Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) SD Conflict minerals disclosure

Exhibit 1.01

TSMC CONFLICT MINERALS REPORT

I. Preliminaries

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (the “Company,” “TSMC,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is filing this Form SD pursuant to Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the reporting period January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (“Reporting Period”).

Rule 13p-1, through Form SD, requires the disclosure of certain information if a company manufactures or contracts to manufacture products for which certain “conflict minerals” (“Covered Minerals” as defined below) are necessary to the functionality or production of such products. Form SD defines “conflict minerals” as: (i)(a) columbite-tantalite (or coltan, the metal ore from which tantalum is extracted); (b) cassiterite (the metal ore from which tin is extracted); (c) gold; and (d) wolframite (the metal ore from which tungsten is extracted), or their derivatives, or (ii) any other mineral or its derivatives determined by the U.S. Secretary of State to be financing conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (collectively, the “Covered Countries”).

TSMC’s operations, including the operations of its consolidated subsidiaries, may at times manufacture, or contract to manufacture, products for which conflict minerals are necessary to the functionality or production of those products (collectively, the “Products”). For example, the Covered Minerals, particularly tantalum, tin and tungsten, are frequently used in our various product lines to varying degrees.

This Conflict Minerals Report describes: (i) the good faith reasonable country of origin inquiry (“RCOI”) regarding the conflict minerals included in the Products during the period from January 1, 2014 until December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) to determine whether any of such Covered Minerals originated in the Covered Countries and/or whether any of the Covered Minerals may be from recycled or scrap sources; (ii) the measures and framework used by us to exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of our Covered Minerals; and (iii) the determination as to the facilities used to process the Covered Minerals as well as their countries of origin. There is a significant overlap between our RCOI efforts and our due diligence measures performed as detailed herein.

II. Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry

Form SD requires that an issuer’s reasonable country of origin inquiry must be conducted in good faith and reasonably designed to determine whether the issuer’s Covered Minerals originated in the Covered Countries, or came from recycled or scrap sources, and it must be performed in good faith.

1

Conflict-Free Policies

As a general matter, TSMC has designed and implemented three procedural cornerstones in support of compliance with conflict-free sourcing: (a) TSMC’s Ethics and Business Conduct Policy; (b) TSMC’s Corporate Social Responsibility Program (including TSMC’s Supplier Responsibilities for Sourcing Conflict-Free Materials), which is publicly available online at http://www.tsmc.com/english/csr/collaborates_with_suppliers.htm); and (c) TSMC’s Green Procurement for Substance Control and Conflict Minerals Procedure (“Green Procurement Policy”). Our Ethics and Business Conduct Policy contains general ethical principles and guidelines that, among other matters, require us to follow all applicable laws, including those related to the sourcing of conflict minerals. As part of the duties of an ethical corporate citizen, our Corporate Social Responsibility Program describes the requirements we place upon our suppliers, such as requiring them to comply with applicable labor laws and also to source materials from conflict-free regions. Our Green Procurement Policy requires us, as well as all of our relevant suppliers and contractors, to watch out for any “red flags” regarding the source of conflict minerals in our supply chain. Please see Exhibit III attached hereto for a description of such warning flags. Also, in addition to imposing requirements relating to hazardous substances materials sourcing, our Green Procurement Policy requires that any of our potential suppliers or contractors adhere to our Supplier Responsibilities for Sourcing Conflict-Free Materials. These documents serve as the basis for our strong internal corporate management system with respect to conflict-free sourcing. Secondly, TSMC adheres to the humanitarian and ethical principles contained in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High Risk Areas: Second Edition, including the related supplements on gold, tin, tantalum and tungsten (the “OECD Guidance”) to supplement its policies and procedures on conflict-free sourcing. We have adopted its due diligence framework and have designed our due diligence measures consistently with the OECD Guidance. Finally, as an applicant member of the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition® (“EICC®”), TSMC has adopted the EICC® Code of Conduct which describes the EICC®’s general principle on the responsible sourcing of minerals. Even though no current law compels us to adopt the EICC® Code of Conduct, we have nevertheless incorporated EICC® Code of Conduct principles on conflict minerals sourcing as an additional safeguard in our conflict minerals regulatory compliance system.

Participation in Trade Association Conflict-Free Initiatives

In 2014, TSMC joined the EICC® as an applicant member with the aim of becoming a full member as soon as permitted under the EICC® bylaws. As an active participating member of the EICC®, TSMC may better lend its influence and resources to support and help sponsor industry-wide conflict-free initiatives like the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (“GeSI”) and the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative (“CFSI”)’s Conflict-Free Smelter Program (or “CFSP”).

Since 2009, the EICC® and GeSI have led efforts to develop implementation tools and programs for the tracking of conflict minerals in the global electronics supply chain. In late 2011, TSMC was among the first in our industry to adopt and require our suppliers and contractors to use the CFSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (the “Dashboard”). The Dashboard was developed by the EICC®-GeSI as a common industry standard method to collect sourcing information related to conflict minerals and is recognized in the OECD Guidance as an important component of responsible supply chain management. As evidenced in the Form SD for fiscal year 2013 filed by almost every issuer who does business in the technology sector, gathering the information for the Dashboard mechanism constituted a significant portion of the due diligence measures adopted by our industry peers. TSMC’s Green Procurement Policy requires our relevant suppliers and contractors (as well as the relevant suppliers and contractors of our consolidated subsidiaries) to complete and regularly update the Dashboard. In addition, the CFSP allows independent third-party certification of the conflict-free status of participating smelters and refiners. Again, based on a review of the Form SD for fiscal year 2013 filed by almost every issuer involved in the technology sector, the sourcing of Covered Minerals from smelters or refiners validated under the CFSP represented a major part of their respective reasonable country of origin inquiry and/or due diligence measures. Our Green Procurement Policy encourages our suppliers and contractors to source from smelters or refineries validated under this Program.

2

Suppliers & Contractors Representations

Because TSMC does not purchase the Covered Minerals directly from smelters, refiners or mines, TSMC relies on the country of origin information provided by its direct first-tier suppliers or contractors that supply Covered Minerals (respectively “Suppliers” and “Contractors). Our Suppliers and Contractors were asked to complete Dashboard templates, obtain representations from their suppliers, obey our Corporate Social Responsibility Program and periodically update all information provided to us regarding conflict minerals for the Reporting Period. We obtained written representations indicating the facility at which the Covered Minerals were processed and demonstrating whether these Covered Minerals originated in the Covered Countries or came from recycled or scrap sources. The representation letters indicated that during the Reporting Period, they either: (i) supplied no Covered Minerals from the Covered Countries; or (ii) they supplied Covered Minerals solely from smelters or refiners that had been validated under the CFSP or were awaiting CFSP validation.

For a summary of the determinations made from our reasonable country of origin inquiry, please see Section IV: Determinations below.

III. Due Diligence Framework

TSMC’s due diligence measures have been designed to conform, in all material respects, to the framework described in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High Risk Areas: Second Edition,including the related supplements on gold, tin, tantalum and tungsten (the “OECD Guidance”), consistent with TSMC’s position as a downstream company. To guide its due diligence, TSMC has established a due diligence compliance process that includes a documentation and record maintenance mechanism performed in accordance with TSMC’s records retention policy to ensure the retention of relevant documentation. The Company expects to continue to refine, revise and improve this process as appropriate in light of existing infrastructures regarding conflict minerals compliance industry-wide.

Description of Due Diligence Framework

In accordance with the OECD Guidance, the Company’s due diligence measures on the source and chain of custody of Covered Minerals have been designed and implemented on the following framework:

i) Establish strong company management systems

Policy: As discussed in Section II above, TSMC has adopted the Supplier Responsibilities for Sourcing Conflict-Free Materials viewable publicly online (athttp://www.tsmc.com/english/csr/collaborates_with_suppliers.htm) which outlines TSMC’s commitment to responsible sourcing of its Conflict Minerals in its products and its expectations that its suppliers and contractors will be similarly committed to responsible sourcing in the supply chain. The Company has communicated our Policy to our suppliers and contractors of Covered Minerals and required them to acknowledge its importance. It is the policy of TSMC to encourage all of our suppliers and contractors to source the Covered Minerals from smelters or refiners who have been certified by independent third parties under the CFSI’s Conflict-Free Smelter Program.

3

Personnel: To oversee compliance with relevant conflict-free materials laws and regulations, we have formed a standing Conflict-Free Materials Task Force (“Task Force”), consisting mainly of Legal, Environmental, Safety & Health, Procurement, and Backend Technology and Service. This cross-functional group is responsible for implementing TSMC’s conflict minerals compliance strategy. The Task Force is sponsored by senior management, including the Vice President & General Counsel as well as the Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer. Our senior management and the Board of Directors’ Audit Committee are briefed about the results of the Company’s due diligence efforts where they provide guidance and oversight. The Task Force identifies and assesses the relevant risks in our supply chain and formulates and implements control points to manage such risks. The Task Force also works closely with our internal team dedicated to managing all EICC® related membership obligations such as complying with the EICC® Code of Conduct relating to the responsible sourcing of minerals.

Supplier Engagement: The Task Force contacted our Suppliers and Contractors to provide them with notice of the relevant U.S. SEC requirements and advised them of the Company’s commitment to responsibly source materials and its due diligence expectations, and has followed up with each Supplier and Contractor as was reasonable to ensure compliance. In addition, the Company has posted its Supplier Responsibilities for Sourcing Conflict-Free Materials on its website so that these entities may understand and acknowledge it as a condition for doing business with us. The Company intends to retain evidence of the received Supplier and Contractor responses as part of its RCOI and due diligence. Feedback from this process will be used to modify, where appropriate, the design of TSMC’s Conflict Minerals compliance program.

Grievance Mechanism: The Company’s existing procedures for reporting code of conduct or other ethics violations are available for reporting Conflict Minerals compliance problems. Any party who has relevant information is able to file anonymous complaints via either the Ombudsman complaint system or Audit Committee whistleblower system. All informants are protected from retaliation under the Ethics and Business Conduct Policy to encourage the frank and full disclosure of grievances.

4

ii) Identify and Assess Risk in the Supply Chain

Identification of Risk: To identify risks in its supply chain, the Task Force through the contact window of the Procurement team contacted and requested its Suppliers and Contractors to complete the Dashboard and include information regarding the source and chain of custody of Conflict Minerals in its supply chain. To facilitate the collection of complete, accurate, standardized and verifiable information, the Company relied primarily on the Dashboard made available by the CFSI. The information provided on the Dashboard facilitates the transfer of information through the supply chain regarding country of origin and smelters and refiners used. Written instructions and recorded training illustrating the use of the Dashboard are available on CFSI’s website. The Task Force has created follow-up processes (including e-mail communication) to identify and escalate any identified issues associated with non-responsive or problematic responses to its inquiry. As part of these processes, the Task Force expects to review the Dashboard and other information provided by its suppliers and contractors to assess the reasonableness of the responses and to look for inconsistencies or other apparent inaccuracies.

Assessment of Risk: Upon receipt of completed Dashboards from its suppliers and contractors, the Task Force conducts due diligence of identified smelters or refiners by examining the information provided in Dashboard to determine if the smelter or refiner has been validated under the CFSP as “conflict-free”, and assess potential risks in its supply chain. The CFSP provides information regarding those smelters or refiners that, following an independent third-party audit, have been found to be compliant with the CFSP’s assessment protocols to assure sourcing of only conflict-free materials.

iii) Design and Implement a Strategy to Respond to Identified Risks

and Implementation of Control Points

TSMC’s Task Force takes the following actions, among others, to improve its due diligence measures, increase supply chain transparency and further mitigate the risk that the Covered Minerals contained in its products may finance or benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries. These actions taken serve as control points in our compliance effort.

• communicate our conflict mineral program to all relevant parties and make same available publicly online;

• design a compliance framework in accordance with the OECD Guidelines;

• request suppliers and contractors to complete a Dashboard and review results of same;

• update the Dashboard template as required;

• request relevant parties sign representation letter confirming their compliance with our conflict mineral program, and requiring them to conduct similar inquiries in their supply chain;

• request our relevant suppliers and contractors use only smelters and refiners certified or have entered into the certification process conducted under the CFSP;

• check whether TSMC suppliers are listed as certified under the CFSP (such as consulting the CFSI’s website);

• compile a list of suppliers, contractors and their smelters or refiners as well as their respective locations;

• provide such list to government agencies and the public if or when required by law;

• discuss compliance status with materials suppliers or contractors;

• conduct conflict minerals compliance training as applicable;

5

• research publicly available information to check whether high risk smelters or refiners identified by the Task Force indirectly or directly finance or benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries;

• watch out for warning flags as identified in Exhibit III attached hereto;

• participate in relevant industry discussions on conflict minerals compliance such as those conducted under the EICC®;

• assist with conflict minerals compliance audits conducted by our customers and investors;

• discuss our conflict minerals compliance efforts with our customers or investors when required;

• reassure our major investor(s) that conflict minerals compliance is an integral part of our corporate governance scheme;

• continue to collect Covered Minerals information contained in our finished products manufactured for all relevant periods;

• continue to engage suppliers and contractors to obtain current, accurate and complete information about the supply chain, smelters and refiners;

• enhance supplier or contractor communication, training and escalation process to improve due diligence data accuracy and completion; and

• encourage suppliers and contractors to implement responsible sourcing and to request that their suppliers or contractors encourage smelters and refiners to obtain a “conflict-free” designation from an independent, third-party auditor such as the CFSI’s Conflict-Free Smelter Program.

iv) Carry Out Independent Third-Party Audit of Supply Chain

TSMC does not have any direct relationships with smelters or refiners that process the Covered Minerals, and it does not perform or direct audits of our conflict minerals smelters or refiners. Instead, the Company relies on information provided by its suppliers and contractors, and on information collected and provided by independent third-party audit programs, such as the CFSP as well as other publicly available information.

TSMC has also been regularly audited by some of its customers as to the sufficiency of its conflict minerals compliance program. To date, TSMC has successfully passed these customer audits (most of which have imposed requirements that are more stringent than those issued by the U.S. SEC) and shall continue to work with our customers and suppliers in building a conflict-free supply chain for the Covered Minerals over time.

v) Report Annually on Supply Chain Due Diligence:

Public Reporting of our Conflict-Free Materials Compliance

TSMC expects to report annually, as required by the U.S. SEC, and the contents of this Form SD describing the methodology of our reasonable inquiry analysis and due diligence measures may be accessed publicly online athttp://www.tsmc.com/english/investorRelations/sec_filings.htm or www.sec.gov.

6

IV. Determinations

Our determination as to the origins and chain of custody of our Covered Minerals is based on the reasonable country of origin inquiry and due diligence measures described above and expressly subject to the Cautionary Statements set forth below.

Exhibit I lists the smelters and refiners reasonably identified by our due diligence measures based on information provided by our materials suppliers and contractors known to have processed the Covered Minerals in our Products during the Reporting Period.

Exhibit II lists the countries of origin of the Covered Minerals in our Products as reasonably identified by our due diligence measures, and based on information from our relevant suppliers and contractors.

For the Reporting Period, our Covered Minerals used in our Products originated from fourteen direct first-tier suppliers who used thirty-one smelters or refiners; thirty of which have been validated by the CFSP with the remaining one undergoing the validation process. During the Reporting Period, the Covered Minerals used in our Products also originated from nine contractors who in turn used fifty-eight smelters or refiners; fifty-two of which have been validated by the CFSP with the rest undergoing the validation process. Some of our suppliers or contractors were unable to provide information on some of the countries of origin of the Covered Minerals supplied or used by its smelters or refiners.

Out of the identified smelters or refiners, five appeared to have supplied Covered Minerals sourced from the Covered Countries, and all five had been validated under the CFSP. To date, validation under the CFSP has been accepted by our industry as the primary standard for determining whether a smelter or refiner process Covered Minerals that directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups. Like our industry peers, TSMC relies on the independent third-party audits conducted under the CFSP as furnishing a reasonable basis to conclude that smelters and refiners validated under such Program have control procedures that prevent them from directly or indirectly financing or benefiting armed groups operating in the Covered Countries. Because of industry acceptance of the CFSI’s Conflict-Free Smelter Program and based on its own research of publicly available information, TSMC found no reasonable basis for independently determining that these validated smelters and refiners, or those awaiting validation, sourced Covered Minerals that directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries.

Cautionary Statements

Our reasonable country of origin inquiry as well as our due diligence measures have endeavoured to overcome the unavoidable limitations inherent in collecting information about the origins and chain of custody of the Covered Minerals used in our finished products as a downstream purchaser of the Covered Minerals operating within a complex international electronics supply chain. As such, we rely on our suppliers and contractors for the ultimate veracity of the information which they provide about the smelters or refiners whom they employ because we do not have any direct contractual relationship with or power of control over such smelters or refiners. Information that have been subjected to fraud by third parties may elude detection even after having been subjected to the most robust verification due diligence measures like the ones we have adopted and implemented for the Reporting Period. In spite of these difficulties, our determination made herein stands as reasonable assurance of the current status of our conflict minerals compliance and in no way detracts from our commitment towards creating a conflict-free supply chain for our Products in the coming years when infrastructures that further facilitate conflict minerals compliance would become more prevalent, established and readily available at reasonable cost in time and resources.

7

Exhibit I

Smelters & Refiners

Conflict Minerals	Smelter/Refiner	Location
Gold	Western Australian Mint trading as The Perth Mint	AUSTRALIA
Gold	CCR Refinery – Glencore Canada Corporation	CANADA
Gold	Royal Canadian Mint	CANADA
Gold	Allgemeine Gold-und Silberscheideanstalt A.G.	GERMANY
Gold	Heraeus Ltd. Hong Kong	HONG KONG
Gold	Metalor Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd	HONG KONG
Gold	Asahi Pretec Corporation	JAPAN
Gold	Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd.	JAPAN
Gold	Ishifuku Metal Industry Co., Ltd.	JAPAN
Gold	JX Nippon Mining & Metals Co., Ltd.	JAPAN
Gold	Matsuda Sangyo Co., Ltd.	JAPAN
Gold	Mitsubishi Materials Corporation	JAPAN
Gold	Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd.	JAPAN
Gold	Nihon Material Co. LTD	JAPAN
Gold	Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.	JAPAN
Gold	Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K.	JAPAN

8

Conflict Minerals	Smelter/Refiner	Location
Gold	Tokuriki Honten Co., Ltd	JAPAN
Gold	Argor-Heraeus SA	SWITZERLAND
Gold	Metalor Technologies SA	SWITZERLAND
Gold	Republic Metals Corporation	UNITED STATES
Gold	United Precious Metal Refining, Inc.	UNITED STATES
Gold	Metalor USA Refining Corporation	UNITED STATES
Tin	Metallo Chimique	BELGIUM
Tin	EM Vinto	BOLIVIA
Tin	OMSA	BOLIVIA
Tin	Mineração Taboca S.A.	BRAZIL
Tin	Cooper Santa	BRAZIL
Tin	Magnu’s Minerais Metais e Ligas LTDA	BRAZIL
Tin	Soft Metais, Ltda.	BRAZIL
Tin	White Solder Metalurgia e Mineração Ltda.	BRAZIL
Tin	Gejiu Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Co. Ltd.	CHINA
Tin	Yunnan Tin Company, Ltd.	CHINA
Tin	China Tin Group Co., Ltd.	CHINA
Tin	Yunnan Chengfeng Non-ferrous Metals Co.,Ltd.	CHINA
Tin	CV United Smelting	INDONESIA
Tin	PT Bangka Putra Karya	INDONESIA
Tin	PT Tambang Timah	INDONESIA
Tin	PT Bangka Tin Industry	INDONESIA
Tin	PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa	INDONESIA

9

Conflict Minerals	Smelter/Refiner	Location
Tin	PT Timah (Persero), Tbk	INDONESIA
Tin	PT Bukit Timah	INDONESIA
Tin	PT Eunindo Usaha Mandiri	INDONESIA
Tin	PT Mitra Stania Prima	INDONESIA
Tin	PT Refined Bangka Tin	INDONESIA
Tin	PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa	INDONESIA
Tin	PT Tinindo Inter Nusa	INDONESIA
Tin	Mitsubishi Materials Corporation	JAPAN
Tin	Malaysia Smelting Corporation (MSC)	MALAYSIA
Tin	Minsur	PERU
Tin	Fenix Metals	POLAND
Tin	Rui Da Hung	TAIWAN
Tin	Thaisarco	THAILAND
Tin	Alpha	UNITED STATES
Tungsten	Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd	CHINA
Tungsten	Xiamen Tungsten (H.C.) Co., Ltd	CHINA
Tungsten	Ganzhou Seadragon W & Mo Co., Ltd.	CHINA
Tungsten	Chongyi Zhangyuan Tungsten Co Ltd	CHINA
Tungsten	Ganzhou Huaxing Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.	CHINA
Tungsten	Hunan Chunchang Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd.	CHINA
Tungsten	Global Tungsten & Powders Corp.	UNITED STATES

10

Conflict Minerals	Smelter/Refiner	Location
Tantalum	Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry Co., Ltd.	CHINA
Tantalum	H.C. Starck GmbH Goslar	GERMANY
Tantalum	H.C. Starck GmbH Laufenburg	GERMANY
Tantalum	H.C. Starck Hermsdorf GmbH	GERMANY
Tantalum	H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co.KG	GERMANY
Tantalum	H.C. Starck Ltd.	JAPAN
Tantalum	Ulba	KAZAKHSTAN
Tantalum	H.C. Starck Co., Ltd.	THAILAND
Tantalum	H.C. Starck Inc.	UNITED STATES
Tantalum	Global Advanced Metals Boyertown	UNITED STATES

11

EXHIBIT II

Conflict Minerals: Countries of Origin

Australia

Bolivia

Brazil

Canada

China

Ethiopia

Germany

India

Indonesia

Japan

Mozambique

Namibia

Russia

Rwanda

Sierra Leone

Thailand

United States

Zimbabwe

12

EXHIBIT III

Warning Flags

Warning Flag Situations:

• minerals originate from or have been transported via a conflict area;

• minerals are claimed to originate from a country that has limited known reserves;

• minerals are claimed to originate from a country in which minerals from conflict areas are known to transit;

• suppliers or other known upstream companies have shareholder or other interests in companies that supply minerals from or operate in conflict area;

• suppliers or other known upstream companies are known to have sourced mineral from a warning flag location of mineral origin and transit in the last 12 months.

(From “Supplement on Tin, Tantalum and Tungsten” in OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD 2011, p. 31)).

13