Average shares outstanding during the second quarter of 2005 were 1.5 million above those of the 2004 second quarter, primarily reflecting shares issued under employee stock plans. The increase in shares outstanding reduced second quarter 2005 results by $.02 per diluted share when compared to the 2004 second quarter.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, income from continuing operations was $25.2 million ($0.79 per diluted share) and $19.4 million ($0.64 per diluted share), respectively. For the 2004 period, $7.4 million ($5.0 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, net of tax) of Kinston-related business interruption and legal costs were included in income from continuing operations. Had the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation been applied to the six months ended June 30, 2004, reported pre-tax income would have been reduced by $1.2 million ($0.8 million, or $0.03 per diluted share, net of tax). The 2004 six-month period also includes equity income of $0.6 million, or $0.02 per share resulting from a real estate gain recorded by the Company’s affiliate in Mexico.
Average shares outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2005, were 1.6 million above those of the same period in 2004 for the same reasons as mentioned above. The increase in shares outstanding reduced 2005 six-month results by $0.04 per diluted share when compared to the 2004 six-month period.
During 2004, the Company entered into a Share and Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its drug delivery business to Archimedes Pharma Limited, a new company formed by Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII and Warburg Pincus International Partners to facilitate the acquisition. The Company also announced in 2004 that it intends to exit the clinical services business during 2005. The drug delivery business and the clinical services business comprised the former Drug Delivery Systems segment. Accordingly, the Company restated all previous periods to present the former Drug Delivery Systems segment as a discontinued operation.
Discontinued operations for the second quarter of 2005 contributed net income of $0.6 million compared to a net loss of $2.8 million for the same period of 2004. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 for discontinued operations was $0.9 million compared to a net loss in 2004 of $4.7 million. The Company completed the sale of its drug delivery business in the first quarter of 2005 resulting in decreased costs when comparing the 2005 to 2004 periods when the business was fully operational. The income in 2005 reflects the results of the clinical services unit, which continues to operate while the Company evaluates potential sale opportunities for that business.
Page 27
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Six Months ended June 30, 2005 versus June 30, 2004, continued
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working capital at June 30, 2005 was $142.5 million compared with $110.0 million at December 31, 2004. The working capital ratio at June 30, 2005 was 2.2 to 1. The June 30, 2005 day’s sales outstanding ratio was 48.4 days, increasing slightly from 48.3 in 2004. Cash flow from operations was $29.0 million for the first six months of 2005, a decrease of $0.6 million from that achieved in the prior year six-month period.
Capital spending for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 was $18.6 million. Over 70% of the capital spending was for manufacturing equipment upgrades, tooling projects and expansion projects. The remaining expenditures were for normal equipment replacements and information systems projects. Full-year 2005 capital spending, including spending in the acquired Tech business, is projected to be approximately $60 million.
2005 cash flows from investing activities include the May 20, 2005 acquisition of the Tech business for a total purchase price of $140.0 million and the February 10, 2005 acquisition of Monarch, a contract laboratory business, for $3.8 million of cash. The contract laboratory purchase also included a non-cash payment of $1.8 million of Company stock. The cash paid to the sellers of these businesses was offset by $2.8 million of cash balances on hand within the acquired business units at the time of their acquisition.
On May 18, 2005, the Company amended its revolving credit agreement, which, among other things:
a) increased the aggregate revolving credit facility to $200 million from $125 million, with the Company retaining the ability to increase the facility by an additional $25 million to an aggregate amount not to exceed $225 million;
b) extended the term of the facility by approximately one year to May 17, 2010;
c) amended the leverage ratio covenant to total indebtedness of not more than 3.5 times earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for any period of four consecutive quarters; and
d) amended the interest rate “spread” applicable to amounts borrowed under the credit agreement to be determined by reference to that leverage ratio.
Debt covenants in the Company’s $100 million senior notes due June 2010 were simultaneously amended to conform to the debt covenants, including the leverage ratio, contained in the amended revolving credit agreement.
As of June 30, 2005 the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.
Page 28
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Six Months ended June 30, 2005 versus June 30, 2004, continued
Borrowings under the revolving credit facility were $177.0 million at June 30, 2005 compared to $50.8 million at December 31, 2004. The increased borrowings were used to finance the Tech acquisition. Total debt was $278 million at June 30, 2005. Debt as a percentage of total invested capital at June 30, 2005 was 46.8% compared to 34.8% at December 31, 2004. Total shareholders’ equity was $314.8 million at June 30, 2005 compared to $301.1 million at December 31, 2004. The increase in equity was due to current year net income and employee stock purchase and option plan activity, partially offset by dividend payments and negative foreign currency translation adjustments.
The Company paid cash dividends totaling $6.8 million ($0.22 per share) during the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 and received $9.8 million in proceeds from employee stock option exercises and employee stock purchase plan contributions. Financing cash flows also include the excess tax benefit derived from the tax deductibility of employee stock option gains in excess of the amounts recorded as compensation expense under the fair value method prescribed in SFAS 123(R).
The discussion of the Company’s recent senior note private placement under the caption “Subsequent Event – Private Placement” is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company believes that its financial condition, current capitalization and expected income from operations will be sufficient to meet the Company’s future expected cash requirements.
New Accounting Standards
In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143” (FIN 47). Under FIN 47, an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The provisions of FIN 47 are required to be applied no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005, although early adoption is encouraged. The Company has determined that the adoption of FIN 47 will have no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Market Risk
The Company is exposed to various market risk factors such as fluctuating interest rates and foreign currency rate fluctuations. These risk factors can impact results of operations, cash flows and financial position. These risks are managed periodically with the use of derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and forward exchange contracts. Derivatives used by the Company are highly effective as all of the critical terms of the derivative instruments match the hedged item. Effectiveness is measured on a quarterly basis. In accordance with Company policy, derivative financial instruments are not used for speculation or trading purposes.
Page 29
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Six Months ended June 30, 2005 versus June 30, 2004, continued
During the first six months of 2005, the Company was party to a forward exchange arrangement to protect against variability in future cash flows related to raw material purchases by European subsidiaries denominated in U.S. dollars (USD). This arrangement is divided into ten monthly contracts of 0.5 million Euro each with the last contract ending on December 13, 2005. The terms of the arrangement set a base rate of 1.30 USD per Euro and a limit rate of 1.36 USD per Euro. The Company is protected against a strengthening USD by restricting the exchange rate to the base rate. The Company would participate in gains caused by a weakening USD up to the limit rate. If the limit rate is exceeded at the expiry date of any of the remaining months, the Company agrees to buy Euro at the base rate for that month. There are no cash payments required and no income statement effect of an exchange rate between the base and limit rates. In the current quarter, the USD strengthened and the exchange rate fell below the base of 1.30 USD per Euro resulting in a gain on the contracts of less than $0.1 million.
The Company periodically uses forward contracts to hedge certain transactions or to neutralize month-end balance sheet exposures on cross-currency intercompany loans. The Company has a number of forward contracts with fair values totaling $0.3 million as of June 30, 2005 to purchase various currencies in Europe and Asia.
Subsequent Event – Medimop Acquisition
On August 2, 2005, the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary West Pharmaceutical Services of Delaware, Inc. acquired 90% of the equity interests in Medimop Medical Projects, Ltd. (“Medimop”) and its affiliated company Medimop USA LLC from Freddy Zinger, Medimop’s founder and President. The Company also received an option to purchase, at fair value, the remaining 10% ownership of the two companies, which generally becomes exercisable four years after the closing date.
The Company paid $36,250 for the initial investment, of which $32,625 was paid in cash and the balance by delivering 128,547 shares of its common stock valued at fair value. West will also pay up to an additional $1.836 million of contingent cash consideration, depending on the achievement of operating goals over a four-year period. Five million dollars of the purchase price was held in escrow as security for potential liabilities for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants of the seller.
Medimop, a privately owned company headquartered in Ra’anana, Israel, is a leading developer of disposable medical devices for the mixing, transfer, reconstitution and administration of injectable drugs. As part of the transaction, Mr. Zinger will enter into a four-year employment contract. In exchange for a payment of $3.75 million, he also will agree to certain non-competition and non-solicitation covenants during his employment and for three years following employment termination.
The acquisition was financed with proceeds from private-lender debt (See “Subsequent Event – Private Placement”).
Page 30
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Six Months ended June 30, 2005 versus June 30, 2004, continued
Subsequent Event – Private Placement
On July 28, 2005, the Company concluded a private placement of $75.0 million in senior floating rate notes. The total amount of the private placement was divided into two tranches with $50.0 million maturing in 7 years on July 28, 2012 (“Series A Notes”) and $25.0 million maturing in ten years on July 28, 2015 (“Series B Notes”). The two tranches have interest payable based on LIBOR rates, with the Series A Notes at LIBOR plus 80 basis points and the Series B Notes at LIBOR plus 90 basis points. Covenants included in the agreement conform to the Company’s previously existing revolving credit agreement. Proceeds from this agreement were used to fund the acquisition of Medimop (See “Subsequent Event – Medimop Acquisition”) with the balance used to reduce borrowings under the revolving credit facility.
On July 28, 2005, the Company also entered into two interest-rate swap agreements with PNC Capital Markets Inc. to protect against volatility in the interest rates payable on the Series A and B Notes. The first interest rate swap agreement has a seven-year term at a notional amount of $50.0 million under which the Company will receive variable interest rate payments based on three-month LIBOR in return for making quarterly payments at a fixed annual rate of 4.52%.
The second interest rate swap agreement has a ten-year term at a notional amount of $25.0 million under which the Company will receive variable interest rate payments based on 3-month LIBOR in return for making quarterly payments at a fixed annual rate of 4.61%.
Including the applicable margin, the interest-rate swap agreements effectively fix the interest rates payable on the Series A and B notes at 5.32% and 5.51%, respectively.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements contained in this report or in other Company documents and certain statements that may be made by management of the Company orally may contain forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historic or current facts. They use words such as “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “believe,” “plan,” “anticipate” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance or condition. In particular, these include statements concerning future actions, future performance or results of current and anticipated products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings and financial results.
Because actual results are affected by risks and uncertainties, the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement.
Page 31
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Six Months ended June 30, 2005 versus June 30, 2004, continued
It is not possible to predict or identify all such risks and uncertainties, but factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results include, but are not limited to: sales demand; the effects of required acquisition-related purchase price allocations on income; the availability of required financing; the timing and commercial success of customers’ products incorporating the Company’s products and services; maintaining or improving production efficiencies and overhead absorption; competition from other providers; the Company’s ability to develop and market value-added products; the successful integration of acquired businesses; the average profitability, or mix, of products sold in a reporting period; financial performance of unconsolidated affiliates; the potential impact of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003; strength of the US dollar in relation to other currencies, particularly the Euro, UK pound, Danish Krone, Japanese Yen and Singapore Dollar; inflation; US and international interest rates; returns on pension assets in relation to the expected returns employed in preparing the Company’s financial statements; raw material price escalation, particularly petroleum-based raw materials and energy costs; exposure to product quality and safety claims; and, realization of the Company’s investment in the clinical services operation upon disposition.
The Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements as circumstances change. Investors are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures the Company makes on related subjects in the Company’s 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K reports.
Page 32
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Six Months ended June 30, 2005 versus June 30, 2004, continued
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
The information called for by this item is included in the text under the caption “Market Risk” in Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under SEC Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that are designed to, among other things, ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis and that such information is made known to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, and based on such evaluation, has concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Additionally, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and based on such evaluation, has concluded that there has been no change to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, these internal controls. The operations of the recently acquired Tech Group were included in the Company’s review of financial reporting controls at the end of the quarter.
Page 33
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Six Months ended June 30, 2005 versus June 30, 2004, continued
Part II - Other Information
Item 2. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table shows information with respect to purchases of common stock of the Company made during the three months ended June 30, 2005, by the Company or any “affiliated purchaser” of the Company, as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act:
Period | | Total number of shares purchased (1) (2) (3) | | Average price paid per share | | Total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or programs | | Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program | |
April 1, 2005 – April 30, 2005 | | 180 | | $26.34 | | — | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
May 1, 2005 – May 31, 2005 | | 58,904 | | 27.39 | | — | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
June 1, 2005 – June 30, 2005 | | 199 | | 28.05 | | — | | — | |
Total | | 59,283 | | $27.39 | | — | | — | |
(1) Includes 58,361 shares of common stock acquired from employees who tender already-owned shares to satisfy the exercise price on option exercises as part of the Company’s 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan.
(2) Includes 799 shares purchased on behalf of employees enrolled in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Designated Officers (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004). Under the plan, Company matching contributions are delivered to the plan’s investment administrator, which upon receipt of the contributions purchases shares in the open market and credits the shares to individual plan accounts.
(3) | Includes 123 shares forfeited under the executive incentive stock program. |
Page 34
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Six Months ended June 30, 2005 versus June 30, 2004, continued
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
(a) | The Company held its annual meeting of shareholders on April 26, 2005. |
(c) One matter was voted on at the annual meeting: (1) the election of three directors in Class III. The results of the voting are as follows:
Proposal #1 – Election of Directors | | |
| For | Withheld |
Tenley E. Albright, M.D. | 24,332,987 | 203,030 |
Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D. | 24,326,005 | 210,012 |
Robert C. Young, M.D. | 24,436,707 | 99,310 |
Item 6. Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits on pages F-1 and F-2 of this Report.
Page 35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC. |
| | (Registrant) |
| | |
| | |
| | /s/ William J. Federici |
| | William J. Federici |
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
August 9, 2005 | |
Date | |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number | |
| |
(2) | None. |
| |
(3)(a) | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company through January 4, 1999 incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(a) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(3)(b) | Bylaws of the Company, as amended through March 6, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(b) to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(4)(a) | Form of stock certificate for common stock incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)(a) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(4)(b) | Article 5, 6, 8(c) and 9 of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(a) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(4)(c) | Article I and V of the Bylaws of the Company, as amended through March 6, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)(c) of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(10)(a) | First Amendment, dated as of May 18, 2005, between the Company, the direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company listed on the signature pages thereto, the several banks and other financial institutions parties to the Credit Agreement (as defined therein), and PNC Bank, National Association, as Agent for the Banks, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 25, 2005 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(10)(b) | Share and Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 5, 2005, among the Company, West Pharmaceutical Services of Delaware, Inc., Medimop Medical Projects, Ltd., Medimop USA LLC and Freddy Zinger, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 8, 2005 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(10)(c) | Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2005, among the Company and several insurance companies, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 3, 2005 (File No. 1-8036). |
F-1
(10)(d) | Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2005, between the Company and the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company.* |
| |
(11) | Non applicable. |
| |
(15) | None. |
| |
(18) | None. |
| |
(19) | None. |
| |
(22) | None. |
| |
(23) | Non applicable. |
| |
(24) | None. |
| |
(31)(a) | Section 302 Certification by Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D. |
| |
(31)(b) | Section 302 Certification by William J. Federici. |
| |
(32)(a) | Certification by Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
(32)(b) | Certification by William J. Federici, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
(99) | None. |
| |
(100) | Non applicable. |
* | Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request submitted to the SEC. |
F - 2