UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
| | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
| | For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002 |
|
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
| | For the transition period from to . |
Commission File Number: 000-25331
Critical Path, Inc.
| | |
A California Corporation | | I.R.S. Employer No. 91-1788300 |
350 The Embarcadero
San Francisco, California 94105
415-808-8800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
As of April 30, 2002, the company had outstanding 77,646,645 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
INDEX
| | | | | | |
| | | | Page |
| | | |
|
PART I |
Item 1. | | Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) | | | | |
| | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | 2 | |
| | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | | | 3 | |
| | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | | 4 | |
| | Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | | | 5 | |
Item 2. | | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | | 11 | |
| | Supplemental Alternative Measurement Financial Data (Unaudited) | | | 29 | |
Item 3. | | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | | | 30 | |
PART II |
Item 1. | | Legal Proceedings | | | 32 | |
Item 6. | | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | | | 33 | |
1
PART I
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | March 31, |
| | 2001 | | 2002 |
| |
| |
|
| | |
| | (Unaudited) |
ASSETS |
Current assets | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 59,463 | | | $ | 52,257 | |
| Short-term investments | | | 9,702 | | | | 11,272 | |
| Accounts receivable, net | | | 26,692 | | | | 27,114 | |
| Other current assets | | | 5,367 | | | | 8,588 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | | Total current assets | | | 101,224 | | | | 99,231 | |
Investments | | | 7,215 | | | | 6,247 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 36,285 | | | | 29,584 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 48,641 | | | | 37,879 | |
Restricted cash | | | 2,674 | | | | 2,670 | |
Other assets | | | 3,913 | | | | 3,671 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | | Total assets | | $ | 199,952 | | | $ | 179,282 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
LIABILITIES, MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 25,955 | | | $ | 31,318 | |
| Accrued expenses | | | 6,232 | | | | 6,251 | |
| Deferred revenue | | | 10,297 | | | | 8,809 | |
| Capital lease and other obligations, current | | | 3,431 | | | | 661 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | | Total current liabilities | | | 45,915 | | | | 47,039 | |
Convertible subordinated notes payable | | | 38,360 | | | | 38,360 | |
Capital lease and other obligations, long-term | | | 1,149 | | | | 865 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | | Total liabilities | | | 85,424 | | | | 86,264 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock | | | 5,373 | | | | 8,442 | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | |
| Common Stock and paid-in-capital, $0.001 par value | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares authorized: 500,000 | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares issued and outstanding: 76,581 and 77,507, respectively | | | 2,176,370 | | | | 2,173,496 | |
| Common stock warrants | | | 5,250 | | | | 5,250 | |
| Notes receivable from shareholders | | | (1,222 | ) | | | — | |
| Unearned compensation | | | (7,050 | ) | | | (3,130 | ) |
| Accumulated deficit, including other comprehensive income | | | (2,064,193 | ) | | | (2,091,040 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | | Total shareholders’ equity | | | 109,155 | | | | 84,576 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | | Total liabilities, mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and shareholders’ equity | | $ | 199,952 | | | $ | 179,282 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| |
|
| | March 31, | | March 31, |
| | 2001 | | 2002 |
| |
| |
|
| | |
| | (Unaudited) |
Net revenues | | | | | | | | |
| Software license | | $ | 5,550 | | | $ | 10,911 | |
| Hosted messaging | | | 14,440 | | | | 6,964 | |
| Professional services | | | 3,416 | | | | 1,937 | |
| Maintenance and support | | | 3,737 | | | | 3,877 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total net revenues | | | 27,143 | | | | 23,689 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Cost of net revenues | | | | | | | | |
| Software license | | | 291 | | | | 287 | |
| Hosted messaging | | | 17,938 | | | | 7,817 | |
| Professional services | | | 2,966 | | | | 2,443 | |
| Maintenance and support | | | 2,586 | | | | 2,103 | |
| Amortization of purchased technology | | | 5,672 | | | | 4,630 | |
| Stock-based expense — Hosted messaging | | | 1,303 | | | | 185 | |
| Stock-based expense — Professional services | | | — | | | | 81 | |
| Stock-based expense — Maintenance and support | | | — | | | | 151 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total cost of net revenues | | | 30,756 | | | | 17,697 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Gross profit (loss) | | | (3,613 | ) | | | 5,992 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | | |
| Sales and marketing | | | 18,712 | | | | 10,943 | |
| Research and development | | | 9,934 | | | | 5,002 | |
| General and administrative | | | 13,293 | | | | 6,678 | |
| Amortization of intangible assets | | | 8,966 | | | | 6,131 | |
| Acquisition-related retention bonuses | | | 170 | | | | 10 | |
| Stock-based expense — Sales and marketing | | | 1,767 | | | | 2,536 | |
| Stock-based expense — Research and development | | | 1,097 | | | | 422 | |
| Stock-based expense — General and administrative | | | 8,733 | | | | 297 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total operating expenses | | | 62,672 | | | | 32,019 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Loss from operations | | | (66,285 | ) | | | (26,027 | ) |
Interest and other income (expense), net | | | 2,425 | | | | 629 | |
Interest expense | | | (5,067 | ) | | | (783 | ) |
Equity in net loss of joint venture | | | (776 | ) | | | (403 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Loss before income taxes | | | (69,703 | ) | | | (26,584 | ) |
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes | | | (343 | ) | | | 573 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net loss | | | (70,046 | ) | | | (26,011 | ) |
Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred shares | | | — | | | | (3,206 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net loss attributable to common shares | | $ | (70,046 | ) | | $ | (29,217 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net loss per share — basic and diluted | | $ | (0.97 | ) | | $ | (0.34 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net loss per share attributable to common — basic and diluted | | $ | (0.97 | ) | | $ | (0.38 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Weighted average shares — basic and diluted | | | 72,137 | | | | 76,514 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| |
|
| | March 31, | | March 31, |
| | 2001 | | 2002 |
| |
| |
|
| | |
| | (Unaudited) |
Operating | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss | | $ | (70,046 | ) | | $ | (26,011 | ) |
| Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 1,642 | | | | 85 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | 12,169 | | | | 8,009 | |
| Amortization of intangible assets | | | 14,638 | | | | 10,761 | |
| Amortization of stock-based costs and expenses | | | 12,912 | | | | 3,672 | |
| Equity in net loss of joint venture | | | 776 | | | | 403 | |
| Change in fair value of preferred stock instrument | | | — | | | | (200 | ) |
| Accounts receivable | | | 8,310 | | | | (507 | ) |
| Other assets | | | (1,198 | ) | | | (3,212 | ) |
| Accounts payable | | | (5,132 | ) | | | 5,363 | |
| Accrued expenses | | | (1,625 | ) | | | 19 | |
| Deferred revenue | | | 1,332 | | | | (1,489 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Net cash used in operating activities | | | (26,222 | ) | | | (3,107 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Investing | | | | | | | | |
| Notes receivable from officers | | | — | | | | 161 | |
| Property and equipment purchases | | | (6,156 | ) | | | (1,307 | ) |
| Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired | | | (9,898 | ) | | | — | |
| Purchase of short-term investments | | | — | | | | (1,569 | ) |
| Restricted cash | | | 57 | | | | 4 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Net cash used in investing activities | | | (15,997 | ) | | | (2,711 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Financing | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of Preferred Stock, net | | | — | | | | (75 | ) |
| Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock, net | | | 575 | | | | 677 | |
| Proceeds from payments of shareholder notes receivable | | | — | | | | 1,221 | |
| Principal payments on lease obligations | | | (2,355 | ) | | | (3,054 | ) |
| Purchase of Common Stock | | | (51 | ) | | | — | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Net cash used in financing activities | | | (1,831 | ) | | | (1,231 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | | (44,050 | ) | | | (7,049 | ) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | | | (858 | ) | | | (157 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 216,542 | | | | 59,463 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 171,634 | | | $ | 52,257 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Critical Path, Inc. was incorporated in California on February 19, 1997. Critical Path, along with its subsidiaries (collectively referred to herein as the “Company”), provides messaging and collaboration solutions, from wireless, secure and unified messaging to basic email and personal information management, as well as identity management solutions that simplify user profile management and strengthen information security. The Company’s customers are corporate enterprises, carriers and service providers, postal authorities and government agencies. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (“Financial Statements”) of Critical Path, Inc. and Subsidiaries furnished herein reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for each interim period presented. All adjustments are normal recurring adjustments. The Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, presented in the Company’s 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the interim periods presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The equity method is used to account for investments in unconsolidated entities if the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over financial and operating matters, but does not have the ability to control such entities. The cost method is used to account for equity investments in unconsolidated entities where the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over financial and operating matters.
| |
| Segment and Geographic Information |
The Company does not currently manage its business in a manner that requires it to report financial results on a segment basis. The Company currently operates in one segment: Internet messaging and communication products and services and management uses one measure of profitability. Revenue information on a product basis has been disclosed in our statement of operations.
Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
| |
| Recent accounting pronouncements |
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of SFAS No. 13, and Technical Corrections. SFAS No. 145 is effective for financial statements issued on or after May 15, 2002 and rescinds both SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, and the amendment to SFAS No. 4, SFAS No. 64, Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements. Through this rescission, SFAS No. 145 eliminates the requirement that gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of the related income tax effect.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This Statement addressed financial accounting and reporting for intangible assets acquired individually or with a group of
5
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
other assets (but not those acquired in a business combination) at acquisition and goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition. This Statement supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, Intangible Assets. Under the provisions of this Statement, if an intangible asset is determined to have an indefinite useful life, it shall not be amortized until its useful life is determined to be no longer indefinite. An intangible asset that is not subject to amortization shall be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Goodwill shall not be amortized. Goodwill shall be tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances at a level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001 will be subject immediately to the nonamortization and amortization provisions of this Statement. The Company adopted the new rules on accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. Adoption resulted in approximately $5.5 million related to acquired workforce and goodwill that will no longer be amortized, however we will annually test them for impairment, if not on a more frequent basis.
The gross carrying value related to these assets totaled $12.3 million and $10.9 million as of March 31, 2001 and March 31, 2002, respectively, and accumulated amortization totaled $1.3 million and $5.4 million. The aggregate amortization expense related to these assets during the first quarter of 2001 and 2002 totaled $1.3 million and zero. The estimated total amortization expense related to all intangible assets is $43.1 million for the year ended 2002, at which time all amortizable intangible assets will be fully amortized.
The following table presents net loss attributable to common shares and net loss per share attributable to common basic and diluted, as if the acquired workforce and goodwill had not been amortized during the periods presented (in thousands, except per share amounts):
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| |
|
| | March 31, | | March 31, |
| | 2001 | | 2002 |
| |
| |
|
Reported net loss attributable to common shares | | $ | (70,046 | ) | | $ | (29,217 | ) |
Amortization of acquired workforce and goodwill | | | 1,284 | | | | — | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net loss attributable to common shares, as adjusted | | $ | (68,762 | ) | | $ | (29,217 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
|
Reported net loss per share attributable to common | | $ | (0.97 | ) | | $ | (0.38 | ) |
Amortization of acquired workforce and goodwill per share | | | 0.02 | | | | — | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net loss per share attributable to common, as adjusted | | $ | (0.95 | ) | | | (0.38 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Note 2 — Commitments and Contingencies
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation in general, and securities and intellectual property litigation in particular, can be expensive and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. Other than as described below, we are not a party to any other material legal proceedings.
Securities Class Actions in Northern District of California.Beginning on February 2, 2001, a number of securities class action complaints were filed against the Company and certain of our current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaints were filed as purported class actions by individuals who allege that they purchased the Company’s common stock during a purported class period and sought an unspecified amount in damages; the alleged class periods vary among the complaints. The complaints were consolidated into a single action which alleged that, during the period from September 26, 2000 to February 1, 2001, the Company and certain of its former officers made false or misleading statements of material fact about the Company’s financial statements, including its revenues, revenue recognition policies, business operations and prospects for the year 2000 and
6
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
beyond. In addition, on September 24, 2001, certain former shareholders of PeerLogic, Inc. filed a putative class action in the Superior Court of the State of California alleging that Critical Path breached representations and warranties made in connection with the acquisition of PeerLogic. The complaint sought an unspecified amount in damages. We subsequently removed the PeerLogic action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On November 8, 2001, Critical Path announced that it had reached an agreement in principle to settle these cases. In February 2002, the Court gave preliminary approval to the settlement of the class action litigation. The Court also set the hearing date for final approval of the settlement agreement for May 23, 2002.
On April 30, 2002, MBCP PeerLogic LLC and other named plaintiffs filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Critical Path and certain of its former officers. The plaintiff shareholders opted out of the shareholder litigation settlement currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint, which has not been served on the Company, alleges breach of contract, unjust enrichment, common law fraud and violations of federal securities laws and seeks compensatory and punitive damages in an unnamed amount but in excess of $200 million.
Derivative Actions in Northern District of California.Beginning on February 5, 2001, Critical Path was named as a nominal defendant in a number of derivative actions, purportedly brought on the Company’s behalf, filed in the Superior Court of the State of California and in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The derivative complaints alleged that certain of Critical Path’s current and former officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company, engaged in abuses of their control of the Company, were unjustly enriched by their sales of the Company’s common stock, engaged in insider trading in violation of California law or published false financial information in violation of California law. The plaintiffs sought unspecified damages on the Company’s behalf from each of the defendants. Because of the nature of derivative litigation, any recovery in the action would inure to the Company’s benefit. Contemporaneously with settlement of the securities class action described above, an agreement in principle has been reached to settle the derivative action.
Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation.In February 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a formal order of investigation of the Company and certain of the Company’s current and former officers and directors associated with the Company with respect to non-specified accounting matters, financial reports, other public disclosures and trading activity in the Company’s securities. The Company fully cooperated with the SEC in its investigation. The SEC’s investigation was concluded against the Company in January 2002 with no imposition of fines or penalties against the Company. The Company consented, without admitting or denying liability, to an administrative order that the Company violated certain non-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws and to a cease and desist order. The investigation has thus far resulted with charges being filed against two former executive officers of the Company. The investigation of former executive officers and directors of the Company is continuing and while the Company is fully cooperating with such investigation we do not know the status of the investigation with respect to many of such former officers.
Securities Class Action in Southern District of New York.Beginning on July 18, 2001, a number of securities class action complaints were filed against the Company, and certain of our current and former officers and directors and underwriters connected with our initial public offering of common stock in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The purported class action complaints were filed by individuals who allege that they purchased common stock at the initial public offering of common stock between March 26, 1999 and December 6, 2000. The complaints allege generally that the Prospectus under which such securities were sold contained false and misleading statements with respect to discounts and commissions received by the underwriters. The complaints have been consolidated into a single action. The complaints seek an unspecified amount in damages on behalf of persons who purchased Critical Path stock during the specified period.
7
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Lease Dispute. In July 2000, PeerLogic, an acquired subsidiary of Critical Path, signed a lease for office space at 292 Ivy Street in San Francisco, CA. The landlord and PeerLogic had begun construction work to build out the space, when Critical Path acquired PeerLogic in December 2000. After reviewing its obligations under the lease, Critical Path noted that local zoning laws likely prohibited a business like Critical Path or PeerLogic from occupying the leased premises, and promptly sought a zoning determination from the San Francisco Zoning Administrator to resolve the matter. The preliminary zoning determination stated that Critical Path’s proposed use of the leased premises was not permitted. The landlord appealed this determination and prevailed before the San Francisco Board of Appeals. Critical Path appealed that determination but upon rehearing the Board of Appeals confirmed its decision. As anticipated, thereafter the landlord filed suit for back rent and breach of contract against Critical Path on April 30, 2002. The complaint seeks $7 million in compensatory damages and an unspecified amount of punitive damages. The Company intends to vigorously defend its rights but there can be no assurance as to the outcome of this litigation.
The uncertainty associated with these and other unresolved or threatened lawsuits could seriously harm the Company’s business and financial condition. In particular, the lawsuits or the continued effects of the SEC investigation could harm our relationships with existing customers and our ability to obtain new customers. The continued defense of the lawsuits could also result in the diversion of management’s time and attention away from business operations, which could harm the Company’s business. Although some of the named lawsuits are in the final stages of settlement, there can be no assurance that the applicable courts will accept the final settlement as executed, or at all. Negative developments with respect to the settlements or the lawsuits could cause the Company’s stock price to decline significantly. In addition, although the Company is unable to determine the amount, if any, that it may be required to pay in connection with the resolution of these lawsuits or the investigation by settlement or otherwise, the size of any such payments could seriously harm the Company’s financial condition.
Note 3 — Related Party Transactions
| |
| Loans to Executive Officers |
During 2001 and in connection with his employment agreement, the Company made a loan and held a note receivable from David Hayden, Executive Chairman, in the amount of $1.5 million. The full recourse note accrues interest at the rate of 6.75% per annum and could be repaid by the achievement of performance-based milestones described in Mr. Hayden’s employment agreement and performance loan agreement. The loan was also subject to forgiveness upon certain change of control events. In February 2002, the Board approved an amendment of Mr. Hayden’s employment agreement which eliminated the original performance-based milestones in favor of a single performance-based milestone tied to a change of control event. In addition, the Board increased the amount available under the loan agreement by an additional $450,000, which Mr. Hayden borrowed in March 2002. The loan amount is secured by a first priority security interest in all of Mr. Hayden’s shares and options in the Company, with all other terms of the loan and other agreements unchanged.
In December 2001, the Board approved a fully secured loan to William McGlashan, Jr., the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, of up to $4.0 million in connection with the purchase of a principal residence in the San Francisco Bay Area. In May 2002, the Compensation Committee of the Board and Mr. McGlashan agreed to amend the agreement in order to reduce the amount of the loan commitment to $1.5 million. In connection with the reduction of the loan commitment, Mr. McGlashan was granted additional options to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock. As of May 14, 2002, no portion of the loan commitment had been funded.
8
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 4 — Strategic Restructuring and Employee Severance
During 2001, the Company announced a strategic restructuring plan that involved reorganizing Critical Path’s product and service offerings around a group of core communications solutions, a reduction in the Company’s workforce, and the consolidation of facilities and operations. Total restructuring charges amounted to $18.3 million, all of which was recognized during 2001. As of December 31, 2001 a $2.2 million accrual remained as a component of accounts payable. During the first quarter of 2002, approximately $400,000 was charged against this accrual, primarily cash paid related to facilities and operations consolidation restructuring activities, leaving a remaining restructuring accrual of $1.8 million as of March 31, 2002, which is expected to be paid over the next 12 months.
Note 5 — Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of other comprehensive loss are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | March 31, |
| |
|
| | 2001 | | 2002 |
| |
| |
|
Net loss | | $ | (70,046 | ) | | $ | (26,011 | ) |
Unrealized investment gains (losses) | | | 302 | | | | (497 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | (839 | ) | | | (339 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Other comprehensive loss | | $ | (70,583 | ) | | $ | (26,847 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax, and cumulative translation adjustments, as presented on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
9
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Note 6 — Net Loss Per Share
| |
| Net loss per share is calculated as follows: (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| |
|
| | March 31, | | March 31, |
| | 2001 | | 2002 |
| |
| |
|
Net loss | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (70,046 | ) | | $ | (26,011 | ) |
Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred shares | | | — | | | | (3,206 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net loss attributable to common shares | | $ | (70,046 | ) | | $ | (29,217 | ) |
Weighted average shares outstanding | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | | | 74,268 | | | | 76,916 | |
Weighted average common shares issued subject to repurchase agreements | | | (526 | ) | | | (58 | ) |
Shares held in escrow related to acquisitions | | | (1,605 | ) | | | (344 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Shares used in computation of basic and diluted net loss per share | | | 72,137 | | | | 76,514 | |
Basic and diluted net loss per share | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (0.97 | ) | | $ | (0.34 | ) |
Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred shares Weighted average shares outstanding | | | — | | | | (0.04 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net loss attributable to common shares | | $ | (0.97 | ) | | $ | (0.38 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
For the three months ended March 31, 2002, approximately 91,603,266 million potential common shares were excluded from the determination of diluted net loss per share, as the effect of such shares on a weighted average basis was anti-dilutive.
10
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
| |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended and in effect from time to time. The words “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seek,” and “estimate” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These are statements that relate to future periods and include statements regarding our future strategic, operational and financial plans, anticipated or projected revenues, expenses and operational growth, markets and potential customers for our products and services, plans related to sales strategies and global sales efforts, the anticipated benefits of our relationships with strategic partners, growth of our competition, our ability to compete, investments in product development, the adequacy of our current facilities and our ability to obtain additional space, our litigation strategy, use of future earnings, the feature, benefits and performance of our current and future products and services, plans to reduce operating costs through continued expense reduction, anticipated effects of restructuring and retirement of debt, and our belief as to our ability to successfully emerge from the restructuring and refocusing of our operations. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Factors that might cause future results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, difficulties of forecasting future results due to our limited operating history, failure to meet sales and revenue forecasts, evolving business strategy and the emerging nature of the market for our products and services, finalization of pending litigation and the settlement of the continuing SEC investigation against former executives and directors, turnover within and integration of senior management, board of directors members and other key personnel, difficulties in our strategic plans to exit certain products and services offerings, failure to expand our sales and marketing activities, potential difficulties associated with strategic relationships, investments and uncollected bills, general economic conditions in markets in which the Company does business, risks associated with our international operations, foreign currency fluctuations, unplanned system interruptions and capacity constraints, software defects, and failure to expand our sales and marketing activities, potential difficulties associated with strategic relationships, investments and uncollected bills, risks associated with an inability to maintain continued compliance with the Nasdaq National Market listing requirements, risks associated with our international operations, unplanned system interruptions and capacity constraints, software defects, and those discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Additional Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results” and elsewhere in this report. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this filing.
All references to “Critical Path,” “we,” “our,” or the “Company” mean Critical Path, Inc. and its subsidiaries, except where it is clear from the context that such terms means only the parent company and excludes subsidiaries.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes numerous trademarks and registered trademarks of Critical Path. Products or service names of other companies mentioned in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
Overview
Critical Path, Inc., a global leader in Internet communications, delivers software and services that are designed to maximize the value of Internet communications. We provide messaging and collaboration solutions from wireless, secure and unified messaging to basic email and personal information management, as well as identity management solutions that simplify user profile management and strengthen information
11
security. Our standards-based Critical Path Communications Platform, built to perform reliably at the scale of public networks, delivers the industry’s lowest total cost of ownership for messaging solutions and lays a solid foundation for next-generation communications services.
Our primary sources of revenue come from providing a wide range of messaging and directory products and services. Critical Path’s customers are corporate enterprises, carriers and service providers, postal authorities and government agencies. Critical Path was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California with offices worldwide.
Results of Operations
In view of the rapidly evolving nature of our business, prior acquisitions, organizational restructuring, and limited operating history, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of revenues and operating results, including gross profit margin and operating expenses as a percentage of total net revenues, are not meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance. At March 31, 2002, we had 583 employees, in comparison with 562 employees at December 31, 2001 and 1,011 employees at March 31, 2001. We do not believe that our historical growth rates for revenue, expenses, or personnel are indicative of future results.
Net Revenues
We derive most of our revenues through the sale of our messaging and directory communications solutions. These solutions include both licensed software products and hosted messaging services. In addition, we receive revenues from professional services and maintenance and support services. Software license revenues are derived from perpetual and term licenses for our messaging, directory, collaborative and enterprise application integration technologies. Hosted messaging revenues relates to fees for our hosted messaging and collaboration services. These fees are primarily based upon monthly contractual per unit rates for the services involved, and are recognized as revenue on a ratable monthly basis over the term of the contract. Professional services revenues are derived from fees primarily related to training, installation and configuration services and revenue is recognized as services are performed. Maintenance and support revenue is derived from fees related to post-contract customer support agreements associated with software product licenses. Maintenance and support revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the agreement.
Software License.We recognized $10.9 million in software license revenues during the first quarter of 2002, compared to $5.6 million in the same quarter in 2001. The significant increase in software license revenues over the prior year was due primarily to the uncertainty surrounding Critical Path during the first quarter of 2001, which caused a number of current and potential customers to delay making purchase decisions. This uncertainty was created by the Company’s restatement of certain previously released financial results for the third quarter of 2000, significant turnover within the senior management group and the termination and resignation of much of the leadership within our sales organization. Even with the higher license revenues levels during the first quarter of 2002, our business activities continue to be impacted by the difficult worldwide business climate, which has resulted in lower and delayed information technology spending across the enterprise software market.
Hosted Messaging.We recognized $7.0 million in hosted messaging revenues during the first quarter of 2002, compared to $14.4 million in the same quarter in 2001. This decrease in 2002 hosted messaging revenues resulted primarily from the Company having either exited or sold, as part of its 2001 restructuring initiatives, certain non-core hosted messaging services during the second half of 2001. These non-core services accounted for a significant portion of first quarter 2001 hosted messaging revenues.
Professional Services.We recognized $1.9 million in professional services revenues during the first quarter of 2002, compared to $3.4 million in the same quarter in 2001. This decrease in 2002 was due primarily to higher first quarter 2001 professional services revenues directly resulting from the Company’s September 2000 acquisition of PeerLogic, Inc. In addition, the Company’s 2001 restructuring initiatives eliminated certain non-core products, reducing the professional services revenues derived from these products.
12
Maintenance and Support.We recognized $3.9 million in maintenance and support revenues during the first quarter of 2002, compared to $3.7 million for the same quarter in 2001. This increase in 2002 resulted primarily from the higher software license revenues levels compared to the first quarter of 2001, partially offset by the loss of maintenance and support revenues from the elimination of certain non-core products and services as part of the Company’s 2001 restructuring initiatives.
Critical Path’s international operations accounted for approximately 52% of net revenues in the first quarter of 2002. Revenues from international operations accounted for approximately 30% of net revenues in the first quarter of 2001. This significant increase in the percentage of international revenues related primarily to a dramatic reduction in enterprise information technology spending during the first quarter of 2001, as it impacted the sale of our license products in international markets.
Cost of Net Revenues
Software License.Cost of net software license revenues consists primarily of product media duplication, manuals and packaging materials, personnel and facility costs, and third-party royalties. The cost of net software license revenues for the first quarter of 2002 was comparable to the year ago period.
Hosted Messaging.Cost of net hosted messaging revenues consists primarily of costs incurred in the delivery and support of messaging services, including depreciation of capital equipment used in network infrastructure, amortization of purchased technology, Internet connection charges, accretion of acquisition-related retention bonuses, personnel costs incurred in operations, and other direct and allocated indirect costs. The cost of net hosted messaging revenues were significantly lower in the first quarter of 2002 compared to the prior year primarily due to the Company’s restructuring initiatives undertaken in the second half of 2001. As a result of these initiatives, the costs associated with the Company’s hosted messaging revenues were reduced through the sale or exit of several non-core services, the termination of employees and reduction in employee-related costs, the retirement of surplus network infrastructure equipment and software, and the consolidation of data centers.
Professional Services.Cost of net professional services revenues consist primarily of personnel costs including custom engineering, installation and training services for both hosted and licensed solutions, and other direct and allocated indirect costs. As a result of the Company’s 2001 restructuring initiatives, personnel and certain overhead costs were reduced, resulting in lower professional services cost of net revenues in the first quarter of 2002, in comparison to the same period in the prior year.
Maintenance and Support.Cost of net maintenance and support revenues consists primarily of personnel costs related to the customer support functions for both hosted and licensed solutions, and other direct and allocated indirect costs. The cost of net maintenance and support revenues was lower in the first quarter of 2002 in comparison to the year ago period, due primarily to a decrease in staffing levels and a reduction in employee-related costs.
Operations, customer support, and professional services staff decreased to 192 employees at March 31, 2002 from 349 employees at March 31, 2001.
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing.Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation for sales and marketing personnel, advertising, public relations, other promotional costs, and, to a lesser extent, related overhead. Sales and marketing expenses for the first quarter of 2002 decreased significantly over the prior year’s first quarter due primarily to cost savings generated from the Company’s 2001 restructuring initiatives. With actions taken as part of the restructuring, sales and marketing staffing levels were reduced to 143 employees at March 31, 2002 from 286 employees at March 31, 2001. The savings in personnel and personnel-related costs together with the termination of certain strategic marketing relationships related to non-core services accounts for the reduction in sales and marketing expenses from the first quarter of 2001 to the same quarter of 2002.
13
Research and Development.Research and development expenses consist primarily of compensation for technical staff, payments to outside contractors, depreciation of capital equipment associated with research and development activities, and, to a lesser extent, related overhead. This significant decrease in first quarter 2002 research and development expenses resulted primarily from a reduction in headcount and related personnel costs as part of the Company’s 2001 restructuring initiatives. These actions have contributed to a decrease in research and development staffing to 156 employees at March 31, 2002, from 244 employees at March 31, 2001. In addition, savings realized from the termination of certain outside consulting arrangements and consolidation of facilities also contributed to this decrease in research and development expenses.
General and Administrative.General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for personnel, fees for outside professional services, occupancy costs and, to a lesser extent, related overhead. The significant decrease in first quarter 2002 general and administrative expenses in comparison to the same period in the prior year was due primarily to cost savings realized from the Company’s 2001 restructuring initiatives. Savings were realized from a decrease in general and administrative staffing levels to 92 employees at March 31, 2002 from 132 employees at March 31, 2001, as well as lower facilities costs resulting from the Company’s reduction in facilities from 77 at December 31, 2000 to 27 at March 31, 2002. In addition, as a result of the restatement of certain previously released 2000 financial results, the Company incurred higher fees for outside professional services in the first quarter of 2001, in particular higher legal and accounting fees related to the SEC investigation and extended outside audit work.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
In connection with the acquisitions we completed in 1999 and 2000, which were all accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, we recorded goodwill and other intangible assets, primarily for assembled workforce, customer base, and existing technology. During 2000 and 2001, we recorded charges of $1.3 billion and $26.6 million, respectively, related to the impairment of certain long-lived assets, including intangible assets. In addition, with the adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, in the beginning of 2002, approximately $5.5 million of the Company’s intangible assets related to acquired workforce and goodwill will no longer be subject to amortization, but instead will be periodically tested for impairment. As a result of the 2001 impairment charge and the adoption of SFAS No. 142, first quarter 2002 amortization expense decreased significantly from the first quarter of 2001. Based upon the types of identifiable intangibles acquired, first quarter 2002 amortization expense of $4.6 million was allocated to cost of net revenues and the remaining amortization expense of $6.1 million was allocated to operating expenses.
Acquisition-Related Retention Bonuses
In connection with the numerous acquisitions completed in 1999 and 2000, we established various retention bonus programs that in the aggregate amounted to approximately $20.7 million in incentives for certain former employees of these companies to encourage their continued employment with Critical Path. The significant decrease in acquisition-related retention bonus expense resulted from the completion during fiscal year 2001 of all but one of the acquisition-related retention bonus programs. The remaining program concluded in April 2002.
Stock-Based Expenses
Stock-based expenses are comprised of charges related to certain stock options and warrants granted to employees, directors and consultants from 1998 through 2001 and common stock issued to certain employees, directors and advisors in 1998 and 1999. The decline in stock-based expenses in the first quarter of 2002 in comparison to the first quarter of 2001 was primarily the result of certain stock-based charges related to 1998 grant activity becoming fully amortized in the second-half of 2001.
14
Interest and Other Income (Expense)
Interest and other income (expense) consists primarily of interest earnings on cash and cash equivalents as well as net realized gains (losses) on foreign exchange transactions. Interest income amounted to $336,000 and $2.3 million in the first quarters of 2002 and 2001, respectively. Interest income was lower for the first quarter of 2002 compared to the same period in the prior year due to lower cash balances available for investing. Cash balances declined during the twelve months ended March 31, 2002, due primarily to the funding of the Company’s net losses and cash utilized in 2001 to retire a significant portion of the Company’s convertible debt obligations. Also included in interest and other income (expense) were net gains recognized from foreign currency transactions associated with our international operations in the amounts of $202,000 and $136,000 for the first quarter of 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Interest Expense
Interest expense consists primarily of the interest, amortization of related issuance costs associated with the Convertible Subordinated Notes we issued in March 2000, and interest on certain capital leases. Because of the retirement of a significant portion of our convertible subordinated notes and capital leases during 2001, interest expense for the first quarter of 2002 declined to $783,000 from $5.1 million for the first quarter of 2001. For the first quarter of 2002, we incurred approximately $552,000 in interest expense on the Convertible Subordinated Notes, and approximately $69,000 from the amortization of debt issuance costs. We incurred approximately $4.3 million in interest expense on the Convertible Subordinated Notes, and approximately $538,000 related to amortization of debt issuance costs during the first quarter of 2001. The amortization of the issuance costs associated with the redeemable convertible preferred shares which the Company issued in the fourth quarter of 2001 totalled $139,000 for the first quarter of 2002 and is also reported as a component of interest expense. Interest on capital leases and other long-term obligations amounted to approximately $23,000 for the first quarter of 2002 and $264,000 during the first quarter of 2001.
Equity in Net Loss of Critical Path Pacific
In June 2000, we established a joint venture, Critical Path Pacific, with Mitsui and Co., Ltd., NTT Communications Corporation and NEC Corporation to deliver advanced Internet messaging solutions to businesses in Asia. We invested $7.5 million and hold a 40% ownership interest in the joint venture. This investment is being accounted for using the equity method. During the first quarter of 2002, we recorded equity in net loss of joint venture of approximately $403,000, compared to a net loss of $776,000 recorded in the first quarter of 2001.
| |
| Provision for Income Taxes |
An $800,000 benefit for U.S. federal income taxes was recorded during the first quarter of 2002 due to the repeal of the federal corporate alternative minimum tax. No current provision for U.S. federal or state income taxes has been recorded as we have incurred net operating losses for income tax purposes since our inception. No deferred provision or benefit for federal or state income taxes has been recorded as we are in a net deferred tax asset position for which a full valuation allowance has been provided due to uncertainty of realization. As a partial offset to the U.S. tax benefit we recorded, we recognized a provision for foreign income taxes during the first quarter of 2002 as certain of our European operations generated income taxable in certain European jurisdictions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2002, our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $63.5 million, comprised of $52.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and $11.3 million in short-term investments. Our working capital amounted to approximately $52.2 million. During the first quarter of 2002, we used approximately $7.0 million in cash.
We used cash of $3.1 million to fund operating activities during the first quarter of 2002 primarily due to our net loss, adjusted for non-cash charges, as operating costs, primarily employee and employee related costs,
15
exceeded the related sales of our software products and services. In addition, we used cash to make certain insurance, and software and hardware support and maintenance renewal payments during the quarter, accounting for the $3.2 million in cash used for other assets. These uses of cash to fund operating activities were partially offset by the growth in our accounts payable balances by $5.4 million.
We used cash in investing activities during the first quarter of 2002 totaling $2.7 million. Cash was primarily used to purchase additional short-term investments of $1.6 million and $1.3 million was used to purchase additional network infrastructure equipment and to fund a portion of the tenant improvements in the Company’s new San Francisco office.
We used cash from financing activities during the first quarter of 2002 of $1.2 million. Cash was principally used to retire $3.1 million in principal on capital lease obligations. This use of cash was partially offset by proceeds the Company received from the repayment of notes receivable from former officers and shareholders totaling $1.2 million and $677,000 from the sale of the Company’s common stock.
Our primary sources of capital have come from both debt and equity financings, that have been completed by Critical Path over the past three years. Revenues generated from the sale of our products and services may not increase to a level that exceeds our operating expenses or could fluctuate significantly as a result of changes in customer demand or acceptance of future products. We also expect to experience increased operating expenses, including moderate increases in strategic areas, such as sales and marketing, and we anticipate that operating expenses and capital expenditures will constitute a material use of our cash. Accordingly, our cash flow from operations may continue to be negatively impacted. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and anticipated cash from operations will be sufficient to maintain current and planned operations for at least the next twelve months.
Additionally, we have no present understandings, commitments or agreements for any material acquisitions of, or investments in, other complementary businesses, products or technologies. We continually evaluate potential acquisitions of, or investments in, other businesses, products and technologies, and may in the future utilize our cash resources or may require additional equity or debt financing to accomplish any acquisitions or investments. Currently, we are considering several alternatives to expend our presence in the Asian markets and potentially other international markets. These alternatives could increase liquidity through the infusion of investment capital by third-party investors or decrease our liquidity as a result of Critical Path seeking to fund expansion into these markets. Such expansions might also cause an increase in capital expenditures and operating expenses.
Additional Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results
| |
| Due to our limited operating history, evolving business strategy and the nature of the messaging and directory infrastructure market, our future revenues are unpredictable, and our quarterly operating results may fluctuate. |
We cannot accurately forecast our revenues as a result of our limited operating history, evolving business strategy and the emerging nature of the Internet messaging infrastructure market. Forecasting is further complicated by rapid changes in our business due to integration of acquisitions we completed in 1999 and 2000, our recent strategic and operational restructuring, as well as significant fluctuations in license revenues as a percentage of total revenues from an insignificant percentage in 1999, to 38% in 2000, 30% in 2001 and 46% for the first quarter of 2002. Our revenues have in some quarters and could continue to fall short of expectations if we experience delays or cancellations of even a small number of orders. We often offer volume-based pricing, which may affect operating margins. A number of factors are likely to cause fluctuations in operating results, including, but not limited to:
| | |
| • | the demand for outsourced messaging services generally and the use of messaging and directory infrastructure products and services in particular; |
|
| • | the demand for licensed solutions for messaging, directory, and other products; |
|
| • | our ability to attract and retain customers and maintain customer satisfaction; |
16
| | |
| • | our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel with industry expertise, particularly sales personnel; |
|
| • | the ability to upgrade, develop and maintain our systems and infrastructure and to effectively respond to the rapid technology change of the messaging and directory infrastructure market; |
|
| • | the budgeting cycles of our customers and potential customers; |
|
| • | the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to expansion of business and infrastructure; |
|
| • | our ability to quickly handle and alleviate technical difficulties or system outages; |
|
| • | the announcement or introduction of new or enhanced services by competitors; and |
|
| • | general economic and market conditions and their affect on our operations and that of our customers. |
In addition to the factors set forth above, operating results have been and will continue to be impacted by the extent to which we incur non-cash charges associated with stock-based arrangements with employees and non-employees. In particular, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur substantial non-cash charges associated with the grant of stock options to employees and non-employees and the grant of warrants to customers, investors and other parties with which we have business relationships. These grants of options and warrants also may be dilutive to existing shareholders.
Although we have largely exited non-core product lines, our operating results have been and could continue to be impacted by decisions to eliminate product or service offerings through termination, sale or other disposition or to sustain certain products and services at a minimum level where customer commitments prevent us from eliminating the offering altogether. Decisions to eliminate or limit any other offerings of a product or service would involve other factors affecting operational results including the expenditure of capital, the realization of losses, further reductions in our workforce, facility consolidation or the elimination of revenues along with the associated costs, any of which could harm our financial condition and operating results.
As a result of the foregoing, we do not believe that period-to-period comparisons of operating results are a good indication of future performance. It is likely that operating results in some quarters will be below market expectations. In this event, the price of our common stock is likely to prove volatile and/or decline.
| |
| We depend on strategic relationships as well as other sales channels and the loss of any key strategic relationships could harm our business and negatively affect our revenues. |
We depend on strategic relationships to expand distribution channels and to undertake joint product development and marketing efforts. Our ability to increase revenues depends upon aggressively marketing our services through new and existing strategic relationships. We depend on a broad acceptance of our software and outsourced messaging services on the part of potential resellers and partners and our acceptance as a supplier of outsourced messaging solutions. We also depend on joint marketing and product development through strategic relationships to achieve further market acceptance and brand recognition. Our agreements with strategic partners typically do not restrict them from introducing competing services. These agreements typically are for terms of one to three years, and automatically renew for additional one-year periods unless either party gives prior notice of its intention to terminate the agreement. In addition, these agreements are terminable by our partners without cause, and some agreements are terminable by us, upon 30 - 120 days notice. Most of the agreements also provide for the partial refund of fees paid or other monetary penalties in the event that our services fail to meet defined minimum performance standards. Distribution partners may choose not to renew existing arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. In addition to strategic relationships, we also depend on the ability of our customers to aggressively sell and market our services to their end-users. If we lose any strategic relationships, fail to renew these agreements or relationships, fail to fully exploit our relationships, or fail to develop new strategic relationships, our business and financial results will suffer. The loss of any key strategic relationships would have an adverse impact on our current and future revenues.
17
| |
| We have experienced turnover of senior management and our current management team has been together for a limited time, which could harm our business and operations. |
In the first quarter of 2001, in response to the restatement of our financial results, we announced a series of changes in our management that included the departure of many senior executives. In the second quarter of 2001, we announced a series of additional changes in our management and board of directors that also included the departures of senior executives and board members. A majority of the current senior executives of the Company joined us in the second and third quarters of 2001. Because of these recent changes and their recent recruitment, our management team has not worked together for a significant length of time and may not be able to work together effectively to successfully implement our strategy. If our management team is unable to accomplish our business objectives, our ability to grow our business and successfully meet operational challenges could be severely impaired. We do not have long-term employment agreements with any of our executive officers. It is possible this high turnover at our senior management levels may also continue for a variety of reasons. The loss of the services of one or more of our current senior executive officers could harm our business and affect our ability to successfully implement our business objectives.
| |
| We have a history of losses, expect continuing losses and may never achieve profitability. |
As of March 31, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit, including other comprehensive income, of approximately $2.1 billion. We have not achieved profitability in any period and expect to continue to incur net losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for the foreseeable future. We do expect that our operating expenses will continue to decrease as a result of our strategic and operational restructuring and other cost-cutting efforts. However, we will continue to spend resources on maintaining and strengthening our business, and this may, in the near term, have a negative effect on our operating results and our financial condition.
In past quarters, we have spent heavily on technology and infrastructure development. We may continue to spend substantial financial and other resources to develop and introduce new end-to-end messaging and directory infrastructure solutions, and to improve our sales and marketing organizations, strategic relationships and operating infrastructure. In addition, in future periods we will continue to incur significant non-cash charges related to the ten acquisitions we completed in 1999 and 2000 and related stock-based compensation. We expect that our cost of revenues, sales and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses, operations and customer support expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses could continue to increase in absolute dollars and may increase as a percent of revenues. If revenues do not correspondingly increase, our operating results and financial condition could be harmed. If we continue to incur net losses in future periods, we may not be able to retain employees, or fund investments in capital equipment, sales and marketing programs, and research and development to successfully compete against our competitors. We may never obtain sufficient revenues to achieve profitability. If we do achieve profitability, we may not sustain or increase profitability in the future. This may also, in turn, cause the price of our common stock to demonstrate volatility and/or to decline.
| |
| If we fail to improve our sales and marketing results, we may be unable to grow our business which would negatively impact our operating results. |
Our ability to increase revenues will depend on our ability to successfully recruit, train and retain experienced and effective sales and marketing personnel. Competition for qualified personnel is intense and we may not be able to hire and retain personnel with relevant experience. The complexity and implementation of our messaging and directory infrastructure products and services require highly trained sales and marketing personnel to educate prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of our services. Current and prospective customers, in turn, must be able to educate their end-users. Any delays or difficulties encountered in our staffing efforts would impair our ability to attract new customers and enhance our relationships with existing customers, and ultimately, grow revenues. This would also adversely impact the timing and extent of our revenues. Because we have experienced turnover in our sales force and the majority of our current sales and marketing personnel have recently joined us and have limited experience working together, our sales and marketing organizations may not be able to compete successfully against the sales and marketing organiza-
18
tions of our competitors. If we do not successfully operate and grow our sales and marketing activities, our business could suffer and the price of our common stock could decline.
| |
| A limited number of customers account for a high percentage of our revenues and if we lose a major customer or are unable to attract new customers, revenues could decline. |
We expect that sales of our services to a limited number of customers will continue to account for a high percentage of our revenue for the foreseeable future. Our future success depends on our ability to retain our current customers, and to attract new customers, in our target markets. The loss of a major customer could harm our business. Our agreements with our customers typically have terms of one to three years often with automatic one year renewals and can be terminated without cause upon 30 - 120 days notice. In addition, a number of our technology industry customers have also suffered from falling revenue, job losses, restructuring and decreased technology spending in the recent economic downturn. If our customers terminate their agreements for any reason before the end of the contract term, the loss of the customer could have an adverse impact on our current and future revenues. Also, if we are unable to enter into agreements with new customers, our business will not grow and we will not generate additional revenues.
| |
| If we are unable to successfully compete in our product market, our operating results could be harmed. |
Because we have a variety of messaging and directory infrastructure products and services, we encounter different competitors at each level of our products and services. Our competitors for corporate customers seeking outsourced hosted messaging solutions are email service providers, such as Commtouch, Easylink, USA.NET and application service providers who offer hosted exchange services. Our primary competitors for service providers seeking insourced or outsourced product-based solutions are iPlanet and OpenWave. For secure delivery services, our competitors include Tumbleweed for product-based solutions and SlamDunk for service-based solutions. In the enterprise/eBusiness directory category, we compete primarily with iPlanet, Microsoft and Novell, and our competitors in the meta-directory market are iPlanet, Microsoft, Novell and Siemens.
We believe that competitive factors affecting the market for messaging and directory infrastructure solutions include:
| | |
| • | breadth of platform features and functionality; |
|
| • | ease of integration into customers’ existing systems; |
|
| • | scalability, reliability and performance, and ease of expansion and upgrade; |
|
| • | flexibility to enable customers to manage certain aspects of their systems internally and leverage outsourced services in other cases when resources, costs and time to market reasons favor an outsourced offering; and |
|
| • | total cost of ownership and operation. |
We believe competition will continue to be fierce and further increase as current competitors increase the sophistication of their offerings and as new participants enter the market. Many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do and may enter into strategic or commercial relationships with larger, more established and better-financed companies. Any delay in our development and delivery of new services or enhancement of existing services would allow our competitors additional time to improve their service or product offerings, and provide time for new competitors to develop and market messaging and directory infrastructure products and services and solicit prospective customers within our target markets. Increased competition could result in pricing pressures, reduced operating margins and loss of market share, any of which could cause our business to suffer.
19
| |
| Our sales cycle is lengthy and our results could be harmed by delays or cancellations in orders. |
Because we sell complex and sophisticated technology, our sales cycle can be long and unpredictable, often taking between two to twelve months. Because of the nature of our product and service offerings it can take many months of customer education and product evaluation before a purchase decision is made. In addition, many factors can influence the decision to purchase our product and service offerings including budgetary restraints and decreases in capital expenditures, quarterly fluctuations in operating results of customers and potential customers, the emerging and evolving nature of the internet-based services and wireless services markets. Furthermore, general global economic conditions, and a slowdown in technology spending in particular, have further lengthened and affected our sales cycle, leading to delays and postponements in purchasing decisions. Any delay or cancellation in sales of our products or services could cause our operating results to differ from those projected and cause our stock price to decline.
| |
| We may need to raise additional capital and to initiate other operational strategies that may dilute existing shareholders. |
We believe that existing capital resources will enable us to maintain current and planned operations through March 31, 2003. However, additional capital may be required to continue operations and achieve profitability. In addition, we may be required to raise additional funds due to unforeseen circumstances. If our capital requirements vary materially from those currently planned, we may require additional financing sooner than anticipated. Such financing may not be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us and may be dilutive to existing shareholders. Additionally, we face a number of challenges in operating our business, including but not limited to the resources to maintain worldwide operations, our leveraged capital structure and significant contingent liabilities associated with litigation. In the event that resolution of these or other operational matters involve issuance of stock or other derivative instruments, our existing shareholders may experience significant dilution.
| |
| Pending litigation could harm relationships with existing or potential strategic partners and customers, and divert management’s attention, either of which could harm our business. |
We have had filed in recent years, a number of lawsuits against us, including securities class action and shareholder derivative litigation filed in February and August 2001, and certain of our current and former officers and directors and some of our subsidiaries, as well as other lawsuits related to acquisitions, employee terminations and copyright infringement. While these lawsuits vary greatly in the materiality of potential liability associated with them, the uncertainty associated with substantial unresolved lawsuits could seriously harm our business, financial condition and reputation, whether material individually or in the aggregate. In particular, this uncertainty could harm our relationships with existing customers, our ability to obtain new customers and our ability to operate certain aspects of our business.
The continued defense of the lawsuits also could result in continued diversion of our management’s time and attention away from business operations, which could harm our business. Negative developments with respect to the lawsuits could cause the price of our common stock to decline significantly. In addition, although we are unable to determine the amount, if any, that we may be required to pay in connection with the resolution of these lawsuits by settlement or otherwise, the size of any such payments, individually or in the aggregate, could seriously harm our financial condition. Many of the complaints associated with these lawsuits do not specify the amount of damages that plaintiffs seek. As a result, we are unable to estimate the possible range of damages that might be incurred as a result of the lawsuits. While we maintain customary business insurance coverage, we have not set aside any financial reserves relating to potential damages associated with any of these lawsuits.
| |
| Failure to complete the settlement of pending securities class action and shareholder derivative action could materially harm our business. |
Although the Company has reached settlement agreements in connection with the securities class action pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, we cannot provide assurance that a
20
final settlement shall be approved in accordance with the settlement agreement, or at all. The approval of the definitive settlement agreements between the parties is subject to other factors, such as court review and approval, before the subject actions are dismissed. In addition, the definitive settlement agreements entered into between the parties are also subject to notice to the putative class and of the shareholders of the Company, as well as review and approval by the court. There can be no assurance that the court will approve the settlement. If the settlement were not given final approval, it could have a number of materially detrimental effects on the Company’s financial condition and business.
Should the Court fail to approve the settlement, and the litigation continue, there can be no assurance that fees and expenses, and any ultimate resolution associated with such litigation, shall be within the coverage limits of our insurance and/or our ability to pay such amounts. Although the terms of the settlement agreement are within the coverage limits of the Company’s directors and officers insurance, should the current agreement in principle fail to be approved by the court, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to conclude such litigation on terms that coincide with the coverage limits of our insurance and/or ability to pay upon any final determination. A failure to complete the settlement could also cast doubt as to the prospects of the Company in the eyes of our customers, potential customers and investors, and cause the Company’s stock price to decline.
| |
| Although concluded without penalty to the Company, lingering effects of the recent SEC investigation could harm our business. |
In February 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, issued a formal order of investigation of us and certain current and former officers associated with us. The investigation relates to non-specified accounting matters, financial reports, other public disclosures and trading activity in our stock. In February 2002, the SEC announced the conclusion of the investigation as to the Company. Although the SEC did not impose any penalties against the Company, we consented without admitting or denying liability, to an administrative order that the Company violated certain non-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws and to a cease and desist order. In addition, the SEC and the Department of Justice charged two former employees of the Company with various violations of the securities laws. Despite the conclusion of the investigation of the Company, lingering concerns about the actions leading up to the restatement of financials for the third quarter of 2000 has nevertheless cast doubt on the future of the Company in the eyes of customers and investors and could continue to harm our business and cause the price of our common stock to continue to fluctuate and/or decline significantly.
| |
| We may not be able to maintain our listing on The Nasdaq National Market and if we fail to do so, the price and liquidity of our common stock may decline. |
The Nasdaq Stock Market has quantitative maintenance criteria for the continued listing of common stock on the Nasdaq National Market. The current requirements affecting us include (i) having net tangible assets of at least $4 million and (ii) maintaining a minimum bid price per share of $1. As of March 31, 2002 we were in compliance with all Nasdaq National Market listing requirements. However, there were periods in the second and third quarters of 2001 when the closing bid price per share for our common stock was well below $1. Although our bid price has been above $1 per share since November 1, 2001, if the bid price of our common stock price again slips below $1 per share for more than 60 days, our common stock may not remain listed on The Nasdaq National Market. Also effective November 1, 2002, we will need to comply with the Nasdaq National Market’s revised quantitative maintenance criteria including a new minimum requirement of $10.0 million in stockholders’ equity. The Nasdaq National Market’s Audit Committee Rules require that our audit committee be comprised of at least three independent members. We believe that we currently comply with this requirement. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the quantitative maintenance criteria or any of the Nasdaq National Market’s rules in the future. If we fail to maintain continued listing on the Nasdaq National Market and must move to a market with less liquidity, our financial condition could be harmed and our stock price would likely decline. If we are delisted, it could have a material adverse effect on the market price of, and the liquidity of the trading market for, our common stock.
21
| |
| Our stock price has demonstrated volatility during recent quarters and continued volatility in the stock market may cause further fluctuations and/or decline in our stock price. |
The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to experience volatility and wide fluctuations. For example, during the fourth quarter of 2001, the closing sale prices of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market ranged from $0.51 on October 1, 2001 to $2.74 on December 31, 2001, and the closing price of our stock on March 28, 2002 was $2.16 per share. Our stock price may further fluctuate or decline in response to any number of factors and events, such as announcements related to litigation, technological innovations, strategic and sales relationships, new product and service offerings by us or our competitors, changes in senior management, changes in financial estimates and recommendations of securities analysts, the operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable, news reports relating to trends in our markets and overall market conditions. In addition, the stock market in general, particularly with respect to technology stocks, has experienced extreme volatility and a significant cumulative decline in recent quarters. This volatility and decline has affected many companies, including our company, irrespective of the specific operating performance of such companies. These broad market influences and fluctuations may adversely affect the price of our stock, and our ability to remain listed on the Nasdaq National Market, regardless of our operating performance or other factors.
| |
| Limitations of our director and officer liability insurance may harm our business. |
Our liability insurance for actions taken by officers and directors during the period from March 1999 to March 2001, the period during which events related to securities class action lawsuits against us and certain of our current and former executive officers are alleged to have occurred, provides only limited liability protection. If these policies do not adequately cover our expenses related to those lawsuits, our business and financial condition could be seriously harmed. Our director and officer liability insurance, that was in place through March 2002, and our current insurance that was renewed through March 2003, contain similar provisions.
Under California law, in connection with our charter documents and indemnification agreements we entered into with our executive officers and directors, we must indemnify our current and former officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. The indemnification covers any expenses and liabilities reasonably incurred in connection with the investigation, defense, settlement or appeal of legal proceedings. The Company has made payments in connection with the indemnification of officers and directors in connection with currently pending lawsuits and has reserved for estimated future amounts to be paid in connection with legal expenses and others costs of defense of pending lawsuits.
| |
| We may experience difficulty in attracting and retaining key personnel, which may negatively affect our ability to develop new services or retain and attract customers. |
The loss of the services of key personnel could harm our business results. Our success also depends on our ability to recruit, retain and motivate highly skilled sales and marketing, operational, technical and managerial personnel. Competition for these people is intense and we may not be able to successfully recruit, train or retain qualified personnel. If we fail to do so, we may be unable to develop new services or continue to provide a high level of customer service, which could result in the loss of customers and revenues.
We do not have long-term employment agreements with any of our key personnel. In addition, we do not maintain key person life insurance on our employees and have no plans to do so. The loss of the services of one or more of our current key personnel could harm our business and affect our ability to successfully implement our business objectives.
| |
| Our failure to carefully manage expenses and growth could cause our operating results to suffer. |
In the past, our management of operational expenses and the growth of our business have contributed to our history of losses. In addition, the expansion of our operations placed a significant strain on managerial, operational and financial resources. To manage any future growth, we may need to improve or replace our existing operational, customer service and financial systems, procedures and controls. Any failure to properly
22
manage these systems and procedural transitions could impair our ability to attract and service customers, and could cause us to incur higher operating costs and delays in the execution of our business plan. We will also need to hire additional personnel including sales personnel. Our management may not be able to hire, train, retain, motivate and manage required personnel. In addition, our management may not be able to successfully identify, manage and exploit existing and potential market opportunities. If we cannot manage growth and expenses effectively, our business and operating results could suffer.
| |
| If we are not successful in implementing our strategic plan, including the exit of certain non-core products and services, our business could be negatively impacted. |
In the first quarter of 2001, we developed a strategic plan that involved reorganizing our product and service offerings around a group of core products deemed most imperative to our ability to serve the messaging and directory infrastructure market. In the second and third quarters of 2001, implementation of the plan occurred and, accordingly, products and services determined to be non-core to our strategy were exited. As a result, revenue from non-core products and services comprising approximately 37% of total revenues in the first quarter of 2001, had declined to approximately 24% of total revenues in the second quarter of 2001, approximately 18% of total revenues in the third quarter of 2001, and approximately 3% of total revenues in the fourth quarter of 2001 and none in 2002. Our strategic plan also included initiatives aimed at reducing operating costs through headcount reduction and consolidation of approximately two-thirds of our office space and related contracts and leases, all in keeping with our increased focus on core messaging products and services. During the fourth quarter of 2001 we incurred additional charges in connection with previously announced reductions in force and were able to finalize the consolidation of additional facilities and related contracts and expenses associated with those facilities.
| |
| We may face continued technical, operational and strategic challenges preventing us from successfully continuing the integration or divestiture of acquired businesses. |
Acquisitions involve risks related to the integration and management of acquired technology, operations and personnel. In addition, in connection with our strategic restructuring, the Company elected to divest or discontinue many of the acquired businesses. Both the integration and divestiture of acquired businesses have been and will continue to be complex, time consuming and expensive processes, which may disrupt and distract our management from its core business. With respect to integration, we must operate as a combined organization utilizing common information and communication systems, operating procedures, financial controls and human resources practices to be successful. In particular, we are currently evaluating, upgrading or replacing our financial information systems and establishing uniformity among the systems of the acquired businesses. With divestitures, the timing and transition of those businesses and their customers to other entities has required and will continue to require resources from our legal, finance and corporate development teams as well as expenses associated with the conclusion of those transactions.
Consequently, we may not be successful or efficient in integrating or divesting acquired businesses or technologies and may not achieve anticipated revenues and benefits and/or cost reductions. We also cannot guarantee that these acquisitions will result in sufficient revenues or earnings to justify our investment in, or expenses related to, these acquisitions or that any synergies will be realized. In addition, if we are not successful in divesting non-core acquired businesses, we will incur costs associated with the cessation of operations or wind up of acquired businesses. In either event, we will likely further incur significant expenses as well as non-cash charges to write-off acquired assets, which could seriously harm our financial condition and operating results.
Further, due in part to the significant underperformance of some of our acquisitions relative to expectations, we have reviewed the products and services we sell to customers, the locations in which we operate and the manner in which we go to market with our core product and service offerings. As a result of this review, in 2001, we decided to eliminate certain acquired product or service offerings through termination, sale or other disposition or to sustain certain products and services at a minimum level where customer commitments prevent us from eliminating the offering altogether. Such decisions to eliminate or limit our offering of an acquired product or service involved and could continue to include the expenditure of capital,
23
the realization of losses, further reduction in workforce, facility consolidation, and/or the elimination of revenues along with the associated costs, any of which could harm our financial condition and operating results.
| |
| We currently license many third-party technologies and may need to license further technologies and we face risks in doing so that could cause our operating results to suffer. |
We intend to continue to license certain technologies from third parties and incorporate such technologies into our products and services, including web server technology, virus and anti-spam solutions and encryption technology. The market is evolving and we may need to license additional technologies to remain competitive. We may not be able to license these technologies on commercially reasonable terms or at all. To the extent we cannot license needed technologies or solutions, we may have to devote Company resources to the development of such technologies which could materially harm our business and operations.
In addition, we may fail to successfully integrate any licensed technology into our services. These third-party in-licenses may expose us to increased risks, including risks related to the integration of new technology, potential patent and copyright infringement issues, the diversion of resources from the development of proprietary technology, and an inability to generate revenues from new technology sufficient to offset associated acquisition and maintenance costs. In addition, an inability to obtain needed licenses could delay product and service development until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed and integrated. Any delays in services or integration problems could cause our business and operating results to suffer.
| |
| If our system security is breached, our business and reputation could suffer. |
A fundamental requirement for online communications is the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. Third parties may attempt to breach our security or that of our customers. If these attempts are successful, customers’ confidential information, including customers’ profiles, passwords, financial account information, credit card numbers or other personal information could be breached. We may be liable to our customers for any breach in security and a breach could harm our reputation. We rely on encryption technology licensed from third parties. Although we have implemented network security measures, our servers remain vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions, which could lead to interruptions, delays or loss of data. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to license encryption technology and additional technologies to protect against security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by any breach. Failure to prevent security breaches may harm our business and operating results.
| |
| Changes in the regulatory environment for the operation of our business or those of our customers could pose risks. |
Few laws currently apply directly to activity on the Internet and the messaging business, however new laws are proposed and other laws made applicable to Internet communications every year. In particular, the Company faces risks associated with privacy, confidentiality of user data and communications, consumer protection, taxation, content, copyright, trade secrets, trademarks, antitrust, defamation and other legal issues. In particular, legal concerns with respect to communication of confidential data have affected our financial services and health care customers due to newly enacted federal legislation. The growth of the industry and the proliferation of Internet-based messaging devices and services may prompt further legislative attention to our industry and thus invite more regulatory control of our business. The imposition of more stringent protections and/or new regulations and application of laws to our business could burden our company and those with which we do business. Further, the adoption of additional laws and regulations could limit the growth of our business and that of our business partners and customers. Any decreased generalized demand for our services or the loss of, or decrease, in business by a key partner due to regulation or the expense of compliance with any regulation, could either increase the costs associated with our business or affect revenue, either of which could harm our financial condition or operating results. Certain of our service offerings include operations subject to the Digital Millenium Copyright Act of 1998. The Company has expended resources and implemented
24
processes and controls in order to remain in compliance with DMCA but there can be no assurance that our efforts will be sufficient and/or new legislation and case law will not affect the operation of certain services.
In addition, the applicability of laws and regulations directly applicable to the businesses of our customers, particularly customers in the fields of banking and health care, will continue to affect us. The security of information about our customers’ end-users continues to be an area where a variety of laws and regulations with respect to privacy and confidentiality are enacted. As our customers implement the protections and prohibitions with respect to the transmission of end user data, our customers will look to us to assist them in remaining in compliance with this evolving area of regulation. In particular the Gramm-Leach-Blilely Act contains restrictions with respect to the use and protection of banking records for end-users whose information may pass through our system.
| |
| Unknown software defects could disrupt our services and harm our business and reputation. |
Our software products are inherently complex. Additionally, our service offerings depend on complex software, both internally developed and licensed from third parties. Complex software often contains defects, particularly when first introduced or when new versions are released. We may not discover software defects in our products or that affect new or current services or enhancements until after they are deployed. Although we have not experienced any material software defects to date, it is possible that, despite testing, defects may occur in the software. These defects could cause service interruptions, which could damage our reputation or increase service costs, cause us to lose revenue, delay market acceptance or divert development resources, any of which could cause our business to suffer.
| |
| We may have liability for Internet content and we may not have adequate liability insurance. |
As a provider of messaging and directory services, we face potential liability for defamation, negligence, copyright, patent or trademark infringement and other claims based on the nature and content of the materials transmitted via our services. We do not and cannot screen all of the content generated by our users, and we could be exposed to liability with respect to this content. Furthermore, some foreign governments, such as Germany, have enforced laws and regulations related to content distributed over the Internet that are more strict than those currently in place in the United States. In some instances, we may be subject to criminal liability in connection with Internet content transmission.
Although we carry general liability and umbrella liability insurance, our insurance may not cover claims of these types or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed. There is a risk that a single claim or multiple claims, if successfully asserted against us, could exceed the total of our coverage limits. There also is a risk that a single claim or multiple claims asserted against us may not qualify for coverage under our insurance policies as a result of coverage exclusions that are contained within these policies. Should either of these risks occur, capital contributed by our shareholders might need to be used to settle claims. Any imposition of liability, particularly liability that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of insurance coverage could harm our reputation and business and operating results, or could result in the imposition of criminal penalties.
| |
| Unplanned system interruptions and capacity constraints could reduce our ability to provide messaging services and could harm our business reputation. |
Our customers have, in the past, experienced some interruptions in our messaging service. We believe that these interruptions will continue to occur from time to time. These interruptions are due to hardware failures, unsolicited bulk email, or “spam,” attacks and operating system failures. Our business will suffer if we experience frequent or long system interruptions that result in the unavailability or reduced performance of systems or networks or reduce our ability to provide email services. We expect to experience occasional temporary capacity constraints due to sharply increased traffic, which may cause unanticipated system disruptions, slower response times, impaired quality and degradation in levels of customer service. If this were to continue to happen, our business and reputation could suffer dramatically.
25
We have entered into messaging agreements with some customers that require minimum performance standards, including standards regarding the availability and response time of messaging services. If we fail to meet these standards, our customers could terminate their relationships with us and we could be subject to contractual monetary penalties.
| |
| We rely on trademark, copyright, trade secret laws, contractual restrictions and patents to protect our proprietary rights, and if these rights are not sufficiently protected, our ability to compete and generate revenue could be harmed. |
We rely on a combination of trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, contractual restrictions, such as confidentiality agreements and licenses, and patents to establish and protect our proprietary rights, which we view as critical to our success. Our ability to compete and grow our business could suffer if these rights are not adequately protected. We seek to protect our source code for our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws. We license our software pursuant to agreements that impose certain restrictions on the licensee’s ability to utilize the software. Despite these precautions, unauthorized third parties may infringe or copy portions of our services or reverse engineer or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary, which could harm our competitive position and market share. We also seek to avoid disclosure of our intellectual property by requiring employees and consultants with access to our proprietary information to execute confidentiality agreements. In addition, we have several patents pending in the United States and may seek additional patents in the future. However, the status of United States patent protection in the software industry is not well defined and will evolve as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office grants additional patents. We do not know if our patent applications or any of our future patent applications will be issued with the scope of the claims sought, if at all, or whether any patents we have received or will receive will be challenged or invalidated.
Our proprietary rights may not be adequately protected because:
| | |
| • | laws and contractual restrictions may not prevent misappropriation of our technologies or deter others from developing similar technologies; |
|
| • | policing unauthorized use of our products and trademarks is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and we may be unable to determine the extent of this unauthorized use; and |
|
| • | end user license provisions in our contracts that protect us against unauthorized use, copying, transfer and disclosure of the licensed program may be unenforceable. |
In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Our means of protecting proprietary rights in the United States or abroad may not be adequate and competitors may independently develop similar technology. Additionally, although no claims of alleged patent infringement are currently pending, we cannot be certain that our products do not infringe issued patents that may relate to our products. In addition, because patent applications in the United States are not publicly disclosed until the patent is issued, applications may have been filed which relate to our software products.
| |
| We may not be able to respond to the rapid technological change of the messaging and directory infrastructure industry. |
The messaging directory infrastructure industry is characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user and customer requirements and preferences, and the emergence of new industry standards and practices that could render our existing services, proprietary technology and systems obsolete. We must continually improve the performance, features and reliability of our services, particularly in response to competitive offerings. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to enhance our existing email and messaging services and to develop new services, functionality and technology that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of prospective customers. If we do not properly identify the feature preferences of prospective customers, or if we fail to deliver email features that meet the standards of these customers, our ability to market our service successfully and to increase revenues could be impaired. The development of proprietary
26
technology and necessary service enhancements entails significant technical and business risks and requires substantial expenditures and lead-time. We may not be able to keep pace with the latest technological developments. We may also be unable to use new technologies effectively or adapt services to customer requirements or emerging industry standards.
| |
�� | Our reserves may be insufficient to cover bills we are unable to collect. |
We assume a certain level of credit risk with our customers in order to do business. Conditions affecting any of our customers could cause them to become unable or unwilling to pay us in a timely manner, or at all, for products or services we have already provided them. For example, if the current economic conditions continue to decline or if new or unanticipated government regulations are enacted which affect our customers, they may be unable to pay their bills. In the past, we have experienced significant collection delays from certain customers, and we cannot predict whether we will continue to experience similar or more severe delays in the future. In particular, some of our customers are suffering from the general weakness in the economy and among technology companies in particular. Although we have established reserves that we believe are sufficient to cover losses due to delays in or inability to pay, there can be no assurance that such reserves will be sufficient to cover our losses. If losses due to delays or inability to pay are greater than our reserves, it could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
| |
| If we do not successfully address the risks inherent in the expansion of our international operations, our business could suffer. |
We derived 52% of our revenues from international sales in the quarter ended March 31, 2002 and 30% of our revenues from international sales in the first quarter of 2001. We intend to continue to operate in international markets and to spend significant financial and managerial resources to do so. If revenues from international operations do not exceed the expense of establishing and maintaining these operations, our business, financial condition and operating results will suffer. We have limited experience in international operations and may not be able to compete or operate effectively in international markets. We face certain risks inherent in conducting business internationally, including:
| | |
| • | difficulties and costs of staffing and managing international operations; |
|
| • | fluctuations in currency exchange rates and imposition of currency exchange controls; |
|
| • | differing technology standards; |
|
| • | difficulties in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods; |
|
| • | changes in regulatory requirements, including U.S. export restrictions on encryption technologies; |
|
| • | political and economic instability; |
|
| • | potential adverse tax consequences; and |
|
| • | reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries. |
Any of these factors could harm our international operations and, consequently, our business and consolidated operating results. Specifically, failure to successfully manage international growth could result in higher operating costs than anticipated or could delay or preclude altogether our ability to generate revenues in key international markets.
| |
| We rely on a continuous power supply to conduct our operations, and any significance disruption in California’s energy supply could harm our operations and increase our expenses. |
During 2000 and 2001 California experienced a serious energy crisis that could have and may in the future disrupt our operations and increase our expenses. In the event of an acute power shortage, that is, when power reserves for the State of California fall below 1.5%, California has on some occasions implemented, and may in the future continue to implement, rolling blackouts throughout the state. If blackouts interrupt our power supply or the power supply of any of our customers, we, or our customers, may be temporarily unable to
27
operate. Any interruption in our ability to continue operations could delay the development of or interfere with the sales of our products. Future interruptions could damage our reputation, harm our ability to retain existing customers and to obtain new customers, and could result in lost revenue, any of which could substantially harm our business and results of operations. Any interruption in the ability of our customers to continue their operations, could harm their business, and ultimately could also harm our business if they were to terminate or fail to renew contracts. We do not carry sufficient business interruption insurance to compensate us for losses that may occur as a result of blackouts, and any losses or damages we incur could harm our business.
Furthermore, the deregulation of the energy industry instituted in 1996 by the California government and shortages in wholesale electricity supplies have caused power prices to increase. If wholesale prices continue to increase, our operating expenses will likely increase, as our headquarters and many employees are based in California.
| |
| Our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control. |
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control of our company. These provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. Some of these provisions:
| | |
| • | authorize the issuance of preferred stock that can be created and issued by our board of directors without prior shareholder approval, commonly referred to as “blank check” preferred stock, with rights senior to those of our common stock; |
|
| • | prohibit shareholder action by written consent; and |
|
| • | establish advance notice requirements for submitting nominations for election to our board of directors and for proposing matters that can be acted upon by shareholders at a meeting. |
In March 2001, we adopted a shareholder rights plan or “poison pill.” This plan could cause the acquisition of our company by a party not approved by our board of directors to be prohibitively expensive.
28
SUPPLEMENTAL ALTERNATIVE MEASUREMENT FINANCIAL DATA
The following supplemental alternative measurement financial information presents Critical Path’s condensed consolidated results of operations during the three-month periods of 2001 and 2002, excluding the impact of certain special charges consisting of (i) amortization of intangible assets associated with purchase business combinations and financing transactions, (ii) accruals for employee retention bonuses associated with purchase business combinations, (iii) stock-based compensation associated with outstanding options and warrants, (iv) one-time charges related to restructuring initiatives, (v) write-down of investments, (vi) gain on adjustment to market of the preferred stock instrument, and (vii) accretion on redeemable convertible preferred shares. This supplemental presentation is for informational purposes only, and is not intended to replace the consolidated operating results prepared and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
CRITICAL PATH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA
Excluding Certain Special Charges
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| |
|
| | March 31, | | March 31, |
| | 2001 | | 2002 |
| |
| |
|
| | |
| | (Unaudited) |
Net revenues | | | | | | | | |
| Software license | | $ | 5,550 | | | $ | 10,911 | |
| Hosted messaging | | | 14,440 | | | | 6,964 | |
| Professional services | | | 3,416 | | | | 1,937 | |
| Maintenance and support | | | 3,737 | | | | 3,877 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total net revenues | | | 27,143 | | | | 23,689 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Cost of net revenues | | | | | | | | |
| Software license | | | 291 | | | | 287 | |
| Hosted messaging | | | 17,938 | | | | 7,817 | |
| Professional services | | | 2,966 | | | | 2,443 | |
| Maintenance and support | | | 2,586 | | | | 2,103 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total cost of net revenues | | | 23,781 | | | | 12,650 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Gross profit | | | 3,362 | | | | 11,039 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Operating expenses | | | | | | | | |
| Sales and marketing | | | 18,712 | | | | 10,943 | |
| Research and development | | | 9,934 | | | | 5,002 | |
| General and administrative | | | 13,293 | | | | 6,678 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| | Total operating expenses | | | 41,939 | | | | 22,623 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Loss from operations | | | (38,577 | ) | | | (11,584 | ) |
Interest and other income (expense), net | | | 2,425 | | | | 533 | |
Interest expense | | | (5,051 | ) | | | (570 | ) |
Equity in net loss of joint venture | | | (776 | ) | | | (403 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Loss before income taxes | | | (41,979 | ) | | | (12,024 | ) |
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes | | | (343 | ) | | | 573 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net loss | | $ | (42,322 | ) | | $ | (11,451 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Net loss per share — basic and diluted | | $ | (0.59 | ) | | $ | (0.15 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
Weighted average shares — basic and diluted | | | 72,137 | | | | 76,514 | |
EBITDA(1) | | $ | (27,393 | ) | | $ | (3,784 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| |
(1) | Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, equity in net loss of joint venture and one-time charges identified in the following table. EBITDA is calculated by adding depreciation, approximately $7.8 million, back into loss from operations. |
29
The following table reconciles the alternative measurement financial data presented above to the consolidated operating results prepared and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| |
|
| | March 31, | | March 31, |
| | 2001 | | 2002 |
| |
| |
|
| | |
| | (Unaudited) |
Supplemental alternative measurement net loss | | $ | (42,322 | ) | | $ | (11,451 | ) |
| Amortization of purchased technology | | | (5,672 | ) | | | (4,630 | ) |
| Amortization of intangible assets | | | (8,966 | ) | | | (6,131 | ) |
| Acquisition-related retention bonuses in operating expenses | | | (170 | ) | | | (10 | ) |
| Stock-based expense in cost of revenue | | | (1,303 | ) | | | (417 | ) |
| Stock-based expense in operating expenses | | | (11,597 | ) | | | (3,255 | ) |
| Amortization of debt issuance costs in non-operating expense | | | (16 | ) | | | (213 | ) |
| Loss on investments in non-operating expense | | | — | | | | (104 | ) |
| Preferred stock instrument marked to market | | | — | | | | 200 | |
| | |
| | | |
| |
| Subtotal of amounts excluded from pro forma net loss | | | (27,724 | ) | | | (14,560 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
GAAP net loss | | | (70,046 | ) | | | (26,011 | ) |
| Accretion on redeemable convertible preferred shares | | | — | | | | (3,206 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
GAAP net loss attributable to common shares | | $ | (70,046 | ) | | $ | (29,217 | ) |
| | |
| | | |
| |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
| |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
As of March 31, 2002, our investment portfolio consisted of available-for-sale securities, excluding those classified as cash equivalents, of $17.5 million. These securities consist of $6.2 million of strategic equity investments in corporate partners, certain of which are publicly traded and marketable and certain of which are privately held and $11.3 million of high grade, low risk government securities and corporate bonds. These securities are subject to equity price risk. Critical Path’s long-term obligations consist of our $38.4 million of face value 5.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due April 2005, and certain fixed rate capital leases. We do not plan to reduce or eliminate our market exposure on these securities.
A significant portion of our worldwide operations has a functional currency other than the United States dollar. Accordingly, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in our sales commitments, anticipated sales, and assets and liabilities of these operations. Fluctuations in exchange rates may harm our results of operations and could also result in exchange losses. The impact of future exchange rate fluctuations cannot be predicted adequately. To date, we have not sought to hedge the risks associated with fluctuations in exchange rates.
Information relating to quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk is set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
30
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Critical Path, Inc.
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets of Critical Path, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002 and the related condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2002 and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flow for the three month period ended March 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We previously audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of shareholders’ equity, and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 5, 2002 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2001, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
San Jose, CA
May 8, 2002
31
PART 2 — OTHER INFORMATION
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation in general, and securities and intellectual property litigation in particular, can be expensive and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. Other than as described below, we are not a party to any other material legal proceedings.
Securities Class Actions in Northern District of California.Beginning on February 2, 2001, a number of securities class action complaints were filed against the Company, and certain of our current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaints were filed as purported class actions by individuals who allege that they purchased the Company’s common stock during a purported class period and sought an unspecified amount in damages; the alleged class periods vary among the complaints. The complaints were consolidated into a single action which alleged that, during the period from September 26, 2000 to February 1, 2001, the Company and certain of its former officers made false or misleading statements of material fact about the Company’s financial statements, including its revenues, revenue recognition policies, business operations and prospects for the year 2000 and beyond. In addition, on September 24, 2001, certain former shareholders of PeerLogic, Inc. filed a putative class action in the Superior Court of the State of California alleging that Critical Path breached representations and warranties made in connection with the acquisition of PeerLogic. The complaint sought an unspecified amount in damages. We subsequently removed the PeerLogic action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On November 8, 2001, Critical Path announced that it had reached an agreement in principle to settle these cases. In February 2002, the Court gave preliminary approval to the settlement of the class action litigation. The Court also set the hearing date for final approval of the settlement agreement for May 23, 2002.
On April 30, 2002, MBCP PeerLogic LLC and other named plaintiffs filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Critical Path and certain of its former officers. The plaintiff shareholders opted out of the shareholder litigation settlement currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint, which has not been served on the Company, alleges breach of contract, unjust enrichment, common law fraud and violations of federal securities laws and seeks compensatory and punitive damages in an unnamed amount but in excess of $200 million.
Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation.In February 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a formal order of investigation of the Company and certain of the Company’s current and former officers and directors associated with the Company with respect to non-specified accounting matters, financial reports, other public disclosures and trading activity in the Company’s securities. The Company fully cooperated with the SEC in its investigation. The SEC’s investigation was concluded against the Company in January 2002 with no imposition of fines or penalties against the Company. The Company consented without admitting or denying liability, to an administrative order that the Company violated certain non-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws and to a cease and desist order. The investigation has thus far resulted with charges being filed against two former executive officers of the Company. The investigation of former executives officers and directors of the Company is continuing and while the Company is fully cooperating with such investigation we do not know the status of the investigation with respect to many of such former officers.
Derivative Actions in Northern District of California.Beginning on February 5, 2001, Critical Path was named as a nominal defendant in a number of derivative actions, purportedly brought on the Company’s behalf, filed in the Superior Court of the State of California and in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The derivative complaints alleged that certain of Critical Path’s current and former officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company, engaged in abuses of their control of the Company, were unjustly enriched by their sales of the Company’s common stock, engaged in insider trading in violation of California law or published false financial information in violation of California law. The plaintiffs sought unspecified damages on the Company’s behalf from each of the defendants. Because
32
of the nature of derivative litigation, any recovery in the action would inure to the Company’s benefit. Contemporaneously with settlement of the securities class action described above, an agreement in principle has been reached to settle the derivative action.
Securities Class Action in Southern District of New York.Beginning on July 18, 2001, a number of securities class action complaints were filed against the Company, and certain of our current and former officers and directors and underwriters connected with our initial public offering of common stock in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The purported class action complaints were filed by individuals who allege that they purchased common stock at the initial public offering of common stock between March 26, 1999 and December 6, 2000. The complaints allege generally that the Prospectus under which such securities were sold contained false and misleading statements with respect to discounts and commissions received by the underwriters. The complaints have been consolidated into a single action. The complaints seek an unspecified amount in damages on behalf of persons who purchased Critical Path stock during the specified period.
Lease Dispute.In July 2000, PeerLogic, an acquired subsidiary of Critical Path, signed a lease for office space at 292 Ivy Street in San Francisco, CA. The landlord and PeerLogic had begun construction work to build out the space, when Critical Path acquired PeerLogic in December 2000. After reviewing its obligations under the lease, Critical Path noted that local zoning laws likely prohibited a business like Critical Path or PeerLogic from occupying the leased premises, and promptly sought a zoning determination from the San Francisco Zoning Administrator to resolve the matter. The preliminary zoning determination stated that Critical Path’s proposed use of the leased premises was not permitted. The landlord appealed this determination and prevailed before the San Francisco Board of Appeals. Critical Path appealed that determination but upon rehearing the Board of Appeals confirmed its decision. As anticipated, thereafter the landlord filed suit for back rent and breach of contract against Critical Path on April 30, 2002. The complaint seeks compensatory damages of approximately $7 million and unspecified punitive damages. The Company intends to vigorously defend its rights but there can be no assurance as to the outcome of this litigation.
The uncertainty associated with these and other unresolved or threatened lawsuits could seriously harm the Company’s business and financial condition. In particular, the lawsuits or the continued effects of the investigation could harm its relationships with existing customers and its ability to obtain new customers. The continued defense of the lawsuits and conduct of the SEC investigation could also result in the diversion of management’s time and attention away from business operations, which could harm the Company’s business. Although some of the named lawsuits are in the final stages of settlement, there can be no assurance that the applicable courts will accept the final settlement as executed, or at all. Negative developments with respect to the settlements or the lawsuits could cause the Company’s stock price to decline significantly. In addition, although the Company is unable to determine the amount, if any, that it may be required to pay in connection with the resolution of these lawsuits or the investigation by settlement or otherwise, the size of any such payments could seriously harm the Company’s financial condition.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
| | | | |
| 4.1 | | | Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated June 2000 issued by the Registrant to i2 Technologies, Inc. |
| 4.2 | | | Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated June 2000 issued by the Registrant to i2 Technologies, Inc. |
| 4.3 | | | Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock dated as of October 20, 1999 by Registrant to U.S. Telesource. |
| 4.4 | | | Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock dated as of May 9, 2001 by Registrant to LaHorgue Family Trust. |
| 4.5 | | | Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock dated as of May 9, 2001 by Registrant to Rajiv Surendra Patel. |
33
| | | | |
| 10.1 | | | First Amendment to Email Services Agreement by and between Registrant and ICQ, Inc. |
| 10.2 | | | Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of February 12, 2002 by and between Registrant and David C. Hayden. |
| 15.1 | | | Letter of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on Unaudited Interim Financial Information |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
34
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| |
|
|
| Laureen DeBuono |
| Executive Vice President, |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal |
| Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Date: May 15, 2002
35
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| | | | |
Exhibit | | |
Number | | Exhibit Description |
| |
|
| 4.1 | | | Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated June 2000 issued by the Registrant to i2 Technologies, Inc. |
| 4.2 | | | Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated June 2000 issued by the Registrant to i2 Technologies, Inc. |
| 4.3 | | | Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock dated as of October 20,1999 by Registrant to U.S. Telesource. |
| 4.4 | | | Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock dated as of May 9, 2001 by Registrant to LaHorgue Family Trust. |
| 4.5 | | | Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock dated as of May 9, 2001 by Registrant to Rajiv Surendro Patel. |
| 10.1 | | | First Amendment to Email Services Agreement by and between Registrant and ICQ, Inc. |
| 10.2 | | | Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of February 12, 2002 by and between Registrant and David C. Hayden. |
| 15.1 | | | Letter of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on Unaudited Interim Financial Information |
| |
* | See Exhibit Index attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference. |
36