Financial Instruments | 4. Financial Instruments Financial Assets The following tables summarize the estimated fair value of the Company’s financial assets measured on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated, which were comprised solely of available-for-sale marketable securities with remaining contractual maturities of one year or less (in thousands): June 30, 2015 Input Level Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Money market funds Level 1 $ 7,422 $ — $ — $ 7,422 U.S. certificates of deposit Level 1 8,246 — — 8,246 U.S. corporate debt obligations Level 2 8,447 — (4 ) 8,443 U.S. commercial paper Level 2 3,498 — (1 ) 3,497 Total available-for-sale securities 27,613 — (5 ) 27,608 Less amounts classified as cash equivalents (8,354 ) — — (8,354 ) Amounts classified as marketable securities $ 19,259 $ — $ (5 ) $ 19,254 December 31, 2014 Input Level Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Money market funds Level 1 $ 9,287 $ — $ — $ 9,287 U.S. certificates of deposit Level 1 6,360 — — 6,360 U.S. corporate debt obligations Level 2 11,789 — (7 ) 11,782 U.S. commercial paper Level 2 2,898 — — 2,898 Total available-for-sale securities 30,334 — (7 ) 30,327 Less amounts classified as cash equivalents (9,532 ) — — (9,532 ) Amounts classified as marketable securities $ 20,802 $ — $ (7 ) $ 20,795 The following table summarizes the available-for-sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of the date indicated, having been in such a position for less than 12 months, and none having been deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired (in thousands): June 30, 2015 Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value U.S. corporate debt obligations $ 4 $ 7,274 U.S. commercial paper 1 2,498 $ 5 $ 9,772 No significant facts or circumstances have arisen to indicate that there has been any deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers of these securities. The gross unrealized losses are not considered to be significant and have generally been for relatively short durations. The Company does not intend to sell these securities before maturity and it is not likely that they will need to be sold prior to the recovery of their amortized cost basis. There were no sales of available-for-sale securities during either the six months ended June 30, 2015 or 2014. Financial Liabilities The following table summarizes the inputs and assumptions and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated, which were comprised solely of a liability for warrants issued in connection with the 2010 Offering: June 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 Inputs and assumptions: Fair market value of Company’s common stock $ 3.01 $ 2.55 Exercise price $ 2.52 $ 2.52 Expected term (years) 0.3 0.8 Expected volatility 52.2 % 144.9 % Risk-free interest rate 0.02 % 0.19 % Expected dividend yield 0.00 % 0.00 % Fair value: Estimated fair value per warrant share $ 0.60 $ 1.21 Shares underlying outstanding warrants classified as liabilities (in thousands) 2,920 2,920 Total estimated fair value of outstanding warrants (in thousands) $ 1,765 $ 3,543 The warrants have been classified as a liability on the Company’s balance sheet due to the potential for the warrants to be settled in cash upon the occurrence of certain transactions specified in the warrant agreements. At each balance sheet date, the estimated fair value of the outstanding warrants is determined using the Black-Scholes model and recorded to the balance sheet, with the change in fair value recorded to other income (expense), net in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss, and the fair value of warrant exercises transferred to additional paid-in capital. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, no warrants to purchase shares of common stock issued in connection with the 2010 Offering were exercised. The Black-Scholes model requires Level 3 inputs such as the expected term of the warrants and share price volatility. These inputs are subjective and generally require significant analysis and judgment to develop. Any changes in these inputs could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities for the period indicated (in thousands): Warrant Liability Balance as of December 31, 2014 $ 3,543 Change in fair value of warrant liability (1,778 ) Exercise of warrants — Balance as of June 30, 2015 $ 1,765 |