Macatawa Bank (MCBC) 10-Q 2019 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number: 000-25927

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Michigan	38-3391345
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

10753 Macatawa Drive, Holland, Michigan 49424

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (616) 820-1444

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock	MCBC	NASDAQ

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☒ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☒ Emerging Growth Company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 34,064,831 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (no par value) were outstanding as of July 25, 2019.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on management’s beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about the financial services industry, the economy, and Macatawa Bank Corporation. Forward-looking statements are identifiable by words or phrases such as “outlook”, “plan” or “strategy”; that an event or trend “could”, “may”, “should”, “will”, “is likely”, or is “possible” or “probable” to occur or “continue”, has “begun” or “is scheduled” or “on track” or that the Company or its management “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “plans”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “predicts”, “projects”, or “expects” a particular result, or is “committed”, “confident”, “optimistic” or has an “opinion” that an event will occur, or other words or phrases such as “ongoing”, “future”, “signs”, “efforts”, “tend”, “exploring”, “appearing”, “until”, “near term”, “concern”, “going forward”, “focus”, “starting”, “initiative,” “trend” and variations of such words and similar expressions. Such statements are based upon current beliefs and expectations and involve substantial risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These statements include, among others, those related to future levels of earning assets, future composition of our loan portfolio, trends in credit quality metrics, future capital levels and capital needs, including the impact of Basel III, real estate valuation, future levels of repossessed and foreclosed properties and nonperforming assets, future levels of losses and costs associated with the administration and disposition of repossessed and foreclosed properties and nonperforming assets, future levels of loan charge-offs, future levels of other real estate owned, future levels of provisions for loan losses and reserve recoveries, the rate of asset dispositions, future dividends, future growth and funding sources, future cost of funds, future liquidity levels, future profitability levels, future interest rate levels, future net interest margin levels, the effects on earnings of changes in interest rates, future economic conditions, future effects of new or changed accounting standards, future loss recoveries, loan demand and loan growth and the future level of other revenue sources. Management’s determination of the provision and allowance for loan losses, the appropriate carrying value of intangible assets (including deferred tax assets) and other real estate owned, and the fair value of investment securities (including whether any impairment on any investment security is temporary or other-than-temporary and the amount of any impairment) involves judgments that are inherently forward-looking. All statements with references to future time periods are forward-looking. All of the information concerning interest rate sensitivity is forward-looking. Our ability to sell other real estate owned at its carrying value or at all, successfully implement new programs and initiatives, increase efficiencies, maintain our current levels of deposits and other sources of funding, maintain liquidity, respond to declines in collateral values and credit quality, increase loan volume, originate high quality loans, maintain or improve mortgage banking income, realize the benefit of our deferred tax assets, continue payment of dividends and improve profitability is not entirely within our control and is not assured. The future effect of changes in the real estate, financial and credit markets and the national and regional economy on the banking industry, generally, and Macatawa Bank Corporation, specifically, are also inherently uncertain. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions (“risk factors”) that are difficult to predict with regard to timing, extent, likelihood and degree of occurrence. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what may be expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Macatawa Bank Corporation does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that may arise after the date of the forward-looking statements.

Risk factors include, but are not limited to, the risk factors described in “Item 1A - Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. These and other factors are representative of the risk factors that may emerge and could cause a difference between an ultimate actual outcome and a preceding forward-looking statement.

INDEX

		Page Number
Part I.	Financial Information:
	Item 1.
	Consolidated Financial Statements	4
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	10
	Item 2.
	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	37
	Item 3.
	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	49
	Item 4.
	Controls and Procedures	50
Part II.	Other Information:
	Item 2.
	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	51
	Item 6.
	Exhibits	51
Signatures		52

Part I Financial Information

Item 1.

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of June 30, 2019 (unaudited) and December 31, 2018

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	30,943		$	40,526
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments		199,940			130,758
Cash and cash equivalents		230,883			171,284
Debt securities available for sale, at fair value		222,825			226,986
Debt securities held to maturity (fair value 2019 - $81,900 and 2018 - $71,505)		79,054			70,334
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock		11,558			11,558
Loans held for sale, at fair value		1,016			415
Total loans		1,343,512			1,405,658
Allowance for loan losses		(16,886	)		(16,876	)
Net loans		1,326,626			1,388,782
Premises and equipment – net		44,424			44,862
Accrued interest receivable		5,487			5,279
Bank-owned life insurance		41,695			41,185
Other real estate owned - net		3,067			3,380
Net deferred tax asset		2,107			3,380
Other assets		9,663			7,679
Total assets	$	1,978,405		$	1,975,124
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	476,700		$	485,530
Interest-bearing		1,184,406			1,191,209
Total deposits		1,661,106			1,676,739
Other borrowed funds		60,000			60,000
Long-term debt		41,238			41,238
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		10,542			6,294
Total liabilities		1,772,886			1,784,271
Commitments and contingent liabilities		—			—
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, no par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 34,064,831 and 34,045,411 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018		217,942			217,783
Retained deficit		(13,764	)		(24,652	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		1,341			(2,278	)
Total shareholders’ equity		205,519			190,853
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,978,405		$	1,975,124

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

-4-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

(unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019			Three Months Ended June 30, 2018			Six Months Ended June 30, 2019			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	16,125		$	14,406		$	32,576		$	28,116
Securities
Taxable		988			917			1,984			1,785
Tax-exempt		865			905			1,704			1,780
FHLB Stock		157			121			317			318
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments		1,104			487			1,848			856
Total interest income		19,239			16,836			38,429			32,855
Interest expense
Deposits		2,365			1,319			4,622			2,312
Other borrowings		345			322			672			692
Long-term debt		574			542			1,159			1,015
Total interest expense		3,284			2,183			6,453			4,019
Net interest income		15,955			14,653			31,976			28,836
Provision for loan losses		(200	)		(300	)		(450	)		(400	)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		16,155			14,953			32,426			29,236
Noninterest income
Service charges and fees		1,078			1,060			2,128			2,110
Net gains on mortgage loans		614			222			825			363
Trust fees		1,003			945			1,893			1,870
ATM and debit card fees		1,481			1,414			2,808			2,692
Gain on sales of securities		—			—			—			—
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) income		249			237			485			475
Other		673			590			1,287			1,089
Total noninterest income		5,098			4,468			9,426			8,599
Noninterest expense
Salaries and benefits		6,379			6,389			12,623			12,583
Occupancy of premises		996			973			2,089			2,045
Furniture and equipment		866			773			1,710			1,578
Legal and professional		211			215			441			417
Marketing and promotion		233			229			461			457
Data processing		761			797			1,491			1,493
FDIC assessment		119			132			239			264
Interchange and other card expense		365			359			711			691
Bond and D&O Insurance		103			110			206			219
Net (gains) losses on repossessed and foreclosed properties		(34	)		17			(69	)		423
Administration and disposition of problem assets		49			66			137			121
Other		1,286			1,199			2,534			2,402
Total noninterest expenses		11,334			11,259			22,573			22,693
Income before income tax		9,919			8,162			19,279			15,142
Income tax expense		1,916			1,434			3,630			2,659
Net income	$	8,003		$	6,728		$	15,649		$	12,483
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.24		$	0.20		$	0.46		$	0.37
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.24		$	0.20		$	0.46		$	0.37
Cash dividends per common share	$	0.07		$	0.06		$	0.14		$	0.12

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

-5-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

(unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019			Three Months Ended June 30, 2018			Six Months Ended June 30, 2019			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net income	$	8,003		$	6,728		$	15,649		$	12,483
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gains (losses):
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on debt securities available for sale		2,320			(571	)		4,581			(2,869	)
Tax effect		(487	)		120			(962	)		602
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on debt securities available for sale, net of tax		1,833			(451	)		3,619			(2,267	)
Less: reclassification adjustments:
Reclassification for gains included in net income		—			—			—			—
Tax effect		—			—			—			—
Reclassification for gains included in net income, net of tax		—			—			—			—
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		1,833			(451	)		3,619			(2,267	)
Comprehensive income	$	9,836		$	6,277		$	19,268		$	10,216

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

-6-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

(unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Common Stock			Retained Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance, April 1, 2018	$	217,573		$	(38,836	)	$	(3,361	)	$	175,376
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2018		—			6,728			—			6,728
Cash dividends at $.06 per share		—			(2,041	)		—			(2,041	)
Net change in unrealized loss on debt securities available for sale, net of tax		—			—			(451	)		(451	)
Stock compensation expense		102			—			—			102
Balance, June 30, 2018	$	217,675		$	(34,149	)	$	(3,812	)	$	179,714
Balance, April 1, 2019	$	217,842		$	(19,384	)	$	(492	)	$	197,966
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2019		—			8,003			—			8,003
Cash dividends at $.07 per share		—			(2,383	)		—			(2,383	)
Repurchase of 452 shares for taxes withheld on vested restricted stock		(5	)		—			—			(5	)
Net change in unrealized gain on debt securities available for sale, net of tax		—			—			1,833			1,833
Stock compensation expense		105			—			—			105
Balance, June 30, 2019	$	217,942		$	(13,764	)	$	1,341		$	205,519

	Common Stock			Retained Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance, January 1, 2018, as reported	$	217,081		$	(42,804	)	$	(1,291	)	$	172,986
Cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of ASU 2018-02		—			278			(278	)		—
Balance, January 1, 2018, adjusted	$	217,081		$	(42,526	)	$	(1,569	)	$	172,986
Reclassification for equity securities upon adoption of ASU 2016-01		—			(24	)		24			—
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2018		—			12,483			—			12,483
Cash dividends at $.12 per share		—			(4,082	)		—			(4,082	)
Repurchase of 452 shares for taxes withheld on vested restricted stock		(5	)		—			—			(5	)
Issuance of 45,000 shares for stock option exercise		386			—			—			386
Net change in unrealized loss on debt securities available for sale, net of tax		—			—			(2,267	)		(2,267	)
Stock compensation expense		213			—			—			213
Balance, June 30, 2018	$	217,675		$	(34,149	)	$	(3,812	)	$	179,714
Balance, January 1, 2019	$	217,783		$	(24,652	)	$	(2,278	)	$	190,853
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2019		—			15,649			—			15,649
Cash dividends at $.14 per share		—			(4,761	)		—			(4,761	)
Repurchase of 452 shares for taxes withheld on vested restricted stock		(5	)		—			—			(5	)
Net change in unrealized gain on debt securities available for sale, net of tax		—			—			3,619			3,619
Stock compensation expense		164			—			—			164
Balance, June 30, 2019	$	217,942		$	(13,764	)	$	1,341		$	205,519

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

-7-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

(unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	15,649		$	12,483
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,328			1,257
Stock compensation expense		164			213
Provision for loan losses		(450	)		(400	)
Origination of loans for sale		(28,815	)		(13,531	)
Proceeds from sales of loans originated for sale		29,039			15,041
Net gains on mortgage loans		(825	)		(363	)
Write-down of other real estate		10			291
Net (gain) loss on sales of other real estate		(79	)		132
Deferred income tax expense		311			427
Change in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(2,217	)		(1,799	)
Earnings in bank-owned life insurance		(485	)		(475	)
Change in accrued expenses and other liabilities		2,501			581
Net cash from operating activities		16,131			13,857
Cash flows from investing activities
Loan originations and payments, net		62,606			(7,175	)
Purchases of securities available for sale		(14,869	)		(19,096	)
Purchases of securities held to maturity		(12,497	)		(5,515	)
Proceeds from:
Maturities and calls of securities		25,142			24,465
Principal paydowns on securities		3,944			4,018
Sales of other real estate		382			1,765
Additions to premises and equipment		(841	)		(564	)
Net cash from investing activities		63,867			(2,102	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Change in deposits		(15,633	)		1,451
Repayments and maturities of other borrowed funds		(10,000	)		(31,451	)
Proceeds from other borrowed funds		10,000			5,000
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		—			386
Repurchase of shares for taxes withheld on vested restricted stock		(5	)		(5	)
Cash dividends paid		(4,761	)		(4,082	)
Net cash from financing activities		(20,399	)		(28,701	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		59,599			(16,946	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		171,284			161,467
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	230,883		$	144,521

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

-8-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

Six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

(unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019		Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Supplemental cash flow information
Interest paid	$	6,047	$	3,920
Income taxes paid		825		1,100
Supplemental noncash disclosures:
Transfers from loans to other real estate		—		293
Security settlement		1,747		—
Reclassification for equity securities upon adoption of ASU 2016-01		—		1,470

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

-9-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Macatawa Bank Corporation (“the Company”, “our”, “we”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Macatawa Bank (“the Bank”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Macatawa Bank is a Michigan chartered bank with depository accounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Bank operates 26 full service branch offices providing a full range of commercial and consumer banking and trust services in Kent County, Ottawa County, and northern Allegan County, Michigan.

The Company owns all of the common stock of Macatawa Statutory Trust I and Macatawa Statutory Trust II. These are grantor trusts that issued trust preferred securities and are not consolidated with the Company under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis of Presentation: The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) believed necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2019. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Use of Estimates:  To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information.  These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and future results could differ.  The allowance for loan losses, valuation of deferred tax assets, loss contingencies, fair value of other real estate owned and fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change.

Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses (allowance) is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio, increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries, and decreased by charge-offs of loans. Management believes the allowance for loan losses balance to be adequate based on known and inherent risks in the portfolio, past loan loss experience, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions and other relevant factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Management continues its collection efforts on previously charged-off balances and applies recoveries as additions to the allowance for loan losses.

The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current qualitative factors. The Company maintains a loss migration analysis that tracks loan losses and recoveries based on loan class and the loan risk grade assignment for commercial loans. At June 30, 2019, an 18 month annualized historical loss experience was used for commercial loans and a 12 month historical loss experience period was applied to residential mortgage loans and consumer loans. These historical loss percentages are adjusted (both upwards and downwards) for certain qualitative factors, including economic trends, credit quality trends, valuation trends, concentration risk, quality of loan review, changes in personnel, external factors and other considerations.

A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is believed to be probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans for which the terms have been modified and a concession has been made, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt restructurings and classified as impaired.

Commercial and commercial real estate loans with relationship balances exceeding $500,000 and an internal risk grading of 6 or worse are evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated and the loan is reported at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing interest rate or at the fair value of collateral, less estimated costs to sell, if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment and they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures.

-10-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Troubled debt restructurings are also considered impaired with impairment generally measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception or using the fair value of collateral, less estimated costs to sell, if repayment is expected solely from the collateral.

Foreclosed Assets: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure, primarily other real estate owned, are initially recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Costs after acquisition are expensed unless they add value to the property.

Income Taxes: Income tax expense is the sum of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company recognizes a tax position as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

During the first quarter of 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2018-02, allowing for the reclassification of the income tax effects of the revaluation the deferred tax impact on accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) due to the enactment of tax reform at the end of 2017.  The Company’s only component of AOCI is the fair value adjustment for securities available for sale.  Upon adoption of this ASU, a transfer was made from AOCI to retained earnings in the amount of $278,000.

Revenue Recognition:  The Company recognizes revenues as they are earned based on contractual terms, as transactions occur, or as services are provided and collectability is reasonably assured.  The Company’s primary source of revenue is interest income from the Bank’s loans and investment securities.  The Company also earns noninterest revenue from various banking services offered by the Bank.

Interest Income: The Company’s largest source of revenue is interest income which is primarily recognized on an accrual basis based on contractual terms written into loans and investment contracts.

Noninterest Revenue:  The Company derives the majority of its noninterest revenue from: (1) service charges for deposit related services, (2) gains related to mortgage loan sales, (3) trust fees and (4) debit and credit card interchange income.  Most of these services are transaction based and revenue is recognized as the related service is provided.

Derivatives:  Certain of the Bank’s commercial loan customers have entered into interest rate swap agreements directly with the Bank.  At the same time the Bank enters into a swap agreement with its customer, the Bank enters into a corresponding interest rate swap agreement with a correspondent bank at terms mirroring the Bank’s interest rate swap with its commercial loan customer.   This is known as a back-to-back swap agreement.  Under this arrangement the Bank has five freestanding interest rate swaps, each of which is carried at fair value.  As the terms mirror each other, there is no income statement impact to the Bank.  At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the total notional amount of such agreements was $59.4 million and $66.0 million, respectively, and resulted in a derivative asset with a fair value of $1,745,000 and $700,000, respectively, which were included in other assets and a derivative liability of $1,745,000 and $700,000, respectively, which were included in other liabilities.

Reclassifications: Some items in the prior period financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards:  FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement.  The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available.  As the Company owns most of its branch locations, this ASU applies primarily to operating leases and the impact of adoption of this ASU by the Company had a nominal income impact and resulted in a right-of-use asset of $800,000 and a corresponding lease obligation liability of $800,000 being established as of January 1, 2019.  The right-of-use asset is included in other assets and the lease obligation liability is included in other liabilities in the June 30, 2019 consolidated balance sheet.

-11-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.  This ASU simplifies and expands the eligible hedging strategies for financial and nonfinancial risks by more closely aligning hedge accounting with a company’s risk management activities, and also simplifies the application of Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging , through targeted improvements in key practice areas.  This includes expanding the list of items eligible to be hedged and amending the methods used to measure the effectiveness of hedging relationships.  In addition, the ASU prescribes how hedging results should be presented and requires incremental disclosures.  These changes are intended to allow preparers more flexibility and to enhance the transparency of how hedging results are presented and disclosed.  Further, the ASU provides partial relief on the timing of certain aspects of hedge documentation and eliminates the requirement to recognize hedge ineffectiveness separately in earnings in the current period.   The ASU was effective for years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years.  The impact of adoption of this ASU was not material.

Newly Issued Not Yet Effective Standards:  FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.  This ASU provides financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date by replacing the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates.  The new guidance eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold and, instead, reflects an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses. The new guidance broadens the information that an entity must consider in developing its expected credit loss estimate for assets measured either collectively or individually to include forecasted information, as well as past events and current conditions. There is no specified method for measuring expected credit losses, and an entity is allowed to apply methods that reasonably reflect its expectations of the credit loss estimate. Although an entity may still use its current systems and methods for recording the allowance for credit losses, under the new rules, the inputs used to record the allowance for credit losses generally will need to change to appropriately reflect an estimate of all expected credit losses and the use of reasonable and supportable forecasts. Additionally, credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities will now have to be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within those years.  The Company selected a software vendor for applying this new ASU, began implementation of the software in the second quarter of 2018, completed integration during the third quarter of 2018 and ran parallel computations with both systems using the current GAAP incurred loss model in the fourth quarter of 2018.  The Company went live with this software beginning in January 2019 for its monthly incurred loss computations and began modeling the new current expected credit loss model assumptions to the allowance for loan losses computation in the first quarter of 2019 and will continue throughout 2019.  In the second quarter of 2019, the Company modeled the various methods prescribed in the ASU against the Company’s identified loan segments.  The Company anticipates running parallel computations in the latter part of 2019 and continues to evaluate the impact of adoption of the new standard.  On July 17, 2019, FASB voted to delay the effective date of this ASU for smaller reporting companies, such as the Company, until fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022.

-12-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at period-end were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
June 30, 2019
Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	92,516	$	56	$	(269	)	$	92,303
U.S. Agency MBS and CMOs		34,404		542		(17	)		34,929
Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds		45,848		1,069		(9	)		46,908
Taxable state and municipal bonds		43,231		351		(61	)		43,521
Corporate bonds and other debt securities		5,128		47		(11	)		5,164
	$	221,127	$	2,065	$	(367	)	$	222,825
Held to Maturity
Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds	$	79,054	$	2,877	$	(31	)	$	81,900

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
December 31, 2018
Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	97,102	$	6	$	(1,710	)	$	95,398
U.S. Agency MBS and CMOs		33,287		97		(494	)		32,890
Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds		45,212		246		(331	)		45,127
Taxable state and municipal bonds		46,565		59		(690	)		45,934
Corporate bonds and other debt securities		7,703		2		(68	)		7,637
	$	229,869	$	410	$	(3,293	)	$	226,986
Held to Maturity
Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds	$	70,334	$	1,488	$	(317	)	$	71,505

There were no sales of securities in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

Contractual maturities of debt securities at June 30, 2019 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Held–to-Maturity Securities				Available-for-Sale Securities
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	16,122	$	16,164	$	26,113	$	26,085
Due from one to five years		30,532		31,309		120,665		121,061
Due from five to ten years		12,760		13,407		40,636		41,464
Due after ten years		19,640		21,020		33,713		34,215
	$	79,054	$	81,900	$	221,127	$	222,825

-13-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES (Continued)

Securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
June 30, 2019	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	5,990	$	(9	)	$	52,205	$	(260	)	$	58,195	$	(269	)
U.S. Agency MBS and CMOs		19		—			3,066		(17	)		3,085		(17	)
Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds		759		(2	)		2,015		(7	)		2,774		(9	)
Taxable state and municipal bonds		—		—			17,162		(61	)		17,162		(61	)
Corporate bonds and other debt securities		—		—			1,606		(11	)		1,606		(11	)
Total	$	6,768	$	(11	)	$	76,054	$	(356	)	$	82,822	$	(367	)
Held to Maturity
Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds	$	3,169	$	(31	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,169	$	(31	)

	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
December 31, 2018	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	1,974	$	(26	)	$	82,895	$	(1,622	)	$	84,869	$	(1,648	)
U.S. Agency MBS and CMOs		1,728		(13	)		18,712		(481	)		20,440		(494	)
Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds		8,987		(69	)		10,785		(262	)		19,772		(331	)
Taxable state and municipal bonds		4,035		(19	)		37,021		(671	)		41,056		(690	)
Corporate bonds and other debt securities		2,698		(12	)		8,170		(118	)		10,868		(130	)
Total temporarily impaired	$	19,422	$	(139	)	$	157,583	$	(3,154	)	$	177,005	$	(3,293	)
Held to Maturity
Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds	$	8,533	$	(76	)	$	4,683	$	(241	)	$	13,216	$	(317	)

Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. At June 30, 2019, 98 securities available for sale with fair values totaling $83.0 million had unrealized losses totaling $367,000.  At June 30, 2019, 4 securities held to maturity with fair values totaling $3.2 million had unrealized losses totaling $31,000.  Management has the intent and ability to hold the securities classified as held to maturity until they mature, at which time the Company will receive full value for the securities.  In addition, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell any if its investment securities before a recovery of cost.  Management determined that the unrealized losses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were attributable to changes in interest rates and not due to credit quality.  As such, no OTTI charges were necessary during each period.

Securities with a carrying value of approximately $2.0 million were pledged as security for public deposits, letters of credit and for other purposes required or permitted by law at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

-14-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS

Portfolio loans were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Commercial and industrial	$	466,590		$	513,345
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		14,582			14,825
Unsecured to residential developers		—			—
Vacant and unimproved		37,455			44,169
Commercial development		689			712
Residential improved		98,608			98,500
Commercial improved		292,381			295,618
Manufacturing and industrial		120,228			114,887
Total commercial real estate		563,943			568,711
Consumer
Residential mortgage		233,271			238,174
Unsecured		338			130
Home equity		72,676			78,503
Other secured		6,694			6,795
Total consumer		312,979			323,602
Total loans		1,343,512			1,405,658
Allowance for loan losses		(16,886	)		(16,876	)
	$	1,326,626		$	1,388,782

-15-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

Activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment was as follows (dollars in thousands):

Three months ended June 30, 2019	Commercial and Industrial		Commercial Real Estate			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Beginning balance	$	6,989	$	6,447		$	3,426		$	30	$	16,892
Charge-offs		—		—			(41	)		—		(41	)
Recoveries		141		67			27			—		235
Provision for loan losses		101		(205	)		(116	)		20		(200	)
Ending Balance	$	7,231	$	6,309		$	3,296		$	50	$	16,886

Three months ended June 30, 2018	Commercial and Industrial			Commercial Real Estate		Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Beginning balance	$	6,506		$	6,532	$	3,603		$	34		$	16,675
Charge-offs		—			—		(30	)		—			(30	)
Recoveries		55			257		38			—			350
Provision for loan losses		(412	)		87		40			(15	)		(300	)
Ending Balance	$	6,149		$	6,876	$	3,651		$	19		$	16,695

Six months ended June 30, 2019	Commercial and Industrial		Commercial Real Estate			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Beginning balance	$	6,856	$	6,544		$	3,449		$	27	$	16,876
Charge-offs		—		(132	)		(66	)		—		(198	)
Recoveries		277		291			90			—		658
Provision for loan losses		98		(394	)		(177	)		23		(450	)
Ending Balance	$	7,231	$	6,309		$	3,296		$	50	$	16,886

Six months ended June 30, 2018	Commercial and Industrial			Commercial Real Estate			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Beginning balance	$	6,478		$	6,590		$	3,494		$	38		$	16,600
Charge-offs		(66	)		—			(60	)		—			(126	)
Recoveries		89			460			72			—			621
Provision for loan losses		(352	)		(174	)		145			(19	)		(400	)
Ending Balance	$	6,149		$	6,876		$	3,651		$	19		$	16,695

-16-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method (dollars in thousands):

June 30, 2019	Commercial and Industrial		Commercial Real Estate		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance attributable to loans:
Individually reviewed for impairment	$	779	$	34	$	417	$	—	$	1,230
Collectively evaluated for impairment		6,452		6,275		2,879		50		15,656
Total ending allowance balance	$	7,231	$	6,309	$	3,296	$	50	$	16,886
Loans:
Individually reviewed for impairment	$	2,910	$	3,303	$	5,466	$	—	$	11,679
Collectively evaluated for impairment		463,680		560,640		307,513		—		1,331,833
Total ending loans balance	$	466,590	$	563,943	$	312,979	$	—	$	1,343,512

December 31, 2018	Commercial and Industrial		Commercial Real Estate		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance attributable to loans:
Individually reviewed for impairment	$	449	$	181	$	468	$	—	$	1,098
Collectively evaluated for impairment		6,407		6,363		2,981		27		15,778
Total ending allowance balance	$	6,856	$	6,544	$	3,449	$	27	$	16,876
Loans:
Individually reviewed for impairment	$	7,375	$	3,499	$	6,347	$	—	$	17,221
Collectively evaluated for impairment		505,970		565,212		317,255		—		1,388,437
Total ending loans balance	$	513,345	$	568,711	$	323,602	$	—	$	1,405,658

-17-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of June 30, 2019 (dollars in thousands):

June 30, 2019	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance Allocated
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	1,180	$	1,180	$	—
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		—		—		—
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		124		124		—
Commercial development		—		—		—
Residential improved		491		491		—
Commercial improved		1,501		1,501		—
Manufacturing and industrial		—		—		—
		2,116		2,116		—
Consumer:
Residential mortgage		—		—		—
Unsecured		—		—		—
Home equity		—		—		—
Other secured		—		—		—
		—		—		—
Total with no related allowance recorded	$	3,296	$	3,296	$	—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	1,730	$	1,730	$	779
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		170		170		3
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		—		—		—
Commercial development		—		—		—
Residential improved		60		60		5
Commercial improved		589		589		16
Manufacturing and industrial		368		368		10
		1,187		1,187		34
Consumer:
Residential mortgage		4,443		4,443		328
Unsecured		—		—		—
Home equity		1,023		1,023		89
Other secured		—		—		—
		5,466		5,466		417
Total with an allowance recorded	$	8,383	$	8,383	$	1,230
Total	$	11,679	$	11,679	$	1,230

-18-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):

December 31, 2018	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance Allocated
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	2,515	$	1,375	$	—
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		—		—		—
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		143		143		—
Commercial development		—		—		—
Residential improved		140		140		—
Commercial improved		1,675		1,675		—
Manufacturing and industrial		—		—		—
		1,958		1,958		—
Consumer:
Residential mortgage		—		—		—
Unsecured		—		—		—
Home equity		—		—		—
Other secured		—		—		—
		—		—		—
Total with no related allowance recorded	$	4,473	$	3,333	$	—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	6,000	$	6,000	$	449
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		172		172		2
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		—		—		—
Commercial development		—		—		—
Residential improved		193		193		13
Commercial improved		794		794		155
Manufacturing and industrial		382		382		11
		1,541		1,541		181
Consumer:
Residential mortgage		5,029		5,029		371
Unsecured		—		—		—
Home equity		1,318		1,318		97
Other secured		—		—		—
		6,347		6,347		468
Total with an allowance recorded	$	13,888	$	13,888	$	1,098
Total	$	18,361	$	17,221	$	1,098

-19-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

The following table presents information regarding average balances of impaired loans and interest recognized on impaired loans for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019		Three Months Ended June 30, 2018		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019		Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Average of impaired loans during the period:
Commercial and industrial	$	5,039	$	3,959	$	5,833	$	5,872
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		170		176		171		177
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		131		254		135		211
Commercial development		—		—		—		63
Residential improved		417		1,175		374		1,315
Commercial improved		2,138		3,327		2,239		3,529
Manufacturing and industrial		371		399		374		326
Consumer		5,880		7,487		6,034		7,777
Interest income recognized during impairment:
Commercial and industrial		230		215		518		517
Commercial real estate		52		61		96		135
Consumer		65		70		140		155
Cash-basis interest income recognized
Commercial and industrial		265		230		547		524
Commercial real estate		52		50		101		129
Consumer		63		65		139		152

-20-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

Nonaccrual loans include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans.  The following tables present the recorded investment in nonaccrual and loans past due over 90 days still on accrual by class of loans as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

June 30, 2019	Nonaccrual		Over 90 days Accruing
Commercial and industrial	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		—		—
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		—		—
Commercial development		—		—
Residential improved		102		—
Commercial improved		—		—
Manufacturing and industrial		—		—
		102		—
Consumer:
Residential mortgage		109		82
Unsecured		—		—
Home equity		—		—
Other secured		—		—
		109		82
Total	$	211	$	82

December 31, 2018	Nonaccrual		Over 90 days Accruing
Commercial and industrial	$	874	$	—
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		—		—
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		—		—
Commercial development		—		—
Residential improved		15		—
Commercial improved		303		—
Manufacturing and industrial		—		—
		318		—
Consumer:
Residential mortgage		111		—
Unsecured		—		—
Home equity		—		1
Other secured		—		—
		111		1
Total	$	1,303	$	1

-21-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 by class of loans (dollars in thousands):

June 30, 2019	30-90 Days		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Loans Not Past Due		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	466,590	$	466,590
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		—		—		—		14,582		14,582
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—		—		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		—		—		—		37,455		37,455
Commercial development		—		—		—		689		689
Residential improved		—		102		102		98,506		98,608
Commercial improved		—		—		—		292,381		292,381
Manufacturing and industrial		—		—		—		120,228		120,228
		—		102		102		563,841		563,943
Consumer:
Residential mortgage		—		190		190		233,081		233,271
Unsecured		6		—		6		332		338
Home equity		62		—		62		72,614		72,676
Other secured		—		—		—		6,694		6,694
		68		190		258		312,721		312,979
Total	$	68	$	292	$	360	$	1,343,152	$	1,343,512

December 31, 2018	30-90 Days		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Loans Not Past Due		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	513,345	$	513,345
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		—		—		—		14,825		14,825
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—		—		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		57		—		57		44,112		44,169
Commercial development		—		—		—		712		712
Residential improved		86		16		102		98,398		98,500
Commercial improved		100		303		403		295,215		295,618
Manufacturing and industrial		—		—		—		114,887		114,887
		243		319		562		568,149		568,711
Consumer:
Residential mortgage		—		110		110		238,064		238,174
Unsecured		7		—		7		123		130
Home equity		67		1		68		78,435		78,503
Other secured		130		—		130		6,665		6,795
		204		111		315		323,287		323,602
Total	$	447	$	430	$	877	$	1,404,781	$	1,405,658

-22-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

The Company had allocated $1,230,000 and $1,098,000 of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.  These loans may have involved the restructuring of terms to allow customers to mitigate the risk of foreclosure by meeting a lower loan payment requirement based upon their current cash flow.  These may also include loans that renewed at existing contractual rates, but below market rates for comparable credit.  The Company has been active at utilizing these programs and working with its customers to reduce the risk of foreclosure.  For commercial loans, these modifications typically include an interest only period and, in some cases, a lowering of the interest rate on the loan.  In some cases, the modification will include separating the note into two notes with the first note structured to be supported by current cash flows and collateral, and the second note made for the remaining unsecured debt.  The second note is charged off immediately and collected only after the first note is paid in full.  This modification type is commonly referred to as an A-B note structure.  For consumer mortgage loans, the restructuring typically includes a lowering of the interest rate to provide payment and cash flow relief.  For each restructuring, a comprehensive credit underwriting analysis of the borrower’s financial condition and prospects of repayment under the revised terms is performed to assess whether the structure can be successful and that cash flows will be sufficient to support the restructured debt.  An analysis is also performed to determine whether the restructured loan should be on accrual status.  Generally, if the loan is on accrual at the time of restructure, it will remain on accrual after the restructuring.  In some cases, a nonaccrual loan may be placed on accrual at restructuring if the loan’s actual payment history demonstrates it would have cash flowed under the restructured terms.  After six consecutive payments under the restructured terms, a nonaccrual restructured loan is reviewed for possible upgrade to accruing status.

In situations where there is a subsequent modification or renewal and the loan is brought to market terms, including a contractual interest rate not less than a market interest rate for new debt with similar credit risk characteristics, the TDR and impaired loan designations may be removed.  In addition, the TDR designation may also be removed from loans modified under an A-B note structure.  If the remaining “A” note is at a market rate at the time of restructuring (taking into account the borrower’s credit risk and prevailing market conditions), the loan can be removed from TDR designation in a subsequent calendar year after six months of performance in accordance with the new terms.  The market rate relative to the borrower’s credit risk is determined through analysis of market pricing information gathered from peers and use of a loan pricing model.  The general objective of the model is to achieve a consistent return on equity from one credit to the next, taking into consideration differences in credit risk.  In the model, credits with higher risk receive a higher potential loss allocation, and therefore require a higher interest rate to achieve the target return on equity.

As with other impaired loans, an allowance for loan loss is estimated for each TDR based on the most likely source of repayment for each loan.  For impaired commercial real estate loans that are collateral dependent, the allowance is computed based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, less estimated costs to sell.  For impaired commercial loans where repayment is expected from cash flows from business operations, the allowance is computed based on a discounted cash flow computation.  Certain groups of TDRs, such as residential mortgages, have common characteristics and for them the allowance is computed based on a discounted cash flow computation on the change in weighted rate for the pool.  The allowance allocations for commercial TDRs where we have reduced the contractual interest rate are computed by measuring cash flows using the new payment terms discounted at the original contractual rate.

The following table presents information regarding troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Number of Loans		Outstanding Recorded Balance		Number of Loans		Outstanding Recorded Balance
Commercial and industrial		9	$	2,910		18	$	6,502
Commercial real estate		17		3,146		22		3,305
Consumer		73		5,466		83		6,346
		99	$	11,522		123	$	16,153

-23-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

The following table presents information related to accruing troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.  The table presents the amount of accruing troubled debt restructurings that were on nonaccrual status prior to the restructuring, accruing at the time of restructuring and those that were upgraded to accruing status after receiving six consecutive monthly payments in accordance with the restructured terms as of each period reported (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Accruing TDR - nonaccrual at restructuring	$	—	$	—
Accruing TDR - accruing at restructuring		8,947		10,336
Accruing TDR - upgraded to accruing after six consecutive payments		2,473		5,693
	$	11,420	$	16,029

The following tables present information regarding troubled debt restructurings executed during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019						Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
	# of Loans		Pre-TDR Balance		Writedown Upon TDR		# of Loans		Pre-TDR Balance		Writedown Upon TDR
Commercial and industrial		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer		1		24		—		2		24		—
		1	$	24	$	—		2	$	24	$	—

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019						Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	# of Loans		Pre-TDR Balance		Writedown Upon TDR		# of Loans		Pre-TDR Balance		Writedown Upon TDR
Commercial and industrial		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		3		492		—
Consumer		1		24		—		4		92		—
		1	$	24	$	—		7	$	584	$	—

According to the accounting standards, not all loan modifications are TDRs.  TDRs are modifications or renewals where the Company has granted a concession to a borrower in financial distress.  The Company reviews all modifications and renewals for determination of TDR status.  In some situations a borrower may be experiencing financial distress, but the Company does not provide a concession.  These modifications are not considered TDRs.  In other cases, the Company might provide a concession, such as a reduction in interest rate, but the borrower is not experiencing financial distress.  This could be the case if the Company is matching a competitor’s interest rate.  These modifications would also not be considered TDRs.  Finally, any renewals at existing terms for borrowers not experiencing financial distress would not be considered TDRs.  As with other loans not considered TDR or impaired, allowance allocations are based on the historical based allocation for the applicable loan grade and loan class.

Payment defaults on TDRs have been minimal and during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the balance of loans that became delinquent by more than 90 days past due or that were transferred to nonaccrual within 12 months of restructuring were not material.

-24-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

Credit Quality Indicators: The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of the borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends, among other factors.  The Company analyzes commercial loans individually and classifies these relationships by credit risk grading.  The Company uses an eight point grading system, with grades 5 through 8 being considered classified, or watch, credits.  All commercial loans are assigned a grade at origination, at each renewal or any amendment.  When a credit is first downgraded to a watch credit (either through renewal, amendment, loan officer identification or the loan review process), an Administrative Loan Review (“ALR”) is generated by the credit department and the loan officer.  All watch credits have an ALR completed quarterly which analyzes the collateral position and cash flow of the borrower and its guarantors.  Management meets quarterly with loan officers to discuss each of these credits in detail and to help formulate solutions where progress has stalled.  When necessary, the loan officer proposes changes to the assigned loan grade as part of the ALR.  Additionally, Loan Review reviews all loan grades upon origination, renewal or amendment and again as loans are selected though the loan review process.  The credit will stay on the ALR until either its grade has improved to a 4 or the credit relationship is at a zero balance.  The Company uses the following definitions for the risk grades:

1. Excellent - Loans supported by extremely strong financial condition or secured by the Bank’s own deposits. Minimal risk to the Bank and the probability of serious rapid financial deterioration is extremely small.

2. Above Average - Loans supported by sound financial statements that indicate the ability to repay or borrowings secured (and margined properly) with marketable securities. Nominal risk to the Bank and probability of serious financial deterioration is highly unlikely. The overall quality of these credits is very high.

3. Good Quality - Loans supported by satisfactory asset quality and liquidity, good debt capacity coverage, and good management in all critical positions. Loans are secured by acceptable collateral with adequate margins. There is a slight risk of deterioration if adverse market conditions prevail.

4. Acceptable Risk - Loans carrying an acceptable risk to the Bank, which may be slightly below average quality. The borrower has limited financial strength with considerable leverage. There is some probability of deterioration if adverse market conditions prevail. These credits should be monitored closely by the Relationship Manager.

5. Marginally Acceptable - Loans are of marginal quality with above normal risk to the Bank. The borrower shows acceptable asset quality but very little liquidity with high leverage. There is inconsistent earning performance without the ability to sustain adverse market conditions. The primary source of repayment is questionable, but the secondary source of repayment still remains an option. Very close attention by the Relationship Manager and management is needed.

6. Substandard - Loans are inadequately protected by the net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or the collateral pledged. The primary and secondary sources of repayment are questionable. Heavy debt condition may be evident and volume and earnings deterioration may be underway. It is possible that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not immediately addressed and corrected.

7. Doubtful - Loans supported by weak or no financial statements, as well as the ability to repay the entire loan, are questionable. Loans in this category are normally characterized less than adequate collateral, insolvent, or extremely weak financial condition. A loan classified doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses makes collection or liquidation in full highly questionable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, however, activity may be underway to minimize the loss or maximize the recovery.

8. Loss - Loans are considered uncollectible and of little or no value as a bank asset.

-25-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (Continued)

As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the risk grade category of commercial loans by class of loans were as follows (dollars in thousands):

June 30, 2019		1		2		3		4		5		6		7		8	Total
Commercial and industrial	$	15,000	$	16,225	$	143,986	$	276,700	$	12,149	$	2,530	$	—	$	—	$	466,590
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		—		—		—		14,164		418		—		—		—		14,582
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		—		5,382		7,072		24,894		107		—		—		—		37,455
Commercial development		—		—		83		606		—		—		—		—		689
Residential improved		—		—		15,424		82,511		233		338		102		—		98,608
Commercial improved		—		5,515		63,888		217,824		4,795		359		—		—		292,381
Manufacturing & industrial		—		3,256		29,105		83,303		4,564		—		—		—		120,228
	$	15,000	$	30,378	$	259,558	$	700,002	$	22,266	$	3,227	$	102	$	—	$	1,030,533

December 31, 2018		1		2		3		4		5		6		7		8	Total
Commercial and industrial	$	15,000	$	15,708	$	164,901	$	299,622	$	11,186	$	6,054	$	874	$	—	$	513,345
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed		—		—		—		14,220		605		—		—		—		14,825
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Vacant and unimproved		—		7,635		3,543		30,688		2,303		—		—		—		44,169
Commercial development		—		—		86		626		—		—		—		—		712
Residential improved		—		—		19,645		78,337		311		192		15		—		98,500
Commercial improved		—		5,292		62,756		222,152		4,751		364		303		—		295,618
Manufacturing & industrial		—		3,372		24,799		81,261		5,455		—		—		—		114,887
	$	15,000	$	32,007	$	275,730	$	726,906	$	24,611	$	6,610	$	1,192	$	—	$	1,082,056

Commercial loans rated a 6 or worse per the Company’s internal risk rating system are considered substandard, doubtful or loss. Commercial loans classified as substandard or worse were as follows at period-end (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Not classified as impaired	$	—	$	—
Classified as impaired		3,329		7,802
Total commercial loans classified substandard or worse	$	3,329	$	7,802

The Company considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. For consumer loan classes, the Company also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in consumer loans based on payment activity (dollars in thousands):

June 30, 2019	Residential Mortgage		Consumer Unsecured		Home Equity		Consumer Other
Performing	$	233,080	$	338	$	72,676	$	6,694
Nonperforming		191		—		—		—
Total	$	233,271	$	338	$	72,676	$	6,694

December 31, 2018	Residential Mortgage		Consumer Unsecured		Home Equity		Consumer Other
Performing	$	238,064	$	130	$	78,502	$	6,795
Nonperforming		110		—		1		—
Total	$	238,174	$	130	$	78,503	$	6,795

-26-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 4 – OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED

Other real estate owned was as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019			Year Ended December 31, 2018			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Beginning balance	$	4,183		$	9,140		$	9,140
Additions, transfers from loans		—			293			293
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		(382	)		(2,212	)		(1,765	)
Valuation allowance reversal upon sale		(171	)		(2,893	)		(2,508	)
Gain / (loss) on sales of other real estate owned		79			(145	)		(132	)
		3,709			4,183			5,028
Less: valuation allowance		(642	)		(803	)		(1,156	)
Ending balance	$	3,067		$	3,380		$	3,872

Activity in the valuation allowance was as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Beginning balance	$	803		$	3,373
Additions charged to expense		10			291
Reversals upon sale		(171	)		(2,508	)
Ending balance	$	642		$	1,156

-27-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 – FAIR VALUE

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value include:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

Investment Securities: The fair values of investment securities are determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).  The fair values of certain securities held to maturity are determined by computing discounted cash flows using observable and unobservable market inputs (Level 3 inputs).

Loans Held for Sale: The fair value of loans held for sale is based upon binding quotes from third party investors (Level 2 inputs).

Impaired Loans: Loans identified as impaired are measured using one of three methods: the loan’s observable market price, the fair value of collateral or the present value of expected future cash flows.  For each period presented, no impaired loans were measured using the loan’s observable market price.  If an impaired loan has had a chargeoff or if the fair value of the collateral is less than the recorded investment in the loan, we establish a specific reserve and report the loan as nonrecurring Level 3.  The fair value of collateral of impaired loans is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Other Real Estate Owned: Other real estate owned (OREO) properties are initially recorded at fair value, less estimated costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis.  Adjustments to OREO are measured at fair value, less costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party appraisals or realtor evaluations of the property. These appraisals and evaluations may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach.  Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available.  Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification.  In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized through a valuation allowance, and the property is reported as nonrecurring Level 3.

Interest Rate Swaps:    For interest rate swap agreements, we measure fair value utilizing pricing provided by a third-party pricing source that that uses market observable inputs, such as forecasted yield curves, and other unobservable inputs and accordingly, interest rate swap agreements are classified as Level 3.

-28-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 – FAIR VALUE (Continued)

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):

	Fair			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	Value			(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
June 30, 2019
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	92,303		$	—	$	92,303	$	—
U.S. Agency MBS and CMOs		34,929			—		34,929		—
Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds		46,908			—		46,908		—
Taxable state and municipal bonds		43,521			—		43,521		—
Corporate bonds and other debt securities		5,164			—		5,164		—
Other equity securities		1,477			—		1,477		—
Loans held for sale		1,016			—		1,016		—
Interest rate swaps		1,745			—		—		1,745
Interest rate swaps		(1,745	)		—		—		(1,745	)
December 31, 2018
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities	$	95,398		$	—	$	95,398	$	—
U.S. Agency MBS and CMOs		32,890			—		32,890		—
Tax-exempt state and municipal bonds		45,127			—		45,127		—
Taxable state and municipal bonds		45,934			—		45,934		—
Corporate bonds and other debt securities		7,637			—		7,637		—
Other equity securities		1,438			—		1,438		—
Loans held for sale		415			—		415		—
Interest rate swaps		700			—		—		700
Interest rate swaps		(700	)		—		—		(700	)

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):

	Fair		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
June 30, 2019
Impaired loans	$	1,848	$	—	$	—	$	1,848
Other real estate owned		808		—		—		808
December 31, 2018
Impaired loans	$	3,211	$	—	$	—	$	3,211
Other real estate owned		1,205		—		—		1,205

-29-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 – FAIR VALUE (Continued)

Quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements measured on a non-recurring basis was as follows at period end (dollars in thousands):

	Asset Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (%)
June 30, 2019
Impaired Loans	$	1,848	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between comparable sales	1.0 to 30.0
			Income approach	Capitalization rate	9.5 to 11.0
Other real estate owned		808	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between comparable sales	3.0 to 20.0
			Income approach	Capitalization rate	9.5 to 11.0

	Asset Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range (%)
December 31, 2018
Impaired Loans	$	3,211	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between comparable sales	1.0 to 15.0
			Income approach	Capitalization rate	9.5 to 11.0
Other real estate owned		1,205	Sales comparison approach	Adjustment for differences between comparable sales	3.0 to 20.0
			Income approach	Capitalization rate	9.5 to 11.0

-30-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 – FAIR VALUE (Continued)

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments, not previously presented, were as follows at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):

	Level in	June 30, 2019							December 31, 2018
	Fair Value Hierarchy	Carrying Amount			Fair Value				Carrying Amount			Fair Value
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks	Level 1	$	30,943			$	30,943		$	40,526			$	40,526
Cash equivalents	Level 2		199,940				199,940			130,758				130,758
Securities held to maturity	Level 3		79,054				81,900			70,334				71,505
FHLB stock			11,558		NA					11,558		NA
Loans, net	Level 2		1,324,322				1,360,415			1,385,571				1,403,005
Bank owned life insurance	Level 3		41,695				41,695			41,185				41,185
Accrued interest receivable	Level 2		5,487				5,487			5,279				5,279
Financial liabilities
Deposits	Level 2		(1,661,106	)			(1,662,384	)		(1,676,739	)			(1,677,634	)
Other borrowed funds	Level 2		(60,000	)			(60,634	)		(60,000	)			(59,092	)
Long-term debt	Level 2		(41,238	)			(37,127	)		(41,238	)			(37,046	)
Accrued interest payable	Level 2		(909	)			(909	)		(503	)			(503	)
Off-balance sheet credit-related items
Loan commitments			—				—			—				—

The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows.

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, bank owned life insurance, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term borrowings and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. Security fair values are determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities as discussed above. For fixed rate loans, interest-bearing time deposits in other financial institutions, or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk (including consideration of widening credit spreads). Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability. The fair value of off-balance sheet credit-related items is not significant.

The estimated fair values of financial instruments disclosed above as follow the guidance in ASU 2016-01 which prescribes an “exit price” approach in estimating and disclosing fair value of financial instruments incorporating discounts for credit, liquidity and marketability factors.

NOTE 6 – DEPOSITS

Deposits are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	476,700	$	485,530
Interest bearing demand		423,127		456,260
Savings and money market accounts		614,943		609,425
Certificates of deposit		146,336		125,524
	$	1,661,106	$	1,676,739

Time deposits that exceed the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000 were approximately $42.0 million at June 30, 2019 and $39.6 million at December 31, 2018.

-31-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 7 - OTHER BORROWED FUNDS

Other borrowed funds include advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank and borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

At period-end, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were as follows (dollars in thousands):

Principal Terms	Advance Amount		Range of Maturities	Weighted Average Interest Rate
June 30, 2019
Single maturity fixed rate advances	$	40,000	April 2021 to July 2024		2.50	%
Putable advances		20,000	November 2024		1.81	%
	$	60,000

Principal Terms	Advance Amount		Range of Maturities	Weighted Average Interest Rate
December 31, 2018
Single maturity fixed rate advances	$	40,000	February 2019 to July 2024		2.27	%
Putable advances		20,000	November 2024		1.81	%
	$	60,000

-32-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 7 - OTHER BORROWED FUNDS (Continued)

Each advance is subject to a prepayment fee if paid prior to its maturity date.  Fixed rate advances are payable at maturity.   Amortizable mortgage advances are fixed rate advances with scheduled repayments based upon amortization to maturity.  These advances were collateralized by residential and commercial real estate loans totaling $502.8 million and $476.4 million under a blanket lien arrangement at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Scheduled repayments of FHLB advances as of June 30, 2019 were as follows (in thousands):

2019	$	—
2020		—
2021		10,000
2022		—
2023		10,000
Thereafter		40,000
	$	60,000

Federal Reserve Bank borrowings

The Company has a financing arrangement with the Federal Reserve Bank.  There were no borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and the Company had approximately $12.3 million and $16.9 million in unused borrowing capacity based on commercial and mortgage loans pledged to the Federal Reserve Bank totaling $14.4 million and $18.2 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

NOTE 8 - EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019		Three Months Ended June 30, 2018		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019		Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net income available to common shares	$	8,003	$	6,728	$	15,649	$	12,483
Weighted average shares outstanding, including participating stock awards - Basic		34,042,886		34,016,679		34,041,628		34,013,555
Dilutive potential common shares:
Stock options		—		—		—		597
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted		34,042,886		34,016,679		34,041,628		34,014,152
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.24	$	0.20	$	0.46	$	0.37
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.24	$	0.20	$	0.46	$	0.37

There were no antidilutive shares of common stock in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

-33-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 9 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019		Three Months Ended June 30, 2018		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019		Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Current	$	1,851	$	1,294	$	3,319	$	2,232
Deferred		65		140		311		427
	$	1,916	$	1,434	$	3,630	$	2,659

The difference between the financial statement tax expense and amount computed by applying the statutory federal tax rate to pretax income was reconciled as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019			Three Months Ended June 30, 2018			Six Months Ended June 30, 2019			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Statutory rate		21	%		21	%		21	%		21	%
Statutory rate applied to income before taxes	$	2,083		$	1,714		$	4,049		$	3,180
Deduct
Tax-exempt interest income		(173	)		(183	)		(340	)		(362	)
Bank-owned life insurance		(52	)		(50	)		(102	)		(100	)
Other, net		58			(47	)		23			(59	)
	$	1,916		$	1,434		$	3,630		$	2,659

The realization of deferred tax assets (net of a recorded valuation allowance) is largely dependent upon future taxable income, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences and the ability to carryback losses to available tax years. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider positive and negative evidence, including taxable income in carry-back years, scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, expected future taxable income and tax planning strategies. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, a valuation allowance of $92,000 was established for a capital loss carryforward related to the liquidation of assets of a partnership interest the Bank acquired through a loan settlement.  Management believes it is more likely than not that all of the remaining deferred tax assets will be realized against deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income.

The net deferred tax asset recorded included the following amounts of deferred tax assets and liabilities (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Deferred tax assets
Allowance for loan losses	$	3,546		$	3,544
Nonaccrual loan interest		209			268
Valuation allowance on other real estate owned		184			218
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale		—			606
Other		237			302
Gross deferred tax assets		4,176			4,938
Valuation allowance		(92	)		(92	)
Total net deferred tax assets		4,084			4,846
Deferred tax liabilities
Depreciation		(1,139	)		(1,005	)
Prepaid expenses		(200	)		(200	)
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale		(357	)		—
Other		(281	)		(261	)
Gross deferred tax liabilities		(1,977	)		(1,466	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	2,107		$	3,380

There were no unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2019 or December 31, 2018 and the Company does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease in the next twelve months. The Company is no longer subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for years before 2015.

-34-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 10 – COMMITMENTS AND OFF BALANCE-SHEET RISK

Some financial instruments are used to meet customer financing needs and to reduce exposure to interest rate changes.  These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.  These involve, to varying degrees, credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount reported in the financial statements.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment, and generally have fixed expiration dates.  Collateral or other security is normally not obtained for these financial instruments prior to their use and many of the commitments are expected to expire without being used.  Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments to guarantee a customer’s performance to a third party.  Exposure to credit loss if the other party does not perform is represented by the contractual amount for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.

A summary of the contractual amounts of financial instruments with off‑balance‑sheet risk was as follows at period-end (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Commitments to make loans	$	101,783	$	77,391
Letters of credit		18,587		15,802
Unused lines of credit		505,848		486,203

The notional amount of commitments to fund mortgage loans to be sold into the secondary market was approximately $15.6 million and $4.1 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

At June 30, 2019, approximately 55.0% of the Bank’s commitments to make loans were at fixed rates, offered at current market rates.  The remainder of the commitments to make loans were at variable rates tied to prime or one month LIBOR and generally expire within 30 days.  The majority of the unused lines of credit were at variable rates tied to prime.

NOTE 11 – CONTINGENCIES

The Company and its subsidiaries periodically become defendants in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2019, there were no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries are a party or which any of its properties are the subject.

NOTE 12 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Regulatory Capital

The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors, and the regulators can lower classifications in certain cases. Failure to meet various capital requirements can initiate regulatory action that could have a direct material effect on the financial statements.

The prompt corrective action regulations provide five categories, including well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If a bank is only adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to, among other things, accept, renew or roll-over brokered deposits. If a bank is undercapitalized, capital distributions and growth and expansion are limited, and plans for capital restoration are required.

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC approved the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks (commonly known as Basel III). Under the rules, minimum requirements increased for both the quantity and quality of capital held by the Company and the Bank. The rules include a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CET1 ratio) of 4.5% and a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, which effectively resulted in a minimum CET1 ratio of 7.0%.  Basel III raised the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% (which, with the capital conservation buffer, effectively resulted in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%), which effectively resulted in a minimum total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10.5% (with the capital conservation buffer), and requires a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. Basel III also made changes to risk weights for certain assets and off-balance-sheet exposures.

-35-

MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION

 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 12 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, actual capital levels and minimum required levels were (dollars in thousands):

						Minimum Capital					Minimum Capital Adequacy With					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Adequacy					Capital Buffer					Action Regulations
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
June 30, 2019
CET1 capital (to risk weighted assets)
Consolidated	$	204,178		13.1	%	$	70,000		4.5	%	$	108,889		7.0	%		N/A		N/A
Bank		237,564		15.3			69,990		4.5			108,873		7.0		$	101,096		6.5	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)
Consolidated		244,178		15.7			93,333		6.0			132,222		8.5			N/A		N/A
Bank		237,564		15.3			93,320		6.0			132,203		8.5			124,426		8.0
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)
Consolidated		261,064		16.8			124,444		8.0			163,333		10.5			N/A		N/A
Bank		254,450		16.4			124,426		8.0			163,309		10.5			155,533		10.0
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Consolidated		244,178		12.3			79,157		4.0			N/A		N/A			N/A		N/A
Bank		237,564		12.0			79,094		4.0			N/A		N/A			98,868		5.0
December 31, 2018
CET1 capital (to risk weighted assets)
Consolidated	$	193,131		12.0	%	$	72,381		4.5	%	$	102,540		6.4	%		N/A		N/A
Bank		226,531		14.1			72,371		4.5			102,526		6.4		$	104,536		6.5	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)
Consolidated		233,131		14.5			96,508		6.0			126,667		7.9			N/A		N/A
Bank		226,531		14.1			96,495		6.0			126,649		7.9			128,660		8.0
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)
Consolidated		250,007		15.5			128,678		8.0			158,837		9.9			N/A		N/A
Bank		243,407		15.1			128,660		8.0			158,814		9.9			160,825		10.0
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Consolidated		233,131		12.1			76,963		4.0			N/A		N/A			N/A		N/A
Bank		226,531		11.8			76,902		4.0			N/A		N/A			96,128		5.0

Approximately $40.0 million of trust preferred securities outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, qualified as Tier 1 capital. Refer to our 2018 Form 10-K for more information on the trust preferred securities.

The Bank was categorized as “well capitalized” at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

-36-

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Macatawa Bank Corporation is a Michigan corporation and a registered bank holding company. It wholly-owns Macatawa Bank, Macatawa Statutory Trust I and Macatawa Statutory Trust II. Macatawa Bank is a Michigan chartered bank with depository accounts insured by the FDIC. The Bank operates twenty-six branch offices and a lending and operational service facility, providing a full range of commercial and consumer banking and trust services in Kent County, Ottawa County, and northern Allegan County, Michigan. Macatawa Statutory Trusts I and II are grantor trusts and issued $20.0 million each of pooled trust preferred securities. These trusts are not consolidated in our Consolidated Financial Statements. For further information regarding consolidation, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

At June 30, 2019, we had total assets of $1.98 billion, total loans of $1.34 billion, total deposits of $1.66 billion and shareholders’ equity of $205.5 million.  For the three months ended June 30, 2019, we recognized net income of $8.0 million compared to $6.7 million for the same period in 2018.  For the six months ended June 30, 2019, we recognized net income of $15.6 million compared to $12.5 million for the same period in 2018.  The Bank was categorized as “well capitalized” under regulatory capital standards at June 30, 2019.

We paid a dividend of $0.06 per share in the first, second and third quarters of 2018 and $0.07 per share in the fourth quarter of 2018 and in the first and second quarters of 2019.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Summary: Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was $8.0 million, compared to $6.7 million for the same period in 2018.  Net income per share on a diluted basis for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was $0.24 compared to $0.20 for the same period in 2018.  Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $15.6 million, compared to $12.5 million for the same period in 2018.  Net income per share on a diluted basis for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $0.46 compared to $0.37 for the same period in 2018.

The increase in earnings in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the same periods in 2018 was due primarily to increased net interest income.  Net interest income increased to $16.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $14.7 million in the same period in 2018.  Net interest income increased to $32.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $28.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Other items impacting earnings included nonperforming asset expenses (including administration costs and losses), which were $15,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $83,000 for the same period in 2018. Also, the provision for loan losses was a negative $200,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to a negative $300,000 for the same period in 2018.  We again were in a net loan recovery position for the three months ended June 30, 2019, with $194,000 in net loan recoveries, compared to $320,000 in net loan recoveries in the same period in 2018.  We were also in a net loan recovery position for the year-to-date periods, with $460,000 in net loan recoveries in the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $495,000 in the same period in 2018.  Each of these items is discussed more fully below.

Net Interest Income: Net interest income totaled $16.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $14.7 million for the same period in 2018.  Net interest income increased to $32.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $28.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Net interest income was positively impacted in the three months ended June 30, 2019 by an increase in average earning assets of $103.4 million compared to the same period in 2018.  Also, our average yield on earning assets for the three months ended June 30, 2019 increased 30 basis points compared to the same period in 2018 from 3.86% to 4.16%. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, our average earning assets increased by $103.4 million compared to the same period in 2018, while our average yield on earning assets increased 39 basis points compared to the same period in 2018 from 3.81% to 4.20%.

Net interest income for the second quarter of 2019 increased $1.3 million compared to the same period in 2018.  Of this increase, $524,000 was due to changes in rates earned or paid, while $778,000 was from changes in the volume of average interest assets and interest bearing liabilities.  The largest changes came in commercial loan interest income which increased by $1.5 million in the second quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018.  Of the $1.5 million increase in interest income on commercial loans, $1.0 million was due to increases in rates earned and $509,000 was due to increases in average balances.

Average interest earning assets totaled $1.86 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $1.76 billion for the same period in 2018. An increase of $40.3 million in average loans between periods and an increase of $76.5 million in average federal funds sold and other short-term investments were the primary drivers of the increase.  The net interest margin was 3.45% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 3.37% for the same period in 2018.  Yield on commercial loans increased from 4.45% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 to 4.84% for the same period in 2019.  Yield on residential mortgage loans increased from 3.55% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 to 3.72% for the same period in 2019, while yields on consumer loans increased from 4.73% for the second quarter of 2018 to 5.36% for the second quarter of 2019.  The increases in yields on commercial loans and consumer loans, in particular, were the result of the predominance of loans in these categories with variable rates of interest tied to prime and LIBOR which increased throughout 2018.

-37-

The Federal Reserve Board increased the target federal funds rate by 100 basis points in 2018.  These increases have had a net positive impact on our net interest margin position as more loans repriced at the higher rate than our funding sources.

The cost of funds increased to 1.01% in the second quarter of 2019 compared to 0.70% in the second quarter of 2018. For the first six months of 2019, the cost of funds increased to 1.00% compared to 0.66% for the same period in 2018.  Increases in the rates paid on our interest-bearing checking, savings and money market accounts in response to the federal funds rate increases over the past two years caused the increase in our cost of funds.

The following table shows an analysis of net interest margin for the three month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):

	For the three months ended June 30,
	2019								2018
	Average Balance			Interest Earned or Paid		Average Yield or Cost			Average Balance			Interest Earned or Paid		Average Yield or Cost
Assets
Taxable securities	$	179,264		$	988		2.21	%	$	179,954		$	917		2.04	%
Tax-exempt securities (1)		118,481			865		3.76			131,162			905		3.55
Commercial loans (2)		1,051,018			12,850		4.84			1,007,037			11,322		4.45
Residential mortgage loans		235,611			2,193		3.72			237,116			2,102		3.55
Consumer loans		80,990			1,082		5.36			83,181			982		4.73
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		11,558			157		5.37			11,558			121		4.15
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments		183,431			1,104		2.38			106,901			487		1.80
Total interest earning assets (1)		1,860,353			19,239		4.16			1,756,909			16,836		3.86
Noninterest earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		30,570								31,330
Other		87,957								84,320
Total assets	$	1,978,880							$	1,872,559
Liabilities
Deposits:
Interest bearing demand	$	450,089		$	427		0.38	%	$	409,334		$	253		0.24	%
Savings and money market accounts		604,012			1,216		0.81			606,231			769		0.51
Time deposits		148,462			722		1.95			105,389			297		1.14
Borrowings:
Other borrowed funds		60,081			345		2.27			73,414			322		1.74
Long-term debt		41,238			574		5.50			41,238			542		4.17
Total interest bearing liabilities		1,303,882			3,284		1.01			1,235,606			2,183		0.70
Noninterest bearing liabilities:
Noninterest bearing demand accounts		465,017								454,454
Other noninterest bearing liabilities		9,093								5,750
Shareholders’ equity		200,888								176,749
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,978,880							$	1,872,559
Net interest income				$	15,955							$	14,653
Net interest spread (1)							3.15	%							3.16	%
Net interest margin (1)							3.45	%							3.37	%
Ratio of average interest earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities		142.68	%							142.19	%

(1) Yields are presented on a tax equivalent basis using an assumed tax rate of 21% at June 30, 2019 and 2018.

(2) Includes loan fees of $163,000 and $171,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  Includes average nonaccrual loans of approximately $326,000 and $125,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

-38-

The following table shows an analysis of net interest margin for the six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2019								2018
	Average Balance			Interest Earned or Paid		Average Yield or Cost			Average Balance			Interest Earned or Paid		Average Yield or Cost
Assets
Taxable securities	$	181,363		$	1,984		2.19	%	$	179,540		$	1,785		1.99	%
Tax-exempt securities (1)		117,294			1,704		3.74			130,195			1,781		3.52
Commercial loans (2)		1,064,186			26,020		4.86			1,003,350			22,082		4.38
Residential mortgage loans		237,076			4,390		3.70			232,925			4,096		3.52
Consumer loans		82,163			2,166		5.32			84,876			1,937		4.60
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		11,558			317		5.45			11,558			318		5.47
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments		153,571			1,848		2.39			101,371			856		1.68
Total interest earning assets (1)		1,847,211			38,429		4.20			1,743,815			32,855		3.81
Noninterest earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		29,706								29,975
Other		86,758								85,519
Total assets	$	1,963,675							$	1,859,309
Liabilities
Deposits:
Interest bearing demand	$	436,176		$	833		0.39	%	$	394,798		$	399		0.21	%
Savings and money market accounts		613,369			2,442		0.80			605,743			1,383		0.46
Time deposits		143,119			1,347		1.89			101,678			530		1.05
Borrowings:
Other borrowed funds		59,931			672		2.23			80,405			692		1.71
Long-term debt		41,238			1,159		5.60			41,238			1,015		4.90
Total interest bearing liabilities		1,293,833			6,453		1.00			1,223,862			4,019		0.66
Noninterest bearing liabilities:
Noninterest bearing demand accounts		464,319								454,278
Other noninterest bearing liabilities		8,327								5,829
Shareholders’ equity		197,196								175,340
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,963,675							$	1,859,309
Net interest income				$	31,976							$	28,836
Net interest spread (1)							3.20	%							3.15	%
Net interest margin (1)							3.50	%							3.35	%
Ratio of average interest earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities		142.77	%							142.48	%

(1) Yields are presented on a tax equivalent basis using an assumed tax rate of 21% at June 30, 2019 and 2018.

(2) Includes loan fees of $513,000 and $297,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Includes average nonaccrual loans of approximately $541,000 and $311,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

-39-

The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in net interest income due to changes in volume and rate (dollars in thousands):

	For the three months ended June 30, 2019 vs 2018 Increase (Decrease) Due to									For the six months ended June 30, 2019 vs 2018 Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Interest income
Taxable securities	$	(24	)	$	95		$	71		$	18		$	181		$	199
Tax-exempt securities		(17	)		(23	)		(40	)		(396	)		319			(77	)
Commercial loans		509			1,019			1,528			1,391			2,547			3,938
Residential mortgage loans		(84	)		175			91			74			220			294
Consumer loans		(158	)		258			100			(168	)		397			229
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		—			36			36			—			(1	)		(1	)
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments		426			191			617			543			449			992
Total interest income		652			1,751			2,403			1,462			4,112			5,574
Interest expense
Interest bearing demand	$	27		$	147		$	174		$	46		$	388		$	434
Savings and money market accounts		(20	)		467			447			18			1,041			1,059
Time deposits		153			272			425			274			543			817
Other borrowed funds		(286	)		309			23			(390	)		370			(20	)
Long-term debt		—			32			32			—			144			144
Total interest expense		(126	)		1,227			1,101			(52	)		2,486			2,434
Net interest income	$	778		$	524		$	1,302		$	1,514		$	1,626		$	3,140

Provision for Loan Losses: The provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was a negative $200,000 compared to a negative $300,000 for the same period in 2018.  The provisions for loan losses for each period were the result of continued stabilization of real estate values on problem credits, continued improvement in asset quality metrics and net loan recoveries of $194,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2019 and $320,000 in the same period in 2018.  The provision for loan losses for the first half of 2019 was a negative $450,000 compared to a negative $400,000 for the same period in 2018.  The provision for loan losses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 were impacted by the need for an increase in the specific reserve on an impaired loan relationship at June 30, 2019.

Gross loan recoveries were $235,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and $350,000 for the same period in 2018.  In the three months ended June 30, 2019, we had $41,000 in charge-offs, compared to $30,000 in the same period in 2018.  For the six months ended June 30, 2019, we experienced gross loan recoveries of $658,000 compared to $621,000 for the same period in 2018.  Gross charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2019 were $198,000 compared to $126,000 for the same period in 2018.  We continue to experience positive results from our collection efforts as evidenced by our net loan recoveries.  While we expect our collection efforts to produce further recoveries, they may not continue at the same level we have experienced the past several quarters.

The amounts of loan loss provision in both the most recent quarter and comparable prior year period were the result of establishing our allowance for loan losses at levels believed necessary based upon our methodology for determining the adequacy of the allowance. The sustained level of quarterly net recoveries over the past several quarters had a significant effect on the historical loss component of our methodology. More information about our allowance for loan losses and our methodology for establishing its level may be found under the heading “Allowance for Loan Losses” below.

Noninterest Income: Noninterest income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 was $5.1 million and $9.4 million compared to $4.5 million and $8.6 million for the same periods in 2018, respectively.   The components of noninterest income are shown in the table below (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019		Three Months Ended June 30, 2018		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019		Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts	$	1,078	$	1,060	$	2,128	$	2,110
Net gains on mortgage loans		614		222		825		363
Trust fees		1,003		945		1,893		1,870
Gain as sales of securities		—		—		—		—
ATM and debit card fees		1,481		1,414		2,808		2,692
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) income		249		237		485		475
Investment services fees		353		271		649		495
Other income		320		319		638		594
Total noninterest income	$	5,098	$	4,468	$	9,426	$	8,599

-40-

Net gains on mortgage loans were up $392,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2019 and were up $462,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to same periods in 2018 as a result of an increase in the volume of loans originated for sale in the 2019 periods due to a lower interest rate environment, spurring more refinancing of fixed rate loans which we sell into the secondary market.  Mortgage loans originated for sale in the three months ended June 30, 2019 were $21.4 million, compared to $8.4 million in the same period in 2018.  Mortgage loans originated for portfolio in the three months ended June 30, 2019 were $8.8 million, compared to $18.8 million in the same period in 2018.  For the first six months of 2019, mortgages originated for sale were $28.8 million, compared to $13.5 million for the same period in 2018.  Mortgage loans originated for portfolio in the first half of 2019 were $15.0 million, compared to $34.9 million for the first half of 2018.

Investment services fees were up in the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, due to success in growing the number of investment services customer relationships we have and favorable investment market value changes. ATM and debit card fees were up in the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, due to higher volume of usage by our customers.

Noninterest Expense: Noninterest expense increased by $75,000 to $11.3 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018.  Noninterest expense decreased to $22.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $22.7 million for the same period in 2018.  The components of noninterest expense are shown in the table below (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019			Three Months Ended June 30, 2018		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Salaries and benefits	$	6,379		$	6,389	$	12,623		$	12,583
Occupancy of premises		996			973		2,089			2,045
Furniture and equipment		866			773		1,710			1,578
Legal and professional		211			215		441			417
Marketing and promotion		233			229		461			457
Data processing		761			797		1,491			1,493
FDIC assessment		119			132		239			264
Interchange and other card expense		365			359		711			691
Bond and D&O insurance		103			110		206			219
Net (gains) losses on repossessed and foreclosed properties		(34	)		17		(69	)		423
Administration and disposition of problem assets		49			66		137			121
Outside services		493			401		945			800
Other noninterest expense		793			798		1,589			1,602
Total noninterest expense	$	11,334		$	11,259	$	22,573		$	22,693

Most categories of noninterest expense were relatively unchanged compared to the three months ended June 30, 2018 due to our ongoing efforts to manage expenses and scale our operations. Our largest component of noninterest expense, salaries and benefits, decreased by $10,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2019 from same period in 2018. This decrease is primarily due to a reduction in costs associated with employee medical and dental insurance, due to a lower level of claims experience in 2019, partially offset by a higher level of variable based compensation. Variable based compensation was up $27,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2018 due to higher sales of investment products and mortgage production.  For the first six months of 2019, salaries and benefits were up $40,000, primarily due a higher level of variable based compensation, partially offset by a reduction of staff not immediately replaced.

Occupancy expenses were up $23,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2019 and were up $44,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the same periods in 2018 due to higher property taxes and maintenance costs incurred associated with certain branch facilities.  Furniture and equipment expenses were up $93,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2019 and were up $132,000 in the six months ended compared to the same periods in 2018 due to costs associated with the implementation of an instant issue card system, allowance for loan losses software and enhanced security and fraud prevention software and related service.

Our FDIC assessment costs decreased by $13,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 due primarily to positive changes in our assessment rates.   These costs have been trending down for the past few years and we believe the rate has stabilized and future expense fluctuations will likely be dependent on changes in our asset size.  In January 2019, the FDIC notified us that the Bank would receive an assessment credit of approximately $400,000 to offset future assessments as the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund had exceeded its target ratio of 1.35% as of September 30, 2018. However, in March 2019, the FDIC provided an update that the Deposit Insurance Fund ratio was 1.36% at December 31, 2018, below the 1.38% threshold required for assessment credits to be applied.  The Deposit Insurance Fund ratio was again below 1.38% at the end of the first quarter of 2019.  As such, the Bank recognized FDIC assessment expense in the first and second quarters of 2019.  Future expense may be reduced by these assessment credits depending on the level of the Deposit Insurance Fund.

Costs associated with administration and disposition of problem assets have decreased significantly over the past several years.  These expenses include legal costs and repossessed and foreclosed property administration expense. Repossessed and foreclosed property administration expense includes survey and appraisal, property maintenance and management and other disposition and carrying costs.  Net (gains) losses on repossessed and foreclosed properties include both net gains and losses on the sale of properties and unrealized losses from value declines for outstanding properties.

-41-

These costs are itemized in the following table (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019			Three Months Ended June 30, 2018		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Legal and professional – nonperforming assets	$	26		$	9	$	69		$	22
Repossessed and foreclosed property administration		23			57		68			99
Net (gains) losses on repossessed and foreclosed properties		(34	)		17		(69	)		423
Total	$	15		$	83	$	68		$	544

As the level of problem loans and assets has declined, the costs associated with these nonperforming assets have decreased significantly over the past several years.  Other real estate owned decreased from $3.9 million at June 30, 2018 to $3.1 million at June 30, 2019.

Net (gains) losses on repossessed assets and foreclosed properties for the three month period ended June 30, 2019 swung favorably by $51,000 compared to the same period in 2018.  For the first six months of 2019, net (gains) losses swung favorably by $492,000 compared to the same period in 2018.  These improvements were due to an improvement in net (gains) losses and lower writedowns in valuation of other real estate properties in these periods. In the three month period ended June 30, 2019, there were no valuation writedowns compared to valuation writedowns of $11,000 for the same period in 2018. In the six month period ended June 30, 2019, valuation writedowns totaled $10,000 compared to valuation writedowns of $291,000 for the same period in 2018. In the three month period ended June 30, 2019, net realized gains totaled $34,000, compared to net realized losses of $6,000 for the same period in 2018. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, net realized gains totaled $79,000, compared to net realized losses of $132,000 for the same period in 2018.

Federal Income Tax Expense: We recorded $1.9 million and $3.6 million in federal income tax expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 compared to $1.4 million and $2.7 million for the same periods in 2018.  Our effective tax rates for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 were 19.32% and 18.83% compared to 17.57% and 17.56% for the same periods in 2018.  The increase in the effective tax rate in the 2019 periods compared the same periods in the prior year was partially due to having similar amounts of tax exempt income in all periods while taxable income increased significantly in the 2019 periods.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets were $1.98 billion at June 30, 2019, an increase of $3.3 million from December 31, 2018. This change reflected increases of $59.6 million in cash and cash equivalents, $8.7 million in securities held to maturity, partially offset by decreases of $62.1 million in our loan portfolio, and $4.2 million in securities available for sale.  Total deposits decreased by $15.6 million at June 30, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Our cash and cash equivalents, which include federal funds sold and short-term investments, were $230.9 million at June 30, 2019 compared to $171.3 million at December 31, 2018.  The increase in these balances related primarily to the decrease in our loan portfolio while total deposits, on the funding side of the balance sheet, were relatively stable.

Securities: Debt securities available for sale were $222.8 million at June 30, 2019 compared to $227.0 million at December 31, 2018. The balance at June 30, 2019 primarily consisted of U.S. agency securities, agency mortgage backed securities and various municipal investments. Our held to maturity portfolio was $70.3 million at December 31, 2018 and $79.1 million at June 30, 2019.  Our held to maturity portfolio is comprised of state, municipal and privately placed commercial bonds.

Portfolio Loans and Asset Quality: Total portfolio loans decreased by $62.1 million in the first six months of 2019 and were $1.34 billion at June 30, 2019 compared to $1.41 billion at December 31, 2018. During the first six months of 2019, our commercial portfolio decreased by $51.5 million, while our consumer portfolio decreased by $5.7 million and our residential mortgage portfolio decreased by $4.9 million.

Mortgage loans originated for portfolio are typically adjustable rate loans as well as fixed rate loans that conform to secondary market requirements and have a term of fifteen years or less.  Mortgage loans originated for portfolio in the first six months of 2019 decreased $19.9 million compared to the same period in 2018, from $34.9 million in the first six months of 2018 to $15.0 million in the same period in 2019.

The volume of residential mortgage loans originated for sale in the first six months of 2019 increased $15.3 million compared to the same period in 2018. Residential mortgage loans originated for sale were $28.8 million in the first six months of 2019 compared to $13.5 million in the first six months of 2018.

-42-

The following table shows our loan origination activity for loans to be held in portfolio during the first six months of 2019 and 2018, broken out by loan type and also shows average originated loan size (dollars in thousands):

	Six months ended June 30, 2019							Six months ended June 30, 2018
	Portfolio Originations		Percent of Total Originations			Average Loan Size		Portfolio Originations		Percent of Total Originations			Average Loan Size
Commercial real estate:
Residential developed	$	4,770		2.8	%		477	$	12,608		5.0	%	$	970
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—			—		—		—			—
Vacant and unimproved		2,179		1.2			436		8,275		3.3			828
Commercial development		—		—			—		250		0.1			250
Residential improved		20,459		11.9			280		41,426		16.3			505
Commercial improved		34,899		20.3			1,203		16,408		6.5			547
Manufacturing and industrial		9,478		5.5			1,053		36,183		14.3			1,508
Total commercial real estate		71,785		41.7			570		115,150		45.4			720
Commercial and industrial		66,678		38.8			580		80,188		31.6			524
Total commercial		138,463		80.5			575		195,338		77.0			624
Consumer
Residential mortgage		15,010		8.7			235		34,878		13.7			226
Unsecured		—		—			—		—		—			—
Home equity		17,079		9.9			102		21,473		8.5			88
Other secured		1,534		0.9			27		2,059		0.8			27
Total consumer		33,623		19.5			117		58,410		23.0			123
Total loans	$	172,086		100.0	%		326	$	253,748		100.0	%		346

The following table shows a breakout of our commercial loan activity during the first six months of 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Commercial loans originated	$	138,463		$	195,338
Repayments of commercial loans		(170,076	)		(161,822	)
Change in undistributed - available credit		(19,910	)		(35,190	)
Net decrease in total commercial loans	$	(51,523	)	$	(1,674	)

Overall, the commercial loan portfolio decreased $51.5 million in the first six months of 2019.  Our commercial and industrial portfolio decreased by $46.7 million while our commercial real estate loans decreased by $4.8 million.  Our production of commercial loans decreased by $56.9 million from $195.3 million in the first six months of 2018 to $138.5 million in the same period of 2019.  Our commercial and industrial portfolio is subject to seasonal fluctuations and we typically experience large paydowns on agricultural credits and loans to automobile, recreational vehicle and boat dealers in the first half of each year. The seasonal paydowns in these loan categories amounted to $38.4 million in the second quarter of 2019.  We also had two large relationships pay off during the first quarter of 2019, one of which amounted to $8.5 million resulting from the sale of the business and we had two relationships totaling $7.9 million pay off during the second quarter of 2019 resulting from the sale of their businesses.

Commercial and commercial real estate loans remained our largest loan segment and accounted for approximately 76.7% and 77.0% of the total loan portfolio at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Residential mortgage and consumer loans comprised approximately 23.3% and 23.0% of total loans at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

-43-

A further breakdown of the composition of the loan portfolio is shown in the table below (in thousands):

	June 30, 2019					December 31, 2018
	Balance		Percent of Total Loans			Balance		Percent of Total Loans
Commercial real estate: (1)
Residential developed	$	14,582		1.1	%	$	14,825		1.1	%
Unsecured to residential developers		—		—			—		—
Vacant and unimproved		37,455		2.8			44,169		3.1
Commercial development		689		0.1			712		0.1
Residential improved		98,608		7.3			98,500		7.0
Commercial improved		292,381		21.8			295,618		21.0
Manufacturing and industrial		120,228		8.9			114,887		8.2
Total commercial real estate		563,943		42.0			568,711		40.5
Commercial and industrial		466,590		34.7			513,345		36.5
Total commercial		1,030,533		76.7			1,082,056		77.0
Consumer
Residential mortgage		233,271		17.4			238,174		16.9
Unsecured		338		—			130		—
Home equity		72,676		5.4			78,503		5.6
Other secured		6,694		0.5			6,795		0.5
Total consumer		312,979		23.3			323,602		23.0
Total loans	$	1,343,512		100.0	%	$	1,405,658		100.0	%

(1) Includes both owner occupied and non-owner occupied commercial real estate.

Commercial real estate loans accounted for 42.0% and 40.5% of the total loan portfolio at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, and consisted primarily of loans to business owners and developers of owner and non-owner occupied commercial properties and loans to developers of single and multi-family residential properties. In the table above, we show our commercial real estate portfolio by loans secured by residential and commercial real estate, and by stage of development. Improved loans are generally secured by properties that are under construction or completed and placed in use. Development loans are secured by properties that are in the process of development or fully developed. Vacant and unimproved loans are secured by raw land for which development has not yet begun and agricultural land.

Our consumer residential mortgage loan portfolio, which also includes residential construction loans made to individual homeowners, comprised 17.4% of portfolio loans at June 30, 2019 and 16.9% at December 31, 2018.  We expect to continue to retain in our loan portfolio certain types of residential mortgage loans (primarily high quality, low loan-to-value loans) in an effort to continue to diversify our credit risk and deploy our excess liquidity.

The volume of residential mortgage loans originated for sale during the first six months of 2019 increased from the first six months of 2018 as a result of interest rate conditions.  The decrease in market interest rates in 2019 has caused an increase in refinancing of fixed rate mortgages which we sell into the secondary market.

Our portfolio of other consumer loans includes loans secured by personal property and home equity fixed term and line of credit loans. Consumer loans decreased by $5.7 million to $79.7 million at June 30, 2019 from $85.4 million at December 31, 2018, due primarily to a decrease in home equity loans.  These other consumer loans comprised 5.9% of our portfolio loans at June 30, 2019 and 6.1% at December 31, 2018.

Our loan portfolio is reviewed regularly by our senior management, our loan officers, and an internal loan review team that is independent of our loan originators and credit administration. An administrative loan committee consisting of senior management and seasoned lending and collections personnel meets quarterly to manage our internal watch list and proactively manage high risk loans.

When reasonable doubt exists concerning collectability of interest or principal of one of our loans, the loan is placed in nonaccrual status. Any interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed and charged against current earnings.

Nonperforming assets are comprised of nonperforming loans, foreclosed assets and repossessed assets. At June 30, 2019, nonperforming assets totaled $3.4 million compared to $4.7 million at December 31, 2018. There were no additions to other real estate owned in the first six months of 2019 compared to $293,000 of additions in the first six months of 2018.  At June 30, 2019, there were no loans in redemption, so we expect there to be few additions to other real estate owned in 2019.  Proceeds from sales of foreclosed properties were $382,000 in the first six months of 2019, resulting in net realized gain on sales of $79,000.  Proceeds from sales of foreclosed properties were $1.8 million in the first six months of 2018 resulting in net realized loss on sales of $132,000.

Nonperforming loans include loans on nonaccrual status and loans delinquent more than 90 days but still accruing. As of June 30, 2019, nonperforming loans were negligible and totaled $293,000, or 0.02% of total portfolio loans, compared to $1.3 million, or 0.09% of total portfolio loans, at December 31, 2018.

-44-

Nonperforming loans at June 30, 2019 consisted of $102,000 of commercial real estate loans and $191,000 of consumer and residential mortgage loans.

Foreclosed and repossessed assets include assets acquired in settlement of loans. Foreclosed assets totaled $3.1 million at June 30, 2019 and $3.4 million at December 31, 2018. The entire balance at June 30, 2019 was comprised of eight commercial real estate properties. All properties acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure are initially transferred at their fair value less estimated costs to sell and then evaluated monthly for impairment after transfer using a lower of cost or market approach. Updated property valuations are obtained at least annually on all foreclosed assets.

At June 30, 2019, our foreclosed asset portfolio had a weighted average age held in portfolio of 7.54 years. Below is a breakout of our foreclosed asset portfolio at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 by property type and the percentages the property has been written down since taken into our possession and the combined writedown percentage, including losses taken when the property was loan collateral (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2019								December 31, 2018
Foreclosed Asset Property Type	Carrying Value		Foreclosed Asset Writedown			Combined Writedown (Loan and Foreclosed Asset)			Carrying Value		Foreclosed Asset Writedown			Combined Writedown (Loan and Foreclosed Asset)
Single Family		—		—	%		—	%		—		—	%		—	%
Residential Lot		—		—			—			38		57.6			70.1
Multi-Family		—		—			—			—		—			—
Vacant Land		122		55.7			64.5			352		40.5			46.6
Residential Development		686		41.6			84.1			815		38.6			82.3
Commercial Office		—		—			—			—		—			—
Commercial Industrial		—		—			—			—		—			—
Commercial Improved		2,259		—			—			2,175		—			—
	$	3,067		17.3			55.7		$	3,380		19.2			55.4

The following table shows the composition and amount of our nonperforming assets (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Nonaccrual loans	$	211		$	1,303
Loans 90 days or more delinquent and still accruing		82			1
Total nonperforming loans (NPLs)		293			1,304
Foreclosed assets		3,067			3,380
Repossessed assets		—			—
Total nonperforming assets (NPAs)	$	3,360		$	4,684
NPLs to total loans		0.02	%		0.09	%
NPAs to total assets		0.17	%		0.24	%

The following table shows the composition and amount of our troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2019									December 31, 2018
	Commercial			Consumer			Total			Commercial			Consumer			Total
Performing TDRs		$	5,954		$	5,466		$	11,420		$	9,682		$	6,347		$	16,029
Nonperforming TDRs (1)			102			—			102			124			—			124
Total TDRs		$	6,056		$	5,466		$	11,522		$	9,806		$	6,347		$	16,153

(1) Included in nonperforming asset table above

We had a total of $11.5 million and $16.2 million of loans whose terms have been modified in TDRs as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.  These loans may have involved the restructuring of terms to allow customers to mitigate the risk of foreclosure by meeting a lower loan payment requirement based upon their current cash flow.  These may also include loans that renewed at existing contractual rates, but below market rates for comparable credit.  For each restructuring, a comprehensive credit underwriting analysis of the borrower’s financial condition and prospects of repayment under the revised terms is performed to assess whether the structure can be successful and whether cash flows will be sufficient to support the restructured debt.  An analysis is also performed to determine whether the restructured loan should be on accrual status.  Generally, if the loan is on accrual at the time of restructure, it will remain on accrual after the restructuring.  In some cases, a nonaccrual loan may be placed on accrual at restructuring if the loan’s actual payment history demonstrates it would have cash flowed under the restructured terms.  After six consecutive payments under the restructured terms, a nonaccrual restructured loan is reviewed for possible upgrade to accruing status.  In situations where there is a subsequent modification or renewal and the loan is brought to market terms, including a contractual interest rate not less than a market interest rate for new debt with similar credit risk characteristics, the TDR and impaired designations may be removed.  Total TDRs decreased by $4.6 million from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019 due to payoffs and paydowns on existing TDRs exceeding new additions.  There were 99 loans identified as TDRs at June 30, 2019 compared to 123 loans at December 31, 2018.

-45-

As with other impaired loans, an allowance for loan loss is estimated for each TDR based on the most likely source of repayment for each loan.  For impaired commercial real estate loans that are collateral dependent, the allowance is computed based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, less estimated costs to sell.  For impaired commercial loans where repayment is expected from cash flows from business operations, the allowance is computed based on a discounted cash flow computation.  Certain groups of TDRs, such as residential mortgages, have common characteristics and for them the allowance is computed based on a discounted cash flow computation on the change in weighted rate for the pool.  The allowance allocations for commercial TDRs where we have reduced the contractual interest rate are computed by measuring cash flows using the new payment terms discounted at the original contractual rate.

Allowance for loan losses: The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2019 was $16.9 million, an increase of $10,000 from December 31, 2018.  The allowance for loan losses represented 1.26% of total portfolio loans at June 30, 2019 and 1.20% at December 31, 2018.  The allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loan coverage ratio increased from 1294% at December 31, 2018 to 5763.1% at June 30, 2019.

The table below shows the changes in certain credit metrics over the past five quarters (dollars in millions):

	Quarter Ended June 30, 2019			Quarter Ended March 31, 2019			Quarter Ended December 31, 2018		Quarter Ended September 30, 2018			Quarter Ended June 30, 2018
Commercial loans	$	1,030.6		$	1,066.7		$	1,082.1	$	1,020.6		$	1,005.5
Nonperforming loans		0.3			0.4			1.3		0.1			0.1
Other real estate owned and repo assets		3.1			3.3			3.4		3.5			3.9
Total nonperforming assets		3.4			3.7			4.7		3.6			4.0
Net charge-offs (recoveries)		(0.2	)		(0.3	)		0.2		(0.1	)		(0.3	)
Total delinquencies		0.4			0.7			0.9		0.5			0.5

We have had net loan recoveries in seventeen of the past eighteen quarters.  Our total delinquencies have continued to be negligible and were $360,000 at June 30, 2019 and $877,000 at December 31, 2018.  Our delinquency percentage at June 30, 2019 was just 0.03%.

These factors all impact our necessary level of allowance for loan losses and our provision for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses increased $10,000 in the first six months of 2019.  We recorded a negative provision for loan losses of $450,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to a negative $400,000 for the same period of 2018.  Net loan recoveries were $460,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, compared to net recoveries of $495,000 for the same period in 2018. The ratio of net recoveries to average loans was -0.07% on an annualized basis for the first six months of 2019 and for the first six months of 2018.

We are encouraged by the reduced level of gross charge-offs over recent quarters. We do, however, recognize that future charge-offs and resulting provisions for loan losses are expected to be impacted by the timing and extent of changes in the overall economy and the real estate markets.

Our allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed appropriate based upon our assessment of the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Our methodology for measuring the appropriate level of allowance and related provision for loan losses relies on several key elements, which include specific allowances for loans considered impaired, general allowance for commercial loans not considered impaired based upon applying our loan rating system, and general allocations based on historical trends for homogeneous loan groups with similar risk characteristics.

Overall, impaired loans declined by $5.4 million to $11.7 million at June 30, 2019 compared to $17.2 million at December 31, 2018.  The specific allowance for impaired loans increased $132,000 to $1.2 million at June 30, 2019, compared to $1.1 million at December 31, 2018.  The specific allowance for impaired loans represented 10.5% of total impaired loans at June 30, 2019 and 6.4% at December 31, 2018.

The general allowance allocated to commercial loans that were not considered to be impaired was based upon the internal risk grade of such loans.  We use a loan rating method based upon an eight point system.  Loans are stratified between real estate secured and non-real estate secured.  The real estate secured portfolio is further stratified by the type of real estate.  Each stratified portfolio is assigned a loss allocation factor.  A higher numerical grade assigned to a loan category generally results in a greater allocation percentage.  Changes in risk grade of loans affect the amount of the allowance allocation.

The determination of our loss factors is based upon our actual loss history by loan grade and adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, affect the collectability of the portfolio as of the analysis date.  We use a rolling 18 month actual net chargeoff history as the base for our computation.  Over the past few years, the 18 month period computations have reflected sizeable decreases in net chargeoff experience.  We addressed this volatility in the qualitative factor considerations applied in our allowance for loan losses computation. Adjustments to the qualitative factors also involved consideration of different loss periods for the Bank, including 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 month periods. We also considered the extended period of improved asset quality in assessing the overall qualitative component.  Considering the change in our qualitative factors and our commercial loan portfolio balances, the general allowance allocated to commercial loans was $12.7 million at June 30, 2019 and $12.8 million at December 31, 2018.  The qualitative component of our allowance allocated to commercial loans was $11.5 million at June 30, 2019, down from $12.0 million at December 31, 2018.

-46-

Groups of homogeneous loans, such as residential real estate and open- and closed-end consumer loans, receive allowance allocations based on loan type.  A rolling 12 month (four quarter) historical loss experience period was applied to residential mortgage and consumer loan portfolios.  As with commercial loans that are not considered impaired, the determination of the allowance allocation percentage is based principally on our historical loss experience.  These allocations are adjusted for consideration of general economic and business conditions, credit quality and delinquency trends, collateral values, and recent loss experience for these similar pools of loans.  The homogeneous loan allowance was $2.9 million at June 30, 2019 and $3.0 million at December 31, 2018.

The allowance allocations are not intended to imply limitations on usage of the allowance for loan losses.  The entire allowance for loan losses is available for any loan losses without regard to loan type.

Premises and Equipment:   Premises and equipment totaled $44.4 million at June 30, 2019, down $438,000 from $44.9 million at December 31, 2018.

Deposits and Other Borrowings: Total deposits decreased $15.6 million to $1.66 billion at June 30, 2019, as compared to $1.68 billion at December 31, 2018.  Non-interest checking account balances decreased $8.8 million during the first six months of 2019.  Interest bearing demand account balances decreased $33.1 million and savings and money market account balances increased $5.5 million in the first six months of 2019.  Certificates of deposits increased by $20.8 million in the first six months of 2019.  We believe our success in maintaining the balances of personal and business checking and savings accounts was primarily attributable to our focus on quality customer service, the desire of customers to deal with a local bank, the convenience of our branch network and the breadth and depth of our sophisticated product line.

Noninterest bearing demand accounts comprised 29% of total deposits at both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.  These balances typically increase at year end for many of our commercial customers, then decline in the first quarter.  Because of the generally low rates paid on interest bearing account alternatives, many of our business customers chose to keep their balances in these more liquid noninterest bearing demand account types.  Interest bearing demand, including money market and savings accounts, comprised 62% of total deposits at June 30, 2019 and 64% at December 31, 2018. Time accounts as a percentage of total deposits were 9% at June 30, 2019 and 7% December 31, 2018.

At both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, borrowed funds totaled $101.2 million including $60.0 million of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances and $41.2 million in long-term debt associated with trust preferred securities.  Borrowed funds were unchanged in the first six months of 2019 primarily due to the scheduled maturity of a $10.0 million FHLB advance in February 2019 being replaced with the addition of a $10.0 million FHLB advance in February 2019.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Total shareholders’ equity of $205.5 million at June 30, 2019 increased $14.7 million from $190.9 million at December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily a result of net income of $15.6 million earned in the first six months of 2019 and an increase of $3.6 million in accumulated other comprehensive income, partially offset by a payment of $4.8 million in cash dividends to shareholders.  The Bank was categorized as “well capitalized” at June 30, 2019.

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC approved the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks (commonly known as Basel III). Under the rules, minimum requirements increased for both the quantity and quality of capital held by the Company and the Bank. The rules include a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CET1 ratio) of 4.5% and a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, effectively resulted in a minimum CET1 ratio of 7.0%. Basel III raised the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% (which, with the capital conservation buffer, effectively results in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%), effectively resulted in a minimum total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10.5% (with the capital conservation buffer), and required a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. Basel III also made changes to risk weights for certain assets and off-balance-sheet exposures. The capital ratios for the Company and the Bank under Basel III have continued to exceed the well capitalized minimum capital requirements.

The following table shows our regulatory capital ratios (on a consolidated basis) for the past several quarters:

Macatawa Bank Corporation	June 30, 2019			March 31, 2019			Dec 31, 2018			Sept 30, 2018			June 30, 2018
Total capital to risk weighted assets		16.8	%		16.1	%		15.5	%		15.8	%		15.5	%
Common Equity Tier 1 to risk weighted assets		13.1			12.6			12.0			12.1			11.8
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets		15.7			15.1			14.5			14.7			14.4
Tier 1 capital to average assets		12.3			12.2			12.1			11.9			11.9

Approximately $40.0 million of trust preferred securities outstanding at June 30, 2019 qualified as Tier 1 capital.

-47-

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity of Macatawa Bank: The liquidity of a financial institution reflects its ability to manage a variety of sources and uses of funds. Our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows categorize these sources and uses into operating, investing and financing activities. We primarily focus on developing access to a variety of borrowing sources to supplement our deposit gathering activities and provide funds for our investment and loan portfolios. Our sources of liquidity include our borrowing capacity with the FRB’s discount window, the Federal Home Loan Bank, federal funds purchased lines of credit and other secured borrowing sources with our correspondent banks, loan payments by our borrowers, maturity and sales of our securities available for sale, growth of our deposits, federal funds sold and other short-term investments, and the various capital resources discussed above.

Liquidity management involves the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of our customers. Our customers may be either borrowers with credit needs or depositors wanting to withdraw funds. Our liquidity management involves periodic monitoring of our assets considered to be liquid and illiquid, and our funding sources considered to be core and non-core and short-term (less than 12 months) and long-term. We have established parameters that monitor, among other items, our level of liquid assets to short-term liabilities, our level of non-core funding reliance and our level of available borrowing capacity. We maintain a diversified wholesale funding structure and actively manage our maturing wholesale sources to reduce the risk to liquidity shortages. We have also developed a contingency funding plan to stress test our liquidity requirements arising from certain events that may trigger liquidity shortages, such as rapid loan growth in excess of normal growth levels or the loss of deposits and other funding sources under extreme circumstances.

We have actively pursued initiatives to maintain a strong liquidity position.  The Bank has reduced its reliance on non-core funding sources, including brokered deposits, and focused on achieving a non-core funding dependency ratio below its peer group average.  We have had no brokered deposits on our balance sheet since December 2011.  We continue to maintain significant on-balance sheet liquidity.  At June 30, 2019, the Bank held $199.9 million of federal funds sold and other short-term investments.  In addition, the Bank had available borrowing capacity from correspondent banks of approximately $356.7 million as of June 30, 2019.

In the normal course of business, we enter into certain contractual obligations, including obligations which are considered in our overall liquidity management.  The table below summarizes our significant contractual obligations at June 30, 2019 (dollars in thousands):

	Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Long term debt	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	41,238
Time deposit maturities		92,814		51,796		1,726		—
Other borrowed funds		—		10,000		20,000		30,000
Operating lease obligations		329		237		65		—
Total	$	93,143	$	62,033	$	21,791	$	71,238

In addition to normal loan funding, we also maintain liquidity to meet customer financing needs through unused lines of credit, unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit.  The level and fluctuation of these commitments is also considered in our overall liquidity management.  At June 30, 2019, we had a total of $505.8 million in unused lines of credit, $101.8 million in unfunded loan commitments and $18.6 million in standby letters of credit.

Liquidity of Holding Company: The primary sources of liquidity for the Company are dividends from the Bank, existing cash resources and the capital markets if the need to raise additional capital arises.  Banking regulations and the laws of the State of Michigan in which our Bank is chartered limit the amount of dividends the Bank may declare and pay to the Company in any calendar year.  Under the state law limitations, the Bank is restricted from paying dividends to the Company in excess of retained earnings.  In 2018, the Bank paid dividends to the Company totaling $11.1 million.  In the same period, the Company paid dividends to its shareholders totaling $8.5 million.  On February 26, 2019, the Bank paid a dividend totaling $2.9 million to the Company in anticipation of the common share cash dividend of $0.07 per share paid on February 27, 2019 to shareholders of record on February 12, 2019.  The cash distributed for this cash dividend payment totaled $2.4 million.  On May 29, 2019, the Bank paid a dividend totaling $3.0 million to the Company in anticipation of the common share cash dividend of $0.07 per share paid on May 30, 2019 to shareholders of record on May 14, 2019.  The cash distributed for this cash dividend payment totaled $2.4 million.  The Company retained the remaining balance in each period for general corporate purposes.  At June 30, 2019, the Bank had a retained earnings balance of $75.7 million.

During 2018, the Company received payments from the Bank totaling $5.8 million, representing the Bank’s intercompany tax liability for the 2018 tax year, in accordance with the Company’s tax allocation agreement.  In the same period, the Company made tax payments totaling $5.3 million.

The Company has the right to defer interest payments for 20 consecutive quarters on its trust preferred securities if necessary for liquidity purposes.  During the deferral period, the Company may not declare or pay any dividends on its common stock or make any payment on any outstanding debt obligations that rank equally with or junior to the trust preferred securities.

-48-

The Company’s cash balance at June 30, 2019 was $6.8 million.  The Company believes that it has sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow obligations.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES:

To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information.  These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and future results could differ.  The allowance for loan losses, other real estate owned valuation, loss contingencies, revenue recognition and income taxes are deemed critical due to the required level of management judgment and the use of estimates, making them particularly subject to change.

Our methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses and the related provision for loan losses is described above in the “Allowance for Loan Losses” discussion.  This area of accounting requires significant judgment due to the number of factors which can influence the collectability of a loan.  Unanticipated changes in these factors could significantly change the level of the allowance for loan losses and the related provision for loan losses.  Although, based upon our internal analysis, and in our judgment, we believe that we have provided an adequate allowance for loan losses, there can be no assurance that our analysis has properly identified all of the probable losses in our loan portfolio.  As a result, we could record future provisions for loan losses that may be significantly different than the levels that we recorded in the first six months of 2019.

Assets acquired through or instead of foreclosure, primarily other real estate owned, are initially recorded at fair value less estimated costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis.  New real estate appraisals are generally obtained at the time of foreclosure and are used to establish fair value.  If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense.  Estimating the initial and ongoing fair value of these properties involves a number of factors and judgments including holding time, costs to complete, holding costs, discount rate, absorption and other factors.

Loss contingencies are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated.  This, too, is an accounting area that involves significant judgment.  Although, based upon our judgment, internal analysis, and consultations with legal counsel we believe that we have properly accounted for loss contingencies, future changes in the status of such contingencies could result in a significant change in the level of contingent liabilities and a related impact to operating earnings.

Noninterest revenue is recognized in accordance with contractual requirements and as we fulfill our obligations under contractual terms.  Most of our noninterest revenue comes from services that are transaction based and such revenue is recognized as the related service is provided.

Our accounting for income taxes involves the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities primarily associated with differences in the timing of the recognition of revenues and expenses for financial reporting and tax purposes.  At June 30, 2019, we had gross deferred tax assets of $4.2 million and gross deferred tax liabilities of $2.0 million resulting in a net deferred tax asset of $2.2 million.  Accounting standards require that companies assess whether a valuation allowance should be established against their deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard.  At December 31, 2018, a valuation allowance of $92,000 was established against a capital loss carryforward created by the liquidation of the assets of a partnership interest the Bank acquired through a loan settlement thereby reducing net deferred tax assets.  This valuation allowance was maintained at June 30, 2019, resulting in a net deferred tax asset balance of $2.1 million.  With the positive results in 2018 and the first six months of 2019, we concluded at June 30, 2019 that no other valuation allowance on our net deferred tax asset was required.  Changes in tax laws, changes in tax rates, changes in ownership and our future level of earnings can impact the ultimate realization of our net deferred tax asset.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, liquidity risk. All of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars with no specific foreign exchange exposure. Macatawa Bank has only limited agricultural-related loan assets, and therefore has no significant exposure to changes in commodity prices.

Our balance sheet has sensitivity, in various categories of assets and liabilities, to changes in prevailing rates in the U.S. for prime rate, mortgage rates, U.S. Treasury rates and various money market indexes. Our asset/liability management process aids us in providing liquidity while maintaining a balance between interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.

We utilize a simulation model as our primary tool to assess the direction and magnitude of variations in net interest income and the economic value of equity (“EVE”) resulting from potential changes in market interest rates. Key assumptions in the model include contractual cash flows and maturities of interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities, prepayment speeds on certain assets, and changes in market conditions impacting loan and deposit pricing. We also include pricing floors on discretionary priced liability products which limit how low various checking and savings products could go under declining interest rates. These floors reflect our pricing philosophy in response to changing interest rates.

We forecast the next twelve months of net interest income under an assumed environment of gradual changes in market interest rates under various scenarios. The resulting change in net interest income is an indication of the sensitivity of our earnings to directional changes in market interest rates. The simulation also measures the change in EVE, or the net present value of our assets and liabilities, under an immediate shift, or shock, in interest rates under various scenarios, as calculated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using market-based discount rates.

-49-

The following table shows the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income over the next twelve months and EVE based on our balance sheet as of June 30, 2019 (dollars in thousands):

Interest Rate Scenario	Economic Value of Equity		Percent Change			Net Interest Income		Percent Change
Interest rates up 200 basis points	$	281,604		(1.37	)%	$	65,734		4.78	%
Interest rates up 100 basis points		284,419		(0.39	)		64,243		2.40
No change		285,523		—			62,735		—
Interest rates down 100 basis points		268,022		(6.13	)		61,179		(2.48	)
Interest rates down 200 basis points		262,946		(7.91	)		58,785		(6.30	)

If interest rates were to increase, this analysis suggests that we are positioned for an improvement in net interest income over the next twelve months.

We also forecast the impact of immediate and parallel interest rate shocks on net interest income under various scenarios to measure the sensitivity of our earnings under extreme conditions.

The quarterly simulation analysis is monitored against acceptable interest rate risk parameters by the Asset/Liability Committee and reported to the Board of Directors.

In addition to changes in interest rates, the level of future net interest income is also dependent on a number of other variables, including: the growth, composition and absolute levels of loans, deposits, and other earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; economic and competitive conditions; potential changes in lending, investing and deposit gathering strategies; and client preferences.

Item 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) as of June 30, 2019, the end of the period covered by this report.

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as the Company’s are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating whether the benefits of the controls and procedures that the Company adopts outweigh their costs.

Our CEO and CFO, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report, have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

-50-

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Period
April 1 - April 30, 2019
Employee Transactions		452	$	9.94		—
May 1 - May 31, 2019
Employee Transactions		—		—		—
June 1 - June 30, 2019
Employee Transactions		—		—		—
Total for Second Quarter ended June 30, 2019
Employee Transactions		452	$	9.94		—

Item 6. EXHIBITS.

3.1	Restated Articles of Incorporation. Previously filed with the Commission on October 27, 2016 in Macatawa Bank Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 3.1. Here incorporated by reference.
3.2	Bylaws. Previously filed with the Commission on February 19, 2015 in Macatawa Bank Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, Exhibit 3.2. Here incorporated by reference.
4.1	Restated Articles of Incorporation. Exhibit 3.1 is here incorporated by reference.
4.2	Bylaws. Exhibit 3.2 is here incorporated by reference.
4.3	Long-Term Debt. The registrant has outstanding long-term debt which at the time of this report does not exceed 10% of the registrant’s total consolidated assets. The registrant agrees to furnish copies of the agreements defining the rights of holders of such long-term debt to the SEC upon request.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

-51-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	MACATAWA BANK CORPORATION
	/s/ Ronald L. Haan
	Ronald L. Haan
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)
	/s/ Jon W. Swets
	Jon W. Swets
	Senior Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Dated: July 25, 2019

-52-