Moody's (MCO) DEF 14A Definitive proxy

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

[Amendment No.    ]

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐	Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
☒	Definitive Proxy Statement
☐	Definitive Additional Materials
☐	Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

MOODY’S CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒	No fee required.
☐	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.
	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)	Total fee paid:
☐	Fee paid previously with written preliminary materials.
☐	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)	Form Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)	Filing Party:
	(4)	Date Filed:

March 11, 2020

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Moody’s Corporation to be held on Tuesday, April 21, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. EDT at the Company’s principal executive offices at 7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10007.

The Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement accompanying this letter describe the business to be acted upon at the meeting. The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2019 is also enclosed.

On March 11, 2020, we mailed to many of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our 2020 Proxy Statement and 2019 Annual Report and vote online. The Notice included instructions on how to request a paper ore-mail copy of the proxy materials, including the Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, Annual Report, and proxy card or voting instruction card. Stockholders who requested paper copies of the proxy materials or previously elected to receive the proxy materials electronically did not receive a Notice and will receive the proxy materials in the format requested.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we encourage you to review the proxy materials and hope you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone by using the instructions provided in the Notice. Alternatively, if you requested and received paper copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can also vote by mail by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by written proxy or voting instruction card will ensure your representation at the annual meeting regardless of whether you attend in person. Instructions regarding the three methods of voting are contained in the Notice or proxy card or voting instruction card.

Sincerely,
Henry A. McKinnell, Jr. Chairman of the Board	Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer

MOODY’S CORPORATION

7 World Trade Center

250 Greenwich Street

New York, New York 10007*

NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Our Stockholders:

The 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Moody’s Corporation will be held on Tuesday, April 21, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. EDT at the Company’s offices at 7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York*, for the following purposes, all as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

1. To elect the nine director nominees named in the Proxy Statement to serve aone-year term;

2. To amend the Moody’s Corporation Restated Certificate of Incorporation to remove supermajority voting standards applicable to the following actions:

a. Future amendments to certain provisions of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation and theBy-Laws;

b. Removing directors from office; and

c. Filling vacancies and newly created directorships at certain special meetings called pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law;

3. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year 2020;

4. To vote on an advisory resolution approving executive compensation; and

5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

The Board of Directors of the Company has fixed the close of business on February 24, 2020 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Elizabeth M. McCarroll

Corporate Secretary and Associate General Counsel

March 11, 2020

* We are actively monitoring the public health and travel concerns relating to the coronavirus (COVID-19) and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold the annual meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting, which may include a change in venue or holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor the Company’s website atwww.moodys.com under the headings “About Us—Investor Relations” for updated information. If you are planning to attend the meeting, please check the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the annual meeting.

IMPORTANT VOTING INFORMATION

Your Participation in Voting the Shares You Own Is Important

If you are the beneficial owner of your shares (meaning that your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee), you may receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials from that firm containing instructions that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted. Certain institutions offer telephone and Internet voting. If you received the proxy materials in paper form, the materials include a voting instruction card so you can instruct the holder of record on how to vote your shares. The firm that holds your shares is not permitted to vote on the matters to be considered at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, other than to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP, unless you provide specific instructions by following the instructions from your broker about voting your shares by telephone or Internet or completing and returning the voting instruction card. For your vote to be counted in the election of directors, on the amendments to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to remove supermajority voting standards, and on the advisory resolution approving executive compensation, you will need to communicate your voting decisions to your bank, broker or other holder of record before the date of the annual meeting.

Voting your shares is important to ensure that you have a say in the governance of the Company and to fulfill the objectives of the majority-voting standard that Moody’s Corporation applies in the election of directors. Please review the proxy materials and follow the relevant instructions to vote your shares. We hope you will exercise your rights and fully participate as a stockholder in the future of Moody’s Corporation.

More Information Is Available

If you have any questions about the voting of your shares or the proxy voting process in general, please contact the bank, broker or other nominee through which you hold your shares. The SEC also has a website (http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/proxymatters.shtml) with more information about voting at annual meetings. Additionally, you may contact the Company’s Investor Relations Department by sending ane-mail toir@moodys.com.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 21, 2020

The Proxy Statement and the Company’s 2019 Annual Report are available at https://materials.proxyvote.com/615369. Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote your shares via a toll-free telephone number or over the Internet as instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Alternatively, if you received a paper copy of a proxy or voting instruction card by mail, you may submit your proxy or voting instruction card for the annual meeting by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy or voting instruction card in thepre-addressed envelope provided. No postage is required if the card is mailed in the United States. If you attend the meeting, you may vote in person, even if you have previously returned your proxy or voting instruction card or voted by telephone or the Internet.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY	1
2020 Annual Meeting Information	1
Matters to be Voted on at the Annual Meeting	1
How to Vote	1
Annual Meeting Admission	2
Corporate Governance Highlights	2
Director Nominee Highlights	3
Corporate Social Responsibility	4
Sustainability	4
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	5
Board Meetings and Committees	5
Recommendation of Director Candidates	5
Director Education	6
Board Leadership Structure	6
Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics	7
Director Independence	7
Board and Committee Evaluation Process	8
The Board’s Role in the Oversight of Company Risk	9

Executive Sessions	10
Communications with Directors	10
Succession Planning	10
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy; Short Sales and Other Speculative Trades	10
Rule10b5-1 Trading Plans	10
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE	11
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT	12
THE GOVERNANCE & NOMINATING COMMITTEE	13
THE COMPENSATION & HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE	13
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION & HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE	14
RELATIONSHIP OF COMPENSATION PRACTICES TO RISK MANAGEMENT	15
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS	15
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS	15
Stock Ownership Guidelines forNon-Management Directors	17
1998 Moody’s CorporationNon-Employee Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan	17
ITEM 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS	18
Qualifications and Skills of Directors	18
Director Nominees	19
ITEM 2—AMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO REMOVE SUPERMAJORITY VOTING STANDARDS	24
Overview	24
Reasons for the Proposed Amendments	24
The Proposed Amendments	25
Additional Information	26
ITEM 3—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS	27
Principal Accounting Fees and Services	27
ITEM 4—ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	28
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT	31
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports	32

i

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS	33
Executive Summary	33
Executive Compensation Governance Highlights	34
Philosophy of the Executive Compensation Program	35
Peer and Market Review	36
Elements of Moody’s Compensation Program	38
Weighting of Elements—Fixed versus “At Risk” Compensation	40
2019 Compensation Decisions	41
Annual Incentive Funding Financial Metrics	44
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation	46
The Role of the Committee, Its Consultant and Management	48
Chief Executive Officer Compensation	48
Executive Compensation Governance Policies and Practices	50
Additional Executive Compensation Policies and Practices	52
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE	54
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE FOR 2019	56
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END TABLE FOR 2019	57
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE FOR 2019	59
PENSION BENEFITS TABLE FOR 2019	59
Moody’s Corporation Retirement Account	60
Moody’s Corporation Pension Benefit Equalization Plan	61
Moody’s Corporation Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan	61
NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE	62
Moody’s Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan	62
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL	62
Moody’s Corporation Career Transition Plan	63
Moody’s Corporation Change In Control Severance Plan	65
Other Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment	66
CEO PAY RATIO	68
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING, PROXY VOTING AND OTHER INFORMATION	69
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials	69
Delivery of Documents to Stockholders Sharing an Address	69
Record Date	69
Special Voting Procedures for Certain Current and Former Employees	69
Quorum and Voting Requirements	70
Proxies	71
OTHER BUSINESS	71
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	71
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2021 ANNUAL MEETING	72
APPENDIX A - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS	A-1

ii

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

2020 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the holders of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), of Moody’s Corporation (“Moody’s” or the “Company”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) for use in voting at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). This summary highlights certain information from this Proxy Statement. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

Date and Time	Place	Record Date
Tuesday, April 21, 2020     9:30 a.m. EDT	7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York*	February 24, 2020

* We are actively monitoring the public health and travel concerns relating to the coronavirus (COVID-19) and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold the Annual Meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting, which may include a change in venue or holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor the Company’s website atwww.moodys.com under the headings “About Us—Investor Relations” for updated information. If you are planning to attend the Annual Meeting, please check the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.

To obtain directions to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, please contact the Company’s Investor Relations Department by sending ane-mail toir@moodys.com. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being made available to stockholders on or about March 11, 2020. The Company’s telephone number is(212) 553-0300.

MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Items of Business		Board Recommendation	Vote Required
Item 1	Election of Directors	FOR each nominee	Majority of votes cast
Items 2(a),   2(b) and 2(c)	Amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to remove the supermajority voting standards applicable to certain actions	FOR each of Items 2(a), 2(b) and 2(c)	80% of outstanding shares
Item 3	Ratification of appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2020	FOR	Majority of shares present and entitled to vote
Item 4	Advisory resolution approving executive compensation	FOR	Majority of shares present and entitled to vote

HOW TO VOTE

In addition to voting in person at the Annual Meeting, stockholders of record can vote by proxy by following the instructions in the Notice and using the Internet or by calling the toll-free telephone number that is available on the Internet. Alternatively, stockholders of record who requested a paper copy of the proxy materials can vote by proxy by mailing their signed proxy cards. The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         1

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, you may receive a Notice from that firm containing instructions that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted. Certain institutions offer telephone and Internet voting. If you received the proxy materials in paper form, the materials include a voting instruction card so you can instruct the holder of record on how to vote your shares. If you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares. For additional information, including voting procedures for certain current and former employees, see “Information about the Annual Meeting, Proxy Voting and Other Information” on page 69.

ANNUAL MEETING ADMISSION

Stockholders will need an admission ticket to enter the Annual Meeting. For stockholders of record, an admission ticket is available over the Internet, or, if you requested paper copies, you will receive a printed proxy card and a printed admission ticket. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please retain and bring the admission ticket.

If you are the beneficial owner of your shares (meaning that your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee) and you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you may obtain an admission ticket in advance by sending a written request, along with proof of share ownership such as a bank or brokerage account statement, to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at 7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10007. An admission ticket is also available over the Internet. Stockholders who do not have admission tickets will be admitted following verification of ownership at the door.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Board Independence	Executive Compensation Governance Practices
✓  Independent Chairman of the Board ✓  Nine of ten current Board members independent ✓  Fully independent Audit, Governance & Nominating, and Compensation & Human Resources Committees ✓  Executive sessions of independent directors at each regular meeting	✓  Robust stock ownership guidelines for directors and executive officers ✓  Comprehensive clawback policy ✓  Minimumone-year vesting period for incentive equity awards ✓  Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy

  Other Board Practices

✓  All directors elected annually by majority vote (in uncontested elections)

✓  Annual evaluations of the Board, committees and individual directors

✓  Board includes a range of tenures to balance fresh perspectives within-depth knowledge about the Company

2         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

DIRECTOR NOMINEE HIGHLIGHTS

The Company strives to maintain a Board that possesses a combination of skills, professional experience, and diversity of backgrounds and tenure necessary to effectively oversee the Company’s business. In addition, the Board amended the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles in 2019 to include a commitment that, as part of the search process for each new director, the Governance & Nominating Committee will include women and minorities in the pool of candidates (and instruct any search firm the Committee engages to do so) (often called a “Rooney Rule”). Nine of the ten directors currently serving are standing for election at the Annual Meeting. Gerrit Zalm will not stand for reelection to the Board at the Annual Meeting and will retire from the Board at the end of his current term. Information regarding the director nominees is provided below.

Director Nominee		Audit		Governance & Nominating		Compensation & Human Resources		Executive
Basil L. Anderson   Former Vice Chairman, Staples, Inc.	✓		M		C		M		M
Jorge A. Bermudez   Former Chief Risk Officer, Citigroup, Inc.	✓		M		M		M
Thérèse Esperdy   Former Global Chairman of Financial Institutions   Group, JPMorgan Chase & Co.	✓		M		M		M
Vincent A. Forlenza   Chairman and Former Chief Executive Officer,   Becton, Dickinson and Company	✓		M		M		M
Kathryn M. Hill   Former Senior Vice President, Cisco Systems, Inc.	✓		M		M		C		M
Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr.   President and Chief Executive Officer,   Moody’s Corporation									M
Henry A. McKinnell, Jr., Ph.D.   Chairman, Moody’s Corporation   Former Chairman, Pfizer Inc.	✓		M		M		M		C
Leslie F. Seidman   Former Chairman, Financial Accounting   Standards Board	✓		C		M		M		M
Bruce Van Saun   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,   Citizens Financial Group, Inc.	✓		M		M		M

✓ Independent                C: Chairman of Committee                M: Member of Committee    

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         3

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Moody’s manages its business with the goal of delivering value to all of its stakeholders, including its customers, employees, business partners, local communities and stockholders. The Company’s Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”) strategy is an integral part of supporting this fundamental commitment to all stakeholders. The senior management of the Company is ultimately responsible for shaping and implementing the CSR strategy. Moody’s CSR Council, chaired by President and Chief Executive Officer Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr. and comprised of members of the management team, evaluates the Company’s CSR progress, generates recommendations to enhance Moody’s approach to CSR and identifies opportunities in Moody’s business that align with the CSR mission. In addition, the Board oversees sustainability matters, with assistance from the Governance & Nominating Committee, as part of its oversight of management and the Company’s overall strategy. Moody’s CSR strategy is focused on the following areas where the Company believes it can make the most impact.

SUSTAINABILITY

Moody’s advances sustainability by considering environmental, social, and governance factors throughout its operations and two business segments. It uses its expertise and assets to make a positive difference through technology tools, research and analytical services that help other organizations and the investor community better understand the links between sustainability considerations and the global markets. Moody’s efforts to promote sustainability-related thought leadership, assessments and data to market participants include following the policies of recognized sustainability and corporate social responsibility parties that develop standards or frameworks and/or evaluate and assess performance, including Global Reporting Initiative and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”). Moody’s sustainability-related achievements in 2019 included the following:

4         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

In order to address evolving best practices and new regulatory requirements, the Board of Directors reviews its corporate governance practices and the charters for its standing committees at least annually. After performing its annual governance review for 2019, the Board determined to amend the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles and its charters for the Audit, Governance & Nominating and Compensation & Human Resources Committees. A copy of the Corporate Governance Principles is available on the Company’s website atwww.moodys.com under the headings “About Us—Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Other Governance Documents.” Copies of the charters of the Audit Committee, the Governance & Nominating Committee, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee and the Executive Committee are available on the Company’s website at www.moodys.com under the headings “About Us—Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Charter Documents.” Print copies of the Corporate Governance Principles and the committee charters may also be obtained upon request, addressed to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at 7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10007. The Audit Committee, the Governance & Nominating Committee and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities, as described below. The Executive Committee has the authority to exercise the powers of the Board when it is not in session (subject to applicable law, rules and regulations, and the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation andBy-Laws), advises management and performs other duties delegated to it by the Board from time to time.

BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

During 2019, the Board of Directors met eight times. The Board had four standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Governance & Nominating Committee, a Compensation & Human Resources Committee and an Executive Committee. All incumbent directors attended more than 80% of the total number of meetings of the Board and of all Board committees on which they served in 2019.

Please refer to page 11 for additional information regarding the Audit Committee, page 13 for additional information regarding the Governance & Nominating Committee and page 13 for additional information regarding the Compensation & Human Resources Committee. The Executive Committee did not meet in 2019. Directors are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting. All individuals elected to the Board at the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of stockholders attended the meeting.

RECOMMENDATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

The Governance & Nominating Committee considers and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the size, structure, composition and functioning of the Board and engages in succession planning for the Board and key leadership roles on the Board and its committees. The Governance & Nominating Committee is also responsible for overseeing processes for the selection and nomination of director candidates. The Governance & Nominating Committee periodically reviews the skills, experience, characteristics and other criteria for identifying and evaluating directors, and recommends these criteria to the Board. The Governance & Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders of the Company and may also engage independent search firms from time to time to assist in identifying and evaluating potential director candidates. In considering a candidate for Board membership, whether proposed by stockholders or otherwise, the Governance & Nominating Committee examines the candidate’s business experience, qualifications, attributes and skills relevant to the management and oversight of the Company’s business, independence, the ability to represent diverse stockholder interests, judgment, integrity, the ability to commit sufficient time and attention to Board activities, and the absence of any potential conflicts with the Company’s business and interests. The Committee also seeks diverse occupational and personal backgrounds for the Board. See “Qualifications and Skills of Directors” on page 18 and “Director Nominees” beginning on page 19 for additional information on the Company’s directors. To have a candidate considered by the Governance & Nominating Committee, a stockholder must submit the recommendation in writing and must include the following information:

• The name of the stockholder and evidence of the stockholder’s ownership of Company stock, including the number of shares owned and the length of time of ownership; and

• The name of the candidate, the candidate’s resume or a listing of his or her qualifications to be a director of the Company, and the candidate’s consent to be named as a director if selected by the Governance & Nominating Committee and nominated by the Board.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         5

The stockholder recommendation and information described above must be sent to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at 7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10007, and must be received by the Corporate Secretary not less than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the Company’s most recent annual meeting of stockholders. For the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, this deadline is December 22, 2020.

The Governance & Nominating Committee identifies potential nominees by asking current directors and executive officers to notify the Committee if they become aware of persons who meet the criteria described above and might be available to serve on the Board. As described above, the Committee will also consider candidates recommended by stockholders on the same basis as those from other sources. The Governance & Nominating Committee, from time to time, may engage firms that specialize in identifying director candidates for the Committee’s consideration.

Once a person has been identified by or for the Governance & Nominating Committee as a potential candidate, the Committee may collect and review publicly available information regarding the person to assess whether the person should be considered further. If the Governance & Nominating Committee determines that the candidate warrants further consideration, the chairman or another member of the Committee contacts the person. Generally, if the person expresses a willingness to be considered and to serve on the Board, the Governance & Nominating Committee requests information from the candidate, reviews the candidate’s accomplishments and qualifications, including in light of any other candidates whom the Committee might be considering, and conducts one or more interviews with the candidate. In certain instances, Committee members may contact one or more references provided by the candidate or may contact other members of the business community or other persons that may have greater first-hand knowledge of the candidate’s accomplishments.

DIRECTOR EDUCATION

The Company provides all new directors with an initial orientation session, which includes a comprehensive overview of the Company and the opportunity to meet with key leaders of the organization such as the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, the Presidents of Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s Investors Service” or “MIS”) and Moody’s Analytics, Inc. (“Moody’s Analytics” or “MA”), the Chief Strategy Officer, the Head of Internal Audit, the Chief Technology Officer and the Controller. This orientation includes, among other topics, an overview of the Company’s business, including MIS and MA, corporate governance, compliance program, strategy, technology and cybersecurity, enterprise risk management, and legal and regulatory matters.

Board and committee meetings, industry and corporate governance update presentations, periodic reports from the Company’s businesses and external training programs also provide the Company’s directors with continuing education throughout their tenure. The Company reimburses directors for expenses associated with attendance at external education programs.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Company’s Corporate Governance Principles permit the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to be filled by a single person or different individuals. This flexibility allows the Board to review the structure of the Board periodically and determine whether to separate the two roles based upon the Company’s needs and circumstances from time to time.

Dr. McKinnell serves as Chairman of the Board and Mr. McDaniel serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Moody’s Corporation. In 2011 and 2012, the Board discussed whether to separate the roles, taking into account numerous considerations that bear upon the issue, including stockholders’ support at the Company’s 2011 annual meeting of a stockholder proposal recommending that, whenever possible, the Company’s chairman be independent. In light of these considerations, the Board determined to appoint an independent Chairman of the Board. The Board continues to believe that strong, independent Board leadership is a critical aspect of effective corporate governance and that the current leadership structure, with an independent Chairman and separate Chief Executive Officer, is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders at this time. The roles and responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board are detailed in the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles.

6         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

CODES OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Company has also adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to the Company’s directors, officers and employees. A current copy of each of these codes is available on the Company’s website atwww.moodys.com under the headings “About Us—Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Other Governance Documents.” A copy of each is also available in print to stockholders upon request, addressed to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at 7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10007. The Company intends to satisfy disclosure requirements regarding any amendments to, or waivers from, the codes of ethics by posting such information on the Company’s website atwww.moodys.com under the headings “About Us—Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Other Governance Documents.”

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

To assist it in making determinations of a director’s independence, the Board has adopted independence standards that are set forth below and are included in the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles. The Board has determined that Mr. Anderson, Mr. Bermudez, Ms Esperdy, Mr. Forlenza, Ms Hill, Dr. McKinnell, Ms Seidman, Mr. Van Saun and Mr. Zalm, and thus a majority of the directors on the Board, are independent under these standards. The standards adopted by the Board incorporate the director independence criteria included in the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) listing standards, as well as additional criteria established by the Board. The Audit Committee, the Governance & Nominating Committee and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee are composed entirely of independent directors. In accordance with NYSE requirements and the independence standards adopted by the Board, all members of the Audit Committee and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee meet additional heightened independence standards applicable to audit committee and compensation committee members.

An “independent” director is a director whom the Board has determined has no material relationship with the Company or any of its consolidated subsidiaries (for purposes of this section, collectively referred to as the “Company”), either directly, or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. For purposes of this definition, the Board has determined that a director is not independent if:

1. the director is, or in the past three years has been, an employee of the Company, or an immediate family member of the director is, or in the past three years has been, an executive officer of the Company;

2. (a) the director, or an immediate family member of the director, is a current partner of the Company’s outside auditor; (b) the director is a current employee of the Company’s outside auditor; (c) a member of the director’s immediate family is a current employee of the Company’s outside auditor and personally works on the Company’s audit; or (d) the director or an immediate family member of the director was in the past three years a partner or employee of the Company’s outside auditor and personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time;

3. the director, or a member of the director’s immediate family, is or in the past three years has been, an executive officer of another company where any of the Company’s present executive officers serves or served on the compensation committee at the same time;

4. the director, or a member of the director’s immediate family, has received, during any12-month period in the past three years, any direct compensation from the Company in excess of $120,000, other than compensation for Board service, compensation received by the director’s immediate family member for service as an employee (other than an executive officer) of the Company, and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service with the Company;

5. the director is a current executive officer or employee, or a member of the director’s immediate family is a current executive officer of another company that makes payments to or receives payments from the Company, or during any of the last three fiscal years, has made payments to or received payments from the Company, for property or services in an amount that, in any single fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of the other company’s consolidated gross revenues; or

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         7

6. the director, or the director’s spouse, is an executive officer of anon-profit organization to which the Company or the Company foundation makes, or in the past three years has made, contributions that, in any single fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of thenon-profit organization’s consolidated gross revenues. (Amounts that the Company foundation contributes under matching gifts programs are not included in the contributions calculated for purposes of this standard.)

An “immediate family” member includes a director’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mother- andfather-in-law, sons- anddaughters-in-law, brothers- andsisters-in-law, and anyone (other than a domestic employee) who shares the director’s home.

In addition, a director is not considered independent for purposes of serving on the Audit Committee, and may not serve on the Audit Committee, if the director: (a) accepts, directly or indirectly, from Moody’s Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee, other than Board and committee fees and fixed amounts of compensation under a retirement plan (including deferred compensation) for prior service with Moody’s Corporation; or (b) is an “affiliated person” of Moody’s Corporation or any of its subsidiaries; each as determined in accordance with SEC regulations.

Furthermore, in determining whether a director is considered independent for purposes of serving on the Compensation & Human Resources Committee, the Board must consider all factors specifically relevant to determining whether the director has a relationship with the Company that is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member, including, but not limited to: (a) the source of the director’s compensation, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee paid by the Company to the director; and (b) whether the director is affiliated with Moody’s Corporation, any of its subsidiaries or an affiliate of any subsidiary; each as determined in accordance with SEC regulations.

In assessing independence, the Board took into account that Mr. Anderson, Mr. Bermudez, Ms Esperdy, Mr. Forlenza, Ms Hill, Ms Seidman, Mr. Van Saun and Mr. Zalm each served during 2019, or currently serves, as directors, employees or trustees of entities that are rated or have issued securities rated by Moody’s Investors Service, as listed in the Company’s Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy posted on the Company’s website under the headings “About Moody’s—Investor Relations—Investor Relations Home—Corporate Governance—Other Governance Documents,” and that associated fees from each such entity accounted for less than 1% of the Company’s 2019 revenue. In addition, the Board took into account that the Company from time to time engages in business with entities where one of our directors, director candidates or their immediate family members are employed or have other relationships. The Board found nothing in the relationships to be contrary to the standards for determining independence as contained in the NYSE’s requirements and the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles. A copy of these standards is found in Attachment A to the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles on the Company’s website atwww.moodys.com under the headings “About Moody’s—Investor Relations—Investor Relations Home—Corporate Governance—Other Governance Documents.”

BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATION PROCESS

The Company’s Board and committee evaluation process is summarized below. The topics considered during the evaluation include Board effectiveness in overseeing key areas, such as strategy and risk, performance of committees’ duties under their respective charters, Board and committee operations, and individual director performance.

1	Review of Evaluation Process. The Governance & Nominating Committee annually reviews the evaluation process, including the evaluation method, to ensure that constructive feedback is solicited on the performance of the Board, its Committees, and individual directors.
2	Questionnaire andOne-on-One Interviews.In 2019, as in prior years, the Board, the Audit Committee, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee and the Governance & Nominating Committee each conducted an annual self-evaluation through the use of a written questionnaire. All directors, other than the Chairman, also evaluate Chairman performance through a written

8         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

	questionnaire. All questionnaires include open-ended questions to solicit direct feedback and the responses are collected on an unattributed basis. In addition, the Chairman conducts annual interviews with each non-management director to discuss individual Board member performance.
3	Summary of Written Evaluations.Directors’ responses to the questionnaires are aggregated without attribution and shared with the full Board and the applicable committees. All responses, including written comments, are provided along with an overview of the high and low scores on various topics.
4	Board and Committee Review. Using aggregated results as a reference, the Audit Committee and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee discuss their respective results. Discussions of the Board, Chairman and Governance & Nominating Committee results occur at the Governance & Nominating Committee. Following the committee-level discussions, all evaluation results and feedback, including those from the one-on-one interviews and the Chairman evaluation questionnaire, are discussed by the full Board.
5	Actions.The Board decides on specific actions to incorporate feedback received, including making any appropriate changes to Board- and committee-related practices.

THE BOARD’S ROLE IN THE OVERSIGHT OF COMPANY RISK

The Board of Directors oversees the Company’s enterprise-wide approach to the major risks facing the Company and, with the assistance of the Audit Committee and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee, oversees the Company’s policies for assessing and managing its exposure to risk. The Board periodically reviews these risks and the Company’s risk management processes, including in connection with its review of the Company’s strategy. The Board’s responsibilities include reviewing the Company’s practices with respect to risk assessment and risk management and reviewing contingent liabilities and risks that may be material to the Company. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s policies with respect to enterprise-wide risk assessment and risk management, financial and compliance risks, including risks relating to internal controls and cyber risks, and major legislative and regulatory developments that could materially affect the Company. In addition, at least annually, the Audit Committee, together with the full Board from time to time, reviews the implementation and effectiveness of the Company’s enterprise risk management program with the Chief Risk Officer. The Compensation & Human Resources Committee oversees management’s assessment of whether the Company’s compensation structure, policies and programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company and reviews the results of this assessment.

Under the oversight of the Board and its committees, the Chief Executive Officer has established an Enterprise-Wide Risk Committee, comprised of the Chief Executive Officer and his direct reports, which include the Chief Risk Officer. The Enterprise-Wide Risk Committee reviews the work of the Enterprise Risk Function that is managed by the Chief Risk Officer. The Chief Risk Officer oversees risk officers for the Company’s two business segments, MIS and MA, and the support functions in Moody’s Shared Services, Inc. who periodically report on risks and their mitigations within their areas of responsibility. Among other things, the Enterprise Risk Function is responsible for identifying and monitoring existing and emerging risks that are important to the achievement of the Company’s strategic and operative objectives; formulating appropriate polices, monitoring and reporting frameworks to support effective management of important risks; reviewing and evaluating the effectiveness of management processes and action plans to address such risks; advising on and recommending to executive management any significant actions or initiatives that they believe are necessary to effectively manage risk; and seeing that activities of discrete risk management disciplines within the Company are appropriately coordinated. The Chief Risk Officer presented the Enterprise Risk Committee’s analysis to the directors at four meetings in 2019. Additionally, the Audit Committee, the Governance & Nominating Committee and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee reviewed risks within their areas of responsibility at separate meetings in 2019. Significant risk issues evaluated by and/or major changes proposed by the Enterprise-Wide Risk Committee and the Chief Risk Officer are discussed at various Board meetings throughout the year.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         9

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS

The independent directors routinely meet in executive session at regularly scheduled Board meetings. Dr. McKinnell, the independent Chairman of the Board, establishes the agenda for and presides at these sessions and has the authority to call additional sessions as appropriate.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors has established a process to receive communications from stockholders and other interested parties. Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board of Directors or with allnon-management directors as a group, or with a specific director or directors (including the Chairman of the Board), by writing to them c/o the Corporate Secretary of the Company at 7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10007.

All communications received as set forth in the preceding paragraph will be opened by the Corporate Secretary for the sole purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to the Company’s directors. Any contents that are not in the nature of advertising, promotions of a product or service, or patently offensive material will be forwarded promptly to the addressee.

SUCCESSION PLANNING

The Board and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee review succession planning annually in conjunction with the Board’s review of strategic planning.

ANTI-HEDGING AND ANTI-PLEDGING POLICY; SHORT SALES AND OTHER SPECULATIVE TRADES

All executive officers, directors and their family members are subject to a securities trading policy under which they are prohibited from hedging and pledging Moody’s securities, including any publicly traded securities of a Moody’s subsidiary. The term “family member” is defined in the Company’s policy against insider trading and generally includes family members or entities that hold, purchase or sell Company stock that is attributed to the director or officer. Specifically, the following activities are prohibited under the policy:

• Making “short sales” of Moody’s securities. A short sale has occurred if the seller: (i) does not own the securities sold; or (ii) does own the securities sold, but does not deliver or transmit them within the customary settlement period.

• Engaging in short-term or speculative transactions or entering into any transaction (including purchasing or selling forward contracts, equity swaps, puts or calls) that is designed to offset any decrease in the market value of or is otherwise based on the price of Moody’s securities.

• Holding Moody’s securities in margin accounts, buying Moody’s securities on margin or pledging Moody’s securities as collateral for a loan.

Employees who are not executive officers (and their family members) are prohibited from: (i) making short sales of Moody’s securities; (ii) buying Moody’s securities on margin or in any account in which a financial firm lends cash to purchase the securities; and (iii) engaging in short-term or speculative transactions involving Moody’s securities, including buying or selling put or call options and entering into other derivative transactions involving Moody’s securities. The restrictions in clause (iii) do not prohibit the exercise of Moody’s stock options that employees receive in connection with their compensation.

RULE10B5-1 TRADING PLANS

The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and certain other officers of the Company, enter into Rule10b5-1 stock trading plans from time to time. These plans allow executives to adopt predetermined procedures for trading shares of Company stock in advance of learning any materialnon-public information. The use of these trading plans permits diversification, retirement and tax planning activities. The transactions under the plans will be disclosed publicly through Form 4 filings with the SEC.

10         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee represents and assists the Board of Directors in its oversight responsibilities relating to: the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and the financial information provided to the Company’s stockholders and others; the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; the Company’s internal controls; the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, and the review of contingent liabilities and risks that might be material to the Company; and the audit process, including the qualifications and independence of the Company’s principal external auditors (the “Independent Auditors”), and the performance of the Independent Auditors and the Company’s internal audit function.

Oversight of Audit Processes

As part of the Audit Committee’s oversight of the audit process, the Audit Committee and its Chairman are directly involved in the selection of the lead engagement partner when there is a rotation required under applicable rules, and the Audit Committee reviews and concurs in the appointment and compensation of the head of the Company’s internal audit function (the “Chief Audit Executive”). The Committee also approves the fees and terms associated with the retention of the Independent Auditors to perform the annual engagement. In determining whether to approve services proposed to be provided by the Independent Auditors, the Committee is provided with summaries of the services, the fee associated with each service as well as information regarding incremental fees to be approved. The Committee also receives benchmarking data for audits of companies of similar sizes and audits of comparable complexity in order to determine the reasonableness of the proposed fees.

Responsibilities under the Audit Committee Charter

In fulfilling the responsibilities under its charter, the Audit Committee:

• Discusses with, and receives regular status reports from, the Independent Auditors and the head of the internal audit function on the overall scope and plans for their audits, including their scope and plans for evaluating the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Also receives regular updates on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and discusses with management and the Independent Auditors their evaluations and conclusions with respect to internal control over financial reporting.

• Meets with the Independent Auditors and the head of the internal audit function, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their respective audits, in addition to holding meetings with members of management, including the General Counsel.

• Reviews significant accounting policies, critical estimates and disclosures with management and the Independent Auditors, including the implementation of any new accounting standards or requirements.

• Reviews and discusses with management and the Independent Auditors the Company’s earnings press releases and periodic filings made with the SEC, including the use of information that is provided to enhance understanding of the results presented in accordance with GAAP.

• Oversees the implementation of new financial reporting systems and their related internal controls.

• Reviews the Company’s financial and compliance risks, including, but not limited to, risks relating to internal controls and cyber risks. The Chairman of the Audit Committee holds a CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight, issued by the CERT Division of the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University.

• Receives periodic reports on the effectiveness of the Company’s compliance program and regular status reports on compliance issues, including reports required by the Audit Committee’s policy for the receipt and treatment of any complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal control, auditing and federal securities law matters.

• Provides input regarding the annual evaluation of the Chief Audit Executive.

• Reviews its charter annually and conducts an annual self-evaluation to assess its performance.

The Audit Committee also has the authority to engage its own outside advisors, including experts in particular areas of accounting, as it determines appropriate.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         11

Ongoing Assessment of the Independent Auditors

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Independent Auditors and, as such, the Independent Auditors report directly to the Audit Committee. KPMG LLP has served as the Company’s Independent Auditors since 2008, and wasre-appointed at the conclusion of a competitive process that the Audit Committee conducted in 2019 to review the selection of the Company’s Independent Auditors. In selecting the Independent Auditors, the Committee considered the relative costs, benefits, challenges, potential impact, and overall advisability of selecting different Independent Auditors. In addition, the Audit Committee conducts an annual performance assessment of the Independent Auditors, seeking performance feedback from all the members of the Committee as well as from officers with audit-related responsibilities. The factors the Audit Committee considered in conducting this assessment included: independence, objectivity and integrity; quality of services and the ability to meet performance delivery dates; responsiveness and ability to adapt; proactivity in identification of opportunities and risks; performance of the lead engagement partners as well as other team members; technical expertise; understanding of the Company’s business and industry; effectiveness of their communication; sufficiency of resources; fee levels in light of the services rendered; and management feedback.

Policy onPre-Approval of Independent Auditors Fees

The Audit Committee has established a policy setting forth the requirements for thepre-approval of audit and permissiblenon-audit services to be provided by the Independent Auditors. Under the policy, the Audit Committeepre-approves the annual audit engagement terms and fees, as well as any other audit services and specified categories ofnon-audit services, subject to certainpre-approved fee levels. In addition, pursuant to the policy, the Audit Committee authorized its Chairman topre-approve other audit and permissiblenon-audit services in 2019 up to $250,000 per engagement and a maximum of $500,000 per year. The policy requires that the Audit Committee Chairman report anypre-approval decisions to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Audit Committee or its Chairmanpre-approved all of the services provided by the Independent Auditors, which are described on page 27. The Audit Committee also is responsible for overseeing the audit fee negotiation associated with the retention of the Independent Auditors to perform the annual audit engagement.

Notable Actions in 2019

During 2019, the Audit Committee also reviewed and oversaw the expansion of voluntary sustainability disclosures in the Company’s periodic filings with the SEC and certain other external reports that reflect recommendations from sustainability assessment organizations. The enhanced disclosures recognize growing investor demand for sustainability information. In 2019, the Company began reporting on such matters using recommendations from SASB and also issued its second annual report on how the Company has implemented the TCFD recommendations.

The members of the Audit Committee are Ms Seidman (Chairman), Mr. Anderson, Mr. Bermudez, Ms Esperdy, Mr. Forlenza, Ms Hill, Dr. McKinnell, Mr. Van Saun and Mr. Zalm, each of whom is independent under NYSE and SEC rules and under the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Anderson, Mr. Bermudez, Ms Esperdy, Mr. Forlenza, Dr. McKinnell, Ms Seidman, Mr. Van Saun and Mr. Zalm is an “audit committee financial expert” under the SEC’s rules. The Audit Committee held nine meetings during 2019.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the Independent Auditors the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Audited Financial Statements”), management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and the Independent Auditors’ evaluation of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP, which reports directly to the Audit Committee, the matters that independent registered public accounting firms must communicate to audit committees under applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards.

12         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

The Audit Committee also has discussed with KPMG LLP its independence from the Company, including the matters contained in the written disclosures and letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding independent registered public accounting firms’ communications with audit committees about independence. The Audit Committee also has discussed with management of the Company and KPMG LLP such other matters and received such assurances from them as it deemed appropriate. The Audit Committee also considers whether the rendering ofnon-audit services by KPMG LLP to the Company is compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG LLP from the Company. The Company historically has used KPMG LLP for only a limited number ofnon-audit services each year.

Following the foregoing review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Audited Financial Statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 for filing with the SEC.

The Audit Committee

Leslie F. Seidman,Chairman

Basil L. Anderson

Jorge A. Bermudez

Thérèse Esperdy

Vincent A. Forlenza

Kathryn M. Hill

Henry A. McKinnell, Jr.

Bruce Van Saun

Gerrit Zalm

THE GOVERNANCE & NOMINATING COMMITTEE

The Governance & Nominating Committee identifies and evaluates possible candidates to serve on the Board and recommends the Company’s director nominees for approval by the Board and the Company’s stockholders. The Governance & Nominating Committee also considers and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the size, structure, composition and functioning of the Board and its committees, oversees the evaluation of the Board, and develops and reviews the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles.

With respect to the evaluation of the Board, the Governance & Nominating Committee oversees a process for annually assessing the performance, contributions and the independence of incumbent directors in determining whether to recommend them for reelection to the Board. The Board, the Audit Committee, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee and the Governance & Nominating Committee, under that Committee’s oversight, each conduct an annual self-evaluation to assess its performance. The Chairman of the Board conducts annual interviews during which individual Board member evaluations are conducted.

In addition, the Governance & Nominating Committee oversees sustainability matters, including significant issues of corporate social and environmental responsibility, as they pertain to the Company’s business.

The members of the Governance & Nominating Committee are Mr. Anderson (Chairman), Mr. Bermudez, Ms Esperdy, Mr. Forlenza, Ms Hill, Dr. McKinnell, Ms Seidman, Mr. Van Saun and Mr. Zalm, each of whom is independent under NYSE rules and under the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles. The Governance & Nominating Committee met six times during 2019.

THE COMPENSATION & HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE

The Compensation & Human Resources Committee oversees the Company’s overall compensation structure, policies and programs, assesses whether the Company’s compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for management and employees, and assesses the results of the most recent vote on the Company’s advisory resolution approving executive compensation. The Committee also oversees the evaluation of senior management (including by reviewing and approving performance goals for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, and by evaluating their performance against approved goals, which, with respect to the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee does in consultation with the Chairman of the Board) and oversees and makes the final decisions regarding compensation arrangements for the Chief Executive Officer and for certain other executive officers, including the named executive officers. The Chief Executive Officer makes

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         13

recommendations to the Committee regarding the amount and form of executive compensation (except with respect to his compensation). For a description of this process, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” or “CD&A”), beginning on page 33. The Committee administers and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s incentive compensation and equity-based compensation plans that are subject to Board approval, including the Company’s key employees’ stock incentive plans. The Committee has authority, acting in a settlor capacity, to establish, amend and terminate the Company’s employee benefit plans, programs and practices, and to review reports from management regarding the funding, investments and other features of such plans, and the Committee delegates to management the responsibilities it has with respect to the Company’s employee benefit plans, programs and practices as the Committee deems appropriate. As discussed below, the Committee annually reviews the form and amount of compensation of directors for service on the Board and its committees and recommends changes to the Board.

The Committee is empowered to retain, at the Company’s expense, such consultants, counsel or other outside advisors as it determines appropriate to assist it in the performance of its functions. In 2019, the Committee retained the services of Meridian Compensation Partners LLC (“Meridian”), an independent compensation consulting company, to provide advice and information about executive and director compensation, including the competitiveness of pay levels, executive compensation design and governance issues, and market trends, as well as technical and compliance considerations. Meridian reports directly and solely to the Compensation & Human Resources Committee. Meridian exclusively provides executive and director compensation consulting services and does not provide any other services to the Company.

The Committee regularly reviews the current engagements and the objectivity and independence of the advice that Meridian provides to the Committee on executive and director compensation. The Committee considered the six specific independence factors adopted by the SEC and the NYSE under Dodd-Frank and other factors it deemed relevant, and the Committee found no conflicts of interest or other factors that would adversely affect Meridian’s independence.

During 2019, management continued to engage Aon Consulting (formerly called Aon Hewitt) as management’s compensation consultant. Aon Consulting worked with the Chief Human Resources Officer and her staff to develop market data regarding Moody’s executive compensation programs. The Committee takes into account that Aon Consulting provides executive compensation-related services to management when it evaluates the information and analyses provided by Aon Consulting.

The members of the Compensation & Human Resources Committee are Ms Hill (Chairman), Mr. Anderson, Mr. Bermudez, Ms Esperdy, Mr. Forlenza, Dr. McKinnell, Ms Seidman, Mr. Van Saun and Mr. Zalm, each of whom is independent under NYSE rules and under the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles. The Compensation & Human Resources Committee met six times during 2019.

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION & HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE

The Compensation & Human Resources Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to, among other things, establishing and reviewing compensation of the Company’s executive officers. In this context, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 33. Following such reviews and discussions, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

The Compensation & Human Resources Committee

Kathryn M. Hill,Chairman

Basil L. Anderson

Jorge A. Bermudez

Thérèse Esperdy

Vincent A. Forlenza

Henry A. McKinnell, Jr.

Leslie F. Seidman

Bruce Van Saun

Gerrit Zalm

14         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

RELATIONSHIP OF COMPENSATION PRACTICES TO RISK MANAGEMENT

When structuring its overall compensation practices for employees of the Company, generally consideration is given as to whether the structure creates incentives for risk-taking behavior and therefore affects the Company’s risk management practices. Attention is given to the elements and the mix of pay as well as seeing that employees’ compensation is aligned with stockholders’ value.

In order to assess whether the Company’s compensation practices and programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company, management established a compensation risk committee led by the Chief Human Resources Officer to assess the risk related to the Company’s compensation plans, practices and programs. As part of this annual review, the compensation risk committee assessed the following items: (i) the relative proportion of variable to fixed components of compensation, (ii) the mix of performance periods (short-term, medium-term and long-term), (iii) the mix of payment mechanisms (cash, options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance shares), (iv) the design of the incentive compensation programs, including the performance metrics used, linking the creation of value and earnings quality and sustainability, (v) the process of setting goals, degree of difficulty, spreads between thresholds, targets and maximum payouts, and ratios of payouts as a fraction of earnings, (vi) the maximum payout levels and caps, (vii) the clawback policy and other compensation-related governance policies, (viii) the retirement program design and (ix) the equity ownership and retention guidelines. These items were assessed in the context of the most significant risks currently facing the Company, to determine if the compensation plans, practices and programs incentivize employees to take undue risks. The committee then took into account controls and procedures that operate to monitor and mitigate against risk. The Chief Human Resources Officer presented the compensation risk committee’s conclusions to the Compensation & Human Resources Committee. These conclusions were also reviewed by the Compensation & Human Resources Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Meridian.

The Compensation & Human Resources Committee reviewed these conclusions through a risk assessment lens. As a result of these reviews, the Company does not believe that the Company’s compensation practices and programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company, nor does it believe that the practices and programs are designed to promote undue risk taking.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The Audit Committee is charged with monitoring and reviewing issues involving potential conflicts of interest, and reviewing and approving all related person transactions, as defined in applicable SEC rules. Under SEC rules, related persons include any director, executive officer, any nominee for director, any person owning 5% or more of the Company’s Common Stock, and any immediate family members of such persons. In addition, under the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics, special rules apply to executive officers and directors who engage in conduct that creates an actual, apparent or potential conflict of interest. Before engaging in such conduct, such executive officers and directors must make full disclosure of all the facts and circumstances to the Company’s General Counsel and the Audit Committee Chairman, and obtain the prior written approval of the Audit Committee. All conduct is reviewed in a manner so as to (i) maintain the Company’s credibility in the market, (ii) maintain the independence of the Company’s employees and (iii) see that all business decisions are made solely on the basis of the best interests of the Company and not for personal benefit.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Our director compensation program is designed to compensate ournon-employee directors fairly for work required for a company of our size and scope and to align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Compensation & Human Resources Committee annually reviews the form and amount of the compensation of directors for service on the Board and its committees and recommends changes to the Board. As part of its 2019 review, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee reviewed and considered data provided to the Committee by its independent consultant, Meridian, regarding the form and amount of compensation paid tonon-management directors at the companies in Moody’s peer group used by the Compensation & Human Resources Committee for the assessment of executive compensation (as disclosed beginning on page 36 of this

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         15

Proxy Statement). The comparative analysis included each element of the director pay program: the annual cash retainer, board and committee fees as well as equity awards. This analysis showed that Moody’s director compensation is competitively positioned relative to the median of its peer group. Its equity to cash ratio was found to be similar to the peer group average and, like many of its peers, Moody’s directors are subject to stock holdings requirements (a multiple of the cash retainer). Moody’s does not provideper-meeting fees for board and committee meetings or anynon-chairman committee member fees.

As a result of this review, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee determined that compensation of directors on the Board and its committees is reasonable and appropriate as compared to the board members of peer companies.

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, the total compensation of thenon-management members of the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. McDaniel does not receive any compensation for serving as a Moody’s director. His compensation for his services as Moody’s President and Chief Executive Officer is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54 of this Proxy Statement.

Name	Year		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1)			Stock Awards ($)(2)			All Other Compensation ($)(3)		Total ($)
Basil Anderson		2019		$	130,000		$	180,002		—		$	310,002
Jorge Bermudez		2019			105,000			180,002		—			285,002
Thérèse Esperdy (4)		2019			105,000			180,054		—			285,054
Vincent Forlenza		2019			105,000			180,002		—			285,002
Kathryn Hill		2019			130,000			180,002		—			310,002
Henry McKinnell, Jr.		2019			165,000			249,955		—			414,955
Leslie Seidman		2019			130,000			180,002		—			310,002
Bruce Van Saun		2019			105,000			180,002		—			285,002
Gerrit Zalm		2019			105,000			180,002		—			285,002

(1) The Company’snon-management directors received an annual cash retainer of $105,000, payable in quarterly installments in 2019. The Chairmen of the Audit Committee, the Governance & Nominating Committee and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee each received an additional annual cash fee of $25,000, also payable in quarterly installments. The Chairman of the Board received an additional annual cash fee of $60,000. There were no separate meeting fees paid in 2019.

Anon-management director may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of his or her annual cash retainer until after termination of service on the Company’s Board of Directors. Deferred amounts are credited to an account and receive the rate of return earned by one or more investment options available under the Profit Participation Plan as selected by the director. Upon a change in control of the Company, alump-sum payment will be made to each director of the amount credited to the director’s deferred account on the date of the change in control, and the total amount credited to each director’s deferred account from the date of the change in control until the date such director ceases to be a director, will be paid in alump-sum.

(2) On February 25, 2019, all thennon-management directors, except Dr. McKinnell, received a grant of approximately $180,000 worth of RSUs issued from the 1998 Moody’s CorporationNon-Employee Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan (the “1998 Directors Plan”) which was equal to 1,037 RSUs. Also on February 25, 2019, Dr. McKinnell received a grant of approximately $250,000 worth of RSUs issued from the 1998 Directors Plan that was equal to 1,440 RSUs. The Compensation & Human Resources Committee authorized the grant of RSU awards for February 25, 2019 on December 17, 2018, and the grant was approved subsequently by the Board on December 17, 2018. The grant of RSU awards was effective on February 25, 2019, the fifth trading day following the date of the public dissemination of the Company’s financial results for 2018. On March 1, 2019, Ms Esperdy received a grant of approximately $180,000 worth of RSUs issued from the 1998 Directors Plan, which was equal to 1,027 RSUs. In each case, the number of RSUs based on the award value has been computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional information on how Moody’s accounts for equity-based compensation, see Note 17 to the financial statements as contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 24, 2020.

16         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

The aggregate number of stock awards outstanding, including any accrued dividends, as of December 31, 2019 for each individual who served as anon-management director of the Company during 2019 was as follows:

Name	Number of Shares Underlying Options		Number of Shares of Unvested RSUs
Basil Anderson		—		1,044
Jorge Bermudez (a)		—		1,037
Thérèse Esperdy		—		1,034
Vincent Forlenza		—		1,044
Kathryn Hill (a)		—		1,037
Henry McKinnell, Jr.		—		1,450
Leslie Seidman (a)		—		1,037
Bruce Van Saun		—		1,044
Gerrit Zalm (a)		—		1,037

(a) Messrs. Bermudez and Zalm and Ms Hill and Ms Seidman did not defer their RSU awards and receive cash dividends upon vesting of the RSUs.

(3) Perquisites and other personal benefits provided to each individual who served as anon-management director in 2019 were, in the aggregate, less than $10,000 per director. Eachnon-management director is reimbursed for travel, meals and hotel expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors or its committees. For the meetings held at the Company’s executive offices, the Company pays for travel for eachnon-management director and one guest of each director, as well as for their accommodations, meals, Company-arranged activities and other incidental expenses.

(4) Ms Esperdy commenced service as a director on March 1, 2019.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES FORNON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS

Moody’s has adopted stock ownership guidelines for its executives, including the named executive officers and itsnon-management directors, encouraging them to acquire and maintain a meaningful stake in the Company. Moody’s believes that these guidelines encourage its executive officers andnon-management directors to act as owners, thereby better aligning their interests with those of the Company’s stockholders.

• The guidelines are intended to ensure an ownership level sufficient to assure stockholders of each director’s commitment to value creation, while satisfying an individual’s need for portfolio diversification.

• Non-management directors are expected, within five years, to acquire and hold shares of the Company’s Common Stock equal in value to five times the annual cash retainer.

• Restricted shares, RSUs and shares owned by immediate family members or through the Company’stax-qualified savings and retirement plans count toward satisfying the guidelines.

• Stock options, whether vested or unvested, do not count toward satisfying the guidelines.

As of December 31, 2019, each of the directors serving on that date was in compliance with the guidelines.

1998 MOODY’S CORPORATIONNON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

The 1998 Directors Plan includes an annual grant limit on awards to individual directors, which is not to exceed “the lesser of 20,000 shares or shares with a fair market value of $400,000.” As disclosed in the Compensation of Directors table above, the fair market value of director grants have historically been below this amount.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         17

ITEM 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

What is being voted on	Election of nine director nominees to the Board.
Board recommendation	The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the director nominees.

The Board of Directors has nominated Basil L. Anderson, Jorge A. Bermudez, Thérèse Esperdy, Vincent A. Forlenza, Kathryn M. Hill, Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr., Henry A. McKinnell, Jr., Ph.D., Leslie F. Seidman and Bruce Van Saun, each for aone-year term expiring in 2021. Gerrit Zalm, together with the rest of the Governance & Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors, determined collectively he will not stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting and will retire from the Board at the end of his current term. Accordingly, the Board will set the number of directors at nine, effective as of the Annual Meeting. If elected, the nominees will hold office until each of their terms expires and until a successor is elected and qualified. All of the nominees are currently members of the Board of Directors and were previously elected by the stockholders. The Governance & Nominating Committee evaluates the qualifications and skills of other potential candidates in light of the Board’s current composition and consideration of the Company’s current and future business and operations. The Company expects the nominees for election as director to be able to serve if elected. If a nominee is unable to serve, proxies may be voted for the election of such other person for director as the Board may recommend in the place of such nominee or just for the remaining nominees, leaving a vacancy. Alternatively, the Board may reduce the size of the Board.

QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS OF DIRECTORS

The Board believes that the Board, as a whole, should possess a combination of skills, professional experience and diversity of backgrounds necessary to oversee the Company’s business. In addition, the Board believes that there are certain attributes that every director should possess, as reflected in the Board’s membership criteria. Accordingly, the Board and the Governance & Nominating Committee consider the qualifications of directors and director candidates individually and in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition and the Company’s current and future business and operations.

The Governance & Nominating Committee is responsible for developing and recommending Board membership criteria to the Board for approval. The criteria, which are set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Principles, include the candidate’s:

• business experience,

• qualifications, attributes and skills relevant to the management and oversight of the Company’s business,

• independence,

• the ability to represent diverse stockholder interests,

• judgment and integrity,

• the ability to commit sufficient time and attention to Board activities, and

• the absence of any potential conflicts with the Company’s business and interests.

In addition, the Board and the Governance & Nominating Committee annually evaluate the composition of the Board to assess whether the skills, experience, characteristics and other criteria established by the Board are currently represented on the Board, and to assess the criteria that may be needed in the future, given the Company’s current situation and strategic plans. The Board and the Governance & Nominating Committee seek a diversity of occupational and personal backgrounds on the Board, including diversity with respect to demographics such as gender, race, ethnic and national background, geography, and age in order to obtain a range of viewpoints and perspectives. As part of the search process for each new director, the Governance & Nominating Committee

18         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

includes women and minorities in the pool of candidates (and instructs any search firm the Committee engages to do so). The Committee also considers the special requirements of Moody’s Investors Service and its role in the securities markets. As an example, the Committee has determined that individuals who by profession actively manage securities portfolios could encounter conflicts of interests or give rise to the appearance of conflicts.

This annual evaluation of the Board’s composition enables the Board and the Governance & Nominating Committee to update the skills and experience they seek in the Board as a whole, and in individual directors, as the Company’s needs evolve and change over time, and to assess the effectiveness of efforts at promoting diversity. In identifying director candidates from time to time, the Board and the Governance & Nominating Committee may identify specific skills and experience that they believe the Company should seek in order to constitute a balanced and effective board.

In addition to a diversity of backgrounds, the Board believes it is important to have diversity of tenures represented on the Board. The Company’s director nominees have varied tenure that the Board believes facilitates and ensures effective oversight by balancing fresh perspectives andin-depth experience and knowledge about the Company.

In considering and nominating directors for election to the Board, the Board and the Governance & Nominating Committee have considered a variety of factors. These include the nominee’s independence, financial literacy, personal and professional accomplishments, experience in light of the needs of the Company and, for incumbent directors, past performance on the Board. With respect to the Company’s director nominees standing for election, their biography as of the date of this Proxy Statement as well as their skills and qualifications that support their service on the Board are set forth below.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election as directors of each of the nominees listed below.

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

BASIL L. ANDERSON

Director since April 2004

Basil L. Anderson, age 74, is Chairman of the Governance & Nominating Committee and is a member of the Executive, Audit and Compensation & Human Resources Committees of the Board of Directors. Mr. Anderson served as Vice Chairman of Staples, Inc., an office products company, from September 2001 until his retirement in March 2006. Prior to joining Staples, Mr. Anderson served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Campbell Soup Company from April 1996 to February 2001. Prior to joining Campbell Soup, Mr. Anderson was with Scott Paper Company, where he served in a variety of capacities beginning in 1975, including Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from December 1993 to December 1995. He served as a director of Staples, Inc. from 1997 until 2016, Hasbro, Inc. from 2002 until May 2017 and Becton Dickinson from 2004 to 2018.

Mr. Anderson has over a decade of experience as an executive officer, including as a chief financial officer, of several public companies where he held significant policymaking positions. He also has experience as an operating executive in charge of an international business based in Paris, France. In addition, Mr. Anderson served as a director of NYSE or Nasdaq listed companies. As a result of these positions, he brings to the Board expertise as a strategist, management and operations experience, and a perspective on international business operations and corporate governance in the public company context.

JORGE A. BERMUDEZ

Director since April 2011

Jorge A. Bermudez, age 68, is a member of the Audit, Governance & Nominating and Compensation & Human Resources Committees of the Board of Directors. He served as Chief Risk Officer of Citigroup, Inc., a global

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         19

financial services company, from November 2007 to March 2008. Before serving as Chief Risk Officer, Mr. Bermudez was Chief Executive Officer of Citigroup’s Commercial Business Group in North America and Citibank Texas from 2005 to 2007. He served as Senior Advisor, Citigroup International from 2004 to 2006, as Chief Executive Officer of Citigroup Latin America from 2002 to 2004, Chief Executive Officer, eBusiness, Global Cash Management and Trade from 1998 to 2002 and Head of Citibank Corporate and Investment Bank, South America from 1996 to 1998. Mr. Bermudez joined Citigroup in 1975 and held leadership positions in other divisions, including equity investments, credit policy and corporate banking from 1984 to 1996. Mr. Bermudez currently is a member of the Texas A&M Foundation Board of Trustees (2014-present) and the Chairman of the Smart Grid Center Board at Texas A&M University, and also serves on the Board of Directors of AB Mutual Funds, overseeing approximately 70 funds within the mutual fund complex (January 2020-present). He served as a director of Citibank N.A. from 2005 to 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Houston Branch from 2009 to 2011, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas from 2011 to 2017, the Association of Former Students, Texas A&M University from 2005 to 2012, the American Institute of Architects for the entirety of 2015, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas from 2010 to 2016. He serves as a director of the Community Foundation of Brazos Valley where he served as Chairman from July 2013 to June 2014 and currently serves as the chairman of the Investment Committee.

Mr. Bermudez brings a history of executive experience at a major international financial services company. As the head of risk for a major global financial institution, he was involved in the debt restructuring of various sovereigns around the world. He also managed a global business with a presence in over 100 countries. As a result, Mr. Bermudez brings a deep understanding of credit risk and years of financial expertise, as well as risk management experience, to the Board.

THÉRÈSE ESPERDY

Director since March 2019

Thérèse Esperdy, age 59, is a member of the Audit, Governance & Nominating and Compensation & Human Resources Committees of the Board of Directors. She held various executive roles at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorgan”) from 1997 through 2015, including Global Chairman of Financial Institutions Group,Co-Head of Banking, Asia Pacific, and Head of Global Debt Capital Markets. Prior to her time at JPMorgan, Ms Esperdy started her banking career at Lehman Brothers. Ms Esperdy currently serves as theNon-Executive Chairman of Imperial Brands PLC (January 2020-present), where she was aNon-Executive Director and then Senior Independent Director (July 2016-December 2019). She also serves as an IndependentNon-Executive Director at National Grid plc (March 2014-present) and is on the board of National Grid USA (May 2015-present).

Ms Esperdy’s extensive experience in global investment banking and financial markets provides her with strategic and financial expertise that is critical to overseeing the Company’s strategies. As a senior executive at JPMorgan, she played key roles in managing JPMorgan’s Asia and capital markets businesses through challenging financial climates. Her experiences and expertise enhance the Board’s ability to oversee the Company’s global operations and effectively manage risk.

VINCENT A. FORLENZA

Director since April 2018

Vincent A. Forlenza, age 66, is a member of the Audit, Governance & Nominating and Compensation & Human Resources Committees of the Board of Directors. He has served as a director of Becton, Dickinson and Company (“BD”), a global medical technology company, since 2011 and became Chairman of its board in 2012. Mr. Forlenza served as BD’s Chief Executive Officer from 2011 to January 2020 and President from 2009 to April 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Forlenza served as Chief Operating Officer from July 2010 to October 2011. Mr. Forlenza joined BD in 1980 and served in a number of different capacities, including strategic planning, business development, research and development, and general management in each of BD’s segments and in overseas roles. Mr. Forlenza is a member of the board of directors and former chairman of the Advanced Medical

20         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

Technology Association (AdvaMed), an international medical technology trade organization. He is a member of the Board of Trustees of The Valley Health System and a member of the Board of Directors of the Quest Autism Foundation. He previously served as a member of the Board of Trustees of Lehigh University from 2011 to 2017.

Mr. Forlenza served as the chief executive officer of a public, global medical technology company for approximately nine years. He has also served as chairman of that company’s board since 2012. Prior to becoming chief executive officer, he was the chief operating officer and held various additional roles. He has experience leading a large global business in a regulated industry, including significant experience in large M&A transactions. He additionally brings experience in areas such as strategic planning, business development and new product development. His service as a director also contributes to his focus on corporate governance matters.

KATHRYN M. HILL

Director since October 2011

Kathryn M. Hill, age 63, is Chairman of the Compensation & Human Resources Committee and is a member of the Executive, Audit and Governance & Nominating Committees of the Board of Directors. Ms Hill has over 30 years of experience in business management and leading engineering and operations organizations. Ms Hill served in a number of positions at Cisco Systems, Inc. from 1997 to 2013, including, among others, Executive Advisor from 2011 to 2013, Senior Vice President, Development Strategy and Operations from 2009 to 2011, Senior Vice President, Access Networking and Services Group from 2008 to 2009 and Senior Vice President, Ethernet Systems and Wireless Technology Group from 2005 to 2008. Cisco designs, manufactures and sells Internet Protocol (IP)-based networking and other products related to the communications and information technology industry and provides services associated with these products. Prior to Cisco, Ms Hill had a number of engineering roles at various technology companies. Ms Hill currently serves as a director of NetApp, Inc. (September 2013-present) and Celanese Corporation (July 2015-present).

Ms Hill has significant experience in business management and leading engineering and operations organizations. Her various executive roles at Cisco Systems, Inc. allow her to bring extensive leadership experience and a strong background in information technology and business operations to the Board.

RAYMOND W. MCDANIEL, JR.

Director since April 2003

Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr., age 62, has served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2012, and served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from April 2005 until April 2012. He currently serves on the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors. Mr. McDaniel served as the Company’s President from October 2004 until April 2005 and the Company’s Chief Operating Officer from January 2004 until April 2005. He has served as Chief Executive Officer of Moody’s Investors Service since October 2007. He held the additional titles of President from November 2001 to August 2007 and December 2008 to November 2010 and Chairman from October 2007 until June 2015. Mr. McDaniel served as the Company’s Executive Vice President from April 2003 to January 2004, and as Senior Vice President, Global Ratings and Research from November 2000 until April 2003. He served as Senior Managing Director, Global Ratings and Research, of Moody’s Investors Service from November 2000 until November 2001 and as Managing Director, International from 1996 to November 2000. Mr. McDaniel currently is a director of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2005-present) and a member of the Board of Trustees of Muhlenberg College (2015-present).

Mr. McDaniel, who is both President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, began his career at the Company serving as a ratings analyst and has served in numerous capacities at the Company over the past three decades. As a result, he brings to the Board a deep understanding of the Company’s business and operations as well as a historical perspective on the Company’s strategy. In addition, his service since 2005 as a director of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., which develops, publishes and sells products in print and electronic media for the educational, professional, scientific, technical, medical and consumer markets worldwide, has provided him with perspective on public company governance issues.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         21

HENRY A. MCKINNELL, JR., PH.D.

Director since October 1997

Henry A. McKinnell, Jr., age 77, is Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Executive Committee and serves as a member of the Audit, Governance & Nominating and Compensation & Human Resources Committees of the Board of Directors. Dr. McKinnell served as the Chief Executive Officer of Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from February 2013 until October 31, 2013. He served as Chairman of the Board of Pfizer Inc., a pharmaceutical company, from May 2001 until his retirement in December 2006 and Chief Executive Officer from January 2001 to July 2006. He served as President of Pfizer Inc. from May 1999 to May 2001, and as President of Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Group from January 1997 to April 2001. Dr. McKinnell served as Chief Operating Officer of Pfizer Inc. from May 1999 to December 2000 and as Executive Vice President from 1992 to 1999. He served as the Chairman of the Accordia Global Health Foundation, is Chairman Emeritus of the Connecticut Science Center and is Life Director of the Japan Society. He currently serves as a director of ChemoCentryx, Inc. He served as Chairman of Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. until 2013 and Emmaus Life Sciences until 2015. He served as a director of Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. until 2011, Pfizer Inc. and ExxonMobil Corporation until 2007 and John Wiley & Sons until 2005. He also served as a director of ViewRay, Inc. from April 2016 to May 2019.

Dr. McKinnell served for five years as the chief executive officer of a public pharmaceutical company with worldwide operations and, prior to that position, served as president, chief operating officer, chief financial officer and executive vice president. As a result of these positions, Dr. McKinnell brings to the Board financial expertise, global management experience and leadership skills. In addition, because the pharmaceutical business, like the Company’s, operates in a highly regulated industry, Dr. McKinnell brings to the Board an appreciation of what a complex regulatory environment means for the Company’s operations. Dr. McKinnell has also served as a director of several public companies, contributing to his perspective on corporate governance matters.

LESLIE F. SEIDMAN

Director since December 2013

Leslie F. Seidman, age 57, is Chairman of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Executive, Governance & Nominating and Compensation & Human Resources Committees of the Board of Directors. Ms Seidman has over 30 years of experience in the accounting profession, serving as a member of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) from 2003-2013, and as Chairman for approximately the last three years of her term. During her tenure, the FASB established numerous accounting standards relating to financial instruments, including securitizations, derivatives and credit losses and worked with regulators and policy makers in the U.S., and in other major capital markets to develop consistent accounting standards. Previously, Ms Seidman was the founder and managing member of a financial reporting consulting firm that served global financial institutions, law firms and accounting firms. From 1987 to 1996, Ms Seidman served as Vice President, Accounting Policy and in other roles at J.P. Morgan & Company, Inc. (now JPMorgan) and from 1984 to 1987, Ms Seidman served as an auditor for Arthur Young & Co. (now Ernst & Young, LLP). Ms Seidman previously served as a Public Governor of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (2014-2019). Ms Seidman currently serves as a director of General Electric (2018-present), where she has served as the Audit Committee Chair since April 2019, and is also an advisor to Idaciti, Inc., astart-up fintech company (2017-present).

Ms Seidman brings regulatory and financial expertise to the Board. She served as a Public Governor of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Her experience as the Chairman of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, executive at a major bank and auditor for a major accounting firm allows her to bring to the Board significant knowledge of global accounting and financial reporting matters in addition to regulatory and senior management experience. In addition, she has previously worked as a CPA and is certified in cybersecurity oversight.

22         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

BRUCE VAN SAUN

Director since March 2016

Bruce Van Saun, age 62, is a member of the Audit, Governance & Nominating and Compensation & Human Resources Committees of the Board of Directors. He has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (“Citizens”), a large regional bank, since October 2013. He joined Citizens from The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (“RBS”), a global banking and financial services group. He led Citizens to a successful initial public offering in September 2014, and full independence from RBS in October 2015. At RBS, Mr. Van Saun served as Group Finance Director and as an executive director on the RBS board from 2009 to 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Van Saun held a number of senior positions with Bank of New York and later Bank of New York Mellon over an11-year period. As Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, he was actively involved in the strategic transformation of Bank of New York from a diversified regional bank into a focused global securities servicer and asset manager. Earlier in his more than30-year financial services career, he held senior positions with Deutsche Bank, Wasserstein Perella Group and Kidder Peabody & Co. Mr. Van Saun has served on a number of boards in both the U.S. and the U.K. He is a current member of The Clearing House supervisory board. He also serves on the boards of The Bank Policy Institute and Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. He has previously served on the boards of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc and National Westminster Bank, Plc, each an RBS affiliate, from October 2009 to October 2013. He also served on the boards of ConvergEx Inc. from May 2007 to October 2013, Direct Line Insurance Group plc from April 2012 to October 2013 and WorldPay (Ship Midco Limited) from July 2011 to September 2013, and on the franchise board of Lloyd’s of London from September 2012 to May 2016.

Mr. Van Saun currently serves as the chief executive officer and chairman of a U.S. bank. He has extensive executive experience, having formerly held several additional senior management positions at banks. As a result of holding these positions, Mr. Van Saun brings financial expertise, management experience and experience managing a business in a highly regulated industry both in the U.S. and in Europe. He has also served as a director of several companies, contributing to his appreciation of corporate governance matters.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         23

ITEM 2— AMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

TO REMOVE SUPERMAJORITY VOTING STANDARDS

What is being voted on	Amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to remove supermajority voting standards applicable to certain actions.
Board recommendation	The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the amendments, which are presented separately as Items 2(a), 2(b) and 2(c).

OVERVIEW

After careful consideration, the Board voted to approve, and to recommend to the stockholders that they approve, amendments to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) to remove the supermajority voting requirements currently in the Certificate of Incorporation and replace them with majority voting standards, and to adopt certain other immaterial amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation, each as described below (collectively, the “Proposed Amendments”). In light of the differing nature of the provisions affected, this matter is presented as three Items. The Proposed Amendments are set forth in Item 2(a), Item 2(b) and Item 2(c) below. Approval of any one of these Items is not conditioned upon approval of the other Items.

As discussed in more detail below, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation currently contains the following supermajority voting provisions:

• Future Amendments to Certain Sections of the Certificate of Incorporation and theBy-Laws—The Certificate of Incorporation states that a supermajority vote is necessary for stockholders to amend certain provisions in the Certificate of Incorporation and theBy-Laws. Item 2(a) proposes to amend the Certificate of Incorporation so that future amendments to these provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and theBy-Laws can be approved by a majority vote of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.

• Removal of Directors—The Certificate of Incorporation states that a director can be removed from office only by a supermajority vote of stockholders. Item 2(b) proposes to amend this requirement so that directors can be removed by a majority vote of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.

• Filling Open Board Seats at Statutorily Required Special Meetings—The Certificate of Incorporation states that a supermajority vote is necessary for stockholders to fill a vacancy or newly created directorship at a statutorily required special meeting of stockholders. Item 2(c) proposes to remove this supermajority voting requirement. As a result, the same voting standards applicable to the election of directors under theBy-Laws (a majority of votes cast in uncontested elections, and plurality voting in contested elections) would apply.

In addition, the Proposed Amendments include certain immaterial changes that are described below.

REASONS FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

As a part of the Company’s ongoing review of its corporate governance, the Board determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to remove the supermajority voting requirements in the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and provide for majority voting standards.

The Board recognizes that supermajority voting requirements can promote stability and protect stockholders by restricting certain fundamental corporate governance changes from being made unless those actions enjoy broad support among the Company’s stockholders. The Board also believes that an additional benefit of the existing supermajority provisions is that they provide enhanced stability that benefits the Company’s rating business, which depends in part upon maintaining the confidence of the marketplace and of regulators that the

24         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

Company’s ratings processes are stable, methodical and free from improper influence. However, the Board also recognizes that many investors and others have a different view, and believe that supermajority voting provisions conflict with principles of good corporate governance. For example, some stockholders and commentators argue that supermajority voting requirements limit a board’s accountability to stockholders or limit stockholders’ participation in a company’s corporate governance. It is important to note that if the Proposed Amendments are approved, they could make it easier for stockholders to remove directors and effect other corporate governance changes in the future.

After considering the advantages and disadvantages of maintaining supermajority voting requirements in the Certificate of Incorporation, the Board adopted resolutions setting forth the Proposed Amendments, declaring the Proposed Amendments advisable and resolving to submit the Proposed Amendments to the Company’s stockholders for deliberation with the recommendation that stockholders approve the Proposed Amendments.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

ITEM 2(a): REMOVAL OF SUPERMAJORITY VOTING STANDARDS FOR STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL OF FUTURE AMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION ANDBY-LAWS

Article Ninth of the Certificate of Incorporation currently states that a vote of at least 80% of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, is necessary to modify Article Ninth or the provisions in the Certificate of Incorporation that:

• allow the Board of Directors to adopt, amend or repeal theBy-Laws (Article Fifth);

• address the size of the Board, the terms of directors, and the process for filling vacancies and newly created Board seats (Article Seventh); and

• provide that any action by stockholders must be taken at an annual or special meeting (Article Eighth).

Likewise, Article Ninth of the Certificate of Incorporation limits amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation, and Article Fifth limits amendments to theBy-Laws (where those amendments are approved by the stockholders), that are inconsistent with the foregoing provisions, by imposing a supermajority voting requirement. Specifically, any such amendments must be approved by the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.

This Item 2(a) proposes to amend Article Ninth of the Certificate of Incorporation by replacing the 80% voting requirements with majority voting requirements. As a result, any future action by stockholders to alter, amend or repeal the Certificate of Incorporation can be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of all the shares of the Company entitled to vote, voting together as a single class. This majority voting requirement is the default voting standard for amending provisions of a certificate of incorporation under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”). This Item 2(a) would also amend Article Fifth of the Certificate of Incorporation to provide that theBy-Law provisions described above will be subject to the same majority voting standard that applies to amend the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation.

In addition, the Board has approved a conforming amendment to Article IX of theBy-Laws, to remove the 80% vote required for stockholders to amend certain provisions of theBy-Laws. TheseBy-Law provisions address the same matters that are subject to an 80% vote under Articles Seventh and Eighth of the Certificate of Incorporation, as described above. TheBy-Law provisions also address: (1) the voting standard applicable to the election of directors by stockholders (which is a majority of votes cast in uncontested elections); (2) the quorum and vote for Board action; and (3) the submission of nominations and other business at meetings of stockholders, including the advance noticeBy-Laws. ThisBy-Law amendment will become effective only if stockholders approve the Proposed Amendments set forth in this Item 2(a).

ITEM 2(b): REMOVAL OF SUPERMAJORITY VOTING STANDARD TO REMOVE DIRECTORS

Currently, Article Seventh, Section 1 of the Certificate of Incorporation states that a director can be removed from office only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of all shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. This Item 2(b)

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         25

requests that stockholders approve an amendment to this standard in order to provide that stockholders can remove directors by “a majority of the voting power of all the shares of the corporation entitled to vote thereon.” This is the default voting standard under the DGCL.

ITEM 2(c): REMOVAL OF SUPERMAJORITY VOTING STANDARDS FOR FILLING OPEN BOARD SEATS AT STATUTORILY REQUIRED SPECIAL MEETINGS

Currently, Article Seventh, Section 1 of the Certificate of Incorporation states that stockholders can fill vacancies and newly created directorships at a statutorily required special meeting of stockholders by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of all shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.

This Item 2(c) requests that stockholders approve an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation that removes this supermajority voting provision. Under Section 223 of the DGCL, if at any time the Company should have no directors in office, then any stockholder may apply to the Court of Chancery for a decree summarily ordering an election. Section 223 further states that if, at the time of filling any vacancy or any newly created directorship, the directors then in office shall constitute less than a majority of the whole board, the Court of Chancery may, upon application of any stockholder or stockholders holding at least 10% of the voting stock at the time outstanding having the right to vote for such directors, summarily order an election to be held to fill any such vacancies or newly created directorships, or to replace the directors chosen by the directors then in office. By deleting the supermajority voting provision, directors elected at a meeting called pursuant to Section 223 will be elected by the same voting standard that governs the election of directors pursuant to theBy-Laws. Under Article II, Section 1 of theBy-Laws, directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, and by a plurality vote in contested elections. The general description of Section 223 set forth herein is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the DGCL.

This Item 2(c) also includes additional immaterial changes that remove from Article Seventh, Section 1 of the Certificate of Incorporation legacy provisions relating to the Company’s transition from a classified board of directors to annual elections, which is now complete.

In addition, the Board has approved a conforming amendment to Article II, Section 2 of theBy-Laws, which contains substantially similar language to Article Seventh, Section 1 of the Certificate of Incorporation governing the filling of any vacancy or any newly created directorship. ThisBy-Law amendment will become effective only if stockholders approve the Proposed Amendments set forth in this Item 2(c).

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The general descriptions of the Proposed Amendments set forth above are qualified in their entirety by reference to the text of the Proposed Amendments, which are attached as Appendix A to these proxy materials. Additions to the Certificate of Incorporation are indicated by double underlining, and deletions are indicated by strike-outs.

If any of the Proposed Amendments are approved, the approved amendments will become effective upon the filing of a certificate of amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware setting forth the approved amendments, which is expected to occur after the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, if the Company’s stockholders approve any of the Proposed Amendments, the Board retains discretion under the DGCL not to implement the approved Proposed Amendments. If the Board exercises this discretion, it will publicly disclose that fact and the reason for its determination. As noted above, the Board has also approved conforming amendments to theBy-Laws, contingent upon stockholder approval and implementation of the Proposed Amendments. If the Proposed Amendments included in any or all of Item 2(a), Item 2(b) and Item 2(c) are not approved by stockholders, the Proposed Amendments that are not approved by stockholders will not be implemented, the Company’s current voting standards relating to the Proposed Amendments that were not approved will remain in place, and the conforming amendments to theBy-Laws will not become effective.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of Item 2(a), Item 2(b) and Item 2(c) in order to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to remove the supermajority voting requirements applicable to certain actions and replace them with majority voting standards as described above.

26         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

ITEM 3—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

What is being voted on	Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
Board recommendation	The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020.

The Audit Committee evaluates the selection of the Company’s independent auditor each year, and has appointed KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2020. KPMG LLP audited the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2019. In determining whether to reappoint KPMG as the Company’s independent auditor, the Audit Committee took into consideration a number of factors, including: KPMG’s performance on prior audits, and the quality and efficiency of the services provided by KPMG; an assessment of the firm’s professional qualifications, resources and expertise; KPMG’s knowledge of the Company’s business and industry; the quality of the Audit Committee’s ongoing communications with KPMG and of the firm’s relationship with the Audit Committee and Company management; KPMG’s independence; the appropriateness of KPMG’s fees; the length of time the firm has served in this role; the impact of changing auditors; and data on audit quality and performance, including recent PCAOB reports on KPMG LLP and peer firms. Considered together, these factors enable the Audit Committee to evaluate whether the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditor, and the retention of KPMG LLP to perform other services, will contribute to and enhance audit quality. Based on its evaluation, the Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of KPMG LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interest of our stockholders.

The Audit Committee has requested the Board of Directors to submit the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020 to stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. If the appointment of KPMG LLP is not ratified by stockholders, the Audit Committee willre-evaluate its selection and will determine whether to maintain KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm or to appoint another independent registered public accounting firm.

A representative of KPMG LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. Such representative will have the opportunity to make a statement if he so desires and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

AUDIT FEES

The aggregate fees for professional services rendered for (i) the integrated audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, (ii) the review of the financial statements included in the Company’s Reports on Forms10-Q and8-K, and (iii) statutory audits of subsidiaries, were approximately $5.4 million and $6.5 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively. These fees included amounts accrued but not billed of approximately $2.5 million and $2.7 million in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

AUDIT-RELATED FEES

The aggregate fees for audit-related services rendered to the Company were approximately $0.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 and approximately $0.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. Such services included employee benefit plan audits.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         27

TAX FEES

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for tax services rendered by the auditors for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $0 and $0, respectively.

ALL OTHER FEES

The aggregate fees billed for all other services rendered to the Company by KPMG LLP for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $0 and $0, respectively.

ITEM 4—ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

What is being voted on	An advisory resolution approving the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.
Board recommendation	The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the advisory resolution approving executive compensation.

We are asking stockholders to vote on an advisory resolution approving the compensation of the Company’s executives who are named in the Summary Compensation Table that appears on page 54 (referred to as the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”) of this Proxy Statement. As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, the goal of the Compensation & Human Resources Committee in setting executive compensation is to provide a competitive total compensation package that assists in the retention of the Company’s executives and motivates them to perform at a superior level while encouraging behavior that is in the long-term best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Consistent with this philosophy, a significant portion of the total compensation opportunity for each of Moody’s executives is performance-based, and ultimately dependent upon the Company’s achievement of specified goals that are both financial and operating(non-financial) in nature, and aligned with stockholder value creation.

The Company achieved strong results for 2019, reporting revenue of $4.8 billion. Moody’s Investors Service revenue increased 6% from 2018, and Moody’s Analytics achieved strong growth, with revenues increasing 13% from 2018.

• Long-Term Performance-Based Shares—For each of the past several years, the Company has granted three-year performance-based share awards with performance requirements based on the Company’s cumulative profitability (measured in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including future acquisitions, if any, and adjusted for restructuring charges and certain othernon-recurring items approved from time to time (“MCO EBITDA for Compensation Purposes”)), MIS’s ratings accuracy performance (“MIS Ratings Performance”), and MA’s cumulative sales over the relevant three-year period (including sales from entities acquired in future acquisitions, if any, and adjusted to exclude foreign exchange impact) (“MA Sales for Compensation Purposes”). To more directly align incentive compensation performance measures with stockholder value, beginning with the 2019-2021 performance period the Company’s performance for purposes of these long-term awards will be measured in earnings per share adjusted for certainnon-recurring items approved from time to time (“MCO EPS for Compensation Purposes”) instead of MCO EBITDA for Compensation Purposes.

• MinimumOne-Year Vesting Period for Equity Awards—The Company amended the Company’s 2001 Key Employees’ Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated on April 15, 2019, the “2001 Stock Incentive Plan”) to impose a minimumone-year vesting period for all equity awards issued under such plan on or after April 15, 2019, subject to certain limited exceptions.

• Balanced Mix of Equity Awards—NEOs are granted a balanced mix of long-term equity awards split 20% in stock options, 20% in RSUs and 60% in performance-based share awards.

28         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

• Clawback Policy—Annual cash incentive awards, performance-based share awards and other equity awards are subject to the Company’s clawback policy under which the Company has the right to require forfeiture of, or seek to recoup all or any portion of the value of the proceeds from such award in the case of a significant or material financial restatement, a restatement resulting from fraud or other misconduct, or material financial harm to the Company resulting from unlawful activity, fraud or intentional or willful misconduct.

• Stock Ownership Guidelines—The Company has robust stock ownership guidelines for its executives (including the NEOs) andnon-management directors, as well as a requirement that executives who are subject to the Company’s guidelines retain a significant percentage (75%) of the net shares received through equity awards until satisfying their ownership goals.

• Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy—The Company prohibits executive officers, directors and their family members from (i) making “short sales” of Moody’s securities; (ii) engaging in short-term or speculative transactions or entering into any transaction (including purchasing or selling forward contracts, equity swaps, puts or calls) that are designed to offset any decrease in the market value of or is otherwise based on the price of Moody’s securities; (iii) holding Moody’s securities in margin accounts or buying Moody’s securities on margin; and (iv) pledging Moody’s securities as collateral for a loan.

• No Dividend Accruals—Dividends do not accrue on unvested performance shares.

• No Executive Employment Agreements—The Company does not maintain employment agreements with its U.S. executives, including the NEOs.

• No Single-Trigger Payments upon a Change in Control—The Company does not provide “single-trigger” cash payments that are prompted solely by a change in control and unvested equity awards granted to the Company’s executive officers do not provide for accelerated vesting or settlement solely upon a change in control when the surviving company assumes the equity awards.

• Limited Executive Perquisites—The Company does not provide perquisites or other personal benefits with an aggregate annual value of more than $10,000 to any of its NEOs.

• No TaxGross-Ups on Perquisites and Change in Control Payments—The Company does not provide any taxgross-ups on perquisites or change in control payments to its executive officers.

We urge stockholders to read the CD&A beginning on page 33 of this Proxy Statement, which describes in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narrative, beginning on page 54, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our NEOs. The Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the CD&A are effective in achieving our goals and that the compensation of our NEOs reported in this Proxy Statement has supported and contributed to the Company’s success.

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, and as a matter of good corporate governance, the Board is asking stockholders to vote at the Annual Meeting on the following advisory resolution approving executive compensation:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Moody’s Corporation (the “Company”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the related compensation tables and narrative in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

This advisory resolution, commonly referred to as asay-on-pay resolution, isnon-binding on the Board. Althoughnon-binding, the Board and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee will review and consider the voting results when evaluating the Company’s executive compensation program.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         29

After consideration of the vote of stockholders at the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders on the frequency of futuresay-on-pay resolutions and other factors, the Board determined to hold a vote on an advisory resolution approving executive compensation annually, although it may determine to vary this practice based on factors such as discussions with stockholders. Accordingly, unless the Board modifies its policy on the frequency of futuresay-on-pay advisory votes, the next vote on an advisory resolution approving executive compensation will be held at the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the advisory resolution approving executive compensation.

30         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The table below sets forth the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned as of the dates indicated below by (i) each director and nominee for director of the Company, (ii) each Named Executive Officer, (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, and (iv) each person who is known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (the “Company’s 5% Owners”). Except as noted below, stock ownership information is based on (a) the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by directors and executive officers as of December 31, 2019 (based on information they supplied to the Company), calculated in accordance with SEC rules, and (b) the number of shares of Common Stock held by the Company’s 5% Owners, based on information filed with the SEC by the Company’s 5% Owners. Unless otherwise indicated and except for the interests of individuals’ spouses, the stockholders listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as owned by them. Percentages are based upon the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on December 31, 2019, and, where applicable, the number of shares of Common Stock that the indicated beneficial owner had a right to acquire within 60 days of such date. The table also sets forth ownership information concerning “Stock Units,” the value of which is measured by the price of the Common Stock. Stock units do not confer voting rights and are not considered “beneficially owned” shares under SEC rules.

Name	Shares Beneficially Owned(1)				Number of Shares Subject to Options Which Are or Become Exercisable Within 60 Days  of December 31 (2)		Number of RSUs That Vest Within 60 Days of December 31 Stock Units  and Dividend Equivalents(3)		Total Beneficial Ownership		Stock Units (4)		Percentage of Shares Outstanding(5)
Basil L. Anderson		42,715				0		0		42,715		12,082		*
Jorge A. Bermudez		17,425				0		0		17,425				*
Thérèse Esperdy		15				0		0		15				*
Robert Fauber		40,906				46,869		0		87,775				*
Vincent A. Forlenza		2,635				0		0		2,635		466		*
John J. Goggins		55,604				77,233		0		132,837				*
Kathryn M. Hill		15,027				0		0		15,027				*
Mark Kaye		0				4,486		0		4,486				*
Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr.		244,642	(6	)		498,802		0		743,444				*
Henry A. McKinnell, Jr.		85,890				0		0		85,889		1,846		*
Leslie F. Seidman		8,247				0		0		8,247				*
Stephen Tulenko		4,654				9,105		0		13,759				*
Bruce Van Saun		4,410				0		0		4,410				*
Michael West		4,754				7,189		0		11,943				*
Gerrit Zalm		1,115				0		0		1,115				*
All current directors and executive officers as a group (18 people)		698,146				786,268		0		1,484,413		14,412		*
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.		24,669,778	(7	)(8)										13.1%
Warren E. Buffett, National Indemnity Company, GEICO Corporation, Government Employees Insurance Company, 3555 Farnam Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131
The Vanguard Group		12,556,009	(9	)										6.7%
100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355
BlackRock Inc.		10,917,720	(1	0)										5.8%
55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055

* Represents less than 1% of the outstanding Common Stock.

(1) Includes all shares held directly, including those held in a rabbi trust and unvested restricted stock.

(2) Options vesting within 60 days of December 31, 2019.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         31

(3) Consists of: (i) RSUs that have been granted to members of management that vest within 60 days of December 31, 2019; and (ii) dividend equivalents that will convert to shares within 60 days of December 31, 2019.

(4) Consists of stock units (payable tonon-management directors after retirement), the value of which is measured by the price of the Common Stock, received under variousnon-management director compensation arrangements of the Company and its predecessor. These units do not confer voting rights and are not considered “beneficially owned” shares of Common Stock under SEC rules. Additional stock units accrue over time to reflect the deemed reinvestment of dividends.

(5) Percentages are based upon the number of shares outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and, where applicable, the number of shares of Common Stock that the individual beneficial owner had a right to acquire within 60 days of such date.

(6) This amount includes 2,000 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. McDaniel’s spouse and shares held in a trust.

(7) As set forth in Amendment No. 3 to the Schedule 13G jointly filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 by Warren E. Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway Inc., National Indemnity Company, GEICO Corporation and Government Employees Insurance Company, (a) each of Mr. Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and National Indemnity Company had shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 24,669,778 shares reported in such Amendment No. 3 to the Schedule 13G and (b) each of GEICO Corporation and Government Employees Insurance Company had shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 11,973,928 of such 24,669,778 shares.

(8) This address is listed in Amendment No. 3 to the Schedule 13G jointly filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 as the address of each of Mr. Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. The address of National Indemnity Company is listed as 3024 Harney Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131; and the address of GEICO Corporation and Government Employees Insurance Company is listed as 1 GEICO Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20076.

(9) As set forth in Amendment No. 7 to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020 by The Vanguard Group. The Vanguard Group had sole voting power with respect to 254,284 shares, shared voting power with respect to 46,279 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 12,270,121 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 285,888 of their 12,556,009 shares as of December 31, 2019.

(10) As set forth in Amendment No. 6 to the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020 by BlackRock Inc. BlackRock Inc. had sole voting power with respect to 9,288,594 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 10,917,720 of their 10,917,720 shares as of December 31, 2019.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 concerning their ownership of, and transactions in, the Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company. As a practical matter, the Company assists its directors and executives by monitoring transactions, and completing and filing reports on their behalf.

Based solely on the Company’s review of copies of such reports filed with the SEC and written representations that no other reports are required, the Company believes that all of its executive officers, directors and thosegreater-than-10% stockholders that filed any reports for the year ended December 31, 2019 reported all transactions on a timely basis, with the exception of one Form 3 for each of Mr. Tulenko and Mr. West that incorrectly reported their initial holdings. Corrected information was subsequently reported on Forms 3/A.

32         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Moody’s executive compensation programs are designed to foster and maintain a strong, capable, experienced and motivated executive team with the ability to manage the business during challenging times and to change as market practices warrant by aligning compensation with business performance and the interests of our stockholders. This discussion and analysis provides a guide to Moody’s executive compensation programs and explains the decisions of the Compensation & Human Resources Committee (in this discussion, also referred to as the “Committee”) regarding compensation reported for 2019 for Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer (referred to as the “CEO”), and the other executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54 (together with the CEO, referred to as the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Company achieved strong results for 2019, reporting revenue of $4.8 billion. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s Investors Service” or “MIS”) revenue increased 6% from 2018, and Moody’s Analytics, Inc. (“Moody’s Analytics” or “MA”) achieved strong growth, with revenues increasing 13% from 2018.

2019 financial performance measures for the Company include:

•  2019 revenue of $4.8 billion, up 9% from 2018;

•  2019 GAAP earnings per share of $7.42, up 10% from 2018; 2019 adjusted earnings per share of $8.29, up 12% from 2018;*

•  2019 operating income of $2.0 billion, up 7% from 2018; 2019 adjusted operating income was $2.3 billion, up 8% from 2018. Adjusted operating income excludes the impact of restructuring charges, depreciation and amortization, acquisition-related expenses, a loss pursuant to the divestiture of Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Services (MAKS), and a captive insurance company settlement;* and

•  Achievement of 113% of the Company’s three-year profitability performance target.

These operating and financial performance achievements formed the basis for the Committee’s award determinations.

•  For the NEOs, cash incentive awards ranged from 110.3% of target to 125.0% of target (excluding Mr. Almeida who is being paid his 2019 annual cash incentive bonus at target pursuant to the terms of his Transition Agreement). This level of payout reflects Moody’s business performance and results outlined above.

•  The grant date fair value of the long-term equity incentive award granted to the CEO in February 2019 was the same as his 2018 grant date award value. The annual grants awarded to the NEO group in 2019 (excluding the CEO and the November grant made to the newly appointed Chief Operating Officer) increased in the aggregate by approximately 11.6% from the value of the annual 2018 awards. This increase reflected the Company’s 2018 performance and was designed to bring long-term incentive levels and total compensation for Messrs. Kaye and Goggins closer to market.

•  The performance share cycle ended December 31, 2019 resulted in a payout of 167.6% of target for MIS, 158.9% of target for MA and 165.9% of target for Moody’s Shared Services, Inc. of performance shares granted for the 2017-2019 performance cycle.

*    See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperations—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Moody’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 for information on these adjusted measures, including a reconciliation of these adjusted financial measures to the most directly comparable generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) financial measures.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         33

2019 Changes

•  Effective November 1, 2019, Mr. Fauber, who had served as President of MIS since 2016, was appointed as Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Michael West succeeded Mr. Fauber as President of MIS effective November 1, 2019. Also effective November 1, 2019, Mr. Stephen Tulenko succeeded Mr. Almeida as President of MA.

•  In order to focus short-term incentive compensation performance on operating performance and income, the Company’s earnings per share is no longer considered in determining the annual cash incentive payouts. As a result, the financial performance goals considered for the 2019 annual cash incentive payout included MCO Operating Income for Compensation Purposes, MIS Operating Income for Compensation Purposes, MA Operating Income for Compensation Purposes, and MA Sales for Compensation Purposes (in each case, as defined below).

•  In addition, beginning with the 2019-2021 performance period, the Company’s performance for performance share purposes will be measured in earnings per share adjusted for certainnon-recurring items as approved from time to time (“MCO EPS for Compensation Purposes”) instead of MCO EBITDA for Compensation Purposes (as defined below) to more directly align long-term performance measurements with stockholder value.

•  The Company also amended the Company’s 2001 Key Employees’ Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated on April 15, 2019, the “2001 Stock Incentive Plan”) to impose a minimumone-year vesting period for all equity awards issued under such plan, subject to certain limited exceptions.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

The Company operates under governance standards that it believes best serve its stockholders, while also incorporating certain “best practices” in governance and executive compensation, including the following:

What We Do
	Long-Term Performance-Based Shares–For each of the past several years, the Company has granted three-year performance-based share awards with performance thresholds based on the Company’s cumulative profitability (measured in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including future acquisitions, if any, and adjusted for restructuring charges and certain othernon-recurring items approved from time to time (“MCO EBITDA for Compensation Purposes”), Moody’s Investors Service’s ratings accuracy performance (“MIS Ratings Performance”), and Moody’s Analytics’ cumulative sales over the relevant three-year period (including sales from entities acquired in future acquisitions, if any, and adjusted to exclude foreign exchange impact) (“MA Sales for Compensation Purposes”). To more directly align incentive compensation performance measures with stockholder value, beginning with the 2019-2021 performance period the Company’s performance for purposes of these long-term awards will be measured in earnings per share adjusted for certainnon-recurring items approved from time to time (“MCO EPS for Compensation Purposes”) instead of MCO EBITDA for Compensation Purposes.
	MinimumOne-Year Vesting Period for Equity Awards–The Company amended the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan to impose a minimumone-year vesting period for all equity awards issued under such plan on or after April 15, 2019, subject to certain limited exceptions.
	Balanced Mix of Equity Awards–NEOs are granted a balanced mix of long-term equity awards split 20% in stock options, 20% in restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and 60% in performance-based share awards.
	Clawback Policy–Annual cash incentive awards, performance-based share awards and other equity awards are subject to the Company’s clawback policy under which the Company has the right to require forfeiture of, or seek to recoup all or any portion of the value of the proceeds from such award in the case of a significant or material financial restatement, a restatement resulting from fraud or other misconduct, or material financial harm to the Company resulting from unlawful activity, fraud or intentional or willful misconduct.

34         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

Stock Ownership Guidelines–The Company has robust stock ownership guidelines for its executives (including the NEOs) andnon-management directors, as well as a requirement that executives who are subject to the Company’s guidelines retain a significant percentage (75%) of the net shares received through equity awards until satisfying their ownership goals.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy–The Company prohibits executive officers, directors and their family members from (i) making “short sales” of Moody’s securities; (ii) engaging in short-term or speculative transactions or entering into any transaction (including purchasing or selling forward contracts, equity swaps, puts or calls) that are designed to offset any decrease in the market value of or is otherwise based on the price of Moody’s securities; (iii) holding Moody’s securities in margin accounts or buying Moody’s securities on margin; and (iv) pledging Moody’s securities as collateral for a loan.

What We Don’t Do
	No Dividend Accruals–Dividends do not accrue on unvested performance shares.
	No Executive Employment Agreements–The Company does not maintain employment agreements with its U.S. executives, including the NEOs.
	No Single-Trigger Payments upon a Change in Control–The Company does not provide “single-trigger” cash payments that are prompted solely by a change in control and unvested equity awards granted to the Company’s executive officers do not provide for accelerated vesting or settlement solely upon a change in control when the surviving company assumes the equity awards.
	Limited Executive Perquisites–The Company does not provide perquisites or other personal benefits with an aggregate annual value of more than $10,000 to any of its NEOs.
	No TaxGross-Ups on Perquisites and Change in Control Payments–The Company does not provide any taxgross-ups on perquisites or change in control payments to Moody’s executive officers.

PHILOSOPHY OF THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Moody’s executive compensation program is designed to:

• Link a substantial part of each executive’s realized compensation to the achievement of the Company’s financial and operating objectives and to the individual’s performance.

• Align executives’ rewards with changes in the value of stockholders’ investments.

• We implement thislinkage and alignmentby:

• awarding the NEOs annual cash incentive compensation that is based on the Company’s performance against financial objectives specified at the beginning of the performance year and an evaluation of individual, qualitative and largely operational(non-financial) accomplishments and performance during that year;

• using Company performance as the primary factor in determining the annual cash incentive compensation payouts that will be distributed to the NEOs;

• establishing the targeted annual long-term equity award mix for all NEOs at 20% options, 20% RSUs and 60% performance shares, in order to tie realizable compensation directly to pre-established performance goals and future increases in stockholder value;

• providing long-term equity-based incentives in the form of (i) performance shares that will be earned following the completion of a three-year performance period only if certain performance goals are achieved or exceeded, (ii) stock options that will deliver value to the executives only if stockholder value increases from the date the awards are

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         35

granted and (iii) RSUs that help to retain executives over a four-year vesting period and increase or decrease in value with share price appreciation or depreciation;

• imposing a minimumone-year vesting period for all incentive equity awards issued under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, subject to certain limited exceptions; and

• establishing thresholds for 2019-2021 performance shares based on the MCO EPS for Compensation Purposes, MIS Ratings Performance and MA Sales for Compensation Purposes. The weights of these metrics vary depending on each NEO’s role and responsibilities.

• Provide acompetitive total compensation package that willmotivatethe Company’s executives to perform at a superior level and assist in incentivizing and retaining the executives. When designing the total compensation package, we compare data to that of a group of select peer companies and the broader financial services industry, as discussed further in the “Peer and Market Review” section, below.

The Company’s compensation philosophy generally is to target the market 50th percentile for base salary, target annual incentives, long-term incentives and target total compensation. The Company has also found that targeting the 50th percentile has allowed it to retain key talent and remain competitive in the marketplace. However, an executive’s positioning against market may be above or below such target positioning based on a number of additional factors that the Compensation & Human Resources Committee uses when establishing targeted total direct compensation, including: skills, performance, tenure, retention risk, seniority, market conditions and the unique nature of Moody’s business.

These factors contribute to variations in actual and target compensation levels. Moody’s believes it is important to exercise discretion and judgment in order to attract and retain superior talent and to reward officers with a greater scope of responsibilities or deeper experience than their peers within the peer group and/or the broader financial services market. Based on the Committee’s analysis of the above, and consideration of a recommendation from the CEO (other than with respect to his own compensation), the Committee establishes a targeted total direct compensation level for each NEO that it believes is competitive and aligned with stockholder value.

PEER AND MARKET REVIEW

The independent compensation consultant annually reviews the peer group. Based on the consultant’s review, management makes recommendations for changes to the composition of the peer group subject to Committee approval. As a result of the review, no changes were recommended for 2019 as the existing peer group entities were deemed to be appropriate in regard to a comparison of the size, revenue and market capitalization of Moody’s. For 2019, the peer companies were:

CME Group Inc.	Gartner Inc.	Nielsen Holdings plc
Dun & Bradstreet Corp.*	IHS Markit Ltd.	T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
Equifax Inc.	Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.	S&P Global
Fidelity National Information Services	Invesco Ltd.	Thomson Reuters Corp.
Fiserv Inc.	NASDAQ, Inc.	TransUnion
		Verisk Analytics, Inc.
* Became a private company in February 2019.

This group, the Committee believes, appropriately reflects the companies with which Moody’s competes for business and executive talent. This group also appropriately reflects the companies against which Moody’s financial performance is measured, as it includes firms that:

• Provide analytics products and services in addition to credit risk analysis;

• Provide company and industry credit research and business information services;

• Had median revenue of $4.6 billion in 2018 (Moody’s 2018 revenue equaled $4.4 billion); and

• Had a median average market capitalization of $18.9 billion as of December 31, 2018 (Moody’s market capitalization equaled approximately $27 billion as of December 31, 2018).

36         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

The Committee continually seeks to improve the criteria upon which the peer group is selected. The Committee reviewed the peer company selection criteria and the revenue threshold fornon-financial companies. In addition to reviewing compensation practices and pay levels within the Company’s peer group, the Committee looks at the broader financial services industry’s compensation data furnished by management’s compensation consultant, Aon Consulting, and reviewed by the Committee’s consultant. This additional compensation data is based on Aon Consulting’s survey data from 26 companies and is used only for reference when evaluating pay for the Company’s NEOs.

Meridian Compensation Partners LLC (“Meridian”) provided the Committee and management with total direct compensation data from these peer group entities along with analyses of each element of compensation. The comparison groups’ information is reviewed in quartile ranges, beginning with the 25th percentile. For 2019, the target total direct compensation opportunity for the CEO was at the 53rd percentile of the peer group, and positioning for the other NEOs ranged from the 6th percentile to the 63rd percentile of the peer group. The Committee periodically benchmarks benefits and perquisites and believes benefits to be in line with market practice and perquisites to be below current market practice. The table below reflects Moody’s percentile ranking and absolute rank against the peer group for revenues, market capitalization, assets and total shareholder return.

¹  Rank is reported highest to lowest (1= highest and 16 = lowest).

²  Data reflects 2019 fiscal year-end data for revenues and assets.

³  Market Capitalization reflects one year average as of December 31, 2019.

⁴  Total Shareholder Return (TSR) is as of December 31, 2019.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         37

ELEMENTS OF MOODY’S COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The following table lists the elements of Moody’s 2019 executive compensation program and the primary purpose of each:

Base Salary—Target at 50th percentile
Form	Fixed Compensation in Cash
Objectives and Basis	Base salary is intended to provide a level of pay that is appropriate given professional status, job content, market value, accomplishments and internal equity.

Annual Cash Incentives–Target at 50th percentile
Form	At Risk Compensation in Cash
Objectives and Basis	Annual cash incentives are intended to reward performance and assist in motivation and retention of management. Award payouts are finalized at the Committee’s February meeting following the performance year in question; payouts primarily reflect the Company’s financial performance and a qualitative assessment of certain strategic and operational metrics, but on occasion have been reduced or modestly adjusted upward based upon the outcome of an extensive review of each NEO’s performance against his annual objectives; actual payouts are typically made at the beginning of March following the performance year in question. Awards customarily are made under the 2004 Moody’s Corporation Covered Employee Cash Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2004 Plan”), although the Committee retains the right to pay discretionary cash incentives outside of the 2004 Plan when circumstances warrant.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation–Target at 50th percentile
Form	At Risk Compensation in Stock Options, Performance Shares and RSUs
Objectives and Basis	To help balance the need to motivate the NEOs to drive long-term stockholder value, manage the number of shares used to deliver equity awards, and allow the Company to measure and reward a broader set of long-term goals, the Committee delivers equity incentive compensation through a combination of stock options, RSUs and performance shares. Stock options have a strike price of no less than 100% of the average of the high and the low market price of the Common Stock on the date of grant and vest based on continued service over four years in annual 25% increments, which means that executives: (i) will realize value from their awards only if the market price of the Company’s stock appreciates above the options’ exercise price after the options have vested, and (ii) will be motivated to remain with the Company due to the multi-year vesting schedule. Stock options expire 10 years after the applicable grant date. Performance shares will be earned following the completion of a three-year performance period only ifpre-established performance goals are met or exceeded. The performance shares are also subject to a minimumone-year vesting period, subject to certain limited exceptions. For the 2019-2021 performance period, these performance thresholds are based on MCO EPS for Compensation Purposes, MIS Ratings Performance and MA Sales for Compensation Purposes. The weights of these metrics vary depending on each NEO’s role and responsibilities. The number of performance shares treated as vested and the corresponding number of shares actually issued to an employee as payout at the end of the three-year performance period may be less than the number determined by the performance goal formula at the discretion of the Committee.

38         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

RSUs will vest equally in four annual installments, provided there is continued employment through each such vesting date. Such awards motivate executives to remain with the Company due to the multi-year vesting schedule and align executive and stockholder interests.

In 2019, equity award grants were made five business days after the release of the Company’syear-end earnings.

Perquisites
Form	Limited
Objectives and Basis	Moody’s does not provide perquisites or other personal benefits with an aggregate annual value of more than $10,000 to any of its NEOs.

Retirement Benefits
Form	Broad-based andnon-tax qualified plans
Objectives and Basis	Defined Contribution Plans. Moody’s offers its U.S. employees, including the NEOs, the opportunity to participate in atax-qualified defined contribution plan, the Profit Participation Plan, and offers highly compensated senior management, including the NEOs who reside in the U.S., a voluntary deferred compensation plan (the “Moody’s Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan,” or “DCP”). The primary purpose of the DCP is to allow certain employees to makepre-tax deferrals into anon-qualified plan and to receive the maximum company match on compensation without regard to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) limits that apply to the Profit Participation Plan. The Company match only applies to deferrals in excess of the IRS limit on compensation that can be taken into account under atax-qualified defined contribution plan. In addition, the Company will credit to the DCP employer contributions that would have been made to the Profit Participation Plan but for the application of the IRS total contribution limit. Additional information regarding the DCP is found on page 62. Defined Benefit Plans. Certain NEOs based in the U.S. participate in thetax-qualified Moody’s Corporation Retirement Account (the “Retirement Account”) and thenon-qualified Pension Benefit Equalization Plan (“PBEP”) which restores benefits that cannot be delivered through the Retirement Account due to IRS qualified plan limits. There are no participants in the Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan (“SEBP”). Any vested SEBP benefits as of December 31, 2018 that were “grandfathered” to Mr. McDaniel and Mr. Goggins as a result of their removal from SEBP participation will be paid pursuant to the terms of the SEBP. All three of these pension plans have been closed to new participants since 2008. More details regarding the Retirement Account, the PBEP and the SEBP are provided in the narrative following the Pension Benefits Table for 2019 on page 59.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         39

WEIGHTING OF ELEMENTS—FIXED VERSUS “AT RISK” COMPENSATION

For 2019, the Company reviewed data from its peer group and the broader financial services market, as discussed in further detail in the “Peer and Market Review” section beginning on page 36. The Committee, based on the recommendations of the CEO (excluding with respect to his own pay) and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Meridian, determined that the large majority of an NEO’s total direct compensation package (which includes salary, target annual cash incentive, performance share awards, option awards andnon-equity incentive plan compensation) should be “at risk,” meaning the amounts that may ultimately be realized by an executive can vary based on performance. The “at risk” elements of an NEO’s direct compensation are delivered in the form of annual cash incentives and long-term equity awards consisting of stock options, RSUs and performance shares. The Committee concluded that approximately 10% to 25% of the NEO group’s target total direct compensation should be fixed and approximately 75% to 90% should be in the form of “at risk” compensation for 2019. The Company did not have a target weight for each element of compensation in 2019. The sum of the figures below may not equal 100% due to rounding. All percentages are based on salary and target figures as of December 31, 2019.

Chief Executive Officer Mix of Pay Elements	Other Named Executives Average Mix of Pay Elements

	Total Target Direct Compensation(1)
Name	% that is Base Salary		% that is Target   Annual Incentive		% that is   Target Equity		% that is   At Risk(2)
Raymond W. McDaniel		9%		18%		72%		91%
Mark Kaye		20%		24%		57%		80%
Robert Fauber		12%		27%		61%		88%
John J. Goggins		25%		21%		55%		75%
Stephen Tulenko		22%		28%		50%		78%
Mark E. Almeida		19%		27%		55%		81%

(1) Total Target Direct Compensation is the sum of the base salary, target annual cash incentive and grant date fair value of equity awards. The sum may not equal 100% due to rounding. All percentages are based on salary and target figures as of December 31, 2019.

(2) Includes annual incentive target award amount and grant date fair value of equity grant.

40         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

2019 COMPENSATION DECISIONS

BASE SALARY

The base salaries of the NEOs as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are listed below:

	Base Salary
Name	2018 Base Salary		2019 Base Salary		Percentage Change
Raymond W. McDaniel	$	1,000,000	$	1,000,000		0%
Mark Kaye		525,000		525,000		0%
Robert Fauber (1)		575,000		700,000		21.7%
John J. Goggins		550,000		550,000		0%
Stephen Tulenko (2)		454,939		525,000		15.4%
Mark E. Almeida		575,000		575,000		0%

(1) In connection with his appointment as Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Fauber’s base salary increased to $700,000 effective November 1, 2019.

(2) In connection with his appointment as President of MA, Mr. Tulenko’s base salary increased to $525,000 effective November 1, 2019.

The base salary increases made in 2019 for Messrs. Fauber and Tulenko reflected their new roles.

ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVES

Cash incentives for 2019 were paid out at 110.3% to 125.0% of target (excluding Mr. Almeida who is being paid his 2019 annual cash incentive bonus at target pursuant to the terms of his Transition Agreement) based upon financial and individual performance and after consideration of the results of an Institutional Investor Satisfaction Survey.

2019 Annual Cash Incentive Program Payouts

This year’s Company financial performance resulted in funding for the NEOs under the 2004 Plan, with the resulting annual cash incentive awards as shown in the table below:

Name	2019 Target Cash   Incentive Under 2004 Plan		2019 Maximum Cash   Incentive Under 2004 Plan		2019 Actual Cash Incentive        Paid Under 2004 Plan
Raymond W. McDaniel	$	2,000,000	$	4,000,000	$	2,500,000
Mark Kaye		625,000		1,250,000		747,600
Robert Fauber (1)		1,300,000		2,600,000		1,568,000
John J. Goggins		460,000		920,000		550,300
Stephen Tulenko (2)		600,000		1,200,000		661,900
Mark E. Almeida (3)		—		—		820,000

(1) In connection with his appointment as Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Fauber’s target cash incentive under the 2004 Plan increased to $1,300,000 effective November 1, 2019.

(2) In connection with his appointment as President of MA, Mr. Tulenko’s target cash incentive under the 2004 Plan increased to $600,000 effective November 1, 2019.

(3) Mr. Almeida is being paid a cash incentive bonus of $820,000, representing his 2019 annual cash incentive bonus at target, pursuant to the terms of his Transition Agreement.

Process for Determining Annual Cash Incentives

• Financial Performance Goals. The significant majority of the cash incentive payout for each NEO is based on the Company’s financial performance againstpre-established Company andline-of-business financial goals. For 2019, potential cash incentive payouts were based on a combination of adjusted measures. These measures included the Company’s operating income, MIS operating income, MA operating income and MA sales, all adjusted for compensation purposes (defined above as “MCO Operating Income for Compensation Purposes,” “MIS Operating Income for Compensation Purposes,” “MA Operating Income for Compensation Purposes,” and “MA Sales

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         41

for Compensation Purposes,” respectively).** The weighting of each measure differed depending on the individual’s area of responsibility.

The additional adjustments for compensation purposes were to exclude the effects of foreign exchange rates as compared topre-established foreign exchange rates, the impact of acquisition related costs, the cost of restructuring, discretionary funding adjustments, and other materialnon-recurring or unusual items.

For 2019, financial performance goals were based on the annual budget plan incorporating stretch objectives. The Committee sets target performance goals that are intended to motivate performance by being aspirational and challenging, but achievable. When the Committee set the NEOs’ targets, there was an expectation that substantially exceeding the targets would require extraordinary efforts individually and collectively. Therefore, in order to receive the maximum cash incentive payments, financial performance must exceed targets by more than 20%, reflecting extraordinary performance.

• Strategic & Operational Measure. This measure is a qualitative assessment of strategic and operational metrics tied to keynon-financial business objectives certified by the Compensation & Human Resources Committee at the beginning of the performance period. The Committee assessed the achievement of the metric by evaluating performance against the following objectives: (i) new sources of growth; (ii) quality assurance and controls; (iii) operating effectiveness and efficiency; (iv) people and culture; (v) risk management; and (vi) enabling technologies and capabilities.

• Adjustment for Institutional Investor Satisfaction. After the cash incentive payouts for each NEO are determined based on the performance metrics and weightings detailed below, the Committee can adjust the formulaic payout upwards by no more than 10% based on the results of a fixed-income Institutional Investor Satisfaction Survey conducted on behalf of the Company by an independent third party. The results of that survey are described below under “Institutional Investor Satisfaction.”

• Adjustment for Individual Performance. The cash incentive amount approved for each NEO may be reduced or modestly adjusted upward from the formulaic determination based upon an extensive assessment of that individual’s performance against qualitative, largely operational objectives established for the year. These are described below under “Individual Performance.”

• Maximum and Minimum Funding. For the 2019 plan year, the maximum incentive payout opportunity was 200% of target. Performance below an established threshold would result in no cash incentive payouts.

• The Committee continues to be rigorous in its oversight of incentive metrics, goals and the relationship between performance and pay.

• With assistance from the Committee’s compensation consultant, Meridian, the Committee conducted a review in 2019 of the Company’s performance periods and sensitivity of the payout curves utilized for its cash incentive plan compared to peer group.

** While the Company reports its financial results in accordance with GAAP, financial performance targets and results under the Company’s incentive plans are based on adjusted financial measures. These adjusted financial measures are permitted by those plans and are approved by the Compensation & Human Resources Committee. Management reviews adjustments from GAAP measures to adjusted measures for compensation purposes with the Compensation & Human Resources Committee to assure the Committee that performance is evaluated on a basis that takes into account the way the goals were set and maintains executive accountability for performance. These metrics and the related performance targets are relevant only to Moody’s executive compensation program and should not be used or applied in other contexts.

42         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

• Peer Group Comparison.

• This 2019 review confirmed that the relationship between Company performance and cash incentive payouts is more demanding than typical market practice. For the upside incentive opportunity above target, the Company’s payout at maximum performance levels generally requires higher performance improvement than its peers and the general industry require.

• For the downside opportunity (minimum payout) below target at the Company, the relationship between target performance and performance at threshold is similar to the relationship at peers and in general industry; however, under Moody’s plan, threshold performance generates a lower minimum payout than is typical for peers and general industry.

2019 ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE PROGRAM PERFORMANCE RESULTS

Financial, Strategic and Operational Performance Goals.Financial, strategic and operational performance measures for 2019 were weighted as set forth in the table below.

Performance Metrics

Name	MCO Operating Income for Compensation Purposes		MIS Operating Income for Compensation Purposes		MA Operating Income for Compensation Purposes		MA Sales for Compensation Purposes		Strategic and Operational
Raymond W. McDaniel		75.00%		—		—		—		25.00%
Mark Kaye		75.00%		—		—		—		25.00%
Robert Fauber		30.00%		45.00%		—		—		25.00%
John J. Goggins		75.00%		—		—		—		25.00%
Stephen Tulenko		—		—		37.50%		37.50%		25.00%
Mark E. Almeida (1)		—		—		—		—		—

(1) Mr. Almeida’s annual cash incentive amount was established pursuant to the terms of his Transition Agreement.

For 2019, performancein-line with the Company’s budget for MCO Operating Income for Compensation Purposes would result in 100% funding of the target cash incentive pool with respect to those metrics. For the 2019 plan year, maximum incentive funding opportunity was 200% of target. Performance below an established threshold would result in no funding with respect to that metric.

The 2019 financial performance goals for threshold, target and maximum payout, as well as actual 2019 performance, are set forth in the table below. For the metric goals used in both 2018 and 2019, the metric goals at target compared to 2018 actual performance were as follows: MCO Operating Income for Compensation Purposes up +5.70%; MIS Operating Income for Compensation Purposes up +1.0%; MA Operating Income for Compensation Purposes up +28.30%; and MA Sales for Compensation Purposes up +10.1%.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         43

ANNUAL INCENTIVE FUNDING FINANCIAL METRICS

As stated above, all adjusted measures used for determining incentive compensation amounts reflect adjustments to exclude the effects of foreign exchange rates as compared topre-established foreign exchange rates, the impact of acquisition related costs, the cost of restructuring, discretionary funding adjustments, and other materialnon-recurring or unusual items.

Institutional Investor Satisfaction.In 2009, the Committee added a Fixed Income Institutional Investor Satisfaction Survey (performed by an independent third party) modifier to the NEOs’ annual cash incentive program in order to take into account input from users of the Company’s products in setting compensation. The annual survey is comprised of approximately 100 questions in total, five of which were used for compensation analysis. Respondents were asked for their perceptions of Moody’s and Moody’s competitors in the market where the respondent is based. The questions used as a basis for the compensation modifier were as follows: (1) Overall, how has Moody’s met your business needs and expectations over the past 12 months? (2) Does Moody’s provide predictive ratings? (3) Is Moody’s an authoritative source on issues or events affecting the market? (4) Does Moody’s clearly and consistently communicate information about its rating decisions, methodology and models? and (5) Does Moody’s provide high quality and insightful research? This survey modifier adjusts the total funding of the annual cash incentive program upwards by no more than 10% based on achievements versus the Company’s customer value goals.

The Company’s institutional investor goals for 2019 were consistent with 2018. The two primary goals were management’s ability to (i) continue to enhance positive investor impressions of Moody’s products and services; and (ii) reduce less favorable impressions of the Company in the marketplace. The survey results do not produce a direct numerical adjustment by the Committee. Rather, the Committee completes a subjective, but structured, analysis of (i) the degree to which positive impressions increased and negative impressions decreased versus the previous year; and (ii) the degree to which the impressions of Moody’s were meaningfully different relative to the impressions of Moody’s competitors included in the survey. After considering the cash incentive payouts based on the financial performance metrics in conjunction with the overall survey results, the Committee determined to adjust the NEO cash incentive formulaic payout percentages by 2.5%.

Individual Performance.The Committee retains the discretion to set individual award payouts under the 2004 Plan based upon its subjective evaluation of the NEO’s performance against operational objectives

44         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

established for the year. For 2019, the individual performance goals evaluated when determining each NEO’s actual annual incentive award payouts are described below. Mr. Almeida left his position as President of Moody’s Analytics effective November 1, 2019 and his 2019 award payout was established pursuant to the terms of his Transition Agreement.

• Mr. McDaniel: The Committee determined, based on Mr. McDaniel’s (i) contributions to the Company’s financial performance including MCO Operating Income for Compensation Purposes, (ii) communication of an appropriate tone at the top with respect to risk management, internal controls and compliance, (iii) management of regulatory processes and initiatives so that MIS can continue to operate independently and successfully, (iv) coordination of management and communication of litigation and regulatory risk with market participants and employees, (v) support of growth and diversification of the Company’s business by advancing MIS’s and MA’s strategic initiatives, including product innovation, development of enabling technologies and investing globally, (vi) building of an agile culture and the support of organizational transformation initiatives, (vii) improvement of overall operating effectiveness by enhancing workforce quality and productivity and delivery of planned savings, and (viii) support of diversity and inclusion initiatives, to pay Mr. McDaniel 125.0% of his target annual cash incentive.

• Mr. Kaye: The Committee determined, based on Mr. Kaye’s (i) contributions to the Company’s financial performance including MCO Operating Income for Compensation Purposes, (ii) coordination of financial requirements for executing MIS and MA strategies, (iii) optimization of earnings call materials and messaging that focused on the Company’s narrative, (iv) successful transformation of the finance organization he oversees, (v) effective cash management, including execution of the Company’s share repurchase program, and capital management, (vi) implementation of diversity and inclusion initiatives, (vii) management of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and (viii) automation of several finance areas, to pay Mr. Kaye 119.6% of his target annual cash incentive.

• Mr. Fauber:The Committee determined, based on Mr. Fauber’s (i) contributions to MIS Operating Income for Compensation Purposes and MCO Operating Income for Compensation Purposes, (ii) communication of an appropriate tone at the top for compliance with regulation and Company policies, (iii) execution of a global MIS strategy, including expansion outside the U.S., (iv) productivity gains across MIS throughre-engineering and automation, (v) development of skill-building programs for MIS staff, (vi) steps taken with respect to diversity and inclusion initiatives, (vii) advancement of enabling technology and innovation initiatives, (viii) ongoing focus on internal controls and compliance and timely implementation of regulatory rules, and (ix) effective organizational management and transition as Chief Operating Officer, to pay Mr. Fauber 120.6% of his target annual cash incentive.

• Mr. Goggins: The Committee determined, based on Mr. Goggins’ (i) management of the Company’s legal risk and all material litigation matters and governmental investigations while balancing business requirements, (ii) mitigation of contingent liabilities for products and services, (iii) coordination with market participants about regulatory affairs and engagement with regulators and legislators globally, (iv) management of all key components of the Company’s compliance function and preparation for examinations by regulatory bodies, (v) support of MIS and MA business initiatives, including the coordination of legal, regulatory and contractual requirements related to expansion outside the U.S., (vi) advising on products and use of new technologies to mitigate contingent liabilities, and (vii) support of diversity and inclusion initiatives, to pay Mr. Goggins 119.6% of his target annual cash incentive.

• Mr. Tulenko:The Committee determined, based on Mr. Tulenko’s (i) contributions to MA Operating Income for Compensation Purposes and MA Sales for Compensation Purposes that exceeded the growth targets by 2.6% and 0.9%, respectively, (ii) continued focus on margin management and cost reduction practices, (iii) pursuit of M&A opportunities, (iv) continued work on enhancing MA’s product portfolio, and Enterprise Risk Solutions’ portfolio in particular, as well as meeting customer demand for analytic and insight tools, conducting business development and positioning MA for growth, as well as sustaining customer retention by enhancing product quality and service, (v) focus on expanding sales in products with scalable and sustainable growth, (vi) focus on risk management,

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         45

and (vii) his effective organizational management and transition of the MA management team, emphasizing values of customer focus, innovation, commercial and operational effectiveness, employee development and the promotion of diversity and inclusion initiatives, to pay Mr. Tulenko 110.3% of his target annual cash incentive.

LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

2019 Long-Term Equity Incentive (LTI) Mix

For 2019, equity grants were made in February based upon the Committee’s evaluation of 2018 performance and the level of each NEO’s target total direct compensation in comparison to the peer group and the broader financial services industry. In 2019, the aggregate long-term equity compensation awards granted for the NEO group in February were between the 15th – 64th percentile of executives in the peer group. The Committee reevaluates the long-term equity incentive mix on an annual basis to determine what arrangement best aligns the NEO’s compensation with Moody’s stockholders and maintains the NEOs’ focus on financial and operational performance.

Performance shares (60% of Total LTI). The performance shares will be earned following the completion of a three-year performance period if certain cumulative performance goals are achieved or exceeded. The number of performance shares treated as vested and the corresponding number of shares actually issued to an employee as payout at the end of the three-year performance period may be less than the number determined by the performance goal formula at the discretion of the Committee. For the 2019-2021 performance period, MCO EPS for Compensation Purposes, MIS Ratings Performance and MA Sales for Compensation Purposes were selected as the performance metrics. For the performance share program measurement, these metrics will be adjusted to exclude the net impact of restructuring charges, and other material,non-recurring, unusual items, as well as to include modified acquisition results in MA Sales for Compensation Purposes. The Committee decided that the impact of acquisitions would continue to be included when measuring MA Sales for Compensation Purposes, with acquired sales receiving a lower weighting than organic sales. These three metrics were chosen for the 2019-2021 performance period because they incent management to consider the long- and medium-term impact of business decisions and the metrics provide a balance of financial and operational factors for business success. In particular, the Committee determined that MCO EPS for Compensation Purposes will replace MCO EBITDA for Compensation Purposes beginning with the 2019-2021 performance period in order to more directly align performance thresholds with stockholder value. The weights of these three performance goals vary depending on each NEO’s role, responsibilities and corporate entity in which each NEO operates, as reflected in the table below:

2019 PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Name	MCO EPS for Compensation Purposes		MA Sales for Compensation Purposes		MIS Ratings Performance
Raymond W. McDaniel		60%		20%		20%
Mark Kaye		60%		20%		20%
Robert Fauber (1)		50%		0%		50%
John J. Goggins		60%		20%		20%
Stephen Tulenko		50%		50%		0%
Mark E. Almeida		50%		50%		0%

(1) Because Mr. Fauber transferred from MIS to Moody’s Corporation effective November 1, 2019, his metrics will be weighted on apro-rated basis for all outstanding performance share grants (including the 2017-2019 grant). Future grants will be weighted as they are for all Moody’s Corporation executives (60% Moody’s Corporation/ 20% MA/ 20% MIS).

The Committee believes these weights to be appropriate based on the individuals’ more direct involvement with certain corporate entities. All NEOs have an incentive to contribute to the overall Company’s profitability, while certain NEO’s performance shares are more directly tied to the performance of MIS or MA.

RSUs (20% of Total LTI).The RSUs vest equally in four annual installments beginning on March 1, 2020 provided there is continued service through each such vesting date. In making the determination to grant RSUs in 2019, the Committee considered the need to manage the number of shares used to deliver equity awards, and to allow the Company to measure and to balance incentives based on financial and operational goals with rewards that are tied more directly to stockholder value.

46         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

Stock options (20% of Total LTI). Stock options vest based on continued service over four years in annual 25% increments, which means (i) executives will realize value from their awards only if the market price of the Company’s stock appreciates above the options’ exercise price at the time that the options vest and (ii) executives are motivated to remain with the Company due to the multi-year vesting schedule. The Committee believes that because value is realized only if the Company’s stock price rises, stock options are performance-based compensation. Stock options expire 10 years after the grant date.

2019 LTI Grant Levels. In determining the value of total equity granted to the NEOs, in addition to the items noted in the following paragraph, the Committee considered the share utilization practices of the Company’s peer group and endeavored to balance aligning the interests of NEOs with stockholders while also motivating the NEOs to improve the Company’s current market position. As a result, the Committee recommended (based on a recommendation from the CEO, other than with respect to his own pay), and the Board approved, equity grants comprised of stock options, RSUs and performance shares, with the average individual NEO grant date value (excluding the November grant made to the newly appointed Chief Operating Officer) increasing approximately 10.2% from the individual NEO grants in 2018, in order to bring equity award values more in line with median market levels. The 2019 equity grant level for Messrs. McDaniel, Fauber and Goggins was approximately between the 50th and 60th percentile of the competitive range of the peer group and between the 55th and 75th percentile of the competitive range of financial services industry data. Mr. Kaye was between the 25th and 50th percentile of the peer group and the financial services industry data. The NEO’s individual awards are reported in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for 2019 on page 56.

Because the annual grants for all NEOs were made in February, each individual award determination considered (i) the Company’s 2018 performance, (ii) the NEO’s role in that performance, including the achievement of individual goals described above in “Annual Cash Incentives,” and (iii) retention objectives for that NEO. The awards are intended to align the interests of NEOs with those of the Company’s stockholders. Annual awards are determined by an examination of the present period as well as by considering expectations of the future. In addition, Mr. Fauber received an additional equity grant in November 2019 in recognition of his promotion to Chief Operating Officer.

2017-2019 Performance Share Payouts

The 2017-2019 performance period for performance shares granted in 2017 ended on December 31, 2019, with the NEOs receiving between 159% and 168% of their performance share target amounts based on the Company’s results. The weighting that was assigned to each of the three performance goals at the time the performance shares were originally granted varied depending on each NEO’s role and responsibilities. The threshold, target and maximum performance goals, as well as actual results, for MCO EBITDA for Compensation Purposes and MA Sales for Compensation Purposes performance criteria are set forth in the table below. MIS Ratings Performance is evaluated based on internally developed metrics that are proprietary and competitively sensitive, and therefore are not disclosed in the table below. The threshold, target and maximum MIS Ratings Performance goals were set to reflect a degree of difficulty that was comparable to the standard applied in setting the performance goals for the other criteria, with target performance levels being difficult but obtainable, based on historical results under this metric.

2017-2019 Performance Share Metrics

(1) Actual plan performance includes increase in sales from businesses acquired after the threshold, target and maximum goals were established. As a result, the actual plan performance may exceed the maximum goal.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         47

As a result of the level of performance that was achieved, the number of shares that vest in March 2020 (subject to continued service through the vesting date) for each NEO relative to the target number of shares granted is reflected in the table below:

Name	2017-2019 Performance Share Award at Target (# of shares)		2017-2019 Performance Share Award to Vest (# of shares)
Raymond W. McDaniel		38,422		63,742
Mark Kaye (1)		—		—
Robert Fauber		6,882		11,527
John J. Goggins		5,373		8,914
Stephen Tulenko		5,294		8,412
Mark E. Almeida		8,470		13,459

(1) Mr. Kaye joined the Company in August 2018 and did not receive a 2017-2019 performance award.

The NEOs’ individual performance share awards are reported in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal-Year End Table For 2019 on page 57.

THE ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE, ITS CONSULTANT AND MANAGEMENT

The Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, has responsibility for oversight of the Company’s compensation program and has final authority for evaluating and setting compensation for NEOs. To assist in this process, it considers recommendations made by the CEO (except with respect to his own compensation), and uses market data and analyses that the Committee’s independent compensation consultant provides in order to help formulate target compensation levels. The Committee has engaged Meridian, an independent compensation consulting company, to advise the Committee on matters related to executive and director compensation. Meridian is engaged directly by and reports to the Committee. Meridian does not offer or provide any other services to the Company and the Committee determined that the retention of Meridian has not raised any conflicts of interest.

The Committee’s independent consultant reviewed an analysis of the annual comparison of the elements of Moody’s executive compensation structure and practices to those of the Company’s peer group, as set forth above, and the broader financial services industry. Based on its review, the consultant concluded that the Company’s executive compensation program structure is consistent with industry practices.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The Committee begins its analysis of total direct compensation for the CEO by analyzing the compensation of executive officers at companies included in its peer group, as well as in the broader financial services market. It also reviews the CEO’s pay with respect to the other NEOs. In light of the CEO’s broad responsibilities requiring oversight of the entire organization and based on the achievements detailed beginning on page 44 under “Individual Performance,” the Committee determined that a higher total direct compensation package was warranted as compared with the other NEOs.

The mix of Mr. McDaniel’s total direct compensation package has changed over the years. For the past six years, the Committee has determined not to increase Mr. McDaniel’s base salary in order to keep his total direct compensation in line with competitive benchmarks.

In terms of his equity grants, 20% of Mr. McDaniel’s 2019 equity award was comprised of stock options, 20% was comprised of RSUs and 60% was comprised of performance shares. Mr. McDaniel’s target “at risk” compensation was 91%. This percentage is in line with the Committee’s objective of continuing to align the CEO’s compensation with long-term Company performance.

48         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

Alignment with Company Performance.The Committee believes this current compensation mix and structure serves to incentivize the CEO and more closely ties his awards with Company and individual performance. For instance, the change to Mr. McDaniel’s annual incentive payouts was tied to the Company’s financial results, as the MCO Operating Income for Compensation Purposes goal served and continues to serve as the metric determining funding of annual cash incentives. Beginning with the 2019-2021 performance period, MCO EPS for Compensation Purposes goals, which will be calculated on a three-year cumulative basis, will serve as one of the metrics for determining long-term performance-based share awards to more directly align performance measures with long-term stockholder value.    The prior year results impact equity award decisions. The following graph illustrates prior year results’ impact on compensation. In 2019, CEO total compensation increased primarily because of the positive change in his pension value.

CEO Summary Compensation Table Total Compensation and Operating Income Performance

In addition, the following graphs compare the totalone- and three-year cumulative stockholder returns of the Company to the performance of Standard & Poor’s Stock 500 Composite Index.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         49

The comparisons included in the MCO Stock Total Return graphs above assume that $100.00 was invested in the Company’s Common Stock and in the S&P 500 Composite Index on December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2018. The comparison also assumes the reinvestment of dividends, if any. Theone-year total return for the Common Stock was 71.25% during the performance period as compared with a total return during the same period of 31.48% for the S&P 500 Index. The three-year total return for the Common Stock was 160.32% during the performance period as compared with a total return during the same period of 53.14% for the S&P 500 Index.

As compared to its peer group, Moody’s Total Shareholder Return (defined as the annualized rate of share price appreciation plus the reinvestment of dividends) was the highest among the peers for theone-year period ending December 31, 2019 and in the 93rd percentile for the three-year period ending December 31, 2019.

Thorough Committee Analysis. The Committee undertook an extensive analysis of CEO pay in 2019 in order to evaluate whether the compensation structure continues to be appropriate.

• The Committee reviewed the alignment between Mr. McDaniel’s pay and Company performance for the three-year period ranging from 2016 through 2018. With the assistance of the Committee’s advisor, Meridian, the Committee assessed the relationship between Mr. McDaniel’s realized/realizable compensation and the Company’s performance across a range of profitability, growth and return metrics for the three-year period relative to the Company’s peer group.

• The Committee concluded that the relative positioning of Mr. McDaniel’s total compensation has been well aligned with the Company’s performance and that the combined structure of the Company’s incentive plans is appropriate and in keeping with the Committee’s objectives for these programs.

Mr. McDaniel’s targeted total direct compensation for 2019 was at the 53rd percentile as compared to the Company’s peer group. His 2019 actual total direct compensation was approximately at the 50th percentile of the benchmark actual total direct compensation levels of the comparative group. In light of the individual achievements listed beginning on page 44, the description of Company achievements on page 33 and the value of Mr. McDaniel’s pension plans, the Committee believes Mr. McDaniel’s total direct compensation package to be appropriate.

Pension Value. The change in Mr. McDaniel’s pension value in 2019, as shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 54, is larger than in prior years primarily because the discount rate for the Retirement Account, PBEP and SEBP (that is the basis for the proxy calculations) decreased significantly during 2019 to 3.15%, 2.75% and 2.65%, respectively. Each of these rates decreased by more than 1%. This rate decrease resulted in the increase of the pension present values reflected in the Pension Benefit Table for 2019, which are the basis for the change in pension value shown in the Summary Compensation Table. While Mr. McDaniel is no longer earning additional benefits under the SEBP, he does continue to earn benefits under the Retirement Account and PBEP which also contribute to the higher disclosed pension values for those plans.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE POLICIES AND PRACTICES

2019Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Moody’s provided stockholders asay-on-pay advisory vote to approve its executive compensation in 2019. At Moody’s 2019 annual meeting, stockholders expressed substantial support for the compensation of the NEOs, with approximately 94% of the votes cast for approval of the NEOs’ executive compensation. The Committee evaluated the results of the 2019 advisory vote and believes the strong stockholder support signals approval of the current pay programs in place at Moody’s. The Committee also considers many other factors in evaluating Moody’s executive compensation programs as discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, including the Committee’s assessment of the alignment of the compensation programs with the Company’s corporate business objectives, evaluations of the programs by the Committee’s external consultant, and review of peer group

50         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

data, each of which is evaluated in the context of the Committee’s fiduciary duty to act as the directors determine to be in stockholders’ best interests. While each of these factors bore on the Committee’s decisions regarding the NEOs’ compensation, the Committee did not make any changes to the Company’s executive compensation program and policies as a result of the 2019say-on-pay advisory vote.

Clawback Policy

Under the Company’s clawback policy, the Company has the right to require the forfeiture or seek recoupment of all or any portion of the value of or proceeds from any annual cash incentive awards, performance shares, or other equity grants in the event of an expanded set of circumstances pursuant to revisions approved by the Board in December 2018. The clawback policy applies to (a) the Company’s Section 16 officers, in the event of a significant or material restatement of the Company’s financial statements covering any of the three fiscal years preceding the payment or settlement of the award, where the payment or settlement of any such award was predicated upon the achievement of specified financial results that are revised as a result of such restatement; (b) any award recipient whose unlawful activity, fraud, or intentional or willful misconduct covering any of the three fiscal years preceding the grant, payment, vesting, or settlement of the award gave rise to or contributed to the restatement; and (c) any award recipient whose unlawful activity, fraud, or intentional or willful misconduct during any of the three fiscal years preceding the grant, payment, vesting or settlement of the award resulted in material financial harm to the Company. The value, amount and awards subject to forfeiture or recoupment under this policy are determined by the Compensation & Human Resources Committee.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Moody’s adopted stock ownership guidelines for its executives, including the NEOs, and itsnon-management directors, encouraging them to acquire and maintain a meaningful stake in the Company. Moody’s believes that these guidelines encourage its directors and executive officers to act as owners, thereby better aligning their interests with those of the Company’s stockholders.

• The guidelines are intended to balance an officer’s need for portfolio diversification with the Company’s desire for officers to hold an ownership level sufficient to assure stockholders of the individual’s commitment to value creation.

• Executive officers are expected, within five years of appointment to officer level, to acquire and hold shares of the Company’s Common Stock equal in value to a specified multiple of their base salary (which varies based on position). Ownership is expected to increase in line with base salary increases.

• The current ownership level multiples are: (i) six times base salary for the CEO, (ii) three times base salary for the remaining NEOs, as well as all direct reports of the CEO who receive performance shares, (iii) one times base salary for the remaining officers subject to the guidelines, and (iv) five times the annual cash retainer fornon-management directors.

• Restricted shares, RSUs and shares owned by immediate family members or through the Company’stax-qualified savings and retirement plans count toward satisfying the guidelines.

• Stock options, whether vested or unvested, do not count toward satisfying the guidelines.

• Unearned performance shares do not count toward satisfying the guidelines.

• A “hold until met” requirement (or share retention ratio) requires executives to hold 75% of net shares that they are awarded until their ownership multiple is met, including when an executive’s holdings no longer satisfy the required ownership multiple due to a decline in stock price.

As of December 31, 2019, each of the NEOs was in compliance with the guidelines. The guidelines for an individual executive officer may be suspended at the discretion of the Board of Directors in situations that it deems appropriate.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy; Short Sales and Other Speculative Trades

All executive officers, directors and their family members are subject to a securities trading policy under which they are prohibited from entering into the following transactions with respect to Moody’s securities,

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         51

including any publicly traded securities of a Moody’s subsidiary. The term “family member” is defined in the Company’s policy against insider trading and generally includes family members or entities that hold, purchase or sell Company stock that is attributed to the director or officer. Specifically, the following activities are prohibited under the policy:

• making “short sales” of Moody’s securities;

• engaging in short-term or speculative transactions or entering into any transaction (including purchasing or selling forward contracts, equity swaps, puts or calls) that are designed to offset any decrease in the market value of or is otherwise based on the price of Moody’s securities;

• pledging Moody’s securities as collateral for a loan; and

• holding Moody’s securities in margin accounts or buying Moody’s securities on margin.

ADDITIONAL EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

Employment Agreements

Moody’s does not enter into employment agreements with its U.S. executives, including the NEOs. All of the Company’s U.S. executives are, or prior to their departure from the Company were, “at will” employees. In connection with leaving his position as President of MA, Mr. Almeida has entered into a Transition Agreement whereby on November 1, 2019, he ceased to serve as the President of MA and commenced service as a Special Advisor with such service expected to end on December 31, 2020. For additional information, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 62.

Severance Policy

Moody’s provides severance benefits to NEOs under the Moody’s Career Transition Plan (the “Moody’s Career Transition Plan” or “CTP”) and the Moody’s Corporation Change in Control Severance Plan (the “Moody’s Corporation Change in Control Severance Plan” or the “CICP”), each of which is described below.

Career Transition Plan

All NEOs in the U.S. participate in the CTP, an ERISA-covered plan that is available to all full-time and regular part-time employees on the Company’s United States payroll. The NEOs are not entitled to receive any severance benefits outside those provided under the CTP and CICP. The CTP is designed to compensate eligible employees in the following situations:

• where there has been a reduction in the Company’s workforce or elimination of specific jobs;

• where the individual’s job performance has not met expectations (but does not involve a basis for terminating his employment for cause); or

• where the Company has agreed with an individual that it is in the mutual best interests of the parties to sever the employment relationship.

While having such a plan in place is in the best long-term interest of stockholders, the plan is not designed to reward individuals who have not performed to expectations or who have engaged in conduct that is detrimental to the Company and its stockholders, and the plan contains provisions to safeguard against this by providing that no severance is payable when termination is for “cause”. CTP benefits are based on position as well as tenure and are more fully described beginning on page 63.

Change in Control Arrangements

The purpose of the CICP is to offer its participants, which include the Company’s executive officers and other key employees selected by the Committee, protection in the event of a termination of employment in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in the CICP). The CICP has been adopted to enhance the alignment of the interests of management and stockholders by allowing executives to remain objective when facing the prospect of a sale and potential job elimination. Under the CICP, participants are entitled to severance

52         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

benefits triggered only if a participant’s employment is terminated within 90 days prior to or two years following a change in control of the Company by the Company or its successor without Cause, or by the participant for Good Reason (both terms as defined in the CICP) (i.e., a “double-trigger”). For the CEO, severance benefits under the CICP consist of alump-sum cash payment equal to three times the sum of his base salary and target annual incentive for the year of termination, plus three years of continued coverage under the Company’s medical and dental insurance plans. For other executives, including the other NEOs, the severance benefits consist of alump-sum cash payment equal to two times the sum of their base salaries and target annual incentives, plus two years of continued medical and dental coverage. Executive officers are not entitled to receive (either under the CICP or any other arrangement) a “golden parachute” excise taxgross-up with respect to change in control benefits.

Tax Deductibility Policy

Section 162(m) of the Tax Code limits income tax deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million that is paid to “covered employees” as defined in the Tax Code, including each of our Named Executive Officers. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2018, this limitation did not apply to the extent the compensation qualified as “performance-based” as defined under the income tax regulations. In addition, certain compensation paid pursuant to written binding contracts in effect on November 2, 2017 continues to be eligible for the performance-based compensation exception. Stock options awarded under the Company’s stockholder-approved stock incentive plans prior to November 3, 2017 were intended to be performance-based for purposes of the federal income tax laws and any amounts required to be included in an executive’s income upon the exercise of such options are not expected to count toward the $1 million limitation. The performance shares awarded by the Company prior to such date were likewise intended to qualify as performance-based compensation and therefore are intended to be fully tax deductible. While Moody’s generally sought to ensure the deductibility of the incentive compensation paid to the Company’s executives, the Committee intended to retain the flexibility necessary to provide cash and equity compensation in line with competitive practice. In addition, there are ambiguities in how the conditions to qualifying as “performance-based” were interpreted and administered under the income tax regulations, so that amounts that Moody’s intends or expects to qualify as fully deductible may not so qualify. Accordingly, there is no certainty that elements of compensation discussed in this Proxy Statement, even if granted on or before November 2, 2017, will in fact be fully tax deductible.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         53

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, as applicable, the total compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers. The Named Executive Officers include (i) Moody’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, (ii) the three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (other than the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officers) who were serving as executive officers at the end of the last completed fiscal year, and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided pursuant to the preceding provision but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at the end of the last completed fiscal year. As such, Mr. Almeida, who left his position as President of Moody’s Analytics effective November 1, 2019 and is no longer an executive officer of the Company, is included as a Named Executive Officer.

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)(1)		Stock Awards ($)(2)		Option Awards ($)(3)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4)		Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(5)		All Other Compensation ($)(6)		Total ($)
Raymond W. McDaniel		2019	$	1,000,000		—	$	6,279,951	$	1,570,004	$	2,500,000	$	2,383,185	$	18,492	$	13,751,632
President and Chief Executive Officer		2018 2017		1,000,000      1,000,000		—   —		6,279,911 5,806,294		1,569,992 1,451,600		1,666,200 2,750,000		—   157,962		40,408 8,100		10,556,511 11,173,956
Mark Kaye		2019		525,000		—		1,199,958		300,019		747,600		—		69,334		2,841,911
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2018		192,837	$	775,000		2,119,958		229,992		—		—		50,435		3,368,222
Robert Fauber		2019		595,833		—		2,400,078		600,020		1,568,000		257,624		18,708		5,440,263
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer		2018 2017		561,250      515,000		—   —		1,159,938 1,040,008		289,990 259,986		667,100 1,189,000		121,197 139,558		18,136 8,100		2,817,611 3,151,652
John J. Goggins		2019		550,000		—		969,445		242,394		550,300		714,368		9,796		3,036,303
Executive Vice President and General Counsel		2018 2017		547,000      534,000		—   —		856,093 811,968		213,984 203,005		425,800 766,300		—   473,639		17,364 8,100		2,060,241 2,797,012
Stephen Tulenko		2019		466,616		—		839,954		209,983		661,900		367,181		9,772		2,555,406
President of Moody’s Analytics
Mark E. Almeida		2019		697,740(7)		820,000		1,344,030		336,008		—		352,330		10,597		3,560,705
Senior Advisor		2018 2017		568,750      548,250		—   —		1,344,020 1,279,949		335,998 320,015		864,400 1,192,300		303,687 263,666		37,871 8,100		3,454,726 3,612,280

(1) The amounts reported in the “Bonus” column represent discretionary bonuses paid to the Named Executive Officers. Mr. Kaye received asign-on bonus payment of $150,000 on October 31, 2018 and a guaranteed incentive cash award for 2018 of $625,000 on March 1, 2019. Payments under the Company’s annual cash incentive program are reported in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. Mr. Almeida is being paid a cash incentive bonus of $820,000, pursuant to the terms of his Transition Agreement, which represents his 2019 annual cash incentive bonus at target.

(2) The amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column represent the full grant date fair market value of performance share and RSU grants. The full grant date fair value is based on the fair market value of the stock, which is defined as the arithmetic mean of the high and low prices of the Common Stock on the date of grant. All grants of performance shares and RSUs were made under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.

The 2017 and 2018 performance share awards are subject to performance metrics of EBITDA, MA’s sales growth and MIS’s ratings quality and the 2019 performance share award is subject to adjusted EPS, MA’s sales growth and MIS’s ratings quality. Because the achievement ornon-achievement of these performance metrics depends upon the occurrence of future events, the actual final payouts of these performance share awards are not known at this time. As such, the total grant date fair value of the performance shares is calculated using the target number of shares underlying these awards and the per share grant date prices on the dates of grant ($173.58 on February 25, 2019 and $215.07 on November 5, 2019). Assuming that the maximum performance for the performance share awards were attained, such awards would settle at 200% of target and the value of the 2019 performance share awards for Messrs. McDaniel, Kaye, Fauber, Goggins, Tulenko and Almeida would be $9,419,839, $1,800,025, $3,600,030, $1,454,253, $1,259,844, and $2,015,958, respectively. No cash dividends will be paid when the underlying shares vest. Cash dividend equivalents will be paid on restricted shares and RSUs at vest. For additional information on performance share and RSU awards, see “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for 2019” on page 56 and the related footnotes.

54         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

(3) The amounts reported in the “Option Awards” column represent the full grant date fair value ofnon-qualified options granted in each year indicated. The aggregate grant date fair value of the stock options granted to our NEOs in 2019 is based on the Black-Scholes value of a stock option on the grant date, as determined in accordance with applicable accounting guidance for equity-based awards. For additional information on the valuation of Moody’s option awards, see Note 17 to the financial statements as contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 24, 2020. The actual amounts realized, if any, will depend on the extent to which the stock price exceeds the option exercise price at the time the option is exercised.

(4) The amounts reported in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column represent the amounts earned by the Named Executive Officers for 2019 (other than Mr. Almeida) and, where applicable, 2018 and 2017 under the Company’s annual cash incentive program. The amounts for 2019, 2018 and 2017 were actually paid on March 6, 2020, March 1, 2019 and March 2, 2018, respectively. For a description of this program, see “Annual Cash Incentives” in the CD&A beginning on page 41. As reported in the “Bonus” column and as discussed in footnote 1, Mr. Almeida received a cash bonus of $820,000, representing his 2019 annual cash incentive bonus at target, pursuant to the terms of his Transition Agreement.

(5) The amounts reported in the “Change in Pension Value andNon-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column represent the aggregate change during 2019 in the actuarial present value of the Named Executive Officers’ accumulated benefits under the Company’s Retirement Account, PBEP and SEBP. For NEOs covered by the SEBP, the change in the actuarial present value year-over-year is largely driven by the impact of the following variables on the SEBP component: one less year of payments since the benefit was frozen as of December 31, 2018 and annual assumption changes (such as the discount rate and the mortality assumption). The change in pension value for 2019 increased for all NEOs covered by the SEBP, primarily due to lower interest rates atyear-end 2019, which increased the lump-sums payable and resulted in higher actuarial present values. For all NEOs not covered by the SEBP, the primary factors impacting the year-over-year changes were pensionable pay changes from 2018 to 2019 and annual assumption changes. The discount rates for the Retirement Account, PBEP and SEBP that are the basis for the proxy present value calculations have decreased during 2019 to 3.15%, 2.75% and 2.65%, respectively.

The PBEP and SEBP are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. SEBP participants elected either an annuity or alump-sum form of payment that will apply at retirement, and the PBEP was amended so that automaticlump-sum distributions are provided to terminated participants at the later of age 55 or six months following termination from Moody’s. The SEBP was closed as of January 1, 2008 to new participants and there were no active participants as of December 31, 2019. In 2018, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee took action so that no additional benefit would accrue under the SEBP for Mr. McDaniel and Mr. Goggins, who were the only NEOs that participated in the SEBP at that time (both elected alump-sum).

(6) The 2019 amounts reported in the “All Other Compensation” column comprise the following compensation items:

Name	Year		Perquisites and Other Personal   Benefits (a)		Company Contributions to Vested and Unvested Defined Contribution Plans (b)		Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards		Termination Benefits		Total
Raymond W. McDaniel		2019		—	$	8,400	$	10,092		—	$	18,492
Mark Kaye		2019		—		61,775		7,559		—		69,334
Robert Fauber		2019		—		8,400		10,308		—		18,708
John J. Goggins		2019		—		8,400		1,396		—		9,796
Stephen Tulenko		2019		—		8,400		1,372		—		9,772
Mark E. Almeida		2019		—		8,400		2,197		—		10,597

(a) For all the NEOs, perquisites and other personal benefits provided in fiscal 2019 were, in the aggregate, less than $10,000 per individual.

(b) These amounts represent the aggregate annual Company contributions to the accounts of the Named Executive Officers under the Company’s Profit Participation Plan and thenon-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan in the United States. The Profit Participation Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan aretax-qualified defined contribution plans.

(7) Mr. Almeida’s amount includes payment for his accrued but unused vacation time, which was paid out following his transition to the Special Advisor role in accordance with the terms of his Transition Agreement.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         55

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE FOR 2019

The following table sets forth, for the year ended December 31, 2019, information concerning each grant of an award made to the Company’s Named Executive Officers in 2019 under any plan.

Name	Grant Date				Authorization Date(1)		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive  Plan Awards(2)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(3)						All Other Option Awards: Number  of Securities Underlying Options (6) (#)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards (7) ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (8)
							Threshold  ($)		Target ($)		Maximum  ($)		Threshold  (#)		Target  (#)		Maximum  (#)
Raymond W. McDaniel		2/25/2019	(3	)		12/16/2018								6,784		27,134		54,268					$	4,709,920
		2/25/2019	(4	)		12/16/2018										9,045								1,570,031
		2/25/2019				12/16/2018														36,427	$	173.58		1,570,004
		N/A						N/A	$	2,000,000	$	4,000,000
Mark Kaye		2/25/2019	(3	)		12/16/2018								1,296		5,185		10,370						900,012
		2/25/2019	(4	)		12/16/2018										1,728								299,946
		2/25/2019				12/16/2018														6,961		173.58		300,019
		N/A						N/A		625,000		1,250,000
Robert Fauber		2/25/2019	(3	)		12/16/2018								1,469		5,876		11,752						1,019,956
		2/25/2019	(4	)		12/16/2018										1,959								340,043
		2/25/2019				12/16/2018														7,889		173.58		340,016
		11/5/2019	(3	)		10/21/2019								907		3,627		7,254						780,059
		11/5/2019	(5	)		10/21/2019										1,209								260,020
		11/5/2019				10/21/2019														5,401		215.07		260,004
		N/A						N/A		1,300,000		2,600,000
John J. Goggins		2/25/2019	(3	)		12/16/2018								1,047		4,189		8,378						727,127
		2/25/2019	(4	)		12/16/2018										1,396								242,318
		2/25/2019				12/16/2018														5,624		173.58		242,394
		N/A						N/A		460,000		920,000
Stephen Tulenko		2/25/2019	(3	)		12/16/2018								907		3,629		7,258						629,922
		2/25/2019	(4	)		12/16/2018										1,210								210,032
		2/25/2019				12/16/2018														4,872		173.58		209,983
		N/A						N/A	$	600,000	$	1,200,000
Mark E. Almeida		2/25/2019	(3	)		12/16/2018								1,452		5,807		11,614						1,007,979
		2/25/2019	(4	)		12/16/2018										1,936								336,051
		2/25/2019				12/16/2018														7,796		173.58		336,008
		N/A						N/A		820,000		1,640,000

 (1) The Compensation & Human Resources Committee authorized the grant of stock options, RSUs and performance shares for 2019 on December 16, 2018, to be effective on February 25, 2019, the fifth trading day following the date of the public dissemination of the Company’s financial results for 2019. In recognition of Mr. Fauber’s appointment to Chief Operating Officer, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee authorized the grant of stock options, RSUs and performance shares to him on October 21, 2018, to be effective on November 5, 2019.

 (2) Amounts in the “Estimated Future Payouts UnderNon-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” columns consist of cash incentive awards granted in 2019 under the Company’s annual cash incentive program. For additional information on the annual cash incentive program, see the CD&A beginning on page 33. These awards were earned during 2019 and are paid in March 2020.

 (3) Amounts in “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” columns consist of performance share awards granted in 2019 under the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. The Compensation & Human Resources Committee determined the target performance share amounts and set performance measures over the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2021. For Mr. McDaniel, Mr. Fauber, Mr. Goggins and Mr. Kaye, performance is based on adjusted EPS, MA’s sales growth and MIS’s ratings quality. For Mr. Almeida and Mr. Tulenko, performance is based on adjusted EPS and MA’s sales growth. For 2019, the maximum incentive payout opportunity was 200% of target.

 (4) Consists of RSU awards granted in 2019 under the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. They vest in four equal installments on March 1, 2020, March 1, 2021, March 1, 2022 and March 1, 2023.

 (5) Mr. Fauber’s November 5, 2019 RSU grant vests on November 5, 2020, November 5, 2021, November 5, 2022 and November 5, 2023.

 (6) Consists of stock option awards made under the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. They vest in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and expire on February 25, 2029, or for Mr. Fauber’s November 5, 2019 award, on November 5, 2029.

56         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

 (7) The exercise price of the stock options is equal to the arithmetic mean of the high and low market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date.

 (8) The February 25, 2019 grant date fair value for stock options is based on the Black-Scholes option valuation model, applying the following assumptions; a stock-price volatility factor of 23.62%; a risk-free rate of return of 2.60%; a dividend yield of 1.15%; and an expected time of exercise of 6.2 years from the date of grant. The November 5, 2019 grant date fair value for stock options is based on the Black-Scholes option valuation model, applying the following assumptions; a stock-price volatility factor of 21.95%; a risk-free rate of return of 1.81%; a dividend yield of 0.93%; and an expected time of exercise of 6.2 years from the date of grant. The Black-Scholes model is premised on the immediate exercisability and transferability of the options, neither of which applies to the options set out in the table above. The actual amounts realized, if any, will depend on the extent to which the stock price exceeds the option exercise price at the time the option is exercised.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END TABLE FOR 2019

The following table sets forth information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for each of the Company’s Named Executive Officers outstanding as of December 31, 2019. The market value of the shares that have not vested is based on the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2019, the last business day of Moody’s 2019 fiscal year, on the NYSE.

	Option Awards(1)											Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexer- cised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Grant Date		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units  or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units  or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(3)		Grant Date
	Exercisable		Unexercisable
Raymond W. McDaniel		85,809		0		$	38.61		2/13/2012		2/13/2022		6,404	$	1,520,374						2/23/2017
													63,742		15,132,988						2/23/2017
		85,324		0			46.43		2/13/2013		2/13/2023		7,030		1,668,992		28,119	$	6,675,732		2/16/2018
		52,080		0			79.55		2/12/2014		2/12/2024		9,045		2,147,373		27,134		6,441,883		2/25/2019
		55,463		0			98.01		2/11/2015		2/11/2025
		76,537		25,513			80.81		2/12/2016		2/12/2026
		24,290		24,291			113.34		2/23/2017		2/23/2027
		8,556		25,671			167.50		2/16/2018		2/16/2028
		0		36,427			173.58		2/25/2019		2/25/2029
Mark Kaye													3,552		843,280						10/1/2018
		0		4,120			156.14		10/23/2018		10/23/2028		1,105		262,338		4,419		1,049,115		10/23/2018
		0		6,961			173.58		2/25/2019		2/25/2029		1,728		410,244		5,185		1,230,971		2/25/2019
Robert Fauber		3,642		0			46.43		2/13/2013		2/13/2023		1,147		272,309						2/23/2017
													11,527		2,736,625						2/23/2017
		4,518		0			79.55		2/12/2014		2/12/2024		1,299		308,396		5,194		1,233,108		2/16/2018
		8,319		0			98.01		2/11/2015		2/11/2025		1,959		465,086		5,876		1,395,021		2/25/2019
		10,623		3,542			80.81		2/12/2016		2/12/2026		1,209		287,029		3,627		861,086		11/5/2019
		2,412		805			94.18		7/1/2016		7/1/2026
		4,350		4,351			113.34		2/23/2017		2/23/2027
		1,580		4,742			167.50		2/16/2018		2/16/2028
		0		7,889			173.58		2/25/2019		2/25/2029
		0		5,401			215.07		11/5/2019		11/5/2029
John J. Goggins		17,927		0			38.61		2/13/2012		2/13/2022		896		212,719						2/23/2017
													8,914		2,116,273						2/23/2017
		16,223		0			46.43		2/13/2013		2/13/2023		959		227,676		3,833		909,993		2/16/2018
		9,908		0			79.55		2/12/2014		2/12/2024		1,396		331,424		4,189		994,510		2/25/2019
		10,216		0			98.01		2/11/2015		2/11/2025
		12,651		4,218			80.81		2/12/2016		2/12/2026
		3,397		3,397			113.34		2/23/2017		2/23/2027
		1,166		3,499			167.50		2/16/2018		2/16/2028
		0		5,624			173.58		2/25/2019		2/25/2029

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         57

	Option Awards(1)											Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexer- cised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Grant Date		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units  or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units  or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(3)		Grant Date
	Exercisable		Unexercisable
Stephen Tulenko		0		3,925			80.81		2/12/2016		2/12/2026		883		209,633						2/23/2017
													8,412		1,997,093						2/23/2017
		0		3,347			113.34		2/23/2017		2/23/2027		941		223,403		3,761		892,899		2/16/2018
		1,144		3,434			167.50		2/16/2018		2/16/2028		1,210		287,266		3,629		861,561		2/25/2019
		0		4,872			173.58		2/25/2019		2/25/2029
Mark E. Almeida		27,354		0			30.01		2/8/2011		2/8/2021		1,412		335,223						2/23/2017
													13,459		3,195,301						2/23/2017
		25,584		0			38.61		2/13/2012		2/13/2022		1,505		357,302		6,018		1,428,733		2/16/2018
		23,140		0			46.43		2/13/2013		2/13/2023		1,936		459,626		5,807		1,378,640		2/25/2019
		13,426		0			79.55		2/12/2014		2/12/2024
		12,779		0			98.01		2/11/2015		2/11/2025
		17,793		5,931			80.81		2/12/2016		2/12/2026
		5,355		5,355			113.34		2/23/2017		2/23/2027
		1,831		5,494			167.50		2/16/2018		2/16/2028
		0		7,796			173.58		2/25/2019		2/25/2029

(1) Option awards are exercisable in four equal, annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

(2) The RSU grants made on February 25, 2019 will vest in four equal installments on March 1, 2020, March 1, 2021, March 1, 2022 and March 1, 2023. The RSU grant made to Mr. Fauber in November 2015 will vest in four equal installments on November 5, 2020, November 5, 2021, November 5, 2022 and November 5, 2023. The remaining portion of the RSU grants made on February 16, 2018 will vest in equal installments on March 1, 2020, March 1, 2021 and March 1, 2022. The remaining portion of the RSU grant made to Mr. Kaye on October 1, 2018 vests on October 1, 2020. The remaining portion of the RSU grant made to Mr. Kaye on October 23, 2018 vests in equal installments on March 1, 2020, March 1, 2021 and March 1, 2022. The remaining portion of the RSU grants made on February 23, 2017 vest in equal installments on March 1, 2020 and March 1, 2021. The performance shares granted on February 23, 2017 were earned at the levels shown for the performance period ending December 31, 2019, and vest in March 2020, subject to continued service through such date.

(3) Value is calculated based on the closing price of the Common Stock on December 31, 2019, which was $237.41.

(4) Represents performance share awards that pay out subject to the attainment of performance objectives and vesting requirements measured over a three-year period. The performance shares granted on February 16, 2018 vest in March 2021 for the performance period ending December 31, 2020, the performance shares granted on October 23, 2018 vest in March 2021 for the performance period ending December 31, 2020, the performance shares granted on February 25, 2019 vest on March 2022 for the performance period ending December 31, 2021 and the performance shares granted on November 5, 2019 vest on March 2022 for the performance period ending December 31, 2021.

58         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED TABLE FOR 2019

The following table sets forth information concerning the number of shares of Common Stock acquired and the value realized upon the exercise of stock options and the number of shares of Common Stock acquired and the value realized upon vesting of restricted stock and RSU awards during 2019 for each of the Company’s Named Executive Officers on an aggregated basis. In the case of stock options, the value realized is based on the market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the NYSE at the time of exercise and the option exercise price; in the case of restricted stock awards and RSUs, the value realized is based on the average high and low market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the NYSE on the vesting date.

	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(1)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Raymond W. McDaniel		199,135	$	30,966,429		60,317	$	10,574,776
Mark Kaye		1,373		97,195		3,919		787,643
Robert Fauber		7,442		1,207,609		15,989		2,803,191
John J. Goggins		42,377		7,395,078		9,821		1,721,818
Stephen Tulenko		9,490		713,234		8,285		1,452,526
Mark E. Almeida		27,236		4,910,000		12,587		2,206,753

(1) The performance shares granted for the 2017-2019 performance period vested on March 1, 2020 and therefore are not reflected in the above table.

PENSION BENEFITS TABLE FOR 2019

The following table sets forth information with respect to each defined benefit pension plan that provides for payments or other benefits to the Named Executive Officers at, following, or in connection with retirement.

Name	Plan Name	Number of Years Credited Service (#)(1)		Present Value of Accumulated Benefit at 12/31/19 ($)		Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)
Raymond W. McDaniel	Retirement Account		31.5000	$	929,087		—
	Pension Benefit Equalization Plan		31.5000		6,254,463		—
	Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan		30.0000		28,904,428		—
Mark Kaye	Retirement Account		N/A		N/A		—
	Pension Benefit Equalization Plan		N/A		N/A		—
	Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan		N/A		N/A		—
Robert Fauber	Retirement Account		13.2500		305,304		—
	Pension Benefit Equalization Plan		13.2500		699,353		—
	Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan		N/A		N/A		—
John J. Goggins	Retirement Account		19.8333		562,287		—
	Pension Benefit Equalization Plan		19.8333		1,295,855		—
	Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan		19.9167		6,515,465		—
Stephen Tulenko	Retirement Account		28.5000		718,757		—
	Pension Benefit Equalization Plan		28.5000		1,235,194		—
	Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan		N/A		N/A		—
Mark E. Almeida	Retirement Account		30.5000		865,780		—
	Pension Benefit Equalization Plan		30.5000		2,165,228		—
	Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan		N/A		N/A		—

(1) The credited service for the Retirement Account and the PBEP is based on service from the date the individual became a participant in the plan. Individuals become participants in the plan on the first day of the month coincident with or next following the completion of one year of service. The SEBP provides credited service from an individual’s date of hire by Moody’s. For Messrs. McDaniel and Almeida, the date of participation in the Retirement Account is based on an earlier plan provision that provided for individuals to become participants on the January 1 or July 1 following the completion of one year of service.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         59

The Company provides retirement benefits to the Named Executive Officers under three defined benefit pension plans: the Retirement Account, the PBEP and the SEBP. All three of these pension plans have been closed to new participants since 2008. The Retirement Account is a broad-based,tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. The PBEP is anon-tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan that restores benefits to participants that would otherwise be lost under the Retirement Account due to limitations under the federal income tax laws on the provision of benefits undertax-qualified defined benefit pension plans. The Retirement Account, together with the PBEP, has a “cash balance” design that provides retirement income based on a percentage of annual compensation that is credited to a notional account that is then credited with periodic interest credits. The SEBP, which has no active participants, is anon-tax-qualified supplemental executive retirement plan that provides additional pension benefits for designated senior executive officers of the Company. In 2018, Mr. McDaniel and Mr. Goggins were removed from active participation in the SEBP by the Compensation & Human Resources Committee so that no additional benefits would accrue under the SEBP. As a result of this removal from active SEBP participation, Mr. McDaniel and Mr. Goggins’ vested benefits as of December 31, 2018 were “grandfathered” and will be paid pursuant to the terms of the SEBP.

The PBEP and SEBP are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. SEBP, which currently has no active participants, allowed participants to elect either an annuity or alump-sum form of payment that will apply at retirement, and the PBEP generally provideslump-sum distributions to terminated participants at the later of age 55 or six months following termination from Moody’s.

The assumptions made in computing the present value of the accumulated benefits of the Named Executive Officers, except as described in the following sentence, are incorporated herein by reference to the discussion of those assumptions under the heading “Pension and Other Retirement Benefits” in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 17 to the financial statements as contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 24, 2020. The assumed retirement age used in computing the present value of the accumulated benefits of the Named Executive Officers was age 65 in the case of the Retirement Account and the PBEP.

The material terms in effect in 2019 of the Retirement Account, the PBEP, the SEBP and Moody’s Group Personal Pension Plan are described below. Future benefit accruals under these plans are subject to change.

MOODY’S CORPORATION RETIREMENT ACCOUNT

All U.S. employees hired prior to January 1, 2008 and who have been continuously employed became eligible to participate in the Retirement Account after attaining age 21 and completing one year of service with the Company. Participants earn one month of credited service for each month or fraction thereof from the date they become eligible to participate in the plan. The Retirement Account is a cash balance plan that provides benefits that grow monthly as hypothetical account balances that are credited with interest andpay-based credits. Interest credits are based on a30-year Treasury interest rate equivalent with a minimum compounded annual interest rate of 4.5%.Pay-based credits are amounts allocated to each participant’s hypothetical account based upon a percentage of monthly pensionable compensation. The percentage of compensation allocated annually ranges from 3% to 12.5%. Each participant’spay-based credit percentage is based on his or her attained age and credited service. Compensation is based on actual earnings, which include base salary, regular bonus (or annual incentive award), overtime and commissions. Severance pay, contingent payments and other forms of special remuneration are excluded.

Participants vest in their benefits after completing three years of service with the Company. Upon termination of employment, a participant may elect to receive an immediatelump-sum distribution equal to 100% of his or her cash balance account or in certain other forms. The normal retirement age under the Retirement Account is age 65, but participants who have attained age 55 with at least 10 years of service may elect to retire early. Upon retirement, participants may choose among thelump-sum and various actuarially equivalent forms of annuities offered under the plan. The active Named Executive Officers who are currently eligible for early retirement under the Retirement Account are Messrs. Goggins and McDaniel. Mr. Almeida, an NEO for 2019 who left his position as President of MA effective November 2019, is also retirement eligible under the Retirement Account.

60         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

MOODY’S CORPORATION PENSION BENEFIT EQUALIZATION PLAN

The PBEP is anon-tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan that restores benefits to participants whose pensionable compensation exceeds the limitations under the federal income tax laws on the provision of benefits undertax-qualified defined benefit pension plans. For 2019, this limitation was $280,000. The benefit-related provisions of the PBEP are the same as those of the Retirement Account except for the form of payment that must be received in the form of alump-sum. Upon attaining age 55 with at least 10 years of service, participants may elect to retire. The PBEP was amended as of January 1, 2008 to provide that any participant who is an active employee of the Company or any subsidiary after December 31, 2004 shall receive all of his benefits under the PBEP in alump-sum on thesix-month anniversary of his separation from service with the Company or a subsidiary. The active Named Executive Officers who are currently eligible for retirement under the PBEP are Messrs. Goggins and McDaniel. Mr. Almeida, an NEO for 2019 who left his position as President of MA effective November 2019, is also retirement eligible under the PBEP.

MOODY’S CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE BENEFIT PLAN

The SEBP is closed to new participants and there are no Named Executive Officers who actively participated in the plan in 2019. The SEBP is anon-tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan designed to ensure the payment of a competitive level of retirement income and disability benefits to participants. Historically, a key management employee of the Company who was deemed to be responsible for the management, growth, or protection of the Company’s business, and who was designated in writing by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Compensation & Human Resources Committee (the successor to the Governance and Compensation Committee) was eligible to participate in the plan on the effective date of his or her designation. The target retirement benefit for a participant is equal to 2% of average final compensation for each year of credited service up to 30 years of credited service, for a maximum benefit of 60% of average final compensation. This target benefit is offset by other pension benefits earned under the Retirement Account and PBEP, as well as benefits payable from Social Security and other pension benefits payable by the Company.

Participants earned one month of credited service for each month or fraction thereof that they were employed by the Company. Eligible compensation included base salary, annual incentive awards, commissions,lump-sum payments in lieu of foregone merit increases, “bonus buyouts” as the result of job changes and any portion of such amounts voluntarily deferred or reduced by the participant under any Company employee benefit plan. Average final compensation was the highest consecutive 60 months of eligible compensation in the last 120 months of employment. In 2018, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee took action so that no additional benefits would accrue under the SEBP for Mr. McDaniel and Mr. Goggins. As a result, Mr. McDaniel and Mr. Goggins’ vested benefits as of December 31, 2018 were “grandfathered” and will be paid pursuant to the terms of the SEBP.

Participants vested in their benefits after completing five years of service with the Company. Benefits are payable at the later of age 55 or termination of employment. For participants who terminate their employment prior to attaining age 55, benefits must commence at age 55 and their SEBP benefit will be reduced by 60% for early retirement. If a participant or vested former participant retires directly from the Company after age 55 and before age 60 without the Company’s consent, his or her retirement benefit is reduced by 3% for each year or fraction thereof that retirement commences prior to reaching age 60. If a participant retires directly from the Company on or after age 55 with the Company’s consent, benefits are not reduced for commencement prior to age 60.

The normal form of payment under the SEBP is a single-life annuity fornon-married participants or a fully subsidized 50% joint and survivor annuity for married participants. Participants were permitted to elect to receive up to 100% of their benefit in the form of alump-sum distribution.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         61

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE (1)

The following table sets forth information concerning thenon-qualified deferred compensation of the Named Executive Officers in 2019.

Name	Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)		Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)		Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)		Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End ($)
Raymond W. McDaniel		—		—	$	60,840		—	$	366,938
Mark Kaye	$	26,250	$	43,575		585		—		66,910
Robert Fauber		—		—		23,150		—		113,821
John J. Goggins		—		—		30,881		—		158,300
Stephen Tulenko		—		—		42,696		—		280,958
Mark E. Almeida		—		—		353,703		—		1,572,440

(1) Non-qualified deferred compensation earnings are included in the “Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year” column of this table. Company contributions to the accounts of the NEOs under the Company’snon-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan also are reflected in column (b) of footnote (7) to the Summary Compensation Table. Contributions of $785,270. for Mr. Almeida and $54,818 for Mr. Goggins were reported as compensation in the Company’s Summary Compensation Table for prior years.

MOODY’S CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company implemented the Moody’s Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”). Each year, employees expected to earn annual compensation in excess of the IRS compensation limit for allowablepre-tax deferrals into the Moody’s Profit Participation Plan are notified of their eligibility to participate in the DCP.

The primary purpose of the DCP is to allow these employees to continuepre-tax deductions into anon-qualified plan and receive the maximum company match on compensation that exceeds the IRS limits for allowablepre-tax deferrals into the Moody’s Profit Participation Plan. A limited group of highly compensated members of senior management have the option of immediate deferral of up to 50% of base salary and/or bonus. However, the Company match only applies to deferrals on compensation in excess of the IRS limit on compensation ($280,000 for 2019). In addition, the Company will credit to the DCP employer contributions that would have been made to the Profit Participation Plan but for the application of the IRS total contribution limit.

Each participant may select one or more deemed investment funds offered under the DCP for the investment of the participant’s account and future contributions. The deemed investment funds are substantially the same as the funds available in the Profit Participation Plan. The DCP is unfunded and no cash amounts are paid into or set aside in a trust or similar fund under the DCP. All amounts deducted from a participant’s earnings, along with any Company contributions, are retained as part of the Company’s general assets and are credited to the participant’s bookkeeping account under the DCP. The value of a participant’s account increases or decreases in value based upon the fair market value of the deemed investment funds as of the end of the year. The forms of distribution under the DCP are either alump-sum or installment payments after termination, as well as an alternative for participants to electin-service distribution at the time deferral elections are made.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

The information below reflects the amount of compensation that would become payable to each of the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Almeida) under certain existing plans and arrangements if the executive’s employment had terminated under the specified circumstances or if there had been a change in control, in each case, on December 31, 2019 (the last business day of 2019), given the named executive’s compensation and, if applicable, based on the Company’s closing stock price on that date. These benefits are in

62         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

addition to benefits that may be available to the executive prior to the occurrence of any termination of employment, including under exercisable stock options held by the executive, and benefits available generally to salaried employees, such as distributions under the Company’stax-qualified defined contribution plan and distributions of accrued vacation pay. In addition, in connection with any event including or other than those described below, the Company may determine to enter into an agreement or to establish an arrangement providing additional benefits or amounts, or altering the terms of benefits described below, as the Company determines appropriate. A “change in control” is defined as: (i) the date any one person, or more than one person acting as a group acquires (or has acquired during the12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) ownership of stock of Moody’s Corporation possessing 50% or more of the total voting power of the stock of Moody’s Corporation, (ii) the date a majority of members of the Board is replaced during any12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board before the date of the appointment or election, or (iii) the date any one person, or more than one person acting as a group acquires (or has acquired during the12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Company immediately before such acquisition or acquisitions.

The actual amounts that would be paid upon a Named Executive Officer’s termination of employment can be determined only at the time of such executive’s separation from the Company. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon the events discussed below, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be higher or lower than reported below. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event, the Company’s stock price and the executive’s then current compensation.

Transition Agreement with Mr. Almeida

In connection with leaving his position as President of Moody’s Analytics in November 2019, Mr. Almeida entered into a Transition Agreement that provides for the following: (i) his service as a Special Advisor through December 31, 2020, (ii) continued payment of his annual base salary of $575,000 during this advisory period, subject to his continued employment, (iii) annual cash incentive bonus in respect of 2019 payable based on target performance resulting in a payment of $820,000, subject to continued employment, (iv) annual cash incentive bonus in respect of 2020 payable based on target performance of $820,000, subject to pro-ration if Mr. Almeida leaves before the end date of December 31, 2020, (v) eligibility for a 2020 long-term incentive award with a grant date value equal to $1,680,000, which is the value of the long-term incentive award he received in 2019, and (vi) twelve months of executive outplacement services following the end of the advisory period, valued at $40,000. Following the advisory period, Mr. Almeida will receive benefits under the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and equity plans as described in this Proxy Statement. In addition, Mr. Almeida’s equity will continue to be governed by the terms of the applicable plan documents such that upon termination, he will receive retirement treatment. In addition, because the Company has agreed to waive theone-year post-grant service requirement applicable to his 2019 and 2020 long-term incentive awards under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, all of Mr. Almeida’s unvested equity would vest upon his departure from the Company.

MOODY’S CORPORATION CAREER TRANSITION PLAN

Other than Mr. Almeida, each of the Company’s Named Executive Officers currently participates in the Moody’s Corporation Career Transition Plan (the “CTP”). This plan generally provides for the payment of benefits if an eligible executive officer’s employment terminates for one of several specified events: a reduction in force, a job elimination, unsatisfactory job performance (not constituting cause), or a mutually agreed-upon resignation.

The CTP provides payments and benefits to individuals for what Moody’s believes to be a reasonable period for them to find comparable employment. It also affords both Moody’s and the individual the motivation to resolve any potential claims or other issues between the parties with finality, which helps minimize distractions for management and protect the interests of stockholders.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         63

The plan does not cover employment terminations resulting from a unilateral resignation, a termination of employment for cause, a sale, merger,spin-off, reorganization, liquidation, or dissolution of the Company, or where the eligible Named Executive Officer takes a comparable position with an affiliate of the Company. “Cause” means willful malfeasance or misconduct, a continuing failure to perform his duties, a failure to observe the material policies of the Company, or the commission of a felony or any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude. In the event of an eligible termination of employment, an eligible Named Executive Officer may be paid 52 weeks of salary continuation (26 weeks if the executive officer is terminated by the Company for unsatisfactory performance), payable at the times the executive officer’s salary would have been paid if employment had not terminated. For this purpose, salary consists of such Named Executive Officer’s annual base salary at the time of termination of employment. In addition, the eligible Named Executive Officer may receive continued medical, dental and life insurance benefits during the applicable salary continuation period and will be entitled to such outplacement services during the salary continuation period as are being generally provided by the Company to its executives. In addition, the executive is entitled to receive any benefits that he or she otherwise would have been entitled to receive under Moody’s retirement plans, although these benefits are not increased or accelerated.

Except in the case of a termination of employment by the Company for unsatisfactory performance, the eligible Named Executive Officer also may receive:

• a prorated portion of the actual annual cash incentive for the year of termination of employment that would have been payable to the executive officer under the annual cash incentive plan in which the executive officer was participating at the time of termination, provided that the executive officer was employed for at least six full months during the calendar year of termination; and

• financial planning and counseling services during the salary continuation period to the same extent afforded immediately prior to termination of employment.

The plan gives the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer the discretion to reduce or increase the benefits otherwise payable to, or otherwise modify the terms and conditions applicable to, an eligible Named Executive Officer (other than himself) under the plan. As a matter of policy, if Mr. McDaniel intended to increase the benefits payable, any such proposal would be reviewed by the Compensation & Human Resources Committee.

The receipt of any benefits under the plan is contingent upon the affected Named Executive Officer’s signing a severance and release agreement that prohibits him or her from engaging in conduct that is detrimental to the Company, such as working for certain competitors, soliciting customers or employees after employment ends, and disclosing confidential information, the disclosure of which would result in competitive harm to the Company. These provisions extend for theone-year period during which the Named Executive Officer would be receiving payments pursuant to the CTP.

The estimated payments and benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers assuming an event triggering payment under the CTP as of the last business day of 2019 are reported in the tables below. Mr. Almeida did not participate in the CTP as of December 31, 2019 and would therefore have not been eligible for the payments and benefit set forth therein.

64         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

Potential Payments and Benefits Upon a Termination of Employment

by Reason of a Reduction in Force, Job Elimination,

or a Mutually Agreed-Upon Resignation(1)

Name	Salary Continuation ($)		Annual Cash Incentive ($)		Medical, Dental, and Life Insurance Benefits ($)		Out- Placement Services ($)		Total ($)
Raymond W. McDaniel	$	1,000,000	$	2,000,000	$	20,045	$	40,000	$	3,060,045
Mark Kaye		525,000		625,000		18,294		40,000		1,208,294
Robert Fauber		700,000		1,300,000		20,237		40,000		2,060,237
John J. Goggins		550,000		460,000		13,361		40,000		1,063,361
Stephen Tulenko		525,000		600,000		20,237		40,000		1,185,237

(1) For purposes of this analysis, the following assumptions were used:

• the date of termination of employment was December 31, 2019;

• each NEO’s base salary was the amount as of December 31, 2019 and is continued for a period of 52 weeks; and

• each NEO’s annual cash incentive is equal to 100% of the target amount under the annual cash incentive program.

Potential Payments and Benefits Upon a Termination of Employment

by Reason of Unsatisfactory Job Performance

(Not Constituting Cause)(1)

Name	Salary Continuation ($)		Medical, Dental, and Life Insurance Benefits ($)		Out- Placement Services ($)		Total ($)
Raymond W. McDaniel	$	500,000	$	10,023	$	40,000	$	550,023
Mark Kaye		262,500		9,147		40,000		311,647
Robert Fauber		350,000		10,118		40,000		400,118
John J. Goggins		275,000		6,681		40,000		321,681
Stephen Tulenko		262,500		10,118		40,000		312,618

(1) For purposes of this analysis, the following assumptions were used:

• the date of termination of employment was December 31, 2019; and

• each NEO’s base salary was the amount as of December 31, 2019 and is continued for a period of 26 weeks.

MOODY’S CORPORATION CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN

On December 14, 2010, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Moody’s Corporation Change in Control Severance Plan (the “CICP”). The CICP was most recently amended on December 18, 2017. The purpose of the CICP is to offer its participants, which include the Company’s executive officers and other key employees selected by the Committee, protection in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the CICP). The CICP has been adopted to enhance the alignment of the interests of management and stockholders by allowing executives to remain objective when facing the prospect of a sale and potential job elimination. The CICP has an initialtwo-year term that will automatically renew each year for an additional year, unless the Company determines not to renew the CICP beyond its then current term. Under the CICP, participants are entitled to severance benefits triggered only if a participant’s employment is terminated within 90 days prior to or two years following a change in control of the Company by the Company or its successor without Cause, or by the participant for Good Reason (both terms as defined in the CICP). Severance benefits will not be payable if a participant is terminated for Cause or voluntarily resigns without Good Reason. For the CEO, severance benefits under the CICP consist of alump-sum cash payment equal to three times the sum of his base salary and target bonus for the year of termination, plus

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         65

three years of continued coverage under the Company’s medical and dental insurance plans. For other executives, including the other NEOs, the severance benefits consist of alump-sum cash payment equal to two times the sum of their base salaries and target annual incentives, plus two years of continued medical and dental coverage. Payment and retention of severance benefits under the CICP are contingent on the participant’s executing and not revoking a general release of claims against the Company and agreeing not to compete with the Company or solicit Company customers or employees for a period of two years following the date of the participant’s termination of employment. There is no“gross-up” of IRS “golden parachute” excise taxes incurred by any executive.

OTHER POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT

Unless otherwise provided in an applicable award agreement, the Company’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan provided for the following vesting of outstanding stock options, restricted stock awards and RSUs under certain circumstances as follows:

Death or Disability

• in the event of the death or disability of a Named Executive Officer after the first anniversary of the date of grant of a stock option, the unvested portion of such stock option will immediately vest in full and such portion may thereafter be exercised during the shorter of (a) the remaining stated term of the stock option or (b) five years after the date of death or disability;

• in the event of the death or disability of a Named Executive Officer after the first anniversary of the date of grant of a restricted stock or RSU award, the award will immediately vest in full;

• in the event of the death or disability of a Named Executive Officer, the Named Executive Officer shall have such rights in his or her performance shares, if any, as may be prescribed by the award agreement;

Retirement

• in the event of the retirement of a Named Executive Officer after the first anniversary of the date of grant of a stock option, the unvested portion of such stock option will continue to vest during the shorter of (a) the remaining stated term of the stock option or (b) five years after the date of retirement;

• in the event of the retirement of a Named Executive Officer after the first anniversary of the date of grant of a restricted stock or RSU award, the award will immediately vest in full;

• in the event of the retirement of a Named Executive Officer, the Named Executive Officer shall have such rights in his or her performance shares, if any, as may be prescribed by the award agreement;

Other Terminations of Employment

• in the event of a termination for any reason other than death, disability or retirement, an unexercised stock option may thereafter be exercised during the period ending 30 days after the date of termination, but only to the extent such stock option was exercisable at the time of termination;

• in the event of termination for any reason other than death, disability or retirement, after the first anniversary of the date of grant of a restricted stock or RSU award, the unvested portion of the award shall be forfeited;

• in the event of a termination for any reason other than death, disability or retirement prior to the end of any applicable performance period, an NEO’s performance shares shall be forfeited, unless, subject to the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine otherwise;

Change in Control

• in the event of a change in control of the Company, the unvested portion of all outstanding stock options granted prior to January 1, 2013 vest in full;

• in the event of a change in control of the Company, (i) unless otherwise determined by the Committee, if the acquirer assumes or substitutes an award of equivalent value, the unvested portion of all outstanding stock options and RSU awards granted on or after January 1, 2013 vest in full if the Named Executive Officer’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by the Named Executive Officer for “good reason” within 90 days before or two years after the change in control, or (ii) if the acquirer does not assume or substitute awards of equivalent value, the unvested portion of the awards shall vest in full; and

66         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

• in the event of a change in control of the Company, performance shares shall become payable in such manner as set forth in the award agreement.

Potential Payments and Benefits Upon a Termination of

Employment Following a Change in Control of the Company(1)

Name	Salary Continuation ($)		Annual Cash Incentive ($)		Medical, Dental and Life Insurance Benefits ($)		Stock Options ($)		Restricted Stock and RSU Awards ($)		Performance Share Awards ($)		Total ($)
Raymond W. McDaniel	$	3,000,000	$	6,000,000	$	60,136	$	11,128,915	$	5,336,739	$	22,239,382	$	47,765,172
Mark Kaye		1,050,000		1,250,000		36,587		779,153		1,515,862		2,280,086		6,911,688
Robert Fauber		1,400,000		2,600,000		40,474		2,165,532		1,332,820		5,123,071		12,661,897
John J. Goggins		1,100,000		920,000		26,722		1,685,600		771,819		3,180,107		7,684,248
Stephen Tulenko		1,050,000		1,200,000		40,474		1,580,968		720,302		3,011,309		7,603,053

(1) For purposes of this analysis, the following assumptions were used:

• the date of termination of employment was December 31, 2019;

• for the CEO, Mr. McDaniel, that he executed a general release andtwo-yearnon-compete agreement under the CICP and received a salarylump-sum payout equal to three times his base salary as of December 31, 2019, an annual cash incentivelump-sum payout equal to three times his 2019 annual target cash incentive and three years continuation of current elected coverage under the medical, dental and life insurance programs;

• for each NEO, other than Mr. McDaniel, that he executed a general release andtwo-yearnon-compete agreement under the CICP and received a salarylump-sum payout equal to two times the executive’s base salary as of December 31, 2019, an annual cash incentivelump-sum payout equal to two times the executive’s 2019 annual target cash incentive, and two years continuation of current elected coverage under the medical, dental and life insurance programs;

• the market price per share of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2019 was $237.41 per share, the closing price of the Common Stock on that date; and

• performance shares paid at target.

Potential Payments and Benefits upon a Termination of

Employment by Reason of Death, Disability or Retirement(1)

Name	Stock Options             ($)		Restricted Stock Awards             ($)		Performance Share Awards             ($)		Total ($)
Raymond W. McDaniel	$	8,803,780	$	3,189,366	$	13,572,255	$	25,565,401
Mark Kaye		334,832		1,105,618		699,410		2,139,860
Robert Fauber		1,541,319		580,705		2,455,928		4,577,952
John J. Goggins		1,326,620		440,395		1,882,266		3,649,281
Stephen Tulenko		1,269,988		433,036		1,852,115		3,555,139

(1) For purposes of this analysis, the following assumptions were used:

• the date of termination of employment was December 31, 2019;

• the market price per share of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2019, which was $237.41 per share, the closing price of the Common Stock on that date; and

• performance shares paid at target.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         67

CEO PAY RATIO

    The Company believes that its compensation practices should motivate its employees to create stockholder value. The Compensation & Human Resources Committee reviewed a comparison of CEO pay to the pay of the median compensated employee in 2019. As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the ratio of the 2019 annual total compensation of Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr., the CEO, to the annual total compensation of the median compensated of all our employees who were employed as of November 15, 2019 (other than the CEO). 157:1
CEO Pay
Ratio

For 2019:

• The annual total compensation of the median compensated employee was $87,393;

• The annual total compensation of the CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, was $13,751,632; and

• Based on this information, for 2019, the ratio of the annual total compensation of the CEO to the annual total compensation of the median compensated employee was 157:1.

Because the SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect the employee populations and compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

The pay ratio reported above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our internal records and the methodology described below. To identify the median employee as well as determine the median employee’s annual total compensation, the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments and estimates that were used are as follows:

• The Company considered the compensation of all Moody’s employees who were identified based on the Company’s internal records as of November 15, 2019. No employee groups were excluded from the population.

• To identify the Company’s median employee, the following figures were used: (i) the annual base salary as of November 15, 2019, which was annualized for all permanent employees who did not work for the entire fiscal year, and (ii) the population set as of November 15, 2019.

• With respect to the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2019 were identified and calculated in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) ofRegulation S-K.

• With respect to the annual total compensation of the CEO, the amount reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 54 of this Proxy Statement was used.

68         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING, PROXY VOTING AND

OTHER INFORMATION

INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

Under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, we are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders primarily via the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to stockholders. On March 11, 2020, we mailed to our stockholders (other than those who previously requestede-mail or paper delivery) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access and review our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report. These materials are available at: https://materials.proxyvote.com/615369. The Notice also instructs you on how to access your proxy card to vote through the Internet or by telephone.

This process is designed to expedite stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the cost of the Annual Meeting, and help conserve natural resources. If you received a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. If you would prefer to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice. If you have previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials viae-mail unless you elect otherwise.

DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS

If you are the beneficial owner, but not the record holder, of the Company’s shares, your broker, bank or other nominee may seek to reduce duplicate mailings by delivering only one copy of the Company’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report, or Notice, as applicable, to multiple stockholders who share an address unless that nominee has received contrary instructions from one or more of the stockholders. The Company will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report, or Notice, as applicable, to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. A stockholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report, or Notice, as applicable, now or in the future, should submit a request to the Company by sending ane-mail toir@moodys.com, by submitting a written request to the Company’s Investor Relations Department, at 7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10007 or contacting the Company’s Investor Relations Department by telephone, at(212) 553-4857. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report, or Notice, as applicable, and wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future should contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all stockholders at the shared address in the future. Please note that if you wish to receive paper proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, you should follow the instructions contained in the Notice.

RECORD DATE

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 24, 2020 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on the Record Date, there were 187,207,731 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Each holder of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be entitled to one vote per share.

SPECIAL VOTING PROCEDURES FOR CERTAIN CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES

Many current and former employees of the Company have share balances in the Moody’s Common Stock Fund of the Moody’s Corporation Profit Participation Plan (the “Profit Participation Plan”). The voting procedures described above do not apply to these share balances. Instead, any proxy given by such an employee or former employee will serve as a voting instruction for the trustee of the Profit Participation Plan, as well as a proxy for any shares registered in that person’s own name (including shares acquired under the Moody’s Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan and/or pursuant to restricted stock awards). To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustee, Profit Participation Plan voting instructions must be received by April 15, 2020. If voting instructions have not been

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         69

received by that date, or properly completed and executed voting instructions are not provided, the trustee will vote those Profit Participation Plan shares in the same proportion as the Profit Participation Plan shares for which it has received instructions, except as otherwise required by law.

QUORUM AND VOTING REQUIREMENTS

The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, whether present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting, the stockholders present may adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time, without notice, other than by announcement at the meeting, until a quorum is present or represented. At any such adjourned meeting at which a quorum is present or represented, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the original meeting. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. A broker“non-vote” occurs when a nominee (such as a bank, broker or other nominee) holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that particular matter and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.

Director Elections. Pursuant to the Company’sBy-Laws, the nominees for director are required to receive a majority of the votes cast with respect to such nominees in order to be elected at the Annual Meeting. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director. Abstentions have no effect on the election of directors. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote shares in the election of directors without instructions from the beneficial owner. Accordingly, shares resulting in brokernon-votes, if any, are not votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of director elections. In accordance with the Company’s Director Resignation Policy, each director subject to election at the Annual Meeting was required to submit a contingent resignation that the Board of Directors will consider, following a review and recommendation from the Governance & Nominating Committee, in the event that the director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast.

Amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to Remove the Supermajority Voting Standards Applicable to Certain Actions. The affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% in voting power of all shares of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required to approve the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to remove the supermajority voting standards applicable to certain actions. The amendments are presented as three separate items. Approval of any one of the three items is not conditioned upon approval of the other items. If a stockholder abstains from voting or directs the stockholder’s proxy to abstain from voting on any one of the items, the abstention has the same effect as a vote against the item. Shares resulting in brokernon-votes, if any, also have the same effect as a vote against the item.

Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of the majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2020. If a stockholder abstains from voting or directs the stockholder’s proxy to abstain from voting on this matter, the abstention has the same effect as a vote against the matter. Brokers have discretionary authority to vote shares on this matter if they do not receive instructions from the beneficial owner.

Advisory Resolution Approving Executive Compensation. The affirmative vote of the majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required for the advisory resolution approving executive compensation. The resolution is advisory, meaning that it is not binding on the Board, although the Board will consider the outcome of the vote on this resolution. If a stockholder abstains from voting or directs the stockholder’s proxy to abstain from voting on the matter, the abstention has the same effect as a vote against the matter. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote shares on the matter without instructions from the beneficial owner. Accordingly, shares resulting in brokernon-votes, if any, are not entitled to vote on the matter and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

70         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

PROXIES

The proxy provides that you may specify that your shares of Common Stock be voted “For,” “Against” or “Abstain” from voting with respect to the director nominees and the other proposals. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “For” the director nominees named in this Proxy Statement, “For” each of the three items comprising the proposal to amend the Certificate of Incorporation to remove the supermajority voting standards applicable to certain actions, “For” the ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm, and “For” the advisory resolution approving executive compensation. All shares of Common Stock represented by properly executed proxies received prior to or at the Annual Meeting and not revoked will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated in such proxies. Properly executed proxies that do not contain voting instructions will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors, except as noted above with respect to shares held in the Profit Participation Plan.

Any stockholder of record who votes by telephone or the Internet or who executes and returns a proxy may revoke such proxy or change such vote at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by (i) filing with the Corporate Secretary of the Company at 7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10007, written notice of such revocation, (ii) casting a new vote by telephone or the Internet or by submitting another proxy that is properly signed and bears a later date, or (iii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. A stockholder whose shares are owned beneficially through a bank, broker or other nominee should contact that entity to change or revoke a previously given proxy.

Proxies are being solicited hereby on behalf of the Board of Directors. The cost of the proxy solicitation will be borne by the Company, although stockholders who vote by telephone or the Internet may incur telephone or Internet access charges. In addition to solicitation by mail, directors, officers and employees of the Company may solicit proxies personally or by telephone, telecopy,e-mail or otherwise. Such directors, officers and employees will not be specifically compensated for such services. The Company has retained Georgeson LLC to assist with the solicitation of proxies for a fee not to exceed approximately $15,000, plus reimbursement forout-of-pocket expenses. Arrangements may also be made with custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of shares of Common Stock held of record by such custodians, nominees and fiduciaries, and the Company may reimburse such custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith.

OTHER BUSINESS

The Board of Directors knows of no business other than the matters set forth herein that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. Inasmuch as matters not known at this time may come before the Annual Meeting, the enclosed proxy confers discretionary authority with respect to such matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, and it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Proxy Statement are forward-looking statements and are based on future expectations, plans and prospects for the Company’s business and operations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such statements may include, among other words, “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “will”, “predict”, “potential”, “continue”, “strategy”, “aspire”, “target”, “forecast”, “project”, “estimate”, “should”, “could”, “may” and similar expressions or words and variations thereof that convey the prospective nature of events or outcomes generally indicative of forward-looking statements. It is possible that Moody’s actual results may differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, projected, anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. For a discussion of some of the risks and important factors that could affect the Company’s future results and financial condition, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s annual report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, and in other filings made by the Company from time to time with the SEC.

MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT         71

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2021 ANNUAL MEETING

Stockholder proposals which are being submitted for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy for the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices no later than 5:00 p.m. EST on November 11, 2020. Such proposals when submitted must be in full compliance with applicable laws, including Rule14a-8 of the Exchange Act.

Under the Company’sBy-Laws, notices of matters which are being submitted other than for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy for the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders must be received by the Corporate Secretary of the Company at its principal executive offices no earlier than January 21, 2021 and no later than February 10, 2021. If the 2021 annual meeting is more than 20 days before or more than 70 days after the anniversary date of this year’s Annual Meeting, such notices must be received no earlier than the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the 70th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day of public announcement of the meeting date. Such matters when submitted must be in full compliance with applicable law and the Company’sBy-Laws. The chairman of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge or introduce any such matter if notice of the matter is not received within the applicable deadlines or does not comply with the Company’sBy-Laws. If a stockholder does not meet these deadlines, or does not satisfy the requirements of Rule14a-4 of the Exchange Act, the persons named as proxies will be allowed to use their discretionary voting authority when and if the matter is raised at the meeting.

March 11, 2020

72         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

APPENDIX A - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

Below are the Articles from the Company’s current Restated Certificate of Incorporation marked to show the Proposed Amendments. Proposed additions are indicated by double underlining, and proposed deletions are indicated by strike-outs:

FIFTH: The Board of Directors shall be authorized to make, amend, alter, change, add to or repeal theBy-Laws of the corporation in any manner not inconsistent with the laws of the State of Delaware, subject to the power of the stockholders to amend, alter, change, add to or repeal theBy-Laws made by the Board of Directors. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Restated Certificate of Incorporation to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least80 percent ina majority of the voting power of all the shares of the corporation entitled to votegenerally in the election of directorsthereon, voting together as a single class, shall be required in order for the stockholders to alter, amend or repeal any provision of the By-lLaws which is to the same effect as Article Fifth, Article Seventh, and Article Eighth of this Restated Certificate of Incorporation or to adopt any provision inconsistent therewith.

SEVENTH: (1) The business and affairs of the corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of a Board of Directors consisting of not less than three directors, the exact number of directors to be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors.Commencing with the annual meeting of stockholders held in 2014, dDirectors shall be elected annually by the stockholders entitled to vote thereon for terms expiring at the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders, provided however, that any director elected or appointed prior to the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders shall complete the term to which such director has been elected or appointed. The term for each director elected at the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders shall expire at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, the term for each director elected at the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders shall expire at the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders, and the term for each director elected at the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders shall expire at the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders. The division of directors into classes shall terminate at the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders. In no case shall a decrease in the number of directors remove or shorten the term of any incumbent director. A director shall hold office until his successor shall be elected and shall qualify, subject, however, to prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office. Any newly created directorship on the Board of Directors that results from an increase in the number of directors and any vacancy occurring in the Board of Directors shall be filled only by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director.If any applicable provision of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware expressly confers power on stockholders to fill such a directorship at a special meeting of stockholders, such a directorship may be filled at such meeting only by the affirmative vote of at least 80 percent of the voting power of all shares of the corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors voting as a single class. Any director elected to fill a newly created directorship that results from an increase in the number of directorsor to fill a vacancy occurring on the Board of Directors shall be elected for a term expiring at the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders, and any director elected to fill a vacancy not resulting from an increase in the number of directors shall have the same remaining term as that of his predecessor.Directors serving in a class of directors elected for a term expiring at the third annual meeting of stockholders following the election of such class may be removed only for cause, and all other dDirectors may be removed either for or without cause, and the removal of any director, whether for or without cause, requires the affirmative vote of at least80 percent ina majority of the voting power of allthe shares of the corporation entitled to votegenerally in the election of directorsthereon, votingtogether as a single class.

(2) Notwithstanding the foregoing, whenever the holders of any one or more series of Preferred Stock or Series Common Stock issued by the corporation shall have the right, voting separately as a series or separately as a class with one or more such other series, to elect directors at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, the election, term of office, removal, filling of vacancies and other features of such directorships shall be governed by the terms of this Restated Certificate of Incorporation (including any certificate of designations relating to any series of Preferred Stock or Series Common Stock) expressly applicable to such directorships.

NINTH: Notwithstanding anything contained in this Restated Certificate of Incorporation to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least80 percent ina majority of the voting power of all the shares of the corporation entitled to votegenerally in the election of directorsthereon, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal Article Fifth, Article Seventh, Article Eighth or this Article Ninth or to adopt any provision inconsistent therewith.

A-1         MOODY’S2020 PROXY STATEMENT

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY E92815-P32273 3. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for 2020. 2a. Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to remove supermajority voting standards for stockholder approval of future amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation andBy-Laws. 4. Advisory resolution approving executive compensation. 2b. Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to remove supermajority voting standard to remove directors. 2c. Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to remove supermajority voting standards for filling open board seats at statutorily required special meetings. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 3 and 4. For address changes/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. MOODY’S CORPORATION 1a. Basil L. Anderson 1b. Jorge A. Bermudez 1c. Thérèse Esperdy 1d. Vincent A. Forlenza 1e. Kathryn M. Hill 1f. Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr. 1g. Henry A. McKinnell, Jr., Ph.D. 1h. Leslie F. Seidman 1. Election of Directors Nominees: The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 1i. Bruce Van Saun Yes No MOODY’S CORPORATION 7 WORLD TRADE CENTER 250 GREENWICH STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 VOTE BY INTERNET—www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before thecut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viae-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BYPHONE—1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before thecut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

E92816-P32273 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report, Notice & Proxy Statement, and Admission Ticket are available at www.proxyvote.com MOODY’S CORPORATION Annual Meeting of Stockholders April 21, 2020 9:30 a.m., EDT This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr., John J. Goggins and Mark Kaye, and each of them, as proxies, each with full power of substitution, to represent the undersigned and vote all the shares of common stock of Moody’s Corporation which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 21, 2020 at 9:30 a.m., EDT, at the Company’s offices at 7 World Trade Center at 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10007, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The undersigned directs the named proxies to vote as directed on the reverse side of this card on the specified proposals and in their discretion on any other business which may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This card also constitutes voting instructions to the Trustee of the Moody’s Corporation Profit Participation Plan to vote, in person or by proxy, the proportionate interest of the undersigned in the shares of common stock of Moody’s Corporation held by the Trustee under the plan, as described in the Proxy Statement. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. Continued and to be marked, signed and dated on the reverse side. Address Changes/Comments: (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)