Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-14793
FIRST BANCORP.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
Puerto Rico | 66-0561882 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. employer | |
incorporation or organization) | identification number) | |
1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Stop 23 | 00908 | |
Santurce, Puerto Rico | (Zip Code) | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(787) 729-8200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerþ | Accelerated filero | Non-accelerated filero | Smaller reporting companyo | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common stock: 92,510,506 outstanding as of July 31, 2008.
FIRST BANCORP.
INDEX PAGE
INDEX PAGE
PAGE | ||||||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements: | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
9 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
81 | ||||||||
81 | ||||||||
82 | ||||||||
82 | ||||||||
82 | ||||||||
82 | ||||||||
83 | ||||||||
83 | ||||||||
83 | ||||||||
Section 302 Certification of the CEO | ||||||||
Section 302 Certification of the CFO | ||||||||
Section 906 Certification of the CEO | ||||||||
Section 906 Certification of the CFO |
2
Table of Contents
Forward Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Form 10-Q or future filings by First BanCorp (the “Corporation”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in the Corporation’s press releases or in other public or shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the word or phrases “would be,” “will allow,” “intends to,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “should,” “anticipate” and similar expressions are meant to identify “forward-looking statements.”
First BanCorp wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such “forward-looking statements,” which speak only as of the date made, and represent First BanCorp’s expectations of future conditions or results and are not guarantees of future performance. First BanCorp advises readers that various factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any “forward-looking statement.” Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
• | risks arising from credit and other risks of the Corporation’s lending and investment activities, including the condo conversion loans in its Miami Agency and the construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico; | ||
• | an adverse change in the Corporation’s ability to attract new clients and retain existing ones; | ||
• | general economic conditions, including the current interest rate scenario and the performance of the financial markets, which may affect demand for the Corporation’s products and services and the value of the Corporation’s assets, including the value of the interest rate swaps that economically hedge the interest rate risk mainly relating to brokered certificates of deposit and medium-term notes as well as other derivative instruments used for protection from interest rate fluctuations; | ||
• | risks arising from worsening economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the United States; | ||
• | changes in the Corporation’s expenses associated with acquisitions and dispositions; | ||
• | developments in technology; | ||
• | the impact of Doral Financial Corporation’s and R&G Financial Corporation’s financial condition on the repayment of their outstanding secured loans to the Corporation; | ||
• | the Corporation’s ability to issue brokered certificates of deposit and fund operations; | ||
• | risks associated with any downgrades in the credit ratings of the Corporation’s securities; | ||
• | general competitive factors and industry consolidation; and | ||
• | risks associated with regulatory and legislative changes for financial services companies in Puerto Rico, the United States, and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands and changes in the regulation of housing government-sponsored enterprises. |
The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any of the “forward-looking statements” to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements except as required by the federal securities laws.
Investors should carefully consider these factors and the risk factors outlined under Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
3
Table of Contents
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except for share information) | June 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 122,979 | $ | 195,809 | ||||
Money market instruments | 121,415 | 148,579 | ||||||
Federal funds sold | 10,810 | 7,957 | ||||||
Time deposits with other financial institutions | 16,646 | 26,600 | ||||||
Total money market investments | 148,871 | 183,136 | ||||||
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value: | ||||||||
Securities pledged that can be repledged | 3,006,577 | 789,271 | ||||||
Other investment securities | 1,052,652 | 497,015 | ||||||
Total investment securities available for sale | 4,059,229 | 1,286,286 | ||||||
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost: | ||||||||
Securities pledged that can be repledged | 1,336,541 | 2,522,509 | ||||||
Other investment securities | 459,571 | 754,574 | ||||||
Total investment securities held to maturity, fair value of $1,779,015 (2007 - $3,261,934) | 1,796,112 | 3,277,083 | ||||||
Other equity securities | 82,126 | 64,908 | ||||||
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $222,272 (2007 - $190,168) | 11,998,579 | 11,588,654 | ||||||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market | 29,194 | 20,924 | ||||||
Total loans, net | 12,027,773 | 11,609,578 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 170,733 | 162,635 | ||||||
Other real estate owned | 38,620 | 16,116 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments | 97,971 | 107,979 | ||||||
Due from customers on acceptances | 652 | 747 | ||||||
Other assets | 283,720 | 282,654 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 18,828,786 | $ | 17,186,931 | ||||
Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits | $ | 690,451 | $ | 621,884 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits (including $1,689,208 and $4,186,563 measured at fair value as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) | 10,837,333 | 10,412,637 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 3,999,590 | 3,094,646 | ||||||
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) | 1,460,000 | 1,103,000 | ||||||
Notes payable (including $13,407 and $14,306 measured at fair value as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) | 27,944 | 30,543 | ||||||
Other borrowings | 231,865 | 231,817 | ||||||
Bank acceptances outstanding | 652 | 747 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 179,258 | 270,011 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 17,427,093 | 15,765,285 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 19) | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, authorized 50,000,000 shares: issued and outstanding 22,004,000 shares at $25 liquidation value per share | 550,100 | 550,100 | ||||||
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 250,000,000 shares; issued 102,408,306 as of June 30, 2008 (2007 - 102,402,306) | 102,408 | 102,402 | ||||||
Less: Treasury stock (at par value) | (9,898 | ) | (9,898 | ) | ||||
Common stock outstanding | 92,510 | 92,504 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 108,326 | 108,279 | ||||||
Legal surplus | 286,049 | 286,049 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 443,473 | 409,978 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit of $977 (2007 - $227) | (78,765 | ) | (25,264 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 1,401,693 | 1,421,646 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 18,828,786 | $ | 17,186,931 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
Table of Contents
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Quarter Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||
Loans | $ | 204,794 | $ | 228,911 | $ | 418,605 | $ | 454,550 | ||||||||
Investment securities | 70,001 | 71,672 | 132,018 | 139,344 | ||||||||||||
Money market investments | 1,813 | 5,288 | 5,072 | 10,562 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income | 276,608 | 305,871 | 555,695 | 604,456 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits | 99,767 | 133,882 | 205,964 | 257,972 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements | 28,969 | 39,390 | 62,908 | 81,160 | ||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB | 9,572 | 9,001 | 20,720 | 17,198 | ||||||||||||
Notes payable and other borrowings | 3,694 | 6,383 | 7,039 | 13,476 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 142,002 | 188,656 | 296,631 | 369,806 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | 134,606 | 117,215 | 259,064 | 234,650 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | 41,323 | 24,628 | 87,116 | 49,542 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses | 93,283 | 92,587 | 171,948 | 185,108 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income: | ||||||||||||||||
Other service charges on loans | 1,418 | 2,418 | 2,731 | 4,209 | ||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 3,191 | 3,185 | 6,555 | 6,376 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage banking activities | 804 | 351 | 1,123 | 1,113 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) gain on investments and impairments | (679 | ) | (1,436 | ) | 15,514 | (3,595 | ) | |||||||||
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution | — | — | — | 2,497 | ||||||||||||
Rental income | 579 | 669 | 1,122 | 1,333 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio | — | — | — | 2,819 | ||||||||||||
Other non-interest income | 6,689 | 5,716 | 14,337 | 11,973 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest income | 12,002 | 10,903 | 41,382 | 26,725 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Employees’ compensation and benefits | 34,994 | 33,352 | 71,320 | 69,724 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment | 15,541 | 14,496 | 30,520 | 28,878 | ||||||||||||
Business promotion | 4,802 | 4,864 | 9,067 | 9,794 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees | 4,919 | 5,608 | 9,978 | 12,005 | ||||||||||||
Taxes, other than income taxes | 3,988 | 3,653 | 8,014 | 7,234 | ||||||||||||
Insurance and supervisory fees | 3,945 | 1,799 | 7,929 | 3,491 | ||||||||||||
Foreclosure-related expenses | 3,172 | 266 | 6,428 | 541 | ||||||||||||
Other non-interest expenses | 10,402 | 9,416 | 20,694 | 21,151 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest expenses | 81,763 | 73,454 | 163,950 | 152,818 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 23,522 | 30,036 | 49,380 | 59,015 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | 9,472 | (6,241 | ) | 17,203 | (12,388 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 32,994 | $ | 23,795 | $ | 66,583 | $ | 46,627 | ||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 22,925 | $ | 13,726 | $ | 46,445 | $ | 26,489 | ||||||||
Net income per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.32 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.32 | ||||||||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
Table of Contents
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 66,583 | $ | 46,627 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation | 9,165 | 8,394 | ||||||
Amortization of core deposit intangible | 1,695 | 1,660 | ||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | 87,116 | 49,542 | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefit | (15,068 | ) | (2,013 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation recognized | — | 2,848 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of investments, net | (16,003 | ) | 732 | |||||
Other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities | 489 | 2,863 | ||||||
Derivative instruments and hedging activities (gain) loss | (27,599 | ) | 363 | |||||
Net gain on sale of loans and impairments | (617 | ) | (606 | ) | ||||
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution | — | (2,497 | ) | |||||
Net amortization of premiums and discounts and deferred loan fees and costs | (539 | ) | (1,043 | ) | ||||
Amortization of broker placement fees | 7,079 | 4,765 | ||||||
Accretion of basis adjustments on fair value hedges | — | (2,061 | ) | |||||
Net accretion of premium and discounts on investment securities | (7,900 | ) | (18,246 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio | — | (2,819 | ) | |||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued income tax payable | (4,715 | ) | 9,963 | |||||
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable | 10,205 | (2,451 | ) | |||||
Decrease in accrued interest payable | (31,588 | ) | (26,809 | ) | ||||
Decrease in other assets | 12,365 | 622 | ||||||
Decrease in other liabilities | (23,244 | ) | (4,017 | ) | ||||
Total adjustments | 841 | 19,190 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 67,424 | 65,817 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Principal collected on loans | 1,446,537 | 1,607,937 | ||||||
Loans originated | (1,948,093 | ) | (1,807,982 | ) | ||||
Purchase of loans | (116,864 | ) | (99,533 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of loans | 70,601 | 69,844 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets | 37,190 | 27,904 | ||||||
Purchase of servicing assets | (621 | ) | (1,036 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of available for sale securities | 389,784 | 3,125 | ||||||
Purchase of securities held to maturity | (99 | ) | (254,586 | ) | ||||
Purchase of securities available for sale | (3,351,675 | ) | — | |||||
Principal repayments and maturities of securities held to maturity | 1,489,215 | 318,094 | ||||||
Principal repayments of securities available for sale | 165,658 | 112,921 | ||||||
Additions to premises and equipment | (15,088 | ) | (11,553 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities | 9,342 | — | ||||||
Increase in other equity securities | (17,106 | ) | (3,419 | ) | ||||
Net cash inflow on acquisition of business | 5,154 | — | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (1,836,065 | ) | (38,284 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Net increase in deposits | 432,637 | 785,821 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements | 904,944 | (421,961 | ) | |||||
Net FHLB advances taken | 357,000 | 65,000 | ||||||
Repayments of notes payable and other borrowings | — | (150,000 | ) | |||||
Dividends paid | (33,088 | ) | (31,793 | ) | ||||
Exercise of stock options | 53 | — | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,661,546 | 247,067 | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (107,095 | ) | 274,600 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 378,945 | 568,811 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 271,850 | $ | 843,411 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents include: | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 122,979 | $ | 134,955 | ||||
Money market instruments | 148,871 | 708,456 | ||||||
$ | 271,850 | $ | 843,411 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
Table of Contents
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
June 30, 2008 | June 30, 2007 | |||||||
Preferred Stock | $ | 550,100 | $ | 550,100 | ||||
Common Stock outstanding: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | 92,504 | 83,254 | ||||||
Common stock issued under stock option plan | 6 | — | ||||||
Balance at end of period | 92,510 | 83,254 | ||||||
Additional Paid-In-Capital: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | 108,279 | 22,757 | ||||||
Shares issued under stock option plan | 47 | — | ||||||
Stock-based compensation recognized | — | 2,848 | ||||||
Balance at end of period | 108,326 | 25,605 | ||||||
Legal Surplus | 286,049 | 276,848 | ||||||
Retained Earnings: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | 409,978 | 326,761 | ||||||
Net income | 66,583 | 46,627 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared on common stock | (12,950 | ) | (11,655 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock | (20,138 | ) | (20,138 | ) | ||||
Cumulative adjustment for accounting change (adoption of FIN 48) | — | (2,615 | ) | |||||
Cumulative adjustment for accounting change (adoption of SFAS No. 159) | — | 91,778 | ||||||
Balance at end of period | 443,473 | 430,758 | ||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | (25,264 | ) | (30,167 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (53,501 | ) | (30,086 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period | (78,765 | ) | (60,253 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,401,693 | $ | 1,306,312 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
7
Table of Contents
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(Unaudited)
Quarter Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 32,994 | $ | 23,795 | $ | 66,583 | $ | 46,627 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities: | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding loss arising during the period | (66,258 | ) | (32,018 | ) | (48,079 | ) | (33,886 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Reclassification adjustments for net loss (gain) and other-than-temporary impairments included in net income | 679 | 1,436 | (6,172 | ) | 3,595 | |||||||||||
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive income | 511 | 230 | 750 | 205 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss for the period, net of tax | (65,068 | ) | (30,352 | ) | (53,501 | ) | (30,086 | ) | ||||||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (32,074 | ) | $ | (6,557 | ) | $ | 13,082 | $ | 16,541 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
8
Table of Contents
FIRST BANCORP
PART I — NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) have been prepared in conformity with the accounting policies stated in the Corporation’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007, included in the Corporation’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been reflected. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The results of operations for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
On April 30, 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position No. FIN 39-1 (“FSP FIN 39-1”), which amends FIN 39, “Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.” FSP FIN 39-1 impacts entities that enter into master netting arrangements as part of their derivative transactions by allowing net derivative positions to be offset in the financial statements against the fair value of amounts (or amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral under those arrangements. FSP FIN 39-1 became effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Corporation analyzed the potential impact of FSP FIN 39-1 on its financial statements. As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation did not apply this pronouncement since FSP FIN 39-1 applies only to cash collateral and all of the collateral received or delivered to counterparties for derivative instruments are investment securities.
In November 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. (“SAB”) 109, “Written Loan Commitments That Are Accounted For At Fair Value Through Earnings Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This interpretation expresses the views of the staff regarding written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings under GAAP. SAB 109 supersedes SAB 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments,” which provided the prior views of the staff regarding derivative loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. (“SFAS”) 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SAB 109 expresses the current view of the staff that, consistent with the guidance in SFAS 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets,” and SFAS 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SAB 109 became effective for fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. The adoption of this statement in 2008 did not have an effect on the Corporation’s financial statements.
9
Table of Contents
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51.” This Statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that is, January 1, 2009, for entities with calendar year-ends). Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Corporation is currently evaluating the possible effect, if any, of the adoption of this statement on its financial statements, commencing on January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations.” This Statement retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This Statement defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. This Statement requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, including contingent liabilities, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the Statement. This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date. The Corporation is currently evaluating the possible effect, if any, of the adoption of this statement on its financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This Statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. Although the Corporation continues to evaluate the disclosure framework dictated by this Statement, most of the required disclosures are included in Note 8 — “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,”. This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Prior to the issuance of SFAS 162, GAAP hierarchy was defined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. (“SAS”) 69, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS 162 provides and direct the GAAP hierarchy to the entities instead of the auditor as provided by SAS 69 because the entities (not its auditor) are responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Any effect of applying the provisions of SFAS 162 should be reported as a change in accounting principle in accordance with SFAS 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The adoption of SFAS 162 will not impact the Corporation’s current accounting policies or the Corporation’s financial results.
10
Table of Contents
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1 (“FSP-APB 14-1”). FSP-APB 14-1 clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.” Additionally, FSP-APB 14-1 specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. FSP-APB 14-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation does not have any convertible debt instrument.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts - - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” This Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement also clarifies how SFAS 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. SFAS 163 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some disclosures about the insurance enterprise’s risk-management activities. Except for those disclosures, earlier application of SFAS 163 is not permitted. The Corporation is currently evaluating the possible effect, if any, of the adoption of this statement on its financial statements, commencing on January 1, 2009.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1 (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”), “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” FSP EITF 03-6-1 applies to entities with outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends. Furthermore, awards with dividends that do not need to be returned to the entity if the employee forfeits the award are considered participating securities. Accordingly, under FSP EITF 03-6-1 unvested share-based payment awards that are considered to be participating securities should be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method under SFAS 128. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Early application is not permitted. The Corporation is currently evaluating this statement in light of the recently approved Omnibus Incentive Plan, however, as of June 30, 2008, there are no outstanding unvested share-based payment awards.
11
Table of Contents
2 — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The calculations of earnings per common share for the quarters and six-month periods ended on June 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
Quarter Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 32,994 | $ | 23,795 | $ | 66,583 | $ | 46,627 | ||||||||
Less: Preferred stock dividends | (10,069 | ) | (10,069 | ) | (20,138 | ) | (20,138 | ) | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 22,925 | $ | 13,726 | $ | 46,445 | $ | 26,489 | ||||||||
Weighted-Average Shares: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding | 92,505 | 83,254 | 92,505 | 83,254 | ||||||||||||
Average potential common shares | 203 | 622 | 145 | 503 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding | 92,708 | 83,876 | 92,650 | 83,757 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.32 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.32 | ||||||||
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from the exercise are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Stock options that result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share. For the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, a total of 2,020,600 and 2,054,600 weighted-average outstanding stock options, respectively, were not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share.
3 — STOCK OPTION PLAN
Between 1997 and January 2007, the Corporation had a stock option plan (“the 1997 stock option plan”) covering certain employees. This plan allowed for the granting of up to 8,696,112 options on shares of the Corporation’s common stock to certain employees. The options granted under the plan could not exceed 20% of the number of common shares outstanding. Each option provides for the purchase of one share of common stock at a price not less than the fair market value of the stock on the date the option was granted. Stock options are fully vested upon issuance. The maximum term to exercise the options is ten years. The stock option plan provides for a proportionate adjustment in the exercise price and the number of shares that can be purchased in the event of a stock dividend, stock split, reclassification of stock, merger or reorganization and certain other issuances and distributions such as stock appreciation rights.
Under the 1997 stock option plan, the Compensation Committee had the authority to grant stock appreciation rights at any time subsequent to the grant of an option. Pursuant to the stock appreciation rights, the optionee surrenders the right to exercise an option granted under the plan in consideration for payment by the Corporation of an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock subject to such option surrendered over the total option price of such shares. Any option surrendered shall be cancelled by the Corporation and the shares subject to the option shall not be eligible for further grants under the option plan. During the second quarter of 2008, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of stock appreciation rights to one employee. The employee surrendered the right to exercise 120,000 stock options in the form of stock appreciation
12
Table of Contents
rights for a payment of $0.2 million. On January 21, 2007, the 1997 stock option plan expired; all outstanding awards grants under this plan shall continue in full force and effect, subject to their original terms.
On April 29, 2008, the Corporation’s stockholders approved the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the “awards”) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. This plan allows the issuance of up to 3,800,000 shares of common stock subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganization and other similar events. The Corporation’s Board of Directors, upon receiving the relevant recommendation of the Compensation Committee, shall have the power and authority to determine those eligible to receive awards and to establish the terms and conditions of any awards; however, the Omnibus Plan has various limits and vesting restrictions that apply to individual and aggregate awards. As of the date of the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, no awards have been granted under the Omnibus Plan.
The Corporation accounted for stock options using the “modified prospective” method under SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” There were no stock options granted during the first six months of 2008. The compensation expense associated with stock options for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007 was approximately $2.8 million. All employee stock options granted during 2007 were fully vested at the time of grant.
The activity of stock options during the first six months of 2008 is set forth below:
Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average | Aggregate Intrinsic | |||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average | Remaining Contractual | Value (In | ||||||||||||||
Number of Options | Exercise Price | Term (Years) | thousands) | |||||||||||||
Beginning of period | 4,136,910 | $ | 12.60 | |||||||||||||
Options exercised | (6,000 | ) | 8.85 | |||||||||||||
Options cancelled | (121,000 | ) | 9.03 | |||||||||||||
End of period outstanding and exercisable | 4,009,910 | $ | 12.71 | 6.6 | $ | — | ||||||||||
The fair value of options granted in 2007, which was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing method, and the assumptions used are as follows:
2007 | ||||
Weighted-average stock price at grant date and exercise price | $ | 9.20 | ||
Stock option estimated fair value | $ | 2.40 - $2.45 | ||
Weighted-average estimated fair value | $ | 2.43 | ||
Expected stock option term (years) | 4.31-4.59 | |||
Expected volatility | 32 | % | ||
Expected dividend yield | 3.0 | % | ||
Risk-free interest rate | 5.1 | % |
The Corporation uses empirical research data to estimate option exercises and employee termination within the valuation model; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected volatility is based on the historical implied volatility of the Corporation’s common stock at each grant date; otherwise, historical volatilities based upon 260 observations (working days) were obtained from Bloomberg L.P. and used as inputs in the model. The dividend yield is based on the historical 12-month dividend yield observable at each grant date. The risk-free rate for the period is based on historical zero coupon curves obtained from Bloomberg L.P. at the time of grant based on the option’s expected term.
The options exercised during the first half of 2008 did not have any intrinsic value and the cash proceeds from these options were approximately $53,000. No stock options were exercised during 2007.
13
Table of Contents
4 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities available for sale as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows:
June 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Weighted | Gross | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | average | Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cost | gains | losses | value | yield% | cost | gains | losses | value | yield% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and Obligations of U.S.Government sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due within one year | $ | 8,324 | $ | — | $ | 9 | $ | 8,315 | 1.11 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
After 5 to 10 years | — | — | — | — | — | 6,975 | 26 | — | 7,001 | 6.05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | — | — | — | — | — | 8,984 | 47 | — | 9,031 | 6.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government obligations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due within one year | 387 | 4 | — | 391 | 6.63 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 1 to 5 years | 13,688 | 122 | 325 | 13,485 | 4.96 | 13,947 | 141 | 347 | 13,741 | 4.99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 5 to 10 years | 7,309 | 222 | 100 | 7,431 | 5.67 | 7,245 | 247 | 99 | 7,393 | 5.67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | 17,755 | 74 | 97 | 17,732 | 5.30 | 3,416 | 37 | 66 | 3,387 | 5.64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations | 47,463 | 422 | 531 | 47,354 | 4.53 | 40,567 | 498 | 512 | 40,553 | 5.62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLMC certificates: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | 93 | — | — | 93 | 5.19 | 98 | 1 | — | 99 | 5.50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 1 to 5 years | 318 | 8 | — | 326 | 7.23 | 640 | 20 | — | 660 | 7.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | 1,984,413 | 243 | 28,732 | 1,955,924 | 5.45 | 158,070 | 235 | 111 | 158,194 | 5.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,984,824 | 251 | 28,732 | 1,956,343 | 5.45 | 158,808 | 256 | 111 | 158,953 | 5.61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | 132 | 1 | — | 133 | 5.83 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 1 to 5 years | 226 | 7 | — | 233 | 6.73 | 496 | 8 | — | 504 | 6.48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 5 to 10 years | 639 | 7 | — | 646 | 5.54 | 708 | 6 | 5 | 709 | 6.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | 344,865 | 604 | 3,725 | 341,744 | 5.38 | 42,665 | 582 | 120 | 43,127 | 5.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
345,862 | 619 | 3,725 | 342,756 | 5.38 | 43,869 | 596 | 125 | 44,340 | 5.94 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA certificates: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due within one year | 3 | — | — | 3 | 6.89 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 1 to 5 years | 16 | — | — | 16 | 6.78 | 34 | 1 | — | 35 | 7.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 5 to 10 years | 274,979 | 319 | 523 | 274,775 | 5.00 | 289,125 | 138 | 750 | 288,513 | 4.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | 1,326,762 | 3,216 | 12,238 | 1,317,740 | 5.57 | 608,942 | 5,290 | 582 | 613,650 | 5.65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,601,760 | 3,535 | 12,761 | 1,592,534 | 5.47 | 898,101 | 5,429 | 1,332 | 902,198 | 5.42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage pass-through certificates: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | 151,201 | 2 | 36,013 | 115,190 | 4.72 | 162,082 | 3 | 28,407 | 133,678 | 6.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 4,083,647 | 4,407 | 81,231 | 4,006,823 | 5.43 | 1,262,860 | 6,284 | 29,975 | 1,239,169 | 5.55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 5 to 10 years | 1,300 | — | 510 | 790 | 7.70 | 1,300 | — | 198 | 1,102 | 7.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | 4,412 | — | 1,796 | 2,616 | 7.97 | 4,412 | — | 1,066 | 3,346 | 7.97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 5,712 | — | 2,306 | 3,406 | 7.91 | 5,712 | — | 1,264 | 4,448 | 7.91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities (without contractual maturity) | 2,149 | — | 503 | 1,646 | — | 2,638 | — | 522 | 2,116 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities available for sale | $ | 4,138,971 | $ | 4,829 | $ | 84,571 | $ | 4,059,229 | 5.42 | $ | 1,311,777 | $ | 6,782 | $ | 32,273 | $ | 1,286,286 | 5.55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on contractual terms assuming no prepayments. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options. The weighted-average yield on investment securities held for sale is based on amortized cost and, therefore, does not give effect to changes in fair value. The net unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale is presented as part of accumulated other comprehensive income.
14
Table of Contents
The following tables show the Corporation’s available-for-sale investments’ fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
As of June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 8,315 | $ | 9 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8,315 | $ | 9 | ||||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government obligations | 3,083 | 43 | 13,681 | 479 | 16,764 | 522 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLMC | 1,864,111 | 28,647 | 3,160 | 85 | 1,867,271 | 28,732 | ||||||||||||||||||
GNMA | 301,362 | 3,723 | 101 | 2 | 301,463 | 3,725 | ||||||||||||||||||
FNMA | 1,199,440 | 12,761 | 38 | — | 1,199,478 | 12,761 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage pass-through trust certificates | 23,318 | 6,463 | 91,552 | 29,550 | 114,870 | 36,013 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | — | — | 3,406 | 2,306 | 3,406 | 2,306 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 1,234 | 503 | — | — | 1,234 | 503 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 3,400,863 | $ | 52,149 | $ | 111,938 | $ | 32,422 | $ | 3,512,801 | $ | 84,571 | |||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government obligations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 13,648 | $ | 512 | $ | 13,648 | $ | 512 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLMC | 48,202 | 40 | 3,436 | 71 | 51,638 | 111 | ||||||||||||||||||
GNMA | 625 | 11 | 26,887 | 114 | 27,512 | 125 | ||||||||||||||||||
FNMA | 285,973 | 274 | 221,902 | 1,058 | 507,875 | 1,332 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage pass-through certificates | 133,337 | 28,407 | — | — | 133,337 | 28,407 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | — | — | 4,448 | 1,264 | 4,448 | 1,264 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 1,384 | 522 | — | — | 1,384 | 522 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 469,521 | $ | 29,254 | $ | 270,321 | $ | 3,019 | $ | 739,842 | $ | 32,273 | |||||||||||||
The Corporation’s investment securities portfolio is comprised principally of (i) mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by FNMA, GNMA or FHLMC and other securities secured by mortgage loans and (ii) U.S. Treasury and agencies securities and obligations of the Puerto Rico Government. Thus, payment of a substantial portion of these instruments is either guaranteed or secured by mortgages together with a U.S. government sponsored entity or is backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. or Puerto Rico Government. The troubled housing and mortgage markets in the United States have raised concerns about the capacity of U.S. government sponsored entities to raise money from investors to cover rising losses from loan defaults and potential bail out by the government. However, the federal government recently passed legislation expanding the government’s line of credit to the agencies and allowing the government to buy shares of the agencies if needed. Also, the Federal Reserve agreed to open its discount window to the agencies. Principal and interest on these securities are deemed recoverable.
The unrealized losses in the available-for-sale portfolio as of June 30, 2008 are substantially related to market interest rate fluctuations and not deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers. In the case of private label mortgage-backed securities, the unrealized loss is mainly related to increases in the discount rate used to value such instruments resulting from current liquidity and credit concerns in the U.S. mortgage loan market. However, the underlying mortgages are fixed-rate single family loans with a high weighted-average FICO score (over 700)
15
Table of Contents
and low loan-to-value ratios (under 80%), as well as a very low delinquency level. The Corporation’s policy is to review its investment portfolio for possible other-than temporary impairment, at least quarterly. As of June 30, 2008, management has the intent and ability to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time and for a forecasted recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of these investments; as a result, the impairments are considered temporary.
For the six-month periods ended on June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation recorded other-than-temporary impairments of approximately $0.5 million and $2.9 million, respectively, on certain equity securities held in its available-for-sale investment portfolio. Management concluded that the declines in value of the securities were other-than-temporary; as such, the cost basis of these securities was written down to the market value as of the date of the analyses and reflected in earnings as a realized loss.
Total proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale during the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 amounted to approximately $389.8 million (2007 — $3.1 million). The Corporation realized gross gains of approximately $6.9 million and approximately $0.2 million in gross losses for the first six months of 2008 (2007 — $0.2 million in gross realized gains and approximately $0.9 million in gross realized losses).
Investment Securities Held to Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows:
June 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Weighted | Gross | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | average | Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cost | gains | losses | value | yield% | cost | gains | losses | value | yield% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 100 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 100 | 2.36 | $ | 254,882 | $ | 369 | $ | 24 | $ | 255,227 | 4.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of other U.S. Government sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | 966,927 | 888 | 2,576 | 965,239 | 5.77 | 2,110,265 | 1,486 | 2,160 | 2,109,591 | 5.82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government obligations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 5 to 10 years | 17,608 | 520 | 103 | 18,025 | 5.85 | 17,302 | 541 | 107 | 17,736 | 5.85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | 13,895 | — | 1 | 13,894 | 5.50 | 13,920 | — | 256 | 13,664 | 5.50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations | 998,530 | 1,408 | 2,680 | 997,258 | 5.77 | 2,396,369 | 2,396 | 2,547 | 2,396,218 | 5.64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLMC certificates: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 1 to 5 years | 9,790 | — | 150 | 9,640 | 3.82 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 5 to 10 years | — | — | — | — | — | 11,274 | — | 116 | 11,158 | 3.65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA certificates: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 1 to 5 years | 9,001 | — | 125 | 8,876 | 3.88 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 5 to 10 years | 449,566 | — | 8,642 | 440,924 | 4.49 | 69,553 | — | 1,067 | 68,486 | 4.30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | 327,225 | — | 6,728 | 320,497 | 4.55 | 797,887 | 61 | 13,785 | 784,163 | 4.42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 795,582 | — | 15,645 | 779,937 | 4.50 | 878,714 | 61 | 14,968 | 863,807 | 4.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After 10 years | 2,000 | — | 180 | 1,820 | 5.80 | 2,000 | — | 91 | 1,909 | 5.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities held-to-maturity | $ | 1,796,112 | $ | 1,408 | $ | 18,505 | $ | 1,779,015 | 5.21 | $ | 3,277,083 | $ | 2,457 | $ | 17,606 | $ | 3,261,934 | 5.31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on contractual terms assuming no prepayments. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options.
16
Table of Contents
The following tables show the Corporation’s held-to-maturity investments’ fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
As of June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government sponsored agencies | $ | 733,251 | $ | 2,118 | $ | 11,200 | $ | 458 | $ | 744,451 | $ | 2,576 | ||||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government obligations | 13,894 | 1 | 4,315 | 103 | 18,209 | 104 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLMC | 8,971 | 128 | 669 | 22 | 9,640 | 150 | ||||||||||||||||||
FNMA | 52,390 | 909 | 717,907 | 14,586 | 770,297 | 15,495 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | — | — | 1,820 | 180 | 1,820 | 180 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 808,506 | $ | 3,156 | $ | 735,911 | $ | 15,349 | $ | 1,544,417 | $ | 18,505 | |||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government sponsored agencies | $ | 616,572 | $ | 1,568 | $ | 24,469 | $ | 592 | $ | 641,041 | $ | 2,160 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes | 24,697 | 24 | — | — | 24,697 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico Government obligations | 13,664 | 256 | 4,200 | 107 | 17,864 | 363 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLMC | — | — | 11,158 | 116 | 11,158 | 116 | ||||||||||||||||||
FNMA | — | — | 849,341 | 14,852 | 849,341 | 14,852 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds | 1,909 | 91 | — | — | 1,909 | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 656,842 | $ | 1,939 | $ | 889,168 | $ | 15,667 | $ | 1,546,010 | $ | 17,606 | |||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity securities in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2008 are primarily mortgage-backed securities and U.S. agency securities. The vast majority of them are rated the equivalent of AAA by major rating agencies. The unrealized losses in the held-to-maturity portfolio as of June 30, 2008 are substantially related to market interest rate fluctuations and not deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers; as a result, the impairment is considered temporary. Refer to the “Investment Securities Available-for-Sale” discussion above for additional information regarding recent concerns on certain government-sponsored agencies due to the troubled U.S. housing and mortgage markets. At this time, the Corporation has the intent and ability to hold these investments until maturity.
17
Table of Contents
5 — OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES
Institutions that are members of the FHLB system are required to maintain a minimum investment in FHLB stock. Such minimum is calculated as a percentage of aggregate outstanding mortgages, and an additional investment is required that is calculated as a percentage of total FHLB advances, letters of credit, and the collateralized portion of interest-rate swaps outstanding. The stock is capital stock issued at $100 par value. Both stock and cash dividends may be received on FHLB stock.
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Corporation had investments in FHLB stock with a book value of $80.6 million and $63.4 million, respectively. The estimated market value of such investments is its redemption value determined by the ultimate recoverability of its par value. Dividend income from FHLB stock for the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 amounted to $1.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, compared to $0.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2007.
The Corporation has other equity securities that do not have a readily available fair value. The carrying value of such securities as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $1.6 million. During the first quarter of 2008, the Corporation realized a one-time gain of $9.3 million on the mandatory redemption of part of its investment in VISA, Inc., which completed its initial public offering (IPO) in March 2008.
6 — LOAN PORTFOLIO
The following is a detail of the loan portfolio:
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Residential real estate loans, mainly secured by first mortgages | $ | 3,364,740 | $ | 3,143,497 | ||||
Commercial loans: | ||||||||
Construction loans | 1,467,544 | 1,454,644 | ||||||
Commercial mortgage loans | 1,324,509 | 1,279,251 | ||||||
Commercial loans | 3,502,929 | 3,231,126 | ||||||
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real estate mortgages | 591,674 | 624,597 | ||||||
Commercial loans | 6,886,656 | 6,589,618 | ||||||
Finance leases | 373,588 | 378,556 | ||||||
Consumer loans | 1,595,867 | 1,667,151 | ||||||
Loans receivable | 12,220,851 | 11,778,822 | ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses | (222,272 | ) | (190,168 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net | 11,998,579 | 11,588,654 | ||||||
Loans held for sale | 29,194 | 20,924 | ||||||
Total loans | $ | 12,027,773 | $ | 11,609,578 | ||||
The Corporation’s primary lending area is Puerto Rico. The Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiary (“First Bank” or “the Bank”) also lends in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands markets and in the United States (principally in the state of Florida). Of the total gross loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, of $12.3 billion as of June 30, 2008, approximately 80% has credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 12% in the United States (mainly in the state of Florida) and 8% in the Virgin Islands.
18
Table of Contents
The Corporation’s largest loan concentration of $360.9 million is with one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation, as of June 30, 2008. Together with the Corporation’s next larger loan concentration of $230.8 million with another mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, R&G Financial Corporation (“R&G Financial”), the Corporation’s total loans granted to these mortgage originators amounted to $591.7 million as of June 30, 2008. These commercial loans are secured by individual mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate.
7 — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
The changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as follows:
Quarter Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 210,495 | $ | 161,419 | $ | 190,168 | $ | 158,296 | ||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | 41,323 | 24,628 | 87,116 | 49,542 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs | (31,602 | ) | (22,419 | ) | (58,988 | ) | (45,596 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries | 2,056 | 1,381 | 3,976 | 2,767 | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 222,272 | $ | 165,009 | $ | 222,272 | $ | 165,009 | ||||||||
The allowance for impaired loans is part of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The allowance for impaired loans covers those loans for which management has determined that it is probable that the debtor will be unable to pay all the amounts due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, and does not necessarily represent loans for which the Corporation will incur a substantial loss. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, impaired loans and their related allowance were as follows:
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Impaired loans | $ | 335,523 | $ | 151,818 | ||||
Impaired loans with valuation allowance | 206,456 | 66,941 | ||||||
Allowance for impaired loans | 31,115 | 7,523 |
The Corporation identified in the first half of 2008 several commercial and construction loans amounting to $239.6 million that it determined should be classified as impaired, of which $188.6 million had a specific reserve of $27.4 million. At the same time, the Corporation’s impaired loans decreased by approximately $53.8 million during the first half of 2008 principally as a result of foreclosed loans in the Miami Agency with a principal balance of approximately $22.4 million which had a related impairment reserve of $4.2 million at the time of foreclosure and a loan sold in the Miami Agency that carried a principal balance of approximately $24.1 million with a related impairment reserve of $2.4 million at the time of sale. The latter was sold for $22.5 million during the second quarter of 2008.
Interest income in the amount of approximately $2.2 million and $1.1 million was recognized on impaired loans for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $7.9 million and $1.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The average recorded investment in impaired loans for the first six months of 2008 and 2007 was $205.8 million and $74.0 million, respectively.
19
Table of Contents
8 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
One of the primary market risks facing the Corporation is interest rate risk, which includes the risk that changes in interest rates will result in changes in the value of the Corporation’s assets or liabilities and the risk that net interest income from its loan and investment portfolios will change in response to changes in interest rates. The overall objective of the Corporation’s interest rate risk management activities is to reduce the variability of earnings caused by changes in interest rates.
The Corporation uses various financial instruments, including derivatives, to manage the interest rate risk related primarily to the values of its brokered certificates of deposit (“CDs”) and medium-term notes.
The Corporation designates a derivative as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or an economic undesignated hedge when it enters into the derivative contract. As of June 30, 2008, all derivatives held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated hedges. These undesignated hedges are recorded at fair value with the resulting gain or loss recognized in current earnings.
The following summarizes most of the derivative activities used by the Corporation in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate swaps — Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying notional principal amount. Since a substantial portion of the Corporation’s loans, mainly commercial loans, yield variable rates, the interest rate swaps are utilized to convert fixed-rate brokered certificates of deposit (liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in these variable rate loans. Similar to unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in fair value, net interest settlements on interest rate swaps are recorded as an adjustment to interest income or interest expense depending on whether an asset or liability is being economically hedged.
Interest rate cap agreements — Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value increases as the reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements to protect against rising interest rates. Specifically, the interest rate of certain private label mortgage pass-through securities and certain of the Corporation’s commercial loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the pass-through certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less a contractual servicing fee.
Indexed options — Indexed options are generally over-the-counter (OTC) contracts that the Corporation enters into in order to receive the appreciation of a specified Stock Index (e.g., Dow Jones Industrial Composite Stock Index) over a specified period in exchange for a premium paid at the contract’s inception. The option period is determined by the contractual maturity of the notes payable tied to the performance of the Stock Index. The credit risk inherent in these options is the risk that the exchange party may not fulfill its obligation.
To satisfy the needs of its customers, the Corporation may enter into non-hedging transactions. On these transactions, generally, the Corporation participates as a buyer in one of the agreements and as the seller in the other agreement under the same terms and conditions.
In addition, the Corporation enters into certain contracts with embedded derivatives that do not require separate accounting as these are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract. When the embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, it is bifurcated, carried at fair value, and designated as a trading or non-hedging derivative instrument.
20
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the notional amounts of all derivative instruments as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
Notional Amounts | ||||||||
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Economic undesignated hedges: | ||||||||
Interest rate contracts: | ||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed rate brokered certificates of deposit, notes payable and loans | $ | 1,829,801 | $ | 4,244,473 | ||||
Written interest rate cap agreements | 128,059 | 128,075 | ||||||
Purchased interest rate cap agreements | 283,770 | 294,982 | ||||||
Equity contracts: | ||||||||
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes payable | 53,515 | 53,515 | ||||||
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embedded stock index options | 53,515 | 53,515 | ||||||
$ | 2,348,660 | $ | 4,774,560 | |||||
The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative instruments and the location in the Statement of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||||||
As of | As of | As of | As of | |||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Fair | Fair | Balance Sheet | Fair | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||
Location | Value | Value | Location | Value | Value | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Economic undesignated hedges: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed rate brokered certificates of deposit, notes payable and loans | Other Assets | $ | 284 | $ | 213 | Accounts payable and other liabilities | $ | 32,650 | $ | 58,057 | ||||||||||||||
Written interest rate cap agreements | Other Assets | — | — | Accounts payable and other liabilities | 62 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchased interest rate cap agreements | Other Assets | 6,044 | 5,149 | Accounts payable and other liabilities | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity contracts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Embedded written options on stock index deposits | Other Assets | — | — | Interest bearing deposits | 1,723 | 4,375 | ||||||||||||||||||
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable | Other Assets | — | — | Notes payable | 2,729 | 4,673 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embedded stock index options | Other Assets | 4,706 | 9,339 | Accounts payable and other liabilities | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 11,034 | $ | 14,701 | $ | 37,164 | $ | 67,152 | |||||||||||||||||
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Income for the quarter and six-month periods ended on June 30, 2008 and 2007:
Unrealized Gain or (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Location of Unrealized Gain or (Loss) | Quarter Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
Recognized in Income on | June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed rate: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Brokered certificates of deposit | Interest Expense on Deposits | $ | (29,805 | ) | $ | (81,839 | ) | $ | 25,552 | $ | (62,057 | ) | ||||||||
Notes payable | Interest Expense on Notes payable and other borrowings | (247 | ) | 569 | (114 | ) | 1,054 | |||||||||||||
Loans | Interest Income on Loans | 2,548 | 1,518 | 40 | 1,278 | |||||||||||||||
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements — mortgage-backed securities | Interest Income on Investment Securities | 3,041 | 4,890 | 857 | 4,480 | |||||||||||||||
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements — loans | Interest Income on Loans | 54 | 159 | 23 | (132 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Equity contracts: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Embedded written and purchased options on stock index deposits | Interest Expense on Deposits | (129 | ) | 154 | (150 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Embedded written and purchased options on stock index notes payable | Interest Expense on Notes payable and other borrowings | (67 | ) | (145 | ) | 113 | (350 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Unrealized (Loss) Gain on derivatives | $ | (24,605 | ) | $ | (74,694 | ) | $ | 26,321 | $ | (55,728 | ) | |||||||||
21
Table of Contents
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. The Corporation’s derivatives are mainly composed of interest rate swaps that are used to convert the fixed interest payment on its brokered CDs and medium-term notes to variable payments (receive fixed/pay floating). As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the financial market’s expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield curve as well as the level of interest rates. The unrealized gains and losses in the fair value of derivatives that economically hedge certain callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes are partially offset by unrealized gains and losses on the valuation of such economically hedged liabilities that were elected to be measured at fair value under the provisions of SFAS 159. The Corporation includes the gain or loss on those economically hedged liabilities (brokered CDs and medium-term notes) in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the related derivatives as set forth below:
Quarter ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss | Gain | Net Unrealized | (Loss) / Gain | Gain | Net Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | on Derivatives | on SFAS 159 liabilities | Loss | on Derivatives | on SFAS 159 liabilities | (Loss) / Gain | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on Deposits | $ | (29,934 | ) | $ | 28,462 | $ | (1,472 | ) | $ | (81,685 | ) | $ | 75,607 | $ | (6,078 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense on Notes payable and other borrowings | (314 | ) | 2 | (312 | ) | 424 | 252 | 676 |
Six-Month Period ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain / (Loss) | (Loss) / Gain | Net Unrealized | (Loss) / Gain | Gain | Net Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
on Derivatives | on SFAS 159 liabilities | Gain | on Derivatives | on SFAS 159 liabilities | (Loss) / Gain | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on Deposits | $ | 25,402 | $ | (21,095 | ) | $ | 4,307 | $ | (62,058 | ) | $ | 56,398 | $ | (5,660 | ) | |||||||||
Interest expense on Notes payable and other borrowings | (1 | ) | 899 | 898 | 704 | 130 | 834 |
A summary of interest rate swaps as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 follows:
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Pay fixed/receive floating (generally used to economically hedge variable rate loans): | ||||||||
Notional amount | $ | 79,840 | $ | 80,212 | ||||
Weighted-average receive rate at period end | 4.39 | % | 7.09 | % | ||||
Weighted-average pay rate at period end | 6.76 | % | 6.75 | % | ||||
Floating rates range from 167 to 252 basis points over 3-month LIBOR | ||||||||
Receive fixed/pay floating (generally used to economically hedge fixed-rate brokered CDs and notes payable): | ||||||||
Notional amount | $ | 1,749,961 | $ | 4,164,261 | ||||
Weighted-average receive rate at period end | 5.32 | % | 5.26 | % | ||||
Weighted-average pay rate at period end | 2.82 | % | 5.07 | % | ||||
Floating rates range from 2 basis points to 54 basis points over 3-month LIBOR |
During the first half of 2008, approximately $2.4 billion of interest rate swaps were cancelled by the counterparties, mainly due to lower 3-month LIBOR. Following the cancellation of the interest rate swaps, the Corporation exercised its call option on approximately $2.4 billion swapped to floating brokered CDs. The Corporation recorded a net gain of $4.4 million as a result of these transactions resulting from the reversal of the cumulative mark-to-market valuation of the swaps and the brokered CDs called.
As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation has not entered into any derivative instrument containing credit-risk-related contingent features.
22
Table of Contents
9 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
Goodwill as of June 30, 2008 amounted to $28.1 million (December 31, 2007 — $28.1 million), recognized as part of “Other Assets,” resulting primarily from the acquisition of Ponce General Corporation in 2005. No goodwill impairment was recognized during 2008 and 2007.
As of June 30, 2008, the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of core deposit intangibles was $45.8 million and $20.0 million, respectively, recognized as part of “Other Assets” in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (December 31, 2007 — $41.2 million and $18.3 million, respectively). The increase in the gross amount from December 2007 relates to the acquisition of the Virgin Islands Community Bank on January 28, 2008. During the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the amortization expense of core deposits amounted to $0.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively. For each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the amortization expense of core deposits amounted to $1.7 million.
10 — DEPOSITS
The following table summarizes deposit balances:
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-interest bearing checking account deposits | $ | 690,451 | $ | 621,884 | ||||
Savings accounts | 1,252,217 | 1,036,662 | ||||||
Interest-bearing checking accounts | 616,152 | 518,570 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit | 1,868,615 | 1,680,344 | ||||||
Brokered certificates of deposit (includes $1,689,208 and $4,186,563 measured at fair value as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) | 7,100,349 | 7,177,061 | ||||||
$ | 11,527,784 | $ | 11,034,521 | |||||
The interest expense on deposits includes the valuation to market of interest rate swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs, the related interest exchanged, the amortization of broker placement fees related to brokered CDs not elected for the fair value option and changes in fair value of callable brokered CDs elected for the fair value option under SFAS 159 (“SFAS 159 brokered CDs”).
23
Table of Contents
The following are the components of interest expense on deposits:
Quarter ended | Six-month period ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on deposits | $ | 94,039 | $ | 125,690 | $ | 203,192 | $ | 248,054 | ||||||||
Amortization of broker placement fees (1) | 4,256 | 2,114 | 7,079 | 4,258 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense on deposits excluding net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives and SFAS 159 brokered CDs | 98,295 | 127,804 | 210,271 | 252,312 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives and SFAS 159 brokered CDs | 1,472 | 6,078 | (4,307 | ) | 5,660 | |||||||||||
Total interest expense on deposits | $ | 99,767 | $ | 133,882 | $ | 205,964 | $ | 257,972 | ||||||||
(1) | Related to brokered CDs not elected for the fair value option under SFAS 159. |
Total interest expense on deposits includes net cash settlements on interest rate swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs that for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 amounted to net interest realized of $12.9 million and $19.9 million, respectively (2007 — net interest incurred of $3.5 million for the second quarter and $7.3 million for the six-month period).
11 — FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED AND SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) consist of the following:
June 30, | December, 31 | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased, interest ranging from 4.50% to 5.12% | $ | — | $ | 161,256 | ||||
Repurchase agreements, interest ranging from 2.24% to 5.39% (2007 - 3.26% to 5.67%) | 3,999,590 | 2,933,390 | ||||||
Total | $ | 3,999,590 | $ | 3,094,646 | ||||
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements mature as follows:
June 30, | ||||
2008 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
One to thirty days | $ | 1,115,258 | ||
Over thirty to ninety days | 596,832 | |||
Over ninety days to one year | 200,000 | |||
One to three years | 787,500 | |||
Three to five years | 500,000 | |||
Over five years | 800,000 | |||
Total | $ | 3,999,590 | ||
24
Table of Contents
12 — ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK (FHLB)
Following is a detail of the advances from the FHLB:
June 30, | December, 31 | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Advances from FHLB, tied to 3-month LIBOR, with an average interest rate of 2.80% (2007 - 4.98%) | $ | 400,000 | $ | 400,000 | ||||
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB, with a weighted-average interest rate of 3.11% (2007 - 4.58%) | 1,060,000 | 703,000 | ||||||
Total | $ | 1,460,000 | $ | 1,103,000 | ||||
Advances from FHLB mature as follows:
June 30, | ||||
2008 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
One to thirty days | $ | 510,000 | ||
Over thirty to ninety days | — | |||
Over ninety days to one year | 514,000 | |||
One to three years | 215,000 | |||
Three to five years | 221,000 | |||
Total | $ | 1,460,000 | ||
13 — NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable consist of:
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Callable step-rate notes, bearing step increasing interest from 5.00% to 7.00% (5.50% as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007) maturing on October 18, 2019, measured at fair value under SFAS 159 | $ | 13,407 | $ | 14,306 | ||||
Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) linked principal protected notes: | ||||||||
Series A maturing on February 28, 2012 | 6,973 | 7,845 | ||||||
Series B maturing on May 27, 2011 | 7,564 | 8,392 | ||||||
$ | 27,944 | $ | 30,543 | |||||
25
Table of Contents
14 — OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings consist of:
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.75% over 3-month LIBOR (5.56% as of June 30, 2008 and 7.74% as of December 31, 2007) | $ | 102,999 | $ | 102,951 | ||||
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.50% over 3-month LIBOR (5.30% as of June 30, 2008 and 7.43% as of December 31, 2007) | 128,866 | 128,866 | ||||||
$ | 231,865 | $ | 231,817 | |||||
15 — INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. income tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income tax only on its income from sources within the United States or income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Any such tax paid is creditable, within certain conditions and limitations, against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability. The Corporation is also subject to U.S. Virgin Islands taxes on its income from sources within this jurisdiction. Any such tax paid is creditable against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (“PR Code”), First BanCorp is subject to a maximum statutory tax rate of 39%. The PR Code also includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that applies if the Corporation’s regular income tax liability is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and doing business through international banking entities (“IBEs”) of the Corporation and the Bank and through the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income taxation. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. Since 2004, IBEs that operate as a unit of a bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the IBEs’ net income exceeds 20% of the bank’s total net taxable income.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, the Corporation recognized an income tax benefit of $17.2 million, compared to an income tax expense of $12.4 million for the same period in 2007. The positive fluctuation on the financial results was mainly due to two non-recurrent transactions: (i) a reversal of $10.6 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (“UTBs”) during the second quarter of 2008 for positions taken on income tax returns recorded under the provisions of FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” as explained below, and (ii) the recognition of an income tax benefit of $5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury during the first quarter of 2008 that establishes a multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the payment of $74.25 million made by the
26
Table of Contents
Corporation during 2007 to settle the securities class action suit. Also, higher deferred tax benefits were recorded in connection with a higher provision for loan and lease losses, and the current income tax provision was lower, excluding the reversal of the FIN 48 contingency, due to lower taxable income.
As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation evaluated its ability to realize the deferred tax asset and concluded, based on the evidence available, that it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax asset will not be realized and, thus, established a valuation allowance of $6.6 million, compared to a valuation allowance of $4.9 million as of December 31, 2007. As of June 30, 2008, the deferred tax asset, net of the valuation allowance of $6.6 million, amounted to approximately $105.9 million compared to $90.1 million, net of the valuation allowance of $4.9 million as of December 31, 2007.
The Corporation adopted FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be taken on income tax returns. Under FIN 48, income tax benefits are recognized and measured based upon a two-step model: 1) a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits in order to be recognized, and 2) the benefit is measured as the largest dollar amount of that position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized in accordance with FIN 48 and the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit.
As of June 30, 2008, the balance of the Corporation’s UTBs amounted to $15.1 million (excluding accrued interest), all of which would, if recognized, affect the Corporation’s effective tax rate. The Corporation classifies all interest and penalties, if any, related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense. As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation’s accrual for interest that relates to tax uncertainties amounted to $6.0 million. As of June 30, 2008, there is no need to accrue for the payment of penalties. For the six-month periods ended on June 30, 2008 and 2007, the total amount of interest recognized by the Corporation as part of income tax expense related with tax uncertainties was $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The amount of UTBs may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons, including changes in the amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the statutes of limitations, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions. During the second quarter of 2008, the Corporation reversed UTBs by approximately $7.1 million and accrued interest of $3.5 million as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations for taxable year 2003. For the remaining outstanding UTBs, the Corporation cannot make any reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of future cash flows or changes, if any, associated with such obligations.
The Corporation’s liability for income taxes includes the liability for UTBs and interest which relate to tax years still subject to review by taxing authorities. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. The statute of limitations under the PR Code is 4 years, and under the Virgin Islands and U.S. income tax purposes is 3 years after a tax return is due or filed, whichever is later. The completion of an audit by the taxing authorities or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Corporation’s liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to results of operations for any given quarterly or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. All tax years subsequent to 2003 remain open to examination under the PR Code and taxable years subsequent to 2004 remain open to examination for Virgin Islands and U.S. income tax purposes.
16 — FAIR VALUE
Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurement,” which provides a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP.
The Corporation also adopted SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2007. SFAS 159 generally permits the measurement of selected eligible financial instruments at fair value at specified election dates. The Corporation
27
Table of Contents
elected to adopt the fair value option for certain of its brokered CDs and medium-term notes (“SFAS 159 liabilities”) on the adoption date.
Fair Value Option
Callable Brokered CDs and Certain Medium-Term Notes
The Corporation elected to account for at fair value certain financial liabilities that were hedged with interest rate swaps that were previously designated for fair value hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS 133. As of June 30, 2008, these liabilities included callable brokered CDs with an aggregate fair value of $1.69 billion and principal balance of $1.70 billion recorded in interest-bearing deposits, and certain medium-term notes with a fair value of $13.4 million and principal balance of $15.4 million recorded in notes payable. Interest paid on these instruments is recorded as part of interest expense and the accrued interest is part of the fair value of the SFAS 159 liabilities. Electing the fair value option allows the Corporation to eliminate the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 (e.g., documentation and effectiveness assessment) without introducing earnings volatility. Interest rate risk on the callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes measured at fair value under SFAS 159 continues to be economically hedged with callable interest rate swaps with the same terms and conditions. The Corporation did not elect the fair value option for the vast majority of other brokered CDs because these are not hedged by derivatives. Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation discontinued the use of fair value hedge accounting for interest rate swaps that hedged a $150 million medium-term note since the interest rate swaps were no longer effective in offsetting the changes in the fair value of the $150 million medium-term note and, as a consequence, the Corporation did not elect the fair value option for this note either. The Corporation redeemed the $150 million medium-term note during the second quarter of 2007.
Callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option are priced using observable market data in the institutional markets.
28
Table of Contents
Fair Value Measurement
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 | Level 1 assets and liabilities include equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. | |
Level 2 | Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for which the fair value is estimated based on the value for identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and (iii) derivative contracts and financial liabilities (e.g., callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes elected for fair value option under SFAS 159) whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. | |
Level 3 | Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. |
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value:
Callable Brokered CDs
The fair value of callable brokered CDs, which are included within deposits, is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the CDs. The valuation uses a “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach for the CDs with callable option components, an industry-standard approach for valuing instruments with interest rate call options. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the deposits.
Medium-Term Notes
The fair value of medium-term notes is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis over the full term of the borrowings. This valuation also uses the “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach to value the option components of the term notes. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of medium-term notes is computed using the notional amount outstanding. The discount rates used in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market
29
Table of Contents
prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes. Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation updated its methodology to calculate the impact of its own credit standing. The net gain from fair value changes attributable to the Corporation’s own credit to the medium-term notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option recorded for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The cumulative mark-to-market unrealized gain on the medium-term notes since the adoption of SFAS 159 amounted to $2.6 million as of June 30, 2008. For the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the difference in yield curves between Swap rates and Treasury rates at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the note and option.
Investment Securities
The fair value of investment securities is the market value based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices for similar instruments. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited market activity of the instrument.
Derivative instruments
The fair value of the derivative instruments was based on observable market parameters and take into consideration the Corporation’s own credit standing. Certain derivatives with limited market activity are valued using models that consider unobservable market parameters.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial liabilities for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
As of June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Assets/ (Liabilities) | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | at Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Callable brokered CDs (1) | $ | — | $ | (1,689,208 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1,689,208 | ) | ||||||
Medium-term notes (1) | — | (13,407 | ) | — | (13,407 | ) | ||||||||||
Securities available forsale (2) | 13,367 | 3,930,672 | 115,190 | 4,059,229 | ||||||||||||
Derivative instruments (3) | — | (32,110 | ) | 5,983 | (26,127 | ) |
(1) | Amounts represent items for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option under SFAS 159. | |
(2) | Carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159. | |
(3) | Derivatives as of June 30, 2008 include derivative assets of $11.0 million and derivative liabilities of $37.1 million, all of which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159. |
Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended | Changes in Fair Values for the Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant | June 30, 2008, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant | |||||||||||||||||||||||
to Election of the Fair Value Option | to Election of the Fair Value Option | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized Losses | Unrealized Losses | Total Changes in | Unrealized Losses | Unrealized Gains | Total Changes in | |||||||||||||||||||
and Interest | and Interest | Fair Value Unrealized Losses | and Interest | and Interest | Fair Value Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Expense | Expense | and Interest Expense | Expense | Expense | (Losses) Gains and Interest | |||||||||||||||||||
included in | included in | Included in | included in | included in | Expense Included in | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense | Interest Expense | Current-Period | Interest Expense | Interest Expense | Current-Period | |||||||||||||||||||
on Deposits (1) | on Notes Payable (1) | Earnings (1) | on Deposits (1) | on Notes Payable (1) | Earnings (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Callable brokered CDs | $ | (1,320 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1,320 | ) | $ | (99,992 | ) | $ | — | $ | (99,992 | ) | ||||||||
Medium-term notes | — | (211 | ) | (211 | ) | — | 474 | 474 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | (1,320 | ) | $ | (211 | ) | $ | (1,531 | ) | $ | (99,992 | ) | $ | 474 | $ | (99,518 | ) | ||||||||
(1) | Changes in fair value for the quarter and six- month period ended June 30, 2008 include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of $29.8 million, and $78.9 million, respectively, and interest expense on medium-term notes of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair value under the provisions of SFAS 159 are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income based on their contractual coupons. |
30
Table of Contents
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008.
Level 3 Instruments Only | Total Fair Value Measurements ( Quarter ended June 30, 2008) | Total Fair Value Measurements ( Six-month period ended June 30, 2008) | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Derivatives (1) | Securities Available For Sale (2) | Derivatives (1) | Securities Available For Sale (2) | ||||||||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 2,888 | $ | 119,051 | $ | 5,103 | $ | 133,678 | ||||||||
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized): | ||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings | 3,095 | — | 880 | — | ||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income | — | 3,025 | — | (7,607 | ) | |||||||||||
Principal repayments and amortization | — | (6,886 | ) | — | (10,881 | ) | ||||||||||
Ending balance | $ | 5,983 | $ | 115,190 | $ | 5,983 | $ | 115,190 | ||||||||
(1) | Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159. | |
(2) | Amounts mostly related to certain private label mortgage-backed securities. |
The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains recorded in earnings for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that are still held as of June 30, 2008.
Changes in Unrealized Gains | ||||||||
Level 3 Instruments Only | Quarter Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2008 | June 30, 2008 | ||||||
Changes in unrealized gains relating to assets still held at reporting date (1) (2): | ||||||||
Interest income on loans | $ | 54 | $ | 23 | ||||
Interest income on investment securities | 3,041 | 857 | ||||||
$ | 3,095 | $ | 880 | |||||
(1) | Amount represents valuation of interest rate cap agreements which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS 159. | |
(2) | Unrealized gain of $3.0 million and unrealized loss of $7.6 million on Level 3 available for sale securities were recognized as part of other comprehensive income for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008, respectively. |
31
Table of Contents
Additionally, fair value is used on a non-recurring basis to evaluate certain assets in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting (e.g., loans held for sale carried at the lower of cost or fair value and repossessed assets) or write-downs of individual assets (e.g., goodwill, loans).
As of June 30, 2008, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
Valuation | Losses recorded for | Losses recorded for | ||||||||||||||||||||||
allowance as of | the Quarter ended | the Six-month period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying value as of June, 2008 | June 30, 2008 | June 30, 2008 | ended June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable(1) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 175,341 | $ | 31,115 | $ | 21,896 | $ | 40,685 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for sale(2) | — | 29,194 | — | 457 | 457 | 457 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Real Estate Owned(3) | — | — | 38,620 | 2,563 | 522 | 843 |
(1) | Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” The fair values are derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable. | |
(2) | Fair value is primarily derived from quotations based on the mortgage-backed securities market. | |
(3) | The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable. Valuation allowance is based on market valuation adjustments after the transference from the loan to the Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) portfolio. |
During the first six months of 2008, the Corporation increased its OREO portfolio as a result of the repossession, in settlement of two of the impaired loans in the Miami Agency, of the associated collateral. As of June 30, 2008, the value of such properties amounted to $18.6 million, net of charge-offs of $4.2 million.
17 — SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Supplemental cash flow information follows:
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash paid for: | ||||||||
Interest on borrowings | $ | 367,767 | $ | 386,145 | ||||
Income tax | 2,082 | 3,255 | ||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
Additions to other real estate owned | 36,171 | 4,907 | ||||||
Additions to auto repossessions | 44,497 | 57,698 | ||||||
Capitalization of servicing assets | 515 | 595 | ||||||
Recharacterization of secured commercial loans as securities collateralized by loans | — | 183,830 |
On January 28, 2008, the Corporation completed the acquisition of the Virgin Islands Community Bank (“VICB”) with operations inSt. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, at a purchase price of $2.5 million. The Corporation acquired cash of approximately $7.7 million from VICB.
18 — SEGMENT INFORMATION
Based upon the Corporation’s organizational structure and the information provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker and, to a lesser extent, the Board of Directors, the operating segments are driven primarily by the Corporation’s legal entities. As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation had four reportable segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; and Treasury and Investments. There is also an Other category reflecting other legal entities reported separately on an aggregate basis. Management determined
32
Table of Contents
the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors such as the Corporation’s organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution channels and the economic characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of the reportable segments.
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s lending and other services for large customers represented by the public sector and specialized and middle-market clients. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash management and business management services. The Mortgage Banking segment’s operations consist of the origination, sale and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. In addition, the Mortgage Banking segment includes mortgage loans purchased from other local banks or mortgage brokers. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s consumer lending and deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan centers. The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the Corporation’s investment portfolio and treasury functions executed to manage and enhance liquidity. This segment loans funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their lending activities and borrows from those segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment also loans funds to other segments. The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments and the Consumer (Retail) Banking segments are allocated based on market rates. The difference between the allocated interest income or expense and the Corporation’s actual net interest income from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury and Investments segment. The Other category is mainly composed of insurance, finance leases and other products.
The accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those described in Note 1 of the Corporation’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 contained in the Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K.
The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based on net interest income after the estimated provision for loan and lease losses, non-interest income and direct non-interest expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average volume of their interest-earning assets less the allowance for loan and lease losses.
33
Table of Contents
The following table presents information about the reportable segments (in thousands):
Mortgage | Consumer | Commercial and | Treasury and | |||||||||||||||||||||
Banking | (Retail) Banking | Corporate | Investments | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
For the quarter ended June 30, 2008: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 47,455 | $ | 40,022 | $ | 85,666 | $ | 71,254 | $ | 32,211 | $ | 276,608 | ||||||||||||
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds | (35,066 | ) | 23,808 | (49,502 | ) | 64,451 | (3,691 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | (19,563 | ) | — | (114,004 | ) | (8,435 | ) | (142,002 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income | 12,389 | 44,267 | 36,164 | 21,701 | 20,085 | 134,606 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | (1,259 | ) | (14,414 | ) | (20,037 | ) | — | (5,613 | ) | (41,323 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-interest income (loss) | 853 | 6,674 | 1,137 | (587 | ) | 3,925 | 12,002 | |||||||||||||||||
Direct non-interest expenses | (6,125 | ) | (25,546 | ) | (8,099 | ) | (1,586 | ) | (11,400 | ) | (52,756 | ) | ||||||||||||
Segment income | $ | 5,858 | $ | 10,981 | $ | 9,165 | $ | 19,528 | $ | 6,997 | $ | 52,529 | ||||||||||||
Average earnings assets | $ | 2,909,308 | $ | 1,720,661 | $ | 5,992,390 | $ | 5,487,619 | $ | 1,357,393 | $ | 17,467,371 | ||||||||||||
For the quarter ended June 30, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 40,944 | $ | 46,506 | $ | 109,183 | $ | 76,148 | $ | 33,090 | $ | 305,871 | ||||||||||||
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds | (30,933 | ) | 26,202 | (72,460 | ) | 81,750 | (4,559 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | (19,921 | ) | — | (160,598 | ) | (8,137 | ) | (188,656 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income (loss) | 10,011 | 52,787 | 36,723 | (2,700 | ) | 20,394 | 117,215 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | (1,237 | ) | (12,091 | ) | (8,171 | ) | — | (3,129 | ) | (24,628 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-interest income (loss) | 372 | 6,275 | 1,272 | (1,297 | ) | 4,281 | 10,903 | |||||||||||||||||
Direct non-interest expenses | (5,114 | ) | (22,707 | ) | (3,658 | ) | (2,023 | ) | (11,230 | ) | (44,732 | ) | ||||||||||||
Segment income (loss) | $ | 4,032 | $ | 24,264 | $ | 26,166 | $ | (6,020 | ) | $ | 10,316 | $ | 58,758 | |||||||||||
Average earnings assets | $ | 2,527,577 | $ | 1,835,842 | $ | 5,401,162 | $ | 5,369,401 | $ | 1,307,741 | $ | 16,441,723 |
Mortgage | Consumer | Commercial and | Treasury and | |||||||||||||||||||||
Banking | (Retail) Banking | Corporate | Investments | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 92,560 | $ | 82,412 | $ | 179,746 | $ | 135,872 | $ | 65,105 | $ | 555,695 | ||||||||||||
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds | (69,146 | ) | 45,999 | (107,276 | ) | 135,109 | (4,686 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | (38,725 | ) | — | (240,675 | ) | (17,231 | ) | (296,631 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income | 23,414 | 89,686 | 72,470 | 30,306 | 43,188 | 259,064 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | (6,968 | ) | (28,989 | ) | (33,081 | ) | — | (18,078 | ) | (87,116 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 1,229 | 13,968 | 2,148 | 15,734 | 8,303 | 41,382 | ||||||||||||||||||
Direct non-interest expenses | (12,505 | ) | (53,115 | ) | (17,596 | ) | (3,436 | ) | (22,839 | ) | (109,491 | ) | ||||||||||||
Segment income (loss) | $ | 5,170 | $ | 21,550 | $ | 23,941 | $ | 42,604 | $ | 10,574 | $ | 103,839 | ||||||||||||
Average earnings assets | $ | 2,861,979 | $ | 1,732,717 | $ | 5,923,744 | $ | 5,297,547 | $ | 1,353,989 | $ | 17,169,976 | ||||||||||||
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 80,818 | $ | 93,638 | $ | 217,078 | $ | 148,352 | $ | 64,570 | $ | 604,456 | ||||||||||||
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds | (60,755 | ) | 54,161 | (145,129 | ) | 162,227 | (10,504 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | (39,084 | ) | — | (315,104 | ) | (15,618 | ) | (369,806 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income (loss) | 20,063 | 108,715 | 71,949 | (4,525 | ) | 38,448 | 234,650 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | (1,186 | ) | (27,687 | ) | (14,078 | ) | — | (6,591 | ) | (49,542 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-interest income (loss) | 1,154 | 15,143 | 2,016 | (3,316 | ) | 9,231 | 24,228 | |||||||||||||||||
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loan to a local financial institution | — | — | 2,497 | — | — | 2,497 | ||||||||||||||||||
Direct non-interest expenses | (10,361 | ) | (45,452 | ) | (9,508 | ) | (4,101 | ) | (22,736 | ) | (92,158 | ) | ||||||||||||
Segment income (loss) | $ | 9,670 | $ | 50,719 | $ | 52,876 | $ | (11,942 | ) | $ | 18,352 | $ | 119,675 | |||||||||||
Average earnings assets | $ | 2,493,630 | $ | 1,852,079 | $ | 5,446,161 | $ | 5,437,931 | $ | 1,287,627 | $ | 16,517,428 |
34
Table of Contents
The following table presents a reconciliation of the reportable segment financial information to the consolidated totals (in thousands):
Quarter Ended | Six-month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Net income: | ||||||||||||||||
Total income for segments and other | $ | 52,529 | $ | 58,758 | $ | 103,839 | $ | 119,675 | ||||||||
Other operating expenses | (29,007 | ) | (28,722 | ) | (54,459 | ) | (60,660 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income taxes | 23,522 | 30,036 | 49,380 | 59,015 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) | 9,472 | (6,241 | ) | 17,203 | (12,388 | ) | ||||||||||
Total consolidated net income | $ | 32,994 | $ | 23,795 | $ | 66,583 | $ | 46,627 | ||||||||
Average assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Total average earning assets for segments | $ | 17,467,371 | $ | 16,441,723 | $ | 17,169,976 | $ | 16,517,428 | ||||||||
Average non-earning assets | 759,060 | 684,398 | 712,651 | 600,243 | ||||||||||||
Total consolidated average assets | $ | 18,226,431 | $ | 17,126,121 | $ | 17,882,627 | $ | 17,117,671 | ||||||||
19 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Corporation enters into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include commitments to extend credit and commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value. As of June 30, 2008, commitments to extend credit amounted to approximately $1.7 billion and standby letters of credit amounted to approximately $100.3 million. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as the conditions established in the contract are met. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Generally, the Corporation’s mortgage banking activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its prospective borrowers.
As of June 30, 2008, First BanCorp and its subsidiaries were defendants in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the final disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial position or results of operations.
35
Table of Contents
20 — FIRST BANCORP (Holding Company Only) Financial Information
The following condensed financial information presents the financial position of the Holding Company only as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and the results of its operations for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 26,888 | $ | 43,519 | ||||
Money market investments | 40,250 | 46,293 | ||||||
Investment securities available for sale, at market: | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | — | 41,234 | ||||||
Equity investments | 1,647 | 2,117 | ||||||
Other investment securities | 1,550 | 1,550 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net | — | 2,597 | ||||||
Investment in FirstBank Puerto Rico, at equity | 1,422,132 | 1,457,899 | ||||||
Investment in FirstBank Insurance Agency, at equity | 5,982 | 4,632 | ||||||
Investment in Ponce General Corporation, at equity | 109,994 | 106,120 | ||||||
Investment in PR Finance, at equity | 2,678 | 2,979 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | — | 376 | ||||||
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust I | 3,093 | 3,093 | ||||||
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust II | 3,866 | 3,866 | ||||||
Other assets | 16,590 | 1,503 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,634,670 | $ | 1,717,778 | ||||
Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Other borrowings | $ | 231,865 | $ | 282,567 | ||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 1,112 | 13,565 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 232,977 | 296,132 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity | 1,401,693 | 1,421,646 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,634,670 | $ | 1,717,778 | ||||
36
Table of Contents
Quarter Ended | Six-month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Income: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income on investment securities | $ | 57 | $ | 852 | $ | 790 | $ | 1,435 | ||||||||
Interest income on other investments | 204 | 6 | 733 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Interest income on loans | — | 89 | — | 462 | ||||||||||||
Dividend from FirstBank Puerto Rico | 30,001 | 20,963 | 41,872 | 22,991 | ||||||||||||
Dividend from other subsidiaries | — | — | 2,500 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||
Other income | 93 | 141 | 213 | 279 | ||||||||||||
30,355 | 22,051 | 46,108 | 26,184 | |||||||||||||
Expense: | ||||||||||||||||
Notes payable and other borrowings | 3,126 | 4,670 | 7,389 | 9,340 | ||||||||||||
Interest on funding to subsidiaries | — | 843 | 550 | 1,708 | ||||||||||||
(Recovery) Provision for loan losses | — | — | (1,398 | ) | 1,320 | |||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 563 | 640 | 1,034 | 1,634 | ||||||||||||
3,689 | 6,153 | 7,575 | 14,002 | |||||||||||||
Net loss on investments and impairments | (489 | ) | (1,437 | ) | (489 | ) | (3,595 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to a local financial institution | — | — | — | (1,207 | ) | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries | 26,177 | 14,461 | 38,044 | 7,380 | ||||||||||||
Income tax (provision) benefit | (1 | ) | 1,212 | (546 | ) | 2,501 | ||||||||||
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries | 6,818 | 8,122 | 29,085 | 36,746 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 32,994 | $ | 23,795 | $ | 66,583 | $ | 46,627 | ||||||||
37
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except for per share and financial ratios)
(In thousands, except for per share and financial ratios)
Quarter ended | Six-month period ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
Condensed Income Statements: | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest income | $ | 276,608 | $ | 305,871 | $ | 555,695 | $ | 604,456 | ||||||||
Total interest expense | 142,002 | 188,656 | 296,631 | 369,806 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | 134,606 | 117,215 | 259,064 | 234,650 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | 41,323 | 24,628 | 87,116 | 49,542 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income | 12,002 | 10,903 | 41,382 | 26,725 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses | 81,763 | 73,454 | 163,950 | 152,818 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 23,522 | 30,036 | 49,380 | 59,015 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (provision) | 9,472 | (6,241 | ) | 17,203 | (12,388 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income | 32,994 | 23,795 | 66,583 | 46,627 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | 22,925 | 13,726 | 46,445 | 26,489 | ||||||||||||
Per Common Share Results: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income per share basic | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.32 | ||||||||
Net income per share diluted | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.32 | ||||||||
Cash dividends declared | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
Average shares outstanding | 92,505 | 83,254 | 92,505 | 83,254 | ||||||||||||
Average shares outstanding diluted | 92,708 | 83,876 | 92,650 | 83,757 | ||||||||||||
Book value per common share | $ | 9.21 | $ | 9.08 | $ | 9.21 | $ | 9.08 | ||||||||
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent): | ||||||||||||||||
Profitability: | ||||||||||||||||
Return on Average Assets | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.54 | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Spread (1) | 2.92 | 2.34 | 2.78 | 2.35 | ||||||||||||
Net Interest Margin (1) | 3.28 | 2.88 | 3.19 | 2.91 | ||||||||||||
Return on Average Total Equity | 9.16 | 7.16 | 9.26 | 7.45 | ||||||||||||
Return on Average Common Equity | 10.29 | 7.05 | 10.46 | 7.55 | ||||||||||||
Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets | 7.91 | 7.76 | 8.04 | 7.31 | ||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio | 28.25 | 42.46 | 27.88 | 44.00 | ||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio (2) | 55.77 | 57.33 | 54.57 | 58.47 | ||||||||||||
Asset Quality: | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans receivable | 1.82 | 1.47 | 1.82 | 1.47 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans | 0.97 | 0.75 | 0.91 | 0.77 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs | 139.86 | 117.06 | 158.36 | 115.67 | ||||||||||||
Non-performing assets to total assets | 2.65 | 1.91 | 2.65 | 1.91 | ||||||||||||
Non-accruing loans to total loans receivable | 3.67 | 2.81 | 3.67 | 2.81 | ||||||||||||
Allowance to total non-accruing loans | 49.56 | 52.29 | 49.56 | 52.29 | ||||||||||||
Allowance to total non-accruing loans, excluding residential real estate loans | 101.85 | 98.45 | 101.85 | 98.45 | ||||||||||||
Other Information: | ||||||||||||||||
Common Stock Price: End of period | $ | 6.34 | $ | 10.99 | $ | 6.34 | $ | 10.99 |
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||
Loans and loans held for sale | $ | 12,250,045 | $ | 11,799,746 | ||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses | 222,272 | 190,168 | ||||||
Money market and investment securities | 6,086,338 | 4,811,413 | ||||||
Total assets | 18,828,786 | 17,186,931 | ||||||
Deposits | 11,527,784 | 11,034,521 | ||||||
Borrowings | 5,719,399 | 4,460,006 | ||||||
Total common equity | 851,593 | 871,546 | ||||||
Total equity | 1,401,693 | 1,421,646 |
1- | On a tax equivalent basis (see “Net Interest Income” discussion below). | |
2- | Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. The denominator includes non-recurring income and changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and financial instruments measured at fair value under SFAS 159. |
38
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This discussion and analysis relates to the accompanying consolidated interim unaudited financial statements of First BanCorp and should be read in conjunction with the interim unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto.
First BanCorp’s results of operations depend primarily upon its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest-earning assets, including investment securities and loans, and the interest expense on its interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by various factors, including: the interest rate scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the re-pricing characteristics of these assets and liabilities. The Corporation’s results of operations also depend on the provision for loan and lease losses, non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy and other costs), non-interest income (mainly insurance income and service charges and fees on loans and deposits), the results of its hedging activities, gains (losses) on investments, gains (losses) on sale of loans, and income taxes.
Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 amounted to $33.0 million or $0.25 per diluted common share, compared to $23.8 million or $0.16 per diluted common share for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The Corporation’s financial performance for the second quarter of 2008, as compared to the second quarter of 2007, was principally impacted by the following factors: (1) an increase of $17.4 million in net interest income due to a decrease in the average cost of funds resulting from lower short-term interest rates coupled with changes in the mix and volume of the Corporation’s balance sheet, and (2) an income tax benefit of $9.5 million recorded for the second quarter, compared to an income tax expense of $6.2 million for the same period a year ago, mainly in connection to the reversal of $10.6 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (“UTBs”) for positions taken on income tax returns recorded under the provisions of Financial Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 48. These factors were partially offset by an increase of $16.7 million in the provision for loan and lease losses due to additional reserves allocated to certain impaired commercial and construction loans as well as increases to the reserve factors for potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio associated with weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the slowdown in the United States housing sector and the overall increase in the volume of the portfolio.
The highlights and key drivers of the Corporation’s financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 included the following:
• | Net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 was $134.6 million, compared to $117.2 million for the same period in 2007. The net interest spread and margin, on an adjusted tax equivalent basis, for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 were 2.92% and 3.28%, respectively, compared to 2.34% and 2.88%, respectively, for the same period in 2007. The increase in net interest income, spread and margin was mainly associated with a decrease in the average cost of funds resulting from lower short-term interest rates and changes in the mix and volume of the Corporation’s balance sheet. The current interest rate scenario has allowed the Corporation to replace brokered certificates of deposit (“CDs”) that matured or were called during 2008 with lower rates brokered CDs that are not hedged with interest rate swaps and, to a lesser extent, with other low cost borrowings such as Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances. Most of the brokered CDs called in 2008 were hedged with interest rate swaps. By reducing the exposure to swapped-to-floating interest rate swaps that hedge brokered CDs, the Corporation locked-in interest rates for longer periods, thus reducing interest rate risk. | ||
Furthermore, given market opportunities, the Corporation increased the volume of earning assets through the purchased, during the second quarter of 2008, of approximately $2.2 billion in U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) at an average yield of 5.50%, which is significantly higher than the cost of borrowings required to finance the purchase of such assets; thus contributing to a higher net |
39
Table of Contents
interest income. Average earning assets for the second quarter of 2008 increased by approximately $1.1 billion as compared to the same period in 2007. Refer to the “Net Interest Income” discussion below for additional information. |
• | For the second quarter of 2008, the Corporation’s provision for loan and lease losses amounted to $41.3 million, compared to $24.6 million for the same period in 2007. Refer to the discussion under the “Risk Management” section below for an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios. The increase in the provision for 2008 was primarily due to additional reserves allocated to certain impaired commercial and construction loans as well as increases to the reserve factors for potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio associated with the weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the slowdown in the United States housing sector. Additional specific reserves recorded during the second quarter of 2008 for new loans classified as impaired amounted to approximately $17.7 million. The growth of the Corporation’s residential and commercial mortgage loan portfolio also contributed to the increase in the provision for loan and lease losses. | ||
• | For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Corporation’s non-interest income amounted to $12.0 million, compared to $10.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. The increase in non-interest income was due to a combination of factors, including lower other-than-temporary impairment charges on equity securities, an increase in point of sale (POS) and ATM interchange fee income, and a recovery in value of servicing rights. Refer to the “Non Interest Income” discussion below for additional information. | ||
• | Non-interest expenses for the second quarter of 2008 amounted to $81.8 million, compared to $73.5 million for the same period in 2007. The increase in non-interest expenses for 2008 was mainly due to an increase of approximately $2.9 million in foreclosure-related expenses, mainly maintenance, insurance, repairs and legal expenses for foreclosed properties in the Miami Agency, an increase of $2.0 million in connection with the new assessment system adopted by the FDIC effective in 2007, an increase of $1.6 million in employees’ compensation and benefit expenses due to higher average compensation and related benefits and a $1.0 million increase in occupancy and equipment expenses to support the expansion of the Corporation’s operations. Refer to the “Non Interest Expenses” discussion below for additional information. | ||
• | For the second quarter of 2008, the Corporation’s income tax benefit amounted to $9.5 million, compared to an income tax expense of $6.2 million for the same period in 2007. The positive fluctuation on the financial results was mainly due to the reversal of $10.6 million of UTBs for positions taken on income tax returns recorded under the provision of FIN 48 because of the lapse of the statute of limitations. Also, higher deferred tax benefits were recorded in connection with a higher provision for |
40
Table of Contents
loan and lease losses and the current income tax provision was lower, excluding the reversal of the FIN 48 contingency, due to lower taxable income. |
• | Total assets as of June 30, 2008 amounted to $18.8 billion, an increase of $1.6 billion compared to total assets as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total assets is mainly attributed to the increase in the Corporation’s portfolio of investment securities caused by the purchase of approximately $3.2 billion of MBS during the first six months of 2008 as market conditions presented an opportunity for the Corporation to obtain attractive yields, improve its net interest margin and mitigate the impact of $1.2 billion of U.S. Agency debentures called by counterparties. Also, the increase in total assets, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007, was related to the increase in loan portfolio of $450.3 million (before the allowance for loan and lease losses) driven by new originations. | ||
• | As of June 30, 2008, total liabilities amounted to $17.4 billion, an increase of approximately $1.6 billion as compared to $15.8 billion as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total liabilities was mainly attributed to a higher volume of securities sold under repurchase agreements aligned with the increase in MBS. In addition, total liabilities increased due to a higher volume of deposits, an increase of $493.3 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007. Other sources of funding, including FHLB advances increased by $357.0 million, as compared to December 31, 2007, reflecting the use of alternative sources to replace brokered CDs that matured or were called and to finance lending activities. | ||
• | Total loan production for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 was $1.0 billion, compared to $932.8 million for the comparable period in 2007. The increase in loan production during 2008, as compared to the second quarter of 2007, was mainly due to increases in commercial and residential real estate mortgage loan originations of $141.2 million and $54.2 million, respectively. Among other things, residential mortgage loan originations in Puerto Rico were favorably affected by recent legislation approved by the Puerto Rico Government (Act 197) which provides credits when individuals purchase certain new or existing homes. Loan originations of the Corporation covered by Act 197 amounted to approximately $31.3 million for the second quarter of 2008. The increase in commercial and residential mortgage loan originations was partially offset by a lower loan production of consumer loans, which was negatively impacted by worsening economic conditions in Puerto Rico. | ||
• | Total non-performing loans as of June 30, 2008 amounted to $448.5 million compared to $413.1 million as of December 31, 2007. The increase in non-performing loans was mainly related to the commercial loan portfolio (other than construction loans) and the residential mortgage loan portfolio, which increased by $53.7 million and $21.2 million, respectively, partially offset by lower construction and consumer loans in non-accrual status. The increase in non-accruing commercial loans is related to continuing adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico that caused the classification as non-accrual during the first half of 2008 of several commercial loans originated in Puerto Rico, mainly secured by land and real estate properties,including $24.6 million of new commercial loans identified as impaired during 2008. Also, there was a classification as non-accrual during the second quarter of 2008 of a participation in a syndicated commercial loan in the U.S. Virgin Islands with a carrying value of $13.0 million as of June 30, 2008, net of a $9.1 million charge-off recorded in the second quarter of 2008. The charge-off was lower than the reserve amount of $11.9 million provided for during the first quarter of 2008, as the loss in this relationship will be lower than originally estimated given recent negotiations for the settlement of the loan. | ||
The decrease in non-accruing construction loans was principally related to the sale of one of the impaired loans in an impaired relationship in the Miami Agency. This relationship was originally identified as impaired during the second quarter of 2007 as reported in previous periodic filings of the Corporation. The loan’s carrying amount was $21.8 million (net of an impairment of $2.4 million) and was sold for $22.5 million. Also, during the 2008, the Corporation added approximately $18.6 million to its other real estate owned (OREO) portfolio, as a result of collateral repossessed in settlement of two other loans in this impaired relationship. As of June 30, 2008, and as a result of the transactions completed during the fourth quarter of 2007 and first half |
41
Table of Contents
of 2008, there were no outstanding loans associated with this relationship in the Miami Agency. The reduction to $18.6 million held in the OREO portfolio, net of charge-offs of $4.2 million, is a significant decrease in the balance of this impaired relationship from the $60.5 million balance when it was identified as impaired during the first half of 2007. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, the Corporation has identified interested purchasers for the two foreclosed properties. However, the Corporation cannot predict whether the properties will be ultimately sold to these parties. |
The decrease in non-accruing consumer loans resulted from successful collection efforts and net charge-offs of approximately $13.4 million and $27.3 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively. Consumer loans delinquencies have shown signs of improvement, particularly in the auto loan portfolio, and the net charge offs to average loans ratio on the consumer portfolio (including finance leases) improved during the quarter to 3.02% from 3.20% for the first quarter of 2008. |
Although the balance of non-accruing residential mortgage loans increased by $21.2 million due to adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007, this portfolio has remained stable since the end of the first quarter of 2008 due to improved collection efforts and, to some extent, the impact of loans modified through the loan loss mitigation program that were returned to accruing status as borrowers have made consistent payments over a sustained period. Refer to “Risk Management — Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets” section below for additional information.
42
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Practices
The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of applying these principles conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and to general practices within the banking industry. The Corporation’s critical accounting policies relate to the 1) allowance for loan and lease losses; 2) other-than-temporary impairments; 3) income taxes; 4) classification and related values of investment securities; 5) valuation of financial instruments; 6) derivative financial instruments; and 7) income recognition on loans. These critical accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the recorded assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities disclosed as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or conditions prevail. Certain determinations inherently have greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than those originally reported.
The Corporation’s critical accounting policies are described in the Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of First BanCorp’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes in the Corporation’s critical accounting policies since December 31, 2007.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by First BanCorp on its interest-earning assets over the interest incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. First BanCorp’s net interest income is subject to interest rate risk due to the re-pricing and maturity mismatch of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. Net interest income for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 was $134.6 million and $259.1 million, respectively, compared to $117.2 million and $234.7 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. On an adjusted tax equivalent basis, excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities, net interest income for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 was $144.5 million and $275.8 million, respectively, compared to $119.5 million and $241.3 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2007.
Part I of the following table presents average volumes and rates on an adjusted tax equivalent basis and Part II presents, also on an adjusted tax equivalent basis, the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of interest-related assets and liabilities have affected the Corporation’s net interest income. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior period rates) and, (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior period volumes). Rate-volume variances (changes in rate multiplied by changes in volume) have been allocated to the changes in volume and rate based upon their respective percentage of the combined totals.
The net interest income is computed on an adjusted tax equivalent basis (for definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure, refer to discussions below) and excluding: (1) the change in the fair value of derivative instruments and (2) unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities.
43
Table of Contents
Part I
Average volume | Interest income (1) / expense | Average rate (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter ended June 30, | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market investments | $ | 374,559 | $ | 424,877 | $ | 1,813 | $ | 5,288 | 1.95 | % | 4.99 | % | ||||||||||||
Government obligations(2) | 1,303,468 | 2,634,794 | 20,566 | 39,139 | 6.35 | % | 5.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 3,806,115 | 2,340,279 | 58,034 | 29,295 | 6.13 | % | 5.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 6,103 | 6,964 | 141 | 143 | 9.29 | % | 8.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB stock | 66,703 | 44,099 | 1,140 | 748 | 6.87 | % | 6.80 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 4,183 | 8,515 | — | 2 | 0.00 | % | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total investments(3) | 5,561,131 | 5,459,528 | 81,694 | 74,615 | 5.91 | % | 5.48 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans | 3,308,950 | 2,877,844 | 54,239 | 46,847 | 6.59 | % | 6.53 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Construction loans | 1,475,995 | 1,447,779 | 20,745 | 31,403 | 5.65 | % | 8.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans | 5,379,906 | 4,740,338 | 73,461 | 90,738 | 5.49 | % | 7.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Finance leases | 376,007 | 381,609 | 8,108 | 8,342 | 8.67 | % | 8.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans | 1,613,563 | 1,737,817 | 46,479 | 50,794 | 11.59 | % | 11.72 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total loans(4) (5) | 12,154,421 | 11,185,387 | 203,032 | 228,124 | 6.72 | % | 8.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | $ | 17,715,552 | $ | 16,644,915 | $ | 284,726 | $ | 302,739 | 6.46 | % | 7.30 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 11,045,132 | $ | 10,503,431 | $ | 98,295 | $ | 127,804 | 3.58 | % | 4.88 | % | ||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 3,724,955 | 3,648,460 | 32,351 | 46,449 | 3.49 | % | 5.11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances | 1,151,861 | 675,530 | 9,572 | 9,001 | 3.34 | % | 5.34 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities(6) | $ | 15,921,948 | $ | 14,827,421 | $ | 140,218 | $ | 183,254 | 3.54 | % | 4.96 | % | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 144,508 | $ | 119,485 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread | 2.92 | % | 2.34 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin | 3.28 | % | 2.88 | % |
Average volume | Interest income (1) / expense | Average rate (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market investments | $ | 402,774 | $ | 416,244 | $ | 5,072 | $ | 10,666 | 2.53 | % | 5.17 | % | ||||||||||||
Government obligations(2) | 1,786,011 | 2,681,953 | 57,711 | 79,480 | 6.50 | % | 5.94 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 3,102,385 | 2,361,926 | 92,025 | 59,268 | 5.97 | % | 5.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 6,185 | 6,983 | 282 | 288 | 9.17 | % | 8.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB stock | 64,274 | 42,817 | 2,261 | 1,202 | 7.07 | % | 5.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 4,186 | 10,368 | 11 | 3 | 0.53 | % | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total investments(3) | 5,365,815 | 5,520,291 | 157,362 | 150,907 | 5.90 | % | 5.51 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans | 3,249,913 | 2,840,729 | 105,959 | 92,368 | 6.56 | % | 6.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Construction loans | 1,474,252 | 1,466,238 | 44,465 | 63,216 | 6.07 | % | 8.69 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans | 5,301,551 | 4,755,577 | 158,901 | 180,703 | 6.03 | % | 7.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Finance leases | 377,004 | 375,825 | 16,396 | 16,579 | 8.75 | % | 8.90 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans | 1,633,598 | 1,755,532 | 94,535 | 102,480 | 11.64 | % | 11.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total loans(4) (5) | 12,036,318 | 11,193,901 | 420,256 | 455,346 | 7.02 | % | 8.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | $ | 17,402,133 | $ | 16,714,192 | $ | 577,618 | $ | 606,253 | 6.67 | % | 7.31 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 10,779,267 | $ | 10,462,227 | $ | 210,271 | $ | 252,312 | 3.92 | % | 4.86 | % | ||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 3,697,892 | 3,742,210 | 70,845 | 95,470 | 3.85 | % | 5.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances | 1,109,465 | 646,242 | 20,720 | 17,198 | 3.76 | % | 5.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities(6) | $ | 15,586,624 | $ | 14,850,679 | $ | 301,836 | $ | 364,980 | 3.89 | % | 4.96 | % | ||||||||||||
�� | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 275,782 | $ | 241,273 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread | 2.78 | % | 2.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin | 3.19 | % | 2.91 | % |
(1) | On an adjusted tax equivalent basis. The adjusted tax equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by (1 less Puerto Rico statutory tax rate of 39%) and adding to it the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. When adjusted to a tax equivalent basis, yields on taxable and exempt assets are comparable. Changes in the fair value of derivative and unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities are excluded from interest income and interest expense for average rate calculation purposes because the changes in valuation do not affect interest paid or received. | |
(2) | Government obligations include debt issued by government sponsored agencies. | |
(3) | Unrealized gains and losses in available-for-sale securities are excluded from the average volumes. | |
(4) | Average loan balances include the average of non-accruing loans, on which interest income is recognized when collected. | |
(5) | Interest income on loans includes $2.9 million and $2.4 million for the second quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $5.4 million and $5.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties and late fees related to the Corporation’s loan portfolio. | |
(6) | Unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities are excluded from the average volumes. |
44
Table of Contents
Part II
Quarter ended June 30, | Six-month period ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 compared to 2007 | 2008 compared to 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) | Increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due to: | Due to: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income on interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market investments | $ | (565 | ) | $ | (2,910 | ) | $ | (3,475 | ) | $ | (334 | ) | $ | (5,260 | ) | $ | (5,594 | ) | ||||||||
Government obligations | (20,470 | ) | 1,897 | (18,573 | ) | (28,387 | ) | 6,618 | (21,769 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 21,234 | 7,505 | 28,739 | 20,858 | 11,899 | 32,757 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | (20 | ) | 18 | (2 | ) | (36 | ) | 30 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB stock | 384 | 8 | 392 | 707 | 352 | 1,059 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | (10 | ) | 18 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Total investments | 562 | 6,517 | 7,079 | (7,202 | ) | 13,657 | 6,455 | |||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans | 6,941 | 451 | 7,392 | 13,506 | 85 | 13,591 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Construction loans | 493 | (11,151 | ) | (10,658 | ) | 435 | (19,186 | ) | (18,751 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans | 10,452 | (27,729 | ) | (17,277 | ) | 18,999 | (40,801 | ) | (21,802 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Finance leases | (136 | ) | (98 | ) | (234 | ) | 76 | (259 | ) | (183 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Consumer loans | (3,704 | ) | (611 | ) | (4,315 | ) | (6,823 | ) | (1,122 | ) | (7,945 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total loans | 14,046 | (39,138 | ) | (25,092 | ) | 26,193 | (61,283 | ) | (35,090 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest income | 14,608 | (32,621 | ) | (18,013 | ) | 18,991 | (47,626 | ) | (28,635 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | 5,635 | (35,144 | ) | (29,509 | ) | 7,432 | (49,473 | ) | (42,041 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other borrowed funds | 797 | (14,895 | ) | (14,098 | ) | (1,109 | ) | (23,516 | ) | (24,625 | ) | |||||||||||||||
FHLB advances | 5,159 | (4,588 | ) | 571 | 10,580 | (7,058 | ) | 3,522 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 11,591 | (54,627 | ) | (43,036 | ) | 16,903 | (80,047 | ) | (63,144 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Change in net interest income | $ | 3,017 | $ | 22,006 | $ | 25,023 | $ | 2,088 | $ | 32,421 | $ | 34,509 | ||||||||||||||
A portion of the Corporation’s interest-earning assets, mostly investments in obligations of some U.S. Government agencies and sponsored entities, generate interest which is exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. Also, interest and gains on sales of investments held by the Corporation’s international banking entities are tax-exempt under the Puerto Rico tax law. To facilitate the comparison of all interest data related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to a taxable equivalent basis. The tax equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by (1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate of 39.0%) and adding to it the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by the Puerto Rico tax law.
The presentation of net interest income excluding the effects of the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities provides additional information about the Corporation’s net interest income and facilitates comparability and analysis. The changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments and unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities have no effect on interest due or interest earned on interest-bearing liabilities or interest-earning assets, respectively, or on interest payments exchanged with swap counterparties.
45
Table of Contents
The following table reconciles interest income on an adjusted tax equivalent basis set forth in Part I above to interest income set forth in the Consolidated Statements of Income:
Quarter ended June 30, | Six-month period ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Interest income on interest-earning assets on a tax equivalent basis | $ | 284,726 | $ | 302,740 | $ | 577,618 | $ | 606,254 | ||||||||
Less: tax equivalent adjustments | (13,761 | ) | (3,436 | ) | (22,843 | ) | (7,424 | ) | ||||||||
Plus: net unrealized gain on derivatives | 5,643 | 6,567 | 920 | 5,626 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income | $ | 276,608 | $ | 305,871 | $ | 555,695 | $ | 604,456 | ||||||||
The following table summarizes the components of the changes in fair values of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, which are included in interest income.
Quarter ended June 30, | Six-month period ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges): | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate caps | $ | 3,095 | $ | 5,049 | $ | 880 | $ | 4,348 | ||||||||
Interest rate swaps on loans | 2,548 | 1,518 | 40 | 1,278 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) | $ | 5,643 | $ | 6,567 | $ | 920 | $ | 5,626 | ||||||||
The following table summarizes the components of interest expense for the quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. As previously stated, the net interest margin analysis excludes the changes in the fair value of derivatives and unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities.
Quarter ended June 30, | Six-month period ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 148,867 | $ | 177,147 | $ | 314,704 | $ | 352,868 | ||||||||
Net interest (realized) incurred on interest rate swaps | (12,905 | ) | 3,507 | (19,947 | ) | 7,347 | ||||||||||
Amortization of placement fees on brokered CDs | 4,256 | 2,114 | 7,079 | 4,258 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of placement fees on medium-term notes | — | 486 | — | 507 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense excluding net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges), net unrealized (gain) loss on SFAS 159 liabilities and accretion of basis adjustment | 140,218 | 183,254 | 301,836 | 364,980 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and SFAS 159 liabilities | 1,784 | 7,348 | (5,205 | ) | 6,887 | |||||||||||
Accretion of basis adjustment | — | (1,946 | ) | — | (2,061 | ) | ||||||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 142,002 | $ | 188,656 | $ | 296,631 | $ | 369,806 | ||||||||
46
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the components of the net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and net unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities which are included in interest expense.
Quarter ended June 30, | Six month period ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges): | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on brokered CDs | $ | 29,934 | $ | 81,685 | $ | (25,402 | ) | $ | 62,058 | |||||||
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on medium-term notes | 314 | 1,522 | 1 | 1,357 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) | $ | 30,248 | $ | 83,207 | $ | (25,401 | ) | $ | 63,415 | |||||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on SFAS 159 liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on brokered CDs | (28,462 | ) | (75,607 | ) | 21,095 | (56,398 | ) | |||||||||
Unrealized gain on medium-term notes | (2 | ) | (252 | ) | (899 | ) | (130 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized (gain) loss on SFAS 159 liabilities | $ | (28,464 | ) | $ | (75,859 | ) | $ | 20,196 | $ | (56,528 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and SFAS 159 liabilities | $ | 1,784 | $ | 7,348 | $ | (5,205 | ) | $ | 6,887 | |||||||
The following table summarizes the components of the accretion of basis adjustment which are included in interest expense for 2007:
Quarter ended June 30, | Six month period ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Accretion of basis adjustment: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps on medium-term notes | $ | — | $ | (1,946 | ) | $ | — | $ | (2,061 | ) | ||||||
Interest income on interest-earning assets primarily represents interest earned on loans receivable and investment securities.
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities primarily represents interest paid on brokered CDs, branch-based deposits, repurchase agreements and notes payable.
Net interest incurred or realized on interest rate swaps primarily represents net interest exchanged on swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes.
The amortization of broker placement fees represents the amortization of fees paid to brokers upon issuance of related financial instruments (i.e., brokered CDs not elected for fair value option under SFAS 159).
Unrealized gains or losses on derivatives represent changes in the fair value of derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps, that economically hedge liabilities (i.e., brokered CDs and medium-term notes) or assets (i.e., loans).
Unrealized gains or losses on SFAS 159 liabilities represent the change in the fair value of liabilities (medium-term notes and brokered CDs), other than the accrual of interests, for which the Corporation elected the fair value option under SFAS 159.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation discontinued the use of fair value hedge accounting under SFAS 133 for interest rate swaps that hedge the Corporation’s $150 million medium-term note. The Corporation’s decision was based on the determination that the interest rate swaps were no longer effective in offsetting the changes in the fair value of the $150 million medium-term note. The basis adjustment represents the basis differential between the market value and the book value of the $150 million medium-term note recognized at the inception of fair value hedge accounting on April 3, 2006, as well as changes in fair value recognized after the inception until the discontinuance of fair value hedge accounting on January 1, 2007, that was amortized or accreted based on the expected maturity of the liability as a yield adjustment. The $150 million medium-term note was redeemed prior to its maturity during the second quarter of 2007.
47
Table of Contents
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. While the Corporation does have certain trading derivatives to facilitate customer transactions, the Corporation does not utilize derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Corporation’s derivatives are mainly composed of interest rate swaps that are used to convert the fixed interest payments on its brokered CDs and medium-term notes to variable payments (receive fixed/pay floating). Refer to Note 8 “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for further details concerning the notional amounts of derivative instruments and additional information. As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the financial market’s expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of the values of derivative instruments on net interest income. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield curve as well as the level of interest rates.
Net interest income increased 15% to $134.6 million for the second quarter of 2008 from $117.2 million in the second quarter of 2007 and by 10% to $259.1 million for the first six months of 2008 from $234.7 million in the first half of 2007. First BanCorp’s net interest spread and margin, on an adjusted tax equivalent basis, for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 were 2.92% and 3.28% and 2.78% and 3.19%, respectively, compared to 2.34% and 2.88% and 2.35% and 2.91%, respectively, for the same periods in 2007. The increase in net interest income, spread and margin reflects the effect of both changes in interest rates and changes in the mix and volume of the Corporation’s balance sheet. The average rate paid by the Corporation on its interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 142 and 107 basis points during the second quarter and first half of 2008 when compared to same periods in 2007, mainly due to the decrease in short-term rates and its effect in the mix of borrowings. The decrease in short-term interest rates resulted in the call by counterparties of approximately $1.4 billion of interest rate swaps used by the Corporation to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs to a floating rate, during the second quarter of 2008 ($2.4 billion for the first half of 2008). Following the cancellation of these swaps, the Corporation exercised its call option on approximately $1.3 billion swapped-to-floating brokered CDs ($2.4 billion for the first half of 2008). The current interest rate scenario has allowed the Corporation to replace brokered CDs that matured or were called with brokered CDs that are not hedged with interest rate swaps and has lower rates than the brokered CDs that were hedged with interest rate swaps and, to a lesser extent, with other lower cost borrowings such as FHLB advances. This has reduced the overall cost of funding. By reducing the exposure to swapped-to-floating interest rate swaps that hedged brokered CDs, the Corporation locked-in interest rates for longer periods, thus reducing interest rate risk.
The drop in rates in the long end of the yield curve adversely affected interest income due to the early redemption through call exercises in the second quarter of 2008 of approximately $1.1 billion of U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 5.87% ($1.2 billion for the first half of 2008 with an average yield of 5.88%). In spite of this, and given market opportunities, the Corporation bought U.S. government sponsored agency MBS amounting to $2.2 billion at an average yield of 5.50% during the second quarter of 2008 ($3.2 billion at an average yield of 5.44% for the first half of 2008) which is significantly higher than the cost of borrowings used to finance the purchase of such assets. The increase in the volume of the investment portfolio also contributed to a higher net interest income during the first half of 2008 as reflected in the increase on the weighted-average yield of investment securities of 43 and 39 basis points during the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. Average earning assets increased by approximately $1.1 billion for the second quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007 and by $687.9 million for the first half of 2008,as compared to the same period a year ago.
Also, a lower overall average cost of funds is related to the repricing of borrowings as reflected to some extent by net interest settlement income of approximately $12.9 million and $19.9 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, compared to net interest settlement expenses of $3.5 million and $7.3 million,
48
Table of Contents
respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. Meanwhile, net interest income was adversely affected by lower yields in the loan portfolio attributed to the re-pricing of variable rate commercial and construction loans tied to short-term indexes, the increase in the balance of non-performing loans, and market disruptions in the U.S. mainland which have increased the spread between the interest rates on Brokered CDs and LIBOR/swap rates and have kept the Corporation from capturing the full benefit of the decrease in interest rates in the wholesale funding source.
As shown on the tables above, the results of operations for the second quarter and first half of 2008 and 2007 were impacted by changes in the valuation of derivative instruments that economically hedge the Corporation’s brokered CDs and medium-term notes and unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities. The change in the valuation of derivative instruments, net unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities and the basis adjustment (for 2007 results) recorded as part of net interest income resulted in a net gain of $3.9 million and $6.1 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, compared to a net gain of $1.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. The results for 2008 include a net gain of $4.0 million for the second quarter and of $4.4 million for the first half, resulting from the reversal of the cumulative mark-to-market valuation of swaps and brokered CDs called. During the first half of 2008, approximately $2.4 billion of interest rate swaps were cancelled by the counterparties, mainly due to lower 3-month LIBOR and the Corporation, following the swaps cancellation, exercised its call option on approximately $2.4 billion swapped to floating brokered CDs.
On an adjusted tax equivalent basis, net interest income, excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and unrealized gains and losses on SFAS 159 liabilities, increased by $25.0 million, or 21%, and $34.5 million, or 14%, for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. The increase in the adjusted tax equivalent net interest income was principally due to an increase in tax-equivalent adjustments and the above mentioned discussions about declining interest rates and changes in the mix and volume of the Corporation’s balance sheet. The adjusted tax equivalent basis includes an adjustment that increases interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans by an amount which makes tax-exempt income comparable, on a pre-tax basis, to the Corporation’s taxable income. For the second quarter and first half of 2008, tax-equivalent adjustments amounted to $13.8 million and $22.8 million, respectively, compared to $3.4 million and $7.4 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. The increase in tax-equivalent adjustments was mainly related to increases in the interest rate spread on tax-exempt assets due to the declines in short-term interest rates.
Provision and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that the Corporation considers adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is also based upon a number of additional factors including historical loan and lease loss experience, current economic conditions, the fair value of the underlying collateral and the financial condition of the borrowers, and, as such, includes amounts based on judgments and estimates made by the Corporation. Although the Corporation believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate, factors beyond the Corporation’s control, including factors affecting the economies of Puerto Rico, the United States (principally the state of Florida), the U.S. Virgin Islands and the British Virgin Islands may contribute to delinquencies and defaults, thus necessitating additional reserves.
For the quarter and six-month period ended on June 30, 2008, the Corporation provided $41.3 million and $87.1 million, respectively, for loan and lease losses, as compared to $24.6 million and $49.5 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2007.
49
Table of Contents
Refer to the discussions under “Credit Risk Management” below for an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios.
First BanCorp’s provision for loan and lease losses for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 increased by $16.7 million, or 68%, and by $37.6 million, or 76%, respectively, compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in the provision for the 2008 periods was primarily due to additional reserves allocated to certain impaired commercial and construction loans as well as increases to the reserve factors for potential losses inherent in the loans portfolio associated with the weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the slowdown in the United States housing sector. Increases to reserve factors due to economic conditions in Puerto Rico include higher provisions for the residential mortgage loan portfolio. Puerto Rico’s economy continued in a recession caused by, among other things, higher utilities prices, higher taxes, government budgetary imbalances and higher oil prices. The increase in non-accruing loans coupled with the growth of the Corporation’s commercial and residential mortgage loans portfolio also contributed to the increase in the provision for loan and lease losses.
The Corporation identified in the first half of 2008 several commercial and construction loans amounting to $239.6 million that it determined should be classified as impaired, of which $188.6 million had a specific reserve of $27.4 million. Refer to the discussion under “Credit Risk Management” below for additional information regarding the composition of impaired loans.
The increase in the provision for 2008 periods, as compared to 2007, also reflects higher reserve factors for the Miami Agency construction loan portfolio since the second half of 2007.
The Corporation maintains a constant monitoring of the Miami Agency portfolio. Recent loan reviews showed that the Miami Agency construction loan portfolio has an added susceptibility to current general market conditions and real estate trends in the U.S. market due to the overbuilding in certain areas and downward price pressures. Based on these factors and a detailed review of the portfolio, the Corporation determined it was prudent to further increase general provisions allocated to this portfolio.
Refer to the discussion under “Credit Risk Management” below for additional information concerning the economy in geographic areas where the Corporation does business and the Corporation’s outlook for the performance of its loan portfolio.
50
Table of Contents
Non-Interest Income
Quarter Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Other service charges on loans | $ | 1,418 | $ | 2,418 | $ | 2,731 | $ | 4,209 | ||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 3,191 | 3,185 | 6,555 | 6,376 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage banking activities | 804 | 351 | 1,123 | 1,113 | ||||||||||||
Rental income | 579 | 669 | 1,122 | 1,333 | ||||||||||||
Insurance income | 2,551 | 2,625 | 5,279 | 5,574 | ||||||||||||
Other operating income | 4,138 | 3,091 | 9,058 | 6,399 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income before net (loss) gain on investments, net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution and gain on sale of credit card portfolio | 12,681 | 12,339 | 25,868 | 25,004 | ||||||||||||
Gain on VISA shares | — | — | 9,342 | — | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) gain on sale of investments | (190 | ) | — | 6,661 | (732 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment on investments | (489 | ) | (1,436 | ) | (489 | ) | (2,863 | ) | ||||||||
Net (loss) gain on investments | (679 | ) | (1,436 | ) | 15,514 | (3,595 | ) | |||||||||
Gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution | — | — | — | 2,497 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio | — | — | — | 2,819 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 12,002 | $ | 10,903 | $ | 41,382 | $ | 26,725 | ||||||||
Non-interest income primarily consists of other service charges on loans; service charges on deposit accounts; commissions derived from various banking, securities and insurance activities; gains and losses on mortgage banking activities; and net gains and losses on investments and impairments.
Other service charges on loans consist mainly of service charges on credit card-related activities.
Service charges on deposit accounts include monthly fees and other fees on deposit accounts.
Income from mortgage banking activities includes gains on sales of loans and revenues earned for administering residential mortgage loans originated by the Corporation and subsequently sold with servicing retained. In addition, lower-of-cost-or-market valuation adjustments to the Corporation’s residential mortgage loans held for sale and servicing rights portfolio, if any, are recorded as part of mortgage banking activities.
Rental income represents income generated by the Corporation’s subsidiary, First Leasing and Rental Corporation, on the rental of various types of motor vehicles.
Insurance income consists of insurance commissions earned by the Corporation’s subsidiary, FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc., and the Bank’s subsidiary in the U.S. Virgin Islands, FirstBank Insurance V.I., Inc. These subsidiaries offer a wide variety of insurance business.
The other operating income category is composed of miscellaneous fees such as debit, credit card and point of sale (POS) interchange fees and check and cash management fees.
51
Table of Contents
The net gain (loss) on investment securities reflects gains or losses as a result of sales that are consistent with the Corporation’s investment policies as well as other-than-temporary impairment charges on the Corporation’s investment portfolio.
Non-interest income increased 10% to $12.0 million for the second quarter of 2008 from $10.9 million for the same period a year ago. This is due to a combination of factors, including lower other-than-temporary impairment charges on equity securities, an increase in POS and ATM interchange fee income and a recovery in value of servicing rights. For the second quarter of 2008, other-than-temporary impairment charges on investment securities amounted to $0.5 million, compared to a $1.4 million charge recorded for the same period a year ago. POS and ATM interchange fee income increased by approximately $0.7 million, based on a change in the calculation of interchange fees charged between financial institutions in Puerto Rico from the fixed fee calculation to a percentage of the sale amount since the second half of 2007. Recent increases in long-term rates and lower prepayment rates caused a recovery of $0.7 million in the value of servicing rights for the second quarter of 2008, as compared to $0.1 million for the comparable period a year ago. The above mentioned factors were partially offset by a decrease of $1.0 million in fees and service charges on loans primarily related to certain non-recurrent transactions recorded during the second quarter of last year including income of $0.5 million related to syndication fees on a commercial loan and fees of approximately $0.6 million in connection with a credit card portfolio interim servicing agreement. This interim servicing agreement was related to a credit card portfolio sold by the Corporation early in 2007.
First BanCorp’s non-interest income for the first half of 2008 amounted to $41.4 million, compared to $26.7 million for the same period in 2007. Aside from the items mentioned above, the increase in non-interest income was mainly attributable to a one-time gain of $9.3 million on the sale of part of the Corporation’s investment in VISA, Inc. in connection with VISA’s initial public offering, coupled with a realized gain of $6.9 million on the sale of approximately $242 million of 5.5% FNMA fixed-rate MBS during the first quarter of 2008. Also, on a comparative basis to the first half of 2007, non-interest income was favorably affected by the lower other-than-temporary impairment charges on investment securities which decreased to $0.5 million for the first half of 2008 compared to an impairment charge of $2.9 million recorded in the first half of 2007. The impact of these transactions is partially offset, when compared to the first quarter of 2007, by the recognition during the first quarter of 2007 of gains of $2.8 million on the sale of a credit card portfolio and of $2.5 million on the partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution.
52
Table of Contents
Non-Interest Expenses
The following table presents the detail of non-interest expenses for the periods indicated:
Quarter Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Employees’ compensation and benefits | $ | 34,994 | $ | 33,352 | $ | 71,320 | $ | 69,724 | ||||||||
Occupancy and equipment | 15,541 | 14,496 | 30,520 | 28,878 | ||||||||||||
Deposit insurance premium | 2,345 | 328 | 4,691 | 684 | ||||||||||||
Other taxes, insurance and supervisory fees | 5,588 | 5,124 | 11,252 | 10,041 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees — recurring | 3,620 | 3,343 | 8,180 | 6,745 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees — non-recurring | 1,299 | 2,265 | 1,798 | 5,260 | ||||||||||||
Servicing and processing fees | 2,381 | 1,656 | 4,969 | 3,375 | ||||||||||||
Business promotion | 4,802 | 4,864 | 9,067 | 9,794 | ||||||||||||
Communications | 2,250 | 2,169 | 4,523 | 4,397 | ||||||||||||
Foreclosure-related expenses | 3,172 | 266 | 6,428 | 541 | ||||||||||||
Other | 5,771 | 5,591 | 11,202 | 13,379 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 81,763 | $ | 73,454 | $ | 163,950 | $ | 152,818 | ||||||||
Non-interest expenses increased 11% to $81.8 million for the second quarter of 2008 from $73.5 million for the same period a year ago and by 7% to $164.0 million for the first half of 2008 from $152.9 million for the first half of 2007. Expenses increased primarily due to higher foreclosure-related expenses, deposit insurance premium payments, employees’ compensation and benefits and occupancy and equipment expenses partially, offset by a decrease in professional fees and in other operating expenses.
Foreclosure-related expenses increased by approximately $2.9 million and $5.9 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, as compared to the same periods a year ago mainly associated with repairs, maintenance, insurance and legal expenses for foreclosed properties in the Miami Agency and includes valuation adjustments and losses on sale of foreclosed properties amounting to approximately $0.7 million for the second quarter of 2008 on certain residential and commercial income properties in Puerto Rico.
Deposit insurance premium expense increased by $2.0 million and $4.0 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, as compared to the same periods a year ago because of the new assessment system adopted by the FDIC effective in 2007. The Corporation used available one-time credits to offset the premium increase during the first and second quarter of 2007.
Employees’ compensation and benefit expenses increased by $1.6 million for both the second quarter and first half of 2008, as compared to the same periods a year ago, primarily due to a higher average compensation and related fringe benefits, partially offset by a decrease in expenses related to the fair value of stock options granted to employees. During the first quarter of 2007, the Corporation recorded $2.8 million in stock-based compensation expense; no stock options were granted during 2008.
Occupancy and equipment expenses increased by $1.0 million and $1.6 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, as compared to the same periods a year ago primarily due to higher software and leasehold improvements amortization to support the expansion of the Corporation’s operations.
53
Table of Contents
Professional fees decreased by $0.7 million and $2.0 million during the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, as compared to the same periods a year ago. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower legal, accounting and consulting fees due to, among other things, the conclusion of the process to file all required reports under the federal securities laws and the settlement of legal and regulatory matters.
For the first half of 2008, other expenses decreased by $2.2 million, compared to the first half of 2007. The decrease reflects the impact of approximately $3.3 million in costs associated with capital raising efforts recorded in the first half of 2007.
Notwithstanding the above mentioned increases in non-interest expenses, the Corporation’s efficiency ratio for the second quarter and first half of 2008 was 55.77% and 54.57%, respectively, compared to 57.33% and 58.47% for the same periods a year ago, as the Corporation has been able to continue the expansion of its operations without incurring substantial additional operating expenses.
Provision for Income Tax
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. income tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income tax only on its income from sources within the United States or income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Any such tax paid is creditable, within certain conditions and limitations, against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability. The Corporation is also subject to U.S. Virgin Islands taxes on its income from sources within this jurisdiction. Any such tax paid is creditable against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (“PR Code”), First BanCorp is subject to a maximum statutory tax rate of 39%. The PR Code also includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that applies if the Corporation’s regular income tax liability is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and doing business through international banking entities (“IBEs”) of the Corporation and the Bank and through the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income taxation. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. Since 2004, IBEs that operate as a unit of a bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the IBEs’ net income exceeds 20% of the bank’s total net taxable income.
For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008, the Corporation recognized an income tax benefit of $9.5 million and $17.2 million, respectively, compared to an income tax expense of $6.2 million and $12.4 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2007. The positive fluctuation on the financial results was mainly due to two non-recurrent transactions: (i) a reversal of $10.6 million of UTBs during the second quarter of 2008 for positions taken on income tax returns recorded under the provisions of FIN 48, as explained below, and (ii) the recognition of an income tax benefit of $5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury during the first quarter of 2008 that establishes a multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the payment of $74.25 million made by the Corporation during 2007 to settle the securities class action suit. Also, higher deferred tax benefits were recorded in connection with a higher provision for loan and lease losses, and the current income tax provision was lower, excluding the reversal of the FIN 48 contingency, due to lower taxable income.
54
Table of Contents
During the second quarter of 2008, the Corporation reversed UTBs by approximately $7.1 million and accrued interest of $3.5 million as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations for taxable year 2003. The Corporation does not anticipate any significant changes to its UTBs within the next 12 months. The amount of UTBs may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons, including changes in the amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the applicable statute of limitations, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions.
As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation evaluated its ability to realize the deferred tax asset and concluded, based on the evidence available, that it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax asset will not be realized and, thus, established a valuation allowance of $6.6 million, compared to a valuation allowance of $4.9 million as of December 31, 2007. As of June 30, 2008, the deferred tax asset, net of the valuation allowance of $6.6 million, amounted to approximately $105.9 million compared to $90.1 million, net of the valuation allowance of $4.9 million as of December 31, 2007.
For additional information relating to income taxes, see Note 15 in the accompanying notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
55
Table of Contents
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING DATA ANALYSIS
Loan Production
First BanCorp relies primarily on its retail network of branches to originate residential and consumer loans. The Corporation supplements its residential mortgage loan originations with wholesale servicing released mortgage loan purchases from small mortgage bankers. The Corporation manages its construction and commercial loan originations through a centralized unit and most of its originations come from existing customers as well as through referrals and direct solicitations. For commercial loan originations, the Corporation also has regional offices to provide services to designated territories.
Total loan production for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 was $1.0 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively, compared to $932.8 million and $1.9 billion, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007. The increase in loan production was mainly due to increases in commercial and residential real estate mortgage loan originations. The increase in commercial and residential mortgage loan originations was partially offset by a lower loan production of consumer loans and finance leases, which was negatively impacted by worsening economic conditions in Puerto Rico.
The following table details the First BanCorp’s loan production for the periods indicated:
Quarter ended June 30, | Six-month period ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 205,542 | $ | 151,362 | $ | 391,360 | $ | 319,701 | ||||||||
Commercial and construction | 652,884 | 575,954 | 1,337,874 | 1,161,881 | ||||||||||||
Finance leases | 28,784 | 35,973 | 58,086 | 83,145 | ||||||||||||
Consumer | 140,064 | 169,473 | 277,637 | 342,788 | ||||||||||||
Total loan production | $ | 1,027,274 | $ | 932,762 | $ | 2,064,957 | $ | 1,907,515 | ||||||||
Residential Real Estate Loans
Residential mortgage loan production for the second quarter and first half of 2008 increased by $54.2 million, or 36%, and $71.7 million, or 22%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. These loans are mainly fully amortizing fixed-rate loans. The residential mortgage loan production was favorably affected by recent legislation approved by the Puerto Rico Government (Act 197) which provides credits to lenders and borrowers when individuals purchase certain new or existing homes.
The incentives are as follows: (a) for a new constructed home that will constitute the individual’s principal residence, a credit equal to 20% of the sales price or $25,000, whichever is lower; (b) for new constructed homes that will not constitute the individuals principal residence, a credit of 10% of the sales price or $15,000, whichever is lower; and (c) for existing homes, a credit of 10% of the sales price or $10,000, whichever is lower.
From the homebuyer’s perspective: (1) the individual may benefit from the credit no more than twice; (2) the amount of credit granted will be credited against the principal amount of the mortgage; (3) the individual must acquire the property before December 31, 2008; and (4) for new constructed homes constituting the principal residence and existing homes, the individual must live in it as his or her principal residence for at least three consecutive years. Noncompliance with this requirement will affect only the homebuyer’s credit and not the tax credit granted to the financial institution.
56
Table of Contents
From the financial institution’s perspective: (1) the credit may be used against income taxes, including estimated taxes, for years commencing after December 31, 2007 in three installments, subject to certain limitations, between January 1, 2008 and June 30, 2011; (2) the credit may be ceded, sold or otherwise transferred to any other person; and (3) any tax credit not used in a given tax year, as certified by the Secretary of Treasury, may be claimed as a refund.
Loan originations of the Corporation covered by Act 197 amounted to approximately $31.3 million and $62.7 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively. Residential mortgage loan originations increase was also related to higher purchases, which amounted to $57.7 million and $116.9 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, compared to $49.7 million and $99.5 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2007.
Residential real estate loans represent 19% of total loans originated and purchased for the first half of 2008. The Corporation’s strategy is to penetrate markets by providing customers with a variety of high quality mortgage products. The Corporation’s residential mortgage loan originations continued to be driven by FirstMortgage, its mortgage loan origination subsidiary. The Corporation continues to commit substantial resources to this operation with the goal of becoming a leading institution in the highly competitive residential mortgage loans market. FirstMortgage supplements its internal direct originations through its retail network with an indirect business strategy. The Corporation’s Partners in Business, a division of FirstMortgage, partners with mortgage brokers and small mortgage bankers in Puerto Rico to purchase ongoing mortgage loan production. FirstMortgage Realty Group focuses on building relationships with realtors by providing resources, office amenities and personnel to assist real estate brokers in building their individual businesses and closing transactions. FirstMortgage’s multi-channel strategy has proven to be effective in capturing business.
Commercial and Construction Loans
Commercial and construction loan production for the second quarter and first half of 2008 increased by $76.9 million, or 13%, and by $176.0 million, or 15%, compared to the same periods in 2007. The increase in commercial and construction loan production was experienced in both geographic segments, Puerto Rico and Miami. Commercial loans originations in Puerto Rico increased by approximately $226.5 million for the first half of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, and in the Miami Agency increased by $61.1 million driven by a commercial loan secured by real estate amounting to $52.5 million to finance the acquisition of a commercial office complex. This was partially offset by lower construction loan originations in the Miami Agency, which decreased by $74.2 million for the first half of 2008, as compared to the first half of 2007 due to the slowdown in the U.S. housing market and the strategic decision by the Corporation to reduce its exposure to condo-conversion loans in the Miami Agency. Also, there was a decrease in construction loan originations in Puerto Rico due to current weakening economic conditions.
Commercial loan originations come from existing customers as well as through referrals and direct solicitations. The Corporation follows a strategy aimed to cater to customer needs in the commercial loans middle-market segment by building strong relationships and offering financial solutions that meet customers’ unique needs. The Corporation has expanded its distribution network and participation in the commercial loans middle-market segment by focusing on customers with financing needs in amounts up to $5 million. The Corporation established 5 regional offices that provide coverage throughout Puerto Rico. The offices are staffed with sales, marketing and credit officers able to provide a high level of personalized service and prompt decision-making.
Consumer Loans
Consumer loan originations are principally driven through the Corporation’s retail network. For the second quarter and first half of 2008, consumer loan originations decreased by $29.4 million, or 17%, and by
57
Table of Contents
$65.2 million, or 19%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007. The decrease in consumer loan originations was mainly due to adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico.
Finance Leases
For the second quarter and first half of 2008, finance lease originations, which are mostly composed of loans to individuals to finance the acquisition of a motor vehicle, decreased by $7.2 million, or 20%, and by $25.1 million, or 30%, as compared to the same periods in 2007 also affected by adverse economic condition in Puerto Rico.
Assets
Total assets as of June 30, 2008 amounted to $18.8 billion as compared to $17.2 billion as of December 31, 2007, an increase of $1.6 billion. This is mainly attributable to the increase in the Corporation’s portfolio of MBS resulting from the aforementioned purchase of approximately $3.2 billion during the first half of 2008 as market conditions presented an opportunity for the Corporation to obtain attractive yields, improve its net interest margin and mitigate the impact of $1.2 billion U.S. Agency debentures called by counterparties. Also, the increase in total assets, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007, was related to the increase in the loan portfolio of $450.3 million (before allowance for loan and lease losses) driven by new originations.
Loan Portfolio
The composition of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, for the periods indicated is as follows:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Residential real estate loans | $ | 3,393,934 | $ | 3,164,421 | ||||
Commercial loans: | ||||||||
Construction loans | 1,467,544 | 1,454,644 | ||||||
Commercial real estate loans | 1,324,509 | 1,279,251 | ||||||
Commercial loans | 3,502,929 | 3,231,126 | ||||||
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real estate mortgages | 591,674 | 624,597 | ||||||
Commercial loans | 6,886,656 | 6,589,618 | ||||||
Finance leases | 373,588 | 378,556 | ||||||
Consumer and other loans | 1,595,867 | 1,667,151 | ||||||
Total loans | $ | 12,250,045 | $ | 11,799,746 | ||||
As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation’s total loans increased by $450.3 million, when compared with the balance as of December 31, 2007. The increase in the Corporation’s total loans primarily relates to new loans originated, in particular residential real estate and commercial loans.
58
Table of Contents
Of the total gross loan portfolio of $12.3 billion as of June 30, 2008, approximately 80% has credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 12% in the United States (mainly in the state of Florida) and 8% in the Virgin Islands, as shown in the following table.
Puerto | Virgin | United | ||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2008 | Rico | Islands | States | Total | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans, including loans held for sale | $ | 2,534,253 | $ | 461,157 | $ | 398,524 | $ | 3,393,934 | ||||||||
Construction loans (1) | 725,778 | 158,650 | 583,116 | 1,467,544 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans | 838,986 | 61,341 | 424,182 | 1,324,509 | ||||||||||||
Commercial loans | 3,332,846 | 136,626 | 33,457 | 3,502,929 | ||||||||||||
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real estate mortgages | 591,674 | — | — | 591,674 | ||||||||||||
Total commercial loans | 5,489,284 | 356,617 | 1,040,755 | 6,886,656 | ||||||||||||
Finance leases | 373,588 | — | — | 373,588 | ||||||||||||
Consumer loans | 1,417,815 | 133,241 | 44,811 | 1,595,867 | ||||||||||||
Total loans, gross | $ | 9,814,940 | $ | 951,015 | $ | 1,484,090 | $ | 12,250,045 | ||||||||
(1) | United States construction loans include approximately $250.4 million of condo-conversion loans originated by the Miami Agency. |
Residential Real Estate Loans
As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation’s residential real estate loan portfolio increased by $229.5 million, or 7%, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007. The Corporation has diversified its loan portfolio by increasing the concentration of residential real estate loans. More than 90% of the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full documentation loans. In accordance with the Corporation’s underwriting guidelines, residential real estate loans are mostly fully documented loans, and the Corporation is not actively involved in the origination and purchase of negative amortization loans or adjustable-rate mortgage loans.
Commercial and Construction Loans
As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation’s commercial and construction loan portfolio increased by $297.0 million, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007. The Corporation has been able to grow its portfolio with new originations from corporate customers as well as commercial real estate and construction loans. A substantial portion of this portfolio is collateralized by real estate. The Corporation’s commercial loans are primarily variable- and adjustable-rate loans.
The Corporation’s largest loan concentration of $360.9 million is with one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation, as of June 30, 2008. Together with the Corporation’s next larger loan concentration of $230.8 million with another mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, R&G Financial Corporation (“R&G Financial”), the Corporation’s total loans granted to these mortgage originators amounted to $591.7 million as of June 30, 2008. These commercial loans are secured by individual mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate. In December 2005, the Corporation obtained a waiver from the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico with respect to the statutory limit for individual borrowers (loans-to-one borrower limit). The Corporation has continued working on the reduction of its exposure to both financial institutions.
59
Table of Contents
The Corporation’s construction lending volume has decreased due to the slowdown in the U.S. housing market and the current economic environment in Puerto Rico. The Corporation has reduced its exposure to condo-conversion loans in the Miami Agency and is closely evaluating market conditions and opportunities in Puerto Rico. The composition of the Corporation’s construction loan portfolio as of June 30, 2008 by category and geographic location follows:
Puerto | Virgin | United | ||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2008 | Rico | Islands | States | Total | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Loans for residential housing projects: | ||||||||||||||||
High-Rise (1) | $ | 158,961 | $ | — | $ | 559 | $ | 159,520 | ||||||||
Mid-Rise (2) | 114,630 | 3,687 | 43,412 | 161,729 | ||||||||||||
Single-Family detach | 93,182 | 2,341 | 49,406 | 144,929 | ||||||||||||
Total for residential housing projects | 366,773 | 6,028 | 93,377 | 466,178 | ||||||||||||
Construction loans to individual secured by residential properties | 16,043 | 38,760 | — | 54,803 | ||||||||||||
Condo-conversion loans | — | — | 250,375 | 250,375 | ||||||||||||
Loans for commercial projects | 152,788 | 75,786 | 33,794 | 262,368 | ||||||||||||
Bridge and Land loans | 162,469 | 38,677 | 205,837 | 406,983 | ||||||||||||
Working Capital | 30,603 | 1 | — | 30,604 | ||||||||||||
Total before net deferred fees and allowance for loan losses | 728,676 | 159,252 | 583,383 | 1,471,311 | ||||||||||||
Net deferred fees | (2,898 | ) | (602 | ) | (267 | ) | (3,767 | ) | ||||||||
Total construction loan portfolio, gross | $ | 725,778 | $ | 158,650 | $ | 583,116 | $ | 1,467,544 | ||||||||
(1) | For purposes of the table above, high-rise portfolio is composed of buildings with more than 7 stories. As of June 30, 2008 is mainly composed of two projects that represent approximately 77% of the Corporation’s total outstanding high-rise residential construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico. | |
(2) | Mid-rise relates to buildings up to 7 stories. |
The following table presents further information on the Corporation’s construction portfolio as of and for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008:
(In thousands) | ||||
Total undisbursed funds under existing commitments | $ | 401,775 | ||
Construction loans in non-accrual status | $ | 49,283 | ||
Net charge offs — Construction loans (1) | $ | 6,311 | ||
Allowance for loan losses — Construction loans | $ | 46,120 | ||
Non-performing construction loans to total construction loans | 3.36 | % | ||
Allowance for loan losses — construction loans to total construction loans | 3.14 | % | ||
Net charge-offs (annualized) to total average construction loans (1) | 0.86 | % | ||
(1) | Includes charge-offs of $6.2 million related to the repossession and sale of impaired loans in the Miami Agency |
The following summarizes the construction loans for residential housing projects in Puerto Rico segregated by the estimated selling price of the units:
(In thousands) | ||||
Under $300K | $ | 56,195 | ||
$300K-$600k | 179,268 | |||
Over $600k | 131,310 | |||
$ | 366,773 | |||
Consumer Loans
As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation’s consumer loan portfolio decreased by $71.3 million, as compared to the portfolio balance as of December 31, 2007. This is mainly the result of decreases in the Corporation’s auto and personal loan portfolios, which in turn is mainly the result of repayments and charge-offs that on a combined basis more than offset the volume of loan originations during the first half of 2008. Notwithstanding, the Corporation experienced a decrease in net charge-offs for consumer loans which amounted to $27.3 million for the first half of 2008, as compared to $32.2 million for the same period a year ago.
60
Table of Contents
Finance Leases
As of June 30, 2008, finance leases, which are mostly composed of loans to individuals to finance the acquisition of a motor vehicle, decreased by $5.0 million as compared to the portfolio balance as of December 31, 2007. These leases typically have five-year terms and are collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets.
Investment Activities
As part of its strategy to diversify its revenue sources and maximize its net interest income, First BanCorp maintains an investment portfolio that is classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. The Corporation’s investment portfolio, other than short-term money market investments, as of June 30, 2008 amounted to $5.9 billion, an increase of $1.3 billion when compared with the investment portfolio as of December 31, 2007. The increase in investment securities was mainly due to the previously discussed purchase of approximately $3.2 billion during the first half of 2008 as market conditions presented an opportunity for the Corporation to obtain attractive yields, improve its net interest margin and mitigate the impact of $1.2 billion U.S. Agency debentures called by counterparties. The Corporation also sold approximately $242 million of MBS in the first quarter of 2008 as a spike and subsequent contraction in the yield spread during the first quarter provided an opportunity to sell the MBS at a gain.
The following table presents the carrying value of investments at the indicated dates:
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Money market investments | $ | 148,871 | $ | 183,136 | ||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity: | ||||||||
U.S. Government and agencies obligations | 967,027 | 2,365,147 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Government obligations | 31,503 | 31,222 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 795,582 | 878,714 | ||||||
Corporate bonds | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||||
1,796,112 | 3,277,083 | |||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale: | ||||||||
U.S. Government and agencies obligations | 8,315 | 16,032 | ||||||
Puerto Rico Government obligations | 39,039 | 24,521 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 4,006,823 | 1,239,169 | ||||||
Corporate bonds | 3,406 | 4,448 | ||||||
Equity securities | 1,646 | 2,116 | ||||||
4,059,229 | 1,286,286 | |||||||
Other equity securities | 82,126 | 64,908 | ||||||
Total investments | $ | 6,086,338 | $ | 4,811,413 | ||||
61
Table of Contents
Mortgage-backed securities at the indicated dates consist of:
As of | As of | |||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Held-to-maturity | ||||||||
FHLMC certificates | $ | 9,790 | $ | 11,274 | ||||
FNMA certificates | 785,792 | 867,440 | ||||||
795,582 | 878,714 | |||||||
Available-for-sale | ||||||||
FHLMC certificates | 1,956,343 | 158,953 | ||||||
GNMA certificates | 342,756 | 44,340 | ||||||
FNMA certificates | 1,592,534 | 902,198 | ||||||
Mortgage pass-through certificates | 115,190 | 133,678 | ||||||
4,006,823 | 1,239,169 | |||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 4,802,405 | $ | 2,117,883 | ||||
The carrying values of investment securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity as of June 30, 2008 by contractual maturity (excluding mortgage-backed securities and equity securities) are shown below:
Carrying | Weighted | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | amount | average yield % | ||||||
U.S. Government and agencies obligations | ||||||||
Due within one year | $ | 8,415 | 1.12 | |||||
Due after ten years | 966,927 | 5.77 | ||||||
975,342 | 5.73 | |||||||
Puerto Rico Government obligations | ||||||||
Due within one year | 391 | 6.63 | ||||||
Due after one year through five years | 13,485 | 4.96 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years | 25,039 | 5.80 | ||||||
Due after ten years | 31,627 | 5.39 | ||||||
70,542 | 5.46 | |||||||
Corporate bonds | ||||||||
Due after five years through ten years | 790 | 7.70 | ||||||
Due after ten years | 4,616 | 7.03 | ||||||
5,406 | 7.13 | |||||||
Total | 1,051,290 | 5.72 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 4,802,405 | 5.28 | ||||||
Equity securities | 1,646 | — | ||||||
Total investment securities — available-for-sale and held-to-maturity | $ | 5,855,341 | 5.36 | |||||
62
Table of Contents
Net interest income of future periods may be affected by the acceleration in prepayments of mortgage-backed securities. Acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would lower yields on securities purchased at a premium, as the amortization of premiums paid upon acquisition of these securities would accelerate. Conversely, acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would increase yields on securities purchased at a discount, as the amortization of the discount would accelerate. Also, net interest income in future periods might be affected by the Corporation’s investment in callable securities. Approximately $1.2 billion of U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 5.88% were called during the first half of 2008, however, given market opportunities, the Corporation bought U.S. government sponsored agency MBS amounting to $3.2 billion at an average yield of 5.44% during the first half of 2008, which is significantly higher than the cost of borrowings used to finance the purchase of such assets. As of June 30, 2008, there are still approximately $967 million in U.S. agency debentures with embedded calls. Lower reinvestment rates and a time lag between calls, prepayments and/or the maturity of investments and actual reinvestment of proceeds into new investments might affect net interest income in the future. These risks are directly linked to future period market interest rate fluctuations. Refer to the “Risk Management” discussion below for further analysis of the effects of changing interest rates on the Corporation’s net interest income and for the interest rate risk management strategies followed by the Corporation.
Sources of Funds
The Corporation’s principal funding sources are retail brokered CDs, branch-based deposits, institutional deposits, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, notes payable and FHLB advances.
As of June 30, 2008, total liabilities amounted to $17.4 billion, an increase of approximately $1.6 billion, as compared to $15.8 billion as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total liabilities was mainly attributed to a higher volume of securities sold under repurchase agreements aligned with the increase in MBS. In addition, total liabilities increased due to a higher volume of deposits, an increase of $493.3 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007. The Corporation has been able to attract clients by offering competitive rates and additional interest-bearing products. In terms of core deposit accounts, the Corporation has added more than 44,000 new accounts since the beginning of 2008. Other sources of funding, including FHLB advances increased by $357.0 million, as compared to December 31, 2007, reflecting the use of alternative sources to replace brokered CDs that matured or were called and to finance lending activities.
The use of brokered CDs has been particularly important for the growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits, in Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and liquid and the Corporation has been able to obtain substantial amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy enhances the Corporation’s liquidity position, since the brokered CDs are unsecured and can be obtained at substantially longer maturities than other regular retail deposits.
63
Table of Contents
The following table presents a maturity summary of CDs with denominations of $100,000 or higher, including brokered CDs, as of June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, brokered CDs over $100,000 amounted to $7.1 billion.
(In thousands) | Total | |||
Three months or less | $ | 2,121,983 | ||
Over three months to six months | 964,747 | |||
Over six months to one year | 1,865,767 | |||
Over one year | 3,206,341 | |||
Total | $ | 8,158,838 | ||
Despite most of the brokered CDs included in the table above are issued and settled in large block trades with brokers through the Depository Trust Corporation (DTC), these brokered CDs are sold by third-party intermediaries in denominations of $100,000 or less within FDIC insurance limit.
The Corporation maintains unsecured lines of credit with other banks. As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation’s total unused lines of credit with these banks amounted to $290.0 million. As of June 30, 2008, the Corporation had an available line of credit with the FHLB, guaranteed by mortgage loans pledged to the FHLB in the amount of $203.3 million. Also, there are available approximately $97.0 million through the Federal Reserve discount window program.
The Corporation’s deposit products include regular savings accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market accounts, CDs, and brokered CDs. Refer to “Note 10 — Deposits” in the accompanying notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for further details. Total deposits amounted to $11.5 billion as of June 30, 2008, compared to $11.0 billion as of December 31, 2007.
Refer to the “Net Interest Income” discussion above for information about average balances of interest-bearing deposits, and the average interest rate paid on deposits for the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
64
Table of Contents
Capital
The Corporation’s stockholders’ equity amounted to $1.4 billion as of June 30, 2008, a decrease of $20.0 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007. The decrease in stockholders’ equity as of June 30, 2008 is mainly attributable to net unrealized losses of $53.5 million on the fair value of available for sale securities recorded as part of comprehensive income in connection to recent decreases in MBS prices. Also, dividends declared during the first half of 2008 amounted to $33.1 million. These factors were partially offset by the net income of $66.6 million recorded for the first half of 2008.
As of June 30, 2008, First BanCorp, FirstBank Puerto Rico and FirstBank Florida were in compliance with regulatory capital requirements that were applicable to them as a financial holding company, a state non-member bank and a thrift, respectively (i.e., total capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8% and 4%, respectively, and Tier 1 capital to average assets of at least 4%). Set forth below are First BanCorp’s, FirstBank Puerto Rico’s and FirstBank Florida’s regulatory capital ratios as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, based on existing Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of Thrift Supervision guidelines.
Banking Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||||||
First | FirstBank | To be well | ||||||||||||||
BanCorp | FirstBank | Florida | capitalized | |||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets) | 13.45 | % | 12.79 | % | 11.69 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) | 12.20 | % | 11.54 | % | 10.82 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||||
Leverage ratio (1) | 8.78 | % | 8.29 | % | 7.97 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets) | 13.86 | % | 13.23 | % | 10.92 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) | 12.61 | % | 11.98 | % | 10.42 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||||
Leverage ratio (1) | 9.29 | % | 8.85 | % | 7.79 | % | 5.00 | % |
(1) | Tier 1 capital to average assets in the case of First BanCorp and FirstBank and Tier 1 Capital to adjusted total assets in the case of FirstBank Florida. |
The moderate decrease in regulatory capital ratios is mainly related to the increase in the volume of risk-weighted assets driven by the aforementioned purchases of MBS and loan originations.
For each of the six-month periods ended on June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation declared cash dividends of $0.14 per common share. Total cash dividends paid on common shares amounted to $13.0 million for the first half of 2008 and $11.7 million for the same period in 2007, an increase attributable to the 9.250 million additional shares issued during the third quarter of 2007. Dividends declared on preferred stock amounted to approximately $20.2 million for each of the six-month periods ended on June 30, 2008 and 2007.
65
Table of Contents
Off -Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are different than the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. These transactions are designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage the Corporation’s credit, market or liquidity risks, (3) diversify the Corporation’s funding sources and (4) optimize capital.
As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statements of financial position. As of June 30, 2008, commitments to extend credit and commercial and financial standby letters of credit amounted to approximately $1.7 billion and $100.3 million, respectively. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as long as the conditions established in the contract are met. Generally, the Corporation’s mortgage banking activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its prospective borrowers.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table presents a detail of the maturities of the Corporation’s contractual obligations and commitments, which consist of CDs, long-term contractual debt obligations, commitments to sell mortgage loans and commitments to extend credit:
Contractual Obligations and Commitments | ||||||||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | After 5 years | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations (1): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit (2) | $ | 8,968,964 | $ | 5,597,645 | $ | 1,580,372 | $ | 129,694 | $ | 1,661,253 | ||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 3,999,590 | 1,912,090 | 787,500 | 500,000 | 800,000 | |||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB | 1,460,000 | 1,024,000 | 215,000 | 221,000 | — | |||||||||||||||
Notes payable | 27,944 | — | 7,564 | 6,973 | 13,407 | |||||||||||||||
Other borrowings | 231,865 | — | — | — | 231,865 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations | $ | 14,688,363 | $ | 8,533,735 | $ | 2,590,436 | $ | 857,667 | $ | 2,706,525 | ||||||||||
Commitments to sell mortgage loans | $ | 71,307 | $ | 71,307 | ||||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit | $ | 100,298 | $ | 100,298 | ||||||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lines of credit | $ | 1,222,199 | $ | 1,222,199 | ||||||||||||||||
Letters of credit | 30,671 | 30,671 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commitments to originate loans | 404,724 | 404,724 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial commitments | $ | 1,657,594 | $ | 1,657,594 | ||||||||||||||||
(1) | $21.1 million of tax liability, including accrued interest of $6.0 million, associated with unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48 has been excluded due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with such obligations. | |
(2) | Include $7.1 million of brokered CDs sold by third-party intermediaries in denominations of $100,000 or less, within FDIC insurance limits. |
The Corporation has obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts, such as debt, and under other commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value and commitments to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. In the case of credit cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can, at any time and without cause, cancels the unused credit facility. In the ordinary course
66
Table of Contents
of business, the Corporation enters into operating leases and other commercial commitments. There have been no significant changes in such contractual obligations since December 31, 2007.
RISK MANAGEMENT
The Corporation has in place a risk management framework to monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks assumed in conducting its activities. First BanCorp’s business is subject to eight broad categories of risks: (1) interest rate risk, (2) market risk, (3) credit risk, (4) liquidity risk, (5) operational risk, (6) legal and compliance risk, (7) reputation risk, and (8) contingency risk. First BanCorp has adopted policies and procedures designed to identify and manage risks to which the Corporation is exposed, specifically those relating to interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, and operational risk.
The Corporation’s risk management policies are described below as well as in the Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of First BanCorp’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Interest Rate Risk Management
First BanCorp manages its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income. The Management’s Investment and Asset Liability Committee of the Corporation (“MIALCO”) oversees interest rate risk, liquidity management and other related matters. The MIALCO, which reports to the Investment Subcommittee of the Board of Directors’ Asset/Liability Risk Committee, is composed of senior management officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Risk Officer, the Wholesale Banking Executive, the Risk Manager of the Treasury and Investments Division, the Financial Risk Manager and the Treasurer.
Committee meetings focus on, among other things, current and expected conditions in world financial markets, competition and prevailing rates in the local deposit market, liquidity, unrealized gains and losses in securities, recent or proposed changes to the investment portfolio, alternative funding sources and their costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives such as swaps and caps, and any tax or regulatory issues which may be pertinent to these areas. The MIALCO approves funding decisions in light of the Corporation’s overall growth strategies and objectives. On a quarterly basis, the MIALCO performs a comprehensive asset/liability review, examining interest rate risk as described below together with other issues such as liquidity and capital.
The Corporation performs on a quarterly basis a net interest income simulation analysis on a consolidated basis to estimate the potential change in future earnings from projected changes in interest rates. These simulations are carried out over a one-year and a five-year time horizon, assuming gradual upward and downward interest rate movements of 200 basis points, achieved during a twelve-month period. Simulations are carried out in two ways:
(1) | using a static balance sheet as the Corporation had on the simulation date, and | ||
(2) | using a growing balance sheet based on recent growth patterns and strategies. |
The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and liabilities detailed by maturity or re-pricing and their corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates rise or fall, these simulations incorporate expected future lending rates, current and expected future funding sources and costs, the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment rates, deposits decay and other factors which may be important in projecting the future growth of net interest income.
67
Table of Contents
The Corporation uses asset-liability management software to project future movements in the Corporation’s balance sheet and income statement. The starting point of the projections generally corresponds to the actual values of the balance sheet on the date of the simulations.
These simulations are highly complex, and use many simplifying assumptions that are intended to reflect the general behavior of the Corporation over the period in question. There can be no assurance that actual events will match these assumptions in all cases. For this reason, the results of these simulations are only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest income to changes in market interest rates.
The following table presents the results of the simulations as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Consistent with prior years, these exclude non-cash changes in the fair value of derivatives and SFAS 159 liabilities:
June 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months) | Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Static Simulation | Growing Balance Sheet | Static Simulation | Growing Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | $ Change | % Change | $ Change | % Change | $ Change | % Change | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
+200 bps ramp | $ | (16.9 | ) | (2.99 | )% | $ | (16.1 | ) | (2.75 | )% | $ | (8.1 | ) | (1.64 | )% | $ | (8.4 | ) | (1.66 | )% | ||||||||||||
-200 bps ramp | $ | (5.1 | ) | (0.91 | )% | $ | (5.1 | ) | (0.87 | )% | $ | (13.2 | ) | (2.68 | )% | $ | (13.2 | ) | (2.60 | )% |
The Corporation continues to pursue the strategy of reducing the re-pricing gaps between the assets and liabilities and to maintain interest rate risk within the established policy target levels. Interest rate risk, as measured by the sensitivity of net interest income to shifts in rates, changed slightly in the second quarter. During the first half of 2008, the Corporation increased earning assets through the purchase of approximately $3.2 billion of fixed-rate U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities. The increase included the replacement of $1.2 billion of U.S. Agency debentures that were called by the issuer; and net growth of the investment portfolio in response to favorable market conditions. The increase in volume of securities sold under repurchase agreements was aligned with the increase in mortgage-backed securities.
Also during the first half of 2008, $2.4 billion of interest rate swaps were cancelled prior to maturity by the counterparties under call option provisions. Due to the economic hedge effect of holding the swapped CD’s, approximately the same amount in brokered CD’s were called by the Corporation and re-issued in different maturity terms.
Assuming parallel shifts in interest rates, the Corporation’s net interest income would compress in rising rates scenarios and expand in falling rates scenarios over a five-year modeling horizon, due to the current composition of the balance sheet. However, during the first 12 months of the income simulation, under a parallel falling rates scenario, net interest income is expected to compress slightly due to embedded option sold on the asset side of balance sheet. In a declining rate scenario, the callable feature of the U.S. Agency debentures would shorten the duration of the assets, with the potential trigger of calls that would lead to the Corporation to reinvest in lower yielding assets.
68
Table of Contents
Derivatives
First BanCorp uses derivative instruments and other strategies to manage its exposure to interest rate risk caused by changes in interest rates beyond management’s control. The following summarizes major strategies, including derivatives activities, used by the Corporation in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate swaps — Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying notional principal amount. Since a substantial portion of the Corporation’s loans, mainly commercial loans, yield variable rates, the interest rate swaps are utilized to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in these variable rate loans.
Interest rate cap agreements — Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value increases as the reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements to protect against rising interest rates. Specifically, the interest rate of certain private label mortgage pass-through securities and certain of the Corporation’s commercial loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the pass-through certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less a contractual servicing fee.
Structured repurchase agreements — The Corporation uses structured repurchase agreements, with embedded call options, to reduce the Corporation’s exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the contractual maturities of its liabilities, while keeping funding costs low. Another type of structured repurchase agreement includes repurchased agreements with embedded cap corridors; these instruments also provide protection from a rising rate scenario.
For detailed information regarding the volume of derivative activities (e.g. notional amounts), location and fair values of derivative instruments in the Statements of Financial Condition and the amount of gains and losses reported in the Statements of Income, refer to Note 8 “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” in the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements.
69
Table of Contents
The following tables summarize the fair value changes of the Corporation’s derivatives as well as the source of the fair values:
Six-month period ended | ||||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2008 | |||
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period | $ | (52,450 | ) | |
Contracts realized or otherwise settled during the period | 20,179 | |||
Changes in fair value during the period | 6,144 | |||
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2008 | $ | (26,127 | ) | |
Source of Fair Value
(In thousands) | Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Maturity | Maturity | |||||||||||||||||||
Less Than | Maturity | Maturity | In Excess | Total | ||||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2008 | One Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | of 5 Years | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
Pricing from observable market inputs | $ | 43 | $ | (474 | ) | $ | 91 | $ | (31,770 | ) | $ | (32,110 | ) | |||||||
Pricing that consider unobservable market inputs | — | — | — | 5,983 | 5,983 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 43 | $ | (474 | ) | $ | 91 | $ | (25,787 | ) | $ | (26,127 | ) | ||||||||
Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation decided to early adopt SFAS 159 for its callable brokered CDs and certain fixed medium-term notes (“Notes”) that were hedged with interest rate swaps. One of the main considerations to early adopt SFAS 159 for these instruments was to eliminate the operational procedures required by the long-haul method of accounting in terms of documentation, effectiveness assessment, and manual procedures followed by the Corporation to fulfill the requirements specified by SFAS 133.
As of June 30, 2008, all of the derivative instruments held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated hedges.
During the first half of 2008, approximately $2.4 billion of interest rate swaps were cancelled by the counterparties, mainly due to lower 3-month LIBOR. Following the cancellation of the interest rate swaps, the Corporation exercised its call option on approximately $2.4 billion swapped to floating brokered CDs. The Corporation recorded a net gain of $4.4 million as a result of these transactions resulting from the reversal of the cumulative mark-to-market valuation of the swaps and the brokered CDs called.
The use of derivatives involves market and credit risk. The market risk of derivatives stems principally from the potential for changes in the value of derivatives contracts based on changes in interest rates. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential of default from the counterparty. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. Master netting agreements incorporate rights of set-off that provide for the net settlement of contracts with the same counterparty in the event of default.
70
Table of Contents
Credit Risk Management
First BanCorp is subject to credit risk mainly with respect to its portfolio of loans receivable and off-balance sheet instruments, mainly derivatives and loan commitments. Loans receivable represents loans that First BanCorp holds for investment and, therefore, First Bancorp is at risk for the term of the loan. Loan commitments represent commitments to extend credit, subject to specific condition, for specific amounts and maturities. These commitments may expose the Corporation to credit risk and are subject to the same review and approval process as for loans. Refer to “Contractual Obligations and Commitments” above for further details. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential of the counterparty’s default on its contractual obligations. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. For further details and information on the Corporation’s derivative credit risk exposure, refer to “Interest Rate Risk Management” section above. The Corporation manages its credit risk through credit policy, underwriting, and quality control procedures and an established delinquency committee. The Corporation also employs proactive collection and loss mitigation efforts.
The Corporation may also have risk of default in the securities portfolio. The securities held by the Corporation are principally mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury and agency securities. Thus, a substantial portion of these instruments are backed by mortgages, a U.S. government-sponsored entity or the full faith and credit of the U.S. government and are deemed to be of the highest credit quality.
Management’s Credit Committee, comprised of the Corporation’s Chief Credit Risk Officer and other senior executives, has primary responsibility for setting strategies to achieve the Corporation’s credit risk goals and objectives. Those goals and objectives are documented in the Corporation’s Credit Policy.
Non-performing Assets and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that the Corporation considers adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the portfolio. The Corporation establishes the allowance for loan and lease losses based on its asset classification report to cover the total amount of any assets classified as a “loss,” the probable loss exposure of other classified assets, and the estimated probable losses of assets not classified. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is also based upon a number of additional factors including historical loan and lease loss experience, current economic conditions, the fair value of the underlying collateral, and the financial condition of the borrowers, and, as such, includes amounts based on judgments and estimates made by the Corporation. Although management believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate, factors beyond the Corporation’s control, including factors affecting the economies of Puerto Rico, the United States (principally the state of Florida), the U.S.VI or British VI, may contribute to delinquencies and defaults, thus necessitating additional reserves.
For small, homogeneous loans, including residential mortgage loans, auto loans, consumer loans, finance lease loans, and commercial and construction loans in amounts under $1.0 million, the Corporation evaluates a specific allowance based on average historical loss experience for each corresponding type of loan and market conditions. The methodology of accounting for all probable losses is made in accordance with the guidance provided by SFAS 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.”
Commercial and construction loans in amounts over $1.0 million are individually evaluated on a quarterly basis for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the
71
Table of Contents
Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The impairment loss, if any, on each individual loan identified as impaired is generally measured based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. As a practical expedient, impairment may be measured based on the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. If foreclosure is probable, the creditor is required to measure the impairment based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. Updated appraisals are obtained when the Corporation determines that loans are impaired and for certain loans on a spot basis selected by specific characteristics such as delinquency levels and loan-to-value ratios. Should the appraisal show a deficiency, the Corporation records an allowance for loan losses related to these loans.
As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals on a spot basis as part of the underwriting and approval process. For construction loans in the Miami Agency, appraisals are reviewed by an outsourced contracted appraiser. Once a loan backed by real estate collateral deteriorates or is accounted for in non-accrual status, a full assessment of the value of the collateral is performed. If the Corporation commences litigation to collect an outstanding loan or commences foreclosure proceedings against a borrower (which includes the collateral), a new appraisal report is requested and the book value is adjusted accordingly, either by a corresponding reserve or a charge-off.
The Credit Risk area requests new collateral appraisals for impaired collateral dependent loans. In order to determine present market conditions in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, and to gauge property appreciation rates, opinions of value are requested for a sample of delinquent residential real estate loans. The valuation information gathered through these appraisals is considered in the Corporation’s allowance model assumptions.
Substantially all of the Corporation’s loan portfolio is located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland, the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio and the value of the collateral backing the transactions are dependent upon the performance of and conditions within each specific area real estate market. Recent economic reports related to the real estate market in Puerto Rico indicate that certain pockets of the real estate market are subject to readjustments in value driven not by demand but more by the purchasing power of the consumers and general economic conditions. However, the outlook is for a stable real estate market with values not growing in certain areas due to the self-inflicted wounds associated with the governmental and political environment in Puerto Rico. The Corporation is protected by healthy loan to value ratios set upon original approval and driven by the Corporation’s regulatory and credit policy standards. The real estate market for the U.S. Virgin Islands remains fairly strong.
72
Table of Contents
The following tables set forth an analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses during the periods indicated :
Quarter ended | Six Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of period | $ | 210,495 | $ | 161,419 | $ | 190,168 | $ | 158,296 | ||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses | 41,323 | 24,628 | 87,116 | 49,542 | ||||||||||||
Loans charged-off: | ||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | (1,129 | ) | (1,102 | ) | (2,368 | ) | (1,267 | ) | ||||||||
Commercial | (11,350 | ) | (2,520 | ) | (15,768 | ) | (5,777 | ) | ||||||||
Construction | (2,526 | ) | (5 | ) | (6,311 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||
Finance leases | (2,061 | ) | (2,292 | ) | (4,976 | ) | (4,418 | ) | ||||||||
Consumer | (14,536 | ) | (16,500 | ) | (29,565 | ) | (34,126 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries | 2,056 | 1,381 | 3,976 | 2,767 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs | (29,546 | ) | (21,038 | ) | (55,012 | ) | (42,829 | ) | ||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period | $ | 222,272 | $ | 165,009 | $ | 222,272 | $ | 165,009 | ||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses to period end total loans receivable | 1.82 | % | 1.47 | % | 1.82 | % | 1.47 | % | ||||||||
Net charge-offs annualized to average loans outstanding during the period | 0.97 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.91 | % | 0.77 | % | ||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs during the period | 1.40x | 1.17x | 1.58x | 1.16x |
The following tables set forth information concerning the allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans as of the dates indicated:
As of | As of | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 13,731 | 28 | % | $ | 8,240 | 27 | % | ||||||||
Commercial real estate loans | 10,631 | 11 | % | 13,699 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Construction loans | 46,120 | 12 | % | 38,108 | 12 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial loans (including loans to local financial institutions) | 78,364 | 33 | % | 63,030 | 33 | % | ||||||||||
Finance leases | 10,378 | 3 | % | 6,445 | 3 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer loans | 63,048 | 13 | % | 60,646 | 14 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 222,272 | 100 | % | $ | 190,168 | 100 | % | |||||||||
First BanCorp’s allowance for loan and lease losses was $222.3 million as of June 30, 2008, compared to $190.2 million as of December 31, 2007 and $165.0 million as of June 30, 2007. The provision for loan and lease losses for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2008 amounted to $41.3 million and $87.1 million, respectively, compared to $24.6 million and $49.5 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2007. The increase, as compared to 2007 periods, is mainly attributable to additional reserves allocated to commercial and construction loans as well as increases to the reserve factors for potential losses inherent in the loans portfolio associated with the weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the slowdown in the United States housing sector and the increase in the overall volume of the loan portfolio. Increases to reserve factors due to economic conditions in Puerto Rico include higher provisions for the residential mortgage loan portfolio. Puerto Rico has continued in a recession caused by, among other things, higher utilities prices, higher taxes, government budgetary imbalances and higher oil prices. Furthermore, as compared to the first half of 2007, the increase is attributed in part to higher reserve factors for the construction loan portfolio, in particular the Miami Agency portfolio.
73
Table of Contents
The U.S. mainland real estate market also has slowed, influenced, among other things, by increases in property taxes and insurance premiums, the tightening of credit origination standards, overbuilding in certain areas and general market economic conditions that may threaten the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio in the U.S. mainland, principally the Corporation’s construction loan portfolio in the Miami Agency. Approximately 39% of the Corporation’s exposure in the U.S. mainland is comprised of construction loans. Refer to “Loan Portfolio — Commercial and Construction Loans” discussion above for detailed information about the Corporation’s construction loan portfolio.
The Corporation also does business in the Eastern Caribbean Region. Growth has been fueled by an expansion in the construction, residential mortgage and small loan business sectors.
The Corporation identified in the first half of 2008 several commercial and construction loans amounting to $239.6 million that it determined should be classified as impaired, of which $188.6 million had a specific reserve of $27.4 million. Most of the new loans identified during 2008, approximately 77%, for which a specific reserve was allocated are construction loans originated by the Miami Agency. At the same time, the Corporation’s impaired loans decreased by approximately $53.8 million during the first half of 2008 principally as a result of foreclosed loans in the Miami Agency with a principal balance of approximately $22.4 million which had a related impairment reserve of $4.2 million at the time of foreclosure and a loan sold in the Miami Agency that carried a principal balance of approximately $24.1 million with a related impairment reserve of $2.4 million at the time of sale. The latter was sold for $22.5 million during the second quarter of 2008. Refer to “Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets” discussion below for additional information.
The Corporation continues its constant monitoring of the Miami Agency portfolio due to susceptibility to current general market conditions and real estate trends in the U.S. market and had obtained new appraisals during 2008 for more than 94% of the entire condo-conversion construction loan portfolio in the Miami Agency.
Net charge-offs for the second quarter and first half of 2008 were $29.5 million and $55.0 million, respectively, (0.97% and 0.91%, respectively, of average loans on an annualized basis), compared to $21.0 million and $42.8 million (0.75% and 0.77%, respectively, of average loans on an annualized basis) for the same periods in 2007. The increase in net charge-offs for the 2008 periods, compared to 2007, was mainly associated with the Corporation’s commercial and construction loan portfolio including a $9.1 million charge-off for the second quarter of 2008 related to the previously reported participation in a syndicated commercial loan collateralized by a marina, commercial real estate, and a high-end apartment complex in the U.S. Virgin Islands and $2.4 million in charge-offs for the second quarter of 2008 ($6.2 million for the first half of 2008) related to the above mentioned repossession and sale of loans in the Miami Agency. Notwithstanding this increase, the Corporation experienced a decrease in net charge-offs for consumer loans that amounted to $13.4 million and $27.3 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, as compared to $15.5 million and $32.2 million for the second quarter and first half of 2007, respectively, that reflects the effect of changes in underwriting standards since late 2005 on a portfolio with an average life of approximately four years as the consumer loan portfolio is replenished by new originations under revised standards. Recoveries made from previously written-off accounts were $2.1 million and $4.0 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively, compared to $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2007.
74
Table of Contents
Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets
Total non-performing assets are the sum of non-accruing loans, foreclosed real estate and other repossessed properties. Non-accruing loans are loans as to which interest is no longer being recognized. When loans fall into non-accruing status, all previously accrued and uncollected interest is reversed and charged against interest income.
Non-accruing Loans Policy
Residential Real Estate Loans- The Corporation classifies real estate loans in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Commercial and Construction Loans- The Corporation places commercial loans (including commercial real estate and construction loans) in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more. The risk exposure of this portfolio is diversified as to individual borrowers and industries among other factors. In addition, a large portion is secured with real estate collateral.
Finance Leases- Finance leases are classified in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Consumer Loans- Consumer loans are classified in non accruing status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)
OREO acquired in settlement of loans is carried at the lower of cost (carrying value of the loan) or fair value less estimated costs to sell the real estate at the date of acquisition (estimated realizable value).
Other Repossessed Property
The other repossessed property category includes repossessed boats and autos acquired in settlement of loans. Repossessed boats and autos are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated realizable value.
Past Due Loans
Past due loans are accruing loans, which are contractually delinquent for 90 days or more. Past due loans are current as to interest but delinquent in the payment of principal or are insured or guaranteed under applicable FHA and VA programs.
The Corporation may also classify loans in non-accruing status and recognize revenue only when cash payments are received because of the deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and payment in full of principal or interest is not expected. The Corporation started during the third quarter of 2007, a loan loss mitigation program providing homeownership preservation assistance. Loans modified through this program are reported as non-performing loans and interest is recognized on a cash basis. When there is reasonable assurance of repayment and the borrower has made payments over a sustained period, the loan is returned to accruing status.
75
Table of Contents
The following table identifies non-performing assets at the dates indicated:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Non-accruing loans: | ||||||||
Residential real estate | $ | 230,240 | $ | 209,077 | ||||
Commercial and commercial real estate | 127,158 | 73,445 | ||||||
Construction | 49,283 | 75,494 | ||||||
Finance leases | 4,619 | 6,250 | ||||||
Consumer | 37,175 | 48,784 | ||||||
448,475 | 413,050 | |||||||
Other real estate owned (1) | 38,620 | 16,116 | ||||||
Other repossessed property | 11,270 | 10,154 | ||||||
Total non-performing assets | $ | 498,365 | $ | 439,320 | ||||
Past due loans | $ | 124,078 | $ | 75,456 | ||||
Non-performing assets to total assets | 2.65 | % | 2.56 | % | ||||
Non-accruing loans to total loans receivable | 3.67 | % | 3.50 | % | ||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses | $ | 222,272 | $ | 190,168 | ||||
Allowance to total non-accruing loans | 49.56 | % | 46.04 | % | ||||
Allowance to total non-accruing loans, excluding residential real estate loans | 101.85 | % | 93.23 | % |
(1) | As of June 30, 2008, other real estate owned include approximately $18.6 million from the previously reported impaired relationship in the Miami Agency. |
Total non-accruing loans increased by $35.4 million, or 9%, from $413.1 million as of December 31, 2007 to $448.5 million as of June 30, 2008. The increase in non-performing loans was mainly related to the commercial and the residential mortgage loan portfolios which increased by $53.7 million and $21.2 million, respectively, partially offset by lower construction and consumer loans in non-accrual status. The increase in non-accruing commercial loans is related to continuing adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico that caused the classification as non-accrual during the first half of 2008 of several commercial loans originated in Puerto Rico, mainly secured by land and real estate properties,including $24.6 million of new commercial loans identified as impaired during 2008. Also, there was the classification as non-accrual during the second quarter of 2008 of a participation in a syndicated commercial loan in the U.S. Virgin Islands with a carrying value of $13.0 million as of June 30, 2008, net of a $9.1 million charge-off recorded in the second quarter of 2008. The charge-off was lower than the reserve amount of $11.9 million, provided for during the first quarter of 2008, as the loss in this relationship will be lower than originally estimated given recent negotiations for the settlement of the loan.
The decrease in non-accruing construction loans was principally related to the sale of one of the impaired loans in the previously reported impaired relationship in the Miami Agency. The loan’s carrying amount was $21.8 million (net of an impairment of $2.4 million) and was sold for $22.5 million. Also, during 2008, the Corporation added approximately $18.6 million to its other real estate owned (OREO) portfolio, as a result of collateral repossessed in settlement of two other loans in this impaired relationship. As of June 30, 2008, and as a result of the transactions completed during the fourth quarter of 2007 and first half of 2008, there were no outstanding loans associated with this relationship in the Miami Agency. The reduction to $18.6 million held in the OREO portfolio, net of charge-offs of $4.2 million, is a significant decrease in the balance of this impaired relationship from the $60.5 million balance when it was identified as impaired during the first half of 2007. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, the Corporation has identified interested purchasers for the two foreclosed properties. However, the Corporation cannot predict whether the properties will be ultimately sold to these parties.
The Corporation has incurred in total expenditures, including legal fees, maintenance fees and property taxes in connection with the resolution of the above mentioned impaired relationship in the Miami Agency amounting to approximately $5.6 million since 2007, of which $1.2 million and $3.5 million were incurred during the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively. First BanCorp’s expenditures ultimately will depend on the length of
76
Table of Contents
time, the amount of professional assistance required, the amount of proceeds upon the disposition of the collateral and other factors not susceptible to current estimation.
The decrease in non-accruing consumer loans resulted from successful collection efforts and net charge-offs of approximately $13.4 million and $27.3 million for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively. Consumer loan delinquencies have shown signs of improvement, particularly in the auto loan portfolio, and the net charge offs to average loans ratio on the consumer portfolio (including finance leases) improved during the quarter to 3.02% from 3.20% for the first quarter of 2008.
Although the balance of non-accruing residential mortgage loans increased by $21.2 million due to adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2007, this portfolio has remained stable since the end of the first quarter of 2008 due to improved collection efforts and to some extent to the impact of loans modified through the loan loss mitigation program that were returned to accruing status as borrowers have made consistent payments over a sustained period. Since the inception of the loan loss mitigation program in the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation has completed approximately 295 loan modifications with an outstanding balance of approximately $50.6 million. Of this amount, approximately $37.0 million were eligible to be returned to accruing status and $22.3 million have been returned to accruing status after a sustained period of repayments. Modifications involve changes in one or more of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include the refinancing of any past-due amounts, including interest and escrow, the extension of the maturity of the loans and modifications of the loan rate.
The Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio amounted to $3.4 billion or approximately 28% of the total loan portfolio. More than 90% of the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio consist of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full documentation loans that have a lower risk than the typical sub-prime loans that have affected and continue to affect the U.S. real estate market. The Corporation has not been active in negative amortization loans or adjustable rate mortgage loans (“ARMs”) with teaser rates. Historically, the Corporation has experienced a low rate of losses on its residential real estate portfolio, given that the real estate market in Puerto Rico has not shown notable declines in the market value of properties in almost four decades, overall comfortable loan-to-value ratios, and the limited amount of construction considering Puerto Rico is an island with finite land recourses. The net charge-offs to average loans ratio on the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio was 0.14% and 0.15% for the second quarter and first half of 2008, respectively and 0.03% for the year ended on December 31, 2007, significantly lower than in the United States mainland market.
In view of current conditions in the Unites States housing market and weakening economic conditions in Puerto Rico, the Corporation may experience further deterioration on its portfolio, in particular the commercial and construction loan portfolio.
77
Table of Contents
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity is the ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, fund asset growth and business operations, and meet contractual obligations through unconstrained access to funding at reasonable market rates. Liquidity management involves forecasting funding requirements and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet the needs and accommodate fluctuations in asset and liability levels due to changes in our business operations or unanticipated events. Sources of liquidity include deposits and other customer-based funding, and wholesale market-based funding.
The Corporation manages liquidity at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the parent company, which is the holding company that owns the banking and nonbanking subsidiaries. The second is the liquidity of the banking subsidiaries. The Board of Directors Treasury and Investments Committee is responsible for establishing the Corporation’s liquidity policy as well as approving operating and contingency procedures, and monitoring liquidity on an ongoing basis. The MIALCO, using measures of liquidity developed by management, which involves the use of several assumptions, reviews the Corporation’s liquidity position on a monthly basis. The Treasury and Investments Division is responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s funding activities and strategy; and reviews liquidity measures on a weekly basis.
In order to ensure adequate liquidity through the full range of potential operating environments and market conditions, the liquidity management and business activities are conducted in a manner that will preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility and diversity. Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on customer-based funding, maintaining direct relationships with wholesale market funding providers, and maintaining the ability to liquefy certain assets when, and if, requirements warrant.
The Corporation develops and maintains contingency funding plans for both the parent company and bank liquidity positions. These plans evaluate the Corporation’s liquidity position under various operating circumstances and allow the Corporation to ensure that it would be able to operate through a period of stress when access to normal sources of funding might be constrained. The plans project funding requirements during a potential period of stress, specify and quantify sources of liquidity, outline actions and procedures for effectively managing through the problem period, and define roles and responsibilities. They are reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors Treasury and Investments Committee.
The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help ensure that adequate levels of liquidity are available when needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great importance to protect the Corporation’s liquidity from market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term funds are deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and lines of credit with the FHLB, the Federal Reserve Discount Window program, and other unsecured lines established with financial institutions. MIALCO reviews credit availability on a regular basis. The Corporation has securitized and sold mortgage loans as supplementary sources of funding. Also, broker dealers have provided additional funding through the issuance of notes and long-term brokered certificates of deposit. The cost of these different alternatives, among other things, is taken into consideration. The Corporation’s principal uses of funds are the origination of loans and the repayment of maturing deposit accounts and borrowings.
Over the last four years, the Corporation has committed substantial resources to its mortgage banking subsidiary, FirstMortgage Inc., with the goal of becoming a leading institution in the highly competitive residential mortgage loans market. As a result, residential real estate loans as a percentage of total loans receivable have increased over time from 14% at December 31, 2004 to 28% at June 30, 2008. Commensurate with the increase in its mortgage banking activities, the Corporation has also invested in technology and personnel to enhance the Corporation’s secondary mortgage market capabilities. The enhanced capabilities improve the Corporation’s liquidity profile as it allows the Corporation to derive, if needed, liquidity from the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market. Recent disruptions in the credit markets and a reduced investors’ demand for mortgage debt have adversely affected the liquidity of the secondary mortgage markets.
78
Table of Contents
The U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is still highly liquid in large part because of the sale or guarantee programs of the FHA, VA, HUD, FNMA and FHLMC. The troubled housing and mortgage markets in the United States have raised concerns about the capacity of U.S. government sponsored entities to raise money from investors to cover rising losses from loan defaults, and potential bail out by the government. However the federal government recently passed legislation expanding the government’s line of credit to the agencies and allowing the government to buy shares of the agencies if needed. Also, the Federal Reserve agreed to open its discount window to the agencies.
A large portion of the Corporation’s funding is retail brokered CDs issued by the Bank subsidiary. In the event that the Corporation’s Bank subsidiary falls below the ratios of a well-capitalized institution, it faces the risk of not being able to replace funding through this source. The Bank currently complies with the minimum requirements of ratios for a “well-capitalized” institution and does not foresee falling below required levels to issue brokered deposits. In addition, the average term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs was approximately 3.3 years as of June 30, 2008. Approximately 29.5% of the value of these certificates is callable at the Corporation’s option.
The Corporation maintains a basic surplus (cash, short-term assets minus short-term liabilities, and secured lines of credit) in excess of a 5% self-imposed minimum limit over total assets. As of June 30, 2008, the basic surplus ratio of approximately 5.22% included un-pledged assets, Federal Home Loan Bank lines of credit, the Federal Reserve Discount Window Program, and cash. Access to regular and customary sources of funding have remained unrestricted, including the repurchase agreements, given the liquidity and credit quality of the securities held in portfolio. The Corporation does not rely on uncommitted inter-bank lines of credit (federal funds lines) to fund its operations; and does not include them on the basic surplus computation. The Corporation’s exposure to non-rated or sub-prime mortgage-backed securities is not-material; therefore, it is not subject to liquidity threats stemming from such exposure.
Operational Risk
The Corporation faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the activities that surround the delivery of banking and financial products. Coupled with external influences such as market conditions, security risks, and legal risk, the potential for operational and reputational loss has increased. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the Corporation has developed, and continues to enhance, specific internal controls, policies and procedures that are designated to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. The purpose of these mechanisms is to provide reasonable assurance that the Corporation’s business operations are functioning within the policies and limits established by management.
The Corporation classifies operational risk into two major categories: business specific and corporate-wide affecting all business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment group works with the various business units to ensure consistency in policies, processes and assessments. With respect to corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business recovery, legal and compliance, the Corporation has specialized groups, such as the Legal Department, Information Security, Corporate Compliance, Information Technology and Operations. These groups assist the lines of business in the development and implementation of risk management practices specific to the needs of the business groups.
Legal and Regulatory Risk
Legal and regulatory risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the risk of adverse legal judgments against the Corporation, and the risk that a counterparty’s performance obligations will be unenforceable. The Corporation is subject to extensive regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it conducts it business, and this regulatory scrutiny has been significantly
79
Table of Contents
increasing over the last several years. The Corporation has established and continues to enhance procedures based on legal and regulatory requirements that are reasonably designed to ensure compliance with all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. The Corporation has a Compliance Director who reports to the Chief Risk Officer and is responsible for the oversight of regulatory compliance and implementation of an enterprise-wide compliance risk assessment process. The Compliance division has officer roles in each major business areas with direct reporting relationships to the Corporate Compliance Group.
80
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For information regarding market risk to which the Corporation is exposed, see the information contained under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Risk Management.”
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Control and Procedures
First BanCorp’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of First BanCorp’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2008. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been changes to the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
81
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the opinion of the Company’s management, the pending and threatened legal proceedings of which management is aware will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Corporation.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
For a detailed discussion of certain risk factors that could affect First BanCorp’s operations, financial condition or results for future periods see Item 1A, Risk Factors, in First BanCorp’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
82
Table of Contents
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
For the discussion of the Corporation’s Annual Stockholders Meeting held on April 29, 2008, refer to Part II, Item 4 in the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
31.1 | - | CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | - | CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | - | CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 | - | CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
83
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized:
First BanCorp. Registrant | ||||
Date: August 11, 2008 | By: | /s/ Luis M. Beauchamp | ||
Luis M. Beauchamp | ||||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: August 11, 2008 | By: | /s/ Fernando Scherrer | ||
Fernando Scherrer | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
84