The securities held by the Trusts qualify as Tier I capital for the Company under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. As a result of the issuance of FIN 46, the Federal Reserve Board is currently evaluating whether deconsolidation of the Trusts will affect the qualification of the securities as Tier I capital. If it is determined that the securities no longer qualify as Tier I capital, the Company would still be considered well-capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions as of March 31, 2004.
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into various transactions, which in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, are not included in the consolidated balance sheets. These transactions are referred to as “off-balance sheet commitments.” The Company enters into these transactions to meet the financing needs of its customers. These transactions include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit, which involve elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company minimizes its exposure to loss under these commitments by subjecting them to credit approval and monitoring procedures.
The Company enters into contractual commitments to extend credit, normally with fixed expiration dates or termination clauses, at specified rates and for specific purposes. Customers use credit commitments to ensure that funds will be available for working capital purposes, for capital expenditures and to ensure access to funds at specified terms and conditions. Substantially all of the Company’s commitments to extend credit are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards at the time of loan funding. Management assesses the credit risk associated with certain commitments to extend credit in determining the level of the allowance for loan losses.
Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The Company’s policies generally require that letters of credit arrangements contain security and debt covenants similar to those contained in loan agreements. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, the Company would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount shown in the table below. If the commitment is funded, the Company would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer. As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, no amounts have been recorded as liabilities for the Company’s potential obligations under these guarantees.
Outstanding commitments and letters of credit are approximately as follows (dollars in thousands):
The Company is subject to various claims and legal actions occurring in the normal course of business. The Company accrues for estimated losses in the accompanying financial statements for those matters where management believes the likelihood of an adverse outcome is probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. After consultation with legal counsel, management currently believes the outcome of outstanding legal proceedings, claims and litigation involving the Company will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operation.
In a series of transactions in 1992, 1994 and 1995, Guaranty Leasing acquired limited partnership interests in three different partnerships (collectively, the “Partnerships” or individually, a “Partnership”) engaged in the equipment leasing business. The investments were structured by TransCapital Corporation (“TransCapital”) through various subsidiaries and controlled partnerships.
Generally, in each of the transactions the Partnership became the lessee of equipment from an equipment owner (pursuant to a sale and leaseback transaction) and the sublessor of the equipment to the equipment user. Each Partnership receives note payments from the equipment owner under a purchase money note given to purchase the equipment from that Partnership. The Partnership makes lease payments to the equipment owner pursuant to the master lease of the equipment. In most instances, payments under the purchase money note equal lease payments under the master lease. Rental payments from the equipment used under these equipment subleases were sold in advance subject to existing liens for purchase of the equipment.
The Partnership incurs a tax loss while the master lease/sublease structure is in place, primarily because deductions for rentals paid under the master lease exceed taxable interest income under the purchase money note. Consequently, Guaranty Leasing has reported tax losses as a result of its investments in the Partnerships, which were deductible by the Company. In November 1998, Guaranty Leasing was informed by the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) that it has taken the position that certain losses taken by one of the three Partnerships during 1994, 1995 and 1996 of $302,000, $410,000 and $447,000, respectively, would be disallowed. In October 2001, Guaranty Leasing was informed by the Service that it has taken the position that certain losses taken by that Partnership during 1997 of $487,000 would also be disallowed. In September 2002, the Company received from the Service a Notice of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment disallowing these deductions. Based upon the advice of counsel, the Company believes that it has correctly reported these transactions for tax purposes and that it has obtained appropriate legal, accounting and appraisal opinions and authority to support its positions. The Company recorded and expensed the tax affect of the disallowed deductions in 2002. On February 3, 2003, the Company filed a petition to begin the process to litigate the matter in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, (the “Texas Court”). On October 17, 2003, the Government filed a Motion to Transfer Venue from the Texas Court to the United States District Court for the Eastern District for Virginia, (the “Virginia Court”). On November 25, 2003, the Government filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings. On December 18, 2003, the Texas Court issued an Order to Stay Proceedings pending the Court’s ruling on the Government’s Motion to Transfer Venue. Any final determination with respect to the Partnership will be binding on the Company. In addition to the ongoing litigation regarding the Partnership, the Service is currently in the process of examining the tax deductions taken for the other two Partnerships. No determination has been made regarding the disallowance of similar deductions for these other two Partnerships. Should the Service ultimately disallow the related tax deductions taken during the remaining years of the above partnership as well as the other two Partnerships, the Company will be required to recognize an additional maximum tax liability of approximately $3.9 million plus possible penalty and interest. The Company is actively contesting the position of the Service in connection with this matter, and will take appropriate steps necessary to protect its legal position.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include forward-looking information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the “Safe Harbor” created by those sections. When used in this document, the words “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “continue,” “may,” “will,” “should” or the negative of such terms and similar expressions as they relate to the Company, its customers or its management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors beyond the Company’s control that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following factors: competitive
11
pressure in the banking industry significantly increasing; changes in the interest rate environment reducing margins; general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally, are less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality and an increase in the provision for loan losses; changes in the regulatory environment; changes in business conditions; volatility of rate sensitive deposits; operational risks including data processing system failures or fraud; asset/liability matching risks and liquidity risks; and changes in the securities markets and the factors contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) is a registered bank holding company that derives substantially all of its revenues and income from the operation of its subsidiary, Guaranty Bond Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank is a full service bank that provides a broad line of financial products and services to small and medium-sized businesses and consumers through ten banking locations in the Texas communities of Mount Pleasant (two offices), Bogata, Commerce, Deport, Paris, Pittsburg, Sulphur Springs, Talco and Texarkana. The Company also maintains an office in Fort Stockton, Texas that limits its product offerings to loans and time deposits.
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
Net earnings for both the three months ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003 were $1.0 million or $0.35 per share. For the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared with the same period in 2003, noninterest income decreased $158,000 or 11.4%, noninterest expense increased $162,000 or 4.1%, and the provision for income tax increased $145,000 or 61.2%. These changes were partially offset by an increase in net interest income of $337,000 or 8.0% and a decrease in provision for loan loss of $125,000 or 33.3%.
Gross loans increased to $367.9 million at March 31, 2004, from $365.5 million at December 31, 2003, an increase of $2.4 million or 0.65%. Total assets increased to $519.0 million at March 31, 2004, compared with $517.1 million at December 31, 2003. The increase of $1.9 million in total assets is primarily due to an increase in cash and cash equivalents, gross loans, and federal funds sold which increased $1.3 million, $2.4 million and $4.6 million, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in securities available for sale of $6.8 million. Total deposits increased to $415.9 million at March 31, 2004 compared with $407.8 million at December 31, 2003. This increase comes primarily from an increase in certificates of deposit of $4.8 million or 2.2%, and an increase in demand deposits of $3.7 million or 5.1%.
Total shareholders’ equity was $37.6 million at March 31, 2004, representing an increase of $1.2 million or 3.2% from December 31, 2003. This increase is due to the earnings for the period of $1.0 million and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $149,000.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Interest Income
Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was $6.7 million, a decrease of $342,000 or 4.9% compared with the three months ended March 31, 2003. The decrease in interest income is due primarily to the decrease in volume of average interest-earning assets from $474.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 compared to $469.1 million for the same period in 2004. Average interest-earning assets decreased primarily due to a $13.0 million or 11.9% decrease in average securities and a $2.0 million or 44.4% decrease in average federal funds sold. The average interest rate earned on interest-earning assets decreased from 6.01% during the three months ended March 31, 2003 to 5.73% during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
12
Interest Expense
Interest expense on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities was $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared with $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, a decrease of $679,000 or 24.0%. The decrease in interest expense is due primarily to the 3.1% decrease in volume of average interest-bearing liabilities from $417.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 compared to $404.3 million for the same period in 2004 combined with a decrease in rates paid on those liabilities. The decrease in total interest average bearing liabilities is primarily due to a $17.8 million or 5.0% decrease in average deposits from $360.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared with $342.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income was $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared with $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, an increase of $337,000 or 8.0%. The increase in net interest income resulted primarily from a decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities to $404.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, from $417.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, a decrease of $12.8 million or 3.1%, partially offset by a decrease in total average interest-earning assets to $469.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, from $474.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003, a decrease of $5.9 million or 1.2%. The net interest margin increased from 3.60% to 3.89% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared with the same three months period ended March 31, 2003. This increase can be attributed to the fact that the percentage decline in average interest-earning liabilities exceeded the percentage decline in average interest-bearing assets, thereby causing the ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities to increase.
The Company’s net interest income is affected by changes in the amount and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as a “volume change.” It is also affected by changes in yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowed funds, referred to as a “rate change.”
The following table sets forth, for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the average amounts outstanding, the interest earned or paid on such amounts, and the average rate earned or paid for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The table also sets forth the average rate earned on total interest-earning assets, the average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities, the net interest spread and the net interest margin for the same periods. The net interest spread is the difference between the average rate earned on total interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. No tax equivalent adjustments were made and all average balances are derived from daily balances. Nonaccruing loans have been included in the tables as loans carrying a zero yield.
13
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| |
| |
| | 2004 | | 2003 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | Average Outstanding Balance | | Interest Earned/ Paid | | Average Yield/ Rate | | Average Outstanding Balance | | Interest Earned/ Paid | | Average Yield/ Rate | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| | (Unaudited) | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | | $ | 363,841 | | $ | 5,688 | | | 6.27 | % | $ | 361,505 | | $ | 5,955 | | | 6.68 | % |
Securities | | | 95,897 | | | 972 | | | 4.07 | % | | 108,890 | | | 1,074 | | | 4.00 | % |
Federal funds sold | | | 2,536 | | | 6 | | | 0.95 | % | | 4,509 | | | 13 | | | 1.17 | % |
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions | | | 6,810 | | | 34 | | | 2.00 | % | | 42 | | | - | | | 1.70 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total interest-earning assets | | | 469,084 | | | 6,700 | | | 5.73 | % | | 474,946 | | | 7,042 | | | 6.01 | % |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less allowance for loan losses | | | (3,932 | ) | | | | | | | | (3,666 | ) | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest-earning assets, net of allowance | | | 465,152 | | | | | | | | | 471,280 | | | | | | | |
Non-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | | 21,083 | | | | | | | | | 16,339 | | | | | | | |
Premises and equipment | | | 13,162 | | | | | | | | | 13,520 | | | | | | | |
Interest receivable and other assets | | | 17,110 | | | | | | | | | 18,072 | | | | | | | |
Other real estate owned | | | 813 | | | | | | | | | 1,569 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 517,320 | | | | | | | | $ | 520,780 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW, savings, and money market accounts | | $ | 123,405 | | $ | 230 | | | 0.75 | % | $ | 115,823 | | $ | 262 | | | 0.92 | % |
Time deposits | | | 218,825 | | | 1,169 | | | 2.14 | % | | 244,226 | | | 1,853 | | | 3.08 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | 342,230 | | | 1,399 | | | 1.64 | % | | 360,049 | | | 2,115 | | | 2.38 | % |
FHLB advances and federal funds purchased | | | 52,011 | | | 500 | | | 3.86 | % | | 47,075 | | | 465 | | | 4.01 | % |
Long-term debt | | | 10,104 | | | 251 | | | 9.96 | % | | 10,000 | | | 249 | | | 10.10 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 404,345 | | $ | 2,150 | | | 2.13 | % | | 417,124 | | $ | 2,829 | | | 2.75 | % |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noninterest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Demand deposits | | | 70,936 | | | | | | | | | 63,984 | | | | | | | |
Accrued interest, taxes and other liabilities | | | 4,809 | | | | | | | | | 4,746 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 480,090 | | | | | | | | | 485,854 | | | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | 37,230 | | | | | | | | | 34,926 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 517,320 | | | | | | | | $ | 520,780 | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
Net interest income | | | | | $ | 4,550 | | | | | | | | $ | 4,213 | | | | |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest spread | | | | | | | | | 3.60 | % | | | | | | | | 3.26 | % |
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest margin | | | | | | | | | 3.89 | % | | | | | | | | 3.60 | % |
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
14
The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for the major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and distinguishes between the increase (decrease) related to outstanding balances and the volatility of interest rates. For purposes of these tables, changes attributable to both rate and volume that can be segregated have been allocated proportionately to changes due to rate and changes due to volume (dollars in thousands):
| |
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| |
| |
| | 2004 vs. 2003 | |
| |
| |
| | Increase (Decrease) Due to | | | |
| |
| | | |
| | Volume | | Rate | | Total | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | (Unaudited) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-earning assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | | $ | 156 | | $ | (423 | ) | $ | (267 | ) |
Securities | | | (520 | ) | | 418 | | | (102 | ) |
Federal funds sold | | | (23 | ) | | 16 | | | (7 | ) |
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions | | | 115 | | | (81 | ) | | 34 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total decrease in interest income | | | (272 | ) | | (70 | ) | | (342 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
NOW, savings, and money market accounts | | | 70 | | | (102 | ) | | (32 | ) |
Time deposits | | | (782 | ) | | 98 | | | (684 | ) |
Other borrowed funds | | | 198 | | | (163 | ) | | 35 | |
Long-term debt | | | 11 | | | (9 | ) | | 2 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total decrease in interest expense | | | (503 | ) | | (176 | ) | | (679 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Increase in net interest income | | $ | 231 | | $ | 106 | | $ | 337 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Provision for Loan Losses
Provisions for loan losses are charged to income to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management of the Company based on such factors as the industry diversification of the Company’s commercial loan portfolio, the effect of changes in the local real estate market on collateral values, the results of recent regulatory examinations, the effects on the loan portfolio of current economic indicators and their probable impact on borrowers, the amount of charge-offs for the period, the amount of nonperforming loans and related collateral security, and the evaluation of the Company’s loan portfolio by an external loan review firm. The provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2004, was $250,000, compared with $375,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, a decrease of $125,000 or 33.3%. The decrease is partially due to the decrease in the ratio of net charge offs to average loans from .08% for the three months ended March 31, 2003 to .03% for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate as of the dates indicated based on its assessment of the factors listed above.
15
Noninterest Income
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest income (dollars in thousands):
| | Three months ended March 31, | |
| |
| |
| | 2004 | | 2003 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | (Unaudited) | |
| | | | | | | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | $ | 724 | | $ | 683 | |
Fee income | | | 271 | | | 256 | |
Fiduciary income | | | 56 | | | 41 | |
Other noninterest income | | | 135 | | | 265 | |
Realized gain on securities | | | 42 | | | 141 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total noninterest income | | $ | 1,228 | | $ | 1,386 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
As indicated above, the Company’s primary sources of recurring noninterest income are service charges on deposit accounts, fee income and other noninterest income. Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 decreased $158,000 or 11.4% over the same period ended March 31, 2003. The decrease in noninterest income for the three months ending March 31, 2004 is primarily due to the decrease in gain on sale of securities realized in 2004 over 2003 and a decrease in the sale of mortgage loans into the secondary market during the same comparable quarters. In the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company realized a gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities of $42,000 from the sale of $1.5 million of securities compared with a gain on the sale of mortgage-backed securities of $141,000 from the sale of $24.5 million of securities during the three months ended March 31, 2003. The Company also decreased the volume of mortgage loans it sold into the secondary market. This activity generated noninterest income of $83,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared with $229,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, a decrease of $146,000 or 63.8%. These decreases were partially offset by increases in service charges on deposit accounts and fee income of $41,000 or 6.0% and $15,000 or 5.9%, respectively, during the comparable quarters.
16
Noninterest Expenses
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest expenses (dollars in thousands):
| | Three months ended March 31, | |
| |
| |
| | 2004 | | 2003 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | (Unaudited) | |
| | | | | | | |
Employee compensation and benefits | | $ | 2,476 | | $ | 2,339 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Non-staff expenses: | | | | | | | |
Net bank premises expense | | | 504 | | | 495 | |
Office and computer supplies | | | 72 | | | 82 | |
Legal and professional fees | | | 212 | | | 156 | |
Advertising | | | 92 | | | 72 | |
Postage | | | 51 | | | 48 | |
FDIC insurance | | | 16 | | | 17 | |
Other | | | 691 | | | 743 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total non-staff expenses | | | 1,638 | | | 1,613 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total noninterest expenses | | $ | 4,114 | | $ | 3,952 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Employee compensation and benefits expense for the three months ended March 31, 2004 increased $137,000 or 5.9% over the same period ended March 31, 2003. The increase is due primarily to normal salary increases and an increase in employee insurance costs. The number of full-time equivalent employees was 219 at March 31, 2004, compared with 220 at March 31, 2003.
Non-staff expenses increased $25,000 or 1.6% over the comparable three month period in 2003. Legal and professional expense increased by $56,000, or 35.9% for the three months primarily due to the cost incurred to contest the position the Internal Revenue Service took regarding Guaranty Leasing Partnership deductions. Other non-staff expenses decreased $52,000 or 7.0% from $743,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 to $691,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense increased $145,000 or 61.2% to $382,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $237,000 for the same period in 2003. The increase is due primarily to a decrease in taxable deductions associated with the Company’s leasing activities. The income stated on the consolidated statement of earnings differs from the taxable income due to tax-exempt income, the amount of non-deductible interest expense and the amount of other non-deductible expenses.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Loan Portfolio
Gross loans were $367.9 million at March 31, 2004, an increase of $2.4 million or 0.7% from $365.5 million at December 31, 2003. Loan growth occurred primarily in the commercial and industrial, and in construction and land development loans, offset by decreases in consumer and commercial real estate loans. Average loans comprised 77.6% of total average interest-earning assets at March 31, 2004 compared with 76.1% at March 31, 2003.
17
The following table summarizes the loan portfolio of the Company by type of loan as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
| | March 31, 2004 | | December 31, 2003 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | Amount | | Percent | | Amount | | Percent | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | $ | 57,041 | | | 15.50 | % | $ | 55,285 | | | 15.13 | % |
Agriculture | | | 10,365 | | | 2.82 | | | 10,173 | | | 2.78 | |
Real estate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Construction and land development | | | 24,480 | | | 6.65 | | | 22,020 | | | 6.02 | |
1-4 family residential | | | 137,027 | | | 37.25 | | | 136,717 | | | 37.40 | |
Loans, held for sale | | | 1,263 | | | 0.34 | | | 1,244 | | | 0.34 | |
Farmland | | | 20,269 | | | 5.51 | | | 20,267 | | | 5.54 | |
Commercial | | | 78,762 | | | 21.41 | | | 79,953 | | | 21.88 | |
Multi-family residential | | | 9,161 | | | 2.49 | | | 9,291 | | | 2.55 | |
Consumer, net of unearned discounts | | | 29,534 | | | 8.03 | | | 30,564 | | | 8.36 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total gross loans | | $ | 367,902 | | | 100.00 | % | $ | 365,514 | | | 100.00 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for Loan Losses
In originating loans, the Company recognizes that it will experience credit losses and that the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, general economic conditions, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan and, in the case of a collateralized loan, the quality of the collateral for such loan. The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses in an amount that it believes is adequate for estimated losses in its loan portfolio. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance through its evaluation of the loan portfolio and based on the factors set forth in “Results of Operations-Provision for Loan Losses”. In addition to unallocated allowances, specific allowances are provided for individual loans when ultimate collection is considered questionable by management after reviewing the current status of loans which are contractually past due and considering the net realizable value of the collateral for the loan. Loans are charged off against the allowance for loan losses when appropriate. Although management believes it uses the best information available to make determinations with respect to the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments may be necessary if economic conditions differ from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. Loan charge-offs, net of recoveries, during the three months ended March 31, 2004 decreased $159,000 or 55.6% compared with the same period ended March 31, 2003. At March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003, the allowance for loan losses totaled $4.0 million or 1.10% of gross loans and $3.8 million or 1.04% of gross loans, respectively. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 121.10% and 88.42% at March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
18
Set forth below is an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
| | Three months ended March 31, | |
| |
| |
| | 2004 | | 2003 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
Average loans outstanding | | $ | 363,841 | | $ | 361,505 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gross loans outstanding at end of period | | $ | 367,902 | | $ | 364,940 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period | | $ | 3,906 | | $ | 3,692 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 250 | | | 375 | |
Charge-offs: | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | | (45 | ) | | (230 | ) |
Real estate | | | (45 | ) | | (7 | ) |
Consumer | | | (60 | ) | | (72 | ) |
Recoveries: | | | | | | | |
Commercial and industrial | | | 3 | | | - | |
Real estate | �� | | 9 | | | 5 | |
Consumer | | | 11 | | | 18 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net loan charge-offs | | | (127 | ) | | (286 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for loan losses at end of period | | $ | 4,029 | | $ | 3,781 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | | | | | |
Ratio of allowance to end of period loans | | | 1.10 | % | | 1.04 | % |
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans | | | 0.03 | % | | 0.08 | % |
Ratio of allowance to end of period nonperforming loans | | | 121.10 | % | | 88.42 | % |
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets were $4.2 million at March 31, 2004 compared to $3.3 million at December 31, 2003. Nonaccrual loans decreased $43,000 from $2.1 million at December 31, 2003 to $2.0 million at March 31, 2004. This decrease is due primarily to three lines of credit being moved to repossessed assets or other real estate and one line of credit being upgraded to interest accrual. Accruing loans 90 or more days past due increased $809,000 from $489,000 at December 31, 2003 to $1.3 million at March 31, 2004. This increase is due primarily to four lines of credit becoming past due. Management believes that these lines of credit are well collateralized and reserves have been established for any anticipated loss. Other real estate increased $145,000 during the same period. The increase is primarily the result of loans that were foreclosed on during the period totaling $215,000 and sales of properties with a carrying value of $69,592. Management anticipates minimal losses on the total of these new nonperforming assets.
The ratio of nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate was 1.14% and 0.90% at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively.
19
The following table presents information regarding nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
| | March 31, 2004 | | December 31, 2003 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | (Unaudited) | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans | | | $ | 2,029 | | | | $ | 2,072 | | |
Accruing loans 90 or more days past due | | | | 1,298 | | | | | 489 | | |
| | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
Total nonperforming loans | | | | 3,327 | | | | | 2,561 | | |
Other real estate | | | | 888 | | | | | 743 | | |
| | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
Total nonperforming assets | | | $ | 4,215 | | | | $ | 3,304 | | |
| | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
Securities
Securities totaled $92.8 million at March 31, 2004, a decrease of $6.8 million from $99.6 million at December 31, 2003. The decrease is primarily the result of the decrease in federal funds purchased of $7.3 million during the quarter. At March 31, 2004, securities represented 17.9% of total assets compared with 19.3% of total assets at December 31, 2003. The yield on average securities for the three months ended March 31, 2004, is 4.07% compared with 4.00% for the same period in 2003. At March 31, 2004 securities included $7.2 million in U.S. Government securities, $80.5 million in mortgage-backed securities, $3.9 million in equity securities, and $1.2 million in municipal securities. The average life of the securities portfolio at March 31, 2004 is approximately 3.47 years, however, all of the Company’s securities are classified as available-for-sale.
Other Assets
Other assets totaled $9.9 million at March 31, 2004 compared with $9.4 million at December 31, 2003, an increase of $523,000 or 5.6%. This increase resulted primarily from the recording of additional cash value of key-man life insurance that the Company owns.
Deposits
At March 31, 2004, demand, money market and savings deposits account for approximately 46.9% of total deposits, while certificates of deposit make up 53.1% of total deposits. Total deposits increased $8.0 million or 2.0% from December 31, 2003 to March 31, 2004. This increase comes primarily from an increase in certificates of deposit of $4.8 million or 2.2% due to the Company offering of competitive yields on these deposits. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits totaled $75.9 million or 18.2% of total deposits at March 31, 2004, compared with $72.2 million or 17.7% of total deposits at December 31, 2003. The average cost of deposits, including noninterest-bearing demand deposits, is 1.36% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared with 2.02% for the same period in 2003.
Liquidity
The Company’s asset/liability management policy is intended to maintain adequate liquidity for the Company. Liquidity involves the Company’s ability to raise funds to support asset growth or reduce assets to meet deposit withdrawals and other payment obligations, to maintain reserve requirements and otherwise to operate the Company on a continuing basis. The Company’s liquidity needs are primarily met by growth in core deposits. Although access to purchased funds from correspondent banks is available and has been utilized on occasion to take advantage of investment opportunities, the Company does not continually rely on these external-funding sources. The cash and federal funds sold position, supplemented by amortizing investments along with payments and maturities within the loan portfolio, has historically created an adequate liquidity position.
20
The Company’s cash flows are composed of three classifications: cash flows from operating activities, cash flows from investing activities, and cash flows from financing activities. As summarized in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, the most significant transactions which affected the Company’s level of cash and cash equivalents, cash flows, and liquidity during the first three months of 2004 are the net change in deposits of $8.0 million, the maturities, calls, and principal repayments of securities totaling $7.3 million, the net change in federal funds purchased of $7.3 million, the net change in federal funds sold of $4.6 million and the net increase in loans of $2.7 million.
Commitments, Contingency and Off Balance Sheet Items
The Company enters into contractual commitments to extend credit, normally with fixed expiration dates or termination clauses, at specified rates and for specific purposes. Customers use credit commitments to ensure that funds will be available for working capital purposes, for capital expenditures and to ensure access to funds at specified terms and conditions. Substantially all of the Company’s commitments to extend credit are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards at the time of loan funding. Management assesses the credit risk associated with certain commitments to extend credit in determining the level of the allowance for loan losses.
Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The Company’s policies generally require that letters of credit arrangements contain security and debt covenants similar to those contained in loan agreements. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, the Company would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount shown in the table below. If the commitment is funded, the Company would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer. As of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, no amounts have been recorded as liabilities for the Bank’s potential obligations under these guarantees.
Outstanding commitments and letters of credit are approximately as follows (dollars in thousands):
| |
Contract or Notional Amount | |
| |
| |
| | March 31, 2004 | | December 31, 2003 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Commitments to extend credit | | | $ | 36,071 | | | | $ | 23,878 | | |
Letters of credit | | | | 1,686 | | | | | 1,491 | | |
Capital Resources
Both the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”), with respect to the Company, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), with respect to the Bank, have established certain minimum risk-based capital standards that apply to bank holding companies and federally insured banks, respectively. As of March 31, 2004, the Company’s Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital and leverage capital ratios are 12.49%, 13.60%, and 8.76%, respectively. As of March 31, 2004, the Bank’s risk-based capital ratios remain above the levels required for the Bank to be designated as “well capitalized” by the FDIC with Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital and leverage capital ratios of 12.02%, 13.14%, and 8.39%, respectively.
In the first quarter of 2004, as a result of applying the provisions of FIN 46, the Company was required to deconsolidate its interest in the Trusts from its financial statement. The impact of this deconsolidation was considered
21
immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In July 2003, the Federal Reserve issued a supervisory letter instructing bank holding companies to continue to include the long-term debt in Tier I capital for regulatory purposes, subject to specified limits, until notice is given to the contrary. If it is determined that the securities no longer qualify as Tier I capital, the Company would still be considered well-capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions as of March 31, 2004.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
There have been no material changes in the market risk information disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. See Form 10-K, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported to the Company’s management within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
22
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is subject to various claims and legal actions occurring in the normal course of business. The Company accrues for estimated losses in the accompanying financial statements for those matters where management believes the likelihood of an adverse outcome is probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. After consultation with legal counsel, management currently believes the outcome of outstanding legal proceedings, claims and litigation involving the Company will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS AND ISSUER REPURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits – The following exhibits are filed as a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q:
| Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
|
| |
|
| 31.1 | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | | |
| 31.2 | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | | |
| 32.1 | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | | |
| 32.2 | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
| The Company filed a Current Report under Item 12 of Form 8-K on March 5, 2004 to announce the release of the Company’s earnings for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2003. |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC. |
| (Registrant) |
| |
Date: May 12, 2004 | By: /s/Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr. |
|
| |
| Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr. President (Principal Executive Officer) |
| |
|
Date: May 12, 2004 | By: /s/Clifton A. Payne |
|
| |
| Clifton A. Payne Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
24
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
| |
|
31.1 | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
25