Organization and Significant Accounting Policies | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Organization and Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
|
|
|
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
We were incorporated in Maryland on October 20, 1997 and we commenced operations on March 17, 1998. We are in the business of investing primarily in United States, or U.S., agency mortgage-backed securities, or Agency MBS. Agency MBS are securities representing obligations guaranteed by the U.S. government, such as Ginnie Mae, or guaranteed by federally sponsored enterprises, such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Our principal business objective is to generate net income for distribution to our stockholders based upon the spread between the interest income on our mortgage assets and the costs of borrowing to finance our acquisition of those assets. |
|
We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the Code. As a REIT, we routinely distribute substantially all of the taxable income generated from our operations to our stockholders. As long as we retain our REIT status, we generally will not be subject to federal or state taxes on our income to the extent that we distribute our taxable net income to our stockholders. |
In February 2014, the Company incorporated Anworth Properties, Inc., a Qualified REIT Subsidiary (“QRS”) that is wholly-owned by the Company. The Company also incorporated Anworth Property Services, Inc., a Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”) that is wholly-owned by the Company. The Company’s QRS will provide the entity through which the Company may own REIT-qualified real estate assets such as: (1) other types of mortgage assets, from which the Company would receive interest income; and (2) real estate assets, from which the Company would receive rental income and potential price appreciation. The Company’s TRS will provide the entity through which the Company may participate in various real estate-related activities which would earn profits that the IRS considers to be taxable income. Unlike a REIT, a TRS pays standard corporate taxes on its income earned from these activities in the mortgage and real estate markets. These other activities include almost everything other than receiving rent on properties owned and collecting interest on real estate mortgages owned. Examples of these other activities include: the securitization of mortgage loans; mortgage origination; leasing and managing rental properties; and owning properties acquired through the foreclosure process. |
Effective as of December 31, 2011, we entered into a Management Agreement, or the Management Agreement, with Anworth Management, LLC, or the Manager, which effected the externalization of our management function, or the Externalization. Since the effective date, our day-to-day operations are being conducted by the Manager through the authority delegated to it under the Management Agreement and pursuant to the policies established by our board of directors. The Manager is supervised and directed by our board of directors and is responsible for (i) the selection, purchase and sale of our investment portfolio; (ii) our financing and hedging activities; and (iii) providing us with management services. The Manager will also perform such other services and activities relating to our assets and operations as may be appropriate. In exchange for these services, the Manager receives a management fee paid monthly in arrears in an amount equal to one-twelfth of 1.20% of our Equity (as defined in the Management Agreement). |
BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
|
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles utilized in the United States of America, or GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Material estimates that are susceptible to change relate to the determination of the fair value of securities, amortization of security premiums and accretion of security discounts and accounting for derivatives and hedging activities. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. In the opinion of management, all material adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the calendar year. The interim financial information in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. |
|
The following is a summary of our significant accounting policies: |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The carrying amount of cash equivalents approximates their fair value. |
|
Reverse Repurchase Agreements |
We use securities purchased under agreements to resell, or reverse repurchase agreements, as a means of investing excess cash. Although legally structured as a purchase and subsequent resale, reverse repurchase agreements are treated as financing instruments under which the counterparty pledges securities (U.S. treasury securities or Agency MBS) and accrued interest as collateral to secure a loan. The difference between the purchase price that we pay and the resale price that we receive represents interest paid to us and is included in “Other income” on our unaudited consolidated statements of income. It is our policy to generally take possession of securities purchased under reverse repurchase agreements at the time such agreements are made. |
Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) |
Agency MBS are securities that are obligations (including principal and interest) guaranteed by the U.S. government, such as Ginnie Mae, or guaranteed by federally sponsored enterprises, such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Our investment-grade Agency MBS portfolio is invested primarily in fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage-backed pass-through certificates and hybrid adjustable-rate MBS. Hybrid adjustable-rate MBS have an initial interest rate that is fixed for a certain period, usually three to seven years (but may also include interest rates that are fixed for up to ten years), and then adjusts annually for the remainder of the term of the asset. We structure our investment portfolio to be diversified with a variety of prepayment characteristics, investing in mortgage assets with prepayment penalties, investing in certain mortgage security structures that have prepayment protections and purchasing mortgage assets at a premium and at a discount. Our portfolio also includes a small amount of Non-Agency MBS (approximately $42 thousand) and this is included with the Agency MBS. Prior year balances have been presented consistent with this treatment. |
We classify our MBS as either trading investments, available-for-sale investments or held-to-maturity investments. Our management determines the appropriate classification of the securities at the time they are acquired and evaluates the appropriateness of such classifications at each balance sheet date. We currently classify all of our MBS as available-for-sale. All assets that are classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value and unrealized gains or losses are generally included in “Other comprehensive income (loss)” as a component of stockholders’ equity. Losses that are credit-related on securities classified as available-for-sale, which are determined by management to be other-than-temporary in nature, are reclassified from “Other comprehensive income” to income (loss). |
The most significant source of our revenue is derived from our investments in MBS. Interest income on Agency MBS is accrued based on the actual coupon rate and the outstanding principal amount of the underlying mortgages. Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted into interest income over the estimated lives of the securities using the effective interest yield method, adjusted for the effects of actual and estimated prepayments based on the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 320-10. Our policy for estimating prepayment speeds for calculating the effective yield is to evaluate historical performance, street consensus prepayment speeds and current market conditions. If our estimate of prepayments is materially incorrect, as compared to the aforementioned references, we may be required to make an adjustment to the amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts that would have an impact on future income, which could be material and adverse. |
|
Securities are recorded on the date the securities are purchased or sold. Realized gains or losses from securities transactions are determined based on the specific identified cost of the securities. |
|
The following table shows our investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value of those individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, aggregated by investment category and length of time (dollar amounts in thousands): |
March 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
| | Less Than 12 Months | | | 12 Months or More | | | Total | | | |
Description | | Number | | Fair | | | Unrealized | | | Number | | | Fair | | | Unrealized | | | Number | | | Fair | | | Unrealized | | | |
of | of | Value | Losses | of | Value | Losses | of | Value | Losses | | |
Securities | Securities | | | Securities | | | Securities | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agency MBS | | 203 | | $ | 3,723,083 | | | $ | (78,467 | ) | | | 244 | | | $ | 1,182,606 | | | $ | (35,704 | ) | | | 447 | | | $ | 4,905,689 | | | $ | (114,171 | ) | | |
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
| | Less Than 12 Months | | | 12 Months or More | | | Total | |
Description | | Number | | | Fair | | | Unrealized | | | Number | | | Fair | | | Unrealized | | | Number | | | Fair | | | Unrealized | |
of | of | Value | Losses | of | Value | Losses | of | Value | Losses |
Securities | Securities | | | Securities | | | Securities | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agency MBS | | | 202 | | | $ | 4,262,712 | | | $ | (122,890 | ) | | | 230 | | | $ | 763,911 | | | $ | (23,089 | ) | | | 432 | | | $ | 5,026,623 | | | $ | (145,979 | ) |
|
We do not consider those Agency MBS that have been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses on our investments in Agency MBS were caused by fluctuations in interest rates. We purchased the Agency MBS primarily at a premium relative to their face value and the contractual cash flows of those investments are guaranteed by the U.S. government or government-sponsored agencies. Since September 2008, the government-sponsored agencies have been in the conservatorship of the U.S. government. We do not expect to sell the Agency MBS at a price less than the amortized cost basis of our investments. Because the decline in market value of the Agency MBS is attributable to changes in interest rates and not the credit quality of the Agency MBS in our portfolio, and because we do not have the intent to sell these investments nor is it more likely than not that we will be required to sell these investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity, we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2014. |
|
Residential Properties |
Residential properties are stated at cost and consist of land, buildings and improvements, including other costs incurred during their acquisition, possession and renovation. Residential properties purchased that are not subject to an existing lease are treated as asset acquisitions and, as such, are recorded at their purchase price, including acquisition and renovation costs, all of which are allocated to land and building based upon their relative fair values at the date of acquisition. Residential properties acquired either subject to an existing lease or as part of a portfolio level transaction are treated as a business combination under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations, and, as such, are recorded at fair value, allocated to land, building and the existing lease, if applicable, based upon their relative fair values at the date of acquisition, with acquisition fees and other costs expensed as incurred. At March 31, 2014, all of our single-family properties acquired were not subject to any existing leases. |
Building depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We will generally use a 27.5 year estimated life with no salvage value. We will incur costs to prepare our acquired properties to be leased. These costs will be capitalized and allocated to building costs. Costs related to the restoration, renovation, or improvement of our properties that improve and extend their useful lives are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Expenditures for ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred by us to lease the properties will be capitalized and amortized over the life of the lease. Escrow deposits include refundable and non-refundable cash and earnest money on deposit with independent third parties for property purchases. |
Repurchase Agreements |
We finance the acquisition of MBS primarily through the use of repurchase agreements. Under these repurchase agreements, we sell securities to a lender and agree to repurchase the same securities in the future for a price that is higher than the original sales price. The difference between the sale price that we receive and the repurchase price that we pay represents interest paid to the lender. Although structured as a sale and repurchase obligation, a repurchase agreement operates as a financing under which we pledge our securities and accrued interest as collateral to secure a loan which is equal in value to a specified percentage of the estimated fair value of the pledged collateral. We retain beneficial ownership of the pledged collateral. Upon the maturity of a repurchase agreement, we are required to repay the loan and concurrently receive back our pledged collateral from the lender or, with the consent of the lender, we may renew such agreement at the then-prevailing financing rate. These repurchase agreements may require us to pledge additional assets to the lender in the event the estimated fair value of the existing pledged collateral declines. |
Derivative Financial Instruments |
Interest Rate Risk Management |
We primarily use short-term (less than or equal to 12 months) repurchase agreements to finance the purchase of MBS. These obligations expose us to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. We continuously monitor changes in interest rate exposures and evaluate hedging opportunities. |
Our objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. We achieve this by entering into interest rate swaps, which effectively convert a percentage of our repurchase agreements to fixed-rate obligations over a period of up to ten years. Under interest rate swap contracts, we agree to pay an amount equal to a specified fixed rate of interest times a notional principal amount and to receive in return an amount equal to a specified variable-rate of interest times a notional amount, generally based on the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR. The notional amounts are not exchanged. We generally account for these swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with ASC 815-10. We do not issue or hold derivative contracts for speculative purposes. |
For all interest rate swaps entered into prior to September 9, 2013, we are exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to interest rate swap agreements. In order to limit credit risk associated with swaps, our practice was to only enter into swaps with large financial institution counterparties who are market makers for these types of instruments, limit our exposure on each swap to a single counterparty under our defined guidelines and either pay or receive collateral to or from each counterparty on a periodic basis to cover the net fair market value position of the swaps held with that counterparty. |
For all interest rate swaps entered into on or after September 9, 2013, all swap participants are required by rules of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC, under authority granted to it pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, to clear swaps through a registered derivatives clearing organization, or “swap execution facility,” through standardized documents under which each swap counterparty transfers its position to another entity whereby a central clearinghouse effectively becomes the counterparty on each side of the swap. Both the swap execution facility and the central clearing house could require greater initial and periodic margin (collateral) requirements and additional transaction fees. It is the intent of the Dodd-Frank Act that the clearing of swaps in this manner is designed to avoid concentration of risk in any single entity by spreading and centralizing the risk in the clearinghouse and its members. |
Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities |
In accordance with ASC 815-10, a derivative that is designated as a hedge is recognized as an asset/liability and measured at estimated fair value. In order for our interest rate swap agreements to qualify for hedge accounting, upon entering into the swap agreement, we must anticipate that the hedge will be highly “effective” as defined by ASC 815-10. |
On the date we enter into a derivative contract, we designate the derivative as a hedge of the variability of cash flows that are to be received or paid in connection with a recognized asset or liability (a “cash flow” hedge). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge, to the extent that the hedge is effective, are recorded in “Other comprehensive income” and reclassified to income when the forecasted transaction affects income (e.g., when periodic settlement interest payments are due on repurchase agreements). The swap agreements are carried on our balance sheets at their fair value, based on values obtained from large financial institutions who are market makers for these types of instruments. Hedge ineffectiveness, if any, is recorded in current-period income. |
We formally assess, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. If it is determined that a derivative is not (or has ceased to be) highly effective as a hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting. |
|
When we discontinue hedge accounting, the gain or loss on the derivative remains in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” and is reclassified into income when the forecasted transaction affects income. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, we will carry the derivative at its fair value on our balance sheet, recognizing changes in the fair value in current-period income. All of the Company’s swaps have historically been accounted for as cash flow hedges under ASC 815. However, on March 17, 2014, the Company discontinued hedge accounting on certain of its swaps totaling approximately $1.685 billion in notional amounts by de-designating these swaps as cash flow hedges. No swaps were terminated in conjunction with this action and the Company’s risk management and hedging practices were not impacted. As a result of discontinuing hedge accounting, beginning March 18, 2014, changes in the fair value of the Company’s swaps are recorded in “Gain on interest rate swaps, net” in the Company’s consolidated statements of income rather than in other comprehensive income (loss). Also, net interest paid or received under these swaps which, up through March 17, 2014, was recognized in “interest expense,” is instead recognized in “Gain on interest rate swaps, net.” These continue to be reported as assets or liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at their fair value. |
|
As long as the forecasted transactions that were being hedged (i.e. rollovers of the Company’s repurchase agreement borrowings) are still expected to occur, the balance in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) from swap activity up through March 17, 2014 will remain in AOCI and be recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income as “interest expense” over the remaining term of the swaps. |
For purposes of the cash flow statement, cash flows from derivative instruments are classified with the cash flows from the hedged item. |
For more details on the amounts and other qualitative information on our swap agreements, see Note 13. For more information on the fair value of our swap agreements, see Note 7. |
Credit Risk |
At March 31, 2014, we have attempted to limit our exposure to credit losses on our MBS by purchasing securities primarily through Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. The payment of principal and interest on the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae MBS are guaranteed by those respective enterprises. In September 2008, both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were placed in the conservatorship of the U.S. government. While it is the intent that the conservatorship will help stabilize Freddie Mac’s and Fannie Mae’s losses and overall financial position, there can be no assurance that it will succeed or that, if necessary, Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae will be able to satisfy its guarantees of Agency MBS. In August 2011, the ratings of each of U.S. sovereign debt, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were downgraded from AAA to AA+ by Standard & Poor’s, and affirmed at Aaa by Moody’s Investors Service, or Moody’s, with each of Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s revising the outlook on U.S. sovereign debt, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to negative. Each of Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s has indicated that it would likely change its ratings on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac if it was to change its rating on the U.S. government. In June 2013, Standard & Poor’s affirmed its AA+ long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States and revised the outlook from negative to stable, and in July 2013, Moody’s affirmed its Aaa government bond rating of the United States and revised the outlook from negative to stable. We do not know what effect any changes in the ratings of U.S. sovereign debt, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will ultimately have on the U.S. economy, the value of our securities, or the ability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to satisfy its guarantees of Agency MBS if necessary. |
Our adjustable-rate MBS are subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps. Periodic caps can limit the amount an interest rate can increase during any given period. Some adjustable-rate MBS subject to periodic payment caps may result in a portion of the interest being deferred and added to the principal outstanding. |
Other-than-temporary losses on our available-for-sale MBS, as measured by the amount of decline in estimated fair value attributable to credit losses that are considered to be other-than-temporary, are charged against income, resulting in an adjustment of the cost basis of such securities. Based on the criteria in ASC 320-10, the determination of whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired, or OTTI, involves judgments and assumptions based on both subjective and objective factors. When a security is impaired, an OTTI is considered to have occurred if (i) we intend to sell the security, (ii) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis or (iii) we do not expect to recover its amortized cost basis (i.e., there is a credit-related loss). The following are among, but not all of, the factors considered in determining whether and to what extent an OTTI exists and the portion that is related to credit loss: (i) the expected cash flow from the investment; (ii) whether there has been an other-than-temporary deterioration of the credit quality of the underlying mortgages; (iii) the credit protection available to the related mortgage pool for MBS; (iv) any other market information available, including analysts’ assessments and statements, public statements and filings made by the debtor or counterparty; (v) management’s internal analysis of the security, considering all known relevant information at the time of assessment; and (vi) the magnitude and duration of historical decline in market prices. Because management’s assessments are based on factual information as well as subjective information available at the time of assessment, the determination as to whether an other-than-temporary decline exists and, if so, the amount considered impaired, is also subjective and therefore constitutes material estimates that are susceptible to significant change. |
Income Taxes |
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT and to comply with the provisions of the Code with respect thereto. Accordingly, we will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent that our distributions to our stockholders satisfy the REIT requirements and that certain asset, income and stock ownership tests are met. |
We have no unrecognized tax benefits and do not anticipate any increase in unrecognized benefits during 2014 relative to any tax positions taken prior to January 1, 2014. Should the accrual of any interest or penalties relative to unrecognized tax benefits be necessary, it is our policy to record such accruals in our income taxes accounts; and no such accruals existed at March 31, 2014. We file REIT U.S. federal and California income tax returns. These returns are generally open to examination by the IRS and the California Franchise Tax Board for all years after 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock |
We classify our Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, or Series B Preferred Stock, on our balance sheets using the guidance in ASC 480-10-S99. The Series B Preferred Stock contains certain fundamental change provisions that allow the holder to redeem the preferred stock for cash only if certain events occur, such as a change in control. As redemption under these circumstances is not solely within our control, we have classified the Series B Preferred Stock as temporary equity. |
We have analyzed whether the conversion features in the Series B Preferred Stock should be bifurcated under the guidance in ASC 815-10 and have determined that bifurcation is not necessary. |
Stock-Based Expense |
In accordance with ASC 718-10, any expense relating to share-based payment transactions is recognized in the unaudited consolidated financial statements. |
Restricted stock is expensed over the vesting period (see Note 11). |
Earnings Per Share |
Basic earnings per share, or EPS, is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS assumes the conversion, exercise or issuance of all potential common stock equivalents (which includes stock options and convertible preferred stock) and the adding back of the Series B Preferred Stock dividends unless the effect is to reduce a loss or increase the income per share. |
The computation of EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows (amounts in thousands, except per share data): |
|
| | Net Income | | | Average | | | Earnings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available to | Shares | per | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common | | Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the three months ended March 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic EPS | | $ | 11,942 | | | | 136,848 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of dilutive securities | | | 394 | | | | 4,027 | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted EPS | | $ | 12,336 | | | | 140,875 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the three months ended March 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic EPS | | $ | 22,178 | | | | 142,903 | | | $ | 0.16 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of dilutive securities | | | 412 | | | | 4,042 | | | | (0.01 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted EPS | | $ | 22,590 | | | | 146,945 | | | $ | 0.15 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, options to purchase 5,000 and 327,700 shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding and not included in the computation of diluted EPS as their exercise price and option expense exceeded the average stock price for those respective periods. |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
In accordance with ASC 220-10-55-2, total comprehensive income is divided into net income and other comprehensive income, which includes unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities classified as available-for-sale, and unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting under ASC 815-10. In accordance with ASU 2013-02, we have identified, in our Statements of Comprehensive Income, items that are reclassified and included in our Statements of Income. |
USE OF ESTIMATES |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. |
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
In the first quarter of 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, “Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date.” This ASU requires an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this ASU is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the following: (a) the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors; and (b) any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. This ASU also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about the obligations including the terms and conditions of the arrangement. Examples of obligations within the scope of this ASU include debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. This ASU is effective for our financial statements beginning with the quarter ending March 31, 2014. We have adopted this ASU and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements. |