055		1,134		4,000
Farmland		781		648		727
Consumer loans		11		145		16
Commercial loans		520		617		121
Total non-accrual loans	$	11,812		7,663		12,119

18

The following table provides a detail of the Company’s activity in the allowance for loan loss account by loan type for the three month period ended June 30, 2013:

	Balance 12/31/2012		Charge off 2013			Recovery 2013		General Provision 2013			Specific Provision 2013			Ending Balance 6/30/2013
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family mortgages	$	2,490		(368	)		8		149			115			2,394
Home equity line of credit		374		(6	)		2		30			(11	)		389
Junior liens		230		(84	)		24		(132	)		25			63
Multi-family		524		(38	)		163		(257	)		(159	)		233
Construction		256		—			—		(61	)		(128	)		67
Land		2,184		(393	)		5		(231	)		235			1,800
Non-residential real estate		2,914		(1,039	)		14		580			469			2,938
Farmland		719		—			—		(271	)		14			462
Consumer loans		338		(386	)		119		307			102			480
Commercial loans		619		(56	)		4		42			(36	)		573
Total	$	10,648		(2,370	)		339		156			626			9,399

The following table provides a detail of the Company’s activity in the allowance for loan loss account by loan type for the year ended December 31, 2012:

	Balance 12/31/2011		Charge off 2012			Recovery 2012		General Provision 2012			Specific Provision 2012			Balance 12/31/2012
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family mortgages	$	2,640		(379	)		81		324			(176	)		2,490
Home equity line of credit		408		(67	)		6		6			21			374
Junior liens		277		(1	)		4		—			(50	)		230
Multi-family		1,201		(417	)		—		429			(689	)		524
Construction		139		—			—		117			—			256
Land		1,332		(1,033	)		405		635			845			2,184
Non-residential real estate		3,671		(1,120	)		137		718			(492	)		2,914
Farmland		—		—			—		315			404			719
Consumer loans		262		(510	)		150		404			32			338
Commercial loans		1,332		(157	)		12		(171	)		(397	)		619
Total	$	11,262		(3,684	)		795		2,777			(502	)		10,648

19

The table below presents currently performing, past due, and non-accrual balances at June 30, 2013, by loan classification allocated between performing and non-performing:

	Currently Performing		30 - 89 Days Past Due		Non-accrual Loans		Special Mention		Impaired Loans
June 30, 2013									Currently Performing
									Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family mortgages	$	149,160		2,172		1,131		1,169		4,248		—		157,880
Home equity line of credit		34,728		289		22		—		943		—		35,982
Junior liens		3,355		14		37		45		461		—		3,912
Multi-family		27,870		—		—		—		2,095		—		29,965
Construction		8,818		—		—		176		—		—		8,994
Land		21,951		235		2,255		7,441		7,263		—		39,145
Non-residential real estate		132,667		206		7,055		890		6,673		—		147,491
Farmland Consumer loans		45,086 12,345		—   49		781 11		352 —		4,081 427		—		50,300 12,832
Commercial loans		47,366		424		520		435		2,410		—		51,155
Total	$	483,346		3,389		11,812		10,508		28,601		—		537,656

The table below presents currently performing, past due, and non-accrual balances at December 31, 2012, by loan classification allocated between performing and non-performing:

	Currently Performing		30 - 89 Days Past Due		Non-accrual Loans		Special Mention		Impaired Loans				Total
									Currently Performing
December 31, 2012									Substandard		Doubtful
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family mortgages	$	155,936		1,339		2,243		779		2,038		—		162,335
Home equity line of credit		34,732		5		66		1,109		1,171		—		37,083
Junior liens		3,584		237		4		47		464		—		4,336
Multi-family		27,463		—		38		1,478		4,077		—		33,056
Construction		13,876		176		—		—		4,848		—		18,900
Land		14,237		137		2,768		7,683		21,081		—		45,906
Non-residential real estate		101,894		293		1,134		669		18,647		—		122,637
Farmland		44,256		—		648		1,230		665		—		46,799
Consumer loans		13,266		74		145		—		401		—		13,886
Commercial loans		43,961		230		617		516		5,225		—		50,549
Total	$	453,205		2,491		7,663		13,511		58,617		—		535,487

20

All loans listed as 30-89 days past due and non-accrual are not performing as agreed. Loans listed as special mention, substandard and doubtful are paying as agreed. However, the customer’s financial statements may indicate weaknesses in their current cash flow, the customer’s industry may be in decline due to current economic conditions, collateral values used to secure the loan may be declining, or the Company may be concerned about the customer’s future business prospects.

The Company does not originate loans it considers sub-prime and is not aware of any exposure to the additional credit concerns associated with sub-prime lending in either the Company’s loan or investment portfolios. The Company does have a significant amount of construction and land development loans. Management reports to the Company’s Board of Directors on the status of the Company’s specific construction and development loans as well as the market trends in those markets in which the Company actively participates.

The Company’s annualized net charge off ratios for six month periods ended June 30, 2013, June 30, 2012, and the year ended December 31, 2012, was 0.77%, 0.71% and 0.52%, respectively. The ratios of allowance for loan losses to non-accrual loans at June 30, 2013, June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2012, were 79.6%, 87.23%, and 138.99% respectively.

21

The table on the below sets forth an analysis of the Bank’s allowance for loan losses for the periods presented:

	Six month period ended June 30, 2013			Year ended December 31, 2012			Six month period ended June 30, 2012
	(Dollars in Thousands, Except Percentages)
Beginning balance, allowance for loan loss	$	10,648			11,262			11,262
Charge offs
One-to-four family mortgages		(368	)		(379	)		(264	)
Home equity line of credit		(6	)		(67	)		(53	)
Junior liens		(84	)		(1	)		(1	)
Multi-family		(38	)		(417	)		(416	)
Land		(393	)		(1,033	)		(779	)
Non-residential real estate		(1,039	)		(1,120	)		(579	)
Consumer loans		(386	)		(510	)		(130	)
Commercial loans		(56	)		(157	)		(206
Total charge offs		(2,370	)		(3,684	)		(2,428	)
Recoveries
One-to-four family mortgages		8			81			43
Home equity line of credit		2			6			3
Junior liens		24			4			2
Multi-family		163			—			—
Land		5			405			234
Non-residential real estate		14			137			100
Consumer loans		119			150			79
Commercial loans		4			12			4
Total recoveries		339			795			465
Net Charge offs		(2,031	)		(2,889	)		(1,963	)
Provision for loan losses		782			2,275			1,269
Ending balance	$	9,399			10,648			10,568
Average loan balance, gross	$	525,448			533,081			550,871
Ratio of net charge offs to average outstanding loans during the period		0.77	%		0.52	%		0.71	%

The determination of the allowance for loan losses is based on management’s analysis, completed on a quarterly basis. Various factors are considered, including the market value of the underlying collateral, growth and composition of the loan portfolio, the relationship of the allowance for loan losses to outstanding loans, historical loss experience, delinquency trends and prevailing economic conditions. Although management believes its allowance for loan losses is adequate, there can be no assurance that additional allowances will not be required or that losses on loans will not be incurred.

22

The Company conducts annual reviews on all loan relationships above $1 million to ascertain the borrowers continued ability to service their debt as agreed. In addition to the credit relationships mentioned above, management may revise a risk grade on any credit relationship once it becomes aware of adverse credit trends for that customer. Typically, the annual review consists of updated financial statements for borrowers and any guarantors, a review of the borrower’s credit history with the Company and other creditors, and current income tax information.

As a result of this review, management will classify loans based on their credit risk. Additionally, the Company provides a risk grade for all loans past due more than sixty days. The Company uses the following risk definitions for risk grades:

Satisfactory loans of average strength having some deficiency or vulnerability to changing economic or industry conditions. These customers should have reasonable amount of capital and operating ratios. Secured loans may lack in margin or liquidity. Loans to individuals, perhaps supported in dollars of net worth, but with supporting assets may be difficult to liquidate.

Watchloans are acceptable credits: (1) that need continual monitoring, such asout-of territory orasset-based loans (since the Bank does not have anasset-based lending department), or (2) with a marginal risk level to business concerns and individuals that; (a) have exhibited favorable performance in the past, though currently experiencing negative trends; (b) are in an industry that is experiencing volatility or is declining, and their performance is less than industry norms; and (c) are experiencing unfavorable trends in their financial position, such asone-time net losses or declines in asset values. These marginal borrowers may have early warning signs of problems such as occasional overdrafts and minor delinquency. If considered marginal, a loan would be a “watch” until financial data demonstrated improved performance or further deterioration to a “substandard” grade usually within a12-month period. In the table on page 25, Watch loans are included with satisfactory loans and classified as Pass.

Other Loans Especially Mentionedare currently protected but are potentially weak. These loans constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a substandard classification. The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitutes an unwarranted risk in light of the circumstances surrounding a specific loan. These credit weaknesses, if not checked or corrected, will weaken the loan or inadequately protect the Bank’s credit position at some future date.

23

A Substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. The loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. This does not imply ultimate loss of the principal, but may involve burdensome administrative expenses and the accompanying cost to carry the credit. Examples of substandard loans include those to borrowers with insufficient or negative cash flow, negative net worth coupled with inadequate guarantor support, inadequate working capital, and/or significantlypast-due loans and overdrafts.

A loan classified Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard credit except that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full (on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values) highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain pending factorscharge-off is deferred until its more exact status may be determined. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral, and refinancing plans. The doubtful classification is applied to that portion of the credit in which the full collection of principal and interest is questionable.

A loan is considered to be impaired when management determines that it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The value of individually impaired loans is measured based on the present value of expected payments using the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Currently, it is management’s practice to classify all substandard or doubtful loans as impaired. At June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, the Company’s impaired loans totaled $40.4 million, $66.6 million and $90.4 million, respectively. At June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, the Company’s specific reserve for impaired loans totaled $3.5 million, $3.8 million and $3.7 million, respectively.

24

A summary of the Company’s impaired loans, including their respective regulatory classification and their respective specific reserve at June 30, 2013, were as follows:

											Specific		Allowance
											Allowance		for
			Special		Impaired Loans						for		Performing
	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total		Impairment		Loans
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family mortgages	$	151,332		1,169		5,348		31		157,880		794		1,600
Home equity line of credit		35,017		—		965		—		35,982		146		243
Junior liens		3,361		45		506		—		3,912		—		63
Multi-family		27,870		—		2,095		—		29,965		—		233
Construction		8,818		176		—		—		8,994		—		67
Land		22,185		7,441		9,519		—		39,145		1,385		415
Non-residential real estate		132,851		890		13,750		—		147,491		1,046		1,892
Farmland		45,086		352		4,862		—		50,300		—		462
Consumer loans		12,394		—		438		—		12,832		87		393
Commercial loans		47,790		435		2,930		—		51,155		91		482
Total	$	486,704		10,508		40,413		31		537,656		3,549		5,850

A summary of the Company’s impaired loans and their respective reserve at December 31, 2012, were as follows:

											Specific		Allowance
											Allowance		for
			Special		Impaired Loans						for		Performing
	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total		Impairment		Loans
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family mortgages	$	156,961		779		4,595		—		162,335		754		1,736
Home equity line of credit		34,737		1,109		1,237		—		37,083		68		306
Junior liens		3,821		47		468		—		4,336		196		34
Multi-family		27,463		1,478		4,115		—		33,056		38		486
Construction		14,052		—		4,848		—		18,900		—		256
Land		14,374		7,683		23,849		—		45,906		932		1,252
Non-residential real estate		107,947		669		14,021		—		122,637		1,240		1,681
Farmland		38,496		1,230		7,073		—		46,799		184		528
Consumer loans		13,330		—		556		—		13,886		121		217
Commercial loans		44,191		516		5,842		—		50,549		308		311
Total	$	455,372		13,511		66,604		—		535,487		3,841		6,807

25

Impaired loans by classification type and the related valuation allowance amounts at June 30, 2013, were as follows:

	At June 30, 2013						For the six month period ended June 30, 2013
			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans with no recorded reserve:
One-to-four family mortgages	$	2,680		2,680		—		1,975		4
Home equity line of credit		468		468		—		507		2
Junior liens		506		506		—		438		1
Multi-family		2,095		2,095		—		1,981		16
Construction		—		—		—		2,056		—
Land		3,979		3,979		—		9,367		11
Farmland		4,862		4,862		—		4,591		108
Non-residential real estate		8,587		8,587		—		6,340		51
Consumer loans		24		24		—		34		3
Commercial loans		2,411		2,411		—		2,439		109
Total	$	25,612		25,612		—		29,728		305
Impaired loans with recorded reserve:
One-to-four family mortgages	$	2,699		2,739		794		2,504		10
Home equity line of credit		497		497		146		420		4
Junior liens		—		—		—		43		—
Multi-family		—		—		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Land		5,540		5,934		1,385		4,753		50
Farmland		—		—		—		226		—
Non-residential real estate		5,163		6,460		1,046		3,321		97
Consumer loans		414		419		87		321		—
Commercial loans		519		570		91		743		3
Total	$	14,832		16,619		3,549		12,331		164
Total impaired loans	$	40,444		42,231		3,549		42,059		469

26

Impaired loans by classification type and the related valuation allowance amounts at December 31, 2012, were as follows:

	At December 31, 2012
			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
Impaired loans with no recorded reserve:
One-to-four family mortgages	$	1,759		1,759		—		5,279		107
Home equity line of credit		1,169		1,169		—		869		50
Junior liens		—		—		—		281		3
Multi-family		4,077		4,077		—		3,626		219
Construction		4,848		4,848		—		3,133		174
Land		20,279		20,279		—		19,857		504
Farmland		5,701		5,701				5,701		202
Non-residential real estate		9,662		9,662		—		14,235		653
Consumer loans		81		81		—		66		5
Commercial loans		1,617		1,617		—		2,701		165
Total	$	49,193		49,193		—		55,748		2,082
Impaired loans with recorded reserve:
One-to-four family mortgages	$	2,836		2,836		754		3,135		145
Home equity line of credit		68		68		76		162		3
Junior liens		468		468		188		365		38
Multi-family		38		38		38		2,640		4
Construction		—		—		—		1,095		—
Land		3,570		3,570		932		4,848		213
Farmland		1,372		1,372		184		1,372		92
Non-residential real estate		4,359		4,359		1,240		5,206		231
Consumer loans		475		475		121		281		1
Commercial loans		4,225		4,225		308		4,470		28
Total	$	17,411		17,411		3,841		23,574		755
Total impaired loans	$	66,604		66,604		3,841		79,322		2,837

27

On a periodic basis, the Bank may modify the terms of certain loans. In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (TDR), Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued Accounting Standards Update 310 (ASU 310),A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a TDR, the Bank must separately conclude that both of the following exist:

• The restructuring constitutes a concession

• The debtor is experiencing financial difficulties

ASU 310 provides the following guidance for the Bank’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession as follows:

• If a debtor does not otherwise have access to funds at a market interest rate for debt with similar risk characteristics as the restructured debt, the restructured debt would be considered a below market rate, which may indicate that the Bank may have granted a concession. In that circumstance, the Bank should consider all aspects of the restructuring in determining whether it has granted a concession, the creditor must make a separate assessment about whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties to determine whether the restructuring constitutes a TDR.

• A temporary or permanent increase in the interest rate on a loan as a result of a restructuring does not eliminate the possibility of the restructuring from being considered a concession if the new interest rate on the loan is below the market interest rate for loans of similar risk characteristics.

• A restructuring that results in a delay in payment that is insignificant is not a concession. However, the Bank must consider a variety of factors in assessing whether a restructuring resulting in a delay in payment is insignificant.

28

A summary of the Company’s loans classified as Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDR’s) that are reported as performing at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, is below:

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(Dollars in Thousands)
TDR by Loan Type:
One-to-four family mortgages	$	267			1,888
Home equity line of credit		—			—
Junior lien		—			196
Multi-family		—			234
Construction		—			4,112
Land		2,256			3,424
Non-residential real estate		3,343			3,173
Farmland		—			909
Consumer loans		4			5
Commercial loans		230			128
Total TDR		6,100			14,069
Less: TDR in non-accrual status
One-to-four family mortgages		—			—
Home equity line of credit		—			—
Junior lien		—			(100	)
Multi-family		—			—
Construction		—			—
Land		(2,256	)		(2,768	)
Non-residential real estate		(3,248	)		(44	)
Farmland		—			—
Consumer loans		—			—
Commercial loans		(127	)		(119	)
Total non-accrual TDRs		(5,631	)		3,031
Total performing TDR	$	469			11,038

(6) REAL ESTATE AND OTHER ASSETS OWNED

The Company’s real estate and other assets owned represent properties and personal collateral acquired through customer loan defaults. The property is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated cost to sell and carrying cost at the date acquired. Any difference between the book value and estimated market value is recognized as a charge off through the allowance for loan loss account. Additional real estate owned and other asset losses may be determined on individual properties at specific intervals or at the time of disposal. In general, the Company will obtain a new appraisal on all real estate owned with a book balance in excess of $250,000 on an annual basis. Additional losses are recognized as a non-interest expense.

29

At June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012, the Company had balances in other real estate and assets owned and non-accrual loans consisting of the following:

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012			June 30, 2012
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family mortgages	$	447			258			707
Multi-family		—			—			—
Construction		—			130			216
Land		1,112			1,112			425
Non-residential real estate		73			44			—
Consumer assets		—			4			—
Total other real estate owned		1,632			1,548			1,348
Total non-accrual loans		11,812			7,663			12,119
Total non-performing assets	$	13,444			9,211			13,467
Non-performing assets / Total assets		1.42	%		0.95	%		1.31	%

30

The following is a summary of the activity in the Company’s real estate and other assets owned for the six month period ending June 30, 2013:

	Activity During 2013
	Balance							Reduction			Gain (Loss)			Balance
	12/31/2012		Foreclosures		Proceeds			in Values			on Sale			6/30/2013
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family mortgages	$	258		548		(349	)		—			(10	)		447
Multi-family		—		—		—			—			—			—
Construction		130		—		(110	)		(110	)		90			—
Land		1,112		—		—			—			—			1,112
Non-residential real estate		44		40		—			(11	)		—			73
Consumer assets		4		5		(3	)		(4	)		(2	)		—
Total	$	1,548		593		(462	)		(125	)		78			1,632

The following is a summary of the activity in the Company’s real estate and other assets owned for the year ended December 31, 2012:

	Activity During 2012
	Balance							Reduction			Gain (Loss)			Balance
	12/31/2011		Foreclosures		Proceeds			in Values			on Sale			12/31/2012
	(Dollars in Thousands)
One-to-four family mortgages	$	480		983		(1,084	)		(92	)		(29	)		258
Multi-family		905		—		(875	)		—			(30	)		—
Construction		465		—		(321	)		—			(14	)		130
Land		248		1,229		(269	)		(77	)		(19	)		1,112
Non-residential real estate		160		64		(178	)		(20	)		18			44
Consumer assets		9		9		(11	)		—			(3	)		4
Total	$	2,267		2,285		(2,738	)		(189	)		(77	)		1,548

31

(7) INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATED COMPANIES

Investments in affiliated companies accounted for under the equity method consist of 100% of the common stock of HopFed Capital Trust 1 (“Trust”), a wholly-owned statutory business trust. The Trust was formed on September 25, 2003. Summary financial information for the Trust follows (dollars in thousands):

Summary Statements of Financial Condition

	At June 30, 2013		At December 31, 2012
Assets - investment in subordinated debentures issued by HopFed Bancorp, Inc.	$	10,310		10,310
Liabilities		—		—
Stockholder’s equity - Trust preferred securities		10,000		10,000
Common stock (100% Owned by HopFed Bancorp, Inc.)		310		310
Total stockholders’ equity	$	10,310	$	10,310

Summary Statement of Income

	Three Month Periods Ended June 30,				Six Month Period Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Income - interest income from subordinated debentures issued by HopFed Bancorp, Inc.	$	88		93	$	176		189
Net income	$	88		93	$	176		189

Summary Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

	Trust Preferred Securities		Common Stock		Retained Earnings			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Beginning balances, December 31, 2012	$	10,000		310		—			10,310
Net income		—		—		176			176
Dividends:
Trust preferred securities		—		—		(171	)		(171	)
Common paid to HopFed Bancorp, Inc.		—		—		(5	)		(5	)
Ending balances, June 30, 2013	$	10,000		310		—			10,310

32

(8) FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

ASC 820-10,Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value. The statement establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable input and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.

• Level 1 is for assets and liabilities that management has obtained quoted prices (unadjusted for transaction cost) or identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

• Level 2 is for assets and liabilities in which significant unobservable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

• Level 3 is for assets and liabilities in which significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by a matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique that is widely used in the industry to value debt securities without exclusively using quoted prices for the individual securities in the Company’s portfolio but rather by relying on the securities relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. Impaired loans are valued at the net present value of expected payments using the fair value of any assigned collateral. The values for bank owned life insurance are obtained from stated values from the respective insurance companies. The liability associated with the Company’s derivative is obtained from a quoted value supplied by our correspondent banker. The value of real estate owned is obtained from appraisals completed on properties at the time of acquisition and annually thereafter.

33

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

The assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2013, are summarized below:

Description	Total carrying value in the consolidated balance sheet at June  30, 2013		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level  3)
Assets
Available for sale securities	$	338,936		—		337,447		1,489
Bank owned life insurance	$	9,486		—		9,486		—
Liabilities
Interest rate swap	$	913		—		913		—

The assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2012, are summarized below:

Description	Total carrying value in the consolidated balance sheet  at December 31, 2012		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level  3)
Assets
Available for sale securities	$	356,345		—		354,856		1,489
Bank owned life insurance	$	9,323		—		9,323		—
Liabilities
Interest rate swap	$	1,126		—		1,126		—

34

The assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below for June 30, 2013:

Description	Total carrying value in the consolidated balance sheet at June  30, 2013		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level  3)
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets
Other real estate owned	$	1,632		—		—	$	1,632
Impaired loans, net of reserve of $3,549	$	36,895		—		—	$	36,895

The assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below for December 31, 2012:

Description	Total carrying value in the consolidated balance sheet  at December 31, 2012		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level  3)
Assets
Other real estate owned	$	1,544		—		—	$	1,544
Other assets owned	$	4		—		—	$	4
Impaired loans, net of reserve of $3,841	$	62,763		—		—	$	62,763

35

The table below includes a roll-forward of the consolidated condensed statement of financial condition items for the six month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, (including the change in fair value) for assets and liabilities classified by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. When a determination is made to classify an asset or liability within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement. However, since level 3 assets and liabilities typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable components (that is components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources), the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.

Six month period ended June 30,	2013				2012
	Other Assets		Other Liabilities		Other Assets		Other Liabilities
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Fair value, January 1,	$	1,489		—		993		—
Change in unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income for assets and liabilities still held at June 30,		—		—		429		—
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net		—		—		—		—
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—		—		—		—
Fair value, June 30,	$	1,489		—		1,422		—

36

The estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows at June 30, 2013:

	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets Level 1		Using Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2		Significant Unobservable Inputs Level  3
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	20,070		20,070	$	20,070		—		—
Interest-earning deposits		9,633		9,633		9,633		—		—
Securities available for sale		338,936		338,936		—		337,447		1,489
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,428		4,428		—		4,428		—
Loans receivable		528,282		527,365		—		—		527,365
Accrued interest receivable		4,919		4,919		—		4,919		—
Bank owned life insurance		9,486		9,486		—		9,486		—
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		742,664		743,829				743,829		—
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		697		697		—		697		—
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		45,768		46,711		—		46,711		—
Repurchase agreements		47,072		48,311		—		48,311		—
Subordinated debentures		10,310		10,091		—		—		10,091
Off-balance-sheet liabilities:
Commitments to extend credit		—		—
Commercial letters of credit		—		—
Market value of interest rate swap		913		913		—		913		—

37

The estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows at December 31, 2012:

	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets Level 1		Using Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2		Significant Unobservable Inputs Level  3
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	31,563		31,563	$	31,563		—		—
Interest-earning deposits		5,613		5,613		5,613		—		—
Securities available for sale		356,345		356,345		—		354,856		1,489
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,428		4,428		—		4,428		—
Loans receivable		524,985		532,040		—		—		532,040
Accrued interest receivable		5,398		5,398		—		5,398		—
Bank owned life insurance		9,323		9,323		—		9,323		—
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		759,865		756,426		—		756,426		—
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		396		396		—		396		—
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		43,741		49,293		—		49,293		—
Repurchase agreements		43,508		44,779		—		44,779		—
Subordinated debentures		10,310		10,092		—		—		10,092
Off-balance-sheet liabilities:
Commitments to extend credit		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial letters of credit		—		—		—		—		—
Market value of interest rate swap		1,126		1,126		—		1,126		—

(9) PARTICIPATION IN UNITED STATE OF AMERICA TREASURY DEPARTMENT’S CAPITAL PURCHASE PLAN

On December 12, 2008, HopFed Bancorp issued and sold 18,400 shares of preferred stock to the United States Treasury (Treasury) for $18,400,000 pursuant to the Capital Purchase Program. The Company also issued a common stock warrant to the Treasury as a condition to its participation in the Capital Purchase Program. The warrant was immediately exercisable and allowed the holder to purchase 253,667 shares of the Company’s common stock at $10.88 per share. The warrant would have expired on December 12, 2018. The preferred stock had no stated maturity and was non-voting, other than having class voting rights on certain matters, and paid cumulative dividends quarterly at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years and 9% thereafter. The Company repurchased the preferred stock from the Treasury at par on December 19, 2012, and repurchased the warrant from the Treasury on January 16, 2013, for $256,257.

38

(10) STOCK OPTIONS

At June 30, 2013, all stock options outstanding were issued under the HopFed Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan. At June 30, 2013, the Company can no longer issue options under this plan. The remaining 20,808 options are fully vested with a strike price of $16.67 and have a final maturity of June 1, 2014.

(11) DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Under guidelines of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 815, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, all derivative instruments are required to be carried at fair value on the consolidated statement of financial position. ASC 815 provides special hedge accounting provisions, which permit the change in fair value of the hedge item related to the risk being hedged to be recognized in earnings in the same period and in the same income statement line as the change in the fair value of the derivative.

A derivative instrument designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges under ASC 815. Derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Cash value hedges are accounted for by recording the fair value of the derivative instrument and the fair value related to the risk being hedged of the hedged asset or liability on the consolidated statement of financial position with corresponding offsets recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position.

The adjustment to the hedged asset or liability is included in the basis of the hedged item, while the fair value of the derivative is recorded as a freestanding asset or liability. Actual cash receipts or payments and related amounts accrued during the period on derivatives included in a fair value hedge relationship are recorded as adjustments to the income or expense recorded on the hedged asset or liability.

Under both the fair value and cash flow hedge methods, derivative gains and losses not effective in hedging the change in fair value or expected cash flows of the hedged item are recognized immediately in the income statement. At the hedge’s inception and at least quarterly thereafter, a formal assessment is performed to determine whether changes in the fair values or cash flows of the derivative instrument has been highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair values or cash flows of the hedged items and whether they are expected to be highly effective in the future. If it is determined a derivative instrument has not been, or will not continue to be highly effective as a hedge, hedged accounting is discontinued. ASC 815 basis adjustments recorded on hedged assets and liabilities are amortized over the remaining life of the hedged item beginning no later than when hedge accounting ceases. There were no fair value hedging gains or losses, as a result of hedge ineffectiveness, recognized for the six month period ended June 30, 2013, or the year ended December 31, 2012.

39

In October of 2008, the Bank entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a term of seven years and an amount of $10.0 million. The Bank will pay a fixed rate of 7.27% for seven years and receive an amount equal to the three-month London Interbank Lending Rate (LIBOR) plus 3.10%. The interest rate swap is classified as a cash flow hedge by the Bank and will be tested quarterly for effectiveness. At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the cost of the Bank to terminate the cash flow hedge was approximately $913,000 and $1,126,000, respectively.

(12) REGULATORY CHANGES

On June 5, 2013, the Company announced that its wholly owned subsidiary, Heritage Bank, has completed its conversion from a federally chartered savings and loan to a state chartered commercial bank regulated by the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In connection with the Bank’s charter conversion, the Company has received approval from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) to convert our holding company from a savings and loan holding company to a bank holding company also with an effective date of June 5, 2013.

On July 2, 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank approved the final rule for BASEL III capital requirements for all commercial banks charted in the United States of America. The rule was subsequently approved by the FDIC on July 9, 2013. The rule will implement in the United States the Basel III regulatory capital reforms from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Under the final rule, minimum requirements will increase for both the quantity and quality of capital held by banking organizations. Consistent with the international Basel framework, the rule includes a new minimum ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5% and a common equity tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets that will apply to all supervised financial institutions. The rule also raises the minimum ratio of tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4 percent to 6 percent and includes a minimum leverage ratio of 4 percent for all banking organizations. In addition, for the largest, most internationally active banking organizations, the final rule includes a new minimum supplementary leverage ratio that takes into account off-balance sheet exposures. The transition period for implementation of Basel III is January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of Basel III on our financial statements.

40

(13) EFFECT OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

ASU 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” ASU 2011-11 amends Topic 210, “Balance Sheet,” to require an entity to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments, such as sales and repurchase agreements and reverse sale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowing/lending arrangements, and derivative instruments that are eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and/or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. ASU No. 2013-01, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities,” clarifies that ordinary trade receivables are not within the scope of ASU 2011-11. ASU 2011-11 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2013, and did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards update No. 2011-05. This update to Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) defers the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income separately with their respective components of net income and other comprehensive income. The deferral supersedes only the paragraphs pertaining to how and where reclassification adjustments are presented. The amendments in this update were effective for public entities for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The implementation of ASU 2011-12 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.” ASU 2012-02 give entities the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity must perform the quantitative impairment test. If, under the quantitative impairment test, the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an entity should recognize an impairment loss in the amount of that excess.

Permitting an entity to assess qualitative factors when testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment results in guidance that is similar to the goodwill impairment testing guidance in ASU 2011-08. ASU 2012-02 is effective for the Company’s beginning January 1, 2013 (early adoption permitted) and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2012-06, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Subsequent Accounting for an Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition Date as a Result of a Government-Assisted Acquisition of a Financial Institution (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).”ASU 2012-06 clarifies the applicable guidance for subsequently measuring an indemnification asset recognized as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution.

41

ASU 2013-02,“Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.”ASU 2013-02 amends recent guidance related to the reporting of comprehensive income to enhance the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2013, and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

(14) INCOME TAXES

The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated Federal income tax returns and Tennessee excise tax returns. The Company and its non bank subsidiaries file consolidated Kentucky income tax returns. The Bank is exempt from Kentucky corporate income tax.

The Company has no unrecognized tax benefits and has not accrued any interest or penalties for uncertain tax positions.

The effective tax rate differs from the statutory federal rate of 35% and Tennessee excise tax rate of 6.5% due to investment in qualified municipal securities, bank owned life insurance, income apportioned to Kentucky and certain non deductible expenses.

42

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies

The consolidated condensed financial statements as of June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, included herein have been prepared by the Company, without an audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in interim financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereon included in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K.

Certain of the Company’s accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances, which could affect these material judgments, include, but without limitation, changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses, determining the fair value of securities and other financial instruments, and assessing other than temporary impairments of securities.

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012

At June 30, 2013, total assets declined $18.3 million, to $949.4 million as compared to $967.7 million at December 31, 2012, due to lower deposit and investment levels. Securities available for sale decreased from $356.3 million at December 31, 2012, to $338.9 million at June 30, 2013. At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, securities classified as “available for sale” had an amortized cost of $336.3 million and $340.5 million, respectively. Net loans totaled $528.3 million and $525.0 million at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The Company’s holdings of Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (FHLB) stock, at cost was $4.4 million at December 31, 2012, and June 30, 2013. Total Federal Home Loan Bank “FHLB” borrowings increased from $43.7 million at December 31, 2012, to $45.8 million at June 30, 2013 due to a $3 million overnight borrowing at the end of the second quarter in 2013. Total repurchase balances increased from $43.5 million at December 31, 2012, to $47.1 million at June 30, 2013.

At June 30, 2013, deposits declined to $742.7 million from $759.9 million at December 31, 2012, due to a $29.0 million reduction in time deposits. At June 30, 2013, non-interest checking account balances increased to $94.4 million, or 12.7% of total deposits. The average cost of all deposits during the six month periods ended June 30, 2013, June 30, 2012, and the year ended December 31, 2012, was 1.04%, 1.39% and 1.20%, respectively.

43

Management continually evaluates the investment alternatives available to customers and adjusts the pricing on its deposit products to more actively manage its funding costs while remaining competitive in its market area. Given our continued high level of liquidity, the Company has chosen to reduce its balances of higher costing time deposits. In the three month period beginning July 1, 2013, and ending September 30, 2013, the Company has approximately $87.1 million in time deposits scheduled to mature at a current weighted average cost of 1.78%.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Net Income. The Company’s net income available to common shareholders was $2.2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2013, as compared to net income available to common shareholders of $1.4 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2012. The improvement in the Company’s results for the six month period ended June 30, 2013, was partially the result of the elimination of $516,000 in preferred stock dividend and warrant accretion and an increase in gains recognized on the sale of securities.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the six month period ended June 30, 2013, was $12.6 million, compared to $13.5 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2012. The decline in net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to June 30, 2012, was due to a $66.8 million decline in the average balance of interest earning assets and an overall decline in net yields available on interest earning assets.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the average yield on loans was 5.16%, as compared to 5.56% for the six month period ended June 30, 2012. For the six month period ended June 30, 2013, income on taxable securities declined to $3.6 million, from $4.8 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, due to lower yields on new investment purchases and a $45.9 million decline in the average balance of available for sale taxable securities. For the six month period ending June 30, 2013, the tax equivalent yield on taxable and tax free securities were 2.53% and 4.56%, respectively, as compared to 2.92% and 4.95% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

For the six month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, the Company’s cost of interest bearing liabilities was 1.49% and 1.81%, respectively. The lower cost of interest bearing liabilities was the result of the continued re-pricing of higher costing certificates of deposit. At June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, the Company’s net interest margin was 2.94% and 2.93%, respectively.

Average Balances, Yields and Interest Expenses. The table on the next page summarizes the overall effect of changes in both interest rates and the average balances of interest earning assets and liabilities for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012. Yields on assets and cost of liabilities are derived by dividing income or expense by the average daily balances of interest earning assets and liabilities for the appropriate six-month periods.

44

Average balances for loans include loans classified as non-accrual, net of the allowance for loan losses. The table adjusts tax-free investment income by $545,000 for June 30, 2013, and $533,000 for June 30, 2012, for a tax equivalent rate using a cost of funds rate of 1.50% for June 30, 2013, and 1.80% for June 30, 2012. The table adjusts tax-free loan income by $4,000 for June 30, 2013, and $5,000 for June 30, 2012, for a tax equivalent rate using the same cost of funds rate:

	Average Balance 6/30/2013		Income and Expense 6/30/2013			Average Rates 6/30/2013			Average Balance 6/30/2012		Income and Expense 6/30/2012			Average Rates 6/30/2012
	(Table Amounts in Thousands, Except Percentages)
Loans	$	525,448		13,562			5.16	%	$	547,815		15,219			5.56	%
Investments AFS taxable		283,867		3,596			2.53	%	$	329,809		4,809			2.92	%
Investment AFS tax free		73,499		1,677			4.56	%	$	66,852		1,655			4.95	%
Interest earning deposits		9,672		13			0.27	%	$	14,762		14			0.19	%
Total interest earning assets		892,486		18,848			4.22	%		959,238		21,697			4.52	%
Other assets		79,201								89,115
Total assets	$	971,687							$	1,048,353
Retail time deposits		378,326		2,877			1.52	%		451,622		4,459			1.97	%
Brokered deposits		46,390		362			1.56	%		54,265		510			1.88	%
Saving & MMDA		83,367		70			0.17	%		73,453		66			0.18	%
Now accounts		165,564		673			0.81	%		147,336		604			0.82	%
FHLB borrowings		43,586		890			4.08	%		62,537		1,138			3.64	%
Repurchase agreements		40,595		472			2.33	%		41,915		485			2.31	%
Subordinated debentures		10,310		364			7.06	%		10,310		368			7.14	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		768,138		5,708			1.49	%		841,438		7,630			1.81	%
Non-interest bearing deposits		93,857								82,153
Other liabilities		4,944								5,212
Stockholders’ equity		104,748								119,550
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	971,687							$	1,048,353
Net interest income				13,140								14,067
Net interest spread							2.73	%							2.71	%
Net interest margin				2.94	%							2.93	%

45

Interest Income. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, the Company’s total interest income was $18.3 million and $21.2 million, respectively. As the Company’s loan demand remains soft, the Company continues to have a high dependency on investment income. As investment options have become less attractive, the Company has chosen to increase its holdings in floating rate securities. By investing in floating rate securities, the Company is limiting the price volatility on a portion of the portfolio while accepting yields that are significantly below the average yield in the remaining portfolio. At June 30 2013, the Company owns approximately $47.1 million in floating rate securities that re-price monthly or quarterly based on movements in the one and three month London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”).

The average balance of loans receivable declined from $547.8 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, to $525.4 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2013. The ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities increased from 114.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, to 116.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

Interest Expense. Interest expense declined approximately $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to June 30, 2012. The decline was attributable to lower market interest rates, the re-pricing of higher costing deposits, and a reduction in the average balance of time deposits and FHLB borrowings. The average cost of interest-bearing retail time deposits declined from 1.97% for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, to 1.52% for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Over the same period, the average balance of interest bearing retail time deposits declined $73.3 million, from $451.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, to $378.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

The average cost of brokered deposits declined from 1.88% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, to 1.56% for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Over the same period, the average balance of brokered deposits declined $7.9 million to $46.4 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2013. For the six month period ended June 30, 2013, the Company’s total cost of deposits was 1.04% as compared to 1.39% for the six month period ended June 30, 2012.

The average balance of funds borrowed from the FHLB declined $18.9 million, from $62.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, to $43.6 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2013. The average cost of borrowed funds from the FHLB were 3.64% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and 4.08% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. The average balance of repurchase agreements declined from $41.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, to $40.6 for the three month period ended June 30, 2013. The average cost of repurchase agreements was 2.31% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and 2.33% for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

46

Provision for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in its loan portfolio and the general economy. Such evaluation considers numerous factors including general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition and prior loss experience, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral and other factors that warrant recognition in providing for an adequate loan loss allowance. The Company determined that an additional $782,000 in provision for loan loss was required for the six month period ended June 30, 2013, compared to a $1.3 million in provision for loan loss expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2012. The lower level of required provision expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2013, is the result of improving credit quality and risk grade trends on the Company’s loan portfolio.

Non-Interest Income. There was a $755,000 increase in non-interest income in the six month period ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012. The increase in non-interest income was largely the result of a $742,000 increase in gains on the sale of investments. For the six month period ended June 30, 2013, the Company earned $412,000 in mortgage origination income as compared to $466,000 during the six month period ended June 30, 2012. The Company’s financial services commission increased from $498,000 to $644,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2012, as bank customers sought higher yields than is available on deposit accounts.

Non-Interest Expenses. There was a $140,000 decrease in total non-interest expenses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012. The most significant change in non-interest expenses was a $494,000 increase in salary and benefit expenses for the six month period ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2012. For the six month period ended June 30, 2013, the Company’s deposit insurance expense was $411,000 as compared to $853,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2012. The decline was due to the removal of the Company’s and Bank’s Memorandum of Understanding and Agreement and declining deposit balances. For the six month period ended June 30, 2013, professional services increased to $942,000 as compared to $886,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, due to the cost associated with the Company’s contested proxy vote.

Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the six-month periods ending June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, was 21.0% and 17.1%, respectively.

47

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Month Periods Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Net Income. The Company’s net income available to common shareholders was $1.2 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2013, as compared to net income available to common shareholders of $903,000 for the three month period ended June 30, 2012. The improvement in the Company’s results for the three month period ended June 30, 2013, was partially the result of the elimination of $259,000 in preferred stock dividend and warrant accretion and an increase in gains recognized on the sale of securities.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the three month period ended June 30, 2013, was $6.2 million, compared to $6.7 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2012. The decline in net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to June 30, 2012, was due to a $72.6 million decline in the average balance of interest earning assets and an overall decline in net yields available on interest earning assets.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the average yield on loans was 5.06%, as compared to 5.45% for the three month period ended June 30, 2012. For the three month period ended June 30, 2013, income on taxable securities declined to $1.8 million, from $2.4 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2012, due to lower yields on new investment purchases and a $55.9 million decline in the average balance of available for sale taxable securities. For the three month period ending June 30, 2013, the tax equivalent yield on taxable and tax free securities were 2.49% and 4.54%, respectively, as compared to 2.87% and 4.74% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

For the three month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, the Company’s cost of interest bearing liabilities was 1.47% and 1.79%, respectively. The lower cost of interest bearing liabilities was the result of lower short term interest rates. At June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, the Company’s net interest margin was 2.90% and 2.87%, respectively.

Average Balances, Yields and Interest Expenses. The table on the next page summarizes the overall effect of changes in both interest rates and the average balances of interest earning assets and liabilities for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012. Yields on assets and cost of liabilities are derived by dividing income or expense by the average daily balances of interest earning assets and liabilities for the appropriate three-month periods.

48

Average balances for loans include loans classified as non-accrual, net of the allowance for loan losses. The table adjusts tax-free investment income by $263,000 for June 30, 2013, and $260,000 for June 30, 2012, for a tax equivalent rate using a cost of funds rate of 1.50% for June 30, 2013, and 1.80% for June 30, 2012. The table adjusts tax-free loan income by $1,000 for June 30, 2013, and $3,000 for June 30, 2012, for a tax equivalent rate using the same cost of funds rate:

	Average Balance 6/30/2013		Income and Expense 6/30/2013			Average Rates 6/30/2013			Average Balance 6/30/2012		Income and Expense 6/30/2012			Average Rates 6/30/2012
	(Table Amounts in Thousands, Except Percentages)
Loans	$	528,160		6,677			5.06	%	$	544,056		7,416			5.45	%
Investments AFS taxable		283,262		1,764			2.49	%		339,125		2,434			2.87	%
Investment AFS tax free		71,333		810			4.54	%		68,035		807			4.74	%
Interest earnings deposits		9,465		7			0.30	%		13,632		6			0.18	%
Total interest earning assets		892,220		9,258			4.15	%		964,848		10,663			4.42	%
Other assets		73,757								79,426
Total assets	$	965,977							$	1,044,274
Retail time deposits		371,908		1,378			1.48	%		445,784		2,186			1.96	%
Brokered deposits		45,688		178			1.56	%		51,185		226			1.77	%
Savings & MMDA		86,018		37			0.17	%		74,472		33			0.18	%
Now accounts		167,038		343			0.82	%		150,813		310			0.82	%
FHLB borrowings		43,612		446			4.09	%		62,105		565			3.64	%
Repurchase agreements		38,185		230			2.41	%		39,788		237			2.38	%
Subordinated debentures		10,310		182			7.06	%		10,310		181			7.02	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		762,759		2,794			1.47	%		834,457		3,738			1.79	%
Non-interest bearing deposits		93,616								83,803
Other liabilities		4,891								4,158
Stockholders’ equity		104,711								121,856
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	965,977							$	1,044,274
Net interest income				6,464								6,925
Interest rate spread							2.68	%							2.63	%
Net interest margin				2.90	%							2.87	%

Interest Income. For the three month periods ended June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, the Company’s total interest income was $9.0 million and $10.4 million, respectively. As the Company’s loan demand remains soft, we continue to have a high dependency on investment income. The average balance of loans receivable declined from $544.1 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2012, to $528.2 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2013. The ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities increased from 115.63% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, to 116.97% for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

49

Interest Expense. Interest expense declined $944,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to June 30, 2012. The decline was attributable to lower market interest rates, the re-pricing of higher costing deposits, and a reduction in the average balance of time deposits FHLB borrowings. The average cost of interest-bearing retail time deposits declined from 1.96% for the three month period ended June 30, 2012, to 1.48% for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Over the same period, the average balance of interest bearing retail time deposits declined $73.9 million, from $445.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, to $371.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

The average cost of brokered deposits declined from 1.77% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, to 1.56% for the three months ended June 30, 2013. Over the same period, the average balance of brokered deposits declined from $51.2 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2012, to $45.7 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2013. For the three month period ended June 30, 2013, the Company’s total cost of deposits was 1.01% as compared to 1.37% for the three month period ended June 30, 2012.

The average balance of funds borrowed from the FHLB declined $18.5 million, from $62.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, to $43.6 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2013. The average cost of borrowed funds from the FHLB were 3.64% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and 4.09% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. The average balance of repurchase agreements declined from $39.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, to $38.2 for the three month period ended June 30, 2013. The average cost of repurchase agreements was 2.38% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and 2.41% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

Provision for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in its loan portfolio and the general economy. Such evaluation considers numerous factors including general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition and prior loss experience, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral and other factors that warrant recognition in providing for an adequate loan loss allowance. The Company determined that an additional $406,000 in provision for loan loss was required for the three month period ended June 30, 2013, compared to a $400,000 in provision for loan loss expense for the three month period ended June 30, 2012.

50

Non-Interest Income. There was a $189,000 increase in non-interest income in the three month period ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012. The increase in non-interest income was largely the result of a $159,000 increase in gains on the sale of investments. For the three month period ended June 30, 2013, the Company earned $212,000 in mortgage origination income as compared to $263,000 during the three month period ended June 30, 2012. The Company’s financial services commission increased from $271,000 for the three month period ended June 30, 2012, to $347,000 for the three month period ended June 30, 2013.

Non-Interest Expenses. There was a $315,000 decrease in total non-interest expenses in the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012. The most significant change in non-interest expenses was a $153,000 increase in salary and benefit expenses for the three month period ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2012. For the three month period ended June 30, 2013, the Company’s deposit insurance expense was $179,000 as compared to $434,000 for the three month period ended June 30, 2012. The decline was due to the removal of the Company’s and Bank’s Memorandum of Understanding and Agreement.

Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the three-month periods ending June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012, was 22.2% and 20.5%, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources. The Company has no business other than that of the Bank. Management believes that dividends that may be paid by the Bank to the Company will provide sufficient funds for its current needs. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will not have a need for additional funds in the future. The Bank is subject to certain regulatory limitations with respect to the payment of dividends to the Company. The Company’s principal source of funds for dividend payments are dividends received from Heritage Bank, USA. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to the Parent Company by the Bank without prior approval of the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current year’s net profits, combined with the retained net profits of the preceding two years.

The Bank uses brokered deposits to supplement its asset liability need for longer term deposits at reasonable prices. In addition to the coupon rate listed below, brokered deposits carry an additional fee of approximately 0.25% that includes the cost of selling and servicing the deposits. The Company includes this cost as interest expense on its income statement and on its table on page 44 that provides the yields and cost of assets and liabilities.

51

At June 30, 2013, the Bank’s brokered deposits consisted of the following:

Issue Date		Interest Rate			Balance		Maturity Date
	1/22/2010		2.20	%	$	3,092,000		7/22/2013
	3/2/2010		2.00	%		3,204,000		9/2/2013
	9/22/2010		1.15	%		2,144,000		3/22/2014
	7/1/2011		1.00	%		3,000,000		5/1/2014
	8/11/2009		3.00	%		5,095,000		8/11/2014
	7/9/2012		0.54	%		3,159,000		1/9/2015
	7/27/2012		0.70	%		3,590,000		7/27/2015
	12/21/2010		1.70	%		805,000		12/21/2015
	9/21/2012		0.60	%		2,500,000		1/21/2016
	7/9/2012		0.70	%		2,309,000		3/9/2016
	3/17/2011		2.25	%		1,500,000		3/17/2016
	10/13/2011		1.35	%		2,086,000		10/13/2016	(1)
	3/9/2012		1.00	%		3,044,000		12/9/2016	(1)
	7/9/2012		0.98	%		1,446,000		1/9/2017	(1)
	7/27/2012		0.50	%		1,496,000		7/27/2017	(1)
	9/22/2011		1.00	%		2,127,000		9/22/2017	(1)
	1/3/2013		1.00	%		3,030,000		1/3/2018
	Total				$	43,627,000

⁽¹⁾  Denotes brokered deposit with rising rate feature in which the Bank has a call option.

52

Presently, the Bank must satisfy three capital standards: a ratio of tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets of 4.0%, a tier one capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.0%, and a combination of core and “supplementary” capital equal to 8.0% of risk-weighted assets. At June 30, 2013, the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements.

The table below presents certain information relating to the Company’s and Bank’s capital compliance at June 30, 2013:

											Minimum To Be Well
						Minimum Capital					Capitalized Under Applicable
	Actual					Requirement					Regulatory Provisions
June 30, 2013	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Tier 1 capital to average assets:
Consolidated		106,722		11.2	%		38,178		4.0	%		n/a		n/a
Heritage Bank		105,099		11.0	%		38,069		4.0	%		47,586		5.0	%
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets:
Consolidated		106,722		18.2	%		23,521		4.0	%		35,282		6.0	%
Heritage Bank		105,099		17.9	%		23,498		4.0	%		35,247		6.0	%
Total capital to risk weighted assets:
Consolidated		114,101		19.4	%		47,042		8.0	%		58,803		10.0	%
Heritage Bank		112,446		19.1	%		46,996		8.0	%		58,745		10.0	%

At June 30, 2013, the Bank had no outstanding commitments to originate loans and undisbursed commitments on loans outstanding of $17.3 million. Management believes that the Bank’s sources of funds are sufficient to fund all of its outstanding commitments. Certificates of deposits scheduled to mature in one year or less from June 30, 2013, totaled $202.9 million. Management believes that a significant percentage of such deposits will remain with the Bank.

The Bank’s FHLB borrowings are secured by a blanket security agreement pledging the Bank’s 1-4 family first mortgage loans and non-residential real estate loans. At June 30, 2013, the Bank has pledged all eligible 1-4 family first mortgages.

53

At June 30, 2013, the Bank has outstanding borrowings of $45.8 million from the FHLB with maturities ranging from overnight to seven years. A schedule of FHLB borrowings at June 30, 2013, is provided below:

Outstanding Balance		Rate			Maturity		Note
(Dollars in thousands)
$	3,000		0.18	%		07/01/13
	4,000		5.34	%		03/17/16
	7,000		4.25	%		05/01/17	Quarterly callable
	10,000		4.56	%		06/27/17	Quarterly callable
	10,000		4.26	%		08/17/17	Quarterly callable
	11,768		3.13	%		01/01/19	Monthly Principal Payments
$	45,768		4.11	%		4.3 years	Weighted average life

At June 30, 2013, the Bank had $43.9 million in additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB which includes an overnight line of credit of $30.0 million. The Bank has an $8 million unsecured overnight borrowing capacity from a correspondent bank.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making these commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

At June 30, 2013, the Company had the following off-balance sheet commitments (in thousands):

Standby letters of credit	$	316
Unused home equity lines of credit	$	28,242
Unused commercial lines of credit	$	33,881
Unused unsecured personal lines of credit	$	22,094

54

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Additional written or oral forward-looking statements may be made by the Company from time to time in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or otherwise. The words “believe,” “expect,” “seek,” and “intend” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement is made. Such forward-looking statements are within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of income or loss, expenditures, acquisitions, plans for future operations, financing needs or plans relating to services of the Company, as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing.

Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims, any obligation to publicly release the results of revisions, which may be made to forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The actual results of the Company’s asset liability management analysis are highly dependent on the prepayment speed of mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. The United States Treasury’s policy of purchasing longer dated Treasury bonds has the result of lowering mortgage loan rates, allowing more consumers to refinance their mortgages and pay-off their current mortgage, resulting in higher prepayment speeds on mortgage investment products.

The effects of rising interest rates are discussed throughout Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Actual results for the year ending December 31, 2013, will differ from simulations due to timing, magnitude, and the frequency or interest rate changes, market conditions, management strategies, and the timing of the Company’s cash receipts and disbursements.

The Company’s analysis at June 30, 2013, indicates that changes in interest rates are less likely to result in significant changes in the Company’s annual net interest income. A summary of the Company’s analysis at June 30, 2013, for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2014, is as follows:

	Down 1.00%		No change		Up 1.00%		Up 2.00%		Up 3.00%
	(Dollars In Thousands)
Net interest income	$	27,037	$	27,386	$	27,398	$	27,579	$	27,764

55

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), an evaluation was carried out with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the three months ended June 30, 2013, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, was made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was being prepared.

Any control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that its objectives are achieved. The design of a control system inherently has limitations, including the controls cost relative to their benefits. Additionally, controls can be circumvented. No cost-effective control system can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected.

The Company is subject to Section 404 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 requires management to assess and report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

56

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company currently has no material pending legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 with the following exception.

Regulatory Developments

Among the recent legislative and regulatory developments affecting the banking industry are evolving regulatory capital standards for banking organizations. These standards include the “Basel III” initiatives, an effort by international banking supervisors to improve the ability of the banking sector to absorb shocks during periods of financial and economic stress.

In July 2013, the U.S. banking regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board, adopted a final rule implementing a revised regulatory capital framework for U.S. banks in accordance with the Basel III international accord and satisfying related mandates under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The final rule codifies into an integrated regulatory framework U.S. bank regulatory agencies’ regulatory capital rules. Among other things, the final rule:

• Implements a revised definition of regulatory capital, a new common equity tier 1, (or CET1) minimum capital requirement, and a higher minimum tier 1 capital requirement.

• Requires new deductions from capital for investments in unconsolidated financial institutions, mortgage servicing assets and deferred tax assets that exceed specified thresholds.

• Incorporates these new requirements into the U.S. bank regulatory agencies’ prompt corrective action framework.

• Establishes limits on capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if a banking organization does not hold a specified amount of CET1 capital in addition to the amount necessary to satisfy its minimum risk-based capital requirements.

• Amends methodologies for determining risk-weighted assets for all banking organizations.

Under the final rule, minimum capital requirements will increase for both quantity and quality of capital held by banking organizations. The final rule includes the new CET1 minimum capital requirement of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets and increases the minimum tier 1 capital requirement from 4.0% to 6.0% of risk-weighted assets. The minimum total risk-based capital requirement remains unchanged at 8.0% of total risk-weighted assets. In addition to the minimum CET1, tier 1 and total risk-based capital requirements, the final rule requires a buffer of CET1 capital in an amount above 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers.

The final rule establishes a standardized approach for determining risk-weighted assets. Under the final rule, risk weights for residential mortgage loans that apply under current capital rules will continue to apply, and banking organizations such as the Company with less than $15 billion in total assets may continue to include existing trust preferred securities as capital. The final rule allows banking organizations such as the Company that are not subject to the advanced approaches rule to make a one-time election not to include most elements of accumulated other comprehensive income in regulatory capital and instead use existing treatment under current capital rules.

The minimum regulatory capital requirements and compliance with a standardized approach for determining risk-weighted assets are effective for the Company on January 1, 2015. The capital conservation buffer framework transition period begins January 1, 2016, with full implementation effective January 1, 2019.

Management believes that at June 30, 2013, the Company and the Bank would have met all new capital adequacy requirements on a fully phased-in-basis if such requirements were then effective. There can be no assurance that the Basel III capital rules will not be revised before the effective date and phase-in periods.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) None

(b) None

(c) None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

Item 5. Other Information

None

57

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer.
31.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer.
32.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 for John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer.
32.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 for Billy C. Duvall, Chief Financial Officer.
101	The following materials from the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, and 2012 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited), (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited), Statement of Stockholders Equity for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 (unaudited), and, (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), tagged as blocks of text.

58

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		HOPFED BANCORP, INC.
Date:	August 13, 2013	/s/ John E. Peck
		John E. Peck
		President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:	August 13, 2013	/s/ Billy C. Duvall
		Billy C. Duvall
		Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

59