Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2012 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Description of Business |
Dot Hill Systems Corp (referred to herein as Dot Hill, we, our or us) is a provider of software and hardware storage systems for the entry and mid-range storage markets for organizations requiring high reliability, high performance networked storage and data management solutions in an open systems architecture. Our storage solutions consist of integrated hardware, firmware and software products employing a modular system that allows end-users to add various capacity or data protection schemes as needed. Our broad range of products, from medium capacity standalone storage units to complete multi-terabyte storage area networks, or SANs, provide end-users with a cost-effective means of addressing increasing storage demands without sacrificing performance. |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. |
2010 and 2011 amounts in our consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted for discontinued operations. See Note 4. |
Principles of Consolidation |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Foreign Currency Translation |
For our foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is the local currency, assets and liabilities are translated into United States dollars at period-end exchange rates. Revenues and expenses, and gains and losses, are translated at rates of exchange that approximate the rates in effect on the transaction date. Resulting translation gains and losses are recognized as a component of other comprehensive loss. |
For our foreign subsidiaries that maintain their books of record in a currency other than the functional currency, the subsidiaries remeasure monetary assets and liabilities using current rates of exchange at the balance sheet date and remeasure non-monetary assets and liabilities using historical rates of exchange. Gains and losses from remeasurement for such subsidiaries are recognized currently in income as a component of general and administrative expenses. |
Foreign currency translation adjustments comprise the entire amount of our accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2011 and 2012. We incurred foreign currency transaction losses of $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and foreign currency transaction gains of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. |
Use of Accounting Estimates |
The preparation of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting periods. The accounting estimates that require management’s most significant and subjective judgments include revenue recognition, inventory valuation, recurring and specific issue warranty obligations (see Note 7), the valuation and recognition of stock-based compensation expense, and the valuation of long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangibles, as well as any other assets and liabilities acquired and accounted for under the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. In addition, we have other accounting policies that involve estimates such as the determination of useful lives of long-lived assets, the accruals for restructuring, and income taxes, including the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. Actual results may differ from these estimates and such differences could be material. |
Revenue Recognition |
We derive our revenue from sales of our hardware products, software and services. |
Hardware |
Hardware product revenue consists of revenue from sales of our AssuredSAN storage systems which is integrated with industry standard hardware which is essential to the functionality of the integrated system product. We recognize hardware product revenue when the following fundamental criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred; (iii) the price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized for hardware product sales upon transfer of title and risk of loss to the customer and in addition, upon installation for certain of our AssuredUVS appliance products. We record reductions to revenue for estimated product returns and pricing adjustments in the same period that the related revenue is recorded. These estimates are based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo data and other factors known at the time. If actual future returns and pricing adjustments differ from past experience and our estimates, additional revenue reserves may be required. |
Software |
In accordance with the specific guidance for recognizing software revenue, where applicable, we recognize revenue from perpetual software licenses at the inception of the license term assuming all revenue recognition criteria have been met. We use the relative method to allocate revenue to software licenses at the inception of the license term when vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, of fair value for all unspecified software updates and enhancements related to our products through service contracts is available. We have established VSOE for the fair value of our support services as measured by the stated renewal prices paid by our customers when the services are sold separately on a standalone basis. |
Specific long term software contracts may contain multiple deliverables including software licenses, services, training and post-contract support for which we have not established VSOE of fair value of any of the elements. Under specific guidance for recognizing software revenue, we begin recognizing revenue upon the delivery of all the elements except post-contract support (PCS). We defer all the direct and incremental costs related to the deliverables in these contracts until delivery of all the elements except PCS. The deferred revenue and costs are amortized over the contractual PCS support periods. |
During the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 and the accounting analysis for the renewal of a long-term software contract, the Company determined that it had applied an inappropriate revenue recognition methodology in 2010 and 2011 to the contract. The Company recorded revenue as royalty payments were received on this contract and should have deferred all the revenue and direct and incremental costs until all the deliverables, except PCS, were delivered in 2012. |
This resulted in an overstatement of $1.4 million of revenue and $1.2 million of costs in 2010, and an overstatement of $2.8 million of revenue and $1.9 million of costs in 2011. This was corrected in the fourth quarter of 2012, and the net out-of-period impact of these adjustments was $1.1 million, consisting of a reduction of revenue and research and development costs of $4.2 million and $3.1 million, respectively. |
Service |
Our service revenue primarily includes out-of-warranty repairs and product maintenance contracts. Out-of warranty repairs primarily consist of product repair services performed by our contract manufacturers for those customers that allowed their original product warranty to expire without purchasing one of our higher level support service plans. Revenue from these out-of-warranty repairs, and the associated cost of sales, is recognized in the period these services are provided. Service revenue also consists of product maintenance contracts purchased by our customers as an extension of our standard warranty. Revenue from our product maintenance contracts is deferred and recognized ratably over the contract term, generally 12 to 36 months. Net revenue derived from services was less than 10% of total revenue for all periods presented. |
Revenue Recognition for Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables |
For multi-element arrangements that include hardware products containing software essential to the hardware product’s functionality, undelivered software elements that relate to the hardware product’s essential software, and undelivered non-software services, we allocate revenue to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, we use a hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for allocating revenue to deliverables: (i) VSOE of fair value, (ii) third-party evidence of selling price, or TPE, and (iii) best estimate of the selling price, or ESP. VSOE generally exists only when we sell the deliverable separately and represents the actual price charged by us for that deliverable. ESPs reflect our best estimates of what the selling prices of elements would be if they were sold regularly on a standalone basis. |
From time to time, we enter into arrangements with customers that include acceptance criteria. In such instances, we defer all revenue on the arrangement until customer acceptance is obtained or the acceptance clause lapses. |
Revenue Recognition for Sales to Channel Partners |
On sales to channel partners, we evaluate whether fees are considered fixed or determinable by considering a number of factors, including our ability to estimate returns, payment terms and our relationship and past history with the particular channel partner. If fees are not considered fixed or determinable at the time of sale to a channel partner, revenue recognition is deferred until there is persuasive evidence indicating the product has sold through to an end-user. Persuasive evidence of sell-through may include reports from channel partners documenting sell-through activity or data indicating an order has shipped to an end-user. |
Deferred Revenue |
We defer revenue on upfront nonrefundable payments from our customers and recognize it ratably over the term of the agreement, unless the payment is in exchange for products delivered that represent the culmination of a separate earnings process. When we provide consideration to a customer, we recognize the value of that consideration as a reduction in net revenue. We may be required to maintain inventory with certain of our largest OEM customers, which we refer to as hubbing arrangements. Pursuant to these arrangements we deliver products to a customer or a designated third-party warehouse based upon the customer’s projected needs, but do not recognize product revenue unless and until the customer has removed our product from the warehouse to incorporate into its end products. |
We report taxes collected from customers on behalf of governmental authorities on a net basis (excluded from revenues). |
Advertising Costs |
We expense advertising costs in the period incurred. Advertising expense is included as a component of sales and marketing expense. Advertising expense was $1.1 million, $1.2 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. |
Shipping and Handling |
Cost related to the shipping and handling of our products is included in cost of goods sold for all periods presented. |
Research and Development |
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. In conjunction with the development of our products, we incur certain software development costs. No costs have been capitalized because the period between achieving technological feasibility and completion of such software is relatively short and software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been insignificant. |
Stock-Based Compensation |
Stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted is determined based on the grant-date fair value. We recognize these compensation costs net of an estimated forfeiture rate, and recognize compensation cost only for those shares expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting term of the share-based payment awards. We estimate forfeiture rates based on our historical experience. |
Income Taxes |
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year the differences are expected to reverse. We record a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
We classify investments as cash equivalents if they are readily convertible to cash and have average maturities of three months or less at the time of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of mutual money market funds issued or managed in the United States. At December 31, 2011 and 2012, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short period of time to maturity. |
As of December 31, 2012, $4.5 million of the $40.3 million of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities was held by our foreign subsidiaries. If these funds are needed for our operations in the U.S., we will be required to accrue and pay U.S. taxes to repatriate these funds. However, our intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside of the U.S. and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate them to fund our U.S. operations. |
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Property and equipment are depreciated for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: machinery and equipment, furniture, fixtures and computer software, 3-5 years; leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the useful lives of the assets or the terms of the leases. Significant improvements to our property and equipment are capitalized while expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense in the period incurred. |
The components of property and equipment consist of the following as of December 31, (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2011 | | 2012 | | | | | | |
Machinery and equipment | 11,577 | | | 14,810 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Furniture, fixtures, and computer software | 854 | | | 1,159 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | 1,034 | | | 1,926 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Construction in progress | 855 | | | 909 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total property and equipment, at cost | 14,320 | | | 18,804 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Less accumulated depreciation | (9,348 | ) | | (11,657 | ) | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | 4,972 | | | 7,147 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Depreciation expense was $1.8 million, $2.2 million and $2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. |
Concentration of Customers and Suppliers |
A majority of our net revenue is derived from a limited number of customers. We currently have two customers that account for more than 10% of our total net revenue: Hewlett Packard, or HP, and Tektronix, Inc., or Tektronix. Our agreements with our original equipment manufacturers, or OEM, partners do not contain any minimum purchase commitments, do not obligate our OEM partners to purchase their storage solutions exclusively from us and may be terminated at any time upon notice from the applicable partner. |
Net revenue by major customer is as follows (as a percentage of total net revenue): |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2010 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | | |
HP | 57 | % | | 74 | % | | 68 | % | | | |
NetApp, Inc. | 26 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | | |
Tektronix | — | % | | 6 | % | | 10 | % | | | |
Other customers less than 10% | 17 | % | | 20 | % | | 22 | % | | | |
Total | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | | |
HP continues to account for a significant percentage of our sales. If our relationship with HP were disrupted or declined significantly, we would lose a substantial portion of our anticipated net revenue and our business could be materially harmed. We cannot guarantee that our relationship with HP or our other customers will expand or not otherwise be disrupted. |
At December 31, 2011, our accounts receivable from HP were $22.3 million comprising 70% of our total accounts receivable. At December 31, 2012, our accounts receivable from HP were $17.0 million comprising 68% of our total accounts receivable. No other customer balance exceeded 10% of our total accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2011 or 2012. |
We expect that the sale of our products to a limited number of customers will continue to account for a high percentage of net revenue for the foreseeable future. On October 31, 2011, we amended the Product Purchase Agreement originally entered into with HP on September 10, 2007 (the Amendment). The Amendment extends the agreement with HP for a five-year period through October 30, 2016. In addition, the Amendment provides that we will continue to comply with the contractually required cost reduction process and to support HP with respect to certain products or statements of work upon any assignment of the agreement for a specified period of time. The Amendment does not contain any minimum purchase commitments by HP. Simultaneously with the extension of the Product Purchase Agreement, we agreed to extend until October 30, 2016 the expiration date of the warrant previously issued to HP to purchase 1,602,489 shares of our common stock at the original exercise price of $2.40 per share. |
We currently rely on a limited number of contract manufacturing partners to produce substantially all of our products. As a result, should any of our current manufacturing partners, such as Foxconn Technology Group, or parts suppliers not produce and deliver inventory for us to sell on a timely basis, operating results may be adversely impacted. |
Long-lived asset impairment |
We periodically review the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. An impairment in the carrying value of an asset group is recognized whenever anticipated future undiscounted cash flows from an asset group are estimated to be less than its carrying value. The amount of impairment recognized is the difference between the carrying value of the asset group and its fair value. Fair value estimates are based on assumptions concerning the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and assumed discount rates, reflecting varying degrees of perceived risk. |
In September 2011, our primary AssuredUVS customer informed us that the AssuredUVS software would no longer be a component of its business strategy, resulting in significant declines in revenues for the Company. Our long-lived assets consisted of the intangible assets associated with our acquisition of certain identified Cloverleaf Communications, Inc., or Cloverleaf, assets acquired in January 2010. The impairment of these long-lived assets is now reported in discontinued operations (see Note 4), since we have ceased all ongoing operational activities as of December 31, 2012. |
Valuation of Goodwill |
We reviewed goodwill for impairment on an annual basis at November 30 and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicated the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. |
Accounting standards required that a two-step impairment test be performed on goodwill. In the first step, we compared the fair value of our reporting unit to its carrying value. We determined the fair value of our reporting unit using a combination of the income approach and market capitalization approach. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of the net assets, goodwill was not impaired, and no further testing is required. If the carrying value of the net assets exceeded the fair value of the reporting unit, then we performed the second step in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill and compared it to the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeded its implied fair value, then we recorded an impairment charge equal to the difference. |
Under the income approach, we calculated the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future discounted cash flows. Under the market capitalization approach, valuation multiples were calculated based on operating data from publicly traded companies within our industry. Multiples derived from companies within our industry provided an indication of how much a knowledgeable investor in the marketplace would be willing to pay for a company. These multiples were applied to the operating data for the reporting unit to arrive at an indicated fair value. Significant management judgment is required in the forecasts of future operating results that were used in the estimated future discounted cash flow method of valuation. The estimates we used were consistent with the plans and estimates that we used to manage our business. We based our fair value estimates on forecasted revenue and operating costs along with business plans. Our forecasts considered the effect of a number of factors including, but not limited to, the current future projected competitiveness and market acceptance of the product, technological risk, the ease of use and ease of implementation of the product, the likely outcome of sales and marketing efforts and projected costs associated with product development, customer support and selling, general and administrative costs. It is possible, however, that the plans may change and that actual results may differ significantly from our estimates. |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Storage Systems | | Standalone Storage Software | | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2011 | | | | | |
|
Goodwill | $ | 40,700 | | | $ | 4,140 | | | $ | 44,840 | |
|
Accumulated impairment losses | (40,700 | ) | | — | | | (40,700 | ) |
|
Goodwill acquired during the year | — | | | — | | | — | |
|
Impairment losses | — | | | (4,140 | ) | | (4,140 | ) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2011 | | | | | |
Goodwill | 40,700 | | | 4,140 | | | 44,840 | |
|
Accumulated impairment losses | (40,700 | ) | | (4,140 | ) | | (44,840 | ) |
| $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Storage Systems | | Standalone Storage Software | | Total |
Balance as of January 1, 2012 | | | | | |
Goodwill | $ | 40,700 | | | $ | 4,140 | | | $ | 44,840 | |
|
Accumulated impairment losses | (40,700 | ) | | (4,140 | ) | | (44,840 | ) |
Goodwill acquired during the year | — | | | — | | | — | |
|
Impairment losses | — | | | — | | | — | |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2012 | | | | | |
Goodwill | 40,700 | | | 4,140 | | | 44,840 | |
|
Accumulated impairment losses | (40,700 | ) | | (4,140 | ) | | (44,840 | ) |
| $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
|
During September 2011, our primary AssuredUVS customer became delinquent on the settlement of its payables to us and upon our investigation it became evident that its financial resources were limited. It also informed us that it was changing its strategy, which would result in a significant decline in revenue for the Company, and we determined that the reporting unit was less than its carrying value. The impairment of the goodwill related to the reporting unit is now reported in discontinued operations (see Note 4), since we have ceased all ongoing operational activities as of December 31, 2012. |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts for accounts receivable amounts that may not be collectible. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of our accounts receivable balances and an analysis of our historical experience of bad debt write-offs. Bad debt expense was $0.0 million, $0.2 million and $0.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively, including $0.0 million, $0.2 million and $0.0 million in discontinued operations. |
Balance sheet details are as follows, (in thousands): |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | December 31, | | | | |
2011 | 2012 | | | | |
Balance, beginning of the year | $ | — | | | $ | 203 | | | | | |
| | | |
Additions to allowance | 203 | | | 37 | | | | | |
| | | |
Balance, quarter ended | $ | 203 | | | $ | 240 | | | | | |
| | | |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued that we adopt as of the specified effective date. We believe that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position. |