UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-32134
Z Trim Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Illinois | 36-4197173 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1011 Campus Drive, Mundelein, Illinois 60060 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
(847) 549-6002 |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
___________________________________________________ |
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
ý Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ý Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “a smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨ Yes ý No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class | | Outstanding at August 14, 2012 |
Common Stock, $0.00005 par value | | 18,110,876 |
1
Z TRIM HOLDINGS, INC. |
| | |
FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT Table of Contents |
| | |
Item | | Page |
PART I | | |
Item l. | Financial Statements (see below) | 3 |
| | |
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial | 3 |
| Condition and Results of Operations | |
| | |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 10 |
| | |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 10 |
| | |
PART II | | |
| | |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 11 |
| | |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 11 |
| | |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. | 11 |
| | |
Item 6. | Exhibits | 11 |
| | |
SIGNATURES | | 12 |
| | |
EXHIBIT INDEX | | 13 |
| | |
Financial Statements | Balance Sheets | |
| At June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011 | F-1 |
| | |
| Statements of Operations | |
| for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited) | F-3 |
| | |
| Statements of Cash Flows | |
| for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited) | F-4 |
| | |
| Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) | F-5 |
2
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
See Financial Statements beginning on page F-1.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Information
This report contains or incorporates by reference various forward-looking statements concerning the Company’s prospects that are based on the current expectations and beliefs of management. Forward-looking statements may contain words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection” and similar expressions or use of verbs in the future tense, and are intended to identify forward-looking statements; any discussions of periods after the date for which this report is filed are also forward-looking statements. The statements contained herein and such future statements involve or may involve certain assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause the Company’s actual results and performance to differ materially from what is expected. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. There can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this document will, in fact, transpire or prove to be accurate.
In addition to the assumptions and other factors referenced specifically in connection with such statements, factors that could cause or contribute to our actual results differing materially from those discussed herein or for our stock price to be adversely affected include, but are not limited to:
· | our history of operating losses and inability to guarantee profitable operations in the future; |
· | the risk that we will not be able to remediate identified material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting; |
· | the risk that we will be unable to pay our debt obligations as they become due; |
· | the risk that there will not be market acceptable of our products; |
· | our plans for commercialization of our products; |
· | possible problems in implementing new relationships or the failure to achieve the desire benefits; |
· | our reliance on a limited number of product offerings; |
· | our product development efforts, including risk that we will not be able to produce our products in a cost-effective manner; |
· | our ability to secure new customers, maintain our current customer base and deliver product on a timely basis; |
· | our dependence on a small concentration of customers; |
· | possible issuance of common stock subject to options, warrants and other securities that may dilute the interest of stockholders; |
· | our ability to protect technology through patents; |
· | our ability to protect our proprietary technology and information as trade secrets and through other similar means; |
· | competition from larger, more established companies with far greater economic and human resources; |
· | fluctuations in raw materials and price for agricultural products; |
· | the effect of changes in the pricing and margins of products; |
· | the potential loss of key personnel or other personnel disruptions; |
· | sufficient voting power by one large stockholder to make corporate governance decisions that could have significant effect on us and the other stockholders; |
· | our nonpayment of dividends to common stockholders and lack of plans to pay dividends to common stockholders in the future; |
· | our need for additional financing; |
· | future sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock that could depress the trading price of our common stock, lower our value and make it more difficult for us to raise capital; |
· | our additional securities available for issuance, which, if issued, could adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock; and |
· | our stock price is likely to be highly volatile due to a number of factors, including a relatively limited public float. |
In addition, see Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a further discussion of some of the factors that could affect future results.
The following discussion is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. You should read the following discussion along with our financial statements and related notes included in this Form 10-Q.
Unless the context requires otherwise, in this report, the “Company,” “Z Trim,” “Z Trim Holdings,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Z Trim Holdings, Inc.
3
Overview
Z Trim Holdings, Inc. is a bio-technology company that owns existing, and develops new, products and processes that transform agricultural by-products into multi-functional ingredients used in food manufacturing and other industries. The Company currently sells a line of products to the food industry that can help manufacturers reduce their costs, improve the quality of finished goods, and also help solve many production problems. The Company’s revolutionary technology provides value-added ingredients across virtually all food industry categories. These all-natural products offer a range of functional attributes, including helping to reduce fat and calories, adding fiber, improving shelf-stability, preventing oil migration, and enhancing binding capacity – all without degrading the taste and texture of the final food products. Perhaps most significantly, Z Trim’s ingredients can help extend finished products, thereby increasing its customers’ gross margins.
The Company, through an exclusive license to technology patented by the United States Department of Agriculture, has developed products that manage moisture to help reduce production costs and improve nutritional value in finished foods, while maintaining the essential taste and mouth-feel associated with full-fat products. The global market for Z Trim's line of products spans the entire food and nutritional beverage industry, including fat-free, low-fat, reduced-fat and full-fat, across meats, baked goods, dairy and non-dairy products, snacks, beverages, dressings, sauces and dips.
As our current facility is a prototype plant, being the first of its kind to produce our innovative products, we are constantly seeking ways to improve efficiencies and achieve economies of scale. We are currently re-designing the process to make use of newer separation technologies and thereby optimize plant output. In late 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with an outside manufacturer, which should exponentially increase production capacity in the second half of 2012.
In July 2012, the Company announced its creation of an industrial products division, which will focus on the manufacture, marketing and sales of products designed specifically for industrial applications including oil drilling fluids, petroleum coke, charcoal briquettes, hydraulic fracturing, and paper and wood adhesives. When used in industrial operations, Z Trim’s products can reduce costs, enhance supply-chain reliability, limit environmental impact, and improve finished product quality compared to current products such as guar gum, xanthan gum, CMC, lignosulfonates and starches used as binders, adhesives, viscofiers or emulsifiers.
Current Trends and Recent Developments Affecting the Company
Sales and Manufacturing
Sales for the first six months of 2012 were up 41% over the first six months of 2011. This improvement was primarily due to an increase in Z Trim product sales to large food processors.
On October 17, 2011, the Company entered into a Custom Processing Agreement (“CPA”) with AVEKA Nutra Processing, LLC (“ANP”), part of the Aveka Group, in order to provide the Company with a partner for future manufacturing initiatives. The CPA provides that ANP will perform certain services related to the Company’s fiber product, including manufacturing, processing, packaging and storage/warehousing for an initial term of three years. The CPA automatically renews at the end of the initial term for an additional two-year term unless either party provides written notice to the other within a specified time frame. Production pursuant to the CPA is anticipated to begin in August 2012. Once production commences, the CPA provides for minimum production volumes of 40,000 lbs per month and average volumes of 100,000 lbs. per month with the ability to increase future production volume to potentially as much as 1,000,000 lbs. per month. However, due to factors including potential start-up problems, changes in customer demand, inability of parties to perform their obligations and factors outside the Company’s control, the Company cannot assure that production will begin as anticipated or that it will achieve these levels.
Conversion of Debt/Preferred Stock to Common Stock
On August 13, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with its largest shareholder, Brightline Ventures I, LLC (“Brightline”), pursuant to which Brightline agreed to convert $7,721,988 (exclusive of dividends) worth of Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock into 7,721,988 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In consideration for the foregoing conversion of Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock by Brightline on or before their respective maturity dates, the Company modified the following warrants held by Brightline to provide them with the ability to exercise such warrants on a cashless basis: (i) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 11,582,983 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.50 per share, which were issued to Brightline in transactions where Brightline acquired shares of the Company’s Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock; and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,859,375 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.50 per share, which equals one half of the outstanding and unexercised warrants issued to Brightline in other transactions where Brightline provided financing to the Company. Further, all similarly situated Series I and II Redeemable Prefered Stock holders will be offered the same terms as Brightline. Prior to this agreement, the Company had $8,061,988 worth of Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock outstanding, of which $4,635,291 came due in 2012 and the other $3,326,697 came due in 2013. Additionally, for Brightline's investors who invested in a private offering of the Company's common stock at a $1.50 per share, the Company will provide an additional warrant at a strike price equal to the value of the securities in any subsequent offering completed by Maxim in the event such offering is at a price point below $1.50 per share of common stock.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, Brightline converted $1,300,000 in principal balance on notes it held, plus $208,000 of interest accrued thereon into 1,508,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. As a result, the Company was able to reduce indebtedness for outstanding convertible notes due in 2012 from $1,420,000 to $120,000. During the reporting period on April 19, 2012, the remaining $120,000 in outstanding convertible notes due in 2012, plus $30,979 in accrued interest, was converted into 150,979 shares of common stock the Company’s Common Stock.
Issuance of Convertible Notes and Warrants
During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we secured financing from three accredited investors (the “Investors”) pursuant to which we sold senior secured convertible promissory notes (each a “Note” and collectively the “2012 Notes”) and warrants and received gross proceeds of $200,000. The 2012 Notes have a twenty-four month term and accrue interest at the rate of 8% per annum. The principal balance of the 2012 Notes is convertible at the rate of $1.00 per share into an aggregate of 200,000 shares of our common stock, $.00005 par value (the “Common Stock”). The interest is payable either upon maturity of the 2012 Notes or quarterly at the Investors’ option in shares of our Common Stock. Any amount of principal or interest which is not paid when due shall bear interest at a rate of interest equal to the eighteen percent (18%) per annum.
The 2012 Notes are secured by a first lien on all of our assets for so long as the Notes remain outstanding. The 2012 Notes are callable at any time by us, at which time the Investors may choose to either convert such notes into Common Stock or to receive payment in cash. The Investors also received a five year warrant, to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of Common Stock per unit with an exercise price of $1.50 per share (“Warrants”). The Warrants are also callable by us in the event that the ten day trailing average closing price per share of Common Stock exceeds $2.99.
4
Investment Banking Agreement
On February 17, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), we entered into an Investment Banking Agreement (“Investment Banking Agreement”) with Legend Securities, Inc. ("Legend"), pursuant to which Legend agreed to provide business advisory services to us for a period of up to eighteen months with our ability to further extend the term of the Investment Banking Agreement for an additional six months.
In exchange for Legend's services, we agreed to pay Legend the sum of $10,000 per month and to issue Legend a warrant for the purchase of five hundred and fifty thousand (550,000) shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Legend Warrants”) at an exercise price of $0.71 per share. The Legend Warrants vest as follows: 91,666 of the Legend Warrants vest on the Effective Date and then 91,666 of the Legend Warrants vest each ninety (90) day period thereafter. The Legend Warrants have a term of five years. The Legend Warrants contain a cashless exercise provision and certain “piggy-back” registration rights, pursuant to which the Company is obligated to register the shares underlying the Legend Warrants under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), in any future registration statement that is filed by the Company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Issuance of Common Stock
On February 23, 2012, we entered into a private placement subscription agreement with Brightline Ventures I-B, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (“Brightline Ventures I B”), pursuant to which we sold 311,545 shares of Common Stock, for a price of $1.50 per share and received gross proceeds of $467,318.
On March 29, 2012, we entered into a private placement subscription agreement with Brightline Ventures I-B, LLC, pursuant to which we sold 437,380 shares of Common Stock, for a price of $1.50 per share and received gross proceeds of $656,070.
On May 8, 2012, we entered into a private placement subscription agreement with Brightline Ventures I-B, LLC, pursuant to which we sold 744,711 shares of Common Stock, for a price of $1.50 per share and received gross proceeds of $1,117,067.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Revenues
Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $323,890, as compared to revenue of $207,560 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Our revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was entirely attributable to product sales. The increase in sales is due to increased demand for our products. Based on current order levels from our customers, we anticipate revenues will continue to increase during the third quarter of fiscal 2012 because of increased demand for our products and the addition of production capacity to meet such demand. Our ability to generate increased revenue in future reporting periods will be partially dependent on continued increased demand for our products from existing and new customers and the completion of changes in our production process to further improve our capacity and reduce costs, all of which cannot be assured.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues for products sold for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $524,621 and $609,038, respectively, a decrease of $84,417 or 14%. The decrease in costs of goods sold is attributable to a decrease in labor costs and manufacturing overhead. If we can sustain an increase in the demand for our products and our monthly production volume, we believe that this will enable us to allocate our fixed costs over a greater number of finished goods and help to further reduce costs of goods sold in the future to improve margins. If we are able to commence production pursuant to the CPA with ANP, we expect that this will result in greater efficiencies in our production process and also result in improved margins.
Gross Loss
Gross loss for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $200,731, or approximately 62% of revenues, as compared to gross loss of $401,478, or approximately 193% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Gross loss reflects a number of factors that can vary from period to period, including those described above.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 consisted entirely of selling, general and administrative expenses. Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were $1,007,192, a decrease of $654,952 or 39% from $1,662,144 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The significant components of selling, general and administrative expenses are as follows:
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
Stock based compensation expenses | $ 269,860 | | $ 651,753 |
Salary expenses | 280,805 | | 307,828 |
Professional fees | 60,338 | | 18,784 |
Non-manufacturing depreciation expenses | 8,202 | | 22,652 |
Employment recruiting expenses | 14,848 | | 2,496 |
Investor relation expense | 30,701 | | 303,666 |
| | | |
| $ 664,754 | | $ 1,307,179 |
| | | |
The decrease in stock-based compensation was attributable to the fewer employees being granted stock-based compensation and a decrease in market price for the stock on the dates issued. In addition, a decrease in the number of employees reduced salary expense in the second quarter of 2012. Investor relations expense decreased for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011,due to the issuance of stock-based compensation to our investor relations consultants in 2011.
5
Operating Loss
Operating loss for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased to $1,207,923 compared to $2,063,622 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 due to the reasons described above.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income for the three months ending on June 30, 2012 was $731,121, as compared to $2,652,901 for the three months ending on June 30, 2011. The decrease in other income of $1,921,780 was primarily due to a decrease of $2,061,071 in the change of the fair value of our derivatives.
Net Profit (Loss)
As a result of the above, we reported a net loss of $476,802 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to a net profit of $589,279 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Basic and Diluted (Loss) per Share
The basic and diluted net loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was ($0.10) per share, as compared to net loss per share of ($0.02) for the three months ended June 30, 2011 due to the effect of the results described above as well as the offset of additional shares outstanding in 2012 due to the conversion of notes payable into shares of common stock and issuance of common stock in financing transactions.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Revenues
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $642,273, a 41% increase from $454,926 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was entirely attributable to product sales. The increase in sales is due to increased demand for our products.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues for products sold for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $1,265,045 and $1,254,696, respectively, an increase of $10,349 or approximately 1%. The increase in costs of goods sold is attributable to an increase in sales and direct labor offset by a decrease in manufacturing overhead. If our production volumes continue to increase, we expect to be able to lower our cost of finished goods on a per unit basis because this would allow us to allocate our fixed costs over a greater number of finished goods and result in improved margins.
Gross Loss
Gross loss for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $622,772, or approximately 97% of revenues, as compared to gross loss of $799,770, or approximately 176% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Gross loss reflects a number of factors that can vary from period to period, including those described above.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $1,943,467, a decrease of $1,512,418 or 44% from $3,455,885 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 consisted entirely of selling, general and administrative expenses.
The significant components of selling, general and administrative expenses are as follows:
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
Stock based compensation expenses | $ 459,972 | | $ 1,367,164 |
Salary expenses | 544,007 | | 618,644 |
Professional fees | 129,770 | | 57,532 |
Non-manufacturing depreciation expenses | 17,242 | | 45,426 |
Employment recruiting expenses | 15,628 | | 26,496 |
Investor relation expense | 58,055 | | 442,191 |
| | | |
| $ 1,224,674 | | $ 2,557,453 |
| | | |
The decrease in stock-based compensation was attributable to the fewer employees being granted stock-based compensation and a decrease in market price for the stock on the dates issued. In addition, a decrease in the number of employees reduced salary expense in the second quarter of 2012. Investor relations expense decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the same period in 2011, due to the issuance of stock-based compensation to our investor relations consultants in 2011.
6
Operating Loss
Operating loss for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased to $2,566,239 compared to $4,255,655 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 due to the reasons described above.
Other Expense
Other expense for the six months ended on June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $2,946,787 and $1,432,618, respectively. The net change of $1,514,169 was primarily due to the change in the fair value of our derivatives resulting in a reduction of other income by $3,853,147 partially offset by a decrease in the interest expense of notes payable of $1,997,729 and the recognition of a loss on derivative settlement in 2011 of $411,192.
Net Loss
As a result of the above, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we reported a net loss of $5,513,026 and $5,688,273, respectively.
Basic and Diluted (Loss) per Share
The basic and diluted net loss per share for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was ($0.49) per share, as compared to net loss per share of ($0.67) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 due to the effect of the results described above as well as the offset of additional shares outstanding in 2012 due to the conversion of notes payable into shares of common stock and issuance of common stock in financing transactions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2012, we had a cash balance of $354,601, an increase from a balance of $313,073 at December 31, 2011. At June 30, 2012, we had a working capital deficit of $12,808,200, an increase in working capital deficit from $12,009,724 as of December 31, 2011. The difference in working capital deficit was primarily because of an increase in the derivative liability of $2,839,374 in the first six months of 2012 partially offset by an increase in current assets.
Over the last several years, the Company’s operations have been funded primarily through the sale of both equity and debt securities. During the first six months of 2012, the Company received a total of $2,242,080 in proceeds from the sale of common stock and $200,000 in proceeds from the sale of convertible notes. To successfully grow our business, our management believes it must improve our cash position through greater and sustainable sales of our product lines, and increase the productivity and efficiency of the production process. We believe the productivity goal can be achieved if the production facility with ANP becomes available during the third quarter of 2012. However, such an increase would depend on sustained or increased levels of purchases by existing and new customers and actual realization of our customers’ current demand levels, all of which cannot be assured.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our largest shareholder, Brightline Ventures I, LLC, decided to convert $1,300,000 in principal balance on notes it held, plus $208,000 of interest accrued thereon into 1,508,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. As a result, the Company was able to reduce indebtedness for outstanding convertible notes due in 2012 from $1,420,000 to $120,000. During the reporting period on April 19, 2012, the remaining $120,000 in outstanding convertible notes due in 2012, plus $30,979 in accrued interest, was converted into 150,979 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. As of June 30, 2012, we have $200,000 worth of convertible notes that remain outstanding, and which come due in 2014.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company had $8,061,988 worth of Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock outstanding, of which $4,635,291 came due in 2012 and the other $3,326,697 came due in 2013.
7
On October 17, 2011, the Company entered into a Custom Processing Agreement (the “Agreement”) with ANP in order to provide the Company with a partner for future manufacturing initiatives. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company agreed to make available to ANP a $500,000 line of credit (which includes $10,000 that the Company loaned ANP to assist it with the purchase of its Waukon, Iowa facility) at an interest rate of 5.5%. The line of credit is only permitted to be used by ANP for operating costs, which excludes capital expenditures of equipment in excess of $5,000. The loan is to be paid back to the Company in the form of discounts on production pricing commencing either two years after the first draw by ANP on the line of credit (other than the $10,000 the Company loaned ANP to assist it with the purchase of its Waukon, Iowa facility) or the first month after the Company has ordered 80,000 lbs. of product for three consecutive months, whichever shall occur first. All of ANP’s obligations under the line of credit, as well as the Agreement, are specifically guaranteed by its parent company, Aveka Inc. As of June 30, 2012, we loaned all $500,000 to ANP under the line of credit. This extension of credit to ANP had a material adverse impact on the Company's cash resources. For this reason, we are seeking to raise additional capital in 2012. The Company cannot provide any assurances of the availability of future financing or the terms on which it might be available. In the absence of such financing, we likely would not have available funds to redeem securities which come due. Therefore, we may be forced to scale back or cease operations, liquidate assets, seek additional capital on less favorable terms and/or pursue other remedial measures.
The Company’s warrants issued in 2008 through 2011 have reset provisions to the exercise price and conversion price if the Company issues equity or other derivatives at a price less than the exercise price set forth in such warrants. This ratchet provision results in a derivative liability in our financial statements. Our derivative liabilities increased to $13,870,806 at June 30, 2012 from $11,031,432 at December 31, 2011. The change in derivative fair value during the six months ended June 30, 2012 resulted in other expense of $2,887,993. Fair values for exchange traded securities and derivatives are based on quoted market prices. Where market prices are not readily available, fair values are determined using market based pricing models incorporating readily observable market data and requiring judgment and estimates.
The following discussion focuses on information in more detail on the main elements of the $41,528 net increase in cash during the six months ended June 30, 2012 included in the accompanying Statements of Cash Flow. The table below sets forth a summary of the significant sources and uses of cash for the six month period ended June 30:
| 2012 | | 2011 |
Cash used for operating activities | $ (2,400,552) | | $ (2,041,158) |
Cash used for investing activities | - | | (762,210) |
Cash provided by financing activities | 2,442,080 | | 3,169,422 |
| | | |
Increase in cash | $ 41,528 | | $ 366,054 |
Cash used in operating activities was $2,400,552 for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to $2,041,158 for the six month period ended June 30, 2011. Net losses of $5,513,026 and $5,688,273 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were the primary reasons for our negative operating cash flow in both years. The Company’s negative operating cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was offset by the effect of non-cash charges to income, such as depreciation, changes in the fair value of the derivative liability, amortization on debt discount and stock-based compensation.
Cash used in investing activities was $0 for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to $762,210 for the three month period ended March 31, 2011. Investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 consisted entirely of purchases of equipment for our manufacturing plant.
Cash provided by financing activities was $2,442,080 for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to $3,169,422 for the six month period ended June 30, 2011. Over the last several years, the Company’s operations have been funded primarily through the sale of both equity and debt securities. Proceeds from the combined sale of convertible debt, preferred stock and common stock totaled $2,442,080 and $3,329,422 for the first six months of 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company made a $160,000 principal payment on outstanding debt.
Commitments/Contingencies:
Debt Instruments and Redeemable Preferred Stock. Our disclosures regarding our obligations under debt instruments and Redeemable Preferred Stock are located in various parts of our regulatory filings. Information in the following table provides a summary of our outstanding obligations and Redeemable Preferred Stock as of June 30, 2012:
| | | | Payments Due by Fiscal Year | |
Obligation | | Total as of June 30, 2012 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | |
2012 Convertible Notes | | $ 200,000 | | | | | | $ 200,000 | |
2010 Redeemable Preferred Stock | | $ 4,635,291 | | $ 4,635,291 | | | | | |
2011 Redeemable Preferred Stock | | $ 3,326,697 | | | | $ 3,326,697 | | | |
Total Obligations | | $ 8,261,988 | | $ 4,635,291 | | $ 3,326,697 | | $ 200,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, $100,000 of 2008 Convertible Notes and $20,000 of 2010 Convertible Notes that were to mature in 2012 were converted into an aggregate of 150,979 shares of common stock the Company’s Common Stock. For this reason, the Company no longer has any obligations under the 2008 Convertible Notes or 2010 Convertible Notes
8
On August 13, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with its largest shareholder, Brightline Ventures I, LLC (“Brightline”), pursuant to which Brightline agreed to convert $7,721,988 (exclusive of dividends) worth of Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock into 7,721,988 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In consideration for the foregoing conversion of Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock by Brightline on or before their respective maturity dates, the Company modified the following warrants held by Brightline to provide them with the ability to exercise such warrants on a cashless basis: (i) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 11,582,983 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.50 per share, which were issued to Brightline in transactions where Brightline acquired shares of the Company’s Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock; and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,859,375 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.50 per share, which equals one half of the outstanding and unexercised warrants issued to Brightline in other transactions where Brightline provided financing to the Company. Further, all similarly situated Series I and II Redeemable Prefered Stock holders will be offered the same terms as Brightline. Prior to this agreement, the Company had $8,061,988 worth of Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock outstanding, of which $4,635,291 came due in 2012 and the other $3,326,697 came due in 2013.
As a result of this agreement, the Company reduced these obligations and after Brightline’s conversions, will have $340,000 worth of Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock outstanding, of which $280,000 comes due in 2012 and the other $60,000 comes due in 2013. If the holders of the remaining outstanding shares of Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock decide not to convert their securities to common stock, the Company will have an obligation to redeem the shares of Series I and II Redeemable Preferred Stock for cash. In such case, the Company would have to find sources of cash to repay such investors and there can be no assurance such resources will be available. If the Company was forced to repay the such investors in cash, this need for funds would have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business operations, financial condition and prospects, would threaten its ability to operate as a going concern.
Capital Expenditures. At June 30, 2012, the Company has no material commitments for capital expenditures.
Lease commitments. The Company leases a combined production and office facility located in Mundelein, Illinois. The lease expires in March 2013 and monthly rental payments are $21,000, exclusive of property taxes. The Company has the ability to terminate the lease by providing 60 days’ notice to the landlord.
Litigation. On July 7, 2007, the Company was served with a complaint by Joseph Sanfilippo and James Cluck for violation of the Consumer Fraud Act and is seeking damages in excess of $200,000. Management believes that the allegations are frivolous and wholly without merit and will vigorously defend the claim. The pleadings are still at issue and discovery is underway. Thus, the outcome is unknown as of the report date.
On or about December 12, 2011, the Company was served with a complaint by LIBCO Industries, Inc., alleging the Company breached a construction contract and tortuously interfered with a business relationship, and is seeking damages in excess of $185,000. Management believes that the allegations are frivolous and wholly without merit and will vigorously defend the claim. Related to this matter, Process Piping, LLC, a sub-contractor for LIBCO Industries, filed a mechanics lien on the property leased by the Company, claiming it was owed in excess of $95,000 by LIBCO Industries. On March 6, 2012, the Company paid $62,500 to Process Piping, LLC in exchange for a release of its lien as well as an assignment of all of its claims against LIBCO Industries. The pleadings of the matters are still at issue and discovery is underway. Thus, the outcome is unknown as of the report date.
On or about March 15, 2012, the Company was served with a Charge of Discrimination filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by Richard Rothmaller, a former employee of the Company. Rothmaller claims that the Company failed to accommodate his alleged disability and ultimately terminated him on October 13, 2011 because of his alleged disability. On or about April 19, 2012, the parties resolved the matter, the case has been dismissed and proper amounts had been accrued at the period ended March 31, 2012. The resolution of this matter is not expected to have any material impact on the Company’s financial position.
Although there can be no assurances, based on the information currently available, management believes that it is probable that the ultimate outcome of each of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. However, an adverse outcome in either of these actions could have a material adverse effect on the financial results of the Company in the period in which it is recorded.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP. For a full discussion of our accounting policies as required by GAAP, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. We consider certain accounting policies to be critical to an understanding of our condensed consolidated financial statements because their application requires significant judgment and reliance on estimations of matters that are inherently uncertain. The specific risks related to these critical accounting policies are unchanged at the date of this report and are described in detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
9
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Market Risks
(Not Applicable)
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act. This conclusion is based primarily on the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting which was disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, where management identified material weaknesses consisting of ineffective controls over the control environment and financial statement disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting through the date of this report or during the quarter ended June 30, 2012, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Remediation of Material Weaknesses
As discussed above, as of December 31, 2011, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting primarily due to the Company not having developed accounting policies and procedures and effectively communicated to same to its employees. Management plans to address these weaknesses by providing future investments in the continuing education of our accounting and financial professionals.
If the remedial measures described above are insufficient to address any of the identified material weaknesses or are not implemented effectively, or if additional deficiencies arise in the future, material misstatements in our interim or annual financial statements may occur in the future. Among other things, any unremediated material weaknesses could result in material post-closing adjustments in future financial statements.
10
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Other than as set forth above, during the three months ended June 30, 2012, there have been no material developments our previously disclosed legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed herein, particularly those discussed in the “Safe Harbor” Cautionary Statement and the other sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part I, Item 2, see the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Subsequent to the reporting period, we issued 150,000 shares of our common stock to Maxim Group LLC as consideration for consulting services rendered. These shares were offered and sold in a private transaction and issued in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising in relation to the issuance of these shares. These shares have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.
Item 3. Exhibits.
See the Exhibit Index included as the last part of this report (following the signature page), which is incorporated herein by reference.
11
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Z TRIM HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: | August 14, 2012 | /s/ Steven J. Cohen |
Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 14, 2012 /s/ Brian Chaiken
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
12
EXHIBIT INDEX
Z TRIM HOLDINGS, INC.
Form 10-Q for Quarter Ended June 30, 2012
Exhibit Number | Description |
10.1 | August 13, 2012 Letter Agreement with Brightline Ventures I, LLC |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS * | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
1.01 LAB * | XBRL Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
101.PRE * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
* In accordance with SEC rules, this interactive data file is deemed “furnished” and not “filed” for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under those sections or acts.
13
| | | INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | PAGE |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011 | | | | F-1 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Statements of Operations for three months ended as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited) | | F-3 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited) | F-4 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Notes to Financial Statements as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited) | | | | F-5 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
14
Z TRIM HOLDINGS, INC. | | | | |
BALANCE SHEETS | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
ASSETS | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | |
| | 6/30/2012 | | 12/31/2011 |
| | | | |
Current Assets | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ 354,601 | | $ 313,073 |
Accounts receivable | | 334,110 | | 315,277 |
Inventory | | 576,960 | | 256,842 |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | | 114,917 | | 120,475 |
| | | | |
Total current assets | | 1,380,588 | | 1,005,667 |
| | | | |
Long Term Assets | | | | |
Letter of Credit | | $ 509,287 | | $ 85,215 |
Property and equipment, net | | 2,838,082 | | 3,188,998 |
| | | | |
Total long term assets | | 3,347,369 | | 3,274,213 |
| | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ 4,727,957 | | $ 4,279,880 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements. | | |