Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2010
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 1-14045
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 36-4219376 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
3 Bethesda Metro Center, Suite 1200 Bethesda, Maryland | 20814 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(301) 941-1500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check one:
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common and preferred shares as of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at October 20, 2010 | |
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest ($0.01 par value) | 73,059,600 | |
8 3/8% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares ($0.01 par value) | 1,100,000 | |
7 1/2% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares ($0.01 par value) | 3,170,000 | |
8% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares ($0.01 par value) | 3,500,000 | |
7 1/4% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares ($0.01 par value) | 6,348,888 |
Table of Contents
PART I. | 1 | |||
Item 1. | 1 | |||
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 23 | ||
Item 3. | 38 | |||
Item 4. | 38 | |||
PART II. | 38 | |||
Item 1. | 38 | |||
Item 1A. | 38 | |||
Item 2. | 38 | |||
Item 3. | 39 | |||
Item 4. | 39 | |||
Item 5. | 39 | |||
Item 6. | 39 | |||
40 |
Table of Contents
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Investment in hotel properties, net | $ | 2,137,292 | $ | 1,882,502 | ||||
Property under development | 68,909 | 64,129 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 29,026 | 8,441 | ||||||
Restricted cash reserves (Note 5) | 17,653 | 11,750 | ||||||
Hotel receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,020 and $881, respectively) | 27,114 | 18,875 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net | 1,035 | 1,677 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset | 10,278 | 13,648 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 40,325 | 22,541 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,331,632 | $ | 2,023,563 | ||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Borrowings under credit facilities (Note 4) | $ | 135,000 | $ | 6,259 | ||||
Bonds payable (Note 4) | 42,500 | 42,500 | ||||||
Mortgage loans (including unamortized premium of $289 and $342, respectively) (Note 4) | 582,292 | 595,389 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 75,316 | 60,013 | ||||||
Advance deposits | 10,869 | 10,065 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 2,749 | 3,038 | ||||||
Distributions payable | 14,725 | 7,325 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 863,451 | 724,589 | ||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest in consolidated entity (Note 3) | 2,595 | 2,739 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Equity: | ||||||||
Shareholders’ Equity: | ||||||||
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value (liquidation preference of $352,972), 40,000,000 shares authorized; 14,118,888 shares issued and outstanding (Note 6) | 141 | 141 | ||||||
Common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 73,061,144 shares issued and 73,059,600 outstanding, and 63,609,154 shares issued and outstanding, respectively (Note 6) | 731 | 636 | ||||||
Treasury shares, at cost | (28 | ) | 0 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital, net of offering costs of $60,938 and $54,622, respectively | 1,656,246 | 1,469,730 | ||||||
Distributions in excess of retained earnings | (191,544 | ) | (174,320 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 1,465,546 | 1,296,187 | ||||||
Noncontrolling Interest: | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated entity | 40 | 48 | ||||||
Total equity | 1,465,586 | 1,296,235 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 2,331,632 | $ | 2,023,563 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Hotel operating revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Room | $ | 113,070 | $ | 98,916 | $ | 294,486 | $ | 272,764 | ||||||||
Food and beverage | 43,340 | 40,143 | 122,469 | 116,001 | ||||||||||||
Other operating department | 12,333 | 12,618 | 33,128 | 32,967 | ||||||||||||
Total hotel operating revenues | 168,743 | 151,677 | 450,083 | 421,732 | ||||||||||||
Other income | 1,566 | 1,277 | 4,813 | 14,476 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | 170,309 | 152,954 | 454,896 | 436,208 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Hotel operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Room | 26,559 | 23,786 | 71,912 | 66,249 | ||||||||||||
Food and beverage | 30,429 | 26,971 | 85,836 | 78,341 | ||||||||||||
Other direct | 5,603 | 5,152 | 14,747 | 13,907 | ||||||||||||
Other indirect | 42,387 | 37,811 | 117,330 | 112,076 | ||||||||||||
Total hotel operating expenses | 104,978 | 93,720 | 289,825 | 270,573 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 26,526 | 26,121 | 79,606 | 78,744 | ||||||||||||
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance | 8,760 | 8,234 | 25,790 | 22,744 | ||||||||||||
Ground rent (Note 5) | 1,742 | 1,890 | 4,639 | 4,891 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 4,187 | 2,263 | 11,784 | 10,691 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition transaction costs | 555 | 0 | 2,026 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses | 798 | 355 | 2,540 | 1,661 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 147,546 | 132,583 | 416,210 | 389,304 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 22,763 | 20,371 | 38,686 | 46,904 | ||||||||||||
Interest income | 26 | 14 | 78 | 43 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (8,872 | ) | (9,171 | ) | (26,369 | ) | (28,915 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income tax expense and discontinued operations | 13,917 | 11,214 | 12,395 | 18,032 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (Note 9) | (2,026 | ) | (2,007 | ) | (4,285 | ) | (6,107 | ) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 11,891 | 9,207 | 8,110 | 11,925 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations of properties disposed of, including gain on sale and loss on impairment | 4,712 | 747 | 3,711 | (59 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax benefit | 166 | 176 | 459 | 972 | ||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations | 4,878 | 923 | 4,170 | 913 | ||||||||||||
Net income | 16,769 | 10,130 | 12,280 | 12,838 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests: | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest in loss of consolidated entity (Note 3) | 17 | 2 | 36 | 21 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest of common units in Operating Partnership (Notes 1 and 6) | 0 | (13 | ) | 0 | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest of preferred units in Operating Partnership (Notes 1 and 6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (367 | ) | |||||||||||
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 17 | (11 | ) | 36 | (368 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to the Company | 16,786 | 10,119 | 12,316 | 12,470 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders | (6,689 | ) | (6,688 | ) | (20,066 | ) | (19,699 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | $ | 10,097 | $ | 3,431 | $ | (7,750 | ) | $ | (7,229 | ) | ||||||
2
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Continued
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Earnings per Common Share - Basic: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders before discontinued operations and excluding amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders excluding amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | ||||||
Earnings per Common Share - Diluted: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders before discontinued operations and excluding amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders excluding amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 71,246,259 | 63,002,718 | 68,531,224 | 51,590,702 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 71,345,731 | 63,078,201 | 68,531,224 | 51,590,702 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(in thousands, except per share/unit data)
(unaudited)
Preferred Shares | Common Shares of Beneficial Interest | Treasury Shares | Additional Paid-In Capital | Distributions in Excess of Retained Earnings | Total Shareholders’ Equity | Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Entity | Noncontrolling Interest of Common Units in Operating Partnership | Noncontrolling Interest of Preferred Units in Operating Partnership | Total Noncontrolling Interests | Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 | $ | 118 | $ | 411 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,146,581 | ($ | 153,438 | ) | $ | 993,672 | $ | 64 | $ | 668 | $ | 59,739 | $ | 60,471 | $ | 1,054,143 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares, net of offering costs | 0 | 224 | 58 | 260,267 | 0 | 260,549 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 260,549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares into treasury | 0 | 0 | (365 | ) | 0 | 0 | (365 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (365 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options exercised | 0 | 0 | 0 | 342 | 0 | 342 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 342 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unit conversions | 23 | 0 | 0 | 58,849 | 0 | 58,872 | 0 | (150 | ) | (58,675 | ) | (58,825 | ) | 47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation, net | 0 | 0 | 307 | 1,955 | 207 | 2,469 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,469 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of noncontrolling interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 242 | 0 | 242 | 0 | (242 | ) | 0 | (242 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on common shares/units ($0.03 per share/unit) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1,682 | ) | (1,682 | ) | 0 | (2 | ) | 0 | (2 | ) | (1,684 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on preferred shares/units | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (19,699 | ) | (19,699 | ) | (8 | ) | 0 | (1,431 | ) | (1,439 | ) | (21,138 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,449 | 12,449 | 0 | 22 | 367 | 389 | 12,838 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2009 | $ | 141 | $ | 635 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,468,236 | ($ | 162,142 | ) | $ | 1,306,870 | $ | 56 | $ | 296 | $ | 0 | $ | 352 | $ | 1,307,222 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 | $ | 141 | $ | 636 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,469,730 | ($ | 174,320 | ) | $ | 1,296,187 | $ | 48 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 48 | $ | 1,296,235 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of shares, net of offering costs | 0 | 95 | 830 | 183,191 | 0 | 184,116 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 184,116 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common shares into treasury | 0 | 0 | (566 | ) | 0 | 0 | (566 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (566 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options exercised | 0 | 0 | 0 | 171 | 0 | 171 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 171 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation, net | 0 | 0 | (292 | ) | 3,154 | 17 | 2,879 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,879 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on issued long-term performance-based share awards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (46 | ) | (46 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (46 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on common shares ($0.13 per share) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (9,445 | ) | (9,445 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (9,445 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on preferred shares | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (20,066 | ) | (20,066 | ) | (8 | ) | 0 | 0 | (8 | ) | (20,074 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,280 | 12,280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,280 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2010 | $ | 141 | $ | 731 | ($ | 28 | ) | $ | 1,656,246 | ($ | 191,544 | ) | $ | 1,465,546 | $ | 40 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 40 | $ | 1,465,586 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 12,280 | $ | 12,838 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 82,910 | 82,331 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs and mortgage premium | 621 | 716 | ||||||
Gain on sale of property | (29,168 | ) | 0 | |||||
Loss on impairment of property | 23,568 | 0 | ||||||
Deferred compensation | 2,879 | 2,469 | ||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | 139 | (450 | ) | |||||
Other | (566 | ) | 0 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Restricted cash reserves, net | (1,466 | ) | (810 | ) | ||||
Rent receivable | 0 | 85 | ||||||
Hotel receivables | (7,185 | ) | (8,301 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax asset | 3,370 | 4,824 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (17,909 | ) | 1,359 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 13,090 | (11,069 | ) | |||||
Advance deposits | 1,067 | (497 | ) | |||||
Accrued interest | (289 | ) | (589 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 83,341 | 82,906 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Improvements and additions to properties | (18,528 | ) | (21,999 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of properties | (386,032 | ) | 0 | |||||
Purchase of office furniture and equipment | (112 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||
Restricted cash reserves, net | (3,030 | ) | (879 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of properties | 66,723 | 0 | ||||||
Property insurance proceeds | 1,207 | 0 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (339,772 | ) | (22,894 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Borrowings under credit facilities | 385,299 | 240,389 | ||||||
Repayments under credit facilities | (256,558 | ) | (472,374 | ) | ||||
Repayments of mortgage loans | (13,044 | ) | (70,094 | ) | ||||
Payment of deferred financing costs | (32 | ) | 0 | |||||
Return of contributions to redeemable noncontrolling interest | (108 | ) | 0 | |||||
Purchase of treasury shares | (566 | ) | (365 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 171 | 342 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares | 190,322 | 272,361 | ||||||
Payment of common offering costs | (6,316 | ) | (11,924 | ) | ||||
Distributions on issued long-term performance-based share awards | (46 | ) | 0 | |||||
Distributions on preferred shares/units | (20,074 | ) | (20,073 | ) | ||||
Distributions on common shares/units | (2,032 | ) | (4,543 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 277,016 | (66,281 | ) | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 20,585 | (6,269 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 8,441 | 18,056 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 29,026 | $ | 11,787 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
1. Organization
LaSalle Hotel Properties (the “Company”), a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”), primarily buys, owns, redevelops and leases upscale and luxury full-service hotels located in convention, resort and major urban business markets. The Company is a self-administered and self-managed REIT as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a REIT, the Company generally is not subject to federal corporate income tax on that portion of its net income that is currently distributed to shareholders. The income of LaSalle Hotel Lessee, Inc. (“LHL”), the Company’s taxable-REIT subsidiary, is subject to taxation at normal corporate rates.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company owned interests in 33 hotels with over 8,800 guest rooms located in 10 states and the District of Columbia. Each hotel is leased to LHL (see Note 8) or a wholly-owned subsidiary of LHL under a participating lease that provides for rental payments equal to the greater of (i) a base rent or (ii) a participating rent based on hotel revenues. The LHL leases expire between 2012 and 2014. Lease revenue from LHL and its wholly-owned subsidiaries is eliminated in consolidation. A third-party or non-affiliated hotel operator manages each hotel, which is also subject to a hotel management agreement. Additionally, the Company owns a 95.0% joint venture interest in Modern Magic Hotel LLC (see Note 3).
Substantially all of the Company’s assets are held by, and all of its operations are conducted through, LaSalle Hotel Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. The Company owned, through a combination of direct and indirect interests, all of the common units of the Operating Partnership at September 30, 2010. See Note 6 for additional disclosures on common and preferred Operating Partnership units.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) applicable to interim financial information. As such, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. These unaudited consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for the periods presented. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010 due to seasonal and other factors. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, LHL and their subsidiaries in which they have a controlling interest, including joint ventures. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and the amounts of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
6
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
Substantially all of the Company’s revenues and expenses are generated by the operations of the individual hotels. The Company records revenues and expenses that are estimated by the hotel operators to produce quarterly financial statements because the management contracts do not require the hotel operators to submit actual results within a time frame that permits the Company to use actual results when preparing its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for filing by the deadline prescribed by the SEC. Generally, the Company records actual revenue and expense amounts for the first two months of each quarter and revenue and expense estimates for the last month of each quarter. Each quarter, the Company reviews the estimated revenue and expense amounts provided by the hotel operators for reasonableness based upon historical results for prior periods and internal Company forecasts. The Company records any differences between recorded estimated amounts and actual amounts in the following quarter; historically, these differences have not been material. The Company believes the quarterly revenues and expenses, recorded on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations based on an aggregate estimate, are fairly stated.
Share-Based Compensation
From time to time, the Company awards nonvested shares under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (“2009 Plan”) as compensation to officers, employees, and non-employee trustees (see Note 7). The shares issued to officers and employees vest over three to nine years. The Company recognizes compensation expense for nonvested shares on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based upon the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance, adjusted for forfeitures.
Noncontrolling Interests
Per GAAP guidance, noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The ownership interests in the subsidiary that are held by owners other than the parent are noncontrolling interests. Under this guidance, such noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the consolidated statements of operations, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and noncontrolling interests. Consolidated statements of equity include beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for shareholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests and total equity.
However, per GAAP requirements, the Company’s securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets at the option of the holder, not solely within the control of the Company, must be classified outside of permanent equity. The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to redemption provisions. Additionally, with respect to noncontrolling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the contract by delivery of its own shares, the Company considered existing GAAP guidance to evaluate whether the Company controls the actions or events necessary to issue the maximum number of shares that could be required to be delivered under share settlement of the contract.
As of September 30, 2010, the consolidated results of the Company include the following ownership interests held by owners other than the Company: the outside preferred ownership interests in a tax-related ownership entity and the 5.0% interest of the outside partner in the Modern Magic Hotel LLC joint venture.
With respect to the preferred ownership interests in a tax-related ownership entity held by third parties, such interests are not redeemable by the holders. Accordingly, the Company has determined that these interests are noncontrolling interests to be included in permanent equity, separate from the Company’s shareholders’ equity, in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of equity. Net income or loss related to these noncontrolling interests is included in net income or loss in the consolidated statements of operations.
Regarding the 5.0% interest of the outside partner in the Modern Magic Hotel LLC joint venture, the operating agreement contains a liquidation option for the 5.0% investor which, in certain circumstances, could result in a net cash settlement outside the control of the Company. Accordingly, consistent with GAAP requirements, the Company records this noncontrolling interest outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Net income or loss is allocated to this noncontrolling interest in the consolidated statements of operations. Based on the Company’s evaluation of the redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest, the Company has reflected
7
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
this interest at its carrying value as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 as the carrying value exceeded the estimated redemption value.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company has adopted the provisions under GAAP for fair value measurements. Fair value measurements during 2010 consisted of the impairment of one of our hotel properties (see Note 3), the allocation of the purchase price for acquired hotels (see Note 3) and the recurring disclosure associated with the valuation of financial instruments (see Note 4).
In evaluating the fair value, GAAP outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and a reporting entity’s own assumptions about market data (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of inputs used to determine fair value, which are then classified and disclosed in one of the three categories. The three levels are as follows:
Level 1—Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.
Level 3—Model-derived valuations with unobservable inputs.
As required by the guidance, the Company classifies assets and liabilities based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a pronouncement which amends GAAP as follows: a) to require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, identifying the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, b) to require ongoing reassessment of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, rather than only when specific events occur, c) to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, d) to amend certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity, e) to add an additional reconsideration event when changes in facts and circumstances pertinent to a variable interest entity occur, f) to eliminate the exception for troubled debt restructuring regarding variable interest entity reconsideration, and g) to require advanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This pronouncement was effective for the first annual reporting period that began after November 15, 2009. Earlier adoption was prohibited. Upon adoption, the Company reevaluated its interest in the Modern Magic Hotel LLC joint venture (see Note 3), in light of the amendments to GAAP described above. Based on the evaluation performed, management has concluded that there is no change from its initial assessment and continues to consolidate the entity.
3. Investment in Properties
Investment in hotel properties is net of accumulated depreciation of $600,043 and $576,013 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The Company, through Modern Magic Hotel LLC, a joint venture in which the Company holds a 95.0% controlling interest, owns floors 2 through 13 and a portion of the first floor of the existing 52-story IBM Building located at 330 N. Wabash Avenue in downtown Chicago, IL. The joint venture has developed plans to convert the existing vacant floors to a hotel. Redevelopment activity has been temporarily suspended, but is expected to resume when economic conditions and lodging industry fundamentals demonstrate sustained improvement. As a result of the suspension of redevelopment activity, the Company has temporarily ceased the capitalization of interest, real estate taxes and insurance costs incurred by the development. Since the Company holds a controlling interest, the
8
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
accounts of the joint venture have been included in the consolidated financial statements. Initial acquisition and subsequent costs, including previously capitalized interest, real estate taxes and insurance costs, totaling $62,508 and $62,190 are included in property under development in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The 5.0% interest of the outside partner is included in redeemable noncontrolling interest in consolidated entity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company acquired 100% interests in four upscale, full-service hotels, each of which is leased to LHL. The Company recorded the acquisitions at fair value using model-derived valuations, which are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 2), with all of the purchase price allocated to investment in hotel properties and hotel working capital assets and liabilities. The acquisition allocations may be adjusted if any of the assumptions underlying the purchase accounting change. In connection with the acquisitions, the Company incurred acquisition transaction costs that were expensed as incurred in accordance with GAAP. The following is a summary of the acquisitions:
Acquisition Transaction Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hotel Name | Acquisition Date | Number of Rooms | Location | Purchase Price | Manager | For the three months ended September 30, 2010 | For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Sofitel Washington, DC Lafayette Square | March 1, 2010 | 237 | Washington, DC | $ | 95,000 | Sofitel (Accor SA) | $ | — | $ | 1,471 | ||||||||||||
Hotel Monaco San Francisco | September 1, 2010 | 201 | San Francisco, CA | 68,500 | Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, L.L.C. | 143 | 143 | |||||||||||||||
Westin Philadelphia | September 1, 2010 | 294 | Philadelphia, PA | 145,000 | HEI Hotels & Resorts | 212 | 212 | |||||||||||||||
Embassy Suites Philadelphia - Center City | September 1, 2010 | 288 | Philadelphia, PA | 79,000 | HEI Hotels & Resorts | 200 | 200 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 387,500 | $ | 555 | $ | 2,026 | ||||||||||||||||
The source of the funding for the March 1, 2010 acquisition was the Company’s senior unsecured credit facility, which was subsequently paid down with proceeds from the March 2, 2010 public offering of common shares of beneficial interest (see Note 6). The sources of the funding for the September 1, 2010 acquisitions were the Company’s senior unsecured credit facility and available cash, including cash from operations, proceeds from the sale of the Seaview Resort and proceeds from prior issuances of common shares of beneficial interest under the Company’s equity distribution agreements (see Note 6). Total revenues and net income from the acquired hotels of $20,607 and $2,525, respectively, are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Condensed Pro Forma Financial Information
The results of operations of the acquired properties are included in the consolidated statements of operations beginning on their respective acquisition dates. The following unaudited condensed pro forma financial information is presented as if the 2010 acquisitions, including the above described acquisitions and the Hotel Roger Williams which was acquired on October 6, 2010 (see Note 12), had been consummated as of the beginning of the respective annual reporting periods. In addition, for purposes of the unaudited condensed pro forma financial information only, the March 2, 2010 issuance of 6,152,500 common shares of beneficial interest and the August 2010 issuance of 3,270,936 common shares of beneficial interest are presented as if the issuances had occurred at the beginning of the respective annual reporting periods. The unaudited condensed pro forma financial information is for comparative purposes only and not necessarily indicative of what actual results of operations of the Company would have been had the acquisitions been consummated at the beginning of the respective annual reporting periods, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods. The unaudited condensed pro forma financial information has not been adjusted for property sales.
9
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 183,626 | $ | 175,652 | $ | 506,162 | $ | 504,402 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 17,035 | $ | 10,474 | $ | 13,525 | $ | 14,110 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | $ | 10,363 | $ | 3,775 | $ | (6,505 | ) | $ | (5,957 | ) | ||||
Earnings per common share - basic | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | ||||
Earnings per common share - diluted | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||
Basic | 72,570,906 | 72,426,154 | 72,566,076 | 61,014,138 | ||||||||||
Diluted | 72,670,378 | 72,501,637 | 72,566,076 | 61,014,138 |
Discontinued Operations
Effective August 20, 2010, the Company entered into a contract to sell the Seaview Resort upon receiving a nonrefundable deposit and the property was determined to be held for sale as of that date. This was deemed a triggering event for impairment since it represented a change in management’s plan with respect to the property, resulting in a change in the property’s estimated holding period. Accordingly, the Company performed an impairment analysis and recorded an impairment loss of $23,568 after determining fair value using the sales contract, which is classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 2). On September 1, 2010, the Company sold the Seaview Resort for $20,000. The Company retained responsibility for the repair of the roof at the property which the Company believes will be covered by its property insurance, less a standard deductible amount which is included in the impairment loss. The estimated cost of the project is between $3,000 and $6,000, with the Company’s exposure limited by contract to $5,000. Accordingly, the Company recorded a liability for related costs of $5,000, of which the unpaid balance of $4,971 is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and a receivable from the insurance company of $4,975, which is included in prepaid expenses and other assets, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2010. The project is expected to be completed by mid-2011.
Effective August 9, 2010, the Company entered into a contract to sell the Westin City Center Dallas upon receiving a nonrefundable deposit and the property was determined to be held for sale as of that date. This was deemed a triggering event for impairment since it represented a change in management’s plan with respect to the property, resulting in a change in the property’s estimated holding period. Accordingly, the Company performed an impairment analysis and determined that no impairment was present. On September 30, 2010, the Company sold the Westin City Center Dallas for $50,000, resulting in a gain of $29,168.
The following is a summary of the results of the properties classified in discontinued operations:
For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Operating revenues | $ | 7,799 | $ | 9,753 | $ | 25,666 | $ | 28,833 | |||||||
Operating expenses | 8,687 | 9,006 | 27,555 | 28,892 | |||||||||||
(Loss) income from operations before gain/loss | (888 | ) | 747 | (1,889 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on sale | 29,168 | — | 29,168 | — | |||||||||||
Loss on impairment | (23,568 | ) | — | (23,568 | ) | — | |||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 4,712 | 747 | 3,711 | (59 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit | 166 | 176 | 459 | 972 | |||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations | $ | 4,878 | $ | 923 | $ | 4,170 | $ | 913 | |||||||
10
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
4. Long-Term Debt
On February 1, 2010, the Company repaid without fee or penalty the Le Montrose Suite Hotel mortgage loan in the amount of $12,836 plus accrued interest with cash and additional borrowings on its senior unsecured credit facility. The loan was due to mature in July 2010.
Debt as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following:
Balance Outstanding as of | ||||||||||
Debt | Interest Rate | Maturity Date | September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
Credit facilities | ||||||||||
Senior unsecured credit facility | Floating (a) | April 2011 (a) | $ | 135,000 | $ | — | ||||
LHL unsecured credit facility | Floating (b) | April 2011 (b) | — | 6,259 | ||||||
Total borrowings under credit facilities | 135,000 | 6,259 | ||||||||
Massport Bonds | ||||||||||
Harborside Hyatt Conference Center & Hotel (taxable) | Floating (c) | March 2018 | 5,400 | 5,400 | ||||||
Harborside Hyatt Conference Center & Hotel (tax exempt) | Floating (c) | March 2018 | 37,100 | 37,100 | ||||||
Total bonds payable | 42,500 | 42,500 | ||||||||
Mortgage loans | ||||||||||
Le Montrose Suite Hotel | 8.08% | July 2010 (d) | — | 12,859 | ||||||
Hilton San Diego Gaslamp Quarter | 5.35% | June 2012 | 59,600 | 59,600 | ||||||
Hotel Solamar | 5.49% | December 2013 | 60,900 | 60,900 | ||||||
Hotel Deca | 5.64% | August 2014 | 9,723 | 9,908 | ||||||
Westin Copley Place | 5.28% | August 2015 | 210,000 | 210,000 | ||||||
Westin Michigan Avenue | 5.75% | April 2016 | 140,000 | 140,000 | ||||||
Indianapolis Marriott Downtown | 5.99% | July 2016 | 101,780 | 101,780 | ||||||
Mortgage loans at stated value | 582,003 | 595,047 | ||||||||
Unamortized loan premium(e) | 289 | 342 | ||||||||
Total mortgage loans | 582,292 | 595,389 | ||||||||
Total debt | $ | 759,792 | $ | 644,148 | ||||||
(a) | Borrowings bear interest at floating rates equal to, at the Company’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or (ii) an Adjusted Base Rate plus an applicable margin. As of September 30, 2010, the rate, including the applicable margin, for the Company’s outstanding LIBOR borrowings was 0.96%. There were no borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2009. The Company has the option to extend the credit facility’s maturity date to April 2012. |
(b) | Borrowings bear interest at floating rates equal to, at LHL’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or (ii) an Adjusted Base Rate plus an applicable margin. As of December 31, 2009, the rate, including the applicable margin, for LHL’s outstanding LIBOR borrowings was 0.93%. There were no borrowings outstanding as of September 30, 2010. LHL has the option to extend the credit facility’s maturity date to April 2012. |
(c) | The Massport Bonds are secured by letters of credit issued by the Royal Bank of Scotland that expire in 2011. The Royal Bank of Scotland letters of credit are secured by the Harborside Hyatt Conference Center & Hotel. The bonds bear interest based on weekly floating rates. The interest rates as of September 30, 2010 were 0.30% and 0.35% for the $5,400 and $37,100 bonds, respectively. The interest rates as of December 31, 2009 were 0.35% and 0.32% for the $5,400 and $37,100 bonds, respectively. The Company also incurs an annual letter of credit fee of 1.10%. |
(d) | The Company repaid the mortgage loan on February 1, 2010 through borrowings on its senior unsecured credit facility. |
(e) | Mortgage debt includes an unamortized loan premium on the mortgage loan on Hotel Deca of $289 as of September 30, 2010 and $342 as of December 31, 2009. |
The Company incurred interest expense of $8,872 and $26,369 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $9,171 and $28,915 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred financing costs of $217 and $674 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $232 and $767 for the three and nine months
11
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Interest was capitalized in the amounts of $59 and $62 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $24 and $673 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants, current on all loan payments and not otherwise in default under the credit facilities, bonds or mortgages.
Credit Facilities
The Company has a senior unsecured credit facility from a syndicate of banks that provides for a maximum borrowing of up to $450,000. The credit facility’s maturity date is April 13, 2011 with, at the Company’s option, a one-year extension option. The senior unsecured credit facility contains certain financial covenants relating to debt service coverage, net worth and total funded indebtedness. It also contains financial covenants that, assuming no defaults, allow the Company to make shareholder distributions. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at floating rates equal to, at the Company’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or (ii) an “Adjusted Base Rate” plus an applicable margin. As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants and was not otherwise in default under the credit facility. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the senior unsecured credit facility was 1.0% for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, and 1.1% and 1.3% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, the Company is required to pay a variable unused commitment fee determined from a ratings or leverage based pricing matrix, currently set at 0.125% of the unused portion of the senior unsecured credit facility. The Company incurred unused commitment fees of $125 and $402 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $139 and $285 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had $135,000 and zero, respectively, of outstanding borrowings under the senior unsecured credit facility.
LHL has a $25,000 unsecured revolving credit facility to be used for working capital and general lessee corporate purposes. The credit facility’s maturity date is April 13, 2011 with, at LHL’s option, a one-year extension option. Borrowings under the LHL credit facility bear interest at floating rates equal to, at LHL’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or (ii) an “Adjusted Base Rate” plus an applicable margin. As of September 30, 2010, LHL was in compliance with all debt covenants and was not otherwise in default under the credit facility. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the LHL credit facility was 1.0% and 0.9% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and 1.1% and 1.2% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, LHL is required to pay a variable unused commitment fee determined from a ratings or leverage based pricing matrix, currently set at 0.125% of the unused portion of the LHL credit facility. LHL incurred unused commitment fees of $7 and $18 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $5 and $13 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, LHL had zero and $6,259, respectively, of outstanding borrowings under the LHL credit facility.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Disclosures about fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to management as of the valuation date. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts at which these instruments could be purchased, sold or settled. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt and the credit spreads over variable market rates on its variable rate debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates or credit spreads consistent with the maturity of the debt obligation with similar credit policies, which is classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 2). Rates and credit spreads take into consideration general market conditions and maturity. As of September 30, 2010, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt were $759,792 and $746,185, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt were $644,148 and $563,731, respectively. The carrying amounts of the Company’s other financial instruments approximate fair value because of the relatively short maturities of these instruments.
12
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
5. Commitments and Contingencies
Ground and Air Rights Leases
Five of the Company’s hotels, San Diego Paradise Point Resort and Spa, Harborside Hyatt Conference Center & Hotel, Indianapolis Marriott Downtown, The Hilton San Diego Resort and Spa and Hotel Solamar, and part of the parking lot at Sheraton Bloomington Hotel Minneapolis South are subject to ground leases under non-cancelable operating leases expiring from October 2014 to December 2102. The lease on the parking lot at the Sheraton Bloomington Hotel Minneapolis South expires in 2014, but the Company has an option to extend the lease for 7 years to 2021. None of the remaining leases expire prior to 2020. The Westin Copley Place is subject to a long term air rights lease which expires on December 14, 2077 and requires no payments through maturity. The ground lease related to the Indianapolis Marriott Downtown requires future ground rent payments of one dollar per year. Total ground rent expense was $1,742 and $4,639 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $1,890 and $4,891 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
Reserve Funds
Certain of the Company’s agreements with its hotel managers, franchisors and lenders have provisions for the Company to provide funds, generally 4.0% to 5.0% of hotel revenues, sufficient to cover the cost of (a) certain non-routine repairs and maintenance to the hotels and (b) replacements and renewals to the hotels’ furniture, fixtures, and equipment. Certain agreements require that the Company reserve cash. As of September 30, 2010, $9,238 was available in restricted cash reserves for future capital expenditures. The Company has sufficient cash on hand and availability on its credit facilities to cover required capital expenditures under agreements that do not necessitate that the Company separately reserve cash.
Restricted Cash Reserves
At September 30, 2010, the Company held $17,653 in restricted cash reserves. Included in such amounts are (i) $9,238 of reserve funds relating to the hotels with leases or operating agreements requiring the Company to maintain restricted cash to fund future capital expenditures, (ii) $7,213 deposited in mortgage escrow accounts pursuant to mortgage obligations to pre-fund a portion of certain operating expenses and debt payments, and (iii) $1,202 held by insurance companies on our behalf to be refunded or applied to future liabilities.
Litigation
The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels and the Company to the risk of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. The Company is not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to the Company’s knowledge, is any litigation threatened against the Company, other than routine actions for negligence or other claims and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability insurance and all of which collectively are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, results of operations or business or financial condition of the Company.
6. Equity
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest
On January 1, 2010, the Company issued 8,097 common shares of beneficial interest from treasury and authorized an additional 28,155 deferred shares to the independent members of its Board of Trustees for their earned 2009 compensation pursuant to award arrangements existing on or before January 1, 2009.
On January 1, 2010, the Company issued 11,688 restricted common shares of beneficial interest to the Company’s executives related to 18,596 long-term performance-based share awards, which were granted on December 20, 2006. The remaining 6,908 shares were forfeited based on performance on January 1, 2010 (see Note 7). One-third of the restricted shares, or 3,896 shares, vested immediately and the remaining two-thirds of the restricted shares, or 7,792 shares, will vest over two years, starting January 1, 2011. These common shares of beneficial interest were issued under the 1998 Share Option and Incentive Plan, which was in place prior to the 2009 Plan.
13
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
On January 27, 2010, the Company granted 49,122 restricted common shares of beneficial interest to the Company’s executives and employees, of which 7,212 were issued from treasury. The restricted shares granted vest over three years, starting January 1, 2011. These common shares of beneficial interest were issued under the 2009 Plan.
On March 2, 2010, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 6,152,500 common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.01 per share, including 802,500 common shares pursuant to an overallotment option exercise by the underwriters. After deducting the underwriters’ discounts and commissions and other offering costs, the Company raised net proceeds of approximately $109,150. The net proceeds were used to pay down amounts outstanding under the Company’s senior unsecured credit facility and under the LHL unsecured credit facility, and for general corporate purposes.
On April 19, 2010, the Company granted 1,153 restricted common shares of beneficial interest to the Company’s employees, all of which were issued out of treasury. The restricted shares granted vest over three years, starting January 1, 2011. These common shares of beneficial interest were issued under the 2009 Plan.
On April 21, 2010, the Company entered into separate equity distribution agreements (the “Agreements”) with each of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (collectively, the “Managers”). Under the terms of the Agreements, the Company may issue and sell from time to time through or to the Managers, as sales agents and/or principals, the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest having an aggregate offering price of up to $150,000.
During August 2010, the Company sold 3,270,936 common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.01 per share, under the Agreements, of which 36,044 were issued from treasury. After deducting the underwriters’ discounts and commissions and other offering costs, the Company raised net proceeds of approximately $74,856. The net proceeds were used to fund in part the September 1, 2010 acquisitions of the Hotel Monaco San Francisco, the Westin Philadelphia and the Embassy Suites Philadelphia – Center City.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had availability under the Agreements to issue and sell common shares of beneficial interest having an aggregate offering price of up to $73,500.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company received 26,262 common shares of beneficial interest related to executives and employees surrendering shares to pay taxes at the time restricted shares vested and 27,788 common shares of beneficial interest related to the forfeiture of restricted shares due to employee resignations.
Common Dividends
The Company paid the following dividends on common shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
Dividend per Share | For the Quarter Ended | Record Date | Payable Date | ||||
$ | 0.01 | 31-Dec-2009 | 31-Dec-2009 | 15-Jan-2010 | |||
$ | 0.01 | 31-Mar-2010 | 31-Mar-2010 | 15-Apr-2010 | |||
$ | 0.01 | 30-Jun-2010 | 30-Jun-2010 | 15-Jul-2010 |
Treasury Shares
Treasury shares are accounted for under the cost method. During the nine months ended September, 2010, the Company received 54,050 common shares of beneficial interest related to executives and employees surrendering shares to pay taxes at the time restricted shares vested and forfeiture of restricted shares due to employee resignations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company re-issued 8,097 treasury shares related to earned 2009 compensation for the Board of Trustees pursuant to award arrangements existing on or before January 1, 2009, 8,365 treasury shares related to the grant of restricted common shares of beneficial interest in
14
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
January and April 2010, and 36,044 treasury shares related to the sale of common shares of beneficial interest under the Agreements in August 2010.
At September 30, 2010, there were 1,544 common shares of beneficial interest in treasury.
Preferred Shares
The Series B Preferred Shares, Series C Preferred Shares (which were issued effective February 1, 2009 and exchanged for Series G Preferred Shares on April 16, 2009), Series D Preferred Shares, Series E Preferred Shares, and Series G Preferred Shares (collectively, the “Preferred Shares”) rank senior to the common shares of beneficial interest and on parity with each other with respect to payment of distributions; the Company will not pay any distributions, or set aside any funds for the payment of distributions, on its common shares of beneficial interest unless it has also paid (or set aside for payment) the full cumulative distributions on the Preferred Shares for the current and all past dividend periods. The outstanding Preferred Shares do not have any maturity date, and are not subject to mandatory redemption. The difference between the carrying value and the redemption amount of the Preferred Shares are the offering costs. In addition, the Company is not required to set aside funds to redeem the Preferred Shares. The Company currently has the option to redeem the Series B Preferred Shares and Series D Preferred Shares. The Company may not optionally redeem the Series E Preferred Shares or Series G Preferred Shares, prior to February 8, 2011 and November 17, 2011, respectively, except in limited circumstances relating to the Company’s continuing qualification as a REIT or as discussed below. After those dates, the Company may, at its option, redeem the Preferred Shares, in whole or from time to time in part, by payment of $25.00 per share, plus any accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions to and including the date of redemption.
The following Preferred Shares were outstanding as of September 30, 2010:
Security Type | Number of Shares | |||
8 3/8% Series B Preferred Shares | 1,100,000 | |||
7 1/2% Series D Preferred Shares | 3,170,000 | |||
8% Series E Preferred Shares | 3,500,000 | |||
7 1/4% Series G Preferred Shares | 6,348,888 |
On February 1, 2009, each of the Series C Preferred Units was redeemed and the Company issued 2,348,888 7.25% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest (the “Series C Preferred Shares”). On April 16, 2009, the holder exchanged all of the Series C Preferred Shares for an equal number of 7.25% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest (liquidation preference $25.00 per share), $0.01 par value per share (the “Series G Preferred Shares”), of the Company in a private transaction exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended. On April 17, 2009, the Company filed a registration statement with the SEC to register the resale of the Series G Preferred Shares. On May 13, 2009, in connection with the exchange, the Company received a fee of $1,000, which the Company recognized in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
15
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
Preferred Dividends
The Company paid the following dividends on preferred shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
Security Type | Dividend per Share(1) | For the Quarter Ended | Record Date | Payable Date | |||||
8 3/8% Series B | $ | 0.52 | 31-Dec-2009 | 1-Jan-2010 | 15-Jan-2010 | ||||
7 1/2% Series D | $ | 0.47 | 31-Dec-2009 | 1-Jan-2010 | 15-Jan-2010 | ||||
8% Series E | $ | 0.50 | 31-Dec-2009 | 1-Jan-2010 | 15-Jan-2010 | ||||
7 1/4% Series G | $ | 0.45 | 31-Dec-2009 | 1-Jan-2010 | 15-Jan-2010 | ||||
8 3/8% Series B | $ | 0.52 | 31-Mar-2010 | 1-Apr-2010 | 15-Apr-2010 | ||||
7 1/2% Series D | $ | 0.47 | 31-Mar-2010 | 1-Apr-2010 | 15-Apr-2010 | ||||
8% Series E | $ | 0.50 | 31-Mar-2010 | 1-Apr-2010 | 15-Apr-2010 | ||||
7 1/4% Series G | $ | 0.45 | 31-Mar-2010 | 1-Apr-2010 | 15-Apr-2010 | ||||
8 3/8% Series B | $ | 0.52 | 30-Jun-2010 | 1-Jul-2010 | 15-Jul-2010 | ||||
7 1/2% Series D | $ | 0.47 | 30-Jun-2010 | 1-Jul-2010 | 15-Jul-2010 | ||||
8% Series E | $ | 0.50 | 30-Jun-2010 | 1-Jul-2010 | 15-Jul-2010 | ||||
7 1/4% Series G | $ | 0.45 | 30-Jun-2010 | 1-Jul-2010 | 15-Jul-2010 |
(1) | Amounts are rounded to the nearest whole cent for presentation purposes. |
Noncontrolling Interest of Common Units in Operating Partnership
As of September 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership had no units held by a third party outstanding.
Noncontrolling Interest of Preferred Units in Operating Partnership
There were no preferred units outstanding as of September 30, 2010.
7. Equity Incentive Plan
At the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 23, 2009, the common shareholders approved the 2009 Plan, under which the Company may issue equity-based awards to officers, employees, non-employee trustees and any other persons providing services to or for the Company and its subsidiaries. The 2009 Plan provides for a maximum of 1,800,000 common shares of beneficial interest to be issued in the form of share options, share appreciation rights, restricted share awards, performance shares, phantom shares and other equity-based awards. In addition, the maximum number of common shares subject to awards of any combination that may be granted under the 2009 Plan during any fiscal year to any one individual is limited to 500,000 shares. The 2009 Plan terminates on January 28, 2019. The 2009 Plan authorized, among other things: (i) the grant of share options that qualify as incentive options under the Code, (ii) the grant of share options that do not so qualify, (iii) the grant of common shares in lieu of cash for trustees’ fees, (iv) grants of common shares in lieu of cash compensation, and (v) the making of loans to acquire common shares in lieu of compensation (to the extent permitted by law and applicable provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002). The exercise price of share options is determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees, but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant. Restricted share awards and options under the 2009 Plan vest over a period determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees, generally a three to four year period, with certain awards vesting over periods of up to nine years. The duration of each option is also determined by the Compensation Committee, subject to applicable laws and regulation. There were no unvested stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2010. At September 30, 2010, there were 1,543,254 common shares available for future grant under the 2009 Plan.
Service Condition Nonvested Share Awards
From time to time, the Company awards nonvested shares to members of the Board of Trustees, executives, and employees. The nonvested shares vest over three to nine years based on continued employment. The Company measures compensation costs for the nonvested shares based upon the fair market value of its common shares at the date of grant. Compensation costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period and are included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
16
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
A summary of the Company’s service condition nonvested shares as of September 30, 2010 is as follows:
Number of Shares | Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2010 | 532,905 | $ | 24.51 | |||
Granted | 50,275 | 21.12 | ||||
Vested | (74,473 | ) | 26.45 | |||
Forfeited | (27,788 | ) | 17.05 | |||
Nonvested at September 30, 2010(1) | 480,919 | $ | 24.29 | |||
(1) | Amount excludes 7,792 long-term performance-based shares which were earned but nonvested due to a service condition as of September 30, 2010. |
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were $7,618 and $8,783, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested share awards. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these costs were expected to be recognized over a weighted–average period of 3.7 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was zero and $1,578, respectively, and during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was zero and $1,049, respectively. The compensation costs (net of forfeitures) that have been included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations were $638 and $1,908 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and ($80) and $2,341 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
Long-Term Performance-Based Share Awards
On December 20, 2006, the Company’s Board of Trustees granted 18,596 performance-based awards of nonvested shares to executives. The actual amounts of the awards earned were determined on January 1, 2010, based on the performance period of January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2009, in accordance with the terms of the agreements. On January 1, 2010, the executives earned 62.9% of the target number of shares, or 11,688 shares. The shares representing the difference between 62.9% and 100% of the target, or 6,908 shares, were forfeited on January 1, 2010. One-third of the shares earned, or 3,896 shares, vested immediately on January 1, 2010 and the remaining two-thirds of the shares earned, or 7,792 shares, will vest in equal amounts on January 1, 2011 and January 1, 2012 based on continued employment. The executives received cash payments on the earned shares equal to the value of all dividends paid on common shares from December 31, 2006 until the determination date, January 1, 2010. As of January 1, 2010, the executives are entitled to receive dividends as declared and paid on the earned shares and to vote the shares, including those shares subject to further vesting.
On November 3, 2009 and January 27, 2010, the Company’s Board of Trustees granted 10,228 and 48,648 performance-based awards of nonvested shares to executives, respectively. The actual amounts of the awards will be determined on January 1, 2013, based on the performance period of January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012, in accordance with the terms of the agreements. The actual amounts of the awards will range from 0% to 200% of the target amounts, depending on the performance analysis stipulated in the agreements, and none of the performance shares are outstanding until issued in accordance with award agreements based on performance. After the actual amounts of the awards are determined (or earned) on January 1, 2013, the earned shares will be issued and outstanding with a portion subject to further vesting based on continued employment. The executives will receive cash payments equal to the value of all dividends paid on common shares from December 31, 2009 until the determination date, January 1, 2013, on all of the earned shares, including those shares subject to further vesting. Such amounts will be paid to the awardees on or about January 1, 2013. Thereafter, the executives will be entitled to receive dividends as declared and paid on the earned shares and to vote the shares, including those shares subject to further vesting.
The fair values were determined by the Company utilizing valuation reports which used the Monte Carlo valuation method provided by a third-party consultant. The measurement of performance for the 2009 and 2010
17
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
awards is substantially the same as the performance measurement for previously granted long-term performance-based share awards. Assumptions used in the valuations consisted of the following:
Capital Market Assumptions
• | Factors associated with the underlying performance of the Company’s share price and shareholder returns over the term of the performance awards including total share return volatility and risk-free interest. |
• | Factors associated with the relative performance of the Company’s share price and shareholder returns when compared to those companies which compose the index including beta as a means to breakdown total volatility into market-related and company specific volatilities. |
• | The valuation has been performed in a risk-neutral framework, so no assumption has been made with respect to an equity risk premium. |
Employee Behavioral Assumptions
• | As termination of employment results in forfeiture of the award, demographic assumptions have not been used. |
The assumptions used were as follows for each performance measure:
Volatility | Interest Rates | Dividend Yield | Stock Beta | Fair Value of Components of Award | Weighting of Total Awards | |||||||||||
November 3, 2009 Grants | ||||||||||||||||
Target amounts | 83.10 | % | 1.70 | % | N/A | N/A | $ | 30.50 | 20.00 | % | ||||||
NAREIT index | 83.10 | % | 1.70 | % | N/A | 1.280 | $ | 28.72 | 40.00 | % | ||||||
Peer companies | 83.10 | % | 1.70 | % | N/A | 0.909 | $ | 30.61 | 40.00 | % | ||||||
January 27, 2010 Grants | ||||||||||||||||
Target amounts | 83.30 | % | 1.40 | % | N/A | N/A | $ | 30.02 | 33.40 | % | ||||||
NAREIT index | 83.30 | % | 1.40 | % | N/A | 1.281 | $ | 28.96 | 33.30 | % | ||||||
Peer companies | 83.30 | % | 1.40 | % | N/A | 0.908 | $ | 29.28 | 33.30 | % |
18
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
A summary of the Company’s long-term performance-based share awards as of September 30, 2010 is as follows:
Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2010 | 153,236 | $ | 26.03 | |||
Granted | 58,876 | 29.49 | ||||
Vested(2) | (3,896 | ) | 49.53 | |||
Forfeited(2) | (6,908 | ) | 49.53 | |||
Nonvested at September 30, 2010(1) | 201,308 | $ | 28.44 | |||
(1) | Amount excludes 150,000 shares that have been committed for future performance share grants. Fair value will be estimated at the beginning of the performance measurement periods on July 1, 2011 and July 1, 2014. |
(2) | Amounts relate to the December 2006 awards which were determined on January 1, 2010, as described fully in the above section. |
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were $3,158 and $2,393, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation costs related to long-term performance-based share awards. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these costs were expected to be recognized over a weighted–average period of 2.9 years. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were 3,896 and zero long-term performance-based share awards vested, respectively. Additionally, there were 7,792 and zero long-term performance-based awards earned but non-vested due to a service condition as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The compensation costs (net of forfeitures) related to long-term performance-based share awards that have been included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations were $324 and $971 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and ($504) and $128 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
8. LHL
A significant portion of the Company’s revenue is derived from operating revenues generated by the hotels leased by LHL.
Other indirect hotel operating expenses consist of the following expenses incurred by the hotels leased by LHL:
For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
General and administrative | $ | 13,632 | $ | 11,904 | $ | 38,464 | $ | 36,279 | ||||||||
Sales and marketing | 11,075 | 9,486 | 31,602 | 29,406 | ||||||||||||
Repairs and maintenance | 6,618 | 5,910 | 19,064 | 17,425 | ||||||||||||
Utilities and insurance | 6,426 | 6,150 | 17,859 | 17,995 | ||||||||||||
Management and incentive fees | 6,424 | 5,942 | 16,511 | 16,082 | ||||||||||||
Franchise fees | 1,259 | 1,097 | 3,373 | 3,159 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses | 338 | 432 | 1,182 | 1,197 | ||||||||||||
Total other indirect expenses | 45,772 | 40,921 | 128,055 | 121,543 | ||||||||||||
Other indirect expenses from discontinued operations | (3,385 | ) | (3,110 | ) | (10,725 | ) | (9,467 | ) | ||||||||
Total other indirect expenses from continuing operations | $ | 42,387 | $ | 37,811 | $ | 117,330 | $ | 112,076 | ||||||||
19
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
As of September 30, 2010, LHL leases all 33 hotels owned by the Company as follows:
1. | Sheraton Bloomington Hotel Minneapolis South | 18. | Hotel Deca | |||
2. | Harborside Hyatt Conference Center & Hotel | 19. | The Hilton San Diego Resort and Spa | |||
3. | Hotel Viking | 20. | Donovan House | |||
4. | Topaz Hotel | 21. | Le Parc Suite Hotel | |||
5. | Hotel Rouge | 22. | Westin Michigan Avenue | |||
6. | Hotel Madera | 23. | Hotel Sax Chicago | |||
7. | Hotel Helix | 24. | Alexis Hotel | |||
8. | The Liaison Capitol Hill | 25. | Hotel Solamar | |||
9. | Lansdowne Resort | 26. | Gild Hall | |||
10. | Hotel George | 27. | Hotel Amarano Burbank | |||
11. | Indianapolis Marriott Downtown | 28. | San Diego Paradise Point Resort and Spa | |||
12. | Hilton Alexandria Old Town | 29. | Le Montrose Suite Hotel | |||
13. | Chaminade Resort and Conference Center | 30. | Sofitel Washington, DC Lafayette Square | |||
14. | Hilton San Diego Gaslamp Quarter | 31. | Hotel Monaco San Francisco | |||
15. | The Grafton on Sunset | 32. | Westin Philadelphia | |||
16. | Onyx Hotel | 33. | Embassy Suites Philadelphia – Center City | |||
17. | Westin Copley Place |
9. Income Taxes
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, income tax expense from continuing operations and discontinued operations of $1,860 was comprised primarily of taxes on LHL’s income of $6,181 before income tax expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, income tax expense from continuing operations and discontinued operations of $3,826 was comprised primarily of taxes on LHL’s income of $11,504 before income tax expense. The Operating Partnership and affiliated entities are subject to minimum state and local income taxes in applicable jurisdictions, which are also included in income tax expense.
The Company has estimated LHL’s income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 using an estimated combined federal and state annual effective tax rate of 36.0%. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had a deferred tax asset of $10,278 primarily due to past years’ federal and state tax net operating losses of LHL. These loss carryforwards will generally expire in 2023 through 2028 if not utilized by then. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset related to federal loss carryforwards and has determined that no valuation allowance is required. The Company analyzes state loss carryforwards on a state by state basis and records a valuation allowance when management deems it more likely than not that future results will not generate sufficient taxable income in the respective state to realize the deferred tax asset. The timing of the reversal of the deferred tax asset in subsequent years cannot be reasonably estimated.
10. Earnings per Common Share
The limited partners’ outstanding common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership (which may be converted to common shares of beneficial interest) have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as there would be no effect on the amounts since the limited partners’ share of income would also be added back to net income. Any anti-dilutive shares have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. Per GAAP requirements, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Accordingly, distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares (participating securities) have been excluded, as applicable, from net income or loss attributable to common shareholders utilized in the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. Net income or loss figures are presented net of noncontrolling interests in the earnings per share calculations.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, diluted weighted average common shares do not include the impact of outstanding stock options and unvested compensation-related shares because the effect of these items on diluted earnings per share would be anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
20
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
2009, there were 100,868 and 76,399 anti-dilutive stock options and compensation-related shares outstanding, respectively.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is as follows:
For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Numerator: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders before discontinued operations | $ | 5,219 | $ | 2,508 | $ | (11,920 | ) | $ | (8,142 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations | 4,878 | 923 | 4,170 | 913 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | 10,097 | 3,431 | (7,750 | ) | (7,229 | ) | ||||||||||
Dividends paid on unvested restricted shares | (54 | ) | (5 | ) | (64 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||
Undistributed earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares | (14 | ) | (25 | ) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders excluding amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares | $ | 10,029 | $ | 3,401 | $ | (7,814 | ) | $ | (7,244 | ) | ||||||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares - basic | 71,246,259 | 63,002,718 | 68,531,224 | 51,590,702 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||||
Stock options and compensation-related shares | 99,472 | 75,483 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares - diluted | 71,345,731 | 63,078,201 | 68,531,224 | 51,590,702 | ||||||||||||
Basic Earnings per Common Share: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders per weighted average common share before discontinued operations and excluding amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders per weighted average common share excluding amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | ||||||
Diluted Earnings per Common Share: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders per weighted average common share before discontinued operations and excluding amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders per weighted average common share excluding amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | ||||||
21
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
11. Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows
For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest | $ | 25,988 | $ | 28,741 | ||||
Interest capitalized | 62 | 673 | ||||||
Income taxes paid, net | 162 | 595 | ||||||
Distributions payable on common shares | 8,036 | 636 | ||||||
Distributions payable on preferred shares | 6,689 | 6,688 | ||||||
Redemption of common/preferred units for common/preferred shares | — | 58,825 | ||||||
Accrued capital expenditures | 538 | 216 | ||||||
Issuance (forfeiture) of restricted shares to employees and executives, net | 2,742 | (2,454 | ) | |||||
Issuance of common shares for board of trustees compensation | 110 | 110 | ||||||
Repurchase of common shares into treasury | 566 | 365 | ||||||
In conjunction with the sale of hotel properties, the Company disposed of the following assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Proceeds on sale, net of closing costs | $ | 68,684 | $ | — | ||||
Other assets | 698 | — | ||||||
Liabilities | (2,659 | ) | — | |||||
Sale of hotel properties | $ | 66,723 | $ | — | ||||
In conjunction with the property acquisitions, the Company acquired assets and assumed liabilities as follows: | ||||||||
Investment in hotel properties (after credits at closing) | $ | (386,381 | ) | $ | — | |||
Other assets | (3,868 | ) | — | |||||
Liabilities | 4,217 | — | ||||||
Acquisition of properties | $ | (386,032 | ) | $ | — | |||
12. Subsequent Events
On October 6, 2010, the Company acquired a 100% leasehold interest in Hotel Roger Williams, a 193-room, upscale, full-service hotel located in New York, NY, for $90,000 (before credits at closing). The hotel is subject to a master lease, which expires in December 2044. The sources of funding for the acquisition were the assumption of a loan secured by the hotel with a principal balance of $64,000 and fixed annual interest rate of 6.31% and borrowings under the Company’s senior unsecured credit facility. The property is leased to LHL and managed by JRK Hotel Group, Inc. In connection with the acquisition and loan assumption, the Company incurred additional costs of approximately $4,500, of which approximately $3,750 will be included in investment in hotel properties, $250 will be reflected as deferred financing costs to be amortized to interest expense over the remaining loan term and $500 will be expensed as acquisition transaction costs in accordance with GAAP during the fourth quarter of 2010.
22
Table of Contents
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
(in thousands, except share/unit data)
(unaudited)
The Company paid the following common and preferred share dividends subsequent to September 30, 2010:
Security Type | Dividend per Share(1) | For the Quarter Ended | Record Date | Payable Date | |||||
Common | $ | 0.11 | 30-Sep-2010 | 30-Sep-2010 | 15-Oct-2010 | ||||
8 3/8% Series B Preferred | $ | 0.52 | 30-Sep-2010 | 1-Oct-2010 | 15-Oct-2010 | ||||
7 1/2% Series D Preferred | $ | 0.47 | 30-Sep-2010 | 1-Oct-2010 | 15-Oct-2010 | ||||
8% Series E Preferred | $ | 0.50 | 30-Sep-2010 | 1-Oct-2010 | 15-Oct-2010 | ||||
7 1/4% Series G Preferred | $ | 0.45 | 30-Sep-2010 | 1-Oct-2010 | 15-Oct-2010 |
(1) | Amounts are rounded to the nearest whole cent for presentation purposes. |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing in Item 1 of this report.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by the Company, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and includes this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe the Company’s future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this report include, among others, statements about the Company’s business strategy, including its acquisition and development strategies, industry trends, estimated revenues and expenses, ability to realize deferred tax assets and expected liquidity needs and sources (including capital expenditures and the ability to obtain financing or raise capital). You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control and which could materially affect actual results, performances or achievements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to:
• | risks associated with the hotel industry, including competition, increases in wages, energy costs and other operating costs, potential unionization, actual or threatened terrorist attacks, any type of flu or disease-related pandemic and downturns in general and local economic conditions; |
• | the availability and terms of financing and capital and the general volatility of securities markets; |
• | the Company’s dependence on third-party managers of its hotels, including its inability to implement strategic business decisions directly; |
• | risks associated with the real estate industry, including environmental contamination and costs of complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act and similar laws; |
• | interest rate increases; |
• | the possible failure of the Company to qualify as a REIT and the risk of changes in laws affecting REITs; |
• | the possibility of uninsured losses; |
• | risks associated with redevelopment and repositioning projects, including delays and cost overruns; and |
• | the risk factors discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as updated elsewhere in this report. |
Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Company’s expectations will be realized. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, the Company disclaims any obligations or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein (or elsewhere) to reflect any change in
23
Table of Contents
the Company’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Overview
The Company measures hotel performance by evaluating financial metrics such as room revenue per available room (“RevPAR”), funds from operations (“FFO”), earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and Hotel EBITDA. The Company evaluates the hotels in its portfolio and potential acquisitions using these metrics to determine each portfolio hotel’s contribution or acquisition hotel’s potential contribution toward reaching the Company’s goals of providing income to its shareholders through increases in distributable cash flow and increasing long-term total returns to shareholders through appreciation in the value of its common shares. The Company invests in capital improvements throughout the portfolio to continue to increase the competitiveness of its hotels and improve their financial performance. The Company actively seeks to acquire new hotel properties that meet its investment criteria. However, due to a high level of competitive capital resources, the Company continues to face significant competition for acquisitions that meet its investment criteria.
During the third quarter of 2010, the economic environment continued to show improvement, with no further increases in the unemployment rate and continued increases in reported corporate profits. The U.S. lodging industry continued to experience increases in demand as corporations are making the return to business travel. As a result, U.S. lodging industry demand grew by 8.5%. Additionally, average daily rate (“ADR”) continued to trend upward reflecting a willingness of consumers to travel without deep discounts and the beginning signs of compression and pricing pressure on certain dates in several markets. The Company’s RevPAR results reflected demand improvement at our Business and Convention hotels, offset somewhat by demand declines at our Resort properties. Average rate grew for each of our segments, with the greatest increase at our Business hotels.
For the third quarter of 2010, the Company had net income attributable to common shareholders of $10.1 million, or $0.14 per diluted share. FFO was $8.5 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, and EBITDA was $55.1 million. RevPAR for the hotel portfolio was $148.39, an increase of 6.3% compared to the third quarter of 2009. ADR improved by 5.8% to $181.64 and occupancy grew 0.5% to 81.7%, compared to the same period of the prior year. Hotel portfolio revenues increased 4.9% and hotel expenses rose by 4.2% compared to the third quarter of 2009, resulting in hotel portfolio EBITDA growth of 6.4%. Hotel portfolio EBITDA margins improved by 44 basis points.
Please refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a detailed discussion of the Company’s use of FFO, EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA and a reconciliation of FFO, EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA to net income, a GAAP measurement.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Substantially all of the Company’s revenues and expenses are generated by the operations of the individual hotels. The Company records revenues and expenses that are estimated by the hotel operators to produce quarterly financial statements because the management contracts do not require the hotel operators to submit actual results within a time frame that permits the Company to use actual results when preparing its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for filing by the deadline prescribed by the SEC. Generally, the Company records actual revenue and expense amounts for the first two months of each quarter and revenue and expense estimates for the last month of each quarter. Each quarter, the Company reviews the estimated revenue and expense amounts provided by the hotel operators for reasonableness based upon historical results for prior periods and internal Company forecasts. The Company records any differences between recorded estimated amounts and actual amounts in the following quarter; historically, these differences have not been material. The Company believes the quarterly revenues and expenses, recorded on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations based on an aggregate estimate, are fairly stated.
The Company’s management has discussed the policy of using estimated hotel operating revenues and expenses with the audit committee of its Board of Trustees. The audit committee has reviewed the Company’s disclosure relating to the estimates in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations section.
24
Table of Contents
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Industry travel continued to improve significantly in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Year-over-year, industry demand increased 8.5%, while industry supply grew 1.7% which translated into an industry occupancy increase of 6.7%. Additionally, industry-wide ADR grew compared to last year, for the first time in several quarters. Occupancy across the portfolio increased 0.5% from the prior year, as ADR grew 5.8% resulting in a RevPAR improvement of 6.3% compared to the third quarter of 2009.
Hotel Operating Revenues
Hotel operating revenues including room, food and beverage and other operating department revenues increased $17.0 million from $151.7 million in 2009 to $168.7 million in 2010. This increase is due primarily to the hotel operating revenues generated from the 2010 hotel acquisitions which consist of the Sofitel Washington DC Lafayette Square, the Westin Philadelphia, the Embassy Suites Philadelphia – Center City and the Hotel Monaco, San Francisco (the “2010 Acquisition Properties”). The 2010 Acquisition Properties, which are not comparable year-over-year, contributed $11.1 million to the increase in hotel operating revenues. Additionally the effects of the beginning of an economic recovery which resulted in a 6.3% increase in RevPAR, attributable to a 5.8% increase in ADR across the portfolio and a 0.5% increase in occupancy across the portfolio contributed to the increase in hotel operating revenues.
The following hotels experienced significant increases in total room, food and beverage and other operating department revenues primarily as a result of the beginning of an economic turnaround:
• | $1.3 million increase from Liaison Capitol Hill; and |
• | $1.9 million increase from the remaining six Washington, DC properties. |
Hotel operating revenues increased a net $2.7 million across 22 additional hotels in the portfolio primarily as a result of the beginning of an economic turnaround, particularly in the West Hollywood and Chicago markets which were partially offset by the lingering effects of the recession in the San Diego market.
Other Income
Other income increased $0.3 million from $1.3 million in 2009 to $1.6 million in 2010. This increase is primarily due to increased retail lease revenue across the portfolio and income recognized in 2010 due to gains from insurance proceeds.
Hotel Operating Expenses
Hotel operating expenses increased $11.3 million from $93.7 million in 2009 to $105.0 million in 2010. This overall increase is due primarily to the hotel operating expenses incurred by the 2010 Acquisition Properties, which are not comparable year-over-year, and which contributed $7.3 million to the increase in hotel operating expenses.
Sheraton Bloomington Hotel Minneapolis South experienced a $1.1 million increase in total room, food and beverage, other direct and other indirect expenses primarily as a result of increased occupancy.
Hotel operating expenses increased a net $2.9 million across 28 additional hotels in the portfolio due to the effects of the beginning of the economic turnaround, particularly in the Washington, DC and West Hollywood markets.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.4 million from $26.1 million in 2009 to $26.5 million in 2010. The increase is primarily due to depreciation on building and furniture, fixtures and equipment for the 2010 Acquisition Properties, partially offset by a portion of the furniture, fixtures and equipment across the hotel portfolio becoming fully depreciated.
25
Table of Contents
Real Estate Taxes, Personal Property Taxes and Insurance
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes, and insurance expenses increased $0.6 million from $8.2 million in 2009 to $8.8 million in 2010, primarily due to the expenses associated with the 2010 Acquisition Properties. Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance expense for the remainder of the portfolio remained relatively flat across the periods.
Ground Rent
Ground rent decreased $0.2 million from $1.9 million in 2009 to $1.7 million in 2010. Certain hotels are subject to ground rent under operating leases which call for either fixed or variable payments based on the hotel’s performance. This decrease is due to the performance at the applicable hotels being slightly better in the 2009 period than in the 2010 period.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense increased $1.9 million from $2.3 million in 2009 to $4.2 million in 2010 primarily as a result of the reversal of non-cash equity compensation related to restricted stock forfeitures in the 2009 period.
Acquisition Transaction Costs
Acquisition transaction costs of $0.6 million were incurred in the 2010 period relating to the acquisitions of the Westin Philadelphia, the Embassy Suites Philadelphia – Center City and the Hotel Monaco, San Francisco, all of which were purchased on September 1, 2010. GAAP guidance requires that acquisition-related costs be expensed when incurred rather than capitalized.
Other Expenses
Other expenses increased $0.4 million from $0.4 million in 2009 to $0.8 million in 2010 primarily due to an increase in expenses related to repositioning of certain hotels and retail lease costs.
Interest Income
Interest income had no change from 2009 to 2010, with an immaterial amount earned in both periods.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased by $0.3 million from $9.2 million in 2009 to $8.9 million in 2010 due to a decrease in the Company’s weighted average interest rate, partly offset by an increase in the weighted average debt. The Company’s weighted average debt outstanding increased from $680.2 million in 2009 to $682.8 million in 2010, which includes increases from:
• | additional borrowings to purchase the 2010 Acquisition Properties; and |
• | additional borrowings to finance other capital improvements during 2009 and 2010. |
The above borrowings are offset by proceeds from:
• | the March 2010 common share offering; |
• | the issuance of common shares under the Company’s equity distribution agreements in August 2010; |
• | the sale of the Seaview Resort in September 2010; |
• | the sale of the Westin City Center Dallas in September 2010; and |
• | operating cash flow. |
The Company’s weighted average interest rate decreased from 5.1% in 2009 to 4.9% in 2010. Capitalized interest increased from an immaterial amount in 2009 to $0.1 million in 2010, primarily due to the start of the renovation project at Westin Copley Place during the 2010 period.
26
Table of Contents
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense from continuing operations and discontinued operations increased $0.1 million from $1.8 million in 2009 to $1.9 million in 2010. LHL’s net income before income tax expense increased $1.8 million from $4.4 million in 2009 to $6.2 million in 2010 primarily due to new participating leases requiring lower rent payments effective January 1, 2010. The increase in income tax expense from the increased LHL taxable income was partially offset by the revaluation of past years’ tax net operating loss carryforwards during the 2010 period upon finalization of LHL’s 2009 federal and state income tax returns. LHL’s income tax expense was calculated using an estimated combined federal and state annual effective tax rate of 36.0%.
Discontinued Operations
Net income from discontinued operations increased $4.0 million from $0.9 million in 2009 to $4.9 million in 2010. Net income from discontinued operations is a result of the sale of the Seaview Resort and Westin City Center Dallas in September 2010. The 2010 period includes gain on sale of Westin City Center Dallas of $29.2 million and loss on impairment of Seaview Resort of $23.6 million.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
Redeemable noncontrolling interest in consolidated entity represents the outside equity interest in the Modern Magic Hotel LLC joint venture, which is included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company since the Company holds a controlling interest.
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interest of common units in the Operating Partnership represents the allocation of income or loss of the Operating Partnership to the common units held by a third party. Income or loss is allocated to common units noncontrolling interest based on the weighted average percentage ownership throughout the period. At September 30, 2010, no third party limited partner held any common units of the Operating Partnership.
Noncontrolling interest of preferred units in the Operating Partnership represents the allocation of income of the Operating Partnership to the preferred units held by third parties. At September 30, 2010, no third party limited partner held any preferred units of the Operating Partnership.
Distributions to Preferred Shareholders
Distributions to preferred shareholders had no change from 2009 to 2010, with $6.7 million distributed in both periods.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Industry travel was stronger than prior year with continued demand improvement in each quarter of 2010 and steadily improving average rate. While industry-wide ADR declined during the first quarter, it stabilized during the second quarter and showed its first increase in several quarters during the third quarter of 2010. With respect to the Company’s hotels, occupancy grew by 2.5% during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, while ADR increased 0.1%, which resulted in RevPAR growth of 2.6% year-over-year.
Hotel Operating Revenues
Hotel operating revenues including room, food and beverage and other operating department revenues increased $28.4 million from $421.7 million in 2009 to $450.1 million in 2010. This increase is due primarily to the hotel operating revenues generated from the 2010 Acquisition Properties, which are not comparable year-over-year, and which contributed $20.6 million to the increase in hotel operating revenues. Additionally the effects of the beginning of an economic recovery which resulted in a 2.6% increase in RevPAR, attributable to a 0.1% increase in ADR across the portfolio and a 2.5% increase in occupancy across the portfolio contributed to the increase in hotel operating revenues.
27
Table of Contents
The following hotels experienced significant increases in total room, food and beverage and other revenues primarily as a result of the effects of the beginning of the economic turnaround:
• | $2.4 million increase from Indianapolis Marriott Downtown; and |
• | $2.0 million increase from Donovan House. |
These increases are partially offset by the following significant decreases from the lingering effects of the recent economic downturn:
• | $1.9 million decrease from Hilton San Diego Resort; and |
• | $1.4 million decrease from Westin Michigan Avenue. |
Hotel operating revenues increased a net $6.7 million across 25 additional hotels in the portfolio primarily as a result of the beginning of an economic turnaround, particularly in the Washington, DC, Boston, West Hollywood and New York markets. These increases are partially offset by the lingering effects of the recession at the Lansdowne Resort and in the San Diego market during 2010.
Other Income
Other income decreased $9.7 million from $14.5 million in 2009 to $4.8 million in 2010. This decrease is primarily due to the following:
• | $9.5 million recognized in 2009 from prior year cure payments from Marriott International at Seaview Resort; and |
• | $1.0 million recognized in 2009 from the fee received related to the exchange of Series C Preferred Shares for Series G Preferred Shares. |
Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase of $0.8 million primarily attributable to gains from insurance proceeds recognized in the 2010 period.
Hotel Operating Expenses
Hotel operating expenses increased $19.2 million from $270.6 million in 2009 to $289.8 million in 2010. This overall increase is due primarily to the hotel operating expenses incurred by the 2010 Acquisition Properties, which are not comparable year-over-year, and which contributed $13.0 million to the increase in hotel operating expenses. To a lesser extent the increase is a result of a 2.5% increase in occupancy across the portfolio attributable to the economic recovery.
The following hotels experienced significant increases in total room, food and beverage, other direct and other indirect expenses primarily as a result of increased occupancies at the hotels:
• | $2.5 million increase from Sheraton Bloomington Hotel Minneapolis South; |
• | $1.5 million increase from Donovan House; and |
• | $1.2 million increase from Indianapolis Marriott Downtown. |
These increases are partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease from Westin Michigan Avenue.
Hotel operating expenses increased a net $2.8 million across 25 additional hotels in the portfolio due to the effects of the beginning of the economic turnaround, particularly in the Washington, DC, Boston and West Hollywood markets.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.9 million from $78.7 million in 2009 to $79.6 million in 2010. The increase is primarily due to depreciation on building and furniture, fixtures and equipment for the 2010 Acquisition Properties, partially offset by a portion of the furniture, fixtures and equipment across the hotel portfolio becoming fully depreciated.
28
Table of Contents
Real Estate Taxes, Personal Property Taxes and Insurance
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes, and insurance expenses increased $3.1 million from $22.7 million in 2009 to $25.8 million in 2010. The 2010 Acquisition Properties contributed $0.9 to this increase. The remainder of the increase is primarily due to the following:
• | $1.4 million increase in real estate taxes in the 2010 period at Hotel Sax due to decreases in assessed property values for 2009 and prior years reflected in the 2009 period; and |
• | $1.3 million increase in real estate taxes in the 2010 period at Indianapolis Marriott Downtown due to decreases in assessed property values for 2009 and prior years reflected in the 2009 period. |
The above increases are partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in real estate taxes at Donovan House and a $0.2 million decrease in real estate taxes at Hilton San Diego Resort, both of which are due to decreases in the assessed property values for 2010 and 2009 reflected in the 2010 period. Insurance expense remained flat across the periods.
Ground Rent
Ground rent decreased $0.3 million from $4.9 million in 2009 to $4.6 million in 2010. Certain hotels are subject to ground rent under operating leases which call for either fixed or variable payments based on the hotel’s performance. This decrease is due to the performance at the applicable hotels being slightly better in the 2009 period than in the 2010 period.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense increased $1.1 million from $10.7 million in 2009 to $11.8 million in 2010 primarily as a result of the reversal of non-cash equity compensation related to restricted stock forfeitures in the 2009 period which was slightly offset by a decrease in compensation costs in the 2010 period.
Acquisition Transaction Costs
Acquisition transaction costs of $2.0 million in 2010 relate to the purchase of the 2010 Acquisition Properties. GAAP guidance requires that acquisition-related costs be expensed when incurred rather than capitalized.
Other Expenses
Other expenses increased $0.8 million from $1.7 million in 2009 to $2.5 million in 2010 primarily due to increases in expenses related to renaming and repositioning the hotels and retail lease costs.
Interest Income
Interest income had no significant change from 2009 to 2010 with an immaterial amount earned in both periods.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased by $2.5 million from $28.9 million in 2009 to $26.4 million in 2010 due to a decrease in the Company’s weighted average debt, partly offset by an increase in the weighted average interest rate. The Company’s weighted average debt outstanding decreased from $837.5 million in 2009 to $655.4 million in 2010, which includes paydowns on outstanding debt with proceeds from:
• | the April 2009, June 2009, and March 2010 common share offerings; |
• | the issuance of common shares under the Company’s equity distribution agreements; |
• | the sale of the Seaview Resort in September 2010; |
• | the sale of the Westin City Center Dallas in September 2010; and |
• | operating cash flows. |
29
Table of Contents
The above paydowns are offset by the following:
• | additional borrowings to purchase the 2010 Acquisition Properties; and |
• | additional borrowings to finance other capital improvements during 2009 and 2010. |
The Company’s weighted average interest rate, including the impact of capitalized interest, increased from 4.4% in 2009 to 5.1% in 2010. Capitalized interest decreased from $0.7 million in 2009 to $0.1 million in 2010, primarily due to the temporary suspension of the redevelopment of the property owned through the Modern Magic Hotel, LLC joint venture, partly offset by the start of the renovation project at Westin Copley Place during the 2010 period.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense from continuing operations and discontinued operations decreased $1.3 million from $5.1 million in 2009 to $3.8 million in 2010. LHL’s net income before income tax expense decreased $0.5 million from $12.0 million in 2009 to $11.5 million in 2010 primarily due to the $9.5 million cure payment revenue recognized at Seaview Resort in the 2009 period, partially offset by new participating leases requiring lower rent payments effective January 1, 2010. Income tax expense decreased as a result of the decreased LHL taxable income as well as the revaluation of past years’ tax net operating loss carryforwards during the 2010 period upon finalization of LHL’s 2009 federal and state income tax returns. LHL’s income tax expense was calculated using an estimated combined federal and state annual effective tax rate of 36.0%.
Discontinued Operations
Net income from discontinued operations increased $3.3 million from $0.9 million in 2009 to $4.2 million in 2010. Net income from discontinued operations is a result of the sale of the Seaview Resort and Westin City Center Dallas in September 2010. The 2010 period includes gain on sale of Westin City Center Dallas of $29.2 million and loss on impairment of Seaview Resort of $23.6 million.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
Redeemable noncontrolling interest in consolidated entity represents the outside equity interest in the Modern Magic Hotel LLC joint venture, which is included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company since the Company holds a controlling interest.
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interest of common units in the Operating Partnership represents the allocation of income or loss of the Operating Partnership to the common units held by a third party. Income or loss is allocated to common units noncontrolling interest based on the weighted average percentage ownership throughout the period. At September 30, 2010, no third party limited partner held any common units of the Operating Partnership.
Noncontrolling interest of preferred units in the Operating Partnership represents the allocation of income of the Operating Partnership to the preferred units held by third parties. The decrease in noncontrolling interest of preferred units in the Operating Partnership from $0.4 million in 2009 to zero in 2010 is a result of the redemption of the 2,348,888 Series C Preferred Units on February 1, 2009, resulting in no third party limited partner holding any preferred units of the Operating Partnership.
Distributions to Preferred Shareholders
Distributions to preferred shareholders increased $0.4 million, from $19.7 million in 2009 to $20.1 million in 2010. This increase was due to the redemption of the Series C Preferred Units and issuance of Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest on February 1, 2009, which were subsequently exchanged for Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest on April 16, 2009.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
FFO, EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA
The Company considers the non-GAAP measures of FFO, EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA to be key supplemental measures of the Company’s performance and should be considered along with, but not as alternatives to, net income or loss as a measure of the Company’s operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate
30
Table of Contents
values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, most real estate industry investors consider FFO, EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA to be helpful in evaluating a real estate company’s operations.
The White Paper on FFO approved by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) in April 2002 defines FFO as net income or loss (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of properties and items classified by GAAP as extraordinary, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred finance costs) and after comparable adjustments for the Company’s portion of these items related to unconsolidated entities and joint ventures. The Company computes FFO consistent with standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than the Company.
With respect to FFO, the Company believes that excluding the effect of extraordinary items, real estate-related depreciation and amortization, and the portion of these items related to unconsolidated entities, all of which are based on historical cost accounting and which may be of limited significance in evaluating current performance, can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between REITs, even though FFO does not represent an amount that accrues directly to common shareholders. However, FFO may not be helpful when comparing the Company to non-REITs.
With respect to EBITDA, the Company believes that excluding the effect of non-operating expenses and non-cash charges, and the portion of these items related to unconsolidated entities, all of which are also based on historical cost accounting and may be of limited significance in evaluating current performance, can help eliminate the accounting effects of depreciation and amortization, and financing decisions and facilitate comparisons of core operating profitability between periods and between REITs, even though EBITDA also does not represent an amount that accrues directly to common shareholders.
With respect to Hotel EBITDA, the Company believes that excluding the effect of corporate-level expenses, non-cash items, and the portion of these items related to unconsolidated entities, provides a more complete understanding of the operating results over which individual hotels and operators have direct control. We believe property-level results provide investors with supplemental information on the ongoing operational performance of our hotels and effectiveness of the third-party management companies operating our business on a property-level basis.
FFO, EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA do not represent cash generated from operating activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income, cash flows from operations or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. FFO, EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA are not measures of the Company’s liquidity, nor are FFO, EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA indicative of funds available to fund the Company’s cash needs, including its ability to make cash distributions. These measurements do not reflect cash expenditures for long-term assets and other items that have been and will be incurred. FFO, EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA may include funds that may not be available for management’s discretionary use due to functional requirements to conserve funds for capital expenditures, property acquisitions and other commitments and uncertainties. To compensate for this, management considers the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or the evaluation of the Company’s operating performance.
31
Table of Contents
The following is a reconciliation between net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders and FFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except share data):
For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | $ | 10,097 | $ | 3,431 | $ | (7,750 | ) | $ | (7,229 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation(1) | 27,453 | 27,107 | 82,503 | 81,797 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred lease costs | 86 | 109 | 278 | 309 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests: | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest in consolidated entity | (17 | ) | (2 | ) | (36 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interest of common units in Operating Partnership | — | 13 | — | 22 | ||||||||||||
Less: Gain on sale of property | (29,168 | ) | — | (29,168 | ) | — | ||||||||||
FFO | $ | 8,451 | $ | 30,658 | $ | 45,827 | $ | 74,878 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares and units outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 71,246,259 | 63,060,196 | 68,531,224 | 51,656,483 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 71,345,731 | 63,135,679 | 68,632,093 | 51,732,882 |
(1) | Includes amount from discontinued operations. |
FFO includes the loss on impairment of Seaview Resort of $23.6 million.
The following is a reconciliation between net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders, EBITDA and Hotel EBITDA for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | $ | 10,097 | $ | 3,431 | $ | (7,750 | ) | $ | (7,229 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense(1) | 8,872 | 9,172 | 26,373 | 28,919 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense(1) | 1,860 | 1,831 | 3,826 | 5,135 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization(1) | 27,584 | 27,290 | 82,910 | 82,331 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests: | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest in consolidated entity | (17 | ) | (2 | ) | (36 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interest of common units in Operating Partnership | — | 13 | — | 22 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest of preferred units in Operating Partnership | — | — | — | 367 | ||||||||||||
Distributions to preferred shareholders | 6,689 | 6,688 | 20,066 | 19,699 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 55,085 | $ | 48,423 | $ | 125,389 | $ | 129,223 | ||||||||
Corporate expense | 381 | 2,921 | 11,980 | 13,188 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other income | (1,602 | ) | (1,293 | ) | (4,904 | ) | (14,523 | ) | ||||||||
Hotel level adjustments, net | (1,126 | ) | (480 | ) | (4,564 | ) | (268 | ) | ||||||||
Hotel EBITDA | $ | 52,738 | $ | 49,571 | $ | 127,901 | $ | 127,620 | ||||||||
(1) | Includes amount from discontinued operations. |
EBITDA includes the gain on sale of Westin City Center Dallas of $29.2 million and the loss on impairment of Seaview Resort of $23.6 million.
Hotel EBITDA includes the operating data for all properties, except those disposed of during either year, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Hotel EBITDA includes adjustments made for presentation of comparable information.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Joint Venture
On February 2, 2010, the Company’s joint venture arrangement with LaSalle Investment Management (“LIM”), entered into on April 17, 2008, was mutually dissolved. The joint venture arrangement with LIM, a leading global real estate investment manager, was to seek domestic hotel investments in high barrier-to-entry urban and resort markets in the U.S. Through the February 2, 2010 dissolution date, there were no acquisitions through the joint venture.
32
Table of Contents
Reserve Funds
Certain of the Company’s agreements with its hotel managers, franchisors and lenders have provisions for the Company to provide funds, generally 4.0% to 5.0% of hotel revenues, sufficient to cover the cost of (a) certain non-routine repairs and maintenance to the hotels and (b) replacements and renewals to the hotels’ furniture, fixtures and equipment. Certain agreements require that the Company reserve cash. As of September 30, 2010, $9.2 million was available in restricted cash reserves for future capital expenditures. The Company has sufficient cash on hand and availability on its credit facilities to cover required capital expenditures under agreements that do not necessitate that the Company separately reserve cash.
The Company has no other off-balance sheet arrangements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s principal source of cash to meet its cash requirements, including distributions to shareholders, is the operating cash flow from hotels leased by LHL. Additional sources of cash are the Company’s senior unsecured credit facility, LHL’s credit facility, secured financing on one or all of the Company’s 26 unencumbered properties, the sale of one or more properties, equity issuances available under the Company’s shelf registration statement and the issuance of up to $73.5 million of common shares from time to time under the Company’s equity distribution agreements.
LHL is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership. Payments to the Operating Partnership are required pursuant to the terms of the lease agreements between LHL and the Operating Partnership relating to the properties owned by the Operating Partnership and leased by LHL. The Company’s liquidity, including its ability to make distributions to shareholders, is dependent on the hotels’ ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations.
33
Table of Contents
Debt as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following (in thousands):
Balance Outstanding as of | ||||||||||
Debt | Interest Rate | Maturity Date | September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
Credit facilities | ||||||||||
Senior unsecured credit facility | Floating (a) | April 2011 (a) | $ | 135,000 | $ | — | ||||
LHL unsecured credit facility | Floating (b) | April 2011 (b) | — | 6,259 | ||||||
Total borrowings under credit facilities | 135,000 | 6,259 | ||||||||
Massport Bonds | ||||||||||
Harborside Hyatt Conference Center & Hotel (taxable) | Floating (c) | March 2018 | 5,400 | 5,400 | ||||||
Harborside Hyatt Conference Center & Hotel (tax exempt) | Floating (c) | March 2018 | 37,100 | 37,100 | ||||||
Total bonds payable | 42,500 | 42,500 | ||||||||
Mortgage loans | ||||||||||
Le Montrose Suite Hotel | 8.08% | July 2010 (d) | — | 12,859 | ||||||
Hilton San Diego Gaslamp Quarter | 5.35% | June 2012 | 59,600 | 59,600 | ||||||
Hotel Solamar | 5.49% | December 2013 | 60,900 | 60,900 | ||||||
Hotel Deca | 5.64% | August 2014 | 9,723 | 9,908 | ||||||
Westin Copley Place | 5.28% | August 2015 | 210,000 | 210,000 | ||||||
Westin Michigan Avenue | 5.75% | April 2016 | 140,000 | 140,000 | ||||||
Indianapolis Marriott Downtown | 5.99% | July 2016 | 101,780 | 101,780 | ||||||
Mortgage loans at stated value | 582,003 | 595,047 | ||||||||
Unamortized loan premium(e) | 289 | 342 | ||||||||
Total mortgage loans | 582,292 | 595,389 | ||||||||
Total debt | $ | 759,792 | $ | 644,148 | ||||||
(a) | Borrowings bear interest at floating rates equal to, at the Company’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or (ii) an Adjusted Base Rate plus an applicable margin. As of September 30, 2010, the rate, including the applicable margin, for the Company’s outstanding LIBOR borrowings was 0.96%. There were no borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2009. The Company has the option to extend the credit facility’s maturity date to April 2012. |
(b) | Borrowings bear interest at floating rates equal to, at LHL’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or (ii) an Adjusted Base Rate plus an applicable margin. As of December 31, 2009, the rate, including the applicable margin, for LHL’s outstanding LIBOR borrowings was 0.93%. There were no borrowings outstanding as of September 30, 2010. LHL has the option to extend the credit facility’s maturity date to April 2012. |
(c) | The Massport Bonds are secured by letters of credit issued by the Royal Bank of Scotland that expire in 2011. The Royal Bank of Scotland letters of credit are secured by the Harborside Hyatt Conference Center & Hotel. The bonds bear interest based on weekly floating rates. The interest rates as of September 30, 2010 were 0.30% and 0.35% for the $5,400 and $37,100 bonds, respectively. The interest rates as of December 31, 2009 were 0.35% and 0.32% for the $5,400 and $37,100 bonds, respectively. The Company also incurs an annual letter of credit fee of 1.10%. |
(d) | The Company repaid the mortgage loan on February 1, 2010 through borrowings on its senior unsecured credit facility. |
(e) | Mortgage debt includes an unamortized loan premium on the mortgage loan on Hotel Deca of $289 as of September 30, 2010 and $342 as of December 31, 2009. |
The Company incurred interest expense of $8.9 million and $26.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $9.2 million and $28.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred financing fees of $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $0.2 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Interest was capitalized at $0.1 million for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and an immaterial amount and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants, current on all loan payments and not otherwise in default under the credit facilities, bonds or mortgages.
34
Table of Contents
Credit Facilities
The Company has a senior unsecured credit facility from a syndicate of banks that provides for a maximum borrowing of up to $450.0 million. The credit facility’s maturity date is April 13, 2011 with, at the Company’s option, a one-year extension option. The senior unsecured credit facility contains certain financial covenants relating to debt service coverage, net worth and total funded indebtedness. It also contains financial covenants that, assuming no defaults, allow the Company to make shareholder distributions. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at floating rates equal to, at the Company’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or (ii) an “Adjusted Base Rate” plus an applicable margin. As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants and was not otherwise in default under the credit facility. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the senior unsecured credit facility was 1.0% for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, and 1.1% and 1.3% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, the Company is required to pay a variable unused commitment fee determined from a ratings or leverage based pricing matrix, currently set at 0.125% of the unused portion of the senior unsecured credit facility. The Company incurred unused commitment fees of $0.1 million and $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had $135.0 million and zero, respectively, of outstanding borrowings under the senior unsecured credit facility.
LHL has a $25.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility to be used for working capital and general lessee corporate purposes. The credit facility’s maturity date is April 13, 2011 with, at LHL’s option, a one-year extension option. Borrowings under the LHL credit facility bear interest at floating rates equal to, at LHL’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin, or (ii) an “Adjusted Base Rate” plus an applicable margin. As of September 30, 2010, LHL was in compliance with all debt covenants and was not otherwise in default under the credit facility. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the LHL credit facility was 1.0% and 0.9% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and 1.1% and 1.2% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, LHL is required to pay a variable unused commitment fee determined from a ratings or leverage based pricing matrix, currently set at 0.125% of the unused portion of the LHL credit facility. LHL incurred unused commitment fees of an immaterial amount for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, LHL had zero and $6.3 million, respectively, of outstanding borrowings under the LHL credit facility.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Disclosures about fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to management as of the valuation date. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts at which these instruments could be purchased, sold or settled. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt and the credit spreads over variable market rates on its variable rate debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates or credit spreads consistent with the maturity of the debt obligation with similar credit policies. Rates and credit spreads take into consideration general market conditions and maturity. As of September 30, 2010, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt were $759.8 million and $746.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt were $644.1 million and $563.7 million, respectively. The carrying amounts of the Company’s other financial instruments approximate fair value because of the relatively short maturities of these instruments.
Equity Issuances
On March 2, 2010, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 6,152,500 common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.01 per share, including 802,500 common shares pursuant to an overallotment option exercise. After deducting the underwriters’ discounts and commissions and other offering costs, the Company raised net proceeds of approximately $109.1 million. The net proceeds were used to reduce amounts outstanding under the Company’s senior unsecured credit facility and under the LHL unsecured credit facility, and for general corporate purposes.
During August 2010, the Company sold 3,270,936 common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.01 per share, under the Company’s equity distribution agreements, of which 36,044 were issued from treasury. After deducting the underwriters’ discounts and commissions and other offering costs, the Company raised net proceeds
35
Table of Contents
of approximately $74.9 million. The net proceeds were used to fund in part the September 1, 2010 acquisitions of the Hotel Monaco San Francisco, the Westin Philadelphia and the Embassy Suites Philadelphia – Center City.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had availability under the equity distribution agreements to issue and sell common shares of beneficial interest having an aggregate offering price of up to $73.5 million.
Sources and Uses of Cash
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had $29.0 million of cash and cash equivalents and $17.7 million of restricted cash reserves, $9.2 million of which was available for future capital expenditures. Additionally, the Company had $307.8 million available under the senior unsecured credit facility, with $7.2 million reserved for outstanding letters of credit, and $25.0 million available under the LHL credit facility.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $83.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to the operations of hotels leased by LHL, which were partially offset by payments for real estate taxes, personal property taxes, insurance and ground rent.
Net cash used in investing activities was $339.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to the purchase of Sofitel Washington, DC Lafayette Square, Hotel Monaco San Francisco, Westin Philadelphia and Embassy Suites Philadelphia – Center City, outflows for improvements and additions at the hotels and development property and the net funding of restricted cash reserves, partially offset by property insurance proceeds and proceeds from the sale of the Seaview Resort and Westin City Center Dallas.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $277.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to borrowings under credit facilities and net proceeds from the common share offerings, partially offset by repayments under credit facilities, mortgage loan repayments, payment of distributions to the common shareholders and payment of distributions to preferred shareholders.
The Company has considered its short-term (one year or less) liquidity needs and the adequacy of its estimated cash flows from operations and other expected liquidity sources to meet these needs. The Company believes that its principal short-term liquidity needs are to fund normal recurring expenses, debt service requirements, property acquisitions, distributions on the preferred shares and the minimum distribution required to maintain the Company’s REIT qualification under the Code. The Company anticipates that these needs will be met with cash flows provided by operating activities, borrowings under the senior unsecured credit facility or LHL’s credit facility, secured financing on one or all of the Company’s 26 unencumbered properties, the sale of one or more properties, equity issuances available under the Company’s shelf registration statement and the issuance of up to $73.5 million of common shares from time to time under the Company’s equity distribution agreements. The Company also considers capital improvements and property acquisitions as short-term needs that will be funded either with cash flows provided by operating activities, utilizing availability under the senior unsecured credit facility or LHL’s credit facility, secured financing on one or all of the Company’s 26 unencumbered properties, the sale of one or more properties or the issuance of additional equity securities.
The Company expects to meet long-term (greater than one year) liquidity requirements such as property acquisitions, scheduled debt maturities, major renovations, expansions and other nonrecurring capital improvements utilizing availability under the senior unsecured credit facility or LHL’s credit facility, secured financing on one or all of the Company’s 26 unencumbered properties, the sale of one or more properties, estimated cash flows from operations, equity issuances available under the Company’s shelf registration statement and the issuance of up to $73.5 million of common shares from time to time under the Company’s equity distribution agreements. The Company expects to acquire or develop additional hotel properties only as suitable opportunities arise, and the Company will not undertake acquisition or development of properties unless stringent acquisition or development criteria have been achieved. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company suspended development activities at the property owned through the Modern Magic Hotel LLC joint venture as a result of the current economic downturn. The Company plans to recommence such activities once economic conditions and lodging industry fundamentals demonstrate sustained improvement.
Reserve Funds
The Company is obligated to maintain reserve funds for capital expenditures at the hotels (including the periodic replacement or refurbishment of furniture, fixtures and equipment) as determined pursuant to the operating agreements. Please refer to “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” for a discussion of the Reserve Funds.
36
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of the Company’s obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
Total Amounts Committed | Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period | ||||||||||||||
Obligations and Commitments | Less than 1 year | 1 to 3 years | 4 to 5 years | Over 5 years | |||||||||||
Mortgage loans(1) | $ | 735,637 | $ | 33,913 | $ | 128,622 | $ | 335,517 | $ | 237,585 | |||||
Borrowings under credit facilities(2) | 135,698 | 135,698 | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Ground rent(3) | 200,612 | 5,175 | 10,372 | 10,227 | 174,838 | ||||||||||
Massport Bonds(1) | 43,583 | 146 | 292 | 292 | 42,853 | ||||||||||
Purchase commitments(4) | |||||||||||||||
Purchase orders and letters of commitment | 16,462 | 16,462 | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Total obligations and commitments | $ | 1,131,992 | $ | 191,394 | $ | 139,286 | $ | 346,036 | $ | 455,276 | |||||
(1) | Amounts include principal and interest. |
(2) | Amounts include principal and interest. Interest expense is calculated based on the variable rate as of September 30, 2010. It is assumed that the outstanding debt as of September 30, 2010 will be repaid upon maturity with interest-only payments until then. |
(3) | Amounts calculated based on the annual minimum future ground lease payments that extend through the term of the lease. Rents may be subject to adjustments based on future interest rates and hotel performance. |
(4) | As of September 30, 2010, purchase orders and letters of commitment totaling approximately $16.5 million had been issued for renovations at the properties. The Company has committed to these projects and anticipates making similar arrangements in the future with the existing properties or any future properties that it may acquire. |
The Hotels
The following table sets forth historical comparative information with respect to occupancy, ADR and RevPAR for the total hotel portfolio for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Variance | 2010 | 2009 | Variance | |||||||
Total Portfolio | ||||||||||||
Occupancy | 81.7% | 81.3% | 0.5% | 75.4% | 73.6% | 2.5% | ||||||
ADR | $181.64 | $171.65 | 5.8% | $177.46 | $177.22 | 0.1% | ||||||
RevPAR | $148.39 | $139.56 | 6.3% | $133.80 | $130.39 | 2.6% |
Joint Ventures
The Company, through Modern Magic Hotel LLC, a joint venture in which the Company holds a 95.0% controlling interest, owns floors 2 through 13 and a portion of the first floor of the existing 52-story IBM Building located at 330 N. Wabash Avenue in downtown Chicago, IL. The joint venture has developed plans to convert the existing vacant floors to a hotel. Redevelopment activity has been temporarily suspended, but is expected to resume when economic conditions and lodging industry fundamentals demonstrate sustained improvement. As a result of the suspension of redevelopment activity, the Company has temporarily ceased the capitalization of interest, real estate taxes and insurance costs incurred by the development. Since the Company holds a controlling interest, the accounts of the joint venture have been included in the consolidated financial statements. Initial acquisition and subsequent costs, including previously capitalized interest, totaling $62.5 million and $62.2 million are included in property under development in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The 5.0% interest of the outside partner is included in redeemable noncontrolling interest in consolidated entity in the consolidated balance sheets.
On February 2, 2010, the Company’s joint venture arrangement with LIM, entered into on April 17, 2008, was mutually dissolved. The joint venture arrangement with LIM, a leading global real estate investment manager, was to seek domestic hotel investments in high barrier-to-entry urban and resort markets in the U.S. Through the February 2, 2010 dissolution date, there were no acquisitions through the joint venture.
37
Table of Contents
Inflation
The Company relies entirely on the performance of the hotels and their ability to increase revenues to keep pace with inflation. The hotel operators can change room rates quickly, but competitive pressures may limit the hotel operators’ abilities to raise rates faster than inflation or even at the same rate.
The Company’s expenses (primarily real estate taxes, property and casualty insurance, administrative expenses and LHL hotel operating expenses) are subject to inflation. These expenses are expected to grow with the general rate of inflation, except for energy costs, liability insurance, property tax rates, employee benefits and some wages, which are expected to increase at rates higher than inflation, and except for instances in which the properties are subject to periodic real estate tax reassessments.
Seasonality
The Company’s hotels’ operations historically have been seasonal. Taken together, the hotels maintain higher occupancy rates during the second and third quarters. These seasonality patterns can be expected to cause fluctuations in hotel operating revenues of LHL and the Company’s quarterly lease revenues from LHL.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. The Company seeks to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower the overall borrowing costs by closely monitoring the Company’s variable rate debt and converting such debt to fixed rates when the Company deems such conversion advantageous. As of September 30, 2010, approximately $177.5 million of the Company’s aggregate indebtedness (23.4% of total indebtedness) was subject to variable interest rates.
If market rates of interest on the Company’s variable rate long-term debt fluctuate by 0.25%, interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $0.4 million annually. This assumes that the amount outstanding under the Company’s variable rate debt remains at $177.5 million, the balance as of September 30, 2010.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Based on the most recent evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) were effective as of September 30, 2010. There were no changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the third quarter ended September 30, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels and the Company to the risk of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. The Company is not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to the Company’s knowledge, is any litigation threatened against the Company, other than routine actions for negligence or other claims and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability insurance and all of which collectively are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, results of operations or business or financial condition of the Company.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None.
38
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
Item 4. | [Removed and Reserved] |
Item 5. | Other Information |
On September 27, 2010, the Company and Hans S. Weger, the Company’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, agreed that Mr. Weger’s employment with the Company would terminate no later than February 28, 2011. The Company currently estimates that it will recognize an expense of approximately $3.0 million, approximately $2.0 million of which is expected to be non-cash equity compensation expense, to be recognized over the period from September 27, 2010 through February 28, 2011.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101 | The following financial statements from LaSalle Hotel Properties’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on October 20, 2010, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text |
39
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
LASALLE HOTEL PROPERTIES | ||||
Dated: October 20, 2010 | BY: | /S/ HANS S. WEGER | ||
Hans S. Weger | ||||
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
40
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101 | The following financial statements from LaSalle Hotel Properties’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on October 20, 2010, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text |
41