SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
| | |
(Mark One) | | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
| | For the quarterly period ended November 4, 2001 |
|
or |
|
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
| | For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 001-13927
CSK AUTO CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Delaware | | 86-0765798 |
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
645 E. Missouri Ave. Suite 400, Phoenix, Arizona (Address of principal executive office) | | 85012 (Zip Code) |
(602) 265-9200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last reports)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
As of December 17, 2001, CSK Auto Corporation had 27,842,853 shares of common stock outstanding.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| |
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | November 4, | | February 4, |
| | 2001 | | 2001 |
| |
| |
|
| | (Unaudited) | | |
ASSETS |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 15,690 | | | $ | 11,131 | |
Receivables, net of allowances of $5,146 and $4,236, respectively | | | 102,488 | | | | 79,901 | |
Inventories | | | 637,028 | | | | 621,814 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 10,349 | | | | 3,133 | |
Assets held for sale | | | 1,699 | | | | 1,497 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 20,234 | | | | 19,169 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total current assets | | | 787,488 | | | | 736,645 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Property and equipment, net | | | 153,188 | | | | 175,358 | |
Leasehold interests, net | | | 16,985 | | | | 20,244 | |
Goodwill, net | | | 128,041 | | | | 130,544 | |
Other assets, net | | | 14,988 | | | | 14,190 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total assets | | $ | 1,100,690 | | | $ | 1,076,981 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
Accounts payable | | $ | 226,956 | | | $ | 199,483 | |
Accrued payroll and related expenses | | | 27,863 | | | | 27,673 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | | 52,143 | | | | 42,448 | |
Current maturities of amounts due under Senior Credit Facility (see Note 10) | | | — | | | | 54,640 | |
Current maturities of capital lease obligations | | | 9,922 | | | | 10,878 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total current liabilities | | | 316,884 | | | | 335,122 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Amounts due under Senior Credit Facility | | | 501,160 | | | | 471,840 | |
Obligations under 11% Senior Subordinated Notes | | | 81,250 | | | | 81,250 | |
Convertible subordinated notes | | | 30,000 | | | | — | |
Obligations under capital leases | | | 26,736 | | | | 29,273 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 7,423 | | | | 10,544 | |
Other | | | 13,107 | | | | 9,339 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total non-current liabilities | | | 659,676 | | | | 602,246 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
| Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 27,842,105 and 27,841,178 shares issued and outstanding at November 4, 2001 and February 4, 2001. | | | 278 | | | | 278 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | | | 291,063 | | | | 291,063 | |
| Stockholder receivable | | | (705 | ) | | | (745 | ) |
| Deferred compensation | | | (29 | ) | | | (156 | ) |
| Accumulated deficit | | | (166,477 | ) | | | (150,827 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total stockholders’ equity | | | 124,130 | | | | 139,613 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 1,100,690 | | | $ | 1,076,981 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Thirteen Weeks Ended | | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended |
| |
| |
|
| | November 4, | | October 29, | | November 4, | | October 29, |
| | 2001 | | 2000 | | 2001 | | 2000 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net sales | | $ | 366,741 | | | $ | 368,898 | | | $ | 1,104,584 | | | $ | 1,100,054 | |
Cost of sales | | | 195,628 | | | | 196,200 | | | | 617,811 | | | | 580,359 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Gross profit | | | 171,113 | | | | 172,698 | | | | 486,773 | | | | 519,695 | |
Other costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating and administrative | | | 146,248 | | | | 144,440 | | | | 437,241 | | | | 423,193 | |
| Store closing and other restructuring costs | | | 11 | | | | 149 | | | | 23,782 | | | | 6,012 | |
| Legal settlement | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,000 | | | | — | |
| Transition and integration expenses | | | — | | | | 1,308 | | | | 250 | | | | 23,818 | |
| Goodwill amortization | | | 1,191 | | | | 1,092 | | | | 3,609 | | | | 3,620 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Operating profit | | | 23,663 | | | | 25,709 | | | | 19,891 | | | | 63,052 | |
Interest expense | | | 14,317 | | | | 15,457 | | | | 45,727 | | | | 45,278 | |
Equity in loss of joint venture | | | — | | | | 1,188 | | | | — | | | | 1,904 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 9,346 | | | | 9,064 | | | | (25,836 | ) | | | 15,870 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 3,412 | | | | 3,172 | | | | (10,186 | ) | | | 5,798 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 5,934 | | | $ | 5,892 | | | $ | (15,650 | ) | | $ | 10,072 | |
| | |
| | �� | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Basic earnings (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | (0.56 | ) | | $ | 0.36 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| Shares used in computing per share amounts | | | 27,842,105 | | | | 27,839,484 | | | | 27,842,105 | | | | 27,839,084 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 0.19 | | | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | (0.56 | ) | | $ | 0.36 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| Shares used in computing per share amounts | | | 31,939,105 | | | | 27,839,484 | | | | 27,842,105 | | | | 27,839,084 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Additional | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | Paid-in | | Stockholder | | Deferred | | Accumulated | | Total |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Capital | | Receivable | | Compensation | | Deficit | | Equity |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balances at February 4, 2001. | | | 27,841,178 | | | $ | 278 | | | $ | 291,063 | | | $ | (745 | ) | | $ | (156 | ) | | $ | (150,827 | ) | | $ | 139,613 | |
Amortization of deferred compensation (unaudited) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 127 | | | | — | | | | 127 | |
Recovery of stockholder receivable (unaudited) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 40 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 40 | |
Issuance of restricted stock (unaudited) | | | 927 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Net income (loss) (unaudited) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (15,650 | ) | | | (15,650 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Balances at November 4, 2001 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(unaudited) | | | 27,842,105 | | | $ | 278 | | | $ | 291,063 | | | $ | (705 | ) | | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (166,477 | ) | | $ | 124,130 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended |
| |
|
| | November 4, | | October 29, |
| | 2001 | | 2000 |
| |
| |
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | | $ | (15,650 | ) | | $ | 10,072 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
| | Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment | | | 24,219 | | | | 24,235 | |
| | Amortization | | | 6,196 | | | | 5,678 | |
| | Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 2,658 | | | | 1,585 | |
| | Provision for write down of inventory | | | 17,292 | | | | — | |
| | Write downs on disposal of fixed and other assets | | | 7,675 | | | | — | |
| | Equity in loss of joint venture | | | — | | | | 1,904 | |
| | Deferred income taxes | | | (10,337 | ) | | | 5,643 | |
| | Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: | | | | | | | | |
| | | Receivables | | | (22,587 | ) | | | (19,427 | ) |
| | | Inventories | | | (33,715 | ) | | | (7,057 | ) |
| | | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | (1,140 | ) | | | 1,083 | |
| | | Accounts payable | | | 27,671 | | | | 31,683 | |
| | | Accrued payroll, accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | | 10,602 | | | | (17,818 | ) |
| | | Other assets and liabilities | | | 4,652 | | | | 5,210 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 17,536 | | | | 42,791 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | | | — | | | | (1,185 | ) |
| Capital expenditures | | | (10,218 | ) | | | (24,477 | ) |
| Expenditures for assets held for sale | | | — | | | | (103 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of property and equipment and assets held for sale | | | 5,281 | | | | 3,814 | |
| Investment in joint venture | | | — | | | | (3,103 | ) |
| Other investing activities | | | (2,908 | ) | | | (1,363 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Net cash used in investing activities | | | (7,845 | ) | | | (26,417 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Borrowings under Senior Credit Facility | | | 232,000 | | | | 199,000 | |
| Payments under Senior Credit Facility | | | (257,320 | ) | | | (200,670 | ) |
| Payment of debt issuance costs | | | (2,102 | ) | | | — | |
| Issuance of convertible subordinated notes | | | 30,000 | | | | — | |
| Payments on capital lease obligations | | | (7,061 | ) | | | (10,608 | ) |
| Advances to stockholders | | | — | | | | (181 | ) |
| Recovery of stockholder receivable | | | — | | | | 28 | |
| Exercise of options | | | — | | | | 59 | |
| Other financing activities | | | (649 | ) | | | (2,906 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Net cash used in financing activities | | | (5,132 | ) | | | (15,278 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | | 4,559 | | | | 1,096 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 11,131 | | | | 11,762 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 15,690 | | | $ | 12,858 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Thirteen and Thirty-nine Weeks Ended November 4, 2001
CSK Auto Corporation is a holding company. At November 4, 2001, CSK Auto Corporation had no business activity other than its investment in CSK Auto, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary (“Auto”). On a consolidated basis, CSK Auto Corporation and Auto are referred to herein as the “Company.”
Auto is a specialty retailer of automotive aftermarket parts and accessories. At November 4, 2001, the Company operated 1,133 stores in 19 Western and Northern Plains states as a fully integrated company under three brand names: Checker Auto Parts, founded in 1969 and operating in the Southwestern, Rocky Mountain and Northern Plains states and Hawaii; Schuck’s Auto Supply, founded in 1917 and operating in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska; and Kragen Auto Parts, founded in 1947 and operating primarily in California.
Note 1 — Basis of Presentation
The unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein were prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, but do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and the results of its operations. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto for the fiscal year ended February 4, 2001, as included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on May 1, 2001.
Note 2 — Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined utilizing the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can only be calculated at the end of a fiscal year based upon the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations reflected herein are based upon management’s estimates of year-end inventory levels and costs. The replacement cost of inventories approximated $553 million and $547 million at November 4, 2001 and February 4, 2001, respectively.
The carrying value of the inventory exceeds the current replacement cost primarily as a result of the application of the LIFO inventory method of accounting. The Company’s costs of acquiring inventories through normal purchasing activities have been decreasing in recent years as the Company’s increased size and cash flows have enabled it to take advantage of volume discounts and lower product acquisition costs.
From time to time, the Company performs an analysis of the net realizable value of the inventory, after consideration of expected disposal costs and normal profit margins, to determine if the LIFO carrying value of the inventory is impaired. Should an impairment be indicated, the carrying value of the inventory would be reduced. No such impairment is indicated based on current market conditions.
Inventories at November 4, 2001 are presented net of an allowance of approximately $4.1 million. This allowance results from the Company’s decision during the second quarter of fiscal year 2001 to eliminate certain product lines (resulting in excess inventories) and to close certain retail stores (resulting in some excess inventories that are not economical to redistribute within the retail chain). See Note 7.
6
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 3 — Earnings Per Share
Calculation of the numerator and denominator used in computing per share amounts is summarized as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Thirteen Weeks Ended | | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended |
| |
| |
|
| | November 4, | | October 29, | | November 4, | | October 29, |
| | 2001 | | 2000 | | 2001 | | 2000 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Numerator for basic EPS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | | | 5,934 | | | | 5,892 | | | | (15,650 | ) | | | 10,072 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Denominator for basic EPS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares outstanding, beginning of period | | | 27,842 | | | | 27,839 | | | | 27,841 | | | | 27,835 | |
| Additional shares issued | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | 4 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| | Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) | | | 27,842 | | | | 27,839 | | | | 27,842 | | | | 27,839 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Numerator for diluted EPS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | | | 5,934 | | | | 5,892 | | | | (15,650 | ) | | | 10,072 | |
| | Interest savings, net of tax, on assumed conversion of notes | | | 294 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| | | Adjusted net income | | | 6,228 | | | | 5,892 | | | | (15,650 | ) | | | 10,072 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Denominator for diluted EPS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) | | | 27,842 | | | | 27,839 | | | | 27,842 | | | | 27,839 | |
| Effect of dilutive stock options | | | 25 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| Assumed conversion of notes | | | 4,072 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| | Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) | | | 31,939 | | | | 27,839 | | | | 27,842 | | | | 27,839 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Shares excluded as a result of anti-dilution: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock options | | | 2,314 | | | | 3,020 | | | | 2,862 | | | | 3,027 | |
| Conversion of notes | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,354 | | | | — | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total shares excluded | | | 2,314 | | | | 3,020 | | | | 4,216 | | | | 3,027 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Note 4 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which are effective for all purchase business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 141 replaces APB Opinion No. 16, “Business Combinations,” and eliminates pooling-of-interests accounting prospectively. It also provides guidance on purchase accounting related to the recognition of intangible assets and accounting for negative goodwill. SFAS No. 142 changes the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach, whereby such intangible assets will be evaluated at least annually or sooner if events or circumstances occur indicating that they might be impaired. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, amortization of goodwill recorded for business combinations consummated prior to July 1, 2001 will cease, and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1, 2001 that do not meet the criteria for recognition under SFAS No. 141 will be reclassified to goodwill. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 142 on February 4, 2002, the beginning of fiscal 2002, for acquisitions consummated prior to July 1, 2001. The Company is in the process of determining the impact the adoption of SFAS 141 will have on its financial position and results of operations. The adoption of SFAS 142
7
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
will reduce pre-tax amortization expense by approximately $4.8 million during fiscal year 2002. The Company is in the process of determining if any impairment under SFAS 142 exists and the related impact on its financial position and results of operations that any such impairment might produce. Neither SFAS 141 nor SFAS 142 will have any impact on cash flows.
In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” SFAS No. 144 replaces certain previously issued accounting guidance, develops a single accounting model for long-lived assets, and broadens the framework previously established for assets to be disposed of by sale (whether previously held or newly acquired). The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 144 as of the beginning of fiscal 2002. The Company is in the process of determining the impact of adoption of this pronouncement.
Note 5 — Investment in Joint Venture
On March 1, 2000, the Company participated in the formation of a new joint venture, PartsAmerica.com, Inc. (“PA”), with Advance Stores Company Incorporated and Sequoia Capital. PA engaged in the sale of automotive parts and accessories via e-commerce. During the second quarter of fiscal 2001, PA ceased operations. The Company has no material financial obligations with respect to PA.
Note 6 — Legal Matters
As previously disclosed, on May 4, 1998, a lawsuit was filed against the Company in the Superior Court in San Diego, California. The case was brought by two former store managers and a former senior assistant manager. It purported to be a class action for all present and former California store managers and senior assistant managers and sought overtime pay for a period beginning in May 1995 as well as injunctive relief requiring overtime pay in the future. The Company was also served with two other lawsuits purporting to be class actions filed in California state courts in Orange and Fresno Counties by thirteen other former and current employees. The Company has finalized a settlement of all these lawsuits. The final amount of the settlement was approximately $8.8 million (which includes plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs and other miscellaneous expenses). The cost of this settlement was expensed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2000, with payments of the settlement made during the first quarter of fiscal 2001.
The Company was served on March 8, 2000 with a complaint filed in Federal Court in the Eastern District of New York by the Coalition for a Level Playing Field, O.K. and 250 individual auto parts dealers alleging that the Company and seven other auto parts dealers (AutoZone, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Advance Stores Company, Inc., Discount Auto, Inc., The Pep Boys — Manny, Moe and Jack, Inc., O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., and Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc.) violated the Robinson-Patman Act. Only 14 of the individual plaintiffs asserted claims against the Company. The complaint alleges that the Company and other defendants knowingly either induced or received discriminatory prices from large suppliers, allegedly in violation of Section 2(a) and 2(f) of the Robinson-Patman Act, as well as received compensation from large suppliers for services not performed for those suppliers, allegedly in violation of Section 2(c) of the Robinson-Patman Act. The complaint seeks injunctive relief against all defendants and seeks treble damages on behalf of the individual auto parts dealers who are plaintiffs, plus attorneys’ fees. The complaint alleges that the estimated average damage amount per plaintiff is $1,000,000 (and more for those plaintiffs that are wholesale distributors and not simply jobbers) before trebling. The Company believes the suit is without merit and plans to vigorously defend it. The Company, with other defendants, filed a motion to dismiss and certain other procedural motions. All motions were denied, except the motion to dismiss one of the Robinson-Patman claims that was based upon the allegation that defendants were acting as brokers, which was granted. The Company does not currently believe that this complaint will result in liabilities material to its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
8
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
During the second quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company recorded a $2.0 million charge for the settlement of certain other legal claims.
The Company currently and from time to time is involved in other litigation incidental to the conduct of its business. The damages claimed in some of this litigation are substantial. Although the amount of liability that may result from these matters cannot be ascertained, the Company does not currently believe that, in the aggregate, they will result in liabilities material to its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
| |
Note 7 — | Store Closing, Restructuring and Other Profitability Enhancement Program Non-Recurring Charges |
During the second quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company’s management implemented a Profitability Enhancement Program (“PEP”) to reduce costs, improve operating efficiencies and close under-performing stores. As a result of the PEP, the Company recorded total restructuring and other charges of $44.6 million during the quarter ended August 5, 2001. The following paragraphs provide detailed information relating to the costs that were recorded in connection with the PEP (in thousands):
| | | | | |
Amounts recorded as store closing and restructuring charges: | | | | |
| Reserve for store closing costs | | $ | 13,698 | |
| Write down of store site costs and store-related property and equipment | | | 6,649 | |
| Reserve for workforce reduction | | | 400 | |
| Other | | | 729 | |
| | |
| |
| | | 21,476 | |
| | |
| |
Amounts recorded as charges to cost of sales: | | | | |
| Provision for excess inventories | | | 17,292 | |
| Actual costs incurred for inventory review and disposal | | | 5,800 | |
| | |
| |
| | | 23,092 | |
| | |
| |
| | $ | 44,568 | |
| | |
| |
Store Closing Costs
The Company provides an allowance for estimated costs to be incurred in connection with store closures. Such costs are recognized when a store is specifically identified, costs can be estimated and closure is planned to be completed within the next twelve months. For stores to be relocated, such costs are recognized when an agreement for the new location has been reached with a landlord and site plans meet preliminary municipal approvals. During the period that they remain open for business, the rent and other operating expenses for the stores to be closed continue to be reflected in the Company’s normal operating expenses.
The allowance for store closing costs is included in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities in the accompanying financial statements and consists primarily of three components: (1) future rents to be paid over the remaining terms of the lease agreements for the stores (net of estimated probable sublease recoveries); (2) lease commissions associated with the anticipated store subleases; and (3) operating expenses associated with the closed store vacancy periods. Future rents of closed stores will be incurred through the expiration of the non-cancelable leases.
Under the PEP, the Company increased the store closing reserve by approximately $13.7 million. Approximately $6.8 million of this amount relates to the planned closure of 36 stores based on several factors including market saturation, store profitability, and store size and format. In addition, the Company recorded
9
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
an increase to the reserve of approximately $6.9 million relating to existing closed stores that have longer than anticipated vacancy periods as a result of the continued economic slowdown and which were evaluated as part of the PEP. The write-down of leasehold improvements and other store-related property and equipment has been recorded as a direct reduction of net property and equipment balances.
Total activity in the provision for store closings and the related store closing costs for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 4, 2001, including the impact of the PEP, is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | |
Balance, at February 4, 2001. | | $ | 1,552 | |
Store closing costs: | | | | |
| Store closing costs, gross ($6,810 relating to PEP) | | | 7,395 | |
| Revisions in estimates ($6,888 relating to extended vacancy periods) | | | 8,638 | |
| | |
| |
| | Store closing costs, net | | | 16,033 | |
Payments | | | (6,846 | ) |
| | |
| |
Balance, at November 4, 2001. | | $ | 10,739 | |
| | |
| |
On a store count basis, closure activity and the remaining number of stores to be closed are summarized as follows (plan amendments represent stores deleted from a store closing plan):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Number of Stores to be Closed |
| |
|
| | Beginning | | Stores | | Plan | | Stores | | Balance to |
Period | | Balance | | Added | | Amendments | | Closed | | be Closed |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Fiscal 1999 | | | 29 | | | | 87 | | | | (11 | ) | | | (77 | ) | | | 28 | |
Fiscal 2000 | | | 28 | | | | 24 | | | | (1 | ) | | | (42 | ) | | | 9 | |
Fiscal 2001(year to date) | | | 9 | | | | 43 | | | | — | | | | (39 | ) | | | 13 | |
At November 4, 2001, there were 13 stores remaining to be closed under the Company’s store closing plans, comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stores in | | Plan | | Stores | | Balance to |
Fiscal Year | | Closing Plan | | Amendments | | Closed | | be Closed |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
1999 | | | 87 | | | | (2 | ) | | | (83 | ) | | | 2 | |
2000 | | | 24 | | | | — | | | | (23 | ) | | | 1 | |
2001 | | | 43 | | | | — | | | | (33 | ) | | | 10
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13 | |
Workforce Reduction
As a result of an internal review of general and administrative functions, the Company terminated 36 employees and eliminated 84 open positions. The terminated employees worked primarily in human resources, information technology and real estate. As a result of these actions, a provision was made for estimated severance and benefits of approximately $0.4 million.
Other Restructuring Charges
Other restructuring costs include estimates for early terminations of equipment operating leases ($0.5 million) and other costs.
10
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Provision for Excess Inventory and Related Charges
In conjunction with the PEP, the Company completed an inventory review to: (1) increase inventory turnover; (2) provide an optimal inventory level at each store and depot location; (3) write down the inventory of the 36 stores planned for closure; and (4) liquidate inventory not meeting the Company’s new asset return levels. As a result of the analysis, the Company has established a reserve for excess inventories resulting from the decision to eliminate certain products and to liquidate inventory from closed stores. In conjunction with this decision, a provision of $17.3 million was recorded to reduce inventory values. In addition, during the second quarter of 2001 the Company incurred actual costs of approximately $5.8 million related to labor, warehouse and distribution, freight and other operating costs associated with the inventory review and disposal. These costs are reflected as cost of sales in the accompanying statement of operations for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 4, 2001.
Note 8 — Long Term Debt
Convertible Subordinated Notes
During August 2001, the Company issued $30.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7% convertible subordinated notes due September 1, 2006 in a private placement. Interest on these notes is payable semiannually on March 1 and September 1, commencing March 1, 2002. The notes are convertible into approximately 4.5 million shares of common stock at a conversion price of $6.63 per share, which represents a 10% premium to the average closing prices of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE for the 10 days preceding the issuance of the notes.
If the Company consummates the Refinancing described below, then the Company has the right to force conversion of all of the unpaid principal amount of the notes into the Company’s common stock, at the stated conversion price. See Note 10.
The note holders have the right to convert all or any portion of the unpaid principal amount of these notes into common stock at the conversion price at any time.
Senior Credit Facility
As a result of increased borrowing and based on our financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our ratio of debt to EBITDA (as defined in our existing senior credit facility) and our Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in our existing senior credit facility) would not have been in compliance with corresponding covenants under our existing senior credit facility. Accordingly, we negotiated a waiver of these covenants effective for the third quarter ending November 4, 2001 in connection with the planned refinancing of our debt.
Note 9 — Stock Options
In August 2001, the Company cancelled outstanding stock options to purchase an aggregate of 495,011 shares of the Company’s common stock that had been granted to certain Company executives. The options covered by such cancellations had exercise prices ranging from $17.50 to $32.25 per share, with a weighted average exercise price of $26.34 per share. These executives will be awarded new stock options to purchase an aggregate of 495,011 shares of the Company’s common stock in February 2002, subject to their continued employment with the Company. The exercise price of the new stock options will be the greater of: (a) $11.00 per share; and (b) the fair market value of CSK Auto Corporation common stock on the date of grant.
11
CSK AUTO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 10 — Subsequent Events
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company obtained commitments for a refinancing (the “Refinancing”) of its capital structure which, when completed, will result in debt reduction, the elimination of scheduled bank debt amortization payments prior to the end of 2004, the extension of debt maturities and enhanced liquidity. The Refinancing is expected to close by the end of December 2001. In connection with the Refinancing, CSK Auto, Inc. expects to enter into a new three year $300.0 million senior secured, asset-based credit facility and expects to issue $280.0 million principal amount of senior notes due 2006. The new three year $300.0 million senior credit facility is expected to be comprised of a $150.0 million non-amortizing term loan and a $150.0 million revolving credit facility with availability subject to a borrowing base formula. Interest on the $300.0 million senior credit facility is expected to be LIBOR plus 3.5%. The coupon interest rate on the $280.0 million of senior notes will be 12.0% per annum. The effective rate on the senior notes will be approximately 12.5% per annum, which includes amortization of the original issue discount.
In addition, CSK Auto Corporation has entered into agreements with certain investors, including an affiliate of Investcorp, one of the Company’s principal stockholders, to purchase $50.0 million principal amount of 7% convertible subordinated debentures due December 2006. The debentures will be convertible into approximately 5.8 million shares of CSK Auto Corporation common stock at a conversion price of $8.69 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustment provisions and other adjustments that may result in the issuance of additional shares of such common stock under certain circumstances. Although the convertible subordinated debentures are not redeemable other than in the event of a change of control, the Company expects to require these investors to convert their convertible subordinated debentures into CSK Auto Corporation common stock following satisfaction of certain conditions, including completion of the Refinancing and the effectiveness of a registration statement covering the shares of common stock underlying the convertible debentures. The Company currently expects the conditions to be satisfied within 150 days of the closing of the Refinancing. If the conditions to conversion are not satisfied, then the debentures will remain convertible at the option of the holders. The convertible subordinated debentures to be held by the affiliate of Investcorp will not be convertible into common stock of CSK Auto Corporation until the issuance of the common stock underlying its debentures has been approved by the stockholders of CSK Auto Corporation.
On the closing of our new senior credit facility, CSK Auto Corporation will convert the existing $30.0 million of 7% convertible subordinated notes due September 1, 2006 into approximately 4.5 million shares of its common stock. See Note 8.
In conjunction with the Refinancing, the Company expects to record in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001 an extraordinary loss of approximately $3.1 million, net of income taxes, relating to the write-off of the unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the existing senior credit facility.
The Company has reclassified all current maturities of the existing senior credit facility as long-term because the Company has the ability and the intent to refinance this obligation on a long term basis. This ability and intent is expressed in the agreements entered into in conjunction with the proposed Refinancing and the Company has complied with all of the requirements of the existing accounting literature that addresses such reclassifications.
12
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Our business is somewhat seasonal in nature, with the highest sales occurring in the summer months of June through August (overlapping our second and third fiscal quarters). Our business is, in addition, affected by weather conditions. While unusually severe or inclement weather tends to reduce sales, as our customers tend to defer elective maintenance during such periods, extremely hot and cold temperatures tend to enhance sales by causing auto parts to fail and sales of seasonal products to increase.
Results of Operations
The following table expresses the statements of operations as a percentage of sales for the periods shown:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Thirteen Weeks | | Thirty-nine Weeks |
| | Ended | | Ended |
| |
| |
|
| | November 4, | | October 29, | | November 4, | | October 29, |
| | 2001 | | 2000 | | 2001 | | 2000 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net sales | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of sales | | | 53.3 | | | | 53.2 | | | | 55.9 | | | | 52.8 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Gross profit | | | 46.7 | | | | 46.8 | | | | 44.1 | | | | 47.2 | |
Operating and administrative | | | 39.9 | | | | 39.2 | | | | 39.6 | | | | 38.5 | |
Store closing and other restructuring costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.2 | | | | 0.5 | |
Legal settlement | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.2 | | | | — | |
Transition and integration expenses | | | — | | | | 0.4 | | | | — | | | | 2.1 | |
Goodwill amortization | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.3 | | | | 0.3 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Operating profit | | | 6.5 | | | | 6.9 | | | | 1.8 | | | | 5.8 | |
Interest expense | | | 3.9 | | | | 4.2 | | | | 4.1 | | | | 4.1 | |
Equity in loss on joint venture | | | — | | | | 0.3 | | | | — | | | | 0.2 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 2.6 | | | | 2.4 | | | | (2.3 | ) | | | 1.5 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 1.0 | | | | 0.9 | | | | (0.9 | ) | | | 0.5 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Net income (loss) | | | 1.6 | % | | | 1.5 | % | | | (1.4 | )% | | | 1.0 | % |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Thirteen Weeks Ended November 4, 2001 Compared to Thirteen Weeks Ended October 29, 2000
Net sales for the thirteen weeks ended November 4, 2001 (the “third quarter of fiscal 2001”) were $366.7 million as compared to net sales of $367.7 million (excluding $1.1 million of service center sales) for the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2000 (“the third quarter of fiscal 2000”). We had comparable store sales growth of 1% which was offset by a reduction in sales due to the closure of 26 of our stores, the negative sales impact during the three weeks immediately following the events of September 11, 2001, and lost sales due to lower than typical in-stock inventory levels. These lower than typical in-stock levels were due to our diminished liquidity position, particularly during the first portion of the third quarter. In-stock levels and liquidity improved after CSK Auto Corporation issued $30.0 million of 7% convertible subordinated notes on August 14, 2001, which has contributed to comparable store sales growth of approximately 4% in recent weeks.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2001, we opened 3 stores, relocated 3 stores and closed 24 stores in addition to the stores closed due to relocation, 23 of which were closed in connection with our previously announced Profitability Enhancement Program (“PEP”). At November 4, 2001, we had 1,133 stores in operation compared to 1,147 at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2000.
Gross profit was $171.1 million, or 46.7% of net sales, in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 as compared to $172.7 million, or 46.8% of net sales, in the third quarter of fiscal 2000. The lower realized gross profit margin
13
was a result of lower vendor volume purchase allowances due to lower sales and the result of lower vendor cash discounts due to our failure to make prompt payment.
Operating and administrative expenses were $146.2 million, or 39.9% of net sales, for the third quarter of fiscal 2001 as compared to $144.4 million, or 39.2% of net sales, for the third quarter of fiscal 2000. The increase in operating and administrative expenses is the result of higher payroll related costs, increased building rent, taxes and insurance offset in part by the cost savings achieved due to the restructuring completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2001.
Operating profit was $23.7 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2001 compared to a $25.7 million profit for the third quarter of fiscal 2000. The decrease in operating profit resulted primarily from lower gross profit margins and increased expense as discussed above. During the comparable 2000 period, we incurred $1.3 million in non-recurring expenses associated with the transition and integration of store acquisitions.
Net interest expense for the third quarter of fiscal 2001 decreased to $14.3 million from $15.5 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2000 due to lower average interest rates and a slightly lower outstanding debt balance.
Income tax expense for the third quarter of fiscal 2001 was $3.4 million, compared to an income tax expense of $3.2 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2000. Our effective tax rate of approximately 36.5% during the third quarter of fiscal 2001 was slightly higher than our rate of 35.0% in the corresponding 2000 period.
As a result of the above factors, we had net income of $5.9 million, or $0.19 per diluted common share, for the third quarter of fiscal 2001, compared to net income of $5.9 million, or $0.21 per diluted common share, for the third quarter of fiscal 2000. Earnings per share are lower in the third quarter of fiscal 2001 than in the third quarter of fiscal 2000 as a result of a higher outstanding share count due to the assumed conversion of the convertible subordinated notes.
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended November 4, 2001 Compared to Thirty-nine Weeks Ended October 29, 2000
Net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 4, 2001 and October 29, 2000 were $1.1 billion. Comparable store sales increased 1% for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 4, 2001. At November 4, 2001, the Company had 1,133 stores in operation, compared to 1,147 at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2000.
Gross profit for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 4, 2001 was $486.8 million, or 44.1% of net sales, compared to $519.7 million or 47.2% of net sales, for the comparable 2000 period. The lower realized gross profit margin was a result of lower vendor volume purchase allowances in the period. We have historically utilized prompt payment and other cash discount programs offered by vendors. Because of the need to pay for the class action lawsuit settlement and the term loan amortization payments, we took efforts to retain cash during most of the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2001 and did not take full advantage of the contractual vendor allowances. We also recorded a non-recurring charge of $23.1 million to cost of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2001 as part of our PEP.
Operating and administrative expenses increased by $14.0 million to $437.2 million, or 39.6% of net sales, for the thirty-nine week period of fiscal 2001 from $423.2 million, or 38.5% of net sales, for the comparable 2000 period. The increase relates to higher payroll related costs partially offset by a reduction of expenses related to the 26 stores closed as part of our PEP.
Operating profit decreased to $19.9 million, or 1.8% of net sales, for the thirty-nine week period of fiscal 2001 from $63.1 million, or 5.8% of net sales, for the comparable 2000 period, due to the factors cited above, including the $46.6 million impact of the PEP and legal settlements. During the comparable 2000 period, we incurred $23.8 million in non-recurring expenses associated with the transition and integration of store acquisitions.
14
Net interest expense for the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2001 totaled $45.7 million compared to $45.3 million for the comparable period of fiscal 2000. This increase was primarily due to increased costs associated with financing vendor payables offset by a reduction in interest rates.
Income tax benefit for the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2001 was $10.2 million compared to income tax expense of $5.8 million for the comparable 2000 period. Our effective tax rate was 39.4% during the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2001 compared to our tax rate of 36.5% in the corresponding 2000 period.
As a result of the above factors, we incurred a net loss of $15.7 million,or $0.56 per diluted common share, for the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2001, compared to net income of $10.1 million, or $0.36 per diluted common share, for the comparable 2000 period.
Restructuring and Other Non-Recurring Charges
During the quarter ended August 5, 2001, (“the second quarter of fiscal 2001”), we implemented our PEP to reduce costs, improve operating efficiencies and close under-performing stores. This program includes the planned closure of 36 stores (26 of which had been closed as of November 4, 2001), the reserve for discontinued and excess inventory, costs incurred associated with the inventory review and disposal, the write-down of store site costs and store-related property and equipment, a workforce reduction and other related charges. As a result, we recorded total charges of $44.6 million, which includes $21.5 million of store closing and other restructuring costs and inventory charges of $23.1 million classified as cost of sales. The following paragraphs provide detailed information relating to the restructuring costs that were recorded.
Store Closing
We provide an allowance for estimated costs to be incurred in connection with store closures. Such costs are recognized when a store is specifically identified, costs can be estimated and closure is planned to be completed within the next twelve months. For stores to be relocated, such costs are recognized when an agreement for the new location has been reached with a landlord and site plans meet preliminary municipal approvals. During the period that they remain open for business, the rent and other operating expenses for the stores to be closed continue to be reflected in our normal operating expenses.
During the thirty-nine weeks ended November 4, 2001, we recorded a charge of $13.7 million for the closure of 36 stores based on several factors including market saturation, store profitability, and store size and format. Of this charge, $6.9 million related to existing closed stores that have longer than anticipated vacancy periods as a result of the continued economic slowdown. The charge consists of three components: (1) future rents to be paid over the remaining terms of the lease agreements for the stores (net of estimated probable sublease recoveries); (2) lease commissions associated with the anticipated store subleases; and (3) operating expenses associated with the closed store vacancy periods. As of November 4, 2001, 26 of these stores have been closed. The remaining stores are expected to be closed by the first half of fiscal 2002.
Total activity relating to store closing costs for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 4, 2001, including the impact of the PEP, is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | |
Balance, at February 4, 2001. | | $ | 1,552 | |
Store closings costs: | | | | |
| Store closings costs, gross ($6,810 relating to PEP) | | | 7,395 | |
| Revisions in estimates ($6,888 relating to extended vacancy periods) | | | 8,638 | |
| | |
| |
| | Store closings costs, net | | | 16,033 | |
Payments | | | (6,846 | ) |
| | |
| |
Balance, at November 4, 2001 | | $ | 10,739 | |
| | |
| |
15
On a store count basis, closure activity and the remaining number of stores to be closed are summarized as follows (plan amendments represent stores deleted from a store closing plan):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Number of Stores to be Closed | | |
| |
| | |
| | Beginning | | Stores | | Plan | | Stores | | Balance to |
Period | | Balance | | Added | | Amendments | | Closed | | be Closed |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Fiscal 1999 | | | 29 | | | | 87 | | | | (11 | ) | | | (77 | ) | | | 28 | |
Fiscal 2000 | | | 28 | | | | 24 | | | | (1 | ) | | | (42 | ) | | | 9 | |
Fiscal 2001 (year to date) | | | 9 | | | | 43 | | | | — | | | | (39 | ) | | | 13 | |
At November 4, 2001, there were 13 stores remaining to be closed under the Company’s store closing plans, comprised of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stores in | | Plan | | Stores | | Balance to |
Fiscal Year | | Closing Plan | | Amendments | | Closed | | be Closed |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
1999 | | | 87 | | | | (2 | ) | | | (83 | ) | | | 2 | |
2000 | | | 24 | | | | — | | | | (23 | ) | | | 1 | |
2001 | | | 43 | | | | — | | | | (33 | ) | | | 10
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13 | |
Other Restructuring Costs
As a result of the consolidation of the regional operations and general and administrative functions, we terminated 36 employees and eliminated 84 open positions. The terminated employees worked primarily in human resources, information technology and real estate. As a result of these actions, the restructuring charges included a provision for severance and benefits of approximately $0.4 million.
We have also accrued other costs and charges incidental to the restructuring. These costs include early termination fees for operating lease commitments and other asset impairments aggregating approximately $0.7 million.
Of the $1.1 million provision for total workforce reduction and other restructuring costs, the remaining reserve at November 4, 2001 was approximately $0.5 million.
Inventory and Related Charges
As a result of the our plan to increase the return on assets, we completed an inventory review to: (1) increase inventory turnover; (2) provide an optimal inventory level at each store location; (3) liquidate inventory not meeting the our new asset return levels; and (4) write down the inventory of the 36 stores planned for closure. As a result of the analysis, we established a reserve for excess inventories resulting from the decision to eliminate certain product lines and to liquidate inventory from closed stores. In conjunction with this decision, a provision of $17.3 million was recorded to reduce inventory values. In addition, we incurred actual costs during the second quarter of approximately $5.8 million related to labor, warehouse and distribution, freight and other operating costs associated with the inventory review and disposal. These costs are reflected as cost of sales in the accompanying statement of operations for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 4, 2001.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our primary cash requirements include working capital (primarily inventory), debt service obligations and capital expenditures. We intend to finance our cash requirements with cash flow from operations and borrowings under our new senior credit facility (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). At November 4, 2001, we had net working capital of approximately $470.6 million, total indebtedness of $649.1 million and total liquidity (cash plus availability under our existing revolving credit facility) of approximately $47.7 million.
16
We have obtained commitments for a refinancing (the “Refinancing”) of our capital structure which, when completed, will result in debt reduction, the elimination of scheduled bank debt amortization payments prior to the end of 2004, the extension of debt maturities and enhanced liquidity. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Refinancing is expected to be consummated by the end of December 2001. In connection with the Refinancing, we expect to enter into a new three year $300.0 million senior secured, asset-based credit facility and have entered into agreements to issue $280.0 million of senior notes due 2006. The new three year $300.0 million senior credit facility is expected to be comprised of a $150.0 million non-amortizing term loan and a $150.0 million revolving credit facility with availability subject to a borrowing base formula. Interest on the $300.0 million senior credit facility is expected to be LIBOR plus 3.5%. Interest on the $280.0 million senior notes is expected to be 12.5% per annum, which includes amortization of the original issue discount. Of the $300.0 million expected commitment under our new senior credit facility, we estimate that our borrowing capacity at the closing of the Refinancing will be approximately $284 million pursuant to a borrowing base formula, a portion of which will be borrowed at closing.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, we entered into an agreement with certain investors, including an affiliate of Investcorp (one of our principal stockholders), for the private placement of $50.0 million in principal amount of 7% convertible subordinated debentures due December 2006. This transaction is expected to close during December 2001. The debentures are convertible into CSK Auto Corporation common stock at $8.69 per share subject to certain anti-dilution adjustment provisions and other adjustments that may result in the issuance of additional shares of common stock of CSK Auto Corporation under certain circumstances. In connection with the Refinancing, we plan to force conversion of the entire unpaid principal amount of the debentures into our common stock, at the stated conversion price. The conversion of the debentures is subject to certain conditions, including completion of the Refinancing and the effectiveness of a registration statement covering the shares of common stock underlying the debentures, which are expected to be satisfied within 150 days of the closing of the refinancing. If the conditions to conversion are not satisfied, then the debentures will remain convertible at the option of the holders. The convertible subordinated debentures to be held by the affiliate of Investcorp will not be convertible into common stock of CSK Auto Corporation until the issuance of the common stock underlying its debentures has been approved by the stockholders of CSK Auto Corporation.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2001, we issued $30.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7% convertible subordinated notes due September 1, 2006 in a private placement. The notes are convertible into common stock at a conversion price of $6.63 per share. In connection with the consummation of the Refinancing, we plan to convert the entire unpaid principal amount of the notes into CSK Auto Corporation common stock, at the stated conversion price. On a pro forma basis giving effect to the Refinancing and assuming conversion of our convertible debt to common stock, on November 4, 2001, we would have had total debt of $589.1 million and total liquidity (comprised of cash and cash equivalents of $15.7 million and unborrowed availability under our new senior credit facility) of $95.8 million. We believe that cash flow from operations combined with the availability of funds under the new revolving credit facility will be sufficient to support our operations and liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2001, we negotiated $27.0 million of additional financing under our existing senior credit facility and negotiated amendments to that facility to permit the increased borrowing and to amend certain covenant restrictions relating to outstanding debt levels. These funds were used to pay the $27.3 million principal payment that was due on the existing senior credit facility on June 30, 2001. Another $27.3 million principal payment is due on the existing senior credit facility as of December 31, 2001, but upon consummation of the Refinancing, expected to occur during December 2001, that payment will no longer be required.
As a result of increased borrowing and based on our financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2001, our ratio of debt to EBITDA (as defined in our existing senior credit facility) and our Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in our existing senior credit facility) would not have been in compliance with corresponding covenants under our existing senior credit facility. Accordingly, we negotiated a waiver to these covenants effective for the third quarter ending November 4, 2001.
17
In conjunction with the Refinancing, we expect to record in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001 an extraordinary loss of $3.1 million, net of income taxes, relating to the write-off of the unamortized deferred financing costs associated with our existing senior credit facility.
We have reclassified all current maturities of our existing senior credit facility as long-term because we have the ability and the intent to refinance this obligation on a long term basis. This ability and intent is expressed in the agreements entered into in conjunction with the proposed Refinancing and the Company has complied with all of the requirements of the existing accounting literature that addresses such reclassifications.
During fiscal 2000, we finalized an agreement to settle the class action lawsuits (see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) brought by former and present California store managers and senior assistant managers seeking overtime pay under California law. The amount of the settlement was approximately $8.8 million (which includes plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and costs and other miscellaneous expenses) and was paid during the first quarter of fiscal 2001. The settlement was funded through our existing revolving credit facility. During the second quarter of fiscal 2001, we also reserved $2.0 million for certain other legal claims and expect to pay such amounts during the remainder of fiscal 2001 and 2002.
For the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2001, net cash provided by operating activities was $17.5 million compared to $42.8 million during the comparable 2000 period. The largest components of the change in cash flow from operations relate to: (1) a net loss of $15.7 million during the 2001 period compared to net income of $10.1 million during the comparable 2000 period; (2) a non-cash provision during the 2001 period of $25.0 million comprised of a $17.3 million provision for write down of inventory and a $7.7 million write down on disposal of fixed and other assets primarily as a result of our PEP (see Note 7); and (3) an increased investment in our inventories, where $33.7 million was used during the 2001 period compared to $7.1 million used for such purposes during the 2000 period.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $7.8 million for the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2001, compared to $26.4 million used during the thirty-nine weeks of 2000. The decrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily the result of $14.3 million less in capital expenditures, an increase of $1.5 million in proceeds from the sale of fixed assets and $3.1 million investment in joint venture during the 2000 fiscal period.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $5.1 million for the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2001 compared to $15.3 million of net cash used by financing activities in the comparable period of fiscal 2000. In the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2001, we made net payments of $25.3 million under the Senior Credit Facility compared to net payments of $1.7 million for the comparable period in fiscal 2000. This was offset by the issuance of $30.0 million in convertible notes during the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2001 and $3.5 million less in capital lease payments than in the comparable period of fiscal 2000.
Forward-looking Statements
The foregoing Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains certain forward-looking statements about the future performance of the Company that are based on management’s assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available. These forward-looking statements are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those statements. Factors that may cause differences are identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and are incorporated herein by reference.
18
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
As previously disclosed, on May 4, 1998, a lawsuit was filed against us in the Superior Court in San Diego, California. The case was brought by two former store managers and a former senior assistant manager. It purported to be a class action for all present and former California store managers and senior assistant managers and sought overtime pay for a period beginning in May 1995 as well as injunctive relief requiring overtime pay in the future. We were also served with two other lawsuits purporting to be class actions filed in California state courts in Orange and Fresno Counties by thirteen other former and current employees. We have finalized a settlement of all these lawsuits. The final amount of the settlement was approximately $8.8 million (which includes plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs and other miscellaneous expenses). The cost of this settlement was expensed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2000, with payments of the settlement made during the first quarter of fiscal 2001.
We were served on March 8, 2000 with a complaint filed in Federal Court in the Eastern District of New York by the Coalition for a Level Playing Field, O.K. and 250 individual auto parts dealers alleging that we and seven other auto parts dealers (AutoZone, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Advance Stores Company, Inc., Discount Auto, Inc., The Pep Boys — Manny, Moe and Jack, Inc., O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., and Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc.) violated the Robinson-Patman Act. Only 14 of the individual plaintiffs asserted claims against us. The complaint alleges that we and other defendants knowingly either induced or received discriminatory prices from large suppliers, allegedly in violation of Section 2(a) and 2(f) of the Robinson-Patman Act, as well as received compensation from large suppliers for services not performed for those suppliers, allegedly in violation of Section 2(c) of the Robinson-Patman Act. The complaint seeks injunctive relief against all defendants and seeks treble damages on behalf of the individual auto parts dealers who are plaintiffs, plus attorneys’ fees. The complaint alleges that the estimated average damage amount per plaintiff is $1,000,000 (and more for those plaintiffs that are wholesale distributors and not simply jobbers) before trebling. We believe the suit is without merit and plan to vigorously defend it. We, with other defendants, filed a motion to dismiss and certain other procedural motions. All motions were denied, except the motion to dismiss one of the Robinson-Patman claims that was based upon the allegation that defendants were acting as brokers, which was granted. We do not currently believe that this complaint will result in liabilities material to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2001, we recorded a $2.0 million charge for the settlement of certain other legal claims.
We currently and from time to time are involved in other litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. The damages claimed in some of this litigation are substantial. Although the amount of liability that may result from these matters cannot be ascertained, we do not currently believe that, in the aggregate, they will result in liabilities material to our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
On August 14, 2001, CSK Auto Corporation issued $30.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7% convertible subordinated notes due September 1, 2006 to Oppenheimer Capital Income Fund. The notes are convertible, at our option, into common stock of CSK Auto Corporation upon the successful completion of a refinancing of our existing senior credit facility, including the Refinancing. On the closing of our new senior credit facility, we will exercise our right to convert these convertible subordinated notes into approximately 4.5 million shares of CSK Auto Corporation’s common stock.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
NONE
19
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
NONE
Item 5. Other Information
Mr. Charles L. Griffith resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors on December 14, 2001.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits:
| | | | |
| 3.01 | | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.01 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on May 4, 1998 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 3.02 | | | Certificate of Correction to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.02 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on May 4, 1998 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 3.03 | | | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.03 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on April 28, 1999 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 3.03.1 | | | First Amendment to Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.03.1 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on May 1, 2001 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 4.01 | | | Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 30, 1999, among CSK Auto, Inc., The Chase Manhattan Bank, DLJ Capital Funding, Inc., Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. and the lenders from time to time parties thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K, filed on October 15, 1999 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 4.01.1 | | | Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.01.1 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on May 1, 2001 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 4.01.2 | | | Amendment No. 2 to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.01.2 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on May 1, 2001 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 4.01.3 | | | Amendment No. 3 to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2001, incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 4.01.3 of the Company’s report on form 10Q, filed on September 19, 2001 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 4.02 | | | Convertible Subordinated Note issued by CSK Auto Corporation in favor of Oppenheimer Capital Income Fund, dated as of August 14, 2001. |
| 4.02.1 | | | Note Purchase Agreement between CSK Auto Corporation and Oppenheimer Capital Income Fund, dated as of August 14, 2001. |
| 4.02.2 | | | Registration Rights Agreement between CSK Auto Corporation and Oppenheimer Capital Income Fund, dated as of August 14, 2001. |
| 10.01 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Martin Fraser. |
| 10.02 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Lon Novatt. |
| 10.03 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Don Watson. |
| 10.04 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Dale Ward. |
| 10.05 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Larry Buresh. |
| 10.06 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Larry Ellis. |
| 10.07 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Bill Evans. |
20
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
On June 29, 2001, the Company filed a current report on Form 8-K to report, under Item 5 thereof, an amendment to CSK Auto, Inc.’s existing senior credit facility.
On August 23, 2001, the Company filed a current report on Form 8-K to report, under Item 5 thereof, the initiation of several strategic and financial initiatives aimed at improving the Company’s balance sheet and enhancing its future profitability.
On December 11, 2001, the Company filed a current report on Form 8-K to report, under Item 5 thereof, the Company’s entry into an agreement concerning the private placement of convertible subordinated debentures.
21
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| |
| CSK AUTO CORPORATION |
|
| By: /s/ DON W. WATSON |
|
|
| Don W. Watson |
| Chief Financial Officer |
DATED: December 19, 2001
22
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | | | |
Exhibit | | |
Number | | Description |
| |
|
| 3.01 | | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.01 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on May 4, 1998 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 3.02 | | | Certificate of Correction to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.02 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on May 4, 1998 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 3.03 | | | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.03 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on April 28, 1999 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 3.03.1 | | | First Amendment to Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.03.1 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on May 1, 2001 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 4.01 | | | Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 30, 1999, among CSK Auto, Inc., The Chase Manhattan Bank, DLJ Capital Funding, Inc., Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. and the lenders from time to time parties thereto, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K, filed on October 15, 1999 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 4.01.1 | | | Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.01.1 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on May 1, 2001 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 4.01.2 | | | Amendment No. 2 to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.01.2 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, filed on May 1, 2001 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 4.01.3 | | | Amendment No. 3 to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2001, incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 4.01.3 of the Company’s report on form 10Q, filed on September 19, 2001 (File No. 001-13927). |
| 4.02 | | | Convertible Subordinated Note issued by CSK Auto Corporation in favor of Oppenheimer Capital Income Fund, dated as of August 14, 2001. |
| 4.02.1 | | | Note Purchase Agreement between CSK Auto Corporation and Oppenheimer Capital Income Fund, dated as of August 14, 2001. |
| 4.02.2 | | | Registration Rights Agreement between CSK Auto Corporation and Oppenheimer Capital Income Fund, dated as of August 14, 2001. |
| 10.01 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Martin Fraser. |
| 10.02 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Lon Novatt. |
| 10.03 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Don Watson. |
| 10.04 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Dale Ward. |
| 10.05 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Larry Buresh. |
| 10.06 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Larry Ellis. |
| 10.07 | | | Severance and Retention Agreement between CSK Auto, Inc. and Bill Evans. |