Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V., p. 3
Company, or violate any requirement or restriction imposed by any court or governmental body having jurisdiction over the Company, (v) the Debt Securities will be offered, issued, granted, sold and delivered to, and paid for by, the purchasers thereof at the price specified in, and in accordance with the terms of, an agreement or agreements duly authorized, executed and delivered by the parties thereto, (vi) the Company will duly authorize the offering and issuance of the Debt Securities and will duly authorize, approve and establish the final terms and conditions of the offering and issuance of the Debt Securities, (vii) the Company has duly authorized, executed and delivered, or will duly authorize, execute and deliver, as applicable, the Base Indenture, the supplemental indenture and any other agreement necessary with respect to the Debt Securities or contemplated by such Debt Securities and will take any other appropriate additional corporate action, and (viii) the certificates, if required, representing the Debt Securities will be duly executed and delivered and, to the extent required by any applicable agreement, duly authenticated and countersigned.
In rendering the opinion expressed above, we have assumed that each series of Debt Securities will be issued with an original aggregate principal amount (or in the case of Debt Securities issued at original issue discount, an aggregate issue price) of U.S. $2,500,000 or more.
We express no opinion as to the subject matter jurisdiction of any United States federal court to adjudicate any action relating to the Debt Securities where jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. §1332 does not exist. We note that the designation in Section 115 of the Base Indenture of the U.S. federal courts sitting in New York City as the venue for actions or proceedings relating to the Debt Securities or the Base Indenture is (notwithstanding the waiver in Section 115) subject to the power of such courts to transfer actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) or to dismiss such actions or proceedings on the grounds that such a federal court is an inconvenient forum for such an action or proceeding.
We note that by statute New York provides that a judgment or decree rendered in a currency other than the currency of the United States shall be converted into U.S. dollars at a rate of exchange prevailing on the date of entry of the judgment or decree. There is no corresponding federal statute and no controlling federal court decision on this issue. Accordingly, we express no opinion as to whether a federal court would award a judgment in a currency other than U.S. dollars or, if it did so, whether it would order the conversion of the judgment into U.S. dollars.
We express no opinion as to the enforceability of Section 1009 of the Base Indenture, providing for indemnification by the Company of the Trustee and the holders of the Debt Securities against any loss in obtaining the currency due to the Trustee or such holders of the Debt Securities from a court judgment in another currency.
The foregoing opinion is limited to the federal law of the United States of America and the law of the State of New York.
We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5.1 to the Registration Statement and to the reference to this firm in the prospectus constituting a part of the Registration Statement under the heading “Validity of Debt Securities” and in any prospectus supplement related thereto as counsel for the Company who have passed on the validity of the Debt Securities being registered by the Registration Statement. In giving such consent, we do