SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Principles of Consolidation. |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Transgenomic, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Risks and Uncertainties. |
Certain risks and uncertainties are inherent in our day-to-day operations and to the process of preparing our financial statements. The more significant of those risks are presented below and throughout the notes to the financial statements. |
|
Use of Estimates. |
|
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. In addition, estimates and assumptions associated with the determination of the fair value of certain assets and related impairments require considerable judgment by management. The key estimates included in the consolidated financial statements include stock option valuations, goodwill and intangible valuations, accounts receivable and inventory valuations, warrant valuations and contractual allowances. Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing these consolidated financial statements. |
Basis of Presentation. |
On January 15, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a reverse split of the Company's common stock, par value $0.01, at a ratio of one-for twelve. This reverse stock split became effective on January 27, 2014 and, unless otherwise indicated, all share amounts, per share data, share prices, exercise prices and conversion rates set forth in these notes and the accompanying consolidated financial statements have, where applicable, been adjusted retroactively to reflect this reverse stock split. Additionally, accrued preferred stock dividends have been re-classed to conform to the current year presentation. |
Fair Value. |
Unless otherwise specified, book value approximates fair market value. The Company's Level 1 financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents. The Company's Level 3 financial instruments include the common stock warrant liability, preferred stock warrant liability and conversion feature, and debt. Due to its variable interest component, debt approximates fair value. The common stock warrant liability and Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) warrant liability and conversion feature are recorded at fair value. See Footnote 12 Fair Value. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents. |
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and investments with original maturities at the date of acquisition of three months or less. Such investments presently consist of temporary overnight investments |
|
Concentrations of Cash. |
From time to time, we may maintain a cash position with financial institutions in amounts that exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses on such accounts as of December 31, 2013. |
Accounts Receivable. |
The following is a summary of activity for the allowance for doubtful accounts during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dollars in Thousands |
| Beginning | | Provision | | Write Offs | | Ending |
Balance | Balance |
Year ended December 31, 2013 | $ | 2,171 | | | $ | 5,548 | | | $ | (3,881 | ) | | $ | 3,838 | |
|
Year ended December 31, 2012 | $ | 1,088 | | | $ | 2,468 | | | $ | (1,385 | ) | | $ | 2,171 | |
|
Year ended December 31, 2011 | $ | 334 | | | $ | 1,738 | | | $ | (984 | ) | | $ | 1,088 | |
|
|
While payment terms are generally 30 days, we have also provided extended payment terms of up to 90 days in certain cases. We operate globally and some of the international payment terms can be greater than 90 days. Accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount and shown net of allowance for doubtful accounts and contractual allowances. The estimate made for doubtful accounts is based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a quarterly basis. The estimate for contractual allowances is based on contractual terms or historical reimbursement rates and is recorded when revenue is recorded. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts and contractual allowances by regularly evaluating individual payor receivables and considering a payor's financial condition, credit history, reimbursement rates and current economic conditions. Accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible and after all collection efforts have been exhausted. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously written off are recorded as a reduction in bad debt expense when received. |
Inventories. |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market net of allowance for obsolete and slow moving inventory. Cost is computed using standard costs for finished goods and average or latest actual cost for raw materials and work in process, which approximates the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. We write down slow-moving and obsolete inventory by the difference between the value of the inventory and our estimate of the reduced value based on potential future uses, the likelihood that overstocked inventory will be sold and the expected selling prices of the inventory. If our ability to realize value on slow-moving or obsolete inventory is less favorable than assumed, additional write-downs of the inventory may be required. |
|
The following is a summary of activity for the allowance for obsolete inventory during the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011: |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dollars in Thousands |
| Beginning | | Provision | | Write Offs | | Ending |
Balance | Balance |
Year ended December 31, 2013 | $ | 616 | | | $ | 217 | | | $ | (34 | ) | | $ | 799 | |
|
Year ended December 31, 2012 | $ | 511 | | | $ | 129 | | | $ | (24 | ) | | $ | 616 | |
|
Year ended December 31, 2011 | $ | 518 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | (55 | ) | | $ | 511 | |
|
We determine the allowance for obsolescence by evaluating inventory quarterly for items deemed to be slow moving or obsolete. |
Property and Equipment. |
Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets as follows: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | 1 to 10 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and fixtures | 3 to 7 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Production equipment | 3 to 7 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Computer equipment | 3 to 7 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development equipment | 2 to 7 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation expense related to property and equipment during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $0.6 million, $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Included in depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to equipment acquired under capital leases. |
Goodwill. |
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually utilizing a combination of income and market approaches. The income approach applies a discounted cash flow methodology to the Company's future period projections and the market approach uses market available information on the Company. We perform this impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of each year or when a significant event occurs that may impact goodwill. Impairment may occur when the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the fair value of all identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities is determined as part of a hypothetical purchase price allocation to determine the amount of goodwill impairment. No impairment of goodwill has occurred to date. |
Intangibles. |
Intangible assets include intellectual property, patents and acquired products. At December 31, 2013, the Company revised its estimate of useful lives on certain intangible assets which will cause amortization expense in 2014 to be $0.4 million lower. |
1. Intellectual Property. Initial costs paid to license intellectual property from independent third parties are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the license period. Ongoing royalties related to such licenses are expensed as incurred. |
2. Patents. We capitalize legal costs, filing fees and other expenses associated with obtaining patents on new discoveries and amortize these costs using the straight-line method over the shorter of the legal life of the patent or its economic life beginning on the date the patent is issued. |
3. Acquired Products. As a part of the FAMILION acquisition and acquisition of certain intangible assets from Axial, we acquired technology, in process technology, trademarks/tradenames, customer relationships, covenants not to compete and third party relationships. These costs will be amortized pursuant to the straight-line method over their estimated economic life of seven to eight years. See Footnote 4 "Intangibles and Other Assets" to our accompanying consolidated financial statements. |
We review our amortizable long lived assets for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying amount of the asset (group) may not be recoverable. An impairment loss may be needed if the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset (group). The amount of the loss would be determined by comparing the fair market value of the asset to the carrying amount of the asset (group). No loss has been recorded during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 or 2011. |
|
Common Stock Warrants. |
Our issued and outstanding 2012 warrants to purchase common stock do not qualify to be treated as equity and accordingly, are recorded as a liability (“Common Stock Warrant Liability”). The Common Stock Warrant Liability was initially recorded at fair value using a Monte Carlo simulation model. We are required to present these instruments at fair value at each reporting date and any changes in fair values are recorded as an adjustment to earnings. The Common Stock Warrant Liability is considered a Level 3 financial instrument. See Footnote 12 - Fair Value. |
Preferred Stock. |
Prior to the 2011 modification, the Series A Preferred Stock met the definition of mandatorily redeemable stock as it was preferred capital stock which was redeemable at the option of the holder and therefore was reported outside of equity. The Series A Preferred Stock was accreted to its redemption value. Prior to the 2011 modification, the warrants to purchase shares of series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Warrants”) did not qualify to be treated as equity and accordingly, were recorded as a liability. A preferred stock conversion feature was embedded within the Series A Preferred Stock that met the definition of a derivative. The Series A Preferred Stock, Series A Warrant liability and Series A Preferred Stock conversion feature were all recorded separately and were initially recorded at fair value using the Black-Scholes model. We were required to record these instruments at fair value at each reporting date and changes were recorded as an adjustment to earnings. The Series A Warrant liability and Series A Preferred Stock conversion feature were considered Level 3 financial instruments. |
In November 2011, we entered into a transaction with the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Holders”), pursuant to an Agreement Regarding Preferred Stock (the “Amendment Agreement”), in which the Series A Holders agreed to (i) waive their rights to enforce the anti-dilution and redemption features of the Series A Preferred Stock and (ii) at the next annual stockholder meeting, vote to amend the Certificate of Designation for the Series A Preferred Stock to remove the anti-dilution and redemption features of the Series A Preferred Stock. In exchange, we issued shares of common stock to the Series A Holders having an aggregate market value of $0.3 million. Our stockholders approved the amendments to the Certificate of Designation for the Series A Preferred Stock at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 23, 2012, and we filed the Certificate of Designation for the Series A Preferred Stock with the Delaware Secretary of State on May 25, 2012. |
As a result of the Amendment Agreement, the value of the Series A Preferred Stock and Series A Warrants, including the Series A Preferred Stock conversion feature and Series A Warrant liability, were reclassified into stockholders' equity as of the date of the Amendment Agreement. |
Expense on Preferred Stock. |
For 2011, we recorded expense associated with the Series A Preferred Stock and Series A Warrants of $6.1 million, which is due to the change in fair value of the Series A Preferred Stock conversion feature and Series A Warrant liability of $5.8 million and the issuance of $0.3 million in common stock to the investors of Series A Preferred Stock. The expense associated with the change in value of the Series A Preferred Stock conversion feature is a non-cash item. There was no expense on preferred stock in 2013 or 2012. |
Stock Based Compensation. |
All stock-based awards to date have exercise prices equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant and have ten-year contractual terms. Unvested options as of December 31, 2013 had vesting periods of one or three years from date of grant. None of the stock options outstanding at December 31, 2013 are subject to performance or market-based vesting conditions. |
We measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors, including stock options. Compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed over the service period of the awards. |
|
Income Taxes. |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities at each balance sheet date using tax rates expected to be in effect in the year the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will not be realized. Our policy is to record interest and penalties directly related to income taxes as income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Net Sales Recognition. |
Revenue is realized and earned when all of the following criteria are met: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | The seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Collectability is reasonably assured. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
In Laboratory Services, net sales from Patient Testing labs are recognized on an individual test basis and take place when the test report is completed, reviewed and sent to the client less the reserve for insurance, Medicare and Medicaid contractual adjustments. There are no deferred net sales associated with our Patient Testing services. Adjustments to the allowances, based on actual receipts from third party payers, are reflected in the estimated contractual allowance applied prospectively. In our Biomarker Identification labs, we perform services on a project by project basis. When we receive payment in advance, we recognize revenue when we deliver the service. These projects typically do not extend beyond one year. When we receive payment in advance, we recognize revenue when we deliver the service. These projects typically do not extend beyond one year. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, deferred net sales associated with pharmacogenomics research projects, included in the balance sheet in deferred revenue, was $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively. |
Net sales of Genetic Assays and Platforms products are recognized in accordance with the terms of the sales arrangement. Such recognition is based on receipt of an unconditional customer order and transfer of title and risk of ownership to the customer, typically upon shipment of the product under a purchase order. Our sales terms do not provide for the right of return unless the product is damaged or defective. Net sales from certain services associated with the analytical instruments, to be performed subsequent to shipment of the products, is deferred and recognized when the services are provided. Such services, mainly limited to installation and training services that are not essential to the functionality of the instruments, typically are performed in a timely manner subsequent to shipment of the instrument. We also enter into various service contracts that cover installed instruments. These contracts cover specific time periods and net sales associated with these contracts are deferred and recognized ratably over the service period. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, deferred net sales, mainly associated with our service contracts, included in the balance sheet in deferred revenue was approximately $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively. |
Taxes collected from customers and remitted to government agencies for specific net sales producing transactions are recorded net with no effect on the income statement. |
Research and Development. |
Research and development and various collaboration costs are charged to expense when incurred. |
Translation of Foreign Currency. |
Our foreign subsidiary uses the local currency of the country in which it is located as its functional currency. Its assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. A translation loss of 0.1 million is reported in other comprehensive income on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013. A translation gain of $0.1 million was reported in other comprehensive income on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates during the period. For transactions that are not denominated in the functional currency, we recognized foreign currency translation income of less than $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and foreign currency translation loss of less than $0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. |
Other Income. |
Other income in the year ended December 31, 2011 includes an award of a federal grant under the Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project related to COLD-PCR, Surveyor Scan kit development for detecting key cancer pathway gene mutations and mtDNA damage assays. Income related to this federal grant net of consulting fees was $0.2 million. There was no such other income in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. |
Comprehensive Income. |
Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 consisted of foreign currency translation adjustments, net of applicable tax of zero. During 2011, we reclassified $1.3 million from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to accumulated deficit with no effect on total stockholders' equity or net loss. |
Earnings Per Share. |
Basic earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share include shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, warrants or conversion rights that have exercise or conversion prices below the market value of our common stock, as long as the effect is not anti-dilutive. Options, warrants and conversion rights pertaining to 3,785,709, 2,471,670 and 1,470,689 shares of our common stock have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The options, warrants and conversion rights that were exercisable in 2013, 2012 and 2011 were not included because the effect would be anti-dilutive due to the net loss. |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. |
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments in the Update do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. The new amendments will require an organization to present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income if the item reclassified is required under generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”) to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. Additionally, for other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP to provide additional detail about those amounts. For public companies, the amendments were effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. Our adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
In February 2013 FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date (“ASU 2013-04”). ASU 2013-04 requires reporting and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements within the scope of Subtopic 405-40 for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date. For public companies, ASU 2013-04 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013. The guidance in ASU 2013-04 is to be applied retrospectively for those obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements within the scope of Subtopic 405-40 that exist at the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year of adoption. Earlier application is permitted. When adopted, ASU 2013-04 is not expected to materially impact our consolidated financial statements. |
In March 2013, the FASB released ASU No. 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)(“ASU 2013-05”). ASU 2013-05 provides that, when a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity, the parent is required to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. The provisions of ASU 2013-05 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. When adopted, ASU 2013-05 is not expected to materially impact our consolidated financial statements. |
In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU 2013-11 provides explicit guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, with an option for early adoption. The Company intends to adopt this guidance at the beginning of our first quarter of fiscal year 2014, and does not expect the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its financial statements. |