The following table reflects the recorded investment in certain types of loans at the periods indicated:
| | September 30, 2020 | | | December 31, 2019 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Nonaccrual loans | | $ | 2,485 | | | $ | 2,679 | |
Government guaranteed portion of loans included above | | $ | 227 | | | $ | 290 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Troubled debt restructured loans, gross | | $ | 10,064 | | | $ | 10,774 | |
Loans 30 through 89 days past due with interest accruing | | $ | 555 | | | $ | 1,947 | |
Loans 90 days or more past due with interest accruing | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans held for investment | | | 1.24 | % | | | 1.19 | % |
The accrual of interest is discontinued when substantial doubt exists as to collectability of the loan; generally, at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent. Any unpaid but accrued interest is reversed at that time. Thereafter, interest income is no longer recognized on the loan. Interest income may be recognized on impaired loans to the extent they are not past due by 90 days. Interest on nonaccrual loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. Foregone interest on nonaccrual and TDR loans for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Foregone interest on nonaccrual and TDR loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, was $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
The following table presents the composition of nonaccrual loans by class of loans:
| | September 30, 2020 | | | December 31, 2019 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Manufactured housing | | $ | 632 | | | $ | 594 | |
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | | | 84 | | | | 84 | |
SBA 504 1st trust deed | | | — | | | | — | |
Land | | | — | | | | — | |
Construction | | | — | | | | — | |
Commercial | | | 1,469 | | | | 1,619 | |
SBA | | | 300 | | | | 382 | |
HELOC | | | — | | | | — | |
Single family real estate | | | — | | | | — | |
Consumer | | | — | | | | — | |
Total | | $ | 2,485 | | | $ | 2,679 | |
Included in nonaccrual loans are $0.2 million of loans guaranteed by government agencies at September 30, 2020 and $0.3 million at December 31, 2019.
The guaranteed portion of each SBA loan is repurchased from investors when those loans become past due 120 days by either CWB or the SBA directly. After the foreclosure and collection process is complete, the principal balance of loans repurchased by CWB are reimbursed by the SBA. Although these balances do not earn interest during this period, they generally do not result in a loss of principal to CWB; therefore, a repurchase reserve has not been established related to these loans.
The Company utilizes an internal asset classification system as a means of reporting problem and potential problem loans. Under the Company’s risk rating system, the Company rates loans with potential problems as “Special Mention,” “Substandard,” “Doubtful” and “Loss”. For a detailed discussion on these risk classifications see “Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Allowance for Loan Losses and Provision for Loan Losses”. Loans that do not currently expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention are deemed to be Special Mention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. Risk ratings are updated as part of our normal loan monitoring process, at a minimum, annually.
The following tables present gross loans by risk rating:
| | September 30, 2020 | |
| | Pass | | | Special Mention | | | Substandard | | | Doubtful | | | Total | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Manufactured housing | | $ | 274,081 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,391 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 275,472 | |
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | | | 333,482 | | | | 4,226 | | | | 12,526 | | | | — | | | | 350,234 | |
SBA 504 1st trust deed | | | 15,264 | | | | — | | | | 3,038 | | | | — | | | | 18,302 | |
Land | | | 5,500 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,500 | |
Construction | | | 17,107 | | | | — | | | | 2,070 | | | | — | | | | 19,177 | |
Commercial | | | 49,789 | | | | 827 | | | | 3,616 | | | | — | | | | 54,232 | |
SBA | | | 2,700 | | | | 37 | | | | 273 | | | | — | | | | 3,010 | |
HELOC | | | 3,857 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,857 | |
Single family real estate | | | 10,369 | | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | 10,374 | |
Consumer | | | 31 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 31 | |
Total, net | | | 712,180 | | | | 5,090 | | | | 22,919 | | | | — | | | | 740,189 | |
Government guarantee | | | 79,325 | | | | — | | | | 4,618 | | | | — | | | | 83,943 | |
Total | | $ | 791,505 | | | $ | 5,090 | | | $ | 27,537 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 824,132 | |
| | December 31, 2019 | |
| | Pass | | | Special Mention | | | Substandard | | | Doubtful | | | Total | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Manufactured housing | | $ | 256,430 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 817 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 257,247 | |
Commercial real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial real estate | | | 322,389 | | | | 3,507 | | | | 84 | | | | — | | | | 325,980 | |
SBA 504 1st trust deed | | | 18,250 | | | | — | | | | 302 | | | | — | | | | 18,552 | |
Land | | | 4,457 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,457 | |
Construction | | | 33,280 | | | | — | | | | 2,014 | | | | — | | | | 35,294 | |
Commercial | | | 61,387 | | | | 170 | | | | 1,619 | | | | — | | | | 63,176 | |
SBA | | | 2,325 | | | | 28 | | | | 1,154 | | | | | | | | 3,507 | |
HELOC | | | 4,531 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,531 | |
Single family real estate | | | 11,840 | | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | 11,845 | |
Consumer | | | 46 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 46 | |
Total, net | | | 714,935 | | | | 3,705 | | | | 5,995 | | | $ | — | | | | 724,635 | |
Government guarantee | | | 6,551 | | | | 1,530 | | | | 867 | | | | — | | | | 8,948 | |
Total | | $ | 721,486 | | | $ | 5,235 | | | $ | 6,862 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 733,583 | |
The increase in Substandard loans during 2020 was primarily from higher risk industries or payment deferrals.
Troubled Debt Restructured Loan (TDR)
A TDR is a loan on which the bank, for reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that the bank would not otherwise consider. The loan terms that have been modified or restructured due to a borrower’s financial situation include, but are not limited to, a reduction in the stated interest rate, an extension of the maturity or renewal of the loan at an interest rate below current market, a reduction in the face amount of the debt, a reduction in the accrued interest, extensions, deferrals, renewals and rewrites. The majority of the Bank’s modifications are extensions in terms or deferral of payments which result in no lost principal or interest followed by reductions in interest rates or accrued interest. A TDR is also considered impaired. Generally, a loan that is modified at an effective market rate of interest may no longer be disclosed as a troubled debt restructuring in years subsequent to the restructuring if it is not impaired based on the terms specified by the restructuring agreement.
The following tables summarize the financial effects of TDR loans by loan class for the periods presented:
| | For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 | |
| | Number of Loans | | | Pre- Modification Recorded Investment | | | Post Modification Recorded Investment | | | Balance of Loans with Rate Reduction | | | Balance of Loans with Term Extension | | | Effect on Allowance for Loan Losses | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Manufactured housing | | | 4 | | | $ | 300 | | | $ | 300 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
SBA | | | 1 | | | | 17 | | | | 17 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total | | | 5 | | | $ | 317 | | | $ | 317 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
There were no new TDRs for the three months ended at September 30, 2019.
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 | |
| | Number of Loans | | | Pre- Modification Recorded Investment | | | Post Modification Recorded Investment | | | Balance of Loans with Rate Reduction | | | Balance of Loans with Term Extension | | | Effect on Allowance for Loan Losses | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Manufactured housing | | | 5 | | | $ | 356 | | | $ | 356 | | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 1 | |
SBA | | | 1 | | | | 17 | | | | 17 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total | | | 6 | | | $ | 373 | | | $ | 373 | | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 1 | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 | |
| | Number of Loans | | | Pre- Modification Recorded Investment | | | Post Modification Recorded Investment | | | Balance of Loans with Rate Reduction | | | Balance of Loans with Term Extension | | | Effect on Allowance for Loan Losses | |
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
SBA | | | 1 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Total | | | 1 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
The average rate concessions were 100 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 200 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The average term extension in months was 181 for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 47 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. There were no new TDR loans for the three months ended September 30, 2019. The concessions for the three months ended September 30, 2020 were related to forbearance loans through bankruptcy.
A TDR loan is deemed to have a payment default when the borrower fails to make two consecutive payments or the collateral is transferred to repossessed assets. The Company had no TDR’s with payment defaults for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2020 or 2019.
At September 30, 2020 there were no material loan commitments outstanding on TDR loans.
5. | OTHER ASSETS ACQUIRED THROUGH FORECLOSURE |
The following table summarizes the changes in other assets acquired through foreclosure:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | 2019 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Balance, beginning of period | | $ | 2,707 | | | $ | 1,074 | | | $ | 2,524 | | | $ | — | |
Additions | | | — | | | | — | | | | 106 | | | | 1,177 | |
Proceeds from dispositions | | | — | | | | (750 | ) | | | — | | | | (750 | ) |
(Loss) gain on sales, net | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | 77 | | | | (11 | ) |
Third-party portion of writedown/loss | | | — | | �� | | (6 | ) | | | — | | | | (99 | ) |
Balance, end of period | | $ | 2,707 | | | $ | 317 | | | $ | 2,707 | | | $ | 317 | |
Other assets acquired through foreclosure consist primarily of properties acquired as a result of, or in-lieu-of, foreclosure. Properties or other assets (primarily manufactured housing) are classified as other real estate owned and other repossessed assets and are reported at fair value at the time of foreclosure less estimated costs to sell. Costs relating to development or improvement of the assets are capitalized and costs related to holding the assets are charged to expense. The balance is primarily attributable to a single commercial agricultural relationship.
The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities. FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) established a framework for measuring fair value using a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset as of the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would consider in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs, as follows:
| • | Level 1— Observable quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
| • | Level 2— Observable quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, matrix pricing or model-based valuation techniques where all significant assumptions are observable, either directly or indirectly in the market. |
| • | Level 3— Model-based techniques where all significant assumptions are not observable, either directly or indirectly, in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques may include use of discounted cash flow models and similar techniques. |
The availability of observable inputs varies based on the nature of the specific financial instrument. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. When market assumptions are available, ASC 820 requires the Company to make assumptions regarding the assumptions that market participants would use to estimate the fair value of the financial instrument at the measurement date.
FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825”) requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value.
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The estimated fair value amounts for September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 have been measured as of period-end, and have not been reevaluated or updated for purposes of these consolidated financial statements subsequent to those dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the reporting date may be different than the amounts reported at the period-end.
This information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only required for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities.
Due to the wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimate, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies or banks may not be meaningful.
The following tables summarize the fair value of assets measured on a recurring basis:
| | Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using: | | | | |
September 30, 2020 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | | Fair Value | |
Assets: | | (in thousands) | |
Investment securities measured at fair value | | $ | 127 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 127 | |
Investment securities available-for-sale | | | — | | | | 18,693 | | | | — | | | | 18,693 | |
Interest only strips | | | — | | | | — | | | | 31 | | | | 31 | |
Servicing assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,329 | | | | 1,329 | |
Total | | $ | 127 | | | $ | 18,693 | | | $ | 1,360 | | | $ | 20,180 | |
| | Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using: | | | | |
December 31, 2019 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | | Fair Value | |
Assets: | | (in thousands) | |
Investment securities measured at fair value | | $ | 167 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 167 | |
Investment securities available-for-sale | | | — | | | | 19,264 | | | | — | | | | 19,264 | |
Interest only strips | | | — | | | | — | | | | 41 | | | | 41 | |
Servicing assets | | | — | | | | — | | | | 846 | | | | 846 | |
Total | | $ | 167 | | | $ | 19,264 | | | $ | 887 | | | $ | 20,318 | |
Market valuations of our investment securities which are classified as Level 2 are provided by an independent third party. The fair values are determined by using several sources for valuing fixed income securities. Their techniques include pricing models that vary based on the type of asset being valued and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. In accordance with the fair value hierarchy, the market valuation sources include observable market inputs and are therefore considered Level 2 inputs for purposes of determining the fair values.
On certain SBA loan sales, the Company retained interest only strip assets (“I/O strips”) which represent the present value of excess net cash flows generated by the difference between (a) interest at the stated rate paid by borrowers and (b) the sum of (i) pass-through interest paid to third-party investors and (ii) contractual servicing fees. I/O strips are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value is determined on a quarterly basis through a discounted cash flow analysis prepared by an independent third-party using industry prepayment speeds. I/O strip valuation adjustments are recorded as additions or offsets to loan servicing income.
The Company had elected to use the amortizing method for the treatment of servicing assets and had measured for impairment on a periodic basis through a discounted cash flow analysis prepared by an independent third-party using industry prepayment speeds. In connection with the sale of certain SBA and USDA loans, the Company recorded servicing assets and elected to measure those assets at fair value in accordance with ASC 825-10. Significant assumptions in the valuation of servicing assets include estimated loan repayment rates, the discount rate, and servicing costs, among others. Servicing assets are classified as Level 3 measurements due to the use of significant unobservable inputs, as well as significant management judgment and estimation.
The Company also has assets that under certain conditions are subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets include loans held for sale, foreclosed real estate, and repossessed assets and certain loans that are considered impaired per generally accepted accounting principles.
The following summarizes the fair value measurements of assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
| | | | | Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using: | |
| | Total | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Active Markets for Similar Assets (Level 2) | | | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
| | (in thousands) | |
September 30, 2020: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | 2,504 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,504 | | | $ | — | |
Loans held for sale | | | 35,986 | | | | — | | | | 35,986 | | | | — | |
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets | | | 2,707 | | | | — | | | | 2,707 | | | | — | |
Total | | $ | 41,197 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 41,197 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using: | |
| | Total | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Active Markets for Similar Assets (Level 2) | | | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |
| | (in thousands) | |
December 31, 2019: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impaired loans | | $ | 2,334 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,334 | | | $ | — | |
Loans held for sale | | | 42,900 | | | | — | | | | 42,900 | | | | — | |
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets | | | 2,524 | | | | — | | | | 2,524 | | | | — | |
Total | | $ | 47,758 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 47,758 | | | $ | — | |
The Company records certain loans at fair value on a non-recurring basis. When a loan is considered impaired an allowance for a loan loss is established. The fair value measurement and disclosure requirement applies to loans measured for impairment using the practical expedients method permitted by accounting guidance for impaired loans. Impaired loans are measured at an observable market price, if available or at the fair value of the loan’s collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. The fair value of the loan’s collateral is determined by appraisals or independent valuation. When the fair value of the loan’s collateral is based on an observable market price or current appraised value, given the current real estate markets, the appraisals may contain a wide range of values and accordingly, the Company classifies the fair value of the impaired loans as a non-recurring valuation within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. For loans in which impairment is determined based on the net present value of cash flows, the Company classifies these as a non-recurring valuation within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets are carried at the lower of book value or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is based upon independent market prices obtained from certified appraisers or the current listing price, if lower. When the fair value of the collateral is based on a current appraised value, the Company reports the fair value of the foreclosed collateral as non-recurring Level 2. When a current appraised value is not available or if management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired, the Company reports the foreclosed collateral as non-recurring Level 3.
FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair values of financial instruments have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
| | September 30, 2020 | |
| | Carrying | | | Fair Value | |
| | Amount | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Financial assets: | | (in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 129,564 | | | $ | 129,564 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 129,564 | |
FRB and FHLB stock | | | 4,633 | | | | — | | | | 4,633 | | | | — | | | | 4,633 | |
Investment securities | | | 23,562 | | | | 127 | | | | 23,714 | | | | — | | | | 23,841 | |
Loans, net | | | 844,273 | | | | — | | | | 852,274 | | | | 8,849 | | | | 861,123 | |
Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 749,180 | | | | — | | | | 748,349 | | | | — | | | | 748,349 | |
Other borrowings | | | 190,103 | | | | — | | | | 191,353 | | | | — | | | | 191,353 | |
| | December 31, 2019 | |
| | Carrying | | | Fair Value | |
| | Amount | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Financial assets: | | (in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 82,661 | | | $ | 82,661 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 82,661 | |
FRB and FHLB stock | | | 4,087 | | | | — | | | | 4,087 | | | | — | | | | 4,087 | |
Investment securities | | | 25,563 | | | | 167 | | | | 25,399 | | | | — | | | | 25,566 | |
Loans, net | | | 766,846 | | | | — | | | | 752,287 | | | | 9,907 | | | | 762,194 | |
Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 750,934 | | | | — | | | | 751,398 | | | | — | | | | 751,398 | |
Other borrowings | | | 65,000 | | | | — | | | | 65,236 | | | | — | | | | 65,236 | |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and due from banks approximate their fair value.
Investment securities
The fair value of Farmer Mac class A stock is based on quoted market prices and are categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair values of other investment securities were determined based on matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique that utilizes observable market inputs including, for example, yield curves, credit ratings and prepayment speeds. Fair values determined using matrix pricing are generally categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Federal Reserve Stock and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
CWB is a member of the FHLB system and maintains an investment in capital stock of the FHLB. CWB also maintains an investment in capital stock of the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”). These investments are carried at cost since no ready market exists for them, and they have no quoted market value. The Company conducts a periodic review and evaluation of our FHLB stock to determine if any impairment exists. The fair values have been categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of loans held for sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics or based on the agreed-upon sale price. As such, the Company classifies the fair value of loans held for sale as a non-recurring valuation within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. At September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company had loans held for sale with an aggregate carrying value of $32.6 million and $42.0 million, respectively.
Loans
Fair value of loans is estimated by calculating loan level fair values for all loans utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology incorporating “exit pricing” analytics in conformance with ASU 2016-01. All active loans were valued in the portfolio as of date of exercise, excluding any loans held for sale, and utilized assumptions such as probability of default, loss given default, recovery delay and prepayment assumptions. Fair value was calculated in accordance with ASC 820. The fair value for loans is categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Fair values of impaired loans using a discounted cash flow method to measure impairment have been categorized as Level 3.
Deposits
The amount payable at demand at report date is used to estimate the fair value of demand and savings deposits. The estimated fair values of fixed-rate time deposits are determined by discounting the cash flows of segments of deposits that have similar maturities and rates, utilizing a discount rate that approximates the prevailing rates offered to depositors as of the measurement date. The fair value measurement of deposit liabilities is categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings
The fair values of the Company’s borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the market rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The FHLB advances and other borrowings have been categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Off-balance sheet instruments
Fair values for the Company’s off-balance sheet instruments (lending commitments and standby letters of credit) are based on quoted fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.
There were $0.7 million standby letters of credit outstanding at September 30, 2020 and zero at December 31, 2019. Unfunded loan commitments at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were $59.7 million and $57.5 million, respectively.
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances – The Company through the bank has a blanket lien credit line with the FHLB. FHLB advances are collateralized in the aggregate by CWB’s eligible loans and securities. Total FHLB advances were $105.0 million and $65.0 million at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, borrowed at fixed rates. The Company also had $79.3 million of letters of credit with FHLB at September 30, 2020 to secure public funds. At September 30, 2020, CWB had pledged to the FHLB $23.4 million of securities and $308.6 million of loans. At September 30, 2020, CWB had $23.7 million available for additional borrowing. At December 31, 2019, CWB had pledged to the FHLB $25.6 million of securities and $324.2 million of loans. At December 31, 2019, CWB had $60.5 million available for additional borrowing. Total FHLB interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019 was $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
Federal Reserve Bank – The Company has established a credit line with the FRB. Advances are collateralized in the aggregate by eligible loans for up to 28 days. There were no outstanding FRB advances as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Available borrowing capacity was $102.3 million and $108.6 million as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The Company also established a borrowing line with FRB under the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Fund (PPPLF). Advances are secured by SBA PPP loans for up to the term of the loan. There were $75.1 million of PPPLF advances at June 30, 2020.
Federal Funds Purchased Lines – The Company has federal funds borrowing lines at correspondent banks totaling $20.0 million. There was no amount outstanding as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
Line of Credit - In July of 2019, the Company entered into a change of terms on its revolving line of credit agreement for up to $10.0 million. The Company must maintain a compensating deposit with the lender of 25% of the outstanding principal balance in a non-interest-bearing deposit account, which was $2.5 million at September 30, 2020. In addition, the Company must maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.65, a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 7.0% and a minimum total risked based capital ratio of 10.0%. As of September 30, 2020, the outstanding balance of the revolving line of credit was $10.0 million at a rate of 3.90%.
The following table summarizes the changes in other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of tax for the period indicated:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | 2019 | |
| | Unrealized holding gains (losses) on AFS | | | Unrealized holding gains (losses) on AFS | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Beginning balance | | $ | (53 | ) | | $ | (71 | ) | | $ | (78 | ) | | $ | (141 | ) |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | | 70 | | | | 4 | | | | 95 | | | | 74 | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Net current-period other comprehensive income | | | 70 | | | | 4 | | | | 95 | | | | 74 | |
Ending Balance | | $ | 17 | | | $ | (67 | ) | | $ | 17 | | | $ | (67 | ) |
Common Stock
On February 28, 2019, the Board of Directors increased the common stock repurchase program to $4.5 million and extended the repurchase program until August 31, 2021. Under this program the Company has repurchased 350,189 common stock shares for $3.0 million at an average price of $8.71 per share. There were zero repurchased common stock shares under this program during the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The Company has suspended the program until further notice.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company paid common stock dividends of $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company paid common stock dividends of $0.5 and $1.4 million, respectively.
The Federal Reserve has adopted capital adequacy guidelines that are used to assess the adequacy of capital in supervising a bank holding company. In July 2013, the federal banking agencies approved the final rules (“Final Rules”) to establish a new comprehensive regulatory capital framework with a phase-in period beginning January 1, 2015 and ending January 1, 2019. The Final Rules implement the third installment of the Basel Accords (“Basel III”) regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) and substantially amend the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to the Company. Basel III redefines the regulatory capital elements and minimum capital ratios, introduces regulatory capital buffers above those minimums, revises rules for calculating risk-weighted assets and adds a new component of Tier 1 capital called Common Equity Tier 1, which includes common equity and retained earnings and excludes preferred equity.
In November 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule, which provides for an additional optional, simplified measure of capital adequacy, the community bank leverage ratio framework. The final rule was effective January 1, 2020. Under this framework, the bank would choose the option of using the community bank leverage ratio (CBLR). In order to qualify, a community banking organization is defined as having less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, a leverage ratio greater than 9%, off-balance sheet exposures of 25% or less of total consolidated assets, and trading assets and liabilities of 5% or less of total consolidated assets. A CBLR bank may opt out of the framework at any time, without restriction, by reverting to the generally applicable risk-based capital rules. The Company chose the CBLR option for calculation of its capital ratio in the first quarter of 2020.
The following tables illustrate the Bank’s regulatory ratios and the Federal Reserve’s current adequacy guidelines as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The Federal Reserve’s fully phased-in guidelines applicable in 2019 are also summarized.
| | Total Capital (To Risk- Weighted Assets) | | | Tier 1 Capital (To Risk- Weighted Assets) | | | Common Equity Tier 1 (To Risk- Weighted Assets) | | | Leverage Ratio/Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets) | | | Community Banking Leverage Ratio | |
September 30, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CWB’s actual regulatory ratios | | | 12.21 | % | | | 10.96 | % | | | 10.96 | % | | | 8.79 | % | | | 8.79 | % |
Minimum capital requirements | | | 8.00 | % | | | 6.00 | % | | | 4.50 | % | | | 4.00 | % | | | 8.00 | % |
Well-capitalized requirements | | | 10.00 | % | | | 8.00 | % | | | 6.50 | % | | | N/A | | | | 9.00 | % |
Minimum capital requirements including fully-phased in capital conservation buffer | | | 10.50 | % | | | 8.50 | % | | | 7.00 | % | | | N/A | | | | N/A | |
| | Total Capital (To Risk- Weighted Assets) | | | Tier 1 Capital (To Risk- Weighted Assets) | | | Common Equity Tier 1 (To Risk- Weighted Assets) | | | Leverage Ratio/Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets) | |
December 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CWB’s actual regulatory ratios | | | 11.41 | % | | | 10.28 | % | | | 10.28 | % | | | 9.06 | % |
Minimum capital requirements | | | 8.00 | % | | | 6.00 | % | | | 4.50 | % | | | 4.00 | % |
Well-capitalized requirements | | | 10.00 | % | | | 8.00 | % | | | 6.50 | % | | | N/A | |
Minimum capital requirements including fully-phased in capital conservation buffer | | | 10.50 | % | | | 8.50 | % | | | 7.00 | % | | | N/A | |
There are no conditions or events since September 30, 2020 that management believes have changed the Company’s or the Bank’s risk-based capital category. The Company is closely monitoring capital levels in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the potential impact of its effect upon earnings.
The Company adopted ASU No, 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606) and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 606 on January 1, 2018. The implementation of the new standard did not have a material impact on the measurement or recognition of revenue; as such, a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings was not deemed necessary. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Topic 605.
Topic 606 does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including revenue from loans and securities. In addition, certain non-interest income streams such as servicing rights, financial guarantees and certain credit card fees are also not in scope of the new guidance. Topic 606 is applicable to non-interest income streams such as deposit related fees, interchange fees and merchant income. However, the recognition of these income streams did not change upon the adoption of Topic 606. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is generated from contracts with customers. Non-interest revenue streams in-scope of Topic 606 are discussed below.
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
Service charges on deposit accounts consist of monthly service fees, check orders, account analysis fees, and other deposit account related fees. The Company’s performance obligation for monthly service fees and account analysis fees is generally satisfied, and the related income recognized, over the period in which the service is provided. Check orders and other deposit related fees are largely transactional based and, therefore, the Company’s performance obligation is satisfied, and related income recognized, at a point in time. Payment for service charges on deposit accounts is primarily received immediately or in the following month through a direct charge to customers’ accounts.
Exchange Fees and Other Service Charges
Exchange fees and other service charges are primarily comprised of debit and credit card income, merchant services income, ATM fees and other service charges. Debit and credit card income is primarily comprised of interchange fees earned whenever the Company’s debit and credit cards are processed through card payment networks such as Visa or MasterCard. Merchant services income is primarily fees charged to merchants to process their debit and credit card transactions. ATM fees are primarily generated when a Company cardholder uses a non-Company ATM, or a non-Company cardholder uses a Company ATM. Other service charges include fees from processing wire transfers, cashier’s checks, and other services. The Company’s performance obligation for exchange and other service charges are largely satisfied, and related revenue recognized, when the services are rendered or upon completion. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month.
The following table presents non-interest income, segregated by revenue streams in-scope and out-of-scope of Topic 606, for periods indicated.
Non-interest income | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | 2019 | |
In-scope of Topic 606: | | (in thousands) | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 114 | | | $ | 228 | | | $ | 360 | |
Exchange fees and other service charges | | | 46 | | | | 43 | | | | 116 | | | | 121 | |
Non-interest income (in-scope of Topic 606) | | | 103 | | | | 157 | | | | 344 | | | | 481 | |
Non-interest income (out-of-scope of Topic 606) | | | 1,249 | | | | 490 | | | | 2,598 | | | | 1,462 | |
Total | | $ | 1,352 | | | $ | 647 | | | $ | 2,942 | | | $ | 1,943 | |
Contract Balances
A contract asset balance occurs when an entity performs a service for a customer before the customer pays consideration (resulting in a contract receivable) or before payment is due (resulting in a contract asset). A contract liability balance is an entity’s obligation to transfer a service to a customer for which the entity has already received payment (or payment is due) from the customer. The Company’s non-interest income streams are largely based on transactional activity. Consideration is often received immediately or shortly after the Company satisfies its performance obligation and income is recognized. The Company does not typically enter into long-term revenue contracts with customers, and therefore, does not experience significant contract balances. As of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company did not have any signficant contract balances.
Contract Acquisition Costs
In connection with the adoption of Topic 606, an entity is required to capitalize, and subsequently amortize into expense, certain incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if these costs are expected to be recovered. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are those costs that an entity incurs to obtain a contract with a customer that it would not have incurred if the contract had not been obtained. The Company utilizes the practical expedient which allows entities to immediately expense contract acquisition costs when the asset that would have resulted from capitalizing these costs would have been amortized in one year or less. Upon adoption of Topic 606, the Company did not capitalize any contract acquisition cost.
As described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Recent Accounting Pronouncements, effective January 1, 2019, we adopted Topic 842. We have operating leases for office space. Our office leases are typically for terms of between 2 and 10 years. Rents usually increase annually in accordance with defined rent steps or based on current year consumer price index adjustments. When renewal options exist, we generally do not deem them to be reasonably certain to be exercised, and therefore the amounts are not recognized as part of our lease liability nor our right-of-use asset. As part of the adoption, we elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, but not the hindsight practical expedient. As of September 30, 2020, the balance of the right-of-use assets was $6.1 million and the lease liabilities were $6.2 million. The right-of-use assets are included in other assets and the lease liabilities are included in other liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2020 | | | 2019 | |
Lease cost: | | (in thousands) | |
Operating lease cost | | | 1,099 | | | | 860 | |
Sublease income | | | — | | | | — | |
Total lease cost | | | 1,099 | | | | 860 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other information | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities | | | — | | | | — | |
Operating cash flows from operating leases | | | 1,068 | | | | 844 | |
Weighted average remaining lease term - operating leases | | 8.93 years | | | 9.75 years | |
Weighted average discount rate - operating leases | | | 3.22 | % | | | 3.22 | % |
Future minimum operating lease payments:
| | September 30, | |
| | 2020 | | | 2019 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
2019 | | $ | — | | | $ | 273 | |
2020 | | | 247 | | | | 1,015 | |
2021 | | | 992 | | | | 884 | |
2022 | | | 887 | | | | 779 | |
2023 | | | 813 | | | | 705 | |
2024 | | | 821 | | | | 813 | |
Thereafter | | | 3,353 | | | | 3,191 | |
Total future minimum lease payments | | $ | 7,113 | | | $ | 7,660 | |
Less remaining imputed interest | | | 960 | | | | 1,122 | |
Total lease liabilities | | $ | 6,153 | | | $ | 6,538 | |
12. | RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES |
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 as a global pandemic, which continues to spread throughout the United States and around the world. The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, economic activity globally, nationally, and locally. Actions taken around the world to help mitigate the spread of COVID-19 include restrictions on travel, quarantines in certain areas, and forced closures for certain types of public places and businesses. COVID-19 and actions taken to mitigate the spread of it have had and are expected to continue to have an adverse impact on the economies and financial markets of many countries, including the geographical area in which the Company operates. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, market interest rates have declined significantly, with the 10-year Treasury bond falling below 1.00 percent on March 3, 2020 for the first time. Such events also may adversely affect business and consumer confidence, generally, and the Company and its customers, and their respective suppliers, vendors, and processors, may be adversely affected. On March 3, 2020, the Federal Open Market Committee reduced the targeted federal funds interest rate range by 50 basis points to 1.00 percent to 1.25 percent. This range was further reduced to 0 percent to 0.25 percent on March 16, 2020. On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was enacted to, among other provisions, provide emergency assistance for individuals, families and businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. These reductions in interest rates and other effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations in future periods. It is unknown how long the adverse conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic will last and what the complete financial effect will be to the Company. It is reasonably possible that estimates made in the financial statements could be materially and adversely impacted in the near-term as a result of these conditions, including expected credit losses on loan receivables.
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This discussion is designed to provide insight into management’s assessment of significant trends related to the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital resources and interest rate sensitivity. It should be read in conjunction with the Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report.
Forward Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for “forward-looking statements” provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may include statements that expressly or implicitly predict future results, performance, or events. Statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. In addition, the words “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “estimates” and “intends” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology constitute “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any obligation to update any such forward-looking statements or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments.
Forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q involve substantial risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond the control of the Company and may cause our actual results to differ significantly from historical results and those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Risks and uncertainties include those set forth in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the following factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented:
| • | general economic conditions, either nationally or locally in some or all areas in which business is conducted, or conditions in the real estate or securities markets or the banking industry which could affect liquidity in the capital markets, the volume of loan origination, deposit flows, real estate values, the levels of non-interest income and the amount of loan losses; |
| • | changes in existing loan portfolio composition and credit quality, and changes in loan loss requirements; |
| • | legislative or regulatory changes which may adversely affect the Company’s business; |
| • | the water shortage in certain areas of California and its impact on the economy; |
| • | the Company’s success in implementing its new business initiatives, including expanding its product line, adding new branches, and successfully building its brand image; |
| • | changes in interest rates which may reduce or increase net interest margin and net interest income; |
| • | increases in competitive pressure among financial institutions or non-financial institutions; |
| • | technological changes which may be more difficult to implement or more expensive than anticipated; |
| • | changes in borrowing facilities, capital markets and investment opportunities which may adversely affect the business; |
| • | changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines which may cause conditions to be perceived differently; |
| • | litigation or other matters before regulatory agencies, whether currently existing or commencing in the future, which may delay the occurrence or non-occurrence of events longer than anticipated; |
| • | the ability to originate loans with attractive terms and acceptable credit quality; |
| • | the ability to attract and retain key members of management; |
| • | the ability to realize cost efficiencies; |
| • | a failure or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure; |
| • | a return of recessionary conditions could result in increases in our level of non-performing loans and/or reduce demand for our products and services; and |
| • | risks related to health epidemics. |
For additional information regarding risks that may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 and in item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report.
Financial Overview and Highlights
Community West Bancshares (“CWBC”) incorporated under the laws of the state of California, is a bank holding company headquartered in Goleta, California providing full service banking and lending through its wholly-owned subsidiary Community West Bank (“CWB” or the “Bank”), which has seven California branch banking offices in Goleta, Ventura, Santa Maria, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Oxnard, and Paso Robles. These entities are collectively referred to herein as the “Company”.
During the first quarter of 2020, the global economy began experiencing a downturn related to the impacts of the COVID-19 global pandemic (the COVID-19 pandemic, or the pandemic). Such impacts have included significant volatility in the global stock and fixed income markets, a 150-basis-point reduction in the target federal funds rate, the enactment of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, including the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) administered by the Small Business Administration, and a variety of rulings from the Company’s banking regulators. The California governor issued a stay-at-home order on March 19, 2020, which limits gatherings and travel and requires workers who are not necessary to sustain or protect life to work from or stay at home. The orders, as a result of COVID-19, have led to financial stress for many businesses and workers throughout the communities we serve.
The CARES Act, a massive and unprecedented federal government support program, was enacted on March 27, 2020. It is a $2 trillion stimulus package intended to provide financial relief across the country. The CARES Act includes the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which enables small businesses to obtain a forgivable Small Business Association (SBA) loan to meet payroll, rent, utility, and mortgage interest obligations. We are proud to have facilitated $75.7 million of SBA PPP loans to businesses throughout the communities we serve. Bank regulators issued an interim rule that neutralizes the regulatory capital effects by allowing a zero percent risk weight, for capital purposes to loans originated under the PPP and exclusion from average assets used for the leverage ratio as long as the loans are pledged to the Federal Reserve Bank’s Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Fund (PPPLF) program. The capital rule was issued April 9, 2020 and was effective immediately.
The Company has held discussions with many of our customers and they have expressed their general concern about the uncertain economic conditions. At this time, we believe it is premature to predict the magnitude of the impact. Measures we have taken to assist our customers include loan programs that provide short-term relief. Under these programs, borrowers who were in good standing as of the date of the request, can elect to defer full or partial payments for up to a 180-day period. Bank regulators issued a statement on March 22, 2020, and a revised statement on April 7, 2020, which provides confirmation that short-term loan modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers with a current payment status are not Troubled Debt Restructured (TDR) loans. As of September 30, 2020, the balance of these loans was $129.7 million or 15.2% of the Bank’s total loan portfolio.
These programs, along with the SBA PPP, could mask or delay the detection or reporting of deterioration in credit quality indicators. The industries most heavily impacted include retail, healthcare, hospitality, schools, and energy. The Company’s management team has evaluated the loans related to the affected industries, and at September 30, 2020, the Bank’s loans to these industries were $185.0 million, which is 21.7% of our $854.5 million loan portfolio.
The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. Future developments include new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others. We expect the significance of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the extent of its effect on our financial and operational results, to be dictated by, among other factors, its duration, the success of efforts to contain it and the impact of actions taken in response. Uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic is pervasive, and the pandemic will likely impact our operations, customers, and various areas of risk; however, we are unable at this time, to estimate the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our ongoing financial and operational results. The Company expects to see continued volatility in the economic markets and government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. These changing conditions and governmental responses could have impacts on the balance sheet and income statement of the Company for the remainder of the year and into 2021.
In light of volatility in the capital markets and economic disruptions, the Company continues to carefully monitor its capital and liquidity position. The Company continues to anticipate that it will have sufficient capital levels to meet all applicable regulatory capital requirements.
Financial Result Highlights for the Third Quarter of 2020
The significant factors impacting the Company’s third quarter earnings performance were:
| • | Net income of $2.9 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, in 3Q20, compared to $1.2 million, or $0.14 per diluted share in 2Q20, and $2.2 million, or $0.25 per diluted share in 3Q19. |
| • | Net interest income was $9.6 million for the quarter, compared to $8.8 million for both 2Q20 and 3Q19, respectively. |
| • | Provision for loan losses was $113,000 for the quarter, compared to $762,000 for 2Q20, and a credit to the provision for loan losses of $75,000 for 3Q19. The resulting allowance was 1.24% of total loans held for investment at September 30, 2020 (1.37% of total loans held for investment at September 30, 2020 excluding the $75.7 million of Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans which are 100% guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”)).* |
| • | Net interest margin was 3.76% for 3Q20, compared to 3.72% for 2Q20, and 4.10% for 3Q19. |
| • | Total demand deposits increased $41.2 million to $545.2 million at September 30, 2020, compared to $504.1 million at June 30, 2020, and increased $97.2 million compared to $448.0 million at September 30, 2019. Total demand deposits represented 72.8% of total deposits at September 30, 2020, compared to 67.2% at June 30, 2020, and 58.8% at September 30, 2019. |
| • | Total loans were $854.5 million at September 30, 2020, compared to $856.0 million at June 30, 2020, and $789.5 million at September 30, 2019. |
| • | Book value per common share increased to $10.23 at September 30, 2020, compared to $9.93 at June 30, 2020, and $9.40 at September 30, 2019. |
| • | Total risked-based capital improved to 12.21% for the Bank at September 30, 2020, compared to 11.63% at June 30, 2020 and 11.18% at September 30, 2019. |
| • | Net non-accrual loans were $2.3 million at September 30, 2020 compared to $2.6 million at June 30, 2020, and $5.5 million at September 30, 2019. |
| • | Other assets acquired through foreclosure, net, was $2.7 million at September 30, 2020 and at June 30, 2020, compared to $317,000 at September 30, 2019. |
*Non-GAAP
The impact to the Company from these items, and others of both a positive and negative nature, will be discussed in more detail as they pertain to the Company’s overall comparative performance for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 throughout the analysis sections of this report.
Critical Accounting Policies
Several critical accounting policies are used in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These policies relate to areas of the financial statements that involve estimates and judgments made by management. These include provision and allowance for loan losses and investment securities. These critical accounting policies are discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 with a description of how the estimates are determined and an indication of the consequences of an over or under estimate.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A summary of our results of operations and financial condition and select metrics is included in the following table:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | 2019 | |
| | (in thousands, except per share amounts) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 2,860 | | | $ | 2,154 | | | $ | 5,618 | | | $ | 5,244 | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 0.34 | | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.66 | | | $ | 0.62 | |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 0.33 | | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.66 | | | $ | 0.61 | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,042,099 | | | $ | 903,252 | | | $ | 1,042,099 | | | $ | 903,252 | |
Total loans | | $ | 844,273 | | | $ | 780,589 | | | $ | 844,273 | | | $ | 780,589 | |
Total deposits | | $ | 749,180 | | | $ | 761,672 | | | $ | 749,180 | | | $ | 761,672 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | $ | 86,717 | | | $ | 79,596 | | | $ | 86,717 | | | $ | 79,596 | |
Book value per common share | | $ | 10.23 | | | $ | 9.40 | | | $ | 10.23 | | | $ | 9.40 | |
Net interest margin | | | 3.76 | % | | | 4.10 | % | | | 3.81 | % | | | 4.06 | % |
Return on average assets | | | 1.09 | % | | | 0.97 | % | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.81 | % |
Return on average stockholders’ equity | | | 13.33 | % | | | 10.85 | % | | | 8.94 | % | | | 9.03 | % |
The following table sets forth a summary financial overview for the comparable three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Increase | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | Increase | |
| | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | (Decrease) | | | 2020 | | | 2019 | | | (Decrease) | |
| | (in thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Consolidated Income Statement Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | $ | 11,116 | | | $ | 11,719 | | | $ | (603 | ) | | $ | 32,868 | | | $ | 34,111 | | | $ | (1,243 | ) |
Interest expense | | | 1,564 | | | | 2,921 | | | | (1,357 | ) | | | 6,072 | | | | 8,592 | | | | (2,520 | ) |
Net interest income | | | 9,552 | | | | 8,798 | | | | 754 | | | | 26,796 | | | | 25,519 | | | | 1,277 | |
Credit (provision) for loan losses | | | 113 | | | | (75 | ) | | | 188 | | | | 1,267 | | | | 45 | | | | 1,222 | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | | | 9,439 | | | | 8,873 | | | | 566 | | | | 25,529 | | | | 25,474 | | | | 55 | |
Non-interest income | | | 1,352 | | | | 647 | | | | 705 | | | | 2,942 | | | | 1,943 | | | | 999 | |
Non-interest expenses | | | 6,722 | | | | 6,464 | | | | 258 | | | | 20,454 | | | | 19,941 | | | | 513 | |
Income before income taxes | | | 4,069 | | | | 3,056 | | | | 1,013 | | | | 8,017 | | | | 7,476 | | | | 541 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | 1,209 | | | | 902 | | | | 307 | | | | 2,399 | | | | 2,232 | | | | 167 | |
Net income | | $ | 2,860 | | | $ | 2,154 | | | $ | 706 | | | $ | 5,618 | | | $ | 5,244 | | | $ | 374 | |
Income per share - basic | | $ | 0.34 | | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.08 | | | $ | 0.66 | | | $ | 0.62 | | | $ | 0.04 | |
Income per share - diluted | | $ | 0.33 | | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.08 | | | $ | 0.66 | | | $ | 0.61 | | | $ | 0.05 | |
Interest Rates and Differentials
The following table illustrates average yields on interest-earning assets and average rates on interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2020 | | | 2019 | |
| | Average Balance | | | Interest | | | Average Yield/Cost (2) | | | Average Balance | | | Interest | | | Average Yield/Cost (2) | |
Interest-Earning Assets | | (in thousands) | |
Federal funds sold and interest-earning deposits | | $ | 129,429 | | | $ | 74 | | | | 0.23 | % | | $ | 28,144 | | | $ | 152 | | | | 2.14 | % |
Investment securities | | | 28,063 | | | | 133 | | | | 1.89 | % | | | 33,839 | | | | 261 | | | | 3.06 | % |
Loans (1) | | | 854,273 | | | | 10,909 | | | | 5.08 | % | | | 788,965 | | | | 11,306 | | | | 5.69 | % |
Total earnings assets | | | 1,011,765 | | | | 11,116 | | | | 4.37 | % | | | 850,948 | | | | 11,719 | | | | 5.46 | % |
Nonearning Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | | 4,513 | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,198 | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (10,009 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (8,913 | ) | | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 38,538 | | | | | | | | | | | | 33,272 | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,044,807 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 877,505 | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-Bearing Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | | 314,839 | | | | 453 | | | | 0.57 | % | | | 291,218 | | | | 914 | | | | 1.25 | % |
Savings deposits | | | 18,209 | | | | 25 | | | | 0.55 | % | | | 15,835 | | | | 32 | | | | 0.80 | % |
Time deposits | | | 204,988 | | | | 568 | | | | 1.10 | % | | | 307,160 | | | | 1,669 | | | | 2.16 | % |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | 538,036 | | | | 1,046 | | | | 0.77 | % | | | 614,213 | | | | 2,615 | | | | 1.69 | % |
Other borrowings | | | 209,886 | | | | 518 | | | | 0.98 | % | | | 45,924 | | | | 306 | | | | 2.64 | % |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 747,922 | | | | 1,564 | | | | 0.83 | % | | | 660,137 | | | | 2,921 | | | | 1.76 | % |
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | | | 195,450 | | | | | | | | | | | | 121,332 | | | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 16,107 | | | | | | | | | | | | 17,273 | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 85,328 | | | | | | | | | | | | 78,763 | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 1,044,807 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 877,505 | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income and margin (3) | | | | | | $ | 9,552 | | | | 3.76 | % | | | | | | $ | 8,798 | | | | 4.10 | % |
Net interest spread (4) | | | | | | | | | | | 3.54 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 3.70 | % |
(1) | Includes nonaccrual loans. |
(3) | Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income by total average earning assets. |
(4) | Net interest spread represents average yield earned on interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2020 | | | 2019 | |
| | Average Balance | | | Interest | | | Average Yield/Cost (2) | | | Average Balance | | | Interest | | | Average Yield/Cost (2) | |
Interest-Earning Assets | | (in thousands) | |
Federal funds sold and interest-earning deposits | | $ | 84,207 | | | $ | 259 | | | | 0.41 | % | | $ | 27,883 | | | $ | 437 | | | | 2.10 | % |
Investment securities | | | 28,508 | | | | 451 | | | | 2.11 | % | | | 35,083 | | | | 920 | | | | 3.51 | % |
Loans (1) | | | 827,244 | | | | 32,158 | | | | 5.19 | % | | | 778,425 | | | | 32,754 | | | | 5.63 | % |
Total earnings assets | | | 939,959 | | | | 32,868 | | | | 4.67 | % | | | 841,391 | | | | 34,111 | | | | 5.42 | % |
Nonearning Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | | 3,251 | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,473 | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | (9,378 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (8,796 | ) | | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | 36,267 | | | | | | | | | | | | 32,254 | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 970,099 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 867,322 | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-Bearing Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | | 296,526 | | | | 1,668 | | | | 0.75 | % | | | 290,106 | | | | 2,679 | | | | 1.23 | % |
Savings deposits | | | 16,986 | | | | 82 | | | | 0.64 | % | | | 15,627 | | | | 94 | | | | 0.80 | % |
Time deposits | | | 255,705 | | | | 2,918 | | | | 1.52 | % | | | 303,658 | | | | 4,869 | | | | 2.14 | % |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | 569,217 | | | | 4,668 | | | | 1.10 | % | | | 609,391 | | | | 7,642 | | | | 1.68 | % |
Other borrowings | | | 137,531 | | | | 1,404 | | | | 1.36 | % | | | 46,414 | | | | 949 | | | | 2.73 | % |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 706,748 | | | | 6,072 | | | | 1.15 | % | | | 655,805 | | | | 8,591 | | | | 1.75 | % |
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | | | 163,232 | | | | | | | | | | | | 116,965 | | | | | | | | | |
Other liabilities | | | 16,147 | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,919 | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 83,972 | | | | | | | | | | | | 77,633 | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 970,099 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 867,322 | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income and margin (3) | | | | | | $ | 26,796 | | | | 3.81 | % | | | | | | $ | 25,520 | | | | 4.06 | % |
Net interest spread (4) | | | | | | | | | | | 3.52 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 3.67 | % |
(1) | Includes nonaccrual loans. |
(3) | Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest income by total average earning assets. |
(4) | Net interest spread represents average yield earned on interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
The table below sets forth the relative impact on net interest income of changes in the volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes in rates earned and paid by the Company on such assets and liabilities. For purposes of this table, nonaccrual loans have been included in the average loan balances.
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 versus 2019 | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 versus 2019 | |
| | Increase (Decrease) Due to Changes in (1) | | | Increase (Decrease) Due to Changes in (1) | |
| | Volume | | | Rate | | | Total | | | Volume | | | Rate | | | Total | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | |
Interest income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal funds sold and interest-earning deposits | | $ | 59 | | | $ | (137 | ) | | $ | (78 | ) | | $ | 173 | | | $ | (351 | ) | | $ | (178 | ) |
Investment securities | | | (28 | ) | | | (100 | ) | | | (128 | ) | | | (104 | ) | | | (365 | ) | | | (469 | ) |
Loans, net | | | 836 | | | | (1,233 | ) | | | (397 | ) | | | 1,902 | | | | (2,498 | ) | | | (596 | ) |
Total interest income | | | 867 | | | | (1,470 | ) | | | (603 | ) | | | 1,971 | | | | (3,214 | ) | | | (1,243 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing demand deposits | | | 34 | | | | (495 | ) | | | (461 | ) | | | 36 | | | | (1,047 | ) | | | (1,011 | ) |
Savings deposits | | | 3 | | | | (10 | ) | | | (7 | ) | | | 7 | | | | (19 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
Time deposits | | | (283 | ) | | | (818 | ) | | | (1,101 | ) | | | (547 | ) | | | (1,404 | ) | | | (1,951 | ) |
Short-term borrowings | | | 405 | | | | (193 | ) | | | 212 | | | | 930 | | | | (475 | ) | | | 455 | |
Total interest expense | | | 159 | | | | (1,516 | ) | | | (1,357 | ) | | | 426 | | | | (2,945 | ) | | | (2,519 | ) |
Net increase | | $ | 708 | | | $ | 46 | | | $ | 754 | | | $ | 1,545 | | | $ | (269 | ) | | $ | 1,276 | |
(1) | Changes due to both volume and rate have been allocated to volume changes. |
Comparison of interest income, interest expense and net interest margin
The Company’s primary source of revenue is interest income. Interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $11.1 million and $32.9 million, compared to $11.7 million and $34.1 million for three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. Total interest income in the third quarter of 2020 was impacted by declining interest rates. The annualized yield on interest-earning assets for the third quarter 2020 was 4.37% compared to 5.46% for the third quarter of 2019. In an emergency FOMC meeting on March 15, 2020, the committee voted to cut the target range for the fed funds overnight rate to 0% - 0.25% to further combat the COVID-19 crisis. Additionally, declines in yields were impacted by $75.7 million of SBA PPP loans originated for the year with a rate of 1.00%.
Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to 2019 decreased by $1.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively. This decrease in interest expense for the comparable periods was primarily due to decreased rates for interest-bearing demand balances and decreased cost of funds on repricing of maturing time deposits. The annualized average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 93 basis points to 0.83% for the three months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased by 92 basis points to 0.77% for the third quarter 2020 compared to 1.69% for the third quarter 2019. The cost of other borrowings for the comparable periods decreased by 166 basis points to 0.98% for the three months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 primarily due to the repricing of some FHLB advances. Total cost of funds was 0.57% for the third quarter 2020 compared to 1.41% for the third quarter of 2019. Year to date total cost of funds at September 30, 2020 was 0.85% compared to 1.41% for the first nine months of 2019.
The net impact of the changes in yields on interest-earning assets and the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities was a decrease in the interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2020 to 3.76% compared to 4.10% in the three months ended September 30, 2019. The net impact of the changes in yields on interest-earning assets and the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities was a decrease in the interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 to 3.81% compared to 4.06% in the nine months ended September 30, 2019.
Provision for loan losses
The provision for loan losses in each period is reflected as a charge against earnings in that period. The provision for loan losses is equal to the amount required to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The provision (credit) for loan losses were $0.1 million and $(0.1) million for the third quarters of 2020 and 2019, respectively. The provision increase for the third quarter 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2019 was primarily due to the increase to qualitative factors to reflect some loan grading migration and the increased economic risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company’s allowance was 1.24% of loans held for investment at September 30, 2020 compared to 1.19% at September 30, 2019. The Company’s allowance was 1.37% of loans held for investment at September 30, 2020 when excluding the $75.7 million of SBA PPP loans, which are 100% government guaranteed.
The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $1.3 million compared to $45,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.
The following schedule summarizes the provision, charge-offs (recoveries) by loan category for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019:
| | For the Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | Manufactured Housing | | | Commercial Real Estate | | | Commercial | | | SBA | | | HELOC | | | Single Family Real Estate | | | Consumer | | | Total | |
2020 | | (in thousands) | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 2,470 | | | $ | 5,759 | | | $ | 1,503 | | | $ | 128 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 120 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 10,008 | |
Charge-offs | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Recoveries | | | 7 | | | | 20 | | | | 47 | | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 76 | |
Net (charge-offs) recoveries | | | 7 | | | | 20 | | | | 47 | | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 76 | |
Provision (credit) | | | 138 | | | | 100 | | | | (109 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | (3 | ) | | | (12 | ) | | | — | | | | 113 | |
Ending balance | | $ | 2,615 | | | $ | 5,879 | | | $ | 1,441 | | | $ | 127 | | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 108 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 10,197 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 2,199 | | | $ | 5,358 | | | $ | 1,150 | | | $ | 40 | | | $ | 49 | | | $ | 91 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,887 | |
Charge-offs | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Recoveries | | | 6 | | | | 21 | | | | 10 | | | | 17 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 56 | |
Net (charge-offs) recoveries | | | 6 | | | | 21 | | | | 10 | | | | 17 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 56 | |
Provision (credit) | | | (17 | ) | | | (41 | ) | | | 17 | | | | (20 | ) | | | (14 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (75 | ) |
Ending balance | | $ | 2,188 | | | $ | 5,338 | | | $ | 1,177 | | | $ | 37 | | | $ | 36 | | | $ | 92 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,868 | |