Earnings in net income of affiliated companies were $0.6 million in the third quarter of 2005 down from the $1.2 million in the third quarter of 2004. Earnings for the nine-month period were also lower than the prior year with income of $1.9 million in 2005 compared to $3.1 million in 2004. 2005 earnings were negatively impacted by lower demand for coated products produced by the Company’s 25% owned Japanese affiliate. The 2004 results also included $0.6 million resulting from a real estate gain recorded by the Company’s 49% owned affiliate in Mexico.
Income from continuing operations for the third quarter ended September 30, 2005 was $7.1 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, compared to $6.8 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2004. Pharmaceutical Systems segment operating results contributed an additional $0.04 per diluted share versus the prior-year quarter with all of the increase occurring in international markets. 2005 operating results in the domestic business were approximately even with the 2004 third quarter. The Tech Group segment also contributed an additional $0.04 per diluted share as compared to the prior-year quarter, with half of the increase contributed by the acquired Tech business and half associated with the closure of the plastics manufacturing facility in the U.K. at the end of 2004. The favorable contributions of the business units were offset by $0.04 per diluted share of higher interest expense associated with acquisition related borrowings, a decrease in equity income of affiliated companies of $0.02 per diluted share, a $0.01 per diluted share effect of the increase in shares outstanding and a $0.01 per diluted share increase in corporate costs resulting from share-based compensation plans.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, income from continuing operations was $32.4 million, or $1.00 per diluted share, and $26.2 million, or $0.86 per diluted share, respectively. Pharmaceutical Systems segment operating results contributed $0.26 per diluted share of the increase in earnings per share in the year-to-date comparison largely due to the decrease of Kinston-related business interruption costs and strong sales and operating results in international markets, which more than offset higher raw material and overhead costs and an unfavorable domestic product mix. The operating results of the Tech Group segment contributed an additional $0.07 per diluted share as compared to the prior-year nine-month period, with the recently acquired Tech business accounting for $0.04 per diluted share of the increase. The 2005 nine-month results also include a $0.05 per diluted share favorable restructuring cost adjustment resulting from lower than anticipated contract termination costs at the former plastics manufacturing facility in the U.K. The favorable operating results of the business units and restructuring credit were partially offset by $0.07 per diluted share of higher interest expense associated with acquisition related borrowings, higher corporate costs of $0.06 per diluted share primarily resulting from share-based compensation charges, a $0.05 per diluted share impact of the increase in shares outstanding resulting from stock option exercises and shares issued in business acquisitions, lower equity income from affiliates of $0.04 per share and a $0.02 per diluted share net impact of increased tax expense, largely resulting from taxes provided on repatriations of cash from foreign affiliates under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
Page 26
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 versus September 30, 2004, continued
Discontinued Operations
On August 23, 2005 the Company sold its clinical services unit resulting in a pre-tax gain of $0.7 million. The clinical services unit had been classified as a discontinued operation since 2004 when the Company announced that it intended to exit the business. Discontinued operations for the third quarter of 2005 contributed pre-tax income of $0.4 million compared to a pre-tax loss of $3.7 million for the same period of 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, discontinued operations contributed pre-tax income of $1.1 million compared to a pre-tax loss of $10.6 million for the same period of 2004. The Company completed the sale of its former drug delivery business in the first quarter of 2005 resulting in decreased costs when comparing the 2005 to 2004 periods when the business was fully operational.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working capital at September 30, 2005 was $95.2 million compared with $110.0 million at December 31, 2004. The working capital ratio at September 30, 2005 was 1.8 to 1. Cash flow from operations was $53.3 million for the first nine months of 2005, an increase of $3.6 million from that achieved in the prior year nine-month period.
Capital spending for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005 was $32.6 million. Nearly 80% of the year-to-date capital spending focused on normal maintenance and replacement manufacturing equipment and tooling. Full-year 2005 capital spending, including spending in the newly acquired businesses, is projected to be approximately $60 million.
2005 cash flows used in investing activities include the May 20, 2005 acquisition of the Tech business for a total purchase price of $140.0 million, the August 2, 2005 acquisition of the Medimop business for $40.2 million, and the February 10, 2005 acquisition of Monarch, a contract laboratory business, for $5.7 million, less non-cash payments of $1.8 million and $3.6 million of Company stock associated with the acquisitions of Monarch and Medimop, respectively. The cash paid to the sellers of these businesses was offset by cash balances on hand of $5.4 million within the acquired business units at the time of their acquisition.
On May 18, 2005, the Company amended its revolving credit agreement, which, among other things:
a) increased the aggregate revolving credit facility to $200 million from $125 million, with the Company retaining the ability to increase the facility by an additional $25 million to an aggregate amount not to exceed $225 million;
b) extended the term of the facility by approximately one year to May 17, 2010;
c) amended the leverage ratio covenant to total indebtedness of not more than 3.5 times earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for any period of four consecutive quarters; and
d) amended the interest rate “spread” applicable to amounts borrowed under the credit agreement to be determined by reference to that leverage ratio.
Page 27
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 versus September 30, 2004, continued
Debt covenants in the Company’s $100 million senior notes due June 2010 were simultaneously amended to conform to the debt covenants, including the leverage ratio, contained in the amended revolving credit agreement.
As of September 30, 2005 the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.
Total debt outstanding at September 30, 2005 was $260.6 million compared to $160.8 million at December 31, 2004. The increase in debt reflects the funding for the Tech and Medimop acquisitions, offset partially by $67.0 million of repatriated funds from foreign subsidiaries.
The following table updates the Company’s contractual obligations under debt agreements since December 31, 2004, and the effect the obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flow in future periods. There were no other material changes to these obligations:
| | Payments Due By Period | |
($ in millions) | | Less than 1 year | | 1 to 3 years | | 4 to 5 years | | More than 5 years | | Total | |
Debt agreements | | $ | 0.4 | | $ | 0.2 | | $ | 185.0 | | $ | 75.0 | | $ | 260.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Please refer to Footnote 16 for the discussion of the Company’s senior note private placement which is incorporated herein by reference.
Debt as a percentage of total invested capital at September 30, 2005 was 44.5% compared to 34.8% at December 31, 2004.
Total shareholders’ equity was $325.4 million at September 30, 2005 compared to $301.1 million at December 31, 2004. The increase in equity was due to current year net income and employee stock purchase and option plan activity, partially offset by dividend payments and foreign currency translation adjustments.
The Company paid cash dividends totaling $10.3 million ($0.33 per share) during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005 and received $10.5 million in proceeds from employee stock option exercises and employee stock purchase plan contributions. Financing cash flows also include the excess tax benefit derived from the tax deductibility of employee stock option gains in excess of the amounts recorded as compensation expense under the fair value method prescribed in SFAS 123(R).
The Company believes that its financial condition, current capitalization and expected income from operations will be sufficient to meet the Company’s future expected cash requirements.
Recent Events
West’s Tech Group segment is one of two contract manufacturers for Nektar’s Exubera® inhalation device to be used in connection with that company’s inhaled insulin product. Scientific review panels in both the U.S. and Europe have recommended approval of the product, but it has not yet been approved for use. On October 28, 2005 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced that it was extending its original review period for Exubera by three months in order to review additional technical chemistry data. The delay in approval is not expected to have a material impact on West’s recently announced earnings guidance for the fourth quarter of 2005 and 2006 revenue projections of between $810 million to $830 million, subject to the “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” section below.
Page 28
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 versus September 30, 2004, continued
New Accounting Standards
In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143” (FIN 47). Under FIN 47, an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The provisions of FIN 47 are required to be applied no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005, although early adoption is encouraged. The Company believes that the adoption of FIN 47 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2005, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes and FASB Statement No. 3” (FAS 154). FAS 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes, unless impracticable, retrospective application as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle in the absence of explicit transition requirements specific to the newly adopted accounting principle. FAS 154 also provides guidance for determining whether retrospective application of a change in accounting principle is impracticable and for reporting a change when retrospective application is impracticable. The provisions of FAS 154 are effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2005.
In August 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-1, “Classification and Measurement of Freestanding Financial Instruments Originally Issued in Exchange for Employee Services under FASB Statement No. 123(R)” (FSP No. FAS 123(R)-1). The FSP defers the requirement of FAS 123(R) that a freestanding financial instrument originally subject to Statement 123(R) becomes subject to the recognition and measurement requirements of other applicable generally accepted accounting principles when the rights conveyed by the instrument to the holder are no longer dependent on the holder being an employee of the entity. The guidance in this FSP is required to be applied upon initial adoption of Statement 123(R). The Company believes that the adoption of FSP No. FAS 123(R)-1 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Page 29
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 versus September 30, 2004, continued
Market Risk
The Company is exposed to various market risk factors such as fluctuating interest rates and foreign currency rate fluctuations. These risk factors can impact results of operations, cash flows and financial position. These risks are managed periodically with the use of derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and forward exchange contracts. Derivatives used by the Company are highly effective as all of the critical terms of the derivative instruments match the hedged item. Effectiveness is measured on a quarterly basis. In accordance with Company policy, derivative financial instruments are not used for speculation or trading purposes.
During the first nine months of 2005, the Company was party to a forward exchange arrangement to protect against variability in future cash flows related to raw material purchases by European subsidiaries denominated in U.S. dollars (USD). This arrangement is divided into ten monthly contracts of 0.5 million Euro each with the last contract ending on December 13, 2005. The terms of the arrangement set a base rate of 1.30 USD per Euro and a limit rate of 1.36 USD per Euro. The Company is protected against a strengthening USD by restricting the exchange rate to the base rate. The Company would participate in gains caused by a weakening USD up to the limit rate. If the limit rate is exceeded at the expiry date of any of the remaining months, the Company agrees to buy Euro at the base rate for that month. There are no cash payments required and no income statement effect of an exchange rate between the base and limit rates. In the current quarter, the USD strengthened and the exchange rate was below the base of 1.30 USD per Euro resulting in a gain on the contracts of $0.1 million.
On July 28, 2005, the Company also entered into two interest-rate swap agreements with PNC Capital Markets Inc. to protect against volatility in the interest rates payable on the Series A and B Notes. The first interest rate swap agreement has a seven-year term at a notional amount of $50.0 million under which the Company will receive variable interest rate payments based on three-month LIBOR in return for making quarterly fixed payments. The second interest rate swap agreement has a ten-year term at a notional amount of $25.0 million under which the Company will receive variable interest rate payments based on 3-month LIBOR in return for making quarterly fixed payments.
Including the applicable margin, the interest-rate swap agreements effectively fix the interest rates payable on the Series A and B notes at 5.32% and 5.51%, respectively. At September 30, 2005, the interest rate swap agreements had a fair value of $0.4 million.
The Company periodically uses forward contracts to hedge certain transactions or to neutralize month-end balance sheet exposures on cross-currency intercompany loans. The Company has a number of forward contracts with fair values totaling $0.3 million as of September 30, 2005 to purchase various currencies in Europe and Asia.
Page 30
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for the Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2005 versus September 30, 2004, continued
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements contained in this report or in other Company documents and certain statements that may be made by management of the Company orally may contain forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historic or current facts. They use words such as “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “believe,” “plan,” “anticipate” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance or condition. In particular, these include statements concerning future actions, future performance or results of current and anticipated products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings and financial results.
Because actual results are affected by risks and uncertainties, the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement.
It is not possible to predict or identify all such risks and uncertainties, but factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results include, but are not limited to: sales demand; the timing and commercial success of customers’ products incorporating the Company’s products and services, including specifically, the Nektar inhaled insulin product; changes in medical and pharmaceutical technologies that alter the demand for injectible drug products; the Company’s ability to pass recent raw material cost increases on to customers through price increases; regulatory changes affecting the marketing, use or competitiveness of Company and customer products, the use and availability of raw materials used in the Company’s products, or the operation of the Company’s facilities; maintaining or improving production efficiencies and overhead absorption; competition from other providers; the Company’s ability to develop and market value-added products; the successful integration of acquired businesses; the average profitability, or mix, of products sold in a reporting period; financial performance of unconsolidated affiliates; the potential impact of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003; strength of the US dollar in relation to other currencies, particularly the Euro, UK pound, Danish Krone, Japanese Yen and Singapore Dollar; inflation; US and international interest rates and the availability of debt financing; returns on pension assets in relation to the expected returns employed in preparing the Company’s financial statements; raw material price escalation, particularly petroleum-based raw materials and energy costs; disruption in the supply of raw materials, particularly petroleum based raw materials, the production of which has been affected by recent hurricane damage in the US Gulf Coast region; exposure to product quality and safety claims; availability and pricing of materials that may be affected by vendor concerns with exposure to product-related liability.
The Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements as circumstances change. Investors are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures the Company makes on related subjects in the Company’s 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K reports, and in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, (No. 333-128438), and amendments thereto.
Page 31
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
The information called for by this item is included in the text under the caption “Market Risk” in Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under SEC Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that are designed to, among other things, ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis and that such information is made known to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, and based on such evaluation, has concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective. The operations of the recently acquired Tech and Medimop businesses were included in the Company’s evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter. The Company added monitoring and oversight controls over budgeting, reporting, revenue recognition and disbursements to Tech and Medimop.
During the period covered by this report, there has been no change to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Page 32
Part II - Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit filed in connection with the January 2003 explosion and related fire at its Kinston, N.C. plant in which the plaintiffs seek unspecified compensatory and punitive damages from the Company. The Company has reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle the lawsuit for an amount that will be largely funded by the Company’s insurers. Under the agreement, the Company’s monetary contribution would be limited to the balance of its deductibles under applicable insurance policies, all of which has been previously recorded in the Company’s financial statements.
By letter dated September 27, 2005, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico notified the Company that it is potentially responsible for damages to natural resources, including groundwater and soils, resulting from alleged releases of hazardous substances at the Company’s former facility at an industrial park in Vega Alta, Puerto Rico. The notice stated that Puerto Rico, assisted by a private attorney, intends to bring suit within 60 days against the Company and other potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”) and other applicable laws. Other PRPs that were industrial park tenants include Caribe GE International Controls Corp., together with alleged successors, General Electric Company and NBC-Rainbow Holdings, Inc., Unisys, Harmon Automotive, Inc., and Motorola Electronica de Puerto Rico, Inc. If pursued, the Company intends to vigorously defend such litigation.
Page 33
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table shows information with respect to purchases of common stock of the Company made during the three months ended September 30, 2005, by the Company or any “affiliated purchaser” of the Company, as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act:
Period | | Total number of shares purchased (1) (2) (3) | | Average price paid per share | | Total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or programs | | Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program | |
July 1, 2005 – July 31, 2005 | | 207 | | $ | 27.51 | | — | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
August 1, 2005 – August 31, 2005 | | 524 | | | 28.35 | | — | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
September 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 | | 3,229 | | | 26.81 | | — | | — | |
Total | | 3,960 | | $ | 27.05 | | — | | — | |
(1) Includes 2,601 shares of common stock acquired from employees who tender already-owned shares to satisfy the exercise price on option exercises as part of the Company’s 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan.
(2) Includes 907 shares purchased on behalf of employees enrolled in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Designated Officers (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004). Under the plan, Company matching contributions are delivered to the plan’s investment administrator, which upon receipt of the contributions purchases shares in the open market and credits the shares to individual plan accounts.
(3) | Includes 452 shares forfeited under the executive incentive stock program. |
Item 6. Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits on pages F-1 and F-2 of this Report.
Page 34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC. |
| | (Registrant) |
| | |
| | |
| | /s/ William J. Federici |
| | William J. Federici |
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
November 4, 2005 | |
Date | |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number | |
| |
(2) | None. |
| |
(3)(a) | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company through January 4, 1999 incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(a) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(3)(b) | Bylaws of the Company, as amended through March 6, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(b) to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(4)(a) | Form of stock certificate for common stock incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)(a) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(4)(b) | Article 5, 6, 8(c) and 9 of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(a) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(4)(c) | Article I and V of the Bylaws of the Company, as amended through March 6, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)(c) of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 1-8036). |
| |
(10)(a) | Form of 2005 Bonus and Incentive Share Award, issued pursuant to the 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. |
| |
(10)(b) | Form of 2005 Non-Qualified Stock Option Award, issued pursuant to the 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. |
| |
(10)(c) | Form of Director 2005 Stock Option Award, issued pursuant to the 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. |
| |
(10)(d) | Form of Director 2005 Stock Unit Award, issued pursuant to the 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. |
| |
(11) | Non applicable. |
| |
(15) | None. |
| |
(18) | None. |
F-1
Exhibit Number | |
| |
(19) | None. |
| |
(22) | None. |
| |
(23) | Non applicable. |
| |
(24) | None. |
| |
(31)(a) | Certification by Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D., pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
(31)(b) | Certification by William J. Federici, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
(32)(a) | Certification by Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
(32)(b) | Certification by William J. Federici, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
(99) | None. |
| |
(100) | Non applicable. |
F-2