Of the $17.1 million loans held-for-sale at June 30, 2010, $11.2 million of loans were sold during the third quarter of 2010, which resulted in a loss on sale of other loans of $887,000. The remaining $5.9 million of problem real estate loans held-for-sale were written down by an additional $1.1 million during the third quarter of 2010 to $4.8 million, after obtaining bids and broker indications on the sale of these loans.
“Loan demand continued to lag as businesses and consumers remained cautious in this economic environment,” said Mr. Kaczmarek. “We also continued to reduce our construction and land development loans and focus on improving asset quality.” Loans, excluding loans held-for-sale, decreased 18% to $886.6 million at September 30, 2010, from $1.08 billion at September 30, 2009, and decreased 5% from $937.8 million at June 30, 2010. The total loan portfolio remains well diversified with commercial and industrial loans accounting for 42% of the portfolio at September 30, 2010. Commercial real estate loans accounted for 40% of the total loan portfolio at September 30, 2010, of which 57% were owner-occupied by busi nesses. Land and construction loans continued to decrease, accounting for 10% of the portfolio at September 30, 2010, compared to 18% and 12% of the total loan portfolio at September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively. Consumer and home equity loans accounted for the remaining 8% of total loans at September 30, 2010.
“We worked diligently to manage credit risk,” added Mr. Kaczmarek. “As a result, we have seen the provision for loan losses and charge-offs decline in the third quarter of 2010, reflecting an improvement in our overall credit quality.” Nonperforming assets decreased to $49.7 million (including $4.6 million in loans held-for-sale), or 3.73% of total assets at September 30, 2010, compared to $58.2 million (none in loans held-for-sale), or 4.26% of total assets at September 30, 2009, and $60.1 million (including $9.8 million in loans held-for-sale), or 4.61% of total assets at June 30, 2010. Excluding the loans held-for-sale, nonperforming assets were $45.1 million, or 3.39% of total assets at September 30, 2010, compared to $58.2 million, or 4.26% of total assets at September 30, 2009, and $50.3 million or 3.86% of total assets at June 30, 2010. At September 30, 2010, 55% of the nonperforming assets were land and construction loans; 15% commercial and industrial loans; 13% commercial real estate loans; 9% SBA loans; 5% restructured and loans over 90 days past due and still accruing; 2% consumer and home equity loans; and 1% other real estate owned (“OREO”). Total OREO was $657,000 at September 30, 2010, compared to $3.0 million a year ago, and $555,000 at June 30, 2010.
The allowance for loan losses at the end of the third quarter of 2010 was $25.3 million, or 2.85% of total loans and 51.62% of nonperforming loans, and represented 56.90% of nonperforming loans excluding nonaccrual loans in loans held-for-sale. The allowance for loan losses for the comparable period in 2009 was $29.0 million, or 2.68% of total loans and 52.43% of nonperforming loans. The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2010, was $26.8 million, or 2.85% of total loans and 44.90% of nonperforming loans and represented 53.74% of nonperforming loans excluding nonaccrual loans in loans held-for-sale.
Deposits totaled $1.07 billion at September 30, 2010, compared to $1.12 billion at September 30, 2009 and $1.04 billion at June 30, 2010. At September 30, 2010, brokered deposits were $132.4 million, compared to $181.8 million a year ago and $163.7 million at June 30, 2010. Total deposits, excluding brokered deposits, were $932.7 million at September 30, 2010, compared to $934.6 million at September 2009 and $873.7 million at June 30, 2010, or a 7% increase in the third quarter of 2010 from the previous quarter. “As our core deposits continue to increase, we will become much less dependent on the high cost of brokered certificates of deposits,” said Mr. Kaczmarek.
Tangible equity was $181.9 million at September 30, 2010, compared to $126.5 million a year ago, and $182.3 million at June 30, 2010. The increase in tangible equity in the second and third quarters of 2010 from the third quarter of 2009 was due to the $75 million private placement in the second quarter of 2010. Tangible book value per common share was $4.72 at September 30, 2010, compared to $7.47 a year ago, and $6.25 at June 30, 2010. The decrease in tangible book value per common share in the third quarter of 2010 was primarily due to the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock into approximately 14.4 million shares of common stock of the Company.
Forward-looking statements are based on management’s knowledge and belief as of today and include information concerning the Company’s possible or assumed future financial condition, and its results of operations, business and earnings outlook. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. A number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict, could cause future results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements could be affected by many factors, including but not limited to: (1) our ability to attract new deposits and loans; (2) local, regional, and national economic conditions and events and the impa ct they may have on us and our customers; (3) risks associated with concentrations in real estate related loans; (4) increasing levels of classified assets, including nonperforming assets, which could adversely affect our earnings and liquidity; (5) market interest rate volatility; (6) stability of funding sources and continued availability of borrowings; (7) changes in legal or regulatory requirements or the results of regulatory examinations that could restrict growth and constrain our activities, including the terms of our written agreement entered into with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and the California Department of Financial Institutions; (8) changes in accounting standards and interpretations; (9) our ability to raise capital or incur debt on reasonable terms; (10) regulatory limits on the Heritage Bank of Commerce’s ability to pay dividends to the Company; (11) effectiveness of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and other legislative and regulatory efforts to help stabilize the U.S. financial markets; (12) future legislative or administrative changes to the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program enacted under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008; (13) the impact of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and related rules and regulations on our business operations and competitiveness, including the impact of executive compensation restrictions, which may affect our ability to retain and recruit executives in competition with other firms who do not operate under those restrictions; (14) the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Consumer Protection Act signed by President Obama on July 21, 2010, and (15) our success in managing the risks involved in the foregoing items. For a discussion of factors which could cause results to differ, please see the Company’s reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Company’s press releases. Readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s view only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.