On December 31, 2020, Red Lion Hotels Corporation, a Washington corporation (the “Company”), filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in connection with the proposed merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of Sonesta International Hotels Corporation, a Maryland corporation (“Sonesta”), with and into the Company (the “Merger”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 30, 2020 (as it may be amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Sonesta and Roar Merger Sub Inc., a Washington corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Sonesta (“Merger Sub”). On January 26, 2021, the Company filed with the SEC its preliminary proxy statement on Schedule 14A (the “Preliminary Proxy Statement”) and on February 9, 2021, the Company filed with the SEC its definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A relating to the special meeting of shareholders of the Company scheduled to be held on March 16, 2021 (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) to, among other things, vote on a proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.
With this filing, the Company is hereby supplementing its disclosure in the Definitive Proxy Statement in connection with litigation brought by certain purported shareholders of the Company, which is described below.
Shareholder Litigation
Since the initial filing of the Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, ten actions (collectively, the “Red Lion Shareholder Actions”) have been filed in federal and state courts in Delaware, New York, Colorado, Washington and Pennsylvania by purported shareholders of the Company in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement: Van Cleave v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00177 (D. Del. Feb. 9, 2021) (the “Van Cleave Action”); Raul v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01208 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2021) (the “Raul Action”); Romero v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01307 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2021) (the “Romero Action”); Babiker v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00440 (D. Colo. Feb. 16, 2021) (the “Babiker Action”); Finger v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00513 (D. Colo. Feb. 22, 2021) (the “Finger Action”); Franchi v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00558 (D. Colo. Feb. 24, 2021) (the “Franchi Action”); Allentoff v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al., Case No. 21-2-02579-6 (Wash. Super. Feb. 24, 2021) (the “Allentoff Action”); Devaney v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al., Case No. 21-2-02580-0 (Wash. Super. Feb. 24, 2021) (the “Devaney Action”); Waterman v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-00916 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 26, 2021) (the “Waterman Action”); and Anderson v. Red Lion Hotels Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00617 (D. Colo. Mar. 2, 2021) (the “Anderson Action”). Each of the Red Lion Shareholder Actions names the Company and its directors as defendants, and the Allentoff Action and Devaney Action name John. J. Russell Jr., the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), as an additional defendant. Each of the Van Cleave Action, Raul Action, Romero Action, Babiker Action, Finger Action, Franchi Action, Waterman Action and Anderson Action alleges, among other things, that the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A is false and misleading and/or omits material information concerning the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 14a-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Each of the Allentoff Action and the Devaney Action alleges that the Company’s directors and CEO breached their fiduciary duties by entering into the Merger Agreement for inadequate consideration and through an unfair process, as well as by allegedly causing materially misleading and incomplete information to be disseminated to the Company’s shareholders. The plaintiffs in the Red Lion Shareholder Actions, among other things, seek to enjoin the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses.
While the Company believes that the disclosures set forth in the Definitive Proxy Statement comply fully with all applicable law and denies the allegations in the pending actions described above, in order to moot the plaintiffs’ disclosure claims, avoid nuisance and possible expense and business delays, and provide additional information to its shareholders, the Company has determined voluntarily to supplement certain disclosures in the Definitive Proxy Statement related to the plaintiffs’ claims with the supplemental disclosures set forth below (the “Supplemental Disclosures”). These Supplemental Disclosures should be read in conjunction with the rest of the Definitive Proxy Statement, which is available at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, or from the Company’s website at https://ir.redlion.com/, and which we urge you to read in its entirety. Nothing in the Supplemental Disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal merit, necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, the Company and the other named defendants specifically deny all allegations in the complaints, including the allegations that any additional disclosure was or is required or material.
To the extent that the information set forth herein differs from or updates information contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement, the information set forth herein shall supersede or supplement the information in the Definitive Proxy Statement. All references to sections and subsections herein are references to the corresponding sections or subsections in the