SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
[X] Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
[ ] Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
Commission file number 000-30285
ENERGY VISIONS INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
N/A
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
43 Fairmeadow Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2P 1W8
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(416) 733-2736
(Issuer's telephone number)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes [X]No [ ]
As of March 31, 2003, the Registrant had 20,066,100 shares of its Common Stock outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes [ ] No [X]
ENERGY VISIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (a development stage company) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (expressed in U.S. dollars) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | (Unaudited) | |
| | | | | | March 31 | September 30, |
| | | | | | 2003 | 2002 |
ASSETS | | |
| | | | | | | |
Current Assets: | | |
Cash | $ 35,240 | $ 5,532 |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of doubtful accounts of $143,000 | 7,142 | 28,022 |
Investments | 147,000 | |
Refundable investment tax credits | 21,660 | 20,065 |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 4,074 | 2,146 |
Total current assets | 215,116 | 55,765 |
| | | | | | | |
Property and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $104,335 and $83,343 | 90,252 | 111,244 |
| | | | | | | |
Total Assets | $ 305,368 | $ 167,009 |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY | | |
| | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ 1,047,526 | $ 851,966 |
Loan payable | 134,863 | |
Due to related parties | 859,426 | 734,023 |
Total current liabilities | 2,041,815 | 1,585,989 |
| | | | | | | |
Loan Payable | 336,849 | 312,047 |
Total liabilities | 2,378,664 | 1,898,036 |
| | | | | | | |
Commitments and Contingencies | | |
| | | | | | | |
Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency): | | |
Preferred stock - $.0001 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares, none issued | | |
Common stock - $.0001 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares, | | |
issued and outstanding 20,066,100 and 17,867,116 shares | 2,007 | 1,787 |
Additional paid-in capital | 10,508,802 | 10,221,065 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (96,870) | 30,162 |
Deficit accumulated during the development stage | (12,487,235) | (11,984,041) |
Stockholders' deficiency | (2,073,296) | (1,731,027) |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficiency | $ 305,368 | $ 167,009 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
ENERGY VISIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (a development stage company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (expressed in U.S. dollars) |
| (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended | | Six months ended | | Period from |
| | | | | | | | | November 19, 1996 |
| March 31, | | March 31, | | March 31, | | March 31, | | (inception) to |
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | March 31, 2003 |
Revenue | | | $ 25,000 | | | | $ 50,000 | | $ 603,495 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development costs | 76,768 | | 208,767 | | 152,346 | | 406,791 | | 2,692,550 |
Professional fees | 71,703 | | 93,111 | | 167,097 | | 181,303 | | 2,170,046 |
General and administrative | 122,418 | | 69,232 | | 180,112 | | 143,403 | | 5,433,160 |
Interest and financing costs | 13,094 | | 4,920 | | 77,647 | | 9,693 | | 2,398,453 |
Depreciation and amortization | 10,461 | | 31,191 | | 20,992 | | 62,155 | | 491,521 |
Total expenses | 294,444 | | 407,221 | | 598,194 | | 803,345 | | 13,185,730 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other - proceeds from sale of Astris options | 95,000 | | | | 95,000 | | | | 95,000 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | $ (199,444) | | $ (382,221) | | $ (503,194) | | $ (753,345) | | $ (12,487,235) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Loss per common share - basic and diluted | ($0.01) | | ($0.02) | | ($0.03) | | ($0.04) | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average number of common | | | | | | | | | |
shares outstanding - basic and diluted | 19,965,767 | | 17,673,960 | | 19,429,477 | | 17,651,223 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
ENERGY VISIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (a development stage company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS (expressed in U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
| (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Period from |
| Three months ended | | Six months ended | | November 19, 1996 |
| March 31, | | March 31, | | March 31, | | March 31, | | (inception) to |
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | March 31, 2003 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net Loss | $ (199,444) | | $ (382,221) | | $ (503,194) | | $ (753,345) | | $ (12,487,235) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Translation | (120,653) | | 2,919 | | (127,032) | | 5,781 | | (96,870) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive loss | $ (320,097) | | $ (379,302) | | $ (630,226) | | $ (747,564) | | $ (12,584,105) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
ENERGY VISIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (a development stage company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (expressed in U.S. dollars) |
| | | | | (Unaudited) | | | |
| | | | | Six months ended | Period from |
| | | | | March 31, | | March 31, | (inception) to |
| | | | | 2003 | | 2002 | March 31, 2003 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | |
Net loss | $ (503,194) | | $ (753,345) | $ (12,487,235) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used | | | | |
in operating activities | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 20,992 | | 62,155 | 491,521 |
Gain from sale of Astris options | (95,000) | | | (95,000) |
Allowance for doubful accounts | | | 51,000 | 143,000 |
Accrued interest on advances from unrelated third party | 47,469 | | | 47,469 |
Noncash interest on advances settled with related party | | | | 28,604 |
Common stock issued to founders | | | | 146,801 |
Noncash compensatory charge on stock issued to an officer | | | | 3,018,815 |
Common stock issued for services | | | | 364,557 |
Noncash compensatory charge on stock options issued to an officer | | | | 275,950 |
Noncash compensatory charge for extension of the expiration date of options | | | | 282,875 |
Issuance of compensatory stock options | 16,196 | | | 540,274 |
Issuance of compensatory stock warrants | | | 109,981 | 2,185,992 |
Impairment of license and technology costs | | | | 253,480 |
Impairment of property and equipment | | | | 272,589 |
Impairment of investment | 63,000 | | | 63,000 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | |
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable | 20,880 | | (46,056) | (150,142) |
(Increase) decrease in refundable investment tax credits | (1,595) | | 875 | (21,660) |
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets | (1,928) | | 35,787 | (4,074) |
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses | 255,201 | | 49,456 | 1,107,167 |
Net cash used in operating activities | (177,979) | | (490,147) | (3,536,017) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | | (53,758) | (202,915) |
Acquisition of license and technology | | | | (4,927) |
Proceeds from sale of Astris options | 95,000 | | | 95,000 |
Net cash used in investing activities | 95,000 | | (53,758) | (112,842) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
ENERGY VISIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (a development stage company) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (expressed in U.S. dollars) |
| | | | | (Unaudited) | | | |
| | | | | Six months ended | Period from |
| | | | | March 31, | | March 31, | (inception) to |
| | | | | 2003 | | 2002 | March 31, 2003 |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | |
Proceeds from related parties' advances, net | 125,403 | | 7,371 | 1,106,772 |
Proceeds from unrelated third party advances | 77,962 | | | 77,962 |
Proceeds from issuance of debentures | | | | 497,678 |
Proceeds (payment) from loan payable, net | 1,244 | | (2,759) | 313,291 |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | | 2,150,329 |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of options and warrants | | 73,532 | 97,505 |
Repayment of debentures | | | | (497,678) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 204,609 | | 78,144 | 3,745,859 |
| | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | (91,922) | | 5,781 | (61,760) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash | 29,708 | | (459,980) | 35,240 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 5,532 | | 489,074 | |
Cash at end of period | $ 35,240 | | $ 29,094 | $ 35,240 |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ 8,164 | | $ 2,322 | $ 196,644 |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: | | | | |
Issuance of common stock for payment of laboratory equipment | | | | $ 450,000 |
Issuance of common stock in satisfaction of debt related to acquisition of license and technology | | | | $ 450,000 |
Issuance of common stock for payment of advances owed to an officer | | $ 275,950 |
Issuance of stock warrants to debenture holders in connection with extension of maturity dates | | | $ 590,120 | $ 1,308,336 |
Issuance of common stock to agent for extension of maturity dates | | | | $ 75,170 |
Issuance of stock warrants for related party advances | | | | $ 29,663 |
Issuance of common stock in exchange for preferred stock of unrelated third party | $ 210,000 | | | $ 210,000 |
Issuance of common stock in settlement of outstanding amounts owed to unrelated third parties | $ 59,641 | | | $ 59,641 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
ENERGY VISIONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2003
(Unaudited)
1.
Basis of Presentation:
The financial statements at March 31, 2003 and for the three month and six month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and operating results for the interim periods. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and therefore omit certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company believes that the disclosures contained in the financial statements are adequate to make the information presented therein not misleading. The financial statements sho uld be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto, together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002.
The results of operations for the three month and six month periods ended March 31, 2003 is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 2003.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 45,Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. Interpretation No. 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. Additionally, Interpretation No. 45 clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of Interpretation No. 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of the guarantor’s fiscal year-end. The Company i s in the process of determining the impact of this pronouncement on its financial position and operations.
The Company is in the development stage and its operations are subject to all of the risks inherent in an emerging business enterprise. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the financial statements, the Company incurred losses of $503,194 and $753,345 for the six month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, and $12,487,235 since its inception in 1996. The Company has had limited revenue during those periods. There is no assurance that the Company will not encounter substantial delays and expenses related to financing the successful completion of its product development and marketing efforts and/or other unforeseen difficulties. The Company will be required to expand its management and administrative capabilities in order to manage the aforementioned items as well as respond t o competitive conditions, and will require additional funds. The Company is seeking other funds through additional debt or equity financing and potential collaborative arrangements. Such additional funds may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company. These factors indicate that the Company may not be able to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
2.
Investments
The Company had options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Astris Energi Inc. (“Astris”) at an exercise price of $0.30 per share at December 31, 2002. The options expire in October 2003. The Company recorded the options at the lower of cost or net realizable value. These options had no cost to the Company. Astris’ management believes these options were issued as part of its licensing agreement with the Company for the use of Astris’ technology in connection with the Company’s alkaline fuel cell research and development. The Company did not make the required royalty payments, since it suspended its alkaline fuel cell technology program to refocus its efforts on more viable aspects of battery technology and as a result the licensing agreement was canceled on September 5, 2002. The management of Astris believed these options were cancelled. The Com pany’s management believed that the options remained valid. On February 12, 2003, the Company sold these options to an unrelated third party for proceeds amounting to $95,000.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2002, the Company received 1,000,000 shares of Pure Energy Inc.’s (“PEI”) preferred stock in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company recorded the PEI stock at $210,000, which represented the fair market value of the Company’s 1,000,000 shares of common stock at the date of exchange ($0.21 per share). During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, in light of the pending status of the proposed transaction with PEI, the Company’s management determined its investment in PEI has been impaired. The Company recorded a charge to operations amounting to $63,000. At March 31, 2003 the Company’s investment in PEI amounted to $147,000.
3.
Loan Payable
In connection with a factoring agreement guaranteed by the Company and its president and chief executive officer (see Note 7), on November 22, 2002, Pure Energy Battery Inc. (“PEBI”), a subsidiary of PEI, advanced approximately $78,000 (Cdn $123,000) of the total amounts received from the commercial factor (See Note 7) to the Company repayable on the earlier of January 31, 2003 or the completion of an additional equity financing, neither of which has occurred. PEBI later agreed to extend the due date beyond January 31, 2003 to an undetermined date in the future, while it considers EVI’s financing plans. Such advances are evidenced by a promissory note issued by the Company and bear interest at prime plus 3%. The Company has agreed to pay all factoring fees and interest to a maximum of Cdn $75,000 (US $47,000), incurred by PEBI on its borrowings against its factored receivables. The Company has recorded a charge to operations and included this amount in loan payable at March 31, 2003.
4.
Due To Related Parties:
Advances amounting to approximately $859,000 (including accrued interest) at March 31, 2003, from the Company’s president and chief executive officer, a company controlled by this individual and the spouse of this individual are reflected in current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
5.
Stock Options:
On March 27, 2003, the Company’s board of directors approved the cancellation of 1,019,267 stock options originally issued under the 1997 stock option plan. Additionally, the Company’s board of directors approved the issuance of replacement options under the 2001 stock option plan to purchase 1,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.14 (Cdn $0.20) per share. The Company recorded a charge to operations for approximately $16,000, representing the fair value of options to purchase 145,000 shares of common stock which were granted to nonemployees. The Company did not record a charge to operations for the remaining options issued to officers, directors and employees to purchase 1,355,000 shares of common stock, since these options were issued at an exercise price exceeding the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the grant date. Th ese replacement options issued to officers, directors and employees will be accounted for as a variable plan.
6.
Stock Issuances:
On November 13, 2002, the Company issued 938,984 shares of common stock to the Alberta Research Council Inc. (“ARC”) for resources and services provided from the inception of its agreement with ARC through the period ended June 30, 2002 at $0.80 per common share (Cdn $1.2637 per common share) for no additional consideration.
Additionally, on November 13, 2002, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for investment advisory services rendered during fiscal year 2002. The Company valued these shares at $0.22 (Cdn $0.35) per common share approximating $11,000 (Cdn $17,500) and such value was charged to operations during fiscal year 2002.
On February 13, 2003, the Company issued 210,000 shares of common stock to National Research Council Canada (“NRC”) as part of the Company’s settlement agreement and outstanding amounts owed to NRC at $0.24 per common share (Cdn $0.37 per common share) for no additional consideration.
7.
Proposed Transaction:
On November 11, 2002, the Company entered into a letter of intent agreement with Rabih Holdings Ltd. (“Rabih”) to acquire control of 51% of the common shares of PEI on or before December 16, 2002, subject to the approval of TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”). The entire transaction has not yet been finalized since the TSXV approval is conditional upon the completion of the necessary equity financing. The transaction was partially completed by the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to PEI (see Note 2) in exchange for 1,000,000 shares of PEI’s preferred stock. These shares are not conditional upon the completion of the PEI transaction and after the transfer of these shares, the Company owned approximately 26% (assuming conversion of the convertible preferred stock) of the total outstanding common shares of PEI. In additi on, the president and chief executive officer of the Company owns an additional 3% of the outstanding common shares of PEI. The Company intends to convert such PEI preferred shares into 7,097,857 common shares of PEI at approximately Cdn $0.14 per PEI common share; no such conversion has taken place yet. The November 11, 2002 agreement also contemplated the purchase of 6,000,000 common shares of PEI (“Additional PEI Shares”) from Rabih valued at Cdn $845,328 in exchange for a noninterest-bearing promissory note secured by a pledge of the Additional PEI Shares and due on the earlier of January 31, 2003 or the completion of additional equity financing, neither of which has taken place. Rabih later agreed to extend the due date beyond January 31, 2003 to an undetermined date in the future, while it considers EVI’s financing plans. If such transactions are completed, the Company will own approximately 48.1% of PEI and together with the common shares of PEI already controlled by the Company’s president and chief executive officer, will effectively control 51% of PEI. The ability of the Company to complete the transaction involves a number of risks and uncertainties and there is no assurance that the transaction will be completed.
8.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has elected to apply APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its stock options and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of the options granted at the grant date as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net loss and net loss per common share for the three month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 would have been as follows:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2003
2002
Net loss, as reported
$(199,444) $(382,221)
Deduct: Total stock-based
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for all awards - 0 -
(72,185)
Pro forma net loss
$(199,444)
$(454,406)
Loss per common share – basic and diluted
As reported
$(0.01)
$(0.02)
Pro forma
$(0.01)
$(0.03)
9.
Contingent Liability and Commitment:
As of November 4, 2002, the Company and its president and chief executive officer guaranteed a factoring agreement being entered into between an unrelated third party and PEBI, a subsidiary of PEI, for PEBI to sell certain trade accounts receivable to a commercial factor with recourse. PEBI may borrow up to a maximum of Cdn $1,000,000 against factored receivables. At March 31, 2003, the amount of PEBI advances guaranteed by the Company approximated $251,000 (Cdn $370,000).
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes which are included under Item 1.
Certain statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, the Company's actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, our ability to complete development and then market our products, competit ive factors and other risk factors as stated in other of our public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This report is for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2003. The reader is directed to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filing for more information about the Company. Accordingly, this section will primarily discuss the Company's position as of the filing date hereof.
Overview
Energy Visions Inc. (hereafter, the Company or EVI) was formed in 1996, to research, develop and commercialize rechargeable battery technologies. The Company has several electro chemical technologies and is currently working on the development and commercialization of the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) and the Nickel Zinc (NiZn) technology.
Costs relating to the DMFC project have been, until recently, in large part supported by Alberta Research Council Inc. (ARC). The company expects to spend significant sums upon expanding its battery testing capability. While there can be no assurance that our business plan for the next year will be successful, the R&D programs, and targeted financings planned for the Company are expected to support the Company's activities until significant income streams of royalties and license fees develop.
Comparative Disclosure
During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, the Company was still a development stage company and has yet to achieve significant revenues. There were no revenues for the three month and six month periods ended March 31, 2003. In the prior year, there were revenues of $25,000 and $50,000 respectively, entirely earned from research and development services performed for and licensing fees from Ilion Technology Corporation ("Ilion"). In September 2002, negotiations were concluded with Ilion to terminate the Ilion License Agreement. We do not expect other revenue sources until the Company successfully completes the commercialization of its rechargeable battery technologies which the Company currently expects to achieve in late calendar 2003.
During the three month period ended March 31, 2003, the Company received $95,000 in proceeds from the sale of Astris options to an unrelated third party; no such transaction occurred in the prior year’s comparable period.
The Company's expenses in the quarters ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 totaled approximately $294,000 and $407,000, respectively, resulting in a decrease of 28%. A major factor in such decrease was the Company incurring in the current year lower expenditures on research and development activities which decreased approximately 63% from approximately $209,000 in 2002 to approximately $77,000 in 2003. The Company’s expenses in the six month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 totaled approximately $598,000 and $803,000, resulting in a decrease of 26%. Such reductions reflect a reduced level of research and development activity but are in part due to the Company incurring in the same period of the prior year noncash compensatory charges of approximately $110,000 for the provision of research and development services from ARC.
One of the more significant costs included above are the Company’s research and development costs of approximately $77,000 and $152,000 for the three month and six month periods ended March 31, 2003, respectively. Compared to the research and development costs for the same three and six month periods in the prior year of approximately $209,000 and $407,000, respectively, resulting in a decrease of 63% respectively. Such decrease is a result of noncash compensatory charges of approximately $52,000 and $110,000 incurred in the prior year’s three month and six month periods; no such significant charges were incurred in the current year’s comparable periods. Also, the Company was entitled to approximately $37,000 and $58,000 in recoverable funds from a grant awarded by the Industrial Research Assistance Program (“IRAP”), a division of the National Research Council Canada, to cover direct labor and consultants costs incurred on research and development being performed on its DMFC technology in Calgary; no such grant was awarded in the prior year’s three and six month periods. The overall reduction in research and development costs also reflects the refocus, announced on August 7, 2002, of the first stage research on the Company’s remodeled Hybrid Battery and Fuel Cell System under the Joint Development Project with ARC.
General and administrative expenses increased to $122,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2003 from $69,000 for the comparable period in the prior year, an increase of approximately 77%. In the six month periods, such expenses increased by approximately 26% from approximately $143,000 in 2002 to approximately $180,000 in 2003. Such increases are primarily the result of the recording of an impairment charge in the current three month period of $63,000 in respect of the Company’s investment in 1,000,000 shares of PEI’s preferred stock. The prior year expenses also included a bad debt provision of approximately $51,000 for which there is no equivalent charge in 2003.
Interest and financing costs in the six months ended March 31, 2003 (approximately $78,000) increased by approximately $68,000 from approximately $10,000 for the same period of 2002. In November 2002, the Company borrowed approximately $78,000 from Pure Energy Battery Inc. (“PEBI”), a subsidiary of Pure Energy Inc., pertaining to PEBI’s factoring of PEBI receivables to provide needed working capital. In connection with this borrowing, the Company paid approximately $6,000 in fees and agreed to assume approximately $47,000 in interest and other factoring costs related to such factoring agreement; no such agreement was in place in the prior year.
Depreciation and amortization charges decreased during the three month period from approximately $31,000 in 2002 to approximately $10,000 in 2003. And similarly, such charges during the six month period ended March 31, 2003 declined from approximately $62,000 in 2002 to approximately $21,000 in 2003. Such decreases are a direct result of the impairment charges taken by the Company in fiscal year 2002.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and the results of our operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements and the data used to prepare them. The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. On an on-going basis, we re-evaluate our judgements and estimates including those related to revenue, bad debts, long-lived assets and income taxes. We base our estimates and judgements on our historical experience, knowledge of current conditions and our beliefs of what could occur in the future considering available information. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our estimates are guided by observing the following critical accounting policies.
Development Stage Company
The Company is considered to be in the development stage as it devotes substantially all of its efforts to establishing a new business through activities such as financial planning, raising capital and research and development.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when services are performed. Additionally, licensing fees are recognized ratably over the term of the license agreement.
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for losses that management estimates will arise from its customers inability to make required payments or disputes that arose over terms to be met in agreements with customers. We make our estimates of the collectibility of our accounts receivable by analyzing historical bad debts, specific customer creditworthiness and current economic trends. At March 31, 2003, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $143,000.
Accounting for Income Taxes
The Company records a valuation allowance to its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While we consider historical levels of income, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event that we determine that we would be able to realize deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net amount recorded, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination has been made. Likewise, should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of the net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged against income in the period such determination was made. A 100% valuation allowance in the amount of $1,650,000 h as been recorded against our deferred tax asset at March 31, 2003. The valuation allowance consists principally of net operating losses previously realized and stock compensation currently not deductible. The valuation allowance was necessary because the utilization of such deductions is not reasonably assured since the Company has not yet reached profitability.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
The Company identifies and records impairment on long-lived assets, when events and circumstances indicate that such assets have been impaired. The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets based on expected undiscounted cash flows, and recognizes impairment, if any, based on the expected discounted cash flows. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:
•
Significant negative industry trends;
•
Significant adverse change in the extent or manner of its use;
•
Current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses.
During fiscal year 2002, the Company recorded impairment losses related to its license and technology costs ($253,480) and its property and equipment ($272,589).
Liquidity
At March 31, 2003, the Company had approximately $35,000 cash on hand and a working capital deficiency of approximately $1,827,000. Such working capital deficiency includes approximately $859,000 owed to the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, to a company controlled by this individual and the spouse of the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer.
The Company currently estimates it will have approximately $70,000 in monthly expenses and no revenues. The cash on hand plus anticipated cash receipts are insufficient to service the Company's cash needs. Accordingly, the Company has insufficient cash to continue its operations and will be dependent upon its creditors until new financing arrangements are completed.
The Company is in need of new capital to support its growth and technology, research and development costs, to fund expanded capital facilities and to complete its proposed acquisition of an effective 51% interest in Pure Energy Inc. The Company is currently attempting to raise approximately Cdn $2,000,000 in debt capital and due diligence is in process in connection with such financing. However, there can be no assurance that this or any other financings will be successful and if it is not successful, additional debt or equity financing will be urgently required and the Company's research and development activities will have to be terminated.
Item 3. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, recognizes that any set of controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB, the Company has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Company's Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In May 2002, an action was commenced in Vancouver, British Columbia, by Mr. Dale Hueser and August Capital Corp. (the "Plaintiffs") against Energy Ventures Inc. (Canada), a wholly owned subsidiary of the company. The Plaintiffs contend that they were entitled to a commission of Cdn. $120,000 to Cdn. $200,000 in respect of equity raised pursuant to the Company's successful initial public offering in 2001. The Company believes that the claim is without merit and intends to vigorously defend it.
On April 1, 2002, the Company announced that it and its major shareholders had commenced an action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against Northern Securities Inc., Vic Alboini and Stature Inc. claiming, among other relief, damages for breach of contract, negligence and breach of fiduciary duties in connection with EVI's private and public financings in 2000 and 2001 and trading activities by Northern Securities Inc. in EVI common shares since August 23, 2001. The defendants have taken steps to defend against the lawsuit and to counterclaim against the Company and others. The matter continues under active negotiation.
Item 2. Changes in Securities.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibit 99.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
(b) Exhibit 99.2 - Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ENERGY VISIONS INC.
/s/Peter F. Searle
Peter F. Searle
Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Dated: 20th day of May, 2003
CERTIFICATION
I, D. Wayne Hartford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Energy Visions Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have;
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors;
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors and material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Dated: 20th day of May, 2003
ENERGY VISIONS INC.
/s/ D. Wayne Hartford
By: D. Wayne Hartford
Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Peter F. Searle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of Energy Visions Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have;
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors;
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors and material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Dated: 20th day of May, 2003
ENERGY VISIONS INC.
/s/Peter F. Searle
By: Peter F. Searle
Chief Financial Officer