ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
| | December 31, 2015 | |
| | Senior Mortgages | | | Senior Securitized Mortgages(1) | | | Mezzanine Loans | | | Preferred Equity | | | Total | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 383,895 | | | $ | 398,634 | | | $ | 522,731 | | | $ | 212,905 | | | $ | 1,518,165 | |
Originations & advances (principal) | | | 293,925 | | | | - | | | | 195,312 | | | | - | | | | 489,237 | |
Principal payments | | | (243,270 | ) | | | (136,469 | ) | | | (153,693 | ) | | | (92,210 | ) | | | (625,642 | ) |
Sales (principal) | | | (46,945 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (46,945 | ) |
Amortization & accretion of (premium) discounts | | | (142 | ) | | | - | | | | (232 | ) | | | 517 | | | | 143 | |
Net (increase) decrease in origination fees | | | (3,702 | ) | | | (279 | ) | | | (4,806 | ) | | | - | | | | (8,787 | ) |
Amortization of net origination fees | | | 2,077 | | | | 817 | | | | 691 | | | | 561 | | | | 4,146 | |
Transfers | | | - | | | | - | | | | 18,500 | | | | - | | | | 18,500 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Net carrying value (2) | | $ | 385,838 | | | $ | 262,703 | | | $ | 578,503 | | | $ | 121,773 | | | $ | 1,348,817 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Assets of consolidated VIE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(2) Excludes Loans held for sale. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Internal CRE Debt and Preferred Equity Investment Ratings
| | March 31, 2016 | |
| | | | | Percentage of CRE Debt and Preferred Equity Portfolio | | | Internal Ratings |
Investment Type | | Outstanding Principal (1) | | | Performing | | | Closely-Monitored | | | Special Mention | | | Substandard | | | Doubtful | | | Loss | | | Total | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior mortgages | | $ | 477,302 | | | | 40.3 | % | | $ | 91,321 | | | $ | 243,681 | | | $ | 142,300 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 477,302 | |
Senior securitized mortgages(2) | | | 212,072 | | | | 17.9 | % | | | 55,770 | | | | 15,500 | | | | 140,802 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 212,072 | |
Mezzanine loans | | | 486,081 | | | | 41.0 | % | | | 295,950 | | | | 160,814 | | | | 29,317 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 486,081 | |
Preferred equity | | | 9,000 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | - | | | | - | | | | 9,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 9,000 | |
| | $ | 1,184,455 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 443,041 | | | $ | 419,995 | | | $ | 321,419 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,184,455 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Excludes Loans held for sale. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(2) Assets of consolidated VIE. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2015 | |
| | | | | | Percentage of CRE Debt and Preferred Equity Portfolio | | | Internal Ratings |
Investment Type | | Outstanding Principal (1) | | | Performing | | | Closely-Monitored | | | Special Mention | | | Substandard | | | Doubtful | | | Loss | | | Total | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior mortgages | | $ | 387,314 | | | | 28.6 | % | | $ | 71,000 | | | $ | 283,148 | | | $ | 33,166 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 387,314 | |
Senior securitized mortgages(2) | | | 263,072 | | | | 19.4 | % | | | 106,770 | | | | 15,500 | | | | 140,802 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 263,072 | |
Mezzanine loans | | | 582,592 | | | | 43.0 | % | | | 342,493 | | | | 219,969 | | | | 20,130 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 582,592 | |
Preferred equity | | | 122,444 | | | | 9.0 | % | | | - | | | | 81,944 | | | | 40,500 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 122,444 | |
| | $ | 1,355,422 | | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 520,263 | | | $ | 600,561 | | | $ | 234,598 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,355,422 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Excludes Loans held for sale. |
(2) Assets of consolidated VIE. |
Real Estate Investments
There were no acquisitions of new real estate holdings during the quarter ended March 31, 2016.
The following table summarizes real estate held for investment as of March 31, 2016:
| | | | | | |
Date of Acquisition | Type | Location | Purchase Price | | Remaining Lease Term (Years) (1) | |
(dollars in thousands) | | | |
| | | | | | |
July 2015 | Multi Tenant Retail | Ohio | | $ | 11,000 | | | | 4.6 | |
August 2015 | Multi Tenant Retail | Florida | | $ | 18,900 | | | | 5.1 | |
October 2015 | Multifamily Property | Washington, DC | | $ | 75,000 | | | | 0.3 | |
October 2015 | Multi Tenant Retail | California | | $ | 37,750 | | | | 3.0 | |
November 2015 | Multi Tenant Retail | Texas | | $ | 131,950 | | | | 4.3 | |
The weighted average amortization period for intangible assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2016 is 7.2 years. Above market leases and leasehold intangible assets are included in Intangible assets, net and below
market leases are included in Accounts payable and other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
Investments in Commercial Real Estate
| | March 31, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Real estate held for investment, at amortized cost | | | | | | |
Land | | $ | 113,494 | | | $ | 113,494 | |
Buildings and improvements | | | 374,213 | | | | 373,603 | |
Subtotal | | | 487,707 | | | | 487,097 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | | | (21,456 | ) | | | (16,886 | ) |
Total real estate held for investment, at amortized cost, net | | | 466,251 | | | | 470,211 | |
Equity in unconsolidated joint ventures | | | 61,535 | | | | 65,735 | |
Investments in commercial real estate, net | | $ | 527,786 | | | $ | 535,946 | |
Depreciation expense was $4.6 million and $2.8 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively and is included in Other income (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Rental Income
The minimum rental amounts due under leases are generally either subject to scheduled fixed increases or adjustments. The leases generally also require that the tenants reimburse us for certain operating costs. Approximate future minimum rents payments under non-cancelable operating leases in effect at March 31, 2016 for consolidated investments in real estate are as follows:
| | March 31, 2016 | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
2016 (remaining) | | $ | 26,105 | |
2017 | | | 30,305 | |
2018 | | | 26,238 | |
2019 | | | 22,157 | |
2020 | | | 17,848 | |
Later years | | | 53,326 | |
| | $ | 175,979 | |
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
Mortgage loans payable as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, were as follows:
March 31, 2016 |
Property | | Mortgage Carrying Value | | | Mortgage Principal | | | Interest Rate | Fixed/Floating Rate | Maturity Date | Priority |
(dollars in thousands) |
Joint Ventures | | $ | 292,821 | | | $ | 296,325 | | | 2.30% to 4.61% | Floating (1) | 2016 and 2025 | First liens |
Tennessee | | | 12,236 | | | | 12,350 | | | | 4.01 | % | Fixed | 6/6/2019 | First liens |
Virginia | | | 11,012 | | | | 11,025 | | | | 3.58 | % | Fixed | 9/6/2019 | First liens |
Arizona | | | 16,271 | | | | 16,227 | | | | 3.50 | % | Fixed | 1/1/2017 | First liens |
Nevada | | | 2,425 | | | | 2,419 | | | | 3.45 | % | Floating (2) | 3/29/2017 | First liens |
| | $ | 334,765 | | | $ | 338,346 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Includes a mortgage with a fixed rate via an interest rate swap (pay fixed 4.31%, receive floating rate of L+215). |
(2) Includes a mortgage with a fixed rate via an interest rate swap (pay fixed 3.45%, receive floating rate of L+200). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2015 |
Property | | Mortgage Carrying Value | | | Mortgage Principal | | | Interest Rate | Fixed/Floating Rate | Maturity Date | Priority |
(dollars in thousands) |
Joint Ventures | | $ | 292,658 | | | $ | 296,325 | | | 2.30% to 4.61% | Floating (1) | 2016 and 2025 | First liens |
Tennessee | | | 12,228 | | | | 12,350 | | | | 4.01 | % | Fixed | 6/6/2019 | First liens |
Virginia | | | 11,012 | | | | 11,025 | | | | 3.58 | % | Fixed | 9/6/2019 | First liens |
Arizona | | | 16,365 | | | | 16,308 | | | | 3.50 | % | Fixed | 1/1/2017 | First liens |
Nevada | | | 2,444 | | | | 2,436 | | | | 3.45 | % | Floating (2) | 3/29/2017 | First liens |
| | $ | 334,707 | | | $ | 338,444 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Includes a mortgage with a fixed rate via an interest rate swap (pay fixed 4.31%, receive floating rate of L+215). |
(2) Includes a mortgage with a fixed rate via an interest rate swap (pay fixed 3.45%, receive floating rate of L+200). |
The following table details future mortgage loan principal payments as of March 31, 2016:
| | Mortgage Loan Principal Payments | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
2016 (remaining) | | $ | 7,502 | |
2017 | | | 18,344 | |
2018 | | | - | |
2019 | | | 23,375 | |
2020 | | | - | |
Later years | | | 289,125 | |
| | $ | 338,346 | |
VIEs
Securitization
In January 2014, the Company closed NLY Commercial Mortgage Trust 2014-FL1 (the "Trust"), a $399.5 million securitization financing transaction which provides permanent, non-recourse financing collateralized by floating-rate first mortgage debt investments originated or co-originated by the Company and is not subject to margin calls. A total of $260.7 million of investment grade bonds were issued by the Trust, representing an advance rate of 65.3% at a weighted average coupon of LIBOR plus 1.74% at closing. The Company used the proceeds to originate commercial real estate investments. The Company retained bonds rated below investment grade and the
interest-only bond issued by the Trust, which are referred to as the subordinate bonds.
The Company incurred approximately $4.3 million of costs in connection with the securitization that have been capitalized and are being amortized to interest expense. Deferred financing costs are included in Securitized debt of consolidated VIEs in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
As of March 31, 2016 the carrying value of the Trust's assets was $211.9 million, net of $0.2 million of unamortized origination fees, which are included in Commercial real estate debt and preferred equity in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. As of March 31, 2016, the carrying value of
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
the Trust's liabilities was $125.6 million, net of $0.2 million of deferred financing costs, classified as Securitized debt of consolidated VIEs in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
In February 2015, the Company purchased the junior-most tranche, Class C Certificate of the Freddie Mac securitization, FREMF Mortgage Trust 2015-KLSF ("FREMF 2015-KLSF") for $102.1 million. The underlying portfolio is a pool of 11 floating rate multifamily mortgage loans with a cut-off principal balance of $1.4 billion. The Company was required to consolidate the FREMF 2015-KLSF Trust's assets and liabilities of $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, at March 31, 2016.
In April 2015, the Company purchased the junior-most tranche, Class C Certificate of the Freddie Mac securitization, FREMF Mortgage Trust 2015-KF07 ("FREMF 2015-KF07") for $89.4 million. The underlying portfolio is a pool of 40 floating rate multifamily mortgage loans with a cut-off principal balance of $1.2 billion. The Company was required to consolidate the FREMF 2015-KF07 Trust's assets and liabilities of $1.1 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, at March 31, 2016.
In February 2016, the Company purchased the junior-most tranche, Class C Certificate of the Freddie Mac securitization, FREM Mortgage Trust 2016-KLH1 ("FREM 2016-KLH1") for $107.6 million, net of a $4.4 million discount to face value of $112.0 million. The underlying portfolio is a pool of 28 floating rate multifamily mortgage loans with a cut-off principal balance of $1.5 billion. The Company was required to consolidate the FREM 2016-KLH1 Trust's assets and liabilities of $1.5 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively, at March 31, 2016. FREMF 2015-KLSF, FREMF 2015-KF07 and FREM 2016-KLH1 are collectively referred to herein as the FREMF Trusts.
The FREMF Trusts are structured as pass-through entities that receive principal and interest on the underlying collateral and distribute those payments to the certificate holders. The FREMF Trusts are VIEs and the Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary as a result of its ability to replace the special servicer without cause through its ownership of the Class C Certificates and its current designation as the directing certificate holder. The Company's exposure to the obligations of the VIEs is generally
limited to the Company's investment in the FREMF Trusts of $291.0 million. Assets of the FREMF Trusts may only be used to settle obligations of the FREMF Trusts. Creditors of the FREMF Trusts have no recourse to the general credit of the Company. The Company is not contractually required to provide and has not provided any form of financial support to the FREMF Trusts. No gain or loss was recognized upon initial consolidation of the FREMF Trusts, but $0.2 million and $0.8 million of related costs were expensed during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively. The FREMF Trusts' assets are included in Commercial real estate debt investments and the FREMF Trusts' liabilities are included in Securitized debt of consolidated VIEs in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
Upon consolidation, the Company elected the fair value option for the financial assets and liabilities of the FREMF Trusts in order to avoid an accounting mismatch, and to more accurately represent the economics of its interest in the entities. The fair value option requires that changes in fair value be reflected in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Company has adopted ASU 2014-13 and applied the practical expedient fair value measurement whereby the Company determines whether the fair value of the financial assets or financial liabilities is more observable as a basis for measuring the less observable financial instruments. The Company has determined that the fair value of the financial liabilities of the FREMF Trusts is more observable, since the prices for these liabilities are primarily available from third-party pricing services utilized for multifamily mortgage-backed securities, while the fair value of the individual assets of the trusts are inherently less capable of precise measurement given their illiquid nature and the limitations on available information related to these assets. Given that the Company's methodology for valuing the financial assets of the FREMF Trusts is an aggregate fair value derived from the fair value of the financial liabilities, the Company has determined that the fair value of each of the financial assets in their entirety should be classified in Level 2 of the fair value measurement hierarchy.
The statement of financial condition of the FREMF Trusts that is reflected in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at March 31, 2016 is as follows:
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
| | March 31, 2016 | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Assets | | | |
Senior securitized commercial mortgages carried at fair value | | $ | 3,968,118 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | | 8,351 | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,976,469 | |
| | | | |
Liabilities | | | | |
Securitized debt (non-recourse) at fair value | | $ | 3,677,079 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 4,311 | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 3,681,390 | |
The FREMF Trusts mortgage loans had an unpaid principal balance of $4.0 billion at March 31, 2016. As of March 31, 2016 there are no loans 90 days or more past due or on nonaccrual status. There is no gain or loss attributable to instrument-specific credit risk of the underlying loans or securitized debt securities as of March 31, 2016 based upon the
Company's process of monitoring events of default on the underlying mortgage loans.
The statement of comprehensive income (loss) of the FREMF Trusts that is reflected in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 is as follows:
| | For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2016 | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Net interest income: | | | |
Interest income | | $ | 21,030 | |
Interest expense | | | 7,876 | |
Net interest income | | | 13,154 | |
| | | | |
Other income (loss): | | | | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on financial instruments at fair value (1) | | | 147 | |
Guarantee fees and servicing costs | | | (5,297 | ) |
Other income (loss) | | | (5,150 | ) |
General and administration expenses | | | 2 | |
Net income | | $ | 8,002 | |
| | | | |
(1) Included in Net unrealized gains (losses) on financial instruments measured at fair value through earnings. | |
The geographic concentrations of credit risk exceeding 5% of the total loan balances related to the FREMF Trusts as of March 31, 2016 are as follows:
Securitized Loans at Fair Value Geographic Concentration of Credit Risk | |
Property Location | | Principal Balance | | | % of Balance | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Texas | | $ | 749,569 | | | | 18.8 | % |
North Carolina | | | 537,375 | | | | 13.5 | % |
Maryland | | | 499,495 | | | | 12.5 | % |
Florida | | | 456,663 | | | | 11.4 | % |
Other | | | 1,751,963 | | | | 43.8 | % |
Total | | $ | 3,995,065 | | | | 100.0 | % |
6. CORPORATE DEBT
The Company invests in corporate loans and corporate debt securities through the MML subsidiary.
The industry and interest rate characteristics of the portfolio as of March 31, 2016 are as follows:
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
| | Industry Dispersion | |
| | Fixed Rate | | | Floating Rate | | | Total | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Healthcare | | $ | - | | | $ | 173,896 | | | $ | 173,896 | |
Security services | | | 74,700 | | | | - | | | | 74,700 | |
Technology | | | - | | | | 93,292 | | | | 93,292 | |
Business services | | | 4,359 | | | | 134,515 | | | | 138,874 | |
Agriculture and protein processing | | | - | | | | 41,576 | | | | 41,576 | |
Food & beverage | | | - | | | | 27,930 | | | | 27,930 | |
Mining & minerals | | | - | | | | 24,671 | | | | 24,671 | |
Consumer products | | | - | | | | 23,230 | | | | 23,230 | |
Manufacturing | | | - | | | | 7,477 | | | | 7,477 | |
Education services | | | - | | | | 21,168 | | | | 21,168 | |
Packaging | | | - | | | | 12,667 | | | | 12,667 | |
Total | | $ | 79,059 | | | $ | 560,422 | | | $ | 639,481 | |
The table below reflects the Company's aggregate positions by their respective place in the capital structure of the borrowers as of March 31, 2016.
| March 31, 2016 | |
| (dollars in thousands) | |
| | |
First lien loans | | $ | 397,693 | |
Second lien loans | | | 162,729 | |
Second lien notes | | | 74,700 | |
Subordinated notes | | | 4,359 | |
Total | | $ | 639,481 | |
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company follows fair value guidance in accordance with GAAP to account for its financial instruments. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
GAAP requires classification of financial instruments into a three-level hierarchy based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure the financial instruments fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition or disclosed in the related notes are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1– inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to overall fair value.
The Company designates its financial instruments as trading, available for sale or held to maturity depending upon the type of instrument and the Company's intent and ability to hold such instrument to maturity. Instruments classified as available for sale and trading are reported at fair value on a recurring basis.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments carried at fair value. These methodologies are applied to assets and liabilities across the three-level fair value hierarchy,
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
with the observability of inputs determining the appropriate level.
Futures contracts are valued using quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. Residential Investment Securities, interest rate swaps, swaptions and other derivatives are valued using quoted prices or internally estimated prices for similar assets using internal models. The Company incorporates common market pricing methods, including a spread measurement to the Treasury curve as well as underlying characteristics of the particular security including coupon, prepayment speeds, periodic and life caps, rate reset period and expected life of the security in its estimates of fair value. Management reviews and indirectly corroborates its estimates of the fair value derived using internal models by comparing its results to independent prices provided by dealers in the securities and/or third party pricing services. Certain liquid asset classes, such as Agency fixed-rate pass-throughs, may be priced using independent sources such as quoted prices for TBA securities.
The Residential Investment Securities, interest rate swap and swaption markets are considered to be active markets such that participants transact with sufficient frequency and volume to provide transparent pricing information on an ongoing basis. The liquidity of the Residential Investment Securities, interest rate swaps, swaptions, TBA derivatives and MBS options markets and the similarity of the Company's securities to those actively traded enable the Company to observe quoted prices in the market and utilize those prices as a basis for formulating fair value measurements. Consequently, the Company has classified Residential Investment Securities, interest rate swaps, swaptions, TBA derivatives and MBS options as Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. Additionally, as discussed in the "Commercial Real Estate Investments" footnote, Commercial real estate debt investments carried at fair value are classified as Level 2.
The following table presents the estimated fair values of financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
March 31, 2016 | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agency mortgage-backed securities | | $ | - | | | | 65,439,824 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 65,439,824 | |
Agency debentures | | | - | | | | 157,035 | | | | - | | | | 157,035 | |
Credit risk transfer securities | | | - | | | | 501,167 | | | | - | | | | 501,167 | |
Non-Agency mortgage-backed securities | | | - | | | | 1,157,507 | | | | - | | | | 1,157,507 | |
Commercial real estate debt investments | | | - | | | | 4,401,725 | | | | - | | | | 4,401,725 | |
Interest rate swaps | | | - | | | | 93,312 | | | | - | | | | 93,312 | |
Other derivatives | | | 717 | | | | 76,732 | | | | - | | | | 77,449 | |
Total assets | | $ | 717 | | | $ | 71,827,302 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 71,828,019 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securitized debt of consolidated VIEs | | $ | - | | | | 3,677,079 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,677,079 | |
Interest rate swaps | | | - | | | | 2,782,961 | | | | - | | | | 2,782,961 | |
Other derivatives | | | 69,171 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 69,171 | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 69,171 | | | $ | 6,460,040 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 6,529,211 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
December 31, 2015 | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agency mortgage-backed securities | | $ | - | | | $ | 65,718,224 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 65,718,224 | |
Agency debentures | | | - | | | | 152,038 | | | | - | | | | 152,038 | |
Credit risk transfer securities | | | - | | | | 456,510 | | | | - | | | | 456,510 | |
Non-Agency mortgage-backed securities | | | - | | | | 906,722 | | | | - | | | | 906,722 | |
Commercial real estate debt investments | | | - | | | | 2,911,828 | | | | - | | | | 2,911,828 | |
Interest rate swaps | | | - | | | | 19,642 | | | | - | | | | 19,642 | |
Other derivatives | | | 12,443 | | | | 9,623 | | | | - | | | | 22,066 | |
Total assets | | $ | 12,443 | | | $ | 70,174,587 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 70,187,030 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securitized debt of consolidated VIEs | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,366,878 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,366,878 | |
Interest rate swaps | | | - | | | | 1,677,571 | | | | - | | | | 1,677,571 | |
Other derivatives | | | 32,778 | | | | 17,185 | | | | - | | | | 49,963 | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 32,778 | | | $ | 4,061,634 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 4,094,412 | |
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
GAAP requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the financial statements, for which it is practical to estimate the value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based upon discounted cash flows using market yields, methodologies that incorporate market-based transactions or other valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, fair values are not necessarily indicative of the amount the Company would realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The carrying value of short-term instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements and other secured financing whose term is less than twelve months, generally approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the instruments.
The estimated fair value of commercial real estate debt and preferred equity investments takes into consideration changes in credit spreads and interest rates from the date of origination or purchase to the reporting date. The fair value also reflects consideration of asset-specific maturity dates and other items that could have an impact on the fair value as of the reporting date.
Estimates of fair value of corporate debt require the use of judgments and inputs including, but not limited to, the enterprise value of the borrower (i.e., an estimate of the total fair value of the borrower's debt and equity), the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the borrower's ability to make payments when due and its
earnings history. Management also considers factors that affect the macro and local economic markets in which the borrower operates.
The fair value of repurchase agreements with remaining maturities greater than one year or with embedded optionality are valued as structured notes, with term to maturity, LIBOR rates and the Treasury curve being primary determinants of estimated fair value.
The fair value of mortgages payable is calculated using the estimated yield of a new par loan to value the remaining terms in place. A par loan is created using the identical terms of the existing loan; however, the coupon is derived by using the original spread against the interpolated Treasury. The fair value of mortgages payable also reflects consideration of the value of the underlying collateral and changes in credit risk from the time the debt was originated.
The carrying value of participation sold is based on the loan's amortized cost. The fair value of participation sold is based on the fair value of the underlying related commercial loan.
The fair value of securitized debt of consolidated VIEs is determined using the average of external vendor pricing services.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value for financial assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
| | March 31, 2016 | |
| | Repurchase Agreements by Collateral Type | | | | | | Weighted Average Rate | |
| | Agency Mortgage-backed Securities | | | Debentures | | | CRTs | | | Non-Agency Mortgage-backed Securities | | | Commercial Loans | | | Total Repurchase Agreements | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
1 day | | $ | 8,050,000 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 8,050,000 | | | | 0.62 | % |
2 to 29 days | | | 12,466,595 | | | | - | | | | 54,656 | | | | 320,677 | | | | - | | | | 12,841,928 | | | | 0.75 | % |
30 to 59 days | | | 4,663,011 | | | | - | | | | 59,313 | | | | 156,354 | | | | - | | | | 4,878,678 | | | | 0.82 | % |
60 to 89 days | | | 9,118,832 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 146,165 | | | | - | | | | 9,264,997 | | | | 0.96 | % |
90 to 119 days | | | 4,270,155 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,270,155 | | | | 0.95 | % |
Over 120 days(1) | | | 14,954,590 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 187,793 | | | | 15,142,383 | | | | 1.46 | % |
Total | | $ | 53,523,183 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 113,969 | | | $ | 623,196 | | | $ | 187,793 | | | $ | 54,448,141 | | | | 0.99 | % |
December 31, 2015 | |
| | Repurchase Agreements by Collateral Type | | | | | | Weighted Average Rate | |
| | Agency Mortgage-backed Securities | | | Debentures | | | CRTs | | | Non-Agency Mortgage-backed Securities | | | Commercial Loans | | | Total Repurchase Agreements | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
1 day | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | | 0.00 | % |
2 to 29 days | | | 20,123,464 | | | | - | | | | 83,664 | | | | 260,359 | | | | - | | | | 20,467,487 | | | | 0.69 | % |
30 to 59 days | | | 7,898,646 | | | | - | | | | 59,189 | | | | 65,374 | | | | - | | | | 8,023,209 | | | | 0.74 | % |
60 to 89 days | | | 4,046,593 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 78,833 | | | | - | | | | 4,125,426 | | | | 0.74 | % |
90 to 119 days | | | 4,846,580 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,846,580 | | | | 0.60 | % |
Over 120 days(1) | | | 18,557,715 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 31,015 | | | | 179,428 | | | | 18,768,158 | | | | 1.33 | % |
Total | | $ | 55,472,998 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 142,853 | | | $ | 435,581 | | | $ | 179,428 | | | $ | 56,230,860 | | | | 0.90 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Approximately 12% and 14% of the total repurchase agreements had a remaining maturity over 1 year as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. |
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
Repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements with the same counterparty and the same maturity are presented net in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition when the terms of the agreements permit netting. The following table summarizes the gross amounts of reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements, amounts offset in accordance with netting arrangements and net
amounts of repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Refer to "Derivative Instruments" footnote for information related to the effect of netting arrangements on the Company's derivative instruments.
| | March 31, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | |
| | Reverse Repurchase Agreements | | | Repurchase Agreements | | | Reverse Repurchase Agreements | | | Repurchase Agreements | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Gross Amounts | | $ | - | | | $ | 54,448,141 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 56,230,860 | |
Amounts Offset | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Netted Amounts | | $ | - | | | $ | 54,448,141 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 56,230,860 | |
The Company also finances a portion of its financial assets with advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines ("FHLB Des Moines"). Borrowings from FHLB Des Moines are reported in Other secured financing in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. As of March 31, 2016, $3.6 billion matures beyond three years. As of December 31, 2015, $402.8 million matures within 90 days and $1.4 billion extends beyond three years. The weighted average rate of the advances from the FHLB Des Moines was 0.59% at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Financial instruments pledged as collateral under secured financing arrangements and interest rate swaps had an estimated fair value and accrued interest of $62.7 billion and $188.6 million, respectively, at March 31, 2016 and $62.3 billion and $171.7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015.
9. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
In connection with the Company's investment/market rate risk management strategy, the Company economically hedges a portion of its interest rate risk
by entering into derivative financial instrument contracts, which include interest rate swaps, swaptions and futures contracts. The Company may also enter into TBA derivatives, MBS options and U.S. Treasury or Eurodollar futures contracts to economically hedge its exposure to market risks. The purpose of using derivatives is to manage overall portfolio risk with the potential to generate additional income for distribution to stockholders. These derivatives are subject to changes in market values resulting from changes in interest rates, volatility, Agency mortgage-backed security spreads to U.S. Treasuries and market liquidity. The use of derivatives also creates exposure to credit risk relating to potential losses that could be recognized if the counterparties to these instruments fail to perform their obligations under the stated contract. Additionally, the Company may have to pledge cash or assets as collateral for the derivative transactions, the amount of which may vary based on the market value, notional amount and remaining term of the derivative contract. In the event of a default by the counterparty, the Company could have difficulty obtaining its Residential Investment Securities pledged as collateral as well as receiving payments in accordance with the terms of the derivative contracts.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
The table below summarizes fair value information about our derivative assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
Derivatives Instruments | Balance Sheet Location | | March 31, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | |
Assets: | | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Interest rate swaps | Interest rate swaps, at fair value | | $ | 93,312 | | | $ | 19,642 | |
TBA derivatives | Other derivatives, at fair value | | | 76,732 | | | | 9,622 | |
Futures contracts | Other derivatives, at fair value | | | 717 | | | | 12,444 | |
| | | $ | 170,761 | | | $ | 41,708 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps | Interest rate swaps, at fair value | | $ | 2,782,961 | | | $ | 1,677,571 | |
TBA derivatives | Other derivatives, at fair value | | | - | | | | 17,185 | |
Futures contracts | Other derivatives, at fair value | | | 69,171 | | | | 32,778 | |
| | | $ | 2,852,132 | | | $ | 1,727,534 | |
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the Company's interest rate swaps at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
March 31, 2016 | |
Maturity | | Current Notional (1) | | | Weighted Average Pay Rate (2) (3) | | | Weighted Average Receive Rate (2) | | | Weighted Average Years to Maturity (2) | |
(dollars in thousands) | |
0 - 3 years | | $ | 4,290,419 | | | | 1.79 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 1.87 | |
3 - 6 years | | | 11,925,000 | | | | 1.87 | % | | | 0.73 | % | | | 4.22 | |
6 - 10 years | | | 10,227,550 | | | | 2.49 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | | 7.88 | |
Greater than 10 years | | | 3,434,400 | | | | 3.54 | % | | | 0.59 | % | | | 18.64 | |
Total / Weighted Average | | $ | 29,877,369 | | | | 2.26 | % | | | 0.69 | % | | | 6.76 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2015 | |
Maturity | | Current Notional (1) | | | Weighted Average Pay Rate (2) (3) | | | Weighted Average Receive Rate (2) | | | Weighted Average Years to Maturity (2) | |
(dollars in thousands) | |
0 - 3 years | | $ | 3,240,436 | | | | 1.85 | % | | | 0.36 | % | | | 1.80 | |
3 - 6 years | | | 11,675,000 | | | | 1.82 | % | | | 0.55 | % | | | 4.25 | |
6 - 10 years | | | 11,635,250 | | | | 2.44 | % | | | 0.57 | % | | | 7.92 | |
Greater than 10 years | | | 3,634,400 | | | | 3.70 | % | | | 0.43 | % | | | 19.37 | |
Total / Weighted Average | | $ | 30,185,086 | | | | 2.26 | % | | | 0.53 | % | | | 7.02 | |
(1) There were no forward starting pay fixed swaps as of March 31, 2016. Notional amount includes $500.0 million in forward starting pay fixed swaps as of December 31, 2015. |
(2) Excludes forward starting swaps. |
(3) There were no forward starting pay fixed swaps as of March 31, 2016. Weighted average fixed rate on forward starting pay fixed swaps was 1.44% as of December 31, 2015. |
|
There were no swaptions outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the Company's TBA derivatives as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
March 31, 2016 | |
Purchase and sale contracts for derivative TBAs | | Notional | | | Implied Cost Basis | | | Implied Market Value | | | Net Carrying Value | |
(dollars in thousands) | |
Purchase contracts | | $ | 14,273,000 | | | $ | 14,847,792 | | | $ | 14,924,524 | | | $ | 76,732 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2015 | |
Purchase and sale contracts for derivative TBAs | | Notional | | | Implied Cost Basis | | | Implied Market Value | | | Net Carrying Value | |
(dollars in thousands) | |
Purchase contracts | | $ | 13,761,000 | | | $ | 14,177,338 | | | $ | 14,169,775 | | | $ | (7,563 | ) |
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the Company's futures derivatives as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
| | March 31, 2016 | |
| | Notional - Long Positions | | | Notional - Short Positions | | | Weighted Average Years to Maturity | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | |
2-year swap equivalent Eurodollar contracts | | $ | - | | | $ | (4,375,000 | ) | | | 2.00 | |
U.S. Treasury futures - 5 year | | | - | | | | (1,847,200 | ) | | | 4.42 | |
U.S. Treasury futures - 10 year and greater | | | - | | | | (655,600 | ) | | | 6.75 | |
Total | | $ | - | | | $ | (6,877,800 | ) | | | 3.10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2015 | |
| | Notional - Long Positions | | | Notional - Short Positions | | | Weighted Average Years to Maturity | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | |
2-year swap equivalent Eurodollar contracts | | $ | - | | | $ | (7,000,000 | ) | | | 2.00 | |
U.S. Treasury futures - 5 year | | | - | | | | (1,847,200 | ) | | | 4.42 | |
U.S. Treasury futures - 10 year and greater | | | - | | | | (655,600 | ) | | | 6.92 | |
Total | | $ | - | | | $ | (9,502,800 | ) | | | 2.81 | |
The Company presents derivative contracts on a gross basis on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Derivative contracts may contain legally enforceable provisions that allow for netting or setting off receivables and payables with each counterparty.
The following tables present information about derivative assets and liabilities that are subject to such provisions and can potentially be offset on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
March 31, 2016 | | | | | Amounts Eligible for Offset | | | | |
| | Gross Amounts | | | Financial Instruments | | | Cash Collateral | | | Net Amounts | |
Assets: | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Interest rate swaps, at fair value | | $ | 93,312 | | | $ | (93,312 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
TBA derivatives, at fair value | | | 76,732 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 76,732 | |
Futures contracts, at fair value | | | 717 | | | | (110 | ) | | | - | | | | 607 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps, at fair value | | $ | 2,782,961 | | | $ | (93,312 | ) | | $ | (1,617,530 | ) | | $ | 1,072,119 | |
TBA derivatives, at fair value | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Futures contracts, at fair value | | | 69,171 | | | | (110 | ) | | | (69,061 | ) | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2015 | | | | | | Amounts Eligible for Offset | | | | | |
| | Gross Amounts | | | Financial Instruments | | | Cash Collateral | | | Net Amounts | |
Assets: | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Interest rate swaps, at fair value | | $ | 19,642 | | | $ | (18,040 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,602 | |
TBA derivatives, at fair value | | | 9,622 | | | | (7,367 | ) | | | - | | | | 2,255 | |
Futures contracts, at fair value | | | 12,443 | | | | (10,868 | ) | | | - | | | | 1,575 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | |
Interest rate swaps, at fair value | | $ | 1,677,571 | | | $ | (18,040 | ) | | $ | (913,576 | ) | | $ | 745,955 | |
TBA derivatives, at fair value | | | 17,185 | | | | (7,367 | ) | | | - | | | | 9,818 | |
Futures contracts, at fair value | | | 32,778 | | | | (10,868 | ) | | | (21,910 | ) | | | - | |
The effect of interest rate swaps on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) is as follows:
| | Location on Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) | |
| | Realized Gains (Losses) on Interest Rate Swaps(1) | | | Realized Gains (Losses) on Termination of Interest Rate Swaps | | | Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Interest Rate Swaps | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Quarters Ended: | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2016 | | $ | (147,475 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (1,031,720 | ) |
March 31, 2015 | | $ | (158,239 | ) | | $ | (226,462 | ) | | $ | (466,202 | ) |
(1) Interest expense related to the Company's interest rate swaps is recorded in Realized gains (losses) on interest rate swaps on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
The effect of other derivative contracts on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) is as follows:
Quarter Ended March 31, 2016 | |
Derivative Instruments | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | | Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Net Gains (Losses) on Trading Assets | |
(dollars in thousands) | |
Net TBA derivatives (1) | | $ | 219,993 | | | $ | 84,295 | | | $ | 304,288 | |
Net interest rate swaptions | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Futures | | $ | (130,994 | ) | | $ | (48,120 | ) | | $ | (179,114 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 125,174 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quarter Ended March 31, 2015 | |
Derivative Instruments | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | | Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Net Gains (Losses) on Trading Assets | |
(dollars in thousands) | |
Net TBA derivatives (1) | | $ | (55,644 | ) | | $ | 117,188 | | | $ | 61,544 | |
Net interest rate swaptions | | $ | (21,891 | ) | | $ | 17,083 | | | $ | (4,808 | ) |
Futures | | $ | (5,506 | ) | | $ | (58,126 | ) | | $ | (63,632 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | (6,896 | ) |
(1) Includes options on TBA contracts.
Certain of the Company's derivative contracts are subject to International Swaps and Derivatives
Association Master Agreements or other similar agreements which may contain provisions that
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
grant counterparties certain rights with respect to the applicable agreement upon the occurrence of certain events such as (i) a decline in stockholders' equity in excess of specified thresholds or dollar amounts over set periods of time, (ii) the Company's failure to maintain its REIT status, (iii) the Company's failure to comply with limits on the amount of leverage, and (iv) the Company's stock being delisted from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Upon the occurrence of any one of items (i) through (iv), or another default under the agreement, the counterparty to the applicable agreement has a right to terminate the agreement in accordance with its provisions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with the aforementioned features that are in a net liability position at March 31, 2016 was approximately $2.6 billion, which represents the maximum amount the Company would be required to pay upon termination. This amount is fully collateralized.
10.
CONVERTIBLE SENIOR NOTES
In 2010, the Company issued $600.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 4% Convertible Senior Notes for net proceeds of approximately $582.0 million. In 2012, the Company repurchased $492.5 million in aggregate principal amount of its 4% Convertible Senior Notes. In February 2015, the 4% Convertible Senior Notes matured and the Company repaid the remaining 4% Convertible Senior Notes for the face amount of $107.5 million.
In May 2012, the Company issued $750.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 for net proceeds of approximately $727.5 million. In May 2015, the 5% Convertible Senior Notes matured and the Company repaid the 5% Convertible Senior Notes for the face amount of $750.0 million.
11. COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK
The Company's authorized shares of capital stock, par value of $0.01 per share, consists of 1,956,937,500 shares classified as common stock, 7,412,500 shares classified as 7.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 4,600,000 shares classified as 6.00% Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, 12,650,000 shares classified as 7.625% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and 18,400,000 shares classified as 7.50% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.
(A) Common Stock
At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had issued and outstanding 924,853,133 and 935,929,561 shares of common stock, respectively, with a par value of $0.01 per share.
No options were exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company raised $0.5 million, by issuing 54,000 shares, through the Direct Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Program. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company raised $0.6 million, by issuing 53,000 shares, through the Direct Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Program.
In August 2015, the Company announced that its board of directors ("Board") had authorized the repurchase of up to $1.0 billion of its outstanding common shares through December 31, 2016 ("Repurchase Program"). During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company repurchased 11,132,226 shares of its common stock under the Repurchase Program for an aggregate amount of $102.7 million. All common shares purchased were part of a publicly announced plan in open-market transactions.
In March 2012, the Company entered into six separate Distribution Agency Agreements ("Distribution Agency Agreements") with each of Merrill Lynch; Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated; Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC; Goldman, Sachs & Co.; J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC; and RCap Securities, Inc. (together, the Agents). Pursuant to the terms of the Distribution Agency Agreements, the Company may sell from time to time through the Agents, as its sales agents, up to 125,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The Company did not make any sales under the Distribution Agency Agreements during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
(B) Preferred Stock
At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had issued and outstanding 7,412,500 shares of Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred Stock"), with a par value of $0.01 per share and a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared). The Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to a dividend at a rate of 7.875% per year based on the $25.00 liquidation preference before the common stock is entitled to receive any dividends. The Series A Preferred Stock is redeemable at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared)
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
exclusively at the Company's option commencing on April 5, 2009 (subject to the Company's right under limited circumstances to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock earlier in order to preserve its qualification as a REIT). Through March 31, 2016, the Company had declared and paid all required quarterly dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock.
At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had issued and outstanding 12,000,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share and a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared). The Series C Preferred Stock is entitled to a dividend at a rate of 7.625% per year based on the $25.00 liquidation preference before the common stock is entitled to receive any dividends. The Series C Preferred Stock is redeemable at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) exclusively at the Company's option commencing on May 16, 2017 (subject to the Company's right under limited circumstances to redeem the Series C Preferred Stock earlier in order to preserve its qualification as a REIT or under limited circumstances related to a change of control of the Company). Through March 31, 2016, the Company had declared and paid all required quarterly dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock.
At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had issued and outstanding 18,400,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share and a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared). The Series D Preferred Stock is entitled to a dividend at a rate of 7.50% per year based on the $25.00 liquidation preference before the common stock is entitled to receive any dividends. The Series D Preferred Stock is redeemable at $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) exclusively at the Company's option commencing on September 13, 2017 (subject to the Company's right under limited circumstances to redeem the Series D Preferred Stock earlier in order to preserve its qualification as a REIT or under limited
circumstances related to a change of control of the Company). Through March 31, 2016, the Company had declared and paid all required quarterly dividends on the Series D Preferred Stock.
The 7.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 7.625% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and 7.50% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock rank senior to the common stock of the Company.
(C) Distributions to Stockholders
During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company declared dividends to common stockholders totaling $277.5 million, or $0.30 per common share which were paid to common stockholders on April 29, 2016. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company declared and paid dividends to Series A Preferred Stock stockholders totaling approximately $3.6 million, or $0.492 per preferred share, Series C Preferred Stock stockholders totaling approximately $5.7 million, or $0.477 per preferred share and Series D Preferred Stock stockholders totaling approximately $8.6 million, or $0.469 per preferred share.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company declared dividends to common stockholders totaling $284.3 million, or $0.30 per common share which were paid to common stockholders on April 30, 2015. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company declared and paid dividends to Series A Preferred Stock stockholders totaling approximately $3.6 million, or $0.492 per preferred share, Series C Preferred Stock stockholders totaling approximately $5.7 million, or $0.477 per preferred share and Series D Preferred Stock stockholders totaling approximately $8.6 million, or $0.469 per preferred share.
12. INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE
The table below presents the components of the Company's interest income and interest expense for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
| | For the Quarters Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
Interest income: | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Residential Investment Securities | | $ | 315,717 | | | $ | 478,239 | |
Commercial investment portfolio(1) | | | 70,187 | | | | 40,336 | |
Reverse repurchase agreements | | | 2,239 | | | | 539 | |
Total interest income | | | 388,143 | | | | 519,114 | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase agreements | | | 132,891 | | | | 102,748 | |
Convertible Senior Notes | | | - | | | | 23,627 | |
Securitized debt of consolidated VIEs | | | 9,033 | | | | 2,882 | |
Participation sold | | | 158 | | | | 159 | |
Other | | | 5,365 | | | | 4 | |
Total interest expense | | | 147,447 | | | | 129,420 | |
Net interest income | | $ | 240,696 | | | $ | 389,694 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) Includes commercial real estate debt, preferred equity and corporate debt. | | | | | | | | |
13. GOODWILL
At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, goodwill totaled $71.8 million.
14. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) and shares used in calculating basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
| | For the Quarters Ended | |
| | March 31, 2016 | | | March 31, 2015 | |
| | (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (868,080 | ) | | $ | (476,499 | ) |
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | (162 | ) | | | (90 | ) |
Net income (loss) attributable to Annaly | | | (867,918 | ) | | | (476,409 | ) |
Less: Preferred stock dividends | | | 17,992 | | | | 17,992 | |
Net income (loss) per share available (related) to common stockholders, prior to adjustment for dilutive potential common shares, if necessary | | | (885,910 | ) | | | (494,401 | ) |
Add: Interest on Convertible Senior Notes, if dilutive | | | - | | | | - | |
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders, as adjusted | | $ | (885,910 | ) | | $ | (494,401 | ) |
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding-basic | | | 926,813,588 | | | | 947,669,831 | |
Add: Effect of stock awards and Convertible Senior Notes, if dilutive | | | - | | | | - | |
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding-diluted | | | 926,813,588 | | | | 947,669,831 | |
Net income (loss) per share available (related) to common share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.96 | ) | | $ | (0.52 | ) |
Diluted | | $ | (0.96 | ) | | $ | (0.52 | ) |
Options to purchase 1.1 million and 2.3 million shares of common stock were outstanding and considered anti-dilutive as their exercise price and option expense exceeded the average stock price for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
15. LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
The Company adopted the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), which authorizes the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to grant options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, or other share-based awards, including restricted shares up to an aggregate of 25,000,000 shares, subject to adjustments as provided in the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. The Company had previously adopted a long term stock incentive plan for executive officers, key employees and non-employee directors (the "Prior
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
Plan"). The Prior Plan authorized the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to grant awards, including non-qualified options as well as incentive stock options as defined under Section 422 of the Code. The Prior Plan authorized the granting of options or other awards for an aggregate of the greater of 500,000 shares or 9.5% of the diluted outstanding shares of the Company's common stock, up to a ceiling of 8,932,921 shares. No further awards will be made
under the Prior Plan, although existing awards remain effective.
Stock options were issued at the market price on the date of grant, subject to an immediate or four year vesting in four equal installments with a contractual term of 5 or 10 years.
The following table sets forth activity related to the Company's stock options awarded under the Plan:
| | For the Quarters Ended | |
| | March 31, 2016 | | | March 31, 2015 | |
| | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
Options outstanding at the beginning of period | | | 1,168,775 | | | $ | 15.34 | | | | 2,259,335 | | | $ | 15.35 | |
Granted | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Exercised | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Forfeited | | | (2,500 | ) | | | 13.72 | | | | (8,799 | ) | | | 14.80 | |
Expired | | | (30,500 | ) | | | 11.72 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Options outstanding at the end of period | | | 1,135,775 | | | | 15.44 | | | | 2,250,536 | | | | 15.35 | |
Options exercisable at the end of the period | | | 1,135,775 | | | $ | 15.44 | | | | 2,250,536 | | | $ | 15.35 | |
The weighted average remaining contractual term was approximately 2.2 years and 2.8 years for stock options outstanding and exercisable as of March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
As of March 31, 2016 and 2015, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation awards.
16. INCOME TAXES
For the quarter ended March 31, 2016 the Company was qualified to be taxed as a REIT under Code Sections 856 through 860. As a REIT, the Company is not subject to federal income tax to the extent that it distributes its taxable income to its stockholders. To maintain qualification as a REIT, the Company must distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income to its stockholders and meet certain other requirements such as assets it may hold, income it may generate and its stockholder composition. It is generally the Company's policy to distribute 100% of its REIT taxable income. To the extent there is any undistributed REIT taxable income at the end of a year, the Company distributes such shortfall within the next year as permitted by the Code. For years prior to 2013, the Company retained the amount of taxable income attributable to certain employee remuneration deductions disallowed for tax purposes pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code ("Section 162(m)"). As a result of the externalization of management effective as of July 1, 2013, the Company was not subject to the Section 162(m) disallowance for the 2013 tax year.
The state and local tax jurisdictions for which the Company is subject to tax-filing obligations recognize the Company's status as a REIT, and therefore, the Company generally does not pay income tax in such jurisdictions. The Company may, however, be subject to certain minimum state and local tax filing fees as well as certain excise, franchise or business taxes. The Company's TRSs are subject to federal, state and local taxes.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company recorded an $837 thousand income tax benefit for income attributable to its TRSs. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company recorded $14 thousand of income tax expense for income attributable to its TRSs.
The Company's federal, state and local tax returns from 2012 and forward remain open for examination.
17. LEASE COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
The Company had a non-cancelable lease for office space which commenced in May 2002 and expired in December 2014. In September 2014, the Company entered into a non-cancelable lease for office space which commenced in July 2014 and expires in September 2025. FIDAC has a lease for office space which commenced in October 2010 and expired in February 2016. The lease expense for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The Company's aggregate
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
future minimum lease payments totaled $35.4 million.
The following table details the lease payments.
Years Ending December 31, | | Lease Commitments | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
2016 (remaining) | | $ | 2,673 | |
2017 | | | 3,565 | |
2018 | | | 3,565 | |
2019 | | | 3,565 | |
2020 | | | 3,652 | |
Later years | | | 18,343 | |
| | $ | 35,363 | |
The Company had no material unfunded loan commitments as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Contingencies
From time to time, the Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. There were no material contingencies as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
18. RISK MANAGEMENT
The primary risks to the Company are liquidity, investment/market risk and credit risk. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond the Company's control. Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on Interest Earning Assets and the interest expense incurred in connection with the Interest Bearing Liabilities and hedges, by affecting the spread between the Interest Earning Assets and Interest Bearing Liabilities. Changes in the level of interest rates can also affect the value of the Interest Earning Assets and the Company's ability to realize gains from the sale of these assets. A decline in the value of the Interest Earning Assets pledged as collateral for borrowings under repurchase agreements and derivative contracts could result in the counterparties demanding additional collateral pledges or liquidation of some of the existing collateral to reduce borrowing levels.
The Company may seek to mitigate the potential financial impact by entering into interest rate agreements such as interest rate swaps, interest rate swaptions and other hedges.
Weakness in the mortgage market, the shape of the yield curve and changes in the expectations for the path and volatility of future interest rates may adversely affect the performance and market value of the Company's
investments. This could negatively impact the Company's book value. Furthermore, if many of the Company's lenders are unwilling or unable to provide additional financing, the Company could be forced to sell its Residential Investment Securities and commercial real estate investments at an inopportune time when prices are depressed. The Company has established policies and procedures for mitigating risks, including conducting scenario analyses and utilizing a range of hedging strategies.
The payment of principal and interest on the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Agency mortgage-backed securities, excluding CRT securities issued by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, are guaranteed by those respective agencies and the payment of principal and interest on Ginnie Mae Agency mortgage-backed securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Principal and interest on Agency debentures are guaranteed by the Agency issuing the debenture. The majority of the Company's Residential Investment Securities have an actual or implied "AAA" rating.
The Company faces credit risk on the portions of its portfolio which are not guaranteed by the respective Agency or by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The Company is exposed to credit risk on CRE Debt and Preferred Equity Investments, investments in commercial real estate, commercial mortgage-backed securities, CRT securities, other non-Agency mortgage-backed securities and corporate debt. The Company is exposed to risk of loss if an issuer, borrower, tenant or counterparty fails to perform its obligations under contractual terms. The Company has established policies and procedures for mitigating credit risk, including reviewing and establishing limits for credit exposure, limiting transactions with specific counterparties, maintaining qualifying collateral and periodically assessing the creditworthiness of issuers, borrowers, tenants and counterparties.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
19. RCAP REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
RCap is subject to regulations of the securities business that include but are not limited to trade practices, use and safekeeping of funds and securities, capital structure, recordkeeping and conduct of directors, officers and employees.
As a self-clearing, registered broker dealer, RCap is required to maintain minimum net capital by FINRA. As of March 31, 2016 RCap had a minimum net capital requirement of $0.3 million. RCap consistently operates with capital in excess of its regulatory capital requirements. RCap's regulatory net capital as defined by SEC Rule 15c3-1, as of March 31, 2016 was $140.4 million with excess net capital of $140.1 million.
20. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Investment in Affiliate and Advisory Fees
In August 2015, FIDAC entered into an agreement with Chimera Investment Corporation ("Chimera") to internalize the management of Chimera. As part of the agreement, the companies agreed to terminate the management agreement between FIDAC and Chimera effective August 5, 2015.
In connection with the transaction, Annaly and Chimera entered into a share repurchase agreement pursuant to which Chimera purchased the Company's approximately 9.0 million shares of Chimera at an aggregate price of $126.4 million. The share repurchase agreement closed in August 2015.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company did not record any advisory fees. For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company recorded advisory fees from Chimera totaling $10.5 million. In August 2014, the management agreement between FIDAC and Chimera was amended and restated to amend certain of the terms and conditions of the prior agreement. Among other amendments to the terms of the prior agreement, effective August 8, 2014, the management fee was increased from 0.75% to 1.20% of Chimera's gross stockholders' equity (as defined in the amended and restated management agreement).
Management Agreement
The Company and the Manager have entered into a management agreement pursuant to which the Company's management is conducted by the Manager through the authority delegated to it in the Management Agreement and pursuant to the policies
established by the Board (the "Externalization"). The management agreement was effective as of July 1, 2013 and applicable for the entire 2013 calendar year and was amended on November 5, 2014 (the management agreement, as amended, is referred to as "Management Agreement").
Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement, the Company pays the Manager a monthly management fee in an amount equal to 1/12th of 1.05% of stockholders' equity, as defined in the Management Agreement, for its management services. For the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the compensation and management fee was $37.0 million and $38.6 million, respectively. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had amounts payable to the Manager of $12.0 million and $12.1 million, respectively.
The Management Agreement provides for a two year term ending December 31, 2016 with automatic two-year renewals unless at least two-thirds of the Company's independent directors or the holders of a majority of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock elect to terminate the agreement in their sole discretion for any or no reason. At any time during the term or any renewal term the Company may deliver to the Manager written notice of the Company's intention to terminate the Management Agreement. The Company must designate a date not less than one year from the date of the notice on which the Management Agreement will terminate. The Management Agreement also provides that the Manager may terminate the Management Agreement by providing to the Company prior written notice of its intention to terminate the Management Agreement no less than one year prior to the date designated by the Manager on which the Manager would cease to provide services or such earlier date as determined by the Company in its sole discretion.
The Company has a limited number of employees following the Externalization, all of whom are employees of the Company's subsidiaries for regulatory or corporate efficiency reasons. All compensation expenses associated with such retained employees reduce the amount paid to the Manager.
The Management Agreement may be amended or modified by agreement between the Company and the Manager. There is no termination fee for a termination of the Management Agreement by either the Company or the Manager.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. Financial Statements
21. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Pending Acquisition of Hatteras Financial Corp.
As previously disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 11, 2016 (the "Merger 8-K"), on April 10, 2016, the Company, Ridgeback Merger Sub Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company ("Purchaser"), and Hatteras Financial Corp. ("Hatteras") entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the "Merger Agreement"), pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions contained therein, the Company agreed to acquire Hatteras (the "Hatteras Acquisition"), an externally managed mortgage REIT that invests primarily in single-family residential mortgage real estate assets, for aggregate consideration to Hatteras common shareholders of approximately $1.5 billion based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on April 8, 2016. Approximately 65% of such consideration will be payable in shares of the Company's common stock, and approximately 35% of which will be payable in cash. In addition, as part of the Hatteras Acquisition, each share of Hatteras 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share ("Hatteras Preferred Share"), that is outstanding as of immediately prior to the completion of the Hatteras Acquisition will be converted into one share of a newly-designated series of the Company's preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, which the Company expects will be classified and designated as 7.625% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, and which will have rights, preferences, privileges and voting powers substantially the same as a Hatteras Preferred Share.
The closing of the Hatteras Acquisition is subject to a number of conditions, including the receipt of specified regulatory approvals.
Prior to closing the Hatteras Acquisition, each of Hatteras and the Company will declare a prorated dividend to their respective shareholders with a record and payment date on the last business day prior to the completion of the Hatteras Acquisition. Each of the dividends will be prorated based on the number of days that elapsed since the record date for the most recent quarterly dividend paid to Hatteras and the Company's shareholders, respectively, and the amount of such prior quarterly dividend, as applicable.
In connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Hatteras and its external manager, Atlantic Capital Advisors LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company ("ACA"), entered into an amendment to the management agreement, dated February 23, 2012, by and between Hatteras and ACA. The amendment provides that upon the completion of the Hatteras Acquisition, the management agreement between Hatteras and ACA will terminate, and as a result of such termination, Hatteras will pay to ACA a termination fee of $45.4 million.
The Hatteras Acquisition is expected to be completed before the end of the third quarter of 2016.
For additional details regarding the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and related matters, please refer to the Merger Agreement and the Merger 8-K and the other documentation filed as exhibits thereto. Additional information regarding the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including associated risks, will be contained in a registration statement on Form S-4 that the Company expects to file with the SEC in connection with the Hatteras Acquisition.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this quarterly report, and certain statements contained in our future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC or the Commission), in our press releases or in our other public or stockholder communications contain or incorporate by reference certain forward-looking statements which are based on various assumptions (some of which are beyond our control) and may be identified by reference to a future period or periods or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as "may," "will," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "continue," or similar terms or variations on those terms or the negative of those terms. Actual results could differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates; changes in the yield curve; changes in prepayment rates; the availability of mortgage-backed securities and other securities for purchase; the availability of financing and, if available, the terms of any financings; changes in the market value of our assets; changes in business conditions and the general economy; our ability to grow our commercial business; our ability to grow our residential mortgage credit business; credit risks related to our investments in credit risk transfer securities, residential mortgage-backed securities and related residential mortgage credit assets, commercial real estate assets and corporate debt; our ability to consummate any contemplated investment
opportunities; changes in government regulations affecting our business; our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes; our ability to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act; and our ability to consummate the proposed Hatteras Acquisition on a timely basis or at all, and potential business disruption following the Hatteras Acquisition. For a discussion of the risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, see "Risk Factors" in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Item 1A "Risk Factors" in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements, except as required by law.
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our most recent annual report on Form 10-K. All references to "Annaly," "we," "us" or "our" mean Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and all entities owned by us, except where it is made clear that the term means only the parent company. Refer to the section titled "Glossary of Terms" located at the end of this Item 2 for definitions of commonly used terms in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
INDEX TO ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview | 41 |
Pending Acquisition of Hatteras | 41 |
Business Environment | 42 |
Economic Environment | 42 |
Financial Regulatory Reform | 43 |
Results of Operations | 43 |
Net Income (Loss) Summary | 44 |
Non-GAAP Financial Measures | 45 |
Core Earnings and Normalized Core Earnings | 46 |
Normalized Interest Income, Economic Interest Expense, Economic Net Interest Income and Normalized Economic Net Interest Income | 46 |
Experienced and Projected Long-term CPR | 47 |
Normalized Interest Income and Normalized Average Yield on Interest Earning Assets | 48 |
Economic Interest Expense and Average Cost of Interest Bearing Liabilities | 48 |
Normalized Economic Net Interest Income | 48 |
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) | 49 |
Other Income (Loss) | 50 |
General Administrative Expenses | 50 |
Unrealized Gains and Losses | 50 |
Net Income (Loss) and Return on Average Equity | 51 |
Financial Condition | 51 |
Residential Investment Securities | 52 |
Contractual Obligations | 54 |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements | 55 |
Capital Management | 55 |
Stockholders' Equity | 55 |
Common and Preferred Stock | 56 |
Distributions to Stockholders | 56 |
Leverage and Capital | 57 |
Risk Management | 57 |
Risk Appetite | 57 |
Governance | 58 |
Description of Risks | 58 |
Liquidity Risk Management | 59 |
Funding | 59 |
Excess Liquidity | 60 |
Maturity Profile | 61 |
Stress Testing | 63 |
Liquidity Management Policies | 63 |
Investment/Market Risk Management | 63 |
Credit Risk Management | 64 |
Counterparty Risk Management | 64 |
Operational Risk Management | 65 |
Compliance, Regulatory and Legal Risk Management | 65 |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates | 66 |
Valuation of Financial Instruments | 66 |
Residential Investment Securities | 66 |
Commercial Real Estate Investments | 66 |
Interest Rate Swaps | 66 |
Revenue Recognition | 67 |
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities | 67 |
Use of Estimates | 67 |
Glossary of Terms | 68 |
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
We are a leading mortgage REIT that is externally managed by Annaly Management Company LLC (or Manager). Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "NLY." Since our founding in 1997, we have strived to generate net income for distribution to our stockholders through the prudent selection and management of our investments.
We own a portfolio of real estate related investments. We use our capital coupled with borrowed funds to invest in real estate related investments, earning the spread between the yield on our assets and the cost of our borrowings and hedging activities.
We are primarily organized around the following operations:
| |
Annaly, the parent company | Invests primarily in various types of Agency mortgage-backed securities and related derivatives to hedge these investments. Its portfolio also includes residential credit investments such as CRTs and non-Agency mortgage-backed securities. |
Annaly Commercial Real Estate Group, Inc. (or ACREG) | Wholly-owned subsidiary that specializes in originating or acquiring, financing and managing commercial loans and other commercial real estate debt, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other commercial real estate-related assets. |
Annaly Middle Market Lending LLC (or MML) | Wholly-owned subsidiary that engages in corporate middle market lending transactions. |
RCap Securities, Inc. (or RCap) | Wholly-owned subsidiary that operates as a broker-dealer, and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (or FINRA) |
For a full discussion of our business, refer to the section titled "Business Overview" in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Pending Acquisition of Hatteras
As previously disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 11, 2016 (Merger 8-K), on April 10, 2016, Annaly, Ridgeback Merger Sub Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (Purchaser), and Hatteras Financial Corp. (Hatteras) entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the Merger Agreement), pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions contained therein, we agreed to acquire Hatteras (the Hatteras Acquisition), an externally managed mortgage REIT that invests primarily in single-family residential mortgage real estate assets, for aggregate consideration to Hatteras common shareholders of approximately $1.5 billion based on the closing price of Annaly's common stock on April 8, 2016. Approximately 65% of such consideration will be payable in shares of our common stock, and approximately 35% of which will be payable in cash. In addition, as part of the Hatteras Acquisition, each share of Hatteras 7.625% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (Hatteras Preferred Share), that is outstanding as of immediately prior to the completion of the Hatteras Acquisition will be
converted into one share of a newly-designated series of our preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, which we expect will be classified and designated as 7.625% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, and which will have rights, preferences, privileges and voting powers substantially the same as a Hatteras Preferred Share.
The closing of the Hatteras Acquisition is subject to a number of conditions, including the receipt of specified regulatory approvals.
Prior to closing the Hatteras Acquisition, each of Hatteras and Annaly will declare a prorated dividend to their respective shareholders with a record and payment date on the last business day prior to the completion of the Hatteras Acquisition. Each of the dividends will be prorated based on the number of days that elapsed since the record date for the most recent quarterly dividend paid to Hatteras and Annaly's shareholders, respectively, and the amount of such prior quarterly dividend, as applicable.
In connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Hatteras and its external manager, Atlantic Capital Advisors LLC, a North Carolina limited
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
liability company (ACA), entered into an amendment to the management agreement, dated February 23, 2012, by and between Hatteras and ACA. The amendment provides that upon the completion of the Hatteras Acquisition, the management agreement between Hatteras and ACA will terminate, and as a result of such termination, Hatteras will pay to ACA a termination fee of $45.4 million.
The Hatteras Acquisition is expected to be completed before the end of the third quarter of 2016.
For additional details regarding the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and related matters, please refer to the Merger Agreement and the Merger 8-K and the other documentation filed as exhibits thereto. Additional information regarding the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including associated risks, will be contained in a registration statement on Form S-4 that we expect to file with the SEC in connection with the Hatteras Acquisition.
The aggregate size of our Residential Investment Securities portfolio and commercial real estate investments (excluding assets held in consolidated VIEs) remained relatively unchanged in the first quarter of 2016 after growing modestly in the fourth quarter of 2015. The composition of our Residential Investment Securities portfolio continued to shift modestly from agency securities to residential credit securities during the current quarter. The first quarter of 2016 witnessed a meaningful bout of volatility that has since subsided, as markets reacted sharply to signs of slowing inflation and growth early in 2016. In light of this environment, we remain cautious with regard to portfolio positioning and leverage.
Economic Environment
Entering 2016, investors continued to face a low growth, low inflation environment in which asset prices are supported by unprecedented central bank policy accommodation. Within this fragile global growth environment, financial markets remained vulnerable to shocks, highlighted by a continued weakness in commodities and trade. Early readings of first quarter 2016 economic growth, as measured by real gross domestic product (or GDP) according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, suggests that the U.S. economy expanded at a weak seasonally-adjusted annualized rate of 0.5%. This slowdown in economic activity was driven by more cautious consumer
spending amidst the presence of the same weak factors that were present in 2015: limited business spending and exports, largely driven by the drop in commodity prices and rise in foreign exchange value of the U.S. dollar. Housing continued to be a modest positive boost, driven by low interest rates and recovering consumer balance sheets.
Despite the slowdown in growth, unemployment continued to fall during the first quarter of 2016. The economy added 226,000 jobs per month during the first quarter of 2016 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, only modestly below the monthly average of 241,000 in 2015. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 5.0% as more people reentered the labor force, in turn resulting in an increase in the participation rate of 0.4% to 63.0%, its highest level in two years. Wage growth, meanwhile, continued to remain low, as the median wage increased 3.2% year-over-year in March 2016, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, unchanged from March 2015.
Realized inflation remained below the Fed's 2% target as measured by their preferred headline Personal Consumer Expenditure Chain Price Index (or PCE), which rose 0.8% year-over-year in March 2016, as well as the more stable core PCE measure, which excludes food and energy prices, at 1.6% year-over-year. Despite a modest upward trend in realized inflation in recent months, both market- and survey-based measures of inflation expectations fell during the quarter, providing the Fed with more time in its rate hike cycle than what would be anticipated by the realized inflation figures alone.
During the first quarter of 2016, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) maintained the federal funds rate target at a range of one-quarter to one-half percent, while simultaneously reinvesting the runoff of its portfolio of U.S. Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities. At their meeting on December 15-16, 2015, the FOMC raised the federal funds target rate by 25 BPs to the current target range – marking the first rate hike since June 2006 – and expected to further increase the target rate in 2016. However, global financial market uncertainty in early 2016 appears to have at least temporarily slowed the FOMC's forecast of higher short-term interest rates. The Fed's Summary of Economic Projections released with the March 2016 FOMC statement suggested that FOMC members expect to increase the federal funds target rate only twice in 2016, down from the previously expected four hikes. Chair Yellen subsequently argued that the significant changes in oil prices, interest rates, and stock values in the first quarter of 2016 did not change the FOMC's baseline outlook of future economic
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
activity, but increased the risks associated with achieving this outlook. She acknowledged investors had sharply marked "down their expectations for the future path of the federal funds rate, thereby putting downward pressure on longer-term interest rates" thereby supporting the continuation of the recovery. At their April 2016 FOMC meeting, the FOMC did not meaningfully update their view in the official statement, noting continued labor market improvement in the face of slowing growth, while somewhat downplaying the risks posed by foreign financial and economic developments.
Interest rates declined 33-56 basis points across the yield curve over the course of the first quarter of 2016, with 10-year Treasury yields reaching their lowest level since 2012/2013 when the Fed was actively engaged in its third round of quantitative easing (or QE). The sizeable decline in interest rates was driven by the aforementioned repricing of short-term rate
expectations related to an expected slower Fed rate hiking cycle and the decline in the market's expectations about future inflation. In addition, the increased global central bank accommodation – with the European Central Bank increasing its QE program and the Bank of Japan introducing negative interest rates – have left the United States with a large share of positive yielding developed market government debt, in turn increasing relative attractiveness of U.S. yields, despite their historically low levels. The mortgage basis, or the spread between the 30-year current coupon Agency mortgage-backed security and 10-year U.S. Treasury, widened modestly during the first quarter of 2016.
The following table provides interest rates as of each date presented:
| | March 31, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | | | March 31, 2015 | |
30-Year mortgage current coupon | | | 2.57 | % | | | 3.00 | % | | | 2.65 | % |
Mortgage basis | | 80 bps | | 73 bps | | 73 bps |
10-Year U.S. Treasury rate | | | 1.77 | % | | | 2.27 | % | | | 1.92 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
LIBOR: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1-Month | | | 0.44 | % | | | 0.43 | % | | | 0.18 | % |
6-Month | | | 0.90 | % | | | 0.84 | % | | | 0.40 | % |
Financial Regulatory Reform
Uncertainty remains surrounding financial regulatory reform and its impact on the markets and the broader economy. In particular, the U.S. government is attempting to change its involvement through the Agencies in the mortgage market. There have been numerous legislative initiatives introduced regarding the Agencies, and it is unclear which approach, if any, may become law. In addition, regulators remain focused on the wholesale funding markets, bank capital levels and shadow banking. It is difficult to predict the ultimate legislative and other regulatory outcomes of these efforts. We continue to monitor these legislative and regulatory developments to evaluate their potential impact on our business.
In January 2016, the Federal Housing Finance Administration (or FHFA) issued final rules relating to captive insurance company membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank (or FHLBs), which provide that captive insurance companies will no longer be eligible for membership in the FHLBs. As part of their membership in the FHLBs, captive insurance companies typically pledge assets as collateral for
advances from the FHLBs. The rules allow captive insurance companies that are existing members of FHLBs to remain members for either one or five years depending on when that member was admitted as a member. Our captive insurance subsidiary Truman Insurance Company LLC (or Truman) was admitted as a member of the FHLB of Des Moines (or FHLB Des Moines) prior to September 2014 and, therefore, through February 2021, may remain a member of the FHLB Des Moines and maintain existing advances until their scheduled repayment dates.
The results of our operations are affected by various factors, many of which are beyond our control. Some of these risks and uncertainties are described herein (see "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements") and in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk factors" of our most recent annual report on Form 10-K.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
Net Income (Loss) Summary
The following table presents summarized financial information related to our results of operations as of and for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
| | For the Quarters Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| | (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Interest income | | $ | 388,143 | | | $ | 519,114 | |
Interest expense | | | 147,447 | | | | 129,420 | |
Net interest income | | | 240,696 | | | | 389,694 | |
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) | | | (1,055,553 | ) | | | (828,999 | ) |
Other income (loss) | | | (6,115 | ) | | | 13,758 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 47,945 | | | | 50,938 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (868,917 | ) | | | (476,485 | ) |
Income taxes | | | (837 | ) | | | 14 | |
Net income (loss) | | | (868,080 | ) | | | (476,499 | ) |
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | (162 | ) | | | (90 | ) |
Net income (loss) attributable to Annaly | | | (867,918 | ) | | | (476,409 | ) |
Dividends on preferred stock | | | 17,992 | | | | 17,992 | |
Net income (loss) available (related) to common stockholders | | $ | (885,910 | ) | | $ | (494,401 | ) |
Net income (loss) per share available (related) to common stockholders: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.96 | ) | | $ | (0.52 | ) |
Diluted | | $ | (0.96 | ) | | $ | (0.52 | ) |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 926,813,588 | | | | 947,669,831 | |
Diluted | | | 926,813,588 | | | | 947,669,831 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Non-GAAP financial measures (1): | | | | | | | | |
Normalized interest income (2) | | $ | 556,551 | | | $ | 606,997 | |
Economic interest expense | | $ | 270,571 | | | $ | 286,752 | |
Normalized economic net interest income (2) | | $ | 285,980 | | | $ | 320,245 | |
Core earnings | | $ | 123,349 | | | $ | 254,082 | |
Normalized core earnings (2) | | $ | 291,757 | | | $ | 341,965 | |
Core earnings per average basic common share | | $ | 0.11 | | | $ | 0.25 | |
Normalized core earnings per average basic common share (2) | | $ | 0.30 | | | $ | 0.34 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other information: | | | | | | | | |
Asset portfolio at period-end | | $ | 74,280,593 | | | $ | 73,941,094 | |
Average total assets | | $ | 76,317,429 | | | $ | 83,515,522 | |
Average equity | | $ | 11,781,965 | | | $ | 13,229,186 | |
Leverage at period-end (3) | | 5.3:1 | | | 4.8:1 | |
Economic leverage at period-end (4) | | 6.2:1 | | | 5.7:1 | |
Capital ratio (5) | | | 13.2 | % | | | 14.3 | % |
Annualized return on average total assets | | | (4.55 | %) | | | (2.28 | %) |
Annualized return (loss) on average equity | | | (29.47 | %) | | | (14.41 | %) |
Annualized core return on average equity | | | 4.19 | % | | | 7.69 | % |
Annualized normalized core return on average equity (2) | | | 9.91 | % | | | 10.34 | % |
Net interest margin (6) | | | 0.79 | % | | | 1.29 | % |
Normalized net interest margin (2) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.68 | % |
Average yield on interest earning assets | | | 2.09 | % | | | 2.54 | % |
Normalized average yield on interest earning assets (2) | | | 3.00 | % | | | 2.96 | % |
Average cost of interest bearing liabilities | | | 1.73 | % | | | 1.64 | % |
Net interest spread | | | 0.36 | % | | | 0.90 | % |
Normalized net interest spread (2) | | | 1.27 | % | | | 1.32 | % |
Constant prepayment rate | | | 8.8 | % | | | 9.0 | % |
Long-term constant prepayment rate | | | 11.8 | % | | | 9.2 | % |
Common stock book value per share | | $ | 11.61 | | | $ | 12.88 | |
(1) See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for a reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures to their corresponding GAAP amounts.
(2) Includes the Premium Amortization Adjustment due to quarter-over-quarter changes in long-term CPR estimates.
(3) Includes repurchase agreements, other secured financing, Convertible Senior Notes and non-recourse securitized debt, loan participation and mortgages payable.
(4) Computed as the sum of recourse debt, TBA derivative notional outstanding and net forward purchases of investments divided by total equity.
(5) Represents the ratio of stockholders' equity to total assets (inclusive of total market value of TBA derivatives and exclusive of consolidated VIEs associated with B-Piece commercial mortgage-backed securities).
(6) Represents the sum of annualized economic net interest income, inclusive of interest expense on interest rate swaps used to hedge costs of funds, plus TBA dollar roll income less interest expense on interest rate swaps used to hedge dollar roll transactions divided by the sum of average Interest Earning Assets plus average outstanding TBA contract balances.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
This Management Discussion and Analysis section contains analysis and discussion of non-GAAP measurements. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for further information.
GAAP
Net income (loss) was ($868.1) million, which includes ($0.2) million attributable to a noncontrolling interest, or ($0.96) per average basic common share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 compared to ($476.5) million, which includes ($0.1) million attributable to a noncontrolling interest, or ($0.52) per average basic common share, for the same period in 2015. We attribute the majority of the change in net income (loss) to the higher unrealized losses on interest rate swaps and lower interest income. Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps were ($1.0) billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 compared to ($466.2) million for the same period in 2015, reflecting an unfavorable change in the fair value of interest rate swaps due to lower forward interest rates for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. Interest income decreased $131.0 million to $388.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to lower coupon income resulting from lower average Interest Earning Assets and lower average yield on Interest Earning Assets, and higher amortization expense reflecting higher projected long-term CPR on Residential Investment Securities, partially offset by higher interest income from the commercial investment portfolio.
Non-GAAP
Normalized core earnings were $291.8 million, or $0.30 per average common share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 compared to $342.0 million, or $0.34 per average common share, for the same period in 2015. Normalized core earnings declined during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 primarily due to a reduction in normalized interest income earned on lower Residential Investment Securities balances, partially offset by increased interest income on a larger commercial investment portfolio. Core earnings were $123.3 million, or $0.11 per average basic common share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 compared to $254.1 million, or $0.25 per average basic common share, for the same period in 2015.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This Management Discussion and Analysis section contains analysis and discussion of non-GAAP measurements. The non-GAAP measurements include the following:
● core earnings;
● normalized core earnings;
● core earnings per average basic common share;
● normalized core earnings per average basic common share;
● normalized interest income;
● economic interest expense;
● economic net interest income; and
● normalized economic net interest income
Core earnings represents a non-GAAP measure and is defined as net income (loss) excluding gains or losses on disposals of investments and termination of interest rate swaps, unrealized gains or losses on interest rate swaps and financial instruments measured at fair value through earnings, net gains and losses on trading assets, impairment losses, GAAP net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest and certain other non-recurring gains or losses, and inclusive of TBA dollar roll income (a component of Net gains (losses) on trading assets).
Normalized core earnings represents a non-GAAP measure and is defined as core earnings excluding the Premium Amortization Adjustment (or PAA). PAA is the component of premium amortization representing the quarter-over-quarter change in estimated long-term constant prepayment rates.
We believe that core earnings, normalized core earnings, core earnings per average basic common share, normalized core earnings per average basic common share, normalized interest income, economic interest expense, economic net interest income and normalized economic net interest income provide meaningful information to consider, in addition to the respective amounts prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures help us to evaluate our financial position and performance without the effects of certain transactions and GAAP adjustments that are not necessarily indicative of our current investment portfolio and operations.
Our presentation of non-GAAP financial measures has important limitations. Other market participants may calculate core earnings, normalized core earnings, core earnings per average basic common share, normalized core earnings per average basic common share, normalized interest income, economic interest expense, economic net interest income and normalized economic net interest income differently than we calculate them, making comparative analysis difficult.
Although we believe that the calculation of non-GAAP financial measures described above helps evaluate and measure our financial position and performance
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
without the effects of certain transactions, it is of limited usefulness as an analytical tool. Therefore, the non-GAAP financial measures should not be viewed in isolation and are not a substitute for net income (loss), net income (loss) per basic share available (related) to common stockholders, interest expense and net interest income computed in accordance with GAAP.
Core Earnings and Normalized Core Earnings
The following table provides GAAP measures of net income (loss) and net income (loss) per basic share available to common stockholders for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 and details with respect to reconciling the aforementioned line items on a non-GAAP basis:
| | For the Quarters Ended March 31, | |
| | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| | (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
GAAP net income (loss) | | $ | (868,080 | ) | | $ | (476,499 | ) |
Less: | | | | | | | | |
Realized (gains) losses on termination of interest rate swaps | | | - | | | | 226,462 | |
Unrealized (gains) losses on interest rate swaps | | | 1,031,720 | | | | 466,202 | |
Net (gains) losses on disposal of investments | | | 1,675 | | | | (62,356 | ) |
Net (gains) losses on trading assets | | | (125,189 | ) | | | 6,906 | |
Net unrealized (gains) losses on financial instruments measured at fair value through earnings | | | (128 | ) | | | 33,546 | |
GAAP net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | | 162 | | | | 90 | |
Plus: | | | | | | | | |
TBA dollar roll income (loss) (1) | | | 83,189 | | | | 59,731 | |
Core earnings | | $ | 123,349 | | | $ | 254,082 | |
Premium Amortization Adjustment cost (benefit) | | $ | 168,408 | | | $ | 87,883 | |
Normalized core earnings | | $ | 291,757 | | | $ | 341,965 | |
| | | | | | | | |
GAAP net income (loss) per average basic common share | | $ | (0.96 | ) | | $ | (0.52 | ) |
Core earnings per average basic common share | | $ | 0.11 | | | $ | 0.25 | |
Normalized core earnings per average basic common share | | $ | 0.30 | | | $ | 0.34 | |
(1) This amount is included as a component of Net gains (losses) on trading assets in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Normalized Interest Income, Economic Interest Expense, Economic Net Interest Income and Normalized Economic Net Interest Income
We believe the economic value of our investment strategy is depicted by the economic and normalized net interest income we earn. We calculate normalized interest income by determining our GAAP interest income and adjusting it by the PAA. Our economic interest expense, which is composed of interest expense on our Interest Bearing Liabilities plus interest expense on interest rate swaps used to hedge cost of funds, reflects total contractual interest payments.
We calculate economic net interest income by determining our GAAP net interest income and reducing it by realized losses on interest rate swaps used to hedge cost of funds, which represents interest expense on interest rate swaps. We calculate normalized economic net interest income by adjusting economic net interest income by the PAA.
The following table illustrates the impact of the PAA on premium amortization expense for the periods presented:
Components of Return on Average Equity
| | Economic Net Interest Income/ Average Equity(1) | | | Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses/Average Equity(2) | | | Other Income (Loss)/Average Equity(3) | | | G&A Expenses/ Average Equity | | | Income Taxes/ Average Equity | | | Return on Average Equity | |
For the Quarters Ended: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2016 | | | 3.99 | % | | | (31.65 | %) | | | (0.21 | %) | | | (1.63 | %) | | | 0.03 | % | | | (29.47 | %) |
March 31, 2015 | | | 7.00 | % | | | (20.28 | %) | | | 0.41 | % | | | (1.54 | %) | | | 0.00 | % | | | (14.41 | %) |
(1) Economic net interest income includes interest expense on interest rate swaps used to hedge cost of funds.
(2) Realized and unrealized gains and losses excludes interest expense on interest rate swaps used to hedge cost of funds.
(3) Other income (loss) includes investment advisory income, dividend income from affiliate, and other income (loss).
Total assets were $77.4 billion and $75.2 billion as of
March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The change was primarily due to a $1.5 billion increase in commercial real estate debt investments, which includes assets held in consolidated VIEs, a $646.9 million increase in cash and cash equivalents and a
$250.8 million increase in non-agency mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by a $278.4 million decrease in Agency mortgage-backed securities.
Our portfolio composition, net equity allocation and debt-to-net equity ratio by asset class was as follows as of March 31, 2016:
| | Residential | | | Commercial | | | | |
| | Agency MBS | | | TBAs | | | Agency Debentures | | | CRTs | | | Non-Agency MBS | | | CRE Debt & Preferred Equity Investments | | | Loans Held for Sale | | | Investments in CRE | | | Corporate Debt | | | Total(1) | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value/Carrying Value | | $ | 65,439,824 | | | $ | 14,924,524 | | | $ | 157,035 | | | $ | 501,167 | | | $ | 1,157,507 | | | $ | 5,579,193 | | | $ | 278,600 | | | $ | 527,786 | | | $ | 639,481 | | | $ | 74,280,593 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase agreements | | | 53,523,183 | | | | 14,273,000 | | | | - | | | | 113,969 | | | | 623,196 | | | | 187,793 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 54,448,141 | |
Other secured financing | | | 2,931,833 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 243,064 | | | | 413,429 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,588,326 | |
Securitized debt | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,802,682 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,802,682 | |
Participation sold | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 13,182 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 13,182 | |
Mortgages payable | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 334,765 | | | | - | | | | 334,765 | |
Net Equity Allocated | | $ | 8,984,808 | | | $ | 651,524 | | | $ | 157,035 | | | $ | 387,198 | | | $ | 291,247 | | | $ | 1,162,107 | | | $ | 278,600 | | | $ | 193,021 | | | $ | 639,481 | | | $ | 12,093,497 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Equity Allocated (%) | | | 74 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 3 | % | | | 3 | % | | | 10 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 100 | % |
Debt/Net Equity Ratio | | 6.3:1 | | | 21.9:1 | | | 0.0:1 | | | 0.3:1 | | | 3.0:1 | | | 3.8:1 | | | 0.0:1 | | | 1.7:1 | | | 0.0:1 | | | 5.3:1 | (2) |
(1) Excludes the TBA asset and debt balances.
(2) Represents the debt/net equity ratio as determined using amounts on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
Residential Investment Securities
Substantially all of our Agency mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were backed by single-family mortgage loans. Substantially all of the mortgage assets underlying these mortgage-backed securities were secured with a first lien position on the underlying single-family properties. Our mortgage-backed securities were largely Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae or Ginnie Mae pass-through certificates or CMOs, which carry an actual or implied "AAA" rating. We carry all of our Agency mortgage-backed securities at fair value on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
We accrete discount balances as an increase to interest income over the expected life of the related Interest Earning Assets and we amortize premium balances as a decrease to interest income over the expected life of the related Interest Earning Assets. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 we had on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition a total of $80.4 million and $61.6 million, respectively, of unamortized discount (which is the difference between the remaining principal value and current amortized cost of our Residential Investment Securities acquired at a price below principal value) and a total of $4.8 billion and $5.0 billion, respectively, of unamortized premium (which is the difference between the remaining principal value and the current amortized cost of our Residential Investment Securities acquired at a price above principal value).
We received mortgage principal repayments from Residential Investment Securities of $1.9 billion and $2.6 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The weighted average experienced prepayment speed for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was 8.8% and 9.0%, respectively. The weighted average projected long-term prepayment speed on our Agency mortgage-backed securities portfolio for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was 11.8% and 9.2%, respectively. Given our current portfolio composition, if mortgage principal prepayment rates were to increase over the life of our mortgage-backed securities, all other factors being equal, our net interest income would decrease during the life of these mortgage-backed securities as we would be required to amortize our net premium balance into income over a shorter time period. Similarly, if mortgage principal prepayment rates were to decrease over the life of our mortgage-backed securities, all other factors being equal, our net interest income would increase during the life of these mortgage-backed securities as we would amortize our net premium balance over a longer time period.
The table below summarizes certain characteristics of our Residential Investment Securities (excluding interest-only mortgage-backed securities) and interest-only mortgage-backed securities as of the dates presented.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
| | March 31, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Residential Investment Securities: (1) | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | $ | 61,976,476 | | | $ | 62,764,045 | |
Net Premium | | | 3,109,745 | | | | 3,301,510 | |
Amortized Cost | | | 65,086,221 | | | | 66,065,555 | |
Amortized Cost/Principal Amount | | | 105.02 | % | | | 105.26 | % |
Carrying Value | | | 65,725,753 | | | | 65,680,037 | |
Carrying Value / Principal Amount | | | 106.05 | % | | | 104.65 | % |
Weighted Average Coupon Rate | | | 3.69 | % | | | 3.68 | % |
Weighted Average Yield | | | 2.72 | % | | | 2.82 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjustable-Rate Residential Investment Securities:(1) | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | $ | 3,861,245 | | | $ | 3,623,673 | |
Weighted Average Coupon Rate | | | 3.08 | % | | | 3.06 | % |
Weighted Average Yield | | | 2.86 | % | | | 2.90 | % |
Weighted Average Term to Next Adjustment | | 59 Months | | | 57 Months | |
Weighted Average Lifetime Cap(2) | | | 8.99 | % | | | 9.15 | % |
Principal Amount at Period End as % of Total Residential Investment Securities | | | 6.23 | % | | | 5.77 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Fixed-Rate Residential Investment Securities: (1) | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | $ | 58,115,231 | | | $ | 59,140,372 | |
Weighted Average Coupon Rate | | | 3.73 | % | | | 3.72 | % |
Weighted Average Yield | | | 2.71 | % | | | 2.82 | % |
Principal Amount at Period End as % of Total Residential Investment Securities | | | 93.77 | % | | | 94.23 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Interest-Only Residential Investment Securities: | | | | | |
Notional Amount | | $ | 10,476,830 | | | $ | 10,310,577 | |
Net Premium | | | 1,632,155 | | | | 1,649,742 | |
Amortized Cost | | | 1,632,155 | | | | 1,649,742 | |
Amortized Cost/Notional Amount | | | 15.58 | % | | | 16.00 | % |
Carrying Value | | | 1,529,780 | | | | 1,553,457 | |
Carrying Value/Notional Amount | | | 14.60 | % | | | 15.07 | % |
Weighted Average Coupon Rate | | | 3.85 | % | | | 3.97 | % |
Weighted Average Yield | | | 5.82 | % | | | 8.89 | % |
(1) Excludes interest-only mortgage-backed securities.
(2) Excludes non-Agency mortgage-backed securities and CRT securities as this attribute is not applicable to these asset classes.
The tables below summarize certain characteristics of our Residential Credit portfolio as of March 31, 2016.
By Sector Product | |
Product | | Market Value | | | Coupon | | | Credit Enhancement | | | 60+ Delinquencies | | | 3M VPR | |
(dollars in thousands) | |
Alt-A | | $ | 167,967 | | | | 4.16 | % | | | 6.84 | % | | | 11.10 | % | | | 4.70 | % |
Prime | | | 106,142 | | | | 4.63 | % | | | 1.48 | % | | | 3.87 | % | | | 3.57 | % |
Subprime | | | 156,317 | | | | 2.46 | % | | | 25.25 | % | | | 21.06 | % | | | 3.35 | % |
Prime Jumbo (>=2010 Vintage) | | | 283,560 | | | | 3.50 | % | | | 14.76 | % | | | - | | | | 9.40 | % |
Prime Jumbo (>=2010 Vintage) Interest Only | | | 17,182 | | | | 0.42 | % | | | - | | | | - | | | | 6.15 | % |
Re-Performing Loan Securitizations | | | 42,565 | | | | 3.63 | % | | | 51.25 | % | | | 14.39 | % | | | 3.83 | % |
Credit Risk Transfer | | | 501,167 | | | | 4.44 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | | 0.11 | % | | | 10.44 | % |
Non-Performing Loan Securitizations | | | 383,774 | | | | 4.00 | % | | | 51.55 | % | | | 65.32 | % | | | 0.31 | % |
Total/Weighted Average | | $ | 1,658,674 | | | | 3.91 | % | | | 19.25 | % | | | 18.87 | % | | | 6.02 | % |
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
Market Value By Sector and Payment Structure | |
Product | | Senior | | | Subordinate | | | Total | |
(dollars in thousands) | |
Alt-A | | $ | 96,298 | | | $ | 71,669 | | | $ | 167,967 | |
Prime | | | 33,990 | | | | 72,152 | | | | 106,142 | |
Subprime | | | 123,232 | | | | 33,085 | | | | 156,317 | |
Prime Jumbo (>=2010 Vintage) | | | 277,105 | | | | 6,455 | | | | 283,560 | |
Prime Jumbo (>=2010 Vintage) Interest Only | | | 17,182 | | | | - | | | | 17,182 | |
Re-Performing Loan Securitizations | | | 42,565 | | | | - | | | | 42,565 | |
Credit Risk Transfer | | | - | | | | 501,167 | | | | 501,167 | |
Non-Performing Loan Securitizations | | | 383,774 | | | | - | | | | 383,774 | |
Total | | $ | 974,146 | | | $ | 684,528 | | | $ | 1,658,674 | |
Market Value By Sector and Bond Coupon | |
Product | | ARM | | | Fixed | | | Floater | | | Interest Only | | | Total | |
(dollars in thousands) | |
Alt-A | | $ | 19,207 | | | $ | 94,820 | | | $ | 53,940 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 167,967 | |
Prime | | | 43,281 | | | | 62,861 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 106,142 | |
Subprime | | | - | | | | 41,041 | | | | 115,276 | | | | - | | | | 156,317 | |
Prime Jumbo (>=2010 Vintage) | | | - | | | | 277,105 | | | | 6,455 | | | | - | | | | 283,560 | |
Prime Jumbo (>=2010 Vintage) Interest Only | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 17,182 | | | | 17,182 | |
Re-Performing Loan Securitizations | | | - | | | | 42,565 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 42,565 | |
Credit Risk Transfer | | | - | | | | - | | | | 501,167 | | | | - | | | | 501,167 | |
Non-Performing Loan Securitizations | | | - | | | | 383,774 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 383,774 | |
Total | | $ | 62,488 | | | $ | 902,166 | | | $ | 676,838 | | | $ | 17,182 | | | $ | 1,658,674 | |
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the effect on our liquidity and cash flows from contractual obligations as of March 31, 2016. The table does not include the
effect of net interest rate payments on our interest rate swap agreements. The net swap payments will fluctuate based on monthly changes in the receive rate. As of March 31, 2016, the interest rate swaps had a net fair value of ($2.7) billion.
| | Within One Year | | | One to Three Years | | | Three to Five Years | | | More than Five Years | | | Total | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Repurchase agreements | | $ | 48,038,112 | | | $ | 6,410,029 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 54,448,141 | |
Interest expense on repurchase agreements(1) | | | 222,291 | | | | 67,640 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 289,931 | |
Other secured financing | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,588,326 | | | | - | | | | 3,588,326 | |
Interest expense on other secured financing(1) | | | 21,310 | | | | 42,620 | | | | 37,357 | | | | - | | | | 101,287 | |
Securitized debt of consolidated VIEs (principal) | | | 125,819 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,695,433 | | | | 3,821,252 | |
Mortgages payable (principal) | | | 25,846 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 312,500 | | | | 338,346 | |
Participation sold (principal) | | | 319 | | | | 12,742 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 13,061 | |
Long-term operating lease obligations | | | 3,267 | | | | 7,129 | | | | 7,266 | | | | 17,701 | | | | 35,363 | |
Total | | $ | 48,436,964 | | | $ | 6,540,160 | | | $ | 3,632,949 | | | $ | 4,025,634 | | | $ | 62,635,707 | |
(1) Interest expense on repurchase agreements and other secured financing calculated based on rates at March 31, 2016.
In the coming periods, we expect to continue to finance our Residential Investment Securities in a manner that is largely consistent with our current operations. We may use FHLB Des Moines advances, securitization structures, mortgages payable or other term financing structures to finance certain of our assets. During the quarter ended March
31, 2016, we received $1.9 billion from principal repayments and $3.6 billion in cash from disposal of Residential Investment Securities, respectively. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, we received $2.6 billion from principal repayments and $14.0 billion in cash from disposal of Residential Investment Securities.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships which would have been established for the sole purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements, or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
The Company has limited future funding commitments related to certain of its unconsolidated joint ventures. In addition, the Company has provided customary non-recourse carve-out and environmental guarantees (or underlying indemnities with respect thereto) with respect to mortgage loans held by subsidiaries of these unconsolidated joint ventures. The Company believes that the likelihood of making any payments under these guarantees is remote, and has not accrued a related liability as of March 31, 2016.
Maintaining a strong balance sheet that can support the business even in times of economic stress and market volatility is of critical importance to our business strategy. A strong and robust capital position is essential to executing our investment strategy. Our capital strategy is predicated on a strong capital position, which enables us to execute our investment strategy regardless of the market environment.
Our Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Program (or ICAAP) supports capital and business performance measurement, and is integrated within the overall risk governance framework. The ICAAP framework is designed to align capital measurement with our risk appetite.
Our objective is to maintain an active ICAAP that reflects sound governance, requires active assessment and reporting of internal capital adequacy, incorporates stress testing based on internal and external factors and identifies potential capital actions to ensure our capital and available financial resources remain in excess of internal capital requirements.
The capital policy defines the parameters and principles supporting a comprehensive capital
management practice, including processes that effectively identify, measure and monitor risks impacting capital adequacy. The capital assessment process considers the precision in risk measures as well as the volatility of exposures and the relative activities producing risk. Parameters used in modeling economic capital must align with our risk appetite.
Economic capital is our internal quantification of the risks inherent in our business and considers the amount of capital we need as a buffer to protect against risks. It is considered the capital needed to remain solvent over a one-year period under extreme scenarios.
The major risks impacting capital applicable to us are liquidity, investment/market, credit, counterparty, operational. For further discussion of the risks we are subject to, please see Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of our most recent annual report on Form 10-K.
Capital requirements are based on maintaining levels above approved limits, ensuring the quality of our capital appropriately reflects our asset mix, market and funding structure. As such we use a complement of capital metrics and related threshold levels to measure and analyze our capital from a magnitude and composition perspective. Our policy is to maintain an appropriate amount of available financial resources over the aggregate economic capital requirements.
Available Financial Resources (or AFR) is the actual capital held to protect against the unexpected losses measured in our capital management process and may include:
● Common and preferred equity
● Other forms of equity-like capital
● Surplus credit reserves over expected losses
● Other loss absorption instruments
In the event we fall short of our internal limits, we will consider appropriate actions which may include asset sales, changes in asset mix, reductions in asset purchases or originations, issuance of capital or other capital enhancing or risk reduction strategies.
Stockholders' Equity
The following table provides a summary of total stockholders' equity as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
| | March 31, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | |
Stockholders' Equity: | | (dollars in thousands) | |
7.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock | | $ | 177,088 | | | $ | 177,088 | |
7.625% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock | | | 290,514 | | | | 290,514 | |
7.50% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock | | | 445,457 | | | | 445,457 | |
Common stock | | | 9,249 | | | | 9,359 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 14,573,760 | | | | 14,675,768 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 640,366 | | | | (377,596 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | | | (4,487,982 | ) | | | (3,324,616 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | | $ | 11,648,452 | | | $ | 11,895,974 | |
Common and Preferred Stock
The following table provides a summary of option and direct purchase activity for the periods presented:
| | Options Exercised | | | Aggregate Exercise Price | | | Shares Issued Through Direct Purchase | | | Amount Raised from Direct Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Program | |
For the Quarters Ended: | | (dollars in thousands) | |
March 31, 2016 | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | 56,000 | | | $ | 524 | |
March 31, 2015 | | | - | | | | - | | | | 53,000 | | | | 570 | |
In August 2015, our Board authorized the repurchase of up to $1.0 billion of our outstanding common shares through December 31, 2016. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, we repurchased 11,132,226 shares of our common stock under this repurchase program for an aggregate amount of $102.7 million.
In March 2012, we entered into six separate Distribution Agency Agreements (or Distribution Agency Agreements) with each of Merrill Lynch; Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated; Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC; Goldman, Sachs & Co.; J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC; and RCap (together, the Agents). Pursuant to the terms of the Distribution Agency Agreements, we may sell from time to time through the Agents, as our sales agents, up to 125,000,000 shares of our common stock. We did not make any sales under the Distribution Agency Agreements during the quarters ended March 31, 2016 or 2015.
Distributions to Stockholders
Our policy is to distribute at least 100% of our REIT taxable income. To the extent there is any undistributed REIT taxable income at the end of a year, we distribute such shortfall within the next year as permitted by the Code. REIT taxable income will differ from GAAP net income (loss) due to timing differences, such as the amortization/accretion of premiums/discounts from purchases of Residential Investment Securities and unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss).
We seek to generate income for distribution to our stockholders, typically by earning a spread between the yield on our assets and the cost of our borrowings. Our REIT taxable income, which serves as the basis for distributions to our stockholders, is generated primarily from this spread income.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
The following table provides a summary of dividend distribution activity for the periods presented:
| | For the Quarters Ended: | |
| | March 31, 2016 | | | March 31, 2015 | |
| | (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Distributions declared to common stockholders | | $ | 277,456 | | | $ | 284,310 | |
Distributions declared per common share | | $ | 0.30 | | | $ | 0.30 | |
Distributions paid to common stockholders after period end | | $ | 277,456 | | | $ | 284,310 | |
Distributions paid per common share after period end | | $ | 0.30 | | | $ | 0.30 | |
Date of distributions paid to common stockholders after period end | | April 29, 2016 | | | April 30, 2015 | |
Dividends declared to Series A Preferred stockholders | | $ | 3,648 | | | $ | 3,648 | |
Dividends declared per Series A Preferred share | | $ | 0.492 | | | $ | 0.492 | |
Dividends declared to Series C Preferred stockholders | | $ | 5,719 | | | $ | 5,719 | |
Dividends declared per Series C Preferred share | | $ | 0.477 | | | $ | 0.477 | |
Dividends declared to Series D Preferred stockholders | | $ | 8,625 | | | $ | 8,625 | |
Dividends declared per Series D Preferred share | | $ | 0.469 | | | $ | 0.469 | |
Leverage and Capital
We believe that it is prudent to maintain conservative debt-to-equity and economic leverage ratios as there continues to be volatility in the mortgage and credit markets. Our capital policy governs our capital and leverage position including setting limits. Based on the guidelines, we will maintain an economic leverage ratio of less than 10:1. Our actual economic leverage ratio varies from time to time based upon various factors, including our management's opinion of the level of risk of our assets and liabilities, our liquidity position, our level of unused borrowing capacity, the availability of credit, over-collateralization levels required by lenders when we pledge assets to secure borrowings and our assessment of domestic and international market conditions.
Our debt-to-equity ratio at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was 5.3:1 and 5.1:1, respectively. Our economic leverage ratio, which is computed as the sum of recourse debt, TBA derivative notional outstanding and net forward purchases of investments divided by total equity, at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was 6.2:1 and 6.0:1, respectively. Our capital ratio, which represents our ratio of stockholders' equity to total assets (inclusive of total market value of TBA derivatives and exclusive of consolidated VIEs associated with B-Piece commercial mortgage-backed securities), was 13.2% and 13.7% at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
We are subject to a variety of risks in the ordinary conduct of our business. The effective management of these risks is of critical importance to the overall success of Annaly. The objective of our risk management framework is to measure, monitor and manage these risks. Our risk management framework is intended to facilitate a holistic, enterprise wide view of risk. We have built a strong and collaborative risk culture throughout Annaly focused on awareness which ensures the key risks are understood and managed appropriately. Each employee of our Manager is accountable for monitoring and managing risk within their area of responsibility.
Risk Appetite
We maintain a firm-wide risk appetite statement which defines the types and levels of risk we are willing to take in order to achieve our business objectives, and reflects our risk management philosophy. Fundamentally, we will only engage in risk activities based on our core expertise that enhance value for our stockholders. Our activities focus on capital preservation and income generation through proactive portfolio management, supported by a conservative liquidity and leverage posture.
The risk appetite statement includes the following key parameters to guide our risk management activities:
| |
Portfolio Composition | We will maintain a portfolio comprised of target assets approved by our Board and in accordance with our capital allocation policy. |
Leverage | We will operate at an economic leverage ratio no greater than 10:1. |
Liquidity Risk | We will seek to maintain an unencumbered asset portfolio sufficient to meet our liquidity needs under adverse market conditions. |
Interest Rate Risk | We will seek to manage interest rate risk to protect the portfolio from adverse rate movements utilizing derivative instruments targeting both income and capital preservation. |
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
| |
Credit Risk | We will seek to manage credit risk by making investments which conform within our specific investment policy parameters and optimize risk-adjusted returns. |
Capital Preservation | We will seek to protect our capital base through disciplined risk management practices. |
Compliance | We will comply with regulatory requirements needed to maintain our REIT status and our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act. |
Governance
Risk management begins with our board of directors, through the review and oversight of the risk management framework, and executive management, through the ongoing formulation of risk management practices and related execution in managing risk. The board of directors exercises its oversight of risk management primarily through the Board Risk Committee (or BRC) and Board Audit Committee (or BAC). The BRC is responsible for oversight of our risk governance structure, risk management and risk assessment guidelines and policies, our risk appetite and our capital, liquidity and funding practices. The BAC is responsible for oversight of the quality and integrity of our accounting, internal controls and financial reporting practices, including independent auditor selection, evaluation and review, and oversight of the internal audit function.
Risk assessment and risk management are the responsibility of our management. A series of management committees have oversight or decision-making responsibilities for risk management activities. Membership of these committees is reviewed regularly to ensure the appropriate personnel are engaged in the risk management process. Four primary management
committees have been established to provide a comprehensive framework for risk management. The management committees responsible for our risk management include the Enterprise Risk Committee, Asset and Liability Committee, Investment Committee and the Financial Reporting and Disclosure Committee. Each of these committees reports to our management Operating Committee which is responsible for oversight and management of our operations including oversight and approval authority over all aspects of our enterprise risk management.
Audit Services is an independent function with reporting lines to the BAC. Audit Services is responsible for performing our internal audit activities, which includes independently assessing and validating key controls within the risk management framework.
Description of Risks
We are subject to a variety of risks due to the business we operate. Risk categories are an important component of a robust enterprise wide risk management framework. We have identified the following primary categories that we utilize to identify, assess, measure and monitor risk.
Risk | Description |
Liquidity Risk | Risk to earnings, capital or business arising from our inability to meet our obligations when they come due without incurring unacceptable losses because of inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding. |
Investment/Market Risk | Risk to earnings, capital or business resulting in the decline in value of our assets or an increase in the costs of financing caused by changes in market variables, such as interest rates, which affect the values of investment securities and other investment instruments. |
Counterparty Risk | Risk to earnings, capital or business, resulting from counterparty's failure to meet the terms of any contract or otherwise failure to perform as agreed. This risk is present in funding and hedging activities. |
Credit Risk | Risk to earnings, capital or business resulting from an obligor's failure to meet the terms of any contract or otherwise failure to perform as agreed. This risk is present in lending, and investing activities. |
Operational Risk | Risk to earnings, capital, reputation or business arising from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems, human factors or external events. Model risk is included in operational risk. |
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
| |
Compliance, Regulatory and Legal Risk | Risk to earnings, capital, reputation or conduct of business arising from violations of, or nonconformance with internal and external applicable rules and regulations, losses resulting from lawsuits or adverse judgments, or from changes in the regulatory environment that may impact our business model. |
Liquidity Risk Management
Our liquidity risk management strategy is designed to ensure the availability of sufficient resources to support
our business and meet our financial obligations under both normal and adverse market and business environments. Our liquidity risk management practices consist of the following primary elements:
| |
Funding | Availability of diverse and stable sources of funds. |
Excess Liquidity | Excess liquidity primarily in the form of unencumbered assets. |
Maturity Profile | Diversity and tenor of liabilities and modest use of leverage. |
Stress Testing | Scenario modeling to measure the resiliency of our liquidity position. |
Liquidity Management Policies | Comprehensive policies including monitoring, risk limits and an escalation protocol. |
Funding
Our primary financing sources are repurchase agreements provided through counterparty arrangements and directly through RCap, other secured financing including FHLB funding, securitized debt, mortgages and various forms of equity. We maintain excess liquidity through high quality assets.
We conservatively manage our repurchase agreement funding position through a variety of methods including diversity, breadth and depth of counterparties and maintaining a staggered and longer-term maturity profile.
Additionally, our wholly owned subsidiary, RCap, provides direct access to third party funding as a FINRA member broker-dealer. RCap raises funds through the General Collateral Finance Repo service offered by the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC), with FICC acting as the central counterparty. Since its inception in 2008, RCap has provided us greater depth and diversity of repurchase agreement funding while also limiting our counterparty exposure.
Our borrowings pursuant to repurchase transactions include repurchase agreements that have maturities that extend beyond two years. To reduce our liquidity risk we maintain a laddered approach to our repurchase agreements and a conservative weighted average days to maturity. As of March 31, 2016, the weighted average days to maturity was 136 days.
Our repurchase agreements generally provide that in the event of a margin call we must provide additional securities or cash on the same business day that a
margin call is made. Should prepayment speeds on the mortgages underlying our Agency and Residential mortgage-backed securities and/or market interest rates or other factors move suddenly and cause declines in the market value of assets posted as collateral, resulting margin calls may cause an adverse change in our liquidity position.
We maintain access to FHLB funding through our captive insurance subsidiary Truman. We finance eligible Agency, residential and commercial investments through the FHLB and maintain a required margin balance. While a recent FHFA ruling requires captive insurance companies to terminate their FHLB membership, given the length of its membership, Truman has been granted a five year sunset provision whereby its membership will expire in February 2021.
We utilize diverse funding sources to finance our commercial investments. Aside from FHLB funding, we maintain bilateral borrowing facilities, securitization funding and, in the case of investments in commercial real estate, mortgage financing.
At March 31, 2016, we had total financial instruments and cash pledged as collateral for secured financing arrangements and interest rate swaps of $54.4 billion. The weighted average haircut was approximately 5% on repurchase agreements. The quality and character of the Agency mortgage-backed securities that we pledge as collateral under the repurchase agreements, other secured financing and interest rate swaps did not materially change during the quarter ended March 31, 2016 compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2015, and our counterparties did not materially alter any requirements, including required haircuts, related to the collateral we pledge
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
under repurchase agreements and interest rate swaps during the quarter ended March 31, 2016.
The table below presents our quarterly average and quarter-end repurchase agreement and reverse repurchase agreement balances outstanding for the periods presented:
| | Repurchase Agreements | | | Reverse Repurchase Agreements | |
| | Average Daily Amount Outstanding | | | Ending Amount Outstanding | | | Average Daily Amount Outstanding | | | Ending Amount Outstanding | |
Quarter Ended: | | (dollars in thousands) | |
March 31, 2016 | | $ | 55,753,041 | | | $ | 54,448,141 | | | $ | 1,294,505 | | | $ | - | |
December 31, 2015 | | | 57,483,870 | | | | 56,230,860 | | | | 214,674 | | | | - | |
September 30, 2015 | | | 57,102,712 | | | | 56,449,364 | | | | 931,522 | | | | - | |
June 30, 2015 | | | 60,643,597 | | | | 57,459,552 | | | | 1,779,121 | | | | - | |
March 31, 2015 | | | 68,572,119 | | | | 60,477,378 | | | | 100,000 | | | | 100,000 | |
December 31, 2014 | | | 72,117,895 | | | | 71,361,926 | | | | 10,870 | | | | 100,000 | |
September 30, 2014 | | | 71,312,473 | | | | 69,610,722 | | | | - | | | | - | |
June 30, 2014 | | | 70,133,219 | | | | 70,372,218 | | | | 227,640 | | | | - | |
March 31, 2014 | | | 64,443,248 | | | | 64,543,949 | | | | 379,042 | | | | 444,375 | |
At March 31, 2016, the repurchase agreements and other secured financing outstanding had weighted average remaining maturities of 235 days and the following remaining maturities and weighted average rates:
| | March 31, 2016 | |
| | Principal Balance | | | Weighted Average Rate | | | % of Total | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
1 day | | $ | 8,050,000 | | | | 0.62 | % | | | 13.9 | % |
2 to 29 days | | | 12,841,928 | | | | 0.75 | % | | | 22.1 | % |
30 to 59 days | | | 4,878,678 | | | | 0.82 | % | | | 8.4 | % |
60 to 89 days | | | 9,264,997 | | | | 0.96 | % | | | 16.0 | % |
90 to 119 days | | | 4,270,155 | | | | 0.95 | % | | | 7.4 | % |
Over 120 days(1) | | | 18,730,709 | | | | 1.29 | % | | | 32.2 | % |
Total | | $ | 58,036,467 | | | | 0.96 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Approximately 17% of the total repurchase agreements and other secured financing had a remaining maturity over 1 year. | |
The table below presents our outstanding debt balances and associated weighted average rates and days to maturity as of March 31, 2016:
| | | | | Weighted Average | |
| | Principal Balance | | | Rate | | | Days to Maturity (3) | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Repurchase agreements | | $ | 54,448,141 | | | | 0.99 | % | | | 136 | |
Other secured financing (1) | | | 3,588,326 | | | | 0.59 | % | | | 1,735 | |
Securitized debt of consolidated VIEs (2) | | | 3,821,252 | | | | 0.85 | % | | | 2,801 | |
Participation sold (2) | | | 13,061 | | | | 5.58 | % | | | 396 | |
Mortgages payable (2) | | | 338,346 | | | | 4.16 | % | | | 3,064 | |
Total indebtedness | | $ | 62,209,126 | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Represents advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines.
(2) Non-recourse to Annaly.
(3) Determined based on estimated weighted-average lives of the underlying debt instruments.
Excess Liquidity
Our primary source of liquidity is the availability of unencumbered assets which may be provided as
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
collateral to support additional funding needs. We target minimum thresholds of available, unencumbered assets to maintain excess liquidity. The following table illustrates our asset portfolio available to support potential collateral obligations and funding needs. Assets are considered encumbered if pledged as
collateral against an existing liability, and therefore no longer available to support additional funding. An asset is considered unencumbered if it has not been pledged or securitized. The following table also provides the carrying amount of our encumbered and unencumbered financial assets as of March 31, 2016:
Encumbered and Unencumbered Assets
| | Encumbered Assets | | | Unencumbered Assets | | | Total | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 2,223,009 | | | $ | 193,127 | | | $ | 2,416,136 | |
Investments, at carrying value:(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agency mortgage-backed securities | | | 60,742,440 | | | | 4,675,389 | | | | 65,417,829 | |
Agency debentures | | | - | | | | 157,035 | | | | 157,035 | |
Credit risk transfer securities | | | 150,479 | | | | 350,688 | | | | 501,167 | |
Non-Agency mortgage-backed securities | | | 1,057,282 | | | | 100,225 | | | | 1,157,507 | |
Commerical real estate debt investments | | | 4,401,725 | | | | - | | | | 4,401,725 | |
Commercial real estate debt and preferred equity, held for investment | | | 523,787 | | | | 653,681 | | | | 1,177,468 | |
Loans held for sale | | | - | | | | 278,600 | | | | 278,600 | |
Corporate debt | | | - | | | | 639,481 | | | | 639,481 | |
Total financial assets | | $ | 69,098,722 | | | $ | 7,048,226 | | | $ | 76,146,948 | |
(1) The amounts reflected in the table above are on a settlement date basis and may differ from the total positions reported on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
We maintain liquid assets in order to satisfy our current and future obligations in normal and stressed operating environments. These are held as the primary means of liquidity risk mitigation. The composition of our liquid assets is considered as well and is subject to certain parameters. The composition is monitored for concentration risk, asset type and ratings. We believe the assets we consider liquid can be readily converted into cash, through liquidation or by being used as
collateral in financing arrangements (including as additional collateral to support existing financial arrangements). Our balance sheet also generates liquidity on an on-going basis through mortgage principal and interest repayments and net earnings held prior to payment of dividends. The following table presents our liquid assets as a percentage of total assets as of March 31, 2016.
We consider the profile of our assets, liabilities and derivatives when managing both liquidity risk as well
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
as investment/market risk employing a measurement of both the maturity gap and interest rate gap.
We determine the amount of liquid assets that are required to be held by monitoring several liquidity metrics. We utilize several modeling techniques to analyze our current and potential obligations including the expected cash flows from our assets, liabilities and derivatives. The following table illustrates the expected maturities of our assets, liabilities and derivatives. The table is based on a static portfolio and assumes no reinvestment of asset cash flows and no future liabilities are entered into. In assessing the maturity of our assets, liabilities and off balance sheet obligations, we use the stated maturities, or our prepayment expectations for assets that exhibit prepayment characteristics. Cash and cash equivalents are included in the 'within 3 months' maturity bucket, as they are typically held for a short period of time.
With respect to each maturity bucket, our maturity gap is considered negative when the amount of maturing liabilities exceeds the amount of maturing assets. A negative gap increases our liquidity risk as we must enter into future liabilities.
Our interest rate sensitivity gap is the difference between Interest Earning Assets and Interest Bearing Liabilities maturing or re-pricing within a given time period. Unlike the calculation of maturity gap, interest rate sensitivity gap includes the effect of our interest
rate swaps. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest-rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest-rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest-rate sensitive liabilities exceeds interest-rate sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to affect net interest income adversely. Because different types of assets and liabilities with the same or similar maturities may react differently to changes in overall market rates or conditions, changes in interest rates may affect net interest income positively or negatively even if assets and liabilities were perfectly matched in each maturity category. The amount of assets and liabilities utilized to compute our interest rate sensitivity gap was determined in accordance with the contractual terms of the assets and liabilities, except that adjustable-rate loans and securities are included in the period in which their interest rates are first scheduled to adjust and not in the period in which they mature. The effects of interest rate swaps, which effectively lock in our financing costs for a longer term, are also reflected in our interest rate sensitivity gap. The interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities in the table below could vary substantially based on actual prepayment experience.
| | Less than 3 Months | | | 3-12 Months | | | More than 1 Year to 3 Years | | | 3 Years and Over | | | Total | |
Financial Assets: | | (dollars in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 2,416,136 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2,416,136 | |
Agency mortgage-backed securities (principal) | | | - | | | | 12,181 | | | | 1,764,055 | | | | 58,330,730 | | | | 60,106,966 | |
Agency debentures (principal) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 158,803 | | | | 158,803 | |
Credit risk transfer securities (principal) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 517,207 | | | | 517,207 | |
Non-Agency mortgage-backed securities (principal) | | | 1,069 | | | | 57,136 | | | | 404,772 | | | | 730,523 | | | | 1,193,500 | |
Commercial real estate debt investments (principal) | | | - | | | | 53,505 | | | | - | | | | 4,375,821 | | | | 4,429,326 | |
Corporate debt (principal) | | | - | | | | - | | | | 7,500 | | | | 640,058 | | | | 647,558 | |
Commercial real estate debt and preferred equity (principal) | | | 31,500 | | | | 307,922 | | | | 721,775 | | | | 123,258 | | | | 1,184,455 | |
Loans held for sale (principal) | | | - | | | | - | | | | 280,000 | | | | - | | | | 280,000 | |
Total financial assets | | $ | 2,448,705 | | | $ | 430,744 | | | $ | 3,178,102 | | | $ | 64,876,400 | | | $ | 70,933,951 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase agreements | | $ | 35,035,603 | | | $ | 13,002,509 | | | $ | 6,410,029 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 54,448,141 | |
Other secured financing | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,588,326 | | | | 3,588,326 | |
Securitized debt of consolidated VIE (principal) | | | - | | | | 125,819 | | | | - | | | | 3,695,433 | | | | 3,821,252 | |
Participation sold (principal) | | | 78 | | | | 241 | | | | 12,742 | | | | - | | | | 13,061 | |
Total financial liabilities | | $ | 35,035,681 | | | $ | 13,128,569 | | | $ | 6,422,771 | | | $ | 7,283,759 | | | $ | 61,870,780 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maturity gap | | $ | (32,586,976 | ) | | $ | (12,697,825 | ) | | $ | (3,244,670 | ) | | $ | 57,592,643 | | | $ | 9,063,172 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative maturity gap | | $ | (32,586,976 | ) | | $ | (45,284,801 | ) | | $ | (48,529,471 | ) | | $ | 9,063,172 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate sensitivity gap | | $ | (10,081,325 | ) | | $ | (4,779,361 | ) | | $ | (2,088,022 | ) | | $ | 26,011,880 | | | $ | 9,063,172 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative rate sensitivity gap | | $ | (10,081,325 | ) | | $ | (14,860,686 | ) | | $ | (16,948,708 | ) | | $ | 9,063,172 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cumulative rate sensitivity gap as a % of total rate sensitive assets | | | (14.21 | %) | | | (20.95 | %) | | | (23.89 | %) | | | 12.78 | % | | | | |
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
The methodologies we employ for evaluating interest rate risk include an analysis of our interest rate "gap," measurement of the duration and convexity of our portfolio and sensitivities to interest rates and spreads.
Stress Testing
We utilize liquidity stress testing to ensure we have sufficient liquidity under a variety of scenarios and stresses. These stress tests assist with the management of our pool of liquid assets and influence our current and future funding plans. Our stress tests are modeled over both short-term and longer time horizons. The stresses applied include market-wide and firm-specific stresses.
Liquidity Management Policies
We utilize a comprehensive liquidity policy structure to inform our liquidity risk management practices including monitoring and measurement, along with well-defined key limits. Both quantitative and qualitative targets are utilized to measure the ongoing stability and condition of the liquidity position, and include the level and composition of unencumbered assets, as well as both short-term and long-term sustainability of the funding composition under stress conditions.
We also monitor early warning metrics designed to measure the quality and depth of liquidity sources based upon both company-specific and macro environmental conditions. The metrics assess both the short-term and long-term liquidity conditions and are integrated into our escalation protocol, with various liquidity ratings influencing management actions with respect to contingency planning and potential related actions.
Investment/Market Risk Management
One of the primary risks we are subject to is interest rate risk. Changes in the level of interest rates can affect our net interest income, which is the difference between the income we earn on our Interest Earning
Assets and the interest expense incurred from Interest Bearing Liabilities and derivatives. Changes in the level of interest rates and spreads can also affect the value of our securities and potential realization of gains or losses from the sale of these assets. We may utilize a variety of financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, swaptions, options, futures and other hedges, in order to limit the adverse effects of interest rates on our results. Our portfolio and the value of our portfolio, including derivatives, may be adversely affected as a result of changing interest rates and spreads.
We simulate a wide variety of interest rate scenarios in evaluating our risk. Scenarios are run to capture our sensitivity to changes in interest rates, spreads and the shape of the yield curve. We also consider the assumptions affecting our analysis such as those related to prepayments. In addition to predefined interest rate scenarios, we utilize Value-at-Risk measures to estimate potential losses in the portfolio over various time horizons utilizing various confidence levels. The following tables estimate the potential changes in economic net interest income over a twelve month period and the immediate effect on our portfolio market value (inclusive of derivative instruments), should interest rates instantaneously increase or decrease by 25, 50 or 75 basis points, and the effect of portfolio market value if mortgage option-adjusted spreads instantaneously increase or decrease by 5, 15 or 25 basis points (assuming shocks are parallel and instantaneous). All changes to income and portfolio market value are measured as percentage changes from the projected economic net interest income and portfolio value at the base interest rate scenario. The base interest rate scenario assumes interest rates at March 31, 2016 and various estimates regarding prepayments and all activities are made at each level of rate shock. The economic net interest income simulations incorporate the interest expense effect of rate resets on assets, liabilities and derivatives as well as the amortization expense and reinvestment of principal based on the prepayments on our securities, which varies based on the level of rates. The results assume no management actions in response to the rate or spread changes. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
Change in Interest Rate | | Projected Percentage Change in Economic Net Interest Income(1) | | | Estimated Percentage Change in Portfolio Value(2) | | | Estimated Change as a % on NAV(2)(3) | |
-75 Basis Points | | | (24.9 | %) | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.2 | % |
-50 Basis Points | | | (15.1 | %) | | | 0.1 | % | | | 0.8 | % |
-25 Basis Points | | | (8.1 | %) | | | 0.1 | % | | | 0.7 | % |
Base Interest Rate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
+25 Basis Points | | | 7.1 | % | | | (0.2 | %) | | | (1.4 | %) |
+50 Basis Points | | | 14.6 | % | | | (0.6 | %) | | | (3.5 | %) |
+75 Basis Points | | | 21.4 | % | | | (1.1 | %) | | | (6.5 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
MBS Spread Shock | | Estimated Change in Portfolio Market Value | | | Estimated Change as a % on NAV(2)(3) | | | | | |
-25 Basis Points | | | 1.4 | % | | | 8.1 | % | | | | |
-15 Basis Points | | | 0.8 | % | | | 4.9 | % | | | | |
-5 Basis Points | | | 0.3 | % | | | 1.6 | % | | | | |
Base Interest Rate | | | - | | | | - | | | | | |
+5 Basis Points | | | (0.3 | %) | | | (1.6 | %) | | | | |
+15 Basis Points | | | (0.8 | %) | | | (4.8 | %) | | | | |
+25 Basis Points | | | (1.3 | %) | | | (7.9 | %) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Scenarios include Residential Investment Securities, commercial real estate investments, corporate debt, repurchase agreements, other secured financing and interest rate swaps. Economic net interest income includes interest expense on interest rate swaps. | |
(2) Scenarios include Residential Investment Securities and derivative instruments. | |
(3) NAV represents book value of equity. | |
Credit Risk Management
Key risk parameters have been established to specify our credit risk appetite. We will seek to manage credit risk by making investments which conform within the firm's specific investment policy parameters and optimize risk-return attributes.
While we do not expect to encounter credit risk in our Agency investments, we face credit risk on the non-Agency mortgage-backed securities and CRT securities in our portfolio. In addition, we are also exposed to credit risk on commercial real estate investments and corporate debt. We are subject to risk of loss if an issuer or borrower fails to perform its contractual
obligations. We have established policies and procedures for mitigating credit risk, including establishing and reviewing limits for credit exposure. We will originate or purchase commercial investments that meet our comprehensive underwriting process and credit standards and are approved by the appropriate committee. Once a commercial investment is made, our ongoing surveillance process includes regular reviews, analysis and oversight of investments by our investment personnel and appropriate committee. We review credit and other risks of loss associated with each investment. Our management monitors the overall portfolio risk and determines estimates of provision for loss. Our portfolio composition as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was as follows:
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
to the repurchase agreement defaults on its obligations and we are not able to recover our pledged asset, we are at risk of losing the over-collateralization or haircut. The amount of this exposure is the difference between the amount loaned to us plus interest due to the counterparty and the fair value of the collateral pledged by us to the lender including accrued interest receivable on such collateral.
We also use interest rate swaps and other derivatives to manage interest rate risk. Under these agreements, we pledge securities and cash as collateral as part of a margin arrangement. If a counterparty were to default on its obligations, we would be exposed to a loss to a derivative counterparty to the extent that the amount of
our securities or cash pledged exceeded the unrealized loss on the associated derivative and we were not able to recover the excess collateral. Additionally, we would be exposed to a loss to a derivative counterparty to the extent that our unrealized gains on derivative instruments exceeds the amount of the counterparty's securities or cash pledged to us.
We monitor our exposure to counterparties across several dimensions including by type of arrangement, collateral type, counterparty type, ratings and geography.
The following table summarizes our exposure to counterparties by geography as of March 31, 2016:
Country | | Number of Counterparties | | | Repurchase Agreement Financing | | | Interest Rate Swaps at Fair Value | | | Exposure(1) | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | | | 16 | | | $ | 42,197,867 | | | $ | (2,036,526 | ) | | $ | 3,431,215 | |
Europe | | | 10 | | | | 8,789,990 | | | | (653,123 | ) | | | 667,471 | |
Asia (non-Japan) | | | 1 | | | | 332,733 | | | | - | | | | 22,309 | |
Japan | | | 4 | | | | 3,127,551 | | | | - | | | | 201,983 | |
Total | | | 31 | | | $ | 54,448,141 | | | $ | (2,689,649 | ) | | $ | 4,322,978 | |
(1) Represents the amount of cash and/or securities pledged as collateral to each counterparty less the aggregate of repurchase agreement financing and unrealized loss on swaps for each counterparty. |
Operational Risk Management
We are subject to operational risk in each of our business and support functions. Operational risk may arise from internal or external sources including human error, fraud, systems issues, process change, vendors, business interruptions and other external events. Model risk considers potential errors with a model's results due to uncertainty in model parameters and inappropriate methodologies used. The result of these risks may include financial loss and reputational damage. We manage operational risk through a variety of tools including policies and procedures which cover topics such as business continuity, personal conduct and vendor management. Other tools include training on topics such as cyber security awareness; testing, including disaster recovery testing; systems controls, including access controls; and monitoring, which includes the use of key risk indicators. Employee level lines of defense against operational risk include proper segregation of incompatible duties, activity-level internal controls over financial reporting, the empowerment of business units to identify and mitigate operational risk sources, an independent operational risk working group, testing by our internal audit staff, and our overall governance framework.
Compliance, Regulatory and Legal Risk Management
Our business is organized as a REIT, and we plan to continue to meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT. The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances. Accordingly, we closely monitor our REIT status within our risk management program. The financial services industry is highly regulated and continues to receive increasing attention from regulators, which may impact both our company as well as our business strategy. We proactively monitor the potential impact regulation may have both directly and indirectly on us. We maintain a process to actively monitor both actual and potential legal action that may affect us. Our risk management framework is designed to identify, monitor and manage these risks under the oversight of the Enterprise Risk Committee.
We currently rely on the exemption from registration provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act, and we plan to continue to meet the requirements for this exemption from registration. The determination that we qualify for this exemption from registration depends on various factual matters and circumstances. Accordingly, in conjunction with our legal department, we closely monitor our compliance with Section 3(c)(5)(C) within our risk management program. The monitoring of this risk is also under the oversight of the Enterprise Risk Committee.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
As a result of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (or CFTC) gained jurisdiction over the regulation of interest rate swaps. The CFTC has asserted that this causes the operators of mortgage real estate investment trusts that use swaps as part of their business model to fall within the statutory definition of Commodity Pool Operator (or CPO), and, absent relief from the Division or the Commission, to register as CPOs. On December 7, 2012, as a result of numerous requests for no-action relief from the CPO registration requirement for operators of mortgage real estate investment trusts, the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight of the CFTC issued no-action relief entitled "No-Action Relief from the Commodity Pool Operator Registration Requirement for Commodity Pool Operators of Certain Pooled Investment Vehicles Organized as Mortgage Real Estate Investment Trusts" that permits a CPO to receive relief by filing a claim to perfect the use of the relief. A claim submitted by a CPO will be effective upon filing, so long as the claim is materially complete. The conditions that must be met relate to initial margin and premiums requirements, net income derived annually from commodity interest positions that are not qualifying hedging transactions, marketing of interests in the mortgage real estate investment trust to the public, and identification of the entity as a mortgage real estate investment trust in its federal tax filings with the Internal Revenue Service. While we disagree that the CFTC's position that mortgage real estate investment trusts that use swaps as part of their business model fall within the statutory definition of a CPO, we have submitted a claim for the relief set forth in the no-action relief entitled "No-Action Relief from the Commodity Pool Operator Registration Requirement for Commodity Pool Operators of Certain Pooled Investment Vehicles Organized as Mortgage Real Estate Investment Trusts" and believe we meet the criteria for such relief set forth therein.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our critical accounting policies that require us to make significant judgments or estimates are described below. For more information on these critical accounting policies and other significant accounting policies, see "Significant Accounting Policies" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Valuation of Financial Instruments
Residential Investment Securities
There is an active market for our Agency mortgage-backed securities, Agency debentures, CRT securities and non-Agency mortgage-backed securities. Since we primarily invest in securities that can be valued using actively quoted prices, there is a high degree of observable inputs and less subjectivity in measuring fair value. Internal market values are determined using quoted prices from the To-Be-Announced (or TBA) security market, the Treasury curve and the underlying characteristics of the individual securities, which may include coupon, periodic and life caps, reset dates and the expected life of the security. Prepayment rates are difficult to predict and are a significant estimate requiring judgment in the valuation of Agency mortgage-backed securities. All internal market values are compared to external pricing sources and/or dealer quotes for reasonableness. Additionally, securities used as collateral for repurchase agreements are priced daily by counterparties to ensure sufficient collateralization, providing additional verification of our internal pricing.
Commercial Real Estate Investments
A commercial mortgage-backed security classified as available-for sale must be evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment if the fair value of the security is lower than its amortized cost. Determining whether there is an other-than-temporary impairment may require us to exercise significant judgment and make estimates to determine expected cash flows incorporating assumptions such as changes in interest rates and loss expectations. For commercial real estate loans and preferred equity investments classified as held for investment, we apply significant judgment in in evaluating the need for a loss reserve. Estimated net recoverable value of the commercial real estate loans and preferred equity investments and other factors such as the fair value of any collateral, the amount and status of senior debt, the prospects of the borrower and the competitive landscape where the borrower conducts business must be considered in determining the allowance for loan losses. For commercial real estate loans held for sale, significant judgment may need to be applied in determining fair value of the loans and whether a valuation allowance is necessary. Factors that may need to be considered to determine fair value of a loan held for sale include the borrower's credit quality, liquidity and other market factors, and the fair value of the underlying collateral.
Interest Rate Swaps
We use the overnight indexed swap (or OIS) curve as an input to value substantially all of our interest rate swaps. We believe using the OIS curve, which reflects
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis
the interest rate typically paid on cash collateral, enables us to most accurately determine the fair value of interest rate swaps. Consistent with market practice, we exchange collateral (also called margin) based on the fair values of our interest rate swaps. Through this margining process, we may be able to compare our recorded fair value with the fair value calculated by the counterparty or derivatives clearing organization, providing additional verification of our recorded fair value of the interest rate swaps.
Revenue Recognition
Interest income from coupon payments is accrued based on the outstanding principal amounts of the Residential Investment Securities and their contractual terms. Premiums and discounts associated with the purchase of the Residential Investment Securities are amortized or accreted into interest income over the projected lives of the securities using the interest method. We use a third-party supplied model to project prepayment speeds. Our prepayment speed projections incorporate underlying loan characteristics (e.g., coupon, term, original loan size, original loan to value, etc.) and market data, including interest rate and home price index forecasts, and expert judgment. Prepayment speeds vary according to the type of investment, conditions in the financial markets and other factors and cannot be predicted with any certainty. Changes to model assumptions, including interest rates and other market data, as well as periodic revisions to the model will cause changes in the results. Adjustments are made for actual prepayment activity as it relates to
calculating the effective yield. The results computed by the model are compared to projections computed by third party models for reasonableness. Gains and losses on sales of Residential Investment Securities are recorded on trade date based on the specific identification method.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
Determining whether an entity has a controlling financial interest in a VIE requires significant judgment related to assessing the purpose and design of the VIE and determination of the activities that most significantly impact its economic performance. We must also identify explicit and implicit variable interests in the entity and consider our involvement in both the design of the VIE and its ongoing activities. To determine whether consolidation of the VIE is required, we must apply judgment to assess whether we have the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and whether we have either the rights to receive benefits or obligation to absorb losses that could be potentially significant to the VIE.
Use of Estimates
The use of GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.