Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 6 Months Ended |
Jun. 30, 2014 |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
The Business |
|
eMagin Corporation (the “Company”) designs, develops, manufactures, and markets OLED (organic light emitting diode) on silicon microdisplays and virtual imaging products which utilize OLED microdisplays. The Company’s products are sold mainly in North America, Asia, and Europe. |
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of eMagin Corporation and its subsidiary reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to instructions, rules and regulations prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company believes that the disclosures provided herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading when these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The consolidated condensed financial statements of December 31, 2013 are derived from audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. |
|
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management utilizes certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments related to, among others, allowance for doubtful accounts, warranty reserves, inventory reserves, stock-based compensation expense, deferred tax asset valuation allowances, litigation and other loss contingencies. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
Revenue and Cost Recognition |
|
Revenue on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, such as when a purchase order or contract is received from the customer, the price is fixed, title and risk of loss to the goods has changed and there is a reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. We obtain written purchase authorizations from our customers for a specified amount of product at a specified price and consider delivery to have occurred at the time of shipment. |
|
Revenues from research and development activities relating to firm fixed-price contracts and cost-type contracts are generally recognized on the percentage-of-completion method of accounting as costs are incurred (cost-to-cost basis). Progress is generally based on a cost-to-cost approach however an alternative method may be used such as physical progress, labor hours or others depending on the type of contract. Physical progress is determined as a combination of input and output measures as deemed appropriate by the circumstances. Contract costs include all direct material, labor and subcontractor costs and an allocation of allowable indirect costs as defined by each contract, as periodically adjusted to reflect revised agreed upon rates. These rates are subject to audit by the other party. |
|
New Accounting Pronouncement |
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new revenue standard on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
Investments |
|
Investments consist of FDIC-insured certificates of deposit (“CDs”) which are classified as held-to-maturity since the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold them until maturity. The CDs are carried at cost which approximates fair value. As of June 30, 2014, the investments mature within one year. |
|
Product warranty |
|
The Company offers a one-year product replacement warranty. In general, the standard policy is to repair or replace the defective products. The Company accrues for estimated returns of defective products at the time revenue is recognized based on historical activity as well as for specific known product issues. The determination of these accruals requires the Company to make estimates of the frequency and extent of warranty activity and estimate future costs to replace the products under warranty. If the actual warranty activity and/or repair and replacement costs differ significantly from these estimates, adjustments to cost of revenue may be required in future periods. |
|
The following table provides a summary of the activity related to the Company's warranty liability included in other current liabilities, (in thousands): |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30. | | | June 30. |
| | (unaudited) | | | (unaudited) |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 |
Warranty accrual, beginning of period | | $ | 380 | | | $ | 276 | | | $ | 394 | | | $ | 276 |
Provision for warranty costs | | | 437 | | | | 89 | | | | 517 | | | | 181 |
Warranty expenditures | | | -214 | | | | -77 | | | | -308 | | | | -169 |
Warranty accrual, end of period | | $ | 603 | | | $ | 288 | | | $ | 603 | | | $ | 288 |
|
|
Net (Loss) Income per Common Share |
|
Basic (loss) income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, and excludes any dilutive effects of common stock equivalent shares, such as stock options, warrants, and convertible preferred stock. Diluted (loss) income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalent shares are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive. |
|
The Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred stock (“Preferred Stock – Series B”) is considered a participating security as the preferred stock participates in dividends with the common stock, which requires the use of the two-class method when computing basic and diluted earnings per share. The Preferred Stock – Series B is not required to absorb any net loss. Though the Company paid a one-time special dividend in 2012, the Company does not expect to continue to pay dividends on its common or preferred stock in the near future. |
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company reported a net loss and as a result, basic and diluted net loss per common share are the same. Therefore, in calculating net loss per share amounts, shares underlying the potentially dilutive common stock equivalents were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share because their effect was anti-dilutive. |
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a table of the potentially dilutive common stock equivalents for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 that were not included in diluted EPS as their effect would be anti-dilutive: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | | | | |
Options | | 4,679,929 | | 5,605,713 | | 4,679,929 | | 5,605,713 | | | | | | | |
Convertible preferred stock | | 7,545,333 | | 7,545,333 | | 7,545,333 | | 7,545,333 | | | | | | | |
Total potentially dilutive common stock equivalents | | 12,225,262 | | 13,151,046 | | 12,225,262 | | 13,151,046 | | | | | | | |
|
|