SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Carter’s, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Fiscal Year The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday in December or January nearest December 31. Every five or six years, our fiscal year includes an additional, or 53 rd , week of results. Fiscal 2020, ended on January 2, 2021, contained 53 calendar weeks. Fiscal 2019, ended on December 28, 2019, and fiscal 2018, ended on December 29, 2018, contained 52 calendar weeks. Certain expenses increased in relationship to the additional revenue from the 53 rd week, while other expenses, such as fixed costs and expenses incurred on a calendar-month basis, did not increase. The consolidated gross margin for the additional revenue from the 53 rd week is slightly lower than the consolidated gross margin for fiscal 2020 due to increased promotional activity during the 53 rd week. Use of Estimates in the Preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Revision of Previously Issued Financial Statements During the second quarter of fiscal year 2020, it was determined that there were amounts presented incorrectly in the statement of cash flows for the annual and interim year to date periods subsequent to the December 30, 2018 adoption of ASC 842, Leases , due to the presentation of the non-cash impact of the initial and subsequent recognition of the Right of Use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities within the “Prepaid expenses and other assets” and “Accounts payable and other liabilities” line items, respectively, within operating cash flows. This incorrect presentation had no impact on net cash (used in) provided by operating activities for any of the periods. We assessed the materiality of the incorrect presentation and concluded that the previously issued financial statements were not materially misstated. The presentation errors resulted in an offsetting overstatement of cash used for prepaid expenses and other assets and cash provided by accounts payable and other liabilities of $739 million, $773 million and $815 million for the three, six and nine-months ended March 30, 2019, June 29, 2019 and September 28, 2019, respectively, $828 million for the year ended December 28, 2019 and $29 million for the three months ended March 28, 2020. The accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows appropriately reflect the corrected presentation of these non-cash activities. In addition, the Company has reclassified prior comparable period amounts to present ROU asset amortization and lease liability payment activity on a net basis within the “Accounts payable and other liabilities” line item. The revisions to the three, six and nine-months ended March 30, 2019, June 29, 2019 and September 28, 2019 have been presented in previous Form 10-Q filings. The revisions to the year ended December 31, 2019 have been presented in this Form 10-K. Revisions to the three months ended March 31, 2020 will be presented in a future Form 10-Q filing. We will continue to provide supplemental noncash cash flow disclosure information in the notes to the financial statements. COVID-19 In December 2019, an outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) began in Wuhan, China. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic and former President Trump declared a national emergency. As a result of COVID-19, the Company temporarily closed its retail stores in North America and implemented several actions during fiscal 2020 to enhance liquidity and financial flexibility including the deferral of lease payments, reductions in discretionary spending, amending its revolving credit facility, issuing $500 million principal amount of senior notes, and suspending dividends and share repurchases. Beginning in April 2020, the Company suspended rent payments under the leases for our temporarily closed stores in North America and initiated discussions with landlords to obtain rent concessions. The Company considered the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) recent guidance regarding lease concessions as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and has elected to treat these rent concessions as lease modifications. As of January 2, 2021, lease modifications resulting from COVID-19 related rent concessions decreased the Company’s operating lease liabilities by $23.7 million during fiscal 2020. The Company continues to negotiate lease concessions with landlords. As of the end of the third fiscal quarter, the Company resumed making the required rent payments under these leases. On May 4, 2020, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, The William Carter Company (“TWCC”), amended its revolving credit facility. This amendment provided for, among other things, a waiver of financial covenants through the balance of fiscal year 2020, revised covenant requirements through the third quarter of fiscal year 2021, and the ability to raise additional unsecured financing at the Company’s discretion. Additionally, on May 11, 2020, TWCC issued $500 million principal amount of senior notes at par, bearing interest at a rate of 5.500% per annum, and maturing on May 15, 2025. See Note 8, Long-Term Debt , for further details on the amendment to the revolving credit facility and the issuance of $500 million principal amount of senior notes. The Company announced in the first half of fiscal 2020, that in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, it suspended its common stock share repurchase program and its quarterly cash dividend. The Company also assessed certain accounting matters that generally require consideration of forecasted financial information in context with the information reasonably available to us and the unknown future impacts of COVID-19 as of January 2, 2021 and through the date of this report filing. The accounting matters assessed included, but were not limited to, our allowance for credit losses, inventory reserves, adverse inventory and fabric purchase commitments, stock based compensation, and the carrying value of our goodwill and other long-lived assets. Based on these assessments, in fiscal 2020, the Company recorded impairments on operating lease assets and other long-lived assets for our underperforming retail stores of $9.0 million, adverse inventory and fabric purchase commitments of $14.7 million, incremental excess inventory reserve related charges of $4.9 million, intangible asset impairments of $26.5 million, and goodwill impairment of $17.7 million. There could be a further material impact to our consolidated financial statements in future reporting periods if, at a future date, the Company determines that these assessments of the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, as well as other factors, were incorrect. Additional COVID-19 related charges in fiscal 2020 were $21.4 million, which primarily included incremental costs of $12.1 million related to payroll continuation for a period of time for our retail employees and increased employee-related costs at our distribution centers, costs associated with additional protective equipment and cleaning supplies of $8.9 million, and restructuring costs of $2.3 million, partially offset by a payroll tax benefit of $3.5 million. Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions Translation Adjustments The functional currency of substantially all of the Company’s foreign operations is the local currency in each foreign country. Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using the current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, while revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates for the period. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Transaction Adjustments The Company also recognizes gains and losses on transactions that are denominated in a currency other than the respective entity’s functional currency. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses also include the impact of intercompany loans with foreign subsidiaries that are marked to market. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in earnings, as a separate component of Other expense (income), net, within the consolidated statements of operations. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses related to intercompany loans with foreign subsidiaries that are of a long-term nature are accounted for as translation adjustments and are included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Foreign Currency Contracts As part of the Company’s overall strategy to manage the level of exposure to the risk of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, primarily between the U.S. dollar and the currencies of Canada and Mexico, the Company may use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge purchases that are made in U.S. dollars, primarily for inventory purchases in its Canadian and Mexican operations. As part of this hedging strategy, the Company may use foreign currency forward exchange contracts with maturities of less than 12 months to provide continuing coverage throughout the hedging period. Historically, these contracts were not designated for hedge accounting treatment, and therefore changes in the fair value of these contracts have been recorded in Other (income) expense, net in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Such foreign currency gains and losses typically include the mark-to-market fair value adjustments at the end of each reporting period related to open contracts, as well as any realized gains and losses on contracts settled during the reporting period. The fair values of any unsettled currency contracts are included in other current assets or other current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. On the consolidated statement of cash flows, the Company includes all activity, including cash settlement of any contracts, as a component of cash flows from operations. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments that have original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of deposit accounts and cash management funds invested in U.S. government instruments. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents also include amounts due from third-party financial institutions for credit and debit card transactions; these amounts typically settle in less than five days. Concentration of Cash Deposits Risk As of January 2, 2021, the Company had approximately $1.10 billion of cash and cash equivalents in major financial institutions, including approximately $85.8 million in financial institutions located outside of the United States. The Company maintains cash deposits with major financial institutions that exceed the insurance coverage limits provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in the U.S. and by similar insurers for deposits located outside the U.S. To mitigate this risk, the Company utilizes a policy of allocating cash deposits among major financial institutions that have been evaluated by the Company and third-party rating agencies as having acceptable risk profiles. Accounts Receivable Concentration of Credit Risk In fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, no one customer accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s consolidated net sales. At January 2, 2021, three wholesale customers each had individual receivable balances in excess of 10% of gross accounts receivable, and the total receivable balances due from these three wholesale customers in the aggregate equaled approximately 69% of total gross trade receivables outstanding. At December 28, 2019, three wholesale customers each had individual receivable balances in excess of 10% of gross accounts receivable, and the total receivable balances due from these three wholesale customers in the aggregate equaled approximately 52% of total gross trade receivables outstanding. Valuation Accounts for Wholesale Accounts Receivable Accounts Receivable Reserves The Company's accounts receivable reserves for wholesale customers include an allowance for expected credit losses and an allowance for chargebacks. The allowance for expected credit losses includes estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make payments. If the financial condition of a customer were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of its ability to make payments, an additional allowance could be required. Past due balances over 90 days are reviewed individually for collectibility. The Company’s credit and collections department reviews all other balances regularly. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when it is probable that the receivable will not be recovered. Provisions for the allowance for expected credit losses are reflected in Selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of operations and provisions for chargebacks are reflected as a reduction in Net sales on the consolidated statement of operations. Sales Returns Reserves Except in very limited instances, the Company does not allow its wholesale customers to return goods to the Company. Inventories Inventories, which consist primarily of finished goods, are stated approximately at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis for wholesale inventory and average cost for retail inventory) or net realizable value. Obsolete, damaged, and excess inventory is carried at net realizable value by establishing reserves after assessing historical recovery rates, current market conditions, and future marketing and sales plans. Rebates, discounts, and other cash consideration received from a vendor related to inventory purchases are reflected as reductions in the cost of the related inventory item, and are therefore reflected in cost of sales when the related inventory item is sold. Leases At the beginning of fiscal 2019, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC No. 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), using a modified retrospective approach. This approach allows the Company to apply the standard and related disclosures to the financial statements for the period of adoption and to apply the old guidance in the comparative periods. The standard had a material impact on our consolidated balance sheets, but did not have a material impact on our consolidated income statements or statement of cash flows. The most significant impact was the recognition of right of use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities for operating leases. Finance leases are not material to the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations or statements of cash flows. Financial Presentation The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at its inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease assets, current operating lease liabilities, and long-term operating lease liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. The operating lease ROU asset also includes initial direct costs and excludes lease incentives. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Certain of our lease agreements include variable rental payments based on a percentage of retail sales over contractual levels and others include variable rental payments adjusted periodically for inflation. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. Policy Elections Practical Expedient Package - The Company has elected the following expedients and applied them consistently to all leases: • The Company will not revisit whether a contract is, or contains, a lease under the ASC 842 definition of a lease. • The lease classification determined under prior guidance will not be reevaluated under ASC 842. • Previously capitalized initial direct costs under prior guidance will be carried forward. Any initial direct costs after the effective date will be included within the ROU asset under ASC 842. Portfolio approach - In general, the Company accounts for the underlying leased asset and applies a discount rate at the lease level. However, there are certain non-real estate leases for which the Company utilizes the portfolio method by aggregating similar leased assets based on the underlying lease term. Non-lease component - The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components. The Company has elected a policy to account for lease and non-lease components as a single component for all asset classes. Short-term lease - Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheets. Discount rate - As most of the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses the incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Renewal options - The Company evaluates the inclusion of renewal options on a lease by lease basis. In general, for leased retail real estate, the Company does not include renewal options in the underlying lease term. Property, Plant, and Equipment Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. When fixed assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the accounts are relieved of the original cost of the assets and the related accumulated depreciation or amortization and any resulting profit or loss is credited or charged to income. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation and amortization are computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: buildings and improvements from 15 to 26 years, retail store fixtures, equipment, and computers from 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements and fixed assets purchased under capital lease are amortized over the lesser of the asset life or related lease term. The Company capitalizes the cost of its fixtures designed and purchased for use at major wholesale accounts. The cost of these fixtures is amortized over 3 years. Internal-Use Software The Company purchases software licenses from external vendors and also develops software internally using Company employees and consultants. Software license costs, including certain costs to internally develop software, that meet the applicable criteria are capitalized while all other costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalized software is depreciated or amortized on the straight-line method over its estimated useful lives, from 3 to 10 years. If a software application does not include a purchased license for the software, such as a cloud-based software application, the arrangement is accounted for as a service contract. Cloud computing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract and that meet the applicable criteria are capitalized and reported in Prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balances sheets. Any capitalized costs are amortized over the term of the hosting arrangement, and the expense is presented in the same line item within the consolidated statements of operations as the expense for the service contract's fees. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Annual Impairment Reviews The carrying values of the goodwill and indefinite-lived tradename assets are subject to annual impairment reviews which are performed as of the last day of each fiscal year. Additionally, a review for potential impairment is performed whenever significant events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Significant assumptions in the impairment models include estimates of revenue growth and profitability, terminal values, discount rates, an implied control premium, and, in the case of tradenames, royalty rates. Goodwill The Company performs impairment tests of its goodwill at the reporting unit level. Qualitative and quantitative methods are used to assess for impairment, including the use of discounted cash flows (“income approach”) and relevant data from guideline public companies (“market approach”). Under a qualitative assessment, the Company determines if it is “more likely than not” that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Qualitative factors may include, but are not limited to: macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors that may have a negative effect on earnings, overall financial performance, and other relevant entity-specific events. If the Company determines that it is “more likely than not” that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then a goodwill impairment test using quantitative assessments must be performed. If it is determined that it is “not more likely than not” that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then no further testing is required and the Company documents the relevant qualitative factors that support the strength in the fair value. Under a quantitative assessment for goodwill, the Company compares the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. The Company uses the income approach and the market approach to determine the fair value of a reporting unit. The assumptions used in these approaches include revenue growth and profitability, terminal values, discount rates, and an implied control premium. These assumptions are consistent with those of hypothetical marketplace participants. An impairment is recorded for any excess carrying value above the fair value of the reporting unit, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill. Due to the decrease in the Company’s market capitalization, lower than expected actual sales, and lower projected sales and profitability, primarily due to the impacts from the outbreak of COVID-19, the Company concluded that impairment indicators existed for the first quarter of fiscal 2020. As a result, during the first quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company conducted interim quantitative impairment assessments of 1) the goodwill ascribed to the Other International reporting unit recorded in connection with the allocation of goodwill to the newly created International segment as a result of the acquisition of Bonnie Togs in 2011 and 2) on the value of the Company’s indefinite-lived OshKosh and Skip Hop tradename assets that was recorded in connection with the acquisition of OshKosh B’Gosh Inc. in July 2005 and Skip Hop Holdings, Inc. in February 2017, respectively. The goodwill impairment assessment for the Other International reporting unit was performed in accordance with ASC 350, “ Intangibles--Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”) and compares the carrying value of the Other International reporting unit to its fair value. Consistent with prior practice, the fair value of the Other International reporting unit was determined using the income approach and the market approach. As a result of this assessment, a goodwill impairment charge of $17.7 million was recorded to our Other International reporting unit in the International segment during the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The goodwill impairment charge recorded on our Other International reporting unit included charges of $9.4 million, $5.2 million, and $3.1 million to Skip Hop, Carter’s, and Carter’s Mexico goodwill, respectively. The carrying value of the Company’s goodwill for the Other International reporting unit as of January 2, 2021 was $11.8 million. Indefinite-lived Tradenames For indefinite-lived tradenames, the Company may utilize a qualitative assessment, as described above, to determine whether the fair value of an indefinite-lived asset is less than its carrying value. If a quantitative assessment is necessary, the Company determines fair value using a discounted cash flow model that uses the relief-from-royalty method. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the tradename, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount of the excess. As discussed above, during the first quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company conducted interim quantitative impairment assessments on the value of the Company’s indefinite-lived OshKosh and Skip Hop tradename assets that was recorded in connection with the acquisition of OshKosh B’Gosh Inc. in July 2005 and Skip Hop Holdings, Inc. in February 2017, respectively. The OshKosh and Skip Hop indefinite-lived tradename asset assessments were performed in accordance with ASC 350 and were determined using a discounted cash flow analysis which examined the hypothetical cost savings that accrue as a result of not having to license the tradename from another owner. Based on these assessments, charges of $15.5 million and $11.0 million were recorded during the first quarter of fiscal 2020 on our indefinite-lived OshKosh and Skip Hop tradename assets, respectively. The charge recorded on our indefinite-lived OshKosh tradename asset included charges of $13.6 million, $1.6 million, and $0.3 million in the U.S. Retail, U.S. Wholesale, and International segments, respectively, to reflect the impairment of the value ascribed to the indefinite-lived OshKosh tradename asset. The charge recorded on our indefinite-lived Skip Hop tradename asset included charges of $6.8 million, $3.7 million, and $0.5 million in the U.S. Wholesale, International, and U.S. Retail segments, respectively, to reflect the impairment of the value ascribed to the indefinite-lived Skip Hop tradename asset. The carrying values of the Company’s indefinite-lived OshKosh and Skip Hop tradename assets as of January 2, 2021 were $70.0 million and $15.0 million, respectively. In the third quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company’s Skip Hop business experienced lower than expected actual and projected sales and profitability due to lower domestic demand, including the loss of a significant customer that declared bankruptcy (Toys “R” Us), lower international demand and higher product costs primarily driven by tariffs imposed on products sourced from China. As a result, the Company conducted an interim impairment assessment in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 on the value of the Company’s indefinite-lived Skip Hop tradename asset that was recorded in connection with the acquisition of Skip Hop Holdings, Inc. in February 2017. The indefinite-lived tradename asset assessment was performed in accordance with ASC 350, “ Intangibles--Goodwill and Other” and was determined using a discounted cash flow analysis which examined the hypothetical cost savings that accrue as a result of our ownership of the tradename. Based on this assessment, a charge of $30.8 million was recorded during the third quarter of fiscal 2019 on our indefinite-lived Skip Hop tradename asset. The charge included charges of $19.1 million, $10.5 million, and $1.2 million in the U.S. Wholesale, International, and U.S. Retail segments, respectively, to reflect the impairment of the value ascribed to the indefinite-lived Skip Hop tradename asset. Based upon our most recent annual assessment, performed as of January 2, 2021, there were no further impairments in the values of goodwill or indefinite-lived or definite-lived intangible assets. This annual assessment indicated that each reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying value by at least 53%. The annual assessment also indicated that the OshKosh and Skip Hop indefinite-lived tradename assets’ fair value exceeded its carrying value by approximately 10% and 40%, respectively. Sensitivity tests on the OshKosh indefinite-lived tradename asset showed that a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate, a 10% decrease in forecasted revenues, or a 25 basis point decrease in the royalty rate was needed to change the conclusion. Although the Company determined that no further impairment exists for the Company’s goodwill or indefinite-lived or definite-lived intangible assets, these assets could be at risk for impairment should global economic conditions continue to deteriorate as a result of COVID-19. Impairment of Other Long-Lived Assets The Company reviews other long-lived assets, including operating lease assets, property, plant, and equipment, and licensing agreements, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such an asset may not be recoverable. Management will determine whether there has been a permanent impairment on such assets held for use in the business by comparing anticipated undiscounted future cash flows from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group to the carrying value of the asset. The amount of any resulting impairment will be calculated by comparing the carrying value to fair value, which may be estimated using the present value of the same cash flows. Long-lived assets that meet the definition of held for sale will be valued at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less costs to sell. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a qualitative indication of impairment related to our store long-lived assets. In fiscal 2020, the Company recorded impairment charges of operating lease assets and other long-lived assets for our underperforming retail stores of $9.0 million. The impairment charges were recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Deferred Debt Issuance Costs Debt issuance costs associated with the Company’s secured revolving credit facility and senior term notes are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt using the effective interest method. Debt issuance costs associated with Company’s senior notes are presented on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as a direct reduction in the carrying value of the associated debt liability. Fees paid to lenders by the Company to obtain its secured revolving credit facility are included within Other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and classified as either current or non-current based on the expiration date of the credit facility. Fair Value Measurements The fair value framework requires the Company to categorize certain assets and liabilities into three levels, based upon the assumptions used to price those assets or liabilities. The three levels are defined as follows: Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable. Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability. The Company measures its pension assets, deferred compensation plan investment assets, and any unsettled foreign currency forward contracts at fair value. T he Company's cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable are short-term in nature. As such, their carrying value approximates fair value. The carrying values of the Company’s outstanding borrowings are not required to be remeasured and adjusted to the then-current fair values at the end of each reporting period. Instead, the fair values of the Company’s outstanding borrowings are disclosed at the end of each reporting period in Note 8, Long-Term Debt , to the consolidated financial statements. Had the Company been required to remeasure and adjust the carrying values of its outstanding borrowings to fair value at the end of each reporting period, such fair value measurements would have been disclosed as a Level 2 liability in the fair value hierarchy. Revenue Recogniti |