![]() Investor Presentation March 2013 Exhibit 99.1 |
![]() 1 Forward Looking Statements Certain matters discussed by Equity One in this presentation constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Although Equity One believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that these expectations will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include volatility of the capital markets; changes in macro-economic and local economic conditions and the demand for retail space in the states and communities in which Equity One owns properties; the continuing financial success of Equity One’s current and prospective tenants and their decisions regarding store locations, especially certain key current tenants; the risks that Equity One may not be able to proceed with or obtain necessary approvals for development or redevelopment projects or that it may take more time to complete such projects or incur costs greater than anticipated; the availability of properties for acquisition; changes in borrowing rates; the ability to sell non-core assets at favorable pricing; the extent to which continuing supply constraints occur in geographic markets where Equity One owns properties; the success of its efforts to lease up vacant space and renew expiring leases at favorable terms; the effects of natural and other disasters; the ability of Equity One to successfully integrate the operations and systems of acquired companies and properties; the loss of key personnel; the ability to meet its substantial debt obligations and remain compliant with financial covenants; continuing to meet the qualifications as a REIT; changes in Equity One’s credit ratings; and other risks, which are described in Equity One’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This presentation also contains non-GAAP financial measures, including Funds from Operations, or FFO. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can be found in Equity One’s quarterly supplemental information package and in filings made with the SEC which are available on its website at www.equityone.net. This presentation also contains case studies which include computations of estimated yield and value creation from investment activities, and such estimates include assumptions of capital investments and current and prospective property valuations and therefore the actual increase in value that may be realized upon a future sale of such property may be materially different than the estimates made. |
![]() Mission Statement 2 Improving retail real estate in urban communities |
![]() Corporate Snapshot 3 Equity One owns, manages, acquires, develops and redevelops quality retail properties located in supply constrained communities primarily in major coastal markets of the United States As of year end 2012, we owned 143 operating properties in 13 states (1) As a result of our capital recycling program we have significantly improved our geographic diversification and portfolio demographics Our largest geographic markets as measured by approximate fair market values are Northeast (29%), South Florida (26%) and California (22%) (2) – Non-core markets in the Southeast and Florida now represent only 11% of our portfolio Our properties have average population density within 3 miles of 178k and average household income within 3 miles of $96k (3) Our total equity capitalization and total enterprise value as of 12/31/2012 were $2.7 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively We have investment grade credit ratings of Baa2 (stable) from Moody’s and BBB- (stable) from S&P (1) Includes acquisitions and dispositions under contract as of 12/31/2012. Excludes land and non-core assets not associated with retail centers. Additionally, we have joint venture interests in twenty retail properties and two office buildings totaling approximately 3.3 million sf. (2) Based on total estimated fair value as of 12/31/2012. Includes acquisitions and dispositions under contract as of 12/31/2012. Excludes land. Does not include unconsolidated JV properties. (3) Demographic data based on weighted estimated fair market value of assets. Includes acquisitions and dispositions under contract as of 12/31/2012. Source: Sites USA. • • • • • • • Our portfolio generates grocer sales in excess of $550 per square foot • |
![]() Investment Considerations 4 Proven management team that has successfully executed a stated transformation strategy to become a national operator in attractive major metropolitan markets Focused investment strategy within geographically diversified major coastal markets Prudent capital recycling which significantly improved portfolio quality while maintaining financial discipline High quality, productive grocery anchored shopping centers located in markets with attractive demographics Intensive focus on asset management and value creation Attractive pipeline of redevelopment opportunities Many anchor leases with below market rents and short term expirations Diversified base of strong anchor tenants with only Publix accounting for more than 6% of AMR Percentage rent comprises less than 1.5% of total revenue Strong balance sheet with modest leverage, ample liquidity and well-laddered debt maturities Financial capacity and proven ability to execute on additional opportunistic acquisitions and redevelopments We are a premier operator of quality retail properties and are positioned for continued growth • • • • • • • • • • • |
![]() Northeast 29% South Florida 26% California 22% Central/ North Florida 12% Atlanta 5% Other 6% South Florida 43% Northeast 7% Central/ North Florida 22% Atlanta 12% Other 16% 82,368 $72,878 178,387 $95,986 $406 $558 117% 32% 37% Dec 2008 Dec 2012 3-mile population 3 mile avg. HH income Grocery sales per sq.ft. Asset Composition by Region (1)(2) Portfolio Quality Metrics in 2012 vs. 2008 (3) Significant Investment Activity has Transformed the Portfolio Dec 2008 Portfolio $2,365 Million Dec 2012 Portfolio $3,618 Million Approximately $2 billion of acquisitions completed since 2009 in our target markets: – Approximately $1.1 billion of assets in West Coast markets – Approximately $700 million of premium quality assets in Northeast portfolio – Substantially completed ground up development of The Gallery at Westbury Plaza in Nassau County, NY Sold approximately $900 million of non-strategic/non-core assets since 2009, the most prominent being: – $473 million sale of 36 non-strategic retail assets to Blackstone – $191 million asset dispositions related to non-retail CapCo assets Equity One Transformation 5 • • (1) Data includes non-core assets within each identified region. (2) Data includes acquisitions and dispositions under contract as of 12/31/2012. Excludes land and non-core assets not associated with retail centers. Based on IFRS fair market values as of 12/31/2012. (3) Demographic data based on weighted estimated fair market value of assets. Includes acquisitions and dispositions under contract as of 12/31/2012. Source: Sites USA. |
![]() Assets Primarily Located in Major Coastal Markets 6 Region $ FMV (1) % FMV Northeast $1,043 29% South Florida $952 26% West Coast $812 22% North Florida $255 7% Southeast (Atlanta) $172 5% Non-Core (Southeast, Florida) $384 11% Total $3,618 100% (1) Data includes acquisitions and dispositions under contract as of 12/31/2012. Excludes land and non-core assets not associated with retail centers. IFRS fair market values are as of 12/31/2012. Estimated FMV: $602 % of FMV: 17% Estimated FMV: $185 % of FMV: 5% Estimated FMV: $1,043 % of FMV: 29% Estimated FMV: $172 % of FMV: 5% Estimated FMV: $952 % of FMV: 26% Estimated FMV: $255 % of FMV: 7% ($ In Millions) |
![]() 2013 Strategic Goals 7 Meet or exceed fundamental operating goals SS NOI growth + 2% to 3% SS Occupancy + 50 to 100 bps Recurring FFO per fully diluted share $1.18 to $1.22 Continue to upgrade portfolio quality and demographic profile through strategic transactions Core acquisition activity of $100 to $200 million Non-core asset dispositions of $300 million JV acquisition activity of $100 to $200 million Continue to strengthen development and redevelopment pipeline Complete lease up of The Gallery at Westbury Plaza Significantly advance construction at the Broadway Plaza site in the Bronx, NY Establish additional redevelopment and densification plans at Serramonte Center in Daly City, CA – Substantially complete Dick’s Sporting Goods (83k sf) at a cost of $18 million – Develop expansion plans to add entertainment wing (movie theatres, restaurants) Close on the Westwood Complex in Bethesda and work on redevelopment plans Maintain low leverage (~40% total debt to gross real estate) and ample liquidity Continue to strengthen credit metrics and maintain large unencumbered asset base Upgrade information technology systems – implement IT strategic plan that is aligned with our operational strategy Operating Fundamentals Portfolio Quality Value Creation Balance Sheet Management Operations • • • • • • • • • • |
![]() Our Path to Sustained NOI Growth 8 Increase occupancy with an emphasis on small shop space Contractual rent steps Below market leases – recent acquisitions provide opportunity to capture market rents in coming years Increase in percentage rent – higher quality assets in more productive markets provide greater upside Expense control and implementation of cost control initiatives within property operations Continue to reduce concentration of assets in secondary and non-core markets Expand tenant relations and marketing efforts with national and regional retailers • • • • • • • |
![]() Enhancing Portfolio Value by Improving Portfolio Quality 9 We plan to further build and diversify our portfolio into supply constrained urban markets Recent acquisitions in California and New York highlight our focused approach on properties which meet the following key criteria aimed at enhancing the quality and performance of our overall portfolio: – Strong demographics – average 3-mile populations of nearly 200,000 as compared to Equity One’s historical portfolio average of approximately 80,000 – Strong barriers to entry due to scarcity of land and strict zoning restrictions – Highly productive anchor sales volumes – Below market anchor rents – Redevelopment and densification opportunities These acquisitions have enabled us to diversify our portfolio into higher quality centers in major MSAs which will ultimately result in greater stability and higher internal growth • • • |
![]() Case Study 1: Westbury Plaza & The Gallery at Westbury Plaza 10 In October 2009, acquired Westbury Plaza, a 400k sf power center in Nassau County, New York – Marked Equity One’s entry into the New York metropolitan market – Major tenants include: Walmart, Costco, Sports Authority and Marshalls – Tenants generate annual sales we believe to be in excess of $500 million – Purchase price of $104 million, generating a going-in yield of 8% with future upside In November 2009, acquired 22 acre land parcel adjacent to Westbury Plaza – Obtained entitlements within 12 months to build The Gallery at Westbury Plaza, a 313k sf regional shopping center – Developed unique design with two story, big-box retail and underground parking – Major tenants include: Trader Joe’s, The Container Store, Saks Off Fifth, Bloomingdale’s Outlet, Nordstrom Rack, Gap Outlet, Banana Republic Outlet, Old Navy, Ulta and Shake Shack – Expecting 11% yield on $129 million in net costs • • Investment Thesis: $233 million total capital investment, generating ~10% blended stabilized yield, implying ~$175 million in value creation at a 5.5% capitalization rate. |
![]() Case Study 1: Westbury Plaza & The Gallery at Westbury Plaza 11 |
![]() Case Study 2: Capital & Counties 12 In May 2010, announced the acquisition of Capital & Counties, a $600 million California portfolio of predominantly retail shopping centers – Largest asset is Serramonte Center, an 883k sf regional mall in Daly City, CA – Other retail assets include: Plaza Escuela in Walnut Creek, CA, Willows Shopping Center in Concord, CA and The Marketplace in Davis, CA – Structured off-market stock transaction with seller becoming a 13% owner of Equity One Marked Equity One’s entry into California – Provided critical mass for management platform and acted as catalyst for future acquisitions including Potrero, Culver City and Long Beach – Positioned Equity One as one of the largest owners of open-air shopping centers in California Transaction was accretive day one, but more importantly offered substantial value creation opportunities – Sold ~$200 million of non-core assets within 12 months, at pricing well in excess of allocated values – Increased retail occupancy from 83% at acquisition to 98% as of year end 2012 – Redevelopment opportunities include Serramonte Center and Willows Shopping Center • • • Investment Thesis: ~$400 million net capital invested yielding ~8%, implying ~$180 million in value creation at a 5.5% capitalization rate. |
![]() Case Study 2: Capital & Counties (Serramonte) 13 Expansion |
![]() Case Study 3: Southern Connecticut 14 • Since 2010, Equity One has acquired six properties in Southern Connecticut for $205 million • Each center offers a value creation play (1) Ridgefield: Kohl’s pays $2.40 psf in rent, lease runs out of term in 2021 (2) Danbury: 4,000 sf expansion opportunity, including Starbucks drive-thru (3) Southbury: 2,700 sf additional outparcel (4) Norwalk: 1,600 sf additional outparcel (5) Darien: Trader Joe’s expansion; increased bank lease from $38 psf to $88 psf (6) Westport: Expanded Trader Joe’s, below market bank lease expiring in 2014 • Centers are located in some of the most affluent markets in the New York Metropolitan region, with an average HH income of $155k within 3 miles Investment Thesis: $205 million initial investment at ~6% yield. Expect to earn yield in excess of 7% beginning in 2015. |
![]() Case Study 3: Southern Connecticut 15 |
![]() Future Case Study - New York City 16 • Equity One has acquired six assets for $243 million in New York City, including the planned development of Broadway Plaza (1) 1175 Third Avenue (E 68 Street & 3 Avenue) – In 2010, purchased 25k sf retail condominium for $21 million – Food Emporium pays $40 psf; market rent is 4x greater (2) 101 7 Avenue (W 16 Street & 7 Avenue) – In 2011, purchased 57k sf retail space for $55 million – Loehmann’s lease expires in 2016 with no options remaining – Contract rent is $25 psf; market rent is 4x greater (3) 90-30 Metropolitan Avenue – In 2011, acquired 60k sf Trader Joe’s anchored center for $28.8 million (4) Broadway Plaza – In 2012, purchased two adjacent land parcels totaling 2+ acres for $9.5 million – $55 million planned investment in ground-up development of 131k sq ft, two-story, multi-tenant retail center – Site is within a major retail corridor served by subway, buses and automobiles, with direct access off the Major Deegan Expressway – Strong tenant interest from box retailers (discounters, fashion, sporting goods and gyms) (5) Clocktower Plaza – In 2012, purchased 79k sq ft Pathmark anchored center for $56 million – Located on Atlantic Avenue, a main thoroughfare in Queens – Potential to expand center and acquire adjacent properties (6) 1225-1239 Second Avenue – In 2012, acquired entire retail block between 64th and 65th Streets on 2nd Avenue for $27.5 million – Anchored by CVS and 7- Eleven Future Investment Thesis: Within 3 years we expect to earn a 7% + unleveraged yield. th th rd th th |
![]() Future Case Study - New York City 17 |
![]() Future Case Study - Bethesda, Maryland 18 • In 2012, announced agreement to acquire Westwood Complex, a 22 acre property in Bethesda, MD for $140 million – 215k sf of retail space in the highly affluent and supply constrained market outside Washington, D.C. – Superior demographics with 140k population within 3 miles and average household income of $200k – Structured as $95 million funded mortgage loan, with outright purchase of property anticipated in early 2014 • Significant opportunities for value creation through below market rents, redevelopment and expansion – Asset has only had one owner and will benefit from capital investment and intensive asset management – Anchored by high volume Giant Food since 1959, with below market lease expiring 2019 – Main center has parking ratio of 10 spaces per 1,000 sf, more than double typical shopping centers |
![]() Future Case Study - Bethesda, Maryland 19 |
![]() Future Case Study - Bethesda, Maryland 20 |
![]() Disciplined Growth While Improving Leverage Metrics 21 Gross Assets (1) Fixed Charge Coverage (2) Total Debt to Gross Real Estate (3) Secured Debt to Gross Real Estate (3) 0.6x improvement Reflects Westwood at 100% leverage (4) 72% increase in Gross Assets 930 bps reduction $4,000 $3,600 $3,200 $2,800 $2,000 $2,400 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 $2,232 $2,692 $2,970 $3,518 $3,839 3.0x 2.5x 2.0x 1.5x 1.0x 0.5x 0.0x 2.2x 2.0x 1.9x 2.1x 2.5x 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 52.0% 48.0% 44.0% 40.0% 49.8% 49.6% 45.1% 42.7% 45.8% Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 26.0% 22.0% 18.0% 14.0% 10.0% Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 17.4% 22.0% 19.6% 16.1% 12.7% (1) Gross Assets represents Total Assets plus Accumulated Depreciation. (2) Represents Adjusted EBITDA to Fixed Charges. Adjusted EBITDA excludes gains/losses on property sales, debt extinguishment, impairments, and other non-recurring items. (3) Gross Real Estate represents Total Real Estate Assets plus Accumulated Depreciation. (4) Ratio at December 31, 2012 includes Westwood Complex $95 million note in both Total Debt and Gross Real Estate. |
![]() Balance Sheet Discipline – Modest Leverage With Strong Coverage Metrics 22 • (1) Based on Net Debt as of 12/31/2012 and Adjusted EBITDA (excluding gains/losses on property sales, debt extinguishment, impairments, and other non-recurring items) calculated by annualizing 4Q2012 Adjusted EBITDA as reported in the 12/31/2012 Supplement. (2) Source: Eastdil Secured, based on Company filings and SNL financial. Credit ratings from S&P and Moody's as of 12/31/2012. Q4 2012 Leverage (Total Debt + Preferred / Gross Assets) (2) 55.0% 50.0% 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% EQY (BBB-/Baa2) FRT (BBB+/Baa1) KIM (BBB+/Baa1) REG (BBB/Baa3) WRI (BBB/Baa2) Key leverage ratios as of December 31, 2012 – Net Debt to Total Market Cap: 36.4% – Net Debt to Gross Real Estate: 45.0% – Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA (1) : 7.0x – Adjusted EBITDA to interest expense: 2.8x – Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges: 2.5x – Weighted average term to maturity for total debt: 5.7 years |
![]() Current Liquidity Position 23 • Cash and cash equivalents amounted to $28 million as of December 31, 2012 • Revolving credit facility has $575 million capacity and matures September 30, 2015 with a one year extension option • We maintain a manageable debt maturity schedule Note: Cash includes restricted cash and cash held in escrow. Debt maturity schedule as of 12/31/2012. Includes scheduled principal amortization. Credit facilities are shown as due on the initial maturity dates, although certain extension options may be available. • Strong lending relationships with both traditional banks and life insurance companies • Demonstrated access to the public markets $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 $38 $342 $233 $289 $273 $63 $6 $9 $328 Secured Debt Senior Notes Term Loan Credit Facility 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter $14 |
![]() Appendix 24 • Portfolio Metrics |
![]() # of centers 4Q12 Fair Value ($M) GLA 4Q12 Occ. All Anchor Shop Pop. Avg HH Income Median HH Income Grocer Sales Balance Interest Rate Years to Maturity Core Markets Northeast Connecticut 7 $257.0 866,937 98.7% $18.52 $13.33 $31.47 37,557 $140,431 $115,845 $891 $82.5 5.6% 5.5 Maryland 1 $140.0 466,919 98.3% $13.84 N/A N/A 139,570 $200,005 $183,860 $847 $0.0 - - Massachusetts 7 $142.6 600,879 99.1% $18.80 $18.96 $17.48 189,085 $84,865 $71,977 $309 $7.1 8.1% 11.6 New York 7 $503.9 951,212 90.2% $31.66 $29.85 $55.19 468,422 $105,490 $87,716 $1,321 $23.7 6.5% 4.3 Northeast Total 22 $1,043.5 2,885,947 95.9% $21.72 $21.53 $32.82 280,013 $123,958 $105,392 $636 $113.2 6.0% 5.6 Southeast North and Central Florida 7 $180.8 1,212,342 86.3% $14.87 $11.27 $21.21 49,353 $91,206 $69,751 $460 $16.1 5.8% 3.4 Atlanta (Core) 5 $171.6 611,645 95.9% $19.11 $15.24 $26.46 98,945 $116,795 $92,074 $574 $31.7 7.1% 2.5 Broward/Miami- Dade/Palm Beach Counties 40 $952.2 4,826,864 92.4% $15.10 $10.44 $23.65 129,732 $76,785 $63,307 $605 $100.2 6.3% 6.8 Florida Treasure/Northeast Coast 6 $74.1 504,568 90.7% $11.86 $8.35 $20.09 39,416 $70,778 $50,683 $646 $11.9 6.0% 5.5 Southeast Total 58 $1,378.7 7,155,419 91.5% $15.20 $10.85 $23.35 110,505 $83,333 $67,054 $603 $159.8 6.4% 5.5 West Coast Arizona 1 $26.0 210,396 64.4% $16.44 $11.12 $29.55 35,703 $74,853 $76,522 $0 $0.0 - - Los Angeles 4 $184.5 489,239 98.5% $22.00 $14.37 $37.75 263,113 $93,115 $69,598 $527 $74.8 5.5% 6.0 San Francisco 6 $601.6 1,595,070 97.4% $27.22 $19.91 $40.05 218,636 $95,635 $81,084 $826 $71.4 6.0% 3.4 West Coast Total 11 $812.1 2,294,705 94.6% $25.23 $17.86 $38.98 222,884 $94,397 $78,328 $661 $146.2 5.7% 4.7 Total 91 $3,234.3 12,336,071 93.1% $18.54 $14.84 $27.61 193,411 $99,218 $82,254 $618 $419.2 6.1% 5.3 Non-core Markets Atlanta 5 $25.8 358,082 83.0% $9.78 $6.95 $13.84 68,907 $72,188 $62,556 $0 $0.0 - - Tampa/St. Petersburg/Venice/Cape Coral/Naples 7 $63.9 738,076 83.8% $10.70 $7.43 $16.95 42,040 $85,138 $59,014 $354 $0.0 - - Louisiana 12 $98.0 1,321,277 95.4% $8.64 $6.87 $13.21 58,343 $76,993 $59,983 $239 $0.0 - - Jacksonville/North Florida 8 $56.4 663,726 90.5% $9.40 $6.95 $15.67 39,689 $58,979 $48,622 $489 $0.0 - - Orlando/Central Florida 5 $41.9 486,007 82.9% $11.21 $6.06 $19.76 91,982 $56,932 $48,543 $313 $0.0 - - North Carolina 8 $50.7 835,286 79.1% $8.00 $6.46 $12.35 27,931 $62,024 $49,434 $291 $6.5 6.3% 0.5 Central/ South Georgia 4 $29.5 624,662 78.7% $8.16 $6.09 $12.39 61,564 $48,452 $36,884 $443 $0.0 - - AL/MS/VA 3 $17.7 258,535 97.9% $7.32 $5.64 $13.48 21,471 $71,305 $54,645 $393 $0.0 - - Total 52 $383.9 5,285,651 86.7% $9.07 $6.66 $14.61 51,800 $68,759 $53,664 $373 $6.5 6.3% 0.5 Grand Total 143 $3,618.1 17,621,722 91.2% $15.84 $12.43 $23.79 178,387 $95,986 $79,221 $558 $425.8 6.1% 5.2 In-Place Debt (12/31/12) Base Rent ($/sf) 25 Portfolio Metrics (1) Fair value of Westwood Center in Bethesda, MD is based on expected purchase price when property is ultimately acquired. (2) New York occupancy rate would be 98% excluding The Gallery at Westbury Plaza which is currently 75% leased. (3) Excludes land and non-core assets not associated with retail centers. Includes acquisitions and dispositions under contract as of 12/31/2012. (1) (3) (2) |