submitted to us as copies. In addition, we have assumed and have not verified the accuracy as to factual matters of each document we have reviewed.
Based on the foregoing, and subject to the further assumptions and qualifications set forth below, it is our opinion that the Securities are the valid, binding and enforceable obligations of the Company, entitled to the benefits of the Sixth Supplemental Indenture.
Insofar as the foregoing opinion relates to the validity, binding effect or enforceability of any agreement or obligation of the Company, (a) we have assumed that the Company and each other party to such agreement or obligation has satisfied those legal requirements that are applicable to it to the extent necessary to make such agreement or obligation enforceable against it (except that no such assumption is made as to the Company regarding matters of the federal law of the United States of America or the law of the State of New York that in our experience normally would be applicable to general business entities with respect to such agreement or obligation) and (b) such opinion is subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally, to general principles of equity and to the effect of judicial application of foreign laws or foreign governmental actions affecting creditors’ rights.
We express no opinion as to the subject matter jurisdiction of any United States federal court to adjudicate any action relating to the Indenture or the Securities where jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. §1332 does not exist. We note that (a) the designation in Section 115 of the Base Indenture and Section 901 of the Sixth Supplemental Indenture of the U.S. federal courts sitting in New York City as the venue for actions or proceedings relating to the Securities or the Base Indenture is (notwithstanding the waiver in Section 115 of the Base Indenture and Section 901 of the Sixth Supplemental Indenture) subject to the power of such courts to transfer actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) or to dismiss such actions or proceedings on the grounds that such a federal court is an inconvenient forum for such an action or proceeding and (b) the enforceability in the United States of the waiver in Section 115 of the Base Indenture and Section 901 of the Sixth Supplemental Indenture by the Company of any immunity from jurisdiction or to service of process is subject to the limitations imposed by the United States Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976.
We note that by statute New York provides that a judgment or decree rendered in a currency other than the currency of the United States shall be converted into U.S. dollars at a rate of exchange prevailing on the date of entry of the judgment or decree. There is no corresponding federal statute and no controlling federal court decision on this issue. Accordingly, we express no opinion as to whether a federal court would award a judgment in a currency other than U.S. dollars or, if it did so, whether it would order the conversion of the judgment into U.S. dollars.
We express no opinion as to the enforceability of Section 1009 of the Base Indenture, providing for indemnification by the Company of the Trustee and the holders of the Securities against any loss in obtaining the currency due to the Trustee or such holders of the Securities from a court judgment in another currency.
The foregoing opinion is limited to the federal law of the United States of America and the law of the State of New York.