To Our Shareholders:
Without question, 2007 was the most challenging year in the history of Macatawa Bank. Since we opened our doors a decade ago, our story has been one of growth, expansion, increased profitability and dividends. Even as West Michigan began to move into an economic downturn, we continued to add new customers, increase market share, and deliver strong financial results.
Last year proved to be different for Macatawa as well as for financial institutions across the state and throughout the country. The economic downturn in Michigan resulted in lower household income and job losses that accelerated throughout the year. This was compounded by a national decline in home sales and values, which we feel significantly impacted West Michigan.
As a result, our 2007 performance was disappointing. The biggest factor contributing to these results was an increase in our loan loss allowance related to residential land development loans. Real estate developers use these loans to finance land and construction for residential communities. While these loans are collateralized by real estate assets, the current economic environment is putting downward pressure on prices and significantly extending the payback periods of many projects.
The marketplace dynamics are causing some of our loans to underperform. We took a fiscally prudent step of increasing our loan loss provision during the third and fourth quarters, which had a negative impact on our overall performance.
Given the environment and the fact we had been a victim of loan fraud, we felt it was appropriate to review our underwriting procedures to ensure we are properly managing our loan portfolio. This review showed that our underwriting principles continue to be sound. We used the opportunity to further improve our loan systems and procedures and to implement emerging “best practices” in our industry. We also reviewed our lending standards and, in light of the current economic conditions in West Michigan, tightened some of our policies and requirements. We believe the measures we have taken will allow us to continue to fulfill our mission as the go-to community bank for mortgages, home-equity lines, manufacturing expansions and other loans that are good for our economy – while building a growing and profitable bank.
Let us be very clear: the majority of our loans continue to perform well. The bulk of our underperforming loans can be traced to the struggling economy, particularly the housing market, in West Michigan. Moving forward, we are committed to disciplined loan underwriting. Our senior loan team has worked to analyze our loan portfolio and taken the appropriate steps to identify and mitigate potential issues going forward.
We strongly believe that 2008 will be a better year for Macatawa Bank. While the loan situation will take some time to resolve, we have already set aside reserves for our most significant issues. Our local economy has already begun to see bright spots in terms of new jobs and increased manufacturing exports. The January cuts in the federal fund rates, along with the much-anticipated growth stimulus package, will help spur our economic recovery.
Built From A Solid Foundation
In just 10 years, Macatawa Bank has grown to be a market leader. We have worked hard to secure a significant market share, good growth in core accounts, great customer acceptance and a group of exceptionally strong employees. We are building on our already-solid foundations to ensure year-over-year financial improvements, continued growth and long-term success.
Every decision made over the last decade has been with these values and principles in mind. Our philosophy continues to resonate with a wide variety of customers, from corporate CEOs looking to fund expansions, to entrepreneurs financing start-up ventures, to prospective retirees planning for the care of their nest egg and newlyweds looking to buy their first homes. We have products and services to meet all of these needs and more. The depth and breadth of our offerings, in combination with our blend of high-tech and high-touch banking, earned us the leading deposit market share in Ottawa County, and moved us to number two overall in the major West Michigan counties of Kent, Ottawa and Allegan.
Focused for a Successful Future
Despite the economic challenges for our region, the team at Macatawa Bank is working to ensure continued growth. Our goal is to help every customer be a partner for life. We continue to emphasize our sales and service culture through face-to-face meetings with existing and potential customers. From a product and services viewpoint, we are continually upgrading our offerings to strengthen customer retention and open additional revenue opportunities. Finally, we are managing our operating costs through process improvements, productivity gains and an ongoing flow of revenue-generation and cost-savings ideas. We invite you to learn more about our plans in the forthcoming pages.
We believe in West Michigan. Macatawa Bank has strong roots in this community. We understand its potential and are committed to its growth. By working with our customers and keeping their best interests in mind during these rough times, we feel we will be well positioned to grow with them when the economy does turn around – as we know it will.
There is no doubt that 2007 was a tough year. Despite the challenging market conditions, we continued to make progress – even if that progress was not as evident as it had been in years past. We certainly can’t control the economy. We can – and have – positioned the Bank to minimize risk and maximize potential.
We are appreciative for the commitment and support extended to us over the past 10 years by our shareholders, customers, employees and the entire West Michigan community. We look forward to many years of continued success and to sharing the fruits of that success with our shareholders.
Benjamin A. Smith III Chairman & CEO Macatawa Bank Corporation | Philip J. Koning President Macatawa Bank Corporation President & CEO Macatawa Bank |
Financial Highlights
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | As of and for the Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2006 | % Change | |||||||||
Summary of Operations | |||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 62,916 | $ | 67,417 | (6.7) | % | |||||
Provision for loan losses (1) (2) | 15,750 | 7,715 | 104.1 | % | |||||||
Noninterest income | 16,098 | 14,177 | 13.6 | % | |||||||
Noninterest expense | 50,259 | 44,913 | 11.9 | % | |||||||
Net income (1) (2) | 9,269 | 19,831 | (53.3) | % | |||||||
Balance Sheet Data | |||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,129,966 | $ | 2,074,816 | 2.7 | % | |||||
Loans | 1,750,632 | 1,711,450 | 2.3 | % | |||||||
Deposits | 1,523,553 | 1,667,557 | (8.6) | % | |||||||
Shareholders' equity | 160,625 | 156,849 | 2.4 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses | 33,422 | 23,259 | 43.7 | % | |||||||
Key Ratios | |||||||||||
Return on average equity (1) (2) | 5.63 | % | 13.09 | % | (57.0) | % | |||||
Return on average assets (1) (2) | .44 | % | 1.01 | % | (56.4) | % | |||||
Average net interest margin | 3.21 | % | 3.67 | % | (12.5) | % | |||||
Efficiency ratio | 63.61 | % | 55.04 | % | 15.6 | % | |||||
Share Information* | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share (1) (2) | $ | .54 | $ | 1.17 | (53.8) | % | |||||
Diluted earnings per common share (1) (2) | .54 | 1.14 | (52.6) | % | |||||||
Book value per common share | 9.47 | 9.19 | 3.0 | % | |||||||
Dividends per common share | .51 | .46 | 10.9 | % | |||||||
Shares outstanding at end of period | 16,968,398 | 17,067,350 | (0.6) | % |
*Retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of all stock splits and dividends.
(1) | Net income for 2007 includes the impact of approximately $11.6 million ($7.5 million after tax, or $0.44 per share) of charges against earnings for additional provisions for loan losses to address risks associated with loans to residential developers. |
(2) | Net income for 2006 includes the impact of a $4.7 million ($3.1 million after tax, or $0.18 per share) charge against earnings related to a commercial borrower whose loans became impaired. |
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial and other data are derived from the Company’s Financial Statements and should be read with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition. The Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, are included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | As of and For the Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Financial Condition | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,129,966 | $ | 2,074,816 | $ | 1,869,990 | $ | 1,672,606 | $ | 1,401,111 | |||||||
Securities | 203,415 | 201,257 | 160,603 | 139,801 | 109,673 | ||||||||||||
Loans | 1,750,632 | 1,711,450 | 1,547,879 | 1,396,387 | 1,157,107 | ||||||||||||
Deposits | 1,523,553 | 1,667,557 | 1,507,772 | 1,351,516 | 1,109,399 | ||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 354,052 | 192,018 | 145,161 | 123,985 | 145,680 | ||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity | 160,625 | 156,849 | 141,744 | 129,074 | 121,900 | ||||||||||||
Share Information* | |||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share | $ | .54 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.24 | $ | .76 | $ | .71 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per common share | .54 | 1.14 | 1.21 | .75 | .69 | ||||||||||||
Book value per common share | 9.47 | 9.19 | 8.38 | 7.69 | 7.29 | ||||||||||||
Dividends per common share | .51 | .46 | .37 | .27 | .21 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average dilutive shares outstanding | 17,283,344 | 17,379,473 | 17,309,322 | 17,065,064 | 16,950,362 | ||||||||||||
Shares outstanding at end of period | 16,968,398 | 17,067,350 | 16,914,541 | 16,787,112 | 16,714,224 | ||||||||||||
Operations | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 139,372 | $ | 133,506 | $ | 105,395 | $ | 78,329 | $ | 64,435 | |||||||
Interest expense | 76,456 | 66,089 | 42,558 | 26,309 | 22,341 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | 62,916 | 67,417 | 62,837 | 52,020 | 42,094 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 15,750 | 7,715 | 3,675 | 7,890 | 4,105 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision | |||||||||||||||||
for loan losses | 47,166 | 59,702 | 59,162 | 44,130 | 37,989 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income | 16,098 | 14,177 | 13,004 | 10,042 | 10,154 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense | 50,259 | 44,913 | 41,423 | 35,400 | 30,575 | ||||||||||||
Income before tax | 13,005 | 28,966 | 30,743 | 18,772 | 17,568 | ||||||||||||
Federal income tax | 3,736 | 9,135 | 9,854 | 5,996 | 5,788 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 9,269 | $ | 19,831 | $ | 20,889 | $ | 12,776 | $ | 11,780 | |||||||
Performance Ratios | |||||||||||||||||
Return on average equity | 5.63 | % | 13.09 | % | 15.30 | % | 10.15 | % | 9.91 | % | |||||||
Return on average assets | .44 | % | 1.01 | % | 1.17 | % | .83 | % | .94 | % | |||||||
Yield on average interest-earning assets | 7.11 | % | 7.26 | % | 6.37 | % | 5.47 | % | 5.55 | % | |||||||
Cost on average interest-bearing liabilities | 4.32 | % | 4.01 | % | 2.87 | % | 2.07 | % | 2.19 | % | |||||||
Average net interest spread | 2.79 | % | 3.25 | % | 3.50 | % | 3.40 | % | 3.36 | % | |||||||
Average net interest margin | 3.21 | % | 3.67 | % | 3.81 | % | 3.64 | % | 3.63 | % | |||||||
Efficiency ratio | 63.61 | % | 55.04 | % | 54.62 | % | 57.04 | % | 58.52 | % | |||||||
Capital Ratios | |||||||||||||||||
Equity to assets | 7.54 | % | 7.56 | % | 7.58 | % | 7.72 | % | 8.70 | % | |||||||
Total risk-based capital ratio | 10.68 | % | 10.85 | % | 11.07 | % | 11.12 | % | 10.92 | % | |||||||
Credit Quality Ratios | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans | 1.91 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.39 | % | |||||||
Nonperforming assets to total assets | 3.75 | % | 1.23 | % | .26 | % | .35 | % | .32 | % | |||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans | .32 | % | .33 | % | .13 | % | .37 | % | .14 | % |
*Retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of all stock splits and dividends.
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
A summary of selected quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 follows:
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | |||||||||||
2007 | ||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 34,931 | $ | 35,683 | $ | 35,391 | $ | 33,368 | ||||||
Net Interest income | 16,059 | 16,335 | 15,835 | 14,687 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 875 | 965 | 3,640 | 10,270 | ||||||||||
Income before income tax expense | 7,132 | 6,785 | 3,494 | (4,406 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | 4,835 | 4,590 | 2,457 | (2,612 | ) | |||||||||
Net income per share* | ||||||||||||||
Basic | .28 | .27 | .14 | (.15 | ) | |||||||||
Diluted | .28 | .26 | .14 | (.15 | ) | |||||||||
2006 | ||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 30,241 | $ | 32,896 | $ | 34,779 | $ | 35,589 | ||||||
Net Interest income | 16,314 | 16,975 | 17,083 | 17,045 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 700 | 800 | 490 | 5,725 | ||||||||||
Income before income tax expense | 7,723 | 8,471 | 8,839 | 3,934 | ||||||||||
Net income | 5,222 | 5,756 | 6,009 | 2,845 | ||||||||||
Net income per share* | ||||||||||||||
Basic | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.17 | ||||||||||
Diluted | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.16 |
*Retroactively adjusted to reflect the effect of all stock splits and dividends.
Net income for the third and fourth quarters of 2007 includes the impact of $2.1 million ($1.4 million after tax, or $0.08 per share) and $9.5 million ($6.2 million after tax, or $0.36 per share), respectively, of charges against earnings for additional provisions for loan losses primarily to address risks associated with loans to residential developers.
Net income for the fourth quarter of 2006 includes the impact of a $4.7 million ($3.1 million after tax, or $0.18 per share) charge against earnings related to a commercial borrower whose loans became impaired.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements.
The following section presents additional information to assess the results of operations and financial condition of the Company. This section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the supplemental financial data contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
Macatawa Bank Corporation is a Michigan corporation and is the holding company for a wholly owned subsidiary, Macatawa Bank and for two trusts, Macatawa Statutory Trust I and Macatawa Statutory Trust II. Effective November 1, 2006, Macatawa Investment Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Macatawa Bank Corporation, ceased doing business as a registered broker-dealer. Macatawa Bank Corporation is a financial holding company pursuant to Title I of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Macatawa Bank is a Michigan chartered bank with depository accounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The bank operates twenty-six branch offices and a lending and operational service facility, providing a full range of commercial and consumer banking and trust services in Kent County, Ottawa County, and northern Allegan County, Michigan. On November 1, 2006, Macatawa Bank began offering brokerage services to its customers through an arrangement with Infinex Investments, Inc. (“Infinex”). Infinex is a full service investment provider, a registered broker-dealer and a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). As more fully discussed in our Form 8-K dated October 11, 2006, Macatawa Bank Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with the Smith & Associates investment advisory firm based in Holland, Michigan. The Smith & Associates acquisition became effective on January 1, 2007 and that business is now part of Macatawa Bank. Macatawa Statutory Trusts I and II are grantor trusts and issued $20.0 million each of pooled trust preferred securities. These trusts are not consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements. For further information regarding consolidation, see the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. Macatawa Bank Mortgage Company, a subsidiary of Macatawa Bank, originates and sells residential mortgage loans into the secondary market on a servicing released basis.
We have experienced rapid and substantial growth since opening Macatawa Bank in November of 1997 with assets reaching $2.1 billion as of December 31, 2007. Since our inception in 1997, we have raised approximately $100.6 million in capital through private and public common stock offerings and trust preferred offerings to facilitate our growth and progress over these years.
We believe that growth in core deposits is key to our long-term success and is our primary funding source for asset growth. Establishing a branching network in our markets has been of high importance in order to facilitate this core deposit growth. We have gained community awareness and acceptance in our markets through this expanding branch network and our high quality service standards.
The West Michigan markets within which we operate continue to provide significant expansion opportunities for us. We opened our twenty-sixth branch during the second quarter of 2007 on the southeast side of the greater Grand Rapids area. Because of the significance of the greater Grand Rapids market and as it represents the greatest opportunity for market share growth, we anticipate additional branch openings in this market within the next few years. We also continue to enjoy success in building new and existing relationships in the Holland/Zeeland and Grand Haven markets.We anticipate that we will continue to experience growth in our balance sheet and in our earnings due to these expansion opportunities.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Summary:Net income totaled $9.3 million or $0.54 per diluted share for 2007 compared to $19.8 million or $1.14 per diluted share for 2006 and $20.9 million or $1.21 per diluted share for 2005. The results for 2007 include charges against earnings of approximately $11.6 million ($7.5 million after tax, or approximately $0.44 per share) for additional provisions for loan losses to address risks associated with loans to residential developers. The results for 2006 include a charge against earnings of $4.7 million ($3.1 million after tax, or approximately $0.18 per share), for a loss associated with an impaired commercial loan relationship. Circumstances associated with these losses are described under Loan Portfolio and Asset Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses.
Net Interest Income:Net interest income totaled $62.9 million during 2007 compared to $67.4 million during 2006 and $62.8 million during 2005. The decrease in net interest income during 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to a decline in the net interest margin partially offset by an increase in average earning assets. Average interest earning assets increased by $120.5 million, or 7%, to $1.96 billion for 2007. The net interest margin decreased 46 basis points to 3.21% for 2007 from 3.67% for 2006 from both a decrease in the yield on earning assets and an increase in the cost of funds.
The yield on earning assets decreased 15 basis points to 7.11% for 2007 from 7.26% for 2006. The impact of rising balances of nonperforming loans during 2007 resulted in a decline of approximately 18 basis points and was the primary reason for the overall decline. In addition, a shift to generally lower rate fixed rate loans offset the impact of an increase in the yield on the variable rate loan portfolio during the period from 2006 to 2007. The shift to fixed rate loan products occurred throughout most of this period as long-term fixed rates were generally lower than short-term rates. The impact from this shift was offset by a general rise in the yield on variable rate loans from the increase in short-term rates that occurred through June of 2006. The recent 100 basis point decline in the prime rate that resulted from the Federal funds rate cuts that began in late September of 2007 partially offset the increase in yield on the variable rate loan portfolio.
The cost of funds increased 31 basis points to 4.32% in 2007 from 4.01% in 2006. The general increase in rates paid on our deposit accounts, the rollover of time deposits at higher rates and a shift to higher costing funds within the generally high interest rate environment that occurred throughout 2006 and through the third quarter of 2007 are the primary reasons for the increase. The rates paid on time deposits and other rate sensitive deposit products reached attractive levels throughout most of 2007 causing deposit customers to shift funds from transaction accounts, primarily non-interest demand and money market accounts, into these higher rate accounts. The recent decrease in market rates that began in late September of 2007, however, led to a decline in our cost of funds during the fourth quarter, partially offsetting the increase in our cost of funds for the year.
The growth in net interest income during 2006 compared to 2005 was largely driven by strong growth in average interest earning assets, partially offset by a decline in the net interest margin. Average interest earning assets increased by $180.5 million, or 11%, to $1.83 billion for 2006. The net interest margin decreased by 14 basis points to 3.67% for 2006 from 3.81% for 2005 as the increase in the cost of funds exceeded the increase in the yield on assets. The increases in short-term market rates, including the Federal funds and prime rates, that continued through the first half of 2006 was the primary reason for the increase in the yield on interest earning assets of 89 basis points and the increase in the overall cost of funds of 114 basis points during this period.
Anticipated growth in earning assets is expected to continue at lower levels than we have experienced in the past due to the generally weak economic conditions in Michigan. The declines in the Federal funds and prime rates that began in September of 2007 and have continued into 2008 and potential future rate cuts will have a negative impact on net interest income in the near term, although over a full twelve month period the overall impact on earnings is expected to be neutral. Our variable rate loan portfolio exceeds the level of variable rate funding, but the fixed rate funding portfolio that reprices over the next twelve months is expected to offset this excess.
The following table shows an analysis of net interest margin for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
(Dollars in Thousands) | For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance | Interest Earned or Paid | Average Yield or Cost | Average Balance | Interest Earned or Paid | Average Yield or Cost | Average Balance | Interest Earned or Paid | Average Yield or Cost | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable securities | $ | 149,530 | $ | 6,665 | 4.46 | % | $ | 128,833 | $ | 5,424 | 4.21 | % | $ | 109,027 | $ | 4,392 | 4.03 | % | |||||||||||
Tax-exempt securities (1) | 51,861 | 2,185 | 6.48 | % | 51,145 | 2,154 | 6.48 | % | 49,285 | 2,084 | 6.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Loans (2) | 1,726,576 | 129,183 | 7.40 | % | 1,636,710 | 125,034 | 7.55 | % | 1,473,558 | 98,031 | 6.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 12,275 | 559 | 4.49 | % | 13,394 | 656 | 4.83 | % | 13,299 | 573 | 4.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and other short-term | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
investments | 14,912 | 780 | 5.16 | % | 4,591 | 238 | 5.12 | % | 8,976 | 315 | 3.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets(1) | 1,955,154 | 139,372 | 7.11 | % | 1,834,673 | 133,506 | 7.26 | % | 1,654,145 | 105,395 | 6.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Noninterest earning assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | 31,189 | 35,351 | 35,370 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 116,198 | 100,281 | 93,517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,102,541 | $ | 1,970,305 | $ | 1,783,032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW and money market accounts | $ | 704,723 | $ | 24,868 | 3.53 | % | $ | 655,549 | $ | 21,427 | 3.27 | % | $ | 608,718 | $ | 11,841 | 1.95 | % | |||||||||||
Savings | 40,957 | 236 | 0.58 | % | 40,827 | 237 | 0.58 | % | 40,674 | 183 | 0.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||
IRAs | 42,836 | 2,033 | 4.75 | % | 36,654 | 1,566 | 4.27 | % | 30,536 | 1,092 | 3.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Time deposits | 653,923 | 31,818 | 4.87 | % | 674,270 | 30,367 | 4.50 | % | 546,307 | 18,944 | 3.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 263,009 | 13,091 | 4.91 | % | 176,796 | 8,209 | 4.58 | % | 171,000 | 6,599 | 3.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 41,238 | 3,441 | 8.23 | % | 41,238 | 3,346 | 8.00 | % | 41,238 | 2,603 | 6.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased | 19,427 | 979 | 4.92 | % | 18,528 | 937 | 4.99 | % | 36,715 | 1,296 | 3.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities | 1,766,113 | 76,456 | 4.32 | % | 1,643,862 | 66,089 | 4.01 | % | 1,475,188 | 42,558 | 2.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing demand accounts | 165,059 | 167,143 | 164,184 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other noninterest bearing liabilities | 6,639 | 7,821 | 7,148 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity | 164,730 | 151,479 | 136,512 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity | $ | 2,102,541 | $ | 1,970,305 | $ | 1,738,032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 62,916 | $ | 67,417 | $ | 62,837 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread (1) | 2.79 | % | 3.25 | % | 3.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (1) | 3.21 | % | 3.67 | % | 3.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of average interest earning assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
to average interest bearing liabilities | 110.70 | % | 111.61 | % | 112.13 | % |
(1) Yields are adjusted for tax-exempt interest.
(2) Loan fees are included in interest income. Nonaccrual loans are included in average loans outstanding.
The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in net interest income due to changes in volume and rate.
For The Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in thousands) | 2007 vs 2006 | 2006 vs 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) Due to | Increase (Decrease) Due to | |||||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | |||||||||||||||
Interest income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable securities | $ | 909 | $ | 332 | $ | 1,241 | $ | 827 | $ | 205 | $ | 1,032 | ||||||||
Tax-exempt securities | 30 | 1 | 31 | 86 | (16 | ) | 70 | |||||||||||||
Loans | 6,711 | (2,562 | ) | 4,149 | 11,542 | 15,461 | 27,003 | |||||||||||||
FHLB stock | (53 | ) | (44 | ) | (97 | ) | 4 | 79 | 83 | |||||||||||
Fed funds sold and other | ||||||||||||||||||||
short-term investments | 540 | 2 | 542 | (189 | ) | 112 | (77 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total interest income | $ | 8,137 | $ | (2,271 | ) | $ | 5,866 | $ | 12,270 | $ | 15,841 | $ | 28,111 | |||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||
NOWs and MMDAs | $ | 1,669 | $ | 1,772 | $ | 3,441 | $ | 974 | $ | 8,612 | $ | 9,586 | ||||||||
Savings | 1 | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | 1 | 53 | 54 | ||||||||||||
IRAs | 282 | 185 | 467 | 240 | 234 | 474 | ||||||||||||||
Time deposits | (936 | ) | 2,387 | 1,451 | 5,020 | 6,403 | 11,423 | |||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 4,254 | 628 | 4,882 | 230 | 1,380 | 1,610 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | --- | 95 | 95 | --- | 743 | 743 | ||||||||||||||
Fed funds purchased | 45 | (13 | ) | 32 | (782 | ) | 423 | (359 | ) | |||||||||||
Total interest expense | 5,315 | 5,052 | 10,367 | 5,683 | 17,848 | 23,531 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 2,822 | $ | (7,323 | ) | $ | (4,501 | ) | $ | 6,587 | $ | (2,007 | ) | $ | 4,580 | |||||
Provision for Loan Losses: The provision for loan losses for 2007 was $15.8 million as compared to $7.7 million for 2006 and $3.7 million for 2005. The provision for loan losses in 2007 includes approximately $11.6 million of extra provisions related primarily to loans to residential developers. The provision for loan losses in 2006 includes a $4.7 million additional provision for one commercial borrower whose loans were allegedly falsely secured by nonexistent collateral. The amount of the loan loss provision in all periods is a byproduct of establishing our allowance for loan losses at levels deemed necessary in our methodology for determining the adequacy of the allowance. For more information about our allowance for loan losses and our methodology for establishing its level, see the discussion under the section Allowance for Loan Losses.
Noninterest Income:Noninterest income totaled $16.1 million during 2007 compared to $14.2million during 2006 and $13.0 million in 2006. The $1.9 million increase in 2007 included increases from each major service category except gains on sold loans which decreased $431,000 from $1.7 million to $1.3 million. The $1.2 million increase in 2006 also included increases in each major service category except gains on sold loans which decreased $615,000 from $2.3 million to $1.7 million.
Revenues from trust services increased $1.3 million or 37% to $4.9 million for 2007 and $668,000 or 23% to $3.6 million for 2006. The majority of the increase in trust fees in 2007 was related to the impact of customer relationships added from the Smith & Associates acquisition on January 1 and from the addition of new trust customers throughout 2007. In addition to customer account levels, trust fees are also based on the underlying values of trust assets managed. For 2006, the increase in revenue was from both an increase in the market valuation of assets held in trust accounts and an increase in new trust customers.
Deposit service charge income increased $213,000 or 4% to $5.1 million for 2007 compared to $4.9 million for 2006 and $4.3 million for 2005. The increase in each period primarily reflects the continued expansion of our deposit customer account base.
Other income increased $822,000 in 2007 and $569,000 in 2006. Debit and ATM card processing income increased $443,000 in 2007 and $362,000 in 2006, representing the majority of the increase in other income. The increase in debit and ATM card processing income reflects both an increase in usage from current customers and an overall increase in the number of debit and ATM card customers. Other fee categories included in other income that experienced growth in each period include credit card commissions and fees from brokerage services. Also included in other income for 2007 was a $288,000 unrealized gain on the Company’s interest rate swaps as more fully disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The increase in other income in 2007 was partially offset by a $171,000 decline in income from bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) while the increase in 2006 included a $373,000 increase in income from BOLI.
Gain on sales of loans primarily includes gains on the sale of real estate mortgage loans, and to a lesser extent, gains on the sale of the SBA guaranteed portion of certain commercial loans. We sell the majority of the fixed-rate mortgage loans we originate. We do not retain the servicing rights for the loans we sell. A summary of gain on sales of loans and related volume was as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | For The Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Gain on the sale of SBA guaranteed loans | $ | -- | $ | 60 | $ | 100 | |||||
Net gain on the sale of real estate mortgage loans | 1,290 | 1,661 | 2,236 | ||||||||
Gain on sales of loans | $ | 1,290 | $ | 1,721 | $ | 2,336 | |||||
Real estate mortgage loans originated for sale | $ | 86,440 | $ | 103,655 | $ | 137,028 | |||||
Real estate mortgage loans sold | 86,150 | 106,100 | 140,083 | ||||||||
Net gain on the sale of real estate mortgage loans as a | |||||||||||
a percent of real estate mortgage loans sold ("Loan | |||||||||||
sales margin") | 1.50 | % | 1.57 | % | 1.60 | % |
Gain on sales of loans decreased $431,000 and $615,000, respectively, in 2007 and 2006. The decline in both years was impacted by lower sales volumes and a declining sales margin. Mortgage interest rate levels had steadily increased since 2004, resulting in a continued decline in the level of residential refinancing and new loan originations. As sales volumes have steadily declined, competition has increased and resulted in a slight decline in our sales margin since 2005. The decline in 2007 also reflects the Company’s interest in holding more of its mortgage loan volume in its portfolio as discussed more fully below under Loan Portfolio and Asset Quality.
Noninterest Expense: Noninterest expense totaled $50.3 million for 2007 as compared to $44.9 million for 2006 and $41.4 million for 2005. The increase of $5.4 million in 2007 included increases across each major expense category. The primary increase in 2006 was a $2.4 million increase in salaries and benefits.
Salaries and benefits increased $708,000 in 2007 largely from an increase in staff associated with the opening of two new branch locations and the addition of the new Asset Management Group from the acquisition of Smith & Associates on January 1. The costs associated with these staffing increases were partially offset by a reduction in performance incentives. The $2.4 million increase in 2006 was related to additional staffing in each line of business and in support departments consistent with growth of the Bank and from increased incentives associated with strong operating performance in 2006. The 2006 increase also included $657,000 of stock compensation expense associated with the adoption of FAS 123, Revised, on January 1, 2006.
Occupancy expense increased $627,000 in 2007 and $319,000 in 2006 and furniture and equipment expense increased $735,000 in 2007 and $246,000 in 2006. The increase in occupancy expense was consistent with our branch and facility expansion. The Company opened four new facilities in 2007, including two new branches and two branch relocations, and one new branch in 2006. The increase in furniture and equipment expense relates to costs associated with improving our internal and customer technologies, as well as costs associated with our facility expansion.
The $141,000 increase in legal and professional fees in 2007 was primarily related to increased costs associated with higher non-performing assets. Data processing fees were up $156,000 in 2007 and $172,000 in 2006, consistent with new account growth.
Other expense increased $2.8 million in 2007 and $279,000 in 2006. The increase in 2007 includes approximately $889,000 of additional FDIC assessments related to a change by the FDIC in their charges for all banks effective January 1, 2007. Costs associated with an increase in nonperforming assets increased by approximately $609,000 and include losses on disposition, costs of property appraisals and other carrying costs. The remaining increase in other expense includes increases in various categories consistent with our customer account growth. These costs include debit card and ATM processing, customer and internal courier, brokerage account processing and outside service support.
Although we expect noninterest expense levels to generally rise with our growth, we expect efficiency to improve by better utilizing our capacity as we grow. We believe the additional capacity within our branch network will continue to provide future growth opportunities without significant additional costs.
Federal Income Tax Expense:Our federal income tax expense has fluctuated generally commensurate with changes in pre-tax earnings. Our federal income tax expense was lower than the amount computed by applying our statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to our pre-tax earnings primarily due to tax-exempt interest income and income from bank-owned life insurance. Our effective tax rate was 28.7%, 31.5% and 32.1% in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Summary:Total assets were $2.13 billion at December 31, 2007, an increase of $55.2 million from $2.08 billion at December 31, 2006. We believe the continued asset growth reflects the acceptance of our full-service community banking philosophy in the communities we serve. Our asset growth consists primarily of growth in our loan portfolio as we continue to attract new loan customers and deepen relationships with existing customers despite the strong competition from other locally based community banks and larger regional banks. The growth in total assets was principally funded by growth in deposits from within the Company’s markets as discussed below.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Our cash and cash equivalents, which include federal funds sold and short-term investments, were $49.8 million at December 31, 2007 compared to $39.9 million at December 31, 2006. The balance at year-end 2007 was elevated due to a large inflow of customer deposits that occurred at the end of the year.
Securities:Securities increased $2.2 million to $203.4 million at December 31, 2007 from $201.3 million at December 31, 2006. We maintain our security portfolio at a level to provide diversity in the level of credit risk within our asset base, to support our liquidity needs and to balance our interest rate risk. Our portfolio consists primarily of high quality U.S government agency and state and local municipal bonds classified as available for sale. These securities are generally purchased at fixed rates to help offset the interest sensitivity of our variable rate loan portfolio. We expect growth of our securities portfolio to be consistent with the growth of our company to maintain the diversity of our assets and support our liquidity and interest rate risk management.
Loan Portfolio and Asset Quality:Our total loan portfolio increased $39.2 million to $1.75 billion at December 31, 2007 from $1.71 billion at December 31, 2006.
During 2007, residential mortgage loans led our loan portfolio growth.Because of the relatively short duration of our assets, we viewed the improvement in rates on residential mortgage loans as an opportunity to hold more of these higher quality loans in our portfolio. The residential mortgage loan portfolio grew $41.5 million to $266.3 million at December 31, 2007. Our residential real estate loan portfolio, which also includes residential construction loans made to individual homeowners, comprised approximately 15% and 13% of portfolio loans at the end of 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Our residential real estate portfolio represents only a portion of our residential origination loan volume, as we also sell a portion of our fixed-rate obligations on the secondary market with servicing released. We originated for sale $86.4 million in residential mortgages in 2007, $103.7 million in 2006 and $137.0 million in 2005. Loans held for sale were $3.1 million at December 31, 2007 compared to $1.5 million at December 31, 2006.
In our remaining portfolios, commercial and industrial loans increased $22.6 million, commercial real estate loans declined $19.8 million and consumer loans declined $5.1 million for 2007. The slower loan growth in our commercial and consumer loan portfolios during 2007 was a reflection of the weak economic conditions in West Michigan. In particular, deterioration in residential land development has impacted both asset growth and asset quality.
Total commercial and commercial real estate loans were $1.29 billion and $1.29 billion at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. This portfolio remains our largest loan segment and accounted for approximately 74% and 76% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our commercial and commercial real estate portfolios are made up of loans to small and mid-sized business. The commercial loan portfolio we have built reflects the acceptance of our lending approach by our customers and the ability of our lending team to respond to their needs effectively. Our commercial loan department is built around a well-seasoned officer team and our lending approach involves an efficient loan approval process.
During 2007, we focused more of our resources on growing our commercial and industrial loans to help diversify our commercial loan portfolio. Our commercial and industrial portfolio was $438.7 million at December 31, 2007 and represented 34% of our commercial portfolio, up from 32% at December 31, 2006. A further breakdown of the composition of the commercial loans portfolio is shown in the table below (in thousands):
December 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Construction/Land Development | $ | 335,366 | $ | 360,372 | ||||
Farmland and Agriculture | 30,371 | 37,426 | ||||||
Nonfarm, Nonresidential | 454,764 | 439,436 | ||||||
Multi-family | 35,381 | 38,483 | ||||||
Total Commercial Real Estate Loans | 855,882 | 875,717 | ||||||
Commercial and Industrial | 438,743 | 416,135 | ||||||
Total Commercial Loans | $ | 1,294,625 | $ | 1,291,852 | ||||
Approximately 42% of the balance of commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2007 was owner-occupied while 58% was non-owner occupied.
Loans for the development or sale of 1-4 family residential properties was approximately $235.8 million at December 31, 2007, representing approximately 70% of the construction and land development portfolio. Of this total, approximately $29.5 million was secured by vacant land, $125.6 million was secured by developed residential land and $80.7 million was secured by 1-4 family properties held for speculative purposes. Vacant land is land zoned for residential purposes but with no further development. Developed residential land is land that has been further developed for future residential construction, including but not limited to completed lot surveys, road work, water, sewer and other utility preparation and general land grade. 1-4 family properties held for speculative purposes are on developed residential lots and include completed residential homes or residential homes in the process of construction.
Our consumer loan portfolio includes loans secured by personal property and home equity fixed term and line of credit loans. Our consumer loan portfolio decreased to $189.7 million at December 31, 2007 from $194.8 million at December 31, 2006. Consumer loans comprised approximately 11% of our portfolio loans at the end of both 2007 and 2006.
Our loan portfolio is reviewed regularly by an independent, internal loan review team, our own loan officers, and our senior management. When reasonable doubt exists concerning collectibility of interest or principal of one of our loans, that loan is placed in non-accrual status. Any interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed and charged against current earnings.
Nonperforming assets are comprised of nonperforming loans, foreclosed assets and repossessed assets. Nonperforming loans include loans on non-accrual status, restructured loans and loans delinquent more than 90 days but still accruing. Foreclosed and repossessed assets include assets acquired in settlement of loans.
Nonperforming loans as of December 31, 2007 totaled $73.9 million or 4.22% of total portfolio loans compared to $22.3 million or 1.30% of total portfolio loans at December 31, 2006.
Loans for the development or sale of 1-4 family residential properties were approximately $57.4 million or 78% of total non-performing loans at December 31, 2007. Of this total, approximately $3.2 million was secured by vacant land, $40.8 million was secured by developed residential land and $13.4 million was secured by 1-4 family properties held for speculative purposes. The remaining balance of nonperforming loans at the end of 2007 consist of a number of commercial loans most of which are on nonaccrual for which we consider to be well collateralized or adequately reserved.
The majority of the balance of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2006 related to one commercial relationship totaling approximately $15.2 million. At December 31, 2007, approximately $15 million remained outstanding for this borrower and was included in the balance of nonperforming loans.
Foreclosed assets totaled $5.7 million at December 31, 2007 compared to $3.2 million at December 31, 2006. The balance at the end of 2007 was comprised of a number of real estate properties for which no loss is expected upon disposition.
Total nonperforming assets amounted to $79.8 million or 3.75% of total assets compared to $25.6 million or 1.23% as of December 31, 2006. The following table shows the composition and amount of our nonperforming assets.
(Dollars in thousands) | As of December 31 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Nonaccrual loans | $ | 70,999 | $ | 5,811 | $ | 3,977 | |||||
Loans 90 days or more delinquent and still accruing | 2,872 | 16,479 | 227 | ||||||||
Restructured loans | 38 | -- | -- | ||||||||
Total nonperforming loans | 73,909 | 22,290 | 4,204 | ||||||||
Foreclosed assets | 5,704 | 3,212 | 527 | ||||||||
Repossessed assets | 172 | 81 | 165 | ||||||||
Total nonperforming assets | $ | 79,785 | $ | 25,583 | $ | 4,896 | |||||
Nonperforming loans to total loans | 4.22 | % | 1.30 | % | .27 | % | |||||
Nonperforming assets to total assets | 3.75 | % | 1.23 | % | .26 | % |
Allowance for Loan Losses: Our allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2007 was $33.4 million, or 1.91% of total portfolio loans, compared to $23.3 million or 1.36% of total portfolio loans at December 31, 2006.
The increase in the level of the allowance was primarily related to the migration of loans to residential developers for the development or sale of 1-4 family residential properties to an impaired status, and a related increase in the level of reserves for these loans. During the third and fourth quarters of 2007, the allowance for loan losses was increased by approximately $11.6 million of additional provisions for loan losses associated with these loans. Based upon our internal analysis, in our judgment, we have provided adequate allowances for loan losses, although there can be no assurance that the allowance for losses on loans will be adequate to cover all losses.
Our allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered appropriate based upon our regular, quarterly assessment of the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Our methodology for measuring the appropriate level of allowance relies on several key elements, which include specific allowances for loans considered impaired, formula allowance for graded loans, general allocations based on historical trends for pools of similar loan types and under certain circumstances, reserves related to current market conditions that are pertinent to certain aspects of the loan portfolio.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, regulatory authorities reached a conceptual consensus on the method for determining the allowance. In addition to reaffirming the importance of experience grounded, objectively determinable amounts, they acknowledged the appropriateness of considering other subjective factors in determining the proper level of the allowance. We believe our process conforms to this guidance.
Specific allowances are established in cases where senior credit management has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to an individually impaired credit that we believe indicates the probability that a loss may be incurred. This amount is determined by methods prescribed by SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”. The specific allowance for impaired loans was $15.8 million at December 31, 2007 and $400,000 at December 31, 2006. The increase in the specific allowance for impaired loans was primarily related to the increase in impaired loans associated with the development or sale of 1-4 family residential properties.
Impaired loans increased $93.2 million to $99.0 million at December 31, 2007. Approximately $62.3 million or 63% of impaired loans were for the development or sale of 1-4 family residential properties. Of this total, approximately $3.3 million was secured by vacant land, $42.5 million was secured by developed residential land and $16.5 million was secured by 1-4 family properties held for speculative purposes.
The allowance allocated to commercial loans that are not considered to be impaired is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans based on the internal risk grade of such loans. We use a loan rating method based upon an eight point system. Loans are assigned a loss allocation factor for each loan classification category. The lower the grade assigned to a loan category, the greater the allocation percentage that is applied. Changes in risk grade of loans affect the amount of the allowance allocation. The determination of our loss factors is based upon our actual loss history by loan grade, and adjusted for consideration of significant factors that, in management’s judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the analysis date. The commercial loan allowance was $15.3 million at December 31, 2007 compared to $21.0 million at December 31, 2006. The decrease in the commercial loan allowance was driven primarily by the migration of loans and allocated allowance to impaired status.
Groups of homogeneous loans, such as residential real estate, open- and closed-end consumer loans, etc., receive general allowance allocations based on a review of loss trends by specific loan segments. These loss allocations are then adjusted based upon past due status, and consideration for general economic and business conditions, collateral values, seasoning of the portfolios and most recent loss experience for similar pools of loans. The general allowance was $2.3 million at December 31, 2007 and $1.8 million at December 31, 2006. The increase was largely related to an increase in the balance of residential real estate loans and a slight increase in the past due status of these loans.
The following table shows the allocation of the allowance for loan loss at the dates indicated to the extent specific allocations have been determined relative to particular loans.
As of December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Dollars in Thousands) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance Amount | % of Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance Amount | % of Each Category to Total Loans | Allowance Amount | % of Each Category to Total Loans | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||
real estate | $ | 31,132 | 74.0 | % | $ | 21,417 | 75.5 | % | $ | 18,883 | 74.5 | % | ||||||||
Residential real estate | 699 | 15.2 | % | 502 | 13.1 | % | 463 | 14.4 | % | |||||||||||
Consumer | 1,591 | 10.8 | % | 1,340 | 11.4 | % | 1,646 | 11.1 | % | |||||||||||
Unallocated | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 33,422 | 100.0 | % | $ | 23,259 | 100.0 | % | $ | 20,992 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
The above allocations are not intended to imply limitations on usage of the allowance. The entire allowance is available for any loan losses without regard to loan type. Of the $33.4 million allowance at December 31, 2007, 47% related to specific allocations on impaired loans, 46% related to commercial loan portfolio allocations and 7% related to general allocations for homogeneous loans.
Net charge-offs totaled $5.6 million or 0.32% of average loans for 2007 compared to $5.4 million, or 0.33% of average loans for 2006 and $1.9 million or 0.13% of average loans for 2005. Net charge-offs in 2007 include charges associated with various loans, primarily related to impaired loans to residential developers. These charge-offs were considered necessary to bring loan balances to levels considered collectible based upon current information. Net charge-offs in 2006 include a $4.7 million charge-off related to one commercial borrower whose loans were allegedly falsely secured by nonexistent collateral. The Company filed a lawsuit against this borrower in 2007 that is still pending.
The following is a summary of our portfolio loan balances and changes in the allowance for loan losses and related ratios.
(Dollars in thousands) | December 31 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Portfolio Loans: | |||||||||||
Average daily balance of loans for the year | $ | 1,725,453 | $ | 1,635,391 | $ | 1,471,404 | |||||
Amount of loans outstanding at end of period | 1,750,632 | 1,711,450 | 1,547,879 | ||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: | |||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 23,259 | $ | 20,992 | $ | 19,251 | |||||
Addition to allowance charged to operations | 15,750 | 7,715 | 3,675 | ||||||||
Loans charged-off: | |||||||||||
Commercial | (5,065 | ) | (5,601 | ) | (1,842 | ) | |||||
Residential real estate | (139 | ) | (43 | ) | (24 | ) | |||||
Consumer | (716 | ) | (410 | ) | (371 | ) | |||||
Recoveries: | |||||||||||
Commercial | 263 | 399 | 261 | ||||||||
Residential real estate | 2 | 10 | 17 | ||||||||
Consumer | 68 | 197 | 25 | ||||||||
Balance at end of year | $ | 33,422 | $ | 23,259 | $ | 20,992 | |||||
Ratios: | |||||||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding | .32 | % | .33 | % | .13 | % | |||||
Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding | |||||||||||
at year end | 1.91 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.36 | % |
Premises and Equipment:Premises and equipment totaled $64.6 million at December 31, 2007, an increase of $3.8 million from December 31, 2006. The increase included costs associated with the opening of four new facilities in 2007, including a new regional facility in downtown Holland, the relocation of a branch site and two new branches in Kent County.
Deposits:Total deposits decreased $144.0 million to $1.52 billion at December 31, 2007, as compared to $1.67 billion at December 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily due to a decline of $147 million in money market balances from one of the Company’s institutional depositors during the last half of 2007. The withdrawals were associated with planned distributions and the depositor remains an excellent customer for the Company.
The Company also reduced its holdings of deposits generated from out-of-market brokers during the year. Brokered deposits declined $70.1 million during 2007. Accordingly, growth from deposits within the Company’s markets was approximately $73.1 million during 2007. The increase in local deposits, combined with an increase in other borrowings at more attractive terms and pricing, allowed the Company to reduce its reliance on brokered deposits. The growth in deposits within the Company’s markets was primarily from an increase of $25.1 million in money market accounts and an increase of $34.4 million in certificates of deposit, as deposit customers preferred such accounts within the generally high rate environment. With our continued focus on quality customer service, the desire of customers to deal with a local bank, and the convenience of our expanding and maturing branch network, we expect further growth in our core transaction deposits.
Noninterest bearing demand accounts comprised approximately 12% of total deposits at December 31, 2007, as compared to approximately 11% of total deposits at the end of 2006. Interest bearing demand, including money market and savings accounts, comprised approximately 43% of total deposits at December 31, 2007, as compared to 46% at the end of 2006. Time accounts as a percentage of total deposits were approximately 45% at December 31, 2007, as compared to 43% at the end of 2006.
Borrowed Funds: Borrowed funds consist of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repo borrowings”), long-term debt associated with the issuance of trust preferred securities and federal funds purchased provided by our correspondent banks.
Borrowed funds totaled $441.8 million at December 31, 2007, including $244.1 million of Federal Home Loan Bank advances, $110.0 million in repo borrowings, $41.2 million in long-term debt associated with trust preferred securities and $46.5 million in federal funds purchased. Borrowed funds totaled $245.2 million at December 31, 2006 including $172.0 million of Federal Home Loan Bank advances, $20.0 million in repo borrowings, $41.2 million in long-term debt associated with trust preferred securities and $12.0 million in federal funds purchased. The increase in borrowed funds in 2007 was used primarily to offset a large portion of the decline in brokered deposits and institutional deposits discussed above.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Capital Resources: Total shareholders’ equity was $160.6 million at December 31, 2007 compared to $156.8 million at December 31, 2006. The increase of $3.8 million was primarily from a $3.0 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income. Net income generated during 2007 of $9.3 million was primarily offset by cash dividends of $8.8 million, or $.51 per share. We began paying cash dividends at the end of 2000 and have increased the amount of the dividend each year since. It is anticipated that we will continue to pay quarterly cash dividends in the future. We have also paid a stock dividend each year beginning in 2001. A 5% stock dividend was paid in May 2007, resulting in a transfer of $9.5 million from retained earnings to common stock.
The increase in accumulated other comprehensive income was due to an increase in the market value of both securities available for sale and the derivative instruments associated with the Company’s interest rate swap arrangements. The market value increases were related to a decrease in market interest rates for similar instruments. For more information regarding our interest rate swaps, see the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Capital levels for the Company continue to be maintained at levels well in excess of regulatory minimums for bank holding companies. The following table shows the Company’s various capital ratios for 2007 and 2006.
As of and for the year ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average equity to average assets | 7.8 | % | 7.7 | % | ||||
Total risk-based capital | 10.7 | % | 10.9 | % | ||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital | 9.4 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||
Tier 1 capital to average assets | 8.3 | % | 8.5 | % |
The regulatory ratios declined slightly in 2007 as assets grew slightly faster than retained capital for 2007. The entire $40.0 million of trust preferred securities outstanding at December 31, 2007 qualified as Tier 1 capital. For more information regarding the trust preferred securities, please refer to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Capital sources include, but are not limited to, additional common stock offerings, trust preferred securities offerings and subordinated debt.
Liquidity: The liquidity of a financial institution reflects its ability to manage a variety of sources and uses of funds. Our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows categorize these sources and uses into operating, investing and financing activities. We primarily focus on developing access to a variety of borrowing sources to supplement our deposit gathering activities and provide funds for growing our investment and loan portfolios. Our sources of liquidity include our borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank, federal funds purchased lines and other secured borrowing sources with our correspondent banks, loan payments by our borrowers, maturity and sales of our securities available for sale, growth of our deposits and deposit equivalents, federal funds sold, and the various capital resources discussed above. Liquidity management involves the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of our customers. Our customers may be either borrowers with credit needs or depositors wanting to withdraw funds. We feel our liquidity position is sufficient to meet these needs.
In the normal course of business, we enter into certain contractual obligations including obligations which are considered in our overall liquidity management. The table below summarizes our significant contractual obligations at December 31, 2007.
(dollars in thousands) | 1 year or less | 2-3 years | 4-5 years | After 5 years | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time deposit maturities | $ | 553,120 | $ | 129,226 | $ | 4,319 | $ | 108 | ||||||
Other borrowed funds | 140,482 | 206,237 | -- | 7,333 | ||||||||||
Federal funds purchased | 46,467 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||
Long-term debt | -- | -- | -- | 41,238 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 740,069 | $ | 335,463 | $ | 4,319 | $ | 48,679 | ||||||
In addition to normal loan funding, we also maintain liquidity to meet customer financing needs through unused lines of credit, unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. The level and fluctuation of these commitments is also considered in our overall liquidity management. At December 31, 2007, we had a total of $424.6 million in unused lines of credit, $44.0 million in unfunded loan commitments and $21.6 million in standby letters of credit.
SENSITIVITY TO MARKET RISK
Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, liquidity risk. All of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars with no specific foreign exchange exposure. Macatawa Bank has only limited agricultural-related loan assets, and therefore has no significant exposure to changes in commodity prices.
Our market risk exposure is mainly comprised of our sensitivity to interest rate risk. Our balance sheet has sensitivity, in various categories of assets and liabilities, to changes in prevailing rates in the U.S., including the Federal funds rate, the prime rate, mortgage rates, U.S. Treasury rates and various money market indexes. As part of our asset/liability management process, we identify and evaluate opportunities to structure our balance sheet to maximize our earnings while balancing our liquidity and interest rate risk within established parameters.
We utilize a simulation model as our primary measurement technique in our interest rate risk management. Our simulation analyses monitors the direction and magnitude of variations in net interest income and the economic value of equity (“EVE”) resulting from potential changes in market interest rates.
Key assumptions in the model include the repricing of cash flows and maturities of interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities at current market rates, prepayment speeds on certain assets, and changes in market conditions impacting loan and deposit pricing. We also assume certain levels of rate sensitivity to changes in market rates of our non-maturing transaction deposits based upon our historical sensitivity under previous interest rate cycles, and we include pricing floors on discretionary priced liability products which limit how low various checking and savings products could go under declining interest rates. These assumptions reflect our pricing philosophy in response to changing interest rates.
The simulation analysis also considers the interest rate swaps we have entered into which have the effect of converting $60.0 million in variable rate loans repricing immediately into fixed rate loans with a weighted average maturity of 1.5 years. The interest rate swaps are more fully discussed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We forecast the next twelve months of net interest income under an assumed environment of gradual changes in market interest rates under various scenarios. The resulting change in net interest income is an indication of the sensitivity of our earnings to directional changes in market interest rates. The simulation also measures the change in EVE, or the net present value of our assets and liabilities, under the same shifts in interest rates, as calculated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using a market-based discount rate.
The following table shows the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income over the next twelve months and EVE based on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands).
Interest Rate Scenario | Economic Value of Equity | Percent Change | Net Interest Income | Percent Change | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change in Interest Rates | ||||||||||||||
200 basis point rise | $ | 163,685 | (15.2 | 5)% | $ | 60,464 | 0.11 | % | ||||||
100 basis point rise | 180,190 | (6.70 | ) | 60,491 | 0.16 | |||||||||
Base-rate scenario | 193,137 | --- | 60,396 | --- | ||||||||||
100 basis point decline | 199,241 | 3.16 | 60,134 | (0.43 | ) | |||||||||
200 basis point decline | 203,161 | 5.19 | 59,690 | (1.17 | ) |
This analysis suggests that we are well-balanced, with limited fluctuations in net interest income under each scenario over the next twelve months. Further, our balanced sensitivity in time horizons beyond one year results in little fluctuation in EVE under the various rate shock scenarios.
We also forecast the impact of immediate and parallel interest rate shocks on net interest income under various scenarios to measure the sensitivity of our earnings under extreme conditions.
The quarterly simulation analysis is monitored against acceptable interest rate risk parameters by the Asset/Liability Committee and reported to the Board of Directors.
In addition to changes in interest rates, the level of future net interest income is also dependent on a number of other variables, including: the growth, composition and absolute levels of loans, deposits, and other earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; economic and competitive conditions; potential changes in lending, investing and deposit gathering strategies; and client preferences.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING AND POLICIES ESTIMATES:
To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and future results could differ. The allowance for loan loss and the status of contingencies are deemed critical due to the required level of management judgment and the use of estimates, making them particularly subject to change.
Our methodology for determining the allowance for loan loss and the related provision for loan losses is described above in the “Allowance for Loan Loss” discussion. This area of accounting requires significant judgment due to the number of factors which can influence the collectibility of a loan. Unanticipated changes in these factors could significantly change the level of the allowance for loan losses and the related provision for loan losses. Although, based upon our internal analysis, and in our judgment, we have provided an adequate allowance for loan losses, there can be no assurance that our analysis has properly identified all of the probable losses in our loan portfolio.
Loss contingencies, including the legal actions involving Trade Partners as described in Note 16 of the financial statements, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. This, too, is an accounting area that involves significant judgment. Although, based upon our judgment and internal analysis we have properly accounted for loss contingencies, future changes in the status of such contingencies could result in a significant change in the level of contingent liabilities and a related impact to operating earnings.
Forward-Looking Statements:This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations are generally identifiable by use of the words believe, expect, intend, anticipate, estimate, project, may or similar expressions. The presentation and discussion of the provision and allowance for loan losses, statements concerning future profitability or future growth or increases, and statements about the adequacy of our capital resources are examples of inherently forward-looking statements in that they involve judgments and statements of belief as to the outcome of future events. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in: interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in our market area and accounting principles, policies, and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further information concerning us and our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Quarterly Stock Price Information:The Company’s common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol MCBC. High and low sales prices (as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market) for each quarter for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are set forth in the table below. This information has been restated to reflect the impact of all previously paid stock dividends and splits.
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||
Quarter | ||||||||||||||
First Quarter | $ | 20.28 | $ | 17.01 | $ | 23.88 | $ | 21.25 | ||||||
Second Quarter | $ | 17.90 | $ | 14.70 | $ | 23.04 | $ | 19.68 | ||||||
Third Quarter | $ | 16.44 | $ | 11.04 | $ | 22.90 | $ | 19.99 | ||||||
Fourth Quarter | $ | 14.44 | $ | 7.56 | $ | 22.65 | $ | 19.42 |
Quarterly cash dividends totaling $.37 were paid during 2005, and a 15% stock dividend was declared during the second quarter of 2005. Quarterly cash dividends totaling $.46 were paid during 2006, and a 5% stock dividend and a 3-for-2 stock split were declared during the second quarter of 2006. Quarterly cash dividends totaling $.51 were paid during 2007, and a 5% stock dividend was declared during the second quarter of 2007.
SHAREHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph shows the cumulative total shareholder return on an investment in the Company’s common stock compared to the Hemscott Group Index of Regional-Midwest Banks and the Russell 2000 Index. The comparison assumes a $100 investment on December 31, 2002 at the initial price of $9.90 per share (adjusted for all stock dividends and splits) and assumes that dividends are reinvested. The comparisons in this table are set forth in response to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) disclosure requirements, and therefore are not intended to forecast or be indicative of future performance of the common stock.
COMPARISON OF 5-YEAR TOTAL CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION,
RUSSELL 2000 INDEX AND HEMSCOTT GROUP INDEX
ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DEC. 31, 2002
ASSUMES DIVIDEND REINVESTED
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2007
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Macatawa Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | 100.00 | 152.95 | 186.17 | 245.35 | 230.30 | 101.49 | ||||||||||||||
Hemscott Group Index | 100.00 | 128.56 | 137.08 | 131.62 | 152.58 | 119.51 | ||||||||||||||
Russell 2000 Index | 100.00 | 145.37 | 170.81 | 176.48 | 206.61 | 196.40 |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING | F-2 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON | |
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING | F-3 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON | |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | F-4 |
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | F-5 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME | F-6 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | F-7 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | F-9 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | F-11 |
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Company management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2007, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
/s/ Benj. A. Smith, III —————————————— Benj. A. Smith, III Chief Executive Officer /s/ Jon W. Swets —————————————— Jon W. Swets Chief Financial Officer |
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Macatawa Bank Corporation
Holland, Michigan
We have audited Macatawa Bank Corporation’s internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Macatawa Bank Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Macatawa Bank Corporation maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Macatawa Bank Corporation as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 and our report dated February 21, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC |
Grand Rapids, Michigan
February 21, 2008
F-3
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Macatawa Bank Corporation
Holland, Michigan
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Macatawa Bank Corporation as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Macatawa Bank Corporation at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Macatawa Bank Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 21, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC |
Grand Rapids, Michigan
February 21, 2008
F-4
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars in thousands)
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 49,816 | $ | 39,882 | ||||
Securities available for sale, at fair value | 201,498 | 198,546 | ||||||
Securities held to maturity (fair value 2007 - $1,961, | ||||||||
2006 - $2,762) | 1,917 | 2,711 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock | 12,275 | 12,275 | ||||||
Loans held for sale | 3,127 | 1,547 | ||||||
Total loans | 1,750,632 | 1,711,450 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (33,422 | ) | (23,259 | ) | ||||
1,717,210 | 1,688,191 | |||||||
Premises and equipment - net | 64,564 | 60,731 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 10,003 | 11,233 | ||||||
Goodwill | 25,919 | 23,915 | ||||||
Acquisition intangibles | 3,023 | 1,563 | ||||||
Bank-owned life insurance | 22,703 | 21,843 | ||||||
Other assets | 17,911 | 12,379 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,129,966 | $ | 2,074,816 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||
Noninterest-bearing | $ | 185,681 | $ | 180,032 | ||||
Interest-bearing | 1,337,872 | 1,487,525 | ||||||
Total | 1,523,553 | 1,667,557 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased | 46,467 | 11,990 | ||||||
Other borrowed funds | 354,052 | 192,018 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 41,238 | 41,238 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 4,031 | 5,164 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 1,969,341 | 1,917,967 | ||||||
Shareholders' equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value, 500,000 shares | ||||||||
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding | ||||||||
Common stock, no par value, 40,000,000 shares | ||||||||
authorized; 16,968,398 and 16,254,619 shares | ||||||||
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 | ||||||||
and 2006, respectively | 163,522 | 153,728 | ||||||
Retained earnings (deficit) | (4,208 | ) | 4,840 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 1,311 | (1,719 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders' equity | 160,625 | 156,849 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 2,129,966 | $ | 2,074,816 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest income | |||||||||||
Loans, including fees | $ | 129,183 | $ | 125,034 | $ | 98,031 | |||||
Securities | |||||||||||
Taxable | 6,665 | 5,424 | 4,392 | ||||||||
Tax-exempt | 2,185 | 2,154 | 2,084 | ||||||||
FHLB stock | 559 | 656 | 573 | ||||||||
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments | 780 | 238 | 315 | ||||||||
Total interest income | 139,372 | 133,506 | 105,395 | ||||||||
Interest expense | |||||||||||
Deposits | 58,955 | 53,597 | 32,060 | ||||||||
Other borrowings | 13,091 | 8,209 | 6,599 | ||||||||
Long-term debt | 3,441 | 3,346 | 2,603 | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased | 969 | 937 | 1,296 | ||||||||
Total interest expense | 76,456 | 66,089 | 42,558 | ||||||||
Net interest income | 62,916 | 67,417 | 62,837 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 15,750 | 7,715 | 3,675 | ||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 47,166 | 59,702 | 59,162 | ||||||||
Noninterest income | |||||||||||
Service charges and fees | 5,087 | 4,874 | 4,323 | ||||||||
Gain on sales of loans | 1,290 | 1,721 | 2,336 | ||||||||
Trust fees | 4,906 | 3,589 | 2,921 | ||||||||
Other | 4,815 | 3,993 | 3,424 | ||||||||
Total noninterest income | 16,098 | 14,177 | 13,004 | ||||||||
Noninterest expense | |||||||||||
Salaries and benefits | 25,499 | 24,791 | 22,388 | ||||||||
Occupancy of premises | 4,185 | 3,558 | 3,239 | ||||||||
Furniture and equipment | 3,956 | 3,221 | 2,975 | ||||||||
Legal and professional fees | 1,068 | 927 | 786 | ||||||||
Marketing and promotion | 1,261 | 1,075 | 1,145 | ||||||||
Data processing fees | 1,912 | 1,756 | 1,584 | ||||||||
Other | 12,378 | 9,585 | 9,306 | ||||||||
Total noninterest expenses | 50,259 | 44,913 | 41,423 | ||||||||
Income before income tax expense | 13,005 | 28,966 | 30,743 | ||||||||
Income tax expense | 3,736 | 9,135 | 9,854 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 9,269 | $ | 19,831 | $ | 20,889 | |||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | .54 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.24 | |||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | .54 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.21 | |||||
Cash dividends per share | $ | .51 | $ | .46 | $ | .37 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Common Stock | Retained Earnings (Deficit) | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Total Shareholders' Equity | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, January 1, 2005 | $ | 124,389 | $ | 4,277 | $ | 408 | $ | 129,074 | ||||||
Net income | 20,889 | 20,889 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) | ||||||||||||||
on derivative instruments, net | ||||||||||||||
of tax of ($725) | (1,346 | ) | (1,346 | ) | ||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) | ||||||||||||||
on securities available for sale, net | ||||||||||||||
of tax of ($1,046) | (1,941 | ) | (1,941 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 17,602 | |||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense (includes 5,000 shares earned under Stock Compensation Plan) | 176 | 176 | ||||||||||||
Issued 1,328,409 shares in payment | ||||||||||||||
OF 15% stock dividend | 10,863 | (10,898 | ) | (35 | ) | |||||||||
Issued 70,681 shares for stock | ||||||||||||||
option exercises (net of 6,017 shares | ||||||||||||||
exchanged and including $275 of tax benefit) | 1,155 | 1,155 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends at $.37 per share | (6,228 | ) | (6,228 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 | 136,583 | 8,040 | (2,879 | ) | 141,744 | |||||||||
Net income | 19,831 | 19,831 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) | ||||||||||||||
on derivative instruments, net | ||||||||||||||
of tax of $135 | 250 | 250 | ||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) | ||||||||||||||
on securities available for sale, net | ||||||||||||||
of tax of $490 | 910 | 910 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 20,991 | |||||||||||||
Issued 513,283 shares in payment of | ||||||||||||||
5% stock dividend | 15,127 | (15,180 | ) | (53 | ) | |||||||||
Issued 5,401,190 shares in payment of 3-for-2 stock split | ||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense | 657 | 657 | ||||||||||||
Issued 90,714 shares for stock option exercises (net of 4,994 shares exchanged and including $258 of tax benefit) | 1,361 | 1,361 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends at $.46 per share | (7,851 | ) | (7,851 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2006 | $ | 153,728 | $ | 4,840 | $ | (1,719 | ) | $ | 156,849 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)
Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Common Stock | Retained Earnings (Deficit) | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Total Shareholders' Equity | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income | 9,269 | 9,269 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) | ||||||||||||||
on derivative instruments, net | ||||||||||||||
of tax of $617 | 1,145 | 1,145 | ||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) | ||||||||||||||
on securities available for sale, net | ||||||||||||||
of tax of $1,015 | 1,885 | 1,885 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 12,299 | |||||||||||||
Issued 819,223 shares in payment of | ||||||||||||||
5% stock dividend | 9,518 | (9,536 | ) | (18 | ) | |||||||||
Issued 136,936 shares for acquisition of | ||||||||||||||
Smith & Associates | 3,150 | 3,150 | ||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense | 591 | 591 | ||||||||||||
Issued 54,272 shares for stock option | ||||||||||||||
exercises (net of 3,833 shares exchanged | ||||||||||||||
and including $89 of tax benefit) | 431 | 431 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase 298,500 shares of stock | (3,896 | ) | (3,896 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash dividends at $.51 per share | (8,781 | ) | (8,781 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 | $ | 163,522 | $ | (4,208 | ) | $ | 1,311 | $ | 160,625 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 9,269 | $ | 19,831 | $ | 20,889 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income | |||||||||||
to net cash from operating activities | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 3,702 | 3,385 | 3,100 | ||||||||
Stock compensation expense | 591 | 657 | 176 | ||||||||
Stock dividends on FHLB stock | 0 | 0 | (249 | ) | |||||||
Provision for loan losses | 15,750 | 7,715 | 3,675 | ||||||||
Origination of loans for sale | (86,440 | ) | (103,655 | ) | (137,028 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales of loans originated for sale | 86,150 | 106,100 | 140,083 | ||||||||
Gain on sales of loans | (1,290 | ) | (1,721 | ) | (2,336 | ) | |||||
Net change in | |||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets | 2,113 | (2,217 | ) | (487 | ) | ||||||
Bank-owned life insurance | (860 | ) | (1,029 | ) | (657 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | (3,437 | ) | (3,727 | ) | 5,374 | ||||||
Net cash from operating activities | 25,548 | 25,339 | 32,540 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||
Loan originations and payments, net | (49,524 | ) | (172,510 | ) | (156,004 | ) | |||||
Purchase of FHLB stock | 0 | 0 | (1,422 | ) | |||||||
Repurchase by FHLB of FHLB stock | 0 | 1,635 | 0 | ||||||||
Purchases of securities available for sale | (22,154 | ) | (42,669 | ) | (37,770 | ) | |||||
Purchases of securities held to maturity | 0 | 0 | (1,430 | ) | |||||||
Maturities and calls of securities available for sale | 22,135 | 1,990 | 15,298 | ||||||||
Maturities and calls of securities held to maturity | 715 | 1,127 | 0 | ||||||||
Principal paydowns on securities | 94 | 241 | 133 | ||||||||
Additions to premises and equipment | (7,123 | ) | (10,652 | ) | (9,957 | ) | |||||
Net cash from investing activities | (55,857 | ) | (220,838 | ) | (191,152 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in deposits | (144,004 | ) | 159,785 | 156,256 | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings | 34,477 | (13,819 | ) | 3,678 | |||||||
Proceeds from other borrowed funds | 440,000 | 95,000 | 475,000 | ||||||||
Repayments of other borrowed funds | (277,966 | ) | (48,143 | ) | (453,824 | ) | |||||
Fractional shares purchased | (18 | ) | (53 | ) | (35 | ) | |||||
Cash dividends paid | (8,781 | ) | (7,851 | ) | (6,228 | ) | |||||
Repurchase of stock | (3,896 | ) | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Proceeds from exercises of stock options, including tax benefit | 431 | 1,361 | 1,155 | ||||||||
Net cash from financing activities | 40,243 | 186,280 | 176,002 | ||||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 9,934 | (9,219 | ) | 17,390 | |||||||
Beginning cash and cash equivalents | 39,882 | 49,101 | 31,711 | ||||||||
Ending cash and cash equivalents | $ | 49,816 | $ | 39,882 | $ | 49,101 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-9
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supplemental cash flow information: | |||||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 76,341 | $ | 65,149 | $ | 40,806 | |||||
Income taxes paid | 6,350 | 12,130 | 9,000 | ||||||||
Supplemental noncash disclosures: | |||||||||||
Transfers from loans to other real estate | 4,755 | 3,551 | 2,677 | ||||||||
Acquisition of Smith & Associates: | |||||||||||
Acquisition intangibles recorded | |||||||||||
Other liabilities assumed | 3,924 | --- | --- | ||||||||
Value of common stock issued | 774 | --- | --- | ||||||||
3,150 | --- | --- |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-10
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Macatawa Bank and Macatawa Investment Services, Inc., as well as Macatawa Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Macatawa Bank Mortgage Company. Macatawa Investment Services, Inc. ceased doing business effective November l, 2006 as discussed below. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company also owns all of the common securities of Macatawa Statutory Trust I and Macatawa Statutory Trust II. These are grantor trusts that issued trust preferred securities and are discussed in a separate note.
Macatawa Bank is a Michigan chartered bank with depository accounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Bank operates 26 full service branch offices providing a full range of commercial and consumer banking and trust services in Kent County, Ottawa County, and northern Allegan County, Michigan. Macatawa Bank Mortgage Company originates and sells residential mortgage loans into the secondary market on a servicing released basis. Macatawa Investment Services, a broker/dealer that provided various brokerage services including discount brokerage, personal financial planning and consultation regarding individual stocks and mutual funds ceased doing business as a registered broker-dealer effective November 1, 2006. On November 1, 2006, Macatawa Bank began offering brokerage services to its customers through an arrangement with Infinex Investments, Inc. (“Infinex”). Infinex is a full service investment provider, a registered broker-dealer and a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). As more fully discussed in the company’s Form 8-K dated October 11, 2006, on October 11, 2006, Macatawa Bank Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Benj. A. Smith & Associates, Ltd. and Benj. A. Smith, III. Smith & Associates is an investment advisory firm based in Holland, Michigan. The transaction was structured as a merger of Smith & Associates into Macatawa, which in turn contributed the business to Macatawa Bank. The transaction closed effective as of January 1, 2007. Macatawa Statutory Trust I and Macatawa Statutory Trust II are grantor trusts that were established on July 15, 2003 and March 18, 2004 through which trust preferred securities were issued. Under generally accepted accounting principles, these trusts are not consolidated into the financial statements of the Company.
The Company is a financial holding company pursuant to Title I of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. At the present time, the Company has no plans to engage in any of the expanded activities permitted under these regulations.
Use of Estimates: To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and future results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, the fair value of intangible assets, the status of contingencies and the fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change.
Concentration of Credit Risk: Loans are granted to, and deposits are obtained from, customers primarily in the western Michigan area as described above. Substantially all loans are secured by specific items of collateral, including residential real estate, commercial real estate, commercial assets and consumer assets. Other financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, include deposit accounts in other financial institutions.
Cash Flow Reporting: Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits with other financial institutions and short-term securities (securities with maturities equal to or less than 90 days and federal funds sold). Cash flows are reported net for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest-bearing time deposits with other financial institutions and short-term borrowings with maturities of 90 days or less.
(Continued)
F-11
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Securities: Securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Securities available for sale consist of those securities which might be sold prior to maturity due to changes in interest rates, prepayment risks, yield and availability of alternative investments, liquidity needs or other factors. Securities classified as available for sale are reported at their fair value and the related unrealized holding gain or loss is reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax.
Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level yield method without anticipating prepayments. Gains and losses on sales are based on the amortized cost of the security sold.
Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are other than temporary are reflected as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary losses, management considers: the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and the Company’s ability and intent to hold the security for a period sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Stock: The Bank is a member of the FHLB system. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. FHLB stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment. Because this stock is viewed as a long term investment, impairment is based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.
Loans: Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of unearned interest, deferred loan fees and costs and an allowance for loan losses. Loans held for sale are reported at the lower of cost or market, on an aggregate basis. Loans are sold servicing released; therefore no mortgage servicing right assets are established.
Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance and includes amortization of net deferred loan fees and costs over the loan term using the level yield method without anticipating prepayments. Interest income is not reported when full loan repayment is in doubt, typically when the loan is impaired or payments are past due over 90 days (180 days for residential mortgages). Consumer loans are typically charged-off no later than 120 days past due. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.
All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries, and decreased by charge-offs. Management estimates the allowance balance required based on known and inherent risks in the portfolio, past loan loss experience, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired or loans otherwise classified substandard or doubtful. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors.
(Continued)
F-12
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Loan impairment is reported when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Loans are evaluated for impairment when payments are delayed, typically 90 days or more, or when the internal grading system indicates a doubtful classification. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures.
Transfers of Financial Assets: Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been relinquished. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Company, the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
Foreclosed Assets: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Costs after acquisition are expensed. The Company held $5.7 million in foreclosed assets at December 31, 2007 and $3.2 million in foreclosed assets at December 31, 2006.
Premises and Equipment: Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Buildings and related components are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 5 to 40 years.
Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 3 to 15 years. Maintenance, repairs and minor alterations are charged to current operations as expenditures occur and major improvements are capitalized. These assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance: The Bank has purchased life insurance policies on certain officers. Bank-owned life insurance is recorded at its currently realizable cash surrender value. Changes in cash surrender value are recorded in other income.
Goodwill: Goodwill results from prior business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment will be recognized in the period identified.
Acquisition Intangibles: Acquisition intangibles consist of core deposit and acquired customer relationship intangible assets arising from acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then are amortized on an accelerated method with estimated useful lives of ten to sixteen years. These assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Long-term Assets: Premises and equipment, core deposit and other intangible assets, and other long-term assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value.
Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments: Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.
(Continued)
F-13
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Derivatives: Derivative financial instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the use of the derivatives and whether the derivatives qualify for hedge accounting. The Company’s derivatives consist of interest rate swap agreements, which are used as part of its asset liability management to help manage interest rate risk. The Company does not use derivatives for trading purposes.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be received on various loans and are effective are reported in other comprehensive income and later reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. If hedge accounting does not apply, changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognized immediately in current earnings as noninterest income or loss.
If designated as a hedge, the Company formally documents the relationship between derivatives as hedged items, as well as the risk-management objective and the strategy for undertaking hedge transactions. This documentation includes linking cash flow hedges to specific assets on the balance sheet. If designated as a hedge, the Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. The Company discontinues hedge accounting when it determines the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative is settled or terminates, or treatment of the derivative as a hedge is no longer appropriate or intended.
During 2007, the Company determined that its use of hedge accounting for five interest rate swaps was in error. See Note 17 for additional details.
(Continued)
F-14
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation: Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R),Share-based Payment, using the modified prospective transition method. Accordingly, the Company has recorded stock-based compensation cost using the fair value method starting in 2006.
Prior to January 1, 2006, employee compensation expense for stock options was reported using the intrinsic value method. Accordingly, no compensation cost related to stock options was recognized during 2005, as all options granted had an exercise price equal to or greater than the market price of the underlying common stock at date of grant.
Had compensation cost for stock options been measured using the fair value method, net income and basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2005 would have been the pro forma amounts indicated below (dollars in thousands, except per share data).
Net income as reported | $ | 20,889 | |||
Deduct: Stock-based compensation expense | |||||
using fair value method | (508 | ) | |||
Pro forma net income | $ | 20,381 | |||
Basic earnings per share as reported | $ | 1.24 | |||
Pro forma basic earnings per share | 1.21 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share as reported | 1.21 | ||||
Pro forma diluted earnings per share | 1.18 |
All share and per share amounts under stock compensation plans are restated for all stock splits and dividends through the date of issue of the financial statements.
The Company’s stock compensation plan allows for the issuance of restricted stock awards. Compensation cost is based upon the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant and is recognized over the vesting period.
Income Taxes: Income tax expense is the sum of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
The Company adopted FASB Interpretation 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), as of January 1, 2007. A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The adoption had no effect on the Company’s financial statements.
The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share is net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding unvested restricted stock awards. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and restricted stock awards. Earnings and dividends per share are restated for all stock splits and dividends through the date of issue of the financial statements.
(Continued)
F-15
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges which are also recognized as separate components of equity.
Loss Contingencies: Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Restrictions on Cash: Cash on hand or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank was required to meet regulatory reserve and clearing requirements. These balances do not earn interest.
Stock Splits and Dividends: The fair value of shares issued for stock dividends of 20% or less is transferred from retained earnings to common stock, to the extent of available retained earnings. No transfer is recorded for stock dividends or splits in excess of 20%. All share and per share amounts are retroactively adjusted for stock splits and dividends.
Dividend Restriction: Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the Bank to the Company or by the Company to shareholders.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments: Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed separately. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions couldsignificantly affect the estimates. The fair value estimates of existing on-and off-balance sheet financial instruments do not include the value of anticipated future business or the values of assets and liabilities not considered financial instruments.
Segment Reporting: The Company, through the branch network of the Bank, provides a broad range of financial services to individuals and companies in western Michigan. These services include demand, time and savings deposits; lending; ATM processing; cash management; and trust and brokerage services. While the Company’s management team monitors the revenue streams of the various Company products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Accordingly, all of the Company’s banking operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment.
Reclassifications: Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards:
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155,Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments (SFAS No. 155), which permits fair value remeasurement for hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. Additionally, SFAS No. 155 clarifies the accounting guidance for beneficial interests in securitizations. Under SFAS No. 155, all beneficial interests in a securitization will require an assessment in accordance with SFAS No. 133 to determine if an embedded derivative exists within the instrument. In January 2007, the FASB issued Derivatives Implementation Group Issue B40,Application of Paragraph 13(b) to Securitized Interests in Prepayable Financial Assets (DIG Issue B40). DIG Issue B40 provides an exemption from the embedded derivative test of paragraph 13(b) of SFAS No. 133 for instruments that would otherwise require bifurcation if the test is met solely because of a prepayment feature included within the securitized interest and prepayment is not controlled by the security holder. SFAS No. 155 and DIG Issue B40 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
(Continued)
F-16
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Effect of Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards:
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157,Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy about the assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The impact of adoption is not expected to be material.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The standard provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or financial liabilities as of January 1, 2008.
On November 5, 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value through Earnings (“SAB 109”). Previously, SAB 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments, stated that in measuring the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, a company should not incorporate the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan. SAB 109 supersedes SAB 105 and indicates that the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in measuring fair value for all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SAB 105 also indicated that internally-developed intangible assets should not be recorded as part of the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, and SAB 109 retains that view. SAB 109 is effective for derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company does not expect the impact of this standard to be material.
NOTE 2 – ACQUISITION
On January 1, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Benj. A. Smith & Associates, Ltd. (“Smith &Associates”).
Under the terms of the transaction, Smith & Associates was merged into the Company in exchange for 143,783 shares of common stock. The Company in turn contributed the business to Macatawa Bank. The value of the common stock was based on the average closing price during the month of September 2006 ($21.91 per share). Share and per share amounts have been adjusted for the 5% stock dividend distributed on May 30, 2007.
The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, customer relationship intangibles valued at $1,920,000 are being amortized in proportion to estimated future revenue over its estimated useful life. The resulting goodwill was $2,004,000 which will be assessed annually for impairment, with any subsequent impairment recognized in the income statement.
Under the terms of the transaction, one $300,000 contingent payment will also be made if revenue from transferred account balances, principal additions to transferred account balances generated by Mr. Smith and new accounts generated by Mr. Smith exceeds $1,600,000 in 2007 and an additional $300,000 contingent payment will be paid if such revenue exceeds $1,700,000 in 2008. If the contingencies are met, payments will be paid in the form of common stock of Macatawa Bank Corporation. For 2007 revenue did not exceed the $1,600,000 target, therefore the contingent payment for this period will not be made.
(Continued)
F-17
NOTE 3 — SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of securities at year-end were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Available for Sale 2007 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal | ||||||||||||||
agency securities | $ | 149,021 | $ | 1,169 | $ | (145 | ) | $ | 150,045 | |||||
State and municipal bonds | 49,460 | 1,056 | (56 | ) | 50,460 | |||||||||
Other equity securities | 1,000 | -- | (7 | ) | 993 | |||||||||
$ | 199,481 | $ | 2,225 | $ | (208 | ) | $ | 201,498 | ||||||
Held to Maturity 2007 | ||||||||||||||
State and municipal bonds | $ | 1,917 | $ | 45 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 1,961 | |||||
$ | 1,917 | $ | 45 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 1,961 | ||||||
Available for Sale 2006 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal | ||||||||||||||
agency securities | $ | 148,753 | $ | 182 | $ | (2,025 | ) | $ | 146,910 | |||||
State and municipal bonds | 49,676 | 1,042 | (63 | ) | 50,655 | |||||||||
Other equity securities | 1,000 | -- | (19 | ) | 981 | |||||||||
$ | 199,429 | $ | 1,224 | $ | (2,107 | ) | $ | 198,546 | ||||||
Held to Maturity 2006 | ||||||||||||||
State and municipal bonds | $ | 2,711 | $ | 56 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 2,762 | |||||
$ | 2,711 | $ | 56 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 2,762 | ||||||
Securities with unrealized losses at year-end 2007 and 2006, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description of Securities | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal | ||||||||||||||||||||
agency securities | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 37,104 | $ | (145 | ) | $ | 37,104 | $ | (145 | ) | ||||||
State and municipal bonds | 1,777 | (6 | ) | 4,479 | (51 | ) | 6,256 | (57 | ) | |||||||||||
Other equity securities | -- | -- | 993 | (7 | ) | 993 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired | $ | 1,777 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 42,576 | $ | (203 | ) | $ | 44,353 | $ | (209 | ) | |||||
(Continued)
F-18
NOTE 3 – SECURITIES (Continued)
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description of Securities | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal | ||||||||||||||||||||
agency securities | $ | 5,079 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 104,727 | $ | (2,010 | ) | $ | 109,806 | $ | (2,025 | ) | |||||
State and municipal bonds | 864 | -- | 5,561 | (68 | ) | 6,425 | (68 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other equity securities | -- | -- | 981 | (19 | ) | 981 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired | $ | 5,943 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 111,269 | $ | (2,097 | ) | $ | 117,212 | $ | (2,112 | ) | |||||
For unrealized losses on securities, no loss has been recognized into income in either 2007 or 2006 because management has the intent and ability to hold these securities for the foreseeable future and the declines are largely due to differences in market interest rates as compared to those of the underlying securities. The declines in fair value are considered temporary and are expected to recover as the bonds approach their maturity date.
Contractual maturities of debt securities at December 31, 2007 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Held-to-Maturity Securities | Available-for-Sale Securities | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||
Due in one year or less | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 26,250 | $ | 26,189 | ||||||
Due from one to five years | 313 | 312 | 126,935 | 128,129 | ||||||||||
Due from five to ten years | 238 | 251 | 27,018 | 27,658 | ||||||||||
Due after ten years | 1,366 | 1,398 | 18,278 | 18,529 | ||||||||||
$ | 1,917 | $ | 1,961 | $ | 198,481 | $ | 200,505 | |||||||
There were no sales of securities for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, securities with a carrying value of approximately $1,000,000 were pledged as security for public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, securities with a carrying value of approximately $120,263,000 and $21,399,000 were pledged as collateral for securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
(Continued)
F-19
NOTE 4 — LOANS
Year-end loans were as follows (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial | $ | 438,743 | $ | 416,135 | ||||
Commercial mortgage | 855,882 | 875,717 | ||||||
Residential mortgage | 266,325 | 224,836 | ||||||
Consumer | 189,682 | 194,762 | ||||||
$ | 1,750,632 | $ | 1,711,450 | |||||
Activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning balance | $ | 23,259 | $ | 20,992 | $ | 19,251 | |||||
Provision for loan losses | 15,750 | 7,715 | 3,675 | ||||||||
Loans charged-off | (5,920 | ) | (6,054 | ) | (2,237 | ) | |||||
Recoveries | 333 | 606 | 303 | ||||||||
Ending balance | $ | 33,422 | $ | 23,259 | $ | 20,992 | |||||
The provision for loan losses in 2007 includes approximately $11.6 million of extra provisions made in the third and fourth quarters for losses related primarily to loans to residential developers. Loans charged off in 2006 include a $4.7 million charge related to one commercial borrower whose loans were allegedly falsely secured by nonexistent collateral. Accordingly, the provision for loan losses for 2006 also included a $4.7 million additional provision related to this borrower. The Company filed a lawsuit against this borrower in 2007 that is still pending.
Impaired loans were as follows (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loans with no allocated allowance | ||||||||
for loan losses | $ | 17,580 | $ | 3,059 | ||||
Loans with allocated allowance for | ||||||||
loan losses | 81,440 | 2,718 | ||||||
$ | 99,020 | $ | 5,777 | |||||
Amount of the allowance for loan | ||||||||
losses allocated | $ | 15,831 | $ | 400 | ||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average of impaired loans during the period | $ | 38,166 | $ | 4,630 | $ | 2,833 | |||||
Interest income recognized during impairment | 782 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
Cash-basis interest income recognized | 189 | 0 | 0 |
(Continued)
F-20
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 4 – LOANS (Continued)
Nonperforming loans were as follows at year-end (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual | $ | 2,872 | $ | 16,479 | ||||
Nonaccrual loans | 70,999 | 5,811 | ||||||
Renegotiated loans | 38 | -- | ||||||
$ | 73,909 | $ | 22,290 | |||||
Nonperforming loans include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans.
The balance of impaired and nonperforming loans at the end of 2007 includes approximately $62.3 and $57.4 million, respectively, of loans for the development or sale of 1-4 family residential properties. The balance of nonperforming loans at the end of 2006 includes one commercial relationship with loans totaling approximately $15.2 million for the development or sale of 1-4 family residential properties. Approximately $15.0 million remained outstanding for this borrower and is included in the balance of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2007.
NOTE 5 — PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT — NET
Year-end premises and equipment were as follows (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Land | $ | 17,060 | $ | 15,093 | ||||
Building | 43,857 | 33,658 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements | 1,219 | 1,277 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment | 18,947 | 16,311 | ||||||
Construction in progress | 664 | 8,558 | ||||||
81,747 | 74,897 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (17,183 | ) | (14,166 | ) | ||||
$ | 64,564 | $ | 60,731 | |||||
The balance of construction in progress at December 31, 2007 primarily relates to a facility expected to open in 2008. The balance of construction in progress at December 31, 2006 primarily related to four facilities that opened in 2007. Depreciation expense was $3,290,000, $2,949,000 and $2,713,000 for each of the years ending December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
The Bank leases certain office and branch premises and equipment under operating lease agreements. Total rental expense for all operating leases aggregated to $359,000, $382,000 and $380,000 for each of the years ending December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. Future minimum rental expense under noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2007 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
2008 | $ | 298 | |||
2009 | 166 | ||||
2010 | 104 | ||||
2011 | 84 | ||||
2012 | 6 | ||||
$ | 658 | ||||
(Continued)
F-21
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 6 – ACQUISITION INTANGIBLES
Intangible assets were as follows at year-end (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Core deposits | $ | 3,185 | $ | 3,185 | ||||
Trust relationships | 478 | 478 | ||||||
Customer relationships | 1,920 | -- | ||||||
$ | 5,583 | $ | 3,663 | |||||
Less accumulated amortization | (2,560 | ) | (2,100 | ) | ||||
$ | 3,023 | $ | 1,563 | |||||
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $460,000, $378,000 and $406,000. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (dollars in thousands):
2008 | $ | 435 | |||
2009 | 417 | ||||
2010 | 401 | ||||
2011 | 386 | ||||
2012 | 186 |
NOTE 7 — DEPOSITS
Deposits at year-end were as follows (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noninterest-bearing demand | $ | 185,681 | $ | 180,032 | ||||
Money market | 337,322 | 459,230 | ||||||
NOW and Super NOW | 273,658 | 265,679 | ||||||
Savings | 40,119 | 40,160 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit | 686,773 | 722,456 | ||||||
$ | 1,523,553 | $ | 1,667,557 | |||||
The following table depicts the maturity distribution of certificates of deposit at December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands):
2008 | $ | 553,120 | |||
2009 | 82,099 | ||||
2010 | 47,127 | ||||
2011 | 2,222 | ||||
2012 | 2,097 | ||||
Thereafter | 108 | ||||
$ | 686,773 | ||||
(Continued)
F-22
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 7 – DEPOSITS (Continued)
Approximately $457,769,000 and $504,274,000 in certificates of deposit were in denominations of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Brokered deposits totaled approximately $202,839,000 and $272,896,000 at December 31, 2007 and 2006. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, brokered deposits had interest rates ranging from 3.65% to 5.20% and 3.30% to 5.49%, respectively, and at year-end 2007, maturities ranging from March 2008 to August 2010.
NOTE 8 — OTHER BORROWED FUNDS
Other borrowed funds include advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
At year-end, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Principal Terms | Advance Amount | Range of Maturities | Weighted Average Interest Rate | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||
Single maturity fixed rate advances | $ | 135,000 | March 2008 to November 2010 | 4.77 | % | ||||||
Daily variable rate advance | 70,000 | June 2008 | 4.32 | % | |||||||
Putable advances | 31,000 | September 2009 to December 2010 | 5.80 | % | |||||||
Amortizable mortgage advances | 8,052 | February 2008 to July 2018 | 3.81 | % | |||||||
$ | 244,052 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2006 | |||||||||||
Single maturity fixed rate advances | $ | 132,000 | April 2007 to May 2010 | 4.63 | % | ||||||
Putable advances | 31,000 | September 2009 to December 2010 | 5.80 | % | |||||||
Amortizable mortgage advances | 9,018 | February 2008 to July 2018 | 3.86 | % | |||||||
$ | 172,018 | ||||||||||
Each advance is payable at its maturity date and contains a prepayment penalty. Putable advances are fixed rate advances that can be changed to a variable rate at the option of the FHLB. If the FHLB exercises that option, these advances may be repaid without penalty. These advances were collateralized by residential and commercial real estate loans totaling $611,055,000 and $596,829,000 under a blanket lien arrangement at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Maturities as of December 31, 2007 were as follows (in thousands):
2008 | $ | 140,482 | |||
2009 | 40,237 | ||||
2010 | 56,000 | ||||
2011 | -- | ||||
2012 | -- | ||||
Thereafter | 7,333 | ||||
$ | 244,052 | ||||
(Continued)
F-23
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 8 — OTHER BORROWED FUNDS (Continued)
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repo borrowings”) are financing arrangements secured by U.S. federal agency securities. These borrowings were collateralized by securities that had a carrying amount of approximately $120,263,000 and $21,399,000 at December 31, 2007 and 2006. At maturity, the securities underlying the arrangements are returned to the company. At year-end, these borrowings were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Principal Terms | Amount | Range of Maturities | Weighted Average Interest Rate | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||
Fixed rate borrowings | $ | 90,000 | February 2009 to November 2010 | 4.66 | % | ||||||
Floating rate borrowings | 20,000 | August 2009 to August 2010 | 5.72 | % | |||||||
$ | 110,000 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2006 | |||||||||||
Floating rate borrowings | $ | 20,000 | August 2009 to August 2010 | 5.78 | % | ||||||
Maturities as of December 31, 2007 were as follows (in thousands):
2009 | $ | 60,000 | |||
2010 | 50,000 | ||||
$ | 110,000 | ||||
NOTE 9 – LONG-TERM DEBT
The Company has issued $40.0 million of pooled trust preferred securities (“Preferred Securities”) through its wholly-owned subsidiary grantor trusts. Macatawa Statutory Trust I issued $619,000 of common securities to the Company and $20.0 million of Preferred Securities on July 15, 2003 at a floating interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.05%. Macatawa Statutory Trust II issued $619,000 of common securities and $20.0 million of Preferred Securities on March 18, 2004 at a floating interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.75%.
The Company issued subordinated debentures (“Debentures”) to each trust in exchange for the proceeds of the offerings, which Debentures represent the sole asset of each trust. The Preferred Securities represent an interest in the Company’s subordinated debentures, which have terms that are similar to the Preferred Securities. As provided in each trust’s indenture, the Preferred Securities accrue and pay distributions quarterly at a specified rate and are subject to mandatory redemption upon the maturity of the Debentures, 30 years from the date of issuance, or upon earlier redemption. The Company has the right to redeem the Debentures in whole or in part beginning five years from the date of issuance at a redemption price specified in each trust’s indenture.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Debentures totaling $41,238,000 are reported in liabilities as Long-term debt, and the common securities of $1,238,000 and unamortized debt issuance costs are included in other assets.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, $40 million and $38 million, respectively, of the $40 million of Preferred Securities issued qualified as Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes.
(Continued)
F-24
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 10 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Loans to principal officers, directors, and their affiliates were as follows (dollars in thousands).
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning balance | $ | 13,905 | $ | 15,992 | ||||
New loans and renewals | 20,513 | 16,906 | ||||||
Repayments and renewals | (14,810 | ) | (18,993 | ) | ||||
Ending balance | $ | 19,608 | $ | 13,905 | ||||
Deposits from principal officers, directors, and their affiliates at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $5,787,000 and $4,324,000.
On October 11, 2006, Macatawa Bank Corporation (“Macatawa”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Benj. A. Smith & Associates, Ltd. (“Smith & Associates”) and Benj. A. Smith, III (“Mr. Smith”). On October 11, 2006, Macatawa also entered into a Noncompetition Agreement with Mr. Smith. Macatawa completed the acquisition of Smith & Associates on January 1, 2007.
Smith & Associates was an investment advisory firm based in Holland, Michigan. Mr. Smith was the owner of Smith & Associates. Mr. Smith is also the founder and Chairman of Macatawa Bank Corporation. The transaction was structured as a merger of Smith & Associates into Macatawa, which in turn contributed the business to Macatawa Bank. For further details regarding the transaction, refer to Note 2, Acquisition.
NOTE 11 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has stock-based compensation plans for its employees (the Employees’ Plans) and directors (the Directors’ Plans). The Employees’ Plans permit the grant of stock options or the issuance of restricted stock for up to 1,917,210 shares of common stock. The Directors’ Plans permit the grant of stock options or the issuance of restricted stock for up to 473,278 shares of common stock. There were 783,588 shares under the Employees’ Plans and 175,711 shares under the Directors’ Plans available for future issuance as of December 31, 2007. The Company issues new shares under its stock-based compensation plans from its authorized but unissued shares.
Stock Options
Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price at the date of grant. Option awards have vesting periods ranging from one to three years and have ten year contractual terms.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. The expected term of options granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable. The Company expects that all options granted will vest and become exercisable. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.
(Continued)
F-25
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 11 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION(Continued)
There were no options granted during 2007. The fair value of options granted during 2006 and 2005 was determined using the following weighted-average assumptions as of grant date.
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk-free interest rate | 4.52 | % | 4.27 | % | ||||
Expected option life | 6.5 years | 6.2 years | ||||||
Expected stock price volatility | 23.68 | % | 23.98 | % | ||||
Dividend yield | 2.55 | % | 2.01 | % | ||||
Weighted average fair value of options granted | $ | 4.80 | $ | 5.70 |
A summary of option activity in the plans is as follows (dollars in thousands, except per option data):
Options | Number Outstanding | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life in Years | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 | 1,025,771 | $ | 14.29 | |||||||||||
Exercised | (59,106 | ) | 7.05 | |||||||||||
Forfeited | (8,900 | ) | 21.80 | |||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 | 957,765 | $ | 14.66 | 6.02 | $ | 300 | ||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2007 | 709,626 | $ | 12.26 | 5.19 | $ | 300 | ||||||||
Information related to stock options during each year follows:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intrinsic value of options exercised | $ | 464 | $ | 1,779 | $ | 1,623 | |||||
Cash received from option exercises | 342 | 1,103 | 880 | ||||||||
Tax benefit realized from option exercises | 89 | 258 | 275 |
Compensation cost for stock options was $446,000 or $400,000 after tax, representing $0.02 per share for 2007 and $657,000 or $522,000 after tax, representing $0.03 per share for 2006.
As of December 31, 2007, there was approximately $555,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
Stock Awards
Stock awards have vesting periods of up to four years. A summary of changes in the Company’s nonvested stock awards for the year follows:
Nonvested Stock Awards | Shares | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 | 22,491 | $ | 19.52 | |||||
Granted | 4,157 | 14.35 | ||||||
Vested | --- | --- | ||||||
Forfeited | (2,309 | ) | 19.52 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 | 24,339 | $ | 18.64 | |||||
(Continued)
F-26
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 11 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION(Continued)
Compensation cost for stock awarded in 2007 and 2005 was $145,000 and $176,000. Compensation cost for stock awarded in 2006 was nominal.
As of December 31, 2007, there was $309,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested shares granted under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years. There were no shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. The total fair value of shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2005 was $176,000.
NOTE 12 – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan which covers substantially all employees. Employees may elect to contribute to the plan up to the maximum percentage of compensation and dollar amount subject to statutory limitations. The Company makes matching contributions equal to 100% of the first 3% of employee contributions and 50% of employee contributions in excess of 3%, up to 6%. The Company’s contributions for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were approximately $767,000, $691,000 and $620,000.
The Company sponsors an Employee Stock Purchase Plan which covers substantially all employees. Employees are allowed to direct the Company to withhold payroll dollars and purchase Company stock at market price on a payroll by payroll basis. The Company has reserved 210,000 shares of common stock to be issued under the plan. The plan allows for shares to be issued directly from the Company or purchased on the open market.
NOTE 13– EARNINGS PER SHARE
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows (dollars in thousands except per share data):
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basic earnings per share | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 9,269 | $ | 19,831 | $ | 20,889 | |||||
Weighted average common shares | |||||||||||
outstanding | 17,109,664 | 17,011,590 | 16,863,630 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | .54 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.24 | |||||
Diluted earnings per share | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 9,269 | $ | 19,831 | $ | 20,889 | |||||
Weighted average common shares | |||||||||||
outstanding | 17,109,664 | 17,011,590 | 16,863,630 | ||||||||
Add: Dilutive effects of assumed | |||||||||||
exercises of stock options | 173,680 | 367,883 | 445,692 | ||||||||
Weighted average common and | |||||||||||
dilutive potential common | |||||||||||
shares outstanding | 17,283,344 | 17,379,473 | 17,309,322 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | .54 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.21 | |||||
Stock options and nonvested stock awards for 507,562, 335,959, and 237,313 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share for December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, because they were antidilutive.
(Continued)
F-27
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 14 — FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
The consolidated provision for income taxes was as follows (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current | $ | 7,606 | $ | 10,226 | $ | 10,503 | |||||
Deferred (benefit) expense | (3,870 | ) | (1,091 | ) | (649 | ) | |||||
$ | 3,736 | $ | 9,135 | $ | 9,854 | ||||||
The difference between the financial statement tax expense and amount computed by applying the statutory federal tax rate to pretax income was reconciled as follows (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statutory rate | 35 | % | 35 | % | 35 | % | |||||
Statutory rate applied to income before taxes | $ | 4,552 | $ | 10,138 | $ | 10,760 | |||||
Add (deduct) | |||||||||||
Tax-exempt interest income | (633 | ) | (634 | ) | (647 | ) | |||||
Bank-owned life insurance | (301 | ) | (360 | ) | (230 | ) | |||||
Other, net | 118 | (9 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||
$ | 3,736 | $ | 9,135 | $ | 9,854 | ||||||
The net deferred tax asset recorded included the following amounts of deferred tax assets and liabilities (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deferred tax asset | ||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 11,698 | $ | 8,141 | ||||
Nonaccrual loan interest | 956 | 136 | ||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments | --- | 617 | ||||||
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale | --- | 309 | ||||||
Other | 597 | 413 | ||||||
13,251 | 9,616 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | ||||||||
Depreciation | (2,069 | ) | (2,013 | ) | ||||
Purchase accounting adjustments | (1,058 | ) | (547 | ) | ||||
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments | (101 | ) | --- | |||||
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale | (706 | ) | --- | |||||
Other | (648 | ) | (625 | ) | ||||
(4,582 | ) | (3,185 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax asset | $ | 8,669 | $ | 6,431 | ||||
A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. Based on the levels of taxable income in the current and prior years which would be available to absorb the benefit, management has determined that no valuation allowance was required at December 31, 2007 or 2006.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2007, and the Company does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease in the next twelve months.
The Company is no longer subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for years before 2004.
(Continued)
F-28
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 15 — COMMITMENTS AND OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
Some financial instruments are used to meet customer financing needs and to reduce exposure to interest rate changes. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These involve, to varying degrees, credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amount reported in the financial statements.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment, and generally have fixed expiration dates. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments to guarantee a customer’s performance to a third party. Exposure to credit loss if the other party does not perform is represented by the contractual amount for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Collateral or other security is normally not obtained for these financial instruments prior to their use, and many of the commitments are expected to expire without being used.
A summary of the notional or contractual amounts of financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk was as follows at year-end (dollars in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commitments to make loans | $ | 43,949 | $ | 25,855 | ||||
Letters of credit | 21,554 | 27,269 | ||||||
Unused lines of credit | 424,582 | 470,882 |
At year-end 2007, approximately 61% of the Bank’s commitments to make loans were at fixed rates, offered at current market rates. The majority of the variable rate commitments noted above were tied to prime and expire within 30 days. The majority of the unused lines of credit were at variable rates tied to prime.
NOTE 16 – CONTINGENCIES
The Company and its subsidiaries periodically become defendants in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.
On July 8, 2003, the Company filed a Form 8-K (dated July 1, 2003) with the Securities and Exchange Commission reporting events related to a former trust customer, Trade Partners, Inc. (“Trade Partners”), of the former Grand Bank, which the Company acquired effective April 1, 2002. Trade Partners was involved in purchasing and selling interests in viaticals, which are interests in life insurance policies of the terminally ill or elderly. Beginning in 1996, Grand Bank served as a custodian and escrow agent with respect to viaticals purchased by Trade Partners and sold to investors. Two lawsuits were filed, one in December 2002 and another in March 2003, against Trade Partners, Grand Bank and the Company alleging that Grand Bank breached certain escrow agreements related to viatical settlement contracts. Both of these lawsuits have been dismissed although the plaintiffs reserved the right to pursue the claims in the future. A third lawsuit was filed in April 2003 by two individual investors against Grand Bank, the Company, Trade Partners and certain individuals and entities associated with Trade Partners. The claims against Grand Bank and the Company in this lawsuit have been settled and dismissed with prejudice. In May 2003 a purported class action complaint was filed against the Company. As amended, this suit alleges that Grand Bank breached escrow agreements and fiduciary duties and violated the Michigan Uniform Securities Act with respect to the investments secured by the purported class in viaticals and in interests in limited partnerships which made loans to Trade Partners secured by viaticals, and with respect to loans made by purported class members directly to Trade Partners. The Company has answered the complaint denying the material allegations and raising certain affirmative defenses. In November 2006 the court denied class certification in this case. The Company believes that the class action, if it had been approved by the court, might have involved as many as 2,000 to 3,000 individual claimants. Since that denial of class certification, nine new actions, none of which is a class action, raising substantially the same allegations as the former class action have been filed in several jurisdictions on behalf of approximately 1,300 Trade Partners investors. Management believes the Company has strong defenses and will vigorously defend the cases.
(Continued)
F-29
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 16 – CONTINGENCIES(Continued)
Trade Partners is now in receivership. The supervising court authorized the receiver to borrow money from Macatawa Bank to pay premiums, if needed. Macatawa Bank extended a $4 million line of credit to the receiver, conditioned upon obtaining a security interest in the viaticals. No draws were made against the line, and the line expired during the fourth quarter of 2004.
It is possible that one or more additional legal actions may be initiated involving the custodial and escrow agent services provided by Grand Bank in connection with Trade Partners. If any such legal actions are commenced, the Company intends to defend them vigorously. To the extent any pending or future claims allege errors or omissions on the part of Grand Bank or Macatawa Bank, management believes that some or all liability, if any is proven or established, will be covered by errors and omissions insurance maintained by Grand Bank and Macatawa Bank. The Company has reported the Trade Partners matter to its two insurance carriers. Federal Insurance Company has assumed the Company’s defense and has advanced a portion of its defense costs pursuant to a reservation of rights letter asserting certain coverage defenses, and an Interim Funding Agreement. Federal Insurance Company on July 21, 2006 notified the Company that it had filed an Arbitration Demand with the American Arbitration Association, seeking a declaration that based on its asserted coverage defenses its policy does not cover this matter. The Company and Federal Insurance Company have agreed to defer any proceedings with respect to this Arbitration Demand. The Company believes that Federal Insurance Company is obligated to provide coverage, and the Company intends to vigorously pursue its rights under the insurance policy. The other carrier has taken the position that the duty of defense rests solely with the first carrier, and reserves its rights with respect to indemnity.
The legal actions involving Trade Partners have not progressed to trial and the outcome of such actions is uncertain. While we are therefore unable to determine at this time whether or to what extent these actions may impact the Company, the Company believes it has strong defenses and fully intends to defend any and all such actions vigorously.
(Continued)
F-30
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 17 – INTEREST RATE SWAPS
The Company entered into five interest rate swap agreements, each with a notional amount of $20,000,000 during 2002, 2003, and 2004. Swaps with a notional amount of $60,000,000 remained in effect at December 31, 2007. A large portion of the Company’s assets are loans on which the interest rates are variable. The Company entered into these interest rate swap agreements to convert the variable rate interest cash inflows on certain of its loans to fixed rates of interest. These interest rate swap agreements pay interest to the Company at a fixed rate and require interest payments from the Company at a variable rate.
Prior to December 31, 2007, these interest rate swap agreements were reported, and had been since their inception, as cash flow hedges as the Company believed the critical terms of the swap agreements matched the critical terms of the variable rate loans and concluded that interest rate swap agreements were effective cash flow hedges. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has now determined that accounting for these agreements as cash flow hedges was in error because the Company did not de-designate existing swap agreements as hedges when a new swap agreement was added and then redesignate the agreements as hedges. Additionally, a critical term did not match because the Company did not designate the swap agreements to pools of variable rate loans with like spreads to prime rate, such as prime plus .25%, prime plus .50%, etc., but did so only in total. Therefore, fluctuations in the fair value of the interest rate swaps should have been recorded in other income instead of in other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2007, the remaining interest rate swaps had a fair value of $288,000, which amount has been reversed out of other comprehensive income and is reported in noninterest income. Changes in the fair value of these interest rate swaps in the future will be recorded as noninterest income or loss. The Company has determined the effect on prior periods of its use of hedge accounting for these interest rate swap agreements was not material and, accordingly, prior period financial statements have not been restated to correct the error.
Summary information about interest rate swaps at year-end follows (dollars in thousands).
December 31 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Notional amounts | $ | 60,000 | $ | 80,000 | ||||
Weighted average pay rates | 7.25 | % | 8.25 | % | ||||
Weighted average receive rates | 6.65 | % | 6.42 | % | ||||
Weighted average maturity | 1.5 years | 2.0 years | ||||||
Fair value of interest rate swaps | $ | 288 | $ | (1,762 | ) |
(Continued)
F-31
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 18 — REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors, and the regulators can lower classifications in certain cases. Failure to meet various capital requirements can initiate regulatory action that could have a direct material effect on the financial statements.
The prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications, including well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If the Bank is only adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits; and if the Bank is undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and plans for capital restoration are required.
Actual capital levels (dollars in thousands) and minimum required levels were as follows at year-end:
Actual | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes | To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk weighted assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ | 194,362 | 10.7 | % | $ | 145,898 | 8.0 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
Bank | 192,677 | 10.6 | 145,715 | 8.0 | $ | 182,143 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | 171,434 | 9.4 | 72,949 | 4.0 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Bank | 169,778 | 9.3 | 72,857 | 4.0 | 109,286 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | 171,434 | 8.3 | 82,850 | 4.0 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Bank | 169,778 | 8.2 | 82,754 | 4.0 | 103,443 | 5.0 | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk weighted assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ | 196,256 | 10.9 | % | $ | 144,677 | 8.0 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
Bank | 189,403 | 10.5 | 144,492 | 8.0 | $ | 180,615 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | 171,650 | 9.5 | 72,338 | 4.0 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Bank | 166,826 | 9.2 | 72,246 | 4.0 | 108,369 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | 171,650 | 8.5 | 80,746 | 4.0 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Bank | 166,826 | 8.3 | 80,602 | 4.0 | 100,752 | 5.0 |
The Bank was categorized as well capitalized at December 31, 2007 and 2006. There are no conditions or events since December 31, 2007 that management believes have changed its category.
Banking regulations limit capital distributions. Generally, capital distributions are limited to undistributed net income for the current and prior two years. The Bank paid dividends to the holding company totaling $10 million in 2007 and 2006. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $37,659,000 and $50,145,000 was available to pay dividends to the holding company.
(Continued)
F-32
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 19 — FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows at year-end (dollars in thousands).
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 49,816 | $ | 49,816 | $ | 39,882 | $ | 39,882 | ||||||
Securities available for sale | 201,498 | 201,498 | 198,546 | 198,546 | ||||||||||
Securities held to maturity | 1,917 | 1,961 | 2,711 | 2,762 | ||||||||||
FHLB stock | 12,275 | 12,275 | 12,275 | 12,275 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale | 3,127 | 3,145 | 1,547 | 1,569 | ||||||||||
Loans, net | 1,717,210 | 1,735,745 | 1,688,191 | 1,690,358 | ||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 10,003 | 10,003 | 11,233 | 11,233 | ||||||||||
Interest rate swaps | 288 | 288 | --- | --- | ||||||||||
Bank-owned life insurance | 22,703 | 22,703 | 21,843 | 21,843 | ||||||||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||
Deposits | (1,523,553 | ) | (1,526,458 | ) | (1,667,557 | ) | (1,665,010 | ) | ||||||
Federal funds purchased | (46,467 | ) | (46,467 | ) | (11,990 | ) | (11,990 | ) | ||||||
Other borrowed funds | (354,052 | ) | (356,764 | ) | (192,018 | ) | (191,582 | ) | ||||||
Long-term debt | (41,238 | ) | (41,011 | ) | (41,238 | ) | (42,034 | ) | ||||||
Interest rate swaps | --- | --- | (1,762 | ) | (1,762 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued interest payable | (5,584 | ) | (5,584 | ) | (5,468 | ) | (5,468 | ) | ||||||
Off-balance sheet credit-related items | ||||||||||||||
Loan commitments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows.
Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, short-term borrowings, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, accrued interest receivable and payable, bank-owned life insurance, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. Security fair values are based on market prices or dealer quotes, and if no such information is available, on the rate and term of the security and information about the issuer. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis or underlying collateral values. Fair value of loans held for sale is based on market quotes. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. The fair value of interest rate swaps is based on market prices or dealer quotes. The fair value of off-balance sheet credit-related items is not significant.
(Continued)
F-33
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 20 – CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
Following are condensed parent company only financial statements (dollars in thousands):
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,000 | $ | 6,562 | ||||
Investment in Bank subsidiary | 198,977 | 190,049 | ||||||
Investment in other subsidiaries | 1,592 | 1,606 | ||||||
Other assets | 674 | 709 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 202,243 | $ | 198,926 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 41,238 | $ | 41,238 | ||||
Other liabilities | 380 | 839 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 41,618 | 42,077 | ||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 160,625 | 156,849 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 202,243 | $ | 198,926 | ||||
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income | |||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiaries | $ | 10,104 | $ | 10,099 | $ | 78 | |||||
Expense | |||||||||||
Interest expense | 3,441 | 3,346 | 2,603 | ||||||||
Other expense | 1,034 | 804 | 661 | ||||||||
Total expense | 4,475 | 4,150 | 3,264 | ||||||||
Income (Loss) before income tax and equity in | |||||||||||
undistributed net income of subsidiaries | 5,629 | 5,949 | (3,186 | ) | |||||||
Equity in undistributed net income | |||||||||||
of subsidiaries | 2,108 | 12,409 | 22,932 | ||||||||
Income before income tax | 7,737 | 18,358 | 19,746 | ||||||||
Income tax benefit | (1,532 | ) | (1,473 | ) | (1,143 | ) | |||||
Net income | $ | 9,269 | $ | 19,831 | $ | 20,889 | |||||
(Continued)
F-34
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 20 – CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
(Continued)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 9,269 | $ | 19,831 | $ | 20,889 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash | |||||||||||
provided by (used in) operating activities: | |||||||||||
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries | (2,108 | ) | (12,409 | ) | (23,010 | ) | |||||
Stock compensation expense | 54 | 145 | 0 | ||||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets | 35 | 449 | (1,126 | ) | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | (459 | ) | 499 | (45 | ) | ||||||
Net cash from operating activities | 6,791 | 8,515 | (3,292 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries | 0 | (75 | ) | (126 | ) | ||||||
Net cash received from dissolution of subsidiary | 0 | 373 | 0 | ||||||||
Net cash from investing activities | 0 | 298 | (126 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||
Proceeds from exercises of stock options | 342 | 1,103 | 880 | ||||||||
Fractional shares purchased | (18 | ) | (53 | ) | (35 | ) | |||||
Cash dividends paid | (8,781 | ) | (7,851 | ) | (6,228 | ) | |||||
Repurchase of stock | (3,896 | ) | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Net cash from financing activities | (12,353 | ) | (6,801 | ) | (5,383 | ) | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (5,562 | ) | 2,012 | (8,801 | ) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 6,562 | 4,550 | 13,351 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 1,000 | $ | 6,562 | $ | 4,550 | |||||
(Continued)
F-35
MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 21 — QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
Earnings Per Share | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest Income | Net Interest Income | Net Income | Basic | Fully Diluted | |||||||||||||
2007 | |||||||||||||||||
First quarter | $ | 34,931 | $ | 16,059 | $ | 4,835 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.28 | |||||||
Second quarter | 35,683 | 16,335 | 4,590 | 0.27 | 0.26 | ||||||||||||
Third quarter | 35,391 | 15,835 | 2,457 | 0.14 | 0.14 | ||||||||||||
Fourth quarter | 33,368 | 14,687 | (2,612 | ) | (0.15 | ) | (0.15 | ) | |||||||||
2006 | |||||||||||||||||
First quarter | $ | 30,241 | $ | 16,314 | $ | 5,222 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.30 | |||||||
Second quarter | 32,896 | 16,975 | 5,756 | 0.34 | 0.33 | ||||||||||||
Third quarter | 34,779 | 17,083 | 6,009 | 0.35 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||
Fourth quarter | 35,589 | 17,045 | 2,845 | 0.17 | 0.16 |
Net income for the third and fourth quarters of 2007 includes the impact of $2.1 million ($1.4 million after tax, or $0.08 per share) and $9.5 million ($6.2 million after tax, or $0.36 per share), respectively, of charges against earnings for additional provisions for loan losses primarily to address risks associated with loans to residential developers.
Net income for the fourth quarter of 2006 includes the impact of a $4.7 million ($3.1 million after tax, or $0.18 per share) charge against earnings related to a commercial borrower whose loans became impaired.
F-36