Stratus Services (SSVG) 10-Q 2006 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

ý	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
o	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-15789

STRATUS SERVICES GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	22-3499261
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
500 Craig Road, Suite 201, Manalapan, New Jersey 07726
(Address of principal executive offices)
(732) 866-0300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:   Not Applicable
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $.04 par value
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One)

Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer T

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No S

The number of shares of Common Stock, $.04 par value, outstanding as of August 11, 2006 was 65,479,756.

1

STRATUS SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

		June 30,		September 30,
Assets		2006		2005
				(Restated)
Current assets
Cash	$	103,866	$	40,784
Accounts receivable-less allowance for doubtful accounts of $697,000
and $3,039,000		929,227		11,591,026
Unbilled receivables		196,315		2,484,799
Notes receivable (current portion)		80,000		39,016
Due from related party		621,764		-
Prepaid insurance		230,058		455,881
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		214,121		264,485
Assets held for sale		-		3,656,539
		2,375,351		18,532,530
Notes receivable (net of current portion)		-		47,593
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation		160,239		182,606
Other assets		12,020		34,906
	$	2,547,610	$	18,797,635
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency)
Current liabilities
Loans payable	$	78,450	$	73,450
Loans payable - related parties		87,721		111,723
Notes payable - acquisitions (current portion)		152,669		182,439
Note payable - related party (current portion)		248,827		-
Line of credit		477,557		8,931,689
Cash overdraft		-		14,731
Insurance obligation payable		10,448		113,373
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		4,188,472		4,574,587
Accounts payable - related parties		-		1,232,342
Accrued payroll and taxes		181,943		284,834
Payroll taxes payable		3,916,235		4,160,539
Series A redemption payable		300,000		300,000
Warrant liability		-		2,135
Series I convertible preferred stock (including unpaid dividends of
$40,091)		-		2,217,591
Liabilities held for sale		-		5,494,279
		9,642,322		27,693,712
Notes payable - acquisitions (net of current portion)		525,875		490,848
Note payable - related party (net of current portion)		393,023		-
Payroll taxes payable		31,546		449,046
Convertible debt		40,000		40,000
		10,632,766		28,673,606
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity (deficiency)
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized
Series E non-voting convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value,
247 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $24,700		-		24,700

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

2

Series F voting convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value, 6,000
shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $600,000
(including unpaid dividends of $80,500 and $94,000)		680,500			694,000
Common stock, $.04 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 65,479,754
and 19,606,423 shares issued and outstanding		2,619,190			784,257
Additional paid-in capital		9,417,738			10,835,031
Accumulated deficit		(20,802,584	)		(22,213,959	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficiency)		(8,085,156	)		(9,875,971	)
	$	2,547,610		$	18,797,635

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

STRATUS SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
		2006			2005			2006			2005
					(Restated)						(Restated)
Revenues	$	1,282,074		$	1,180,222		$	3,706,018		$	3,414,949
Cost of revenues ($-0-, $222,191, $479,873
and $319,756 to related parties)		910,576			839,557			2,604,400			2,435,317
Gross profit		371,498			340,665			1,101,618			979,632
Selling, general and administrative expenses		527,365			1,384,590			2,534,869			3,736,838
Operating loss from continuing operations		(155,867	)		(1,043,925	)		(1,433,251	)		(2,757,206	)
Interest expense		(47,179	)		(187,433	)		(430,987	)		(654,427	)
Other income (expense)		7,108			(24,049	)		(11,629	)		(43,322	)
Gain on change in fair value of warrants		-			882,409			2,135			5,152,130
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations		(195,938	)		(372,998	)		(1,873,732	)		1,697,175
Discontinued operations - income (loss) from discontinued operations		-			225,187			(307,044	)		1,469,079
Gain on sale of discontinued operations (net)		215,425			2,239,108			3,592,151			2,239,108
Net earnings		19,487			2,091,297			1,411,375			5,405,362
Dividends on preferred stock		(10,500	)		(10,500	)		(31,500	)		(31,500	)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	8,987		$	2,080,797		$	1,379,875		$	5,373,862
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders
Basic:
(Loss) from continuing operations	$	-		$	(.02	)	$	(.05	)	$	.10
Earnings from discontinued operations		-			.14			.09			.22
Net earnings (loss)	$	-		$	.12		$	.04		$	.32
Diluted:
(Loss) from continuing operations	$	-		$	(.02	)	$	(.05	)	$	.08
Earnings from discontinued operations		-			.12			.08			.20
Net earnings (loss)	$	-		$	.10			.03		$	.28
Weighted average shares outstanding per common share
Basic		52,849,291			17,062,909			36,388,673			16,905,693
Diluted		71,933,849			20,874,831			43,104,426			19,446,974

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

STRATUS SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
		2006			2005
					(Restated)
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
Net earnings	$	1,411,375		$	5,405,362
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities
Depreciation		93,302			251,399
Amortization		41,902			319,988
Provision for doubtful accounts		-			500,000
Deferred financing costs amortization		-			1,748
Gain on sale of discontinued operations		(3,592,151	)		(2,239,108	)
Stock compensation		100,400			42,000
Warrants issued for fees		-			13,000
Accrued interest		29,326			(36,695	)
Imputed interest		26,782			55,920
Dividends on preferred stock		163,625			194,662
Intrinsic value of beneficial conversion feature of convertible preferred stock		-			1,674
Gain on change in fair value of warrants		(2,135	)		(5,152,130	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		10,920,387			1,400,409
Prepaid insurance		225,823			886,071
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		182,935			8,035
Other assets		21,886			34,346
Insurance obligation payable		(102,925	)		35,729
Accrued payroll and taxes		(102,891	)		(859,513	)
Payroll taxes payable		(661,804	)		(918,201	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(1,631,500	)		2,057,675
Total adjustments		5,727,636			(3,417,665	)
		7,139,011			1,987,697
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment		(32,782	)		(182,706	)
Cash received in connection with sale of discontinued operations					(136,000	)
(net of $10,000 in costs) - (including $628,236 from a related party)		-			1,024,587
Payments for business acquisitions		-			11,184
Collection of notes receivable		6,609			(322,952	)
Payments in connection with sale of discontinued operations		998,414			(630,474	)
Cash flows (used in) financing activities
Payments of loans payable		-			(76,600	)
Proceeds from loans payable - related parties		-			650,000
Payments of loans payable - related parties		(24,002	)		(778,087	)
Payments of note payable - related party		-			(1,490,000	)
Payments of notes payable - acquisitions		(63,999	)		(696,445	)
Net repayment of line of credit		(6,481,611	)		(1,099,393	)
Redemption of preferred stock		-			(34,000	)
Cash overdraft		(14,731	)		(4,144	)
Dividends paid		-			(20,000	)
		(8,074,343	)		(2,058,669	)
Net change in cash		63,082			(701,446	)
Cash - beginning		40,784			735,726
Cash - ending	$	103,866		$	34,280

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Supplemental disclosure of cash paid
Interest		$	381,418		$	1,014,536
Schedule of noncash investing and financing activities
Business acquired:
Fair value of net assets acquired		$	-		$	358,500
Less: cash paid			-			(136,000	)
Less: common stock issued			-			(16,500	)
Liabilities assumed		$	-		$	206,000
Sale of discontinued operations:
Gain on sale		$	3,592,151		$	2,239,108
Net assets sold			1,683,783			377,265
Due from related party			(621,764	)		-
Accrued earn-out			(138,219	)		-
Cancellation of accounts payable - related parties (net)			(3,541,364	)		(3,315,719	)
Cancellation of amounts due from related party			-			376,394
Accrued expenses	��		50,000			-
Net cash received (paid)		$	1,024,587		$	(322,952	)
Issuance of common stock upon conversion of convertible preferred stock		$	24,366		$	-
Cumulative dividends on preferred stock		$	31,500		$	31,500
Accrued interest converted to loan payable		$	-		$	21,600
Put option liability converted to loan payable		$	-		$	18,000

6

STRATUS SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the periods presented. It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Until December 2005, Stratus Services Group, Inc. together with its 50%-owned consolidated joint venture, (the “Company”) was a national provider of staffing and productivity consulting services. Prior to December 2005, the Company operated a network of 29 offices in 7 states. In December 2005, the Company completed a series of asset sales transactions pursuant to which it sold substantially all of the assets that it used to conduct its staffing services business (see Note 6). As a result, the Company is no longer conducting active staffing services for any clients and is not operating any branch offices. The Company plans to focus on expanding its information technology staffing solutions business, which is conducted through its 50% owned consolidated joint venture, Stratus Technology Services, LLC (“STS”) (see Notes 1 and 11).

NOTE 2 - LIQUIDITY

At June 30, 2006, the Company had limited liquid resources. Current liabilities were $9,642,322 and current assets were $2,375,351. The difference of $7,266,971 is a working capital deficit, which is primarily the result of losses incurred during the last four years. These factors, among others, indicate that the Company may be unable to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management recognizes that the Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to allow it to satisfy its obligations on a timely basis, to fund the operation and capital needs, and to obtain additional financing as may be necessary.

Management of the Company has taken steps to revise and reduce its operating requirements, which it believes will be sufficient to assure continued operations and implementation of the Company’s plans. The steps included closing branches that were not profitable, consolidating branches and reductions in staffing and other selling, general and administrative expense, and most significantly, the asset sales transactions that were completed in December 2005 (see Note 5).

The Company continues to pursue other sources of equity or long-term debt financings. The Company also continues to negotiate payment plans and other accommodations with its creditors.

NOTE 3 - ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Effective October 1, 2005, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123(R) (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective application transition method. All outstanding stock options at September 30, 2005, were fully-vested. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) did not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

7

The following table illustrates, for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005, the effect on net (loss) and net (loss) per share had compensation expense for the employee stock-based plans been recorded based on the fair value method using the Black-Scholes option pricing model under SFAS No. 123, as amended:

		Three Months			Nine Months
		Ended			Ended
		June 30, 2005			June 30, 2005
Net earnings, as reported	$	2,080,797		$	5,373,862
Deduct: total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value method		(242,400	)		(617,288	)
Net earnings, as adjusted	$	1,838,397		$	4,756,574
Basic net earnings per share:
As reported	$	.12		$	.32
As adjusted	$	.11		$	.28
Diluted net earnings per share:
As reported	$	.10		$	.28
As adjusted	$	.09		$	.24

During the nine months ended June 30, 2006, the Company issued an aggregate of 12,200,000 shares of its common stock to five employees, a director, three former directors and a consultant. In connection therewith, the value of the shares was based on the market price at date of issuance and accordingly, $100,400 was charged to operations.

NOTE 4 - NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments,” (SFAS 155), which amends SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”. SFAS 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS 155 also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS 133 and SFAS 140. This statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect its adoption of this new standard to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (SFAS 156”). This statement was issued to simplify the accounting for servicing assets and liabilities, such as those common with mortgage securitization activities. This statement addresses the recognition and measurement of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities and provides an approach to simplify hedge-like (offset) accounting. SFAS 156 clarifies when an obligation to service financial assets should be separately recognized (as a servicing asset or liability), requires initial measurement at fair value and permits an entity to select either the Amortization Method of the Fair Value Method. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect its adoption of this new standard to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. This interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. The Company does not expect that the implementation of FIN 48 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 5 - EARNINGS/LOSS PER SHARE

Basic “Earnings Per Share” (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS assumes conversion of dilutive options and warrants, and the issuance of common stock for all other potentially dilutive equivalent shares outstanding. There were 19,084,558 and 3,811,922 dilutive shares for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. There were 6,715,753 and 1,381,367 dilutive shares for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,

8

respectively. Outstanding common stock options and warrants not included in the computation of earnings per share for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, totaled 20,326,787 and 18,611,403, respectively. These options and warrants were excluded because their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share.

NOTE 6 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

(a) In December 2005, the Company completed the following series of transactions pursuant to which it sold substantially all of the assets used to conduct its staffing services business, other then the IT staffing solutions business that is conducted through the Company’s 50% owned joint venture, STS.

(i) On December 2, 2005, the Company completed the sale, effective as of November 21, 2005, of substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets, excluding accounts receivable, of several of its offices located in the Western half of the United States (the “ALS Purchased Assets”) to ALS, LLC (“ALS”), a related party (see Note 11). The offices sold were the following: Chino, California; Colton, California; Los Nietos, California; Ontario, California; Santa Fe Springs, California and the Phoenix, Arizona branches and the Dallas Morning News Account (the “Western Offices”). Pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and ALS dated December 2, 2005 (the “ALS Asset Purchase Agreement”), the purchase price for the ALS Purchased Assets was payable as follows:

• $250,000 was payable over the 60 days following December 2, 2005, at a rate no faster than $125,000 per 30 days;

• $1,000,000 payable by ALS is being paid directly to certain taxing authorities to reduce the Company’s tax obligations; and

• $3,537,000 which was paid by means of the cancellation of all net indebtedness owed by the Company to ALS outstanding as of the close of business on December 2, 2005.

In addition to the foregoing amounts, ALS also assumed the Company’s obligation to pay $798,626 due under a certain promissory note issued by the Company in connection with an acquisition to Provisional Employment Solutions, Inc. As a result of the sale of the ALS Purchased Assets to ALS, all sums due and owing to ALS by the Company were deemed paid in full and no further obligations remain.

(ii) On December 5, 2005, the Company completed the sale, effective as of November 28, 2005 (the “AI Effective Date”), of substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets, excluding accounts receivable and other certain items, as described below, of three of its California offices (the “AI Purchased Assets”) to Accountabilities, Inc. (AI”). The offices sold were the following: Culver City, California; Lawndale, California and Orange, California (the “Other California Offices”). Pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and AI dated December 5, 2005 (the “AI Asset Purchase Agreement”), AI has agreed to pay to the Company an earnout amount equal to two percent of the sales of the Other California Offices for the first twelve month period after the AI Effective Date; one percent of the sales of the Other California Offices for the second twelve month period after the AI Effective Date; and one percent of the sales of the Other California Offices for the third twelve month period from the AI Effective Date. In addition, a Demand Subordinated Promissory Note between the Company and AI dated September 15, 2005, which had an outstanding principal balance of $125,000 at the time of closing was deemed paid and marked canceled.

Certain assets held by the other California Offices were excluded from the sale, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and the Company’s rights to receive payments from any source.

(iii)On December 7, 2005, the Company completed the sale, effective as of November 28, 2005 (the “SOP Effective Date”), of substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets, excluding accounts receivable and other assets as described below, of several of its Northeastern offices (the “SOP Purchased Assets”) to Source One Personnel, Inc. (“SOP”). The offices sold were the following: Cherry Hill, New Jersey; New Brunswick, New Jersey; Mount Royal/Paulsboro, New Jersey (soon to be Woodbury Heights, New Jersey); Pennsauken, New Jersey; Norristown, Pennsylvania; Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania; New Castle, Delaware and the former Freehold, New Jersey profit center (the “NJ/PA/DE Offices”). The assets of Deer Park, New York, Leominster, Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts and Athol, Massachusetts (the “Earn Out Offices”) were also purchased (collectively the “NJ/PA/DE Offices” and the “Earn Out Offices” shall be referred to as the “Purchased Offices”). In addition to the foregoing, the SOP Purchased Assets also included substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets, excluding accounts receivable and other assets as described below, used by the Company in the operation of its business at certain facilities of certain customers including the following: the Setco facility in Cranbury, New Jersey, the

9

Record facility in Hackensack, New Jersey, the UPS-MI (formerly RMX) facility in Long Island, New York, the UPS-MI (formerly RMX) facility in the State of Connecticut, the UPS-MI (formerly RMX) facility in the State of Ohio, the APX facility in Clifton, New Jersey (the “Earn Out On-Site Business”) and the Burlington Coat Factory in Burlington, New Jersey, the Burlington Coat Factory facility in Edgewater Park, New Jersey and the UPS-MI (formerly RMX) facility in Paulsboro, New Jersey (the foregoing business and the “Earn Out On-Site Businesses” shall be referred to herein collectively as the “On-Site Businesses”). Pursuant to the SOP Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and SOP dated December 7, 2005 (the “SOP Asset Purchase Agreement:), the purchase price for the SOP Purchased Assets was payable as follows (the “SOP Purchase Price”):

• An aggregate of $974,031 of indebtedness owed by the Company to SOP (i) under certain promissory notes previously issued by the Company to SOP and (ii) in connection with a put right previously exercised by SOP with respect to 400,000 shares of our common stock was cancelled.

• SOP is required to make the following earn out payments to the Company during the three year period commencing on the SOP Effective Date (the “Earn Out Period”):

• Two percent of sales (excluding taxes on sales) from the Earn Out Offices and the Earn Out On-Site Businesses for the initial twelve months of the Earn Out Period.

• One percent of sales (excluding taxes on sales) from the Earn Out Offices and the Earn Out On-Site Businesses for the second twelve months of the Earn Out Period.

• One percent of sales (excluding taxes on sales) from the Earn Out Offices and the Earn Out On-Site Businesses for the third twelve months of the Earn Out Period.

Certain assets held by the Purchased Businesses were excluded from the sale, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and the Company’s rights to receive payments from any source.

(iv) On December 7, 2005 (the “Closing Date”), the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents, of two of its California branch offices (the “TES Purchased Assets”) to Tri-State Employment Service, Inc. (“TES”). The offices sold were the following: Bellflower, California and West Covina, California (the “California Branch Offices”). Pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and TES dated December 7, 2005 (the “TES Asset Purchase Agreement”), TES has agreed to pay to the Company an earnout amount as follows:

• two percent of sales of the California Branch Offices to existing clients for the first twelve month period after the Closing Date;

• one percent of sales of the California Branch Offices to existing clients for the second twelve month period after the Closing Date; and

• one percent of sales of the California Branch Offices to existing clients for the third twelve month period after the Closing Date.

For purposes of calculating the amount owed by TES to the Company, in no event shall the aggregate annual sales to such clients exceed $25,000,000.

(b) Effective as of June 5, 2005 (the “Effective Date”), the Company sold substantially all of the assets, excluding accounts receivable of its six Northern California offices to ALS (see Note 11).

10

The consolidated financial statements for all periods presented have been restated to reflect discontinued operations of the aforementioned asset sales. The operating results of discontinued operations are summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
		2006		2005			2006			2005
Revenues	$	-	$	29,263,653		$	18,265,587		$	89,942,702
Cost of revenues		-		25,352,961			16,215,630			77,759,463
Gross profit		-		3,910,692			2,046,957			12,183,239
Selling, general and administrative expenses		-		3,199,959			1,950,622			9,605,552
Other charges		-		243,084			-			416,345
Operating income		-		467,640			96,335			2,161,342
Interest expense		-		(242,528	)		(205,056	)		(688,775	)
Other income (expense)		-		66			(198,323	)		(3,488	)
Net income (loss)	$	-	$	225,187		$	(307,044	)	$	1,469,079

Assets of the discontinued operations have been reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as current assets held for sale. The liabilities that were assumed or cancelled by the purchasers are reflected as current liabilities held for sale. The following is a summary of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations at September 30, 2005:

		September 30,
		2005
Pre-paid expenses and other current assets	$	61,781
Property and equipment, net		291,552
Goodwill		2,553,081
Intangible assets, net		689,182
Other assets		60,943
Total assets of discontinued operations	$	3,656,539
Loans payable		125,000
Notes payable - acquisitions		936,820
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		185,037
Accounts payable - related parties		3,597,422
Put options liability		650,000
Total liabilities of discontinued operations	$	5,494,279

The gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2006 is summarized as follows:

		Three Months		Nine Months
		Ended		Ended
		June 30, 2006		June 30, 2006
Sold to:
ALS	$	-	$	4,340,459
AI		99,704		(104,897	)
SOP		50,594		(233,990	)
TES		65,127		(349,421	)
		215,425		3,652,151
Other costs of sales		-		(60,000	)
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	$	215,425	$	3,592,151

The above gain includes earnout payments of $215,425 and $509,570 in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.

11

NOTE 7 - LINE OF CREDIT

The Company had a loan and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Capital Temp Funds, Inc. (the “Lender”) which provided for a line of credit up to 85% of eligible accounts receivable, as defined, not to exceed $12,000,000. Until April 10, 2003, advances under the Loan Agreement bore interest at a rate of prime plus 1-3/4%. The Loan Agreement restricted the Company’s ability to incur other indebtedness, pay dividends and repurchase stock. Effective April 10, 2003, the Company entered into a modification of the Loan Agreement which provided that borrowings under the Loan Agreement would bear interest at 3% above the prime rate. Borrowings under the Loan Agreement were collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets.

On January 15, 2005, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement (the “Forbearance Agreement”) pursuant to which Lender agreed to forebear from accelerating obligations and/or enforcing existing defaults.

The Forbearance Agreement amended the Loan Agreement to reduce the maximum credit line to $12,000,000, which, after March 1, 2005 was further reduced by $250,000 per month.

On August 11, 2005, the Company and the Lender entered into an Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement (the “Amended Forbearance Agreement”) whereby the Lender had again agreed to forbear from accelerating obligations and/or enforcing existing defaults until the earlier to occur of (a) August 26, 2005 or (b) the date of any Forbearance Default, as defined (the “Forbearance Period”).

The Amended Forbearance Agreement provided that during the Forbearance Period, the maximum credit line would be $10,500,000.

Between August 25, 2005 and December 21, 2005, the Lender granted the Company a series of extensions of the Amended Forbearance Agreement. An extension granted in November 2005 was conditioned upon, among other things, the Company and ALS entering into a binding agreement providing for a sale to ALS of certain assets of the Company. The Company and ALS entered into such an agreement on November 3, 2005. As a condition to obtaining an extension granted in December 2005, the Company was required to represent that it had closed the sale of assets to ALS and to acknowledge and agree that any loans and advances made by the Lender during the extension period would be the last requested advances under the Loan Agreement. The final extension of the Amended Forbearance Agreement expired on December 21, 2005. As of January 31, 2006, the Company repaid all of the indebtedness under the Loan Agreement.

The Lender charged the Company $350,000 of fees in connection with the Forbearance Agreement, the Amended Forbearance Agreement and the various extensions thereof during the three months ended December 31, 2005.

In connection with the Company and the Lender entering into the Amended Forbearance Agreement, the Company, the Lender and ALS also entered into the ALS Forbearance, whereby ALS agreed to forbear, through August 25, 2005, from enforcing payment defaults under the Company’s Outsourcing Agreement (see Note 11). All of the Company’s obligations under the Company’s Outsourcing Agreement with ALS were satisfied in connection with the sale of assets to ALS which occurred in December 2005 (see Note 5).

On January 3, 2006, the Company’s consolidated 50% owned joint venture, STS (see Notes 1 and 11), entered into a factoring and security agreement (the “Factoring Agreement”) with Action Capital Corporation (“Action”). The Factoring Agreement provides for the sale of up to $1,500,000 of acceptable accounts receivable of STS to Action. Action reserves and withholds an amount in a reserve account equal to 10% of the face amount of accounts receivable purchased under the Factoring Agreement. Action has full recourse against STS including, without limitation, the right to charge-back or sell back any accounts receivable, if not paid within 90 days of the date of purchase. The Factoring Agreement provides for STS to pay interest of prime plus 1% plus a monthly fee of .6% on the daily average of unpaid advances.

The prime rate at June 30, 2006 was 8.25%.

NOTE 8 - PAYROLL TAX LIABILITIES

During fiscal 2003, the Company was notified by both the New Jersey Department of Labor and the California Employment Development Department (the “EDD”) that, if certain payroll delinquencies were not cured, judgment would be entered against the Company. As of June 30, 2006, there was still an aggregate of $3.9 million in delinquent payroll taxes outstanding which are included in “Payroll taxes payable” on the balance sheet. Judgment has not been entered against the Company in California. While judgment has been entered against the Company in New Jersey, no actions have been taken to enforce same.

12

On January 7, 2005, the Company entered into a payment plan agreement with the EDD with regard to the Company’s past due and unpaid unemployment taxes.

The Company is to continue to pay $12,500 per week to be first applied to its unpaid employment tax liability of $621,546 (as of June 30, 2006) for periods prior to the second quarter 2004; then to second quarter 2004 and third quarter 2004 employment taxes to the extent not already paid, then to interest and then to penalties.

The weekly payment of $12,500 is to increase for a three month period following any quarter in which the Company’s reported income is above $200,000 based on a percentage increase tied to the amount in excess of $200,000. The Company believes that consistent with the parties’ intentions when entering into the Plan, the gain on sale of discontinued operations, which resulted in no cash to the Company, would be excluded from reported income for purposes of the Plan.

NOTE 9 - INCOME TAXES

No income tax expense was recorded in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2006, because the Company recognized a deferred tax benefit resulting from the utilization of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards.

NOTE 10 - PREFERRED STOCK

a.Series F

In July 2002, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer invested $1,000,000 in the Company in exchange for 10,000 shares of newly created Series F Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series F Preferred Stock”), which has a stated value of $100 per share.

The holder of the Series F Preferred Stock is entitled to receive, from assets legally available therefore, cumulative dividends at a rate of 7% per year, accrued daily, payable monthly, in preference and priority to any payment of any dividend on the Common Stock and on the Series F Preferred Stock. Dividends may be paid, at the Company’s option, either in cash or in shares of Common Stock, valued at the Series F Conversion Price (as defined below). Holders of Series F Preferred Stock are entitled to a liquidation preference of $100 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends.

The Series F Preferred Stock is convertible into Common Stock at a conversion price equal to $.40 per share. The number of shares issuable upon conversion is determined by multiplying the number of shares of Series F Preferred Stock to be converted by $100, and dividing the result by the Series F Conversion Price.

Except as otherwise required by law, holders of Series F Preferred Stock and holders of Common Stock shall vote together as a single class on each matter submitted to a vote of stockholders. Each outstanding share of Series F Preferred Stock shall be entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of full shares of Common Stock into which each such share of Series F Preferred Stock is then convertible on the date for determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting. Holders of the Series F Preferred Stock are entitled to vote as a separate class on any proposed amendment to the terms of the Series F Preferred Stock which would increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of Series F Preferred Stock or have an adverse impact on the Series F Preferred Stock and on any proposal to create a new class of shares having rights or preferences equal to or having priority to the Series F Preferred Stock.

The Company may redeem the shares of the Series F Preferred Stock at any time prior to conversion at a redemption price of 115% of the purchase price paid for the Series F Preferred Shares plus any accrued but unpaid dividends.

b.Series I

The Company was required to redeem each share of the Series I Preferred Stock for an amount equal to the stated value of $100 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends on August 5, 2005, the one year anniversary date of the issuance of the Series I Preferred Stock to the extent permitted by applicable law; provided, however, that the Company had the right to extend the required redemption date for an additional one year, in which case the Company was required to pay all dividends accrued through the first year of issuance in cash and issue to each holder of Series I Preferred Stock a number of shares of its common stock which then have a value equal to 10% of the stated value of the Series I Preferred Stock held. In addition, because the Company extended the redemption date, it was required to pay dividends quarterly and pay an advisory fee to an advisor designated by the holders of the Series I Preferred Stock in an amount equal to 10% of the aggregate stated value of the outstanding shares of Series I Preferred Stock, 80% of which was payable in cash and 20% of which will be paid in shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at the then current market value. If the Company did not redeem the Series I Preferred Stock by the extended redemption date, the dividend rate of the Series I Preferred Stock would have increased to 24% per year and the Series I Preferred Stock would have been convertible, at the option of the

13

holder, into either common stock at a conversion price equal to 80% of the average closing bid price of the common stock during the five trading days preceding the conversion or common stock and warrants at a rate of 125 shares of common stock and 250 warrants for each $100 of stated value and accrued and unpaid dividends represented by the Series I Preferred Stock. Holders of Series I Preferred Stock had no voting rights, except as provided by law and with respect to certain limited matters.

Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP (“Pinnacle”), the holder of the shares of the Company’s Series I Preferred Stock (see Note 11) notified the Company that the Company was in default of its obligations to pay $30,000 of the $174,200 cash portion of the advisory fee which was required to be paid in connection with the Company’s election to extend the date by which it was required to redeem the Series I Preferred Stock to August 5, 2006. The Company was also in default for non-payment of $40,091 of dividends on the Series I Preferred Stock that were due on September 30, 2005.

The Company permitted Pinnacle to convert 41 shares of Series I Preferred Stock into 840,000 shares of common stock in October 2005 as a result of the payment defaults.

In December 2005, the Company permitted Pinnacle to convert an aggregate of 203 shares of Series I Preferred Stock into 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock and agreed to pay to Pinnacle a default fee of $100,000.

On January 13, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Pinnacle, pursuant to which the Company issued to Pinnacle, effective December 28, 2005, a secured convertible promissory note (the “Convertible Note”) (see Note 10) in the aggregate principal amount of $2,356,850 in exchange for 21,531 shares of the Company’s Series I Preferred Stock held by Pinnacle. As a result of the exchange, there are no longer any shares of Series I Preferred Stock outstanding, and the Company no longer has any obligation to pay to Pinnacle any amounts owed to it under the terms of the Series I Preferred Stock, including $103,716 of unpaid dividends which had accrued through December 28, 2005.

NOTE 11 - NOTE PAYABLE - RELATED PARTY

The Convertible Note, payable to Pinnacle (see Notes 9 and 11), which is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, becomes due as follows:

•$1,800,000 was due and payable in cash upon the earlier of the Company’s receipt of $1,800,000 of accounts receivable or March 15, 2006. At June 30, 2006, $235,000 of this has not been paid.

•$331,850 and accrued interest at a rate of 12% per annum is payable in 24 equal installments of principal and interest during the period commencing June 28, 2007 and ending on May 28, 2009.

•$225,000 and accrued interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum becomes due and payable on December 28, 2007; provided, however, that the Company has the right to pay such amount in cash or shares of its common stock (valued at $0.0072 per share).

Pinnacle has the right to convert the principal amount of and interest accrued under the Convertible Note at any time as follows:

•��$331,850 of the principal amount and unpaid interest accrued thereon is convertible into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $.06 per share.

•$225,000 of the principal amount and unpaid accrued interest thereon is convertible into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.0072. During the nine months ended June 30, 2006, $150,000 of principal was converted into 20,833,331 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Pinnacle may not convert the Convertible Note to the extent that the conversion would result in Pinnacle owning in excess of 9.999% of the then issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. Pinnacle may waive this conversion restriction upon not less than 60 days prior notice to the Company.

NOTE 12 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Consulting Fees

An entity which employs the son of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the “CEO”) provided consulting services to the Company. Consulting expense was $44,000 and $139,151 for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included in the $44,000 is a charge of $16,000 in connection with the issuance of 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the entity. The Company has paid consulting fees to an entity whose stockholder is another son of the CEO of the Company. Consulting fees amounted to $-0- and $76,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

14

Joint Venture

The Company provides information technology staffing services through a joint venture, STS (see Note 1), in which the Company has a 50% interest. A son of the CEO of the Company has a majority interest in the other 50% venturer.

Payroll Outsourcing

The Company was a party to an Outsourcing Agreement with ALS pursuant to which ALS and its affiliate, Advantage Services Group, LLC (“Advantage”), were to provide payroll outsourcing services for all of the Company’s in-house staff, except for its corporate employees, and customer staffing requirements. As a result of this arrangement, all of the Company’s field personnel were employees of ALS. The Company paid agreed upon pay rates, plus burden (payroll taxes and workers’ compensation insurance) plus a fee ranging between 2% and 3% (0% - 1 ½% effective June 10, 2005) of pay rates. On June 10, 2005, the Company entered into a Second Addendum to Outsourcing Agreement with ALS, which, among other things, reduced certain rates charged by ALS to the Company. The total amount charged by ALS under this agreement and similar agreements previously in effect between the parties was $17,326,000 and $76,265,000 in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Accounts payable - related parties in the attached condensed consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2005, represents amounts due to ALS and Advantage.

The Company terminated the Outsourcing Agreement effective February 3, 2006.

Loan Payable

During the nine months ended June 30, 2006, the Company repaid the $15,000 balance of a loan made to the Company by the CEO.

Other

An entity through which the son of the CEO is employed is a consultant to AI (see Note 6).

The nephew of the CEO of the Company is affiliated with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP, the holder of the shares of the Company’s Series I Preferred Stock (see Notes 9 and 10). The Company believes that PIP Management Inc., which was designated as the advisor to the Series I holders (see Notes 9 and 10), is also affiliated with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP.

NOTE 13 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND RESTATEMENT

In accordance with SFAS No. 133 and EITF 00-19, in August 2006, the Company determined that certain warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock should be separately accounted for as liabilities. The Company had not classified those derivative liabilities as such in its previously issued financial statements. In order to reflect these changes, the Company restated its financial statements for the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, and the quarterly periods therein, to record the fair value of these warrants on the Company’s balance sheet as a liability and record changes in the values of these derivatives in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as “Gain on Change in Fair Value of Warrants”. This resulted in total liabilities being understated by $113,859 at June 30, 2005.

The aggregate balance sheet amount shown for the warrant liability decreased from $5,265,989 at September 30, 2004 to $113,859 at June 30, 2005 and to $-0- at June 30, 2006. As a result, we recognized a gain of $-0- and $982,401 in the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $2,135 and $5,152,130 in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

15

Item 2 -	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
	AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements relate to future economic performance, plans and objectives of management for future operations and projections of revenue and other financial items that are based on the beliefs of our management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. The words “expect”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “intend”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements involve assumptions, uncertainties and risks. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or expected. Among the key factors that may have a direct bearing on our expected operating results, performance or financial condition are economic conditions facing the staffing industry generally; uncertainties related to the job market and our ability to attract qualified candidates; uncertainties associated with our brief operating history; our ability to raise additional capital; our ability to achieve and manage growth; our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; our ability to develop new services; the continued cooperation of our creditors; our ability to enhance and expand existing offices; our ability to open new offices; general economic conditions; and other factors discussed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These factors are not intended to represent a complete list of all risks and uncertainties inherent in our business. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this report.

Our critical accounting policies and estimates are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005.

Introduction

Through December 2005, we provided a wide range of staffing services and productivity consulting services associated with such staffing services nationally through a network of offices located throughout the United States. Regardless of the type of temporary service offering we provided, we recognized revenues based on hours worked by assigned personnel. Generally, we billed our customers a pre-negotiated, fixed rate per hour for the hours worked by our temporary employees. Therefore, we did not separate our various service offerings into separate offering segments. We did not routinely provide discrete financial information about any particular service offering. We also did not conduct any regular reviews of, nor make decisions about, allocating any particular resources to a particular service offering to assess its performance. As set forth below, certain of our service offerings targeted specific markets, but we did not necessarily conduct separate marketing campaigns for such services. Pursuant to the Outsourcing Agreement that was in place with ALS, ALS was responsible for paying wages, workers’ compensation, unemployment compensation insurance, Medicare and Social Security taxes and other general payroll related expenses for all of the temporary employees we placed, and we were billed for such expenses plus a fee by ALS. These expenses are included in the cost of revenue. Because we paid our temporary employees only for the hours they actually worked, wages for our temporary personnel were a variable cost that increased or decreased in proportion to revenues. Gross profit margin varied depending on the type of services offered. In some instances, temporary employees placed by us may have decided to accept an offer of permanent employment from the customer and thereby “convert” the temporary position to a permanent position. Fees received from such conversions were included in our revenues. Selling, general and administrative expenses include payroll for management and administrative employees, office occupancy costs, sales and marketing expenses and other general and administrative costs.

In December 2005, we completed a series of asset sale transactions pursuant to which we sold our staffing operations. As a result of such sales, we no longer actively conduct any staffing services business, other than IT staffing solutions services conducted through our 50% owned joint venture, STS. As a result of these asset sale transactions, we expect that our revenues in fiscal 2006 will be substantially less than revenues achieved in fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2006, we plan to expand the IT staffing solutions business we conduct through STS; however, we can give no assurance that such efforts will be successful.

16

Results of Operations

Discontinued Operations/Acquisition on Disposition of Assets

In December 2005, we completed the following series of transactions pursuant to which we sold substantially all of our assets used to conduct our staffing services business, other than the IT staffing solutions business that is conducted through our 50% owned joint venture, Stratus Technology Services, LLC:

(a) On December 2, 2005, we completed the sale, effective as of November 21, 2005, of substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets, excluding accounts receivable, of several of our offices located in the Western half of the United States (the “ALS Purchased Assets”) to ALS, LLC (“ALS”). The offices sold were the following: Chino, California; Colton, California; Los Angeles, California; Los Nietos, California; Ontario, California; Santa Fe Springs, California and the Phoenix, Arizona branches and the Dallas Morning News Account (the “Western Offices”). Pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement between us and ALS dated December 2, 2005 (the “ALS Asset Purchase Agreement”), the purchase price for the ALS Purchased Assets was payable as follows:

• $250,000 was payable over the 60 days following December 2, 2005, for our documented cash flow requirements, all of which is payable at a rte no faster than $125,000 per 30 days;

• $1,000,000 payable by ALS is being paid directly to certain taxing authorities to reduce our tax obligations; and

• $3,537,000 which was paid by means of the cancellation of all net indebtedness owed by us to ALS outstanding as of the close of business on December 2, 2005.

In addition to the foregoing amounts, ALS also assumed our obligation to pay $798,626 due under a certain promissory note issued by us to Provisional Employment Solutions, Inc. As a result of the sale of the ALS Purchased Assets to ALS, all sums due and owing to ALS by Stratus were deemed paid in full and no further obligations remain.

In connection with the transaction, we entered into Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements with ALS pursuant to which we agreed not to compete with ALS with the customers of and in the geographic area of the Western Offices, and ALS agreed not to compete with us with respect to certain customers and accounts, including, accounts serviced by our remaining offices, for a period of two years.

(b) On December 5, 2005, we completed the sale, effective as of November 28, 2005 (the “AI Effective Date”), of substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets, excluding accounts receivable and other certain items, as described below, of three of our California offices (the “AI Purchased Assets”) to Accountabilities, Inc. (“AI”) The offices sold were the following: Culver City, California; Lawndale, California and Orange, California (the “Other California Offices”). Pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and AI dated December 5, 2005 (the “AI Asset Purchase Agreement”), AI has agreed to pay to us an earnout amount equal to two percent of the sales of the Other California Offices for the first twelve month period after the AI Effective Date; one percent of the sales of the Other California Offices for the second twelve month period after the AI Effective Date; and one percent of the sales of the Other California Offices for the third twelve month period from the AI Effective Date. In addition, a Demand Subordinated Promissory Note between us and AI dated September 15, 2005 which had an outstanding principal balance of $125,000 at the time of closing was deemed paid and marked canceled.

Certain assets held by the Other California Offices were excluded from the sale, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and our rights to receive payments from any source.

In connection with the AI transaction, we entered into Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements with AI pursuant to which we agreed not to compete with AI with the customers of and in the geographic area of the Other California Offices, and AI agreed not to compete with us with respect to certain customers and accounts, including, accounts serviced by our remaining offices, for a period of three years.

(c) On December 7, 2005, we completed the sale, effective as of November 28, 2005 (the “SOP Effective Date”), of substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets, excluding accounts receivable and other assets as described below, of several of our Northeastern offices (the “SOP Purchased Assets”) to Source One Personnel, Inc. (“SOP”). The offices sold were the following: Cherry Hill, New Jersey; New Brunswick, New Jersey; Mount Royal/Paulsboro, New Jersey (soon to be Woodbury Heights, New Jersey); Pennsauken, New Jersey; Norristown, Pennsylvania; Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania; New Castle Delaware and the former Freehold, New Jersey profit

17

center (the “NJ/PA/DE Offices”). The assets of Deer Park, New York, Leominster, Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts and Athol, Massachusetts (the “Earn Out Offices”) were also purchased (collectively the “NJ/PA/DE Offices” and the “Earn Out Offices” shall be referred to as the “Purchased Offices”). In addition to the foregoing, the SOP Purchased Assets also included substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets, excluding accounts receivable and other assets as described below, used by us in the operation of our business at certain facilities of certain customers including the following: the Setco facility in Cranbury New Jersey, the Record facility in Hackensack, New Jersey, the UPS-MI (formerly RMX) facility in Long Island, New York, the UPS-MI (formerly RMX) facility in the State of Connecticut, the UPS-MI (formerly RMX) facility in the State of Ohio, the APX facility in Clifton, New Jersey (the “Earn Out On-Site Business”) and the Burlington Coat Factory in Burlington, New Jersey, the Burlington Coat Factory facility in Edgewater Park, New Jersey and the UPS-MI (formerly RMX) facility in Paulsboro, New Jersey (the foregoing business and the “Earn-Out On-Site Businesses” shall be referred to herein collectively as the “On-Site Businesses”). Pursuant to the SOP Asset Purchase Agreement between us and SOP dated December 7, 2005 (the “SOP Asset Purchase Agreement”), the purchase price for the SOP Purchased Assets was payable as follows (the “SOP Purchase Price”):

· An aggregate of $974,031 of indebtedness owed by us to SOP (i) under certain promissory notes previously issued by us to SOP and (ii) in connection with a put right previously exercised by SOP with respect to 400,000 shares of our common stock was cancelled.

· SOP is required to make the following earn out payments to us during the three year period commencing on the SOP Effective Date (the “Earn Out Period”):

· Two percent of sales (excluding taxes on sales) from the Earn Out Offices and the Earn Out On-Site Businesses for the initial twelve months of the Earn Out Period.

· One percent of sales (excluding taxes on sales) from the Earn Out Offices and the Earn Out On-Site Businesses for the second twelve months of the Earn Out Period.

· One percent of sales (excluding taxes on sales) from the Earn Out Offices and the Earn Out On-Site Businesses for the third twelve months of the Earn Out Period.

Certain assets held by the Purchased Offices were excluded from the sale, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, our rights to receive payments from any source.

In connection with the SOP transaction, we entered into Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements with SOP pursuant to which we agreed not to compete with SOP with respect to the business acquired from us by SOP for a period of two years.

(d) On December 7, 2005 (the “Closing Date”), we completed the sale of substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents, of two of our California branch offices (the “TES Purchased Assets”) to Tri-State Employment Service, Inc. (“TES”). The offices sold were the following: Bellflower, California and West Covina, California (the “California Branch Offices”). Pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and TES dated December 7, 2005 (the “TES Asset Purchase Agreement”), TES has agreed to pay to us as follows:

· two percent of sales of the California Branch Offices to existing clients for the first twelve month period after the Closing Date;

· one percent of sales of the California Branch Offices to existing clients for the second twelve month period after the Closing Date; and

· one percent of sales of the California Branch Offices to existing clients for the third twelve month period after the Closing Date.

For purposes of calculating the amount owed by TES to us, in no event shall the aggregate annual sales to such clients exceed $25,000,000.

On the Closing Date, TES made a payment of $1,972,521 to our lender and acquired the lender’s rights to certain of our accounts receivable that collateralize our obligation to the lender. As a result of this transaction, our obligations to the lender were reduced by $1,972,521.

18

In connection with the TES transaction, we entered into Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements pursuant to which we agreed not to compete with TES with the customers of and in the geographic area of the California Branch Offices, and TES agreed not to compete with Stratus with respect to certain customers and accounts, including, accounts serviced by Stratus’ remaining offices, for a period of three years.

The foregoing transactions resulted in a $3,592,151 net gain on sale of discontinued operations which is summarized as follows:

Sold to:
ALS	$	4,340,459
AI		(104,897	)
SOP		(233,990	)
TES		(349,421	)
		3,652,151
Other costs of sales		(60,000	)
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	$	3,592,151

The above gain includes earnout payments of $509,570.

Continuing Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2005

Revenues. Revenues increased 8.6% to $1,282,074 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $1,180,222 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily a result of an increase in billable hours.

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 9.1% to $371,498 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $340,665 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, primarily as a result of increased revenues. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues increased slightly to 29.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 28.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2005.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) decreased 61.9% to $527,365 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $1,384,590 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 41.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 117.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2005.

As a result of the asset sales transactions completed in December 2005, the Company began reducing its corporate overhead structure to be more in line with the remaining revenues. These reductions were completed in February 2006.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased 74.8% to $47,179 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from$187,433 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Interest expense as a percentage of revenues decreased to 3.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 15.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease was a result of the decrease in outstanding debt.

Gain on Change in Fair Value of Warrants. We recognized a non-cash gain as a result of the decrease in the fair value of certain warrants accounted for as a derivative liability of $882,409 in the three months ended June 30, 2005.

Net Earnings Attributable to Common Stockholders.As a result of the foregoing, we had net earnings attributable to common stockholders of $8,987, for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to net earnings attributable to common stockholders of $2,080,797 for the three months ended June 30, 2005.

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Nine Months Ended June 30, 2005

Revenues. Revenues increased 8.5% to $3,706,018 for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 from $3,414,949 for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily a result of an increase in billable hours.

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 12.5% to $1,101,618 for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 from $979,632 for the nine months ended June 30, 2005, primarily as a result of increased revenues. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues increased to 29.7% for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 from 28.7% for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was a result of increased permanent placements.

19

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.SG&A decreased 32.2% to $2,534,869 for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 from $3,736,838 for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 68.4% for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 from 109.4% for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. SG&A in the nine months ended June 30, 2006, includes $350,000 of fees charged to us by our former lender in connection with the Forbearance Agreement, the Amended Forbearance Agreement and the various extensions thereof (see Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

As a result of the asset sales transactions completed in December 2005, the Company began reducing its corporate overhead structure to be more in line with the remaining revenues. These reductions were completed in February 2006.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased 34.1% to $430,987 for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 from$654,427 for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. Interest expense in the nine months ended June 30, 2006, includes $100,000 of the principal amount of the Convertible Note issued in exchange for our Series I Preferred Stock that was attributable to the settlement of our obligation to pay certain advisory fees and dividend payments under the terms of the Series I Preferred Stock. (see Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). Interest expense as a percentage of revenues decreased to 11.6% for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 from 19.2% for the nine months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease was a result of the decrease in outstanding debt.

Gain on Change in Fair Value of Warrants. We recognized a non-cash gain as a result of the decrease to the fair value of certain warrants accounted for as a derivative liability of $2,135 and $5,152,130 in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Net Earnings Attributable to Common Stockholders.As a result of the foregoing, we had net earnings attributable to common stockholders of $1,379,875 for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 compared to net earnings attributable to common stockholders of $5,373,862 for the nine months ended June 30, 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flows have not been segregated between continuing operations and discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Cash provided to us from discontinued operations (included in the consolidated cash flow discussions below) during the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was comprised of the following:

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
		2006			2005
Cash provided by operating activities	$	8,400,417		$	3,883,929
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities		1,011,541			(252,297	)
Cash used in financing activities		(7,930,389	)		(1,992,635	)
Net	$	1,481,569		$	1,638,997

Although there is no assurance we will continue to receive earnout payments in connection with discontinued operations, we estimate that we will receive approximately $80,000 per month, through November 2006 and $40,000 per month thereafter, through November 2008.

At June 30, 2006, we had limited liquid resources. Current liabilities were $9,642,322 and current assets were $2,375,351. The difference of $7,266,971 is a working capital deficit, which is primarily the result of losses incurred during the last four years. This condition raises substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effect on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Our continuation of existence is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our continuing obligations on a timely basis, to fund the operating and capital needs, and to obtain additional financing as may be necessary.

We have taken steps to revise and reduce our operating requirements, which we believe will be sufficient to assure continued operations and implementation of our plans. The steps included closing branches that are not profitable, reductions in staffing, and other selling, general and administrative expenses, and most significantly, the asset sales transactions that were completed in December 2005. We continue to pursue other sources of equity or long-term debt financings. We also continue to negotiate payments plans and other accommodations with our creditors. We believe that

20

the cash flow from operations and earnout payments to which we are entitled in connection with the Asset Sales will provide us with sufficient cash flow to support our operations in the next twelve months.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $7,139,011 and $1,987,697 in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities was $998,414 and $(630,474) in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net cash received in connection with the sale of discontinued operations was $1,024,587, including earnout payments of $371,351, in the nine months ended June 30, 2006. Cash used for capital expenditures was $32,782 and $182,706 in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We used $136,000 in connection with an acquisition in March 2005. Payments in connection with the sale of discontinued operations aggregated $322,952 in the nine months ended June 30, 2005.

Net cash used in financing activities was $8,074,343 and $2,058,669 in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We had net repayments of $6,481,611 and $1,099,393 under our line of credit in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net short-term loan repayments were $24,002 and $204,687 in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the nine months ended June 30, 2005, our Chief Executive Officer loaned an aggregate of $650,000 to us, all of which was repaid during the nine months ended June 30, 2005. Payments of notes payable - acquisitions was $63,999 and $696,445 in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We paid $1,490,000 in the nine months ended June 30, 2006, against a note payable to Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP, a related party.

Our principal uses of cash through December 2005 were to fund temporary employee payroll expense and employer related payroll taxes, investment in capital equipment, start-up expenses of new offices, expansion of services offered, workers’ compensation, general liability and other insurance coverages, debt service and costs relating to other transactions such as acquisitions. Temporary employees were paid weekly, as were payments under our payroll outsourcing agreements with related parties (see Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

Through December 2005, we had a loan and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Capital Temp Funds, Inc. (the “Lender”) which provided for a line of credit up to 85% of eligible accounts receivable, as defined, not to exceed $12,000,000. Until April 10, 2003, advances under the Loan Agreement bore interest at a rate of prime plus 1 1/2%. The Loan Agreement restricted our ability to incur other indebtedness, pay dividends and repurchase stock. Effective April 10, 2003, we entered into a modification of the Loan Agreement which provided that borrowings under the Loan Agreement would bear interest at 3% above the prime rate. Borrowings under the Loan Agreement were collateralized by substantially all of our assets. As of September 30, 2005, $8,931,689 was outstanding under the credit agreement.

During the year ended September 30, 2005, we were in violation of the following covenants under the Loan Agreement:

(i)	Failing to meet the tangible net worth requirement;
(ii)	Our common stock being delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market; and
(iii)	Our having delinquent state, local and federal taxes

We had received a waiver from the lender on all of the above violations.

On January 15, 2005, we entered into a Forbearance Agreement (the “Forbearance Agreement”) pursuant to which the Lender agreed to forebear from accelerating obligations and/or enforcing existing defaults. The Forbearance Agreement amended the Loan Agreement to reduce the maximum credit line to $12,000,000, which, after March 1, 2005 was further reduced by $250,000 per month.

On August 11, 2005, we entered into an Amended and Restated Forbearance Agreement (the “Amended Forbearance Agreement”) whereby the Lender had again agreed to forbear from accelerating obligations and/or enforcing existing defaults until the earlier to occur of (a) August 26, 2005 or (b) the date of any Forbearance Default, as defined (the “Forbearance Period”).

The Amended Forbearance Agreement provided that during the Forbearance Period, the maximum credit line would be $10,500,000.

Between August 25, 2005 and December 21, 2005, the Lender granted us a series of extensions of the Amended Forbearance Agreement. An extension granted in November 2005 was conditioned upon, among other things, our entry

21

into a binding agreement providing for a sale to ALS of the assets of our offices in Southern California, the Phoenix region and its Dallas Morning News account. We entered into such an agreement with ALS on November 3, 2005. As a condition to obtaining an extension granted in December 2005, we were required to represent that we had closed the sale of assets to ALS and to acknowledge and agree that any loans and advances made by the Lender during the extension period would be the last requested advances under the Loan Agreement. The final extension of the Amended Forbearance Agreement expired on December 21, 2005. At such time, $2,431,808 of indebtedness remained outstanding under the Loan Agreement. As of January 31, 2006, we had repaid all of the indebtedness.

The Lender charged us $412,500 of fees in connection with the Forbearance Agreement, the Amended Forbearance Agreement and the various extensions thereof during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 and $350,000 during the three months ended December 31, 2005.

In connection with us and the Lender entering into the Amended Forbearance Agreement, we, the Lender and ALS also entered into the ALS Forbearance, whereby ALS agreed to forbear, through August 25, 2005, from enforcing payment defaults under our Outsourcing Agreement with ALS subject to certain conditions. All of our obligations under our Outsourcing Agreement with ALS were satisfied in connection with the sale of assets to ALS which occurred in December 2005.

In January 2006, STS entered into a Factoring and Security Agreement (the “Factoring Agreement”) with Action Capital Corporation (“Action”) which provides for the sale of up to $1,500,000 of accounts receivable of STS to Action. Action will reserve and withhold in a reserve account, an amount equal to 10% of the face amount of accounts receivable purchased under the Factoring Agreement. Action has full recourse against STS, including the right to charge-back or sell back any accounts receivable if not paid within 90 days of the date of purchase. The Factoring Agreement provides for interest at an annual rate of prime plus 1% plus a monthly fee of .6% on the daily average of unpaid balances. The prime rate at June 30, 2006 was 8.25%.

SOP had the right to require us to repurchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $8.00 per share at any time after July 27, 2003 and before the later of July 27, 2005 and the full payment of the outstanding note that we issued to it in connection with the acquisition transaction completed with SOP in July 2001. SOP exercised this right on July 29, 2003. During the year ended September 30, 2004, we paid $150,000 against this liability, which is reflected as “put options liability” on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Our remaining repurchase obligation was cancelled in connection with the closing of the asset sale transaction that we completed with SOP in December 2005.

During fiscal 2003, we were notified by both the New Jersey Department of Labor and the California Employment Development Department (the “EDD”) that, if certain payroll delinquencies were not cured, judgment would be entered against us. As of June 30, 2006, there was still an aggregate of $3.9 million in delinquent payroll taxes outstanding, including interest and penalties, which are included in “Payroll taxes payable” on the balance sheet as of June 30, 2006. Judgment has not been entered against us in California. While judgment has been entered against us in New Jersey, no actions have been taken to enforce same. On January 7, 2005, we entered into a payment plan agreement with the EDD, which requires us to pay $12,500 per week to the EDD. The $12,500 weekly payment is subject to increase for a three month period following any quarter in which our reported income exceeds $200,000, based upon a percentage related to the amount of increase above $200,000.

In January 2006 we entered into an agreement with the holder of all of the outstanding shares of our Series I Preferred Stock pursuant to which we issued to the holder, effective as of December 28, 2005, a secured convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $2,356,750 in exchange for all of such shares of Series I Preferred Stock. (See Notes 9 and 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

As of March 31, 2006, there were no off-balance sheet arrangements, unconsolidated subsidiaries, commitments or guarantees of other parties, except as disclosed in the notes to financial statements. Stockholders’ (deficiency) at that date was $(8,085,156).

22

We engaged in various transactions with related parties during the nine months ended June 30, 2006 including the following:

•   We paid $44,000 to an entity which employs Jeffrey J. Raymond, the son of Joseph J. Raymond, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, for consulting services. This amount was included in selling, general and administrative expense and includes a charge of $16,000 in connection with the issuance of 2,000,000 shares of our Common Stock to the entity. The services provided included the identification of acquisition candidates, acquisition advisory services, due diligence, post-acquisition transition services, customer relations, accounts receivable collection and strategic planning advice.  

•   Joseph J. Raymond, Jr., the son of Joseph J. Raymond, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, is a 50% member in ALS, LLC, which is the holding company for Advantage. We were a party to an Outsourcing Agreement with ALS and pursuant to which ALS provided payroll outsourcing services for all our in-house staff, except for our corporate employees, and customer staffing requirements. As a result of this arrangement, all of our field personnel were employed by ALS until December 2005. We paid agreed upon pay rates, plus burden (payroll taxes and workers’ compensation insurance) plus a fee ranging between 2% and 3% (0% - 1 ½% effective June 10, 2005) of pay rates to ALS. The total amount charged by ALS under this agreement was $17,326,000 in the nine months ended June 30, 2006.  

•   We repaid a $15,000 non-interest bearing loan made to us by Joseph J. Raymond.  

•   At June 30, 2006, we owed: $41,000 under a demand note bearing interest at 10% per annum to a corporation owned by the son of Joseph J. Raymond; $5,123 to a trust formed for the benefit of a family member of a former member of our Board of Directors under a promissory note bearing interest at 12% per annum which became due in full in August 2005 and $41,598 to a former member of our Board of Directors under a promissory note bearing interest at 12% per annum which becomes due in full in May 2006.  

•   Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related parties in the attached condensed consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2005, represents amounts due to ALS and Advantage.  

•   The nephew of our Chairman, President and CEO is affiliated with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP (“Pinnacle”), which held 21,163 shares of our Series I Preferred Stock as of September 30, 2005. The Company also believes that PIP Management, Inc., which was designated as the advisor to the Series I holders, is also affiliated with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP. In January 2006, we entered into an agreement with Pinnacle pursuant to which we issued to Pinnacle, effective as of December 28, 2005, a secured convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $2,356,750 in exchange for all the outstanding shares of Series I Preferred Stock (see Notes 9 and 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). During the nine months ended June 30, 2006, we paid $1,490,000 against the note. In addition, $225,000 of principal was converted into 25,833,331 shares of our common stock.  

•   In December 2005, we sold substantially all of the assets, excluding accounts receivable, of certain other offices located in California and Arizona to ALS. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Discontinued Operations/Acquisition or Disposition of Assets” and Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  

•   In December 2005, we sold substantially all of the assets, excluding accounts receivable and certain other items of three of our California offices to AI. The son of Joseph J. Raymond, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, is employed by an entity which serves as a consultant to AI. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations/Acquisition or Disposition of Assets” and Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  

23

Contractual Obligations

Our aggregate contractual obligations are as follows:

			Payments Due by Fiscal Period (in Thousands)
						2008 -		2010 -
		Total		2007		2009		2011		Thereafter
Contractual Obligations:
Long-term debt obligations	$	1,487	$	568	$	704	$	215	$	-
Operating lease obligations		134		76		58		-		-
Series A redemption payable		300		300		-		-		-
Earnout liability		45		45		-		-		-
Payroll tax liability (a)		682		650		32		-		-
TOTAL	$	2,648	$	1,639	$	794	$	215	$	-

(a) Exclusive of interest and penalties. Payments may be accelerated based upon future operating result benchmarks.

Seasonality

Our business follows the seasonal trends of our customer’s business. Historically, we have experienced lower revenues in the first calendar quarter with revenues accelerating during the second and third calendar quarters and then starting to slow again during the fourth calendar quarter.

Impact of Inflation

We believe that since our inception, inflation has not had a significant impact on our results of operations.

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2006, the financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments,” (SFAS 155), which amends SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”. SFAS 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS 155 also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS 133 and SFAS 140. This statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. We do not expect our adoption of this new standard to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 156”). This statement was issued to simplify the accounting for servicing assets and liabilities, such as those common with mortgage securitization activities. This statement addresses the recognition and measurement of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities and provides an approach to simplify hedge-like (offset) accounting. SFAS 156 clarifies when an obligation to service financial assets should be separately recognized (as a servicing asset or liability), requires initial measurement at fair value and permits an entity to select either the Amortization Method of the Fair Value Method. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. We do not expect our adoption of this new standard to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. This Interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. We do not expect that the implementation of FIN 48 will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

24

Sensitive Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and notes. Significant estimates include management’s estimate of the carrying value of accounts receivable, the impairment of goodwill and the establishment of valuation reserves offsetting deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company’s critical accounting policies relating to these items are described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005. As of June 30, 2006, there have been no material changes to any of the critical accounting policies contained therein.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISKS

During fiscal 2005, we were subject to the risk of fluctuating interest rates in the ordinary course of business for borrowings under our Loan and Security Agreement, as modified by the Forbearance Agreement with Capital Tempfunds, Inc. This credit agreement provided for a line of credit up to 85% of eligible accounts receivable, not to exceed $12,000,000. Advances under this credit agreement bore interest at a rate of prime plus 3%. The line or credit was terminated in December 2005 and no additional borrowings are permitted under the line of credit. In January 2006, STS entered into a Factoring Agreement, which provides for the sale of up to $1,500,000 of accounts receivable to Action. STS is charged interest at an annual rate of prime plus 1%, plus a monthly management fee of .6% on the daily average of unpaid balances. As a result, we continue to be subject to the risk of fluctuating interest rates.

We believe that our business operations are not exposed to market risk relating to foreign currency exchange risk or commodity price risk.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as a result of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting discussed below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

In March 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission requested that we amend our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 to remove the audit report issued by Amper Politziner & Mattia, P.C., our predecessor auditor, on our financial statements as of and for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, inasmuch as we had not obtained permission from the predecessor auditor to include such report in the filing as contemplated by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Statements of Auditing Standards Section 508. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the inclusion of the predecessor auditor report in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 represents a material weakness in our review of applicable financial reporting regulatory requirements when preparing our financial statements. A “material weakness” is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the specific control components has a defect or defects that could have a material adverse effect on our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data in the financial statements in a timely manner. We are addressing the weakness in our review of the application of applicable financial reporting regulatory requirements by improving the training of our personnel and researching, identifying, analyzing, documenting and reviewing applicable regulatory requirements.

In connection with its audit of, and in the issuance of its report on our financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2004, Amper Politziner & Mattia, P.C. delivered a letter to the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors and our management that identified three items that it considered to be material weaknesses in the effectiveness of our internal controls pursuant to standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Those material weaknesses arose due to (1) limited resources and manpower in the finance department; (2) inadequacy of the financial review process; and (3) inadequate documentation of certain financial procedures. While we believe that we have adequate policies, we agreed with our independent auditors that our implementation of those policies should be improved. As a result, although we were unable to expand the number of personnel in the accounting function due to financial constraints, we did provide additional training to existing staff which allowed us to increase redundancies in our system and improve our segregation of duties.

25

In addition, in August 2006, we identified deficiencies in our internal controls and disclosure controls related to the accounting for certain warrants, primarily with respect to accounting for derivative liabilities in accordance with EITF 00-19 and SFAS 133. We restated our consolidated financial statements for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2005, in order to correct the accounting in such financial statements with respect to derivative liabilities in accordance with EITF 00-19 and SFAS 133. Since July 2006, we have undertaken improvements to our internal controls in an effort to remediate those deficiencies by training our accounting staff to understand and implement the requirements of EITF 00-19 and SFAS 133.

Notwithstanding the material weaknesses and deficiencies described above, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believes that the consolidated financial statements, as restated, included in the 2005 Form 10-K/A and this report on Form 10-Q fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected.

There were no significant changes in our internal controls during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to have materially affected, our internal controls subsequent to the date we carried out our evaluation.

Part II	Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

As referenced in our Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 8, 2006, the California State Compensation Insurance Fund instituted an action on May 17, 2006 in the U.S. District Court, Control District of California, to collect $2.3 million allegedly owed by the Company with respect to workers’ compensation insurance premiums.  In addition, on May 24, 2006 Liberty Mutual Insurance filed suit in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Somerset County, seeking $250,000 allegedly owed for workers’ compensation insurance premiums. These amounts have been provided for in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors disclosed in our Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Dividends on our Series F Preferred Stock accrue at a rate of 7% per annum, payable monthly. As of the date of the filing of this report, $85,678 is in arrears on the Series F Preferred Stock.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security holders during the three months ended June 30, 2006.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

26

Item 6. Exhibits

Number	Description
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

27

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	STRATUS SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Date: August 16, 2006	By:	/s/ Joseph J. Raymond
		Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 16, 2006	By:	/s/ Michael A. Maltzman
		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

28