As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2017
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 20-F
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
Commission file number: 001-14668
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Energy Company of Paraná (Translation of Registrant’s Name into English) | The Federative Republic of Brazil (Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
Rua Coronel Dulcídio, 800
80420-170 Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Antonio Sergio de Souza Guetter
+55 41 3222 2027 – ri@copel.com
Rua Coronel Dulcídio, 800, 3rd floor – 80420 – 170 Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Preferred Class B Shares, without par value* | New York Stock Exchange |
American Depositary Shares (as evidenced by American Depositary Receipts), each representing one Preferred Class B Share | New York Stock Exchange |
* Not for trading, but only in connection with the listing of American Depositary Shares on the New York Stock Exchange.
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of December 31, 2016:
145,031,080 Common Shares, without par value
328,627 Class A Preferred Shares, without par value
128,295,668 Class B Preferred Shares, without par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yesx No¨
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes¨ Nox
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesx No¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and ”emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerx Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨ Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.¨
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ¨ IFRS x Other¨
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
N/A
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Yes¨ Nox
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
In this annual report, we refer to Companhia Paranaense de Energia ‒ Copel, and, unless the context otherwise requires, its consolidated subsidiaries as “Copel”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”.
References to (i) the “real”, “reais” or “R$” are to Brazilianreais (plural) and the Brazilianreal (singular) and (ii) “U.S. dollars”, “dollars” or “US$” are to United States dollars. We maintain our books and records inreais. Certain figures included in this annual report have been subject to rounding adjustments.
Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, are included in this annual report. We prepared our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB.
References in this annual report to the “Common Shares”, “Class A Shares” (or “Class A”) and “Class B Shares” (or “Class B”) are to our common shares, class A preferred shares and class B preferred shares, respectively. References to “American Depositary Shares” or “ADSs” are to American Depositary Shares, each representing one Class B Share. The ADSs are evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”).
Certain terms are defined the first time they are used in this annual report. As used herein, all references to “GW” and “GWh” are to gigawatts and gigawatt hours, respectively, references to “kW” and “kWh” are to kilowatts and kilowatt hours, respectively, references to “MW” and “MWh” are to megawatts and megawatt hours, respectively, and references to “kV” are to kilovolts. These and other technical terms are defined in the “Technical Glossary” that begins on page 121.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report contains forward-looking statements. We may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in our annual report to shareholders, in our offering circulars and prospectuses, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by our officers, directors or employees. These statements are not historical facts and are based on management’s current view and estimates of future economic circumstances, industry conditions, company performance and financial results. The words “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “expects”, “plans” and similar expressions, as they relate to the company, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Statements regarding the declaration or payment of dividends, the implementation of principal operating and financing strategies and capital expenditure plans, the direction of future operations and the factors or trends affecting financial condition, liquidity or results of operations are examples of forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update publicly any of them in light of new information or future events.
Forward-looking statements involve only the current view of management and are subject to a number of inherent risks and uncertainties. There is no guarantee that the expected events, trends or results will actually occur. We caution you that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Such factors include, but are not limited to:
· Brazilian political and economic conditions;
· economic conditions in the State of Paraná;
· developments in other emerging market countries;
· our ability to obtain financing;
· lawsuits;
3
· technical and operational conditions related to the provision of electricity services;
· changes in, or failure to comply with, governmental regulations;
· competition;
· electricity shortages; and
· other factors discussed below under “Item 3.Key Information―Risk Factors”.
All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement, and you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement contained in this annual report.
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Not applicable.
4
Item 3. Key Information
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
This section contains selected consolidated financial data presented inreais and derived from our consolidated financial statements that were prepared in accordance with IFRS as of and for each of the five years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements (including the notes thereto), “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.
The selected financial data as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 have been derived from our audited financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS, and included in this annual report. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 have been derived from our audited financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS, which is not included in this annual report.
| As of and for the year ended December 31, |
| | | | | |
| (R$ million) |
Statement of income data: | | |
Operating revenues(1) | 13,102 | 14,946 | 13,996 | 9,288 | 8,659 |
Cost of sales and services provided | (10,234) | (11,799) | (11,289) | (7,159) | (6,629) |
Gross profit | 2,868 | 3,147 | 2,707 | 2,129 | 2,030 |
Operational expenses/income | (824) | (1,020) | (903) | (784) | (859) |
Profit before financial results and taxes | 2,044 | 2,127 | 1,804 | 1,345 | 1,171 |
Financial results | (566) | (329) | 54 | 161 | (198) |
Profit before income tax and social contribution | 1,478 | 1,798 | 1,858 | 1,506 | 973 |
Income tax and social contribution on profit | (530) | (532) | (522) | (405) | (246) |
Net income for the year | 948 | 1,266 | 1,336 | 1,101 | 727 |
Statement of financial position data: | | | | | |
Current assets | 4,403 | 6,933 | 5,218 | 4,680 | 4,682 |
Recoverable rate deficit (CRC)(2) | 1,523 | 1,383 | 1,344 | 1,381 | 1,384 |
Non-current assets | 8,302 | 4,952 | 8,261 | 7,224 | 6,297 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | 8,934 | 8,693 | 8,304 | 7,984 | 7,872 |
Total assets | 30,434 | 28,948 | 25,618 | 23,111 | 21,209 |
Loans and financing and debentures (current) | 2,602 | 1,233 | 1,299 | 1,015 | 274 |
Current liabilities | 5,656 | 4,789 | 4,055 | 3,348 | 2,833 |
Loans and financing and debentures (non-current) | 6,235 | 6,528 | 4,755 | 3,517 | 2,988 |
Non-current liabilities | 9,623 | 9,574 | 7,880 | 6,835 | 6,014 |
Equity | 15,155 | 14,585 | 13,683 | 12,929 | 12,362 |
Attributable to controlling shareholders | 14,864 | 14,246 | 13,331 | 12,651 | 12,097 |
Attributable to non-controlling interest | 291 | 339 | 352 | 277 | 265 |
Share capital | 7,910 | 6,910 | 6,910 | 6,910 | 6,910 |
| | | | | |
(1)The information contained herein reflects the restatement of the Income Statement of the years 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012. For more information about the restatement of our income statement, see “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARSENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, 2015 AND 2014 – Results of Operations for 2016 Compared with 2015” and – Results of Operations for 2015 Compared with 2014.
(2)Amounts due from the State of Paraná that were included in current assets totaled R$111.7 million in 2015, R$94.6 million in 2014, R$85.5 million in 2013 and R$75.9 million in 2012. Amounts due from the State of Paraná that were included in long-term assets totaled R$1,271.6 million in 2015, R$1,249.5 million in 2014, R$1,295.1 million in 2013 and R$1,308.4 million in 2012. In 2016 the entire amount due by the State of Paraná was included in long-term assets due to the ongoing negotiation of the Amendment to the CRC Agreement. See Note 8 to our audited consolidated financial statements. This item includes both current and non-current CRC Account receivables.
5
| | | | | |
| (R$, except for number of shares) |
Basic and diluted earnings per share: | | |
Common Shares | 3.35 | 4.16 | 4.21 | 3.74 | 2.44 |
Class A Preferred Shares | 3.68 | 4.58 | 4.63 | 4.49 | 4.17 |
Class B Preferred Shares | 3.68 | 4.57 | 4.63 | 4.12 | 2.69 |
Number of shares outstanding at year end (in thousands): | | | | | |
Common Shares | 145,031 | 145,031 | 145,031 | 145,031 | 145,031 |
Class A Preferred Shares | 329 | 380 | 380 | 381 | 381 |
Class B Preferred Shares | 128,295 | 128,244 | 128,244 | 128,243 | 128,243 |
Total | 273,655 | 273,655 | 273,655 | 273,655 | 273,655 |
Dividends per share at year end: | | | | | |
Common Shares | 0.99 | 1.14 | 2.17 | 1.96 | 0.94 |
Class A Preferred Shares | 2.89 | 2.53 | 2.53 | 2.53 | 2.53 |
Class B Preferred Shares | 1.08 | 1.25 | 2.39 | 2.15 | 1.03 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| (US$¹, except for number of shares) |
Basic and diluted earnings per share: | | |
Common Shares | 1.03 | 1.07 | 1.58 | 1.60 | 1.19 |
Class A Preferred Shares | 1.13 | 1.17 | 1.74 | 1.92 | 2.04 |
Class B Preferred Shares | 1.13 | 1.17 | 1.74 | 1.76 | 1.32 |
Number of shares outstanding at year end (in thousands): | | | | | |
Common Shares | 145,031 | 145,031 | 145,031 | 145,031 | 145,031 |
Class A Preferred Shares | 329 | 380 | 380 | 381 | 381 |
Class B Preferred Shares | 128,295 | 128,244 | 128,244 | 128,243 | 128,243 |
Total | 273,655 | 273,655 | 273,655 | 273,655 | 273,655 |
Dividends per share at year end: | | | | | |
Common Shares | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.45 |
Class A Preferred Shares | 0.89 | 0.65 | 0.95 | 1.08 | 1.24 |
Class B Preferred Shares | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.50 |
| | | | | |
(1)This information is presented in U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect as of the end of each year.
EXCHANGE RATES
The following table provides information on the selling exchange rate, expressed inreais per U.S. dollar (R$/US$), for the periods indicated.
| Exchange rate of Brazilian currency per US$1.00 |
| | | | |
2012 | 1.7024 | 2.1121 | 1.9588 | 2.0435 |
2013 | 1.9528 | 2.4457 | 2.1741 | 2.3426 |
2014 | 2.1974 | 2.7403 | 2.3599 | 2.6562 |
2015 | 2.5754 | 4.1949 | 3.3876 | 3.9048 |
2016 | 3.1193 | 4.1558 | 3.4500 | 3.2591 |
Source:Central Bank.
(1) Represents the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the relevant period.
6
| | |
October 2016 | 3.1193 | 3.2359 |
November 2016 | 3.2024 | 3.4446 |
December 2016 | 3.2591 | 3.4650 |
January 2017 | 3.1270 | 3.2729 |
February 2017 | 3.0510 | 3.1479 |
March 2017 | 3.0765 | 3.1735 |
April 2017 (until April 17, 2017) | 3.0923 | 3.1463 |
Source:Central Bank.
Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Company and our Operations
We are controlled by the State of Paraná, the policies and priorities of which directly affect our operations and may conflict with the interests of our investors.
We are controlled by the State of Paraná, which holds 58.6% of our outstanding common voting shares as of the date of this annual report, and whose interests may differ from other shareholders. As a major shareholder, the State of Paraná has the power to control all of our operations, including the power to elect a majority of the members of our Board of Directors and determine the outcome of any action requiring common shareholder approval, including transactions with related parties and corporate reorganizations.
Our operations have had and will continue to have an important impact on the commercial and industrial development of the State of Paraná. In the past, the State of Paraná has used, and may in the future use, its status as our controlling shareholder to decide whether we should engage in certain activities and make certain investments aimed, principally, to promote its public policies or socialobjectives and not necessarily to meet the objective of improving our business and/or operational results.
We are largely dependent upon the economy of the State of Paraná.
Our distribution market for the majority of our sales of electricity is located in the State of Paraná. Although a more competitive market involving possible sales to customers outside Paraná might develop in the future, our business depends and is expected to continue to depend to a very large extent on the economic conditions of Paraná. We cannot assure you that economic conditions in Paraná will be favorable to us in the future. The GDP (gross domestic product) of the State of Paraná decreased 2.4% in 2016, while Brazil’s GDP decreased 3.6% during the same period.
The recessive economic environment led to the reduction of energy consumption in the State of Paraná and in Brazil as whole, resulting in leftover energy in the interconnected system, consequently reducing (i) short-term prices and (ii) prices negotiated in the free market. At the same time, prices on the regulated market had risen steadily as a result of supply deficiencies on the part of contracted energy by distributors and high prices in the short-term market in previous years. As a result, consumers consistentely migrated into the free market and, therefore, the captive market of distributors suffered a reduction in 2016. A reduction in the captive market often leads to distributors selling excess contracted energy in the short-term market. This short-term market is subject to relevant price fluctuations. Whenever the price in the short-term market is lower than the price paid by the distributor in its long-term energy purchase agreement, the sale of energy in the short-term market is made at a loss, which may not be recovered in the future.
7
Deteriorating economic conditions in the State of Paraná and increasing energy prices may affect both the ability of our distribution costumers to pay amounts they owe us, as well as increase the amount of our commercial losses. An increase in our commercial losses or uncollected receivables could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The general economic performance of Brazil and of the State of Paraná have declined in 2016. Among other effects, this decline resulted in a reduction of 2.0% in energy consumption in the State of Paraná, as compared to 2015. For instance, in 2016, Copel Distribuição’s captive market (which is concentrated in the State of Paraná) decreased by 7.1%, reflecting the reduction in average income of the population in conjunction with a migration of clients to the Free Market, notably with respect to the industrial and commercial clients segment.
In addition, an increase in electricity prices, as well as poor economic performance in the State of Paraná, would affect the ability of some of our distributions customers to pay amounts owed to us. As of December 31, 2016, our past due receivables with Final Customers were approximately R$642.2 million in the aggregate, or 12.3% of our revenues from electricity sales to Final Customers for the year ended December 31, 2016, and our allowance for doubtful accounts related to these receivables was R$217.5 million. See Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
In addition, increased prices and a deteriorating economy could result in a greater number of our distribution customers connecting illegally to our distribution grid, which would decrease our revenue from electricity sales to Final Customers. Furthermore, energy we lose to these illegal connections is considered a commercial loss, and we may incur regulatory penalties if our commercial losses exceed certain established regulatory thresholds.
We are involved in several lawsuits that could have a material adverse effect on our business if their outcome is unfavorable to us.
We are the defendant in several legal proceedings, mainly relating to civil, administrative, labor and tax claims. The outcome of these proceedings is uncertain and, if determined against us, may result in obligations that could materially affect our results of operations. At December 31, 2016 our provisions for probable (more likely than not) and reasonably estimated losses were R$1,241.3 million. For additional information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”.
The construction and expansion of our transmission and power generation projects involve significant risks that may have an adverse effect on us.
In connection with the development of transmission and generation projects, we generally must obtain feasibility studies, governmental concessions or authorizations, permits and approvals, condemnation agreements, equipment supply agreements, engineering, procurement and construction contracts, sufficient equity and debt financing and site agreements, each of which involves the consent of third parties over which we have no control. In addition, project development is subject to environmental, engineering and construction risks that can lead to cost overruns, delays and other impediments to timely complete within a project’s budget. We cannot assure you that all required permits and approvals for our projects will be obtained, that we will be able to secure private sector partners for any of our projects, that we or any of our partners will be able to obtain adequate financing for our projects or that financing will be available on a non-recourse basis to us.
If we are unable to complete a project, whether at the initial development phase or after construction has commenced, or if the completion of a project is delayed, this may decrease our expected financial return from the project, which may lead to impairment. If we experience these or other problems relating to the expansion of our electricity transmission and power generation capacity, we may be exposed to increased costs, or we may fail to achieve the revenues we planned in connection with such expansion projects, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
8
We are subject to limitations regarding the amount and use of public sector financing, which could prevent us from obtaining financing and implanting our investment plan.
Our current budget anticipates capital expenditures for expansion, modernization, research, infrastructure and environmental projects of approximately R$2,034.9 million in 2017. As a state- controlled company, we are subject to certain National Monetary Council (Conselho Monetário Nacional - “CMN”) and Brazilian Central Bank (Banco Central do Brasil) limitations regarding the level of credit financial institutions may offer to public sector entities. As a result, we may have difficulty in obtaining financing from Brazilian and international financial institutions, which could create difficulties in the implementation of our investment plan. Additionally, some of our concession contracts have provisions that limit our permitted level of indebtedness, which could also affect our ability to obtain necessary financing. As a result of these regulations and provisions, our capacity to incur debt from certain sources is limited, which could negatively affect the implementation of our investment plan.
Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our data centers and operations and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In our ordinary course of business, we collect and store personal data of our customers in our data centers. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or loss of information could affect our operations and could result in legal claims or proceedings under Brazilian laws that protect the privacy of personal information (among others) and damage our reputation.
Disruptions in the operation of, or deterioration of the quality of, our services, or those of our subsidiaries, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The operation of complex electricity generation, transmission, generation and distribution systems and networks involves various risks, such as operational setbacks and unexpected interruptions, caused by accidents, breakdown or failure of equipment or processes, performance below expected levels of availability and efficiency of assets, or disasters (such as explosions, fires, natural phenomena, landslides, sabotage, vandalism, and similar events). In adition, operational decisions by authorities responsible for the electricity network, environment matters, operations and other issues affecting the electricity generation, transmission or distribution could have an adverse effect on the performance and profitability of the operations of our generation, transmission and distribution systems. If these issues occurred, our insurance may be insufficient to wholly account for the costs and losses that we may incur as a result of the damages caused to our assets, or due to outages.
Further, the revenues that our subsidiaries generate from establishing, operating and maintaining their facilities are related to the availability of equipment and assets, and to the quality of the services (continuity and service in accordance with levels demanded by regulations). Under the related concession contracts, we and our subsidiaries are subject to: (i) a reduction of the distributor revenue as a result of the reduction of the so-called “Portion B” allocation in the revenue calculation formula; (ii) a reduction of the Permitted Annual Revenue - APR (Receita Anual Permitida, or RAP in portuguese), for the transmission companies; (iii) the effects on the Availability Factor (Fator de Disponibilidade, or FID) and the offtake guarantee levels for the generation facilities; and (iv) the application of penalties and payment of compensation amounts, depending on the scope, severity and duration of non-availability of the services and equipment. Therefore, outages or stoppages in our generation, transmission and distribution facilities, or in substations or networks, may cause a material adverse effect on our business, financial situation and results of operations.
Risks Relating to the Brazilian Electricity Sector
We are uncertain as to the renewal of certain of our generation and transmission concessions.
Under Federal Law No. 12,783/2013, or the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, we may only renew our concessions that were in effect as of 1995 (and, in the case of generation facilities, generationconcession contracts entered into prior to 2003) for an additional 30-year period (or an additional 20-year period in the case of thermal plants), if we agree to amend the terms of the concession contract that is up for renewal to reflect certain new terms and conditions imposed by the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, which vary depending on whether the concession is for generation, transmission or distribution. If we do not agree to amend the concession contract to reflect these new conditions, the concession contract cannot be renewed and will be subject to a competitive bidding process upon its expiration, which we might not win. If we do not renew our generation and transmission concessions or if they are renewed under less favorable conditions, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
9
For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Concessions”.
Our operating results depend on prevailing hydrological conditions, which have been volatile recently. The impact of water shortages and resulting measures taken by the government to conserve energy may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are dependent on the prevailing hydrological conditions throughout Brazil and in the geographic region in which we operate. According to data from ANEEL, approximately 64.4% of Brazil’s installed capacity currently comes from hydroelectric generation facilities. Hydrological conditions in our region, and Brazil in general, are frequently subject to changes because of non-cyclical deviations in average rainfall.
From 2012 to 2015, Brazil experienced a period of similarly low rainfall. Poor hydrological conditions could lead the Brazilian government to institute a rationing program, which would require that our distribution business distribute less energy to Final Customers. Our distribution business would be adversely affected by a mandatory rationing program because its revenues are partially based on the volume of electricity it provides through our distribution grid to Final Customers. However, a mandatory rationing program involves a predictable decrease in energy, which would allow our distribution business to better estimate the amount of electricity it must purchase in order to sell to Final Customers. In addition, in the context of a formal rationing program, our distribution business would be fully compensated for the amount of energy that it purchased prior to the rationing period in excess of the amount of energy it is allowed to distribute under the rationing program, through automatic adjustment in its energy supply contracts.
In contrast, the Brazilian federal government in the past has reacted to poor hydrological conditions not by implementing a formal rationing program, but rather by seeking to reduce the consumption of electricity by Final Customers by other means, for example through general conservation campaigns to raise public awareness. The effect of these campaigns is less predictable, making it difficult for our distribution business to accurately estimate the volume of energy it needs to purchase for sale to Final Customers. Furthermore, in the absence of a formal rationing program, our distribution business is not compensated for the amount of energy it had previously contracted that now exceeds the newly-depressed Final Customer demand. Even after a conservation or rationing program ends, it may take several years for demand by Final Customers to fully recover, if at all. Deteriorating hydrological conditions may therefore have a material adverse effect on our distribution business.
In 2014 and 2015 the Brazilian Federal Government provided and facilitated various forms of assistance to distribution concessionaires experiencing cash flow difficulties arising from poor hydrological conditions, which had increased their energy acquisitions costs thereby resulting in mismatches of cash flow in the short-term. These forms of assistance included funding from the CDE Account, credit facilities contracted by the CCEE through the ACR Account and the new “Bandeira Tarifária” system. There is no assurance that the Federal Government will continue this assistance, or that the Federal Government will continue it on favorable terms or that it will be sufficient to cover our losses. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Energy Sector Regulatory Charges—CDE” and Item 4. Information on the Company—Energy Sector Regulatory Charges—Regulated Market Account – ACR Account”.
With respect to our generation business, in order to compensate for poor hydrological conditions and to maintain adequate water levels in reservoirs, the ONS may order the reduction of generation from hydroelectric power plants, which would be partially compensated by increased generation bythermoelectric plants. This mechanism for replacing hydroelectric production with thermoelectric production may not provide all of the energy we need to fulfill our obligations under existing energy supply contracts. To compensate for this deficit, our generation business can be required to purchase energy in the spot market, typically at higher prices, and we would not be able to pass on these increased costs. This mechanism impacts all generation companies in Brazil regardless of whether the geographical region in which a specific generator is located is experiencing low rainfall, and could have a material adverse effect on our generation business.
10
The Generation Scaling Factor, or GSF, is a factor used to adjust the guaranteed power output and represents the ratio between the total power produced by the hydroelectric plants that integrate the Energy Reallocation Mechanism (Mecanismo de Realocação de Energia, or MRE) and their guaranteed power outputs. This represents, on average, the amount of energy committed to energy generation contracts. If there are excessively low flow rates, the GSF equals to less than 1 and the hydroelectric generators that contracted their guaranteed power outputs will have to incur additional costs to acquire energy in the spot market to fulfill their obligations. As Brazil experienced an unusually severe drought between 2012 and 2015, its energy generation was below its expected levels.
In 2015, the financial effects of the GSF on the generation companies were discussed. There was a broad sector debate on the effects of and solutions for the GSF from an administrative, regulatory, business and legal perspective. Accordingly, Law No. 13,203, dated December 8, 2015, and ANEEL Resolution No. 684, dated December 11, 2015, established the criteria for the approval and the conditions for the renegotiation of the hydrological risks borne by certain hydroelectric generation companies. Pursuant to such new rules, the generators could share their hydrologic risks with consumers, through the payment of a “risk premium”. Copel Geração e Transmissão and Elejor filed a request for the renegotiation of the hydrological risk of HPPs Mauá, Foz do Areia, Santa Clara and Fundão, which was consented through ANEEL Decisions No. 84/2016 and 43/2016, respectively. For more information, see Note 14.1 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
In addition, in an extreme scenario, given the increased presence of thermal generation in the national electric matrix, if a shortage of natural gas were to occur, this would increase the general demand for hydroelectric energy in the market and therefore increase the risk that a rationing program would be instated.
Our operating revenues could be adversely affected if ANEEL makes decisions relating to our tariffs that are unfavorable to us.
The tariffs that we charge for sales of electricity to Captive Customers are determined pursuant to a concession agreement with the Brazilian government through ANEEL. ANEEL has substantial discretion to establish the tariff rates we charge our customers, which are determined pursuant to a concession agreement with ANEEL and in accordance with ANEEL’s regulatory decision-making authority.
Our distribution concession agreement and Brazilian law establish a price cap mechanism that permits three types of tariff adjustments: (i) annual readjustment (reajuste anual), (ii) periodic revision (revisão periódica), and (iii) extraordinary revision (revisão extraordinária). We are entitled to apply each year for the annual readjustment, which is designed to offset some effects of inflation on tariffs and pass through to customers certain changes in our cost structure that are beyond our control, such as the cost of electricity we purchase from certain sources and certain other regulatory charges, including charges for the use of transmission facilities. In addition, ANEEL carries out a periodic revision every five years that is aimed at identifying variations in our costs as well as setting a factor based on our operational efficiency that will be applied against the index of our ongoing annual tariff readjustments, the effect of which is to ensure that we share the benefits of improved economies of scale with our customers. At any time, we may also request an extraordinary revision of our tariffs in the case of a significant and unexpected event, including if such an event significantly alters our cost structure.
We cannot assure you that ANEEL will establish tariffs at rates that are favorable to us. To the extent that any of our requests for adjustments are not granted by ANEEL in a timely manner, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. In addition, ANEEL’s decisions relating to our tariffs may be contested by public authorities or by our customers. Administrative andjudicial decisions resulting from these challenges may modify ANEEL’s decisions in a manner that is unfavorable to us, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
11
We are subject to comprehensive regulation of our business, which fundamentally affects our financial performance.
Our business is subject to extensive regulation by various Brazilian legal and regulatory authorities, particularly the MME and ANEEL, which regulate and oversee various aspects of our business and establish our tariffs. Changes to the laws and regulations governing our operations, which have occurred in the past, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
For example, the Brazilian government has taken action to reduce tariffs in recent years. In order to substantially reduce the price paid by Final Customers for electricity, the Brazilian government enacted the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, which significantly changed the conditions under which concessionaires are able to renew concession contracts. Under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, most generation, transmission and distribution concessionaires may be renewed at the request of the concessionaire for an additional period of 30 years, but only if the concessionaire agrees to amend the terms of the concession contract to reflect certain new terms and conditions. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company - Concessions”.
If any further regulations or new laws are passed by the Brazilian government to lower electricity prices, these new laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. If we are required to conduct our business in a manner substantially different from our current operations as a result of regulatory changes, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Certain customers in our distribution concession area may cease to purchase energy from our distribution business.
Our distribution business generates a large portion of its revenues by selling energy that it purchases from generation companies. Large electricity customers within the geographic area of our concession that meet certain regulatory requirements may qualify as free customers (“Free Customers”). A Free Customer in our distribution concession area is entitled to purchase energy directly from generation companies rather than through our distribution business, in which case that Free Customer would cease to pay our distribution business for that energy that we previously supplied. Therefore, if the number of Free Customers within the geographic area of our concession increases and these Free Customers purchase energy from sources other than our generation business, our revenues and results of operations would be adversely affected. Furthermore, prices in the free market have recently been lower than those in the regulated market in the past years, which has been leading to an increase in the number of Free Customers within the geographic area of our concession.
In addition, ANEEL has recently improved regulations related to micro and mini distributed generation, which has been facilitating customers to purchase or to lease power generation equipment, specially solar photovoltaic modules, to produce energy for their own consumption. Therefore, if the number of customers with micro and mini distributed generation within the geographic area of our concession increases, our revenues and results of operations could also be adversely affected.
We generate a portion of our operating revenues from Free Customers who may seek other energy suppliers upon the expiration of their contracts with us.
As of December 31, 2016, we had 40 Free Customers, representing approximately 4.6% of our consolidated operating revenues and approximately 14.8% of the total volume of electricity we soldto Final Customers. From January 1, 2017 until March 31, 2017, we signed 94 additional agreements with Free Customers. Our contracts with Free Customers are typically for periods ranging between two years and five years.
Approximately 11.8% of the megawatt-hours sold under contracts to Free Customers are set to expire in 2017. In addition, as of December 31, 2016, we had 30 customers that were eligible to purchase energy as Free Customers. These customers represented approximately 2.2% of the total volume of electricity we sold in 2016, and approximately 2.8% of our operating revenues from energy sales for thatyear. There can be no assurance that Free Customers will enter into contracts or extend their current contracts to purchase energy from us.
12
Additionally, it is possible that our large industrial clients could be authorized by ANEEL to generate electric energy for their own consumption or sale to other parties, in which case they may obtain an authorization or concession for the generation of electric power in a given area, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
The regulatory framework under which we operate is subject to legal challenge.
The Brazilian government implemented fundamental changes in the regulation of the electric power industry under the 2004 legislation known as the New Industry Model Law (Lei do Novo Modelo do Setor Elétrico) and, recently, under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law. Challenges to the constitutionality of both laws are still pending before the Brazilian Supreme Court. If all or part of these laws were held to be unconstitutional, it would have uncertain consequences for the validity of existing regulation and the further development of the regulatory framework. The outcome of the legal proceedings is difficult to predict, but they could have an adverse impact on the entire energy sector, including our business and results of operations.
We may be forced to purchase or sell energy in the spot market at higher or lower prices if our forecasts for energy demand are not accurate, if there is a shortage of energy supply available in the regulated market, or if energy we contract is not delivered, and we may not be entitled to pass on any increased costs or incurred losses to our Final Customers in a timely manner, or at all.
Under the New Industry Model Law, electric energy distributors, including us, must contract to purchase, through public bids conducted by ANEEL, 100% of the forecasted electric energy demand for their respective distribution concession areas, up to seven years prior to the actual delivery of electric energy. We cannot guarantee that our forecasts for energy demand in our distribution concession area will be accurate, particularly given the recent conservation campaigns by the Brazilian government in response to deteriorating hydrological conditions. If our forecasts fall short of actual electricity demand, or if we are unable to purchase energy through the regulated market due to lack of energy supply in the market, or if a generation company fails to deliver energy that was previously contracted, we may be forced to make up for the shortfall by entering into short-term agreements to purchase electricity in the spot market where we may pay significantly more for energy without being able to pass on these increased costs to our Final Customers. In addition, if we underestimate our distribution energy needs, we may be subject to penalties imposed by the Electric Energy Trading Chamber (Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica, or “CCEE”). In addition, if our forecasts surpass actual demand by more than the allowed margin (105% of actual demand), including where demand is depressed due to government campaigns in response to poor hydrological conditions or when the number of Free Customers within the geographical area of our distribution concession increases beyond our expectations, we will not be able to pass on to our Final Customers the cost of the excess energy that we acquire.
In 2016, as a consequence of the country’s economic crisis and the increase in the number of Free Customers who were attracted by lower prices in the free market, several distribution companies were contracted above 105% of their actual demand. As a result, those companies incurred losses arising from the sale of the excess energy at lower prices in the spot market. ANEEL Normative Resolution No. 711, dated April 19, 2016, allowed distribution companies to renegotiate their energy purchase agreements in the regulated market to reduce the contracted amounts. Additionally, Federal Law No. 13,360, dated November 17, 2016, also permitted distribution companies to sell excess energy in the free market, but the effectiveness of this permitted action is still subject to further regulation by ANEEL. Despite these legal and regulatory measures to mitigate the losses of distribution companies, it is still uncertain if this excess of energy supply contracted by distributors will be resolved.
13
Our equipment, facilities and operations are subject to numerous environmental and health regulations, which may become more stringent in the future and may result in increased liabilities and increased capital expenditures.
Our distribution, transmission and generation activities are subject to comprehensive federal, state and local legislation, as well as supervision by Brazilian governmental agencies that are responsiblefor the implementation of environmental and health laws and policies. These agencies could take enforcement action against us for our failure to comply with their regulations and with requirements established for the maintenance of our environmental licenses. These actions could result in, among other things, the imposition of fines and revocation of licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. It is also possible that enhanced environmental and health regulations will force us to allocate capital towards compliance, and consequently, divert funds away from planned investments. Such a diversion could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
ANEEL could penalize us for failing to comply with the terms of our concessions or with applicable laws and regulations, and we may not recover the full value of our investment in the event that any of our concessions are terminated.
Our concessions are for terms of 20 to 35 years and may be extended if certain conditions are met. In the event that we fail to comply with any term of our concessions or applicable law or regulation, ANEEL may impose penalties on us, which may include warnings, the imposition of potentially substantial fines (in some instances, up to 2% of our revenues in the fiscal year immediately preceding the assessment) and restrictions on our operations, among others. ANEEL may also terminate our concessions prior to the expiration of their terms if we fail to comply with their provisions or if they determine that terminating our concessions would be in the public interest, in both cases through an expropriation proceeding. In particular, our renewed distribution concession agreement contains both quality and financial metrics that become more restrictive over time, and that we must meet to ensure that our distribution concession agreement is not terminated. If ANEEL terminates any of our concessions before its expiration, we would not be able to operate the segment(s) of our business that had been authorized by the concession. Furthermore, any compensation that we may receive from the federal government for the unamortized portion of our investment may not be sufficient for us to recover the full value of our investment. The early termination or non-renewal of any of our concessions or the imposition of severe fines or penalties by ANEEL could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Brazilian Electric Power Industry—Concessions”.
The construction, expansion and operation of our generation, transmission and distribution facilities and equipment involve significant risks that may cause loss of revenues or increase of expenses.
The construction, expansion and operation of our generation, transmission and distribution of electricity facilities and equipment involve many risks, including theinability to obtain required governmental permits and approvals,supply interruptions, strikes, climate and hydrological interference, unexpected environmental and engineering problems, increase in losses of electricity (including technical and commercial losses), the unavailability of adequate financing andthe unavailability of equipment.
In the event we experience these or other problems, we might not be able to generate, transmit and distribute electricity in favorable quantities and on favorable terms, which may adversely affect our financial condition and the results of our operations.
If we are unable to conclude our investment program on schedule, the operation and development of our business could be adversely affected.
In 2017, we plan to invest approximately R$570.3 million in our generation and transmission activities (including Baixo Iguaçu HPP, Colíder HPP and SPCs of transmission lines), R$638.6 million in wind farms, R$629.6 million in our distribution , R$164.3 million in our telecommunications activities and R$32.1 in others investments. Our ability to complete this investment program depends on multiple factors, including our ability to charge sufficient fees for our services and a variety of regulatory and operational contingencies. There is no assurance that we will have the financial resources to complete our proposed investment program, and our inability to do so may adversely affect the operation and development of our business leading to the imposition of fines levied by ANEEL as well as reduction in tariff levels.
14
We are strictly liable for any damages resulting from inadequate provision of electricity services and our insurance policies may not fully cover such damages.
We are strictly liable under Brazilian law for damages resulting from the inadequate provision of electricity distribution services. In addition, our distribution, transmission and generation utilities may be held liable for damages caused to others as a result of interruptions or disturbances arising from the Brazilian generation, transmission or distribution systems, whenever these interruptions or disturbances are not attributed to an identifiable member of the National Electric System Operator, theOperador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico (“ONS”). We cannot assure you that our insurance policies will fully cover damages resulting from inadequate rendering of electricity services, which may have an adverse effect on us.
Risks Relating to Brazil
The Brazilian Government has significant influence over the Brazilian economy. Brazilian economic and political conditions— and investor perception of these conditions— have a direct impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy which often changes monetary, credit, exchange and other policies to influence Brazil’s economy. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be adversely affected by changes in government policies, as well as other factors including, without limitation:
• fluctuations in the exchange rate;
• inflation;
• changes in interest rates;
• exchange control policies;
• fiscal policy and changes in tax laws;
• other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments which may affect Brazil or the international markets;
• controls on capital flows; and/or
• limits on foreign trade.
Changes in, or uncertainties regarding the implementation of, the policies above, might generate or contribute to uncertainties in the Brazilian economy. This would increase the volatility of the domestic capital market and the value of Brazilian securities traded abroad, and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Moreover, taking into account the Brazilian presidential system of government, and the considerable influence of the executive power, it is not possible to predict whether the present government or any successive governments will have an adverse effect on the Brazilian economy, and consequently on our business.
Fluctuations in the value of the Brazilian real against foreign currencies may result in uncertainty in the Brazilian economy and the Brazilian securities market, and they could have a material adverse effect on our net income and cash flow.
In recent years, the Brazilianrealhas fluctuated against foreign currencies, and the value of therealmay rise or decline substantially from current levels. In the course of 2015, the value of the Brazilianreal declined more than 48% against the U.S. Dollar, and on September 23, 2015 reached its lowest value since the introduction of the currency. In contrast, in the course of 2016, the Brazilian real appreciated16.5% against the U.S. Dollar, following a yearof intense volatily. As of December 31, 2016, thereal vs. U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.259 to US$1.00. Depreciation of therealincreases the cost of servicing our foreign currency-denominated debt and the cost of purchasing electricity from Itaipu-a hydroelectric facility that is one of our major suppliers and that adjusts electricity prices based in part on its U.S. dollar costs. Depreciation of therealalso creates additional inflationary pressure in Brazil that may negatively affect us. Depreciation generally curtails access to international capital markets and may prompt government intervention. It also reduces the U.S. dollar value of our dividends and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the market price of our common shares and the ADSs. For additional information about historical exchange rates, see “Exchange Rates”.
15
Inflation and governmental measures to curb inflation may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil, and could reduce our margins and the market price of the Class B Shares and ADSs.
Brazil has in the past experienced extremely high rates of inflation. More recently, Brazil’s annual rates of inflation, measured in accordance with the variation of theÍndice Geral de Preços -Disponibilidade Interna (“IGP-DI”) index, were0.1%for the three months ended March 31, 2017, 7.2% in 2016, 10.7% in 2015 and 3.7% in 2014.2016 was a year of intense volatility in the inflation rates and by year-end the rates started to converge to the government’s desired rate, but this scenario can change abruptly as a consequence of facts beyond our control.The Brazilian government has in the past taken measures to combat inflation,such as raising the basic Selic interest rate to elevated levels,and public speculation about possible future government actions has had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy. Although our concession contracts provide for annual readjustments based on inflation indexes, if Brazil experiences substantial inflation in the future, and the Brazilian government adopts inflation control policies similar to those adopted in the past, our costs may increase faster than our revenues, our operating and net margins may decrease and, if investor confidence lags, the price of the Class B Shares and ADSs may fall. Inflationary pressures may also curtail our ability to access foreign financial markets and could lead to further government intervention in the economy, including the introduction of government policies that may adversely affect the overall performance of the Brazilian economy.
Allegations of political corruption against the Brazilian federal government and the Brazilian legislative branch could create economic and political instability.
Currently, several former and current members of the Brazilian executive and legislative branches of government are being investigated as a result of allegations of unethical and illegal conduct identified by the Car Wash Operation (Operação Lava-Jato) being conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor and a number of politicians and businessmen have been arrested. The potential outcome of these investigations is unknown, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the investigated companies, in addition to adversely impacting general market perception of the Brazilian economy. Moreover, the conclusion of these proceedings or further allegations of illicit conduct could have additional adverse effects in the Brazilian economy. We cannot predict whether such allegations will lead to further instability or whether new allegations against key Brazilian government officials will arise in the future. In addition, we cannot predict the outcome of any such allegations and their effect on the Brazilian economy.
Changes in Brazilian tax policies may have an adverse effect on us.
The Brazilian government has in the past changed its tax policies in ways that affect the electricity sector, and it may do so again in the future. These changes include increases in the tax rates affecting energy companies and, occasionally, the collection of temporary taxes related to specific governmental purposes. If we are unable to adjust our tariffs accordingly, we may be adversely affected.
Negative developments in other national economies, especially those in developing countries, may negatively impact foreign investment in Brazil and the country’s economic growth.
International investors generally consider Brazil to be an emerging market. Historically, adverse developments in the economies of emerging markets have resulted in investors’ perception of greater risk from investments in such markets. Such perceptions regarding emerging market countries have significantly affected the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers. Furthermore, although economic conditions are different in each country, investors’ reactions to developments in one country can impactthe prices of securities in othercountries, including those in Brazil and this may diminish investors’ interest in securities of Brazilian issuers, including ours.
16
Risks Relating to the Class B Shares and ADSs
As a holder of ADSs you will generally not have voting rights at our shareholders’ meetings.
In accordance with Brazilian Corporate Law and our bylaws, holders of the Class B Shares, and thus of the ADSs, are not entitled to vote at our shareholders’ meetings except in limited circumstances. That means, among other things, that you, as a holder of the ADSs, are not entitled to vote on corporate transactions, including any proposed merger.
In addition, in the limited circumstances where the holders of Class B Shares are entitled to vote, holders may exercise voting rights with respect to the Class B Shares represented by ADSs only in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement relating to the ADSs. There are no provisions under Brazilian Corporate Law or under our bylaws that limit ADS holders’ ability to exercise their voting rights through the Depositary with respect to the underlying Class B Shares. However, the procedural steps involved create practical limitations on the ability of ADS holders to vote. For example, holders of our Class B Shares will be able to exercise their voting rights by either attending the meeting in person or voting by proxy. In accordance with the Deposit Agreement, we will provide the notice to the Depositary, which will in turn, as soon as practicable thereafter, mail to holders of ADSs the notice of such meeting and a statement as to the manner in which instructions may be given by holders. To exercise their voting rights, ADS holders must then instruct the Depositary how to vote their shares. Because of this extra procedural step involving the Depositary, the process for exercising voting rights will take longer for ADS holders than for direct holders of Class B Shares. ADSs for which the Depositary does not receive timely voting instructions will not be voted.
As a holder of ADSs you will have fewer and less well-defined shareholders’ rights in Brazil than in the United States and certain other jurisdictions.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our bylaws and Brazilian Corporate Law, which may differ from the legal principles that would apply if we were incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States or in certain other jurisdictions outside Brazil. Under Brazilian Corporate Law, you and the holders of the Class B Shares may have fewer and less well-defined rights to protect your interests in connection with actions taken by our Board of Directors or the holders of Common Shares than under the laws of the United States and certain other jurisdictions outside Brazil.
Although Brazilian law imposes restrictions on insider trading and price manipulation, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly supervised as the United States securities markets or markets in certain other jurisdictions outside Brazil. For instance, rules and policies against self-dealing and regarding the preservation of minority shareholder interests may be less developed and not as robustly enforced in Brazil as in the United States and certain other jurisdictions outside Brazil, which could potentially disadvantage you as a holder of the preferred shares and ADSs. In addition, shareholders in Brazilian companies must hold 5% of the outstanding share capital of a corporation in order to have standing to bring shareholders’ derivative suits, and shareholders in Brazilian companies ordinarily do not have standing to bring a class action suit.
You may be unable to exercise preemptive rights relating to the preferred shares.
You will not be able to exercise the preemptive rights relating to the Class B Shares underlying your ADSs unless a registration statement under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”) is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. Therefore, the Depositary will not offer rights to you as a holder of the ADSs unless the rights are either registered under provisions of the Securities Act or are subject to an exemption from the registration requirements. We are not obligated to file a registration statement with respect to the shares or other securities relating to these rights, and we cannot assure you that we will file any such registration statement. Accordingly, you may receive only the net proceeds from the sale of your preemptive rights by the Depositary or, if the preemptive rights cannot be sold, they will be allowed to lapse. If you are unable to participate in rights offerings, your holdings may also be diluted.
17
Holders of our ADSs may be unable to enforce judgments against our directors or officers.
All of our directors and officers named in this annual report reside in Brazil. Substantially all of our assets, as well as the assets of these persons, are located in Brazil. As a result, it may not be possible for holders of our ADSs to effect service of process upon us or our directors and officers within the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil, attach their assets, or to enforce against us or our directors and officers judgments obtained in the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil. Because judgments of U.S. courts for civil liabilities based upon the U.S. federal securities laws may only be enforced in Brazil if certain requirements are met, holders of ADSs may face greater difficulties in protecting their interest in actions against us or our directors and officers than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a state or other jurisdiction of the United States.
If you exchange your ADSs for Class B Shares, you risk increased taxes and the inability to remit foreign currency abroad.
Brazilian law requires that parties obtain a registration before the Central Bank in order to be allowed to remit foreign currencies, including U.S. dollars, abroad. For the ADSs, the Brazilian custodian for the Class B Shares has obtained the necessary certificate from the Central Bank for the payment of dividends or other cash distributions relating to the preferred shares or upon the disposition of the preferred shares. If you exchange your ADSs for the underlying Class B Shares, however, you must obtain your own certificate of registration or register in accordance with Central Bank and CVM rules in order to obtain and remit U.S. dollars abroad upon the disposition of the Class B Shares or distributions relating to the preferred shares. If you do not obtain a certificate of registration, you may not be able to remit U.S. dollars or other currencies abroad and may be subject to less favorable tax treatment on gains with respect to the preferred shares. Pursuant to Central Bank rules, obtaining this registration requires exchange transactions, which are subject to taxes in Brazil. For more information, see “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Other Brazilian Taxes”. If you attempt to obtain your own registration, you may incur expenses or suffer delays in the application process, which could delay your ability to receive dividends or distributions relating to the preferred shares or the return of your capital in a timely manner. The custodian’s registration before the Central Bank and any certificate of foreign capital registration you obtain may be affected by future legislative changes. Additional restrictions may be imposed in the future on the disposition of the underlying Class B Shares or the repatriation of the proceeds from disposition.
The Brazilian government may impose exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad which may adversely affect your ability to convert funds in reais into other currencies and to remit other currencies abroad.
In the past, the Brazilian government has imposed restrictions on the remittance to foreign investors of the proceeds of their investments in Brazil and the conversion of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies. The Brazilian government could again choose to impose this type of restriction if, among other things, there is deterioration in Brazilian foreign currency reserves or a shift in Brazil’s exchange rate policy. Reintroduction of these restrictions would hinder or prevent your ability to convert dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale of Class B Shares, as the case may be, fromreaisinto U.S. dollars or other currencies and to remit those funds abroad. We cannot assure you that the Brazilian government will not take similar measures in the future.
The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets may impair your ability to sell the Class B Shares underlying the ADSs.
The Brazilian securities markets are substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and more volatile than major securities markets in the United States and certain other jurisdictions outside Brazil, and are not as highly regulated or supervised as some of these other markets. The illiquidity and relatively small market capitalization of the Brazilian equity markets may cause the market price of securities of Brazilian companies, including our ADSs and Class B Shares, to fluctuate in both the domestic and international markets, and may substantially limit your ability to sell the Class B Shares underlying your ADSs at a price and time at which you wish to do so.
18
Item 4. Information on the Company
The Company
We engage in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity mainly in the Brazilian State of Paraná, pursuant to concessions granted by ANEEL, the Brazilian regulatory agency for the electricity sector. We also provide telecommunications and other services.
As of December 31, 2016, we generated electricity from 18 (eighteen) hydroelectric plants, 12 (twelve) wind plants and 1 (one) thermoelectric plant, for a total installed capacity of 5,025.7 MW of which, approximately 99.6% is derived from renewable sources. Including the installed capacity of generation companies in which we have an equity interest, our total installed capacity is 5,624.7 MW. Our electric power business is subject to comprehensive regulation by ANEEL.
We hold concessions to distribute electricity in 394 of the 399 municipalities in the State of Paraná and in the municipality of Porto União in the State of Santa Catarina. As of December 31, 2016, we owned and operated 2,522 km of transmission lines and 195,458.5 km of distribution lines, constituting one of the largest distribution networks in Brazil. Of the electricity volume we supplied in 2016 to our Final Customers:
· 36.6% was to industrial customers;
· 26.5% to residential customers;
· 19.4% to commercial customers; and
· 17.5% to rural and other customers.
Key elements of our business strategy include the following:
· expanding our power generation, transmission, distribution, and telecommunication systems;
· expanding our generation business’ sales to Free Customers both inside and outside the State of Paraná;
· seeking productivity improvements in the short term and sustained growth in the long term;
· striving to keep customers satisfied and our workforce motivated and prepared;
· seeking cost efficiency and innovation;
· achieving excellence in data, image, and voice transmission; and
· researching new technologies in the energy sector to expand power output with renewable and non-polluting sources.
Historical Background
We were formed in 1954 by the State of Paraná to engage in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, as part of a plan to bring the electric energy sector under state control. We acquired the principal private power companies located in the State of Paraná in the early 1970s. From 1970 to 1977, we significantly expanded our transmission and distribution grid and worked to increase the connectivity of our network to networks in other Brazilian states. In 1979, a change in state law permitted us to extend our generating activities to include production from sources other than hydroelectric and thermal power plants.
Currently, we are the largest energy company in the State of Paraná. We are a corporation incorporated and existing under the laws of Brazil, with the legal name Companhia Paranaense deEnergia – Copel. Our head offices are located at Rua Coronel Dulcídio, 800, CEP 80420-170 Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Our telephone number at the head office is +55 (41) 3322-3535 and our website is www.copel.com. The commercial name of each of our businesses is provided below.
19
.
Relationship with the State of Paraná
The State of Paraná owns 58.6% of our Common Shares and, consequently, has the ability to control the election of the majority of the members of our Board of Directors, the appointment of senior management and our direction, future operations and business strategy.
Corporate Structure
Prior to 2001, we operated as a single corporation engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity and in certain related activities. In compliance with the new regulatory regime, we transferred our operations to four wholly-owned subsidiaries (one each for generation, transmission, distribution and telecommunications) and our investments in other companies to a fifth wholly-owned subsidiary. This corporate restructuring was completed in July 2001.
In 2007, to comply with energy sector legislation, we divided the assets of our transmission business (“Copel Transmissão S.A.”) between our distribution business (“Copel Distribuição S.A.”) and our generation business, (“Copel Geração S.A.”). As a result, we changed the name of the latter entity to Copel Geração e Transmissão S.A.
In 2013, the Company was restructured in order to enhance the efficiency of our corporate structure and reduce our operating costs.
On January 28, 2016, our board of directors approved the amendment of the bylaws of Copel Participações S.A., in order to change its corporate purpose and denomination to Copel Comercialização S.A. The corporate purpose of this company is the sale of energy and rendering of related services. The restructuring that created Copel Comercialização S.A. is aimed at strengthening Copel’s positioning in the energy trading market and to improve its efficiency, allowing for greater agility and flexibility in the sale of energy.
Copel currently has five wholly-owned subsidiaries, which are Copel Geração e Transmissão S.A., Copel Distribuição S.A., Copel Telecomunicações, Copel Comercialização S.A. and Copel Renováveis S.A.
The current organization of the group is as described below All of our subsidiaries are incorporated in the Federative Republic of Brazil and subject to the Brazilian law.
20
21
BUSINESS
In the past, our generation and distribution businesses were integrated, and we sold most of the electricity we generated to the customers of our distribution business. This changed as a result of the implementation of the New Industry Model Law, enacted in 2004. Today, open auctions on the regulated market are still one of the primary channels by which our distribution business purchases energy to resell to Captive Customers and one of the channel by which our generation business generates revenues. Our generation business only sells energy to our distribution business through auctions in the regulated market. Moreover, our distribution business, like other certain Brazilian distribution companies, is also required to purchase energy from Itaipu, in an amount determined by the Brazilian government based on our proportionate share in the Brazilian electricity market. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Brazilian Electric Power Industry”.
The following table shows the total electricity we (i) generated through entities in which we hold a 100% shareholding stake and the 51% of energy generated by Mauá Hydroelectric Plant (correspoding to the interest we hold in this asset) and (ii) purchased in the last five years, broken down by the total amount of electricity generated and purchased by Copel Geração e Transmissão and Copel Renováveis, and the total amount of electricity purchased by Copel Distribuição.
| |
| | | | | |
| (GWh) | |
Copel Geração e Transmissão | | | | | |
Electricity generated(1) | 25,850 | 24,960 | 24,605 | 24,420 | 18,181 |
Electricity purchased from others | 141 | 401 | 612 | 2,505 | 3,981 |
Total electricity generated and purchased by Copel Geração e Transmissão | 25,991 | 25,361 | 25,217 | 26,925 | 22,162 |
Wind Farms(2) | | | | | |
Electricity generated(1) | 1,218 | 662 | - | - | - |
Electricity purchased from others | - | 317 | - | - | - |
Total electricity generated and purchased by Copel Renováveis | 1,218 | 979 | - | - | - |
Copel Distribuição | | | | | |
Electricity purchased from Itaipu(3) | 5,958 | 5,941 | 5,870 | 5,193 | 5,256 |
Electricity purchased from Auction – CCEAR – affiliates | 157 | 215 | 411 | 832 | 1,316 |
Electricity purchased from Auction – CCEAR – other | 13,387 | 14,419 | 16,281 | 14,715 | 17,457 |
Electricity purchased from others | 10,361 | 8,419 | 6,171 | 6,149 | 3,267 |
Total electricity purchased by Copel Distribuição | 29,863 | 28,994 | 28,733 | 26,889 | 27,296 |
Copel Comercialização | | | | | |
Electricity purchased from others | 59 | - | - | - | - |
Total electricity purchased by Copel Comercialização | 59 | - | - | - | - |
Total electricity generated and purchased by Copel Geração e Transmissão, Copel Distribuição, Copel Renováveis and Copel Comercialização | 57,131 | 55,334 | 53,950 | 53,814 | 49,458 |
| | | | | |
(1) Includes the total capacity generated during the periods indicated. The total capacity generated might not be fully delivered due to technical and non-technical losses.
(2) Electricity generated and purchased by our wind farm generation facilities which were under the supervision of Copel Renováveis up to November 2015. In December 2015, Copel Geração e Transmissão became responsible for the operation of these facilities.
(3)Distribution companies operating under concessions in the Midwest, South and Southeast regions of Brazil purchase electricity generated by Itaipu.
The following table shows the total electricity we sold to Free Customers, Captive Customers, distributors, energy traders and other utilities service providers in the south of Brazil through the Interconnected Transmission System in the last five years.
22
| |
| | | | | |
| | | (GWh) | | |
Copel Geração e Transmissão | | | | | |
Electricity delivered to Free Customers | 3,823 | 3,906 | 4,016 | 4,082 | 1,404 |
Electricity delivered to bilateral agreements | 7,682 | 6,675 | 7,392 | 5,233 | 1,367 |
Electricity delivered to Auction – CCEAR – affiliates | 157 | 215 | 411 | 832 | 1,316 |
Electricity delivered to Auction – CCEAR – other | 3,348 | 4,457 | 4,694 | 6,389 | 13,780 |
Electricity delivered to Spot Market – CCEE | 1,762 | 2,137 | 1,773 | 1,942 | 96 |
Electricity delivered to the Interconnected System(1) | 8,575 | 7,360 | 6,197 | 7,855 | 3,761 |
Total electricity delivered by Copel Geração e Transmissão | 25,347 | 24,750 | 24,483 | 26,332 | 21,723 |
Copel Renováveis(2) | | | | | |
Electricity delivered to Auction – CCEAR – other | 841 | 764 | - | - | - |
Electricity delivered to Auction – CER – other | 358 | 269 | - | - | - |
Total electricity delivered by Copel Renováveis | 1,199 | 1,033 | - | - | - |
Copel Distribuição | | | | | |
Electricity delivered to Captive Customers | 22,328 | 24,043 | 24,208 | 22,926 | 23,248 |
Electricity delivered to distributors in the State of Paraná | 614 | 699 | 699 | 620 | 635 |
Spot Market – CCEE | 3,607 | 910 | 368 | 43 | 36 |
Total electricity delivered by Copel Distribuição | 26,549 | 25,652 | 25,275 | 23,589 | 23,919 |
Copel Comercialização | | | | | |
Electricity delivered to Free Customers | 58 | - | - | - | - |
Electricity delivered to Spot Market – CCEE | 1 | - | - | - | - |
Total electricity delivered by Copel Comercialização | 59 | - | - | - | - |
Subtotal | 53,154 | 51,435 | 49,758 | 49,921 | 45,645 |
Losses by Copel Geração e Transmissão, Copel Distribuição and Copel Renováveis | 3,977 | 3,899 | 4,192 | 3,893 | 3,816 |
Total electricity delivered by Copel Geração e Transmissão,Copel Renováveis, Copel Distribuição and Copel Comercialização, including losses | 57,131 | 55,334 | 53,950 | 53,814 | 49,458 |
(1) Includes capacity made available but not fully delivered.
(2) Electricity sold by our wind farm generation facilities which were under the supervision of Copel Renováveis up to November 2015. In December 2015, Copel GeT became responsible for the operation of these facilities.
Generation
As of December 31, 2016, considering only the entities in which we hold a 100% shareholding stake and 51% of the energy generated by Mauá Hydroelectric Plant (correspoding to the interest we hold in this asset), we operated and sold energy through 18 (eighteen) hydroelectric plants, 12 (twelve) wind plants and 1 (one) thermoelectric plant, with a total installed capacity of 5,025.7 MW. Our assured energy totaled an average of 2,203.1 MW in 2016. Our generation varies yearly as a result of hydrological conditions and other factors. We generated 27,068 GWh in 2016, 25,960 GWh in 2015, 24,605 GWh in 2014, 24,420 GWh in 2013 and 18,181 GWh in 2012.
Considering the installed capacity of all the generation companies in which we have an interest (equity or otherwise), our total installed capacity as of December 31, 2016 was 5,624.7 MW.
The generation of electrical energy at our power plants is supervised, coordinated and operated by our Generation and Transmission Operation Center in the city of Curitiba. This operation center isresponsible for coordinating the operations related to approximately 99.9% of our total installed capacity, including some of the plants in which we hold only partial ownership interests.
23
Hydroelectric Generation Facilities
The following table sets forth certain information related to our main hydroelectric plants in operation during 2016:
| | | | |
| (MW) | (GWh/yr) | | |
Foz do Areia | 1,676.0 | 5,045.8 | 1980 | September, 2023 |
Segredo | 1,260.0 | 5,282.3 | 1992 | November, 2029 |
Salto Caxias | 1,240.0 | 5,299.8 | 1999 | May, 2030 |
Capivari Cachoeira(2) | 260.0 | 954.8 | 1970 | January, 2046 |
Mauá | 185.2(3) | 883.0 | 2012 | July, 2042 |
Others | 102.7 | 513.3 | N/A | N/A |
(1) Values used to determine volumes committed for sale.
(2)On January 5, 2016, Copel Geração e Tramissão executed a concession agreement with ANEEL so that it will continue to operate this plant under a operation and maintenance regime until 2046.
(3) Corresponds to 51% of the installed capacity of the plant (363 MW) as we operate this plant through a consortium.
Governador Bento Munhoz da Rocha Netto (“Foz do Areia” Plant).The Foz do Areia Hydroelectric Plant is located on the Iguaçu River, approximately 350 kilometers southwest of the city of Curitiba.
Governador Ney Aminthas de Barros Braga (“Segredo” Plant).The Segredo Hydroelectric Plant is located on the Iguaçu River, approximately 370 kilometers southwest of the city of Curitiba.
Governador José Richa (“Salto Caxias” Plant).The Salto Caxias Hydroelectric Power Plant is located on the Iguaçu River, approximately 600 kilometers southwest of the city of Curitiba.
Governador Pedro Viriato Parigot de Souza (“Capivari Cachoeira” Plant).The Capivari Cachoeira Hydroelectric Plant is the largest underground hydroelectric plant in Southern Brazil. The reservoir is located on the Capivari River, approximately 50 kilometers north of the city of Curitiba, and the power station is located on the Cachoeira River, approximately 15 kilometers from the reservoir.
Our concession agreement for the Capivari Cachoeira Plant expired on July 7, 2015. Although Copel Geração e Transmissão did not elect to renew the original concession pursuant the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, it participated in the new competitive bidding process and won. On January 5, 2016, Copel GeT executed a concession agreement with ANEEL, allowing it to continue to operate this plant under a operation and maintenance regime until January 5, 2046. We paid a total of R$574.8 million as signing bonus for this concession and we received an annual generation revenue (AGR) of R$144.1 million from January 5, 2016 to December 31, 2016. This AGR will be subject to an annual tariff adjustment on July 2017.
The Capivari Cachoeira Plant has 260 MW of installed capacity and assured energy of 954.8 GWh/year. 100% of the energy generated by this plant in 2016 was allocated in quotas to the regulated market (this number was reduced to 70% starting on January 1, 2017). Copel GeT will no longer bear the hydrological risk for the energy allocated in quotas under the MRE associated with the Capivari Cachoeira Plant.
Mauá.The Mauá Hydroelectric Plant is located on the Tibagi River, in the State of Paraná. It was constructed between 2008 and 2012 by Consórcio Energético Cruzeiro do Sul, in which we hold a51% interest and Eletrosul holds the remaining 49%. The facility is located approximately 250 kilometers from Curitiba, in the Municipality of Telêmaco Borba.
24
In addition to our generation facilities, we have ownership interests in several other hydroelectric generation companies.
Between 2004 and 2010, we were required by law to retain a majority of the voting shares of any company in which we obtained an ownership interest. Starting in 2010, it became possible for us to hold non-controlling interests in companies.
The following table sets forth information regarding the hydroelectric generation plants in which we had a partial equity interest as of December 31, 2016:
| | | | | |
| (MW) | (GWh/yr) | | (%) | |
Elejor Facility (Santa Clara and Fundão) | 246.5 | 1,229.0 | July, 2005 June, 2006 | 70.0 | May, 2037(2) December, 2032 |
Dona Francisca | 125.0 | 683.3 | February, 2001 | 23.0 | August, 2033 |
PCH Arturo Andreoli (Foz do Chopim) | 29.1 | 178.7 | October, 2001 | 35.8 | April, 2030 |
(1) The table above does not include HPP Lajeado since our equity interest is acconted for as a financial investment rather an operational asset.
(2)Elejor Facility adhered in January 14, 2015 the renegotiation of the hydrological risks, which caused the expiration date to be extended from 2036 to 2037.
Elejor Facility. The Elejor Facility consists of the Santa Clara and Fundão Hydroelectric Plants, both of which are located on the Jordão River in the State of Paraná. The aggregate total installed capacity of the units is 246.5 MW, which includes two smaller hydroelectric generation units installed in the same location. Elejor signed a concession agreement with a term of 35 years for the Santa Clara and Fundão plants in October 2001. As of December 31, 2016, we own 70.0% of the common shares of Elejor, and Paineira Participações owns the remaining 30.0%.
Elejor is required to make monthly payments to the federal government for the use of hydroelectric resources, which in 2001 totaled R$19.0 million. This amount is adjusted on an annual basis by the IGP-M Index.
We have a power purchase agreement with Elejor, which provides that we will purchase all of the energy produced by the Santa Clara and Fundão facilities at a set rate until April 2019, to be adjusted annually in accordance with the IGP-M Index. In 2016, Elejor’s net revenues and net profits were R$263.7 million and R$49.1 million, respectively, while in 2015 its net revenues and net profits were R$237.7 million and R$43.1 million, respectively.
Dona Francisca. We own 23.03% of the common shares of Dona Francisca Energética S.A. (“DFESA”). The other shareholders are Gerdau S.A. with a 51.82% interest, Celesc S.A. with a 23.03% interest and Desenvix S.A. with a 2.12% interest. DFESA Hydroelectric Power Plant is located on the Jacuí River in the State of Rio Grande do Sul. The plant began full operations in 2001. In April 2015, we signed a new ten year power purchase agreement with DFESA, valued at R$17.0 million annually, under which Copel Geração e Transmissão purchases 23.03% of DFESA’s assured energy (proportional to Copel’s stake).
In 2016, DFESA’s net revenues and net profits were R$70.2 million and R$34.3 million, respectively, while in 2015 its net revenues and loss were R$67.1 million and R$4.7 million, respectively.
PCH Arturo Andreoli (“Foz do Chopim” Hydroelectric Plant).The Foz do Chopim Hydroelectric Plant is located on the Chopim River in the State of Paraná. We own 35.77% of the common shares of Foz do Chopim Energética Ltda., the entity that owns the Foz do Chopim Hydroelectric Plant. Silea Participações Ltda. owns the remaining 64.23%. The operation andmaintenance of Foz do Chopim Hydroelectric Plant is performed by Copel Geração e Transmissão S.A. Energy supply agreements were executed at an average tariff of R$220.07/MWh. Foz do Chopim Energética Ltda. also has the authorization to operate Bela Vista SHP, a hydroelectric power plant which is located on the same river and has similar capacity. The process for obtaining the necessary installation environmental license is ongoing. In 2016, Foz do Chopim’s net revenues and net profits were R$40.8 million and R$29.9 million, respectively, while in 2015 its net revenues and net profits were R$47.6 million and R$33.5 million, respectively.
25
Wind Farm Generation Facilities
Since 2013 we have been expanding our energy generation capacity and diversifying our energy matrix through the development of renewable energy sources, like the construction and acquisition of wind farms in the State of Rio Grande do Norte.
The following table sets forth certain information relating to our wind farm plants in operation:
| | | | |
| (MW) | (Average MW) | | |
São Bento Energia | 94.0 | 46.3 | | |
Boa Vista | 14.0 | 6.3 | February, 2015 | April, 2046 |
Olho d'Água | 30.0 | 15.3 | February, 2015 | May, 2046 |
São Bento do Norte | 30.0 | 14.6 | February, 2015 | May, 2046 |
Farol | 20.0 | 10.1 | February, 2015 | April, 2046 |
Palmas | 2.5 | 0.5 | February, 1999 | September, 2029 |
Copel Brisa Potiguar Wind Complex | 183.6 | 92.6 | | |
Asa Branca I | 27.0 | 14.2 | August, 2015 | April, 2046 |
Asa Branca II | 27.0 | 14.3 | September, 2015 | May, 2046 |
Asa Branca III | 27.0 | 14.5 | September, 2015 | May, 2046 |
Eurus IV | 27.0 | 14.7 | August, 2015 | April, 2046 |
Santa Maria | 29.7 | 15.7 | April, 2015 | May, 2047 |
Santa Helena | 29.7 | 16.0 | May, 2015 | April, 2047 |
Ventos de Santo Uriel | 16.2 | 9.0 | May, 2015 | April, 2047 |
São Miguel do Gostoso I(1) | 108.0 | 57.1 | | |
Carnaúbas | 27.0 | 13.1 | June, 2015 | April, 2047 |
Reduto | 27.0 | 14.4 | June, 2015 | April, 2047 |
Santo Cristo | 27.0 | 15.3 | June, 2015 | April, 2047 |
São João | 27.0 | 14.3 | June, 2015 | March, 2047 |
(1) Copel has a 49% interest in São Miguel do Gostoso I. These wind farms are able to start up production, waiting for completion of the construction of transmission line.
São Bento Energia. On February 26, 2015, the four wind farms (Boa vista, Olho d’Água, São Bento do Norte and Farol) included in the São Bento Wind Farm Complex, located in the State of Rio Grande do Norte began operations. With an installed capacity of 94 MW and assured energy of 46.3 average-MW. In August 2010, 43.7 average-MW of energy generated at a weighted average price of R$134.40/MWh (annually adjusted by IPCA index) was sold to fifteen distribution concessionaires in ANEEL public auctions. The energy to be generated by these wind farms was sold through 20-year term contracts.
Copel Brisa Potiguar Wind Complex. On September 15, 2015, Copel concluded the installation of the Brisa Potiguar Wind Complex with an installed capacity 183.6 MW and assured energy of 92.6 average-MW. An assured energy of 52.2 average-MW (from Asa Branca I, Asa Branca II, Asa Branca IIIand Eurus IV) was committed under contract to electric power distributors in the alternative energy auction in August 2010 at a weighted average price of R$135.40/MWh (adjusted annually by IPCA inflation index) and an average of 40.7 MW (from WPPs Santa Helena, Santa Maria and Santo Uriel) was committed under contract in the 6th Reserve Energy Auction held in August 2011 at a weighted average price of R$101.98/MWh (annually adjusted by the IPCA inflation index). The energy to be generated was sold through 20-year term contracts with payments beginning in April 2015.
26
São Miguel do Gostoso I. In June 2014, we negotiated with Voltalia Energia do Brasil Ltda.(Voltalia) the acquisition of a 49% interest in the São Miguel do Gostoso I Wind Farm Complex, in the state of Rio Grande do Norte. The São Miguel do Gostoso wind farm complex has 108 MW of installed capacity and assured energy of 57.1 average-MW, and its energy was sold in the 4th Reserve Energy Auction at an average price of R$98.92/MWh through 20-year term contracts. In April 2015, we concluded the construction on this wind farm complex and ANEEL, in July and August 2015, classified it as ready for commercial operation. This wind farm complex will only start production after the necessary transmission lines are completed.
Thermoelectric Generation Facilities
The following table sets forth certain information about our thermoelectric plants in operation as of December 31, 2016:
| | | | | |
| (MW) | (GWh/yr) | | (%) | |
Araucária | 484.1 | 3,199.2(1) | September, 2002 | 80.0 | December, 2029 |
Figueira | 20.0 | 90.2 | April, 1963 | 100.0 | March, 2019 |
(1) The annual assured energy of thermal plants such as Araucária varies depending on the price of natural gas, according to criteria established by the MME.
Araucária. We have an 80% interest in UEG Araucária Ltda., which owns the Araucária Thermoelectric plant, a natural gas thermoelectric power plant, located in the state of Paraná. The Araucária Thermoelectric plant has 484.1 MW of installed capacity, does not have Availability Agreements currently in force and operates under a business model in which revenue depends on the plant’s operation. When produced, energy will be sold in the spot market as directed by the ONS.
Figueira. The Figueira Plant is located in the city of Figueira, in the northeast of the state of Paraná, on an area called “Rio do Peixe” valley (where the main coal basin of Paraná is located). Operation and maintanence of this facility is performed by “Companhia Carbonífera do Cambuí”, a company also responsible for supplying the coal consumed in the plant.
Expansion and Maintenance of Generating Capacity
We expect to spend R$808.6 million in 2017 to expand and maintain our generation capacity, including participation in new businesses, of which R$638.6 million will be invested in Complexo Eólico Cutia, R$24.1 million will be invested in the Colíder Hydroelectric Power Plant and R$20.5 million will be invested in the Baixo Iguaçu Hydroelectric Power Plant. The remaining amount will be spent on equipment maintenance, the modernization of the Figueira Thermal Power Plant, and other projects.
27
Hydroelectric Power Plant Projects
We have interests in several hydroelectric generation projects. The following table sets forth information regarding our major hydroelectric generation projects under construction.
| | Estimated assured energy(1) | | Beginning of operation (expected) | | |
| (MW) | (GWh/year) | (R$ million) | | (%) | |
Colíder HPP | 300.0 | 1,558 | 2,153 | December, 2017(2) | 100.0 | Concession granted |
Baixo Iguaçu HPP | 350.2 | 1,500 | 2,286 | November, 2018 | 30.0 | Concession granted |
��
(1) Values used to determine volumes committed for sale.
(2) The scheduled commencement of operations for the Colíder plant was delayed due to fortuitous events.
Colíder. In July 2010, we won an ANEEL bid for the 35-year concession to build and operate the Colíder Hydroelectric Power Plant on the Teles Pires River in the State of Mato Grosso. The Colíder plant will have an installed capacity of 300 MW and is located between the municipalities of Nova Canaã do Norte and Itaúba, the municipalities of Colíder and Cláudia will also be affected by the future reservoir. The construction of the plant began in 2011 and about 92% of the work was concluded on 2016. The reservoir is completed and the spillway is being completed. Equipment manufacturing and electromechanical assemblies are underway, with the generating unit 01 entering its final phase of assembly in 2017. In February 2016, we started the construction of a 64-km-long transmission line that will connect the plant to the “Cláudia” substation. As a result of fortuitous events, Copel GeT filed an application with ANEEL to excuse it from certain fines, penalties and charges incurred as a result of the delay in the beginning of operations of the plant, initially scheduled for December 30, 2014. Copel GeT has been honoring the commitments of the Colíder HPP (CCEAR), totaling 125 average MW, using leftover energy de-contracted in other generation facilities.
In October 2015, COPEL GeT obtained a preliminary injunction exempting it from fines, penalties, and other charges until final ruling by ANEEL. ANEEL originally rejected our request and, therefore, Copel GeT filed an administrative appeal with ANEEL, requesting reconsideration of the decision. On March 14, 2017 ANEEL finally denied Copel GeT’s request. We plan to challenge ANNEL’s administrative decision in the judicial courts, and we believe we have good grounds for such challenge.
Additionaly, considering the delay in the operation schedule, Copel GeT adhered to the Mechanism for Compensation of Surpluses and Deficits – MCSD, aimed at reducing the amount of energy contracted under CCEARs and, as a result, the Colíder HPP obtained a release of its obligations to deliver energy in 2017 under the contracted CCEARs (125 average-MW).
Regarding the 177.9 MW average physical guarantee of the plant, established by Ordinance MME No. 258, as of December 21, 2016, 125.0 average MW are committed under a 30-year contract, at a price of R$103.40/MWh, as of July 1, 2010 (annually adjusted by the variation of the IPCA rate). The remaining 52.9 average MW not sold under this agreement have not yet been contracted and are available for sale to large consumers in the free market.
Baixo Iguaçu. In June 2013, we acquired a 30% equity interest in the Baixo Iguaçu HPP through a consortium, with no premium payment. Baixo Iguaçu is the last large energy project planned for the main Iguaçu River and will be located around 30 km downstream from Governador José Richa HPP - the Salto Caxias Hydroelectric Power Plant, which is 100% owned by Copel. The Baixo Iguaçu facility will have an installed capacity of 350.2 MW and will be located in the municipalities of Capanema, Capitão Leonidas Marques, Planalto, Realeza and Nova Prata do Iguaçu. Of the facility’s assured energy of 171.3 average MW, 121 average MW are committed under a 30-year contract to distributors at a price of R$98.98/MWh, as of July 1, 2008 (adjusted annually in accordance with the IPCA inflation index), withsupply starting in September 2018. The remaining 50.3 average MW power not sold under this contract has yet to be contracted for and is still available for sale to large customers in the free market.
28
The construction of this facility began in 2013 and the the expected commercial operation in 2016 has changed because the environmental installation license has been suspended since June 2014 due to judicial disputes. The 4th Regional Federal Court determined the suspension of the construction, because the construction did not have the approval of the ICMBio, the environmental agency responsible for the Iguaçu National Park (Parque Nacional do Iguaçu) (the natural reserve is located 500 meters from the plant). On January 19, 2016, ANEEL (i) recognized that we were not responsible for this delay and delayed the construction deadline for additional 756 days, counted as from January 9, 2016 and (ii) recommended that the MME extend the deadline set forth for the beginning of the commercial operation of this facility, among others.
Baixo Iguaçu’s generating unit 1 is now scheduled to go into commercial operation in November 2018 and generating units 2 and 3 in December 2018 and January 2019, respectively.
Wind Farm Projects
Currently, we hold 100% of the equity interest of 13 (thirteen) wind power plants under construction, totaling 332 MW of installed capacity. All the energy to be produced from these wind farms was sold to distribution concessionaires through 20-year agreements. The following table sets forth information regarding our wind farm projects:
| | | | Beginning of operation (expected) | | |
| (MW) | (Average MW) | (R$ million) | | (%) | |
Cutia | 332.0 | 126.2 | 2,211.4 | - | 100.0 | |
Dreen Cutia | 25.2 | 9.6 | - | October, 2017 | - | January, 2042 |
Dreen Guajiru | 21.6 | 8.3 | - | October, 2017 | - | January, 2042 |
Esperança do Nordeste | 30.0 | 9.1 | - | October, 2017 | - | May, 2050 |
GE Jangada | 30.0 | 10.3 | - | October, 2017 | - | January, 2042 |
GE Maria Helena | 30.0 | 12.0 | - | October, 2017 | - | January, 2042 |
Paraíso dos Ventos do Nordeste | 30.0 | 10.6 | - | October, 2017 | - | May, 2050 |
Potiguar | 28.8 | 11.5 | - | October, 2017 | - | May, 2050 |
São Bento do Norte I | 24.2 | 9.7 | - | January, 2019 | - | August, 2050 |
São Bento do Norte II | 24.2 | 10.0 | - | January, 2019 | - | August, 2050 |
São Bento do Norte III | 22.0 | 9.6 | - | January, 2019 | - | August, 2050 |
São Miguel I | 22.0 | 8.7 | - | January, 2019 | - | August, 2050 |
São Miguel II | 22.0 | 8.4 | - | January, 2019 | - | August, 2050 |
São Miguel III | 22.0 | 8.4 | - | January, 2019 | - | August, 2050 |
(1) The installed capacity for our wind farm projects can be reduced during the implementation of the projects.
Cutia. On October 31, 2014, in the 6th Reserve Energy Auction, we sold 71.2 average MW from the Cutia Wind Farm Complex (Dreen Cutia, Dreen Guajiru, Esperança do Nordeste, GE Jangada, GE Maria Helena, Paraíso dos Ventos do Nordeste and Potiguar) for R$144.00/MWh (maximum price in the auction). These seven wind farms have a combined installed capacity of 195.6 MW, assured energy of 71.4 average MW and will be built in the cities of Pedra Grande and São Bento do Norte, in the State of Rio Grande do Norte.
Additionally, in the 20th New Energy Auction (A-5), held on November 28, 2014, we sold an additional 54.8 average MW of wind power energy (for R$136.97/MWh), through Availability Agreements with a 20-year supply term. With a total capacity of 136.4 MW and assured energy of 54.8 average MW, the newest six wind farms (São Bento do Norte I, São Bento do Norte II, São Bento doNorte III, São Miguel I, São Miguel II and São Miguel III) belonging to the Cutia Wind Farm Complex, will be built in São Bento do Norte, in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, in the same region as the other Wind Farm Complexes belonging to Copel.
29
Development Projects
We are involved in various initiatives to study the technical, economic and environmental feasibility of certain hydroelectric, wind, solar photovoltaic and thermoelectric generation projects. These proposed generation projects would have a total of 2.412,5 MW of installed capacity. The following table sets forth information regarding our proposed generation projects.
| Estimated Installed Capacity | | Our Ownership |
| (MW) | (GWh/yr) | |
TPP Araucária II | 500.0 | 4,029.6 | 100.0 |
TPP Litoral | 500.0 | 4,029.6 | 100.0 |
TPP Sul | 500.0 | 4,029.6 | 100.0 |
HPP São Jerônimo | 331.0 | 1,560.2 | 41.2 |
TPP Norte Pioneiro | 220.0 | 1,773.0 | 100.0 |
WPP Complexo Jandaia | 99.0 | 428.2 | 100.0 |
WPP Complexo Alto Oriente | 60.0 | 247.5 | 100.0 |
HPP Salto Grande | 47.0 | 235.8 | 36.0 |
SHP Dois Saltos | 30.0 | 135.7 | 30.0 |
SHP Foz do Curucaca | 29.5 | 137.3 | 19.0 |
SHP Bela Vista | 29.0 | 145.8 | 36.0 |
SHP Salto Alemã | 29.0 | 173.8 | 19.0 |
SHP Alto Chopim | 20.3 | 108.4 | 19.0 |
SHP Rancho Grande | 17.7 | 90.4 | 19.0 |
TOTAL | 2,412.5 | 17,124.9 | - |
In 2016, SEF - Saneamento e Engenharia Ferroviária Ltda decided to leave the Consortium Geração Luz Paranaense and its stake was distributed among the remaining consortium members. Therefore, the participation held by Copel in the projects (i)SHP Foz do Curucaca, (ii) SHP Salto Alemã, (iii) SHP Alto Chopim and (iv) SHP Rancho Grande;went from 15% to 19%. This increase did not require additional investments by COPEL. The abovementioned projects are currently in the process of requesting the revocation of their respective Authorization Grants before ANEEL. If approved, ANEEL will be able to run a new public bid and grant new Authotization Grants with respect to the projects.
In 2017, we plan to bid for concessions to construct and operate new hydroelectric power plants in power auctions in the regulated market for new generation projects. We are studying the feasibility of our participation in the hydroelectric, wind farms and solar photovoltaic projects planned to be listed in the auctions of 2017. We will also conduct studies of new hydroelectric power plants. For instance, we have partnered withBE - Empresa de Estudos Energéticos S.A.,Minas PCH S.A. andSilea Participações S.A. to develop studies in the lower region of the Chopim River, which may lead to the development of another four (4) hydroelectric projects.We are also conducting studies related to future government auctions for wind farms, solar photovoltaic and hydro power plants, small hydroelectric plants and thermoelectric power plants in which we may eventually participate. Other renewable energy projects under study or development include the use of municipal solid waste in power generation, and termosolar energy. For instance, in the end of 2016, Copel installed two solarimetric stations in the state of Rio Grande do Norte at the substations of the Brisa Potiguar wind farm. Solarimetric measurements are being conducted in 2017 and may support the development of photovoltaic solar plant projects in the area.
30
Transmission and Distribution
General
Electricity is transferred from power plants to customers through transmission and distribution systems. Transmission is the bulk transfer of electricity from generating facilities to the distribution system by means of the Interconnected Transmission System, in tension greater than or equal to 230 kV. Distribution is the transfer of electricity to Final Customers, in tension lesser or equal to 138 kV.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning our transmission and distribution grids on the dates presented.
| |
| | | | | |
Transmission lines (km): | | | | | |
230 kV and 500 kV | 2,514 | 2,398.8 | 2,197.3 | 2,160.9 | 2,010.7 |
138 kV | 7.2 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 7.2 |
69 kV(1) | - | - | - | 5.4 | 5.4 |
Distribution lines (km): | | | | | |
230 kV | 165.5 | 129.6 | 123.5 | 63.3 | 68.3 |
138 kV | 5,970.3 | 5,866.6 | 5,153.5 | 5,054.7 | 4,880.1 |
69 kV | 695.4 | 695.3 | 727.2 | 932.5 | 968.5 |
34.5 kV | 84,071.3 | 83,347.4 | 82,232.5 | 81,546.1 | 81,253.3 |
13.8 kV | 104,556.0 | 103,488.2 | 101,688.7 | 100,279.8 | 99,195.1 |
Transformer capacity (MVA): | | | | | |
Transmission and distribution substations (69 kV – 500 kV)(2) | 22,535.4 | 21,727.2 | 21,649.7 | 20,576.5 | 19,454.8 |
Generation (step up) substations | 6.335,0 | 6,312.4 | 6,312.4 | 5,006.8 | 5,006.8 |
Distribution substations (34.5 kV) | 1,488.5 | 1,517.2 | 1,545.0 | 1,480.2 | 1,504.8 |
Distribution transformers | 12,548.2 | 12,032.7 | 11,278.2 | 10,882.2 | 10,325.3 |
Total energy losses | 7.0% | 7.0% | 7.8% | 7.2% | 7.7% |
| | | | | |
(1) As approved by ANEEL in 2008, these 69 kV transmission lines held by Copel Distribuição were transferred to Copel Geração e Transmissão, since they were part of our transmission business segment.
(2) This figure includes transformers with primary tensions of 69 kV and 138 kV which belong to Copel Distribuição but are implemented in 230 kV and 525 kV substations, which belong to Copel Geração e Transmissão.
Transmission
Our transmission system consists of all our assets of 230 kV and greater and a small portion of our 69 kV and 138 kV assets, which are used to transmit the electricity we generate and the energy we receive from other sources. In addition to using our transmission lines to provide energy to customers in the State of Paraná, we also transmit energy through the Interconnected Transmission System. Two companies owned by the federal government, Eletrosul and Furnas, also maintain significant transmission systems in the State of Paraná. Furnas is responsible for the transmission of electricity from Itaipu, while Eletrosul’s transmission system links the states in the south of Brazil. Copel, like all other companies that own transmission facilities, is required to allow third party access to its transmission facilities in exchange for compensation at a level set by ANEEL.
Currently, we carry out the operation and maintenance of 2,574 km of transmission lines, 34 (thirty-four) substations in the State of Paraná and 2 (two) substation in the State of São Paulo. In addition, we have partnerships with other companies to operate 4,025 km of transmission lines and 9 (nine) substations through special purpose companies (SPCs).
31
The table below sets forth information regarding our transmission assets in operation:
| | | | Concession Expiration Date | | |
COPEL GeT | Main Transmission Concession(1) | 2,021 | 32 | December, 2042 | 100% | 192.1 |
COPEL GeT | TL Bateias - Jaguariaiva | 137 | - | August, 2031 | 100% | 19.1 |
COPEL GeT | TL Bateias - Pilarzinho | 32 | - | March, 2038 | 100% | 1.0 |
COPEL GeT | TL Foz - Cascavel Oeste | 116 | - | November, 2039 | 100% | 11.2 |
COPEL GeT | Cerquilho III Substation | - | 1 | October, 2040 | 100% | 4.5 |
COPEL GeT | TL Londrina – Figueira Foz do Chopim – Salto Osório | 102 | - | August, 2042 | 100% | 5.6 |
COPEL GeT | TL Assis – Paraguaçu Paulista Paraguaçu Paulista II Substation | 83 | 1 | February, 2043 | 100% | 7.7 |
COPEL GeT | Curitiba NorteSubstation TL Bateias – Curitiba Norte | 31 | 1 | January, 2044 | 100% | 8.4 |
COPEL GeT | Realeza Sul Substation TL Foz do Chopim- Realeza Sul | 52 | 1 | September, 2044 | 100% | 7.0 |
Subtotal Copel GeT | 2,574 | 36 | | | 256.6 |
Costa Oeste | LT Cascavel Oeste - Umuarama Sul SE Umuarama Sul | 152 | 1 | January, 2042 | 51%(2) | 6.5 |
Transmissora Sul Brasileira | Nova Sta Rita - Camaquã | 785 | 1 | May, 2042 | 20%(2) | 13.6 |
Caiuá Transmissora | TL Guaíra - Umuarama Sul TL Cascavel Norte - Cascavel Oeste Santa Quitéria Substation / Cascavel Norte Substation | 136 | 2 | May, 2042 | 49%(2) | 12.0 |
Integração Maranhense | LT Açailandia-Miranda II | 365 | - | May, 2042 | 49%(2) | 18.0 |
Marumbi | LT Curitiba – Curitiba Leste | 29 | 1 | May, 2042 | 80%(2) | 14.3 |
Matrinchã | TL Paranaíta - Ribeirãozinho | 1,005 | 3 | May, 2042 | 49%(2) | 94.2 |
Guaraciaba | TL Ribeirãozinho - Marimbondo | 600 | 1 | May, 2042 | 49%(2) | 48.7 |
Paranaíba | TL Barreiras II - Pirapora II | 953 | - | May, 2043 | 24.5%(2) | 32.1 |
Subtotal SPCs | | 4,025 | 9 | | | 239.4 |
Total | | 6,599 | 45 | | | 496.0 |
| | | | | | |
(1) Our main transmission concessions encompasses several transmission lines.
(2)Refers to the equity interest held by Copel Geração e Transmissão.
Expansion and Maintenance of Transmission Facilities
The construction of new transmission facilities of 230 kV and higher must be awarded in a bidding process or otherwise authorized by ANEEL. We are permitted by ANEEL to make minor improvements to some of the existing 230 kV and 500 kV facilities.
In June 2010, Copel won a public auction No. 001/2010 for the construction and operation of the transmission line Araraquara II - Taubaté which is a 356 km transmission line of 500 kV, located in the State of São Paulo. With a APR of R$27.4 million, the corresponding concession agreement was signed in May 2014 and we expect to complete the construction work of these facilities by August 2017.
32
In November 2013, SPC Mata de Santa Genebra Transmissora, a strategic agreement between Copel (50.1%) and Furnas (49.9%), won the right to build and operate 847 km of transmission lines and three substations in the States of Paraná and São Paulo. With a APR of R$109.9 million, the corresponding concession agreement was signed in May 2014, and these transmission lines are scheduled to become operational in November 2017.
In May 2014, Copel won an ANEEL public auction for the construction and operation of two lots of transmission lines, the first lot composed of 52 km of transmission lines and one substation in the State of Paraná and the second lot composed of 120 km of transmission lines in the States of Paraná and São Paulo. With a total APR of R$25.3 million, the corresponding concession agreements were signed in September 2014. The first one became operational in January 2017 and the second one is scheduled for September 2017.
In the same public auction, a strategic agreement between Copel (49%) and Elecnor (51%) won the right to construct and operate 328 km of transmission lines in the States of São Paulo and Minas Gerais. With an APR of R$45.9 million, the corresponding concession agreement was signed in September 2014, and these transmission lines are scheduled to become operational in March 2018.
In November 2015, Copel GeT won ANEEL’s public auction No. 005/2015 for the construction and operation of 230 km of transmission lines in the States of Paraná and Santa Catarina, and three substations in the State of Paraná, with a total capacity of 900 MVA. With an APR of R$104.8 million, the corresponding concession agreement was signed in April 2016, and these transmission lines are scheduled to become operational part in September 2019 and part in March 2021.
The table below summarizes information regarding our transmission assets currently under construction:
| | | | | | Beginning of Operation (expected) |
COPEL GeT | TL Araraquara II — Taubaté | SP | 334 | - | 100% | August, 2017 |
COPEL GeT | TL Assis – Londrina | SP / PR | 123 | - | 100% | September, 2017 |
COPEL GeT | TL Curitiba Leste-Blumenau TL BaixoIguaçu-Realeza | PR/SC | 189 | 3 | 100% | March, 2021 |
Subtotal Copel GeT | | 646 | 3 | | |
Mata de Santa Genebra | TL Araraquara II - Bateias | SP / PR | 885 | 1 | 50.1% | October, 2017 |
Cantareira | TL Estreito - Fernão Dias | SP / MG | 342 | - | 49% | March, 2018 |
Subtotal SPC | | | 1,227 | 1 | | |
| | | | | | |
Distribution
Our distribution system consists of a widespread network of overhead lines and substations with voltages up to 138 kV and a small portion of our 230 kV assets. Higher voltage electricity is supplied to bigger industrial and commercial customers and lower voltage electricity is supplied to residential, small industrial, and commercial customers in addition to other customers. As of December 31, 2016, we provided electricity in a geographic area encompassing approximately 98% of the State of Paraná and served 4.4 million customers.
Our distribution grid includes 195,458.5 km of distribution lines, 417,689 distribution transformers and 223 distribution substations of 34.5 kV, 35 substations of 69 kV and 106 substations of 138 kV. During 2016, 60,705 new customers were connected to our network, including customers connected through the rural and urban electrification programs. We are continuing to implement compactgrid design distribution lines in urban areas with large concentration of trees in the vicinity of the distribution grid.
33
We have 22 customers that are directly supplied with energy at a high voltage (69 kV and above) through connections to our distribution lines. These customers accounted for approximately 3.5% of the total volume of electricity sold by Copel Distribuição or 2.1% of our total volume of electricity sold in 2016.
We are also responsible for expanding the 138 kV and 69 kV distribution grid within our concession area to meet any future demand growth.
Performance of the Distribution System
Total losses are commonly divided into a technical and non-technical component. Technical losses are inherent to the transportation of electricity and consist mainly of power dissipation in the line network. Non-technical (or commercial) losses are caused by actions external to the power system (for instance, electricity theft). Since total losses are comprised of both technical and non-technical parcels, the latter is easily calculated as the difference between total losses and the estimated technical losses inherent to the system.
Total losses in our distribution system are segmented between (i) losses in the basic network (tension equal to or greater than 230kv), which are external to our distribution grid and have a technical cause, and (ii) losses in the distribution network (internal to our distribution grid), which are usually caused by both technical and non-technical reasons.
Losses in the basic network are calculated monthly by the CCEE as the diference between the total generation and the energy effectively delivered to the distribution networks. The total losses from our distribution grid are calculated as the difference between the energy allocated to the system and the energy supplied to the customers.
Our total energy distribution losses (including transmission system, technical and commercial losses) totaled 12.8% of the total energy amount available in 2016, being (i) 1.9% related to losses in the basic network, (ii) 6.3% of technical losses and (iii) 4.6% of non-technical losses.
Furthermore, ANEEL requires distributors to observe certain standards for “energy supply continuity”, namely (i) duration of outages per customer per year or DEC –Duração Equivalente de Interrupção por Unidade Consumidora and (ii) frequency of outages per customer per year or FEC –Frequência Equivalente de Interrupção por Unidade Consumidora. Information regarding the duration and frequency of outages for our customers is set forth in the following chart for the years indicated.
| |
Quality of supply indicator | | | | | |
DEC – Duration of outages per customer per year (in hours) | 10h49min | 13h40min | 14h01min | 11h37min | 10h15min |
FEC – Frequency of outages per customer per year (number of outages) | 7.23 | 8.33 | 9.08 | 8.06 | 7.84 |
We comply with the quality indicators defined by ANEEL for 2016, which penalizes power outages in excess of an average number of hours per customer, in each case calculated on an annual basis. These limits vary depending on the geographic region, and the average limit established by ANEEL for our distribution company was 13 hours and 37 minutes of outages per customer per year, and a total of 9.24 outages per customer per year. Failure to comply with these predetermined standards with a Final Customer results in a reduction of the amount we can charge such Final Customer in future periods.
In addition, quality target indicators are taken into consideration by ANEEL during distribution concession renewal proceedings, and also influence ANEEL’s calculation of our tariff adjustments. For more information, see “Distribution Concessions” and “Distribution Tariffs”.
34
Purchases
The following table contains information concerning volume, cost and average tariff for the main sources of the electricity we purchased in the last three years.
| | | |
Itaipu | | | |
Volume (GWh) | 5,958 | 5,941 | 5,870 |
Cost (R$ millions) | 1,089.9 | 1,567.8 | 756.1 |
Average tariff (R$/MWh) | 182.91 | 263.89 | 128.80 |
Angra | | | |
Volume (GWh) | 1,026 | 1,051 | 1,046 |
Cost (R$ millions) | 227.0 | 178.2 | 157.4 |
Average tariff (R$/MWh) | 221.25 | 169.55 | 150.48 |
CCGF | | | |
Volume (GWh) | 7,553 | 3,873 | 1,315 |
Cost (R$ millions) | 499.9 | 132.1 | 42.6 |
Average tariff (R$/MWh) | 66.19 | 34.11 | 32.40 |
Auctions in the regulated market | | | |
Volume (GWh) | 13,387 | 15,722 | 16,281 |
Cost (R$ millions)(1) | 2,493.6 | 3,502.2 | 3,1 |
Average tariff (R$/MWh) | 186.27 | 222.76 | 196.19 |
(1) These numbers do not include short-term energy purchased through the CCEE.
Itaipu
We purchased 5,958 GWh of electricity from Itaipu in 2016, which constituted 10.4% of our total available electricity in 2016 and 20.0% of Copel Distribuição’s total available electricity in 2016. Our purchases represented approximately 9.3% of Itaipu’s total production. Distribution companies operating under concessions in the midwest, south and southeast regions of Brazil are required by law to purchase Brazil’s portion of the energy generated by Itaipu in a proportion that correlates with the volume of electricity that they provide to customers. The rates at which these companies are required to purchase Itaipu’s energy are fixed to cover Itaipu’s operating expenses and payments of principal and interest on Itaipu’s U.S. dollar-denominated borrowings, as well as the cost of transmitting the power to their concession areas. These rates are denominated in U.S. dollars, and have been set for 2017 at US$28.73 per kW per month.
In 2016, we paid an average tariff of R$182.91/MWh for energy from Itaipu, compared to R$263.89/MWh in 2015. These figures do not include the transmission tariff that distribution companies must pay for the transmission of energy from Itaipu.
ANGRA
Because Eletronuclear renewed the generation concession of Angra under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, the energy generated by Angra is no longer sold in auctions in the regulated market. Rather, under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, this energy is sold to distributors in accordance with the quota system established by said law. For more information, see “item 4. The Brazilian Electric Power Industry”. As a result, Copel Distribuição was legally required to purchase 1,026 GWh from Angra in 2016, 1,051 GWh in 2015 and 1,046 GWh in 2014.
35
Assured Power Quota Contract – CCGF
Under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, certain generation concessionaires renewed their concession contracts, and therefore these concessionaires no longer sell the energy produced by these generation facilities at auctions in the regulated market. Rather, this energy is sold to distribution companies in accordance with the quota system established by the 2013 Concession Renewal Law. For more information, see “item 4. The Brazilian Electric Power Industry”. Copel Distribuição is obligated to purchase energy from these generation concessionaires that have renewed generation concessions under this quota system. Copel Distribução was legally required to purchase 7,553 GWh in CCGF contracts in 2016, 3,873 GWh in 2015 and 1,315 GWh in 2014.
Auctions in the Regulated Market
In 2016, we purchased 13,387 GWh of thermoelectric and hydroelectric energy through auctions in the regulated market. This energy represents 44.8% of the total electricity we purchased. For more information on the regulated market and the free market, see “The Brazilian Electric Power Industry—The New Industry Model Law”.
Sales to Final Customers
During 2016, we supplied approximately 97% of the energy distributed directly to Captive Customers in the State of Paraná. Our concession area includes 4.5 million customers located in the State of Paraná and in one municipality in the State of Santa Catarina, located south of the State of Paraná. We also sold energy to a total of 40 (forty) Free Customers, 4 (four) of which were located outside of our concession area. During 2016, the total power consumption of our Captive Customers and Free Customers was 26,209 GWh, a 6.2% decrease as compared to 27,949 GWh during 2015. The following table sets forth information regarding our volumes of energy sold to different categories of purchasers for the periods indicated.
| |
| | | | | |
| (GWh) |
Industrial customers | 9,585 | 10,823 | 10,841 | 10,675 | 8,799 |
Residential | 6,932 | 6,957 | 7,267 | 6,888 | 6,559 |
Commercial | 5,108 | 5,542 | 5,482 | 5,086 | 5,058 |
Rural | 2,180 | 2,256 | 2,252 | 2,081 | 2,025 |
Other(1) | 2,404 | 2,371 | 2,382 | 2,279 | 2,211 |
Total(2) | | | | | |
| | | | | |
(1) Includes public services such as street lighting, electricity supply for municipalities and other governmental agencies, as well as our own consumption.
(2) Total GWh does not include our energy losses.
The following table sets forth the number of our Final Customers in each category as of December 31, 2016.
| Number of Final Customers |
Industrial | 82,075 |
Residential | 3,597,105 |
Commercial | 382,127 |
Rural | 360,066 |
Other(1) | 57,454 |
Total | 4,478,827 |
(1) Includes street lighting, as well as electricity for municipalities and other governmental agencies, public services and own consumption.
36
Industrial and commercial customers accounted for approximately 34.3% and 20.4%, respectively, of our total net revenues from sales to Final Customers during 2016. In 2016, 26.2% of our total net revenues from energy sales were from sales to residential customers.
Tariffs
Retail Tariffs.We classify our customers in two groups (“Group A Customers” and “Group B Customers”), based on the voltage level at which electricity is supplied to them and on whether they are considered as industrial, commercial, residential or rural customers. Each customer falls within a certain tariff level defined by law and based on the customer’s classification, although some flexibility is available according to the nature of each customer’s demand. Under Brazilian regulation, low voltage customers such as residential customers (other than Low Income Residential Customers, as defined below) pay the highest tariff rates, followed by 13.8 kV and 34.5 kV voltage customers (usually commercial customers), and 69 kV and 138 kV voltage customers (usually industrial customers).
Group A Customers receive electricity at 2.3 kV or higher and the tariffs applied to them are based on the actual voltage level at which energy is supplied and the time of day the energy is supplied. Tariffs are comprised of two components: a “capacity charge” and an “energy charge”. The capacity charge, expressed inreaisper kW, is based on the higher of (i) contracted firm capacity and (ii) power capacity actually used. The energy charge, expressed inreaisper MWh, is based on the amount of electricity actually consumed as evidenced by our metering.
Group B Customers receive electricity at less than 2.3 kV, and the tariffs applied to them are comprised solely of an energy charge and are based on the classification of the customer.
ANEEL restates our tariffs annually, generally in June. For more information about the distribution tariff adjustments that have been made by ANEEL in recent years, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview—Rates and Prices”.
The following table sets forth the average tariffs for each category of final customer in effect in 2016, 2015 and 2014.
| | | |
| (R$/MWh) |
Industrial | 398.35 | 369.91 | 236.35 |
Residential | 459.35 | 434.82 | 292.99 |
Commercial | 439.47 | 407.17 | 269.00 |
Rural | 302.47 | 272.10 | 178.48 |
Other customers | 331.85 | 316.56 | 208.73 |
All Final Customers | 410.08 | 382.82 | 252.63 |
| | | |
Low Income Residential Customers. Under Brazilian law, we are required to provide discounted rates to certain low income residential customers (“Low Income ResidentialCustomers”). In December2016, we served about 298,706 low income residential customers. For servicing these customers, in 2016 we received an approximately R$73.5 million grant from the Brazilian Federal Government, which was approved by ANEEL.
The following table sets forth the current minimum discount rates approved by ANEEL for each category of Low Income Residential Customer.
| Discount from base tariff |
Up to 30 kWh per month | 65% |
From 31 to 100 kWh per month | 40% |
From 101 to 220 kWh per month | 10% |
Special Customers.A customer of our distribution business that consumes at least 500 kV (a “Special Customer”) may choose its energy supplier if that supplier derives its energy from alternativesources, such as small hydroelectric plants, wind plants or biomass plants. A Special Customer that chooses to purchase energy from a supplier other than Copel Geração e Transmissão continues to use our distribution grid and pay our distribution tariff. However, as an incentive for Special Customers to purchase from alternative sources, we are required to reduce the tariff paid by Special Customers by 50%. This discount is subsidized by the Brazilian federal government, and therefore does not impact the revenues of our distribution business.
37
Transmission Tariffs. A transmission concessionaire is entitled to annual revenues based on the transmission network it owns and operates. These revenues are annually readjusted according to criteria stipulated in the concession contract. We are directly a party to twelve transmission concession contracts, nine of which are in the operational stage and three of which are in construction. Not all of the transmission concession contracts employ the same revenue model. 7.4% of our transmission revenues are updated on an annual basis by the IGP-M and the other 92.6% are subject to the tariff review process.
Of all our transmission concessions in operational stage, our main transmission concession (which involves our main transmission facilities) accounted for about 74.9% of our gross transmission revenues in 2016.
The first periodic revision related to our main transmission concession scheduled for 2005 was only carried out in 2007, at which point ANEEL reduced the tariffs by 15.08%. This adjustment was applied retroactively to July 2005, and was passed on to our final customers until June 2009. In addition, in July 2010 pursuant to a second periodic revision of our principal concession, ANEEL granted provisional approval of a reduction in our transmission tariff by 22.88%, applied to the revenues of new installations in the Interconnected Transmission System, and applied retroactively from July 1, 2009 onward. In June 2011, ANEEL reviewed the figures of the second periodic revision and reduced the annual revenues by 19.94%. The remainder of our annual revenues was subject to adjustment by IGP-M or IPCA, as applicable.
By late 2012, Copel decided to anticipate the extension of its main transmission concession agreement (corresponding to 78% of the Company’s transmission lines then in operation) that would expire in 2015, pursuant to the new rules of the 2013 Concession Renewal Law. In December 2012, Copel executed the Third Addendum to the Concession Agreement 060/2001, extending this transmission concession agreement until December 31, 2042. In order to adjust these assets’ annual permitted revenue to the new rules of 2013 Concession Renewal Law, ANEEL reduced the transmission tariffs we charged by 61.9%.
In addition, we have 8 (eight) concession agreements for transmission lines and substations in operation, which correspond to an aggregate of 25.2% of our transmission revenues. The amount of revenues we are entitled to receive pursuant to one of these contracts is updated on an annual basis by the IGP-M and is not subject to the tariff review process. However, this amount will be reduced by 50% from the 16th year forward, as of 2018. Other seven agreements revenues are subject to the tariff review process and adjustments by the IPCA.
In 2013, our main transmission concession agreement was adjusted by the IPCA, and improvements to the system were approved by ANEEL (increase of 8.9%). Out of the other three transmission concession agreements that were operational in 2013, one was adjusted by the IPCA (increase of 6.5%), another by the IGP-M (increase of 6.2%), and the last one had a first tariff review (decrease of 8.9%). As a result, the annual permitted revenues for the 2013/2014 cycle for our transmission assets reflected an 8.4% net increase over our annual permitted revenues following the renewal of our main transmission concession in 2012.
In 2014, (i) two of our transmission concession agreements (including our main transmission concession agreement), were adjusted by the IPCA and improvements to the system were approved by ANEEL (average increase of 18.2%), (ii) one was adjusted by the IPCA (6.4%), (iii) another one was adjusted by the IGP-M (7.8%) and (iv) one became operational on July 28, 2014, adding R$4.2 million to our annual permitted revenues. As a result, the annual permitted revenues for the 2014/2015 cycle for our transmission assets reflects an increase of 19.9% over our annual permitted revenues for the 2013/2014 cycle.
38
In 2015, (i) two of our transmission concession agreements (including our main transmission concession agreement), were adjusted by the IPCA and improvements to the system were approved by ANEEL (average increase of 15.6%), (ii) three transmission concession agreements were adjusted by the IPCA (8.5%), (iii) one transmission concession agreement was adjusted by the IGP-M (4.1%), and (iv) two transmission agreement became operational on June 28, 2015 and January 25, 2016, adding R$12.1 million of annual permitted revenues. As a result, the annual permitted revenues for the 2015/2016 cycle for our transmission assets reflects an increase of 21.0% over our annual permitted revenues for the 2014/2015 cycle.
In 2016, (i) four of our transmission concession agreements (including our main transmission concession agreement), were adjusted by the IPCA and improvements to the system were approved by ANEEL (average increase of 9.5%), (ii) two transmission concession agreements were adjusted by the IPCA (9.3%), (iii) one transmission concession agreement was adjusted by the IGP-M (11.1%), and (iv) two transmission agreement became operational on May 16, 2016, and on January 15, 2017, adding R$15.4 million of annual permitted revenues. As a result, the annual permitted revenues for the 2016/2017 cycle for our transmission assets reflects an increase of 16.7% over our annual permitted revenues for the 2015/2016 cycle.
The table below shows our APR (R$ million) for the last four cycles of transmission lines over which we hold an 100% ownership:
| Transmission Line / Substation | | | | |
| | APR (R$ million) |
060/2001 | Main Transmission Concession(1) | 192.1 | 174.9 | 150.1 | 126.4 |
075/2001 | Bateias – Jaguariaiva | 19.1 | 17.2 | 16.5 | 15.3 |
006/2008 | Bateias – Pilarzinho | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
027/2009 | Foz do Iguaçu - Cascavel Oeste | 11.2 | 10.2 | 10.1 | 9.1 |
015/2010 | Cerquilho III | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.2 | - |
022/2012 | Foz do Chopim – Salto Osório | 5.6 | 5.1 | 1.1 | - |
002/2013 | Assis-Paraguaçu Paulista II SE Paraguaçu Paulista II | 7.7 | 7.0 | - | - |
005/2014 | Bateias – Curitiba Norte | 8.4 | - | - | - |
021/2014 | Foz do Chopim - Realeza(2) | 7.1 | - | - | - |
Total | | 256.7 | 219.9 | 182.9 | 151.6 |
| | | | | |
(1) Our main transmission concessions encompasses several transmission lines.
(2) This transmission line became operational in January 2017.
Other Businesses
Telecommunications
Copel Telecomunicações S.A. Pursuant to an authorization from the Brazilian National Telecommunication Agency,Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações(“ANATEL”), we provide telecommunication services within the States of Paraná and Santa Catarina. We have been offering these services since August 1998 through the use of our fiber optics network (totaling31,117 km of fiber optic cables by the end of 2016). In 2016, we served the 399 municipalities in the State of Paraná and two additional municipalities in the State of Santa Catarina and we have also been involved in an educational project aimed at providing public elementary and middle schools in the State of Paraná with broadband internet access.
We provide services to most of the major Brazilian telecommunication companies that operate in the State of Paraná. In total, we havecorporate clientsthat include supermarkets, universities, banks,internet service providers and television networksin addition toretail clients. We also provide a number of different telecommunication services to our subsidiaries.
39
Sercomtel.We own 45% of the stock of Sercomtel Telecomunicações S.A. (“Sercomtel”). Sercomtel hold concessions to provide fixed and mobile telephone services in the municipalities of Londrina and Tamarana in the State of Paraná and has obtained ANATEL’s authorization to provide telephone services to all other cities in the State of Paraná. Currently, Sercomtel operates under an authorization regime with its own network in 14 (fourteen) cities of the State of Paraná. Through a commercial agreement in force since March 2012, Sercomtel has been providing telephone services to another 66 (sixty-six) cities within the State of Paraná, including Curitiba. Sercomtel has concessions from ANATEL to provide cable television in São José in the State of Santa Catarina and Osasco in the State of São Paulo and radio-wave television transmission in Maringá in the State of Paraná.
As of December 31, 2016, Sercomtel, in its concessions area for fixed telephone services, had a total of 302,974 telephone lines installed, of which 254,878 were in operation. As of December 31, 2016, Sercomtel had an installed capacity of 100,000 terminals in its Global System for Mobile Communications GSM system, of which 71,460 were in operation. Sercomtel 2016 net revenues were R$162.0 million, registering a loss of R$20.4 million.
In addition to the telecommunications business, Sercomtel currently holds 100% of the capital stock of three subsidiaries: (i) Sercomtel Participações, a company whose purpose is to provide added value services, design, deploy and maintain internet service providers, operate a service center for users of telecommunications services, offer integrated IT solutions, among others (ii) Sercomtel Contact Center, a company whose purpose is to operate call centers, develop and implement CRM - Customer Relation Management projects, provide customer service and relationship services, among others, and (iii) Sercomtel Illumination, that provides maintenance services in public lighting in the city of Londrina, State of Paraná.
Water and Sewage
In January 2008, Copel bought a 30% stake in Dominó Holdings S.A. (“Dominó Holdings”) held by Sanedo Ltda., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Grupo Veola, for R$110.2 million.
In March 2014, we restructured our equity interest in Dominó Holdings and its subsidiary Companhia de Saneamento do Paraná– Sanepar (“Sanepar”), a public utility company that provides 345 urban and rural municipalities and approximately 10.8 million people in the State of Paraná, with water distribution services and 7.1 million with sewage services.
In December 2016, Dominó Holdings converted 41,000,000 of Sanepar’s voting shares into 41,000,000 preferred shares and tagged along Sanepar’s initial and secondary public offering at the pricing of R$9.50 per share. Dominó Holdings had its Sanepar’s voting shares reduced to 16,237,359 shares, or 9.7% voting capital and 3.2% of Sanepar’s total capital.
Currently we hold (i) indirectly through Copel Comercialização S.A. 49% of the remaining 16,237,359 Sanepar’s voting shares held by Dominó Holdings, representing then 1.6% of its voting capital, and (ii) directly 36,343,267 of Sanepar’s preferred shares, or 7.2% of its total capital. State of Paraná owns now 89.8% of Sanepar’s total voting capital and 29.9% of its total capital.
Dominó Holdings’ net income in 2016 was R$76.5 million.
40
Gas
Gas Distribution
We are engaged in the distribution of natural gas through Companhia Paranaense de Gás (“Compagas”), the company that holds the exclusive rights to supply piped gas in the State of Paraná. Compagas operates the gas distribution grid in the State of Paraná, which covered 800 kilometers in 2016, an increase of 2.5% compared to 780 kilometers covered in 2015. In 2016, Compagas’s net revenues were R$542.8 million, a decrease of 61%, compared to 2015, and its net income was R$5.0 million, a decrease of 78.5% compared to 2015. Compagas’ customers include thermoelectric plants, cogeneration plants, gas stations, other businesses and residences. Compagas is focusing its business strategy on increasing the volume of gas it distributes to customers by marketing the benefits of substituting oil and other fuels by gas as a mean of achieving greater energy efficiency. Compagas’ customer base increase 13%, to 36,189customers in 2016 from 31,790 in 2015.
Compagas registered a decrease of 11% in the average daily volume of natural gas distributed to Final Customers, to 1,259,138 cubic meters per day in 2016 (not including the volume of gas supplied to Araucária Thermoelectric plant) compared to 1,415,837 cubic meters per day in 2015. In addition, Compagas makes available its distribution grid to transport natural gas to Araucária TPP. In 2016, Petrobras S.A. delivered 15,4 million cubic meters of gas to Araucária TPP, compared to 1,316,754 million cubic meters in 2015.
As of December 31, 2016, we owned a controlling stake (51%) of the capital stock of Compagas and consolidated this equity interest in our financial statements. The minority shareholders of Compagas are Petrobras and Mitsui Gás, each of which owns 24.5% of the capital stock of Compagas.
Gas Exploration
In the 12th bidding round of ANP, held at the end of 2013, the consortium formed by us (30%), Bayar Participações (30%), Tucumann Engenharia (10%) and Petra Energia (30%), the latter acting as operating company, won the right to explore, research, develop and produce oil and natural gas in four blocks located in the central southern region of the State of Paraná, in a 11,327 km² area. The minimum investment in the first phase of the research is approximately R$78.1 million for a 4-year term. We and our partners have signed the concession contracts for 2 blocks in May 2014. However, the first phase of exploration for these two blocks was halted due to public civil action. The execution of the concession agreements for the remaining two blocks is also on hold as a result of said civil action.
Moreover, the Government of the State of Paraná recently enacted Law No. 18,947 (December 22, 2016) - suspending for ten years the exploration of shale gas through the drilling / fracking method. The suspension is intended to prevent environmental damage. As a result of the recent developments mentioned above, we are currently assessing the next steps with respect to this project.
CONCESSIONS
We operate under concessions granted by the Brazilian government for our generation, transmission and distribution businesses. Under Brazilian law, concessions are subject to competitive bidding processes at the end of their respective terms.
2013 Concession Renewal Law
Until 2013, the Brazilian rules governing generation concessions gave concessionaires the right to renew for an additional 20 years concession contracts that were entered into prior to 2003. For transmission and distribution concessions granted after 1995, concessionaires had the right to renew these contracts for an additional 30 years.
On September 11, 2012, the Brazilian federal government enacted the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, which had been preceded by a provisional measure (medida provisória), which significantly changed the conditions under which concessionaires are able to renew concession contracts. Under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, generation, transmission and distribution concessionaires may renew theconcessions that were in effect as of 1995 (and, in the case of generation facilities, generation concession contracts entered into prior to 2003) for an additional period of 30 years (or an additional 20-year period in the case thermal plants), provided that the concessionaire agrees to amend the concession contract to reflect a series of new conditions. Under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, concessionaires must decide 60 months before the end of each concession term whether to amend and renew a concession contract or to terminate each concession contract at the end of its respective term.
41
For concessionaires of existing generation facilities, the 2013 Concession Renewal Law changes the scope of these concession contracts that are renewed. Previously, a generation concessionaire had the right to sell the energy generated by the facilities subject to its concession for profit. In contrast, generation concessions renewed pursuant to the 2013 Concession Renewal Law will not grant concessionaires the right to sell the energy generated by these facilities. Instead, these concessions will only cover the operation and maintenance of the generation facilities. The energy generated by these facilities will be allocated by the Brazilian federal government in quotas to the regulated market, for purchase by distribution concessionaires. For new generation facilities, on the other hand, the concessionaire will still have the right to sell the energy produced by the generation facility.
In addition to changing the scope of generation concessions, the 2013 Concession Renewal Law establishes a new tariff regime that significantly affects the treatment of amounts to be invested by concessionaires to improve and maintain generation plants. To this effect, several regulations were issued by MME and ANEEL to regulate the compensation due to concessionaires as a result of their investments to improve and maintain generation plants.
The 2013 Concession Renewal Law affects transmission and distribution concessions differently. The principal change is that amounts invested related to modernization projects, structural reforms, equipment and contingencies will be subject to prior ANEEL approval. However, the 2013 Concession Renewal Law does not affect the manner in which distribution and transmission concessionaires may recover amounts invested in transmission infrastructure.
The 2013 Concession Renewal Law applies to all generation, transmission and distribution contracts that were in effect as of 1995 (and, in the case of generation concessions, entered into prior to 2003), regardless of whether a contract grants to the concessionaire the right to renew a concession on its original terms. For example, several of our concession contracts contain provisions allowing us to renew these concessions for a period of 20 years. Under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, in order to renew these contracts, we nonetheless would be required to accept the application of the conditions imposed by the 2013 Concession Renewal Law to the contract, and the concession contract would then be renewed for 30 years, rather than 20 years. If we choose to renew a concession contract that contains a renewal provision, we would be indemnified by the Brazilian government using funds from the RGR Fund (see Energy Sector Regulatory Charges) in an amount equal to the portion of our investments related to the concession that have not yet been amortized or depreciated, as calculated by ANEEL.
If a concessionaire decides not to accept the new tariff regime with respect to a concession contract and therefore decides not to renew the contract, the concession will terminate at the end of its original term, and the Brazilian government will conduct a new competitive bidding process for the concession. The original concessionaire may participate in the new competitive bidding process.
Generation Concessions
Out of the 18 generation plants we operated in 2016, 15 were operated pursuant to generation concession agreements that were still in effect. The other three generation plants (Capivari Cachoeira, Chopim I and Rio dos Patos, with respective installed capacity of 260 MW, 8.2 MW, 1.8 MW and 1.7 MW) were plants for which we had concession agreements that expired between 2014 and 2015 and for which we elected not to renew the respective concessions.
With respect to Capivari Cachoeira, although Copel GeT did not elect to renew the original concession for the Capivari Cachoeira HPP, it participated in the new competitive bidding process and won. On January 5, 2016, Copel GeT executed a concession agreement with ANEEL so that it will continue to operate this plant under an operation and maintenance regime until 2045. We paid a total amount of R$574.8 million as signing bonus for this concession agreement.
42
The Capivari Cachoeira Plant has 260 MW of installed capacity, assured average power of 109 MW and the revenue of its operation and maintenance for the period of July 2015 to June 2016 was R$130.9 million and for the period of July 2016 to June 2017 is R$126.1 million. 100% of the energy generated by this plant in 2016 was allocated in quotas to the regulated market, and reduced to to 70% on January 1, 2017. Copel GeT will no longer bear the hydrological risk for “assured energy” under the Energy Reallocation Mechanism (MRE) associated with the Capivari Cachoeira Plant.
With respect to Chopim I, it is worth mentioning that Law No. 13,097/15, enacted in January 2015, changed the installed capacity limit for Hydroelectricity Generation Centers – HGCs and SHPs. After this change, HGCs’ limit installed capacity increased from 1MW to 3MW. As a result, the Chopim I plant, which used to be classified as a SHP, is now a HGC, and no longer needs a concession, but rather a registration with ANEEL.
With respect to the Rio dos Patos facility, we are currently in charge of the facility on a temporary basis but the operation has been suspended since September 2014 as a result of a flood damage occured in July of that same year. In February 2017, ANEEL recommended to the MME the shut down of the facility without reverting the assets to the granting authority. We are currently awaiting MME´s decision with respect to this facility.
Under the rules in effect prior to the enactment of the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, 13 of our generation plants have had their concessions extended by Brazilian authorities since 1999, in each case for the 20-year term allowed by previous regulation. Under the previous law, these concessions were not eligible for a second extension. However, as described above, the 2013 Concession Renewal Law now allows extension of these concessions for an addition 30 years period if we choose to accept the application of the new tariff regime.
Concessions for generation projects, granted after 2003, such as the Mauá Hydroelectric Plant, are non-renewable, meaning that upon expiration of their 35-year term, the concession will be granted subject to a competitive bidding process. The 2013 Concession Renewal Law does not impact generation concessions granted after 2003.
The following tables sets forth information relating to the terms as well as the renewals of our main generation hydroelectric, thermoelectric and wind farm plants, whose original concessions are not yet subject to the 2013 Concession Renewal Law and all of which we hold a direct ownership interest in:
| | | | |
Foz do Areia | May, 1973 | May, 2003 | January, 2001 | September, 2023 |
Apucaraninha | October, 1975 | October, 2005 | April, 2003 | October, 2025 |
Guaricana | August, 1976 | August, 2006 | August, 2005 | August, 2026 |
Chaminé | August, 1976 | August, 2006 | August, 2005 | August, 2026 |
Segredo | November, 1979 | November, 2009 | September, 2009 | November, 2029 |
Derivação do Rio Jordão | November, 1979 | November, 2009 | September, 2009 | November, 2029 |
Salto Caxias | May, 1980 | May, 2010 | September, 2009 | May, 2030 |
Marumbi | March, 1956 | Under review by ANEEL | Under review by ANEEL | Under review by ANEEL |
Mauá(1) | June, 2007 | July, 2042 | Not extendable | July, 2042 |
Colíder(2) | January, 2011 | January, 2046 | Not extendable | January, 2046 |
Cavernoso II | February, 2011 | February, 2046 | Not extendable | February, 2046 |
Baixo Iguaçu(3) | August, 2012 | August, 2047 | Not extendable | September, 2049 |
(1) Mauá was constructed by Consórcio Energético Cruzeiro do Sul, of which Copel owns 51.0% and Eletrosul owns the remaining 49.0%
(2) Expected to begin operations in December, 2017.
(3) Under construction by Consórcio Empreendedor Baixo Iguaçu, of which Copel owns 30% and Geração Céu Azul the remaining 70%. It is expected to begin operations in November, 2018.
43
| | | | |
Figueira | March 1969 | March 1999 | June 1999 | March 2019 |
| | |
Asa Branca I | April, 2011 | April, 2046 |
Asa Branca II | May, 2011 | May, 2046 |
Asa Branca III | May, 2011 | May, 2046 |
Nova Eurus IV | April, 2011 | April, 2046 |
Santa Maria | May, 2012 | May, 2047 |
Santa Helena | April, 2012 | April, 2047 |
Ventos de Santo Uriel | April, 2012 | April, 2047 |
Boa Vista | April, 2011 | April, 2046 |
Farol | April, 2011 | April, 2046 |
Olho D'Água | June, 2011 | May, 2046 |
São Bento do Norte | May, 2011 | May, 2046 |
Cutia(1) | January, 2012 | January, 2042 |
Guariju(1) | January, 2012 | January, 2042 |
Jangada(1) | January, 2012 | January, 2042 |
Maria Helena(1) | January, 2012 | January, 2042 |
Palmas | September, 1999 | September, 2029 |
Potiguar(1) | May, 2015 | May, 2050 |
Esperança do Nordeste(1) | May, 2015 | May, 2050 |
Paraíso dos Ventos do Nordeste(1) | May, 2015 | May, 2050 |
São Bento do Norte I(1) | August, 2015 | August, 2050 |
São Bento do Norte II(1) | August, 2015 | August, 2050 |
São Bento do Norte III(1) | August, 2015 | August, 2050 |
São Miguel I(1) | August, 2015 | August, 2050 |
São Miguel II(1) | August, 2015 | August, 2050 |
São Miguel III(1) | August, 2015 | August, 2050 |
(1) Wind plants located at Copel’s Cutia wind farm complex under construction.
The following table sets forth information relating to the terms of our generation hydroelectric plant, whose concession agreement has been executed under the terms and conditions of the 2013 Concession Renewal Law:
| | | | |
Capivari Cachoeira (Gov Parigot de Souza) | January, 2015 | January, 2046 | Not subject to extension | January, 2046 |
44
The following table sets forth information relating to the terms of our generation hydroelectric plants which, once respective original concession period expires, will no longer be subject to a concession regime but rather to a registration proceeding with the ANEEL:
| | Concession expiration date | |
Chopim I(1) | March, 1964 | July, 2015 | Indefinitely |
São Jorge | December, 1974 | December, 2024 | Indefinitely |
Cavernoso | January, 1981 | January, 2031 | Indefinitely |
Melissa | May, 2002 | Indefinitely | - |
Pitangui | May, 2002 | Indefinitely | - |
Salto do Vau | May, 2002 | Indefinitely | - |
(1) Law 13,097/15, enacted in January 2015, changed the capacity limit for Hydroelectricity Generation Centers – HGCs and SHPs. After this change, the HGCs’ limit increased from 1MW to 3MW. As a result, the Chopim I plant, which used to be classified as a SHP, is now a HGC, and no longer needs a concession, just registration with ANEEL.
We also have ownership interests in eight other generation projects. The following table sets forth information relating to the terms of the concessions of the generation facilities in which we had such partial ownership interest as of December 31, 2016.
| | | | |
Dona Francisca hydroelectric power plant | Dona Francisca Energética SA ‒ DFESA | July, 1979 | August, 2033 | Possible |
Santa Clara and Fundão hydroelectric power plant | Centrais Elétricas do Rio Jordão S.A. - ELEJOR | October, 2001 | May, 2037 | Possible |
Araucária thermoelectric power plant | UEG Araucária Ltda. | December, 1999 | December, 2029 | Possible |
Arturo Andreoli hydroelectric power plant | Foz do Chopim Energética | April, 2000 | April, 2030 | Possible |
Carnaúbas(1) | São Miguel do Gostoso I | April, 2012 | April, 2047 | Not possible |
Reduto(1) | São Miguel do Gostoso I | April, 2012 | April, 2047 | Not possible |
Santo Cristo(1) | São Miguel do Gostoso I | April, 2012 | April, 2047 | Not possible |
São João(1) | São Miguel do Gostoso I | March, 2012 | March, 2047 | Not possible |
(1) Wind plants.
Transmission Concessions
Pursuant to the 2013 Concession Renewal Law and the terms of our transmission concessions, we have the right to request 30-year extensions of the concessions from ANEEL, provided that such request is delivered within 60 months prior to the expiration of the contract. Our principal transmission concession, from which we derived 74.9% of our transmission revenues in 2016, has been renewed pursuant to the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, and will therefore now expire in December 2042.
In addition, we have eight other concession contracts for transmission lines and substations that are currently in operation, and are set to expire in August 2031, March 2038, November 2039, October 2040, August 2042, February 2043, January 2044 and Setember 2044, respectively. We derived an aggregate of 25.2% of our transmission revenues from these eight contracts in 2016. In accordance with the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, each of these contracts can be extended for an additional 30-year period.
We intend to continue requesting extensions for all of our transmission concessions.
45
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the terms and extension terms of our main transmission concessions (all of which we hold a direct ownership interest):
| | | | Expected (or final) expiration date |
Main transmission concession | July, 2001 | July, 2015 | Extended | December, 2042 |
Bateias – Jaguariaíva | August, 2001 | August, 2031 | Possible | August, 2061 |
Bateias – Pilarzinho | March, 2008 | March, 2038 | Possible | March, 2068 |
Foz do Iguaçu – Cascavel Oeste | November, 2009 | November, 2039 | Possible | November, 2069 |
Substation Cerquilho III | October, 2010 | October, 2040 | Possible | October, 2070 |
Araraquara 2 – Taubaté(1) | October, 2010 | October, 2040 | Possible | October, 2070 |
Foz do Chopim - Salto Osorio | August, 2012 | August, 2042 | Possible | August, 2072 |
Assis – Paraguaçu Paulista II | February, 2013 | February, 2043 | Possible | February, 2073 |
Bateias – Curitiba Norte | January, 2014 | January, 2044 | Possible | January, 2074 |
Realeza Sul – Foz do Chopim | September, 2014 | September, 2044 | Possible | September, 2074 |
Assis - Londrina(1) | September, 2014 | September, 2044 | Possible | September, 2074 |
Curitiba Leste – Blumenau(1) | April, 2016 | April, 2046 | Possible | April, 2076 |
(1)Facility under construction.
We have ownership interests in ten other transmission projects, through special purpose companies. The following table sets forth information relating to the terms of the concessions of the transmission facilities in which we had such partial ownership interest as of December 31, 2016:
| Special Purpose Company (SPC) | | | | Expected (or final) expiration date |
Cascavel Oeste – Umuarama | Costa Oeste Transmissora de Energia S.A | January 2012 | January 2042 | Possible | January 2072 |
Nova Santa Rita -Camaquã 3 | Transmissora Sul Brasileira de Energia S.A | May 2012 | May 2042 | Possible | May 2072 |
Umuarama - Guaira | Caiuá Transmissora de Energia S.A | May 2012 | May 2042 | Possible | May 2072 |
Açailândia Miranda II | Integração Maranhense Transmissora de Energia S.A. | May, 2012 | May, 2042 | Possible | May, 2072 |
Curitiba - Curitiba Leste | Marumbi Transmissora de Energia S.A. | May, 2012 | May, 2042 | Possible | May, 2072 |
Paranaíta – Ribeirãozinho | Matrinchã Transmissora de Energia S.A. | May, 2012 | May, 2042 | Possible | May, 2072 |
Ribeirãozinho – Marimbondo II | Guaraciaba Transmissora de Energia S.A | May, 2012 | May, 2042 | Possible | May, 2072 |
Barreiras II – Pirapora II | Paranaíba Transmissora de Energia S.A | May, 2013 | May, 2043 | Possible | May, 2073 |
Itatiba – Bateias(1) | Mata de Santa Genebra Transmissora S.A | May, 2014 | May, 2044 | Possible | May, 2074 |
Estreito – Fernão Dias(1) | Cantareira Transmissora de Energia S.A. | September, 2014 | September, 2044 | Possible | September, 2074 |
(1) Facility under construction.
Distribution Concessions
We originally operated our distribution business pursuant to a concession contract that was signed on June 24, 1999 (retroactive to July 7, 1995), and was set to expire on July 7, 2015. Under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, we had the right to renew this concession for an additional 30-year period by accepting an amendment to the concession contract. Notwithstanding the changes introduced by the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, we concluded that the renewal of our distribution concession in accordance with the 2013 Concession Renewal Law would not materially affect our results of operations. Accordingly, after a careful evaluation of the conditions imposed by the Brazilian federal government for the extension of our distribution concession, we decided to request the renewal of this contract and our renewal request was approved by the MME on November 11, 2015. On December 9, 2015, we haveexecuted the fifth amendment to the public Electricity Distribution Service Concession Agreement No. 46/1999 of Copel Distribuição S.A.
46
This amendment imposes efficiency conditions to Copel Distribuição that are measured through two different metrics: quality of the service and economic-financial sustainability of the company. Failure to comply with any of these metrics (a) for two consecutive years within the first four years of this renewed concession or (b) in the fifth year of this concession, may, in each case, result in the termination of our distribution concession. From January 1, 2021 on, failure to comply with the quality indicator for three consecutive years or the economic-financial sustainability indicator for two consecutive years may also result in the termination of the distribution concession.
Additionally, non-compliance with quality indicator targets for two consecutive years or three times in five years may lead to restrictions in the payment of dividends and interest on equity to the controlling shareholder Copel Distribuição, while non-compliance with the economic-financial sustainability indicators may require capital contributions from Copel Distribuição controlling shareholders.
The table below presents the economic and financial and quality indicators established for the first five years after the execution of this amendment.
| Economic and Financial Indicators | |
| | | |
2016 | N/A | 13.61 | 9.24 |
2017 | EBITDA(3) ≥ 0 | 12.54 | 8.74 |
2018 | EBITDA (-) QRR(4)≥ 0 | 11.23 | 8.74 |
2019 | {Net Debt(5)/[EBITDA(3) (-) QRR(4)]}≤ 1/(0.8*SELIC6) | 10.12 | 7.74 |
2020 | {Net Debt(5)/[EBITDA(3) (-) QRR(4)]}≤ 1/(1.11*SELIC6) | 9.83 | 7.24 |
| | | |
(1)According to ANEEL’s Technical Note No. 0335/2015.
(2)DECi – Duration of outages per customer per year (in hours); and FECi – Frequency of outages per customer per year (number of outages).
(3) Earnings before interest, tax depreciation and amortization, as calculated according to ANEEL regulations.
(4)QRR: Regulatory Reintegration Quota or Regulatory Depreciation Expense. This is the value defined in the most recent Periodic Tariff Review (RTP), plus the General Market Price inflation index (IGP-M) between the month preceding the Periodic Tariff Review and the month preceding the twelve-month period of the economic and financial sustainability measurement.
(5)As calculated according to ANEEL regulations.
(6)Selic base rate: limited to 12.87% per year.
(7)We have complied with the quality indicators for 2016 both with respect to DECi (totaling 10.82 in 2016) and FECi (totaling 7.23 in 2016).
COMPETITION
We have concessions to distribute electricity in substantially all of the State of Paraná, and we do not face competition from the five utilities that have been granted concessions for the remainder of the state. As a result of legislation passed in 2004, however, other suppliers are able to offer electricity to our existing Free Customers at prices lower than those we currently charge. However, when a Captive Customer becomes a Free Customer, it is still required to pay to use our distribution grid. The reduction in net revenue of our distribution business is therefore compensated with a reduction in our costs for energy that we would otherwise acquire to sell to these customers.
Furthermore, under certain circumstances, Free Customers may be entitled to connect directly to the Interconnected Transmission System rather than our distribution grid. Unlike a Free Customer’s choice of another energy supplier, in which case that customer must still use our distribution grid and thus pay us the appropriate tariff, our distribution business ceases to collect tariffs from a customer that connects directly to the Interconnected Transmission System. The migration of customers from the distribution grid to the transmission network therefore results in the loss of revenues for our distribution business.
47
Distribution and transmission companies are required to permit the use of their lines and ancillary facilities for the distribution and transmission of electricity by other parties upon payment of a tariff.
Free Customers are limited to:
- existing customers (those connected to the distribution grid before July 1995) with demand of at least 3 MW and supplied at voltage levels equal to or greater than 69 kV;
- new customers (those connected to the distribution grid after July 1995) with demand of at least 3 MW at any voltage; and
- customers with demand of at least 500 kW that opt to be supplied energy by means of alternative sources, such as wind power projects, small hydroelectric power plants, biomass projects, solar plants and others.
As of December 31, 2016, we had 40 (forty) Free Customers, representing approximately 29.2% of our consolidated net operating revenue and approximately 25.5% of the total quantity of electricity sold by us. Through March 31, 2017, we signed 94 additional agreements with Free Customers. Our contracts with Free Customers are typically for periods of more than two and less than five years.
Approximately 11.8% of the megawatts sold under contracts to such customers are set to expire in 2017. In addition, as of December 31, 2016, we had 30 customers that were eligible to purchase energy as Free Customers. These customers represented approximately 2.2% of the total volume of electricity we sold in 2016, and approximately 2.8% of our total net operating revenue from energy sales for that year.
In the generation business, any producer may be granted a concession to build or manage thermoelectric and small hydroelectric generating facilities in the State of Paraná. Brazilian law provides for competitive bidding for generation concessions for hydroelectric facilities with capacity higher than 30 MW.
In the transmission business, Brazilian law provides for competitive bidding for transmission concessions for facilities with voltage of 230 kV or greater that will form part of the Interconnected Transmission System.
Brazilian law requires that all of our generation, transmission and distribution concessions be subject to a competitive bidding process upon their expiration. We may face significant competition from third parties in bidding for renewal of such concessions or for any new concessions. The loss of certain concessions could adversely affect our results of operations.
ENVIRONMENT
Our construction and operation activities for the generation, transmission and distribution of electric energy, distribution of natural gas and our telecommunications operations are subject to federal, state and municipal environmental regulations.
All of our activities follow our Sustainability Policy, which integrates corporate planning and sustainability management in order to optimize our financial, social and environmental performance. Moreover, in 2016 we have implemented the Climate Change Policy, which establishes guidelines for the mitigation of greenhouse gas emission and a framework for adapting our business to this new policy, evaluating risks and opportunities related to climate change. Additionally, we are also evaluating the impact of the carbon price in our business.
We request and renew our environmental licenses in accordance with the environmental regulation issued by applicable federal, state and municipal level authorities. We are in compliance with material environmental regulations and our more recent (post-1986) generation, transmission and distribution projects are in compliance with federal, state and municipal regulations.
48
During 2016, we implemented the necessary environmental and social plans for the development and operation of our local assets related to generation, transmission and distribution.
To reinforce our commitment to environmental, social and economic sustainability, we are signatories to the United Nations Global Compact, and we actively seek to implement the principles of the Global Compact in our daily activities and our corporate culture.
PLANT, PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Our principal properties consist of the generation and telecommunications facilities described in “Business—Generation and Purchasers of Energy”. Of the net book value of our total property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2016 (including construction in progress), generation facilities represented 67.5%, wind farms represented 17.0%, telecommunications represented 7.5%, Elejor represented 4.6%, and Araucária Thermoelectric plant represented 3.4%. We believe that our facilities generally are adequate for our present needs and suitable for their intended purposes.
THE EXPROPRIATION PROCESS
Although we receive concessions from the Brazilian government to construct hydroelectric facilities, we do not receive title to the land on which the facilities are to be located. In order for us to construct, the land must be expropriated. The land required for the implementation of a hydroelectric facility may only be expropriated pursuant to specific legislation. We generally negotiate with communities and individual owners occupying the land so as to resettle such communities in other areas and to compensate individual owners. Our policy of resettlement and compensation generally has resulted in the settlement of expropriation disputes. As of December 31, 2016, we estimated our liability related to the settlement of such disputes to be approximately R$63.6 million. This amount is in addition to amounts for land expropriation included in each of our hydroelectric facility budgets.
The Brazilian eLECTRIC Power Industry
General
In December 2015, the MME approved a ten-year expansion plan under which Brazil’s installed power generation capacity is projected to increase to 206.4 GW by 2024, of which 56.7% is projected to be hydroelectric, 14.3% is projected to be thermoelectric, 1.6% is projected to be nuclear and 27.4% is projected to be from alternative energy sources such as wind, biomass and small hydroelectric plants.
Approximately 34% of the installed power generating capacity of Brazil is currently owned by Eletrobras (including its wholly-owned subsidiary Eletronuclear and its 50% participation interest in Itaipu). Through its subsidiaries, Eletrobras is also responsible for 47% of the installed transmission capacity equal or above 230 kV within Brazil. In addition, some Brazilian states control entities involved in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity.They include Companhia Energética de São Paulo – CESP, Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais – CEMIG and us, among others.
Principal Regulatory Authorities
Ministry of Mines and Energy – MME
The MME is the primary regulator of the power industry and acts as the Brazilian governmental authority empowered with policymaking, regulatory and supervisory powers.
National Energy Policy Council – CNPE
The National Energy Policy Council (Conselho Nacional de Política Energética - “CNPE”), created in August 1997, provides advice to the President of the Republic of Brazil regarding the development and creation of a national energy policy. The CNPE is chaired by the MME and is composed of six ministers of the Federal Government and three members chosen by the President of Brazil. The CNPE was created in order to optimize the use of energy resources in Brazil and ensure the national supply of electricity.
49
National Electric Energy Agency – ANEEL
The Brazilian power industry is regulated by ANEEL, an independent federal regulatory agency. ANEEL’s primary responsibility is to regulate and supervise the power industry in accordance with the policies set forth by the MME and to respond to matters which are delegated to it by the Brazilian government and the MME. ANEEL’s current responsibilities include, among others, (i) administering concessions for electric energy generation, transmission and distribution, including the approval of electricity tariffs, (ii) enacting regulations for the electric energy industry, (iii) implementing and regulating the utilization of energy sources, including the use of hydroelectric power, (iv) promoting, monitoring and managing the public bidding process for new concessions, (v) settling administrative disputes among electricity sector entities and electricity purchasers, and (vi) defining the criteria and methodology for the determination of transmission and distribution tariffs.
National Electric System Operator – ONS
The ONS (Operador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico) is a non-profit, private entity comprised of electric utilities engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electric energy, in addition to other private participants such as importers, exporters and Free Customers. The primary role of the ONS is to coordinate and regulate the generation and transmission operations in the Interconnected Transmission System, subject to the ANEEL’s regulation and supervision. The objectives and principal responsibilities of the ONS include, among others, operational planning for the generation industry, organizing the use of the domestic Interconnected Transmission System and international interconnections, ensuring that industry participants have access to the transmission network in a non-discriminatory manner, assisting in the expansion of the electric energy system, proposing plans to the MME for extensions of the Interconnected Transmission System, and formulating regulations regarding the operation of the transmission system for ANEEL’s approval.
Electric Energy Trading Chamber – CCEE
The CCEE (Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica) is a non-profit, private entity subject to authorization, inspection and regulation by ANEEL. The CCEE is responsible for, among other things, (i) registering all energy purchase agreements in the regulated market,Contratos de Comercialização de Energia no Ambiente Regulado (“CCEAR”) and in the free market, and (ii) accounting for and clearing short-term transactions. The CCEE is composed of holders of concessions, permissions and authorizations in the electricity industry and Free Customers, and its board of directors is composed of four members appointed by these agents and one by the MME, who is the chairman of the board of directors.
Energy Sector Monitoring Committee – CMSE
The CMSE (Comitê de Monitoramento do Setor Elétrico) was created by the New Industry Model Law to monitor service conditions and to recommend preventative measures to ensure energy supply adequacy, including demand-side action and contracting of energy reserves.
Energy Research Company – EPE
In August 2004, the Brazilian government created the Energy Research Company (Empresa de Pesquisa Energética - “EPE”), a federal public company responsible for conducting strategic studies and research in energy sector, including the industries of electric power, petroleum, natural gas, coal and renewable energy sources. The studies and research conducted by the EPE subsidize the formulation of energy policy by the MME.
Eletrobras
Eletrobras serves as a holding company for the following federally-owned energy companies: Companhia Hidro Elétrica do São Francisco – CHESF, Furnas, Eletrosul, Centrais Elétricas do Norte do Brasil S.A. –Eletronorte, Companhia de Geração Térmica de Energia Elétrica – CGTEE and Eletrobras Termonuclear S.A.–Eletronuclear, Eletrobras Amazonas Energia, Eletrobras Distribuição Roraima, Eletrobras Distribuição Alagoas, Eletrobras Distribuição Piauí, Eletrobras Distribuição Rondônia, Eletrobras Distribuição Acre, Cepel and Itaipu Binacional.Eletrobras manages funds generated by someof the regulatory charges, as well as the commercialization of energy from Itaipu and from alternative energy sources, under the Proinfa Program.
50
Historical Background of Industry Legislation
The Brazilian constitution provides that the development, use and sale of electric energy may be undertaken directly by the Brazilian government or indirectly through the granting of concessions, permissions or authorizations. Historically, the Brazilian electric energy industry has been dominated by generation, transmission and distribution concessionaires controlled by the federal or state governments. Since 1995, the Brazilian government has taken a number of measures to reform the Brazilian electric energy industry.in general, these measures were aimed at increasing the role of private investment and eliminating foreign investment restrictions in order to increase overall competition and productivity in the industry.
The following is a summary of the principal developments in the regulatory and legal framework of the Brazilian electricity sector:
- In 1995, (i) the Brazilian constitution was amended to authorize foreign investment in power generation; (ii) the Concessions Law was enacted, requiring that all concessions for energy related services be granted through public bidding processes, providing for the creation of independent producers and Free Customers and granting electricity suppliers and Free Customers open access to all distribution and transmission systems; and (iii) a portion of the controlling interests held by Eletrobras and various Brazilian states in generation and distribution companies were sold to private investors.
- In 1998, the Power Industry Law was enacted, providing for, among other things, the creation of the ONS and the appointment of Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (“BNDES”), a development bank wholly owned by the Brazilian government, as the financing agent of the power industry, especially to support new generation projects.
- In 2001, Brazil faced a serious energy crisis that lasted through February 2002. During this period, the Brazilian government implemented an energy-rationing program in the most adversely affected regions, namely the southeast, central-west and northeast regions of Brazil. In April 2002, the Brazilian government for the first time implemented the extraordinary tariff readjustment to compensate the electricity suppliers for financial losses incurred as a result of the rationing period.
- In 2004, the Brazilian government enacted the New Industry Model Law, in an effort to further restructure the power industry with the ultimate goal of providing customers with a stable supply of electricity at reasonable prices.
- In 2012, the Brazilian government enacted two Provisional Measures that brought important changes to the Brazilian electricity regulatory framework: (i) Provisional Measure No. 577, dated as of August 29, 2012 (converted into Law No. 12,767 dated as of December 27, 2012); and (ii) Provisional Measure No. 579, dated September 11, 2012 (converted into the 2013 Concession Renewal Law). Provisional Measure No. 577 established the obligation of the granting authority to render electricity services in the event of termination of an electricity concession, as well as new rules related to the intervention by the granting authority in electricity concessions to ensure adequate performance of utility services. The 2013 Concession Renewal Law established new rules that changed concessionaires’ ability to renew concession contracts. Under this Law, generation and distribution concessionaires may renew their concession contracts that were in effect as of 1995 and transmission concessionaires may renew their concession contracts that were in effect prior to and as of 1995 for an additional period of 30 years, provided that the concessionaires agree to amend the concession contracts to reflect a new tariff regime to be established by ANEEL. See “Concessions”.
51
- In 2015, the Brazilian government enacted Provisional Measure No. 688, dated as of August 18, 2015, converted into Federal Law No. 13,203, dated as of December 8, 2015, to revise the allocation of the hydrological risks borne by hydroelectric power plants that share hydrological risks under Energy Reallocation Mechanism. See “Energy Reallocation Mechanism”. In 2014 and 2015, given poor hydrological conditions, the MRE participants generated less electricity than their assured energies, which was confirmed by a significant decrease of the Generating Scaling Factor (“GSF”), a measurement of the proportion between the electricity generated by the MRE participants and their respective assured energy. These generation deficits resulted in losses for the MRE participants given their exposure to hydrological risks. As a consequence, Federal Law No. 13,203 established an optional mechanism that allows each generation plant to transfer these risks to Final Customers upon payment of a risk premium to the Brazilian federal government, as well as certain temporary extensions of generation concessions to compensate for losses in 2015. We decided to opt in with respect to all of Copel GeT´s and Elejor´s eligible Energy Agreements under this new hydrological risk allocation mechanism, which represented approximately 16% of Copel GeT´s total assured energy.
- In 2016, the Brazilian government enacted Provisional Measure No. 735, dated as of June 22, 2016, converted into Federal Law No. 13,360, dated as of November 17, 2016, which changed several federal laws mainly to: (i) revise certain rules related to regulatory charges (CDE, CCC and RGE) and appoint CCEE as the new manager of such charges; (ii) facilitate the privatization of generation, transmission and distribution companies, (iii) change certain requirements of the generation concession and authorization regimes; (iv) change rules related to the MRE; (v) allow distribution companies to sell energy excess in the free market; (vi) extension of terms for commencement of the supply under energy auctions in the regulated market; and (vii) transfer back from MME to ANEEL the authority to decide about generation and transmission companies’ requests for extension of their facilities construction schedules.
Concessions
The companies or consortia that wish to build or operate facilities for generation, transmission or distribution of electricity in Brazil must participate in a competitive bidding process or must apply to the MME or to ANEEL for a concession, permission or authorization, as the case may be. Concessions grant rights to generate, transmit or distribute electricity in a specific concession area for a specified period. This period is 35 years for generation concessions granted after 2003, and 30 years for new transmission or distribution concessions. In accordance with the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, generation and distribution concessionaires may renew their concession contracts that were in effect as of 1995 and transmission concessionaires may renew their concession contracts that were in effect prior to and as of 1995 for an additional period of 30 years, provided that the concessionaires agree to amend the concession contracts to reflect certain new terms and conditions established by the law. The 2013 Concession Renewal Law does not impact generation concessions granted after 2003, as they are non-renewable.
The Concessions Law establishes, among others, the conditions that the concessionaire must comply with when providing electricity services, customers’ rights and the respective rights and obligations of the concessionaire and the granting authority. In addition to the Concessions Law, the concessionaire must also comply with the general regulations governing the electricity sector. The main provisions of the Concessions Law and related ANEEL regulations are summarized as follows:
Adequate service. The concessionaire must render adequate service to all customers in its concession and must maintain certain standards with respect to regularity, continuity, efficiency, safety and accessibility.
Use of land. The concessionaire may use public land or request that the granting authority expropriate necessary private land for the benefit of the concessionaire. In the latter case, the concessionaire must compensate the affected private landowners.
Strict liability. The concessionaire is strictly liable for all damages arising from the provision of its services.
52
Changes in controlling interest. The granting authority must approve any direct or indirect change in the concessionaire’s controlling interest.
Intervention by the granting authority. The granting authority may intervene in the concession, through ANEEL, to ensure the adequate performance of services, as well as the full compliance with applicable contractual and regulatory provisions. Once ANEEL determines the intervention, limited to one year, but extendable for additional two years, it must designate a third party to manage the concession. Within 30 days of the determination of the intervention, the granting authority’s representative must commence an administrative proceeding in which the concessionaire is entitled to contest the intervention. The administrative proceeding must be completed within 1 year. The shareholders of the concessionaire under intervention must submit to ANEEL, within 60 days of the determination of the intervention, a recovery and correction plan. If ANEEL approves such plan, the intervention is terminated. In the event ANEEL does not approve the plan, the granting authority may: (i) declare forfeiture of the concession; (ii) determine the spin-off, incorporation, merger or transformation of the concessionaire, incorporation of a subsidiary or assignment of quotas/shares to a third party; (iii) determine the change of control of the concessionaire; (iv) determine a capital increase of the concessionaire; or (v) determine the incorporation of an special purpose company.
Termination of the concession. The termination of the concession agreement may occur by means of expropriation and/or forfeiture. Expropriation is the early termination of a concession for reasons related to the public interest. An expropriation must be specifically approved by law or decree. Forfeiture must be declared by the granting authority after ANEEL or the MME has made a final administrative ruling that the concessionaire, among other things, (i) has failed to render adequate service or comply with an applicable law or regulation, (ii) no longer has the technical, financial or economic capacity to provide adequate service, or (iii) has not complied with penalties assessed by the granting authority. The concessionaire may contest any expropriation or forfeiture in the courts.
A concession agreement may also be terminated (i) through the mutual agreement of the parties, (ii) upon the bankruptcy or dissolution of the concessionaire, or (iii) following a final, non-appealable judicial decision rendered in a proceeding filed by the concessionaire.
When a concession agreement is terminated, all assets, rights and privileges that are materially related to the rendering of electricity services revert to the Brazilian government. Following termination, the concessionaire is entitled to indemnification for its investments in assets that have not been fully amortized or depreciated, after deduction of any amounts due by the concessionaire related to fines and damages.
Expiration. When the concession expires, all assets, rights and privileges that are materially related to the rendering of the electricity services revert to the Brazilian government. Following the expiration, the concessionaire is entitled to indemnification for its investments in assets that have not been fully amortized or depreciated as of the expiration.
Penalties.ANEEL regulations govern the imposition of sanctions against electricity sector participants and determine the appropriate penalties based on the nature and importance of the breach (including warnings, fines, temporary suspension from the right to participate in bidding procedures for new concessions, licenses or authorizations and forfeiture). For each infraction, the fines can be up to 2% of the revenue (net of value-added tax and services tax) of the concessionaire in the 12-month period preceding any penalty notice. Some infractions that may result in fines relate to the failure to request ANEEL’s approval to, among other things: (i) execute certain contracts between related parties; (ii) sell or assign the assets related to services rendered as well as impose any encumbrance (including any security, bond, guaranty, pledge and mortgage) on these or any other assets related to the concession or the revenues from electricity services; (iii) effect a change in the controlling interest of the holder of the authorization or concession; and (iv) make certain changes to the bylaws. In the case of contracts executed between related parties that are submitted for ANEEL’s approval, ANEEL may seek to impose restrictions on the terms and conditions of these contracts and, in extreme circumstances, require that the contract be rescinded.
53
The New Industry Model Law
In 2004, the New Industry Model Law introduced material changes to the regulation of the electric energy industry, in order to (i) provide incentives to private and public entities to build and maintain generation capacity, and (ii) ensure the supply of electricity in Brazil at low tariffs through a competitive electricity public bidding process. The key elements of the New Industry Model Law include:
- Ensuring the existence of two markets: (i) the regulated market, a more stable market in terms of supply of electricity, and (ii) a market specifically addressed to certain participants (i.e., Free Customers and energy-trading companies), called the free market, that permits a certain degree of competition vis-à-vis the regulated market.
- Restrictions on certain distribution activities, including requiring distributors to focus on their core business of distribution activities in order to promote more efficient and reliable services to Captive Customers.
- Elimination of self-dealing by providing an incentive for distributors to purchase electricity at the lowest available prices rather than buying electricity from related parties.
- Upholding contracts executed prior to the New Industry Model Law, in order to provide regulatory stability for transactions carried out before its enactment.
The New Industry Model Law excludes Eletrobras and its subsidiaries from the National Privatization Program, which was created by the Brazilian government in 1990 to promote the privatization process of state-owned companies. However, in 2016, the Federal government included six distribution companies controlled by Eletrobras in the Investment Partnerships Program (Programa de Parcerias de Investimentos – “PPI”) to be privatized in 2017.
For concessionaires of existing generation facilities, the 2013 Concession Renewal Law changes the nature of these concession contracts. Previously, a generation concessionaire had the right to sell the energy generated by the facilities subject to its concession for profit. In contrast, generation concessions for existing generation facilities (including those renewed pursuant to the 2013 Concession Renewal Law) will not grant concessionaires the right to sell the energy generated by these facilities. Instead, these concessions will only cover the operation and maintenance of the generation facilities. The energy generated by these facilities will be allocated by the Brazilian federal government in quotas to the regulated market, for purchase by distribution concessionaires. For new generation facilities, the concessionaire will have the right to sell the energy produced by the facility.
Parallel Environment for the Trading of Electric Energy
Under the New Industry Model Law, the purchase and sale of electricity is carried out in two different segments: (i) the regulated market, which contemplates that distribution companies will purchase by public auction all the electricity they need to supply their customers; and (ii) the free market, which provides for the purchase of electricity by non-regulated entities (such as the Free Customers and energy traders).
However, the electricity arising from the following is subject to specific rules different from the rules applicable to the regulated market and to the free market: (i) low capacity generation projects located near consumption points (such as certain co-generation plants and small hydroelectric power plants), (ii) plants qualified under the Proinfa Program, an initiative established by the Brazilian government to create incentives for the development of alternative energy sources, such as wind power projects, small hydroelectric power plants and biomass projects, (iii) Itaipu, (iv) Angra 1 and 2 as from 2013 and (v) those generation concession contracts extended or subject to a new bidding process in accordance with the 2013 Concession Renewal Law.
The electricity generated by Itaipu will continue to be sold by Eletrobras to the distribution concessionaires operating in the South, Southeast and Midwest portions of the Interconnected Transmission System. The rates at which Itaipu-generated electricity is traded are denominated in U.S. dollars and established pursuant to a treaty between Brazil and Paraguay. As a consequence, Itaipu rates rise or fall in accordance with the variation of thereal/U.S. dollarexchange rate. Changes in the price ofItaipu-generated electricity are, however, subject to the Parcel A cost recovery mechanism discussed below under “Distribution Tariffs”.
54
Beginning January 2013, the energy generated by nuclear plants Angra 1 and 2 started to be sold by Eletronuclear to the distribution concessionaires at a rate calculated by ANEEL.
The New Industry Model Law does not affect bilateral agreements entered into before 2004.
The Regulated Market
In the regulated market, distribution companies must purchase their expected electricity requirements for their Captive Customers in the regulated market through a public auction process. The auction process is administered by ANEEL, either directly or through the CCEE, under certain guidelines provided by the MME.
Electricity purchases are generally made through three types of bilateral agreements: (i) Energy Agreements (Contratos de Quantidade de Energia), (ii) Availability Agreements (Contratos de Disponibilidade de Energia) and (iii) allocation of energy quotas, as defined by the ANEEL. Under an Energy Agreement, a generator commits to supply a certain amount of electricity and assumes the risk that its electricity supply could be adversely affected by hydrological conditions and low reservoir levels, among other conditions, which could interrupt the supply of electricity. In such case, the generator would be required to purchase electricity elsewhere in order to comply with its supply commitments. Under an Availability Agreement, a generator commits to make a certain amount of capacity available to the regulated market. In such case, the generator’s revenue is guaranteed and the distributors must bear the risk of a supply shortage. With respect to the third method (introduced by the 2013 Concession Renewal Law), the plants that have had their concession renewed under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law lost the right to sell their energy, and from now on will only receive compensation under the energy quota system as a result of the operation and maintenance of such facilities. As a result, energy generated by these generation concessionaries are passed on to distributors at a lower cost through quotas that match the size of the markets served.
For the generation plants with expired concessions, which were then subject to a new competitive bidding process, the winner of the competitive bidding process was required, from January 1 to December 31, 2016, to allocate 100% of the energy generated by this plant in quotas to the regulated market, as provided by the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, falling to 70% after January 1, 2017, with the remaining 30% available for the generation concessionaire to sell in the market.
The estimate of demand from distributors is the principal factor in determining how much electricity the system as a whole will contract. A distributor is obligated to contract all of its projected electricity needs. A deviation in actual demand from projected demand could result in penalties to distributors. In the event of under-contracting, the distributor is penalized directly in an amount that increases as the difference between the amount of energy contracted for and actual demand increases. An under-contracting distributor must also pay to meet its demand by purchasing energy in the spot market.
In the event of over-contracting, where the contracted volume falls between 100% and 105% of actual demand, the distributor is not penalized and the additional costs are compensated through increases in its customers’ tariffs. Where the contracted volume is over 105% of actual demand, the distributor must sell energy in the spot market. If the contract price proves lower than the current spot market price, the distributor sells its excess energy for a profit. On the other hand, if the contract price is higher than the spot market price, the distributor sells its excess energy at a loss. ANEEL Normative Resolution No. 711, dated April 19, 2016, allowed distribution companies to renegotiate their energy purchase agreements in the regulated market to reduce the contracted amounts. Recently, Federal Law No. 13,360, dated November 17, 2016, also permitted the sale of excess energy by distribution companies in the free market, but effectiveness of such rule is still subject to further regulation by ANEEL.
With respect to the granting of new concessions, regulations provide that bids for new hydroelectric generation facilities may include, among other things, the minimum percentage of electricity to be supplied in auctions in the regulated market. Concessions for new generation projects,such as Mauá and Colíder in our case, are non-renewable, meaning that upon expiration, the concessionaire must again complete a competitive bidding process.
55
The Free Market
The free market covers transactions between generation concessionaires, Independent Power Producers – IPPs, self-generators, energy traders, exporters and importers of electric energy and Free Customers. The free market also covers bilateral agreements between generators and distributors signed under the old model, until they expire. Upon expiration, such contracts must be executed under the New Industry Model Law guidelines.
A consumer that is eligible to choose its supplier may only do so upon the expiration of its contract with the local distributor and with advance notice or, in the case of a contract with no expiration date, upon 15 days’ notice in advance of the date on which the distributor must provide MME with its estimated electricity demand for the year. In the latter case, the contract will only be terminated in the following year. Once a consumer has chosen the free market, it may only return to the regulated system with five years prior notice to its regional distributor, provided that the distributor may reduce such term at its discretion. This extended period of notice seeks to assure that, if necessary, the distributor can buy additional energy in auctions on the regulated market without imposing extra costs on the captive market.
Private generators may sell electricity directly to Free Customers. State-owned generators may sell electricity directly to Free Customers but are obligated to do so only through private auctions carried out by the state-owned generators exclusively to Free Customers or by the Free Customers.
As mentioned above, recently, Federal Law No. 13,360, dated November 17, 2016, also permitted the sale of excess energy by distribution companies in the free market, but the effectiveness of the rule is still subject to further regulation by ANEEL.
Regulation under the New Industry Model Law and further rules enacted
A July 2004 decree governs the purchase and sale of electricity in the regulated market and the free market, as well as the granting of authorizations and concessions for electricity generation projects. This decree includes, among other items, regulations relating to auction procedures, the form of power purchase agreements and the mechanism for passing costs through to final customers.
These regulations establish the guidelines under which electricity-purchasing agents must contract their electricity demand. Electricity-selling agents must show that the energy to be sold comes from existing or planned power generation facilities. Agents that do not comply with such requirements are subject to penalties imposed by ANEEL.
These regulations also require electricity distribution companies to contract for 100% of their energy needs primarily through public auctions. In addition to these auctions, distribution companies can purchase limited amounts (up to 10% of their demand) from: (i) generation companies that are connected directly to the distribution company (except for hydroelectric power plants with capacity higher than 30 MW and certain thermoelectric power plants) (ii) electricity generation projects participating in the initial phase of the Proinfa Program, (iii) the Itaipu Power Plant and (iv) quotas from those generation concession contracts extended or subject to a new competitive bidding process in accordance with the 2013 Concession Renewal Law.
The MME establishes the total amount of energy that will be contracted in the regulated market, the number and the type of generation projects that will be auctioned each year.
All electricity generation, distribution and trading companies, independent producers and Free Customers are required to notify MME, by August 1 of each year of their estimated electricity demand or estimated electricity generation, as the case may be, for each of the subsequent five years. In advance of each electricity auction, each distribution company is also required to inform MME of the amount of electricity that it intends to contract in the auction. In addition, distribution companies are required to specify the portion of the contracted amount they intend to use to supply potentially Free Customers.
56
Auctions in the Regulated Market
Electricity auctions for new generation projects are held from the third to the seventh year before the initial delivery date of electricity (“A-3 to A-7 Auctions”). Electricity auctions for existing generation projects are held (i) from the first to the fifth year before the initial delivery date (“A-1 to A-5 Auctions”), and (ii) up to four months before the initial delivery date (“Adjustment Auctions”).
New and existing power generators may participate in the Reserve Energy Auctions as long as these generators increase the power system capacity or if they did not achieve commercial operation by January 2008. Invitations to bid in the auctions are prepared by ANEEL in accordance with guidelines established by the MME, including the requirement that the lowest bid wins the auction. Each generation company that participates in the auction executes a contract for the purchase and sale of electricity with each distribution company, in proportion to the distribution companies’ respective estimated demand for electricity, except for the market adjustment and Reserve Energy Auctions.
The contracts for new generation projects have a term between 15 and 35 years, and the contracts for existing generation projects have a term between 1 and 15 years. Contracts arising from market Adjustment Auctions are limited to a two-year term. The reserve energy contracts are limited to a 35-year term.
The quantity of energy contracted from existing generation facilities may be reduced for three reasons: (i) to compensate for Captive Customers that become Free Customers; (ii) to compensate for market deviations from the estimated market projections (up to 4% per year of the annual contracted amount, beginning two years after the initial electricity demand is estimated); and (iii) to adjust the quantity of contracted energy in bilateral agreements entered into prior to the enactment of the New Industry Model Law.
With regard to (i) above, the reduction in net revenue caused when a Captive Customer becomes a Free Customer is compensated by the increased amounts that Free Customers are required to pay to use our distribution system. However, a Free Customer may disconnect from our distribution grid (and therefore cease to pay us a distribution tariff) if it chooses to connect directly to the Interconnected Transmission System or if it generates energy for self-consumption and transports this energy without using our distribution grid. Because a Free Customer that connects directly to the Interconnected Transmission System no longer pays us a distribution tariff, we might not be able to fully recover this loss in revenues.
Since 2004, CCEE has conducted twenty-three auctions for new generation projects, sixteen auctions for energy from existing power generation facilities, nine auctions for reserve energy in order to increase energy supply security, three auctions from alternative energy sources and eighteen auctions for market adjustments. No later than August 1 of each year, the generators and distributors provide their estimated electricity generation or estimated electricity demand for the five subsequent years. Based on this information, MME establishes the total amount of electricity to be traded in the auction and determines which generation companies will participate in the auction. The auction is carried out electronically in two phases.
After the completion of the auction (except in the case of reserve energy auction), generators and distributors execute the CCEAR, in which the parties establish the price and amount of the energy contracted in the auction. The price is adjusted annually based on price variations published by the IPCA. The distributors grant financial guarantees to the generators (mainly receivables from the distribution service) to secure their payment obligations under the CCEAR.
Also after completion of the Reserve Energy Auction, the generation concessionaire and the CCEE execute theContrato de Energia de Reserva, in which the parties establish the price and amount of the energy contracted for in the auction. The distributors, Free Customers and self-producing customers then execute theContrato de Uso da Energia de Reserva (“CONUER”) with CCEE, in order to provide for the terms of the use of the reserve energy. The reserve energy customers grant financial guarantees to CCEE to secure their payment obligations under CONUER.
57
The 2013 Concession Renewal Law established that generation concessions entered into prior to 2003 that were not renewed would be subject to a new competitive bidding process and that the energygenerated by these facilities will be allocated by the Brazilian federal government in quotas to the regulated market, for purchase by distribution concessionaires. On November 25, 2015, ANEEL carried out a competitive bidding process for the grant of new 30-year concessions of 29 hydroelectric plants in accordance with the 2013 Concession Renewal Law. Until December 31, 2016, 100% of the electricity generated by such 29 hydroelectric plants must be destined to the regulated market and, as of January 1, 2017, the percentage was reduced to 70%.
The Annual Reference Value
Brazilian regulation establishes a mechanism (“Annual Reference Value”) that limits the costs that can be passed through to final customers. The Annual Reference Value corresponds to the weighted average of the electricity prices in the A-5 and A-3 Auctions (excluding alternative energy auctions), calculated for all distribution companies.
The regulation establishes the following permanent limitations on the ability of distribution companies to pass-through costs to customers: (i) no pass-through of costs for electricity purchases that exceed 105% of actual demand; (ii) limited pass-through of costs of the acquisition of electricity in the A-3 Auctions, if the amount of purchased energy exceeds 2% of the amount of electricity contracted in the A-5 Auctions.
The MME establishes the maximum acquisition price for electricity generated by existing projects. If distributors do not comply with the obligation to fully contract their demand, the pass-through of costs from energy acquired in the short-term market is the lower of the spot market price and the Annual Reference Value.
Electric Energy Trading Convention
The Electric Energy Trading Convention (Convenção de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica) regulates the organization and functioning of the CCEE and defines, among other things, (i) the rights and obligations of CCEE participants, (ii) the penalties to be imposed on defaulting agents, (iii) the means of dispute resolution, (iv) trading rules in the regulated and free markets, and (v) the accounting and clearing process for short-term transactions.
Restricted Activities of Distributors
Distributors in the Interconnected Transmission System are not permitted to (i) engage in activities related to the generation or transmission of electric energy, (ii) hold, directly or indirectly, any interest in any other company, corporation or strategic agreement, or (iii) engage in activities that are unrelated to their respective concessions, except for those permitted by law or the relevant concession agreement. A generator is not allowed to hold more than a 10% equity interest in any distributor. According to Law No. 13,360/2016, distributors are allowed to sell energy to Free Customers. However this legal authorization is still subject to further regulation by ANEEL.
Elimination of Self-Dealing
Since the purchase of electricity for Captive Customers is now performed through auctions in the regulated market, “self-dealing” (under which distributors were permitted to meet up to 30% of their energy needs using energy that was either self-produced or acquired from affiliated companies) is no longer permitted.
Challenges to the Constitutionality of the New Industry Model Law
The New Industry Model Law is currently being challenged on constitutional grounds before the Brazilian Supreme Court. The Brazilian government moved to dismiss the actions, arguing that the constitutional challenges were moot because they related to a provisional measure that had already been converted into law. To date, the Supreme Court has not reached a final decision and we do not know when such a decision may be reached. While the Supreme Court is reviewing the law, its provisions have remained in effect. Regardless of the Supreme Court’s final decision, certain portions of the New Industry Model Law relating to restrictions on distributors performing activities unrelated to the distribution ofelectricity, including sales of energy by distributors to Free Customers and the elimination of self-dealing, are expected to remain in full force and effect.
58
Challenges to the Constitutionality of the 2013 Concession Renewal Law
The 2013 Concession Renewal Law is currently being challenged on constitutional grounds before the Brazilian Supreme Court by the National Confederation of Industry Workers – CNTI (Confederação Nacional dos Trabalhadores na Indústria). It is not possible to predict whether the 2013 Concession Renewal Law shall remain valid in the future. While the Supreme Court is reviewing the law, its provisions remain in full force and effect.
Tariffs for the Use of the Distribution and Transmission Systems
ANEEL regulates access to the distribution and transmission systems and establishes tariffs for the use of these systems. The tariffs are (i) network usage charges, which are charges for the use of the proprietary local grid of distribution companies (“TUSD”) and (ii) tariffs for the use of the transmission system, which is the Interconnected Transmission System and its ancillary facilities (“TUST”).
TUSD
Users of a distribution grid pay the distribution concessionaire a tariff known as the TUSD (Tarifa de Uso dos Sistemas Elétricos de Distribuição). The TUSD is divided into two parts: one related to the contracted power in R$/kW and other related to the regulatory charges in R$/kWh. The amount paid by the users of a distribution grid is calculated by multiplying the maximum contracted power for each of the customer’s points of connection to the concessionaire’s distribution grid, by the tariff in R$/kW, plus the product of the power consumption by the tariff in R$/kWh, per month.
In relation to the Captive Customers, the TUSD is part of the supply tariff that is calculated based on the voltage used by each customer.
TUST
The TUST (Tarifa de Uso do Sistema de Transmissão)is paid by distribution companies, generators and Free Customers to transmission companies for the use of the Interconnected Transmission System (electrical transmission system with voltage equal or higher than 230 kV). This tariff is revised annually according to (i) the location of the user of the Interconnected Transmission System and (ii) the annual revenues that a transmission company is permitted to collect for the use of its assets in the Interconnected Transmission System. The ONS, an entity that represents all transmission companies that own assets in the Interconnected Transmission System, coordinates the payment of transmission tariffs to these transmission companies. Users of the Interconnected Transmission System sign contracts with the ONS, which allows them to use the transmission grid in return for paying TUST.
Distribution Tariffs
Distribution tariff rates to final customers (including the TUSD) are subject to review by ANEEL, which has the authority to adjust and review these tariffs in response to changes in energy purchase costs and market conditions. When adjusting distribution tariffs, ANEEL divides the costs of distribution companies into (i) costs that are beyond the control of the distributor, or (“Parcel A costs”), and (ii) costs that are under control of distributors (“Parcel B costs”). ANEEL’s tariff readjustment formula treats these two categories differently.
Parcel A costs include, among others, the following:
· costs of electricity purchased by the concessionaire to attend Captive Customers, in accordance to the regulatory model in force;
· charges for connection to and use of the transmission and distribution grids; and
· energy sector regulatory charges.
59
Parcel B costs include, among others, the following:
- a component designed to compensate the distributor for the investments made by the distributor on the concession assets;
- depreciation costs; and
- a component designed to compensate the distributor for its operating and maintenance costs.
Each distribution company’s concession agreement provides for an annual readjustment (reajuste anual). In general, Parcel A costs are fully passed through to customers. Parcel B costs, however, are only adjusted for inflation in accordance with the IPCA Index, minus the X factor.
Electricity distribution concessionaires are also entitled to periodic tariff revisions (revisão periódica) every four or five years. These revisions are aimed at (i) assuring necessary revenues to cover efficient Parcel B operational costs and adequate compensation for investments deemed essential for services provided within the scope of each such company’s concession and (ii) determining the “X factor”.The fifth amendment to our concession agreement, which establishes the renewal of our concession agreement, determines the Periodic Tariff Review every five years.
The X factor for each distribution company is calculated based on the following components:
- P, based on the concessionaire’s productivity, which is measured in terms of increases in assets (kms of power grid), total volume of energy sold, and the number of final customers to which energy is sold;
- T, based on the trajectory of the concessionaire’s operating costs, measured as the difference between the cost benchmarks established by ANEEL and the concessionaire’s actual operating costs; and
- Q, based on quality target indicators that measure the interruption of energy supply to final customers, and other quality indicators.
In addition, a distribution concessionaire is entitled to an extraordinary tariff review (revisão extraordinária) on a case-by-case basis, to ensure its financial stability and compensate it for unpredictable costs, including taxes, which significantly change its cost structure. Extraordinary tariff adjustments were granted (i) in June 1999 to compensate for increased costs of electricity purchased from Itaipu as a result of the devaluation of thereal against the dollar; (ii) in 2000 to compensate for the increase in Social Security Financing Contribution (Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social - COFINS) from 2% to 3%; (iii) in December 2001 to compensate for losses caused by the Rationing Program; (iv) in January 2013, due to the enactment of 2013 Concession Renewal Law, and (v) in March 2015, to compensate the costs related to the quotas of the Electric Development Account (CDE) andincreased costs with the purchase of energy.
Since October 2004, on the date of a subsequent tariff readjustment or tariff revision, whichever occurs earlier, distribution companies have been required to execute separate contracts for the connection and use of the distribution grid and for the sale of electricity to their potentially Free Customers.
Tariff Flags (Bandeiras Tarifárias)
Effective as of January 1, 2015, a new system has been introduced by the ANEEL to permit distribution concessionaires to pass on to their final customer certain variable cost increases attributable to changes in hydrological conditions in Brazil, prior to the formal tariffs periodic revisions made by ANEEL.
In accordance with this model, a green, yellow or red flags, as determined by ANEEL, is included in invoices sent to final customers, reflecting nationwide hydrological conditions (except for the State of Roraima). If a green flag is added into final customers’ invoices due to satisfactory hydrologicalconditions, no additional charges are added. On the other hand, if these invoices contain yellow or red flags, this will indicate that distribution concessionaires are facing higher variable costs from the acquisition of electricity and have passed certain on to final customers.
60
Incentives
In 2000, a Federal decree created the Thermoelectric Priority Program, (Programa Prioritário de Termoeletricidade, or“PPT”), for purposes of diversifying the Brazilian energy matrix and decreasing Brazil’s strong dependence on hydroelectric plants. The incentives granted to the thermoelectric plants included in the PPT were: (i) guarantee of gas supply for 20 years, as per a MME regulation, (ii) assurance that the costs related to the acquisition of the electric energy produced by thermoelectric plants will be passed on to customers through tariffs up to the normative value established by ANEEL, and (iii) guarantee of access to a special BNDES financing program for the electric energy industry.
In 2002, the Brazilian government established the Proinfa Program to encourage the generation of alternative energy sources. Under the Proinfa Program, Eletrobras would purchase the energy generated by alternative sources for a period of 20 years. In its initial phase, the Proinfa Program was limited to a total contracted capacity of 3,300 MW. In its second phase, which should start after the 3,300 MW cap has been reached, the Proinfa Program intends to purchase up to 10% of Brazil’s annual electric energy consumption from alternative sources. The first phase of the Proinfa program commenced in 2004 and it so far has supported the construction of 119 alternative energy plants with a total capacity of 2,649.8 MW.
Energy Sector Regulatory Charges
EER
TheEncargo de Energia de Reserva(“EER”) is a regulatory charge designed to raise funds for energy reserves that have been contracted through CCEE and which are deposited in the Reserve Energy Account (Conta de Energia de Reserva – CONER). These energy reserves, which are mandatory, were created in order to attempt to ensure a sufficient supply of energy in the Interconnected Transmission System. The EER shall be collected from final customers of the Interconnected Transmission System. Beginning in 2010, this charge has been collected on a monthly basis.
RGR Fund
In certain circumstances, electric energy companies are compensated for certain assets used in connection with a concession if the concession is revoked or is not renewed. In 1971, the Brazilian Congress created a reserve fund designed to provide these compensatory payments (“RGR Fund”). In February 1999, ANEEL established a fee requiring public-industry electric companies to make monthly contributions to the RGR Fund at an annual rate equal to 2.5% of the company’s fixed assets in service, not to exceed 3% of total operating revenues in any year. Since the enactment of the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, the RGR Fund has been used to fund the compensations arising from the termination of non-renewed concessions. The 2013 Concession Renewal Law also allowed the funds from the RGR Fund to be transferred to the CDE.
According to 2013 Concession Renewal Law, as from January 1, 2013, the concession contracts from concessionaires of (i) distribution; (ii) transmission which competitive bidding process occurred after September 12, 2012; and (iii) transmission and generation which had their concession contract renewed or had their underlying facilities subject to a new competitive bidding process are no longer obliged to pay the annual RGR fee.
UBP
Some hydroelectric generation enterprises (except small hydroelectric power plants) are required to make contributions for using a public asset,Uso de Bem Público (“UBP”) according to the rules of the corresponding public bidding process for the granting of concessions. Eletrobras receives the UBP payments in a specific account. See Note 28 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
61
ESS
The costs related to maintaining system reliability and stability when thermoelectric plants generate energy to meet demand in the National Connection System (SIN) are called System Service Charges, orEncargos de Serviços de Sistema (ESS). These amounts are paid by each entity that purchases energy in the spot market (CCEE), proportional to each such entity’s consumption.
ESS is expressed in R$/MWh and paid only to thermoelectric plants that generate energy in response to requests by the Electricity System National Operator (ONS).
CDE
In 2002, the Brazilian government instituted the Electric Energy Development Account,Conta de Desenvolvimento Energético (“CDE Account”). The CDE Account is funded by (i) annual payments made by concessionaires for the use of public assets, (ii) penalties and fines imposed by ANEEL, (iii) the annual fees paid by agents offering electric energy to final customers, by means of an additional charge added to the tariffs for the use of the transmission and distribution grids and (iv) the credits held by the federal government against Itaipu. The CDE Account was originally created, amongst others, to promote the availability of electric energy services to all of Brazil and the competitiveness of the energy produced by alternative sources. The CDE is regulated by the executive branch and will be managed by Eletrobras until April 30, 2017 and by CCEE from May 1, 2017, pursuant to Federal Law No. 13,360/2016. This charge had been substantially reduced by the 2013 Concession Renewal Law (approximately 75% compared to its December 31, 2011 amount) in an attempt to reduce the cost of electricity paid by final customers, among others. The 2013 Concession Renewal Law also allowed the funds from the RGR Fund to be transferred to the CDE Account, provided that the Federal Treasury would also contribute with the CDE Account and permitted the funds deposited in the CDE Account to be used in support of the electricity generation program in non-integrated electric grids (sistemas elétricos isolados) as well as to partially offset the increased costs borne by distribution concessionaires for the purchase of energy in the spot market as a result of the non-renewal of generation concessions due to the 2013 Concession Renewal Law.
On March 7, 2014, the Brazilian government also permitted the transfer to distribution concessionaires of funds deposited in the CDE Account to cover their respective costs arising from the involuntary exposure to the spot market in January 2014 as a result of poor hydrological conditions in 2013 and 2014, which mandated the acquisition of thermoelectric energy at higher prices in the spot market, costs which distribution concessionaires were not able to pass on to Final Customers through regular Retail Tariffs prior to formal tariffs periodic revisions made by ANEEL.
Distribution concessionaries will be able pass on to its final customer a CDE Account charge, to the extent necessary to repay their respective financing obligations contracted by the CCEE through the ACR Account. See “Regulated Market Account – ACR Account.”
On February 27, 2015, ANEEL approved a significant increase of the CDE fee charged to cover all these additional costs supported by the CDE Account, which were aggravated by the lack of contribution from the Brazilian Federal Treasury. ABRACE, an association of Free Customers filed lawsuits to contest the increase of the CDE fee and this litigation remains ongoing. Since July 2015, the Free Customers associated with ABRACE benefit from an injunction suspending the increase of the CDE fee. Associations of distributors of energy (including ABRADEE, with whom Copel Distribuição is associated), also obtained injunctions suspending its obligation to withhold such CDE fees while ABRACE´sand other consumers’ injunction remains in force.
Federal Law No. 13,360/2016 established that the Federal Government must prepare a plan for a structural reduction of the CDE charge until December 31, 2017, and it also provided that the revenues, expenses and beneficiaries of the CDE Account must be published monthly by CCEE. More specifically, promulgation of Law No. 13,360, dated November 17, 2016, implemented a series of changes in the structure of the CDE rules, causing the fund to abandon its role as a source of funds for (i) the amortization of financial operations linked to the indemnity for concessions reversal or (ii) the affordable tariff policy. Currently, the scope of the CDE is to compensate for the discounts applied in the transmission tariffs, to provide funds for the payment of amounts related to the management andmovement of CDE, CCC and RGR by CCEE; and to compensate fthe tariff impact of the reduced load density of the rural electrification cooperatives market. In addition, CDE will no longer be managed by Eletrobrás and will be now managed by CCEE.
62
Regulated Market Account – ACR Account.
On April 2014, the Brazilian government created the Regulated Market Account,Conta no Ambiente de Contratação Regulada – Conta-ACR (“ACR Account”), to assist distribution concessionaires to cover their respective costs for the acquisition of thermoelectric energy for the period from February 2014 to December 2014, incurred as a result of poor hydrological conditions. Distributors incurred higher costs as a result of adverse hydrological conditions because they were required to buy thermoelectric energy at higher prices in the spot market, and were unable to pass all these costs on to Final Customers prior to a formal tariff periodic revision made by ANEEL. To fund the ACR Account, the Brazilian federal government authorized the CCEE to enter into credit agreements with certain Brazilian financial institutions. An aggregate of R$21.7 billion, composed of nine tranches, has been deposited in the ACR Account. Distribution concessionairesare reimbursing this financingfrom the 2015 tariff process,through the application of monthly additional CDE Account charges to its final customers, for a period of approximately 60 months. In 2016, the CCEE did not release to us funds from the ACR Account.
Itaipu Transmission Fee
The Itaipu Hydroelectric Plant has an exclusive transmission grid and is not part of the Interconnected Transmission System. Companies that are entitled to receive electricity from Itaipu pay a transmission fee in an amount equal to their proportional share of the Itaipu generated electricity.
Use of Water Resources Tax
Holders of concessions and authorizations that allow for the exploitation of water resources must pay a total tax of 6.75% of the value of the energy they generate, which for purposes of this calculation is based on a rate set by ANEEL. Beginning on January 1, 2017, ANEEL set this rate at R$72.20/MWh. The proceeds of this tax are shared among the states and municipalities where the plant or the plant’s reservoir is located, as well as with certain federal agencies.
ANEEL Inspection Fee (TFSEE)
The ANEEL Inspection Fee is an annual fee due by the holders of concessions, permissions or authorizations equal to an ANEEL determined percentage of their revenues. The ANEEL Inspection Fee requires these holders to pay up to 0.4% of their annual revenue to ANEEL in 12 monthly installments.
Default on the Payment of Regulatory Charges
The failure to pay required contributions to the RGR Fund, Proinfa Program, CDE Account, or make certain payments, such as those due from the purchase of electric energy in the regulated market or from Itaipu, will prevent the defaulting party from receiving readjustments or reviews of their tariffs (except for an extraordinary review) and will also prevent the defaulting party from receiving funds from the RGR Fund or CDE Account. We comply with payment obligations related to Regulatory Charges.
Energy Reallocation Mechanism
The Energy Reallocation Mechanism, orMecanismo de Realocação de Energia attempts to mitigate the risks borne by hydroelectric generators due to variations in river flows (hydrological risk).
Under Brazilian law, each hydroelectric plant is assigned a determined amount of “assured energy”, according to an energy supply risk criteria defined by MME, based on historical river flow records. The assured energy also represents the maximum energy that can be sold by the generator, which is set forth in each concession agreement, irrespective of the volume of electricity actually generated by the facility.
63
The MRE tries to guarantee that all participating plants receive the revenue corresponding to their assured energy, irrespective of the volume of electricity generated by them. In other words, the MRE effectively reallocates the electricity, transferring the surplus from those who have produced in excess of their assured energy to those that have produced less than their assured energy. The relocation, which occurs in the Interconnected Transmission System, is determined by the ONS, considering the nationwide electricity demand and hydrological conditions, regardless of the power purchase agreement of each individual generator. The volume of electricity actually generated by the plant, whether more or less than their assigned assured energy quotient, is priced pursuant to a tariff known as the “Energy Optimization Tariff”, designed to cover only the variable operation and maintenance costs of the plant, so that generators are largely unaffected by the actual dispatch of their plants.
Each hydroelectric plant which has its concession contract renewed in accordance to 2013 Concession Renewal Law will no longer participate in the MRE, and the hydrological risk from those plants will be borne by the distribution concessionaires under the National Interconnected Power Grid. For the generation plants with expired concessions, which were subject to a new competitive bidding process under the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, the 30% of generated energy available for the generation concessionaire to sell in the market starting on the second year of its concession is also subject to the MRE hydrological risk allocation mechanism. This risk does not impact our distribution business, since we are allowed to increase the tariffs of our distribution customers to compensate any costs arising from this hydrological risk.
Research and Development
The companies holding concessions and permissions for distribution of electricity must invest a minimum of 0.50% of their annual net operational revenues in research and development and 0.50% in energy efficiency programs. Beginning on January 1, 2023, these percentages will become 0.75% and 0.25%, respectively.
A company holding concessions and authorizations for generation and transmission of electricity must invest a minimum of 1% of its annual net operational revenues in research and development. A company that generates electricity exclusively from small hydroelectric power plants, cogeneration or alternative energy projects is not subject to this requirement.
The amount to be invested in research and development must be distributed as follows:
· 40% to the company research and development projects, under the supervision of ANEEL;
· 40% to the Ministry of Sciences and Technology, to be invested in national research and development projects; and
· 20% to the MME, to defray EPE.
In 2016, we spent R$52.6 million on research and development, while in 2015 we spent R$72.9 million and in 2014 we spent R$33.5 million.
Environmental Regulations
The Brazilian Federal Constitution includes environmental matters among the matters that are subject to concurrent legislative competence, meaning that the Brazilian federal government enacts general rules, which are supplemented by rules passed by states; municipalities, in turn, enact local rules or supplement federal and/or state legislation.
The Federal Environmental Crimes Act, which took effect in 1998, establishes a general framework of liability for environmental crimes. Federal laws and statutes have established the National System for Management of Water Resources and the National Council of Water Resources to address the major environmental issues facing the hydroelectric sector and users of water resources. In 2000, the Brazilian government created an independent agency, the National Water Agency, to regulate and supervise the use of water resources.
64
The Brazilian Forestry Code and related regulations establish rules regarding the maintenance and acquisition of areas affected by hydroelectric plant reservoirs. These regulations may result in increased maintenance, reforestation and expropriation costs to energy industry concessionaires. We have been developing conservation actions in our power plants, as established in the Forestry Code, since their construction. A violator of an environmental law may be subject to administrative and criminal sanctions and, in case environmental damage occurs, will have an obligation to repair or provide compensation to the affected party. Administrative sanctions may include substantial fines and suspension of activities, while criminal sanctions may include fines and, for individuals, including for directors and employees of companies that commit environmental crimes, possible imprisonment.
Our energy generation, distribution and transmission facilities are subject to environmental licensing procedures, which may include the preparation of environmental impact assessments before such facilities are constructed. Once the respective environmental licenses are obtained, their maintenance is still subject to the compliance with certain requirements.
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
The information presented below has been derived from our consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 that have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. For more information see “Presentation of Financial and Other Information” and Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.
OVERVIEW
Brazilian Economic Conditions
All of our operations are in Brazil, and we are affected by general Brazilian economic conditions. In particular, the general performance of the Brazilian economy affects demand for electricity, and inflation affects our costs and our margins. The Brazilian economic environment has been characterized by significant variations in economic growth rates, with very low growth from 2001 through 2003, an economic recovery that led to consistent growth from 2004 to 2009. Since then, the Brazilian GDP growth has fluctuated, from 0.1% in 2014, to decrease of 3.8% and 3.6% in 2015 and 2016, respectively.
The following table shows selected economic data for the periods indicated:
| |
| | | |
Inflation (IGP-DI) | 7.18% | 10.70% | 3.78% |
Appreciation (depreciation) of therealvs. U.S. dollar | 19.81% | (31.98)% | (11.81)% |
Period-end exchange rate – US$1.00(1) | 3.2591 | 3.9048 | 2.6562 |
Average exchange rate – US$1.00 | 3.4500 | 3.3876 | 2.3599 |
Change in realGDP | (3.6)% | (3.8)% | 0.1% |
Average interbank interest rates(2) | 14.05% | 13.46% | 10.83% |
(1) Thereal/U.S. dollar exchange rate at April 17, 2017 was R$3.1036 per US$1.00.
(2) Calculated in accordance with Central Clearing and Custody House, orCentral de Custódia e Liquidação Financeira de Títulos (“CETIP”), methodology (based on nominal rates).
Sources:FGV ‒ Fundação Getúlio Vargas, the Brazilian Central Bank, the Brazilian Geography and Statistics Institute IBGE and CETIP.
65
Rates and Prices
Our results of operations are significantly affected by changes in the prices at which our generation business sells energy, and by the prices at which our distribution business buys and resells energy.
Our generation business sells energy at unregulated prices in the regulated market, in the Free Market and in the Spot Market. Our generation business allocates the amount of energy that it sells in each of these markets seeking to maximize returns, based on factors such as: (i) the requirements of its concession contracts, many of which set a minimum percentage of energy generated in a particular concession that must be sold in the regulated market; (ii) the volume of energy that we plan to sell to Free Customers for a given year; and (iii) the outlook of the short-term, medium-term and long-term for energy prices generally. Although sales in the Free Market and the Spot Market are not directly regulated, they are influenced by energy regulatory policy. The prices at which our generation business sells energy are not regulated.
Our distribution business purchases enough energy to meet 100% of the demand we forecast for our final customers in auctions at unregulated prices in the regulated market. Our distribution business resells that energy to final customers at regulated tariffs that take into consideration the price at which the energy was purchased. If our forecasts fall short of the actual electricity demand of our final customers, we may be forced to make up for the shortfall by entering into short-term agreements to purchase electricity in the spot market. If our forecasts exceed the actual demand of our final customers, our distribution business sells the excess energy in the Spot Market. Except for possible future effects brought by the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, the margins in our distribution business tend to be relatively stable due to the regulated nature of the distribution business, while the margins in our generation business are typically larger but less stable, since they are substantially market regulated.
Sales to final customers (which include sales by our distribution business to Captive Customers and sales by our generation business to Free Customers) represented approximately 58.7% of the volume of electricity we made available in 2016, and accounted for 66.2% of our energy sales revenues. Almost all of such sales were to Captive Customers. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — The Brazilian Electric Power Industry — Distribution Tariffs”. In general, if our costs for energy increase, the tariff process permits us to recover these costs from our customers through higher rates in future periods. However, if we do not receive tariff increases to cover our costs, if the recovery of these costs is delayed, or if our Board of Directors elects to reduce the tariff increase awarded by ANEEL,our profits and cash flows may be adversely affected.
ANEEL modifies our Retail Tariffs annually, generally in June. Since January 2012, the adjustments have been as follows.
- In June 2012, ANEEL approved the third periodic review of our Retail Tariffs and the average impact of this review in the tariffs we charge our customers was a decrease of 0.65%.
- In January 2013, due to the enactment of 2013 Concession Renewal Law, we were subject to an extraordinary revision that has been approved by ANEEL. The average impact of this extraordinary review in the tariffs we charge our customers was a decrease of 19.28% which caused a reduction of approximately 14.4% in our distribution revenues since the difference was paid for with funds from the federal government.
- In June 2013, ANEEL approved the annual readjustment of our Retail Tariffs, increasing them by an average of 13.08%, of which 11.40% related to the tariff increase and 1.68% referred to an increase in recovery of deferred regulatory accounts (CVA). After giving effect to the recovery of Parcel A costs, the average effect of this tariff readjustment on our Captive Customers was an increase of 14.61%. However, Copel Distribuição requested a partial deferral of this adjustment, which was authorized by ANEEL and approved on July 9, 2013. The amount of R$255.9 million was therefore deferred, and will be included as a financial component in the 2014 annual readjustment. This deferral reduced the average effect of the tariff readjustment to 9.55%.
66
- In June 2014, ANEEL approved the annual readjustment of our Retail Tariffs, increasing them by an averageof 35.38%, of which 25.05% related to the tariff increase and 10.34% referred to an increase in recovery of deferred regulatory accounts (CVA). After giving effect to the recovery of Parcel A costs, the average effect of this tariff readjustment on our Captive Customers was an increase of 39.71%. However, Copel Distribuição requested a partial deferral of this adjustment, which was authorized by ANEEL and approved on July 22, 2014. The amount of R$898.3 million was therefore deferred, and will be included as a financial component in the 2015 annual readjustment. This deferral reduced the average effect of the tariff readjustment to 24.86%.
- In March 2015, ANEEL approved an extraordinary revision due to a series of events that significantly impacted the distribution concessionaires’ costs, which were not originally foreseen in the 2014 Retail Tariff increase, such as the increase of Itaipu tariffs (46.14%) and higher prices to purchase energy in recent energy auctions. Copel Distribuição’s average tariff revision approved by ANEEL was 36.79% starting from March 02, 2015. Of this total, 22.14% relatesto CDE Account chargesthat have been passed to customers and 14.65% relates to (i) Itaipu’s tariff increase and (ii) thehigher prices paid by us to purchase energy in recent energy auctions that have been passed to customers.
- In June 2015, ANEEL authorized theannual readjustment of Copel Distribuição’s tariff to final customers, increasing them by an average of 15.32%, of which (a) 20.58% related to the inclusion of the financial components, which will be recovered in the 12 months subsequent to the adjustment (including the amount of R$935.3 million corresponding to the deferrals in 2013 and 2014), (b) 0.34% related to the restatement of Portion B, (c) (3.25)% related to the adjustment of Portion A, and (d) (2.35)% reflecting the removal of the financial components from the previous process. The adjustment was fully applied to Copel Distribuição’s tariffs as of June 24, 2015.
- In June 2016, ANEEL approved the fourth periodic review of our Retail Tariffs, decreasing them by 12.87%, of which: (1.73)% related to the inclusion of financial components; 4.48% due to the update of Portion B; (2.57)% related to the update of Portion A; and (13.05)% reflecting the removal of the financial components of the previous tariff process.
Purchase and Resale of Energy
Our distribution business purchases energy from generation companies and resells this energy to final customers at regulated rates. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company— Business—Generation” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business—Purchases”. Our major long-term contracts or purchase obligations are described below.
- We purchase energy from Itaipu at prices that are determined based on the Itaipu project’s costs, including servicing its U.S. dollar-denominated debt. In 2016, our electricity purchases from Itaipu amounted to R$1,089.8 million
- Our distribution business is required to purchase a large portion of its energy needs from the regulated market. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — The Company — Distribution — Auctions in the Regulated Market”.
Under current legislation, the amount that our distribution business charges Final Customers is composed of two fees: a fee for the actual energy consumed and a fee for the use of our distribution grid. Since the regulated rates at which our distribution business sells energy to final customers are substantially the same as the rates at which it purchases energy (after accounting for deductions and the cost of energy purchased for resale), our distribution business does not generate operating profit from the sale of electricity to final customers. Rather, our distribution business generates operating profit principally by collecting tariffs for the use of our distribution grid.
67
Impact of the CRC Account
One of our most significant assets consists of the obligations of the State of Paraná under an agreement that was last amended in January 2005. These obligations derive from amounts we wereentitled to recover under a prior regulatory regime, and as a result they are referred to as the recoverable rate deficit account or “CRC Account” (Conta de Resultados a Compensar). The balance is adjusted for IGP-DI plus interest at 6.65%, and is payable in monthly installments until April 2025. If the State of Paraná fails to make payments on a timely basis, we may apply dividends we owe to the State of Paraná in its capacity as our shareholder against amounts it owes us under the CRC Account agreement.
In June 2016, our Board of Directors approved the amendment to the CRC Agreement setting forth a grace period for the payment of interest and amortization until December 31, 2017 (“Amendment to the CRC Agreement”). (i) from April 2016 to December 2016 no amounts were paid under the CRC Agreement; (ii) from January 2017 to December 2017, amounts corresponding exclusively to the interest are being paid. Amendment is still subject to consent from the Department of Treasury. As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding balance of the CRC Account was R$1,522.7 million. For additional information, see Note 8 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Special Obligations
The contributions received from the federal government and our customers exclusively for investment in our generation assets, transmission and distribution grid are named as special obligations. We record the amount of these contributions on our statement of financial position as a reduction of our intangible and financial assets, under the caption “special obligations”, and, upon the conclusion or termination of the operating concession granted to us, the amount of these contributions is offset against intangible and financial assets. The amount we recorded as special obligations as of December 31, 2016 was R$2,873.5 million as a reduction of intangible assets and R$77.0 million as a reduction of financial assets.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates concerning a variety of matters as referred to in Note 3.4 to our audited consolidated financial statements. Some of these matters are highly uncertain, and our estimates involve judgments we make based on the information available to us. We have discussed in “Overview” above certain accounting policies relating to regulatory matters. In the discussion below, we have identified several other matters for which our financial information would be materially affected if either (i) we reasonably used different estimates or (ii) in the future we change our estimates in response to changes that are reasonably likely to occur.
The discussion below addresses only those estimates that we consider most important based on the degree of uncertainty and the likelihood of a material impact if we used a different estimate. There are many other areas in which we use estimates about uncertain matters, but the reasonably likely effect of changed or different estimates is not material to our financial presentation. Please see Note 3.4 to our audited consolidated financial statements included herein for a more detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies.
Property, Plant and Equipment
We have adopted the deemed cost methodology to determine the fair value of Copel Geração e Transmissão’s property, plant and equipment, specifically for the generation business as of the date of transition of our financial statements to IFRS (January 1, 2009). These assets are depreciated according to the linear method based on annual rates set forth and reviewed periodically by ANEEL, which are used and accepted by the market as representative of the economic useful life of the assets related to concession’s infrastructure, limited to the term of said concession, when applicable. The estimated useful life, the residual amounts, and depreciation are reviewed as of each reporting date, and the effect of any changes in estimates is recorded prospectively.
68
Accounting for concession arrangements
We account for our concession agreements for transmission and distribution business in accordance with IFRIC 12 - Service Concession Agreements.
IFRIC 12 establishes that electric energy utilities should record and measure revenues according to IAS 11 - Construction Contracts and IAS 18 - Revenues, even when governed by a singleconcession agreement. When we make investments in the infrastructure used in the power transmission and distribution services we perform pursuant to our concession agreements, we capitalize these investments as intangible assets and financial assets, and we recognize construction revenue and construction costs in connection with these investments. Intangible assets represent the right to access and to operate infrastructure that is provided to us or that we build or acquire as part of the concession agreement. The value of intangible assets is determined based on construction fair value, reduced by the corresponding estimated financial assets, described in greater detail below, and by any accumulated amortization and impairment losses, when applicable. The amortization pattern for intangible assets reflects our estimate of our future economic benefits from these assets, limited to the term of the concession. These intangible assets are amortized according to the lesser of (i) the remaining useful life of the asset or; (ii) the time remaining until the end of the concession term.
We calculate the value of financial assets related to our distribution business based on our distribution concession arrangements. These financial assets represent our understanding of our unconditional right to receive cash payments upon expiration of the concession from the grantor, as set forth in our concession agreements. These cash payments are designed to compensate us for the investments we make in infrastructure and that are not recovered through the collection of tariffs from users.
Financial assets related to our distribution business do not have determinable cash flows, since we operate under the assumption that the value of the cash payments we will receive from the grantor upon expiration of a concession will be based on the replacement cost of the concession assets. Since these financial assets do not fit into any other category of financial assets under IFRS, they are classified as “available for sale”. The cash flows related to these assets are determined taking into account the replacement cost of PPE, which is known as the Regulatory Compensation Basis (Base de Remuneração Regulatória or BRR), and is defined by ANEEL. The return on these financial assets is based on the regulatory weighted average cost of capital approved by ANEEL in the periodic rate review process carried out every four years.
We calculate the value of the financial assets related to our transmission business based on: (i) revenues from tariffs based on the construction of transmission infrastructure for use by system users; (ii) revenues from tariffs based on the operation and maintenance of infrastructure assets related to our concessions; and (iii) the financial return on these assets that is guaranteed by ANEEL and that is not otherwise recovered through tariffs by the end of the concession term. Because the aggregate transmission tariffs we collect are calculated entirely based on the infrastructure assets that we make available to system users as a whole, they are not subject to demand risk, and are therefore considered guaranteed revenues. These revenues, which are calculated considering the entire term of the transmission concession, are known as Annual Permitted Revenues (Receita Anual Permitida or RAP). Users of this infrastructure are billed on a monthly basis for these amounts, pursuant to reports issued by the National System Operator (ONS). Upon expiration of the concession, the grantor is required to pay any uncollected amounts related to the construction, operation, and maintenance of infrastructure, as compensation for investments made and not recovered through tariffs. Because these financial assets do not have an active market and present fixed and determinable cash flows, they are classified as “loans and receivables”. These financial assets are initially estimated based on their fair values, and are later measured according to the amortized cost calculated under the effective interest rate method.
As described above, we recognized financial assets in connection with these transmission concessions. However, we renewed the Concession Agreement 060/2001 pursuant to the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, which required that we accept certain amendments to this concession contract. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Concessions.” One of the effects of these amendments is that we no longer recognize financial assets for concessions renewed pursuant to the 2013 Concession Renewal Law, because the scope of the concession has been narrowed to cover only maintenance and operation of the transmission facilities. As a result, the financial assets we had previously recognized for concessions that were renewed pursuant to the 2013 Concession Renewal Law were converted into a receivable, since the Granting Authority has an obligation to pay these amounts. As of December 31, 2016, the amount recorded in “Accounts Receivable Related to the Concession Extension” account totaled R$67.4 million relates to the residual amount of generation assets, the concessions of which expired in 2014 and 2015.
Generation concessions are deemed outside the scope of IFRIC 12 and are accounted for under other applicable IFRS.
69
In addition to our financial assets and intangible assets, under IFRS we also recognize construction revenues and construction costs for construction activities we perform in connection with our distribution and transmission concessions. Our distribution business outsources power distribution infrastructure construction. As a result, under IFRS we recognize construction costs and revenues in roughly the same amounts. In contrast, since our transmission business performs much of our transmission infrastructure construction, we recognize construction revenue in amounts that exceed construction costs. The resulting margin for our transmission business’ construction revenue was 1.65% in 2015 and 2016, and is calculated based on a methodology that takes into account business risk.
The determination of the amortization term of our intangible assets and the fair value of our financial assets in connection with our concession contracts is subject to assumptions and estimates, and the use of different assumptions could affect the amounts we recognize. The estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, as well as the rate of return of the financial assets also require significant assumptions and estimates. Different assumptions and estimates and changes in future circumstances could have a significant impact on our results of operations. Additional information on the accounting for intangible and financial assets arising from concession agreements is contained in Notes 4.4.9 and 4.7 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We bill our residential, industrial and commercial customers monthly. Unbilled revenues from the billing date to month-end are estimated based on the prior month’s billing and recognized as revenue at the end of the month in which the service was provided. We read certain of our individual customers’ meters systematically throughout the month in order to estimate how much energy we have sold to individual customers as a group. At the end of each month, the amount of energy delivered to each customer since their last meter reading date is estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue is determined based upon a customer’s daily estimated usage by class and applicable customer rates reflecting significant historical trends and experience. Differences between estimated and actual unbilled revenues, which have historically been insignificant, are recognized in the following month.
Net Sectorial Financial Assets and Liabilities
Until 2009, the Brazilian accounting standards allowed distribution concessionaires to book the difference, if any, between the amounts that concessionaires were entitled to collect under their respective concession contracts and the amounts they actually collected, which are referred to as sectorial assets and liabilities. The positive or negative variations in these amounts were included in the tariffs in the following annual tariff adjustment. With the adoption of IFRS in 2010, these assets and liabilities were no longer recorded in the financial statements of distribution concessionaires.
As a result of an amendment to our distribution concession agreement executed on December 10, 2014, we recognized on December 31, 2016 a financial liability in the amount of R$ R$279.0 million (financial asset of R$1,045.7 million in 2015), which represents our net balance of sectorial financial assets and liabilities. This amendment added a guarantee that, if the concession is extinguished for any reason, the residual amounts of items of Parcel A costs and other financial components that have not been recovered or returned via tariff shall be incorporated in the calculation of the indemnification amount by the granting authority. For more information, see Note 9 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, primarily property, plants and equipment and intangible assets, comprise a significant amount of our total assets. We evaluate our long-lived assets and make judgments and estimates concerning the carrying value of these assets, including the amounts to be capitalized, the depreciation/ amortization rates and useful lives of these long-lived assets. The carrying values of these assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recorded in the period in which it is determined that the carrying amount is not recoverable. This requires us to make long-term forecasts of future revenues and costs related to the assets subject to review. These forecasts require assumptions about the demand for our products and services, future market conditions and regulatory developments. Significant and unanticipated changes to these assumptions could require a provision for impairment in a future period. Our evaluation at December 31, 2016 resulted in an impairment of our in service and in progress property, plant and equipment in the amounts of R$77,318 and R$1,136,105, respectively (see notes 19.1 and 19.9 of our consolidated financial statements).
70
Electric Energy Trading Chamber – CCEE
For accounting purposes, we recognize costs and revenues related to purchases and sales of energy in the spot market based on our internal estimates, which are reviewed by the CCEE.
We claimed a credit based on energy purchased from Itaipu during the energy rationing period that occurred in 2001, when there was a significant difference between the purchase price of Itaipu energy and energy sold at a loss in the spot market. However, we may be required to contribute to the amounts owed by other energy companies under similar lawsuits, and as of December 31, 2016, we had provisions of R$49.7 million to cover probable losses related to these other lawsuits.
Provision for Risks (Labor, Civil, Tax and Environmental Claims)
Our subsidiaries and we are party to certain legal proceedings in Brazil arising in the normal course of business regarding tax, labor, civil and environmental claims.
Provisions are recognized when, and only when: i) the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) resulting from a past event, ii) it is probable (i.e., more likely than not) that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and iii) a reliable estimate can be made of the amount to settle the obligation. By their nature, risks will only be resolved when a future event or events occur or fail to occur, typically such events will occur a number of years in the future. The evaluation of these risks is performed by our internal and external legal counsel. Accounting for risks requires significant judgment by management concerning the estimated probabilities including classification as probable or possible losses and ranges of exposure to potential liability. Management’s assessment of our exposure to risks could change as new developments occur or more information becomes available. The outcome of the risks could vary significantly and could materially impact our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position. The provision for contingencies, classified as probable losses, as of December 31, 2016 amounted to R$1,241.3 million, of which R$204.9 million was related to tax proceedings, R$465.8 million was related to civil claims, R$458.9 million was related to labor claims, R$42.4 million was related to employee benefits, R$67.9 million was related to regulatory proceedings and R$1.4 million was related to environmental claims.
As of December 31, 2016, we estimate that the total amount of claims against us, excluding disputes involving non-monetary claims or claims that cannot be evaluated in the current stage of proceedings, classified as possible losses, was approximately R$2,559.8 million, of which R$423.5 million correspond to labor claims; R$23.6 million to employee benefits; R$765.9 million to regulatory claims; R$594.2 million to civil claims; and R$752.6 million to tax claims. For more information, see Note 30 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
Employee Retirement and Health Benefits
We sponsor a (i) defined-benefit pension plan and a (ii) variable contribution pension plan covering substantially all of our employees. We have also established a health care plan for current and retired employees. We determine our obligations for these plans based on calculations performed by independent actuaries using assumptions that we provide about interest rates, investment returns, rates of inflation, mortality rates and future employment levels(see the assumptions in note 25.5.1 and the sensitivity analysis in note 25.5.8 of our consolidated financial statements).These assumptions directly affect our post- employment benefits liability.
In 2016, we recorded expenses in the amount of R$259.8 million for our pension and health care plans. We estimate that we will incur expenses in the amount of R$96.9 million in 2017 for our health care plans (according to actuarial calculations).
Deferred Taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using prevailing rates. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. If we are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there is a material change in the actual effective tax rates or time period within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable or deductible, we could be required to derecognize all or a significant portion of our deferred tax assets resulting in asubstantial increase in our effective tax rate and a material adverse impact on our operating results. The taxes balances subject to the federal taxing department inspection are those constituted over the last five years.As of December 31, 2016, we recognized deferred tax assets in the amount of R$1,714.9 million and we not consider any reduction in the risk of recuperation of these assets (see Note 13.2.1 of our consolidated financial statements).
Estimated losses for doubtful accounts
The estimated losses for doubtful accounts are recorded in amounts deemed sufficient by Copel’s senior management to cover potential losses on the realization of customer receivables and others whose recovery is considered unlikely. The estimated losses for doubtful accounts are recorded considering the parameters recommended by ANEEL, based on the expectation of receivables from the main debtors, on the analysis of large debts in judicial recovery / bankruptcy, on amounts receivable from residential class customers overdue for more than 90 days, from commercial class customers overdue for more than 180 days and from industrial and rural customers, public authorities, public lighting and public utilities overdue for more than 360 days in addition to previous experience of actual losses. As of December 31, 2016 we recorded a provision for doubtful accounts in the amount of R$355.7 million (see note 7.3 to our consolidated financial statements for further details including provisions and reversals).
71
ANALYSIS OF ELECTRICITY SALES AND COST OF ELECTRICITY PURCHASED
The following table sets forth the volume and average rate components of electricity sales and purchases for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:
| |
| | | |
Electricity Sales | | | |
Sales to Final Customers | | | |
Average price (R$/MWh):(1) | | | |
Industrial customers(2) | 246.25 | 231.79 | 180.95 |
Residential customers | 338.80 | 361.03 | 305.85 |
Commercial customers | 339.26 | 300.19 | 245.25 |
Rural customers | 378.67 | 232.59 | 164.33 |
Other customers(3) | 268.98 | 237.18 | 187.03 |
All customers(2) | 301.95 | 278.05 | 224.79 |
Volume (GWh): | | | |
Industrial customers(2) | 9,585 | 10,823 | 10,841 |
Residential customers | 6,932 | 6,957 | 7,267 |
Commercial customers | 5,108 | 5,542 | 5,482 |
Rural customers | 2,180 | 2,256 | 2,252 |
Other customers(3) | 2,404 | 2,371 | 2,382 |
All customers(2) | 26,209 | 27,949 | 28,224 |
Total revenues from sales to final customers (millions of R$) | 7,914 | 7,771 | 6,344 |
Sales to distributors(4) | | | |
Average price (R$/MWh)(1) | 146.93 | 233.02 | 292.96 |
Volume (GWh)(5) | 18,213 | 15,910 | 14,920 |
Total revenues (millions of R$) | 2,676 | 3,707.4 | 4,370.8 |
Electricity Purchases | | | |
Purchases from Itaipu | | | |
Average cost (R$/MWh)(6) | 182.91 | 263.89 | 128.81 |
Volume (GWh) | 5,958 | 5,941 | 5,870 |
Percentage of total Itaipu production purchased | 6.5 | 7.6 | 7.6 |
Total cost (millions of R$)(7) | 1,089.8 | 1,567.8 | 756.1 |
Purchases from Angra | | | |
Average cost (R$/MWh) | 221.25 | 169.55 | 150.48 |
Volume (GWh) | 1,026 | 1,051 | 1,046 |
Total cost (millions of R$)(7) | 227.0 | 178.2 | 157.4 |
Purchases from CCGF | | | |
Average cost (R$/MWh) | 66.19 | 34.11 | 32.40 |
Volume (GWh) | 7,553 | 3,873 | 1,315 |
Total cost (millions of R$)(7) | 499.9 | 132.1 | 42.6 |
Purchases from others(4) | | | |
Average cost (R$/MWh) | 202.27 | 267.10 | 212.22 |
Volume (GWh) | 14,180 | 15,556 | 19,517 |
Total cost (millions of R$)(7) | 2,868 | 4,155 | 4,142 |
| | | |
(1) Average prices or costs have been computed by dividing (i) the corresponding revenues or expenses by (ii) MWh of electricitysold or purchased.
(2) Includes Free Customers outside Paraná.
(3) Includes public services such as street lighting, as well as supply of electricity to government agencies, and our own consumption.
(4) Energy traded between Copel’s subsidiaries not included.
(5) Energy Reallocation Mechanism not included.
(6) Our purchases of electricity generated by Itaipu are stated in reais and paid for on the basis of a capacity charge expressed in U.S. dollars per kW plus a “wheeling” (or transportation) charge expressed in reais per kWh.
(7) See “Item 4. Information on the Company-Business—Generation” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—Business Purchases” for an explanation of our expenses relating to electricity purchases.
72
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, 2015 AND 2014
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Our consolidated financial statements present our operating costs of sales and services provided by function. However, in accordance with IFRS, Note 33 of our audited consolidated financial statements presents this information according to the nature of the operating cost or expense. For ease of understanding, the analysis below reflects the information presented by nature.
| |
| | | |
| (R$ million) |
Operating Revenues(1): | | | |
Electricity sales to Final Customers: | 5,231.5 | 5,746.9 | 4,371.2 |
Residential | 1,371.2 | 1,804.7 | 1,429.6 |
Industrial | 1,796.0 | 2,049.5 | 1,563.1 |
Commercial, services and other activities | 1,065.2 | 1,156.0 | 838.3 |
Rural | 584.5 | 339.3 | 260.8 |
Other classes | 414.6 | 397.4 | 279.4 |
Electricity sales to distributors | 2,676.1 | 3,707.4 | 4,370.8 |
Use of main distribution and transmission grid | 3,976.6 | 2,388.5 | 2,237.5 |
Residential | 977.4 | 707.0 | 793.0 |
Industrial | 564.3 | 459.2 | 398.6 |
Commercial, services and other activities | 667.7 | 507.7 | 506.2 |
Rural | 241.0 | 185.4 | 109.3 |
Other classes | 231.9 | 164.9 | 166.2 |
Interest income | 854.1 | 116.1 | 50.2 |
Other distribution and transmission revenue | 440.2 | 248.2 | 214.0 |
Construction revenues | 1,279.7 | 1,196.3 | 1,279.0 |
Revenues from telecommunications | 261.6 | 209.9 | 165.5 |
Distribution of piped gas | 471.9 | 526.4 | 391.3 |
Sectorial financial assets and liabilities result | (1,079.7) | 858.2 | 1,033.9 |
Other operating revenues | 151.4 | 94.5 | 69.3 |
Fair value of assets from the indemnity for the concession | 132.7 | 217.7 | 77.0 |
| 13,101.8 | 14,945.8 | 13,995.5 |
Cost of sales and services provided: | | | |
Electricity purchased for resale | (4,685.6) | (6,032.9) | (5,080.6) |
Charge of main distribution and transmission grid | (866.2) | (919.8) | (384.8) |
Personnel and management | (1,304.4) | (1,168.9) | (1,052.8) |
Pension and healthcare plans | (259.8) | (254.3) | (201.6) |
Material and supplies | (81.5) | (76.7) | (74.4) |
Materials and supplies for power electricity | (33.4) | (199.3) | (150.8) |
Natural gas and supplies for gas business | (325.4) | (1,176.1) | (1,469.8) |
Third-party services | (550.5) | (519.5) | (424.5) |
Depreciation and amortization | (708.3) | (676.5) | (629.9) |
Accruals and provisions | (768.7) | (210.8) | (1,203.7) |
Construction cost | (1,280.7) | (1,251.0) | (1,285.9) |
Other costs and expenses | (414.8) | (426.1) | (392.6) |
| (11,279.3) | (12,911.9) | (12,351.4) |
Equity in earnings of associates and joint ventures | 221.7 | 92.5 | 159.9 |
Financial results | (565.7) | (328.6) | 53.6 |
Profit before income tax and social contribution | 1,478.4 | 1,797.8 | 1,857.6 |
Income tax and social contribution on profit | (530.6) | (532.2) | (522.0) |
Net income for the year | 947.8 | 1,265.6 | 1,335.6 |
Net income attributable to controlling shareholders | 958.7 | 1,192.7 | 1,206.0 |
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest | (10.9) | 72.9 | 129.6 |
Other comprehensive income | (57.2) | 291.3 | 90.0 |
Comprehensive income | 890.6 | 1,556.9 | 1,425.6 |
Comprehensive income attributable to controlling shareholders | 901.4 | 1,483.6 | 1,297.2 |
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest | (10.8) | 73.3 | 128.4 |
| | | |
(1)The information contained herein reflects the restatement of the Income Statement of the years 2015 and 2014.
73
Results of Operations for 2016 Compared with 2015
The information contained herein reflects the restatement of Operating Revenues of the Income Statement of the years 2015 and 2014.
Operating Revenues
Our consolidated operating revenues decreased by 12.3% or R$1,844.1 million, in 2016 compared to 2015. This result reflected a decrease of R$1,937.9 million in the sectorial financial assets and liabilities; a decrease of R$1,031.4 million in electricity sales to distributors; a decrease of R$515.4 million in electricity sales to final customers; a decrease of R$85.0 million in fair value of the Indemnifiable Concession Assets ; and a decrease of R$54.5 million in distribution of piped gas. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of R$1,588.1 million in revenues from the use of our main transmission grid; an increase of R$83.3 million in construction revenues; an increase of R$57.0 million in other operating revenues; and an increase of R$51.7 million in telecommunication revenues.
Electricity Sales to Final Customers. Our revenues from electricity sales to Final Customers decreased by 9.0%, or R$515.4 million, to R$5,231.5 million in 2016 compared with R$5,746.9 million in 2015, primarily due to (i) a decrease of 12.9% from June 2016 in the average tariff paid by Final Customers, and (ii) a decrease of 6.2% of total power consumption of our Final Customers, from 27,949 GWh in 2015 to 26,209 GWh in 2016, as follow:
- The volume of electricity sold to residential customers decreased by 0.4% in 2016 compared to 2015. Despite the increase in number of customers of 2.0%, the average consumption decreased by 2.3% in 2016 compared to 2015.
- The volume of electricity sold to industrial customers, including both Captive Customers and Free Customers, decreased by 11.4% in 2016 compared with 2015. Primarily due the negative Brazilian economic conditions, the number of industrial customers decreased by 7.1% and the average consumption decreased by 4.7% in 2016 compared to 2015.
- The volume of electricity sold to commercial customers, including both Captive Customers and Free Customers, decreased by 7.8% in 2016 compared with 2015. This decrease was mainly due to a decrease of 9.1% in the average of consumption.
- The volume of electricity sold to rural customers decreased by 3.4% in 2016 compared to 2015. This decrease is mainly due to the negative performance of agribusiness in the State of Paraná.
Electricity Sales to Distributors. Our revenues from electricity sales to distributors decreased by 27.8%, or R$1,031.4 million, to R$2,676.1 million in 2016 compared with R$3,707.4 million in 2015. This decrease was mainly caused by a decrease in our revenues from energy sold to distributors in the spot market (CCEE), which decreased by R$1,399.6 million, or 64.8%, to R$759.9 million in 2016 from R$2,159.4 million in 2015. This decrease in CCEE revenues is a result of the non-activation of Araucária Thermoeletric plant and lower prices in the spot market.
Use of main distribution and transmission grid. Our revenues from the use of main distribution and transmission grid increased by 66.5%, or R$1,588.1 million, to R$3,976.6 million in 2016 compared to R$2,388.5 million in 2015. This increase was principally due to the recognition of the indemnification of assets related to the Existing System Basic Network (RBSE), which registered a revenue of R$809.6 million in 2016, as discloused in Note 10.4 of our Consolidated Financial Statements. It also reflect the result of the 4th tariff review cycle in June 2016, which increased the Parcel B in 22%. For more information about the calculation of the tariff review, see “Item 4. Information on the Company — The Brazilian Electric Power IndustryRates and Prices”.
Construction revenues. Our revenues from construction increased by 7.0%, or R$83.4 million, to R$1,279.7 million in 2016 compared with R$1,196.3 million 2015. This increase was mainly due to an intensification of construction efforts occured in 2016 aimed at improving our distribution and transmission infrastructure.
74
Fair value of assets from the indemnity for the concession.In 2016, we reviewed our accounting policy and reclassified the gains on “Fair Value of the Indemnifiable Concession Asset”, from financial income to operating revenue, as we believe that this reflects a more appropriate accounting approach for the distribution segment. For more information see Note 4.1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements. This reclassification resulted in a restatement of the Income Statement of the years end 2014 and 2015. An amount of R$217.7 million was reclassified from financial income to operating revenue in 2015. In 2016 we recognized a gain of R$132.7 million, resulting in a decrease of 39%, or R$85.0 million. This decrease reflects the renewal of one of our concession agreements in 2015 and, therefore, a reduction in the balance of “Accounts Receivable Related to the Concession” as a result of the transfer of part of its balance to “Intangible Assets”.
Revenues from Telecommunications. Revenues from our telecommunications segment increased by 24.6%, or R$51.7 million, to R$261.6 million in 2016 compared to R$209.9 million in 2015, as a result of an increased number of customers in the retail market, notably in the internet broadband segment.
Distribution of Piped Gas. Revenues from distribution of piped gas decreased by 10.4%, or R$54.5 million, in 2016 compared to 2015, reflecting the of the Araucária TPP and a decrease in gas consumption by industrial clients. This decrease was partially offset by a 10.4% increase in gas prices.
Sectorial Financial Assets and Liabilities. Sectorial financial assets and liabilities registered a loss of R$1,079.7 million in 2016, compared to a gain of R$858.2 million in 2015. This negative variation of R$1,937.8 million was primarily due to the amortization (as a result of tariff rebalance ocurred in 2016) of (a) the balance recorded in 2015 as Sectorial Assets as a result of a deferral to 2013 and 2014 in the tariff increase for Captive Customers, (b) the balance recorded as a result of the exchage rate variation of the Itaipu power purchase agreement, and (c) the balance of the CDE Account.
Other Operating Revenues. Other operating revenues increased by 60.2% or R$57.0 million, to R$151.4 million in 2016 compared to R$94.4 million in 2015, mainly due to revenue from leases and rentals and income from telecomm services rendered in 2016 (other than broadband internet).
Cost of sales and services provided
Our consolidated costs of sales and services provided decreased by 12.6% or R$1,632.6 million, to R$11.279,3 million in 2016 compared with R$12,911.9 million in 2015. The main factors leading to the decrease of our cost of sales and services provided are as follows:
- Electricity Purchased for Resale.Our expenses for purchasing energy for resale decreased by 22.3%, or R$1,347.3 million, to R$4,685.6 million in 2016 compared with R$6,032.9 million in 2015. This decrease was mainly due to: (a) a reduction of R$478.0 million in the cost of energy purchased from Itaipu in 2016 compared to 2015, notably due to the reduction in the tariffs (US$25.78/kWh in 2016 versus US$38.07/kWh in 2015) and the appreciation of real against the U.S. dollar; (b) a reduction of 15.5% in the cost of energy purchased in the regulated market, from R$3,812.5 million in 2015 to R$3,220.5 million in 2016, notably due to a reduction in the exposure of contracts entered in the regulated market; and (c) a lower PLD in the period (R$92.35/MWh in 2016 versus R$282.71/MWh in 2015).
- Charge of Main Distribution and Transmission Grid.Expenses we incurred for our use of the main distribution and transmission grid decreased by 5.8%, or R$53.6 million, to R$866.2 million in 2016 compared with R$919.8 million in 2015, mainly as a result of the decrease of ESS charges following a lower level of activity in thermoelectric plants in 2016.
- Personnel and Management.Personnel and management expenses increased by 11.6%, or R$135.5 million, to R$1,304.4 million in 2016 compared with R$1,168.9 million in 2015, as a result of (a) wage increases of 9.15% as of October 2016 and 9.9% as of October 2015, and (b) the provision of R$44.3 million for the retirement incentive program (PDI).
75
- Pension and Healthcare Plans. Pension and Healthcare expenses increased by 2.2%, or R$5.5 million, to R$259.8 million in 2016, compared with R$254.3 million in 2015.
- Material and Supplies.Materials and supplies expenses increased by 6.3%, or R$4.8 million, to R$81.5 million in 2016 compared with R$76.7 million in 2015.
- Material and Supplies for Power Electricity. These expenses drastically decreased 83.3%, or R$165.9 million, to R$33.4 million in 2016, compared to R$199.3 million in 2015, mainly as a result of the non-activation of TPP Araucaria in 2016, and the corresponding reduction in natural gas purchases.
- Natural Gas and Supplies for Gas Business.Expenses related to natural gas purchases decreased by 72.3%, or R$850.7 million, to R$325.4 million in 2016 compared with R$1,176.1 million in 2015, mainly as a result of the non-activation of TPP Araucária, causing a reduction in the demand of natural gas. Due to poor hydrological conditions in 2015, the generation of thermoelectric energy was higher than normal.
- Third-Party Services. Third-party services expenses increased by 6.0%, or R$31.0 million, to R$550.5 million in 2016 compared with R$519.5 million in 2015, mainly due to inflation indexation.
- Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased by 4.7%, to R$708.3 million in 2016, compared with R$676.5 in 2015, mainly due to an increase in our non-current assets.
- Accruals and Provisions.Accruals and provisions expenses increased by 264.6% or R$557.9 million, to R$768.7 million in 2016 compared with R$210.8 million in 2015, mainly due to the R$581.6 million impairment of generation and gas distribution assets.
- Construction Cost.Construction costs increased by 2.4%, or R$29.7 million, to R$1,280.7 million in 2016 from R$1,251.0 million in 2015, mainly due the intensification of construction efforts occured in 2016 aimed at improving our distribution and transmission infrastructure.
- Other Costs and Expenses. Other costs and expenses decreased by 2.7% or R$11.3 million, to R$414.8 million in 2016, compared with R$426.1 million in 2015. This decrease was mainly due to a non-operational gain of R$52.1 million arising from the change in the accounting technique for assessing our stake at Sanepar (from the equity method to fair value).
Equity earnings of associates and joint ventures
Equity earnings of associates and joint ventures was R$221.7 million in 2016, an increase of 139.7%, compared to R$92.5 million in 2015, mainly due to an increase in the profits of our associate entities in 2016. Namely, our equity method income for 2016 was: (i) R$43.1 million from Sanepar, compared with R$34.7 million in 2015; (ii) R$41.9 million from Matrinchã, compared with R$0.3 million in 2015; (iii) R$37.5 million from Dominó Holdings, compared with R$24.8 million in 2015; (iv) R$16.2 million from Marumbi, compared with R$13.1 million in 2015; (v) R$15.9 million from Integração Maranhense, compared with R$14.3 million in 2015; (vi) R$12.8 million from Parnaíba, compared with R$3.0 million in 2015; and (vii) R$11.2 million from Guaraciaba, compared with a loss of R$17.1 in 2015.
Financial Results
We recognized R$565.7 million of net financial losses in 2016, compared to a net financial loss of R$328.6 million in 2015. This increase in financial losses is primarily due to the increase in debt charges, mainly arising from the higher balance of financing and debentures. This result was partially offset by a decrease of IGP-DI rate (IGP-DI) and appreciation of the Real versus U.S. dollar.
76
Income Tax and Social ContributionExpenses
In 2016, we recognized income tax and social contribution expenses of R$530.6 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 35.9% on our pretax income. The increase in our effective tax rate in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to the increase in (a) the difference between actual profit and presumed profit booked in our controlled companies, result of the commercial start-up of wind farms which use an alternative method to calculate income tax payments based on a presumed taxable income base (i.e., gross revenue multiplied by statutorily provided margin percentages), and (b) the Interest on Capital paid in 2016. In 2015, we recognized income tax and social contribution expenses of R$532.2 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 29.6% on our pretax income.
Results of Operations for 2015 Compared with 2014
The information contained herein reflects the restatement of Operating Revenues of the Income Statement of the years 2015 and 2014.
Operating Revenues
Our consolidated operating revenues increased by 6.8%, or R$950.3 million, in 2015 compared to 2014. This increase reflected an increase of R$1,375.7 million in electricity sales to final customers; an increase of R$151.0 million in revenues from the use of our main transmission grid; an increase of R$140.7 million in revenues from fair value of assets from the indemnity for the concession; an increase of R$135.1 million in revenues from distribution of piped gas; an increase of R$44.5 million in telecommunications revenues, and an increase in R$25.2 million in other operating revenues. These increases were offset by a decrease of R$663.3 million in electricity sales to distributors, a decrease of R$175.7 million in sectorial financial assets and liabilities and a decrease of R$82.7 million in construction revenues.
Electricity Sales to Final Customers. Our revenues from electricity sales to final customers increased by 31.5%, or R$1,375.7 million, to R$5,746.9 million in 2015 compared with R$4,371.2 million in 2014, primarily due to (i) an extraordinary average tariff adjustment of 36.8% in March 2015 and (ii) an increase of 15.3% from June 24, 2015 in the average tariff paid by Final Customers.
The volume of energy sold to final customers in 2015 decreased by 1.0% in 2015 compared with 2014:
- The volume of electricity sold to residential customers decreased by 4.3% in 2015 compared to 2014. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in average income in the State of Paraná and increased costs of energy following the extraordinary tariff revision in March 2015 and the periodic tariff readjustment in June 2015.
- The volume of electricity sold to industrial customers, including both Captive Customers and Free Customers, decreased by 0.2% in 2015 compared with 2014, primarily due to the expiration of a contract with a Free Customer.
- The volume of electricity sold to commercial customers, including both Captive Customers and Free Customers, increased by 1.1% in 2015 compared with 2014. This increase was mainly due to an increase of 2.1% in the number of commercial customers.
- The volume of electricity sold to rural customers increased by 0.2% in 2015 compared to 2014. This increase is mainly due to the positive performance of agribusiness in the State of Paraná.
Electricity Sales to Distributors. Our revenues from electricity sales to distributors decreased by 15.2%, or R$663.3 million, to R$3,707.4 million in 2015 compared with R$4,370.0 million in 2014. This decrease was mainly caused by a decrease in our revenues for energy sold to distributors in the spot market (CCEE), which decreased by R$827.7 million, or 27.7%, to R$2,159.4 million in 2015 from R$2,987.1 million in 2014, mainly due to (i) lower prices of energy sold in the spot market (CCEE) in 2015 compared to 2014 and (ii) a reduction in the volume of energy generated by the Araucária Thermoelectric plant.
77
Use of main distribution and transmission grid. Our revenues from the use of main distribution and transmission grid increased by 6.7%, or R$151.0 million, to R$2,388.5 million in 2015 compared with R$2,237.5 million in 2014. This increase was principally due to: (i) adjustment of the Permitted Annual Revenue of our transmission assets to reflect inflation and operations of new transmission assets and (ii) tariff increases applied by Copel Distribuição, partially offset by the 2% decline in the grid market of Copel Distribuição.
Construction revenues. Our revenues from construction decreased by 6.5%, or R$82.7 million, to R$1,196.3 million in 2015 compared with R$1,279.0 million 2014. This decrease was mainly due to reduced investments in infrastructure, reflecting the completion of certain projects by Copel Distribuição in 2014 and 2015. Construction revenue for Copel Distribuição decreased by 9.5%, or R$94.4 million, in 2015 compared to 2014.
Revenues from Telecommunications. Revenues from our telecommunications segment increased by 26.8%, or R$44.4 million, to R$209.9 million in 2015 compared to R$165.5 million in 2014, primarily due to an increased number of customers. In 2015, the customer base increased by 73.8%, to 47,987 in December 2015 from 27,614 in December 2014.
Distribution of Piped Gas. Revenues from distribution of piped gas increased by 34.5%, or R$135.1 million, in 2015 compared to 2014, primarily due to (i) an increase of 48.0% in the volume of pipe gas distributed to industrial customers and (ii) a 6.0% tariff adjustment in March 2015.
Sectorial Financial Assets and Liabilities. Revenues related to our sectorial financial assets and liabilities decreased by 17.0%, or R$175.7 million, to R$858.2 million in 2015 compared to R$1,033.9 million in 2014. In 2015, we began amortizing our sectorial financial assets that reflected our deferred tariff revisions from both 2014 and 2013.
Fair value of assets from the indemnity for the concession.In 2016 we reviewed our accounting policy and reclassified the gains on “Fair Value of the Indemnifiable Concession Asset”, from financial income to operating revenue, as we believes that this reflects a more appropriate accounting approach for the distribution segment. This reclassification resulted in a restatement of the Income Statement of the years end 2014 and 2015. An amount of R$217.7 million was reclassified from Financial income to Operating revenue in 2015 and an amount of R$77.0 million was reclassified in 2014.
Other Operating Revenues. Other operating revenues increased by 36.4% or R$25.2 million, to R$94.5 million in 2015 compared with R$69.3 million in 2014, mainly due to the non-recurrence in 2015 of the application in 2014 of PIS and COFINS taxes on certain of our other operating revenues.
Cost of sales and services provided
Our consolidated costs of sales and services provided increased by 4.5% or R$560.5 million, to R$12,911.9 million in 2015 (including amounts recognized as other operating expenses) compared with R$12,351.4 million in 2014. The following were the principal factors in the increase of our costs of sales and services provided:
- Electricity Purchased for Resale.Our expenses for the energy we purchased for resale increased by 18.7%, or R$952.3 million, to R$6,032.9 million in 2015 compared with R$5,080.6 million in 2014. This increase was most significantly due to: (a) the effect of the depreciation of the real on costs of energy purchased from Itaipu, which increased by an average of 109.6%, to R$1,567.8 million in 2015 from R$739.0 million in 2014; (b) an increase of 14.6% in the average cost of energy purchased in the regulated market; and (c) the non-recurrence of payments obtained from the CDE Account and ACR Account, which totaled R$1,253.4 million in 2014. This was partially offset by R$134.6 million in cost recovery under the new hydrological risk allocation mechanism described under“Historical Background of Industry Legislation.”
- Charge of Main Distribution and Transmission Grid.Expenses we incurred for our use of the main distribution and transmission grid increased by 139.0%, or R$535.0 million, toR$919.8 million in 2015 compared with R$384.8 million in 2014, mainly due to (a) increased ESS charges, which are shared costs associated with thermoelectric generation which was mandated in 2015 by the ONS as a result of poor hydrological conditions, (b) the effect of the depreciation of the real on costs of energy transmission from Itaipu, which increased by an average of 23.5%, to R$84.3 million in 2015 from R$67.3 million in 2014 and (c) a 15.9% increase in transmission tariffs.
78
- Accruals and Provisions.Accruals and provisions expenses decreased by 82.5% or R$992.9 million, to R$210.8 million in 2015 compared with R$1,203.7 million in 2014, as a result of (a) non-recurrence in 2015 of the recognition of impairment on certain generation assets (particularly HPP Colíder), which totaled R$807.3 million in 2014, (b) the reversion of impairment charges recorded in 2014, amounting to R$66.0 million and (c) the reversion of R$209.9 million in provisions related to litigation with Ivaí Engenharia de Obras S.A.
- Natural Gas and Supplies for Gas Business.Expenses related to natural gas purchases decreased by 20.0%, or R$293.7 million, to R$1,176.1 million in 2015 compared with R$1,469.8 million in 2014 as a result of decreased generation by the Araucária Thermoelectric plant.
- Personnel and Management.Personnel and management expenses increased by 11.0%, or R$116.1 million, to R$1,168.9 million in 2015 compared with R$1,052.8 million in 2014, mainly due to wage increases of 9.9% as of October 2015 and 7.5% as of October 2014.
- Material and Supplies for Power Electricity. These expenses increased 32.2%, or R$48.5 million, to R$199.3 million in 2015, compared to R$150.8 million in 2014, reflecting an increase in State ICMS tax rate applicable to the acquisition costs for raw materials in 2015, which was raised from 12.0% to 18.0%.
- Construction Cost.Construction costs decreased 2.7%, or R$34.9 million, to R$1,251.0 million in 2015 from R$1,285.9 million in 2014. This decrease was mainly due to reduced investments in infrastructure, reflecting the completion of certain projects by Copel Distribuição in 2014 and 2015.
- Pension and Healthcare Plans. Pension and Healthcare expenses increased 26.1%, or R$52.7 million, to R$254.3 million in 2015, compared to R$201.6 million in 2014.
- Material and Supplies.Materials and supplies expenses increased by 3.1%, or R$2.3 million, to R$76.7 million in 2015 compared with R$74.4 million in 2014.
- Third-Party Services. Third-party services expenses increased 22.4%, or R$95.0 million, to R$519.5 million in 2015 compared with R$424.5 million in 2014, mainly due to higher expenses related to (a) maintenance of electrical system and (b) development of software for communication, processing and transmission of data.
- Other Costs and Expenses. Other costs and expenses increased by 8.5% or R$33.5 million, to R$426.1 million in 2015, compared with R$392.6 million in 2014. This increase was mainly due to losses arising from (a) the sale and demobilization of assets and (b) the write-off of certain assets from our distribution concessionaire.
Equity earnings of associates and joint ventures
Equity earnings of associates and joint ventures was R$92.5 million in 2015, a decrease of 42.2%, compared to R$159.9 million in 2014, mainly due to lower equity income registered by our joint ventures in 2015, specially attributable to (i) net losses recognized by SPC Matrinchã and Guaraciaba, as a result of the write-off of financial assets related to the accounting reclassification of interest on debt due by such SPCs (R$104.1 million), and net losses of R$17.1 million from Guaraciaba and R$6.4 million from Transmissora Sul Brasileira. In any event this positive net result in 2015 was mainly due to: (i) income of R$34.7 million from Sanepar; (ii) income of R$24.8 million from Dominó Holdings; (iii)income of R$14.3 million from Integração Maranhense; (iv) income of R$13.1 million from Marumbi; (v) income of R$12.0 million from Foz do Chopim Energética; (vi) income of R$8.6 million from Caiuá and (vii) income of R$7.5 million from Costa Oeste.
79
Financial Results
We recognized R$328.6 million of net financial losses in 2015, compared to a net financial income of R$53.6 million in 2014. The financial losses recognized in 2015 are mainly attributable to (a) increase in debt charges as a result of two new debenture issuances in 2015, as well as inflation and interest rate adjustments, and (b) increase in exchange variation about purchase Itaipu’s electricity due the effect of the devaluation of thereal in relation to the U.S. dollar. This was partially offset by (a) increased inflation adjustments on accounts receivable related to our distribution concession and our CRC Account and (b) moratory interest applied to past due receivables owed by Captive Customers.Financial results were also impacted by the restatement of the Income statement, due to reclassification of Fair value of assets from the indemnity for the concession. An amount of R$217.7 million was reclassified from financial income to operating Revenue in 2015 and an amount of R$77.0 million was reclassified in 2014. These reclassifications had no impact on net income.
Income Tax and Social ContributionExpenses
In 2015, we recognized income tax and social contribution expenses of R$532.2 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 29.6% on our pretax income. The increase in our effective tax rate in 2015 compared to 2014 was primarily due to the effect on deferred tax balances of negative investment values in the Araucária Thermoelectric Plant in 2014, as well as the increase in 2015 in the difference between actual profit and presumed profit booked in our controlled companies, and the increased Interest on Capital paid in 2015 compared to 2014. In 2014, we recognized income tax and social contribution expenses of R$522.0 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 28.1% on our pretax income.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our principal liquidity and capital requirements are to finance the expansion and improvement of our distribution and transmission infrastructure and to finance the expansion of our generation facilities. We believe our working capital is sufficient for our present requirements and the next 12 months. Our other principal uses of cash are to dividends payments and debt servicing. Capital expenditures were R$3,651.2 million in 2016 and R$2,439.3 million in 2015. The following table sets forth a breakdown of our capital expenditures for the periods indicated. Our capital expenditures are focused on projects located in Brazil.
| |
| | | |
| (R$ million) |
Generation and transmission¹ | 2,129.5 | 948.5 | 758.4 |
Distribution | 777.1 | 656.4 | 857.7 |
Telecom | 193.8 | 105.7 | 107.5 |
Investment of associates and joint ventures | 503.1 | 654.4 | 739.5 |
Araucária Thermoelectric Plant | 20.4 | 3.7 | 32.7 |
Compagas | 25.8 | 69.6 | 79.1 |
Elejor | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 |
Total | 3,651.2 | 2,439.3 | 2,575.4 |
¹ Considers investment in projects 100% Copel GeT.
Our total budgeted capital expenditures for our wholly-owned subsidiaries for 2017 is R$2,034.9 million, of which:
- R$570.3 million is for generation and transmission, R$24.1 million for the construction of the Colíder Hydroelectric Plant, and R$20.5 million for the construction of the Baixo Iguaçu Hydroelectric Plant;
80
· R$629.6 million is for our distribution business;
· R$164.3 million is for our telecommunication business;
· R$653.9 million is for our wind farms, including R$638.6 million for the construction of the Cutia Wind Farm Complex;
· R$16.8 million is for new businesses and others, including R$12.1 million for Paraná Gás.
Our following subsidiaries also budgeted their own capital expenditures for 2017, as described below:
· Compagas: R$25.7 million;
· Araucária: R$2.8 million; and
· Elejor: R$13.6 million.
Historically, we have financed our liquidity and capital requirements primarily with cash provided by our operations and through external financing. Our principal source of funds in 2016 was our operating activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was R$535.6 million in 2016, compared with R$1,371.5 million in 2015. Net cash provided by operating activities was R$1,476.8 million in 2016, compared with R$1,320.7 million in 2015. In 2017, we expect to finance our liquidity and capital requirements primarily with cash provided by our operations and through debt financing from BNDES and the Brazilian capital markets.
As in prior years, we plan to make significant investments in future periods to expand and upgrade our generation, transmission and distribution businesses. In addition, we may seek to invest in other existing electric utilities, in communications services or in other areas, each of which may require additional domestic and international financing. Our ability to generate cash sufficient to meet our planned expenditures is dependent upon a variety of factors, including our ability to maintain adequate tariff levels, to obtain the required regulatory and environmental authorizations, to access domestic and international capital markets, and a variety of operating and other contingencies. We anticipate that our cash provided by operations may be insufficient to meet these planned capital expenditures, and that we may require additional financing from sources such as BNDES and the Brazilian capital markets.
ANEEL’s regulations require prior approval from ANEEL for any transfer of funds from our subsidiaries to us in the form of loans or advances. ANEEL approval is not required for cash dividends, as long as cash dividends do not exceed a dividend threshold (“Dividend Threshold”) equal to the greater of adjusted net income or income reserves available for distribution. The Dividend Threshold is established by Brazilian Corporate Law.
The cash dividends we have received from our subsidiaries have been historically sufficient to meet our cash flow requirements without exceeding the Dividend Threshold. As a result, we have not sought approval from ANEEL to receive either loans or advances from our subsidiaries or cash dividends from our subsidiaries in excess of the Dividend Threshold. We do not expect these restrictions on loans and advances and on cash dividends exceeding the Dividend Threshold to impact our ability to meet our cash obligations, since we expect cash dividends below the Dividend Threshold to be sufficient in the future.
Like other state-owned companies, we are subject to certain CMN restrictions on our ability to obtain financing from domestic and international financial institutions. CMN restrictions could limit our ability to accept bank financing but do not affect our ability to access the Brazilian and international capital markets, and do not restrict our access to banking financing for the purpose of repaying or refinancing debt.
Our total outstanding loans and financing (including debentures) at December 31, 2016 totaled R$8,837.1 million. Approximately R$90.5 million of the total debt outstanding at December 31, 2016 was denominated in U.S. dollars. For more information on the terms of these loans and financings, includingreference to their specific maturity dates and interest rate structure, see Notes 23 and 24 to our audited consolidated financial statements. We are not subject to seasonality with respect to our borrowing requirements. Our major loans and financing arrangements are:
81
Banco do Brasil:
- We have R$1,475.4 million of outstanding debt with Banco do Brasil (not including the debentures listed above), consisting of financings we contracted to pay debentures issued in 2002, 2005 and 2006, as well as a September 2010 fixed-rate credit agreement.
Debentures:
- In October 2012, Copel Distribuição issued R$1,000.0 million in five-year non-convertible debentures, all of which were subscribed for by Banco do Brasil S.A. These debentures have an interest rate equal to CDI + 0.99% per year, with semiannual interest payments. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate balance of R$511.5 million of debt related to this issuance;
- In June 2013, Compagas issued R$62.6 million of simple non-convertible debentures, single series, of the floating type, private issue, with an interest rate equal to TJLP index + 2.7% per year, with a five year maturity and payment of interest on a quartely basis. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate balance of R$38.0 million of outstanding debt related to these debentures;
- In September 2013, Elejor issued R$203.0 million of non-convertible debentures, with an interest rate of 101.0% of the CDI index per year, with a five year maturity and payment of interest on a monthly basis. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate balance of R$71.0 million of outstanding debt related to these debentures;
- In May 2014, Copel Holding issued R$1,000.0 million of non-convertible debentures, with an interest rate of 111.5% of the CDI index per year and with a five year maturity and payment of interest on a semester basis. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate outstanding balance of R$1,017.1 million;
- In May 2015, Copel GeT issued R$1,000 million in five-year non-convertible debentures, with an interest rate of 113.0% of the CDI index per year and payment of interest on an annual basis. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate balance of R$1,094.7 million of outstanding debt related to these debentures;
- In October 2015, Copel Telecom issued R$160.0 million in ten-year non-convertible debentures. These debentures have an interest rate equal to IPCA index + 7.96% per year, a five year maturity and payment of interest on an annual basis. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate balance of R$174.2 million of outstanding debt related to these debentures;
- In March 2016, Nova Asa Branca I, Nova Asa Branca II, Nova Asa Branca III, Nova Eurus IV e Ventos de Santo Uriel Wind Farms issued R$300.8 million in non-converstivle debentures, with sixteen year maturity and payment of interest on monthly basis. Interest rate of TJLP index + 2.02% per year is applicable to R$147.6 million and IPCA index + 9.87% per year is applicable to R$153.2 million. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate balance of R$295.2 million of outstanding debt related to these debentures;
- In April 2016, Compagas issued R$33.6 million of simple non-convertible debentures, single series, of the floating type, private issue, with an interest rate equal to TJLP index + 2.17% per year, with a five year maturity and payment of interest on a quartely basis. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate balance of R$23.8 million of outstanding debt related to these debentures;
82
- In July 2016, Copel GeT issued R$1.0 billion of three-year non convertible debentures, with an interest rate of 121% of the CDI index per year and payment of interest on an annual basis. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate balance of R$1,060.6 million of outstanding debt related to these debentures; and
- In October 2016, Copel Distribuição issued R$500.0 million of non-convertible debentures, with an interest rate of 124% of the CDI index per year, with a three years maturity and payment of interest on a annual basis. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate outstanding balance of R$504.7 million.
BNDES
- In December 2013, we received approval for the BNDES financing of HPP Colíder in an aggregate amount of R$1,041.2 million. As of December 31, 2013, we had received R$840.1 million of this amount, with the remaining disbursements to be made in accordance with the construction schedule. Additionally, BNDES approved to finance the Cerquilho III transmission substation in the amount of R$17.6 million, which was disbursed in a single installment. As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate outstanding balance of these two contracts totaled R$939.0 million;
- BNDES has provided a loan to Copel of R$339.0 million to finance the construction of the Mauá Hydroelectric Plant. Mauá is owned by Consórcio Energético Cruzeiro do Sul, in which Copel has a 51.0% interest and Eletrosul has a 49.0% interest. BNDES is providing 50.0% of the loan amount, and Banco do Brasil S.A. is providing the remaining 50.0%. All the receivables arising from this plant were pledged in favor of BNDES and Banco do Brasil until full repayment of the loan. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate of R$257.4 million in outstanding debt with BNDES and Banco do Brasil under this facility;
- We have R$49.3 million in outstanding debt with Eletrobras (i) for the Salto Caxias plant and (ii) under government programs to finance distribution projects;
- In December 2011 we entered into a financing contract with BNDES in the total value of R$44.7 million for the construction of Transmission Line Foz do Iguacu - Cascavel Oeste, with a 14 years term. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate of R$30.5 million in outstanding debt;
- In March 2012, we entered into a financing contract with BNDES in the total value of R$282.1 million for the construction of GE Farol, Ge Boa Vista, GE São Bento do Norte and GE Olho D’Água Wind Farms with a 16 years term. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate of R$271.0 million in outstanding debt;
- In September 2012, we entered into a financing contract with BNDES in the total value of R$73.1 million for the construction of SHP Cavernoso II. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate balance of R$59.5 million of outstanding debt related to this contract;
- In December 2014, we entered into a financing contract with BNDES to finance the improvement of the distribution system of the greater Curitiba area. We have obtained a R$139.1 million funding on December 2014 and as of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate outstanding balance of R$105.5 million; and
- In June 2015, we entered into a financing contract with BNDES in the total value of R$124.0 million for the construction Santa Helena and Santa Maria Wind Farm. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate balance of R$114.1 million of outstanding debt related to this contract.
FINEP
- In July 2012, a loan agreement in amount of R$52.2 million was signed by Copel Telecomunicações S.A. to partially support the BEL – Extra Broadband project. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate outstanding balance of R$22.0 million.
83
Promissory notes
- In December 2015, Copel GeT issued R$500.0 million of promissory notes with an interest rate of 117.0% of the CDI index per year, with a two years maturity. As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate outstanding balance of R$581.9 million.
We are party to several legal proceedings that could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity if the rulings are adverse to us. In addition, we are contesting a determination by ANEEL that would require us to pay additional amounts for energy we purchased for resale during the electricity-rationing period in 2001 and the first quarter of 2002. We are also involved in several lawsuits, including challenges to the legality of certain federal taxes, which have been assessed against us, claims by industrial customers that certain increases in electricity tariffs from March through November 1986 were illegal and several labor related claims. These contingencies are described in “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”. If any of these claims are decided against us either individually or in the aggregate, they could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our financial condition.
84
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
In the table below, we set forth certain of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2016, and the period in which such contractual obligations come due.
| |
| | | | | |
| (R$ million) |
Contractual obligations: | | | | | |
Loans and financing(1) | 5,273.9 | 1,843.2 | 1,387.0 | 487.0 | 1,556.7 |
Debentures(2) | 6,305.3 | 1,574.3 | 2,859.8 | 1,287.3 | 583.9 |
Suppliers(3) | 1,292.4 | 1,252.1 | 39.5 | 0.8 | - |
Purchase obligations(4) | 116,320.9 | 4,626.9 | 9,062.3 | 8,624.0 | 94,007.7 |
Concession payments(5) | 2,217.7 | 66.8 | 143.5 | 156.8 | 1,850.6 |
Eletrobras ‒ Itaipu(6) | 8,889.4 | 1,086.4 | 2,527.0 | 2,577.9 | 2,698.1 |
Installment due to the Federal Revenue of Brazil(7) | 225.6 | 64.1 | 142.4 | 19.1 | - |
Post-employment benefits(8) | 7,750.7 | 467.5 | 977.4 | 918.6 | 5,387.2 |
Sectoral Financial liabilities(9) | 309.5 | 164.9 | 144.6 | - | - |
Total | 148,585.4 | 11,146.2 | 17,283.5 | 14,071.5 | 106,084.2 |
| | | | | |
(1) Includes interest as agreed under agreements in the amount of R$1,420.4 million. For more details, see Note 23 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
(2)Includes interest as agreed under relevant agreements in the amount of R$1,647.3 million. For more details, see Note 24 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
(3) Mainly consists of Electricity purchased from Auction – CCEAR with balances falling due in less than 30 days and gas supplied by Petrobras to the Araucária Thermoelectric Plant.
(4) Consists of binding power purchase commitments. Includes monetary restatements as agreed under relevant agreements.
(5) Payments to the federal government arising from Elejor, Mauá, Colíder, Cavernoso, Apucaraninha, Chopim I, Chaminé, Rio Jordão and Baixo Iguaçu facilities concession agreement. Includes interest and applicable monetary restatements.
(6)Includes expected exchange variation.
(7)Income Tax and Social Contribution due by Copel Geração e Transmissão in 2014. Includes interest and applicable monetary restatement.
(8)For more details, see Note 25 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
(9)For more details, see Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
We are also subject to risks with respect to tax, labor and civil claims and have provisioned R$1,241.3 million for accrued liabilities for legal proceedings related to these claims as of December 31, 2016. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” and Notes 17 and 30 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the registrant’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
We are managed by:
· a Board of Directors, which may consist of seven or nine members and is currently composed of nine members; and
· a Board of Executive Officers, which consists of six members.
85
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors ordinarily meets monthly. A majority of the members of the Board of Directors is required for the meeting to be held, and decisions are taken by a majority vote of those present at the meeting. For additional information, see item 10. “Memorandum and Articles of Association”. The members of the Board of Directors are elected to serve for two-year terms and may be reelected. Among the current nine members of the Board of Directors:
· seven are elected by the controlling shareholders;
· one is elected by minority shareholders; and
· one is elected by our employees.
The member of our Board of Directors who is elected by the non-controlling shareholders has the right to veto (provided it is duly justified) the appointment of the independent accountant made by the majority of the members of our Board of Directors.
The State of Paraná and BNDES Participações S.A.– BNDESPAR (“BNDESPAR”), acting through the Company and Paraná Investimentos S.A., are parties to a Shareholders’ Agreement dated December 22, 1998, as amended on March 29, 2001 and with term set to expire by December 21, 2018 (“Shareholders’ Agreement”). BNDESPAR is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BNDES. Under the Shareholders’ Agreement, the parties agree to exercise their voting rights so that:
· the State of Paraná appoints five members to the Board of Directors; and
· BNDESPAR appoints two members to the Board of Directors.
According to Brazilian Corporate Law, minority shareholders are entitled to appoint and remove a member of the Board of Directors, in a separate election, where such minority shareholders (i) hold at least 15% of the company’s voting shares or (ii) hold at least 10% of the company’s outstanding non-voting shares.
The terms of the current members of the Board of Directors expires in April 2017. The current members are as follows:
| | |
Fernando Xavier Ferreira | Chairman | 2015 |
Antonio Sergio de Souza Guetter | Director | 2017 |
Marlos Gaio | Director | 2015 |
Mauro Ricardo Machado Costa | Director | 2015 |
José Richa Filho | Director | 2011 |
Carlos Homero Giacomini | Director | 2011 |
Hélio Marques da Silva | Director | 2015 |
Sandra Guerra | Director | 2016 |
Sergio Eduardo Weguelin Vieira | Director | 2016 |
The following are brief biographies of the current members of our Board of Directors:
Fernando Xavier Ferreira. Mr. Ferreira is 68 years old. He received a degree in Electrical Engineering - Telecommunications from Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro - PUCRJ (1971) and took an additional management training course from School of Business Administration, from Western Ontario University (Canadá) (1982). Mr. Ferreira has been the chairmanof our board of directors since April 2015.Mr.Ferreira is also a member of the Superior Strategic Council ofFederação das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo - Fiesp; of the Board of Directors ofCentro Educacional João PauloII; of the Council ofAssociação Amigos do Hospital das Clínicas; and as a member of the Board of Directors of several other companies. He also took positions as Chief Executive Officer of Telecomunicações do Paraná S.A. - Telepar; as the Brazilian General Director of Itaipu Binacional, in Grupo Telefônica in Brazil and at Telecomunicações Brasileiras S.A. – Telebras. Mr. Ferreira also served as an Executive Secretary of the Brazilian Ministry of Communications and as a Professor of Microwaves and Electromagnetism at the Department of Electrical Engineering of Universidade Federal do Paraná. He was also a member of the Latin American Committee of New York Stock Exchange - NYSE (USA) and the Chairman of the Superior Council of Infrastructure atFederação das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo – Fiesp.Mr. Ferreira was appointed by the State of Paraná.
86
Antonio Sergio de Souza Guetter.Mr. Guetter is 56 years old. He received a post-graduation degree in Finance from Wharton School (2012) and from New York University (2001); a post-graduation degree in Management and Planning from Drexel University of Philadelphia (2000); a post-graduation degree in Quality from Japanese Union of Scientists and Engineers - JUSE (1999); a post-graduation degree in Marketing and Strategic Management from Texas University (1998); took an Executive MBA in Business Management from PUC/ISAD (1998) and in Finance from ISPG (1997. Mr. Guetter holds a degree in Civil Engineering from Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR (1986). He is currently Copel’s Chief Executive Officer. Previously he acted as the Chief Executive Officer of Copel Distribuição S.A. (2016-2017) and held also positions as Head of Coordination of Corporate Integrity at Companhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel (2015); Chief Financial and Investors Relations Officer of Copel (2014); Chief Financial Officer of Copel Distribuição S.A., Copel Geração e Transmissão S.A., Copel Participações S.A., Copel Telecomunicações S.A. and Copel Renováveis S.A. (2014); Chief Executive Officer of Copel Renováveis S.A. (2014); Chief Executive Officer of Fundação Copel de Assistência e Previdência Social (2013); and Chief Management and Social Security Officer of Fundação Copel de Assistência e Previdência Social (2011-2012).
Marlos Gaio.Mr. Gaio is 42 years old. Mr. Gaio is a lawyer with specialization in Fiscal Planning from Instituto Internacional de Educação e Gerência - Iege (2004) and a specialization in Business Law from Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (2002).Mr. Gaio has been a member of our board of directors since April 2015.He is currently the founding partner and Executive Officer of Gaio & Flor Junior Advogados Associados (2001-present); founding partner and business manager of FBG Participações e Administração de Imóveis Ltda. (2010-present). Previously, he held important positions throughout his professional career: member of the Governance Commission of State-Owned Companies, of Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa - IBGC (2008-2009); member of the Board of Directors of Centrais Elétricas do Rio Jordão S.A. - Elejor (2007-2008); chairman of the Oversight Board of Fundação Copel de Previdência e Assistência Social (2006-2010); Head of the Corporate Management Office of Copel (2005-2011); having also carried out juridical activities in several areas of Copel.
Mauro Ricardo Machado Costa.Mr. Costa is 55 years old.He received a post-graduation degree in Public Management fromFundação Getúlio Vargas – FGV(1988) and a degree in Business Management fromCentro Universitário de Brasília - Uniceub (1981-1984). Mr. Costa has been a member of our board of directors since February 2015, a member of our audit committee since April 2015 and he is currently the Secretary of Treasury for the State of Paraná, Chairman of the Board of Directors ofAgência de Fomento do Paraná, Chairman of the Board of Directors ofServiço Social Autônomo PARANACIDADE, Chairman of the Board of Directors ofCompanhia de Saneamento do Paraná – Sanepar, member of the Board of Directors ofCompanhia de Habitação do Paraná – Cohapar, and member of the Board of Directors ofAgência Paraná de Desenvolvimento - APD.Previously, he served as Municipal Secretary of Treasury for the city of Salvador; as a fiscal audit of the Brazilian Federal Revenue; the Secretary of Treasury for the State of São Paulo (2007-2010); Secretary of Finance for the city of São Paulo (2005-2006 and 2011-2012); Chief Executive Officer ofFundação Nacional de Saúde - Funasa; chief executive officer ofCompanhia de Saneamento de Minas Gerais - Copasa; and chief officer of theZona Franca de Manaus – Suframa. Mr. Costa was appointed by the State of Paraná.
José Richa Filho. Mr. José Richa is 52 years old. He has a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering fromUniversidade Católica do Paraná and a graduate degree in public management fromSociedade Paranaense de Ensino e Informática. Mr. José Richa has been a member of our board of directors since January 2011 and a member of our audit committee and its financial expert since March 2011. He is currently the chairman of the Board of Directors ofParaná Edificações, member of the Board of Directors ofAgência Paraná de Desenvolvimento – APD, Secretary of Infrastructure and Logistics for theState of Paraná, and member of the Board of Directors ofDepartamento de Transito do Paraná - Detran-PR. Previously, Mr. José Richa was the President of the Board of Directors ofEstrada de Ferro Oeste PR – Ferroeste (2012 – 2014), member of the Management and Deliberative Committee of theParaná Competitivo program (2013-2014), member of the Board of Directors ofCompanhia de Informática do Paraná - Celepar (2011-2013), Management Secretary of the Municipality of Curitiba (2005-2010), Chief Administrative and Financial Officer atAgência de Fomento do Paraná S.A. (State Development Agency) (2003-2004), and Chief Administrative and Financial Officer of Departamento deEstradas de Rodagem - DER-PR (State Agency for Roads) (2000-2002). Mr. José Richa was appointed by the State of Paraná.
87
Carlos Homero Giacomini. Mr. Giacomini is 62 years old. He has a master’s degree in Public Health fromUniversidade Estadual de Londrina – UEL; a specialization in Pediatrics, with residency atHospital Evangélico do Paraná and a degree in Medicine fromFaculdade Evangélica de Medicina do Paraná. Mr. Giacomini has been a member of our board of directors since July 2011 and the chairman of our audit committee since February 2012. He also currently works as a doctor for theParaná State Secretary of Health, and for theCuritiba Municipal Secretary of Health. Previously, Mr. Giacomini was Municipal Secretary of Planning and Coordination of the Municipality of Curitiba (2009-2012), Chairman ofImap Curitiba (2005-2012), Municipal Secretary of Human Resources of the Municipality of Curitiba (1999-2002), Chairman atInstituto de Previdência dos Servidores do Município de Curitiba - IPMC (Pension Fund Institute for Curitiba’s Municipality Servants) (1999), director of Planning and chief officer at theInstituto Municipal de Administração Pública - Imap (Municipal Institute for Public Administration) (1997-1998) and Director atHospital Oswaldo Cruz (1985-1986). Mr. Giacomini was appointed by the State of Paraná.
Hélio Marques da Silva. Mr. Silva is 55 years old. He has a specialization in Applied Law, fromEscola da Magistratura do Paraná - Núcleo Maringá (2011); a degree in Law, fromFaculdades Maringá, Maringá - PR (2010); technical degree in electronics, from Colégio Poli, Maringá - PR (1993); and technical degree in electrotechnics, from Colégio Poli, de Maringá - PR (1993). Mr. Silva has been a member of our board of directors since April 2015 and has been an Industrial Technician of Electrotechnics at Copel since July 1993. He has held several positions throughout his career in the Company, such as maintenance technician (1993-2005); maintenance mechanic (1993); trainee mechanic (1991-1993); and security guard (1987-1991).
Sandra Guerra.Ms. Guerra is 62 years old. She received a master’s degree in Business Administration (2009) fromUniversidade de São Paulo and a degree in Journalism (1977) fromUniversidade Paulista. Ms. Guerra has been a member of our board of directors since October 2016. Ms. Guerra currently serves as a member of the board of directors for Vix Logística S.A. (since 2015), and she is also an executive officer for Better Governance Consulting Services (since 2005). Previously, Ms. Guerra was a member of Grupo Solvi (2011-2013), a member of Coteminas S.A. (2007-2012), a member of International Corporate Governance Network - ICGN (2001-2004), a member of Mundomedia S.A. (2000-2002), and a member of Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa – IBGC (1995-2001). She has also previously served as a member in numerous ICGN comimittees, including the Nomination Committee (2012-2015), the Principles Revision Committee (2009), the annual assemblies (2007-2009), and the Awards Committee (2006-2007). Ms. Guerra has additionally served as a member in numerous IBGC committees, including the International Committee (2009-2012), the Corporate Governance Committee (2008) and the Certification Committee. (2008-2009). Additionally, Ms. Guerra has held several positions as Coordinator, including for the Organization and Personnel Committee of Grupo Itapemirim (2010-2013), the Companies Circle Corporate Governance in Latin America (2005-2012), the ICGN annual assembly in Rio de Janeiro (2002-2004), the IBGC 10 ten-year Committee (2005), and IBGC’s Annual Assembly Committe (2001-2003-2007). Additionally, Ms. Guerra has held positions as President of ICGN’s Award Committee, (2008-2010), member of the Consulting Council of Grupo Itapemirim, (2009-2013) and of InVent (2002-2003), Marketing Director for CPM S.A. (2000-2005); Country Manager for the Institute for International Research do Brasil - IIR (1996-1999), Senior Partner and Counsel of Paradygma Marketing e Comunicação (1991-1996), Partner-Director for Mútua Assessoria de Comunicação (1982-1991), and journalist on radio and television channels. (1975-1987). Ms. Guerra has also served as the President of board of directors of IBGC (2012-2016), and as a member of the administrative council for various firms (2012-2016).Ms. Guerra was appointed by BNDESPAR.
Sergio Eduardo Weguelin Vieira.Sergio Eduardo Weguelin Vieira.Mr. Vieira is 62 years old. He received a master’s degree in Politics Economy (1982) from The New School for Social Research anda degree in Economics (1979) fromUniversidade Cândido Mendes. Mr. Vieira has been a member of our board of directors since October 2016. Previously, Mr. Vieira was a partner of BRZ Investimentos (2013-2015), Executive Officer of the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários - CVM (2004-2008), a supervisor in the environmental area (2009-2013), Chief officer in the department of market and capital and in the Research and Development department (2002-2004), and he held the same position in BNDES (2000-2001), and supervisor in BNDESPAR (1995-2000). Mr. Vieira has been a member of the Administrative Council for several entities, including Amata and the Granéis Terminal in Santa Catarina - TGSC, the Sustainability Committee for Fibria, and for the Derivatives Chamber for BM&Fbovespa. He has also acted as a representative for the Project “Brazilian Excellence in Securities Transactions – Best”, started by CVM, for the Brazilian Central Bank,for BM&FBovespa and for Anbid.Additionally, Mr. Vieira has previously served as Director for Investments of Fundação de Assistência e Previdência Social do Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social - BNDES - Fapes (2015-2016).Mr. Vieira was appointed by BNDESPAR.
88
BOARD OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Our Board of Executive Officers meets every two weeks and is responsible for the daily management of the Company. Each Executive Officer also has individual responsibilities established by the Board’s internal rules.
According to our bylaws, our Board of Executive Officers consists of six members. The Executive Officers are elected by the Board of Directors for three-year terms but may be removed by the Board of Directors at any time. Under the Shareholders’ Agreement, BNDESPAR has the right to appoint one member to the Board of Executive Officers. The terms of the current members of the Board of Executive Officers expire in December, 2017. The current members are as follows:
| | |
Antonio Sergio de Souza Guetter | Chief Executive Officer | 2017 |
Gilberto Mendes Fernandes | Chief Business Management Officer | 2015 |
Luiz Eduardo da Veiga Sebastiani | Chief Financial and Investor Relations Officer | 2015 |
Jonel Nazareno Iurk | Chief Business Development Officer | 2013 |
Cristiano Hotz | Chief Legal and Institutional Relations Officer | 2015 |
Fabio Malina Losso | Chief Governance, Risk and Compliance Officer | 2016 |
The following are brief biographies of the current members of our Board of Executive Officers:
Antonio Sergio de Souza Guetter.Mr. Guetter has been our Chief Executive Officer since March 23, 2017. For biographical information regarding Mr. Guetter, see “Board of Directors”.
Gilberto Mendes Fernandes. Mr. Fernandes is 60 years old. He received a specialization degree in Strategic Planning from Fundação Dom Cabral (2001); and a graduate degree in Electronics from Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica do Paraná - Cefet/Paraná (1975). Mr. Fernandes is currently the Chief Corporate Management Officer of Companhia Paranaense de Energia – Copel; a member of the Board of Directors of Carbocampel - S.P.C. Copel/Cambui, since April 2014; a member of the Board of Directors of CS Bioenergia - S.P.C. Cattalini/Sanepar, since May 2015; a member of the Advisory Technical Committee of the Board of Directors of Sanepar, since November 2013; a member of the Deliberative Council of UEGA Thermal Plant, since February 2012; and a member of the Directing Council of Consórcio Cruzeiro do Sul - Mauá Power Plant, since August 2013. Mr. Fernandes held important positions throughout his professional career: Chief Assistant Officer of Copel Participações S.A., our Chief Environment and Corporate Citizenship Officer (2012-2013); Advisor to TV SBT Rio de Janeiro (2002-2010); Executive Technical Officer at Grupo Paulo Pimentel (1989-2002), among others.
Luiz Eduardo da Veiga Sebastiani.Mr. Sebastiani is 57 years old. He received a degree in Economy fromUniversidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR and a post-graduate degree in Economic Theory fromUniversidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP (1988). Mr. Sebastiani is currently the Chief Financial and Investor Relations Officer ofCompanhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel,Chief FinancialOfficer ofCopel Distribuição S.A. - Copel DIS, Chief Financial Officer ofCopel Comercialização S.A. - Copel COM, Chief Financial Officer of Copel Geração e Transmissão S.A. – Copel GeTand Chief Financial Officer ofCopel Renováveis S.A. - Copel REN. He held important positions throughout his professional career as a Secretary of Treasury for the State of Paraná (2014); member of the Board of Directors atCopel (2014); Chief Financial and Investor Relations Officer at Copel (2013-2014); Chief of Staff of Paraná State Government (2012); Member of the Fiscal Council at Copel (2011-2012); Member of the Fiscal Council atCompanhia de Saneamento do Paraná - Sanepar (Sanitation Utility Company) (2011-2012); Secretary of Management and Provision for the State of Paraná (2011-2012); Municipal Secretary of Finance in Curitiba (2005-2010); member of the Board of Directors at Companhia de Habitação de Curitiba - Cohab - CT (2005-2010); Chief Transport Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors atUrbanização de Curitiba S.A. - Urbs (2005); Board member and State of Paraná representative at theConselho Federal de Economia - Cofecon (Federal Economy Council), where he was the Chairman of the Budget Commission (2001-2002); and head of theConselho Regional de Economia do Paraná - Corecon-PR (Regional Economy Council - State of Paraná).
89
Jonel Nazareno Iurk. Mr. Iurk is 62 years old. Mr. Iurk has a master’s degree in Soil Science and in River Basin Management from theUniversidade Federal do Paraná (2005); a specialization degree in Management and Environmental Engineering fromUniversidade Estadualdo Paraná (1999), and bachelor’s degrees in Mathematics (1975) and in Civil Engineering (1978) fromUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa. Mr. Iurk is currently the Chief Business Development Officer of Copel, Member of the Board of Directors ofCopel Geração e Transmissão S.A., and Member of the Board of Directors ofCopel Renováveis S.A. Previously, he was Chairman of the Board of Directors ofCopel Telecomunicações; Chairman of the Board of Directors ofCopel Renováveis S.A.; our Chief Environment and Corporate Citizenship Officer (2012-2013); Secretary of Environment and Water Resources for the State of Paraná (2011-2013); Executive Technical Officer ofECOBR - Engenharia e Consultoria Ambiental (2002-2010); Chief Officer ofInstituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis - Ibama for the State of Paraná (1995-1999); Environmental Sanitation Coordinator ofCoordenação da Região Metropolitana de Curitiba - Comec (1994); and Operational Development Engineer and Coordinator of Rural Sanitation and Environmental Studies of Sanepar (1992-2002).
Cristiano Hotz. Mr. Hotz is 44 years old. He received a degree in Law fromPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná – PUC/PR and took a Specialization Course in Constitutional Law from ABDConst - Curitiba – PR. He is currently the Chief Legal and Institutional Relations Officer ofCompanhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel. Mr. Hotz held important positions throughout his professional career: he was Chairman of the Board of Directors ofCopel Distribuição S.A.; Chairman of the Board of Directors ofCopel Participações S.A.;member of the Board of Directors atElejor - Centrais Elétricas do Rio Jordão S.A. (2014); Alternate Member of the Board of Directors atDominó Holdings S.A. (2014); Advisor to the Governor of the State of Paraná (2011-2014); Member of the Electoral Law Commission of the Bar Association of the State of Paraná (OAB/PR) (2011-2014); Alternate Member of the Fiscal Council atFomentos Paraná - Agência de Fomento do Paraná (2011); Electoral Law Professor at theEscola Superior de Advocacia (ESA - OAB/PR) (2006-2008); Attorney General of the City of Pontal do Paraná, State of Paraná (2005); Assistant to the Secretary of Finance of the city of Curitiba (2002-2004); Chief of Staff for the Government Office at Curitiba Municipality (2000-2002); Founding member of theInstituto Paranaense de Direito Eleitoral - Iprade; Chairman of the 6th Trial Group of the Court of Ethics and Discipline at OAB/PR; Member of Special Trial Chamber of the Court of Ethics and Discipline at OAB/PR; and Member of the Research Group on the Masters in Business Law and Citizenship at Unicuritiba: Civil and Environmental Responsibility from the Civil and Constitutional Perspective.
Fabio Malina Losso. Mr. Losso is 43 years old. He received a postdoctoral degree in Public Policies in 2013 from Harris School of Public Policy, a doctoral degree in Civil Law in 2008 from Universidade de São Paulo and a degree in Law in 1999 from Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná. He is currently the Chief Governance, Risk and Compliance Officer of Copel, a partner and attorney ofLosso Advogados Associados (since 1999), a founding member of “The Harris Council” of the University of Chicago (since 2015), member (2009 - 2014) and chairman (2014 - 2015) of the International Council of the Dean of the School of Public Politics of the University of Chicago (since 2014). Previously, Mr. Losso had served as liquidator President ofBanco de Desenvolvimento do Paraná S.A. - Badep (2011-2013), founder and board member ofFundo Especial de Segurança Pública do Estado do Paraná - Funesp (2012-2013), secretary general ofConselho Estadual de Trânsito do Estado do Paraná (2012-2013), visiting scholar and associate researcher of University of Chicago, as well as Graduate courses of Universidade Positivo, UniCuritiba and FAAP.
90
FISCAL COUNCIL
We have a permanent Fiscal Council, which generally meets monthly. The Fiscal Council consists of five members and five alternates elected for one-year terms by the shareholders at the annual meeting. The Fiscal Council, which is independent of our management and of our external auditors, is responsible for:
· reviewing our financial statements and reporting on them to our shareholders;
· issuing special reports on proposed changes in capitalization, corporate budgets and proposed dividend distributions and any corporate reorganization; and
· in general, supervising the activities of management and reporting on them to our shareholders.
The following table lists the current and alternate members of the Fiscal Council, who were appointed at the 61th annual shareholders’ meeting held on April 28, 2016, and whose terms expire in April 2017.
| |
Vacant – Chairman | - |
Georg Hermann Rodolfo Tormin | 2015 |
Nelson Leal Junior | 2015 |
Massao Fabio Oya | 2015 |
João Carlos Flor Junior | 2015 |
Alternates | |
Osni Ristow | 2011 |
Roberto Brunner | 2011 |
Gilmar Mendes Lourenço | 2013 |
Aurelio Belarmino BarbosaVinícius | 2015 |
Vinícius Flor | 2016 |
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Pursuant to Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act and our bylaws, our Audit Committee is composed of at least three members of our Board of Directors, each of whom serves a term of two years, and may be re-elected. Pursuant to the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee members are appointed by, and may be replaced by, a resolution taken by our Board of Directors. Since April 30, 2015, the members of the Audit Committee are Mr. José Richa Filho, Carlos Homero Giacomini and Mauro Ricardo Costa. All of the members of the Audit Committee are members of our Board of Directors. The Audit Committee is responsible for helping to prepare our financial statements, ensuring that we are in compliance with all legal requirements related to our reporting obligations, monitoring the work of the independent auditors and our staff who are responsible for internal auditing of the Company and reviewing the effectiveness of our internal control and risk management procedures and staff.
Under Brazilian Corporate Law, the function of hiring independent auditors is reserved for the board of directors of a company. As a result, our Board of Directors acts as our Audit Committee, as specified in Section 3(a)(58) of the Securities Exchange Act, for purposes of approving, on a case-by-case basis, any engagement of our independent auditors for audit and non-audit services provided to us or our subsidiaries. Except in these respects, our Audit Committee is comparable to and performs the functions of audit committees of U.S. companies.
91
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, FISCAL COUNCIL MEMBERS AND AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Under Brazilian law, the total compensation of the Board of Directors, Executive Board and Fiscal Council is established annually by our general shareholders meeting. Under Section 162 of the Brazilian Corporate Law, the compensation of the members of our fiscal council must be equal to, or greater than, 10% of the average compensation paid to the members of our Board of Directors (excluding benefits and profit-sharing plans, if applicable). Finally, the members of our audit committee (all members of our Board of Directors) receive an additional of 50% of their compensation as Board members.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the aggregate amount of compensation paid by us to the members of our Board of Directors, Board of Executive Officers and Fiscal Council was R$8.8 million, of which 78.6% was for our Board of Executive Officers, 15.5% was for our Board of Directors, and 5.9% was for our Fiscal Council, as approved by our 61st annual shareholders’ meeting held on April 28, 2016.
The following table shows additional details about the compensation paid to the members of our Board of Directors, Executive Board and Fiscal Council for the periods indicated.
| | Compensation (R$’000) in the years ended December 31, |
| | Board of Directors |
| Executive Officers |
| Fiscal Council |
Area |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
Number of members(1) | | 9 | | 9 | | 7 | | 6 | | 6 | | 6 | | 5 | | 5 | | 5 |
Salary | | 1,159.6 | | 955.5 | | 860.8 | | 6,417.9 | | 6,507.9 | | 6,438.4 | | 505.1 | | 544.0 | | 494.1 |
Compensation for attending committees(2) | | 180.6 | | 160.2 | | 173.3 | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - |
Others(3) | | 23.5 | | 22.5 | | 33.8 | | 483.0 | | 491.7 | | 493.5 | | 11.1 | | 15.9 | | 16.9 |
Total |
| 1,363.7 | | 1,138.2 | | 1,067.9 | | 6,900.9 | | 6,999.6 | | 6,931.9 | | 516.2 | | 559.9 | | 511.0 |
(1) The number of members corresponds to the monthly average of members divided by 12 months.
(2) Refers Audit Committee.
(3)Refers Private Pension Contribution, Assistance Plan for all members and Representation Grant for Executive Officers.
We have no service contracts with our directors providing for benefits upon termination of employment. We do not have a stock option plan for our directors, officers or employees.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 2016, we had 8,531 employees, compared to 8,628 employees on December 31, 2015 and 8,592 employees on December 31, 2014. Including employees at Compagas, Elejor and UEG Araucária Ltda. (companies in which we have a majority stake) we had 8,716 employees on December 31, 2016.
The following table sets forth the number of our employees and a breakdown of employees by category of activity as of the dates indicated in each area of our operations.
92
| |
| | | |
Generation and transmission | 1,680 | 1,568 | 1,554 |
Distribution | 6,022 | 6,032 | 6,071 |
Telecommunications | 660 | 621 | 601 |
Corporation staff and research and development | 69 | 347 | 329 |
Other employees | 100 | 60 | 37 |
Total employees of Copel wholly-owned subsidiaries | 8,531 | 8,628 | 8,592 |
Compagas | 162 | 162 | 160 |
Elejor | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Araucária | 16 | 16 | 13 |
Total | 8,716 | 8,813 | 8,772 |
All of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements that we renegotiate annually with the unions that represent the various employee groups. In 2016, we negotiated and signed labor agreements with the unions representing our employees. These new bargaining agreements became effective in October and will be in place for a one-year term. We agreed to salary increases of 9.15% in 2016 compared to 2015 salaries.
We provide a number of benefits to our employees. The most significant is our sponsorship ofFundação Copel de Previdência e Assistência Social (“Fundação Copel”), which supplements the Brazilian government retirement and health benefits available to our employees. As of December 31, 2016, approximately 99.0% of our employees had elected to participate in a defined contribution plan.
In accordance with federal law and our compensation policy, our employees participate in a profit-sharing plan. The Board of Directors and the shareholders must approve the amount of such compensation, which is determined in accordance with an agreement between an employee committee and us. An employee’s receipt of compensation is conditioned on the company meeting certain benchmarks described in the above-mentioned agreement, as confirmed in our published year-end financial statements. The amount of profit-sharing distributions reserved and approved for the 2016 fiscal year (including Compagas) was R$64.8 million. The amount of profit-sharing distributions accrued and approved for the 2015 fiscal year (including Compagas) was R$78.5 million. The terms of the profit-sharing agreement are currently being revised and negotiated for future years.
On August 1, 2016, we launched a new retirement incentive program (“PDI”), in which an employee who had worked at least 20 years at Copel and was at least 50 years of age could join. The deadline for joining this program (which is still in force) is 120 days counted from the first day of the month immediately following the date on which the employee simultaneously meets the requirements of: (i) being 55 years of age and having obtained the retirement benefit; or (ii) being 55 years of age and having the sum of the minimum contribution time plus age in accordance with the National Institute of Social Security (“INSS”) standards. After joining the PDI, the deadline for dismissal is up to 12 months.
As of December 31, 2016, 236 employess joined the program and 57 employess were dismissed under the program, totalizing R$8.6 million in benefits / indemnity compensation for the termination of employment contracts.
93
SHARE OWNERSHIP
As of March 31, 2017, board members and executive officers held, collectively, directly or indirectly, less than 1.0% of any class of our shares.
The following table shows the number of shares held by board members, executive officers and members of the fiscal council as of March 31, 2017:
| Number of Shares |
Common | Class A | Class B |
Board of Directors |
Fernando Xavier Ferreira | 1 | - | - |
Antonio Sergio de Souza Guetter | 1 | - | - |
Mauro Ricardo Machado Costa | 1 | - | - |
José Richa Filho | 1 | - | - |
Sergio Eduardo Weguelin Vieira | 1 | - | - |
Sandra Maria Guerra De Azevedo | 1 | - | - |
Carlos Homero Giacomini | 1 | - | - |
Marlos Gaio | 100 | - | - |
Hélio Marques da Silva | 1 | - | - |
Executive Officers |
Antonio Sergio de Souza Guetter | - | - | - |
Gilberto Mendes Fernandes | - | - | - |
Luiz Eduardo da Veiga Sebastiani | - | - | - |
Cristiano Hotz | - | - | - |
Jonel Nazareno Iurk | - | - | - |
Fabio Malina Losso | - | - | - |
Paulo Cesar Krauss | - | - | - |
Fiscal Council - Members |
Joaquim Antonio Guimarães de Oliveira Portes | - | - | - |
George Hermann Rodolfo Tormin | - | - | - |
Nelson Leal Junior | - | - | - |
Massao Fabio Oya | - | - | - |
João Carlos Flor Junior | - | - | - |
Fiscal Council - Alternates |
Osni Ristow | - | - | - |
Roberto Brunner | - | - | - |
Gilmar Mendes Lourenço | - | - | - |
Aurelio Belarmino Barbosa | - | - | - |
Vinícius Flor | - | - | - |
We have no share-based incentive plan for employees.
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
Since 1954, the State of Paraná has owned the majority of our Common Shares and has exercised control over us. At December 31, 2016, the State of Paraná directly owned 58.6% of the Common Shares, and BNDESPAR owned directly 26.4% of the Common Shares.The State of Paraná does not have any different voting rights, but as long as it holds a majority of our Common Shares, it will have the right elect a majority of our directors.The following table sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of our Common Shares on December 31, 2016:
94
| |
| (thousands) | (% of total) |
State of Paraná | 85,029 | 58.6 |
BNDESPAR | 38,299 | 26.4 |
Eletrobras | 1,531 | 1.1 |
Public Float – ADSs | 1,205 | 0.8 |
Public Float – BM&FBovespa | 18,632 | 12.9 |
Other | 335 | 0.2 |
All directors and officers as a group(1) | | |
Total | 145,031 | 100.0 |
(1) Our directors and officers hold an aggregate of 108 Common Shares.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of our Class B Shares on December 31, 2016:
| |
| (thousand) | (% of total) |
State of Paraná | – | – |
BNDESPAR | 27,282 | 21.3 |
Eletrobras | – | – |
Traded as ADSs | 33,958 | 26.4 |
Traded in the BM&FBovespa Market | 66,918 | 52.2 |
Other | 138 | – |
All directors and officers as a group | – | – |
Total | 128,296 | 100.0 |
As of March 31, 2017, 4.4% of the Common Shares and 26.6% of the Class B Shares were held by 293 holders that reside in the United States and have registered with the Companhia Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia (“CBLC”). At the same date, the ADSs represented 0.8% of the Common Shares and 25.3% of the Class B Shares, and together, approximately 12.3% of our total share capital. By March, 2017, our shareholders had voted to convert 51,664 Class A Shares into Class B shares. For the last three fiscal years, we had no changes in the amount of our issued corporate capital, in the number of our shares or any changes in the voting rights of our shares.
Shareholders’ Agreement
Under the Shareholders’ Agreement, the State of Paraná cannot approve, without BNDESPAR’s prior authorization, the following matters:
· amendments to our bylaws;
· reductions or increases of our capital stock;
· changes in our corporate purpose;
· creation of a new class of our preferred shares;
· issuances of securities convertible into our shares or call options for our shares;
· reverse splits or splits of issued shares;
95
· constitution of reserves, funds or accounting provisions that affect the rights and interests of minority shareholders;
· liquidations or voluntary corporate restructurings;
· mergers, spin-offs, transformations, transfers or acquisitions of interests in other companies;
· incorporation of wholly-owned subsidiaries;
· adoption of policy with respect to minority shareholders in the case of merger, amalgamation, split-off and transfer of control in Copel; and
· reduction in mandatory dividends.
Related Party Transactions
We engage in transactions, including the sale of electric energy, with our principal shareholders and with our affiliates. The tariffs we charge on electric energy sold to our related parties are approved by ANEEL, and the amounts are not material.
Transactions with Shareholders
The following summarizes the most significant transactions with our principal shareholders:
Government of the State of Paraná
The State of Paraná owns 58.6% of our Common Shares. We had accounts receivable from the government of the State of Paraná under the CRC Account agreement in the amount of R$1,522.7 million at December 31, 2016. The outstanding balance bears interest of 6.65% per year and is adjusted in accordance with the IGP-DI inflation index. We recorded interest income and monetary variation receivable from the government of the State of Paraná under the CRC Account of R$188.9 million in 2016. For more information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview—Impact of the CRC Account”. We also had ICMS payables in the amount of R$113.8 million as of December 31, 2016. ICMS expenses during 2016 amounted to R$4.1 billion.
We also had an amount receivable of R$115.9 million related to the Luz Fraterna Program, a program that allows the State of Paraná to pay off the energy bills of customers enrolled in the Social Electricity Tariff, provided that consumption does not exceed 120 kWh. For more information, see Note 37 of our audited consolidated financial statements.
BNDES and BNDESPAR
BNDESPAR, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BNDES, owns 26.4% of our Common Shares and has the right to appoint two members to our Board of Directors. BNDES has granted us loans to finance the construction of generation and transmission facilities.
As of December 31, 2016, we had an aggregate of R$2,049.7 million in outstanding debt with BNDES under these facilities.
Fundação Copel
Fundação Copelis a closed pension fund sponsored by Copel, Compagas and other entities that runs and operates benefit plans, welfare and social assistance. In 2016, Copel made payments toFundação Copel consisting of: (i) rental in amount of R$13.5 million and (ii) R$259.8 million for expenditure on pension and welfare plans.
96
Transactions with Affiliates
Dona Francisca Energética S.A.
We own 23.0% of the total issued and outstanding share capital ofDona Francisca Energética S.A. We had accounts payable in the amount of R$1.4 million as of December 31, 2016.
Until March 2015, we had a power purchase agreement with DFESA, valued at R$81.3 million annually, under which Copel Geração e Transmissão purchased 100% of DFESA’s assured energy. In April 2015, we signed a new ten year power purchase agreement with DFESA, valued at R$17.0 million annually, under which Copel Geração e Transmissão purchases 23.03% of DFESA’s assured energy (proportional to Copel’s equity interest).
Voltália São Miguel do Gostoso I Participações S.A.
We own 49.0% of the total issued and outstanding share capital of Voltália São Miguel do Gostoso I S.A. On May 14, 2015, a loan agreement was entered by and between us (lender) and Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso Participações S.A. (borrower), with retroactive effect as of February 6, 2015, in the total amount of up to R$29.4 million plus IOF tax, with a two year term and a remuneration of 111.5% of the CDI index aiming at providing working capital to finance the activities and business of Voltália São Miguel do Gostoso I S.A. Of total amount the credit line, Voltália used R$23.7 million.
As of December, 2016 we had an outstanding receivable amount of R$29.0 million related to this loan agreement.
Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso I Participações S.A. paid in full the loan agreement in February, 2017.
Item 8. Financial Information.
See pages F-1 through F-138.
Legal Proceedings
We are currently subject to numerous proceedings relating to civil, administrative, labor and tax claims. Our audited consolidated financial statements only include provisionswhen the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) resulting from a past event; it is probable (i.e, more likely than not) that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation; and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount to settle the obligation.As of December 31, 2016, our provisions for such risks were R$1,241.3 million. However, we cannot assure you that the actual amountsultimately paid will not be different from the estimates made in recognizing theseprovisions.
As of December 31, 2016, we estimate that the total amount of claims against us, excluding disputes involving non-monetary claims or claims whose potential losses cannot be reasonably estimated due to the current early stages of proceedings, for which no provisions have been made, was approximately R$2,559.8 million, of which R$423.5 million correspond to labor claims; R$23.6 million to employee benefits; R$765.9 million to regulatory claims; R$594.2 million to civil claims; and R$752.6 million to tax claims. For more information, see Note 30 of our audited consolidated financial statements.
ANEEL Determinations
We are contesting a determination by ANEEL that would require us to recognize, in our current liabilities at December 31, 2016, approximately R$2,322.7 million in relation to energy purchased from Itaipu during the energy rationing period that occurred in 2001, when there was a significant difference between the purchase price of Itaipu energy and energy sold in the spot market. Our management believes that losses resulting from the final ruling of this claim are remote and therefore we have no provision relating to this matter. However, we may be required to contribute to the amounts owed by other energy companies under similar lawsuits, and as of December 31, 2016, we had provisions of R$49.7 million to cover expected losses related to these other lawsuits.
Tax and Social Contribution Claims
During the second half of 2010, two lawsuits were decided before the Federal Regional Court (Tribunal Regional Federal) in favor of the federal government, reversing the prior judgment that recognized our immunity regarding the payment of COFINS tax. As a result, the Federal Internal Revenue Service (Receita Federal) issued an infraction notice demanding the payment of COFINS tax from the period between August 1995 and December 1996. As of December 31, 2016, we had provisioned R$93.9 million to cover expected losses related to these lawsuits.
We are party to administrative and judicial proceedings pursuant to which we are challenging claims of the Brazilian Social Security authorities to pay additional security contributions for the periodbetween 2000 and 2006. In these proceedings, we estimate the amount of our expected loss to be R$23.3 million.
97
Labor Related Claims
We are the defendant in several lawsuits filed by either current or past employees of ours, related to overtime claims, dangerous work conditions, relocation, and other matters. As of December 31, 2016, we have provisions totaling R$458.9 million reflecting the expected losses related to these lawsuits.
Regulatory
We are disputing certain regulatory and legal proceedings in connection with ANEEL’s allegations that we violated regulatory standards. As of December 31, 2016, we have provisions totaling R$68.0 million reflecting the expected losses related to these proceedings.
Additional Claims
We are party to several lawsuits related to accidents involving equipment used in our electricity transmission and distribution grids, vehicle accidentsand lawsuits for recovery of commissions by Tradener (more information see Note 30.1.2(e) of ouraudited consolidated financial statements). As of December 31, 2016, we have provisions totaling R$295.5 million reflecting the expected losses related to these lawsuits.
As the result of a November 2004 lawsuit filed byIvaí Engenharia de Obras S.A. (“Ivaí”), we were ordered to pay R$180.9 million based on a claim by Ivaí that amounts paid by us were insufficient to cover Ivaí’s costs related to Ivaí’s construction work on the Rio Jordão project. On October 20, 2016 our Board of Directors approved the terms and conditions for a settlement agreement to finally resolve the lawsuit. The agreement was entered with Ivaí on October 10, 2016, and ratified by the Court immediately thereafter. Under the settlement agreement we agreed to pay the amount of R$152.3 million in fifteen monthly installments, adjusted by 50.0% of the monthly IPCA for the period.
We are also party to several lawsuits brought by landowners whose land has been affected by our transmission and distributions lines. As of December 31, 2016, we have provisions totaling R$99.4 million relecting the expected losses related to these lawsuits.
Dividend Payments
In accordance with our bylaws and Brazilian Corporate Law, we regularly pay annual dividends for each fiscal year within sixty days of the declaration of the dividends at the annual shareholders’ meeting. To the extent amounts are available for distribution, we are required to distribute as a mandatory dividend an aggregate amount equal to at least 25.0% of our adjusted net profit. Dividends are allocated pursuant to the formula described in “Dividend Priority of Class A Shares and Class B Shares” below. Under Brazilian Corporate Law, we are not permitted to suspend the mandatory dividend payable with respect to the Common Shares Class A Shares and Class B Shares for any year. Brazilian Corporate Law permits, however, a company to suspend the payment of all dividends if the Board of Directors, with the approval of the Fiscal Council, reports at the shareholders’ meeting that the distribution would be detrimental to the Company given its financial circumstances. In such a case, companies with publicly traded securities must submit a report to the CVM providing the reasons for the suspension of dividend payments. Notwithstanding the above, Brazilian Corporate Law and our bylaws provide that Class A Shares and Class B Shares shall acquire voting rights if we suspend the mandatory dividend payments for more than three consecutive fiscal years, and such voting rights will continue until all dividend payments, including back payments, have been made. We are not subject to any contractual limitations on our ability to pay dividends.
98
Calculation of Adjusted Net Profit
Annual dividends are payable from our adjusted net profit for such period. Brazilian Corporate Law defines “net profit” for any fiscal year as the result of a fiscal year after the deduction of income andsocial contribution taxes for that fiscal year and after the deduction of any amounts allocated to employees’ and management’s participation in our results in such fiscal year. The “net profit” for a relevant fiscal year is subject to adjustment by the addition or subtraction of amounts allocated to legal and other reserves, the result of which is known as our adjusted net profit.
In accordance with Brazilian Corporate Law, we must maintain a legal reserve, to which we must allocate a minimum of 5% of our net profits for each fiscal year until such reserve reaches an amount equal to 20.0% of our capital stock (calculated in accordance with Brazilian Corporate Law). However, we are not required to make any allocations to our legal reserve in a fiscal year in which the legal reserve, when added to our other established capital reserves, exceeds 30.0% of our total capital. The amounts to be allocated to such reserve must be approved by our shareholders in a shareholders’ meeting and may be used only for the increase of our capital stock or compensation of losses.
At December 31, 2016, our legal reserve was R$792.7 million, or approximately 10.0% of our capital stock at that date.
In addition to deducting amounts for the legal reserve, under Brazilian Corporate Law net profit may also be adjusted by deducting amounts allocated to:
- the contingency reserve: under Brazilian Corporate Law, our shareholders’ meeting, upon a justified proposal of our Board of Directors or Board of Executive Officers, may decide to allocate a percentage of our net profits to a contingency reserve for anticipated losses that are deemed probable in future years, which amount may be estimated;
- the tax incentives reserve: under Brazilian Corporate Law, our shareholders’ meeting, upon a justified proposal of our Board of Directors or Board of Executive Officers, may decide to allocate a percentage of our net profits resulting from government donations or subsidies for investment purposes.
On the other hand, net profits may also be increased by:
- the reversal of any amounts previously allocated to a contingency reserve in the fiscal year in which the loss that had been anticipated does not occur as projected or in which the anticipated loss occurs but is lower than the contingency allocated to it; and
- any amounts included in the unrealized profits reserve that have been realized in the relevant fiscal year and have not been used to offset losses, as approved by our shareholders’ meeting, upon proposal of our Board of Directors or Board of Executive Officers.
Moreover, our net profits are also adjusted by adding the realization of amounts registered under “Equity Value Adjustments”.The account “Equity Value Adjustments” was created as a result of the first-time adoption of IFRS by Copel in 2010, which caused a fair value revaluation of certain fixed assets and the adoption of the fair value as its “deemed cost” at that date. The increase of the deemed cost of fixed assets lead to an increase of depreciation costs. Thus, our management has decided to add to the adjusted net profits the realization of the “Equity Value Adjustments” in order to compensate the effects of the increased depreciation costs. This procedure is authorized by ICPC 10 (Interpretação do Comitê de Pronunciamento Contábil). In 2016, our adjusted net profits used to calculate our dividends was increased in R$101.7 million as a result of said realization.
The amounts available for distribution are determined on the basis of the Statutory Financial Statements prepared using the method required by Brazilian Corporate Law, which differ from our audited consolidated financial statements included herein.
Dividend Priority of Class A Shares and Class B Shares
According to our bylaws, Class A Shares and Class B Shares are entitled to receive annual, non-cumulative minimum dividends, which dividend per share shall be at least 10% higher than the dividends per share paid to the holders of the Common Shares. Class A Shares have a dividend priority over the Class B Shares, and Class B Shares have a dividend priority over the Common Shares. To the extent that dividends are paid, they are to be paid in the following order:
- first, the holders of Class A Shares have the right to receive a minimum dividend equal to 10% of the total share capital represented by the Class A Shares outstanding at the end of the fiscal year in respect of which the dividends have been declared;
- second, to the extent there are additional amounts to be distributed after all amounts allocated to the Class A Shares have been paid, the holders of Class B Shares have the rightto receive a minimum dividend per share equal to (i) the mandatory dividend divided by (ii) the total number of Class B Shares outstanding at the end of the fiscal year in respect of which the dividends have been declared; and
99
- third, to the extent that there are additional amounts to be distributed after all amounts allocated to the Class A Shares and the Class B Shares have been paid, the holders of Common Shares have the right to receive an amount per share equal to (i) the mandatory dividend divided by (ii) the total number of Common Shares outstanding at the end of the fiscal year in respect of which dividends have been declared, provided that the Class A Shares and Class B Shares receive dividends per share at least 10% higher than the dividends per share paid to the Common Shares.
To the extent that there are additional amounts to be distributed after all amounts described in the preceding items have been paid and in the form therein described, any such additional amount will be divided equally among all our shareholders.
Payment of Dividends
We are required to hold an annual shareholders’ meeting by April 30th of each year at which, among other things, an annual dividend may be declared by decision of the shareholders on the recommendation of the management, as approved by the Board of Directors. The payment of annual dividends is based on the financial statements prepared for the fiscal year ending December 31. Under Brazilian Corporate Law, we must pay dividends to shareholders of record within 60 days of the date of the shareholders meeting that declared the dividends. A shareholders’ resolution may set forth another date of payment, which must occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which such dividend was declared. We are not required to adjust the amount of paid-in capital for inflation for the period from the end of the last fiscal year to the date of declaration or to adjust the amount of the dividend for inflation for the period from the end of the relevant fiscal year to the payment date. Consequently, the amount of dividends paid to holders of Class B Shares may be substantially reduced due to inflation.
Pursuant to our bylaws, our management may declare interim dividends to be paid from profits in our semi-annual financial statements approved by our shareholders. Any payment of interim dividends count towards the mandatory dividend for the year in which the interim dividends were paid.
Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, we may pay interest on equity in lieu of dividends as an alternative form of making distributions to shareholders. We may treat a payment of interest on equity as a deductible expense for tax purposes, provided that it does not exceed the lesser of:
- the total amount resulting from (i) Long-Term Interest Rate (Taxa de Juros a Longo Prazo, or “TJLP”) multiplied by (ii) the total shareholders’ equity (determined in accordance with Brazilian Corporate Law), less certain deductions prescribed by Brazilian Corporate Law; and
- the greater of (i) 50.0% of current net income (after the deduction of social contribution on profits (CSLL ‒Contribuição Social sobre o Lucro Líquido) and before taking such distributions and any deductions for corporate income tax) for the year in respect of which the payment is made or (ii) 50.0% of retained earnings and profit reserves for the year prior to the year in respect of which the payment is made.
In order to be eligible to receive amounts remitted in foreign currency outside of Brazil, shareholders who are not residents of Brazil must register with the Central Bank in order to receive dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to their shares. The Class B Shares underlying the ADSs are held in Brazil by the Custodian, as agent for the Depositary, which is the registered owner of our shares.
Payments of cash dividends and distributions, if any, will be made in Brazilian currency to the Custodian on behalf of the Depositary, which will then convert such proceeds into U.S. dollars and will cause such U.S. dollars to be delivered to the Depositary for distribution to holders of ADSs. In the event that the Custodian is unable to immediately convert the Brazilian currency received as dividends into U.S. dollars, the amount of U.S. dollars payable to holders of ADSs may be adversely affected by devaluationsof the Brazilian currency that occur before such dividends are converted and remitted. In the event the holder of an ADS fails to collect its dividends from the Custodian within three (3) years, counted as of the date when such dividend was made available, Brazilian corporate law states that such dividends may be returned to us. In this case, the ADS holder shall lose its right to receive the dividends.
100
The table below sets forth the cash distributions we paid/will pay as dividends and as interest on equity for the periods indicated.
| | Distribution (R$ thousands) | |
| | | | | |
2012 | May 2013 | 268,554 | 0.93527 | 2.52507 | 1.02889 |
2013 | May 2014 | 560,537 | 1.95572 | 2.52507 | 2.15165 |
2014 | June 2015 | 622,523 | 2.17236 | 2.52507 | 2.39000 |
2015 | June 2016 | 326,795 | 1.13716 | 2.52507 | 1.25473 |
The table below sets forth the cash distributions we paid/will pay as dividends and as interest on equity, translated into US$ based on the exchange rate at year-end, for the periods indicated.
| | Distribution (US$ thousands) | Payment per thousand shares (US$) |
| | | | | |
2012 | May 2013 | 131,419 | 0.45768 | 1.23566 | 0.50349 |
2013 | May 2014 | 239,280 | 0.83485 | 1.07789 | 0.91849 |
2014 | June 2015 | 234,366 | 0.81785 | 0.95063 | 0.89978 |
2015 | June 2016 | 83,691 | 0.29122 | 0.64666 | 0.32133 |
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
The principal trading market for our shares (including our Class B Shares) is the BM&FBovespa market, which is maintained by BM&FBovespa. On March 31, 2017, approximately 3,169 shareholders owned our Class B Shares.
The following table sets forth the reported high and low closing sale prices for our shares on the BM&FBovespa market for the periods indicated.
101
| | |
| | | | |
| (R$) | (R$) | (R$) | (R$) |
2012 | 39.00 | 20.80 | 48.29 | 26.40 |
2013 | 30.50 | 20.02 | 37.01 | 26.21 |
2014 | 27.86 | 17.18 | 40.40 | 23.64 |
2015 | 25.20 | 15.90 | 36.75 | 23.60 |
1st Quarter | 24.37 | 21.30 | 34.77 | 30.75 |
2nd Quarter | 25.20 | 21.45 | 36.75 | 32.48 |
3rd Quarter | 23.88 | 20.11 | 36.13 | 29.30 |
4th Quarter | 23.25 | 15.90 | 34.70 | 23.60 |
2016 | 24.81 | 12.07 | 37.20 | 17.75 |
1st Quarter | 19.57 | 12.07 | 30.39 | 17.75 |
2nd Quarter | 20.79 | 15.49 | 30.66 | 23.37 |
3rd Quarter | 23.29 | 19.81 | 35.37 | 29.33 |
4th Quarter | 24.81 | 18.97 | 37.20 | 26.36 |
October | 23.65 | 20.94 | 37.20 | 33.52 |
November | 24.81 | 19.88 | 36.49 | 27.77 |
December | 20.57 | 18.97 | 28.62 | 26.36 |
2017, up to April 17, 2017 | 28.46 | 19.10 | 35.37 | 27.20 |
1st Quarter | 28.46 | 19.10 | 35.37 | 27.20 |
January | 22.73 | 19.10 | 32.33 | 27.20 |
February | 26.40 | 22.70 | 34.86 | 31.85 |
March | 28.46 | 24.71 | 35.37 | 32.20 |
2nd Quarter | 25.25 | 23.97 | 32.27 | 29.52 |
April | 25.25 | 23.97 | 32.27 | 29.52 |
In the United States, our Class B Shares in the form of ADSs, each representing one Class B Share (as a result of the reverse stock split), issued by the Depositary pursuant to the Deposit Agreement by and between Copel, the Depositary and the registered holders and beneficial owners from time to time of the ADSs. The ADSs trade on the NYSE under the symbols “ELP” and “ELPVY”. The following table sets forth the reported high and low closing sales prices for ADSs on the NYSE for the period indicated.
| U.S. dollars per ADR (ELPVY) | U.S. dollars per ADS |
| | | | |
| (US$) | (US$) | (US$) | (US$) |
2012 | 19.81 | 10.68 | 26.03 | 12.75 |
2013 | 14.50 | 9.10 | 18.05 | 11.77 |
2014 | 12.33 | 7.43 | 18.12 | 9.97 |
2015 | 8.92 | 3.54 | 13.00 | 5.87 |
1st Quarter | 8.92 | 6.74 | 13.00 | 9.88 |
2nd Quarter | 7.99 | 6.78 | 11.72 | 10.29 |
3rd Quarter | 7.64 | 4.96 | 11.47 | 7.63 |
4th Quarter | 5.99 | 3.54 | 9.01 | 5.98 |
2016 | 7.74 | 2.79 | 11.78 | 4.26 |
1st Quarter | 5.07 | 2.79 | 8.43 | 4.26 |
2nd Quarter | 6.07 | 4.19 | 9.40 | 6.54 |
3rd Quarter | 7.10 | 5.85 | 10.99 | 8.71 |
4th Quarter | 7.74 | 5.64 | 11.78 | 7.88 |
October | 7.46 | 6.46 | 11.78 | 10.28 |
November | 7.74 | 5.64 | 11.47 | 8.04 |
December | 6.20 | 5.68 | 8.60 | 7.88 |
2017, up to April 17, 2017 | 8.62 | 5.86 | 11.29 | 8.92 |
1st Quarter | 8.62 | 5.86 | 11.29 | 8.92 |
January | 7.07 | 5.86 | 10.26 | 8.92 |
February | 8.54 | 7.05 | 11.22 | 10.16 |
March | 8.62 | 7.75 | 11.29 | 10.17 |
2nd Quarter | 8.05 | 7.62 | 10.28 | 9.39 |
April | 8.05 | 7.62 | 10.28 | 9.39 |
102
On June 19, 2002, our shares were listed on the Latibex, an Euro-based market for Latin American securities. The shares trade under the symbol “XCOP”.
Item 10. Additional Information
Memorandum and Articles of Association
Organization
We are a publicly traded company duly registered with the CVM under No. 1431-1. According to Article One of our bylaws, we are authorized to pursue, directly or through consortia or in partnership with private companies, the following objectives and purposes:
- researching and studying, technically and economically, all energy sources, providing solutions for a sustainable development;
- researching, studying, planning, constructing and developing the production, transformation, transportation, storage, distribution and trade of energy in any of its forms, chiefly electric power, as well as fuels and energy raw materials;
- studying, planning, designing, constructing and operating dams and their reservoirs, as well as other undertakings for multiple uses of water resources;
- providing information and technical assistance services concerning the rational use of energy by businesses, with the aim of implementing and developing economic activities deemed relevant for the development of the State of Paraná; and
- implementing electronic data transmission, electronic communications, cellular telephone systems, and other endeavors that may be deemed relevant to the Company and the State of Paraná.
Except as described in this section, our bylaws do not contain provisions addressing the duties, authority, or liabilities of directors and management, which are instead established by Brazilian Corporate Law.
Qualification of Directors
Our bylaws require that each director be a shareholder of the Company and a Brazilian citizen and resident.
Limitations on Directors’ Powers
Under Brazilian Corporate Law, if a director or an executive officer has a conflict of interest with the company in connection with any proposed transaction, the director or executive officer may not vote in any decision of the board of directors or of the board of executive officers related to that transaction, and must disclose the nature and extent of the conflict of interest for transcription in the minutes of the meeting. A director or an executive officer may not transact any business with a company, including accepting any loans, except on reasonable and fair terms for the Company and conditions that are identical to the terms and conditions prevailing in the market or offered by third parties. According to our bylaws, shareholders set the aggregate compensation payable to directors and executive officers. For more information, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees”. Our bylaws do not establish any mandatory retirement age limits.
Board of Directors and Board of Executive Officers
According to our bylaws, we are managed by a Board of Directors, composed of seven or nine members, and a Board of Executive Officers, composed of six members.
103
Our Board of Directors ordinarily meets monthly and is responsible, among other things, for: (i) establishing our corporate strategy; (ii) defining the general orientation of our business; (iii) defining the responsibilities of members of our Board of Executive Officers; and (iv) electing the members of our Board of Executive Officers.
Our Board of Executive Officers meets every two weeks and is responsible for the daily management of the Company. Each Executive Officer also has individual responsibilities established by our bylaws.
For further information, see Items 6 –“Board of Directors” and “Board of Executive Officers”.
Shareholders’ Meetings
The convening of our shareholders’ meeting is made through publication of a notice to shareholders in two newspapers, which are determined at the previous shareholders’ meeting. Generally, we make such notice inDiário Oficial do Estado – PRand the Folha de Londrina. As provided by Brazilian Corporate Law, publications have to be made in the official newspaper located in the state of our corporate headquarters, in a newspaper with wide circulation in the same city as our corporate headquarters. The notice must be published no fewer than three times, beginning at least 30 calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting date.
In order for a shareholders' meeting to be held on first call, shareholders representing at least one quarter of the voting capital have to be present, except as otherwise provided for under Brazilian law. If no such quorum is verified, a second meeting may be called by notice given at least 8 calendar days prior to such meeting and in accordance with the same rules of publication previously described. The quorum requirements will not apply to a second meeting, subject to the minimum quorum and voting requirements for certain matters, as discussed below. A shareholder without a right to vote may attend a general shareholders' meeting and take part in the discussion of matters submitted for consideration.
A shareholder may be represented at a general shareholders' meeting by a proxy appointed in accordance with applicable Brazilian law not more than one year before the meeting, who must be a shareholder, a company officer, a lawyer or a financial institution.
Right of Withdrawal
Brazilian Corporate Law provides that under certain circumstances a dissenting shareholder has the right to withdraw its equity interest from a company and to receive a payment for the portion of shareholder’s equity attributable to his or her equity interest.
Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, each preferred share of a class that is admitted to trading on a Brazilian stock exchange must have the certain rights under the Company’s bylaws.
Our bylaws comply with the directives provided by Brazilian Corporate Law as follows: (i) our Class A Shares shall have priority in the distribution of minimum dividends of 10.0% per year,pro rata, calculated as a percentage of the paid-in capital stock represented by such shares on December 31 of the previous fiscal year; (ii) our Class B Shares shall have priority in the distribution of minimum dividends,pro rata, in the amount equivalent to 25.0% of our net profits, as adjusted in accordance with Section 202 of Law No. 6,404/76, calculated as a proportion of the paid-in capital stock represented by such shares on December 31st of the previous fiscal year; (iii) the dividends paid on Class B Shares pursuant to item (ii) above shall be paid only from any remaining profits after the payment of priority dividends to Class A Shares; and (iv) the dividends to be paid per preferred share, regardless of the class, shall be at least 10% higher than the dividends to be paid per Common Share.
Liquidation
In the event of liquidation of the Company, after all creditors have been paid, all shareholders will participate equally and ratably in any remaining residual assets.
104
Liability of the Shareholders for Further Capital Calls
Neither Brazilian Corporate Law nor our bylaws provide for capital calls. The shareholders’ liability is limited to the payment of the issue price of the shares subscribed or acquired.
Conversion Rights
Our bylaws provide that the only permitted conversion of shares is Class A Shares are convertible into Class B Shares. Our shares are not otherwise convertible.
Form and Transfer
Our shares are maintained in book-entry form with a transfer agent (“Transfer Agent”). To make a transfer of shares, the Transfer Agent makes an entry in the register, debits the share account of the transferor and credits the share account of the transferee.
Transfers of shares by foreign investors are made in the manner described above and are executed by the investor’s local agent on the investor’s behalf. However, if the original investment was registered with the Central Bank pursuant to a foreign investment mechanism regulated by Resolution No. 4,373 of September 29, 2014 of the CMN (“Resolution No. 4,373”) as described under “Exchange Controls” below, the foreign investor must declare the transfer in its electronic registration.
A shareholder may choose, in its individual discretion, to hold its shares through CBLC. Shares are added to the CBLC system through Brazilian institutions that have clearing accounts with the CBLC. Our shareholder registry indicates which shares are listed on the CBLC system. Each participating shareholder is in turn registered in a register of beneficial shareholders maintained by the CBLC and is treated in the same manner as the other registered shareholders.
Changes in rights of stockholders
A General Meeting of Stockholders must be held whenever the Company intends to change the rights of holders of our common shares or preferred shares. Under Brazilian Corporate Law the proposed changes must be approved by a majority of the class of stockholders that would be affected. Certain changes related to the rights of preferred shares, such as changes in preferences, advantages or conditions of redemption or amortization, may result in the exercise of rights to withdraw by the holders of the shares affected.
Regulation of and Restrictions on Foreign Investors
Foreign investors face no legal restrictions barring them from holding Common Shares, Class A Shares, Class B Shares or ADSs.
The ability to convert into foreign currency dividend payments and proceeds from the sale of Class B Shares or preemptive rights and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to restrictions under foreign investment legislation which generally requires, among other things, the registration of the relevant investment with the Central Bank. Any foreign investor who registers with the CVM in accordance with CMN Resolution No. 4,373 may buy and sell securities on Brazilian stock exchanges without obtaining a separate certificate of registration for each transaction.
Annex II to CMN Resolution No. 4,373 (“Annex II Regulations”) allows Brazilian companies to issue depositary receipts in foreign exchange markets. Our ADS program is duly registered with the Central Bank and the CVM.
Our bylaws do not impose any limitation on the rights of Brazilian residents or non-residents to hold our shares and exercise the rights in connection therewith.
105
Disclosure of Shareholder Ownership
Brazilian regulations require that any person or group of persons representing the same interest that has directly or indirectly reached an interest corresponding to 5.0% or more of any class of shares, or any rights under such shares, of a publicly traded company must disclose its share ownership to the investor relations officer of such company, which, in turn, must disclose such information to the CVM and to any relevant stock exchange. Any subsequent increase or decrease of 5.0% or more in ownership of any class of shares must be similarly disclosed. The same reporting obligation applies to any person or group of persons with an interest of 5.0% or more of any class of shares of a publicly traded company ceases to hold its stake. If such increase results in change of corporate control or administrative structure, or if the increase imposes a public offering, in addition to informing the investor relations officer, a statement containing certain required information must be published in newspapers that are widely circulated in Brazil.
Material Contracts
For information concerning our material contracts, see “Item 4. Information on the Company” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.
Exchange Controls
The ownership of Class A Shares, Class B Shares or Common Shares of the Company by individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil is subject to certain conditions established under Brazilian law, as described below.
The right to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the sale of shares into foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to restrictions under Brazilian foreign investment legislation, which generally requires, among other things, that the relevant investments have been registered with the Central Bank. Such restrictions on the remittance of foreign capital abroad may hinder or prevent Itaú Unibanco S.A., as custodian for the Class B Shares represented by ADSs (“Custodian”), or holders who have exchanged ADSs for Class B Shares from converting dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale of such Class B Shares, as the case may be, into U.S. dollars and remitting such U.S. dollars abroad. Holders of ADSs could be adversely affected by delays in, or refusal to grant any, required government approval for conversions of Brazilian currency payments and remittances abroad of the Class B Shares underlying the ADSs.
Under Resolution No. 4,373/2014, foreign investors may invest in almost all financial assets and engage in almost all transactions available in the Brazilian financial and capital markets, provided that certain requirements are fulfilled. The definition of foreign investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual funds and other collective investment entities, domiciled or headquartered abroad.
To be eligible to invest in the Brazilian financial and capital markets, foreign investors must:
1. appoint at least one representative in Brazil with powers to perform actions relating to foreign investments;
2. register as a foreign investor with the CVM; and
3. register the foreign investment with the Central Bank; and
4. constitute at least one custodian institution authorized by CVM.
Securities and other financial assets held by foreign investors must be registered or maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity duly licensed by the Central Bank or the CVM. In addition, securities trading is restricted to transactions carried out in the stock exchanges or organized over-the-counter markets licensed by the CVM.
106
The Annex II Regulations provide for the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign markets in respect of shares of Brazilian issuers. Prior to the issuance of the ADSs, the ADS program was approvedby the Central Bank and the CVM under the Annex V to CMN Resolution No. 2,689, which allowed Brazilian companies to issue depositary receipts in foreign exchange markets and was in force by the time the ADSs were issued. Depositary receipts are currently governed by Resolution No. 4,373. The proceeds from the sale of ADSs by ADS holders outside Brazil are free of Brazilian foreign investment controls and holders of the ADSs who are not resident of a tax haven will be entitled to favorable tax treatment. For more information, see “Taxation - Brazilian Tax Considerations - Taxation of Gains Outside Brazil”.
An electronic registration has been issued in the name of the Depositary with respect to the ADSs and is maintained by the Custodian on behalf of the Depositary. Pursuant to this electronic registration, the Custodian and the Depositary are able to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the Class B Shares represented by ADSs into foreign currency and remit the proceeds outside Brazil. In the event that a holder of ADSs exchanges such ADSs for Class B Shares, such holder must seek to obtain its own electronic registration with the Central Bank.
Pursuant to Central Bank Resolution No. 4,373/2014, the withdrawal of Class B Shares upon cancellation of ADSs requires simultaneous exchange transactions in the event the investor decides not to dispose of those Class B Shares. The simultaneous exchange transactions are required in order to obtain a certificate of registration of Class B Shares with the Central Bank. This transaction will be subject to tax in Brazil. For more information, see “Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Other Brazilian Taxes”.
Thereafter, any holder of Class B Shares may not be able to convert into foreign currency and remit outside Brazil the proceeds from the disposition of, or distributions with respect to, such Class B Shares, unless such holder obtains his own electronic registration. A holder that obtains an electronic registration may be subject to less favorable Brazilian tax treatment than a holder of ADSs. For more information, see “Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations”.
The federal government may impose temporary restrictions on remittances of foreign capital abroad in the event of a serious imbalance or an anticipated serious imbalance of Brazil’s balance of payments. For approximately six months in 1989 and early 1990, the federal government froze all dividend and capital repatriations held by the Central Bank that were owed to foreign equity investors, in order to conserve Brazil’s foreign currency reserves. These amounts were subsequently released in accordance with federal government directives. There can be no assurance that the federal government will not impose similar restrictions on foreign repatriations in the future.
Taxation
The following summary contains a description of the principal Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Class B Shares or ADSs, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase Class B Shares or ADSs. The summary is based upon the tax laws of Brazil and regulations thereunder and on the tax laws of the United States and regulations thereunder as in effect on the date hereof, which are subject to change. Prospective purchasers of Class B Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Class B Shares or ADSs.
Although there is at present no income tax treaty between Brazil and the United States, the tax authorities of the two countries have had discussions that may culminate in such a treaty. No assurance can be given, however, as to whether or when a treaty will enter into force or how it will affect the U.S. holders of Class B Shares or ADSs. Prospective holders of Class B Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Class B Shares or ADSs in their particular circumstances.
Brazilian Tax Considerations
The following discussion summarizes the principal Brazilian tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Class B Shares or ADSs by an individual, entity, trust or organization resident or domiciled outside Brazil for purposes of Brazilian taxation (“Non-Brazilian Holder”). It is based on Brazilian law currently in effect, which is subject to differing interpretations and changes that may apply retroactively. This discussion does not address all the Brazilian tax considerationsthat may be applicable to any particular Non-Brazilian Holder, and each Non-Brazilian Holder should consult its own tax advisor about the Brazilian tax consequences of investing in Class B Shares or ADSs.
107
Taxation of Dividends
Dividends paid by the Company in cash or in kind from profits of periods beginning on or after January 1, 1996 (i) to the Depositary in respect of Class B Shares underlying ADSs or (ii) to a Non-Brazilian Holder in respect of Class B Shares generally will not be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax. Dividends paid from profits generated before January 1, 1996 may be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at varying rates depending upon the year in which the profits have been obtained.
Distributions of Interest on Equity
In accordance with Law No. 9,249, dated December 26, 1995, as amended, Brazilian corporations may make payments to shareholders characterized as distributions of interest on the equity of the company as an alternative form of making dividend distributions. The rate of interest may not be higher than TJLP, as determined by the Central Bank from time to time. The total amount distributed as interest on equity may not exceed, for tax purposes, the greater of (i) 50.0% of net income (after the deduction of the social contribution on net profits and before taking into account the provision for corporate income tax and the amounts attributable to shareholders as net interest on equity) related to the period in respect of which the payment is made and (ii) 50.0% of the sum of retained profits and profit reserves as of the date of the beginning of the period in respect of which the payment is made.
Distributions of interest on equity paid to Brazilian and Non-Brazilian Holders of Class B Shares, including payments to the Depositary in respect of Class B Shares underlying ADSs, are deductible by the Company for Brazilian corporate income tax and social contribution on net profits purposes as far as the limits above described are observed. Such payments to shareholders are subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at the rate of 15.0%, except for payments to shareholders situated in tax haven jurisdictions (that is, a country or location that does not impose income tax or where the maximum income tax rate is lower than 20% or where the local legislation imposes restrictions on disclosing the shareholding composition or the ownership of the investment or the beneficial owner of the income derived from transactions carried out and attributable to a Non-Brazilian Holder ‒ “Tax Haven Holder”), which payments are subject to withholding income tax at a 25.0% rate. These payments may be included, at their net value, as part of any mandatory dividend. To the extent that payment of interest on net equity is so included, the corporation is required to distribute to shareholders an additional amount to ensure that the net amount received by them, after payment of the applicable withholding income tax, plus the amount of declared dividends, is at least equal to the mandatory dividend.
Taxation of Gains Outside Brazil
According to Law No. 10,833 of December 29, 2003 (“Law No. 10,833/03”), capital gains realized on the disposition of assets located in Brazil by a Non-Brazilian Holder, whether to another non-Brazilian resident or to Brazilian residents, are subject to taxation in Brazil. In this sense, if the Class B Shares are disposed of by a Non-Brazilian Holder, as they are defined as assets located in Brazil, such holder will be subject to income tax on the gains assessed, following the rules described below, whether the disposition is conducted in Brazil or abroad and with a Brazilian resident or not.
A disposition of Class B Shares can occur abroad if an investor decides to cancel its investment in ADSs and register the underlying Class B Shares as a direct foreign investment under Law No. 4,131. Any capital gain arising from sales or other dispositions of Class B Shares outside Brazil would be subject to Brazilian income tax at the rate of 15.0% or, if the investor is a Tax Haven Holder, 25.0%, which should be withheld by the purchaser of the Class B Shares outside Brazil or its attorney-in-fact in Brazil.
Regarding ADSs, although the matter is not free from doubt, the gains realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder on the disposition of ADSs to another Non-Brazilian Holder should not be taxed in Brazil, based on the theory that ADSs do not constitute assets located in Brazil for purposes of Law no. 10,833/03. However, we cannot assure you that Brazilian courts would adopt this theory. Thus, the gain on a disposition of ADSs by a Non-Brazilian Holder to a resident in Brazil (or possibly even to a Non-Brazilian Holder in the event that courts determine that ADSs would constitute assets located in Brazil) may be subject to income tax in Brazil.
108
Taxation of Gains in Brazil
For purposes of Brazilian taxation, the income tax rules on gains related to disposition of Class B Shares vary depending on the domicile of the Non-Brazilian Holder, the form by which such Non-Brazilian Holder has registered its investment before the Brazilian Central Bank and/or how the disposition is carried out, as described below.
Generally, gains are defined as the positive difference between the amount realized on the sale or exchange of a security and its acquisition cost. Gains assessed on the disposition of the Class B Shares carried out on the Brazilian stock exchange (which includes the transactions carried out on the organized over-the-counter market) are:
1. | exempt from income tax when assessed by a Non-Brazilian Holder registered under Resolution No. 4,373 of the CMN (“4,373 Holder”) that is not a Tax Haven Holder; or |
2. | subject to income tax at a rate of 15.0% in any other case, including the gains assessed by a Non-Brazilian Holder that (i) is not a 4,373 Holder, or (ii) is a 4,373 Holder and a Tax Haven Holder. In these cases, a withholding income tax of 0.005% on the sale value shall be applicable and can be offset with the eventual income tax due on the capital gain. |
There can be no assurance that the current preferential treatment for 4,373 Holders will continue in the future.
Any other gains assessed on a disposition of the Class B Shares that is not carried out on the Brazilian stock exchange is subject to an income tax rate of 15.0%, except for gains assessed on Tax Haven Holders who are subject to an income tax rate of 25.0%. If these gains are related to transactions conducted on the Brazilian non-organized over-the-counter market, through an intermediary, the withholding income tax of 0.005% on the sale value shall also be applicable and can be offset with the eventual income tax due on the capital gain. It should be noted that additional rules were recently enacted and must be considered for gains assessed and not carried out on the Brazilian stock exchange. See “—Additional Recent Rules Regarding Taxation of Gains”.
The deposit of Class B Shares in exchange for the ADSs may be subject to Brazilian income tax if the acquisition cost of the Class B Shares is lower than (i) the average price per Class B share on a Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of such shares were sold on the day of the deposit; or (ii) if no Class B Shares were sold on that day, the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of Class B Shares were sold during the 15 trading sessions immediately preceding such deposit. In this case, the difference between the acquisition cost and the average price of the Class B Shares, calculated as set forth above, shall be considered a capital gain subject to income tax at a rate of 15.0% or 25.0% in the case of investors that are Tax Haven Holders. There may be arguments to claim that this taxation is not applicable in the case of a Non-Brazilian Holder that is registered under Resolution 4,373 (other than Tax Haven Holders), which should not be subject to income tax in such a transaction.
The withdrawal of Class B Shares upon cancellation of ADSs is not subject to Brazilian income tax, as long as the regulatory rules are appropriately observed with respect to the registration of the investment before the Central Bank.
In the case of redemption of the Class B Shares or ADSs or capital reduction by a Brazilian corporation, with subsequent withdrawal of the ADSs, such as our company, the positive difference between the amount effectively received by the Non-Brazilian Holder and the acquisition cost of the securities redeemed is treated as capital gain derived from the sale or exchange of shares not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange market and is therefore subject to income tax at the rate of 15.0% or 25.0%, as the case may be.
109
Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to the Class B Shares or ADSs will not be subject to Brazilian taxation. Gains on the sale or assignment of preemptive rights will be subject to the same tax treatment applicable to disposition of Class B Shares.
Additional Recent Rules Regarding Taxation of Gains
OnMarch 16, 2016, the Federal Governmentconverted the Provisional MeasureNo.692 into the Law No. 13,259, which established progressive income tax rates applicable to capital gains derived from the disposition of assets by Brazilian individuals.The Law No. 13,259 provides fornew ratesthatrange from 15.0% to22.5% depending on the gain derived by the Brazilian individual, as follows: (i) 15% on gains not exceeding R$5,000,000.00; (ii)17.5% on gains that exceed R$5,000,000.00 and do not exceed R$10,000,000.00; (iii) 20.0% on gains that exceed R$10,000,000.00 and do not exceed R$30,000,000.00; and (iv)22.5% on gains exceedingR$30,000,000.00.Pursuant to the Section 18 of the Law No. 9,249/95,the tax treatmentapplicable to capital gains earned by Brazilian individuals also applies to capital gains earned by non-Brazilian residents(in transactionsnotcarried outin the Brazilian stock exchange or the organized over-the-counter market). Therefore, new tax rates defined by the Law No. 13,259 shall also apply to non-Brazilian residents. This law entered into force on January 1, 2017.
Other Brazilian Taxes
There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of Class B Shares or ADSs by a Non-Brazilian Holder except for gift and inheritance taxes levied by some states in Brazil on gifts made or inheritances bestowed by individuals or entities not resident or domiciled in Brazil or in the relevant State to individuals or entities that are resident or domiciled within such State in Brazil. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration, or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of Class B Shares or ADSs.
Pursuant to Decree No. 6,306 of December 14, 2007 (“Decree No. 6,306/07”), a tax on foreign exchange transactions (“IOF/Exchange”) may be imposed on the conversion of Brazilian currency into foreign currency (e.g., for purposes of paying dividends and interest) orvice-versa. Currently, for most exchange transactions, the rate of IOF/Exchange is 0.38%, except for: (i) foreign exchange transactions for the inflow of funds related to investments in variable income effectuated by a Non-Brazilian Holder in the Brazilian financial and capital market, in which case the rate is 0%, and (ii) payment of dividends, capital gain and interest on shareholders’ equity related to the investment mentioned under item (i) above, in which case the rate is zero. Nonetheless, the Brazilian government may increase the rate to a maximum of 25.0%. Any such increase will be applicable only prospectively.
The withdrawal of Class B Shares upon cancellation of ADSs will be subject to IOF/Exchange at the rate of 0.38%, considering that a simultaneous exchange transaction is required for this operation if the investor remains with the Class B Shares, pursuant to Resolution No. 3,845, issued by the Brazilian Central Bank.
Pursuant to Decree No 6,306/07, the Tax on Bonds and Securities Transactions (“IOF/Bonds”) may be imposed on any transactions involving bonds and securities, including those carried out on Brazilian stock, futures and commodities exchanges. The rate of IOF/Bonds Tax applicable to transactions involving common shares is currently zero if the redemption, transfer or renegociation occurs after 30 days of their acquisition. The Brazilian government is permitted to increase such rate at any time up to 1.5% per day, but only in respect of future transactions.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The statements regarding U.S. tax law set forth below are based on U.S. law as in force on the date of this annual report, and changes to such law subsequent to the date of this annual report may affect the tax consequences described herein (possibly with retroactive effect). This summary describes the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Class B Shares or ADSs, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the U.S. tax consequences that may be relevant to a decision to hold or dispose of Class B Shares or ADSs. This summary applies only to purchasers of Class B Shares or ADSs who will hold the Class B Shares or ADSs as capital assets and does not apply to special classes of holders such as dealers in securities or currencies, holders whosefunctional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders of 10.0% or more of our shares (taking into account shares held directly or through depositary arrangements), tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, holders liable for the alternative minimum tax, securities traders who elect to account for their investment in Class B Shares or ADSs on a mark-to-market basis, partnerships or other pass-through entities, insurance companies, U.S. expatriates, and persons holding Class B Shares or ADSs in a hedging transaction or as part of a straddle, conversion or other integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Moreover, this summary does not address the Medicare tax on net investment income or the tax consequences to U.S. holders of acquiring, owning or disposing of Class B Shares or ADSs under any U.S. federal estate or gift, state, local or foreign taxes.
110
Each holder is encouraged to consult such holder’s tax advisor concerning the overall tax consequences to it, including the consequences under laws other than U.S. federal income tax laws, of an investment in Class B Shares or ADSs.
In this discussion, references to a “U.S. holder” are to a beneficial holder of a Class B Share or an ADS that is (i) an individual citizen or resident of the United States of America, (ii) a corporation, or any other entity taxable as a corporation, organized under the laws of the United States of America, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia, or (iii) otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net basis with respect to the Class B Share or ADS.
For purposes of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we call the “Code”, holders of ADSs will generally be treated as owners of the Class B Shares represented by such ADSs.
Taxation of Distributions
A U.S. holder will recognize dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the amount of any cash and the value of any property distributed by us as a dividend to the extent that such distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, when such distribution is received by the custodian (or by the U.S. holder in the case of a holder of Class B Shares). The amount of any distribution will include the amount of Brazilian tax withheld on the amount distributed, and the amount of a distribution paid inreais will be measured by reference to the exchange rate for convertingreais into U.S. dollars in effect on the date the distribution is received by the custodian (or by a U.S. holder in the case of a holder of Class B Shares). If the custodian (or U.S. holder in the case of a holder of Class B Shares) does not convert suchreais into U.S. dollars on the date it receives them, it is possible that the U.S. holder will recognize foreign currency loss or gain, which would be ordinary loss or gain, when thereais are converted into U.S. dollars. Dividends paid by us will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.
Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by an individual with respect to the ADSs will be subject to taxation at preferential rates if the dividends are “qualified dividends”. Dividends paid on the ADSs will be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the ADSs are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States and (ii) we were not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and are not, in the year in which the dividend is paid, a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”). The ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and will qualify as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States so long as they are so listed. Based on our audited financial statements and relevant market and shareholder data, we believe that we were not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to our 2016 taxable year. In addition, based on our audited financial statements and our current expectations regarding the value and nature of our assets, the sources and nature of our income, and relevant market and shareholder data, we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC for the 2017 taxable year. Based on existing guidance, it is not clear whether dividends received with respect to the Class B Shares will be treated as qualified dividends, because the Class B Shares themselves are not listed on a U.S. exchange. In addition, the U.S. Treasury has announced its intention to promulgate rules pursuant to which holders of ADSs or Class B Shares and intermediaries through whom such securities are held will be permitted to rely on certifications from issuers to treat dividends as qualified for tax reporting purposes. Because such procedures have not yet been issued, it is not clear whether we will be able to comply with them. Holders of ADSs and Class B Shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding the availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in the light of the considerations discussed above and their own particular circumstances.
111
Distributions out of earnings and profits with respect to the Class B Shares or ADSs generally will be treated as dividend income from sources outside of the United States and generally will be treated separately along with other items of “passive” income for purposes of determining the credit for foreign income taxes allowed under the Code. Subject to certain limitations, Brazilian income tax withheld in connection with any distribution with respect to the Class B Shares or ADSs may be claimed as a credit against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a U.S. holder if such U.S. holder elects for that year to credit all foreign income taxes. Alternatively such Brazilian withholding tax may be taken as a deduction against taxable income. Foreign tax credits will not be allowed for withholding taxes imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions and may not be allowed in respect of arrangements in which a U.S. holder’s expected economic profit, after non-U.S. taxes, is insubstantial. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the implications of these rules in light of their particular circumstances.
Distributions of additional shares to holders with respect to their Class B Shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all our shareholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Holders of Class B Shares or ADSs that are foreign corporations or nonresident alien individuals, which we call “Non-U.S. Holders”, generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on distributions with respect to Class B Shares or ADSs that are treated as dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes unless such dividends are effectively connected with the conduct by the holder of a trade or business in the United States.
Taxation of Capital Gains
Upon the sale or other disposition of a Class B Share or ADS, a U.S. holder generally will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The amount of the gain or loss will be equal to the difference between the amount realized in consideration for the disposition of the Class B Share or ADS (including the gross amount of the proceeds before the deduction of any Brazilian tax) and the U.S. holder’s tax basis in the Class B Share or ADS. Such gain or loss generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Class B Share or ADS has been held for more than one year on the date of the disposition. The net amount of long-term capital gain recognized by an individual holder generally is subject to taxation at preferential rates. Capital losses may be deducted from taxable income, subject to certain limitations. Gain realized by a U.S. holder on a sale or disposition of Class B Shares or ADSs generally will be treated as U.S. source income. Consequently, if Brazilian tax is imposed on such gain, the U.S. holder will not be able to use the corresponding foreign tax credit, unless the holder has other foreign source income of the appropriate type in respect of which the credit may be used. Alternatively, such Brazilian tax may be taken as a deduction against taxable income if the U.S. holder does not take a credit for any foreign income tax during the taxable year.
A Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on gain realized on the sale or other disposition of a Class B Share or ADS unless (i) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by the holder of a trade or business in the United States, or (ii) such holder is an individual who is present in the United States of America for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
Dividends paid on, and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, the ADSs or Class B Shares to a U.S. holder generally may be subject to the information reporting requirements of the Code and may be subject to backup withholding unless the U.S. holder (i) is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) provides an accurate taxpayer identification number and certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred. The amount of any backup withholding collected from a payment to a U.S. holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. holder to a refund, provided that certain required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
A Non-U.S. Holder generally will be exempt from these information reporting requirements and backup withholding tax, but may be required to comply with certain certification and identificationprocedures in order to establish its eligibility for such exemption in connection with payments received within the United States or through certain U.S.-related intermediaries.
112
Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
statement by experts
Not applicable.
Documents on Display
We file reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, and other information with the SEC pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC that apply to foreign private issuers. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20459. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We are required to make filings with the SEC by electronic means. Any filings we make electronically will be available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
See Note 36.2 to our audited consolidated financial statements for disclosure about market risk.
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
Not applicable.
Item 12A. Debt Securities
Not applicable.
Item 12B. Warrants and Rights
Not applicable.
Item 12C. Other Securities
Not applicable.
Item 12D. American Depositary Shares
In the United States, the Class B Shares trade in the form of ADSs, each representing one Class B Share (as a result of the reverse stock split), issued by The Bank of New York Mellon (or the Depositary) pursuant to the Deposit Agreement. The ADSs trade under the symbols ELP and ELPVY. ADS holders are required to pay various fees to the Depositary, and the Depositary may refuse to provide any service for which a fee is assessed until the applicable fee has been paid. The Depositary is located at 225 Liberty St, New York, NY 10286, EUA.
ADS holders are required to pay the Depositary: (i) an annual fee of up to US$0.02 per ADS (or portion thereof) for administering the ADS program, and (ii) amounts in respect of expenses incurred by the Depositary or its agents on behalf of ADS holders, including expenses arising from compliance with applicable law, taxes or other governmental charges, facsimile transmission, or conversion of foreign currency into U.S. dollars. In both cases, the Depositary may decide in its sole discretion to seek payment by either billing holders or by deducting the fee from one or more cash dividends or other cash distributions.
Brazilian Holder in the event that courts determine that ADSs would constitute assets located in Brazil) may be subject to income tax in Brazil.
113
| Fee payable by ADS holders |
Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property | US$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof) |
Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates | US$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof) |
Distribution of cash dividends | US$0.02 or less per ADS |
Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the depositary to ADS registered holders | A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to the holder had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs |
Depositary services | US$0.02 (or less) per ADSs per calendar year |
Transfer and registration of shares on the Depositary’s share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when the holder deposits or withdraws shares | Registration or transfer fees |
Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (when expressly provided in the deposit agreement) | Expenses of the Depositary |
Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars | Expenses of the Depositary |
Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or the custodian are required to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS (e.g., stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes) | As necessary |
Any charges incurred by the Depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities | As necessary |
Payments by the Depositary
The Depositary pays us an agreed amount, which includes reimbursements for certain expenses we incur in connection with the ADS program. These reimbursable expenses currently include legal and accounting fees, listing fees, investor relations expenses and fees payable to service providers for the distribution of material to ADR holders. For the year ended December 31, 2016, this amount was US$ 617.3 thousand.
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
Not applicable.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
Financial Responsibility, Disclosure Controls and Procedures, and Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on our evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016 were effective to provide reasonableassurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
114
(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal controls were designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may decline.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, it used the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission - COSO. Based on its evaluation and those criteria, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.
Changes in Internal Controls
The management of the Company identified no change in its internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Companhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel
Curitiba - PR
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Companhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel and its subsidiaries (the "Company”) as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principlesand that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 of the Company and our report dated April 27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
Auditores Independentes
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
April 27, 2017
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
Our Board of Directors has reviewed the qualifications and backgrounds of the members of the Audit Committee and determined that José Richa Filho is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 16A and satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act. For more information regarding our Audit Committee, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Audit Committee”.
Item 16B. Code of Ethics
In November 2003, we adopted a code of ethics that also applies to our chief executive officer, our executive financial officer and the main executive of our accounting department.
In 2015, our Code of Ethics was revised after an open consultation process that involved our internal staff and inputs from stakeholders. After the consolidation of the proposals, the code was approved by our Management and our Board of Directors and it now applies our employees, all board and directors and outsourced. Our code of ethics is called “Code of Conduct” and it is available in our website, atwww.copel.com/ir. Copies of our code of ethics can also be obtained for free via letter sent to the address on the cover page of this 20-F. As from the adoption of our code of ethics, we have not granted any implicit or explicit exemptions to any sections of our code of ethics to the officers named above.
115
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes acted as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and KPMG Auditores Independentes acted as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.
The table below sets forth the total amount billied to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes for services performed in 2016, and KPMG Auditores Independentes for services performed in 2015 and 2014, and breaks down these amounts by category of service:
| |
Billed | | | |
| (R$ million) |
Audit fees | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
Audit-related fees | – | – | – |
Tax fees | – | – | – |
All other fees | 0.8 | – | – |
Total | 3.2 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
Audit Fees
Audit fees are fees billed for the audit of our annual financial statements and for the reviews of our quarterly financial information in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
All Other Fees
The services comprising the fees disclosed under “All Other Fees” refer to (a) the rendering of independent technical assistance and issuance of opinions in connection with the dispute with the Colíder Consortium with respect to the “Agreement for the Supply of Goods and Services” for the Implementation of the Colíder HPP, and (b) the analysis and issuance of an opinion in connection with the legal procedure aimed at reestablishing the economic and financial balance of said Agreement.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Neither our Board of Directors nor our Audit Committee has established pre-approval policies and procedures for the engagement of our registered public accounting firm for services. Our Board of Directors expressly approves on a case-by-case basis any engagement of our Registered Public Accounting Firm for audit and non-audit services provided to us or our subsidiaries. Our Audit Committee provides recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding such engagements. For more information regarding our Board of Directors and Audit Committee, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees”.
116
Item 16D. Exemption from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
Under the listed company audit committee rules of the NYSE and the SEC, we must comply with Securities Exchange Act Rule 10A-3, which requires that we establish an audit committee composed of members of the board of directors that meets specified requirements. In reliance on the exemption in Rule 10A-3(b)(iv)(E), we have designated three members to our Audit Committee, José Richa Filho, Carlos Homero Giacomini and Mauro Ricardo Machado Costa, who are designees of the State of Paraná, which is our controlling shareholder and therefore one of our affiliates. In our assessment, each of these members acts independently in performing the responsibilities of an audit committee member under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and satisfy the other requirements of Securities Exchange Act Rule 10A-3.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Item 16F. Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant
On March 15, 2016, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes replaced KPMG Auditores Independentes as our independent public accounting for the fiscal yearsstarting January 1, 2016. Pursuant to CVM regulations, Brazilian public companies are required to rotate their independent public accounting firm every five years. Due to the limitations set forth in these regulations, we did not seek to renew KPMG’s contract when it expired and KPMG Auditores Independentes could not attempt to stand for reelection for CVM purposes. The replacement was approved by our Board of Directors and ourAudit Committee.
The reports of KPMG Auditores Independentes on our financial statements for each of the fiscal years ended on December 31, 2014 and 2015 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and they were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During such fiscal years, there were no disagreements with KPMG Auditores Independentes, whether or not resolved, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or scope of audit procedures, which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG Auditores Independentes, would have caused KPMG Auditores Independentes to make a reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its audit reports for such fiscal years.
We have requested that KPMG Auditores Independentes furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the above statements. A copy of this letter is filed as Exhibit 15.1 to this Form 20 F.
We did not consult Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes during the two fiscal years prior to its engagement (or any subsequent interim period prior to its engagement) as to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item 16F(a)(1)(iv) of Form 20 F) or a reportable event (as described in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20 F).
Item 16G. Corporate Governance
| New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Rules for U.S. Domestic Issuers | |
|
303A.01 | A company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (a “listed company”) must have a majority of independent directors on its Board of Directors. “Controlled companies” are not required to comply with this requirement. | Copel fits the definition of a “controlled company” for a majority of its voting shares are held by the State of Paraná. As such, Copel is not required to comply with the majority of independent directors requirement. Law 13,303/2016 requires us to keep a minium ration of 25% of independent board members. Currently, seven out of nine members of Copel’s Board of Directors are independent as provided for in rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act. |
303A.03 | The non-management directors of a listed company must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. | The non-management directors of Copel do not hold regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. |
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee |
303A.04 | A listed company must have a Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee composed entirely of independent directors, with a written charter that covers certain minimum specified duties. “Controlled companies” are not required to comply with this requirement. | Copel does not have a nominating/ corporate governance committee. As a controlled company, Copel would not be required to comply with the nominating/ corporate governance committee requirements if it were a U.S. domestic issuer. |
117
|
303A.05 | A listed company must have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors, with a written charter that covers certain minimum specified duties. “Controlled companies” are not required to comply with this requirement. | Copel does not have a compensation committee. As a controlled company, Copel would not be required to comply with the compensation committee requirements if it were a U.S. domestic issuer. |
|
303A.06 303A.07 | A listed company must have an audit committee with a minimum of three (3) independent directors who satisfy the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act, with a written charter that covers certain minimum specified duties. | Our shareholders amended our bylaws to establish an Audit Committee composed of at least three board members (all of whom must satisfy the requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act), each of whom serves a term of two years, and may be re-elected. Pursuant to the Audit Committee internal rules, the Audit Committee members are appointed by, and may be replaced by, the Board of Directors. All of the members of the Audit Committee are members of our Board of Directors. The Audit Committee is responsible for our financial statements, ensuring that we are in compliance with all legal requirements related to our reporting obligations, monitoring the work of the independent auditors and our staff who are responsible for internal auditing of the Company and reviewing the efficacy of our internal control and risk management procedures and staff |
Equity Compensation Plans |
303A.08 | Shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto, with limited exemptions set forth in the NYSE rules. | Under Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholder pre-approval is required for the adoption of any equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto. |
Corporate Governance Guidelines |
303A.09 | A listed company must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines that cover certain minimum specified subjects. | Although the corporate governance practices adopted by Copel do not comply with all the terms specified in the rules of the NYSE, they fulfill the requirements established for companies listed on level 1 of governance of BM&FBOVESPA. The Company also adopts the Code of Better Corporate Governance Practices of the Brazilian Institute for Corporate Governance (”IBGC”). |
Code of Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees |
303A.10 | A listed company must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for its directors, officers and employees, and must promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. | Copel has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the board of directors, the fiscal council, management and employees. Copel will disclose any waivers of the requirements of the code for directors or executive officers in its annual report on Form 20-F. |
118
Certification Requirements |
303A.12 | A CEO of a listed company must promptly notify the NYSE in writing after any executive officer of the listed company becomes aware of any material non-compliance with any applicable provisions of Section 303A and certify he or she is not aware of any violation by the listed company of NYSE corporate governance listing standards, qualifying the certification to the extent necessary. Each listed company must submit an executed Written Affirmation annually to the NYSE. In addition, each listed company must submit an interim Written Affirmation as and when required by the interim Written Affirmation form specified by the NYSE. | Copel’s CEO will promptly notify the NYSE in writing after any executive officer of Copel becomes aware of any material non-compliance with any applicable provisions of the NYSE corporate governance rules and will also certify if he is not aware of any violation by the listed company of NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Copel submits every year an Annual Written Affirmation to the NYSE and will submit an interim Written Affirmation when required. |
Item 17. Financial Statements
Not applicable.
Item 18. Financial Statements
Reference is made to pages F-1 through F-138.
119
Item 19. Exhibits
1.1 | Approved and consolidated by the 187th Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting, of October 10, 2013, and amended by the 190th Extraordinary Shareholders meeting, of April 23, 2015, and by the 193rd Extraordinary Shareholders meeting of December 22, 2016. |
2.1 | Deposit Agreement (preferred shares) dated as of March 21, 1996, as amended and restated as of November 21, 2007, filed with the SEC on February 12, 2009 as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form F-6 and in incorporated herein by reference (File No. 333-157278). |
4.1 | The Adjustment Agreement of August 4, 1994 between the State of Paraná and Companhia Paranaense de Energia ‒ Copel (“Adjustment Agreement”) (incorporated by reference to our Form F-1 333-7148, filed with the SEC on June 30, 1997) and the Deed of Amendment to the Adjustment Agreement (Quarto Termo Aditivo ao Termo de Ajuste celebrado em 21 de janeiro de 2005) (English translation) (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on June 30, 2006) (File No. 001-14668). |
8.1 | List of subsidiaries. |
12.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Copel, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
12.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Copel, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
13.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Copel, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
13.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Copel, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
15.1 | Letter from KPMG Auditores Independentes |
We omitted from the exhibits filed with or incorporated by reference into this annual report certain promissory notes and other instruments and agreements with respect to our long-term debt, none of which authorizes securities in a total amount that exceeds 10% of our total assets. We hereby agree to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission copies of any such omitted promissory notes or other instruments or agreements as the Commission requests.
120
technical GLOSSARY NOT DEFINED IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT
2013 Concession Renewal Law: Brazilian Law No. 12,783 enacted on January 11, 2013, under which most generation, transmission and distribution concessionaires may be renewed at the request of the concessionaire for an additional period of 30 years, but only if the concessionaire agrees to amend the terms of the concession contract to reflect a new tariff regime to be established by ANEEL.
A-3 Auctions: The denomination of electricity auctions for new generation projects being held in the regulated Brazilian market in the third year before the initial delivery date.
A-5 Auctions: The denomination of electricity auctions for new generation projects being held in the regulated Brazilian market in the fifth year before the initial delivery date.
ADRs: American Depositary Receipts.
ADSs: American Depositary Shares, each representing one Class B Share.
ANATEL: The Brazilian National Telecommunication Agency, or theAgência Nacional de Telecomunicações.
ANEEL: The Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency, or theAgência Nacional de Energia Elétrica.
Annual Permitted Revenues: The annual revenue established by ANEEL to be charged by a transmission concessionaire for the use of its transmission lines by third parties, which include Free Customers, generators and distributors, orReceita Anual Permitida - RAP.
Assured Energy: Determined amount assigned to each hydroelectric plant according to the energy supply risk criteria defined by MME. The assured energy also represents the maximum energy that can be sold by the generator, which is set forth in each concession agreement, irrespective of the volume of electricity actually generated by the facility.
Availability Agreement: Agreement under which a generator commits to make a certain amount of electrical capacity available to the Regulated Market. In such case, the generator’s revenue is guaranteed and the distributors must bear the risk of a supply shortage.
Average Tariff or Rate: Total sales revenue divided by total megawatt hours (MWh) sold for each relevant period, including in the case of the Company, unbilled electricity, or electricity which has been delivered to a customer, but for which the utility has yet to deliver a bill. Total sales revenue, for the purpose of computing average tariff or rate, includes both gross billings before deducting value-added tax and unbilled electricity sales upon which such taxes have not yet accrued.
BM&FBovespa: TheBM&FBovespa S.A. – Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros.
Captive Customers: customers whose energy is supplied by the distributor in which the consumer unit is connected, such as that the amount paid already includes the energy cost and service cost for use of transmission and distribution - wire service. The consumer is not free to negotiate the conditions and the flexibility of energy supplied to meet the needs of its business, instead having to follow the determinations set forth by the distributor. The consumer is subject to the unpredictability of the annual variation of the value of the distributors’ tariffs.
CBLC: TheCompanhia Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia.
CER: Reserve Energy Contract (Contrato de Energia Reserva).
Central Bank: The Brazilian Central Bank, orBanco Central do Brasil.
Class A Shares: The Company’s class A preferred shares.
Class B Shares: The Company’s class B preferred shares.
121
CMN: The National Monetary Council of Brazil, orConselho Monetário Nacional.
Code:The U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Common Shares: The Company’s common shares.
Copel Distribuição: The Company’s entity engaged in the distribution business.
Copel Geração e Transmissão or Copel GeT: The Company’s entity engaged in the generation and transmission business.
CRC Account: Therecoverable rate deficit account, orConta de Resultados a Compensar.
Custodian: Itaú Unibanco S.A., as custodian for the Class B Shares represented by ADSs.
Decree No. 6,306/07: Brazilian tax Decree No. 6,306 of December 14, 2007, which regulating tax on credit, exchange and insurance, or relating to securities -IOF.
Deloitte:Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes.
Deposit Agreement: A Deposit Agreement between Copel, the Depositary and the registered holders and beneficial owners from time to time of the ADSs.
Depositary: The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary.
Distribution: The transfer of electricity from the transmission lines at grid supply points and its delivery to customers through distribution lines at voltages between 13.8 kV and 44 kV.
Distributor: An entity supplying electrical energy to a group of customers by means of a distribution network.
Elejor: Centrais Elétricas do Rio Jordão S.A.
Eletrosul: Eletrosul Centrais Elétricas S.A.
Energy Agreement: Agreement under which a generator commits to supply a certain amount of electricity and assumes the risk that its electricity supply could be adversely affected by hydrological conditions and low reservoir levels, which could interrupt the supply of electricity. In such case, the generator would be required to purchase electricity elsewhere in order to comply with its supply commitments.
Final Customer: A party that uses electricity for its own needs.
Firm Capacity: The level of electricity that we can deliver from a specified power plant with a 95.0% degree of certainty, determined in accordance with certain prescribed statistical models.
Free Customers: Electricity customers that are able to choose their own power suppliers since they meet the following requirements: (i) demand of at least 3 MW at any voltage for new customers (those connected to the distribution grid after July 1995); (ii) demand of at least 3 MW and supplied at voltage levels equal to or greater than 69 kV for existing customers (those connected to the distribution grid before July 1995); and (iii) demand of at least 500 kW and that opt to be supplied energy by means of alternative sources, such as wind power projects, small hydroelectric power plants or biomass projects (also known as Special Customers).
Free Market: Market segment that permits a certain degree of competition. The free market specifically contemplates purchase of electricity by non-regulated entities such as Free Customers and energy traders.
Furnas: Furnas Centrais Elétricas S.A
122
Generating Unit: An electric generator together with the turbine or other device that drives it.
Gigawatt (GW): One billion watts.
Gigawatt hour (GWh): One gigawatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour, or one billion watt hours.
Group A Customers: A group of customers that uses electricity at 2.3 kV or higher. Tariffs applied to this group are based on the actual voltage level at which energy is supplied and the time of day and year the energy is supplied.
Group B Customers: A group of customers that uses electricity at less than 2.3 kV. Tariffs applied to this group are comprised solely of an energy charge and are based on the classification of the customer.
High Voltage: A class of nominal system voltages equal to or greater than 100,000 volts and less than 230,000 volts.
HPP – Hydroelectric Power Plant: A generating unit that uses water power to drive the electric generator.
IASB: International Accounting Standards Board.
IFRS: International Financial Reporting Standards.
IGP-DI: TheÍndice Geral de Preços—Disponibilidade Interna inflation index.
IGP-M Index:The Brazilian General Market Price inflation index, or theÍndice Geral de Preços do Mercado.
Installed Capacity: The level of electricity that can be delivered from a particular generating unit on a full-load continuous basis under specified conditions as designated by the manufacturer.
Interconnected Transmission System: Systems or networks for the transmission of energy, connected together by means of one or more lines and transformers.
IPCA:Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo - IPCA inflation index.
IPP: Independent Power Producer, a legal entity or consortium holding a concession or authorization for power generation for sale for its own account to public utility concessionaires or Free Customers.
Itaipu:Itaipu Binacional, a hydroelectric facility equally owned by Brazil and Paraguay, with an installed capacity of 14,000 MW.
Kilovolt (kV): One thousand volts.
Kilowatt (kW): One thousand watts.
Kilowatt hour (kWh): One kilowatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour, or one thousand watt hours.
KPMG: KPMG Auditores Independentes.
Latibex: A Euro-based market for Latin American securities, which is part of the Madrid Stock Exchange.
Low Income Residential Customers: A group of customers that consumes less than 220 kWh per month and has filed an application to receive benefits under any of the federal government’s social
123
programs. Low-income residential customers are considered a subgroup of residential customers and are not subject to payment of emergency capacity and emergency acquisition charges or any extraordinary tariff approved by ANEEL.
Main Transmission Concession: transmission concession contract no. 060/2001 comprised of different transmission assets that were in operation in the year of 2001 (date of execution of the concession agreement).
Megawatt (MW): One million watts.
Megawatt hour (MWh): One megawatt of power supplied or demanded for one hour, or one million watt hours.
MME: The Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy, or the Ministério de Minas e Energia.
MRE: The Energy Reallocation Mechanism is a mechanism which attempts to mitigate the risks borne by hydroelectric generators due to variations in river flows (hydrological risk).
Non-Brazilian Holder: An individual, entity, trust or organization resident or domiciled outside Brazil for purposes of Brazilian taxation that acquires, owns and disposes of Class B Shares or ADSs.
ONS: The National Electric System Operator, or theOperador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico.
RAP:Annual Permitted Revenues (or Receita Anual Permitida)
Rationing Program: A program instituted by the Brazilian government to reduce electricity consumption, in effect from June 1, 2001 to February 28, 2002, given it was a period of low rainfall in Brazil.
Real, Reais or R$: Brazilianreais(plural)and the Brazilianreal (singular).
Regulated Market: Market segment in which distribution companies purchase all the electricity needed to supply customers through public auctions. The auction process is administered by ANEEL, either directly or through CCEE, under certain guidelines provided by the MME. The regulated market is generally considered to be more stable in terms of supply of electricity.
Reserve Enegy Auction:mechanism for the contracting of reserve energy created to increase the security in the supplied of energy by the National Interconnected System (SIN). The reserve auction acts as an insurance contracted by distributors to be used when there is a mismatch between forecasted demand and supply. This modality of contracting is formalized through the conclusion of the CER between the selling agents in the auctions and the CCEE.
Retail Tariff: Revenue charged by distribution companies to its customers. Each customer falls within a certain tariff level defined by law and based on the customer’s classification, although some flexibility is available according to the nature of each customer’s demand. Retails tariffs are subject to annual readjustments by ANEEL.
RGR Fund: A reserve fund designed to provide compensatory payments to energy companies for certain assets used in connection with a concession if the concession is revoked or is not renewed.
Sanepar: Companhia de Saneamento do Paraná– Sanepar.
Securities Exchange Act:The United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Sercomtel Telecomunicações: Sercomtel Telecomunicações S.A.
Shareholders’ Agreement: A shareholders’ agreement dated December 22, 1998, as amended on March 29, 2001, between the State of Paraná and BNDESPAR.
124
SHP ‒ Small Hydroelectric Plant: Hydroelectric plants with generating capacity between 1,000 kW and 30,000 kW with a reservoir covering an area equal to or less than 3.0 km2.
Special Customers: A group of customers that uses at least 500 kV. A Special Customer may choose its energy supplier if that supplier derives its energy from alternative sources, such as small hydroelectric plants, wind plants or biomass plants.
Spot Market:Deregulated market segment in which electricity is bought or sold for immediate delivery. In general, prices of spot market energy purchases tend to be substantially higher than the price of energy under long-term energy purchase agreements.
Substation: An assemblage of equipment, which switches and/or changes or regulates the voltage of electricity in a transmission and distribution system.
Tax Haven Holder: A shareholder situated in tax haven jurisdictions (that is, a country or location that does not impose income tax or where the maximum income tax rate is lower than 20% or where the local legislation imposes restrictions on disclosing the shareholding composition or the ownership of the investment or the beneficial owner of the income derived from transactions carried out and attributable to a Non-Brazilian Holder).
Thermoelectric Plant or TPP: A generating unit which uses combustible fuel, such as coal, oil, diesel natural gas or other hydrocarbon as the source of energy to drive the electric generator.
TJLP: The Long-Term Interest Rate, or theTaxa de Juros a Longo Prazo,the Brazilian federal government’s long-term interest rate.
Transmission: The bulk transfer of electricity from generating facilities to the distribution grid at load center station by means of the transmission grid (in lines with capacity between 69 kV and 525 kV).
Transmission Tariff: Revenue charged by a transmission concessionaire based on the transmission network it owns and operates. Transmission tariffs are subject to periodic revisions by ANEEL.
TUST: The tariff established by ANEEL for the use of the transmission system, which is the Interconnected Transmission System and its ancillary facilities.
U.S. Dollars, dollars, or US$: United States dollars.
U.S. holder: A beneficial holder of a Class B Share or an ADS that is (i) an individual citizen or resident of the United States of America, (ii) a corporation, or any other entity taxable as a corporation, organized under the laws of the United States of America, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia, or (iii) otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net basis with respect to the Class B Share or ADS.
Utility: An entity that is the holder of a concession or authorization to engage in the generation, transmission or distribution of electric energy in Brazil.
Volt: The basic unit of electric force analogous to water pressure in pounds per square inch.
Watt: The basic unit of electrical power.
125
Signatures
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
Companhia Paranaense De Energia – Copel
By:/s/Antonio Sergio de Souza Guetter
Name: Antonio Sergio de Souza Guetter
Title: Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ Luiz Eduardo da Veiga Sebastiani
Name: Luiz Eduardo da Veiga Sebastiani
Title: Chief Financial and Investor Relations Officer
Date: April 27, 2017
126
| Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Rua Pasteur, 463 - 1º andar - cj 101 e 103 e 5º andar Bairro Batel 80250-080 – Curitiba – PR Brasil Tel: + 55 (41) 3312 – 1400 Fax: + 55 (41) 3312 – 1470 www.deloitte.com.br |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Companhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel
Curitiba - PR
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of CompanhiaParanaense de Energia - Copel and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016,and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders'equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements arethe responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onthese financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditto obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of materialmisstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amountsand disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accountingprinciples used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating theoverall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basisfor our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in allmaterial respects, the financial position of Companhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel and itssubsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flowsfor the year ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with International Financial ReportingStandards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - IntegratedFramework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the TreadwayCommission and our report dated April 27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on theCompany's internal control over financial reporting.
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
April 27, 2017
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
Auditores Independentes
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee ("DTTL"), its network of member firms, and their relatedentities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as "Deloitte Global") does not provide services to clients.Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms.
Deloitte provides audit, consulting, financial advisory, risk management, tax and relates services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. Deloitte servesfour out of five Fortune Global 500® companies through a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries bringing world-class capabilities,insights, and high-quality service to address clients’ most complex business challenges. To learn more about how Deloitte’s approximately 225,000 professionals make animpact that matters, please connect with us on Facebook, LinkedIn or Twitter.
© 2017 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved.
KPMG Auditores Independentes
Al. Dr. Carlos de Carvalho, 417 - 16º andar
80410-180 - Curitiba/PR - Brasil
Caixa Postal 13533 - CEP 80420-990 - Curitiba/PR - Brasil
Telefone 55 (41) 3544-4747, Fax 55 (41) 3544-4750
www.kpmg.com.br
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position of Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board .
As further described in note 4.1 to the consolidated financial statements,in 2016 the Company changed its accounting policy for classifying in its consolidated statements of income certain electricity distribution transactions. This change in classification was retrospectively applied to the Company’s 2015 and 2014 consolidated income statements. The effects of this accounting policy change to previously reported 2015 and 2014 consolidated income statement amounts are also explained in note 4.1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Curitiba, Brazil
April 27, 2016, except for Note 4.1, which is April 27, 2017
/s/ KPMG Auditores Independentes
KPMG Auditores Independentes, uma sociedade simples brasileira e firma-membro da rede KPMG de firmas-membro independentes e afiliadas à KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), uma entidade suíça. | | KPMG Auditores Independentes, a Brazilian entity and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. |
Companhia Paranaense de Energia – Copel and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Statements as of
December 31, 2016 and 2015, and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
ASSETS | Note | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 5 | 982,073 | 1,480,727 |
Bonds and securities | 6 | 302,398 | 406,274 |
Collaterals and escrow accounts | | 1,294 | 2,000 |
Trade accounts receivable | 7 | 2,217,355 | 3,032,827 |
Dividends receivable | | 71,758 | 40,345 |
CRC transferred to the State Government of Paraná | 8 | - | 111,663 |
Sectorial financial assets | 9 | - | 910,759 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession | 10 | 65,595 | 9,162 |
Other current receivables | 12 | 306,933 | 474,889 |
Inventories | | 130,637 | 131,018 |
Income tax and social contribution | 13.1 | 188,952 | 194,244 |
Other current recoverable taxes | 13.3 | 67,931 | 70,725 |
Prepaid expenses | 14 | 39,096 | 49,282 |
Receivable from related parties | 15 | 28,968 | 19,482 |
| | 4,402,990 | 6,933,397 |
NONCURRENT ASSETS | | | |
Long Term Assets | | | |
Bonds and securities | 6 | 195,096 | 91,117 |
Other temporary investments | 16 | 408,297 | - |
Collaterals and escrow accounts | 23.1 | 73,074 | 86,137 |
Trade accounts receivable | 7 | 270,786 | 75,062 |
CRC transferred to the State Government of Paraná | 8 | 1,522,735 | 1,271,579 |
Judicial deposits | 17 | 657,603 | 719,927 |
Sectorial financial assets | 9 | - | 134,903 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession | 10 | 3,748,335 | 1,358,451 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession compensation | 11 | 67,401 | 219,556 |
Other noncurrent receivables | 12 | 73,551 | 31,614 |
Income tax and social contribution | 13.1 | 169,967 | 94,686 |
Deferred income tax and social contribution | 13.2 | 803,477 | 537,562 |
Other noncurrent recoverable taxes | 13.3 | 131,108 | 112,902 |
Prepaid expenses | 14 | 25,583 | 25,493 |
Receivable from Related parties | 15 | 155,141 | 192,803 |
| | 8,302,154 | 4,951,792 |
Investments | 18 | 2,334,950 | 2,224,710 |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 19 | 8,934,303 | 8,692,682 |
Intangible Assets | 20 | 6,459,812 | 6,145,076 |
| | 26,031,219 | 22,014,260 |
| | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | 30,434,209 | 28,947,657 |
Notes are an integral part of these financial statements |
F-1
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, continued
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
LIABILITIES | Note | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | |
Payroll, social charges and accruals | 21 | 287,797 | 258,401 |
Suppliers | 22 | 1,255,639 | 1,613,126 |
Income tax and social contribution payable | 13.1 | 41,454 | 311,916 |
Other taxes due | 13.3 | 294,994 | 340,948 |
Loans and financing | 23 | 1,470,742 | 308,558 |
Debentures | 24 | 1,131,198 | 924,005 |
Dividend payable | | 266,831 | 346,007 |
Post-employment benefits | 25 | 47,894 | 43,323 |
Customer charges due | 26 | 141,712 | 277,458 |
Research and Development and Energy Efficiency | 27 | 231,513 | 167,881 |
Accounts payable related to concession | 28 | 66,210 | 61,786 |
Sectorial financial liabilities | 9 | 155,261 | - |
Other accounts payable | 29 | 264,791 | 135,709 |
| | 5,656,036 | 4,789,118 |
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES | | | |
Suppliers | 22 | 36,711 | 5,923 |
Deferred income tax and social contribution | 13.2 | 178,430 | 214 |
Other taxes due | 13.3 | 303,146 | 257,273 |
Loans and financing | 23 | 2,575,551 | 3,768,502 |
Debentures | 24 | 3,659,611 | 2,759,923 |
Post-employment benefits | 25 | 721,971 | 551,337 |
Research and Development and Energy Efficiency | 27 | 252,376 | 231,112 |
Accounts payable related to concession | 28 | 499,332 | 473,879 |
Sectorial financial liabilities | 9 | 123,731 | - |
Other accounts payable | 29 | 30,525 | 30,962 |
Provisions for legal claims | 30 | 1,241,343 | 1,494,936 |
| | 9,622,727 | 9,574,061 |
EQUITY | | | |
Attributable to controlling shareholder's | | | |
Capital | 31.1.1 | 7,910,000 | 6,910,000 |
Equity valuation adjustments | 31.1.2 | 998,466 | 1,177,372 |
Legal reserve | 31.1.3 | 792,716 | 744,784 |
Profit retention reserve | 31.1.3 | 5,162,983 | 5,413,572 |
| | 14,864,165 | 14,245,728 |
Attributable to non-controlling interest | 18.2.2 | 291,281 | 338,750 |
| | 15,155,446 | 14,584,478 |
| | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY | | 30,434,209 | 28,947,657 |
Notes are an integral part of these financial statements |
F-2
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| | | Restated | Restated |
| Note | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
NET OPERATING REVENUE | 32 | 13,101,753 | 14,945,844 | 13,995,506 |
OPERATING COSTS | 33 | (10,234,115) | (11,799,316) | (11,288,762) |
GROSS PROFIT | | 2,867,638 | 3,146,528 | 2,706,744 |
Operational expenses / income | | | | |
Selling expenses | 33 | (250,448) | (283,397) | (120,987) |
General and administrative expenses | 33 | (741,145) | (670,606) | (552,116) |
Other operational income (expenses) | 33 | (53,638) | (158,619) | (389,568) |
Equity in earnings of investees | 18 | 221,695 | 92,545 | 159,955 |
| | (823,536) | (1,020,077) | (902,716) |
PROFIT BEFORE FINANCIAL RESULTS AND TAXES | | 2,044,102 | 2,126,451 | 1,804,028 |
Financial results | 34 | | | |
Financial income | | 896,553 | 769,627 | 624,989 |
Financial expenses | | (1,462,297) | (1,098,298) | (571,386) |
| | (565,744) | (328,671) | 53,603 |
| | | | |
OPERATING PROFIT BEFORE INCOME TAX AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION | | 1,478,358 | 1,797,780 | 1,857,631 |
INCOME TAX AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION | 13.4 | | | |
Current | | (589,322) | (698,023) | (747,869) |
Deferred | | 58,754 | 165,794 | 225,853 |
| | (530,568) | (532,229) | (522,016) |
NET INCOME | | 947,790 | 1,265,551 | 1,335,615 |
Attributed to controlling shareholders | | 958,650 | 1,192,738 | 1,205,950 |
Attributed to non-controlling interest | 18.2.2 | (10,860) | 72,813 | 129,665 |
BASIC AND DILUTED NET EARNING PER SHARE ATTRIBUTED TO | | | | |
PARENT COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS - EXPRESSED IN BRAZILIAN REAIS | | | | |
Ordinary shares | 31.1.3 | 3.34587 | 4.16287 | 4.20899 |
Class "A" Preferred shares | 31.1.3 | 3.68045 | 4.57807 | 4.62953 |
Class "B" Preferred shares | 31.1.3 | 3.68045 | 4.56917 | 4.62989 |
Notes are an integral part of these financial statements |
F-3
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| | | | |
| Note | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
NET INCOME | | 947,790 | 1,265,551 | 1,335,615 |
Other comprehensive income | | | | |
Items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss | | | | |
Gain (losses) on actuarial liabilities | | | | |
Post employment benefits | | (88,906) | 410,330 | 140,383 |
Post employment benefits - equity | 31.1.2 | (852) | 19,660 | (582) |
Taxes on other comprehensive income | 31.1.2 | 30,174 | (139,059) | (48,584) |
Items that are or maybe reclassified to profit or loss | | | | |
Adjustments related to financial assets classified as available for sale | 31.1.2 | 3,612 | 628 | 880 |
Other adjustments - subsidiary | | - | - | (2,777) |
Taxes on other comprehensive income | 31.1.2 | (1,229) | (215) | 647 |
Total comprehensive income, net of taxes | | (57,201) | 291,344 | 89,967 |
| | | | |
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | | 890,589 | 1,556,895 | 1,425,582 |
| | | | |
Attributed to controlling shareholders | | 901,384 | 1,483,587 | 1,297,225 |
Attributed to non-controlling interest | | (10,795) | 73,308 | 128,357 |
Notes are an integral part of these financial statements |
| | | | |
F-4
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| | Attributable to Parent Company | | | |
| | | Equity valuation adjustments | Profit reserves | | | |
| | | | | | | | Attributable | |
| Note | | | Other | | Profit | Additional | | | to non - | |
| | Deemed | comprehensive | Legal | retention | proposed | Accumulated | Shareholders’ | controlling | |
| | Capital | cost | income | reserve | reserve | dividends | profit | equity | interests | Equity |
Balance as of January 1, 2014 | | 6,910,000 | 1,238,955 | (255,796) | 624,849 | 3,897,833 | 235,498 | - | 12,651,339 | 277,413 | 12,928,752 |
Net Income | | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,205,950 | 1,205,950 | 129,665 | 1,335,615 |
Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | |
Losses on financial assets, net of taxes | 31.1.2 | - | - | (700) | - | - | - | - | (700) | (550) | (1,250) |
Actuarial losses, net of taxes | 31.1.2 | - | - | 91,975 | - | - | - | - | 91,975 | (758) | 91,217 |
Total comprehensive income | | - | - | 91,275 | - | - | - | 1,205,950 | 1,297,225 | 128,357 | 1,425,582 |
Realization - deemed cost, net of taxes | 31.1.2 | - | (101,851) | - | - | 850 | - | 99,394 | (1,607) | - | (1,607) |
Realization - actuarial losses, net of taxes | 31.1.2 | - | - | 4,381 | - | (4,381) | - | - | - | - | - |
Additional dividends proposed | | - | - | - | - | - | (235,498) | - | (235,498) | - | (235,498) |
Allocation proposed to GSM: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Legal reserve | | - | - | - | 60,298 | - | - | (60,298) | - | - | - |
Interest on own capital | 31.1.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | (30,000) | (30,000) | - | (30,000) |
Dividends | 31.1.3 | - | - | - | - | - | 241,753 | (592,523) | (350,770) | (53,679) | (404,449) |
Profit retention reserve | | - | - | - | - | 622,523 | - | (622,523) | - | - | - |
Balance as of December 31, 2014 | | 6,910,000 | 1,137,104 | (160,140) | 685,147 | 4,516,825 | 241,753 | - | 13,330,689 | 352,091 | 13,682,780 |
Net Income | | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,192,738 | 1,192,738 | 72,813 | 1,265,551 |
Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on financial assets, net of taxes | 31.1.2 | - | - | 413 | - | - | - | - | 413 | - | 413 |
Actuarial gain, net of taxes | 31.1.2 | - | - | 290,436 | - | - | - | - | 290,436 | 495 | 290,931 |
Total comprehensive income | | - | - | 290,849 | - | - | - | 1,192,738 | 1,483,587 | 73,308 | 1,556,895 |
Realization - deemed cost, net of taxes | 31.1.2 | - | (90,441) | - | - | - | - | 90,441 | - | - | - |
Additional dividends proposed | | - | - | - | - | - | (241,753) | - | (241,753) | (8,733) | (250,486) |
Dividends with retained earnings | | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (48,601) | (48,601) |
Allocation proposed to GSM: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Legal reserve | | - | - | - | 59,637 | - | - | (59,637) | - | - | - |
Interest on own capital | 31.1.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | (198,000) | (198,000) | - | (198,000) |
Dividends | 31.1.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | (128,795) | (128,795) | (29,315) | (158,110) |
Profit retention reserve | | - | - | - | - | 896,747 | - | (896,747) | - | - | - |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | | 6,910,000 | 1,046,663 | 130,709 | 744,784 | 5,413,572 | - | - | 14,245,728 | 338,750 | 14,584,478 |
Net Income (loss) | | - | - | - | - | - | - | 958,650 | 958,650 | (10,860) | 947,790 |
Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on financial assets, net of taxes | 31.1.2 | - | - | 2,383 | - | - | - | - | 2,383 | - | 2,383 |
Actuarial gain (losses), net of taxes | 31.1.2 | - | - | (59,649) | - | - | - | - | (59,649) | 65 | (59,584) |
Total comprehensive income | | - | - | (57,266) | - | - | - | 958,650 | 901,384 | (10,795) | 890,589 |
Realization - deemed cost, net of taxes | 31.1.2 | - | (101,707) | - | - | - | - | 101,707 | - | - | - |
Realization - actuarial gain | 31.1.2 | - | - | (19,933) | - | 19,933 | - | - | - | - | - |
Additional dividends proposed | 18.2.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (23,072) | (23,072) |
Dividends with retained earnings | 18.2.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (9,342) | (9,342) |
Capital increase | | 1,000,000 | - | - | - | (1,000,000) | - | - | - | - | - |
Allocation proposed to GSM: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Legal reserve | | - | - | - | 47,932 | - | - | (47,932) | - | - | - |
Interest on own capital | 31.1.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | (282,947) | (282,947) | - | (282,947) |
Dividends | 31.1.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (4,260) | (4,260) |
Profit retention reserve | | - | - | - | - | 729,478 | - | (729,478) | - | - | - |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | | 7,910,000 | 944,956 | 53,510 | 792,716 | 5,162,983 | - | - | 14,864,165 | 291,281 | 15,155,446 |
Notes are an integral part of these financial statements |
F-5
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| | | | |
| Note | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES | | | | |
Net income for the period | | 947,790 | 1,265,551 | 1,335,615 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income for the period with cash generated from operating activities | | | | |
Unrealized monetary and exchange variations - net | | 1,142,316 | 617,197 | 399,757 |
Sectorial financial assets and liabilities result | 9.2 | 1,079,662 | (858.170) | (1.033.866) |
Interest - bonus from the grant | 10.2 | (96,783) | - | - |
Remuneration of accounts receivable related to concession | 10.3 | (98,780) | (110,893) | (58,782) |
Reversal of estimated losses of accounts receivable related to concession | 10.3 | (29,025) | - | - |
Gain on remeasurement of the cash flow from the RBSE assets | 10.4 | (809,639) | - | - |
Income tax and social contribution | 13.4 | 589,322 | 698,023 | 747,869 |
Deferred income tax and social contribution | 13.4 | (58,754) | (165,794) | (225,853) |
Result of renegotiation of hydrological risk - GSF | 20.1 | (26,872) | (134,620) | - |
Equity in earnings of joint ventures and associates | 18.1 | (221,695) | (92,545) | (159,955) |
Provisions (reversals) for losses with depreciation of investments | 18.1 | - | - | (6,981) |
Recognition of fair value of accounts receivable related to concession | 32 | (132,741) | (217,713) | (76,989) |
Result from the change of the investment valuation method | 33.6 | (52,107) | - | - |
Appropriation of acturial calculation of post-employment benefits | 25.4 | 130,707 | 143,202 | 102,108 |
Appropriation of pension and healthcare contributions | 25.4 | 142,735 | 133,428 | 118,392 |
Creation for research and development and energy efficiency programs | 27.2 | 101,946 | 128,898 | 115,368 |
Depreciation and amortization | 33 | 708,296 | 676,472 | 629,943 |
Net operating estimated losses, provisions and reversals | 33.4 | 768,696 | 210,829 | 1.203,682 |
Impairment of accounts receivable related to concession | 10.1 | 54 | 40,757 | 23,884 |
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 19.2 | 27,316 | 41,715 | 5,670 |
Loss on disposal of intangible assets | 20.1 | 47,434 | 30.026 | 10.479 |
| | 4,159,878 | 2,406,363 | 3,130,341 |
Decrease (increase) in assets | | | | |
Trade accounts receivable | | 578,116 | (1,022,952) | (789,176) |
Dividends and interest on own capital received | | 154,877 | 62,070 | 43,860 |
CRC transferred to the Government of the State of Paraná | 8.1 | 49,425 | 178,588 | 172,078 |
Judicial deposits | | 62,324 | 16,326 | (61,028) |
Net sectorial financial assets | 9.2 | 258.779 | 975.053 | - |
Accounts receivable related to the concession extension | | - | 321,409 | 306,814 |
Other receivables | | 15,244 | (16,238) | (90.184) |
Inventories | | 381 | 19,604 | (11,344) |
Income tax and social contribution | | (69,989) | (55,241) | 97,512 |
Other current taxes recoverable | | (25,608) | 49,229 | (17,879) |
Prepaid expenses | | 10,096 | (5,814) | 80 |
Related Parties | | - | (49.911) | (137.137) |
| | 1,033,645 | 472,123 | (486,404) |
Increase (decrease) in liabilities | | | | |
Payroll, social charges and accruals | | 29,396 | 5,783 | 12,792 |
Suppliers | | (666,864) | (173,809) | 94,244 |
Other taxes | | (62,239) | 144,711 | (144,932) |
Post-employment benefits | 25.4 | (187,143) | (170,258) | (148,731) |
Customer charges due | | (135,746) | 254,225 | (14,761) |
Research and development and energy efficiency | 27.2 | (58.831) | (99,729) | (85,584) |
Payable related to the concession | 28.2 | (648,593) | (55,346) | (51,716) |
Other accounts payable | | (23,605) | 8,377 | 33,182 |
Provisions for legal claims | 30.1.1 | (193,197) | (163,684) | (53,343) |
| | (1,946,822) | (249,730) | (358,849) |
| | | | |
CASH GENERATED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | 3,246,701 | 2,628,756 | 2,285,088 |
Income tax and social contribution paid | | (859,784) | (488,289) | (736,613) |
Loans and financing - interest due and paid | 23.4 | (362,128) | (452,924) | (259,388) |
Debentures - interest due and paid | 24.2 | (547,971) | (366,815) | (197,715) |
| | | | |
NET CASH GENERATED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | 1,476,818 | 1,320,728 | 1,091,372 |
(continued) | | | | |
F-6
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| | | | |
| Note | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES | | | | |
Financial investments | | 13,664 | 76,883 | (103,603) |
Loans and financing granted to related parties | | (9,422) | (29,400) | - |
Receipt of loans and financing granted to related parties | | 5,112 | 7,805 | - |
Additions related parties - Net effect of acquired cash | | - | - | 149,760 |
Additions in investments | 18.1 | (505,098) | (528,629) | (628,621) |
Capital reduction of investees | | 74,983 | - | - |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | | (1,284,436) | (752,529) | (894,575) |
Customers contributions - property, plant and equipment | | 40 | - | - |
Additions to intangible assets | 20.1 | (928,727) | (968,802) | (1,254,570) |
Customers contributions - intangible assets | 20.1 | 122,809 | 243,054 | 168,933 |
| | | | |
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | (2,511,075) | (1,951,618) | (2,562,676) |
| | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | |
Loans and financing obtained from third parties | 23.4 | 93,806 | 1,836,190 | 221,556 |
Issue of Debentures | 24.2 | 1,822,965 | 1,168,633 | 1,383,378 |
Payments of principal - loans and financing | 23.4 | (226,973) | (1,170,987) | (425,554) |
Payments of principal - debentures | 24.2 | (785,239) | (154,822) | (40,608) |
Dividends and interest on own capital paid | | (368,956) | (307,528) | (668,969) |
| | | | |
NET CASH GENERATED FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | 535,603 | 1,371,486 | 469,803 |
| | | | |
TOTAL EFFECTS ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | (498,654) | 740,596 | (1,001,501) |
| | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 5 | 1,480,727 | 740,131 | 1,741,632 |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | 5 | 982,073 | 1,480,727 | 740,131 |
| | | | |
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | (498,654) | 740,596 | (1,001,501) |
Notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
F-7
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
1 Operations
Companhia Paranaense de Energia (Copel, Company or Parent Company), with headquarters at Rua Coronel Dulcídio, 800, Curitiba, State of Paraná, is a publicly-held mixed capital company controlled by the State of Paraná and its shares are traded on Corporate Governance Level 1 of the Special Segments Listing of the BM&FBOVESPA – Securities, Commodities and Futures Exchange, on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and on the Madrid Stock Exchange in the Latin American segment (Latibex).
The core activities of Copel and its subsidiaries, regulated by the Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (Aneel), linked to the Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), is to research, study, plan, build and explore the production, transformation, distribution and trading of energy in any of its forms, primarily electricity. Furthermore, Copel participates in consortiums and in private sector and mixed-capital companies for the purpose of engaging in activities, primarily in the fields of energy, telecommunications, and natural gas.
1.1 Copel’s Equity Interests
Copel has direct and indirect interests in subsidiaries (1.1.1), joint ventures (1.1.2), associates (1.1.3) and joint operations (1.1.4).
F-8
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
1.1.1 Subsidiaries
| Headquarters | Main activity | Interest |
Subsidiaries | % | Investor |
Copel Geração e Transmissão S.A. (Copel GeT) | Curitiba/PR | Production and transmission of electricity | 100.0 | Copel |
Copel Distribuição S.A. (Copel DIS) | Curitiba/PR | Distribution and marketing of electricity | 100.0 | Copel |
Copel Telecomunicações S.A. (Copel TEL) | Curitiba/PR | Telecommunication and communication | 100.0 | Copel |
Copel Renováveis S.A. (Copel REN) | Curitiba/PR | Control and management of interests | 100.0 | Copel |
Copel Comercialização S.A. (Copel Energia) | Curitiba/PR | Commercialization of electricity | 100.0 | Copel |
Companhia Paranaense de Gás - Compagas | Curitiba/PR | Distribution of pipeline gas | 51.0 | Copel |
Elejor - Centrais Elétricas do Rio Jordão S.A. | Curitiba/PR | Production of electricity | 70.0 | Copel |
UEG Araucária Ltda. | Curitiba/PR | Production of electricity from natural gas | 20.0 | Copel |
| | | 60.0 | Copel GeT |
São Bento Energia, Investimentos e Participações S.A. (São Bento) | Curitiba/PR | Control and management of interests | 100.0 | Copel GeT |
Nova Asa Branca I Energias Renováveis S.A. | S. Miguel do Gostoso/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Copel GeT |
Nova Asa Branca II Energias Renováveis S.A. | Parazinho/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Copel GeT |
Nova Asa Branca III Energias Renováveis S.A. | Parazinho/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Copel GeT |
Nova Eurus IV Energias Renováveis S.A. | Touros/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Copel GeT |
Santa Maria Energias Renováveis S.A. | Maracanaú/CE | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Copel GeT |
Santa Helena Energias Renováveis S.A. | Maracanaú/CE | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Copel GeT |
Ventos de Santo Uriel S.A. | João Câmara/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Copel GeT |
Cutia Empreendimentos Eólicos S.A. (Cutia) | Curitiba/PR | Control and management of interests | 100.0 | Copel GeT |
Copel Brisa Potiguar S.A. (a) | Curitiba/PR | Control and management of interests | 100.0 | Copel REN |
GE Olho D’Água S.A. | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | São Bento |
GE Boa Vista S.A. | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | São Bento |
GE Farol S.A. | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | São Bento |
GE São Bento do Norte S.A. | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | São Bento |
Central Geradora Eólica São Bento do Norte I S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Central Geradora Eólica São Bento do Norte II S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Central Geradora Eólica São Bento do Norte III S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Central Geradora Eólica São Miguel I S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Central Geradora Eólica São Miguel II S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Central Geradora Eólica São Miguel III S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Usina de Energia Eólica Guajiru S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Usina de Energia Eólica Jangada S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Usina de Energia Eólica Potiguar S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Usina de Energia Eólica Cutia S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Usina de Energia Eólica Maria Helena S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Usina de Energia Eólica Esperança do Nordeste S.A.(a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
Usina de Energia Eólica Paraíso dos Ventos do Nordeste S.A. (a) | São Bento do Norte/RN | Production of electricity from wind sources | 100.0 | Cutia |
(a) Pre-operating stage. | | | | |
1.1.2 Joint ventures
Joint ventures | Headquarters | Main activity | Interest |
% | Investor |
Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso I Participações S.A. | São Paulo/SP | Interests in companies | 49.0 | Copel |
Paraná Gás Exploração e Produção S.A. (a) | Curitiba/PR | Exploration of natural gas | 30.0 | Copel |
Costa Oeste Transmissora de Energia S.A. | Curitiba/PR | Transmission of electricity | 51.0 | Copel GeT |
Marumbi Transmissora de Energia S.A. | Curitiba/PR | Transmission of electricity | 80.0 | Copel GeT |
Transmissora Sul Brasileira de Energia S.A. | Florianópolis/SC | Transmission of electricity | 20.0 | Copel GeT |
Caiuá Transmissora de Energia S.A. | Rio de Janeiro/RJ | Transmission of electricity | 49.0 | Copel GeT |
Integração Maranhense Transmissora de Energia S.A. | Rio de Janeiro/RJ | Transmission of electricity | 49.0 | Copel GeT |
Matrinchã Transmissora de Energia (TP NORTE) S.A. | Rio de Janeiro/RJ | Transmission of electricity | 49.0 | Copel GeT |
Guaraciaba Transmissora de Energia (TP SUL) S.A. | Rio de Janeiro/RJ | Transmission of electricity | 49.0 | Copel GeT |
Paranaíba Transmissora de Energia S.A. (b) | Rio de Janeiro/RJ | Transmission of electricity | 24.5 | Copel GeT |
Mata de Santa Genebra Transmissão S.A. (b) | Rio de Janeiro/RJ | Transmission of electricity | 50.1 | Copel GeT |
Cantareira Transmissora de Energia S.A. (b) | Rio de Janeiro/RJ | Transmission of electricity | 49.0 | Copel GeT |
Dominó Holdings S.A. | Curitiba/PR | Interest in sewage treatment | 49.0 | Copel Energia |
(a) Entity with its activities paralyzed due to a Public Civil Action. | | | | |
(b) Pre-operating stage. | | | | |
F-9
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
1.1.3 Associates
Associated companies | Headquarters | Main activity | Interest % |
Dona Francisca Energética S.A. | Agudo/RS | Production of electricity | 23.03 |
Foz do Chopim Energética Ltda. | Curitiba/PR | Production of electricity | 35.77 |
Carbocampel S.A. | Figueira/PR | Coal exploration | 49.0 |
Dois Saltos Empreendimentos de Geração de Energia Elétrica Ltda. (a) | Curitiba/PR | Production of electricity | 30.0 |
Copel Amec S/C Ltda. - in liquidation | Curitiba/PR | Services | 48.0 |
Sercomtel S.A. Telecomunicações (b) | Londrina/PR | Telecommunications | 45.0 |
(a) Pre-operating stage. | | | | |
(b) Investment reduced to zero due to the impairment tests. | | | | |
1.1.4 Joint operations (consortiums)
Joint operations | Interest (%) Copel GeT | Other consortium members |
Hydroelectric Power Plant Gov. Jayme Canet Júnior (Mauá) | 51.0 | Eletrosul Centrais Elétricas S.A. (49%) |
Hydroelectric Power Plant Baixo Iguaçu (Note 19.7.1) (a) | 30.0 | Geração Céu Azul S.A (subsidiarie of Neoenergia S.A.) (70%) |
(a) Pre-operating stage. | | |
2 Concessions and Authorizations
2.1 Concessions contracts or authorizations obtained by Copel
Copel | | Interest % | Maturity |
Concession agreement / authorization of the equity | | |
Copel DIS | Contract 046/1999, extended by 5th addendum to the contratct | 100 | 07.07.2045 |
Copel TEL | Authorization Term No. 54/2003 - Anatel/SVP/PVST | 100 | Indeterminate |
| Authorization Term No. 305/2012 - Anatel/SVP/PVST | 100 | Indeterminate |
Elejor | Contract 125/2001 - HPP Fundão and Santa Clara | 70 | 05.28.2037 |
| Authorization - SHP Fundão I and SHP Santa Clara I - 753/2002 and 757/2002 | 70 | 12.18.2032 |
Dona Francisca Energética | Contract 188/1998 - HPP Dona Francisca | 23 | 08.27.2033 |
Foz do Chopim | Authorization 114/2000 - SHP Arturo Andreoli | 36 | 04.23.2030 |
UEG Araucária | Authorization 351/1999 - TTP Araucária (60% Copel GET) | 20 | 12.22.2029 |
Compagás | Concession gas distribution contract | 51 | 07.06.2024 |
Dois Saltos (a) | Authorization 5,204/2015 | 30 | 04.22.2045 |
Paraná Gás (b) | PART-T-300_R12 4861-.0000.99/2014-00 - ANP | 30 | 05.15.2045 |
Usina de Energia Eólica São João S.A. (c) | MME Ordinance 173 /2012 - WPP São João | 49 | 03.25.2047 |
Usina de Energia Eólica Carnaúba S.A. (c) | MME Ordinance 204 /2012 - WPP Carnaúbas | 49 | 04.08.2047 |
Usina de Energia Eólica Reduto S.A. (c) | MME Ordinance 230 /2012 - WPP Reduto | 49 | 04.15.2047 |
Usina de Energia Eólica Santo Cristo S.A. (c) | MME Ordinance 233/2012 - WPP Santo Cristo | 49 | 04.17.2047 |
(a) Building under construction. | | | |
(b) Entity with its activities paralyzed due to a Public Civil Action. | | |
(c) Subsidiaries of Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso I Participações S.A. | | |
F-10
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
2.2 Concessions contracts or authorizations obtained by subsidiary Copel Geração e Transmissão:
Copel GeT | | Interest % | Maturity |
ONEROUS CONCESSION BY THE USE OF PUBLIC PROPERTY - UBP | | |
Generation Concession 001/2007 - HPP Gov. Jayme Canet Júnior (Mauá) | 51 | 07.02.2042 |
Generation concession 001/2011- HPP Colíder (a) | 100 | 01.16.2046 |
Ordinance 133/2011 - SHP Cavernoso II | 100 | 02.27.2046 |
Generation Concession 002/2012- HPP Baixo Iguaçu (a) | 30 | 09.14.2049 |
Generation Concession 007/2013 | | |
HPP Apucaraninha | 100 | 10.12.2025 |
HPP Chaminé | 100 | 08.16.2026 |
HPP Derivação do Rio Jordão | 100 | 11.15.2029 |
HPP Cavernoso | 100 | 01.07.2031 |
PUBLIC SERVICE CONCESSIONS | | | |
Generation concession 045/1999 | | |
TPP Figueira | 100 | 03.26.2019 |
HPP Gov. Bento Munhoz da Rocha Neto (Foz do Areia) | 100 | 09.17.2023 |
HPP São Jorge | 100 | 12.03.2024 |
HPP Guaricana | 100 | 08.16.2026 |
HPP Gov. Ney Aminthas de Barros Braga (Segredo) | 100 | 11.15.2029 |
HPP Gov. José Richa (Salto Caxias) | 100 | 05.04.2030 |
Authorization 278/1999 - WPP Palmas | 100 | 09.28.2029 |
Dispatch 182/2002- HGP Melissa, HGP Pitangui and HGP Salto do Vau (only register with ANEEL) | 100 | - |
Generation concession 002/2016 -HPP Gov. Pedro Viriato Parigot de Souza (GPS) | 100 | 01.05.2046 |
In progress for homologation from ANEEL - HPP Marumbi | 100 | - |
Authorization Aneel 5,373/2015 - HGP Chopim I (only register with ANEEL) | 100 | - |
Concession agreement / authorization of the equity | | | |
UEG Araucária | Authorization 351/1999 - TPP Araucária (20% - Copel) | 60 | 12.22.2029 |
Nova Asa Branca I | MME Ordinance 267/2011 - WPP Asa Branca I | 100 | 04.24.2046 |
Nova Asa Branca II | MME Ordinance 333/2011 - WPP Asa Branca II | 100 | 05.30.2046 |
Nova Asa Branca III | MME Ordinance 334/2011 - WPP Asa Branca III | 100 | 05.30.2046 |
Nova Eurus IV | MME Ordinance 273/2011 -WPP Eurus IV | 100 | 04.26.2046 |
Santa Maria | MME Ordinance 274/2012 - WPP SM | 100 | 05.07.2047 |
Santa Helena | MME Ordinance 207/2012 - WPP Santa Helena | 100 | 04.08.2047 |
Ventos de Santo Uriel | MME Ordinance 201/2012 - WPP Santo Uriel | 100 | 04.08.2047 |
GE Boa Vista | MME Ordinance 276 /2011 - WPP Dreen Boa Vista | 100 | 04.27.2046 |
GE Farol | MME Ordinance 263 /2011 - WPP Farol | 100 | 04.19.2046 |
GE Olho D’Água | MME Ordinance 343 /2011 - WPP Dreen Olho D'Água | 100 | 05.31.2046 |
GE São Bento do Norte | MME Ordinance 310 /2011 - WPP Dreen São Bento do Norte | 100 | 05.18.2046 |
Esperança do Nordeste | MME Ordinance 183/2015 - WPP Esperança do Nordeste (a) | 100 | 05.10.2050 |
Paraíso dos Ventos do Nordeste | MME Ordinance 182/2015 - WPP Paraíso dos Ventos do Nordeste (a) | 100 | 05.10.2050 |
Usina de Energia Eólica Jangada | Resolution 3,257/2011 - WPP GE Jangada (a) | 100 | 01.04.2042 |
Maria Helena | Resolution 3,259/2011 - WPP GE Maria Helena (a) | 100 | 01.04.2042 |
Usina de Energia Eólica Potiguar | MME Ordinance 179/2015 - WPP Potiguar (a) | 100 | 05.10.2050 |
Usina de Energia Eólica Guajiru | Resolution 3,256/2011 - WPP Dreen Guajiru (a) | 100 | 01.04.2042 |
Usina de Energia Eólica Cutia | Resolution 3,258/2011 - WPP Dreen Cutia (a) | 100 | 01.04.2042 |
São Bento do Norte I | Ordinance 349/2015 - WPP São Bento do Norte I (a) | 100 | 08.03.2050 |
São Bento do Norte II | Ordinance 348/2015 - WPP São Bento do Norte II (a) | 100 | 08.03.2050 |
São Bento do Norte III | Ordinance 347/2015 - WPP São Bento do Norte III (a) | 100 | 08.03.2050 |
São Miguel I | Ordinance 352/2015 - WPP São Miguel I (a) | 100 | 08.03.2050 |
São MigueI lI | Ordinance 351/2015 - WPP São Miguel II (a) | 100 | 08.03.2050 |
São Miguel III | Ordinance 350/2015 - WPP São Miguel III (a) | 100 | 08.03.2050 |
(a) Building under construction. |
Hydroelectric Power Plant - HPP |
Small Hydroelectric Plant - SHP |
Thermal Power Plant - TPP |
Wind Power Plant - WPP |
Hydroeletric Generating Plant - HGP |
F-11
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| | | |
| | | |
Copel GeT | | Interest % | Maturity |
Transmission lines and substations concession agreements | | |
Contract 060/2001 (extended by 3rd addendum to the contratct) - Transmission facilities – several joint ventures | 100 | 12.31.2042 |
Contract 075/2001 - Transmission line Bateias - Jaguariaíva | 100 | 08.16.2031 |
Contract 006/2008 - Transmission line Bateias - Pilarzinho | 100 | 03.16.2038 |
Contract 027/2009 - Transmission line Foz do Iguaçu - Cascavel Oeste | 100 | 11.18.2039 |
Contract 010/2010 - Transmission line Araraquara 2 - Taubaté (a) | 100 | 10.05.2040 |
Contract 015/2010 - Substation Cerquilho III | 100 | 10.05.2040 |
Contract 022/2012 - Transmission line - Foz do Chopim - Salto Osorio C2; Transmission line 230 kV Londrina - Figueira | 100 | 08.26.2042 |
Contract 002/2013 - Transmission line - Assis - Paraguaçu Paulista II; Substation 230/88 kV Paraguaçu Paulista II | 100 | 02.24.2043 |
Contract 005/2014 - Transmission line - Bateias - Curitiba Norte; Substation 230/20138 kV Curitiba Norte | 100 | 01.28.2044 |
Contract 021/2014 - Transmission line Foz do Chopim - Realeza (a); Substation Realeza 230/20138 kV - Pátio novo 230 kV (a) | 100 | 09.04.2044 |
Contract 022/2014 - Transmission line Assis - Londrina (a) | 100 | 09.04.2044 |
Contract 006/2016 - Transmission line 525kV Curitiba Leste - Blumenau C1 (a) | 100 | 04.06.2046 |
Contract 006/2016 - Transmission line 230 kV Uberaba - Curitiba Centro C1 e C2 (Underground) (a) | | |
Substation 230/138 kV Curitiba Centro (SF6) - 230/138 kV - 2 x ATF 150 MVA (a) | | |
Substation 230/138 kV Medianeira (Pátio novo 230 kV) - 2 x 150 MVA (a) | | |
Transmission line 230 kV Baixo Iguaçu - Realeza (a) | | |
Substation 230/138 kV Andirá Leste - 2 x ATR 150 MVA (a) | | |
| | | |
Concession agreement / authorization of the equity | | |
Costa Oeste Transmissora | Contract 001/2012 - Transmission line Cascavel Oeste - Umuarama; Substation Umuarama 230/20138 kV | 51 | 01.11.2042 |
Transmissora Sul Brasileira | Contract 004/2012 - Transmission line Nova Santa Rita - Camaquã 3; | 20 | 05.09.2042 |
| Transmission line 230 kV Camaquã 3 - Quinta; Transmission line 525 kV Salto Santiago - Itá; | | |
| Transmission line 525 kV Itá - Nova Santa Rita; Substation Camaquã 3 230/69/2013,8 kV | | |
Caiuá Transmissora | Contract 007/2012 - Transmission line Umuarama - Guaíra; Transmission line 230 kV Cascavel Oeste - Cascavel Norte; | 49 | 05.09.2042 |
| Substation Santa Quitéria 230/69-13,8 kV; Substation Cascavel Norte 230/20138-13,8 kV | | |
Marumbi Transmissora | Contract 008/2012 - Transmission line Curitiba - Curitiba Leste; Substation Curitiba Leste 525/230 kV | 80 | 05.09.2042 |
Integração Maranhense | Contract 011/2012 - Transmission line Açailândia - Miranda II | 49 | 05.09.2042 |
Matrinchã Transmissora | Contract 012/2012 - Transmission line Paranaíta - Ribeirãozinho; Transmission line 500 kV Paranaíta - Cláudia; | 49 | 05.09.2042 |
| Substation Cláudia 500 kV; Transmission line 500 kV Cláudia - Paranatinga; Substation Paranatinga 500 kV; | | |
| Transmission line 500 kV Paranatinga - Ribeirãozinho | | |
Guaraciaba Transmissora | Contract 013/2012 - Transmission line Ribeirãozinho - Marimbondo II; | 49 | 05.09.2042 |
| Transmission line 500 kV Ribeirãozinho - Rio Verde Norte; Transmission line 500 Rio Verde Norte - Marimbondo II; | | |
| Sectioning of Transmission lines 500 kV Marimbondo - Araraquara, at Substation Marimbondo II; | | |
| Substation Marimbondo II 500 kV | | |
Paranaíba Transmissora | Contract 007/2013 - Transmission line - T 500 kV Barreiras II - Rio das Éguas; | 24.5 | 05.01.2043 |
| Transmission line 500 kV Rio Das Éguas - Luziânia (a); Transmission line 500 kV Luziânia - Pirapora 2 | | |
Mata de Santa Genebra | Contract 001/2014 - Transmission line - Itatiba - Bateias (a); Transmission line 500 kV Itatiba - Bateias (a); | 50.1 | 05.13.2044 |
| Transmission line 500 kV Araraquara 2 - Itatiba (a); Transmission line 500 kV Araraquara 2 - Fernão Dias (a); | | |
| Substation Santa Bárbara D'Oeste 440 kV (a); Substation Itatiba 500 kV (a); | | |
| Substation 500/440 kV Fernão Dias (a) | | |
Cantareira Transmissora | Contract 019/2014 - Transmission line - Estreito - Fernão Dias (a) | 49 | 09.04.2044 |
| | | |
(a) Buildings under construction. | | |
3 Basis of Preparation
3.1 Statement of compliance
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, IASB.
Company's management believes that all the relevant information used in its management is evidenced in the financial statements.
The issuance of the financial statements was authorized by the Board of Directors on April 27, 2017.
3.2 Functional and presentation currency
The financial statements are presented in Brazilian Reais, which is the functional currency of the Company. The financial information has been rounded to the nearest thousand, unless otherwise indicated.
F-12
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
3.3 Basis of measurement
The financial statements have been prepared based on the historical cost, except for certain financial instruments and investments, as described in the related accounting policies and explanatory notes.
3.4 Use of estimates and judgments
In the preparation of these financial statements, Management used judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses of the Company. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Estimates and assumptions are reviewed on a continuous basis. Reviews of estimates are recognized in the period in which it is revised (prospective basis).
3.4.1 Judgments
Information about judgment referring to the adoption of accounting policies which impacts significantly the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements, except those involving estimates, is included in the following notes:
· Note 4.3 - Basis of consolidation;
· Note 4.4 - Financial instruments; and
· Note 4.13 - Leases.
3.4.2 Uncertainties on assumptions and estimates
Information on uncertainties related to assumptions and estimates that pose a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment within the next financial year is included in the following notes:
· Notes 4.4.8 and 9 - Sectorial financial assets and liabilities;
· Notes 4.6 and 19 - Property, plant and equipment;
· Notes 4.7 and 20 - Intangible assets;
· Notes 4.8 and 19.9 - Impairment of assets;
· Notes 4.9 and 30 - Provisions for litigation and contingent liabilities;
· Note 4.10.1 - Unbilled revenues;
· Note 4.10.2 – Interest;
· Note 4.12 - Power purchase and sales transactions in the Spot Market (Electric Energy Trading Chamber – CCEE);
· Note 7.3 - Estimated losses for doubtful accounts;
· Note 10.4 - Remeasurement of financial asset RBSE;
· Note 11 - Accounts receivable from the indemnity for the concession;
· Note 13.2 - Deferred income tax and social contribution; and
· Note 25 - Post-employment benefits.
F-13
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
3.5 Management's Judgment on Going Concern
Management has concluded that there are no material uncertainties that cast doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. No events or conditions were identified that, individually or in the aggregate, may raise significant doubts on its ability to continue as a going concern.
The main bases of judgment used for such conclusion are: (i) main activities resulting from long-term concessions; (ii) robust shareholders equity, reducing the third-party capital necessity; (iii) strong operating cash generation, including financial capacity to settle commitments entered into with financial institutions; (iv) historical series of profits in the last fiscal years; and (v) fulfillment of the objectives and targets set forth in the Company's Strategic Planning, which is approved by Management, monitored and reviewed periodically, seeking the continuity of its activities. See Note 36.2.2 for additional information about Liquidity Risk.
4 Significant accounting policies
4.1 Restatement of comparative balances
After reviewing its accounting practices, the Company and its electricity distribution subsidiary, aiming at the best presentation of its operational and financial performance, concluded that the changes in the expected cash flows of the indemnifiable financial asset of Copel DIS, which was originally presented in the Financial Income, in Financial Results, would be better classified in the group of Operating Revenue, together with other revenues related to its activity. This allocation better reflects the electricity distribution business model and provides a better presentation on its performance. This conclusion is supported by the fact that:
i) Investing in infrastructure is the indispensable activity of the electricity distribution business, whose management model is supported in building, maintaining and operating this infrastructure;
ii) The return on infrastructure investment in the distribution business is determined by the fair value of that infrastructure, either the amortizable portion over the contract horizon (intangible asset), or the portion indemnifiable by the Granting Authority to its final (financial asset), plus regulatory Weighted Average Cost of Capital – WACC; and
iii) Tariff revenues represent both the return on the intangible asset and a portion of the return on the financial asset, both of which are part of the regulatory remuneration base. Tariff revenues are fully recorded as part of the "Net Operating Revenue".
According to IAS 8 - Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors, the Company changed its accounting policy previously adopted by an accounting policy that best reflects the performance of its business (for the above mentioned arguments) and therefore reclassified retrospectively in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
F-14
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The reclassifications do not change the total assets, shareholders' equity and net income for the current and comparative year, nor the current and comparative Statements of Cash Flows.
The Consolidated Statements of Income, for comparison purposes, is presented below:
12.31.2015 | As previously stated | Classification adjustments | Restated |
Consolidated Statements of Income | | | |
Net Operating Revenues | 14,728,131 | 217,713 | 14,945,844 |
Gross Profit | 2,928,815 | 217,713 | 3,146,528 |
Profit before financial results and taxes | 1,908,738 | 217,713 | 2,126,451 |
Financial results | (110,958) | (217,713) | (328,671) |
Financial income | 987,340 | (217,713) | 769,627 |
12.31.2014 | As previously stated | Classification adjustments | Restated |
Consolidated Statements of Income | | | |
Net Operating Revenues | 13,918,517 | 76,989 | 13,995,506 |
Gross Profit | 2,629,755 | 76,989 | 2,706,744 |
Profit before financial results and taxes | 1,727,039 | 76,989 | 1,804,028 |
Financial results | 130,592 | (76,989) | 53,603 |
Financial income | 701,978 | (76,989) | 624,989 |
4.2 Out-of period adjustments
In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company recorded out of period adjustments to correct prior year errors in judicial deposits, provision for legal claims, noncurrent other taxes, receivables from the Luz Fraterna program and from Infrastructure Use. The impact of these adjustments was to increase net other operating expenses by approximately R$30,679, increase finance income by approximately R$77,478, and increase finance expense by approximately R$56,315. The net impact of these adjustments was to decrease operating profit and net income by approximately R$9,516 and R$6,281, respectively. The Company has evaluated the effects of these errors and concluded that they were not material to any of the affected prior annual or interim financial statements, and that the impact of recording these adjustments were not material to the fourth quarter period income and either to the net income for the year.
4.3 Basis of consolidation
4.3.1 Calculation of equity in earnings of investees
Payment of dividends decreases the carrying value of investments.
When required, for calculation of equity in earnings of investees, the investees' financial statements are adjusted to adapt their policies to the Parent Company's accounting policies.
F-15
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
4.3.2 Subsidiaries
The subsidiaries are entities to which the investor is exposed to, or has a right over the variable returns arising from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns exerting its power over the entity.
The financial statements of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements as from the date they start to be controlled by the Company until the date such control ceases.
The balances of the subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities, and profit or loss, are consolidated and transactions between consolidated companies are eliminated.
4.3.3 Interest of non-controlling shareholders
Non-controlling interest is presented in equity, separately from the equity attributable to the Parent Company's shareholders. Profits, losses and other comprehensive income are also allocated separately from the ones allocated to the Parent Company's shareholders, even if this results in non-controlling interest having a deficit balance.
4.3.4 Joint ventures and associates
Joint ventures are entities over which the Company, subject to an agreement, has the ability to affect returns exerting its power in conjunction with other parties, irrespective of the percentage of interest in the voting capital.
Associates are entities over which the Company exerts significant influence regarding financial and operational decisions, without control.
When the share in losses of a joint venture or associate equals or exceeds the accounting balance of the investor’s equity interest in the investee, the investor should discontinue the recognition of its share in future losses. Additional losses will be considered, and a liability will be recognized, only if the investor incurs legal or constructive obligations, or performs payments on behalf of the investee. Should the investee subsequently determine profits, the investor should resume the recognition of its interest in these profits only subsequent to the point at which the portion to which it is entitled to in these subsequent profits equals its share in unrecognized losses.
4.3.5 Joint operations (consortiums)
Joint operation is a joint business according to which parties that jointly control the business have rights on assets and obligations regarding liabilities related to the business.
Joint operations are recorded in the company holding the share, in proportion to the quotas of assets, liabilities and income (loss).
F-16
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
4.4 Financial instruments
The Company does not use derivative financial instruments.
Non-derivative financial instruments are recognized on the trading date, i.e. when the obligation or right arises. They are initially recognized at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs.
Fair values are determined based on the market quotation, for financial instruments traded in active markets, and for those with no quotations available on the market, fair values are determined by the present value of expected cash flows method.
After the initial recognition, the non-derivative financial instruments are measured as described below:
Financial assets
4.4.1 Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss
Financial instruments designated as such upon initial recognition are classified as held for trading and if the Company manages these investments and make purchase or sale decisions based on their fair value in the context of an investment and risk management strategy. After initial recognition, transaction costs and attributable interests, when incurred, are recognized through profit and loss.
4.4.2 Loans and receivables
This category only comprises non-derivative assets with fixed or determinable payments which are not quoted in any active markets. They are measured using the amortized cost or effective interest rate methods.
4.4.3 Financial instruments available-for-sale
The initial and subsequent measurement of financial instruments classified as “available for sale” is based on their fair value. The changes in the fair value resulting from the difference between the market interest rates and the effective interest rates are recognized in other comprehensive income, net of taxes. Interest set at the beginning of the agreement, calculated based on the effective interest rate method, as well as any changes in expected cash flows, are recognized directly in income for the period. At settlement of a financial instrument classified as available for sale, any gains or losses recognized in OCI are reclassified to income for the year.
4.4.4 Financial instruments held to maturity
If the Company is interested in and capable of holding any financial assets until maturity, they are classified as held to maturity. They are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, deducting any reductions in their recoverable value.
F-17
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Financial liabilities and equity instruments
4.4.5 Financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss
Financial liabilities designated as such upon initial recognition are classified as held for trading. They are stated at fair value and related gains or losses are recognized in income. The net losses or gains recognized in the income statement also include interest paid on the financial liability.
4.4.6 Other financial liabilities
Other financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest method. This method is also used to allocate interest expense of these liabilities for the period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash flows (including fees paid or received that form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) over the expected life of the financial liability or, when appropriate, over a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the financial liability.
4.4.7 Derecognition of financial liabilities
The Company derecognizes financial liabilities only when its obligations are discharged, cancelled or settled. The difference between the book value of the derecognized financial liability and the corresponding disbursement made or to be made is recorded to income.
Net sectorial financial assets and liabilities and related to the concession
4.4.8 Net sectorial financial assets and liabilities
An amendment to the concession agreement of distribution companies, approved by ANEEL Order No. 4,621/2014, provides that, in the event of termination of the concession for any reason, the residual values of Part A items and other financial components not recovered or returned through tariff are incorporated in the calculation of compensation or deducted from unamortized assets indemnity values, thus protecting rights or obligations of the distribution company to the Granting Authority.
Accordingly, the related sectorial financial assets and liabilities comply with the criteria established by the conceptual framework for Financial Reporting issued by IASB, mandating the recognition of such sector financial assets and liabilities of electricity distribution companies as from the year 2014. Thus, Copel Distribuição recognized the related sector financial assets and liabilities in its statutory financial statements in December 2014.
The effects of amendments related to concession and permission contracts do not characterize a change in accounting policy but rather a new situation, therefore, their application were prospective to the event and the initial recognition adopted was based on the existing sectorial financial assets and liabilities values at the date of signature of the amendments of the concession contracts on December 10, 2014. Thus, the impact of the initial recognition was recorded as a component of net income.
F-18
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Following guidance from ANEEL, the Company accounts for variations in sectoral financial assets and liabilities when there is a probable expectation that future revenue, equivalent to the costs incurred, will be billed and charged, resulting in the direct transfer of costs at an adjusted tariff according to the parametric formula defined in the concession agreement. The balance of these variations is retained and updated until the next tariff adjustment / review, when the Granting Authority authorizes the transfer in the Company’s tariff basis and consequently the transfer to the consumer in the next annual cycle, which occurs as from June 24 of each year.
4.4.9 Accounts receivable related to the concession
Power transmission concession
These refer to receivables in connection with the power transmission concession agreements and include the following amounts: (i) revenues from the construction of transmission infrastructure for use by system users; (ii) the financial return on these revenues guaranteed by the Granting Authority during the concession period.
Revenues under power transmission concession agreements are collected by making infrastructure available to system users and are not subject to demand risk, and are thus considered guaranteed revenues, called Annual Permitted Revenues (Receita Anual Permitida or RAP, in Portuguese) to be received during the concession period. Amounts are billed monthly to the users of this infrastructure, pursuant to reports issued by the National System Operator (Operador Nacional do Sistema or ONS, in Portuguese). Upon expiration of the concession, any uncollected amounts related to the construction of infrastructure shall be received directly from the Granting Authority, as an unconditional right to cash reimbursement pursuant to the concession agreement, as compensation for investments made and not recovered through tariffs (RAP).
These financial assets do not have an active market, have fixed and determinable cash flows, and therefore are classified as “loans and receivables”. They are initially estimated based on their respective fair values and later measured according to the amortized cost calculated under the effective interest rate method.
Specifically to the Concession Agreement 060/2001, the subsequent additions, which represents expansion, improvement or enhancement of infrastructure, are recognized as a concession financial asset by virtue of representing the future generation of additional operating cash, according to specific rules from the Granting Authority.
Power distribution service concession
These refer to reimbursements set forth in the public power distribution service concession agreements, which the Company understands as an unconditional right to cash payments from the Granting Authority upon expiration of the concession. These reimbursements are designed to compensate Copel DIS for the investments made in infrastructure, which have not been recovered through the collection of tariffs at the end of the concession because of their useful lives being longer than the term of said concession.
F-19
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Since these financial assets do not have determinable fixed cash flows – as the Company operates under the assumption that the value of the corresponding reimbursements will be based on the replacement cost of the concession assets and as they do not feature the necessary characteristics to be classified under any other category of financial assets – they are classified as “available for sale”. The cash flows related to these assets are determined taking into account the Regulatory Compensation Basis (Base de Remuneração Regulatória or BRR, in Portuguese), defined by the Granting Authority. The methodology of the BRR is based on the replacement cost of the assets that make up the power distribution infrastructure related to the concession. This tariff basis (BRR) is reviewed every four years taking into account several factors. Its goal is to reflect the variation in the prices of physical assets, including write-offs, depreciation, and additions of assets to the concession infrastructure (physical assets).
The return on these financial assets is based on the regulatory Weighted Average Cost of Capital or WACC approved by ANEEL in the periodic rate review process, whose amount is included in the tariffs charged to customers and collected monthly.
1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Tariff Readjustment Cycles were conducted every four years and, beginning on the 5th cycle, which started in January 2016, they will be conducted every five years, considering a change introduced by the fifth amendment to the concession agreement.
Gas Concession
Gas concession agreement falls the bifurcated model, where part of the investments made by the concessionaire is paid by users of the public service and the other part is indemnified by the Granting Authority, the State of Paraná, at the end of the concession. This model contemplates the recognition of financial assets and intangible assets.
As a financial asset is recognized the amount that will be indemnified by the Granting Authority corresponding to the investments made in the last ten years prior to the end of the concession as foreseen in the agreement and which the Company understands as an unconditional right to cash payments from the Granting Authority upon expiration of the concession.
Since these financial assets do not have determinable fixed cash flows – as the Company operates under the assumption that the value of the corresponding reimbursements will be based on the replacement cost of the concession assets and as they do not feature the necessary characteristics to be classified under any other category of financial assets – they are classified as “available for sale”.
4.4.10 Accounts receivable from concession indemnification
Arises from the residual balance of assets of the power transmission and generation infrastructure not yet depreciated and / or amortized existing at the end of the concession.
F-20
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The amounts are transferred from Accounts Receivable Related to the Concession, Property, Plant and Equipment and Intangible Assets to the power transmission and generation activities, respectively, with the end of the concession.
At the end of each reporting period, Management evaluates the recoverability of the asset, remeasuring its cash flow based on its best estimate.
4.4.11 Accounts payable related to the concession
Refers to the amounts set forth in the concession agreement in connection with the right to explore hydraulic energy potential (onerous concession), whose agreement is signed as Use of Public Property (Uso do Bem Público or UBP, in Portuguese) agreements. The asset is recognized on the date of signature of the concession agreement, corresponding to the present value of future cash payments for the concession. The liability is then remeasured using the effective interest rate and reduced by contracted payments.
4.5 Inventories (including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets - concession agreement)
Materials and supplies in inventory, classified under current assets and those assigned for investments, classified under property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets – concession agreements, have been recorded at their average acquisition cost. Recorded amounts do not exceed their net realizable value.
4.6 Property, plant and equipment
The assets related to the public service concession agreement are depreciated according to the straight-line method based on annual rates set forth and reviewed periodically by Aneel, which are used and accepted by the market as representative of the economic useful life of the assets related to concession's infrastructure. Assets related to contracts for the use of public property under the independent electricity producer scheme are depreciated based on annual rates established by Aneel limited to the concession period. All other fixed assets are depreciated using the straight-line method based on estimates of their useful lives.
Costs directly attributable to construction work as well as interest and financial charges on loans from third parties during construction are recorded under property, plant and equipment in progress, if it is probable that they will result in future economic benefits for the Company.
4.7 Intangible assets
Software acquired from third parties and those internally developed, are measured at acquisition cost and depreciated over five years. Intangibles from Concession Agreements are discussed below.
4.7.1 Onerous concession of electric power generation
Corresponds to acquisition of exploration rights on hydropower potential whose contract is signed as Use of Public Property - UBP.
F-21
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
During construction work, this asset is recognized at the present value of future cash disbursements during the Concession Agreement term. When commercial operation starts, the amount starts to be amortized during the concession period.
4.7.2 Hydrological risk renegotiation - GSF
Asset consisting of the renegotiation of the hydrological risk under the terms of Law No. 13,203, arising from the excess amount between the amounts recovered from the cost with the adjustment of the MRE (Generation Scaling Factor - GSF) subtracted from the total cost of the risk premium to be amortized over the energy supply period in the regulated environment. The amount was transformed by Aneel into an extension of the concession period, which is amortized on a straight-line basis as from January 1, 2016 until the end of the new concession period, according to note 14.1.
4.7.3 Concession agreement – electricity distribution
These comprise the right to control infrastructure, built or acquired by the operator or provided to be used by the operator as part of the electric energy public service concession agreement (the right to charge fees to the users of the public service provided by the operator), in compliance with IAS 38 – Intangible Assets, and IFRIC 12 – Concession Agreements.
Intangible assets are recorded at their fair acquisition and construction value, less accumulated amortization and impairment losses, when applicable.
The amortization of intangible assets reflects the pattern in which it is expected that future economic benefits will flow to Copel DIS during to the concession period.
4.7.4 Concession agreement – gas distribution
Intangible assets from the construction of infrastructure and the purchase of assets required for the provision of gas distribution services correspond to the right to charge users for the gas supply.
This intangible asset was initially recognized at acquisition, formation or construction cost, plus interest and other capitalized finance charges. This asset is amortized using the straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, considering the economic benefits generated by intangible assets.
4.7.5 Intangible assets acquired separately
Intangible assets with a defined useful life, acquired separately, are recorded at cost, less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Amortization is recognized using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the corresponding assets. The estimated useful lives and the amortization method are reviewed at the end of each reporting period, with the effect of any changes in estimate being accounted for on a prospective basis.
F-22
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
4.7.6 Derecognition of intangible assets
An intangible asset is derecognized when no future economic benefits are expected from use or disposal. Gains or losses arising from derecognition of an intangible asset, measured as the difference between net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset are recognized in profit or loss when the asset is derecognized.
4.8 Impairment of assets
Assets are assessed annually to detect evidence of impairment.
4.8.1 Financial assets
A financial asset not measured at fair value through profit or loss is assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is objective evidence that it might be impaired. A financial asset is considered to be impaired if objective evidence indicates that a loss event has occurred after the initial recognition of the asset and that the loss event had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows that can be reliably estimated.
The Company considers evidence of impairment of receivables at both the individual and collective levels. All individually significant receivables are valued for the specific loss of value.
An impairment of a financial asset measured at amortized cost is calculated as the difference between the carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the effective original interest rate of the financial asset. Losses and their reversals are recognized in profit or loss and reflected in an allowance account against receivables.
4.8.2 Non-financial assets
Assets under formation arising from onerous concession and concession rights and / or authorization to generate electricity, classified as intangible assets, are annually tested along with the other assets of that cash- generating unit.
Whenever there is a loss resulting from situations where an asset’s carrying value exceeds its recoverable value, defined as the greater between the asset’s value in use and its net selling price, this loss is recognized in profit or loss for the year.
For impairment assessment purposes, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (Cash Generating Units - CGU).
The amount of the impairment of non-financial assets is reviewed for the analysis of a possible reversal at the reporting date, in case of reversal of loss of prior years, this is recognized in current year's profit or loss.
F-23
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
4.9 Provisions
Provisions are recognized when, and only when: i) the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) resulting from a past event, ii) it is probable (i.e., more likely than not) that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and iii) a reliable estimate can be made of the amount to settle the obligation.
The estimates of outcomes and financial impacts are determined by the Company's management judgment, supplemented by experience of similar transactions and, in some cases, by independent expert reports.
Social-environmental liabilities are recognized as the Company assumes formal obligations before regulatory agencies or becomes aware of potential risks related to socio-environmental issues, which may lead to cash disbursements that are deemed probable and that may be estimated. During the project implementation phase, the accrued amounts are recorded against property, plant and equipment (generation), construction cost (transmission) or intangible assets in progress (distribution). At the start of operations, all costs included in the Operating License, whose programs will be executed during the concession and the respective disbursement has not yet occurred, are measured and adjusted to present value according to the estimated cash flow of disbursements and recorded as social-environmental provisions in contra-entry to the assets related to the project, being adjusted periodically. Once the project enters commercial operation, all costs or expenses incurred with socio-environmental programs related to the project’s operation and maintenance licenses are analyzed according to their nature and recorded directly to profit or loss for the period.
4.10 Revenue recognition
Operating revenues are recognized when: (i) the revenue amount can be reliably measured; (ii) the costs incurred or to be incurred in the transaction are reliably measurable; (iii) it is likely that the economic benefits will be received by the Company; and (iv) the risks and rewards have been fully transferred to the buyer.
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, less discounts and/or bonuses granted and charges on sales.
4.10.1 Unbilled revenues
Refers to revenues from electricity sales to final customers, electricity sales to distributors, use of the main distribution and transmission grid and telecommunication services, from the period between the last billing and the end of each month, by estimate based on the last measurement taken.
F-24
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
4.10.2 Interest
Revenue from interest is recognized when it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Company and the revenue value can be reliably measured. Interest revenue is recognized at the straight-line basis and based on time and effective interest rate on outstanding principal amounts. The effective interest rate is the one that discounts exactly estimated future cash receipts during the estimated life of the financial asset in relation to initial net book value of that asset.
4.11 Construction revenues and costs
Revenue related to construction services for infrastructure in the power transmission and distribution services, and gas distribution, are recognized using the stage of completion method, accordingly to IAS 11 - Construction contracts. Related costs are recognized in the income statement as construction cost.
Given that Copel DIS and Compagas outsource the construction of distribution infrastructure to unrelated parties and works are carried out over short periods, the construction margin to the power and gas distribution activities result in no significant amounts, resulting in the non-recognition of such margin.
The construction margin adopted for the transmission activity for the years 2016 and 2015 was 1.65%, and results from a calculation methodology which takes into account the respective business risk.
4.12 Power purchase and sales transactions in the Spot Market (Electric Energy Trading Chamber – CCEE)
Power purchase and sales transactions in CCEE are recorded on the accrual basis according to the information disclosed by this Trading Chamber or to estimates prepared by the Management of the subsidiaries when public information is not yet available.
4.13 Leases
Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. Other leases are classified as operating.
4.14 New standards that are not yet in effect
A number of new IFRS standards and amendments to the standards and interpretations were issued by the IASB and had not yet come into effect for the year ended December 31, 2016. Consequently, the Company and its subsidiaries has not adopted them in advance.
The new rules that may have an impact on the Company and its subsidiaries are mentioned below:
4.14.1 IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments
IFRS 9 is effective for the financial statements of an entity prepared in accordance with IFRS for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 and earlier application is permitted.
F-25
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
This standard establishes new requirements for classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities. Financial assets are classified into three categories: (i) measured at fair value through profit or loss; (ii) measured at amortized cost, based on the business model within which they are held and the characteristics of their contractual cash flows; and (iii) measured at fair value through other comprehensive income.
With regard to financial liabilities, the main alteration in relation to the requirements already set by IAS 39 requires any change in fair value of a financial liability designated at fair value through profit or loss attributable to changes in the liability's credit risk to be stated in other comprehensive income and not in the statement of profit or loss, unless such recognition results in a mismatching in the statement of profit or loss.
In relation to the impairment of financial assets, IFRS 9 requires an expected credit loss model, as opposed to an incurred credit loss under IAS 39. The expected credit loss model requires an entity to account for expected credit losses and changes in those expected credit losses at each reporting date to reflect changes in credit risk since initial recognition. In other words, it is no longer necessary for a credit event to have occurred before credit losses are recognized.
Regarding the modifications related to hedge accounting, IFRS 9 retains three types of hedge accounting mechanisms currently available in IAS 39. Under IFRS 9, greater flexibility has been introduced to the types of transactions that are eligible for hedge accounting, more specifically regarding the types of instruments that qualify as hedging instruments and the types of risk components of nonfinancial items eligible for hedge accounting.
In addition, the effectiveness test has been overhauled and replaced with the principle of an “economic relationship”. Retrospective assessment of hedge effectiveness is also no longer required. Enhanced disclosure requirements about an entity’s risk management have also been introduced.
The Company’s subsidiaries have material assets classified as “available for sale”, in accordance with the current requirements of IAS 39. These assets represent the right to indemnity at the end of the concession period of the subsidiaries. The designation of these instruments as “available for sale” occurs due to the nonclassification in the other three categories described in IAS 39 (loans and receivables, fair value through profit or loss and heldtomaturity). Management’s preliminary opinion is that, should these assets be classified as measured at fair value through profit or loss according to the new standard, the effects of the subsequent remeasurement of this asset would be recognized in profit or loss for the year. Thus, there will not be material impacts on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Moreover, as the Company and its subsidiaries do not apply hedge accounting, Management concluded that there will not be material impact on the information disclosed or amounts recorded in its consolidated financial statements as a result of the amendments to standard. As regards the changes in the calculation of impairment of financial instruments, the Company is assessing any impacts of the adoption of this standard.
F-26
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
4.14.2 IFRS 15 - Clarifications to IFRS 15 Revenue from contracts with customers
IFRS 15 provides a single, straightforward model for accounting for contracts with customers, and when it comes into effect, it will supersede the current guide for revenue recognition provided in IAS 18 – Revenue and IAS 11 Construction contracts and related interpretations.
The standard establishes that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard introduces a fivestep model for revenue recognition: (i) Identify the contract with the customer; (ii) Identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) Determine the transaction price; (iv) Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
Under IFRS 15, an entity recognizes revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation, i.e., when the "control" over the goods and services in a certain operation is transferred to the customer, and will establish a greater level of detail in the disclosures.
The standard will be applicable for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, and its early adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing the method and potential impacts of the adoption of this new standard and preliminarily assess that they will not be material in its consolidated financial statements.
4.14.3 IFRS 16 - Leases
Issued on January 13, 2016, establishes, in the lessee’s view, a new form for accounting for leases currently classified as operating leases, which are now recognized similarly to leases classified as finance leases. As regards the lessors, it virtually retains the requirements of IAS 17, including only some additional disclosure aspects.
IFRS 16 is effective for annual periods beginning or on after January 1, 2019, and its early adoption is permitted as long as the entities also early adopt IFRS 15 Revenues from contracts with customers. The Company is assessing the potential impacts of the adoption of this new standard.
4.14.4 Amendments to IAS 12 - Recognition of Deferred Tax Assets for Unrealized Losses
Issued on January 19, 2016, the amendments to IAS 12 clarify the requirements of recognition of deferred tax assets for unrealized losses on debt instruments and the method for assessing the existence of probable future taxable profits for the realization of temporarily nondeductible differences, to address the diversity in practice.
The amendments to IAS 12 will be applicable for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2017, and its early adoption is permitted. The Company estimates that the application of the amendments to IAS 12 tends not to cause material impacts on its consolidated financial statements.
F-27
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
4.14.5 Amendments to IAS 7 - Disclosure initiative
Issued on January 29, 2016, the objective of the amendments to IAS 7 from the Disclosure Initiative is for the entities to provide disclosures that permit the users of the financial statements to assess the amendments as regards the responsibilities arising from financing activities.
For this, IASB requires that the following changes in liabilities arising from financing activities be disclosed: (i) changes in cash flows from financing activities; (ii) changes arising from the obtainment or loss of control of subsidiaries or other businesses; (iii) effect of exchange rate changes; (iv) changes in fair values; and (v) other changes.
The IASB defines liabilities arising from financing activities as liabilities "for which their cash flows were or will be classified in the Statements of Cash Flows as cash flows from financing activities". It also highlights that the new disclosure requirements refer similarly to changes in financial assets, if they meet the same definition. Finally, the amendments indicate that the changes in liabilities arising from financing activities should be disclosed separately from the changes in other assets and liabilities.
The amendments to IAS 7 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2017, and its early adoption is permitted. Since the amendments were disclosed in a period of time shorter than one year before the mandatory adoption period, entities are exempt from publishing comparative information on the early adoption of the amendments. The Company estimates that the application of the amendments to IAS 7 will not result in changes in the classification of the amounts of the Company’s statements of cash flows for future periods with no other material impacts on its consolidated financial statements.
4.14.6 IFRIC 22 - Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration
Issued on December 8, 2016, IFRIC 22 deals with the exchange rate to be used in transactions that involve the consideration paid or received in advance in foreign exchange transactions.
The IFRIC is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, and its early adoption is permitted.
The transactions in foreign currency of the Company are currently restricted to debt instruments with international financial institutions, measured at fair value, and to the acquisition of energy from Itaipu. Since assets and liabilities measured at fair value are not within the scope of the IFRIC and that there are no advance payments on transactions with Itaipu, the Company estimates that IFRIC 22 will not have material impacts on its consolidated financial statements.
4.14.7 Amendments to IAS 40 - Investment Property
Issued on December 8, 2016, the amendments to IAS 40 clarify the requirements relating to transfers from or to investment properties. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, and its early adoption is permitted.
F-28
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The Company is assessing the potential impacts of the adoption of the amendments.
4.14.8 Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2014 - 2016 Cycle
Every year, IASB discusses and decides on the proposed improvements to IFRS as they arise during the period. Issued on December 8, 2016, the improvements deal with the following subjects:
i) amendments to IFRS 1 - excludes from the standard some exceptions existing for application in the transition period of the entities that are new IFRS adopters.
ii) amendments to IFRS 12 - clarifies the scope of the pronouncement, in respect of interest of entities in other entities that are classified as available for sale or discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS 5.
iii) amendments to IAS 28 - clarifies if an entity has an option of "investment for investment" to measure the investees at fair value in accordance with IAS 28 for a risk capital organization.
Based on a preliminary assessment of the amendments, the Company's management believes that the application of these amendments should not have material impact on the disclosures or amounts recognized in its consolidated financial statements in future periods.
5 Cash and Cash Equivalents
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Cash and bank accounts | 173,020 | 167,724 |
Financial investments with immediate liquidity | 809,053 | 1,313,003 |
| 982,073 | 1,480,727 |
It comprises liquid funds in cash, bank deposits and short-term high liquidity investments, which can be redeemed within 90 days for cash from the contract date. Temporary short-term investments are recorded at cost at the reporting date, plus earnings accrued. Cash and cash equivalents are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.
Financial investments refer to Bank Deposit Certificates - CDBs and Repurchase Agreements, which are the sale of a security with the commitment of the seller (Bank) to repurchase it, and of the purchaser to resell it in the future. Investments are remunerated between 65% and 101% of the rate of change of the Interbank Deposit Certificate (Certificado de Depósito Interbancário - CDI).
F-29
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
6 Bonds and Securities
Category | Index | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Securities available for sale | | | |
Quotas in Funds | CDI (a) | 94,268 | 64,473 |
Committed Operation | 96.5% to 100% of CDI | 56,512 | 48,085 |
Bank Deposit Certificates - CDB | 96.0% to 101% of CDI | 50,811 | 45,996 |
Financial Treasury Bonds - LFT | Selic (b) | 1,475 | 2,623 |
| | 203,066 | 161,177 |
Securities held for trading | | | |
Multimarket Fund | 110% of CDI | 111,817 | 111,760 |
Quotas in Funds | 100% to 110% of CDI | 62,608 | 100,282 |
Committed Operation | Fixed rate | 58,930 | 88,594 |
Financial Notes | 110% of CDI | 51,384 | 26,025 |
Time Deposits with Special Guarantee from the Credit | | | |
Guarantee Fund (FGC) - DPGE | 110% of CDI | 4,785 | 4,515 |
National Treasury Bonds - LTN | Selic | 3,378 | 2,563 |
Housing credit | 110% of CDI | 1,390 | 2,316 |
Debentures | 110% of CDI | 129 | 157 |
Treasury | - | 7 | 2 |
| | 294,428 | 336,214 |
| | 497,494 | 497,391 |
| Current | 302,398 | 406,274 |
| Noncurrent | 195,096 | 91,117 |
(a) Interbank Deposit Certificate - CDI | | | |
(b) Interest rate equivalent to the reference rate of the Special System for Settlement and Custody - Selic |
Copel has securities that yield variable interest rates. The term of these securities ranges from 1 to 60 months from the end of the reporting period. None of these assets is overdue or impaired at year-end.
F-30
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
7 Trade Accounts Receivable
| | | | | |
| Balances | Overdue | Overdue for | Total | Total |
| falling due | up to 90 days | more than 90 days | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Customers | | | | | |
Residential | 235,473 | 161,934 | 49,938 | 447,345 | 593,803 |
Industrial | 204,464 | 39,689 | 69,810 | 313,963 | 386,777 |
Commercial | 187,188 | 49,902 | 30,557 | 267,647 | 377,310 |
Rural | 41,647 | 16,874 | 10,090 | 68,611 | 81,772 |
Public Entities | 31,940 | 11,781 | 20,860 | 64,581 | 66,919 |
Public lighting | 28,687 | 103 | 201 | 28,991 | 40,599 |
Public service | 30,721 | 1,535 | 2,135 | 34,391 | 42,985 |
Unbilled (4.10.1) | 377,498 | - | - | 377,498 | 648,455 |
Energy installments plan (7.1) | 137,348 | 20,301 | 35,777 | 193,426 | 130,589 |
Low income subsidy - Eletrobras | 12,128 | - | - | 12,128 | 12,351 |
Other receivables | 38,289 | 28,122 | 92,640 | 159,051 | 141,481 |
| 1,325,383 | 330,241 | 312,008 | 1,967,632 | 2,523,041 |
Concessionaires and Permission holder | | | | | |
Energy supplies | | | | | |
Energy purchase agreements in the | | | | | |
regulated market - CCEAR | 105,303 | 1,128 | 10,085 | 116,516 | 147,809 |
Bilateral contracts | 100,835 | 917 | 818 | 102,570 | 94,961 |
CCEE (7.2) | 151,022 | 3,466 | 200,174 | 354,662 | 434,523 |
Unbilled (4.10.1) | 28,873 | - | - | 28,873 | 49,431 |
Quota system and Reimbursement to generators | 13,417 | 426 | 3,572 | 17,415 | 4,158 |
| 399,450 | 5,937 | 214,649 | 620,036 | 730,882 |
Charges from using transmission grid | 94,053 | 3,327 | 7,451 | 104,831 | 83,171 |
| | | | | |
Telecommunications | 19,046 | 25,954 | 36,374 | 81,374 | 49,766 |
| | | | | |
Gas distribution | 49,018 | 18,374 | 2,542 | 69,934 | 60,715 |
| | | | | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts (7.3) | (2,019) | (3,034) | (350,613) | (355,666) | (339,686) |
| 1,884,931 | 380,799 | 222,411 | 2,488,141 | 3,107,889 |
Current | | | | 2,217,355 | 3,032,827 |
Noncurrent | | | | 270,786 | 75,062 |
7.1 Energy installments plan (renegotiations)
The trade accounts receivable renegotiated are discounted to present value, taking into consideration the future value, the maturity dates, the dates of settlement and the discount rate ranging from 0.16% to 3.00%.
7.2 Electricity Trade Chamber – CCEE
Of the balance presented, the main amount of R$203,415 is related to Copel GeT. Of this total, the amounts of R$4,361, R$15,484 and R$2,010 were received on January 6, 2017, February 7, 2017 and March 10, 2017, respectively, and the remaining balance of R$181,560 derive from sale of energy to be reprocessed by CCEE for the period from January to May 2015 as a result of the request for exemption from responsibility of complying with trading contracts of Colíder Hydroelectric Power Plant for delivery of energy (Note 19.6), of which the contested portion there is a register of estimated losses for doubtful accounts. On March 14, 2010, ANEEL denied the Company's request for reconsideration of ANEEL Order No. 1,580, dated June 14, 2016, which had maintained unaltered the implementation schedule and the energy supply schedules related to the plant.
F-31
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Considering that the plant's start-up schedule was impacted by acts of public authorities and unforeseeable or force majeure events occurred during the implementation of the project, the Company will refer the matter to the court with the conviction that the decision of the Agency will be reversed.
7.3 Allowance for doubtful accounts
The Allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded in amounts deemed sufficient by Copel’s senior management to cover potential losses on the realization of customer receivables and others whose recovery is considered unlikely.
The estimated losses for doubtful accounts is recorded considering the parameters recommended by ANEEL, based on the expectation of receivables from the main debtors, on the analysis of large debts in judicial recovery / bankruptcy, on amounts receivable from residential class customers overdue for more than 90 days, from commercial class customers overdue for more than 180 days and from industrial and rural customers, public authorities, public lighting and public utilities overdue for more than 360 days in addition to previous experience of actual losses.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of | | Reversal | Balance as of | | Reversal | Balance as of | | Reversal | Balance as of |
| January 1, 2014 | Additions | of write offs | December 31, 2014 | Additions | of write offs | December 31, 2015 | Additions | of write offs | December 31, 2016 |
Customers | | | | | | | | | | |
Residential | 46,177 | 25,323 | (11,982) | 59,518 | 64,976 | (20,327) | 104,167 | 69,041 | (106,706) | 66,502 |
Industrial | 32,670 | 14,752 | (11,465) | 35,957 | 11,265 | (5,046) | 42,176 | 45,552 | (21,165) | 66,563 |
Commercial | 26,762 | 18,400 | (5,327) | 39,835 | 14,242 | (5,692) | 48,385 | 49,664 | (30,974) | 67,075 |
Rural | 6,407 | (4,798) | (336) | 1,273 | 1,382 | (828) | 1,827 | 4,106 | (2,803) | 3,130 |
Public Entities | 13,043 | (3,888) | - | 9,155 | 1,496 | - | 10,651 | 2,424 | (94) | 12,981 |
Public lighting | 81 | - | - | 81 | - | - | 81 | 23 | - | 104 |
Public service | 183 | 71 | 6 | 260 | 347 | - | 607 | 504 | - | 1,111 |
| 125,323 | 49,860 | (29,104) | 146,079 | 93,708 | (31,893) | 207,894 | 171,314 | (161,742) | 217,466 |
Concessionaries and permission holder | | | | | | | | | |
CCEE (7.3.2) | - | - | - | - | 119,665 | - | 119,665 | - | - | 119,665 |
Concessionaries and permission holder | 8,877 | 927 | (715) | 9,089 | 1,052 | - | 10,141 | 3,266 | (330) | 13,077 |
| 8,877 | 927 | (715) | 9,089 | 120,717 | - | 129,806 | 3,266 | (330) | 132,742 |
Telecommunications | 3,254 | 1,023 | (1,234) | 3,043 | 987 | (3,839) | 191 | 2,598 | (2,255) | 534 |
Gas distribution | 1,077 | 251 | (18) | 1,310 | 549 | (64) | 1,795 | 3,209 | (80) | 4,924 |
| 138,531 | 52,061 | (31,071) | 159,521 | 215,961 | (35,796) | 339,686 | 180,387 | (164,407) | 355,666 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
7.3.1 Consumers’ estimated losses for doubtful accounts
In 2016 estimated losses were recognized in connection with companies undergoing judicial recovery, from Commercial and Industrial classes, in the amount of R$45,858, which represents the total amount exposed.
7.3.2 CCEE
An estimated losses for doubtful trade accounts receivable was recognized in 2015 in the amount of R$119,665 in respect of differences between the sales price of the energy traded under the Contracts for Purchasing and Selling Electricity in the Regulated Market (CCEARs) of the Colíder Hydroelectric Power Plant and the difference settlement price (PLD). The Company will await the decision on the request for a revision of the power plant’s operations start date to reverse that estimated losses.
F-32
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
8 CRC Transferred to the State Government of Paraná
By means of a fourth amendment dated January 21, 2005, the Company renegotiated with the State of Paraná the outstanding CRC (Account for Compensation of Income and Losses) balance as of December 31, 2004, in the amount of R$1,197,404, to be paid in 244 installments under the Price amortization system, adjusted according to the IGP-DI inflation index plus interest of 6.65% p.y., which are received monthly, with the first installment due on January 30, 2005 and the others due in subsequent and consecutive months.
At the request of the State of Paraná, approved by the Company's Board of Directors subject to the consent of the Department of the Treasury, the Adjustment Term Novation of the CRC is in progress, which contemplates, (i) no principal and interest payments in the period from April to December 2016, (ii) payment of interest and no payment of principal from January to December 2017 and the maintenance of the current indexes of correction and interest and of the global net present value of referred agreement. The other clauses will be maintained.
As from 2017, the State of Paraná has been paying monthly the amount referring to the interest of the installment as established in the Adjustment Term Novation, still to be concluded. Amortization is guaranteed by dividends payable to the State as a shareholder.
8.1 Changes in CRC
| Current | Noncurrent | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 94,579 | 1,249,529 | 1,344,108 |
Interest | 84,010 | - | 84,010 |
Monetary variations | 5,400 | 128,312 | 133,712 |
Transfers | 106,262 | (106,262) | - |
Amortizations | (178,588) | - | (178,588) |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 111,663 | 1,271,579 | 1,383,242 |
Interest | 43,917 | 49,042 | 92,959 |
Monetary variations | 1,555 | 94,404 | 95,959 |
Transfers | (107,710) | 107,710 | - |
Amortizations | (49,425) | - | (49,425) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | - | 1,522,735 | 1,522,735 |
8.2 Maturity of noncurrent installments
| 12.31.2016 |
2018 | 167,812 |
2019 | 178,972 |
2020 | 190,874 |
2021 | 203,569 |
2022 | 217,107 |
After 2022 | 564,401 |
| 1,522,735 |
F-33
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
9 Net Sectorial Financial Assets and Liabilities
Net Sectorial Financial Assets and Liabilities refer to the Variance of Parcel “A” Costs (CVA) and other financial components relating to non-manageable costs incurred in the tariff cycle without adequate tariff coverage.
The CVA, comprised of the costs of power purchase, transmission costs and sector charges, and financial items, which correspond to overcontracting of energy, neutrality of charges, and other rights and obligations included in the tariff, are transferred entirely to the electricity tariff or covered in the manner defined by the Granting Authority, not affecting the distributor's annual result.
The asset or liability balances represent the positive and negative variances between the amounts projected in the tariff and actual amounts, adjusted using a monetary adjustment index. Annually, in the tariff adjustment/ review processes, they are ratified by Aneel and transferred as components of the power tariff. Monthly, the amounts approved in previous tariff adjustment / review processes are amortized.
The balance as of 12.31.2016 is composed of the previous cycle (2016 tariff adjustment), under amortization, which represents the balance approved by Aneel already contemplated in the tariff and by the cycle under constitution (2017 tariff adjustment and 2021 periodic tariff review), which will be ratified by Aneel in the next tariff events.
F-34
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
9.1 Composition of net sectorial financial assets and liabilities balances per tariff cycle
| | 12.31.2016 | | 12.31.2015 |
| | Liabilities | | Assets |
| Current | Noncurrent | Current | Noncurrent |
Sectorial financial assets - Electricity rate adjustment recoverable 2015 | | | | |
Portion A | | | | |
Charges for using the transmission system - basic grid | - | - | 69,781 | - |
ESS | - | - | (200,644) | - |
CDE | - | - | 171,008 | - |
Proinfa | - | - | (1,185) | - |
CVA Energ | - | - | 365,276 | - |
Transport of energy purchased from Itaipu | - | - | 2,859 | - |
Other financial components | | | | |
Deferral IRT 2013 | - | - | 143,624 | - |
Deferral IRT 2014 | - | - | 324,003 | - |
Extraordinary Tariff Review | - | - | (179,763) | - |
Overcontracting | - | - | 78,778 | - |
Neutrality | - | - | (7,888) | - |
Financial exposure | - | - | 9,922 | - |
Guarantees | - | - | 84 | - |
| - | - | 775,855 | - |
Sectorial financial assets and liabilities - Electricity rate adjustment recoverable 2016 | | | | |
Portion A | | | | |
Charges for using the transmission system - basic grid | (67) | - | 3,615 | 3,615 |
Electricity purchased for resale - Itaipu | 354,651 | - | 349,704 | 349,704 |
ESS | (65,712) | - | (69,255) | (69,255) |
CDE | 146,005 | - | 231,052 | 231,052 |
Proinfa | 15,179 | - | (40) | (40) |
CVA Energ | (318,905) | - | (190,070) | (190,071) |
Transport of energy purchased from Itaipu | 3,759 | - | 2,432 | 2,432 |
Other financial components | | | | |
Overcontracting | (4,794) | - | 20,999 | 20,999 |
Extraordinary Tariff Review | (257,353) | - | (264,423) | (264,423) |
Neutrality | 40,564 | - | 36,266 | 36,266 |
Financial exposure | (16,250) | - | 4,396 | 4,396 |
Preliminary injunctions CDE | - | - | 10,228 | 10,228 |
Others | 149 | - | - | - |
| (102,774) | - | 134,904 | 134,903 |
Sectorial financial liabilities - Electricity rate adjustment recoverable 2017 | | | | |
Portion A | | | | |
Charges for using the transmission system - basic grid | 4,239 | 4,239 | - | - |
Electricity purchased for resale - Itaipu | 34,717 | 34,717 | - | - |
ESS | (103,853) | (103,853) | - | - |
CDE | (37,697) | (37,697) | - | - |
Proinfa | 1,057 | 1,057 | - | - |
CVA Energ | (108,610) | (108,610) | - | - |
Transport of energy purchased from Itaipu | 1,972 | 1,972 | - | - |
Other financial components | - | - | - | - |
Overcontracting | 80,482 | 80,482 | - | - |
Neutrality | 75,206 | 75,206 | - | - |
| (52,487) | (52,487) | - | - |
Sectorial financial liabilities - Tariff Review 2021 | | | | |
Financial components | | | | |
Tariff refunds | - | (71,244) | - | - |
| - | (71,244) | - | - |
| (155,261) | (123,731) | 910,759 | 134,903 |
F-35
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
9.2 Changes in net sectorial financial assets and liabilities
| | Operating revenues | Financial results | | |
| Balance as of | | Balance as of |
| January 1, 2016 | Constitution | Amortization | Updating | Rate flags | December 31, 2016 |
Portion A | | | | | | |
Charges for using the transmission system - basic grid | 77,011 | (271) | (74,168) | 5,839 | - | 8,411 |
Electricity purchased for resale - Itaipu (9.2.1) | 699,408 | 61,905 | (409,894) | 72,666 | - | 424,085 |
ESS (9.2.2) | (339,154) | (124,737) | 292,804 | (32,157) | (70,174) | (273,418) |
CDE (9.2.3) | 633,112 | (249,476) | (350,600) | 37,575 | - | 70,611 |
Proinfa | (1,265) | 32,382 | (16,271) | 2,447 | - | 17,293 |
CVA Energ (9.2.4) | (14,865) | (255,085) | (37,860) | (39,710) | (188,605) | (536,125) |
Transport of energy purchased f rom Itaipu | 7,723 | 6,340 | (7,388) | 1,028 | - | 7,703 |
Other financial components | | | | | | |
Overcontracting (9.2.5) | 120,776 | 115,791 | (73,595) | (6,802) | - | 156,170 |
Deferral IRT | 467,627 | - | (467,627) | - | - | - |
Extraordinary Tariff Review | (708,609) | 21,541 | 457,942 | (28,227) | - | (257,353) |
Neutrality (9.2.6) | 64,644 | 154,607 | (35,958) | 7,683 | - | 190,976 |
Financial exposure | 18,714 | (42,000) | 7,643 | (607) | - | (16,250) |
Tariff refunds (9.2.7) | - | (66,043) | - | (5,201) | - | (71,244) |
Preliminary injunctions CDE (9.2.8) | 20,456 | (19,808) | - | (648) | - | - |
Others | 84 | 409 | (245) | (99) | - | 149 |
| 1,045,662 | (364,445) | (715,217) | 13,787 | (258,779) | (278,992) |
Current | 910,759 | | | | | (155,261) |
Noncurrent | 134,903 | | | | | (123,731) |
| | Operating revenues | Financial results | ACR Account | Rate flags | |
| Balance as of | Balance as of |
| January 1, 2015 | Constitution | Amortization | Updating | December 31, 2015 |
Portion A | | | | | | | |
CCC | 4,254 | - | (4,254) | - | - | - | - |
Charges for using the transmission system - basic grid | 96,852 | 57,734 | (89,677) | 12,102 | - | - | 77,011 |
Electricity purchased for resale - Itaipu (9.2.1) | (108,701) | 788,542 | (2,610) | 22,177 | - | - | 699,408 |
ESS (9.2.2) | (370,765) | 30,779 | 300,650 | (44,439) | - | (255,379) | (339,154) |
CDE (9.2.3) | 16,892 | 756,556 | (184,185) | 43,849 | - | - | 633,112 |
Proinfa | 4,604 | (2,350) | (3,601) | 82 | - | - | (1,265) |
CVA Energ (9.2.4) | 603,474 | 421,026 | (561,430) | 66,337 | (19,590) | (524,682) | (14,865) |
Transport of energy purchased f rom Itaipu | 2,057 | 8,398 | (3,229) | 497 | - | - | 7,723 |
Other financial components | | | | | | | |
Overcontracting (9.2.5) | 212,537 | 206,796 | (157,979) | 34,824 | (38,704) | (136,698) | 120,776 |
Deferral IRT | 599,402 | 311,212 | (467,628) | 24,641 | - | - | 467,627 |
Extraordinary Tariff Review | - | (842,087) | 179,763 | (46,285) | - | - | (708,609) |
Neutrality (9.2.6) | (21,016) | 63,603 | 18,559 | 3,498 | - | - | 64,644 |
Financial exposure | - | 25,174 | (9,922) | 3,462 | - | - | 18,714 |
Preliminary injunctions CDE (9.2.8) | - | 19,808 | - | 648 | - | - | 20,456 |
Others | 1,554 | 160 | (1,638) | 8 | - | - | 84 |
| 1,041,144 | 1,845,351 | (987,181) | 121,401 | (58,294) | (916,759) | 1,045,662 |
Current | 609,298 | | | | | | 910,759 |
Noncurrent | 431,846 | | | | | | 134,903 |
9.2.1 Electricity purchased for resale - Itaipu
Power output from the Itaipu hydropower station is sold as quotas to utilities companies in the South, Southeast and Midwest in proportion to their markets. The amount constituted in 2016 refers to the change in the power purchase cost and foreign exchange variance, in relation to that predicted in the last tariff adjustment.
F-36
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
9.2.2 System Service Charges - ESS
Consist in the costs associated to thermal power dispatching for the maintenance of the system reliability and stability and whose pricing was not considered in the calculation of the allowance for doubtful accounts. This amount is paid by all agents with consumption measurement registered on the CCEE, in the proportion of the consumption subject to payment of this charge.
These charges include the refund to generation agents of the operation restriction costs, provision of ancillary services, and for reasons of energy security.
The ESS was offset by the resources received from the Rate Tier Pooling Account (CCRBT) or Tariff Flags Account.
In 2016 there was an improvement of the hydrological conditions and a decrease in dispatch of the thermopower plants, favoring the reduction of this charge.
9.2.3 Energy Development Account - CDE
The balance of CDE in 2016 is the result of the lower amount of monthly payment quotas, except in this case the CDE discounts resulting from preliminary injunctions, ratified by ANEEL (Note 32.5.1), in relation to the regulatory quota in the electricity tariff.
9.2.4 Electricity purchased for resale - CVA Energ
The balance reflects the difference between the average price of payment, related to the effects of contracting for availability (ECD), Angra and Cotas, and the average price of tariff coverage.
The CVA Energ account was offset by funds received from the Rate Tier Pooling Account (CCRBT) or Tariff Flags Account.
On January 26, 2016, Aneel approved Normative Resolution No. 700/2016, which deals with the methodology for cases of positive balances of the Tariff Flags Account, which provides that the surplus of flags is allocated in the distributor, to be allocated to customers in the subsequent tariff processes, and may be offset in future calculations of the Tariff Flags Account, until the next tariff adjustment.
9.2.5 Overcontracting
Corresponds to the cost of acquisition of the amount of energy overcontracting in relation to the annual supply charge, as well as the energy cost related to spot market exposure. The balance results from the sale of energy surpluses on the spot market at a price (PLD) lower than the mix of coverage.
9.2.6 Neutrality
Refers to the estimated recoverable portion of sector charges not covered by the current tariff (billed revenue) due to the decline in consumption during the period.
F-37
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
9.2.7 Tariff refunds
Aneel, by means of Order No. 245 of January 28, 2016, in line with the Tariff Regulation Procedures - Proret, sub-module 2.1 - General Procedures, determined that the new amounts resulting from excess demand and surplus of reagents previously recorded as special obligations should be accounted for as of January 1, 2016 as sector financial liabilities, net of taxes levied, of the regulatory percentage of 3.5% of revenue, referring to the excess demand in the transmission grid, and of the unrecoverable revenues, applying the regulatory percentage associated with the industrial consumption class. These amounts, updated monthly based on the Selic rate, should be subtracted from the tariff in the next tariff review, generating effects from 2021.
9.2.8 Injunctions CDE
Under Resolution No. 1,986/2015, ANEEL established the rates applying to members of the Brazilian Association of Large Industrial Consumers and Free Consumers (ABRACE) following a judicial award suspending payment of part of the Economic Development Account (CDE) charge, resulting in a decrease in revenues. The amount unpaid by members will be apportioned to other consumers in the following tariff cycle.
Copel DIS, in compliance with ANEEL Order No. 1,576/2016 of 06.14.2016, which changed the methodology for the application of the injunctions, including in view of the increase in proceedings challenging this charge, made a disallowance in the payment of the CDE and reversed the financial component.
10 Accounts Receivable Related to the Concession
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Distribution concession agreement (10.1) | 614,806 | 424,140 |
Bonus from the grant (10.2) | 586,706 | - |
Transmission concession agreement (10.3) | 1,342,055 | 929,835 |
Transmission concession agreement - Remeasurement of RBSE financial assets (10.4) | 1,186,985 | - |
Concession agreement - gas distribution (10.5) | 83,378 | 13,638 |
| 3,813,930 | 1,367,613 |
Current | 65,595 | 9,162 |
Noncurrent | 3,748,335 | 1,358,451 |
F-38
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
10.1 Distribution concession agreement
| Noncurrent | |
| Assets | Special liabilities | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 6,061,481 | (2,269,005) | 3,792,476 |
Transfers from intangible assets in progress | 607,440 | (95,689) | 511,751 |
Transfers to intagible - Extension of Copel Distribuição’s Concession (Note 20.1) | (6,635,901) | 2,579,546 | (4,056,355) |
Fair value recognition | 418,064 | (201,039) | 217,025 |
Loss on disposal | (26,944) | (13,813) | (40,757) |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 424,140 | - | 424,140 |
Transfers from intangible assets | 58,970 | - | 58,970 |
Transfer from investments | 12 | - | 12 |
Fair value recognition | 131,738 | - | 131,738 |
Loss on disposal | (54) | - | (54) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 614,806 | - | 614,806 |
On December 9, 2015, the Company signed the Fifth Amendment to Concession Agreement No. 46/1999, extending the concession period to July 7, 2045, in accordance with the Decision of the Ministry of Mines and Energy of November 9, 2015, based on Law No. 12,783/2013, Decree No. 7,805/2012 and Decree No. 8,461/2015.
Accounts Receivable Related to the Concession are measured at fair value and their collection is assured by the Granting Authority through an indemnity upon the reversal of these assets at the end of the concession period.
As a result of the term extension, the amount of R$4,056,355 was reclassified from Accounts Receivable Related to the Concession to Intangible Assets in 2015, remaining a balance of R$424,140 at the end of the year. As a result of the positive result of the tariff review, the amount of R$104,239 was recognized, which, in addition to the application of the IPCA on the armored base, during 2016 allowed the recognition of fair value of R$131,738. The final balance, plus new capitalizations in 2016, is R$614,806.
10.2 Bonus from the grant of concession agreements under the quota system
| | Current | Noncurrent | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2016 | | - | - | - |
Bonus from the grant recognition | | - | 574,827 | 574,827 |
Transfers from current to noncurrent | | 86,173 | (86,173) | - |
Transfers to electricity grid use charges - customers | | (84,904) | - | (84,904) |
Interest (Note 32.2) | | - | 96,783 | 96,783 |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | | 1,269 | 585,437 | 586,706 |
On January 5, 2016, Copel GeT entered into a 30-year concession agreement of HPP GPS, in accordance with Law No. 12,783/2013, with payment of the Bonus from the Grant - BO to the Granting Authority, amounting to R$574,827, asper ANEEL Invitation to Bid 12/2015.
F-39
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The signing of the agreement permits to operate the concession for the next 30 years and the energy will be sold within the Regulated Contracting Environment - ACR under the Assured Power Quota System - CGF or “quota regime” in 2016 and, as from 2017, in the proportion of 70% of the power on the ACR and 30% on the free environment - ACL.
The amount of the bonus for the grant was recognized as a financial asset due to the Company’s unconditional right to receive the amount paid with inflation adjustment based on IPCA and interest during the concession period.
10.3 Transmission concession agreement
| | Noncurrent | |
| | | Special | |
| Current | Assets | liabilities | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 7,430 | 699,301 | (75,710) | 631,021 |
Transfers from current to noncurrent | 48,118 | (48,118) | - | - |
Transfers to electricity grid use charges - customers | (46,386) | - | - | (46,386) |
Transfers from property, plant and equipment | - | 1,740 | - | 1,740 |
Remuneration | - | 110,893 | - | 110,893 |
Construction income | - | 232,567 | - | 232,567 |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 9,162 | 996,383 | (75,710) | 929,835 |
Transfers from current to noncurrent | 55,967 | (55,967) | - | - |
Transfers to electricity grid use charges - customers | (53,851) | - | - | (53,851) |
Transfers to property, plant and equipment | - | (5,066) | - | (5,066) |
Transfers to intagible | - | (150) | - | (150) |
Transfers from recognition of RBSE appraisal report adjustment (10.4) | - | (61,760) | - | (61,760) |
Remuneration | - | 100,085 | (1,305) | 98,780 |
Reversal of estimated losses | - | 29,025 | - | 29,025 |
Construction income | - | 405,242 | - | 405,242 |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 11,278 | 1,407,792 | (77,015) | 1,342,055 |
10.4 Remeasurement of RBSE financial assets
| | Current | Noncurrent | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2016 | | - | - | - |
Gain on remeasurement of the cash flow from the RBSE assets (Note 32.3) | | - | 809,639 | 809,639 |
Transfer from accounts receivable related to the concession compensation (Note 11) | | - | 160,217 | 160,217 |
Transfers from current to noncurrent | | 53,048 | (53,048) | - |
Transfers from property, plant and equipment | | - | 155,369 | 155,369 |
Transfers from recognition of RBSE appraisal report adjustment (10.3) | | - | 61,760 | 61,760 |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | | 53,048 | 1,133,937 | 1,186,985 |
F-40
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Copel GeT extended concession agreement 060/2001, pursuant to Law No. 12,783/2013.
Regarding the amounts receivable for part of the electricity transmission assets of the Existing Basic Network System (RBSE) and for the connecting facilities and Other Transmission Facilities (RPC) prior to May 2000, on March 31, 2015, Copel GeT filed an appraisal report for these assets with Aneel in the amount of R$882,300 on December 31, 2012, which is pending approval.
On April 20, 2016, MME Ordinance No. 120 was published, determining that the amounts of assets arising from electricity transmission infrastructure construction exclusively related to these not yet depreciated and/or amortized, shall comprise the Regulatory Remuneration Base (BRR) for electricity transmission concessionaires as of the 2017 tariff review process, in order to define the new Annual Permitted Revenue (APR). The Ordinance addressed issues related to updating, remunerating and period for receiving the amounts, which are regulated by Aneel Normative Resolution No. 726/2017, by means of Public Hearing 068/2016.
After the instruction from the Granting Authority described above, the Company has, in each reporting period, remeasured its cash flow from these assets based on its best estimate, which represents an Asset balance of R$1,186,985 as of 12.31.2016, accordingly to IAS 39 – Financial Assets. The variation in the remeasurement of the asset has a corresponding entry in operating income and was reflected in the income for 2016 in the amount of R$809,639.
In addition, in October 2016 Aneel submitted new notes to the appraisal report, which, in their interpretation, reduces the amount receivable. The Company is already considering in its estimate the adjustments of the new manifestation of Aneel. However, exercising its right to the contradictory, Copel GeT timely filed an appeal with its manifestation which awaits analysis of that agency.
10.5 Concession agreement – gas distribution
| Noncurrent |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 1,920 |
Capitalization of intangible assets in progress | 11,030 |
Fair value recognition | 688 |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 13,638 |
Capitalization of intangible assets in progress | 68,737 |
Fair value recognition | 1,003 |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 83,378 |
F-41
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
10.6 Commitments regarding transmission
Commitments with suppliers of equipment and services are related to the following projects:
Transmission Lines and Substations | Balance |
Contract 010/2010 - | TL 500kV Araraquara 2 - Taubaté and SEs 500kV Araraquara and Taubaté | 116,293 |
Contract 021/2014 - | TL 230kV Foz do Chopim Realeza Sul and SE 230kV Realeza Sul | 1,388 |
Contract 022/2014 - | TL 500kV Londrina - Assis and SEs 500kV Londrina and Assis | 27,048 |
Contract 006/2016 - | TL 500kV Blumenau - Curitiba Leste and SE 500kV Blumenau and Curitiba Leste | 29,887 |
| TL 230kV SE B. Iguaçu - Realeza Sul and SE 230kV Medianeira Norte | 52,518 |
| TL 230kV Curitiba Centro - Uberaba and SE 230kV Curitiba Centro | 166,225 |
| Sectional LT 230kV Assis - Salto Grande and SE 230kV Andirá Leste | 40,024 |
| | 433,383 |
11 Accounts Receivable Related to Concession Compensation
The balance recorded as of December 31, 2016 refers to generation assets and as a result of the expiry of the Rio dos Patos SPP, GPS and Mourão I HPP concessions. Copel GeT depreciated the plants up to the expiry dates of the concessions, and reclassified them to Accounts Receivable Related to Concession Indemnity at the residual book value from Property, Plant and Equipment. Copel GeT assessed these assets and, although the Granting Authority has not yet disclosed the means of remunerating these assets and there are uncertainties as to the approval of the investments made, Management believes that compensation for these assets indicates the recoverability of the recorded balance, based on the compensation methodology determined by Aneel.
The variation in the remeasurement of the cash flow from these assets has a corresponding entry in other operating income, and was reflected in the income for 2016 in the amount of R$8,137.
Copel GeT submitted to Aneel, in a timely manner, its interest in receiving the indemnifiable amount. Proof of the investments made was formalized with the regulatory agency on December 17, 2015. The new replacement value methodology was used to prepare the information, as defined in ANEEL Normative Resolution No. 596/2013.
Of the balances recorded as of December 31, 2015, the amounts receivable from energy transmission assets of the RBSE and connection facilities and other transmission facilities (RPC) were reclassified to Accounts Receivable Related to the Concession, as a result of the recognition of the effects of MME Ordinance No. 120, as described in Note 10.4.
F-42
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
11.1 Changes in accounts receivable related to concession compensation
| Current | Noncurrent | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 301,046 | 160,217 | 461,263 |
Transfer from property, plant and equipment - generation concessions compensation | - | 81,191 | 81,191 |
Transfer from property, plant and equipment - impairment (Note 19.9) | - | (21,852) | (21,852) |
Remuneration | 20,363 | - | 20,363 |
Amortization | (321,409) | - | (321,409) |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | - | 219,556 | 219,556 |
Transfer to accounts receivable related to the concession (Note 10.4) | - | (160,217) | (160,217) |
Gain on remeasurement of the cash flow | - | 8,137 | 8,137 |
Impairment | - | (75) | (75) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | - | 67,401 | 67,401 |
12 Other Receivables
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Services in progress (a) | 136,085 | 128,336 |
CDE Transfer (12.1) | 45,929 | 119,010 |
Advance payments to suppliers (b) (12.2) | 44,806 | 95,765 |
Decommissioning in progress | 43,602 | 31,159 |
Advance payments to employees | 25,916 | 24,660 |
Advance for severance estate | 11,050 | 20,277 |
Other receivables | 73,096 | 87,296 |
| 380,484 | 506,503 |
Current | 306,933 | 474,889 |
Noncurrent | 73,551 | 31,614 |
(a) This item refers to services currently in progress within the Company, most of which are related to the Research and Development and Energy Efficiency programs, which upon conclusion are offset against the respective liability recorded for this purpose.
(b) Refers to advances to suppliers provided on contractual clauses.
12.1 CDE Transfer
One of the main purpose of the CDE is to provide funds to subsidize discounts applied to tariffs for use of power distribution systems (Note 32.5.1).
F-43
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The amount transferred to Copel DIS between June 2015 and May 2016, ratified by ANEEL resolutions 1,858/2015 and 1,897/2015, was amended by resolution 2,094 of June 21, 2016, which ratified the result of Copel DIS’s Fourth Periodic Tariff Review.
12.2 Advances to suppliers
This balance includes the advance to suppliers of Compagas regarding the gas acquisition contract with Petrobras, the acquisition of contracted and guaranteed volumes and transportation capacities, higher than those actually withdrawn and used, and contains a future compensation clause. Compagas has the right to withdraw the gas in subsequent months, and can compensate the volume contracted and not consumed within a period of up to 10 years. This balance is adjusted monthly, updating the recovery amount. In accordance with contractual provisions and consumption estimates, resulting from the review of projects and scenarios for the coming years, Compagas adjusted the recoverable value of theship or pay credit to be offset. The effect of R$87,479 on income for the year was recorded under operating costs - estimated losses, provisions and reversals.
13 Taxes
13.1 Income tax and social contribution
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Current assets | | |
IR and CSLL paid in advance | 765,150 | 517,206 |
IR and CSLL to be offset against liability | (576,198) | (322,962) |
| 188,952 | 194,244 |
Noncurrent assets | | |
IR and CSLL paid in advance | 169,967 | 94,686 |
| 169,967 | 94,686 |
Current liabilities | | |
IR and CSLL due | 547,992 | 613,278 |
IR and CSLL to be offset against asset | (506,538) | (301,362) |
| 41,454 | 311,916 |
The taxation on profit comprises the income tax and social contribution calculated based on the taxable profits (adjusted profit) of each taxable entity at the applicable rates according to prevailing legislation, 15%, plus 10% on the amount exceeding R$240 per year, for income tax and 9% for social contribution.
Income tax and social contribution losses can be offset against future taxable profits, considering the limit of 30% of the taxable profit for the period, and can be carried forward indefinitely.
F-44
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
13.2 Deferred income tax and social contribution
The deferred income tax and social contribution are recognized on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used for tax calculation purposes to the extent that it is probable that there will be sufficient taxable profits against which the temporary differences can be utilized and the tax losses can be offset.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities may be netted if there is a legal right to offset the current tax assets and liabilities and they relate to the same taxing authority.
F-45
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
13.2.1 Changes in deferred income tax and social contribution
| | | Recognized | | | Recognized | |
| | | in other | | | in other | |
| Balance as of | Recognized | comprehensive | Balance as of | Recognized | comprehensive | Balance as of |
| January 1, 2015 | in income | income | December 31, 2015 | in income | income | December 31, 2016 |
Noncurrent assets | | | | | | | |
Provisions for legal claims | 467,565 | (11,249) | - | 456,316 | (28,656) | - | 427,660 |
Private pension and health plans | 220,371 | 35,700 | - | 256,071 | 29,151 | - | 285,222 |
IAS 36 effects - impairment of assets | 274,476 | (22,450) | - | 252,026 | 37,591 | - | 289,617 |
Research and development and energy efficiency programs | 93,581 | 23,090 | - | 116,671 | 25,608 | - | 142,279 |
Estimated losses for doubtful accounts | 61,174 | 64,767 | - | 125,941 | 3,697 | - | 129,638 |
Provision for energy purchases | 155,614 | 28,857 | - | 184,471 | (69,214) | - | 115,257 |
Social security contributions - injunction on judicial deposit | 29,607 | 7,151 | - | 36,758 | 17,992 | - | 54,750 |
Amortization - concession | 36,942 | 2,597 | - | 39,539 | 4,592 | - | 44,131 |
IFRIC 12 effects - concession contracts | 46,259 | (8,250) | - | 38,009 | (11,803) | - | 26,206 |
Provision for tax losses | 17,114 | 312 | - | 17,426 | 5,750 | - | 23,176 |
IAS 39 effects - financial instruments | 7,601 | (1,069) | (216) | 6,316 | 6,607 | - | 12,923 |
Provision for profit sharing | 30,438 | (4,613) | - | 25,825 | (4,494) | - | 21,331 |
Tax losses and negative tax basis | 14,574 | (8,524) | - | 6,050 | 45,063 | - | 51,113 |
IAS 19 effects - employee benefits | 83,939 | - | (82,359) | 1,580 | (517) | (1,063) | - |
GSF renegotiation effects | - | 41,308 | - | 41,308 | (41,308) | - | - |
Rate flag | - | 16,486 | - | 16,486 | (16,486) | - | - |
Others | 24,691 | 13,699 | - | 38,390 | 53,256 | - | 91,646 |
| 1,563,946 | 177,812 | (82,575) | 1,659,183 | 56,829 | (1,063) | 1,714,949 |
(-) Noncurrent liabilities | | | | | | | |
IAS 16 effects - deemed cost | 585,781 | (46,591) | - | 539,190 | (52,395) | - | 486,795 |
IFRIC 12 effects - concession contracts | 19,113 | 72,013 | - | 91,126 | 348,820 | - | 439,946 |
Escrow deposits monetary variation | - | - | - | - | 62,538 | - | 62,538 |
IAS 19 effects - employee benefits | - | - | 56,700 | 56,700 | - | (31,237) | 25,463 |
Result from the change in the investment | | | | | | | |
valuation method (Note 18.4) | - | - | - | - | 17,717 | - | 17,717 |
Deferment of capital gains | 39,618 | (28,298) | - | 11,320 | - | - | 11,320 |
IAS 39 effects - financial instruments | 5,946 | (96) | (1) | 5,849 | - | 1,229 | 7,078 |
Capitalization of financial charges | 5,357 | - | - | 5,357 | - | - | 5,357 |
Sectoral financial assets | 353,989 | 1,536 | - | 355,525 | (355,525) | - | - |
Provisions for negative goodwill | 25,297 | - | - | 25,297 | (25,297) | - | - |
Others | 18,017 | 13,454 | - | 31,471 | 2,217 | - | 33,688 |
| 1,053,118 | 12,018 | 56,699 | 1,121,835 | (1,925) | (30,008) | 1,089,902 |
Net | 510,828 | 165,794 | (139,274) | 537,348 | 58,754 | 28,945 | 625,047 |
Assets presented in the Statement of Financial Position | 526,046 | | | 537,562 | | | 803,477 |
(-) Liabilities presented in the Statement of Financial Position | (15,218) | | | (214) | | | (178,430) |
Net | 510,828 | | | 537,348 | | | 625,047 |
13.2.2 Realization of deferred tax credits
Tax credits related to the pension and healthcare plans are realized according the movement of the related accrual based on the actuarial valuation conducted annually by an independent actuary. Deferred taxes on all other provisions will be realized as judicial rulings are issued and regulatory assets are realized.
The Company’s Board of Directors and Fiscal Council have approved and examined, respectively, the technical study prepared by the Chief Finance and Investor Relations, which points out to the realization of deferred taxes:
F-46
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
2017 | 113,386 |
2018 | 132,807 |
2019 | 63,925 |
2020 | 19,634 |
2021 | 18,628 |
2022 to 2024 | 8,000 |
2025 to 2027 | 268,667 |
| 625,047 |
13.2.3 Unrecognized tax credits
As of December 31, 2016, UEG Araucária did not recognize income tax and social contribution credits on tax loss carryforwards and negative bases in the amount of R$16,925 because there is at present no reasonable assurance of generation of future taxable profits sufficient to absorb this assets.
13.3 Other recoverable taxes and other taxes due
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Current assets | | |
Recoverable ICMS (VAT) | 62,934 | 66,475 |
Recoverable PIS/Pasep and Cofins taxes | 52,240 | 76,810 |
PIS/Pasep and Cofins to be offset against liabilities | (47,810) | (73,162) |
Other recoverable taxes | 567 | 602 |
| 67,931 | 70,725 |
Noncurrent assets | | |
Recoverable ICMS (VAT) | 35,659 | 20,386 |
PIS/Pasep and Cofins taxes | 62,113 | 59,209 |
Other recoverable taxes | 33,336 | 33,307 |
| 131,108 | 112,902 |
Current liabilities | | |
ICMS (VAT) payable | 113,793 | 143,561 |
PIS/Pasep and Cofins payable | 136,437 | 163,840 |
PIS/Pasep and Cofins to be offset against assets | (87,629) | (73,162) |
IRRF on JSCP | 90,147 | 71,662 |
IRRF on JSCP to be offset against IR and CSLL assets | (29,841) | (21,600) |
Ordinary financing of taxes with the federal tax authorities | 59,558 | 45,586 |
Other taxes | 12,529 | 11,061 |
| 294,994 | 340,948 |
Noncurrent liabilities | | |
Social security contributions - injunction on judicial deposit | 161,336 | 108,278 |
Ordinary financing of taxes with the federal tax authorities | 138,969 | 148,153 |
Other taxes | 2,841 | 842 |
| 303,146 | 257,273 |
F-47
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Sales and services revenues are subject to value-added tax (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços or ICMS, in Portuguese) and service tax (Imposto sobre Serviços or ISS, in Portuguese), at the applicable rates, and to the PIS (Social Integration Program) and COFINS (Contribution for Social Security Funding).
Credits resulting from non-cumulative PIS and COFINS charges are accounted for deducting the operating costs in the statement of income.
Credits arising from non-cumulative ICMS, PIS and COFINS related to the purchase of assets are presented deducting the acquisition cost of these assets.
Prepayments or amounts that can be offset are presented in current and non-current assets, according to their expected realization.
13.4 Reconciliation of provision for income tax (IRPJ) and social contribution (CSLL)
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Income before IRPJ and CSLL | 1,478,358 | 1,797,780 | 1,857,631 |
IRPJ and CSLL (34%) | (502,642) | (611,245) | (631,595) |
Tax effects on: | | | |
Equity in income | 66,899 | 21,882 | 47,897 |
Interest on own capital | 96,202 | 67,320 | 10,200 |
Dividends | 838 | 572 | 238 |
Finam | - | - | 1,745 |
Non deductible expenses | (11,624) | (13,706) | (8,209) |
Tax incentives | 16,567 | 18,757 | 20,248 |
Unrecognized income and social contribution tax loss carry-forwards | - | (909) | 35,146 |
Difference between the calculation bases of deemed profit and taxable profit | (114,149) | (15,302) | 1,924 |
Others | (82,659) | 402 | 390 |
Current IRPJ and CSLL | (589,322) | (698,023) | (747,869) |
Deferred IRPJ and CSLL | 58,754 | 165,794 | 225,853 |
Effective rate - % | 35.9% | 29.6% | 28.1% |
14 Prepaid Expenses
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Risk premium - GSF renegotiation (14.1) | 40,909 | 48,653 |
Others | 23,770 | 26,122 |
| 64,679 | 74,775 |
Current | 39,096 | 49,282 |
Noncurrent | 25,583 | 25,493 |
F-48
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
14.1 Risk premium – GSF (Generation Scaling Factor) renegotiation
During 2015, hydropower generation utilities were strongly impacted by the power generation below their physical guarantee due to the low level of the reservoirs affected by the rainfall shortage of the last years, and resulting in the need for liquidation with the CCEE, at the price of the PLD, of the deficit between the generated power and the sold power.
Hydropower generation utilities significantly affected by the low reservoir levels in recent years were benefited by the enactment of Law No. 13,203 by the Concession Authority on 12.08.2015, which allows hydropower generation companies subscribing to the Electricity Reallocation Mechanism (MRE) to reallocate their hydrological risk as from January 1, 2015.
ANEEL Regulatory Resolution No. 684 of 12.11.2015 establishes the criteria and other conditions for reallocation of hydrological risk by MRE members. In the Regulated Contracting Environment (ACR), hydrological risk was transferred to consumers against payment by the generation company of a risk premium into the Rate Tier Pooling Account (CCRBT). In the Free Contracting Environment (ACL), hydrological risk was reallocated through Reserve Capacity contracts.
On December 23, 2015, following analysis of reallocation conditions in the ACR and ACL, Copel GeT and Elejor filed a request for renegotiation of hydrological risk in ACR of HPPs Mauá, Foz do Areia, Santa Clara and Fundão, which was consented through Decisions No. 84/2016 and 43/2016, respectively.
In accordance with Hydrological Risk Renegotiation Term and previously mentioned regulations, subsidiaries acquired the right to partially recover cost with GSF in 2015, in the amount of R$33.55 per average MW for SP100 product class, based on the risk premium contracted by them.
As of December 31, 2015, the Copel GeT and the Elejor recognized the amount of R$134,620 as Recovery of Power Purchase Cost through Renegotiation of GSF in income for the year, as follows:
Power Plant | Physical guarantee (Average MW ) | Eligible amount of energy (Average MW ) | Amortization period of prepaid expenses | Grant extension period (intangible asset) | Asset value to recover as renegotiation of GSF | Value of prepaid expenses to amortize with future risk premium | Value of intangible assets amortization over the concession period |
Mauá | 100.827 | 97.391 | 01.01.2016 to 06.30.2020 | not applicable | 28,623 | 28,623 | - |
Foz do Areia | 576.000 | 226.705 | 01.01.2016 to 12.31.2016 | 05.24.2023 to 09.17.2023 | 66,628 | 17,222 | 49,406 |
Santa Clara and Fundão | 135.400 | 134.323 | 01.01.2016 to 04.22.2019 | 10.25.2036 to 05.28.2037 | 39,369 | 30,326 | 9,043 |
| | 458.419 | | | 134,620 | 76,171 | 58,449 |
Also as of December 31, 2015, R$48,653 was recorded under Prepaid Expenses and R$30,807 under Intangible Assets and charged to profit or loss, and R$55,160 was charged to CCEE liabilities.
A breakdown of these items as at 12.31.2016 is presented below:
F-49
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| December 31, 2015 | Amortization | Transfers | December 31, 2016 |
Risk premium - current asset | 23,313 | (32,679) | 24,825 | 15,459 |
Risk premium - noncurrent asset | 25,340 | - | 110 | 25,450 |
Intangible | 30,807 | (4,493) | 26,872 | 53,186 |
Liability deduction with CCEE | 55,160 | (3,353) | (51,807) | - |
| 134,620 | (40,525) | - | 94,095 |
Risk premium to be amortized | 76,171 | | | 40,909 |
Grant extension period | 58,449 | | | 53,186 |
15 Receivable from related parties
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Controlling shareholders | | |
State of Paraná (15.1) | 155,141 | 187,048 |
Joint Ventures | | |
Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso (15.2) | 28,968 | 25,237 |
| 184,109 | 212,285 |
Current | 28,968 | 19,482 |
Noncurrent | 155,141 | 192,803 |
15.1 State of Paraná
15.1.1 Credit related to Luz Fraterna Program, R$115,890 (R$153,300 as of 12.31.2015)
The transfer of the receivables from the Luz Fraterna (Note 37.a) account of Copel DIS to Copel was suspended from the second half of 2015, considering Decree No. 2,789/2015, which created the possibility of using presumed ICMS (VAT tax) credits for the settlement of invoices referring to this program.In addition, State Law No. 18,875, dated 09.27.2016 authorized the State of Paraná to pay in installments the debts due and unpaid to Copel relating to services rendered up to the date of publication of said Law.
The settlement of the remaining balances is in the final stage of negotiation, through the use of presumed ICMS credits, according toDecree No. 2,789/2015. However, during the negotiations, the amount of R$37.410 was identified as controversial, due to the calculation method adopted by the Company to estimate the monetary variation. Considering that the negotiations did not end until the date of issuance of these financial statements the Management recognized the reversal of such amount.
15.1.2 Credit referring to 2014 World Cup construction work, R$14,266 (R$14,266 as of 12.31.2015)
Copel’s executive board, through 2,119th Meeting, of July 28, 2014, approved the transfer of credit rights on costs related to mobility projects for FIFA 2014 World Soccer Cup made by Copel DIS and under the responsibility of the Paraná State government.
F-50
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
ANEEL agreed to the transaction through order No. 3,483 and a Credit Assignment Agreement that transfers Copel DIS rights to Copel was executed.
In addition, State Law No. 18,875, dated 09.27.2016 authorized the State of Paraná to pay debts due and unpaid to Copel relating to services rendered up to the date of publication of said Law. Considering this legal forecast, the Administration is in the negotiation phase to define the terms of the settlement of this balance.
15.1.3 Credit referring toPrograma Morar Bem, R$24,985 (R$19,482 as of 12.31.2015)
Programa Morar Bem Paraná, established by Decree No. 2,845/2011, is an agreement between Paraná State, Companhia de Habitação do Paraná (Cohapar) and Copel DIS, and is managed by Cohapar. Copel main attributions in this agreement are comprised of the construction of electric power distribution networks and housing projects consumer units service connections.
In addition, State Law No. 18,875, dated 09.27.2016 authorized the State of Paraná to pay debts due and unpaid to Copel relating to services rendered up to the date of publication of said Law. Considering this legal forecast, the Administration is in the negotiation phase to define the terms of the settlement of this balance.
15.2 Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso Participações S.A. - Loan
On May 14, 2015, a loan agreement was signed between Copel (lender) and Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso Participações S.A. (borrower), with retroactive effects as from February 6, 2015, in the amount of R$29,400, plus IOF (tax on financial transactions) and with a two year term and a remuneration at 111.5% of the Interbank Deposit Certificate (CDI), aiming at providing working capital for financing the borrower’s activities and business. Of the limit approved, the borrower invested R$23,672. In 2016, the Company recorded financial income of R$3,509 (R$3,260 in 2015).
16 Other Temporary Investments
| | | Stock exchange | |
| Shares | | quotation | Market value |
Investiment | (quantity) | Type | per share (R$) | R$ |
Companhia de Saneamento do Paraná - Sanepar (Note 18.4) | 36,343,267 | PN | 10.75 | 390,690 |
Other investments | | | | 17,607 |
| | | | 408,297 |
F-51
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
16.1 Loans of preferred shares of Sanepar
As a result of the conversion of the common shares issued by Sanepar into preferred shares (Note 18.4), Copel entered into a Service Agreement for the Price Stabilization of Preferred Shares Issued by Companhia de Saneamento do Paraná - Sanepar on 12.19.2016. Under this agreement, 23,101,329 shares owned by Copel were lent, with fixed term of return of the securities to Copel of 45 days counted from the date of loan of the shares, with possibility of advance repayment. On January 20, 2017, all the shares returned to Copel’s ownership.
The Company has evaluated this operation in accordance with applicable accounting practices and concluded that this asset remains with its accounting classification as a long-term financial asset, even during the rental period.
17 Judicial Deposits
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Taxes claims | 433,880 | 457,449 |
Labor claims | 149,968 | 169,194 |
Civil | | |
Suppliers | 7,680 | 2,828 |
Civil | 51,482 | 75,788 |
Easements | 6,679 | 7,715 |
Customers | 3,197 | 3,628 |
| 69,038 | 89,959 |
Others | 4,717 | 3,325 |
| 657,603 | 719,927 |
F-52
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
18 Investments
18.1 Changes in investments
| | | | Investiment/ | | | | |
| | | Equity | Advance | | Proposed | | |
| Balance as of | | valuation | for future | | dividends | | Balance as of |
| January 1, 2016 | Equity | adjustments | capital increase | Amortization | and JCP | Other | December 31, 2016 |
Joint Ventures | | | | | | | | |
Dominó Holdings (18.3) | 242,652 | 37,492 | (375) | - | - | (123,260) | (74,983) | 81,526 |
Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso I | 72,249 | 4,345 | - | - | - | (1,031) | - | 75,563 |
Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso - authorization rights | 11,507 | - | - | - | (367) | - | - | 11,140 |
Paraná Gás | 106 | (69) | - | - | - | - | - | 37 |
Costa Oeste | 32,631 | 7,372 | - | - | - | (2,771) | - | 37,232 |
Marumbi | 75,914 | 16,188 | - | 3,520 | - | (744) | - | 94,878 |
Transmissora Sul Brasileira | 67,563 | 1,806 | - | - | - | - | - | 69,369 |
Caiuá | 51,271 | 8,143 | - | - | - | 643 | - | 60,057 |
Integração Maranhense | 104,286 | 15,934 | - | 1,569 | - | 464 | - | 122,253 |
Matrinchã | 697,912 | 41,910 | - | 67,345 | - | (15,098) | - | 792,069 |
Guaraciaba | 298,794 | 11,194 | - | 90,564 | - | (1,583) | - | 398,969 |
Paranaíba | 100,726 | 12,847 | - | 36,691 | - | (3,051) | - | 147,213 |
Mata de Santa Genebra | 26,903 | (2,578) | - | 207,915 | - | - | - | 232,240 |
Cantareira | 60,105 | 5,155 | - | 97,431 | - | (836) | - | 161,855 |
| 1,842,619 | 159,739 | (375) | 505,035 | (367) | (147,267) | (74,983) | 2,284,401 |
Associates | | | | | | | | |
Sanepar (18.4) | 311,679 | 43,120 | (479) | - | - | (19,372) | (334,948) | - |
Dona Francisca Energética (18.5) | 32,234 | 7,901 | - | - | - | (7,369) | - | 32,766 |
Foz do Chopim Energética (18.5) | 15,574 | 10,675 | - | - | - | (12,282) | - | 13,967 |
Other | 2,131 | 260 | - | 63 | - | - | - | 2,454 |
| 361,618 | 61,956 | (479) | 63 | - | (39,023) | (334,948) | 49,187 |
Other investments | 20,473 | - | 570 | - | - | - | (19,681) | 1,362 |
| 2,224,710 | 221,695 | (284) | 505,098 | (367) | (186,290) | (429,612) | 2,334,950 |
(a) The amount of (R$74,983) refers to the capital reduction of the investee. | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | Investiment/ | | | |
| | | Equity | Advance | Proposed | | |
| Balance as of | | valuation | for future | dividends | | Balance as of |
| January 1, 2015 | Equity | adjustments | capital increase | and JCP | Amortization | December 31, 2015 |
Joint Ventures | | | | | | | |
Dominó Holdings (18.3) | 225.334 | 24.767 | 8.625 | - | (16.074) | - | 242.652 |
Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso I | 52.421 | (99) | - | 20.055 | (128) | - | 72.249 |
Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso - authorization rights | 11.693 | - | - | - | - | (186) | 11.507 |
Paraná Gás | - | (8) | - | 114 | - | - | 106 |
Costa Oeste | 23.924 | 7.506 | - | 2.983 | (1.782) | - | 32.631 |
Marumbi | 63.747 | 13.056 | - | 2.211 | (3.100) | - | 75.914 |
Transmissora Sul Brasileira | 73.291 | (6.393) | - | 665 | - | - | 67.563 |
Caiuá | 44.761 | 8.579 | - | - | (2.069) | - | 51.271 |
Integração Maranhense | 91.835 | 14.348 | - | 2.352 | (4.249) | - | 104.286 |
Matrinchã | 443.262 | 327 | - | 254.323 | - | - | 697.912 |
Guaraciaba | 145.979 | (17.136) | - | 169.951 | - | - | 298.794 |
Paranaíba | 68.308 | 3.018 | - | 29.400 | - | - | 100.726 |
Mata de Santa Genebra | 26.151 | (2.004) | - | 2.756 | - | - | 26.903 |
Cantareira | 15.273 | 1.550 | - | 43.650 | (368) | - | 60.105 |
| 1.285.979 | 47.511 | 8.625 | 528.460 | (27.770) | (186) | 1.842.619 |
Associates | | | | | | | |
Sanepar (18.5) | 282.311 | 34.720 | 11.035 | - | (16.387) | - | 311.679 |
Dona Francisca Energética (18.5) | 53.908 | (1.077) | - | - | (20.597) | - | 32.234 |
Foz do Chopim Energética (18.5) | 14.907 | 11.996 | - | - | (11.329) | - | 15.574 |
Others | 2.567 | (605) | - | 169 | - | - | 2.131 |
| 353.693 | 45.034 | 11.035 | 169 | (48.313) | - | 361.618 |
| | | | | | | |
Other investments | 20.478 | - | (5) | - | - | - | 20.473 |
| 1.660.150 | 92.545 | 19.655 | 528.629 | (76.083) | (186) | 2.224.710 |
| | | | | | | |
F-53
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
18.2 Subsidiaries with non-controlling interest
18.2.1 Summarized financial information
| Compagas | Elejor | UEG Araucária |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
ASSETS | 526,477 | 481,303 | 708,688 | 743,254 | 685,438 | 1,048,507 |
Current assets | 135,292 | 103,579 | 76,231 | 75,004 | 328,563 | 674,778 |
Noncurrent assets | 391,185 | 377,724 | 632,457 | 668,250 | 356,875 | 373,729 |
| | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | 526,477 | 481,303 | 708,688 | 743,254 | 685,438 | 1,048,507 |
Current liabilities | 180,133 | 137,886 | 142,222 | 165,642 | 62,253 | 173,420 |
Noncurrent liabilities | 46,716 | 47,696 | 486,765 | 503,612 | 20,422 | 16,847 |
Equity | 299,628 | 295,721 | 79,701 | 74,000 | 602,763 | 858,240 |
| | | | | | |
STATEMENT OF INCOME | | | | | | |
Operating revenues | 542,822 | 1,390,786 | 263,686 | 237,719 | 57,432 | 1,434,180 |
Operating costs and expenses | (534,817) | (1,360,357) | (96,321) | (61,639) | (259,324) | (1,120,473) |
Financial results | (1,422) | 1,758 | (93,717) | (108,490) | 15,416 | 49,845 |
Income tax and social contribution | (1,632) | (9,119) | (24,525) | (24,469) | 46,358 | (120,692) |
Net income | 4,951 | 23,068 | 49,123 | 43,121 | (140,118) | 242,860 |
Other comprehensive income | 132 | 1,010 | - | - | - | - |
Total comprehensive income | 5,083 | 24,078 | 49,123 | 43,121 | (140,118) | 242,860 |
| | | | | | |
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | | | | | | |
Cash flows from operational activities | 32,714 | 18,357 | 104,136 | 79,239 | 65,203 | 374,702 |
Cash flows from investiment activities | (25,975) | (74,430) | (1,465) | (1,309) | 21,587 | 7,860 |
Cash flows from financing activities | (751) | (14,030) | (105,843) | (65,007) | (200,000) | (252,670) |
| | | | | | |
TOTAL EFFECTS ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 5,988 | (70,103) | (3,172) | 12,923 | (113,210) | 129,892 |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 29,321 | 99,424 | 41,655 | 28,732 | 132,854 | 2,962 |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | 35,309 | 29,321 | 38,483 | 41,655 | 19,644 | 132,854 |
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 5,988 | (70,103) | (3,172) | 12,923 | (113,210) | 129,892 |
18.2.2 Changes in equity attributable to non-controlling shareholders
Participation in capital stock of non-controlling interest | Compagas: 49% | Elejor: 30% | UEG Araucária: 20% | Consolidated |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 136,233 | 25,445 | 190,413 | 352,091 |
Income for the period | 11,304 | 12,937 | 48,572 | 72,813 |
Other comprehensive income | 495 | - | - | 495 |
Dividends | (3,128) | (16,182) | (67,339) | (86,649) |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 144,904 | 22,200 | 171,646 | 338,750 |
Income (loss) for the year | 2,425 | 14,736 | (28,021) | (10,860) |
Other comprehensive income | 65 | - | - | 65 |
Deliberation of additional dividends proposed | - | - | (23,072) | (23,072) |
Distribution of dividends with retained earnings | - | (9,342) | - | (9,342) |
Dividends | (576) | (3,684) | - | (4,260) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 146,818 | 23,910 | 120,553 | 291,281 |
F-54
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
18.3 Total balances of the groups of assets, liabilities and profit or loss of the main joint ventures
| Dominó (a) | Voltalia | Costa Oeste | Marumbi | Transmissora Sul Brasileira | Caiuá | Integração Maranhense | Matrinchã | Guaraciaba | Paranaíba | Mata de Santa Genebra | Cantareira |
12.31.2016 |
. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ASSETS | 180,049 | 156,422 | 112,601 | 185,888 | 696,381 | 255,276 | 513,186 | 2,583,118 | 1,247,036 | 1,284,733 | 1,050,330 | 525,446 |
Current assets | 24,725 | 2,177 | 9,892 | 12,614 | 51,963 | 26,820 | 49,355 | 273,185 | 107,429 | 41,648 | 59,160 | 1,242 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 5,340 | 41 | 4,323 | 3,324 | 23,295 | 1,435 | 115 | 118,196 | 16,284 | 3,051 | 47,792 | 157 |
Other current assets | 19,385 | 2,136 | 5,569 | 9,290 | 28,668 | 25,385 | 49,240 | 154,989 | 91,145 | 38,597 | 11,368 | 1,085 |
Noncurrent assets | 155,324 | 154,245 | 102,709 | 173,274 | 644,418 | 228,456 | 463,831 | 2,309,933 | 1,139,607 | 1,243,085 | 991,170 | 524,204 |
. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | 180,049 | 156,422 | 112,601 | 185,888 | 696,381 | 255,276 | 513,186 | 2,583,118 | 1,247,036 | 1,284,733 | 1,050,330 | 525,446 |
Current liabilities | 13,669 | 2,212 | 8,003 | 17,760 | 33,949 | 26,776 | 76,137 | 120,886 | 41,099 | 83,078 | 523,351 | 140,759 |
Financial liabilities | - | - | 3,110 | 5,190 | 25,153 | 7,387 | 13,188 | 52,625 | 9,928 | 45,939 | 489,017 | 65,697 |
Other current liabilities | 13,669 | 2,212 | 4,893 | 12,570 | 8,796 | 19,389 | 62,949 | 68,261 | 31,171 | 37,139 | 34,334 | 75,062 |
Noncurrent liabilities | - | - | 31,594 | 49,531 | 315,589 | 105,934 | 187,554 | 845,764 | 391,712 | 600,784 | 63,427 | 54,373 |
Financial liabilities | - | - | 27,426 | 43,171 | 308,859 | 70,633 | 115,732 | 747,709 | 378,528 | 561,700 | - | - |
Other noncurrent liabilities | - | - | 4,168 | 6,360 | 6,730 | 35,301 | 71,822 | 98,055 | 13,184 | 39,084 | 63,427 | 54,373 |
Equity | 166,380 | 154,210 | 73,004 | 118,597 | 346,843 | 122,566 | 249,495 | 1,616,468 | 814,225 | 600,871 | 463,552 | 330,314 |
. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
STATEMENT OF INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income | - | - | 20,433 | 37,559 | 56,553 | 38,148 | 64,428 | 433,833 | 310,380 | 322,855 | 570,237 | 337,614 |
Operating costs and expenses | (969) | (122) | (3,341) | (11,906) | (12,042) | (4,008) | (2,851) | (237,779) | (204,412) | (185,789) | (497,852) | (321,966) |
Financial results | (24,062) | 5 | (1,213) | (3,596) | (32,674) | (6,432) | (10,934) | (66,462) | (73,693) | (58,703) | (80,255) | 225 |
Equity in income of subsidiaries | 101,543 | 8,987 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Income tax and social contribution | - | - | (1,426) | (1,822) | (2,810) | (11,355) | (18,125) | (44,061) | (9,429) | (25,924) | 2,724 | (5,354) |
Net income | 76,512 | 8,870 | 14,453 | 20,235 | 9,027 | 16,353 | 32,518 | 85,531 | 22,846 | 52,439 | (5,146) | 10,519 |
Other comprehensive income | (9,669) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total comprehensive income | 66,843 | 8,870 | 14,453 | 20,235 | 9,027 | 16,353 | 32,518 | 85,531 | 22,846 | 52,439 | (5,146) | 10,519 |
. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment interest - % | 49.0 | 49.0 | 51.0 | 80.0 | 20.0 | 49.0 | 49.0 | 49.0 | 49.0 | 24.5 | 50.1 | 49.0 |
Investment book value | 81,526 | 75,563 | 37,232 | 94,878 | 69,369 | 60,057 | 122,253 | 792,069 | 398,969 | 147,213 | 232,240 | 161,855 |
(a) Balances adjusted to accounting practices
| Dominó (a) | Voltalia | Costa Oeste | Marumbi | Transmissora Sul Brasileira | Caiuá | Integração Maranhense | Matrinchã | Guaraciaba | Paranaíba | Mata de Santa Genebra | Cantareira |
12.31.2015 |
. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ASSETS | 516,611 | 147,700 | 106,485 | 164,324 | 706,250 | 237,263 | 473,129 | 2,240,755 | 1,080,290 | 1,043,392 | 612,267 | 143,693 |
Current assets | 19,250 | 1,138 | 11,088 | 9,487 | 57,022 | 21,460 | 39,560 | 68,224 | 109,297 | 55,894 | 220,806 | 5,779 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 2,852 | 697 | 5,900 | 1,914 | 27,977 | 100 | 183 | 55,677 | 106,129 | 51,594 | 214,326 | 5,590 |
Other current assets | 16,398 | 441 | 5,188 | 7,573 | 29,045 | 21,360 | 39,377 | 12,547 | 3,168 | 4,300 | 6,480 | 189 |
Noncurrent assets | 497,361 | 146,562 | 95,397 | 154,837 | 649,228 | 215,803 | 433,569 | 2,172,531 | 970,993 | 987,498 | 391,461 | 137,914 |
. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | 516,611 | 147,700 | 106,485 | 164,324 | 706,250 | 237,263 | 473,129 | 2,240,755 | 1,080,290 | 1,043,392 | 612,267 | 143,693 |
Current liabilities | 21,401 | 254 | 8,998 | 16,738 | 46,853 | 28,848 | 74,720 | 103,564 | 425,866 | 599,927 | 552,028 | 6,731 |
Financial liabilities | - | - | 3,067 | 5,147 | 21,530 | 7,329 | 13,076 | 47,642 | 401,726 | 548,011 | 489,732 | - |
Other current liabilities | 21,401 | 254 | 5,931 | 11,591 | 25,323 | 21,519 | 61,644 | 55,922 | 24,140 | 51,916 | 62,296 | 6,731 |
Noncurrent liabilities | - | - | 33,503 | 52,692 | 321,582 | 103,778 | 190,379 | 807,637 | 44,633 | 32,339 | 6,541 | 14,298 |
Financial liabilities | - | - | 29,990 | 47,532 | 316,266 | 76,846 | 126,749 | 611,101 | - | - | - | - |
Advance for future capital increase | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4,800 | 94,756 | - | - | - | - |
Other noncurrent liabilities | - | - | 3,513 | 5,160 | 5,316 | 26,932 | 58,830 | 101,780 | 44,633 | 32,339 | 6,541 | 14,298 |
Equity | 495,210 | 147,446 | 63,984 | 94,894 | 337,815 | 104,637 | 208,030 | 1,329,554 | 609,791 | 411,126 | 53,698 | 122,664 |
. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
STATEMENT OF INCOME | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income | - | - | 20,634 | 47,663 | 73,863 | 33,802 | 107,415 | 678,806 | 219,820 | 611,495 | 320,948 | 90,201 |
Operating costs and expenses | (955) | (80) | (2,855) | (26,633) | (71,297) | (2,061) | (54,487) | (568,599) | (160,723) | (537,924) | (308,580) | (86,165) |
Financial results | (22,942) | - | (1,911) | (2,632) | (31,088) | (5,898) | (9,746) | (43,245) | (70,625) | (51,613) | (18,807) | 649 |
Equity in income of subsidiaries | 74,444 | (124) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Income tax and social contribution | - | - | (1,148) | (2,077) | (3,442) | (8,332) | (13,901) | (22,767) | 3,872 | (7,467) | 2,438 | (1,521) |
Net income | 50,547 | (204) | 14,720 | 16,321 | (31,964) | 17,511 | 29,281 | 44,195 | (7,656) | 14,491 | (4,001) | 3,164 |
Other comprehensive income | 17,601 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total comprehensive income | 68,148 | (204) | 14,720 | 16,321 | (31,964) | 17,511 | 29,281 | 44,195 | (7,656) | 14,491 | (4,001) | 3,164 |
. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment interest - % | 49.0 | 49.0 | 51.0 | 80.0 | 20.0 | 49.0 | 49.0 | 49.0 | 49.0 | 24.5 | 50.1 | 49.0 |
Investment book value | 242,652 | 72,249 | 32,631 | 75,914 | 67,563 | 51,271 | 104,286 | 697,912 | 298,794 | 100,726 | 26,903 | 60,105 |
. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) Balances adjusted to accounting practices
Copel's interest in the commitments assumed from its joint ventures is equivalent to R$503,546 and in contingent liabilities is equivalent to R$834.
F-55
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
18.4 Companhia de Saneamento do Paraná - Sanepar
Dominó Holdings, joint venture of Copel Comercialização, requested from Sanepar the conversion of 41,000,000 common shares issued by Sanepar and owned by Dominó Holdings into an equal number of preferred shares.
On November 24, 2016, the share conversion was made and Dominó Holdings, which held 24.6747%, currently holds 9.6702% of the common shares issued by Sanepar. As a result of this event, the Shareholders’ Agreement, entered into between the State of Paraná and Dominó Holdings, was automatically terminated, withdrawing from Dominó Holdings the significant influence on its investment in Sanepar, which is no longer classified as an associate and is now considered an available-for-sale financial asset and as consequence accounted at fair value method.
Copel held 7.6252% of its direct interest in Sanepar, but it had a significant influence in this investee through Dominó Holdings, due to the existence of the Shareholders' Agreement. With the termination of this agreement, Copel also failed to classify its investment in Sanepar as an associate and classified it as an available-for-sale financial asset in the Long-Term Assets under Other Temporary Investments. Accordingly, its recognition is no longer recorded under the equity method, but rather at fair value.
As a result of the change in the method to account for Copel's investment in Sanepar, from equity method to fair value, a gain of R$52,107 was recognized in Other operational income on 2016 (Note 33.6). The balance of R$11,189 recognized in Other Comprehensive Income in Copel’s Equity related to this investment was reclassified to Profit Retention Reserve. The initial recognition as a financial asset totaled R$387,055.
F-56
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
18.5 Total balances of the groups of assets, liabilities and profit or loss of the main associates
| Dona Francisca | Foz do Chopim |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
. | | | | |
ASSETS | 151,563 | 156,042 | 48,937 | 50,361 |
Current assets | 19,311 | 19,483 | 11,043 | 12,391 |
Noncurrent assets | 132,252 | 136,559 | 37,894 | 37,970 |
. | | | | |
LIABILITIES | 151,563 | 156,042 | 48,937 | 50,361 |
Current liabilities | 5,306 | 14,929 | 2,336 | 1,933 |
Noncurrent liabilities | 3,982 | 1,149 | 7,553 | 4,890 |
Equity | 142,275 | 139,964 | 39,048 | 43,538 |
. | | | | |
STATEMENT OF INCOME | | | | |
Net operating income | 70,208 | 67,080 | 40,762 | 47,556 |
Operating costs and expenses | (34,074) | (64,543) | (10,130) | (12,684) |
Financial income (expense) | 1,453 | 4,518 | 795 | 253 |
Income tax and social contribution | (3,275) | (11,732) | (1,580) | (1,588) |
Net income (loss) | 34,312 | (4,677) | 29,847 | 33,537 |
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - |
Total comprehensive income | 34,312 | (4,677) | 29,847 | 33,537 |
Investment interest - % | 23.0303 | 23.0303 | 35.7700 | 35.7700 |
Investment book value | 32,766 | 32,234 | 13,967 | 15,574 |
| | | | |
Copel's interest in the contingent liabilities of its associates is equivalent to R$55,565.
19 Property, Plant and Equipment
The Company record assets used in administrative and commercial facilities for generation of electric power and telecommunication services in property, plant and equipment. Investments in electric power transmission and distribution and in piped gas distribution are recorded in financial assets and/or intangible assets as IAS 38 and IFRIC 12 (Notes 4.3.9 and 4.6).
On initial adoption of IFRS, property, plant and equipment were measured at fair value with recognition of their deemed cost.
Under Articles 63 and 64 of Decree No. 41,019/1957 and Article 19 of Decree No. 2,003/1996, the assets and facilities used mostly in the generation of power are attached to these services and cannot be withdrawn, sold, assigned, or mortgaged without the prior written consent of the regulatory agency. ANEEL Resolution No. 691/2015, however, regulates the release of assets from the concessions of the Public Electric Power Service, granting prior authorization to release the property and other fixed assets not usableby the concession when they are destined for sale, and also determining that the sales proceeds less respective charges be deposited in a restricted bank account to be invested in the concession.
F-57
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
19.1 Property, plant and equipment by asset class
| | Accumulated | | | Accumulated | |
| Cost | depreciation | 12.31.2016 | Cost | depreciation | 12.31.2015 |
In service | | | | | | |
Reservoirs, dams and aqueducts | 6,595,895 | (3,912,383) | 2,683,512 | 6,602,340 | (3,772,049) | 2,830,291 |
Machinery and equipment | 5,309,674 | (2,645,702) | 2,663,972 | 5,415,726 | (2,560,616) | 2,855,110 |
Buildings | 1,498,841 | (954,470) | 544,371 | 1,499,892 | (918,338) | 581,554 |
Land | 277,112 | (12,351) | 264,761 | 277,038 | (9,416) | 267,622 |
Vehicles and aircraft | 60,914 | (45,243) | 15,671 | 63,012 | (42,805) | 20,207 |
Furniture and tools | 16,771 | (10,989) | 5,782 | 16,420 | (10,185) | 6,235 |
(-) Provision for impairment (19.9) | (77,318) | - | (77,318) | (15,096) | - | (15,096) |
(-) Special Obligations | (56) | 10 | (46) | (16) | 2 | (14) |
| 13,681,833 | (7,581,128) | 6,100,705 | 13,859,316 | (7,313,407) | 6,545,909 |
| | | | | | |
In progress | | | | | | |
Cost | 3,969,703 | - | 3,969,703 | 2,851,078 | - | 2,851,078 |
(-) Provision for impairment (19.9) | (1,136,105) | - | (1,136,105) | (704,305) | - | (704,305) |
| 2,833,598 | - | 2,833,598 | 2,146,773 | - | 2,146,773 |
| 16,515,431 | (7,581,128) | 8,934,303 | 16,006,089 | (7,313,407) | 8,692,682 |
19.2 Changes in property, plant and equipment
| Balance as of | Additions | | | | Balance as of |
| January 1, 2016 | Depreciation | Disposal | Transfers (a) | December 31, 2016 |
In service | | | | | | |
Reservoirs, dams and aqueducts | 2,830,290 | - | (142,986) | (555) | (3,237) | 2,683,512 |
Machinery and equipment | 2,855,110 | - | (185,254) | (11,143) | 5,259 | 2,663,972 |
Buildings | 581,554 | - | (37,246) | (1,971) | 2,034 | 544,371 |
Land | 267,623 | - | (2,935) | (7) | 80 | 264,761 |
Vehicles and aircraft | 20,205 | - | (4,861) | (142) | 469 | 15,671 |
Furniture and tools | 6,236 | - | (835) | (4) | 385 | 5,782 |
(-) Provision for impairment | (15,095) | (62,223) | - | - | - | (77,318) |
(-) Special Obligations | (14) | - | 8 | - | (40) | (46) |
| 6,545,909 | (62,223) | (374,109) | (13,822) | 4,950 | 6,100,705 |
In progress | | | | | | |
Cost | 2,851,078 | 1,301,856 | - | (13,580) | (169,651) | 3,969,703 |
(-) Provision for impairment | (704,305) | (431,800) | - | - | - | (1,136,105) |
| 2,146,773 | 870,056 | - | (13,580) | (169,651) | 2,833,598 |
| 8,692,682 | 807,833 | (374,109) | (27,402) | (164,701) | 8,934,303 |
(a) The amount of R$155,369 was transfered to accounts receivable related to the concession compensation, as disclosed in Note 10.4. |
F-58
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| Balance as of | Additions | | | | | Balance as of |
| January 1, 2015 | Depreciation | Disposal | Transfers | Transfer (a) | December 31, 2015 |
In service | | | | | | | |
Reservoirs, dams and aqueducts | 2,977,380 | - | (145,410) | - | 1,672 | (3,352) | 2,830,290 |
Machinery and equipment | 2,536,086 | 68 | (197,115) | (22,688) | 611,799 | (73,040) | 2,855,110 |
Buildings | 490,405 | - | (34,043) | (50) | 128,952 | (3,710) | 581,554 |
Land | 272,406 | - | (4,202) | - | 377 | (958) | 267,623 |
Vehicles and aircraft | 22,502 | - | (7,079) | (101) | 4,917 | (34) | 20,205 |
Furniture and tools | 6,839 | - | (883) | (300) | 677 | (97) | 6,236 |
(-) Provision for impairment | (46,571) | 9,624 | - | - | - | 21,852 | (15,095) |
(-) Special Obligations | (14) | - | - | - | - | - | (14) |
| 6,259,033 | 9,692 | (388,732) | (23,139) | 748,394 | (59,339) | 6,545,909 |
In progress | | | | | | | |
Cost | 2,805,865 | 816,030 | - | (18,576) | (752,241) | - | 2,851,078 |
(-) Provision for impairment | (760,710) | 56,405 | - | - | - | - | (704,305) |
| 2,045,155 | 872,435 | - | (18,576) | (752,241) | - | 2,146,773 |
| 8,304,188 | 882,127 | (388,732) | (41,715) | (3,847) | (59,339) | 8,692,682 |
(a) Transfers to accounts receivable related to the concession compensation. | | | | | |
19.3 Effects on property, plant and equipment of the end date and the extension of the electric power generation concessions and the quota regime
Since September 12, 2012, with issuance of Provisional Measure No. 579, enacted into Law No. 12,783/2013, hydroelectric and thermoelectric power generation concessions may be extended, only once, at the discretion of the Granting Authority for a period of up to 30 and 20 years, respectively.
Extension of concessions for hydroelectric power generation is subject to acceptance of certain conditions established by the Granting Authority, such as: (i) change in remuneration to tariff calculated by ANEEL for each plant; (ii) allocation of the plant’s physical power and capacity guarantee shares to concessionaires and licensees of distribution utilities; (iii) submission to service quality standards determined by ANEEL; and (iv) agreement with amounts established as indemnity of assets related to the concession.
With the expiration of HPP Rio dos Patos, HPP GPS and HPP Mourão concessions, investments subject to indemnity were transferred to account “Accounts receivable related to the concession extension”, considering the right to indemnity (Note 11).
Also in relation to current regulation, a concessionaire has a period to request the extension of the concession of up to 60 months before the term end of hydroelectric power generation plants, and of up to 24 months for thermoelectric plants.
Current regulatory framework also determines that, if the concessionaire opts to extend the concession, the Granting Authority may advance the effects of the extension by up to 60 months from the final agreement term or the concession term, defining the initial tariff.
F-59
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
If the concession period is not extended, the Granting Authority will open an auction or bid for a concession period of up to 30 years, considering as bid winner, the lowest tariff value and the highest offer to pay onerous grant.
Both in cases of early extension as new bid for a new concession term, Management understands it has an assured contractual right to receive an indemnity of the assets related to the public service concessions, based on the new replacement value (VNR), that will consider accumulated depreciation and amortization as of the date of initial operation of the facility.
19.4 Average depreciation rates
Average rate of depreciation (%) | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Generation | | |
General equipment | 6.31 | 6.32 |
Machinery and equipment | 2.29 | 3.10 |
Generators | 3.04 | 3.07 |
Reservoirs, dams and ducts | 2.13 | 2.13 |
Hydraulic turbines | 2.57 | 2.59 |
Gas and steam turbines | 2.30 | 2.30 |
Water cooling and treatment | 3.99 | 3.67 |
Gas conditioner | 3.66 | 4.74 |
Wind pow er plant unit | 3.85 | 4.40 |
Central management | | |
Buildings | 3.33 | 3.33 |
Machinery and of fice equipment | 6.25 | 6.25 |
Furniture and fixtures | 6.25 | 6.32 |
Vehicles | 14.29 | 14.29 |
Telecommunications | | |
Transmission equipment | 6.90 | 7.25 |
Terminal equipment | 13.41 | 13.30 |
Infrastructure | 7.43 | 7.44 |
Depreciation of the assets which are part of the original project of Mauá, Colíder, Cavernoso II, Santa Clara and Fundão HPPs
Copel GeT has assets from the original project of Mauá, Colíder and Cavernoso II Hydroelectric Power Plants, and Elejor of Santa Clara and Fundão Hydroelectric Power Plant, for which the Company does not expect to receive full guarantee from the Granting Authority that it will indemnify the Company by the end of the concession period for the residual value of the assets which are part of the original project. This interpretation is based on Law No. 8,987/95 and Decree No. 2,003/96, which regulates the production of electricity by independent producers.
F-60
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Accordingly, from the date these assets start operations they are depreciated at the rates set by ANEEL (Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency), limited to the concession period.
As established on concession agreements, subsequent investments not forecast in the original project, provided that they are approved by the Granting Authority and have not yet been amortized, will be indemnified by the end of concessions. Therefore, these assets will be depreciated at the rates set by ANEEL, from the operating start.
19.5 Costs of loans, financing and debentures capitalized
The costs of loans, financing and debentures capitalized during the year of 2016 amounted to R$7,142, at an average rate of 0.26% p.y. (R$28,948, at an average rate of 6.43% p.y., in 2015).
19.6 HPP Colíder
On July 30, 2010, at the ANEEL Auction of Power from New Projects 003/10, Copel GeT won the rights to the concession of the Colíder Hydroelectric Power Plant, valid for 35 years from the date of signature of Concession Agreement No. 001/11-MME-HPP Colíder, which took place on January 17, 2011.
This project is included in the Federal Government’s Growth Acceleration Program (PAC) and will comprise a main powerhouse of 300 MW, which is enough to supply approximately one million people. The facility will take advantage of the hydroelectric potential discovered on the Teles Pires River, between the towns of Nova Canaã do Norte and Itaúba, in the northern region of the State of Mato Grosso.
The National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) approved the classification of the HPP Colíder project for financial support feasibility analysis and the signed financing agreement, amounted to R$1,041,155 (Note 23). Until December 31, 2016 the financing amount of R$907,608 was released.
Due to unforeseeable events or force majeure and acts of public authorities, such as difficulties related to environmental licensing, supplier delays in meeting the equipment delivery schedule, electromechanical assembly services and the construction of the transmission line associated to the plant, the project suffered impacts on its schedule, and the commercial operation forecast was revised, with the first generating unit scheduled for December 2017, while the third and final generating unit is scheduled to come on line in April 2018. Due to a delay in the construction work's schedule, an impairment is still recorded for the assets in the amount of R$595,489 as of December 31, 2016 (R$642,551 as of December 31, 2015), as per Note 19.9.
The Colíder Hydroelectric Power Plant’s power output was sold at an ANEEL auction at a final price of R$103.40/MWh, as of July 1, 2010, adjusted according to the variation of IPCA inflation index to R$158.74 as of December 31, 2016. 125 averages MW were sold, for supply starting on January 2015, for 30 years. Copel GeT submitted an application to ANEEL to exclude its responsibility, so that the obligation to supply energy could be postponed. In a first judgement, the request was not accepted, Copel GeT filed an application for reconsideration of the decision, which was also denied on March 14, 2017. The Company will refer the matter to the court with the conviction that the Agency's decision will be reversed.
F-61
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The Company has complied with its commitments of energy supply as follows:
· | From January 2015 to September 2016: with energy surpluses not contracted in its other plants; |
· | From October 2016 to December 2017: with reduction of all supply contracts due to the offer made to the New Energy and Decrease Clearing Facility (“Mecanismo de Compensação de Sobras e Déficits - MCSD de Energia Nova”). |
On December 31, 2016, the assured power of the project was revised by MME Ordinance No. 258, going from 179.6 average MW to 177.9 average MW, once the machinery has been fully installed.
As of December 31, 2016, the expenditures on this project totaled R$2,053,700.
Total commitments already assumed with suppliers of equipment and services in connection with the Colíder Hydroelectric Power Plant amounted to R$65,061, as of December 31, 2016.
19.7 Joint operations - consortiums
The amounts recorded under property, plant and equipment referring to the participations of Copel GeT in consortiums are shown below:
| Share | Annual average | | |
Joint operations | Copel GeT (%) | depreciation rate (%) | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
In service | | | | |
HPP Mauá (Consórcio Energético Cruzeiro do Sul) | 51.00 | | 859,917 | 859,917 |
(-) Accumulated depreciation | | 3.43 | (117,625) | (88,165) |
| | | 742,292 | 771,752 |
In progress | | | | |
HPP Baixo Iguaçu (19.7.1) | 30.00 | | 390,420 | 270,097 |
Consórcio Tapajós (19.7.2) | 13.80 | | - | 14,359 |
| | | 390,420 | 284,456 |
| | | 1,132,712 | 1,056,208 |
19.7.1 Consórcio Empreendedor Baixo Iguaçu – Cebi
The purpose of the consortium is to build and operate the project known as Baixo Iguaçu Hydroelectric Plant, with minimum installed capacity of 350.20 MW, located on the Iguaçu River between the municipalities of Capanema and Capitão Leônidas Marques, and between the Governador José Richa Hydroelectric Plant and the Iguaçu National Park, in the State of Paraná.
F-62
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The start of commercial operation of Unit 1 is scheduled for 11.27.2018 and Units 2 and 3 for December 2018 and January 2019, respectively. The previous schedule has been changed due to the suspension of the Installation License, as per the decision of the Federal Court of the 4th Region (TRF-RS), held on June 16, 2014, that stopped the construction work as of July of that year. In March 2015, a decision authorizing the Company to resume construction work was published. However, ICMBio imposed additional conditions for granting an environmental license to the Company, which prevented it from resuming construction work. Cebi sent IAP – Environmental Institute of Paraná the information necessary for those conditions to be met and in August 2015 the license was issue. Having obtained the IAP license, and after technical and contractual adjustments required due to the long downtime, the works were resumed as of 02.01.2016.
On August 23, 2016, the Company signed the 2nd Amendment to the Concession Agreement with the purpose of formalizing the redefinition of the work schedule, acknowledging in favor of Cebi the exclusion of responsibility for the delay in implementing the project for a period of 756 days, which was considered as an extension of the concession period, which originally was until 08.19.2047 and became 09.14.2049.
On 01.18.2017 the assured power of the project was revised by MME Ordinance No. 11, going from 172.8 average MW to 171.3 average MW, once the machinery has been fully installed.
Total commitments already assumed with suppliers of equipment and services in connection with the consortium amounted to R$193,085, as of December 31, 2016.
19.7.2 Consórcio Tapajós
On August 10, 2016, the Management decided on the withdrawal of Copel GeT from the consortium with eight other companies to carry out studies on the Tapajós and Jamanxim rivers in the northern region of Brazil, covering feasibility and environmental studies of five hydroelectric plants with a total installed capacity of 10,682 MW.
Due to legal and environmental restrictions and uncertainties about the auction date, on September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a provision for impairment in the total amount of the investments in the statement of income, in other operating expenses, under Provisions and reversals (Note 33.4).
19.8 Cutia wind farm project
The largest Copel wind farm called Cutia is under construction, and is divided into two large complexes:
· | Cutia Complex: composed of seven wind farms (Guajiru, Jangada, Potiguar, Cutia, Maria Helena, Esperança do Nordeste and Paraíso do Ventos do Nordeste) with 180.6 MW of total installed capacity, 71.4 average MW of assured power, all located in Rio Grande do Norte. The power that will be generated by the farms was sold on the 6th Reserve Auction that was held on October 31, 2014, at an average historical price of R$144.00/MWh, and the initial forecast for commercial generation of these farms is September 2017; and |
F-63
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
· | Bento Miguel Complex:Composed of six wind farms (São Bento do Norte I, São Bento do Norte II, São Bento do Norte III, São Miguel I, São Miguel II and São Miguel III) with a total installed capacity of 132.3 MW, 54.8 average MW assured power, all also located in Rio Grande do Norte. The power that will be generated by the farms was sold on the 20th New Energy Auction that was held on 11.28.2014, at an average historical price of R$136.97/MWh, and the initial forecast for commercial generation of these farms is January 2019. |
The following are the relevant milestones for the execution of the works from January 2016 to January 2017. In January 2016, the environmental licenses were obtained, beginning the access road runs, bases and assembly platform of the generator set. In April 2016, construction of the Cutia Substation was started, with installed capacity of three 120 MVA transformers and twenty six 34 kV circuits, two circuits for each wind farm. In October 2016, with the advanced stage of construction services in some farms, the first generator sets began to be delivered, and Torres Productive Center began operating, a structure in which precast elements that will constitute the towers of support of the wind turbines will be produced. In January 2017, the process of assembling the towers of the wind turbines began and the planned deadlines are within the forecast.
As of December 31, 2016, the total commitments entered into with suppliers of equipment and services for the wind farms under construction totaled R$2,211,450. The amount refers primarily to supply of wind turbines.
19.9 Asset impairment from generation segment
The main principles underpinning the conclusions of Copel’s impairment tests are listed below:
· | Lower CGU level: generation concessions and authorizations, analyzed individually; |
· | measurement of value in use: based on future cash flows, derived from the continuous use of the asset until the end of its useful life, in constant currency, discounted to present value at an actual discount rate; and |
· | fair value measurement: a market approach was used considering the Multiples of Comparable Companies Valuation Method - CCA (“Método de Múltiplos de Empresas Comparáveis - MEC”). |
The respective cash flows are estimated based on the operating results achieved in the Company's annual corporate budget, approved at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors, with a consequent multi-annual budget, and future trends in the electric sector.
As for the period for the analysis, the Company takes into account the expiration date of each concession.
As for market growth, Copel’s projections are consistent with historical data and the Brazilian economy’s growth prospects.
F-64
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The respective cash flows are discounted at average rates that range between 5.7% (post taxes) and 12.13% (before taxes), obtained through a methodology commonly employed by the market, supported by the regulator and approved by the Management.
The Company classified into level 3 the calculation of the recoverable value when measured at its fair value, according to the technique presented in the previous paragraphs.
The Company’s management understands it has an assured contractual right with respect to compensation of the assets related to the end of the public service concessions, using in the calculation of recovery the new replacement value (VNR). Thus, the residual value of the assets upon expiration of concession has been considered.
In 2015 and 2016, the Company tested the recoverable value of its assets. As a result of these analyses, the balance of the impairment suffered the following changes in the period:
| Property, Plant and Equipment | Total |
| In service | In progress |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | (46,571) | (760,710) | (807,281) |
Provision for impairment | (253) | - | (253) |
Reversal of provision for impairment | 9,877 | 56,405 | 66,282 |
Transfer to accounts receivable related to the concession compensation (Note 11) | 21,852 | - | 21,852 |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | (15,095) | (704,305) | (719,400) |
Provision for impairment | (71,551) | (478,861) | (550,412) |
Reversal of provision for impairment | 9,328 | 47,061 | 56,389 |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | (77,318) | (1,136,105) | (1,213,423) |
The main balance of impairment and their respective impacts on income for the year are as follows:
· | R$595,489 refers to the assets of the Colíder HPP, under construction, located in the State of Mato Grosso. The calculation of the value in use considered: premises and budgets of the company and discount rate post tax in constant currency of 5.70% p.y. (5.11% p.y. post tax in 2015), which derives from the WACC methodology for the electricity generation segment. This loss was mainly recognized as a result of: (i) increase in the discount rate; (Ii) delays in implementation, resulting from unforeseeable events or force majeure and acts of public authorities, such as difficulties related to environmental licensing, supplier delays in meeting the equipment delivery schedule, electromechanical assembly services and the construction of the transmission line associated to the plant. The effect on the result of this year was a reversal of estimated losses in R$47,062. |
· | R$314,464 refers to assets of wind generation under construction in the State of Rio Grande do Norte. The calculation of the value in use considered: the Company's assumptions and budgets and discount rate before tax in constant currency of 8.06% (7.74% in 2015), which derives from the WACC methodology for the energy generation segment, adjusted to the specific condition of taxation of thoseundertakings. This loss was mainly recognized as a result of: (i) increase in the discount rate and (ii) increase in the investment originally planned, with effect on results for this year. |
F-65
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| |
· | R$108,238 refers to the thermal generation assets located in the State of Paraná. For the TPP Araucária, which operates in the Merchant mode, the calculation of value in use considered: premises and budgets of the Company, discount rate before tax in constant currency of 12.13% (7.74% in 2015), which is derived from the WACC methodology for the electric power generation segment, plus additional risk associated with revenue variation. For the TPP Figueira, the calculation of the value in use considered the flow horizon associated with the term of the coal subsidy, and the discount rate before tax in constant currency of 8.63% (7.74% in 2015), which derives from the WACC methodology for the electric power generation segment. These losses were recognized mainly due to: (i) increase in the discount rate, (ii) Company's projections regarding the dispatch expectation, in the case of UEGA, and the volume of future investments, in the case of Figueira, with effect in this year. |
· | R$195,232 refers to other hydraulic generation assets in the State of Paraná. The calculation of value in use considered: the Company's assumptions and budgets and discount rate before tax in constant currency of 8.63% (7.74% in 2015), which derives from the WACC methodology for the energy generation segment. This loss was recognized, mainly, due to expected delays in entering into commercial operations, increase in planned investments and increase in the discount rate observed in the period. The effect on the result of this year was a complement of estimated losses in the amount of R$118,383. |
The Company recorded the the effects on income for the period in operating costs, under Estimated losses, provisions and reversals (Note 33.4).
F-66
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
20 Intangible Assets
20.1 Changes in intangible assets
| | | | Concession contract (a) | Concession and | | Other (b) | |
| in | in | Special liabilities | authorization | in | in | |
| service | progress | in service | in progress | rights | service | progress | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 497,289 | 1,435,463 | (24,337) | (199,650) | 423,722 | 24,753 | 16,916 | 2,174,156 |
Acquisitions | - | 958,280 | - | - | - | - | 10,522 | 968,802 |
Customers contributions | - | - | - | (243,054) | - | - | - | (243,054) |
ANEEL grant - use of public property | - | 334 | - | - | - | - | - | 334 |
Renegotiation of hydrological risk - GSF | 30,807 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 30,807 |
Provision for claims added to the cost of the works | - | 10,609 | - | - | - | - | - | 10,609 |
Transfers to accounts receivable related to concession - | | | | | | | | |
Extension of Copel Distribuição’s Concession (Note 10.1) | 6,635,901 | - | (2,579,546) | - | - | - | - | 4,056,355 |
Transfers from property, plant and equipment | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,039 | 2,039 |
Capitalizations for accounts receivable related to concession | - | (618,470) | - | 95,689 | - | - | - | (522,781) |
Capitalizations for intangible in service | 865,998 | (865,998) | (306,252) | 306,252 | - | 9,137 | (9,137) | - |
Amortization of quotas - concession and authorization | (350,467) | - | 76,467 | - | (7,450) | (8,923) | - | (290,373) |
Amortization of quotas - Pasep/Cofins credits | (15,026) | - | 3,205 | - | - | 29 | - | (11,792) |
Disposal | (5,979) | (22,454) | (532) | - | - | (597) | (464) | (30,026) |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 7,658,523 | 897,764 | (2,830,995) | (40,763) | 416,272 | 24,399 | 19,876 | 6,145,076 |
Acquisitions | - | 918,516 | - | - | - | - | 10,211 | 928,727 |
Customers contributions | - | - | - | (122,809) | - | - | - | (122,809) |
ANEEL grant - use of public property | - | 742 | - | - | - | - | - | 742 |
Renegotiation of hydrological risk - GSF | 26,872 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 26,872 |
Provision for claims added to the cost of the works | - | 3,430 | - | - | - | - | - | 3,430 |
Transfers from property, plant and equipment | - | - | - | - | - | 25 | 341 | 366 |
Transfers from investments | - | - | - | - | - | - | 122 | 122 |
Transfers from / for accounts receivable related to concession | (2,230) | (125,477) | - | - | - | 150 | - | (127,557) |
Capitalizations for intangible in service | 779,261 | (779,261) | (135,104) | 135,104 | - | 11,714 | (11,714) | - |
Amortization of quotas - concession and authorization | (435,098) | - | 121,075 | - | (13,139) | (9,234) | - | (336,396) |
Amortization of quotas - Pasep/Cofins credits | (11,270) | - | - | - | - | (57) | - | (11,327) |
Amortization of quotas appropriated in the cost of the work | (292) | 292 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Disposal | (27,329) | (19,754) | - | - | - | - | (351) | (47,434) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 7,988,437 | 896,252 | (2,845,024) | (28,468) | 403,133 | 26,997 | 18,485 | 6,459,812 |
(a) Amortization during the concession/authorization as of the start of commercial operations of the enterprieses or based on the useful life of the assets, of the two the shortest. |
(b) Annualamortization rate: 20%. |
20.2 Copel DIS
In accordance with Technical Interpretation IFRIC 12, accounting concessions, the share of infrastructure that will be used during concession was recorded in Intangible Assets, composed of the assets of the electricity distribution, net of interests of consumers (special obligations).
Special liabilities comprise customers’ contributions, Federal Government grants, federal, state, and municipal funds, and special credits assigned to the investments in facilities related to a concession.
The amortization of the special liabilities is calculated using the average rate of depreciation of assets that comprises the infrastructure, and the balance of special liabilities contained in intangible assets will be amortized over the concession period.
Special obligations are not financial liabilities or shareholder’s credits.
F-67
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
20.3 Costs of loans, financing and debentures capitalized
The costs of loans, financing and debentures capitalized during 2016 amounted to R$7,608, at an average rate of 0.41% p.y. (R$32,579, at an average rate of 1.78% p.y., in 2015).
21 Payroll, social charges and accruals
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Social security liabilities | | |
Taxes and social contribution | 50,016 | 43,691 |
Social security charges on paid vacation and 13th salary | 35,570 | 32,186 |
| 85,586 | 75,877 |
Labor liabilities | | |
Payroll, net | 835 | 2,568 |
Vacation | 111,021 | 101,485 |
Profit sharing | 64,814 | 78,462 |
Voluntary termination | 25,532 | - |
Profit sharing | 9 | 9 |
| 202,211 | 182,524 |
| 287,797 | 258,401 |
22 Suppliers
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Energy supplies (22.1) | 673,442 | 917,307 |
Materials and supplies | 399,576 | 478,895 |
Natural gas for resale | 132,985 | 87,384 |
Charges for use of grid system | 86,347 | 135,463 |
| 1,292,350 | 1,619,049 |
Current | 1,255,639 | 1,613,126 |
Noncurrent | 36,711 | 5,923 |
22.1 Electricity - CCEE
In September 2016, Copel GeT settled the liabilities owned to CCEE, due to the renegotiation of hydrological risk (Note 14.1), amounting to R$321,640, which was paid as of April 18, 2016 in six installments with interest and inflation adjustment and after deducting the credit determined in the month of settlement.
F-68
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
22.2 Main power purchase agreements
The power purchase agreements signed in the regulated power trading environment, shown at original value and adjusted annually according to the IPCA index:
. | | Energy | | Average purchase | |
| Supply | purchased (annual | Auction | price (R$/MWh) | |
Auctions | period | average MW) | date | historical | updated |
Auction of power from existing facilities | | | | | |
4thAuction - Product 2009 | 2009 to 2016 | 35.33 | 10.11.2005 | 94.91 | 180.40 |
12th Auction-Product 2014 36M | 01.01.2014 to 12.31.2016 | 129.30 | 12.17.2013 | 149.99 | 187.74 |
13th Auction-Product 2014 - DIS | 05.01.2014 to 12.31.2019 | 109.35 | 04.30.2014 | 262.00 | 318.83 |
13th Auction-Product 2014 - QTD | 05.01.2014 to 12.31.2019 | 218.82 | 04.30.2014 | 271.00 | 329.78 |
14th Auction-Product 2015 - 03 DIS | 01.01.2015 to 12.31.2017 | 13.32 | 12.05.2014 | 191.99 | 225.84 |
14th Auction-Product 2015 - 03 QTD | 01.01.2015 to 12.31.2017 | 13.58 | 12.05.2014 | 201.00 | 236.44 |
| | 519.70 | | | |
Auction of power from new facilities | | | | | |
1st Auction- Product 2008 Hydro | 2008 to 2037 | 3.62 | 12.16.2005 | 106.95 | 201.45 |
1st Auction- Product 2008 Thermo | 2008 to 2022 | 24.77 | 12.16.2005 | 132.26 | 249.13 |
1st Auction- Product 2009 Hydro | 2009 to 2038 | 3.55 | 12.16.2005 | 114.28 | 215.26 |
1st Auction- Product 2009 Thermo | 2009 to 2023 | 40.50 | 12.16.2005 | 129.26 | 243.48 |
1st Auction- Product 2010 Hydro | 2010 to 2039 | 70.06 | 12.16.2005 | 115.04 | 216.69 |
1st Auction- Product 2010 Thermo | 2010 to 2024 | 65.19 | 12.16.2005 | 121.81 | 229.44 |
3rd Auction- Product 2011 Hydro | 2011 to 2040 | 57.82 | 10.10.2006 | 120.86 | 222.47 |
3rd Auction- Product 2011 Thermo | 2011 to 2025 | 54.37 | 10.10.2006 | 137.44 | 252.98 |
4th Auction- Product 2010 Thermo | 2010 to 2024 | 15.49 | 07.26.2007 | 134.67 | 240.36 |
5th Auction- Product 2012 Hydro | 2012 to 2041 | 53.39 | 10.16.2007 | 129.14 | 228.31 |
5th Auction- Product 2012 Thermo | 2012 to 2026 | 115.69 | 10.16.2007 | 128.37 | 226.95 |
6th Auction- Product 2011 Thermo | 2011 to 2025 | 9.92 | 09.17.2008 | 128.42 | 214.32 |
7th Auction- Product 2013 Hydro | 2013 to 2042 | - | 09.30.2008 | 98.98 | 165.19 |
7th Auction- Product 2013 Thermo | 2013 to 2027 | 111.27 | 09.30.2008 | 145.23 | 242.38 |
8th Auction- Product 2012 Hydro | 2012 to 2041 | 0.01 | 08.27.2009 | 144.00 | 230.87 |
8th Auction- Product 2012 Thermo | 2012 to 2026 | 0.15 | 08.27.2009 | 144.60 | 231.84 |
17th Auction- Product 2016 Wind farm | 2016 to 2035 | 32.68 | 11.18.2013 | 124.43 | 157.18 |
| | 658.48 | | | |
Structuring projects auction | | | | | |
Santo Antonio | 2012 to 2041 | 138.12 | 12.10.2007 | 78.87 | 137.89 |
Jirau | 2013 to 2042 | 229.81 | 05.19.2008 | 71.37 | 121.28 |
| | 367.93 | | | |
F-69
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
23 Loans and Financing
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Issue | Number of | Final | Annual rate p.y. | | | |
| Contracts | Company | Date | installment | maturity | (interest + commission) | Principal | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Foreign currency | | | | | | | | |
| National Treasury Department | | | | | | | | |
| (Secretaria do Tesouro Nacional or STN) | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Par Bond | Copel | 05.20.1998 | 1 | 04.11.2024 | 6.0% + 0.20% | 17,315 | 53,498 | 61,763 |
(1) | Discount Bond | Copel | 05.20.1998 | 1 | 04.11.2024 | 1.1875%+0.20% | 12,082 | 37,007 | 42,671 |
Total foreign currency | | | | | | | 90,505 | 104,434 |
Local currency | | | | | | | | |
| Banco do Brasil | | | | | | | | |
(2) | 21/02155-4 | Copel DIS | 09.10.2010 | 2 | 08.15.2018 | 109.0% of DI | 116,667 | 122,713 | 122,353 |
(3) | 21/02248-8 | Copel DIS | 06.22.2011 | 2 | 05.16.2018 | 109.0% of DI | 150,000 | 152,314 | 151,901 |
(4) | CCB 21/11062X | Copel DIS | 08.26.2013 | 3 | 07.27.2018 | 106.0% of DI | 151,000 | 151,359 | 196,852 |
(5) | CCB 330.600.773 | Copel DIS | 07.11.2014 | 3 | 07.11.2019 | 111.8% of DI | 116,667 | 124,170 | 123,478 |
(5) | NCI 330.600.132 | Copel | 02.28.2007 | 3 | 02.28.2019 | 107.8% of DI | 231,000 | 241,312 | 241,059 |
(5) | NCI 330.600.151 | Copel | 07.31.2007 | 3 | 07.31.2017 | 111.0% of DI | 18,000 | 6,366 | 12,722 |
(5) | CCB 306.401.381 | Copel | 07.21.2015 | 2 | 07.21.2018 | 109.4% of DI | 640,005 | 677,177 | 672,985 |
| | | | | | | | 1,475,411 | 1,521,350 |
| Eletrobras | | | | | | | | |
(6) | 1293/94 | Copel GeT | 09.23.1994 | 180 | 06.30.2016 | 5.5% to 6.5% + 2,0% | 307,713 | - | 16,980 |
(7) | 980/95 | Copel DIS | 12.22.1994 | 80 | 11.15.2018 | 8.0% | 11 | 5 | 8 |
(7) | 981/95 | Copel DIS | 12.22.1994 | 80 | 08.15.2019 | 8.0% | 1,169 | 180 | 246 |
(7) | 982/95 | Copel DIS | 12.22.1994 | 80 | 02.15.2020 | 8.0% | 1,283 | 71 | 95 |
(7) | 983/95 | Copel DIS | 12.22.1994 | 80 | 11.15.2020 | 8.0% | 11 | 103 | 128 |
(7) | 984/95 | Copel DIS | 12.22.1994 | 80 | 11.15.2020 | 8.0% | 14 | 44 | 55 |
(7) | 985/95 | Copel DIS | 12.22.1994 | 80 | 08.15.2021 | 8.0% | 61 | 29 | 35 |
(8) | 002/04 | Copel DIS | 06.07.2004 | 120 | 07.30.2016 | 8.0% | 30,240 | - | 643 |
(8) | 142/06 | Copel DIS | 05.11.2006 | 120 | 09.30.2018 | 5.0% + 1.0% | 74,340 | 6,369 | 10,007 |
(8) | 206/07 | Copel DIS | 03.03.2008 | 120 | 08.30.2020 | 5.0% + 1.0% | 109,642 | 32,648 | 41,550 |
(8) | 273/09 | Copel DIS | 02.18.2010 | 120 | 12.30.2022 | 5.0% + 1.0% | 63,944 | 9,866 | 11,510 |
(8) | 2540/06 | Copel DIS | 05.12.2009 | 60 | 10.30.2016 | 5.0% + 1.5% | 5,095 | - | 375 |
| | | | | | | | 49,315 | 81,632 |
| Caixa Econônica Federal | | | | | | | | |
(8) | 415.855-22/14 | Copel DIS | 03.31.2015 | 120 | 12.08.2026 | 6.0% | 2,844 | 5,631 | 5,307 |
| | | | | | | | 5,631 | 5,307 |
| Finep | | | | | | | | |
(9) | 21120105-00 | Copel TEL | 07.17.2012 | 81 | 10.15.2020 | 4.0% | 35,095 | 11,983 | 15,132 |
(9) | 21120105-00 | Copel TEL | 07.17.2012 | 81 | 10.15.2020 | 3.5% + TR | 17,103 | 10,043 | 12,406 |
| | | | | | | | 22,026 | 27,538 |
| BNDES | | | | | | | | |
(10) | 820989.1 | Copel GeT | 03.17.2009 | 179 | 01.15.2028 | 1.63% above TJLP | 169,500 | 128,722 | 138,347 |
(11) | 1120952.1-A | Copel GeT | 12.16.2011 | 168 | 04.15.2026 | 1.82% above TJLP | 42,433 | 28,895 | 31,558 |
(12) | 1120952.1-B | Copel GeT | 12.16.2011 | 168 | 04.15.2026 | 1.42% above TJLP | 2,290 | 1,559 | 1,702 |
(13) | 1220768.1 | Copel GeT | 09.28.2012 | 192 | 07.15.2029 | 1.36% above TJLP | 73,122 | 59,493 | 63,312 |
(14) | 13211061 | Copel GeT | 12.04.2013 | 192 | 10.15.2031 | 1.49% above TJLP | 1,041,155 | 923,982 | 902,592 |
(15) | 13210331 | Copel GeT | 12.03.2013 | 168 | 08.15.2028 | 1.49% and 1.89% above TJLP | 17,644 | 15,017 | 16,077 |
(16) | 15206041 | Copel GeT | 12.28.2015 | 168 | 06.15.2030 | 2.42% above TJLP | 34,265 | 27,666 | 23,942 |
(17) | 15205921 | Copel GeT | 12.28.2015 | 168 | 12.15.2029 | 2.32% above TJLP | 21,584 | 16,860 | 14,663 |
(18) | 14205611-A | Copel DIS | 12.15.2014 | 72 | 01.15.2021 | 2.09% p.y. above TJLP | 41,583 | 27,893 | 34,266 |
(18) | 14205611-B | Copel DIS | 12.15.2014 | 6 | 02.15.2021 | 2.09 p.y. above TR BNDES | 17,821 | 18,735 | 21,267 |
(19) | 14205611-C | Copel DIS | 12.15.2014 | 113 | 06.15.2024 | 6% p.y. | 78,921 | 58,787 | 47,353 |
(20) | 14205611-D | Copel DIS | 12.15.2014 | 57 | 02.15.2021 | TJLP | 750 | 38 | - |
(21) | 14212711 | Santa Maria | 06.01.2015 | 192 | 08.15.2031 | 1.66% p.y. above TJLP | 59,462 | 54,734 | 57,789 |
(21) | 14212721 | Santa Helena | 06.01.2015 | 192 | 08.15.2031 | 1.66% p.y. above TJLP | 64,520 | 59,355 | 62,487 |
(22) | 11211521 | GE Farol | 03.19.2012 | 192 | 06.15.2030 | 2.34% p.y. above TJLP | 54,100 | 52,053 | 55,087 |
(22) | 11211531 | GE Boa Vista | 03.19.2012 | 192 | 06.15.2030 | 2.34% p.y. above TJLP | 40,050 | 38,482 | 40,726 |
(22) | 11211541 | GE S.Bento do Norte | 03.19.2012 | 192 | 06.15.2030 | 2.34% p.y. above TJLP | 90,900 | 87,275 | 92,362 |
(22) | 11211551 | GE Olho D'Água | 03.19.2012 | 192 | 06.15.2030 | 2.34% p.y. above TJLP | 97,000 | 93,229 | 98,228 |
| | | | | | | | 1,692,775 | 1,701,758 |
(23) | Promissory notes | Copel GeT | 12.29.2015 | 1 | 12.18.2017 | 117% of DI | 500,000 | 581,909 | 496,694 |
| | | | | | | | 581,909 | 496,694 |
| Banco do Brasil | | | | | | | | |
| BNDES Transfer | | | | | | | | |
(24) | 21/02000-0 | Copel GeT | 04.16.2009 | 179 | 01.15.2028 | 2,13% above TJLP | 169,500 | 128,721 | 138,347 |
| | | | | | | | 128,721 | 138,347 |
Total local currency | | | | | | | 3,955,788 | 3,972,626 |
| | | | | | | | 4,046,293 | 4,077,060 |
| | | | | | | Current | 1,470,742 | 308,558 |
| | | | | | | Noncurrent | 2,575,551 | 3,768,502 |
| | | | | | | | | |
F-70
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Banco do Brasil: annual installments |
(2) Installments in the amount of R$58,334, falling due on August 8, 2017, and August 8, 2018.The proportional interest is paid half-yearly. |
(3) Installments in the amount of R$75,000, falling due on May 16, 2017, and May 16, 2018.The proportional interest is paid half-yearly. |
(4) Together with the data is the interest accrued on the installments, in the amount of R$50,333, falling due on July 27, 2017 and July 27, 2018. |
(5) Contract CCB 330600773: Installments in the amount of R$38,889, falling due on July 11, 2017, July 11, 2018 and July 11, 2019.The interest is paid half-yearly. |
Contract NCI 330.600.132: Installments in the amount of R$77,000, falling due on February 28, 2017, February 28, 2018 and February 28, 2019.The interest is paid half-yearly. |
Contract NCI 330.600.151: Installments in the amount of R$6,000, falling due on July 31, 2017 and July 31, 2018.The interest is paid half-yearly. |
Contract CCB 306.401.381: Installments in the amount of R$320,003, falling due on July 21, 2017 and July 21, 2018.The interest is paid half-yearly. |
|
Allocation: |
(1) The restructuring of medium and long-term debt in connection w ith the financing received under Law 4,131/62. |
(2) (3) (4) (5) Working capital. |
(6) Financial cover up to 29.14% of the total project of HPP Governador José Richa Implementation and transmission system. |
(7) National Program for Watering - Proni. |
(8) Rural Electricity Program -Luz para Todos. |
(9) BEL project - ultra wide band intranet service (Ultra Wide Band - UWB). |
(10) (24) Construction of the Mauá Hydroelectric Power Plant and its transmission system, in consortium with Eletrosul. |
(11) Implementation of transmission line between substations Foz do Iguaçu and Cascavel Oeste. |
(12) Purchase of machinery and equipment for implementation of the transmission line described above. |
(13) Implementation of Cavernoso II SHP. |
(14) Implementation of HPP Colíder and associated transmission system. |
(15) Implementation of the 230/138kV Cerquilho III Substation. |
(16) Implementation of transmission line Assis – Paraguaçu Paulista II. |
(17) Implementation of transmission lines Londrina – Figueira and Salto Osório – Foz do Chopim C2. |
(18) Investment in preservation of businesses, improvements, operational support and general investments in expansion. |
(19) National machinery and equipment accredited by BNDES. |
(20) Implementation, expansion and consolidation of projects and Enterprises Social Investment Programs (ISE). |
(21) (22) Construction and implementation of wind generating plant. |
(23) Payment of grant – auction 012/2015, relative to HPP GPS. |
|
F-71
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Guarantees: |
(1) Company’s centralized revenues account. Deposited Collateral (23.1). |
(2) (3) Pledge until 360 days. |
(2) (3) (4) (5) Credit assignment. |
(6) (7) (8) Own revenue, supported by power of attorney granted by a public instrument, and the issue of promissory notes and commercial |
duplicates equal to the number of installments falling due. |
(9) Withhold the amounts from the checking account in which revenues are deposited. |
(10) (13) (24) Total revenue from the sale and/or transaction of CCEAR energy, related to the project, through Concession Agreement of |
Attachment of Revenues, Account Management and Other Covenants. |
(11) (12) Fiduciary assignment of rights under the Concession Agreement No.027/2009-ANEEL, Transmission Service Provision Contract No. |
09/2010-ONS and contracts for use of Transmission System, signed by the ONS, the Dealerships and the Transmission System users, |
including the total income from the provision of transmission services. |
(14) Fiduciary assignment of rights under the Concession Agreement No. 01/2011MME-HPP Colíder and fiduciary assignment due to the |
Purchase and Sale of Energy Eétrica (CCVEE) between Copel and BRF - Brasil Foods S.A. |
(15) Fiduciary assignment of rights under the Public Service Concession Agreement for Electric Power Transmission No. 015/2010-ANEEL, |
signed betw een Copel and the Federal Government. |
(16) Assignment of credit rights deriving from Concession Agreement No. 002/2013 - ANEEL. |
(17) Assignment of credit rights deriving from Concession Agreement No. 022/2012 - ANEEL. |
(18) (19) (20) Surety of Companhia Paranaense de Energia; fiduciary assignment of income and indemnity rights of the concession. |
(21) Guarantee from Companhia Paranaense de Energia; pledge of shares; assignment of credit rights deriving from Electricity Agreement |
Reservation No. 153/2011; assignment of revenues arising from the project. |
(22) Pledge of shares of companies (GE Farol, GE Boa Vista, GE S.B.Norte and GE Olho D'Água); assignment of receivables arising from |
the sale of electricity produced by the project; assignment of machinery and equipment assembled or built with the funds pegged to it. |
(23) Surety of Companhia Paranaense de Energia. |
23.1 Collateral and escrow deposits - STN
Guarantees provided in the form of Par Bonds for R$42,988 (R$50,689 at December 31, 2015), and Discount Bonds in the amount of R$30,086 (R$35,448 at December 31, 2015), to be used to repay amounts of principal corresponding to STN contracts, when these payments are due on April 11, 2024. The amounts are updated by applying the weighted average percentage changes of United States Treasury Zero Coupon bond prices, by the share of each series of the instrument in the portfolio of collateral for principal, provided in the context of the Brazilian Financing Plan - 1992.
F-72
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
23.2 Breakdown of loans and financing by currency and index
| | 12.31.2016 | % | 12.31.2015 | % |
Foreign currency - change in currencies in the period (%) | | | | | |
U.S. Dollar | (14.15) | 90,505 | 2.24 | 104,434 | 2.56 |
| | 90,505 | 2.24 | 104,434 | 2.56 |
Local currency - accumulated index in the period (%) | | | | | |
CDI | 13.63 | 2,057,320 | 50.84 | 2,018,044 | 49.50 |
TJLP | 7.50 | 1,743,974 | 43.10 | 1,771,485 | 43.45 |
Ufir | 0.00 | 54,946 | 1.36 | 69,959 | 1.72 |
IPCA | 6.29 | 18,735 | 0.46 | 21,267 | 0.52 |
TR | 2.01 | 10,043 | 0.25 | 12,406 | 0.30 |
Finel | 1.63 | - | - | 16,980 | 0.42 |
Without indexer | - | 70,770 | 1.75 | 62,485 | 1.53 |
| | 3,955,788 | 97.76 | 3,972,626 | 97.44 |
| | 4,046,293 | 100.00 | 4,077,060 | 100.00 |
23.3 Maturity of noncurrent installments
12.31.2016 | Foreign currency | Local currency | Total |
2018 | - | 807,008 | 807,008 |
2019 | - | 276,264 | 276,264 |
2020 | - | 156,830 | 156,830 |
2021 | - | 141,505 | 141,505 |
2022 | - | 136,165 | 136,165 |
After 2022 | 89,669 | 968,110 | 1,057,779 |
| 89,669 | 2,485,882 | 2,575,551 |
F-73
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
23.4 Changes in loans and financing
| | Foreign currency | | Local currency | |
| Current | Noncurrent | Current | Noncurrent | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 596 | 70,601 | 867,030 | 2,530,723 | 3,468,950 |
Funding | - | - | 450,000 | 1,386,190 | 1,836,190 |
Charges | 4,161 | - | 339,320 | 10,961 | 354,442 |
Monetary and exchange variations | - | 32,946 | 1,163 | 7,280 | 41,389 |
Transfers | - | - | 270,199 | (270,199) | - |
Amortization - principal | - | - | (1,170,987) | - | (1,170,987) |
Payment - charges | (3,870) | - | (449,054) | - | (452,924) |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 887 | 103,547 | 307,671 | 3,664,955 | 4,077,060 |
Funding | - | - | - | 93,806 | 93,806 |
Charges | 3,909 | - | 357,426 | 90,735 | 452,070 |
Monetary and exchange variations | - | (13,878) | 3,882 | 22,454 | 12,458 |
Transfers | - | - | 1,386,068 | (1,386,068) | - |
Amortization - principal | - | - | (226,973) | - | (226,973) |
Payment - charges | (3,960) | - | (358,168) | - | (362,128) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 836 | 89,669 | 1,469,906 | 2,485,882 | 4,046,293 |
23.5 Covenants
The Company signed loan and financing agreements containing covenants that require economic and financial ratios to remain within pre-determined parameters, requiring annual fulfillment and other conditions to be observed, such as not making any alteration to the Company’s shareholdings in the capital stock of subsidiaries that would alter control without prior consent. Failing to fulfill these conditions may lead to accelerated debt repayment and/or fines.
As of and during the year ended on December, 2016, all the agreed conditions had been fulfilled.
Below we highlight the financial covenants present in the loan and financing agreements:
Company | Contract | Financial index | Limit |
Copel GeT | BNDES Finem nº 820989.1 - Mauá | EBITDA / Net financial results | ≥ 1,3 |
Copel GeT | Banco do Brasil nº 21/02000-0 - Mauá |
Copel GeT | 2nd issue of Promissory Notes | Consolidated net debt / Consolidated EBITDA | ≤ 3,5 |
Debt service coverage ratio | ≥ 1,5 |
Copel DIS | BNDES Finem nº 14205611 | Financial indebtedness / adjusted EBITIDA | ≤ 5,0 |
Santa Maria Energias Renováveis | BNDES Finem nº 14212711 | Debt service coverage ratio | ≥ 1,3 |
Santa Helena Energias Renováveis | BNDES Finem nº 14212721 |
São Bento Energia, Investimento e Participações | BNDES Assignment Agreement | Debt service coverage ratio | ≥ 1,3 |
GE Boa Vista S.A. | BNDES Finem nº 11211531 |
GE Farol S.A. | BNDES Finem nº 11211521 |
GE Olho D´Água S.A. | BNDES Finem nº 11211551 |
GE São Bento do Norte S.A. | BNDES Finem nº 11211541 |
Financing for businesses - Finem | | | |
F-74
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
24 Debentures
| | Issue | Number of | Maturity | Annual rate p.y. | | | |
Issue | Company | Date | installment | initial | final | (interest) | Principal | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
(1) 5th | Copel | 05.13.2014 | 3 | 05.13.2017 | 05.13.2019 | 111.5% of DI | 1,000,000 | 1,017,099 | 1,016,087 |
(2) 1st | Copel GeT | 05.15.2015 | 3 | 05.20.2018 | 05.20.2020 | 113.0% of DI | 1,000,000 | 1,094,731 | 1,090,755 |
(3) 2nd | Copel GeT | 07.13.2016 | 2 | 07.13.2018 | 07.13.2019 | 121.0% of DI | 1,000,000 | 1,060,613 | - |
(4) 1st | Copel DIS | 10.30.2012 | 2 | 10.30.2016 | 10.30.2017 | DI + Spread 0.99% p.y. | 1,000,000 | 511,525 | 1,023,378 |
(5) 2nd | Copel DIS | 10.27.2016 | 2 | 10.27.2018 | 10.27.2019 | 124.0% of DI | 500,000 | 504,699 | - |
(6) 1st | Copel CTE | 10.15.2015 | 5 | 10.15.2020 | 10.15.2024 | IPCA + 7.9633% p.y. | 160,000 | 174,184 | 162,158 |
(7) 2nd | Elejor | 09.26.2013 | 60 | 10.26.2013 | 09.26.2018 | DI + Spread 1.00% p.y. | 203,000 | 70,984 | 111,516 |
(8) 1st | Compagás | 06.15.2013 | 40 | 09.15.2015 | 12.15.2018 | TJLP+1.7% p.y.+1.0% p.y. | 62,626 | 38,018 | 56,219 |
(9) 2nd | Compagás | 04.15.2016 | 57 | 07.15.2017 | 12.15.2021 | TJLP/Selic + 2,17% p.y. | 33,620 | 23,768 | - |
(10) 1st | (a) | 06.10.2014 | 1 | - | 12.10.2016 | DI + Spread 1,45% p.y. | 222,000 | - | 223,815 |
(11) 2nd | (a) | 03.24.2016 | 192 | 08.15.2016 | 07.15.2032 | TJLP + 2,02% p.y. | 147,575 | 143,407 | - |
(12) 2nd | (a) | 03.24.2016 | 192 | 08.15.2016 | 07.15.2032 | IPCA + 9,87% p.y. | 153,258 | 151,781 | - |
| | | | | | | | 4,790,809 | 3,683,928 |
| | | | | | | Current | 1,131,198 | 924,005 |
| | | | | | | Noncurrent | 3,659,611 | 2,759,923 |
(a) Nova Asa Branca I, Nova Asa Branca II, Nova Asa Branca III, Nova Eurus IV e Ventos de Santo Uriel. | | | |
Characteristics: |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (9) (10) Simple debentures, single series, not convertible into shares, unsecured, for public distribution with restricted |
placement efforts, according to CVM No. 476. |
(8) (9) Simple floating debentures, issued privately in a single series and not convertible into shares. |
(11) Simple debentures, 1st serie, issued privately and not convertible into shares. |
(12) Simple debentures, 2nd serie, issued privately and not convertible into shares. |
Finance charges: |
(1) Half-yearly interest - May and November. |
(2) Anuual interest - May. |
(3) Anuual interest - July. |
(4) (6) Half-yearly interest - April and October. |
(5) Anuual interest - October. |
(7) (11) (12) Monthly interest. |
(8) (9) Quarterly interest - March, June, September and December. |
(10) Half-yearly interest - June and December. |
Allocation: |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Working capital or used to make investments in the issuer. |
(6) Deployment, expansion and modernization of the telecommunication network. |
(7) Full settlement of the loan agreement with Copel. |
(8) (9) Fund investment plan of the issuer. |
(10) Redemption of promissory notes and investment in wind farms. |
(11) (12) Implementation of wind farms and associated transmission systems. |
Collaterals: |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (10) Personal guarantee |
(8) (9) Floating |
(11) (12) Real and personal guarantee and pledge of Copel Geração e Transmissão's shares. |
Guarantor: |
(2) (3) (4) (5) (9) (10) (11) (12) Copel. |
(7) Copel, at the ratio of 70% and Paineira Participações S.A., at the ratio of 30%. |
(8) (9) Compagas. |
Trustee: |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (10) Pentágono S.A. DTVM. |
(8) (9) BNDES Participações S.A. - BNDESPAR. |
(11) (12) None. |
F-75
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
24.1 Maturity of noncurrent installments
12.31.2016 | |
2018 | 1,448,351 |
2019 | 1,459,667 |
2020 | 364,920 |
2021 | 41,267 |
2022 | 67,432 |
After 2022 | 277,974 |
| 3,659,611 |
24.2 Changes in debentures
| Current | Noncurrent | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 431,491 | 2,153,957 | 2,585,448 |
Funding | - | 1,168,633 | 1,168,633 |
Charges | 448,627 | 2,857 | 451,484 |
Transfers | 565,524 | (565,524) | - |
Amortization - principal | (154,822) | - | (154,822) |
Payment - charges | (366,815) | - | (366,815) |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 924,005 | 2,759,923 | 3,683,928 |
Funding | - | 1,822,965 | 1,822,965 |
Charges and monetary variations | 620,915 | (3,789) | 617,126 |
Transfers | 919,488 | (919,488) | - |
Amortization - principal | (785,239) | - | (785,239) |
Payment - charges | (547,971) | - | (547,971) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 1,131,198 | 3,659,611 | 4,790,809 |
24.3 Covenants
Copel issued debentures containing covenants that require certain economic and financial ratios to be kept within pre-determined parameters, requiring annual fulfillment and other conditions to be observed, such as not making any alteration to the Company’s shareholdings in capital stock that would alter control without prior consent from the debenture holders; not paying out dividends or interest on capital if it is in arrears in relation to honoring any of its financial obligations or not keeping the financial ratios as determined without prior written consent of the debenture holders. Failing to fulfill these conditions may lead to accelerated redemption of debentures and regulatory penalties.
As of and during the year ended in December, 2016, all the agreed conditions had been fulfilled.
F-76
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Below we highlight the financial covenants present in the loan and financing agreements:
Company | Contract | Financial index | Limit |
Companhia Paranaense de Energia | 5th issue de Debentures | Consolidated net debt / Consolidated EBITDA | ≤ 3,5 |
| | Debt service coverage ratio | ≥ 1,5 |
Copel Geração e Transmissão | 1st issue de Debentures | Consolidated net debt / Consolidated EBITDA | ≤ 3,5 |
Copel Geração e Transmissão | 2nd issue de Debentures | | |
Copel Telecomunicações | 1st issue de Debentures | Debt service coverage ratio | ≥ 1,5 |
Copel Distribuição | 2nd issue de Debentures | | |
Copel Distribuição | 1st issue de Debentures | Consolidated net debt / Consolidated EBITDA | ≤ 4,0 |
Elejor | 2nd issue de Debentures | Debt service coverage ratio | ≥ 1,2 |
Compagas | 2nd issue de Debentures | Consolidated net debt / Consolidated EBITDA | ≤ 3,5 |
| | General Indebtedness | ≤ 0,7 |
Nova Asa Branca I | 2nd issue de Debentures | Debt service coverage ratio | ≥ 1,3 |
Nova Asa Branca II | 2nd issue de Debentures | | |
Nova Asa Branca III | 2nd issue de Debentures | | |
Nova Eurus IV | 2nd issue de Debentures | | |
Ventos de Santo Uriel | 2nd issue de Debentures | | |
25 Post-employment benefits
The Company sponsors private retirement and pension plans (Unified Pension Plan and Pension Plan III) and medical and dental care (“ProSaúde II” and “ProSaúde III” plans’ regulations ) for their active employees and their dependents. The lifetime sponsorship of the healthcare plan for retirees, pensioners and legal dependents is only applied to “Prosaúde II” plan participants.
The amounts of these actuarial obligations (contributions, costs, liabilities, and/or assets) are calculated annually by an independent actuary at year end.
The benefits plan assets are valued at market values (mark-to-market).
The amount of the net assistance liability is recognized at the present value of the actuarial liability, less the fair value of the plan assets.
The adoption of the projected credit unit method adds each year of service as the source of an additional benefit unit, adding up to the calculation of the final liability.
Other actuarial assumptions are used which take into account biometric and economic tables in addition to historical data from the benefits plans, obtained from the manager of these plans, Fundação Copel de Previdência e Assistência Social.
F-77
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Actuarial gains or losses caused by changes in assumptions and/or actuarial adjustments are recognized in other comprehensive income.
25.1 Benefit Pension Plan
The unified pension plan is a Defined Benefit Plan - BD in which the income is predetermined, according to each individual’s salary, and pension plan III is a Variable Contribution Plan - CV.
The Defined Benefit plan - BD is a closed plan for new participants since 1998 and has only 39 active participants out of a total of 4,502 as of December 31, 2016. The Variable Contribution plan - CV is the only plan available for new participants.
The costs assumed by the sponsors for these plans are recognized according to the actuarial evaluation prepared annually by independent actuaries in accordance with IAS 19 and IFRIC 14. The economic and financial assumptions for purposes of the actuarial evaluation are discussed with the independent actuaries and approved by the sponsor’s management.
25.2 Healthcare Plan
The Company allocates resources for the coverage of healthcare expenses incurred by their employees and their dependents, within rules, limits, and conditions set in “ProSaúde II” and “ProSaúde III” plans’ regulations. Coverage includes periodic medical exams in both plans and is only extended to all retirees and pensioners for life in the “ProSaúde II” plan.
25.3 Statement of financial position and statement of income
Amounts recognized in liabilities, under Post-employment Benefits, are summarized below:
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Pension plans | 1,252 | 1,008 |
Healthcare plans | 768,613 | 593,652 |
| 769,865 | 594,660 |
Current | 47,894 | 43,323 |
Noncurrent | 721,971 | 551,337 |
The amounts recognized in the statement of income are shown below:
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Pension plans | 75,407 | 65,878 | 65,715 |
Pension plans - management | 1,175 | 2,241 | 1,256 |
Healthcare plan - post employment | 129,647 | 143,236 | 102,119 |
Healthcare plan - active employees | 75,578 | 61,927 | 51,266 |
Healthcare plan - management | 228 | 139 | 143 |
(-) Transfers to construction in progress | (22,268) | (19,094) | (18,957) |
| 259,767 | 254,327 | 201,542 |
F-78
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
25.4 Changes in post-employment benefits
| Current | Noncurrent | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 37,404 | 861,214 | 898,618 |
Appropriation of actuarial calculation | - | 143,202 | 143,202 |
Pension and healthcare contributions | 133,428 | - | 133,428 |
Adjustment related to actuarial gains | - | (410,330) | (410,330) |
Transfers | 42,749 | (42,749) | - |
Amortizations | (170,258) | - | (170,258) |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 43,323 | 551,337 | 594,660 |
Appropriation of actuarial calculation | - | 130,707 | 130,707 |
Pension and healthcare contributions | 142,735 | - | 142,735 |
Adjustment related to actuarial gains | - | 88,906 | 88,906 |
Transfers | 48,979 | (48,979) | - |
Amortizations | (187,143) | - | (187,143) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 47,894 | 721,971 | 769,865 |
25.5 Actuarial valuation in accordance with IAS 19
25.5.1 Actuarial assumptions
The actuarial assumptions used to determine the amounts of liabilities and costs for 2016 and 2015 are shown below:
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Real | Nominal | Real | Nominal |
Economic | | | | |
Inflation p.y. | - | 5.15% | - | 6.80% |
Expected rate of discount/return p.y. | | | | |
Benefit pension plan | 5.91% | 11.37% | 7.30% | 14.60% |
Healthcare plan | 5.89% | 11.35% | 7.28% | 14.57% |
Salary growth p.y. | 2.00% | 7.25% | 2.00% | 8.94% |
Demographic | | | | |
Mortality Table | | AT - 2000 | | AT - 2000 |
Mortality table of individuals w ith permanent disability | | WINKLEVOSS | | WINKLEVOSS |
Table of new disability benefit vested | | A. VINDAS | | A. VINDAS |
F-79
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
25.5.2 Number of participants and beneficiaries
| Pension plan | | Healthcare plan |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Number of active participants | 8,702 | 8,838 | 8,456 | 8,571 |
Number of Inactive participants | 7,826 | 7,795 | 7,546 | 7,445 |
Number of dependent people | - | - | 23,745 | 23,933 |
| 16,528 | 16,633 | 39,747 | 39,949 |
25.5.3 Life expectancy from the average age - Annuity Table AT-2000 (in years)
| BD Plan | CV Plan |
As of 12.31.2016 | | |
Retired participants | 15.62 | 23.75 |
Pensioner Participants | 16.59 | 28.89 |
As of 12.31.2015 | | |
Retired participants | 15.62 | 25.68 |
Pensioner Participants | 16.64 | 28.65 |
The average age of inactive participants of the healthcare and pension plans of the Company and its subsidiaries is 66.2 years.
25.5.4 Actuarial evaluation
Based on the review of the assumptions, the values of the pension plan as of December 31, 2016 amounted to a plan surplus of R$527,699, while the position at December 31, 2015, was R$312,586. The current applicable legislation does not permit any significant reduction in contributions or reimbursements to the Company based on the current surplus in this plan. For this reason, the Company did not record an asset on its December 31, 2016 balance sheet reflecting any such right to reduce contributions or refund surplus or other amounts.
| Benefit Pension Plan | Healthcare Plan | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Total liabilities or partially covered | 4,950,876 | 933,914 | 5,884,790 | 4,931,012 |
Fair value of the plan assets | (5,478,575) | (165,301) | (5,643,876) | (4,649,946) |
Plan coverage status | (527,699) | 768,613 | 240,914 | 281,066 |
Unrecognized asset | 527,699 | - | 527,699 | 312,586 |
| - | 768,613 | 768,613 | 593,652 |
The Company made adjustments to their assistance liabilities through the actuarial report issued onDecember 31, 2016, when an actuarial gain of R$89,107 was recorded in other comprehensive income.
F-80
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
25.5.5 Changes in actuarial liabilities
| Benefit Pension Plan | Healthcare plan |
Present value of net actuarial obligations as of 01.01.2014 | 3,941,108 | 1,092,697 |
Cost of services | 600 | 8,055 |
Cost of interest | 405,498 | 110,906 |
Benefits paid | (276,463) | (65,911) |
Actuarial (gain) losses | 308,687 | (98,463) |
Present value of net actuarial obligations as of 12.31.2014 | 4,379,430 | 1,047,284 |
Cost of services | 471 | 34,802 |
Cost of interest | 559,366 | 127,622 |
Benefits paid | (345,288) | (74,722) |
Actuarial (gain) losses | (419,249) | (378,704) |
Present value of net actuarial obligations as of 12.31.2015 | 4,174,730 | 756,282 |
Cost of services | 203 | 44,942 |
Cost of interest | 601,259 | 108,465 |
Benefits paid | (381,274) | (88,259) |
Actuarial (gain) losses | 555,958 | 112,484 |
Present value of net actuarial obligations as of 12.31.2016 | 4,950,876 | 933,914 |
| | |
25.5.6 Changes in actuarial assets
| Benefit Pension Plan | Healthcare plan |
Fair value of the Plan's assets at 01.01.2014 | 4,303,143 | 125,470 |
Return estimated for assets | 524,992 | 15,945 |
Contributions and distributions | 27,321 | - |
Benefits paid | (276,463) | - |
Actuarial gain (losses) | (16,446) | 8,281 |
Fair value of the Plan's assets at 12.31.2014 | 4,562,547 | 149,696 |
Return estimated for assets | 564,872 | 19,223 |
Contributions and distributions | 36,294 | - |
Benefits paid | (345,288) | - |
Actuarial gain (losses) | (331,109) | (6,289) |
Fair value of the Plan's assets at 12.31.2015 | 4,487,316 | 162,630 |
Return estimated for assets | 637,541 | 23,749 |
Contributions and distributions | 25,724 | - |
Benefits paid | (381,274) | - |
Actuarial gain (losses) | 709,268 | (21,078) |
Fair value of the Plan's assets at 12.31.2016 | 5,478,575 | 165,301 |
| | |
F-81
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
25.5.7 Estimated costs
The estimated net periodic plan costs (gains) for 2017 for each plan are shown below:
| Benefit Pension Plan | Healthcare plan | 2017 |
Cost of current service | 588 | 9,213 | 9,801 |
Estimated cost of interest | 563,235 | 105,971 | 669,206 |
Expected return on plan assets | (606,478) | (18,299) | (624,777) |
Expected employee contributions | (259) | - | (259) |
Costs (income or loss) | (42,914) | 96,885 | 53,971 |
25.5.8 Sensitivity analysis
The following tables feature a sensitivity analysis, which shows the effect of a one percent increase or decrease in the assumed rates of change in care costs, in the aggregate of the cost of service and cost of interest components of the net care costs and the accumulated post-employment benefit obligation.
. | Projected scenarios |
| Increase by 1% | Decrease in 1% |
Sensitivity of long-term interest rate | | |
Impacts on the obligations of the pension | (53,980) | 60,025 |
Impacts on the obligations of healthcare program | (160,400) | 90,612 |
Sensitivity of growth rate of the medical costs | | |
Impacts on the obligations of healthcare program | 56,981 | (56,981) |
Impact on cost of service for the following financial year of healthcare program | 4,095 | (4,095) |
Sensitivity of the service cost | | |
Impacts on the obligations of the pension | (468) | 468 |
Impacts on the obligations of healthcare program | (830) | 830 |
25.5.9 Benefits payable
The estimated benefits to be paid by the Company in the next five years and the total benefits for the following fiscal years are shown below:
| Benefit Pension Plan | Other benefits | Total |
2017 | 439,774 | 27,724 | 467,498 |
2018 | 465,316 | 29,742 | 495,057 |
2019 | 453,267 | 29,045 | 482,312 |
2020 | 438,853 | 28,218 | 467,072 |
2021 | 424,171 | 27,384 | 451,555 |
2022 - 2056 | 5,047,393 | 339,785 | 5,387,178 |
F-82
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
25.5.10 Asset allocation and investment strategy
The asset allocation for the Company pension and healthcare plans at the end of 2016 and the allocation goal for 2017, by asset category, are shown below:
| Goal for 2017 | 2016 |
Fixed Income | 87.5% | 90.8% |
Variable income | 4.6% | 5.7% |
Loans | 1.2% | 1.2% |
Real estate | 1.9% | 1.7% |
Investment structuring | 4.8% | 0.6% |
| 100.0% | 100.0% |
Below are the limits set by the Fund management:
| Unified Plan (BD) | Plan III (CV) |
| target (%)(*) | minimum (%) | target (%) | minimum (%) |
Fixed Income | 92.0% | 86.0% | 79.7% | 61.3% |
Variable income | 2.0% | 1.0% | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Loans | 0.5% | 0.0% | 2.4% | 1.0% |
Real estate | 2.5% | 1.0% | 1.1% | 0.0% |
Investment structuring | 3.0% | 0.0% | 7.9% | 0.0% |
(*) Target based on the total investment of each plan. | | | | |
Management of Fundação Copel decided to keep a more conservative approach investing in variable income in relation |
to the allowed legal limit, which is 70%. | | | | |
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the pension plan assets included the following securities issued by Copel:
| | Defined benefit pension plan |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Shares | 66 | 968 |
| 66 | 968 |
25.5.11 Additional information
The Company also sponsors a variable contribution plan for all its employees.
The contributions made in the years ended on December 31, 2016 and 2015 were R$75,679, and R$68,939, respectively.
F-83
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
26 Customer Charges Due
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Energy Development Account (CDE) (a) | 136,450 | 204,309 |
Global Reversal Reserve (RGR) | 5,262 | 20,768 |
Tariff flags | - | 52,381 |
| 141,712 | 277,458 |
(a) Aneel published Resolutions No. 2,004/2015 and No. 2,077/2016. | | |
27 Research and Development and Energy Efficiency
In accordance with Law No. 9,991/2000, concessionaires and licensees of electric power generation and transmission are required to allocate annually the percentage of 1% of their net operating regulatory revenue to research and development of the electricity sector, and the electric power distribution concessionaires must segregate this same percentage into the research and development and energy efficiency programs of the electricity sector, according to ANEEL Normative Resolutions No. 504/2012 and 556/2013, and updated by Sub-module 5.6 - Research and Development - R&D and Energy Efficiency - EE Approved by RN ANEEL No. 737/2016.
27.1 Balances recognized for investment in Research and Development (R&D) and the Energy Efficiency Program (EEP)
| Amounts payable, before any related prepayments | Amounts payable to regulatory agencies | Other amounts payable | Balance as of
12.31.2016 | Balance as of
12.31.2015 |
|
Research and Development - R&D | | | | | |
National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development - FNDCT | - | 4,603 | - | 4,603 | 5,762 |
MME | - | 2,302 | - | 2,302 | 2,882 |
R&D | 86,077 | - | 208,011 | 294,088 | 252,828 |
| 86,077 | 6,905 | 208,011 | 300,993 | 261,472 |
Energy efficiency program - EEP | | | | | |
National Program of electricity conservation - Procel | - | 4,932 | - | 4,932 | - |
EEP | 33,459 | - | 144,505 | 177,964 | 137,521 |
| 33,459 | 4,932 | 144,505 | 182,896 | 137,521 |
| 119,536 | 11,837 | 352,516 | 483,889 | 398,993 |
| | | Current | 231,513 | 167,881 |
| | | Noncurrent | 252,376 | 231,112 |
F-84
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
27.2 Changes in R&D and EEP balances
| FNDCT | MME | R&D | Procel | EEP | |
| current | current | current | noncurrent | current | current | noncurrent | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 5,742 | 2,872 | 81,127 | 130,857 | - | 86,231 | 28,935 | 335,764 |
Additions | 33,496 | 16,747 | 971 | 32,526 | - | - | 42,916 | 126,656 |
Performance agreement | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2,242 | 2,242 |
Selic interest rate (Note 34) | - | - | 216 | 22,567 | - | - | 11,277 | 34,060 |
Transfers | - | - | 31,103 | (31,103) | - | 9,105 | (9,105) | - |
Payments | (33,476) | (16,737) | - | - | - | - | - | (50,213) |
Concluded projects | - | - | (15,436) | - | - | (34,080) | - | (49,516) |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 5,762 | 2,882 | 97,981 | 154,847 | - | 61,256 | 76,265 | 398,993 |
Additions | 25,535 | 12,768 | 1,062 | 24,472 | 4,804 | - | 31,398 | 100,039 |
Performance agreement | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,907 | 1,907 |
Selic interest rate (Note 34) | - | - | 159 | 25,702 | 128 | - | 15,792 | 41,781 |
Transfers | - | - | 46,334 | (46,334) | - | 31,673 | (31,673) | - |
Payments | (26,694) | (13,348) | - | - | - | - | - | (40,042) |
Concluded projects | - | - | (10,135) | - | - | (8,654) | - | (18,789) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 4,603 | 2,302 | 135,401 | 158,687 | 4,932 | 84,275 | 93,689 | 483,889 |
28 Accounts payable related to concession
These refer to concession charges for use of public property (UPP).
| | | | | Discount | Annual | | |
| Company | Grant | Signature | Closing | Rate | Adjustment | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
(1) HPP Mauá | Copel GeT | 06.29.2007 | 07.03.2007 | 07.2042 | 5.65% p.y. | IPCA | 16,235 | 15,437 |
(2) HPP Colider | Copel GeT | 12.29.2010 | 01.17.2011 | 01.2046 | 7.74% p.y. | IPCA | 22,783 | 21,493 |
(3) HPP Baixo Iguaçu | Copel GeT | 07.19.2012 | 08.20.2012 | 01.2047 | 7.74% p.y. | IPCA | 6,299 | 5,557 |
(4) SHP Cavernoso | Copel GeT | 07.11.2013 | 07.11.2013 | 07.2018 | 7.74% p.y. | IPCA | 66 | 97 |
(5) HPP Apucaraninha | Copel GeT | 07.11.2013 | 07.11.2013 | 07.2018 | 7.74% p.y. | IPCA | 460 | 676 |
(6) HPP Chaminé | Copel GeT | 07.11.2013 | 07.11.2013 | 07.2018 | 7.74% p.y. | IPCA | 795 | 1,170 |
(7) HPP Derivação Rio Jordão | Copel GeT | 07.11.2013 | 02.24.2014 | 02.2019 | 7.74% p.y. | IPCA | 532 | 702 |
(8) HPP Fundão e HPP Santa Clara | Elejor | 10.23.2001 | 10.25.2001 | 10.2036 | 11.00% p.y. | IGPM | 518,372 | 490,533 |
| | | | | | | 565,542 | 535,665 |
| | | | | | Current | 66,210 | 61,786 |
| | | | | | Noncurrent | 499,332 | 473,879 |
Discount rate applied to calculate present value: |
Actual net discount rate, in line with the estimated long-term rate.It bears no relationship with the expected project return. |
Payment to the federal government: |
(1) Monthly installments equivalent to 1/12 of the proposed annual payment of R$643 (51% of R$1,262), according to clause six ofConcession Agreement No. 001/07. |
|
(2) Monthly installments of 1/12 of the proposed annual payment of R$1,256, from the forecast start of commercial operation of HPP,as clause 6 of the Concession Agreement No. 001/11. |
|
(3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Monthly installments equivalent to 1/12 of the proposed annual payment, according to clause 5a of ConcessionAgreement No. 007/2013 for 5 years. |
|
(8) Monthly installments equivalent to 1/12 from the proposed annual payment of R$19,000, from the 6th to 35th year of grant or while inthe exploitation of hydropower facilities, as Terms of Ratification of Bidding and clause six of the Concession Contract No. 125/01. |
|
F-85
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
28.1 Nominal value and present value of accounts payable related to concession
| Nominal value | Present value |
2017 | 66,366 | 66,210 |
2018 | 66,380 | 47,248 |
2019 | 65,832 | 42,236 |
2020 | 65,788 | 38,476 |
After 2020 | 1,078,823 | 371,372 |
| 1,343,189 | 565,542 |
28.2 Changes in accounts payable related to concession
| Current | Noncurrent | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2015 | 54,955 | 436,772 | 491,727 |
Additions | - | 334 | 334 |
Adjust to present value | - | (1,742) | (1,742) |
Monetary variations | 6,500 | 94,192 | 100,692 |
Transfers | 55,677 | (55,677) | - |
Payments | (55,346) | - | (55,346) |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 61,786 | 473,879 | 535,665 |
Additions (a) | 574,827 | 742 | 575,569 |
Adjust to present value | - | (483) | (483) |
Monetary variations | 17,693 | 85,691 | 103,384 |
Transfers | 60,497 | (60,497) | - |
Payments | (648,593) | - | (648,593) |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 66,210 | 499,332 | 565,542 |
(a) The addition of R$574,827 referers to Bonus from the grant (Note 10.2).This balance is fully settled. |
F-86
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
29 Other accounts payables
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Agreement Ivaí Engenharia (Note 30.1.2 - g) | 122,068 | - |
Customers | 32,283 | 26,391 |
Financial offset for the use of water resources | 28,880 | 31,399 |
Public lighting rate collected | 27,565 | 11,671 |
Aneel Order No. 084/2017 provision | 20,542 | 15,823 |
Reimbursements to customer contributions | 10,894 | 12,011 |
Investment acquisition | 9,595 | 9,571 |
Pledges in guarantee | 8,067 | 8,861 |
Other liabilities | 35,422 | 50,944 |
| 295,316 | 166,671 |
Current | 264,791 | 135,709 |
Noncurrent | 30,525 | 30,962 |
30 Provisions for legal claims
The Company is defendant in various judicial and administrative proceedings before different courts. Based on assessments made by the Company’s legal counsel, Management makes provisions for actions in which losses are rated probable, thus meeting the criteria for recognition of provisioning described in Note 4.9.
The Company’s management believes that, at the time of preparation of financial statements, it is not practicable to provide meaningful information regarding the expected timing of any cash outflows resulting from these legal actions in which the Company is involved, due to the slow pace and unpredictability of Brazilian legal, tax and regulatory systems, and since final resolution of the proceedings for which a provision has been registered depends on the conclusions of court proceedings. Therefore, this information is not being provided.
F-87
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
30.1 Provisions for litigation
30.1.1 Changes in provisions for litigation in actions rated as probable losses
| | Income | Additions to | | | |
| | Provision | Construction | fixed assets | | | |
| Balances as of | for litigations | cost | in progress | | | Balances as of |
| January 1, 2016 | Additions | Reversals | Additions | Additions | Discharges | Transfers | December 31, 2016 |
Tax | | | | | | | | |
Cofins (a) | 258,715 | 28,563 | (193,386) | - | - | - | - | 93,892 |
Others (b) | 68,333 | 86,362 | (9,630) | - | - | (1,758) | (32,317) | 110,990 |
| 327,048 | 114,925 | (203,016) | - | - | (1,758) | (32,317) | 204,882 |
Labors (c) | 408,133 | 168,352 | (9,824) | - | - | (107,760) | - | 458,901 |
Employee benefits (d) | 104,480 | 7,583 | (69,334) | - | - | (363) | - | 42,366 |
Civil | | | | | | | | |
Civil and administrative claims (e) | 325,217 | 99,205 | (53,965) | - | - | (74,973) | - | 295,484 |
Easements (f) | 62,869 | 1,786 | (17,141) | 49,842 | 2,575 | (551) | - | 99,380 |
Expropriations and property (g) | 196,895 | 26,764 | (943) | 1,980 | (5,197) | (1,537) | (152,250) | 65,712 |
Customers (h) | 13,656 | - | (2,195) | - | - | (6,233) | - | 5,228 |
| 598,637 | 127,755 | (74,244) | 51,822 | (2,622) | (83,294) | (152,250) | 465,804 |
Environmental (i) | 868 | 564 | - | - | - | - | - | 1,432 |
Regulatory (j) | 55,770 | 12,211 | (1) | - | - | (22) | - | 67,958 |
| 1,494,936 | 431,390 | (356,419) | 51,822 | (2,622) | (193,197) | (184,567) | 1,241,343 |
| | Income | Additions to | | |
| | Provision | Construction | fixed assets | | |
| Balances as of | for litigations | cost | in progress | | Balances as of |
| January 1, 2015 | Additions | Reversals | Additions | Additions | Discharges | December 31, 2015 |
Tax | | | | | | | |
Cofins (a) | 254,386 | 4,328 | - | - | - | - | 258,714 |
Others (b) | 37,458 | 50,125 | (15,262) | - | - | (3,987) | 68,334 |
| 291,844 | 54,453 | (15,262) | - | - | (3,987) | 327,048 |
Labors (c) | 326,246 | 132,868 | (17,949) | - | - | (33,032) | 408,133 |
Employee benefits (d) | 114,543 | 27,219 | (15,018) | - | - | (22,264) | 104,480 |
Civil | | | | | | | |
Suppliers | 60,680 | - | (2,868) | - | - | (57,812) | - |
Civil and administrative claims (e) | 256,169 | 134,097 | (22,890) | - | - | (42,159) | 325,217 |
Easements (f) | 25,407 | 36,390 | (41,657) | 36,816 | 6,249 | (336) | 62,869 |
Expropriations and property (g) | 402,219 | 45,586 | (270,270) | 6,460 | 13,964 | (1,064) | 196,895 |
Customers (h) | 10,602 | 7,336 | (2,438) | - | - | (1,844) | 13,656 |
| 755,077 | 223,409 | (340,123) | 43,276 | 20,213 | (103,215) | 598,637 |
Environmental (i) | 479 | 389 | - | - | - | - | 868 |
Regulatory (j) | 58,443 | 5,498 | (6,985) | - | - | (1,186) | 55,770 |
| 1,546,632 | 443,836 | (395,337) | 43,276 | 20,213 | (163,684) | 1,494,936 |
F-88
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
30.1.2 Description of nature and/or details of the principal actions
a) Contribution for Social Security Funding (COFINS)
Plaintiff:Federal Tax Authority
Cofins payables and respective interest and fines from August 1995 to December 1996 due to the termination of a judicial decision that had recognized the Company’s exemption from Cofins.
Current status: awaiting judgment.
In the second quarter of 2016, Copel recorded a provision reversal of R$193,386, given that a final and unappealable decision was issued in favor of the Company on case 10980-720.458/2011-15, related to the period between October 1998 and June 2001, thus canceling the tax claim.
b) Other tax provisions
Actions relating to federal, state and municipal taxes, taxes, fees and other charges in which the Company challenges their applicability, calculation bases and amounts due to be collected. The principal action is described below:
Defendant: Federal Tax Authority
By thecase5037809-14.2015.4.04.7000, Copel GeT required payment in installments of the balance owed on the annual adjustment of corporate income tax (IRPJ) and social contribution (CSLL) for the fiscal year 2014. The Federal Tax Authority consolidated the amount and applied the maximum fine. An injunction was filed in order to prevent the Tax Authority taking action that failed to obey the limit established in legislation, in Management’s opinion.
Current status:
A judgment rendered by the Federal Judge of the 4th Region dismissed the action and the Company filed an appeal against the decision. On December 31, 2016, the amount of R$32,318 was transferred to Other Tax Liabilities.
c) Labor
Labor claims comprise claims filed by former employees in connection with the payment of overtime, hazardous working conditions, transfer bonuses, salary equality/reclassification, and other matters, and also claims by former employees of contractors and third parties (secondary responsibility) involving indemnity and other matters.
d) Employee benefits
Labor claims comprise claims filed by retired former employees of the Company and its subsidiaries against the Copel Foundation, which will have consequential impact on the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, since additional contributions will be required.
F-89
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
e) Civil and administrative claims
Lawsuits that discuss billings, irregular procedure, administrative contracts and contract fines, damages to compensate for electric grid and car accidents. The main lawsuits are as follows:
Plaintiff: Tradener Ltda. Estimated amount: R$105,010
Class actions and civil public actions were filed in which illegalities and annulments relating to the execution of the electric power purchase agreement entered into between the Company and Tradener are pointed out. Class action No. 588/2006 has already been rendered final and unappeasable, and the ruling recognized as valid commissions payable by the Company to Tradener. In the civil public action No. 0000219-78.2003.8.16.0004, filed by the Prosecution Office, a decision has also been rendered ruling on the absence of irregularities in the electric power purchase agreement. Therefore, Tradener brought recovery lawsuits, seeking to receive its commissions.
Current status:- case record 0005550-26.2012.8.16.0004 - The Company was ordered to pay the commission fees due to Tradener in a final and unappelable decision rendered on June 28, 2016. In compliance with judgment, on November 7, 2016, the Company settled the obligation, in the amount of R$57,116, resulting in the extinction of the proceeding.
- case record 0005990.22.2012.8.16.0004 - in the judgment rendered on January 27, 2014 the Company was ordered to pay the amount of R$105,010, which is the value updated by the (INPC/IBGE) from the maturity of the commissions payable to Tradener under the purchase agreement entered into with Celesc, plus default interest of 1% per month, as of the date of notification (October 31, 2012), as well as attorneys’ fees. The Company filed an appeal against this decision,however, on 11.08.2016, by majority votes, the Court dismissed the appeal. From this decision, Copel filed an appeal which is pending judgment.
f) Easements
Lawsuits are filed when there is a difference between the amount determined by Copel for payment and the amount claimed by the owner and/or when the owner's paper title may not be registered (probate proceedings are underway, properties have no registry number, etc.).
They may also involve third-party interventions for adverse possession, whether from owners or occupants of contiguous properties or even in cases of properties where right of way easements are required to preserve limits and boundaries of these areas.
g) Expropriations and property
Lawsuits are filed challenging expropriation when there is a difference between the amount determined by Copel for payment and the amount claimed by the owner and/or when the owner's paper title may not be registered (probate proceedings are underway, properties have no registry number etc).
F-90
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Possessory cases actions include those for repossession of property owned by the concessionaire. Litigation arises when there is a need to repossess properties invaded or occupied by third parties in areas owned by the Company. Cases may also arise from intervention in third-party adverse possession, or owners or occupants of contiguous properties or even in cases of properties to preserve limits and boundaries of expropriated areas. The principal action is described below:
Plaintiff: Ivaí Engenharia de Obras S.A.
Declaratory action brought by the plaintiff in order to recognize the right to economic and financial rebalancing of the contract signed with Copel GeT, followed by an action for relief from judgment filed by Copel to vacate the final and unappealable decision in the declaratory judgment action, followed by a collection suit filed by the plaintiff to collect the amounts arising from the economic and financial rebalance of the agreement and followed by compliance with the provisional decision proposed by the plaintiff.
Current status: A final and unappealable decision has been issued on the declaratory action and on the action for relief from judgment, sentencing Copel to pay attorneys’ fees and court costs. The amounts deriving from the right to the economic and financial rebalancing of the contract involved in the unappealable decision issued on the declaratory action are the object of a collection lawsuit under appeal in the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), which are also object of compliance of provisional sentence started by the opposing party, pending at the trial court. On October 21, 2016, Copel signed an agreement, previously approved by the Board of Directors, whereby it undertook to pay to Ivaí Engenharia R$152,250, in 15 monthly and consecutive installments of R$10,150 - the first installment maturing by the fifth business day after signature of the transaction agreement and the 14 remaining installments on the 15th of each immediately subsequent months, considering that the base amount of the second installment, as well as the subsequent ones, will be adjusted for inflation, as of the signature of the agreement, at 50% of the last IPCA index disclosed until the maturity date of each installment. The agreement comprises the discussions between the parties on the economic and financial balance of the agreement and suspends the ongoing collection suits, under appeal in the STJ, and compliance with provisional sentence, until the payment of all the installments of the agreement, when the abovementioned lawsuits will be dismissed. On September 30, 2016, R$152,250 was transferred to Other accounts payable (Note 29).
h) Consumers
Lawsuits seeking compensation for damages caused by household appliances, lawsuits claiming damages for pain and suffering caused by service interruption and lawsuits filed by industrial consumers challenging the lawfulness of the increase in electricity prices while Plano Cruzado (anti-inflation plan) was in effect and claiming reimbursement for the amounts paid by the Company.
F-91
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
i) Environmental
Class actions whose purpose is to obstruct the progress of environmental licensing for new projects or to recover permanent preservation areas located around the hydroelectric power plant dams unlawfully used by private individuals. If the outcome of the lawsuits is unfavorable to the Company, management estimates only the cost to prepare new environmental studies and to recover the areas owned by Copel GeT.
They also contemplate the “Termos de Ajuste de Conduta –TAC”, which refers to the commitments agreed upon and approved between the Company and the competent bodies for noncompliance with any condition contained in the Installation and Operation Licenses. As they are considered liabilities, these amounts are recorded as "obligations" in current and non-current liabilities and the counterparts in property, plant and equipment (construction cost).
j) Regulatory
The Company is challenging, both at the administrative and judicial levels, notifications issued by the Regulatory Agency of alleged violations against regulations.The mainlawsuitare as follows:
Plaintiffs: Companhia Estadual de Energia Elétrica - CEEE and Dona Francisca Energética S.A.
Estimated amount: R$49,655
Copel, Copel Geração e Transmissão and Copel Distribuição are challenging lawsuits filed against ANEEL's decision No. 288/2002 involving the companies that have been mentioned.
Current status: awaiting judgment.
30.2 Contingent liabilities
30.2.1 Classification of actions rated as possible losses
Contingent liabilities are present obligations arising from past events for which no provisions are recognized because it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. The following information concerns the nature of the Company’s contingent liabilities and potential losses arising thereof.
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Tax (a) | 752,625 | 1,476,765 |
Labor (b) | 423,495 | 605,095 |
Employee benefits (c) | 23,631 | 73,310 |
Civil (d) | 594,220 | 1,170,019 |
Regulatory (e) | 765,906 | 646,455 |
| 2,559,877 | 3,971,644 |
F-92
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
30.2.2 Description of nature and/or details of the principal actions
a) Tax
Actions relating to federal, state and municipal taxes, taxes, fees and other charges in which the Company challenges their applicability, calculation bases and amounts due to be collected. The principal actions are described below:
Plaintiff: Federal Tax Authority
In the second quarter, Copel reduced the estimated of this item by R$635,797, given the final and unappealable decision issued in favor of the Company on case 10980-720.458/2011-15 (relating to the Cofins from October 1998 to June 2001), canceling this tax claim.
In the fourth quarter, a final and unapeallable decision favorable to the Compnay was rendered on case 11453.720.001/2011-23 (referring to most of the interest charged for Cofins from August 1995 to December 1996), allowing the cancelation of this tax requirement, estimated at that time at approximately R$153,000.
Current status:case closed.
Plaintiff: Social Security National Institute (INSS) Estimated amount: R$307,450
Tax claims against Copel related to social security contribution on assignment of manpower (NFLD 35.273.870-7); it is worth emphasizing that the case has already been judged favorably to the Company at two court levels.
Current status: awaiting judgment.
Plaintiff: Social Security National Institute (INSS) Estimated amount: R$27,044
Tax collections against Copel consisting of social security contribution imposed on the assignment of labor (NFLD - 35.273.876-6). The case has been at Carf (Brazilian Administrative Tax Court) for judgment since 2010. The assessment of risk as possible is due to the existence of several legal arguments to defend the Company, particularly (a) the fact that no services were provided and no labor was assigned and (b) the fact that service providers classified into the Simples (lower taxation) category are not required to withhold that contribution.
Current status: awaiting judgment.
Plaintiff: State Tax Authority (SEFA) Estimated amount: R$62,139
Copel DIS received tax deficiency notice 6587156-4 from the State of Paraná for allegedly failing to pay ICMS (VAT) tax on the ‘metered demand’ line in the electricity bills issued to a major consumer between May 2011 and December 2013.
F-93
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Copel DIS claims lack of standing in regard to this tax deficiency notice, given that it derives from Declaratory Action No. 33,036, currently pending judgement by the 3rd Public Treasury Court of Curitiba, filed by a major consumer in the State of Paraná, which was held valid and considered that ICMS tax should be levied on metered demand only. Note that this sentence was subsequently overturned by the Paraná State Court of Justice (TJ/PR), through Civil Appeal 822.670-2, given the major consumer’s lack of standing to question the levy of ICMS on contracted demand.
The Company believes that, since it was not involved in the lawsuit, it is not subject to the effects from the respective court ruling, which would imply its lack of standing in tax deficiency notice 6.587.156-4.
b) Labor
Labor claims comprise claims filed by Copel employees and former employees in connection with the payment of overtime, hazardous working conditions, transfer bonuses, salary equality/reclassification, and other matters, and also claims by former employees of contractors and third-parties (secondary responsibility) involving indemnity and other matters.
c) Employee benefits
Labor claims comprise claims filed by retired former employees of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries against the Copel Foundation, which will have consequential impact on the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, since additional contributions will be required.
d) Civil
Actions involving billing, irregular procedure, administrative contracts and contractual penalties, compensation for accidents involving electric power grid or vehicles. The principal actions are described below:
Plaintiff: Mineradora Tibagiana Ltda. Estimated amount: R$143,354
Action claiming compensation for alleged losses when this mining company was involved in the construction of the Mauá plant by the Energético Cruzeiro do Sul consortium in which Copel GeT has a 51% stake. The action challenges the validity of the mining permit granted Tibagiana for the Mauá job site and the indemnifying effects arising thereof.
Current status: Action suspended in lower court until the conclusion of action No 5013943-50.2010.04.7000 pending before the 6th Federal Court of Curitiba.
Plaintiff: Ivaí Engenharia de Obras S.A.
Action for collection brought by the plaintiff in order to collect amounts arising from economic and financial rebalancing of the contract signed with Copel GeT, recognized in the declaratory action.
Current status:the judgment of the 2nd motion for clarification filed by Copel GeT before the Superior Courtof Justice (STJ) was published on December 18, 2015, challenging the difference in amounts due arising from
cumulative updating of the amount of plaintiff’s credit at the SELIC interest rate as against other interest rates in the period preceding the court’s expert report (October 2005). The judgment prescribes the case’s return to the State of Paraná Court of Justice (TJ-PR) for the latter to render a new judgment on the motion for clarification brought by Copel GeT, thus righting the omission of the previous trial. Ivaí has filed a motion for clarification on February 5, 2016, which is now pending judgment by the Superior Court of Justice (STJ). Therefore the amount to be assessed as probable loss is the amount of the plaintiff’s receivable adjusted on a monthly basis using the TJ-PR’s official price index, which is the average of the IGP-DI/INPC indices, as sought by Copel GeT in court, plus late payment penalties at 1% per month, plus burden of defeat. However, it is still considered as a possible loss, with reversal of the TJ-PR’s previous judgment, that is, the amount of debt will be adjusted according to the SELIC interest rate cumulative with other interest rates in the period preceding the court’s expert report. At the same time, a provisional execution of the total credit amount sought by Ivaí is currently taking place. As described in Note 30.1.2, the parties entered into an agreement, that comprises the discussions between the parties on the economic and financial balance of the agreement and suspends the ongoing collection suits, under appeal in the STJ, and compliance with provisional sentence, until the payment of all the installments of the agreement, when the abovementioned lawsuits will be dismissed.
F-94
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Plaintiffs:franchises of the Agency / Copel store Estimated amount: R$48,924
Filing of two individual claims against Copel Distribuição of the franchise contracts for Copel branches/stores, with the main petition claiming an extension of the term of the contract and secondary petition to recognize the existence of a sub concession, with transfer of the services provided and full pass-through of the fees, amongst other amounts,currently have appeals awaiting trial.
Current status: awaiting judgment.
e) Regulatory
The Company is challenging, both at the administrative and judicial levels, notifications issued by the Regulatory Agency of alleged violations against regulations.The mainlawsuitsare as follows:
Plaintiff: ANEEL Estimated amount: R$17,007
Copel DIS filed an appeal against a decision by ANEEL's Director-General under Resolution No. 3,959 from 12.08.2015 imposing an inefficiency penalty on Copel Distribuição due to over-contracting for use of the distribution system (MUSD) with the National Power Network Operator (ONS).
Current status: awaiting judgment.
F-95
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Plaintiff: Energia Sustentável do Brasil S.A. - ESBR Estimated amount: R$721,060
The primary matter at issue is the exclusion of distribution utilities from liability for damages resulting from schedule overruns in the construction of the Jirau hydropower station. ESBR brought Ordinary Action No. 10426-71.2013.4.01.4100 against Aneel in the federal courts of Rondônia, the decision on which: (i) excludes liability for the 535-day schedule overrun in the construction of the Jirau Hydropower Station; (ii) declares any obligations, penalties and costs imposed on ESBR as a result of the schedule overrun to be unenforceable, and (iii) annuls ANEEL Resolution No. 1,732/2013, which recognized a schedule overrun of only 52 days. An appeal has been brought by ANEEL, n progress at the TRF of the 1st Region.
The practical outcome of the decision is that, by exempting ESBR, it exposed the distribution utilities with which it had concluded regulated power trading contracts (CCEARs) – including Copel Distribuição – to the spot market and spot prices during the period. The reason is that electricity trading rules require that all electricity consumed be covered by a contract.
One of the measures adopted was the filing for writ of mandamus 1001675-88.2015.4.01.0000 submitted to the Regional Federal Court of the 1st Region by the Brazilian Association of Electricity Distributors (Abradee), of which Copel DIS is a member, seeking to annul the case brought by ESBR against ANEEL since service of process. Although a favorable preliminary injunction was obtained, there was an unfavorable judgment of the writ of mandamus, stating that it was not applicable in this case. After the publication of the judgement, Abradee filed an ordinary appeal, currently being judged by the Regional Federal Court of the 1st Region.
However, ANEEL´s motion to stay execution 0050083-30.2015.4.01.0000/RO was partly accepted on November 30, 2015 by the presiding judge of the Regional Federal Court of the 1st Region, which upheld the CCEE Board of Directors’ resolution voted at meeting 813 on July 21, 2015, based on the court’s decision in the case of Action for a Provisional Remedy 9500-90.2013.4.01.4100, determining the “obligation to deliver 70% of the physical guarantee provided by the effective start-up of commercial operations by Jirau HPP generators until this amount is equivalent to the original delivery obligation.” An appeal brought by ESBR was rejected. This decision is also subject to appeal.
The risk of loss in this case is rated ‘possible’ (intermediate), considering the amount of R$721,060, on December 31, 2016. If the actions are judged unfavorably, the amount will be classified as Sectorial Financial Asset to be recovered through tariff rates.
Current status: awaiting judgment.
F-96
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
31 Equity
31.1 Attributable to parent company’s shareholders
31.1.1 Capital
Capital consists of common and preferred shares. Each common share entitles its holder to one vote in the general shareholders’ meetings. Preferred shares do not have voting rights and have two classes “A” and “B”.
According to Article 17 and following paragraphs of Federal Law No. 6,404/76, dividends paid to preferred shares must be at least 10% higher than those paid on common shares.
Class “A” preferred shares have priority in the reimbursement of capital and in the distribution of minimum dividends of 10% p.y. (non-cumulative), calculated based on the capital represented by this class of shares.
Class “B” preferred shares have priority in the reimbursement of capital and the right to the distribution of dividends, calculated as 25% of adjusted net income, pursuant to the corporate legislation and to the Company’s by-laws, calculated proportionately to the capital represented by the shares of this class. Dividends for Class “B” have priority only over the common shares and are only paid out of the remaining profits, following payment of priority dividends of class “A” shares.
On December 15, 2016, the Extraordinary General Meeting approved a capital increase in the amount of R$1,000,000, using the profit retention reserve.
The paid-in share capital is R$7,910,000. The different classes of shares (with no par value) and main shareholders are detailed below:
| | | | | | | Number of shares in units |
Shareholders | Common | Class "A” Preferred | Class “B” preferred | Total |
| in share | % | in share | % | in share | % | in share | % |
State of Paraná | 85,028,598 | 58.63 | - | - | - | - | 85,028,598 | 31.07 |
BNDES | 38,298,775 | 26.41 | - | - | 27,282,006 | 21.26 | 65,580,781 | 23.96 |
Eletrobrás | 1,530,774 | 1.06 | - | - | - | - | 1,530,774 | 0.56 |
Free float: | | | | | | | | |
BM&FBOVESPA | 18,631,543 | 12.85 | 76,763 | 23.36 | 66,917,562 | 52.16 | 85,625,868 | 31.30 |
NYSE | 1,204,601 | 0.83 | - | - | 33,958,398 | 26.47 | 35,162,999 | 12.85 |
Latibex | - | - | - | - | 88,949 | 0.07 | 88,949 | 0.03 |
Municipalities | 178,393 | 0.12 | 9,326 | 2.84 | 3,471 | - | 191,190 | 0.07 |
Other shareholders | 158,396 | 0.10 | 242,538 | 73.80 | 45,282 | 0.04 | 446,216 | 0.16 |
| 145,031,080 | 100.00 | 328,627 | 100.00 | 128,295,668 | 100.00 | 273,655,375 | 100.00 |
F-97
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
31.1.2 Equity value adjustments
Fair values of fixed assets – deemed costs – were recognized on the first-time adoption of IFRS. The account “Equity value adjustments” was the balancing item of this adjustment, net of deferred income tax and social contribution, including under the equity method. The realization of such adjustments is recorded in the retained earnings account, to the extent of the depreciation or possible write-off of the valued items.
Adjustments arising from the changes in fair value involving financial assets available for sale, as well as actuarial gains and losses, are also recorded in this account.
F-98
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Changes in equity value adjustments
| Equity Valuation Adjustments | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Total |
As of 01.01.2014 | 1,238,955 | (255,796) | 983,159 |
Adjustments to financial assets available for sale | | | |
Financial investments (a) | - | 1,070 | 1,070 |
Taxes on adjustments | - | (363) | (363) |
Equity interest investments | - | (190) | (190) |
Taxes on adjustments | - | 65 | 65 |
Adjustments related to actuarial liabilities: | | | |
Post employment benefits | - | 140,383 | 140,383 |
Taxes on adjustments | - | (48,584) | (48,584) |
Post employment benefits - equity (a) | - | (582) | (582) |
Other adjustments: | | | |
Other adjustments - subsidiaries (a) | - | (2,777) | (2,777) |
Taxes on other adjustments | - | 945 | 945 |
Realization of equity evaluation adjustment | | | |
Deemed cost of fixed assets | (149,295) | - | (149,295) |
Taxes on the adjustments | 50,760 | - | 50,760 |
Deemed cost of fixed assets - equity (a) | (2,466) | - | (2,466) |
Deemed cost of fixed assets - investment realization | (850) | - | (850) |
Actuarial liabilities - investment realization | 4,381 | - | 4,381 |
Attributed to non-controlling interest | - | 1,308 | 1,308 |
As of 12.31.2014 | 1,141,485 | (164,521) | 976,964 |
Adjustments to financial assets available for sale | | | |
Financial investments (a) | - | 633 | 633 |
Taxes on adjustments | - | (216) | (216) |
Equity interest investments | - | (5) | (5) |
Taxes on adjustments | - | (1) | (1) |
Adjustments related to actuarial liabilities: | | | |
Post employment benefits | - | 410,330 | 410,330 |
Taxes on adjustments | - | (139,059) | (139,059) |
Post employment benefits - equity (a) | - | 19,660 | 19,660 |
Realization of equity evaluation adjustment | | | |
Deemed cost of fixed assets | (137,031) | - | (137,031) |
Taxes on the adjustments | 46,590 | - | 46,590 |
Attributed to non-controlling interest | - | (495) | (495) |
As of 12.31.2015 | 1,051,044 | 126,328 | 1,177,372 |
Adjustments to financial assets available for sale | | | |
Financial investments (a) | - | (2) | (2) |
Equity interest investments | - | 3,614 | 3,614 |
Taxes on adjustments | - | (1,229) | (1,229) |
Adjustments related to actuarial liabilities | | | |
Post employment benefits | - | (88,906) | (88,906) |
Taxes on adjustments | - | 30,174 | 30,174 |
Post employment benefits - equity (a) | - | (852) | (852) |
Realization of equity evaluation adjustment | | - | |
Deemed cost of fixed assets | (154,102) | - | (154,102) |
Taxes on the adjustments | 52,395 | | 52,395 |
Actuarial liabilities - investment realization | (19,933) | - | (19,933) |
Attributed to non-controlling interest | - | (65) | (65) |
As of 12.31.2016 | 929,404 | 69,062 | 998,466 |
(a) Equity in the parent company, net of taxes | | | |
F-99
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
31.1.3 Legal reserve and profit retention reserve
5% of the net income for the year is allocated to the legal reserve, before any other allocation, limited to 20% of capital.
The profit retention reserve is designed to cover the Company's investment program, according to Article 196 of Law No. 6,404/1976. It is funded by retaining any remaining net profit after legal reserve, interest on capital and dividends.
31.1.4 Proposed dividend distribution
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Calculation of minimum mandatory dividend (25%) - (1) | | |
Net income (loss) for the year | 958,650 | 1,192,738 |
Legal Reserve (5%) | (47,933) | (59,637) |
Realization of equity evaluation adjustment | 101,707 | 90,441 |
Calculation basis for minimum mandatory dividends | 1,012,424 | 1,223,542 |
| 253,106 | 305,885 |
Total proposed distribution - (2) (3 + 5) | 282,947 | 326,795 |
| | |
Interest on own capital, net - (3) | 282,947 | 198,000 |
Tax on interest on own capital | (29,841) | (20,910) |
Interest on own capital, net - (4) | 253,106 | 177,090 |
| | |
Dividends proposed - (5) | - | 128,795 |
| | |
Total proposed distribution, net - (6) (4 + 5) | 253,106 | 305,885 |
| | |
Gross value of dividends per share: | | |
Ordinary shares | 0.98539 | 1.13716 |
Class “A” preferred shares | 2.89050 | 2.52507 |
Class “B” preferred shares | 1.08410 | 1.25473 |
| | |
Gross amount of dividends per class of shares: | | |
Ordinary shares | 142,912 | 164,924 |
Class “A” preferred shares | 949 | 960 |
Class “B” preferred shares | 139,086 | 160,911 |
In accordance with legal and statutory requirements in effect, the basis for calculating the minimum mandatory dividends is obtained from the net income for the year, less the portion that will fund the legal reserve. However, Management decided to include in this basis the amount related to the realization of the equity value adjustments, specifically to compensate the effects coming from the increase of the depreciation expense arriving from the adoption of the new accounting standards. This procedure reflects the policy to distribute dividends to Company’s shareholders, which will be effective during the realization of the entire asset/liability valuation adjustments account.
F-100
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The distribution of the minimum mandatory dividend is recognized as a liability in the Company’s and its subsidiaries financial statements at year-end.
The tax benefit of interest on capital is recorded in the statement of income in the moment of its recognition in accounts payable.
31.1.5 Earnings per share - basic and diluted
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Basic and diluted numerator | | | |
Basic and diluted earnings allocated by classes of shares, allocated to shareholders | | | |
controlling shareholders: | | | |
Ordinary shares | 485,255 | 603,746 | 610,434 |
Class “A” preferred shares | 1,282 | 1,741 | 1,766 |
Class “B” preferred shares | 472,113 | 587,251 | 593,750 |
| 958,650 | 1,192,738 | 1,205,950 |
Basic and diluted denominator | | | |
Weighted average of shares (in thousands): | | | |
Ordinary shares | 145,031,080 | 145,031,080 | 145,031,080 |
Class “A” preferred shares | 348,531 | 380,291 | 381,465 |
Class “B” preferred shares | 128,275,764 | 128,244,004 | 128,242,830 |
| 273,655,375 | 273,655,375 | 273,655,375 |
Basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to shareholders of | | | |
parent company: | | | |
Ordinary shares | 3.34587 | 4.16287 | 4.20899 |
Class “A” preferred shares | 3.68045 | 4.57807 | 4.62953 |
Class “B” preferred shares | 3.68045 | 4.56917 | 4.62989 |
| | | |
The earnings or loss per share are calculated based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the reporting period. For all periods presented, the Company has no potential instrument that could have a dilutive effect, therefore, basic earnings per share is equivalent to diluted earnings per share.
Since the preferred and common shareholders have rights to dividends, voting and different settlements, basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated using the “two-class” method. The two-class method is a formula for allocation of earnings which determines earnings per preferred share and per common share according to the declared dividends, pursuant to the Company’s by-laws and to the rights to participation in non-distributed earnings calculated in accordance with the right to dividends of each share type.
F-101
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
32 Net Operating Revenue
| Gross | PIS/Pasep | | Regulatory | Service tax | Net revenues |
| revenues | and Cofins | ICMS (VAT) | charges (32.5) | (ISSQN) | 12.31.2016 |
Electricity sales to final customers (32.1) | 9,606,133 | (884,681) | (2,426,940) | (1,063,007) | - | 5,231,505 |
Electricity sales to distribuitors (32.2) | 2,963,349 | (239,531) | - | (47,746) | - | 2,676,072 |
Use of the main distribution and transmission grid (32.3) | 6,974,829 | (575,166) | (1,511,601) | (911,479) | - | 3,976,583 |
Construction income | 1,279,642 | - | - | - | - | 1,279,642 |
Fair value of assets from the indemnity for the concession | 132,741 | - | - | - | - | 132,741 |
Telecommunications | 357,361 | (13,872) | (79,582) | - | (2,326) | 261,581 |
Distribution of piped gas | 647,579 | (62,037) | (113,657) | - | - | 471,885 |
Sectorial financial assets and iabilities result | (1,079,662) | - | - | - | - | (1,079,662) |
Other operating revenue (32.4) | 179,820 | (26,072) | - | - | (2,342) | 151,406 |
21,061,792 | (1,801,359) | (4,131,780) | (2,022,232) | (4,668) | 13,101,753 |
| | | | | | Net revenues |
| Gross | PIS/Pasep | | Regulatory | Service tax | 12.31.2015 |
| revenues | and Cofins | ICMS (VAT) | charges (32.5) | (ISSQN) | Restated |
Electricity sales to final customers (32.1) | 11,289,201 | (1,045,529) | (2,784,289) | (1,712,463) | - | 5,746,920 |
Electricity sales to distribuitors (32.2) | 4,130,184 | (350,796) | - | (71,947) | - | 3,707,441 |
Use of the main distribution and transmission grid (32.3) | 5,879,729 | (547,565) | (1,420,129) | (1,523,530) | - | 2,388,505 |
Construction income | 1,196,324 | - | - | - | - | 1,196,324 |
Fair value of assets from the indemnity for the concession | 217,713 | - | - | - | - | 217,713 |
Telecommunications | 277,876 | (10,760) | (55,038) | - | (2,151) | 209,927 |
Distribution of piped gas | 704,625 | (66,877) | (111,349) | - | - | 526,399 |
Sectorial financial assets and liabilities result | 858,170 | - | - | - | - | 858,170 |
Other operating revenue (32.4) | 119,402 | (22,545) | - | - | (2,412) | 94,445 |
24,673,224 | (2,044,072) | (4,370,805) | (3,307,940) | (4,563) | 14,945,844 |
| | | | | | Net revenues |
| Gross | PIS/Pasep | | Regulatory | Service tax | 12.31.2014 |
| revenues | and Cofins | ICMS (VAT) | charges (32.5) | (ISSQN) | Restated |
Electricity sales to final customers (32.1) | 6,581,808 | (573,026) | (1,584,499) | (53,130) | - | 4,371,153 |
Electricity sales to distribuitors (32.2) | 4,882,071 | (430,976) | - | (80,303) | - | 4,370,792 |
Use of the main distribution and transmission grid (32.3) | 3,708,296 | (347,962) | (958,690) | (164,174) | - | 2,237,470 |
Construction income | 1,279,010 | - | - | - | - | 1,279,010 |
Fair value of assets from the indemnity for the concession | 76,989 | - | - | - | - | 76,989 |
Telecommunications | 216,223 | (11,310) | (38,615) | - | (837) | 165,461 |
Distribution of piped gas | 495,132 | (45,504) | (58,343) | - | - | 391,285 |
Sectorial financial assets and liabilities result | 1,033,866 | - | - | - | - | 1,033,866 |
Other operating revenue (32.4) | 131,434 | (59,529) | - | - | (2,425) | 69,480 |
| 18,404,829 | (1,468,307) | (2,640,147) | (297,607) | (3,262) | 13,995,506 |
F-102
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
32.1 Electric sales to final customers by category
| Gross revenue | Net revenue |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Residential | 2,841,218 | 3,554,995 | 2,110,043 | 1,371,184 | 1,804,690 | 1,429,593 |
Industrial | 3,029,411 | 3,829,081 | 2,369,527 | 1,795,957 | 2,049,456 | 1,563,121 |
Trade, services and other activities | 2,130,228 | 2,511,750 | 1,365,319 | 1,065,202 | 1,155,967 | 838,312 |
Rural | 815,079 | 546,685 | 305,214 | 584,452 | 339,338 | 260,801 |
Public entities | 236,550 | 273,120 | 152,321 | 138,535 | 149,663 | 108,348 |
Public lighting | 229,182 | 271,036 | 127,838 | 114,540 | 122,904 | 78,626 |
Public service | 324,465 | 302,534 | 151,546 | 161,635 | 124,902 | 92,352 |
| 9,606,133 | 11,289,201 | 6,581,808 | 5,231,505 | 5,746,920 | 4,371,153 |
32.2 Electricity sales to distributors
| Gross revenue |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Bilateral contracts | 1,366,551 | 1,160,503 | 1,172,588 |
Electric Energy Trade Chamber - CCEE | 753,393 | 2,159,431 | 2,987,114 |
Agreements for Pow er Trade on the Regulated Market - CCEAR (auction) | 673,154 | 793,036 | 722,120 |
Interest (Note 10.2) | 96,783 | - | - |
Quota system | 73,468 | 17,214 | 249 |
| 2,963,349 | 4,130,184 | 4,882,071 |
| | | |
32.3 Use of the main distribution and transmission grid by customer class
| Gross revenue | Net revenue |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Residential | 2,060,305 | 1,961,163 | 1,363,517 | 977,359 | 706,983 | 793,022 |
Industrial | 1,246,575 | 1,280,283 | 701,408 | 564,335 | 459,231 | 398,566 |
Trade, services and other activities | 1,409,771 | 1,399,336 | 869,622 | 667,715 | 507,703 | 506,163 |
Rural | 339,438 | 300,297 | 190,620 | 241,039 | 185,378 | 109,278 |
Public entities | 168,823 | 161,275 | 108,809 | 94,430 | 71,141 | 72,590 |
Public lighting | 167,255 | 153,826 | 97,828 | 78,274 | 53,844 | 56,376 |
Public service | 125,928 | 111,539 | 64,337 | 59,209 | 39,896 | 37,212 |
Free consumers | 398,024 | 282,241 | 147,135 | 300,531 | 179,711 | 126,534 |
Basic network, BN connections, and connection grid | 1,494 | 1,352 | 1,044 | 1,128 | 860 | 899 |
Operating and maintenance income (loss) - O&M | 151,984 | 91,772 | 106,833 | 138,502 | 67,663 | 86,590 |
Interest income (a) | 905,232 | 136,645 | 57,143 | 854,061 | 116,095 | 50,240 |
| 6,974,829 | 5,879,729 | 3,708,296 | 3,976,583 | 2,388,505 | 2,237,470 |
(a) Of the R$905,232 interest income gross revenue, R$809,639 refers to gain on remeasurement of the cash flow from the RBSE assets (Note 10.4). |
32.4 Other operating revenues
| Gross revenue |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Leasing and rent (32.4.1) | 103,793 | 88,008 | 96,809 |
Income from rendering of services | 32,575 | 17,203 | 23,987 |
Charged service | 10,148 | 8,773 | 8,207 |
Other income | 33,304 | 5,418 | 2,431 |
| 179,820 | 119,402 | 131,434 |
| | | |
F-103
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
32.4.1 Revenues from leases and rentals
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Equipment and framework | 103,490 | 87,190 | 88,988 |
Real estate | 248 | 271 | 206 |
Facilities sharing | 55 | 547 | 1,210 |
Thermal Power Plant of Araucária | - | - | 6,405 |
| 103,793 | 88,008 | 96,809 |
32.5 Regulatory charges
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Energy Development Account - "CDE Uso" (32.5.1) | 876,361 | 1,494,630 | 133,021 |
Energy Development Account - "CDE Energia" | 790,117 | 497,667 | - |
Other charges - rate flags | 203,671 | 1,120,218 | - |
Research and development and energy efficiency - R&D and PEE | 100,039 | 126,656 | 114,257 |
Global Reversion Reserve - RGR quota | 42,887 | 62,554 | 50,329 |
Inspection fee | 9,157 | 6,215 | - |
| 2,022,232 | 3,307,940 | 297,607 |
32.5.1 Energy Development Account - CDE
The primary objectives of the Energy Development Account (CDE) created by Law No. 10,438/2002 are: (i) universalization; (ii) subsidy to the low income residential subclass; (iii) Fuel Consumption Account - CCC; (iv) amortization of financial operations related to the reversal of assets at the end of the concessions; (v) competitiveness of energy produced from wind power, small hydroelectric plants, biomass, natural gas and coal. CDE’s quotas were originally defined based on the CCC figures for the 2001 Interconnected Systems, the values of which were adjusted annually starting in 2002 in proportion to the market growth of each agent, and in 2004 also by the IPCA. As of Law 12,783/2013, the system is changed and quotas are defined based on the resources needed to achieve its purposes and other revenues related to the CDE. The CDE charge incorporates:
a) annual quota of “CDE-Uso”: this quota is allocated to the financing of the objectives of the CDE, set forth in its annual budget, defined by the Federal Government, as provided in §§ 2 and 3 of art. 13 of Law 10,438/2002, with wording given by Law No. 12,783/2013.
ANEEL Resolution No. 2,018/2016 defined the CDE-Uso quota, in the monthly amount of R$83,727 as of January 2016. However, as of June of the same year, the monthly amount of the quota was changed to R$71,600, established by ANEEL Resolution No. 2,077/2016;
F-104
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
b) annual quota of “CDE-Energia (ACR Account)”: This quota is intended for the discharge of credit operations contracted by CCEE in the management of the Regulated Contracting Environment - ACR Account, in compliance with Decree No. 8,222/2014, and pursuant to Normative Resolution No. 612/2014.
The purpose of the ACR Account is to cover costs relating to involuntary spot market exposure and the costs of thermal power dispatching in 2014.
Resolution No. 1,863/2015 defined the value of the CDE quota (ACR Account) at R$46,638, as of June 2015. Beginning June 2016, by means of Resolution No. 2004/2015, the amount of the quota was updated to R$49,362. As of 12.31.2016, there are 36 installments to be paid. These installments are updated annually, based on the tariff process of each distributor, in accordance with the conditions contracted by CCEE for each of the loans made to the participating financial institutions; and
c) annual quota of “CDE-Energia”: This quota is destined to the return of the resources received by the distribution concessionaires, from January 2013 to January 2014, to cover costs relating to involuntary spot market exposure and the hydrological risk of the plants contracted on a regime of quotas, and the costs of thermal power dispatching for reasons of energy security, in compliance with Decrees 7,895/2013 and Decree 8,203/2014.
ANEEL Resolution No. 1,857/2015 defined the CDE-Energia quota, in the monthly amount of R$17,120. As of June 2016, the monthly amount of the quota was changed to R$18,947, established by ANEEL Resolution No. 2,077/2016.
Preliminary injunction Abrace and Anace
As a result of preliminary injunctions in favor of the Brazilian Association of Large Industrial Consumers and Free Consumers - Abrace, and of the National Association of Energy Consumers - Anace and other associates, which challenge at court the tariff components of CDE-Uso and CDE-Energia, ANEEL, through Resolutions 1,967/2015, 1,986/2015 and 2,083/2016, ratified the tariff calculation deducting these charges from associates of those entities, as long as the preliminary injunctions granted in Judicial Proceedings No. 24648-39.2015.4.01.3400 and No. 0069262-32.2015.4.01.3400 / 16th Federal Court are in effect.
On the other hand, by the preliminary injunction in favor of Abradee, the associated distributors are guaranteed the right of non-transfer, deducting from the portion of CDE-Uso and CDE-Energia the amounts not collected due to the effects of the preliminary injunction. This deduction, which covers all preliminary injunctions, was approved by Aneel by Order No. 1,576, dated 06.14.2016.
Recently, in compliance with the preliminary injunction granted in the Judicial Proceedings No. 0028882-30.2016.4.01.3400 of the 2nd Federal Court, ANEEL, through Order No. 2,634, dated 09.30.2016, ratified, regarding the 2016 tariff process, new Tariffs for Use of Distribution Systems - Tusd for Abrace members, effective as of 06.29.2016, for as long as the effects of the preliminary injunction relief remain.
F-105
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Based on the December 2016 figures, there are currently 96 consumer units benefiting from the preliminary injunction. Accordingly, the Company has been carrying out, during the year, the deduction of the payment of the CDE quota from the unbilled amounts resulting from these injunctions, thus not impacting the distributor’s result.
The differences between the rate coverage for this charge and the amount actually paid, from the beginning of the preliminary injunction to December 2016, represent the amount of R$79,364 for CDE Uso and R$6,414 for CDE Energy.
32.6 Copel DIS periodic tariff review
Aneel’s Resolution No. 2,096 of June 21, 2016 approved the result of Copel DIS fourth Periodic Tariff Review and authorized a -12.87% average adjustment to be perceived by consumers, consisting of: -1.73% related to the inclusion of financial components; 4.48% from updating Portion B; -2.57% from adjusting Portion A; and -13.05% reflecting the withdrawal of the financial components from the previous tariff process.
This adjustment was fully applied to Copel DIS tariffs as of June 24, 2016.
In the Periodic Tariff Review process, which up to the 4th Cycle was carried out for four years, ANEEL redefined the costs that make up the so-called Portion B, that is, the operating and capital costs, which are depreciation and return on investments. In order to do so, the changes in the cost and market structure of the concessionaire, the tariff levels observed in similar companies, the incentives for efficiency and the modality of tariffs are taken into account.
The Tariff Review process also involves updating the costs that make up Portion A, that is, the costs related to the acquisition of energy, the use of transmission systems and the sector charges.
Regulatory Remuneration Base (BRR)
The BRR corresponds to the amount of investments made by the distributors in the provision of services that will be covered by the tariffs charged by consumers. These assets related to the electric energy public service distribution concession agreement are only eligible to compose the Regulatory Remuneration Base when effectively used in the granted activity.
According to ANEEL’s Proret, for the evaluation of the electric power distribution companies’ assets, the remuneration base in the current RTP Cycle is calculated considering the remuneration base approved in the previous Cycle (“armored” base), approved by the appraisal report (associated to the existing assets, in operation, except for the changes occurred in the period), plus the values of the inclusions occurred between the previous and current RTP base dates (incremental basis).
In the 4th Tariff Review Cycle, Copel DIS achieved net BRR of R$4,920,381 and remuneration of capital of R$595,326.
F-106
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
33 Operating Costs and Expenses
| | | General and | Other | |
| Operational | Selling | administrative | expenses, | |
| costs | expenses | expenses | net | 12.31.2016 |
Electricity purchased for resale (33.1) | (4,685,604) | - | - | - | (4,685,604) |
Charge of the main distribution and transmission grid | (866,243) | - | - | - | (866,243) |
Personnel and management (33.2) | (976,027) | (17,314) | (311,077) | - | (1,304,418) |
Pension and healthcare plans (Note 25.3) | (192,880) | (2,616) | (64,271) | - | (259,767) |
Materials and supplies | (71,747) | (851) | (8,865) | - | (81,463) |
Materials and supplies for power electricity | (33,352) | - | - | - | (33,352) |
Natural gas and supplies for gas business | (325,413) | - | - | - | (325,413) |
Third-party services (33.3) | (369,442) | (53,659) | (127,392) | - | (550,493) |
Depreciation and amortization | (664,470) | (31) | (30,290) | (13,505) | (708,296) |
Estimated losses, provisions and reversals (33.4) | (567,112) | (184,610) | - | (16,974) | (768,696) |
Construction cost (33.5) | (1,280,745) | - | - | - | (1,280,745) |
Other operating costs and expenses, net (33.6) | (201,080) | 8,633 | (199,250) | (23,159) | (414,856) |
| (10,234,115) | (250,448) | (741,145) | (53,638) | (11,279,346) |
| | | General and | Other | |
| Operational | Selling | administrative | expenses, | |
| costs | expenses | expenses | net | 12.31.2015 |
Electricity purchased for resale (33.1) | (6,032,916) | - | - | - | (6,032,916) |
Charge of the main distribution and transmission grid | (919,788) | - | - | - | (919,788) |
Personnel and management (33.2) | (863,406) | (15,617) | (289,827) | - | (1,168,850) |
Pension and healthcare plans (Note 25.3) | (196,238) | (2,388) | (55,701) | - | (254,327) |
Materials and supplies | (66,968) | (748) | (8,986) | - | (76,702) |
Materials and supplies for power electricity | (199,323) | - | - | - | (199,323) |
Natural gas and supplies for gas business | (1,176,090) | - | - | - | (1,176,090) |
Third-party services (33.3) | (365,745) | (41,876) | (111,882) | - | (519,503) |
Depreciation and amortization | (600,240) | (35) | (68,558) | (7,639) | (676,472) |
Estimated losses, provisions and reversals (33.4) | 66,029 | (226,837) | - | (50,021) | (210,829) |
Construction cost (33.5) | (1,251,004) | - | - | - | (1,251,004) |
Other operating costs and expenses, net (33.6) | (193,627) | 4,104 | (135,652) | (100,959) | (426,134) |
| (11,799,316) | (283,397) | (670,606) | (158,619) | (12,911,938) |
| | | | | |
| | | General and | Other | |
| Operational | Selling | administrative | expenses, | |
| costs | expenses | expenses | net | 12.31.2014 |
Electricity purchased for resale (33.1) | (5,080,594) | - | - | - | (5,080,594) |
Charge of the main distribution and transmission grid | (384,846) | - | - | - | (384,846) |
Personnel and management (33.2) | (781,270) | (12,534) | (259,007) | - | (1,052,811) |
Pension and healthcare plans (Note 25.3) | (157,968) | (1,468) | (42,106) | - | (201,542) |
Materials and supplies | (64,238) | (524) | (9,673) | - | (74,435) |
Materials and supplies for power electricity | (150,848) | - | - | - | (150,848) |
Natural gas and supplies for gas business | (1,469,842) | - | - | - | (1,469,842) |
Third-party services (33.3) | (299,958) | (44,517) | (79,989) | - | (424,464) |
Depreciation and amortization | (590,540) | (26) | (38,622) | (755) | (629,943) |
Estimated losses, provisions and reversals (33.4) | (807,281) | (66,196) | - | (330,205) | (1,203,682) |
Construction cost (33.5) | (1,285,902) | - | - | - | (1,285,902) |
Other operating costs and expenses, net (33.6) | (215,475) | 4,278 | (122,719) | (58,608) | (392,524) |
| (11,288,762) | (120,987) | (552,116) | (389,568) | (12,351,433) |
| | | | | |
F-107
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
33.1 Electricity purchased for resale
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Purchase of Energy in the Regulated Environment - CCEAR | 3,220,461 | 3,812,509 | 3,394,222 |
Itaipu Binacional | 1,089,804 | 1,567,844 | 739,002 |
Electric Energy Trade Chamber - CCEE | 535,656 | 982,388 | 2,281,328 |
Program for incentive to alternative energy sources - Proinfa | 242,910 | 177,946 | 183,617 |
Bilateral contracts | 20,006 | 30,557 | 177,149 |
(-) Transfer CDE and ACR Account - Decrees 8,221/2014 and 7,891/2013 | - | - | (1,253,436) |
(-) PIS/Pasep/Cofins taxes on electricity purchased for resale | (423,233) | (538,328) | (441,288) |
| 4,685,604 | 6,032,916 | 5,080,594 |
33.2 Personnel and management
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Personnel | | | |
Wages and salaries | 801,789 | 735,072 | 642,901 |
Social charges on payroll | 257,519 | 227,667 | 204,695 |
Meal assistance and education allowance | 109,999 | 98,367 | 85,927 |
Provisons for profit sharing (a) | 64,814 | 78,462 | 92,657 |
Compensation - Voluntary termination Program/retirement | 44,276 | 5,443 | 6,588 |
| 1,278,397 | 1,145,011 | 1,032,768 |
Management | | | |
Wages and salaries | 20,639 | 19,027 | 15,614 |
Social charges on payroll | 5,136 | 4,645 | 3,977 |
Other expenses | 246 | 167 | 452 |
| 26,021 | 23,839 | 20,043 |
| 1,304,418 | 1,168,850 | 1,052,811 |
(a) According to Federal Law No. 10,101/2000, State Decree No. 1,978/2007 and State Law No. 16,560/2010. | |
33.3 Third-party services
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Maintenance of electrical system | 160,720 | 160,564 | 102,116 |
Maintenance of facilities | 90,451 | 85,192 | 90,909 |
Communication, processing and transmission of data | 61,317 | 72,042 | 50,894 |
Meter reading and bill delivery | 49,462 | 44,399 | 37,766 |
Consulting and audit | 41,396 | 19,120 | 3,942 |
Authorized and registered agents | 40,035 | 34,429 | 35,116 |
Consumer service | 21,000 | 20,478 | 17,624 |
Other services | 86,112 | 83,279 | 86,097 |
| 550,493 | 519,503 | 424,464 |
| | | |
F-108
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
33.4 Estimated losses, provisions and reversals
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Estimated losses for doubtful accounts (Client and Other credits) | 179,908 | 226,838 | 53,193 |
Impairment of assets | 581,577 | (66,029) | 807,281 |
Provision (reversal) for litigations | (21,408) | 48,499 | 323,811 |
Tax credits estimated losses | 23,917 | 1,521 | 6,394 |
Consortiums estimated losses | 4,702 | - | 13,003 |
| 768,696 | 210,829 | 1,203,682 |
33.5 Construction cost
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Materials and supplies | 588,414 | 574,132 | 648,102 |
Third party services | 495,309 | 504,197 | 450,627 |
Personnel | 135,272 | 100,299 | 127,039 |
Others | 61,750 | 72,376 | 60,134 |
| 1,280,745 | 1,251,004 | 1,285,902 |
33.6 Other operating costs and expenses, net
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Financial offset for the use of water resources | 183,014 | 155,147 | 140,810 |
Compensation | 89,531 | 50,541 | 28,549 |
Losses in the decommissioning and disposal of assets | 43,496 | 53,266 | 21,765 |
Advertising and publicity | 37,451 | 25,867 | 16,745 |
Leasing and rent (33.6.1) | 35,453 | 33,961 | 28,533 |
Taxes | 29,443 | 24,237 | 84,671 |
Result of the change in the investment valuation method (Note 18.4) | (52,107) | - | - |
Other net costs and expenses | 48,575 | 83,115 | 71,451 |
| 414,856 | 426,134 | 392,524 |
33.6.1 Leasing and rents
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Real estate | 29,911 | 27,830 | 23,919 |
Others | 6,919 | 7,434 | 5,977 |
(-) PIS and Cofins credits | (1,377) | (1,303) | (1,363) |
| 35,453 | 33,961 | 28,533 |
| | | |
F-109
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
34 Financial Results
. | | Restated | Restated |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Financial income | | | |
Arrears charges on energy bills | 221,673 | 168,796 | 138,578 |
Interest and monetary variation of CRC transfer (Note 8.1) | 194,153 | 217,722 | 157,422 |
Return on financial investments held for trading | 175,367 | 139,056 | 184,468 |
Escrow deposits monetary variation | 99,823 | - | - |
Monetary variation over the Itaipu power purchase | 39,283 | 25,198 | 7,455 |
Remuneration of net sectorial assets and liabilities (Note 9.2) | 27,734 | 121,401 | 7,278 |
Return on financial investments held for sale | 13,497 | 16,160 | 26,658 |
Monetary variation and adjust to present value of accounts | | | |
payable related to the concession | 1,116 | 2,122 | - |
Monetary variation and interest of accounts receivable | | | |
related to the concession compensation | - | 20,363 | 50,271 |
Other financial income | 123,907 | 58,809 | 52,859 |
| 896,553 | 769,627 | 624,989 |
( - ) Financial expenses | | | |
Monetary and cambial variation and debt charges | 1,072,875 | 751,524 | 366,686 |
Monetary variation and adjust to present value of accounts | | | |
payable related to the concession | 90,480 | 101,072 | 63,000 |
Monetary variation on CCEE installments | 54,753 | - | - |
Interest on R&D and EEP (Note 27.2) | 41,781 | 34,060 | 23,399 |
PIS/Pasep/Cofins taxes on interest on capital | 40,607 | 42,627 | 28,404 |
Monetary variation over the Itaipu power purchase | 20,597 | 96,162 | 24,580 |
Remuneration of net sectorial assets and liabilities (Note 9.2) | 13,947 | - | - |
Interest and monetary variation of CRC transfer (Note 8.1) | 5,235 | - | 21,790 |
Other financial expenses | 122,022 | 72,853 | 43,527 |
| 1,462,297 | 1,098,298 | 571,386 |
Net | (565,744) | (328,671) | 53,603 |
35 Operating Segments
Operating segments are business activities that generate revenues and incur expenses, whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the executive boards of the Company and by key strategic decision makers responsible for allocating funds and assessing performance.
35.1 Products and services from which we generate revenues from the reportable segments
The Company operates in five reportable segments identified by management, through the Chief Executive Office and the chief offices of each business area, taking into consideration the regulatory environments, the strategic business units, and the different products and services. These segments are managed separately, since each business and each company requires different technologies and strategies.
In 2016, 2015 and 2014, all sales have been to customers within Brazilian territory, as well as all non-current assets are located in national territory.
F-110
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The Company does not identified any customer who individually accounts for more than 10% of total net revenues in the year 2016.
The Company evaluates the performance of each segment based on information derived from accounting records.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies and transactions between segments are recognized as transactions with third parties, i.e. at current market prices.
35.2 The Company’s reportable segments
The reportable segments of the Company, in accordance with IFRS 8, are:
Power generation and transmission (GET) - this segment comprises the generation of electric energy from hydraulic, wind, and thermal projects (GER) and the transport and transformation of the power generated by the Company, and the construction, operation, and maintenance of all power transmission substations and lines(TRA). For managers, the assets and liabilities of the generation and transmission segments are shown on an aggregate basis while their result is shown separately;
Power distribution and sales (DIS) -this segment comprises the distribution and sale of electric energy, the operation and maintenance of the distribution infrastructure, and related services.
Telecommunications (TEL) -this segment comprises telecommunications and general communications services.
GAS- this segment comprises the public service of piped natural gas distribution.
Holding Company (HOL) - this segment comprises participation in other companies.
F-111
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
35.3 Assets per reportable segment
ASSETS | Electricity | TEL | GAS | HOL | Intersegment operations | TOTAL |
12.31.2016 | GET | DIS |
| | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | 15,590,175 | 10,074,577 | 856,510 | 526,477 | 3,351,656 | (373,483) | 30,025,912 |
CURRENT ASSETS | 1,288,148 | 2,588,602 | 89,471 | 135,292 | 941,761 | (640,284) | 4,402,990 |
NON-CURRENT ASSETS | 14,302,027 | 7,485,975 | 767,039 | 391,185 | 2,409,895 | 266,801 | 25,622,922 |
Long Term Assets | 3,680,669 | 1,971,232 | 79,853 | 152,676 | 2,145,759 | (136,332) | 7,893,857 |
Investments | 2,116,139 | 1,362 | - | - | 217,449 | - | 2,334,950 |
Property, plant and equipment | 8,223,951 | - | 667,443 | - | 42,909 | - | 8,934,303 |
Intangible Assets | 281,268 | 5,513,381 | 19,743 | 238,509 | 3,778 | 403,133 | 6,459,812 |
ASSETS | Electricity | TEL | GAS | HOL | Intersegment operations | TOTAL |
12.31.2015 | GET | DIS |
| | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | 13,730,872 | 10,715,266 | 769,317 | 481,303 | 3,641,088 | (390,189) | 28,947,657 |
CURRENT ASSETS | 2,237,784 | 4,155,554 | 179,898 | 103,579 | 873,169 | (616,587) | 6,933,397 |
NON-CURRENT ASSETS | 11,493,088 | 6,559,712 | 589,419 | 377,724 | 2,767,919 | 226,398 | 22,014,260 |
Long Term Assets | 1,568,330 | 1,426,826 | 59,031 | 71,016 | 2,016,463 | (189,874) | 4,951,792 |
Investments | 1,517,582 | 1,374 | - | - | 705,754 | - | 2,224,710 |
Property, plant and equipment | 8,138,199 | - | 512,068 | - | 42,415 | - | 8,692,682 |
Intangible Assets | 268,977 | 5,131,512 | 18,320 | 306,708 | 3,287 | 416,272 | 6,145,076 |
35.4 Statement of income per reportable segment
STATEMENT OF INCOME | Electricity | | | | | |
| GET | DIS | TEL | GAS | HOL | Intersegment operations | TOTAL |
12.31.2016 | GER | TRA |
| | | | | | | | |
NET OPERATING REVENUES | 2,927,680 | 1,491,547 | 8,344,765 | 325,115 | 542,822 | 6,238 | (536,414) | 13,101,753 |
Net operating revenues - third-parties | 2,618,869 | 1,406,335 | 8,313,141 | 258,794 | 498,376 | 6,238 | - | 13,101,753 |
Net operating revenues - between segments | 308,811 | 85,212 | 31,624 | 66,321 | 44,446 | - | (536,414) | - |
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES | (2,032,767) | (605,202) | (8,502,377) | (241,848) | (534,817) | 101,251 | 536,414 | (11,279,346) |
Energy purchased for resale | (92,050) | - | (4,893,230) | - | - | (9,119) | 308,795 | (4,685,604) |
Charges for use of the main transmission grid | (322,849) | - | (642,753) | - | - | - | 99,359 | (866,243) |
Personnel and management | (208,887) | (116,966) | (804,974) | (101,397) | (32,765) | (39,429) | - | (1,304,418) |
Pension and healthcare plans | (43,251) | (24,171) | (163,329) | (18,827) | (3,596) | (6,593) | - | (259,767) |
Materials and supplies | (12,768) | (5,017) | (59,178) | (2,044) | (1,768) | (688) | - | (81,463) |
Raw materials and supplies for generation | (77,797) | - | - | - | - | - | 44,445 | (33,352) |
Natural gas and supplies for gas business | - | - | - | - | (325,413) | - | - | (325,413) |
Third party services | (157,602) | (24,030) | (348,479) | (46,552) | (20,082) | (26,755) | 73,007 | (550,493) |
Depreciation and amortization | (369,352) | (3,697) | (274,180) | (34,645) | (25,251) | (1,171) | - | (708,296) |
Provision (reversal) for litigations and estimated losses on tax credits | (1,086) | (9,234) | (128,899) | (4,653) | (1,036) | 166,316 | - | 21,408 |
Impairment of assets | (494,098) | - | - | - | (87,479) | - | - | (581,577) |
Other estimated losses, provisions and reversals | (30,700) | (975) | (171,045) | (2,598) | (3,209) | - | - | (208,527) |
Construction cost | - | (406,345) | (849,275) | - | (25,125) | - | - | (1,280,745) |
Other operating costs and expenses | (222,327) | (14,767) | (167,035) | (31,132) | (9,093) | 18,690 | 10,808 | (414,856) |
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF INVESTEES | - | 117,970 | - | - | - | 103,725 | - | 221,695 |
PROFIT BEFORE FINANCIAL INCOME (LOSS) AND TAX | 894,913 | 1,004,315 | (157,612) | 83,267 | 8,005 | 211,214 | - | 2,044,102 |
Financial income | 122,694 | 21,339 | 396,880 | 13,489 | 13,551 | 331,646 | (3,046) | 896,553 |
Financial expenses | (613,041) | (108,538) | (369,868) | (23,100) | (14,973) | (335,823) | 3,046 | (1,462,297) |
OPERATING PROFIT | 404,566 | 917,116 | (130,600) | 73,656 | 6,583 | 207,037 | - | 1,478,358 |
Income Tax and Social Contribution | (205,027) | (220,512) | (28,729) | (15,324) | (1,632) | (59,344) | - | (530,568) |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | 199,539 | 696,604 | (159,329) | 58,332 | 4,951 | 147,693 | - | 947,790 |
F-112
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
STATEMENT OF INCOME | Electricity | | | | | |
| GET | DIS | TEL | GAS | HOL | Intersegment operations | TOTAL |
12.31.2015 - Restated | GER | TRA |
| | | | | | | | |
NET OPERATING REVENUES | 4,264,197 | 501,387 | 9,797,855 | 272,247 | 1,391,474 | - | (1,281,316) | 14,945,844 |
Net operating revenues - third-parties | 3,954,296 | 420,451 | 9,770,086 | 207,091 | 593,920 | - | - | 14,945,844 |
Net operating revenues - between segments | 309,901 | 80,936 | 27,769 | 65,156 | 797,554 | - | (1,281,316) | - |
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES | (2,580,045) | (394,015) | (9,516,397) | (203,878) | (1,360,357) | (138,672) | 1,281,426 | (12,911,938) |
Energy purchased for resale | (309,682) | - | (6,007,222) | - | - | - | 283,988 | (6,032,916) |
Charges for use of the main transmission grid | (294,660) | - | (706,680) | - | - | - | 81,552 | (919,788) |
Personnel and management | (186,385) | (79,873) | (699,891) | (87,393) | (30,715) | (84,593) | - | (1,168,850) |
Pension and healthcare plans | (40,325) | (18,477) | (165,635) | (17,516) | (3,264) | (9,110) | - | (254,327) |
Materials and supplies | (12,502) | (3,399) | (55,531) | (2,745) | (1,937) | (588) | - | (76,702) |
Raw materials and supplies for generation | (996,679) | - | - | - | - | - | 797,356 | (199,323) |
Natural gas and supplies for gas business | - | - | - | - | (1,176,090) | - | - | (1,176,090) |
Third party services | (184,228) | (20,476) | (353,773) | (35,900) | (20,282) | (15,472) | 110,628 | (519,503) |
Depreciation and amortization | (369,778) | (3,399) | (243,645) | (31,510) | (21,532) | (6,608) | - | (676,472) |
Provision (reversal) for litigations and for losses on tax credits | 89,726 | 35,061 | (164,615) | (3,742) | (7,744) | 2,813 | - | (48,501) |
Impairment of assets | 66,029 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 66,029 |
Other estimated losses, provisions and reversals | (122,700) | - | (104,121) | (987) | (549) | (7) | 7 | (228,357) |
Construction cost | - | (287,247) | (896,924) | - | (66,833) | - | - | (1,251,004) |
Other operating costs and expenses | (218,861) | (16,205) | (118,360) | (24,085) | (31,411) | (25,107) | 7,895 | (426,134) |
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF INVESTEES | - | 22,853 | - | - | - | 69,692 | - | 92,545 |
PROFIT BEFORE FINANCIAL INCOME (LOSS) AND TAX | 1,684,152 | 130,225 | 281,458 | 68,369 | 31,117 | (68,980) | 110 | 2,126,451 |
Financial income | 114,767 | 33,198 | 354,626 | 5,939 | 14,968 | 248,350 | (2,221) | 769,627 |
Financial expenses | (414,791) | (9,583) | (340,439) | (6,459) | (13,898) | (315,252) | 2,124 | (1,098,298) |
OPERATING PROFIT | 1,384,128 | 153,840 | 295,645 | 67,849 | 32,187 | (135,882) | 13 | 1,797,780 |
Income Tax and Social Contribution | (392,507) | (30,966) | (89,591) | (13,205) | (9,119) | 3,159 | - | (532,229) |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | 991,621 | 122,874 | 206,054 | 54,644 | 23,068 | (132,723) | 13 | 1,265,551 |
| | | | | | | | |
STATEMENT OF INCOME | Electricity | | | | | |
| GET | DIS | TEL | GAS | HOL | Intersegment operations | TOTAL |
12.31.2014 - Restated | GER | TRA |
| | | | | | | | |
NET OPERATING REVENUES | 4,930,654 | 413,348 | 8,424,025 | 213,163 | 1,748,045 | 3 | (1,733,732) | 13,995,506 |
Net operating revenues for third-parties | 4,593,854 | 352,615 | 8,406,845 | 167,445 | 474,744 | 3 | - | 13,995,506 |
Net operating revenues between segments | 336,800 | 60,733 | 17,180 | 45,718 | 1,273,301 | - | (1,733,732) | - |
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES | (3,996,428) | (392,187) | (7,740,651) | (137,404) | (1,664,860) | (153,758) | 1,733,855 | (12,351,433) |
Energy purchased for resale | (496,887) | - | (4,886,909) | - | - | - | 303,202 | (5,080,594) |
Charges for use of the main transmission grid | (247,126) | - | (209,066) | - | - | - | 71,346 | (384,846) |
Personnel and management | (154,803) | (77,138) | (633,236) | (62,069) | (25,892) | (99,673) | - | (1,052,811) |
Pension and healthcare plans | (38,291) | (14,136) | (126,961) | (8,507) | (2,093) | (11,554) | - | (201,542) |
Materials and supplies | (13,184) | (3,864) | (53,918) | (1,551) | (1,410) | (508) | - | (74,435) |
Raw materials and supplies for generation | (1,424,147) | - | - | - | - | - | 1,273,299 | (150,848) |
Natural gas and supplies for gas business | - | - | - | - | (1,469,842) | - | - | (1,469,842) |
Third party services | (150,061) | (20,370) | (289,717) | (21,530) | (19,374) | (7,707) | 84,295 | (424,464) |
Depreciation and amortization | (354,596) | (7,990) | (221,401) | (28,277) | (16,921) | (758) | - | (629,943) |
Provision (reversal) for litigations | (112,489) | (37,642) | (135,219) | (2,013) | (15,864) | (20,584) | - | (323,811) |
Provision (reversal) for impairment of assets | (807,281) | - | - | - | - | - | - | (807,281) |
Other provisions and reversals | (21,579) | - | (49,988) | (1,023) | - | - | - | (72,590) |
Construction cost | - | (213,042) | (991,356) | - | (81,504) | - | - | (1,285,902) |
Other operating costs and expenses | (175,984) | (18,005) | (142,880) | (12,434) | (31,960) | (12,974) | 1,713 | (392,524) |
EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF INVESTEES | - | 67,419 | - | - | - | 92,536 | - | 159,955 |
PROFIT BEFORE FINANCIAL INCOME (LOSS) AND TAX | 934,226 | 88,580 | 683,374 | 75,759 | 83,185 | (61,219) | 123 | 1,804,028 |
Financial income | 139,117 | 81,880 | 191,616 | 4,508 | 7,008 | 202,650 | (1,790) | 624,989 |
Financial expenses | (127,471) | (649) | (204,037) | (1,586) | (5,176) | (234,132) | 1,665 | (571,386) |
OPERATING PROFIT | 945,872 | 169,811 | 670,953 | 78,681 | 85,017 | (92,701) | (2) | 1,857,631 |
Income Tax and Social Contribution | (185,716) | (25,877) | (233,089) | (20,097) | (24,651) | (32,586) | - | (522,016) |
NET INCOME | 760,156 | 143,934 | 437,864 | 58,584 | 60,366 | (125,287) | (2) | 1,335,615 |
| | | | | | | | |
F-113
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
35.5 Additions to noncurrent assets by reportable segment
| GET | DIS | TEL | GAS | HOL | TOTAL |
12.31.2016 | GER | TRA |
Property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | |
Additions | 619,964 | - | - | 187,313 | - | 556 | 807,833 |
Intangible Assets | | | | | | | |
Additions | 23 | 3,184 | 892,693 | 6,447 | 25,847 | 533 | 928,727 |
| GET | DIS | TEL | GAS | HOL | TOTAL |
12.31.2015 | GER | TRA |
Property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | |
Additions | 724,538 | - | - | 100,998 | - | 186 | 825,722 |
Reversal of estimated losses | 56,405 | - | - | - | - | - | 56,405 |
| 780,943 | - | - | 100,998 | - | 186 | 882,127 |
Intangible Assets | | | | | | | |
Additions | 285 | 5,058 | 888,906 | 4,427 | 69,592 | 534 | 968,802 |
| GET | DIS | TEL | GAS | HOL | TOTAL |
12.31.2014 | GER | TRA |
Property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | |
Additions | 1,383,964 | - | - | 102,929 | - | (29,738) | 1,457,155 |
Provisions | (807,281) | - | - | - | - | - | (807,281) |
| 576,683 | - | - | 102,929 | - | (29,738) | 649,874 |
Intangible Assets | | | | | | | |
Additions | 138 | 3,051 | 1,026,632 | 4,572 | 79,121 | 141,056 | 1,254,570 |
F-114
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
36 Financial instruments
36.1 Categories and determination of fair value of financial instruments
| | | | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
| Note | Level | Book value | Fair value | Book value | Fair value |
Financial assets | | | | | | |
Fair value through profit or loss - held for trading | | | | | | |
Trading securities | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents (a) | 5 | 1 | 982,073 | 982,073 | 1,480,727 | 1,480,727 |
Bonds and securities (b) | 6 | 1 | 3,385 | 3,385 | 2,565 | 2,565 |
Bonds and securities (b) | 6 | 2 | 291,043 | 291,043 | 333,649 | 333,649 |
| | | 1,276,501 | 1,276,501 | 1,816,941 | 1,816,941 |
Loans and receivables | | | | | | |
Pledges and restricted deposits linked (a) | | | 1,294 | 1,294 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
Trade accounts receivable (a) | 7 | | 2,488,141 | 2,488,141 | 3,107,889 | 3,107,889 |
CRC Transferred to the State Government of Paraná (d) | 8 | | 1,522,735 | 1,610,269 | 1,383,242 | 1,343,497 |
Sectorial financial assets (a) | 9 | | - | - | 1,045,662 | 1,045,662 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession (e) | 10 | | 2,612,418 | 2,612,418 | 943,473 | 943,473 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession - | | | | | | |
bonus from the grant (f) | 10 | | 586,706 | 673,545 | - | - |
State of Paraná - Government Programs (a) | 15.1 | | 155,141 | 155,141 | 187,048 | 187,048 |
Collaterals and escrow accounts STN (c) | 23.1 | | 73,074 | 47,166 | 86,137 | 51,414 |
| | | 7,439,509 | 7,587,974 | 6,755,451 | 6,680,983 |
Available for sale | | | | | | |
Bonds and securities | 6 | 1 | 1,567 | 1,567 | 2,728 | 2,728 |
Bonds and securities | 6 | 2 | 201,499 | 201,499 | 158,449 | 158,449 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession (g) | 10 | 3 | 614,806 | 614,806 | 424,140 | 424,140 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession compensation (h) | 11 | 3 | 67,401 | 67,401 | 219,556 | 219,556 |
Other investments (i) | | 1 | - | - | 17,626 | 17,626 |
| | | 885,273 | 885,273 | 822,499 | 822,499 |
Total financial assets | | | 9,601,283 | 9,749,748 | 9,394,891 | 9,320,423 |
Financial liabilities | | | | | | |
Other financial liabilities | | | | | | |
Sectorial financial liabilities (a) | 9 | | 278,992 | 278,992 | - | - |
Ordinary financing of taxes with the federal tax authorities (c) | 13.3 | | 198,527 | 183,573 | 193,739 | 171,119 |
Suppliers (a) | 22 | | 1,292,350 | 1,292,350 | 1,619,049 | 1,619,049 |
Loans and financing (c) | 23 | | 4,046,293 | 3,677,926 | 4,077,060 | 3,539,257 |
Debentures (j) | 24 | | 4,790,809 | 4,790,809 | 3,683,928 | 3,683,928 |
Payable related to concession (k) | 28 | | 565,542 | 640,839 | 535,665 | 651,403 |
Total financial liabilities | | | 11,172,513 | 10,864,489 | 10,109,441 | 9,664,756 |
Different levels are defined as follows: | | | | | | |
Level 1: Obtained from quoted prices (not adjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; |
Level 2: obtained through other variables in addition to quoted prices included in Level 1, which are observable for theassets or liabilities; |
|
Level 3: obtained through assessment techniques which include variables for the assets or liabilities, which however are not basedon observable market data. |
|
| | | | | | |
F-115
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Determining fair values
a) Equivalent to their respective carrying values due to their nature and terms of realization.
b) Calculated according to information made available by the financial agents and to the market values of the bonds issued by the Brazilian government.
c) Calculated based on the cost of the last issue by the Company, 124% of the CDI for discount of the expected payment flow.
d) The Company based its calculation on the comparison with a noncurrent, long-term and post-fixed National Treasury bond (NTN-B) maturing on August 15, 2024, which yields approximately 5.24% p.y. plus the IPCA inflation index.
e) Criteria and assumptions disclosed on note 4.4.9, transmission concession.
f) Receivables related to the concession agreement for providing electricity generation services under quota arrangements at their fair value calculated by expected cash inflows discounted at the rate established in Aneel auction notice 12/2015 (9.04%), the best market benchmark in this case.
g) Criteria and assumptions disclosed on note 4.4.9, distribution concession. The changes held in 2015 are as note 10.1.
h) The fair values of generation assets approximate their book values, according to Note 11.
i) Calculated from price quotations published on active markets.
j) Calculated from the Unit Price quotation (PU) for December 30, 2016, obtained from the Brazilian Association of Financial and Capital Markets (Anbima), net of financial cost to amortize.
k) Real net discount rate of 8.63% p.a., in line with the Company’s estimated rate for long-term projects
36.2 Financial risk management
The Company has a Corporate Risk Management Committee in charge of formulating and tracking risk management policies and assisting the Audit Committee to ensure a good management of resources and the protection and appreciation of its assets.
The Company's business activities are exposed to the following risks arising from financial instruments:
36.2.1 Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of the Company incurring losses due to a customer or financial instrument counterparty, resulting from failure in complying with contract obligations.
F-116
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| | |
Exposure to credit risk | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Cash and cash equivalents (a) | 982,073 | 1,480,727 |
Bonds and securities (a) | 497,494 | 497,391 |
Pledges and restricted deposits linked (a) | 74,368 | 88,137 |
Trade accounts receivable (b) | 2,488,141 | 3,107,889 |
CRC Transferred to the State Government of Paraná (c) | 1,522,735 | 1,383,242 |
Sectorial financial assets | - | 1,045,662 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession (d) | 3,227,224 | 1,367,613 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession - Bonus from the grant (e) | 586,706 | - |
Accounts receivable related to the concession compensation (f) | 67,401 | 219,556 |
State of Paraná - Government Programs (g) | 155,141 | 187,048 |
| 9,601,283 | 9,377,265 |
a) Company management manages the credit risk of its assets in accordance with the Group's policy of investing virtually all of its funds in federal banking institutions. As a result of legal and/or regulatory requirements, in exceptional circumstances the Company may invest funds in prime private banks.
b) The risk arises from the possibility that the Company might incur in losses resulting from difficulties to receive its billings to customers. This risk is closely related to internal and external factors of Copel. To mitigate this type of risk the Company manages its accounts receivable, detecting customer groups that pose the greatest risk of default, cutting off energy supplies and implementing specific collection policies, supported by real or personal guarantees for debits above R$200.0.
c) Management believes this credit risk is low because repayments are secured by funds from dividends.
d) Management believes this risk is very low because these contracts assure an unconditional right to be paid in cash by the concession Granting Authority at the end of the concession period for any infrastructure investments not recovered through tariffs by the end of the period, specifically for the transmission business, since RAP is guaranteed revenue that does not involve demand risk.
For the amount relating to RBSE assets existing on May 31, 2000, Aneel published Normative Resolution 589/2013, which defines criteria for calculating New Replacement Value (VNR). Given that on April 20, 2016, the Granting Authority defined the means and period for receiving this asset (still to be regulated by Aneel) through MME Ordinance 120, Management believes credit risk is low.
e) Management considers the risk of this credit to be very low, as the contract for the sale of energy by quotas guarantees the receipt of an Annual Generation Revenue - RAG guaranteed which includes the annual amortization of this amount during the concession term.
F-117
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
f) For the generation concession assets, Aneel published Normative Resolution No. 596/2013, which defines criteria for calculating New Replacement Value (VNR), for indemnity purposes. Although the Granting Authority has not yet disclosed the means of remunerating these assets and there are uncertainties as to approval or ratification of investments made in this respect, Management believes that compensation for these assets indicates the recoverability of the recorded balance.
g) Management believes this credit risk is very low because these are specific programs together with the State Government to highlight the Luz Fraterna program (Note 37.a).
36.2.2 Liquidity risk
The Company's liquidity risk consists of the possibility of insufficient funds, cash or other financial asset to settle obligations on scheduled dates.
The Company manages liquidity risk relying on a set of methodologies, procedures and instruments applied for a permanent control over financial processes to ensure a proper management of risks.
Investments are financed by incurring medium and long-term debt with financial institutions and capital markets.
Short-term, medium-term and long-term business projections are made and submitted to management bodies for evaluation. The budget for the next fiscal year is annually approved.
Medium and long-term business projections cover monthly periods over the next five years. Short-term projections consider daily periods covering only the next 90 days.
The Company permanently monitors the volume of funds to be settled by controlling cash flows to reduce funding costs, the risk involved in the renewal of loan agreements and compliance with the financial investment policy, while at the same time keeping minimum cash levels.
The following table shows the expected undiscounted settlement amounts in each time range. Projections were based on financial indicators linked to the related financial instruments and forecast according to average market expectations as disclosed on the Central Bank of Brazil's Focus Report, which provides the average expectations of market analysts for these indicators for the current year and the following year. From 2019, 2018 indicators are repeated through the forecast period, except for the US dollar, which follows the US inflation rate.
F-118
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| Interest (a) | Less than | 1 to 3 | 3 months | | Over | Total |
| | 1 month | months | to 1 year | 1 to 5 years | 5 years | liabilities |
12.31.2016 | | | | | | | |
Loans and financing | Note 23 | 90,265 | 164,214 | 1,588,764 | 1,873,952 | 1,556,703 | 5,273,898 |
Debentures | Note 24 | 8,725 | 19,929 | 1,545,694 | 4,147,064 | 583,869 | 6,305,281 |
Payable related to concession | Rate of return + | | | | | | |
use of public property | IGP-M and IPCA | 5,494 | 10,988 | 50,331 | 300,343 | 1,850,518 | 2,217,674 |
Eletrobras - Itaipu | Dollar | - | 193,346 | 893,025 | 5,104,889 | 2,698,195 | 8,889,455 |
Other suppliers | - | 1,106,430 | 21,619 | 124,060 | 40,239 | 2 | 1,292,350 |
Purchase obligations | IGP-M and IPCA | - | 1,497,009 | 3,129,899 | 17,686,276 | 94,007,720 | 116,320,904 |
Ordinary financing of taxes | | | | | | | |
with the federal tax authorities | Selic | 5,133 | 10,392 | 48,578 | 161,534 | - | 225,637 |
Sectorial financial liabilities | Selic | 13,071 | 26,537 | 125,315 | 144,590 | - | 309,513 |
| | 1,229,118 | 1,944,034 | 7,505,666 | 29,458,887 | 100,697,007 | 140,834,712 |
12.31.2015 | | | | | | | |
Loans and financing | Note 23 | 78,969 | 86,071 | 473,032 | 3,546,135 | 2,023,379 | 6,207,586 |
Debentures | Note 24 | 6,277 | 13,735 | 1,313,062 | 3,485,797 | 205,515 | 5,024,386 |
Payable related to concession | Rate of return + | | | | | | |
use of public property | IGP-M and IPCA | 4,978 | 9,958 | 46,687 | 287,316 | 2,001,514 | 2,350,453 |
Eletrobras - Itaipu | Dollar | - | 210,867 | 988,015 | 5,774,563 | 5,047,764 | 12,021,209 |
Other suppliers | - | 1,138,130 | 228,200 | 230,316 | 22,403 | - | 1,619,049 |
Purchase obligations | IGP-M and IPCA | - | 1,278,480 | 3,629,110 | 21,371,882 | 112,292,091 | 138,571,563 |
Ordinary financing of taxes | | | | | | | |
with the federal tax authorities | Selic | 3,764 | 7,641 | 36,228 | 191,659 | - | 239,292 |
| | 1,232,118 | 1,834,952 | 6,716,450 | 34,679,755 | 121,570,263 | 166,033,538 |
(a) Effective interest rate - weighted average. | | | | | | | |
On December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a negative net working capital of R$1,253,046, mainly due to the reduction in current assets due to the realization of sectorial assets transferred to the tariff, together with the higher concentration of short-term debt. During the definition of the business budget for the year 2017, the Company's Management defined actions to balance the short-term financial capacity, preserving the Company's investment programs, however at lower levels than in 2016, as observed in the proposed capital budget for 2017, as well as seeking debt stretching.
As disclosed in notes 23.5 and 24.3, the Company has loans and financing agreements and debentures with covenants that if breached may have its payment accelerated.
36.2.3 Market risk
Market risk it is the risk that fair value or the future cash flows of a financial instrument shall oscillate due to changes in market prices, such as currency rates, interest rates and stock price. The purpose of managing this risk is to control exposures within acceptable limits, while optimizing return
a) Foreign currency risk (US Dollar)
This risk comprises the possibility of losses due to fluctuations in exchange rates, which may reduce assets or increase liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
F-119
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The Company’s foreign currency indebtedness is not significant and it is not exposed to foreign exchange derivatives. The Company monitors all relevant exchange rates.
The effect of the exchange rate variation resulting from the power purchase agreement with Eletrobras (Itaipu) is passed on to customers in Copel Distribuição's next tariff adjustment.
The exchange rate risk posed by the purchase of gas arises from the possibility of Compagas reporting losses on the fluctuations in gas prices resulting from a fluctuation in the value of the OPEC Reference Basket and exchange rates, increasing the balances of accounts payable related to the acquired gas.
Compagas monitors these fluctuations on a permanent basis.
Currency risk sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis of foreign currency risk
The Company has developed a sensitivity analysis in order to measure the impact of the devaluation of the U.S. dollar on its loans and financing subject to exchange risk.
The baseline takes into account the existing balances in each account as of December 31, 2016 and the probable scenario assumes a variation in the exchange rate – end of year (R$/US$3.29) based on the median market expectation for 2017 reported in the Central Bank’s Focus report of March 17, 2017. For the adverse and remote scenarios, deteriorations of 25% and 50%, respectively, were considered for the main risk factor for the financial instrument compared to the rate used in the likely scenario.
. | | Baseline | Projected scenarios - Dec.2017 |
Foreign exchange risk | Risk | 12.31.2016 | Probable | Adverse | Remote |
. | | | | | |
Financial assets | | | | | |
Collaterals and escrow accounts - STN | USD depreciation | 73,074 | 672 | (17,764) | (36,201) |
. | | 73,074 | 672 | (17,764) | (36,201) |
Financial liabilities | | | | | |
Loans and financing | | | | | |
STN | USD appreciation | (90,505) | (833) | (23,667) | (46,502) |
Suppliers | | | | | |
Eletrobras (Itaipu) | USD appreciation | (198,358) | (1,825) | (51,871) | (101,917) |
Petrobras (acquisition of gas by Compagas) | USD appreciation | (132,985) | (1,224) | (34,776) | (68,328) |
| | (421,848) | (3,882) | (110,314) | (216,747) |
F-120
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
In addition to the sensitivity analysis, the Company evaluates its financial instruments considering the possible effects on profit and loss and shareholders’ equity of the risks evaluated by Company management on the reporting date for the financial instruments, as recommended by IFRS 7. Based on the equity position and the notional value of the financial instruments held as of December 31, 2016, it is estimated that these effects will approximate the amounts stated in the above table in the column for the forecast probable scenario, since the assumptions used by the Company are similar to those previously described.
b) Interest rate and monetary variation risk
This risk comprises the possibility of losses due to fluctuations in interest rates or other indicators, which may reduce financial income or financial expenses or increase the financial expenses related to the assets and liabilities raised in the market.
The Company has not engaged in transactions with derivatives to cover this risk, but it has continually monitored interest rates and market indicators, in order to assess the potential need for such transactions.
Sensitivity analysis of interest rate and monetary variation risk
The Company has developed a sensitivity analysis in order to measure the impact of variable interest rates and monetary variations on its financial assets and liabilities subject to these risks.
The baseline scenario takes into account the existing balances in each account as of December 31, 2016 while the ‘probable’ scenario assumes balances reflecting varying indicators as follows: CDI/Selic - 9.00%, IPCA - 4.15% IGP DI - 4.34% IGP-M - 4.52% and TJLP - 7.50%, estimated as market average projections for 2017 according to the Focus Report issued by the Central Bank of Brazil as of March 17, 2017.
For the adverse and remote scenarios, deteriorations of 25% and 50%, respectively, were considered for the main risk factor for the financial instrument compared to the rate used in the probable scenario.
F-121
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
. | | Baseline | Projected scenarios - Dec.2017 |
Interest rate risk and monetary variation | Risk | 12.31.2016 | Probable | Adverse | Remote |
. | | | | | |
Financial assets | | | | | |
Bonds and securities | Low CDI/SELIC | 497,494 | 44,774 | 33,581 | 22,388 |
Collaterals and escrow accounts | Low CDI/SELIC | 1,294 | 117 | 87 | 59 |
CRC transferred to the State Government of Paraná | Low IGP-DI | 1,522,735 | 66,087 | 49,565 | 33,043 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession | Low IPCA | 3,813,930 | 158,278 | 118,709 | 79,139 |
Accounts receivable related to the concession compensation | Undefined (a) | 67,401 | - | - | - |
State of Paraná - Government Programs | No risk | 155,141 | - | - | - |
| | 6,057,995 | 269,256 | 201,942 | 134,629 |
Financial liabilities | | | | | |
Loans and financing | | | | | |
Banco do Brasil | High CDI | (1,475,411) | (132,787) | (165,984) | (199,180) |
BNDES | High TJLP | (1,692,775) | (126,958) | (158,698) | (190,437) |
Promissory notes | High CDI | (581,909) | (52,372) | (65,465) | (78,558) |
Banco do Brasil - Distribution of Funds from BNDES | High TJLP | (128,721) | (9,654) | (12,068) | (14,481) |
Eletrobrás - RGR, Caixa Econômica Federal and Finep | No risk | (76,972) | - | - | - |
Debentures | High CDI/SELIC | (4,271,453) | (384,431) | (480,538) | (576,646) |
Debentures | High IPCA | (325,965) | (13,528) | (16,909) | (20,291) |
Debentures | High TJLP | (193,391) | (14,504) | (18,130) | (21,756) |
Sectorial financial liabilities | High Selic | (278,992) | (25,109) | (31,387) | (37,664) |
Ordinary financing of taxes with the federal tax authorities | High Selic | (198,527) | (17,867) | (22,334) | (26,801) |
Payable related to concession | High IGP-M | (518,372) | (27,007) | (33,759) | (40,511) |
Payable related to concession | High IPCA | (47,170) | (1,958) | (2,447) | (2,936) |
. | | (9,789,658) | (806,175) | (1,007,719) | (1,209,261) |
(a) Risk assessment still requires ruling by the Granting Authority. | | | | | |
In addition to the sensitivity analysis, the Company evaluates its financial instruments considering the possible effects on profit and loss and equity of the risks evaluated by Company management on the reporting date for the financial instruments, as recommended by IFRS 7. Based on the equity position and the notional value of the financial instruments held as of December 31, 2016, it is estimated that these effects will approximate the amounts stated in the above table in the column for the forecast probable scenario, since the assumptions used by the Company are similar to those previously described.
36.2.4 Electricity shortage risk
Approximately 61% of installed capacity in the country currently comes from hydroelectric generation, which makes Brazil and the geographic region in which we operate subject to hydrological conditions that are unpredictable, due to non-cyclical deviations of mean precipitation. Unsatisfactory hydrological conditions may cause, among other things, the implementation of comprehensive programs of electricity savings, such as rationalization or even a mandatory reduction of consumption, which is the case of rationing.
F-122
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
From 2014, the reservoirs of the Southeast/Midwest, North and Northeast regions have been subject to adverse climate situations in recent years, leading agencies responsible for this industry to adopt water resources optimization measures to guarantee full compliance with load.
The economic crisis that the country is going through has had a significant impact on the consumption of electricity, practically stagnating its growth in the last 2 years, being decisive to avoid a greater difficulty in the full service of the market.
Regarding short-term risk, the Electric Power Industry Monitoring Committee - CMSE has been reporting a balance between energy supply and demand, and indices have been kept within safety margins. The same position is adopted by ONS regarding the risk of deficit in the medium term, as stated in the 2016-2020 Energy Operation Plan.
Although dam storage levels are not ideal, from the standpoint of regulatory agencies, when combined with other variables they are sufficient to keep the risk of deficit within the safety margin established by the National Energy Policy Council - CNPE (maximum risk of 5%) in all subsystems.
36.2.5 Risk of GSF impacts
The Energy Reallocation Mechanism (MRE) is a system of redistribution of electric power generated, characteristic of the Brazilian electric sector, which has its existence by the understanding, at the time, of the need for a centralized operation associated with a centrally calculated optimum price known as PLD. Since generators have no control over their production, each plant receives a certain amount of virtual energy which can be compromised through bilateral contracting. This value, which enables the registration of bilateral contracts, is known as Physical Guarantee - GF and, like the PLD, is also calculated centrally.
Monthly, the GF committed to bilateral contracts needs to be backed by electricity generation. This is done, basically, through the allocation of power generated received from the MRE or purchase of generation valued to the PLD. The GSF is the ratio of the entire hydroelectric generation of the MRE participants to the GF sum of all the MRE plants. Basically, the GSF is used to calculate how much each plant will receive from generation to back up its GF. Thus, knowing the GSF of a given month the company will be able to know if it will need to back up its bilateral contracts through purchases to the PLD.
Where GF multiplied by GF is less than the sum of bilateral contracts, companies will need to buy the difference in the spot market. However, for the GSF multiplication situation by GF to be greater than the bilateral contracts, the Company receives the difference to the PLD.
The low inflows recorded since 2014 as well as problems with delays in the expansion of the transmission system have resulted in low GSF values, resulting in heavy losses for the companies holding MRE participating hydroelectric projects.
For plants with contracts in the Free Contracting Environment - ACL, the main way to manage the low GSF risk is not to compromise the entire GF with bilateral contracts, currently is the approach adopted by Copel.
F-123
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
For the contracts in the ACR, Law No. 13,203/2015, allowed the generators to contract insurance against the load, by means of payment of a Risk Premium. Copel adopted this approach to protect contracts related to energy produced by Mauá, Foz do Areia, Santa Clara and Fundão HPPs.
For the distribution segment, the effects of the GSF are perceived in the costs of the contracts for availability, as well as in the costs associated with quotas of Itaipu, Angra and the plants whose concessions were renewed in accordance with Law No. 12,783/2013. This is a financial risk, however, since it guarantees the neutrality of energy purchase expenses through a tariff transfer.
36.2.6 Risk of non-renewal of concessions - generation and transmission
On March 3, 2017 Copel GeT filed an agreement with Aneel with its intention to extend the granting of the TPP Figueira, noting, however, that it will sign the necessary contracts and / or additives only after knowing and accepting the contractual terms and the rules that will govern any process related to the extension of the grant. For the other plants, the deadline for manifestation to opt or not to extend the generation concessions are shown below:
Plant | Deadline for manifestation |
HPP Gov. Bento Munhoz da Rocha Neto (Foz do Areia) | 09.17.2018 |
HPP Apucaraninha | 10.12.2020 |
HPP Chaminé | 08.16.2021 |
HPP Guaricana | 08.16.2021 |
These plants represent a Physical Guarantee of an average 620.69 MW. Currently, the extension of generation, transmission and distribution concessions covered by Articles 17, 19 and 22 of Law No. 9,074/1995 is governed by Law No. 12,783/2013. However, extension is permitted after express acceptance of conditions of that Law, such as: i) revenue determined according to criteria established by Aneel; ii) change from price remuneration to tariff calculated by Aneel for each plant; iii) allocation of plant energy and capacity physical guarantee shares to concessionaires and permittees of distribution public utilities; iv) submission to service quality standards defined by Aneel; and v) agreement with values established as indemnity of assets related to concession.
Concessions of hydroelectric power generation, electric power transmission and distribution may be extended at the discretion of Concession Grantor, one single time, for the period of up to 30 years. However, for concessions of thermoelectric power generation, extension period is limited to 20 years.
Current regulation also defined that the concessionaire has a period to request extension of concession of up to 60 months before final contract date or after granting of hydroelectric power generation plants, and of up to 24 months for thermoelectric plants.
F-124
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
It is also defined that, if the concessionaire opts to extend its concession, Concession Grantor may advance effects of extension by up to 60 months counted as of contract or grant date, and may also define initial tariff.
The Company will make analyses in the future to decide on whether or not concessions should be extended in view of conditions imposed by the Concession Grantor, aiming at preserving its profitability levels.
In case extension is not brought forward, Concession Grantor will open a tender bid process for concessions of the auction or competition type, for up to 30 years, considering, for tender bid judgment, the lowest tariff value and the highest offer to pay grant bonus.
In 2012, Copel GeT extended the Transmission Concession Agreement No. 060/2001, extending its main transmission concession up to 12.31.2042.
In 2016, after having won the bid carried out by Aneel, Copel GeT had its concession of Governador Parigot de Souza Hydroeletric Power Plant, with installed capacity of 260 MW and assured power of 109 average MW, renewed up to January 5, 2046.
36.2.7 Risk of non-renewal of concessions - distribution
Recently, pursuant to the terms of Concession Agreement amendment No. 46/1999 of Copel DIS, concession was extended, provided that quality and efficiency parameters for provision of distribution services are met, measured by indicators that consider duration and frequency of service interruptions (DECi and FECi) and efficiency in the Company’s economic and financial management.
The Fifth Amendment to the Concession Agreement imposes indexes of economic and financial efficiency and quality. Failure to comply with the indexes for two consecutive years or any limits at the end of the period of the first five years will result in the termination of the concession. From the sixth year following the signing of the agreement, the breach of quality criteria for three consecutive years or of economic and financial criteria for two consecutive years will result in the opening of an expiration process. In addition, non-compliance with the electricity supply quality indicators (DEC and FEC) for two consecutive years or three times in five years, may limit dividends or interest on equity payments to shareholders, while the breach of the economic and financial sustainability indicators may require a capital contribution from the controlling shareholders.
F-125
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The following table sets out the targets set for Copel DIS in the first five years of the renewal:
| | Quality (limit established) (a) | Quality (performed) |
Year | Economic and Financial Management | DECi (b) | FECi (b) | DECi (b) | FECi (b) |
2016 | | 13.61 | 9.24 | 10.82 | 7.23 |
2017 | EBITDA ≥ 0 | 12.54 | 8.74 | - | - |
2018 | EBITDA (-) QRR ≥ 0 (c) | 11.23 | 8.24 | - | - |
2019 | {Net Debt / [EBITDA (-) QRR]} ≤ 1 / (0.8 * SELIC) (c) (d) | 10.12 | 7.74 | - | - |
2020 | {Net Debt / [EBITDA (-) QRR]} ≤ 1 / (1.11 * SELIC) (c) (d) | 9.83 | 7.24 | - | - |
(a) According to Aneel’s Technical Note No. 0335/2015. |
(b) DECi - Equivalent Time of Interruption Caused by Internal Source per Consumer Unit; and FECi - Equivalent Frequency of Interruption Caused by Internal Source per Consumer Unit. |
(c) QRR: Regulatory Reintegration Quota or Regulatory Depreciation Expense. This is the value defined in the most recent Periodical Tariff Review (RTP), plus the General Market Price Index (IGP-M) between the month preceding the RTP and the month preceding the twelve-month period of the economic and financial sustainability measurement. |
(d) Selic: limited to 12.87% p.y. |
36.2.8 Risk of overcontracting and subcontracting of electricity
The agreement for purchase of electric power by distributors is regulated by Law 10,848/2004and Decree 5,163/2004, which determine that distributors must purchase the volume required to serve 100% of their market through auctions on the Regulated Contacting Environment - ACR.
The contracting of the total output available in the market is verified by observing the period comprising the calendar year, and the difference between the costs remunerated by the tariff and those actually incurred on the power purchase are fully passed on to captive consumers as long as: (i) presents a contracting level between 100% and 105% of its market; (ii) presents a level lower than 100% - being, therefore, exposed to the risk of power purchase subject to the allowance for doubtful accounts, if the condition of involuntary undercontracting is recognized; and (iii) the Distributor presents a level higher than 105% - being, therefore, exposed to the risk of power sale subject to the allowance for doubtful accounts, if the condition of involuntary overcontracting is recognized.
That is, even if distributors determine contracting levels lower or higher than the regulatory limits, there is the assurance of neutrality if it is identified that such violation derives from extraordinary and unforeseen events that are not manageable.
On the other hand, if the violation of the contracting limits derives from voluntary actions, these will be subject to the risk of spot market exposure, which can be advantageous or disadvantageous according to the amount of the difference settlement price (PLD).
In 2016, the distributors experienced a scenario of general overcontracting and most of the companies determined contracting level higher than 105%, arising from economic factors such as the fall of consumption related to the crisis in the country and industry, the allocation of the Assured Power Quota Agreements, and the migration of special consumers to the free market.
F-126
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
As regards industry issues, through Normative Resolution No. 706/2016, a ANEEL recognized as involuntary overcontracting the allocation of assured power quotas of hydro power plants classified under Law No. 783/2013 above the amount of replenishment of the distributors.
To recognize the overcontracting arising from the migration of special consumers to ACL, on 6.27.2016, as a partial result of the Public Hearing 85/2013, Normative Resolution No. 726/2016 was published. On that occasion, ANEEL confirmed the Distributors’ right to return the power not contracted by special consumers, based on Opinions No. 260/2012/PFANEEL/PGF/AGU and 219/2016/PFANEEL/PGF/AGU and Technical Notes NT 66/2012-SEM/ANEEL and NT 46/2016-SRM/ANEEL.
Nevertheless, ANEEL's Collegiate Body established that this possibility would be applicable only to existing power agreements signed after the publication of such resolution, thus following the vote of the Reporting Officer, who justified such proposal based on the principles of legal security and regulatory stability.
However, as it is not subject to Public Hearing and also because it considered such judgment on a general basis inappropriate, ANEEL understood that distributors eventually interested should request individually the recognition of the involuntary exposure, demonstrating the utilization of the other possibilities at their disposal.
Copel DIS put forth all efforts possible, provided for in the regulation, to mitigate the overcontracting generated by the migration of special consumers to the free market and requested from ANEEL that any overcontracting related to this matter was considered as involuntary, mainly based on Opinion No. 219/2016/PFANEEL/PGF/AGU, which explicitly addressed special consumers in article 29, item I, of Decree 5,163/2004.
36.2.9 Gas shortage risk
This risk involves potential periods of shortage of natural gas supply to meet the Company’s gas distribution and thermal generation business requirements
Long periods of gas shortage could result in losses due to lower revenues by subsidiaries Compagas and UEG Araucária.
36.3 Capital management
The Company seeks to maintain a strong capital base to maintain the trust of investors, creditors and market and ensure the future development of the business. Management strives to maintain a balance between the highest possible returns with more adequate levels of loans and the advantages and the assurance afforded by a healthy capital position. Thus, it maximizes the return for all interested parties in its operations, optimizing the balance of debts and equity.
F-127
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The Company monitors capital by using an index represented by adjusted net debt divided by adjusted EBITDA, as presented below. Corporate goal established in strategic planning provides for maintenance of index below 3.5, while any expectation of failing to meet this target will prompt management to take steps to correct its course by the end of each reporting period. As of December 31, 2016, the index performed is shown below:
| 12.31.2016 |
Loans and financing | 4,046,293 |
Debentures | 4,790,809 |
Endorsment and securities | 1,373,064 |
(-) Cash and cash equivalents | (982,073) |
(-)Bonds and securities | (302,398) |
(-)Bonds and securities - held for sale | (188,461) |
(-) Collaterals and escrow accounts STN | (73,074) |
Adjusted net debt | 8,664,160 |
Net income | 947,790 |
Deferred IRPJ and CSLL | (58,754) |
Provision for IRPJ and CSLL | 589,322 |
Financial expenses (income), net | 565,744 |
Depreciation and amortization | 708,296 |
Ebitda | 2,752,398 |
Adjusted net debt / Ebitda | 3.15 |
The equity indebtedness is shown below:
Indebtedness | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Loans and financing | 4,046,293 | 4,077,060 |
Debentures | 4,790,809 | 3,683,928 |
(-) Cash and cash equivalents | 982,073 | 1,480,727 |
(-)Bonds and securities | 302,398 | 406,274 |
Net debt | 7,552,631 | 5,873,987 |
Equity | 15,155,446 | 14,584,478 |
Equity indebtedness | 0.50 | 0.40 |
F-128
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
37 Related Party Transactions
| | Assets | | Liabilities | Revenue | | Cost / Expense |
Related parties / Nature of operation | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Controlling shareholder | | | | | | | | |
State of Paraná - dividends payable | - | - | 83,786 | 96,691 | - | - | - | - |
CRC Transfer (Note 8) | 1,522,735 | 1,383,242 | - | - | 188,918 | 217,722 | - | - |
"Luz Fraterna" Program (a) | 167,674 | 181,348 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
2014 World Cup construction work (Note 15.1.2) | 14,266 | 14,266 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Morar Bem Paraná Program (Note 15.1.3) | 24,985 | 19,482 | - | - | 5,502 | 19,482 | - | - |
Remuneration and employ social security charges assigned (b) | 302 | 407 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Telecommunication services (c) | 48,794 | 42,634 | - | - | 29,763 | 29,456 | - | - |
Entities with significant influence | | | | | | | | |
BNDES and BNDESPAR (d) -dividends payable | - | - | 57,218 | 70,722 | - | - | - | - |
Financing (Note 23) | - | - | 1,692,775 | 1,701,758 | - | - | (149,794) | (120,982) |
Debentures - Compagas (Note 24) | - | - | 61,786 | 56,219 | - | - | (2,883) | (3,347) |
Debentures - wind farms (e) | - | - | 295,188 | - | - | - | (14,415) | - |
State of Paraná investee | | | | | | | | |
Sanepar (c) (f) | 32 | 492 | - | 3 | 3,319 | 2,886 | (1,455) | (1,409) |
Dividends | 16,817 | 6,202 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Joint ventures | | | | | | | | |
Dominó Holdings - dividends | 5,123 | 9,067 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso- mutual (Note 15.2) | 28,968 | 25,237 | - | - | 5,297 | 3,260 | - | - |
Costa Oeste Transmissora de Energia (g) (h) (i) | 72 | - | 73 | 44 | 848 | 726 | (3,072) | (3,815) |
Dividends | 1,751 | 1,783 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Marumbi Transmissora de Energia(g) (i) | 285 | - | 55 | 48 | 4,085 | 1,264 | (900) | (346) |
Dividends | 3,845 | 3,101 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Caiuá Transmissora de Energia(g) (h) (i) | 308 | - | 356 | 154 | 2,066 | 914 | (15,595) | (14,481) |
Dividends | 1,991 | 2,634 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Integração Maranhense Transmissora (g) (i) | - | - | 76 | - | - | - | (1,910) | (1,878) |
Dividends | 4,012 | 4,476 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Matrinchã Transmissora de Energia (g) (i) | - | - | 326 | 55 | - | - | (4,043) | (444) |
Dividends | 23,213 | 8,115 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Transmissora Sul Brasileira (g) (i) | - | - | 149 | 140 | - | - | (3,593) | (2,952) |
GuaraciabaTransmissora de Energia- dividends | 5,512 | 3,930 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Other | 1,246 | 21 | 173 | - | - | - | (1,249) | - |
Associates | | | | | | | | |
Dona Francisca Energética S.A.(j) | - | - | 1,436 | 1,304 | - | - | (16,949) | (30,556) |
Foz do Chopim Energética Ltda. (c) (g) | 161 | - | - | - | 2,178 | 1,913 | - | - |
Sercomtel S.A. Telecomunicações (c) (k) | 2,787 | 236 | - | - | 8,210 | 5,788 | (6) | (6) |
Key management staff | | | | | | | | |
Fees and social security charges (Note 33.2) | - | - | - | - | - | - | (26,021) | (23,839) |
Pension and healthcare plans (Note 25) | - | - | - | - | - | - | (1,403) | (2,380) |
Other related parties | | | | | | | | |
Fundação Copel (c) | 52 | 44 | - | - | 305 | 292 | - | - |
Administrative property rental | - | - | 340 | 688 | - | - | (13,519) | (15,390) |
Pension and healthcare plans (Note 25) | - | - | 769,865 | 594,660 | - | - | - | - |
. | | | | | | | | |
Lactec (l) | - | - | 1,743 | 938 | - | - | (12,911) | (14,752) |
| | | | | | | | |
a) The Luz Fraterna Program, created under Law No. 491/ 2013 and No. 17,639/2013 allows the State Government to pay for the electricity bills of low income families in Paraná – which have duly applied for the program – provided their consumption does not exceed 120 kWh a month. This benefit is available to residential customers with single-phase connections, rural customers with single-phase connections or two-phase connections with circuit breakers of up to 50 amperes. Applicants must not have more than one electricity bill under their names and must not have any pending debts to Copel DIS.
F-129
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
As of August 2016, monthly payments were made in a timely manner, totaling the amount of R$17,085 in 2016, and the possibility of using presumed ICMS credits for the discharge of outstanding invoices related to this program is being evaluated, as fixed in Decree No. 2,789/2015.As of December 31, 2016, the amount of R$115,890 (R$153,300 as of December 31, 2015) is recognized in the Related Parties account as per Note 15.1.1.
b) Reimbursement of wages and social charges for employees transferred to the Paraná State Government. The balances shown are net of allowance for loan losses in the amount of R$1,749 as of December 31, 2016 (R$1,040 as of December 31, 2015).
c) Telecommunications services rendered in accordance with the agreement entered into by Copel Telecomunicações with the State of Paraná.
d) BNDES is the parent company ofBNDESParticipações S.A. (BNDESPAR), which has significant influence over Copel (Note 31.1.1).
e) BNDES and BNDESPAR acquired all the debentures issued by the subsidiaries Nova Asa Branca I, Nova Asa Branca II, Nova Asa Branca III, Nova Eurus IV and Ventos de Santo Uriel (Note 24).
f) Basic sanitation provided by Sanepar.
g) Charges for the use of the Transmission System and revenue from operating and maintenance contracts and rendering of engineering services with Copel GeT.
h) Copel DIS has transmission system connection contracts (CCT) with two companies - Costa Oeste Transmissora de Energia and Caiuá Transmissora de Energia – expiring upon the termination of the distribution or transmission concession, whichever occurs first.
i) Copel DIS Copel Distribuição maintains a Contract for the Use of Transmission System (Cust) with ONS and power transmission concessionaires whose object is the contracting of Transmission System Use Amount (Must). Contracting is permanent and is regulated by Aneel Regulatory Resolution No. 399/2010. Amounts are defined for four subsequent years, with annual reviews.
j) Power purchase and sale agreement signed by Dona Francisca Energética and Copel GeT, expiring on March 31, 2025.
k) Light pole sharing agreement signed between Sercomtel S.A. Telecomunicações and Copel DIS, expiring on December 28, 2018.
l) The Institute of Technology for Development (Lactec) is a Public Interest Civil Society Organization (OSCIP), in which Copel is an associated. Lactec has service and R&D contracts with Copel Geração e Transmissão and Copel Distribuição, which are subject to prior or later control and approval by Aneel.
The asset balances refer to Energy Efficiency and R&D programs, recorded under current assets, in service in progress, until the respective projects are concluded, pursuant to Aneel.
F-130
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
The values resulting from operating activities of Copel DIS with related parties are billed at the rates approved by Aneel.
37.1 Guarantees and endorsements awarded to related parties
Sureties and guarantees granted by Copel to its subsidiaries for financing and debentures are informed in Notes 23 and 24.
Copel provided financial guarantees, in the form of corporate bond, for power purchase agreements made by Copel GeT in May 2015, in the total amount of R$3,052 and made by Copel Energia, in November 2016, in the amount of R$16,406.
Sureties and guarantees granted by Copel and Copel GeT for financing, debentures and insurance contracts of joint ventures are shown below:
| | | | | | | | Amount |
| | | Date | Final | Amount | Balance | Interest | endorsement/ |
| Company | Operation | issued | maturity | approved | 12.31.2016 | % | security |
(1) | Caiuá Transmissora | Financing | 12.23.2013 | 02.15.2029 | 84,600 | 78,020 | 49.0 | 38,230 |
(2) | Costa Oeste Transmissora | Financing | 12.30.2013 | 11.15.2028 | 36,720 | 30,536 | 51.0 | 15,573 |
(3) | Guaraciaba Transmissora | Debentures | 09.28.2016 | 01.15.2031 | 440,000 | 388,456 | 49.0 | 190,343 |
(4) | Integração Maranhense | Financing | 12.30.2013 | 02.15.2029 | 142,150 | 128,920 | 49.0 | 63,171 |
(5) | Mata de Santa Genebra | Debentures | 09.12.2014 | 06.30.2017 | 469,000 | 489,017 | 50.1 | 244,998 |
(6) | Matrinchã Transmissora | Financing | 12.27.2013 | 05.15.2029 | 691,440 | 614,795 | 49.0 | 301,250 |
(7) | Matrinchã Transmissora | Debentures | 05.15.2016 | 06.15.2029 | 180,000 | 185,539 | 49.0 | 90,914 |
(8) | Transmissora Sul Brasileira | Financing | 12.12.2013 | 07.15.2028 | 266,572 | 225,985 | 20.0 | 45,197 |
(9) | Transmissora Sul Brasileira | Debentures | 09.15.2014 | 09.15.2028 | 77,550 | 108,027 | 20.0 | 21,605 |
(10) | Paranaíba Transmissora | Financing | 10.21.2015 | 10.15.2030 | 606,241 | 607,639 | 24.5 | 148,872 |
(11) | Marumbi Transmissora | Financing | 10.06.2014 | 07.15.2029 | 55,037 | 48,361 | 80.0 | 38,689 |
(12) | Voltalia São Miguel do Gostoso Part. S.A. (a) | Debentures | 01.15.2016 | 12.15.2028 | 57,000 | 59,340 | 49.0 | 29,077 |
(13) | Usina de Energia Eólica Carnaúba S.A. (a) | Financing | 08.24.2015 | 11.15.2031 | 74,000 | 59,155 | 49.0 | 28,986 |
(14) | Usina de Energia Eólica Reduto S.A. (a) | Financing | 08.24.2015 | 11.15.2031 | 70,000 | 59,125 | 49.0 | 28,971 |
(15) | Usina de Energia Eólica Santo Cristo S.A. (a) | Financing | 08.24.2015 | 11.15.2031 | 74,000 | 55,869 | 49.0 | 27,376 |
(16) | Usina de Energia Eólica São João S.A. (a) | Financing | 08.24.2015 | 11.15.2031 | 68,000 | 56,367 | 49.0 | 27,620 |
(17) | Cantareira Transmissora de Energia | Credit Note | 11.24.2016 | 02.22.2017 | 150,000 | 65,697 | 49.0 | 32,192 |
(a) Subsidiaries of Voltália São Miguel do Gostoso I Participações S.A. |
Financial institution (fund provider): |
BNDES: (1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (8) (11) (13) (14) (15) (16) |
Allocation: |
Investment Program and/or Working capital. |
Endorsement/Security: |
Provided by Copel Geração e Transmissão: (1) (4) |
Provided by Copel: (2) (3) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) |
Securities offered for the transaction: |
Lien on shares given by Copel Geração e Transmissão, corresponding to: 49% (1) (3) (4) (6) (7) (17); 51% (2); 20% (8) (9); 24,5% (10); 80% (11) |
F-131
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
| | | | |
Performance bond | Final | Amount | % endorsement | Amount |
Company | maturity | Insured | Copel GeT | endorsement |
Matrinchã Transmissora | 02.28.2017 | 90,000 | 49.0 | 44,100 |
Guaraciaba Transmissora | 05.30.2017 | 47,000 | 49.0 | 23,030 |
Paranaíba Transmissora | 06.28.2017 | 48,000 | 24.5 | 11,760 |
Mata de Santa Genebra | 05.26.2018 | 78,300 | 50.1 | 39,228 |
Cantareira Transmissora | 11.30.2018 | 31,200 | 49.0 | 15,288 |
38 Insurance
Details by risk type and effectiveness date of the main policies can be seen below.
| Term Of validity
| Insured amount |
|
Nominated Risks | 08.24.2017 | 2,112,196 |
Operational risks - HPP Mauá - Consórcio Energético Cruzeiro do Sul | 11.23.2017 | 799,290 |
Operational risks - UEG Araucária (a) | 05.31.2017 | 714,564 |
Operational risks - Brisa Potiguar | 12.29.2017 | 674,673 |
Fire - Company-owned and rented facilities | 08.24.2017 | 521,931 |
Operational risks - São Bento | 12.29.2017 | 449,928 |
Legal guarantee - Office of the General Counsel to the National Treasury | 05.11.2018 | 291,396 |
Multi-risk - Elejor | 03.11.2017 | 197,800 |
D&O Insurance (a) | 03.28.2017 | 81,478 |
Aviation insurance (hull and civil liability) (a) | 01.30.2018 | 79,729 |
(a) The values of the insured of operating risks - UEG Araucária and Seguro Aeronáutico have been translated from USD into BRL, with the current rate R$3.2591, as of 12.31.2016. |
| | |
In addition to the related insurance, the Company and its subsidiaries contract other insurance policies with lower values, such as: general civil liability, payment guarantee, several risks, national and international transportation and life insurance.
The guarantee insurance contracted by the subsidiaries and joint ventures have Copel as a guarantor, within the limits of their participation in each project.
39 Subsequent Events
39.1 Bank Credit Note- CCB,of Banco do Brasil
On February 24, 2010, Copel raised R$77,000 through a Bank Credit Note issued by Banco do Brasil, with a payment of 124.5% of the average daily rates of Interbank Deposits - DI, with semiannual interest payments, term of 3 years and amortization in the second and third years.
F-132
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
39.2 Related party guarantees
39.2.1 Cantareira Transmissora de Energia S.A.
In January 2017, BNDES made the first release of financial resources, in the amount of R$285,000, from the long-term financing contracted in December 2016, for the implementation of the transmission line between Ibiraci/MG and Fernão Dias/SP, with 328 Km, by the Cantareira Transmissora de Energia. The financial support will be through the BNDES Finem financing agreement, with a total amount of R$426,833, with a term of 14 years, remunerated by the TJLP variation, plus 2.12% pa, and monthly amortizations as of 10.15.2018. The following guarantees were provided: (i) the Concession Agreement; (ii) the shares of the SPE; (iii) contracts for the provision of energy transmission services; and (iv) a bank guarantee, with counter-guarantee from Copel, proportional to Copel GeT's ownership interest in the project, from 49%.
39.2.2 Paranaíba Transmissora de Energia S.A.
On March 17, 2012, Paranaíba Transmissora de Energia concluded the issuance of simple debentures, pursuant to article 2 of Law No. 12,431, dated June 24, 2011 ("Infrastructure Debentures"), not convertible into shares, for public offering of distribution with restricted placement efforts under CVM Instruction No. 476/2009, in the total amount of R$120,000. 120,000 debentures were issued, with a nominal unit value of R$1 (one real), with a term of 11 years and 2 months, amortization and semi-annual interest, as of 09.15.2017. The debentures will be remunerated with interest corresponding to the variation of the IPCA, plus a surcharge of 6.9045% per year. The following guarantees were provided: (i) the Concession Agreement; (ii) the shares of the SPE; (iii) contracts for the provision of energy transmission services; and (iv) corporate bonds of the shareholders, proportional to their participation (24.5% of Copel GeT's interest). The funds raised will be allocated to the implementation of the enterprise.
40 Condensed unconsolidated financial information of CompanhiaParanaense de Energia – Copel
Since the condensed unconsolidated financial information required by Rule 12-04 of Regulation S-X is not required under IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board - IASB, such information was not included in the original financial statements filed with the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commissions – CVM in March 28, 2017. In order to attend the specific requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), Management has included the condensed unconsolidated information in these financial statements as part of the Form 20-F. The condensed unconsolidated financial information of Companhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel, as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for each of the two years in the period ending on December 31, 2016, presented herein were prepared considering the same accounting policies as described in Note 3 and 4 to Company’s consolidated financial statements.
F-133
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
(a) Condensed statements of financial position as of December 31, 2016 and 2015
ASSETS | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Current assets | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 46,096 | 25,653 |
Bonds and securities | 149 | 168 |
Collaterals and escrow accounts | 128 | 132 |
Dividends receivable | 485,263 | 488,187 |
CRC transferred to the State Government of Paraná | - | 111,663 |
Other current receivables | 8,736 | 13,018 |
Income tax and social contribution | 41,899 | 154,077 |
Other current recoverable taxes | 197 | - |
Receivable from related parties | 116,020 | 447 |
| 698,488 | 793,345 |
Noncurrent assets | | |
Other temporary investments | 408,297 | - |
CRC transferred to the State Government of Paraná | 1,522,735 | 1,271,579 |
Judicial deposits | 153,932 | 267,411 |
Income tax andsocialcontribution | 153,216 | 79,144 |
Deferred tax assets | 47,462 | 100,919 |
Other noncurrent recoverable taxes | 15 | 15 |
Receivables from Related parties | 220,661 | 297,237 |
| 2,506,318 | 2,016,305 |
| | |
Investments | 14,111,959 | 14,140,573 |
Property, Plant and Equipment | 630 | 455 |
Intangible Assets | 3,168 | 3,046 |
| | |
TOTAL ASSETS | 17,320,563 | 16,953,724 |
| | |
LIABILITIES | 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Current liabilities | | |
Payroll, social charges and accruals | 5,573 | 15,436 |
Suppliers | 2,225 | 2,602 |
Other taxes due | 412 | 32,617 |
Loans and financing | 453,288 | 61,788 |
Debentures | 351,148 | 19,497 |
Dividends payable | 256,426 | 310,020 |
Post employment benefits | 188 | 21 |
Other accounts payable | 579 | 232 |
| 1,069,839 | 442,213 |
Noncurrent liabilities | | |
Other taxes due | 2,075 | 1,466 |
Loans and financing | 562,072 | 969,412 |
Debentures | 665,951 | 996,590 |
Post employment benefits | 3,517 | 7,795 |
Provision for Legal claims | 152,944 | 290,520 |
| 1,386,559 | 2,265,783 |
Equity | | |
Capital | 7,910,000 | 6,910,000 |
Equity valuation adjustments | 998,466 | 1,177,372 |
Legal reserve | 792,716 | 744,784 |
Profit retention reserve | 5,162,983 | 5,413,572 |
| 14,864,165 | 14,245,728 |
| | |
Total liabilities and equity | 17,320,563 | 16,953,724 |
| | |
F-134
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
(b) Condensed statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
Operational expenses / income | | | |
General and administrative expenses | (107,761) | (123,717) | (119,639) |
Other operational income (expenses) | 231,651 | (3,586) | (20,569) |
Equity in earnings of investees | 902,731 | 1,385,624 | 1,410,276 |
| 1,026,621 | 1,258,321 | 1,270,068 |
| | | |
Operating income before financial results and taxes | 1,026,621 | 1,258,321 | 1,270,068 |
| | | |
Financial results | | | |
Financial income | 321,056 | 245,347 | 202,208 |
Financial expenses | (334,113) | (314,101) | (233,762) |
| (13,057) | (68,754) | (31,554) |
| | | |
Operating profit before income tax and social contribution | 1,013,564 | 1,189,567 | 1,238,514 |
| | | |
Income tax and social contribution | | | |
Current | (4,882) | (217) | (38,258) |
Deferred | (50,032) | 3,388 | 5,694 |
| (54,914) | 3,171 | (32,564) |
| | | |
Net income | 958,650 | 1,192,738 | 1,205,950 |
| | | |
Basic and diluted net earning per share attributed to parent company shareholders -Expressed in brazilian reais | | | |
Class A preferred shares | 3.6805 | 4.5781 | 4.6295 |
Class B preferred shares | 3.6805 | 4.5692 | 4.6299 |
Common shares | 3.3459 | 4.1629 | 4.2090 |
| | | |
(c) Condensed statements of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
NET INCOME | 958,650 | 1,192,738 | 1,205,950 |
Other comprehensive income | | | |
Items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss | | | |
Gain (losses) on actuarial liabilities | | | |
Post employment benefits | 6,460 | 2,050 | (3,712) |
Post employment benefits - equity | (63,913) | 289,082 | 94,425 |
Taxes on other comprehensive income | (2,196) | (696) | 1,262 |
Items that are or maybe reclassified to profit or loss | | | |
Adjustments related to financial assets classified as available for sale: | 3,612 | 412 | 517 |
Other adjustments - subsidiary | - | - | (1,282) |
Taxes on other comprehensive income | (1,229) | 1 | 65 |
Total comprehensive income, net of taxes | (57,266) | 290,849 | 91,275 |
| | | |
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | 901,384 | 1,483,587 | 1,297,225 |
|
F-135
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
(d) Condensed statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
| | | |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 | 12.31.2014 |
| | | |
Net cash generated from operating activities | 1,905,189 | 1,455,819 | 1,031,444 |
| | | |
Cash flow from investing activities | | | |
Bonds and securities | 23 | (148) | 34 |
Loans and financing granted to related parties | (87,272) | (36,800) | - |
Receipt of loans and financing granted to related parties | 5,112 | 15,359 | - |
Additions to investments | (1,489,563) | (1,235,576) | (827,437) |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (224) | (134) | (294) |
Additions to intangible | (122) | (292) | (14,887) |
| | | |
Net cash generated from (used in) investing activities | (1,572,046) | (1,257,591) | (842,584) |
| | | |
Cash flow from financing activities | | | |
Loans and financing obtained from third parties | - | 640,005 | - |
Issue of Debentures | - | - | 1,000,000 |
Amortization of principal - loans and financing | (6,000) | (606,000) | (80,600) |
Amortization of principal - liabilities with related parties | - | - | (468,317) |
Dividends and interestonown capital paid | (306,700) | (241,442) | (615,491) |
| | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | (312,700) | (207,437) | (164,408) |
| | | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 20,443 | (9,209) | 24,452 |
| | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 25,653 | 34,862 | 10,410 |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | 46,096 | 25,653 | 34,862 |
| | | |
During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we received R$2,006,220 and R$1,738,989, respectively, from dividends and interest on own capital paid by our investees. Additional disclosures relating to Companhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel unconsolidated condensed financial information presented above are as follows:
•Related Parties: The Company has the following balances outstanding with related parties:
| | |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Noncurrent assets | | |
Estado do Paraná | 130,156 | 167,566 |
Copel Distribuição | 90,640 | 104,434 |
Copel Telecomunicações | 85,421 | - |
Voltalia | 28,968 | 25,237 |
Copel Renováveis | 955 | 312 |
Copel Energia | 541 | 135 |
| 336,681 | 297,684 |
| | |
F-136
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
• Investments - As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, investments in subsidiaries are comprised as follows:
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Copel Geração e Transmissão | 8,060,462 | 6,905,421 |
Copel Distribuição | 4,827,098 | 5,603,673 |
Copel Telecomunicações | 446,155 | 508,874 |
Copel Energia | 269,870 | 252,074 |
UEG Araucária | 120,552 | 171,648 |
Compagas | 152,811 | 150,818 |
Other investments | 99,084 | 84,959 |
| 13,976,032 | 13,677,467 |
| | |
The information regarding joint ventures, associates and other investments are presented in note 18.1 – Changes in investments.
• Dividends receivable - The dividends receivable are comprised as follows:
| | |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Investees and subsidiaries | | |
Copel Geração e Transmissão | 261,686 | 292,813 |
Copel Distribuição | 149,500 | 133,950 |
Copel Telecomunicações | 28,910 | - |
Copel Comercialização | 6,763 | 3,815 |
Compagas | 600 | 2,794 |
Elejor | 8,596 | 23,865 |
UEG Araucária | 6,143 | 23,072 |
Nova Asa Branca I | 114 | 114 |
Nova Asa Branca II | 157 | 157 |
Nova Asa Branca III | 75 | 75 |
Nova Eurus IV | 48 | 48 |
Santa Maria | 186 | 186 |
Santa Helena | 214 | 214 |
Ventos de Santo Uriel | 235 | 235 |
| | |
Joint Ventures | | |
Voltália | 1,032 | 128 |
| | |
Other investments | | |
Sanepar | 20,275 | 6,202 |
Other investments | 729 | 519 |
| 485,263 | 488,187 |
| | |
• Provisions for risks - Companhia Paranaense de Energia - Copel recognized provisions for risks mainly related to Cofins and PIS/PASEP. The provisions for risks are shown below:
| | |
| 12.31.2016 | 12.31.2015 |
Regulatory | 15,121 | 14,109 |
Labor | 18 | 29 |
Civil | 20,578 | 5,652 |
Tax Claim | 117,227 | 270,730 |
| 152,944 | 290,520 |
| | |
F-137
COMPANHIA PARANAENSE DE ENERGIA – COPEL and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
All amounts expressed in thousands of Brazilian reais, unless otherwise stated
Restriction of transfer of funds from subsidiaries - The subsidiaries described below qualify as either concessionaires of public services or independent power producers. As such, any transfer of funds to the respective parent company, in the form of loans or advances, requires approval by ANEEL. This regulatory restriction does not apply to cash dividends determined in accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law.
In addition, Copel G&T has certain financing agreements with the Brazilian National Development Bank (“BNDES”) under which BNDES approval is required for Copel G&T to pay cash dividends exceeding 30% of its net profit. Since BNDES has always approved Copel G&T’s requests to pay cash dividends in excess of 30% of its net profit and this restriction has not affected Copel G&T’s ability to pay cash dividends or parent company’s ability to meet its cash obligations, management deemed it to be a perfunctory clause.
As of December 31, 2016, total restricted subsidiaries net assets amount to R$13,570,024composed as follows:
| |
| 12.31.2016 |
Copel Geração e Transmissão S.A. | 8,060,462 |
Copel Distribuição S.A. | 4,827,098 |
UEG Araucária Ltda. | 602,763 |
Centrais Elétricas Rio Jordão - Elejor | 79,701 |
| 13,570,024 |
| |
F-138