Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates The accompanying consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of CymaBay and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company has no unconsolidated subsidiaries or investments accounted for under the equity method. These consolidated statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), which requires management to make informed estimates and assumptions that impact the amounts and disclosures reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period amounts to conform to the current year presentation. “Prepaid research and development expenses” and “Other prepaid expenses”, which previously were reported as “Prepaid expenses” on the consolidated balance sheet, are now reported as separate line items. Accounting estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The estimation process often may yield a range of potentially reasonable estimates of the ultimate future outcomes, and management must select an amount that falls within that range of reasonable estimates. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates and assumptions. The Company believes a higher level of Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company’s financial instruments during the periods reported consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses. Fair value estimates of these instruments are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information. These estimates may be subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment. The carrying amounts of financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and accrued interest payable approximate the related fair values due to the short maturities of these instruments. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value are reported using a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy maximizes the use of observable inputs and maximizes the use of unobservable inputs and is as follows: Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3—Inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement and are unobservable (i.e. supported by little market activity), which requires the reporting entity to develop its own valuation techniques and assumptions. The following tables present the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the above input categories (in thousands): As of December 31, 2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Cash equivalents: Money market funds $ 18,597 $ — $ — $ 18,597 Total cash equivalents 18,597 — — 18,597 Short-term investments: U.S. and foreign commercial paper — 51,102 — 51,102 U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities — 56,729 — 56,729 Asset-backed securities — 39,788 — 39,788 U.S. treasury securities — 18,457 — 18,457 Total short-term investments — 166,076 — 166,076 Total assets measured at fair value $ 18,597 $ 166,076 $ — $ 184,673 As of December 31, 2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Cash equivalents: Money market funds $ 39,481 $ — $ — $ 39,481 U.S. and foreign commercial paper — 6,469 — 6,469 Total cash equivalents 39,481 6,469 — 45,950 Short-term investments: U.S. and foreign commercial paper — 51,627 — 51,627 U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities — 34,634 — 34,634 Asset-backed securities — 25,472 — 25,472 U.S. treasury securities — 17,936 — 17,936 Total short-term investments — 129,669 — 129,669 Total assets measured at fair value $ 39,481 $ 136,138 $ — $ 175,619 The Company estimates the fair value of its money market funds , corporate debt, asset backed securities, c o aper . There were no transfers between fair value measurement levels for any periods presented. Historically, the Company held a Level 3 liability associated with common stock warrants that were issued in connection with the Company’s financings completed in September and October 2013, January 2014, and August 2015. The warrants were accounted for as liabilities until either they were exercised or expired in September 2018 The following tables set forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Company’s liabilities measured using Level 3 inputs (in thousands): Year Ended 2019 2018 Balance, beginning of period $ — $ 6,091 Change in fair value — 3,710 Settlement of financial instruments — (9,379 ) Extinguishment of financial instruments — (422 ) Balance, end of period $ — $ — See Note 3 for further discussion regarding the carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments. Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Marketable Securities The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original The Company invests excess cash in marketable securities with high credit ratings that are classified in Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. These securities consist primarily of corporate debt, commercial paper, asset-backed securities, and U.S. treasury securities and are classified as “available-for-sale.” Realized gains and losses from the sale of marketable securities, if any, are calculated using the specific-identification method. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than- temporary are included in interest income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Unrealized holding gains and losses are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets. To date, the Company has not recorded any impairment charges on its marketable securities related to other-than-temporary declines in market value. In determining whether a decline in market value is other-than-temporary, various factors are considered, including the cause, duration of time and severity of the impairment, any adverse changes in the investees’ financial condition, and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in market value. Concentration of Credit Risk Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities consist of financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk to the extent of the fair value recorded on the balance sheet. The Company invests cash that is not required for immediate operating needs primarily in highly liquid instruments that bear minimal risk. The Company has established guidelines relating to the quality, diversification, and maturities of securities to enable the Company to manage its credit risk. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of a default by the financial institutions holding its cash, cash equivalents and investments and issuers of investments to the extent recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. Certain materials and key components that the Company utilizes in its operations are obtained through single suppliers. Since the suppliers of key components and materials must be named in an NDA filed with the FDA for a product, significant delays can occur if the qualification of a new supplier is required. If delivery of material from the Company’s suppliers were interrupted for any reason, the Company may be unable to supply any of its product candidates for clinical trials. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method, and the costs are amortized over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, generally three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful lives or the non-cancelable Long-Lived Assets The Company reviews the carrying value long-lived assets, including right-of-use Leases The Company has one lease, a non-cancelable Subsequent to the adoption of the new leasing standard on January 1, 2019, the Company recognizes a lease asset for its right to use the underlying asset and a lease liability for the corresponding lease obligation. The Company determines whether an arrangement is or contains a lease at contract inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use right-of-use The operating lease right-of-use non-lease non-lease Research and Development Expenses Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred in identifying, developing, and testing product candidates. These expenses consist primarily of costs for research and development personnel, including related stock-based compensation; contract research organizations (CRO) and other third parties that assist in managing, monitoring, and analyzing clinical trials; investigator and site fees; laboratory services; consultants; contract manufacturing services; non-clinical The Company records expenses related to clinical studies and manufacturing development activities based on its estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to contracts with multiple CROs and manufacturing vendors that conduct and manage these activities on its behalf. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation, vary from contract to contract, and may result in uneven payment flows. There may be instances in which payments made to the Company’s vendors will exceed the level of services provided and result in a prepayment of the expense. Payments under some of these contracts depend on factors such as the successful enrollment of subjects and the completion of clinical trial milestones. In amortizing or accruing service fees, the Company estimates the time period over which services will be performed, enrollment of subjects, number of sites activated and the level of effort to be expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from the Company’s estimate, the Company will adjust the accrued or prepaid expense balance accordingly. To date, there have been no material differences from the Company’s estimates to the amounts actually incurred. Restructuring Charges The Company recognizes restructuring charges related to reorganization plans that have been committed to by management and when , , One-time employee termination benefits are recognized in their entirety when communication has occurred and future services are not required. If future services are required, the costs are recorded ratably over the remaining period of service. Contract termination costs to be incurred over the remaining contract term without economic benefit are recorded in their entirety when the contract is canceled. The recognition of restructuring charges requires the Company to make certain judgments and estimates regarding the nature, timing and amount of costs associated with the planned reorganization plan. To the extent the Company’s actual results differ from its estimates and assumptions, the Company may be required to revise the estimates of future accrued restructuring liabilities, requiring the recognition of additional restructuring charges or the reduction of accrued restructuring liabilities already recognized. Such changes to previously estimated amounts may be material to the consolidated financial statements. Changes in the estimates of the restructuring charges are recorded in the period the change is determined. At the end of each reporting period, the Company evaluates the remaining accrued restructuring balances to ensure that no excess accruals are retained, and the utilization of the provisions are for their intended purpose in accordance with developed restructuring plans. Stock-Based Compensation Employee and director stock-based compensation is measured at fair value on the grant date of the award. Compensation cost is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for options and on an accelerated basis for stock options with performance conditions, net of estimated forfeitures. For stock options with performance conditions, the Company evaluates the probability of achieving performance conditions at each reporting date. The Company begins to recognize the expense when it is deemed probable that the performance conditions will be met. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock option awards. The determination of fair value for stock-based awards using an option-pricing model requires management to make certain assumptions regarding subjective input variables such as expected term, dividends, volatility and risk-free rate. The Company is also required to make estimates as to the probability of achieving the specific performance criteria. If actual results are not consistent with the Company’s assumptions and judgments used in making these estimates, the Company may be required to increase or decrease compensation expense, which could be material to the Company’s results of operations. Equity awards granted to non-employees 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation Common Stock Warrant Liabilities Historically, the Company’s outstanding common stock warrants issued in connection with certain equity and debt financings that occurred in 2013 through 2015 were classified as liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets because of certain contractual terms that preclude equity classification. All outstanding warrants related to these financings had been exercised or had expired by September 30, 2018. Upon expiration, the remaining fair value of the liability was extinguished and credited to other (expense) income, net in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. Prior to expiration, the Company estimated the fair value of common stock warrants at each reporting period until the exercise of the warrants, at which time the liability was revalued and reclassified to stockholders’ equity. The determination of fair value of these common stock warrants required management to make certain assumptions regarding subjective input variables such as timing, probability and valuation impact of certain potential strategic events, expected term, dividends, expected volatility and risk-free interest rates. Income Taxes The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that all or part of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. When the Company establishes or reduces the valuation allowance related to the deferred tax assets, the provision for income taxes will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made. The accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute criteria for the financial recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. The Company is required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States. The preparation of these income tax returns requires the Company to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect that could affect the amount of tax paid to these jurisdictions. The Company records interest related to income tax reserves, if any, as interest expense, and any penalties would be recorded as other expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. There was no interest or penalties related to income tax reserves during the years ended December 31, 2019 or 2018. Comprehensive Loss Comprehensive loss includes net loss and net unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities, which are presented in a single continuous statement. Other comprehensive (loss) gain is also disclosed in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of stockholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and is stated net of related tax effects, if any. Net Loss Per Common Share Basic net loss per share of common stock is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding equivalents during the period. Diluted net loss per share of common stock is calculated as the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding adjusted to include the assumed exercises of stock options and common stock warrants, if dilutive. The calculation of diluted loss per share also requires that, to the extent the average market price of the underlying shares for the reporting period exceeds the exercise price of the common stock warrants and the presumed exercise of such securities are dilutive to earnings (loss) per share for the period, adjustments to net income or net loss used in the calculation are required to remove the change in fair value of the common stock warrant liability for the period. Likewise, adjustments to the denominator are required to reflect the related dilutive shares. In all periods presented, the Company’s outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of net loss per share because the effect would be antidilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except share and per share amounts): Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 Numerator: Net loss allocated to common stock—basic $ (102,808 ) $ (72,548 ) Adjustment for revaluation and extinguishment of common stock warrants — (422 ) Net loss allocated to common stock—diluted $ (102,808 ) $ (72,970 ) Denominator: Weighted average number of common stock shares outstanding—basic 67,033,046 57,808,254 Dilutive securities: Common stock warrants — 30,045 Weighted average number of common stock shares outstanding—diluted 67,033,046 57,838,299 Net loss per share—basic $ (1.53 ) $ (1.25 ) Net loss per share—diluted $ (1.53 ) $ (1.26 ) The following table shows the total outstanding securities considered anti-dilutive and therefore excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share (in thousands): Year Ended 2019 2018 Common stock options 6,727 5,593 Incentive awards 101 130 Total 6,828 5,723 Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements ASU 2016-02 2018-11 In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). right-of-use O 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842) Targeted Improvements The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach and elected the package of practical expedients permitted under transition guidance, which allowed the Company to carry forward its historical assessments of: 1) whether contracts are or contain leases, 2) lease classification and 3) initial direct costs. The Company did not elect the practical expedient allowing the use-of-hindsight The adoption of this standard resulted in the recognition of a ROU asset and lease liabilities of $0.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively, and the derecognition of the deferred rent balance of $2.3 million as of January 1, 2019. The adoption of the standard had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss or to its cash flows from or used in operating, financing, or investing activities on its condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. No cumulative-effect adjustment within accumulated deficit was required to be recorded as a result of adopting this standard. ASU 2018-08 On January 1, 2019 the Company adopted ASU No. 2018-08, Not-For-Profit Clarifying the Scope and the Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made 2018-08), 2018-08 Not-for-Profit Entities ASU 2018-07 On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation non-employees – non-employees non-employees Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements ASU 2018-18 In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-18, Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606 ASU 2018-15 In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract internal-use ASU 2018-13 In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, ( ): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement ASU In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments available-for-sale securities be recorded as an allowance through net income rather than reducing the carrying amount under the current, other-than-temporary-impairment model. In November 2019, FASB issued ASU No. 2019-10, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Leases (Topic 842) |