Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
Principles of Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by RLHC pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP"), and include all accounts and wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries' accounts. All significant inter-company and inter-segment transactions and accounts have been eliminated upon consolidation. |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. At times, cash balances at banks and other financial institutions may be in excess of federal insurance limits. |
|
Restricted Cash |
|
In accordance with our various borrowing arrangements, at December 31, 2014 cash of approximately 0.2 million was held for collateralizing a letter of credit for an equity method investment. |
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
The ability to collect individual accounts receivable is reviewed on a routine basis. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded based on specifically identified amounts believed to be uncollectible. If actual collection experience changes, revisions to the allowance may be required and if all attempts to collect a receivable fail, it is recorded against the allowance. The estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is impacted by, among other things, national and regional economic conditions. |
|
The following schedule summarizes the activity in the allowance account for trade accounts receivable for the past three years for continuing operations: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| | (In thousands) |
Allowance for doubtful accounts, continuing operations | |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 132 | | | $ | 98 | | | $ | 387 | |
|
| Additions to allowance | 244 | | | 95 | | | 137 | |
|
| Write-offs, net of recoveries | (73 | ) | | (61 | ) | | (426 | ) |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 303 | | | $ | 132 | | | $ | 98 | |
|
|
Inventories |
|
Inventories consist primarily of food and beverage products held for sale at the company-operated restaurants and guest supplies. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost, determined on a first-in, first-out basis, or net realizable value. |
|
Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost. The cost of improvements that extend the life of property and equipment is capitalized. Repairs and maintenance charges are expensed as incurred. |
|
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of each asset, which ranges as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Buildings | 25 to 39 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equipment | 2 to 15 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and fixtures | 5 to 15 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
Landscaping and improvements | 15 years | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets |
|
We test long-lived asset groups for recoverability when changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable, for example, when there are material adverse changes in projected revenues or expenses, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected operating results, or significant negative industry or economic trends. We also perform a test for recoverability when management has committed to a plan to sell or otherwise dispose of an asset group and the plan is expected to be completed within a year. We evaluate recoverability of an asset group by comparing its carrying value to the future net undiscounted cash flows that we expect will be generated by the asset group. If the comparison indicates that the carrying value of an asset group is not recoverable, we recognize an impairment loss for the excess of carrying value over the estimated fair value. When we recognize an impairment loss for assets to be held and used, we depreciate the adjusted carrying amount of those assets over their remaining useful life. |
|
We base our calculations of the estimated fair value of an asset group on the income approach or the market approach. The assumptions and methodology utilized for the income approach are the same as those described in the "Valuation of Goodwill" caption. For the market approach, we use analyses based primarily on market comparables, recent appraisals and assumptions about market capitalization rates, growth rates, and inflation. |
|
For information on impairment losses recorded in 2014, 2013 and 2012 associated with long-lived assets, see Note 4. |
|
Valuation of Goodwill and Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets |
|
We assess goodwill and other intangibles for potential impairments annually as of October 1, or during the year if an event or other circumstance indicates that we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of the asset. For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, we have determined that the individual segments where goodwill is recorded constitute reporting units as defined in the literature. |
|
We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The qualitative factors include economic environment, business climate, market capitalization, operating performance, competition, and other factors. If quantitative analyses are required, in the first step of evaluating goodwill for impairment we compare the estimated fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, no further analysis is needed. |
|
If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed to the second step of the test to calculate the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill in order to determine whether any impairment is required. We calculate the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill by allocating the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. If the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, we recognize an impairment loss for that excess amount. In allocating the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, we use industry and market data, recent appraisals and knowledge of the industry and past experiences. |
|
We base our calculations of the estimated fair value of a reporting unit on a combined income and market approach. For the income approach, we use a discounted cash flow model that includes the following assumptions: projections of revenues and expenses and related cash flows based on assumed long-term growth rates and demand trends; expected future investments to grow new units; and estimated discount rates. We base these assumptions on historical data and experience, third-party appraisals, industry projections, micro and macro general economic condition projections, and our own expectations. For the market approach, we use analyses based primarily on market comparables and assumptions about market capitalization rates, growth rates, and inflation. See Note 7. |
|
The impairment test for indefinite lived intangible assets consists of either a qualitative assessment or a comparison of the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying amount. An impairment loss, if any, is recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis. |
|
Assets Held for Sale |
|
We consider a property to be an asset held for sale when all of the following criteria are met: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | management commits to a plan to sell the property; | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | it is unlikely that the disposal plan will be significantly modified or discontinued; | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition; | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | actions required to complete the sale of the property have been initiated; | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | sale of the property is probable, we expect the completed sale will occur within one year; and | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | the property is actively being marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable given its current market value. | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Upon designation as an asset held for sale, we record the carrying value of each property at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell, and cease depreciation. |
|
For information on the assets classified as held for sale, see Note 5. |
|
Notes Receivable |
|
We carry notes receivable at their estimated collection amount and they are classified as either current or noncurrent depending on the expected collection date. Interest income on notes receivable is recognized using the interest method. |
|
During 2014, we sold the Red Lion Hotel Pocatello ("Pocatello property") and the Red Lion Hotel & Conference Center Kelso/Longview ("Kelso property") and received a $1.8 million secured promissory note and a $0.2 million secured promissory note, respectively. |
|
During 2013, we sold a property, the Red Lion Hotel Pendleton ("Pendleton property") and received a $1.7 million secured promissory note. |
|
During 2012, we sold two properties, the Red Lion Hotel Sacramento at Arden Village ("Sacramento property") and the Red Lion Hotel Denver Southeast in Aurora, Colorado ("Denver Southeast property") and received a $2.7 million secured promissory note and a $4.0 million secured promissory note, respectively. |
|
Other Assets |
|
Other assets primarily include deferred loan costs, equity method and cost method investments discussed in Note 1. Equity method investments are carried at cost, adjusted for our proportionate share of earnings and any investment disbursements. Cost method investments are carried at their original purchase price. Deferred loan costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the related loan agreement. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
Applicable accounting standards define fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). We measure our assets and liabilities using inputs from the following three levels of the fair value hierarchy: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs). | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 3 includes unobservable inputs that reflect assumptions about what factors market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. We develop these inputs based on the best information available, including our own data. | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Deferred Income |
|
In 2003, we sold a hotel to an unrelated party in a sale-operating leaseback transaction. The pre-tax gain on the transaction of approximately $7.0 million was deferred and is being amortized into income over the period of the lease term, which expires in November 2018 and is renewable for three, five-year terms at our option. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, we recognized income of approximately $0.5 million each year for the amortization of the deferred gain. The remaining balance at December 31, 2014, was $1.8 million. |
|
Income Taxes |
|
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. |
|
We recognize deferred tax assets to the extent that we believe these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning, and results of recent operations. At December 31, 2014, a valuation allowance has been recorded to reduce our deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized. If we determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes. |
|
We record uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740 on the basis of a two-step process whereby (1) we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. See Note 14. |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
Revenue is generally recognized as services are provided. When payments from customers are received before services have been performed, the amount received is recorded as deferred revenue until the service has been completed. We recognize revenue from the following sources: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Hotels - Room rental and food and beverage sales from owned and leased hotels and management fees from hotels under management contract. Revenues are recognized when services have been performed, generally at the time of the hotel stay or guests visit to the restaurant and at the time the management services are provided. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Franchise - Fees received in connection with the franchise and marketing of our brand names. Franchise revenues are recognized as earned in accordance with the contractual terms of the franchise agreements. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Entertainment - Online ticketing services, ticketing inventory management systems, promotion of Broadway-style shows and other special events. Where we act as an agent and receive a net fee or commission, revenue is recognized in the period the services are performed. When we are the promoter of an event and are at-risk for the production, revenues and expenses are recorded in the period of the event performance. | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Advertising and Promotion |
|
Costs associated with advertising and promotional efforts are generally expensed as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we incurred approximately $3.4 million, $3.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively, in advertising expense from continuing operations. |
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share gives effect to all dilutive potential shares that are outstanding during the period and include outstanding stock options and other outstanding employee equity grants, as well as the effect of noncontrolling interest related to the previously outstanding operating partnership units of RLHLP, by increasing the weighted-average number of shares outstanding by their effect. When we report a net loss during the period, basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are the same. See Note 13. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. |
|
Reclassifications |
|
Certain amounts disclosed in prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported income/losses, cash flows, total assets, or stockholders' equity as previously reported. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-08, |
"Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” The amendments in ASU 2014-08 change the criteria for reporting a discontinued operation and require new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. Only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. This accounting standard update is effective for annual filings beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-08 on our company's results of operations, financial position, cash flows and disclosures will be based on our company’s future disposal activity. |
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers". ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model requiring a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 may be applied using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. We are in the process of evaluating this guidance and our method of adoption. |
|
Management has assessed the potential impact of other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards and determined that the provisions are either not applicable to our company, or are not anticipated to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. |