UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended September 11, 2009
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 0-25087
HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
| | |
Delaware | | 52-2095412 |
(State of Incorporation) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
6903 Rockledge Drive, Suite 1500, Bethesda, Maryland | | 20817 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(240) 744-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | x (do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
| | |
Class | | Units outstanding as of October 16, 2009 |
Units of limited partnership interest | | 629,494,246 |
INDEX
2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 11, 2009 and December 31, 2008
(in millions)
| | | | | | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | December 31, 2008 |
| | (unaudited) | | (see Note 2) |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | | $ | 10,336 | | $ | 10,739 |
Due from managers | | | 52 | | | 65 |
Investments in affiliates | | | 144 | | | 229 |
Deferred financing costs, net | | | 46 | | | 46 |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund | | | 139 | | | 119 |
Other | | | 280 | | | 198 |
Restricted cash | | | 49 | | | 44 |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 1,019 | | | 508 |
| | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 12,065 | | $ | 11,948 |
| | | | | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST OF THIRD PARTIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | | | | | | |
| | |
Debt: | | | | | | |
Senior notes, including $822 million and $916 million, respectively, net of discount, of Exchangeable Senior Debentures | | $ | 4,232 | | $ | 3,943 |
Mortgage debt | | | 1,221 | | | 1,436 |
Credit facility | | | — | | | 410 |
Other | | | 86 | | | 87 |
| | | | | | |
Total debt | | | 5,539 | | | 5,876 |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 130 | | | 119 |
Other | | | 201 | | | 183 |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 5,870 | | | 6,178 |
| | | | | | |
| | |
Limited partnership interests of third parties | | | 124 | | | 158 |
| | |
Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. partners’ capital: | | | | | | |
General partner | | | 1 | | | 1 |
Cumulative redeemable preferred limited partner | | | 97 | | | 97 |
Limited partner | | | 5,945 | | | 5,485 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 6 | | | 5 |
| | | | | | |
Total Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. partners’ capital | | | 6,049 | | | 5,588 |
Non-controlling interests—consolidated partnerships | | | 22 | | | 24 |
| | | | | | |
Total partners’ capital | | | 6,071 | | | 5,612 |
| | | | | | |
Total liabilities, limited partnership interest of third parties and partners’ capital | | $ | 12,065 | | $ | 11,948 |
| | | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated statements.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Quarter and Year-to-date Ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008
(unaudited, in millions, except per unit amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | Year-to-date ended | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | | | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rooms | | $ | 579 | | | $ | 736 | | | $ | 1,707 | | | $ | 2,179 | |
Food and beverage | | | 242 | | | | 304 | | | | 831 | | | | 1,062 | |
Other | | | 69 | | | | 77 | | | | 225 | | | | 238 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total hotel sales | | | 890 | | | | 1,117 | | | | 2,763 | | | | 3,479 | |
Rental income | | | 22 | | | | 22 | | | | 76 | | | | 79 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 912 | | | | 1,139 | | | | 2,839 | | | | 3,558 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rooms | | | 169 | | | | 186 | | | | 470 | | | | 533 | |
Food and beverage | | | 205 | | | | 249 | | | | 634 | | | | 781 | |
Hotel departmental expenses | | | 263 | | | | 305 | | | | 765 | | | | 873 | |
Management fees | | | 33 | | | | 48 | | | | 106 | | | | 170 | |
Other property-level expenses | | | 95 | | | | 89 | | | | 271 | | | | 264 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 138 | | | | 130 | | | | 478 | | | | 377 | |
Corporate and other expenses | | | 19 | | | | 14 | | | | 50 | | | | 45 | |
Gain on insurance settlement | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating costs and expenses | | | 922 | | | | 1,021 | | | | 2,774 | | | | 3,036 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING PROFIT (LOSS) | | | (10 | ) | | | 118 | | | | 65 | | | | 522 | |
Interest income | | | 1 | | | | 4 | | | | 5 | | | | 13 | |
Interest expense | | | (95 | ) | | | (90 | ) | | | (264 | ) | | | (262 | ) |
Net gains on property transactions and other | | | 11 | | | | — | | | | 13 | | | | 2 | |
Gain on foreign currency transactions and derivatives | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | — | |
Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates | | | (2 | ) | | | 1 | | | | (36 | ) | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | (94 | ) | | | 33 | | | | (212 | ) | | | 278 | |
Benefit (provision) for income taxes | | | 25 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 29 | | | | (11 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | | | (69 | ) | | | 29 | | | | (183 | ) | | | 267 | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations. | | | 11 | | | | 18 | | | | (3 | ) | | | 36 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | | | (58 | ) | | | 47 | | | | (186 | ) | | | 303 | |
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | | | 1 | | | | (5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. | | | (56 | ) | | | 50 | | | | (185 | ) | | | 298 | |
Less: Distributions on preferred units | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | (6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS | | $ | (58 | ) | | $ | 48 | | | $ | (191 | ) | | $ | 292 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings (loss) per common unit: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | (.11 | ) | | $ | .06 | | | $ | (.33 | ) | | $ | .47 | |
Discontinued operations | | | .02 | | | | .03 | | | | — | | | | .07 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings (loss) per common unit | | $ | (.09 | ) | | $ | .09 | | | $ | (.33 | ) | | $ | .54 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | (.11 | ) | | $ | .06 | | | $ | (.33 | ) | | $ | .47 | |
Discontinued operations | | | .02 | | | | .03 | | | | — | | | | .07 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings (loss) per common unit | | $ | (.09 | ) | | $ | .09 | | | $ | (.33 | ) | | $ | .54 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year-to-Date Ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008
(unaudited, in millions)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year-to-date ended | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (186 | ) | | $ | 303 | |
Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operations: | | | | | | | | |
Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | |
Gain on dispositions | | | (27 | ) | | | (24 | ) |
Depreciation | | | 37 | | | | 11 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 478 | | | | 377 | |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | | | 11 | | | | 8 | |
Amortization of debt premiums/discounts, net | | | 22 | | | | 23 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (33 | ) | | | 5 | |
Net gains on property transactions and other | | | (13 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
Gains on foreign currency transactions and derivatives | | | (5 | ) | | | — | |
Gain on extinguishment of debt | | | (4 | ) | | | — | |
Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates, net | | | 36 | | | | (3 | ) |
Distributions from equity investments | | | 1 | | | | 3 | |
Change in due from managers | | | 11 | | | | 7 | |
Changes in other assets | | | (20 | ) | | | (11 | ) |
Changes in other liabilities | | | 62 | | | | 18 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by operations | | | 370 | | | | 715 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sales of assets, net | | | 199 | | | | 38 | |
Proceeds from sale of interest in CBM Joint Venture LLC | | | 13 | | | | — | |
Investments in affiliates | | | — | | | | (18 | ) |
Return of capital from affiliates | | | 39 | | | | — | |
Capital expenditures: | | | | | | | | |
Renewals and replacements | | | (114 | ) | | | (245 | ) |
Repositionings and other investments | | | (141 | ) | | | (218 | ) |
Change in furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E) replacement fund | | | (20 | ) | | | 1 | |
Change in restricted cash designated for FF&E replacement fund | | | (11 | ) | | | 1 | |
Other | | | — | | | | (9 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash used in investing activities | | | (35 | ) | | | (450 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | |
Financing costs | | | (10 | ) | | | (8 | ) |
Issuances of debt | | | 506 | | | | 510 | |
Repayments on credit facility | | | (410 | ) | | | — | |
Repurchase of senior notes, including exchangeable debentures | | | (115 | ) | | | — | |
Debt prepayments and scheduled maturities | | | (342 | ) | | | (211 | ) |
Scheduled principal repayments | | | (11 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
Common OP unit issuance | | | 588 | | | | — | |
Common OP unit repurchase | | | — | | | | (100 | ) |
Distributions on common OP units | | | (27 | ) | | | (433 | ) |
Distributions on preferred OP units | | | (7 | ) | | | (7 | ) |
Distributions to non-controlling interests | | | (2 | ) | | | (7 | ) |
Change in restricted cash other than FF&E replacement fund | | | 6 | | | | 9 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 176 | | | | (259 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | 511 | | | | 6 | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | | 508 | | | | 488 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 1,019 | | | $ | 494 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to condensed consolidated statements.
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year-to-date Ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008
(unaudited)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information (in millions):
| | | | | | |
| | Year-to-date ended |
| | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 |
Interest paid | | $ | 216 | | $ | 213 |
Income taxes paid | | | 4 | | | 6 |
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
For the year-to-date periods ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008, limited partners converted operating partnership units, or OP units, valued at approximately $17 million and $39 million, respectively, into approximately 3.3 million and 2.5 million shares, respectively, of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., or Host, common stock.
On March 12, 2008, we acquired the remaining limited partnership interests in Pacific Gateway Ltd., a subsidiary partnership of Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., or Host LP, which owns the San Diego Marriott Hotel and Marina, and other economic rights formerly held by our partners, including the right to receive 1.7% of the hotel’s sales, in exchange for 5,575,540 OP units. The OP units were valued at $93 million based on the closing stock price on such date for Host of $16.68.
See notes to condensed consolidated statements.
6
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., or Host LP, a Delaware limited partnership operating through an umbrella partnership structure with Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., or Host, as the sole general partner, is primarily the owner of hotel properties. Host operates as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, with its operations conducted solely through us and our subsidiaries. As of September 11, 2009, Host held 98% of our operating partnership interests, or OP units.
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
We have condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. We believe the disclosures made are adequate to prevent the information presented from being misleading. However, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 18, 2009 to revise the previously issued Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position as of September 11, 2009 and the results of our operations for the quarterly and year-to-date periods ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008 and cash flows for the year-to-date periods ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of full year performance because of the impact of seasonal and short-term variations. Subsequent events have been evaluated through October 15, 2009.
Certain prior year financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation, including changes as a result of the application of new accounting pronouncements for our exchangeable debentures and non-controlling interests in consolidated entities.
Reporting Periods
The results we report are based on results of our hotels reported to us by our hotel managers. Our hotel managers use different reporting periods. Marriott International, Inc., the manager of the majority of our properties, uses a fiscal year ending on the Friday closest to December 31 and reports twelve weeks of operations for each of the first three quarters of the year and sixteen or seventeen weeks for the fourth quarter of the year. In contrast, other managers of our hotels, such as Starwood Worldwide, Inc. and Hyatt Hotels, report results on a monthly basis. For results reported by hotel managers using a monthly reporting period (approximately 42% of our hotels), the month of operation that ends after our fiscal quarter-end is included in our results of operations in the following fiscal quarter. Accordingly, our results of operations include results from hotel managers reporting results on a monthly basis as follows: first quarter (January, February), second quarter (March to May), third quarter (June to August), and fourth quarter (September to December). We elected to adopt the reporting period used by Marriott, modified so that our fiscal year always ends on December 31 to match the fiscal year used by Host. Accordingly, our first three quarters of operations end on the same day as Marriott, but our fourth quarter ends on December 31.
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
We record the non-controlling interests of other consolidated partnerships as a separate component of partners’ capital in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, the condensed consolidated statements of operations separately present earnings and other comprehensive income attributable to controlling and non-controlling interests.
7
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Limited Partnership Interests of Third Parties
We adjust the limited partnership interests of third parties, other than Host, each period so that the carrying value equals the greater of its carrying value based on the accumulation of historical cost or its redemption value. The historical cost of the limited partnership interests of third parties is based on the proportional relationship between the carrying value of equity associated with Host’s common stockholders relative to that of the unitholders of Host LP. Net income (loss) is allocated to the limited partnership interests of third parties based on their weighted average ownership percentage during the period. As of September 11, 2009, approximately $124 million of cash or Host common stock, at Host’s option, would be paid to the limited partnership interests of third parties if the partnership were terminated. This balance is equivalent to the approximately 11.8 million partnership units outstanding valued at the September 11, 2009 Host common stock closing price of $10.55, which we have assumed would be equal to the value provided to outside partners upon liquidation of Host LP.
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)
We separately account for the liability and capital components of our exchangeable senior debentures to reflect the fair value of the liability component based on our non-convertible borrowing cost at the issuance date. Accordingly, for both our 25/8% Exchangeable Senior Debentures (the “2007 Debentures”) and our 31/4% Exchangeable Senior Debentures (the “2004 Debentures”) (collectively, the “Debentures”), we record the liability components of the Debentures at fair value as of the date of issuance and amortize the resulting discount as an increase to interest expense over the expected life of the debt. We measured the fair value of the debt components of the 2004 Debentures and 2007 Debentures at issuance based on effective interest rates of 6.8% and 6.5%, respectively. As a result, we attributed $165 million of the proceeds received to the conversion feature of the Debentures. This amount represents the excess proceeds received over the fair value of the debt at the date of issuance and is included in partners’ capital on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The retroactive application of this accounting treatment has resulted in a decrease to net income (increase to net loss) and earnings (loss) per unit for all periods presented; however, there is no effect on our cash interest payments. As a result of this accounting:
| • | | The unamortized discount of the Debentures is $49 million and $76 million as of September 11, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The unamortized discount is recognized as a reduction to the carrying value of the Debentures on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and beginning partners’ capital was increased by $76 million. |
| • | | Interest expense recorded for the Debentures for the periods presented consists of the following (in millions): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | Year-to-date ended |
| | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 | | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 |
Contractual interest expense | | $ | 7 | | $ | 8 | | $ | 21 | | $ | 24 |
Non-cash interest expense due to discount amortization | | | 6 | | | 7 | | | 19 | | | 21 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest expense | | $ | 13 | | $ | 15 | | $ | 40 | | $ | 45 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Application of New Accounting Standards
The FASB recently amended its guidance surrounding a company’s analysis to determine whether any of its variable interests constitute controlling financial interests in a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both of the following characteristics:
| a. | The power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. |
8
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
| b. | The obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. |
Additionally, an enterprise is required to assess whether it has an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a variable interest entity operates as designed when determining whether it has the power to direct the activities of the variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. The new guidance also requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The guidance is effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009 and, accordingly, we will reevaluate our interests in variable interest entities for the period beginning on January 1, 2010 to determine that the entities are reflected properly in the financial statements as investments or consolidated entities. We do not anticipate that the implementation of this guidance will have any material effect on our financial statements.
3. | Earnings per Common Unit |
Basic earnings (loss) per common unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common unitholders by the weighted average number of common OP units outstanding. Diluted earnings per common unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common unitholders as adjusted for potentially dilutive securities, by the weighted average number of common OP units outstanding plus potentially dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include units distributed to Host for Host common shares granted under comprehensive stock plans, preferred OP units held by non-controlling partners and exchangeable debt securities. No effect is shown for securities that are anti-dilutive.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | Year to date ended | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | | | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | |
| | (in millions, except per unit amounts) | |
| | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (58 | ) | | $ | 47 | | | $ | (186 | ) | | $ | 303 | |
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | | | 1 | | | | (5 | ) |
Distributions on preferred units | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | (6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) available to common unitholders | | | (58 | ) | | | 48 | | | | (191 | ) | | | 292 | |
Assuming deduction of gain recognized for the repurchase of 2004 Debentures (a) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings (loss) available to common unitholders | | $ | (58 | ) | | $ | 48 | | | $ | (193 | ) | | $ | 292 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Basic weighted average units outstanding | | | 617.9 | | | | 541.6 | | | | 581.7 | | | | 542.5 | |
Diluted weighted average units outstanding | | | 617.9 | | | | 542.0 | | | | 583.0 | | | | 542.9 | |
| | | | |
Basic earnings (loss) per unit | | $ | (.09 | ) | | $ | .09 | | | $ | (.33 | ) | | $ | .54 | |
Diluted earnings (loss) per unit | | $ | (.09 | ) | | $ | .09 | | | $ | (.33 | ) | | $ | .54 | |
(a) | During the first quarter of 2009, we repurchased $75 million face amount of the 2004 Debentures with a carrying value of $72 million for $69 million. The adjustments to dilutive earnings per common unit related to the 2004 Debentures repurchased during the year include the $3 million gain on repurchase, net of interest expense on the repurchased debentures. |
9
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Property and equipment consists of the following as of:
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | December 31, 2008 | |
| | (in millions) | |
Land and land improvements | | $ | 1,575 | | | $ | 1,613 | |
Buildings and leasehold improvements | | | 11,426 | | | | 11,502 | |
Furniture and equipment | | | 1,788 | | | | 1,749 | |
Construction in progress | | | 129 | | | | 174 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 14,918 | | | | 15,038 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (4,582 | ) | | | (4,299 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 10,336 | | | $ | 10,739 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Impairment of Property and Equipment
We analyze our assets for impairment when events or circumstances occur that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. We consider a property to be impaired when the sum of future undiscounted cash flows during our remaining estimated holding period is less than the carrying value of the asset. For impaired assets, we record an impairment charge equal to the excess of the property’s carrying value over its fair value.
During 2009, we reviewed our hotel portfolio for impairment and identified several properties that may be sold prior to the end of their previously estimated useful lives or that had current or projected operating losses or other events or circumstances indicating a reduction in value or change in intended use. Properties exhibiting these characteristics are tested for impairment based on management’s estimate of expected future undiscounted cash flows from operations and sale during our expected remaining hold period. The fair value of these properties is generally determined based on either a discounted cash flow analysis or negotiated sales price. Based on these assessments, we have recorded non-cash impairment charges totaling $97 million for the year-to-date period ended September 11, 2009. There were no impairment charges recorded during the third quarter of 2009. Impairment charges are classified within depreciation and amortization on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. For year-to-date 2009, discontinued operations include a non-cash impairment charge of $31 million.
5. | Investments in Affiliates |
We hold a 32.1% ownership interest in a joint venture based in Europe that owns 11 hotel properties located in six countries. The terms of this joint venture agreement limit the life of the investment to 2016, with two one-year extensions. We review our investment in the joint venture for other than temporary impairment based on the occurrence of any events that would indicate that the carrying amount of the investment exceeds its fair value on an other than temporary basis. We used certain inputs such as available third-party appraisals and forecast net operating income for the hotel properties to estimate the fair value of our investment in the joint venture as of September 11, 2009. During the second quarter of 2009, we determined that our investment was impaired based on the reduction of anticipated distributable cash flows from the joint venture, which was caused primarily by a decline in cash flows generated by the properties. We believe this impairment to be other than temporary as defined by GAAP because the time period over which the joint venture may be able to improve operations such that our investment would be fully recoverable is limited by the remaining life of the joint venture. As a result, in the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge totaling $34 million based on the difference between the estimated fair value and carrying value of our investment. This impairment is included in equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. There were no impairment charges recorded in the third quarter of 2009 for our joint venture investment in Europe.
10
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
On September 11, 2009, we sold our remaining 3.6% limited partnership interest in CBM Joint Venture Limited Partnership (“CBM JV”) for approximately $13 million and recorded the gain on property transaction of $5 million, net of taxes. As a result of this transaction, we no longer have any ownership interest in CBM JV. The net loss for the third quarter of 2009 includes a $12 million tax benefit related to the reversal of an excess deferred tax liability that was established in prior periods associated with our investment.
Credit Facility. On September 11, 2009, we prepaid the entire $210 million term loan outstanding at December 31, 2008 under our credit facility and currently have $600 million of available capacity on the revolver portion of the credit facility.
Exchangeable Debentures. The total face amount of the Debentures is $876 million, as of September 11, 2009. The Debentures are equal in right of payment with all of our other senior notes. There are $325 million in 2004 Debentures that mature April 2024; however, holders have the right to require us to repurchase the 2004 Debentures on April 15, 2010, April 15, 2014 and April 15, 2019 for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount. There are $551 million in 2007 Debentures that mature April 2027; however, holders have the right to require us to repurchase the 2007 Debentures on April 15, 2012, April 15, 2017 and April 15, 2022 for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount.
During the first quarter of 2009, we repurchased $75 million face amount of the 2004 Debentures with a carrying value of $72 million for $69 million. We recognized a $3 million gain on the transaction. During the third quarter of 2009, we repurchased approximately $49 million face amount of the 2007 Debentures with a carrying value of $44 million for $42 million. We recognized a $2 million gain on the transaction. The gain on the repurchased debentures is recorded in interest expense in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Since the fourth quarter of 2008, we have repurchased a total of $224 million face amount of the Debentures for approximately $193 million.
Mortgage Debt. On July 1, 2009, we repaid the $175 million mortgage debt secured by the San Diego Marriott Hotel & Marina at maturity. Additionally, on September 1, 2009, we prepaid the $135 million Westin Kierland Resort & Spa mortgage loan, which was due on December 1, 2009.
Distributions. On September 14, 2009, Host’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.25 per share of common stock. The dividend will be paid on December 18, 2009 to stockholders of record as of November 6, 2009. In reliance on the specific terms of the guidance issued by the IRS and, subject to certain elections by Host’s stockholders, Host will pay approximately 90% of the dividend with Host common stock, with the remaining 10% paid with cash. Host LP similarly intends to make a $.025 per unit distribution to Host and non-controlling holders of common OP units. Common OP unitholders will not, however, participate in the portion of the dividend being paid with shares of Host common stock and will not receive any Host common stock or additional common OP units. Instead, the ratio (currently 1:1) at which each common OP unitholder can convert its common OP units to shares of Host common stock will be proportionately adjusted to reflect the issuance of additional shares of Host common stock as a taxable stock dividend similar to the adjustment that would occur had Host effected a stock split. Accordingly, this means the equivalency of OP units and Host common stock will no longer be maintained. Host intends to continue paying a cash dividend on its preferred stock, regardless of its amount of taxable income, unless contractually restricted. The amount of any dividend will be determined by Host’s Board of Directors.
On September 14, 2009, Host’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.5546875 per share on its Class E cumulative redeemable preferred stock. The dividend was paid on October 15, 2009 to preferred stockholders of record as of September 30, 2009. Accordingly, we made a similar distribution on our preferred OP units.
11
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Common Stock Offering. On August 19, 2009, Host entered into a Sales Agency Financing Agreement with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, through which Host may issue and sell, from time to time, shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $400 million. The sales will be made in “at the market” offerings under SEC rules, including sales made directly on the New York Stock Exchange. BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC is acting as sales agent. Host has issued approximately 13 million shares of common stock through this program at an average price of approximately $10 per share for proceeds of $130 million, net of $1.3 million of commissions. The net proceeds were contributed to us in exchange for an equivalent number of OP units. Approximately $22 million of the proceeds were received after quarter end. Host may continue to sell shares of common stock under this program from time to time based on market conditions, although Host is not under an obligation to sell any shares.
Capital and limited partnership interests of third parties are allocated between controlling and non-controlling interests as follows (in millions):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Partners’ Capital of Host L.P. | | | Limited Partnership Interests of Third Parties | | | Non-controlling interests | | | Net Loss | |
Balance, December 31, 2008 | | $ | 5,588 | | | $ | 158 | | | $ | 24 | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | (181 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | $ | (186 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of common OP units | | | 611 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Changes in ownership | | | 30 | | | | (30 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) (note 9) | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, September 11, 2009 | | $ | 6,049 | | | $ | 124 | | | $ | 22 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | Partners’ Capital of Host L.P. | | | Limited Partnership Interests of Third Parties | | | Non-controlling interests | | | Net Loss | |
Balance, December 31, 2007 | | | 5,424 | | | | 312 | | | | 28 | | | | | |
Net income | | | 285 | | | | 13 | | | | 5 | | | $ | 303 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Changes in ownership | | | (208 | ) | | | (19 | ) | | | (7 | ) | | | | |
Other comprehensive loss | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, September 5, 2008 | | $ | 5,500 | | | $ | 306 | | | $ | 26 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We consider each one of our hotels to be an operating segment, none of which meets the threshold for a reportable segment. We also allocate resources and assess operating performance based on individual hotels. All of our other real estate investment activities (primarily our leased hotels and office buildings) are immaterial and meet the aggregation criteria, and thus, we report one segment: hotel ownership. Our foreign operations consist of four properties located in Canada, two properties located in Chile and one property located in Mexico. There were no intercompany sales during the periods presented. The following table presents total revenues for each of the geographical areas in which we operate:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | Year-to-date ended |
| | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 | | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 |
| | (in millions) |
United States | | $ | 883 | | $ | 1,102 | | $ | 2,752 | | $ | 3,436 |
Canada | | | 20 | | | 23 | | | 61 | | | 81 |
Chile | | | 5 | | | 7 | | | 15 | | | 22 |
Mexico | | | 4 | | | 7 | | | 11 | | | 19 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | $ | 912 | | $ | 1,139 | | $ | 2,839 | | $ | 3,558 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
12
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Other comprehensive income consists of unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency translation adjustments and hedging instruments.
The following table presents comprehensive income for all periods presented:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | Year-to-date ended | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | | | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | |
| | (in millions) | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (58 | ) | | $ | 47 | | | $ | (186 | ) | | $ | 303 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (4 | ) | | | (5 | ) | | | 1 | | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | | (62 | ) | | | 42 | | | | (185 | ) | | | 302 | |
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to the non-controlling interests | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | | | 1 | | | | (5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. | | $ | (60 | ) | | $ | 45 | | | $ | (184 | ) | | $ | 297 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dispositions. In the third quarter of 2009, we sold four properties: the 448-room Sheraton Stamford, the 253-room Washington Dulles Marriott Suites, the 430-room Boston Marriott Newton and the 353-room Hanover Marriott for net proceeds of approximately $90 million. We recorded an aggregate gain of approximately $9 million, net of tax. In the first quarter of 2009, we sold the Hyatt Regency Boston for approximately $113 million, including the return of cash reserves held by the manager, and recorded a gain on the disposition of approximately $20 million, net of tax. The following table summarizes the revenues, income (loss) before taxes, and the gain on dispositions, net of tax, for the five properties which have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | Year-to-date ended |
| | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 | | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 |
| | (in millions) |
Revenues | | $ | 6 | | $ | 30 | | $ | 40 | | | $ | 89 |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | 2 | | | 5 | | | (29 | ) | | | 13 |
Gain on dispositions, net of tax | | | 9 | | | 13 | | | 26 | | | | 24 |
Net income attributable to common unitholders is allocated between continuing and discontinued operations as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | Year-to-date ended |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 |
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax | | $ | (67 | ) | | $ | 32 | | $ | (182 | ) | | $ | 262 |
Discontinued operations, net of tax | | | 11 | | | | 18 | | | (3 | ) | | | 36 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | | $ | (56 | ) | | $ | 50 | | $ | (185 | ) | | $ | 298 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
13
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
11. | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities and other financial instruments are shown below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | December 31, 2008 |
| | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
| | (in millions) |
Financial assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Notes receivable | | $ | 12 | | $ | 12 | | $ | 12 | | $ | 12 |
Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior notes | | | 3,410 | | | 3,326 | | | 3,027 | | | 2,297 |
Exchangeable senior debentures | | | 822 | | | 816 | | | 916 | | | 743 |
Credit facility (including the $210 million term loan) | | | — | | | — | | | 410 | | | 378 |
Mortgage debt and other, net of capital leases | | | 1,306 | | | 1,219 | | | 1,522 | | | 1,501 |
Notes receivable and other financial assets are valued based on expected future cash flows discounted at risk-adjusted rates. Valuations for secured debt and our credit facility are determined based on expected future payments discounted at risk-adjusted rates. Due to continuing uncertainty in the credit markets, third party estimates for the risk adjusted rate for each loan is not readily attainable. Management has estimated the rate based upon available market data and estimates of the fair value of the property securing the mortgage. Senior notes and the exchangeable senior debentures are valued based on quoted market prices. The fair values of financial instruments not included in this table are estimated to be equal to their carrying amounts.
We are involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business. On April 27, 2005, we initiated suit against Keystone-Texas Property Holding Corporation (“Keystone”) in the 73rd Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas, Case No. 05-CI-14229, seeking a declaration that a provision of our ground lease for the property under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter was valid and claiming that Keystone had breached that lease provision. On April 6, 2006, a Bexar County Court granted an interlocutory motion for summary judgment that the provision was not valid and the lease provision had not been breached. On October 18, 2006, Keystone filed an amended counterclaim and later, a third party claim, alleging that we tortiously interfered with Keystone’s attempted sale of the property and that we slandered Keystone’s title to the property. We believe that we were asserting rights that parties had recognized as valid in past dealings. Keystone is seeking between $30 million and $40 million in damages. A jury trial on Keystone’s amended counterclaim and third party claim potentially could begin as early as mid-January 2010. We believe that our actions were entirely lawful and that Keystone’s claims are without merit.
We are vigorously defending this claim; however, no assurance can be given as to the outcome of any pending legal proceedings. We do not believe that the final resolution will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
13. | Supplemental Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Subsidiary Information |
A portion of our subsidiaries guarantee our senior notes. Among the subsidiaries not providing guarantees are those owning 24 of our full-service hotels, our taxable REIT subsidiaries and all of their respective subsidiaries, and HMH HPT RIBM LLC and HMH HPT CBM LLC, the lessees of the Residence Inn and Courtyard properties, respectively. The separate financial statements of each guaranteeing subsidiary (each, a “Guarantor Subsidiary”) are not presented because we have concluded that such financial statements are not material to investors. The guarantee of each Guarantor Subsidiary is full and unconditional and joint and several and each Guarantor Subsidiary is wholly owned.
14
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following condensed consolidating information sets forth the financial position as of September 11, 2009 and December 31, 2008, results of operations for the quarter and year-to-date periods ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008 and cash flows for the year-to-date periods ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008 of the parent, Guarantor Subsidiaries and the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries:
Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
(in millions)
September 11, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | | Consolidated |
Property and equipment, net | | $ | 738 | | | $ | 4,883 | | $ | 4,715 | | $ | — | | | $ | 10,336 |
Due from managers | | | (1 | ) | | | 5 | | | 51 | | | (3 | ) | | | 52 |
Investments in affiliates | | | 5,837 | | | | 1,977 | | | 27 | | | (7,697 | ) | | | 144 |
Rent receivable | | | — | | | | 32 | | | — | | | (32 | ) | | | — |
Deferred financing costs, net | | | 37 | | | | 1 | | | 8 | | | — | | | | 46 |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund | | | 38 | | | | 44 | | | 57 | | | — | | | | 139 |
Other | | | 467 | | | | 40 | | | 351 | | | (578 | ) | | | 280 |
Restricted cash | | | — | | | | — | | | 49 | | | — | | | | 49 |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 765 | | | | 26 | | | 228 | | | — | | | | 1,019 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 7,881 | | | $ | 7,008 | | $ | 5,486 | | $ | (8,310 | ) | | $ | 12,065 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt | | $ | 1,525 | | | $ | 2,976 | | $ | 1,331 | | $ | (293 | ) | | $ | 5,539 |
Rent payable | | | — | | | | — | | | 32 | | | (32 | ) | | | — |
Other liabilities | | | 183 | | | | 274 | | | 162 | | | (288 | ) | | | 331 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 1,708 | | | | 3,250 | | | 1,525 | | | (613 | ) | | | 5,870 |
Limited partnership interests of third parties | | | 124 | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | 124 |
Partners’ capital | | | 6,049 | | | | 3,758 | | | 3,939 | | | (7,697 | ) | | | 6,049 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | | | 7,881 | | | | 7,008 | | | 5,464 | | | (8,310 | ) | | | 12,043 |
Non-controlling interests — other consolidated partnerships | | | — | | | | — | | | 22 | | | — | | | | 22 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities, limited partnership interest of third parties and capital | | $ | 7,881 | | | $ | 7,008 | | $ | 5,486 | | $ | (8,310 | ) | | $ | 12,065 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
15
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
December 31, 2008
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | | Consolidated |
Property and equipment, net | | $ | 831 | | | $ | 5,128 | | | $ | 4,780 | | $ | — | | | $ | 10,739 |
Due from managers | | | (19 | ) | | | — | | | | 85 | | | (1 | ) | | | 65 |
Investments in affiliates | | | 6,212 | | | | 2,043 | | | | 34 | | | (8,060 | ) | | | 229 |
Rent receivable | | | — | | | | 36 | | | | — | | | (36 | ) | | | — |
Deferred financing costs, net | | | 38 | | | | 1 | | | | 7 | | | — | | | | 46 |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund | | | 37 | | | | 42 | | | | 41 | | | (1 | ) | | | 119 |
Other | | | 514 | | | | 39 | | | | 221 | | | (576 | ) | | | 198 |
Restricted cash | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | 44 | | | 1 | | | | 44 |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 255 | | | | 44 | | | | 209 | | | — | | | | 508 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 7,868 | | | $ | 7,332 | | | $ | 5,421 | | $ | (8,673 | ) | | $ | 11,948 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt | | $ | 1,975 | | | $ | 2,842 | | | $ | 1,397 | | $ | (338 | ) | | $ | 5,876 |
Rent payable | | | — | | | | — | | | | 36 | | | (36 | ) | | | — |
Other liabilities | | | 147 | | | | 239 | | | | 155 | | | (239 | ) | | | 302 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 2,122 | | | | 3,081 | | | | 1,588 | | | (613 | ) | | | 6,178 |
Limited partnership interests of third parties | | | 158 | | | | — | | | | — | | | — | | | | 158 |
Partners’ capital | | | 5,588 | | | | 4,251 | | | | 3,809 | | | (8,060 | ) | | | 5,588 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | | | 7,868 | | | | 7,332 | | | | 5,397 | | | (8,673 | ) | | | 11,924 |
Non-controlling interests — other consolidated partnerships | | | — | | | | — | | | | 24 | | | — | | | | 24 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities, limited partnership interest of third parties and capital | | $ | 7,868 | | | $ | 7,332 | | | $ | 5,421 | | $ | (8,673 | ) | | $ | 11,948 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
16
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
(in millions)
Quarter ended September 11, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Eliminations | | | Consolidated | |
REVENUES | | $ | 6 | | | $ | 131 | | | $ | 892 | | | $ | (117 | ) | | $ | 912 | |
Hotel operating expenses | | | — | | | | — | | | | (670 | ) | | | — | | | | (670 | ) |
Property-level expenses | | | (7 | ) | | | (34 | ) | | | (54 | ) | | | — | | | | (95 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (13 | ) | | | (65 | ) | | | (60 | ) | | | — | | | | (138 | ) |
Corporate and other expenses | | | (2 | ) | | | (9 | ) | | | (8 | ) | | | — | | | | (19 | ) |
Rental expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | (117 | ) | | | 117 | | | | — | |
Interest income | | | 3 | | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | (4 | ) | | | 1 | |
Interest expense | | | (64 | ) | | | (15 | ) | | | (20 | ) | | | 4 | | | | (95 | ) |
Net gains on property transactions | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 10 | | | | — | | | | 11 | |
Gain on foreign currency and derivatives | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | |
Equity in earnings of affiliates | | | 5 | | | | 6 | | | | — | | | | (13 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (70 | ) | | | 14 | | | | (25 | ) | | | (13 | ) | | | (94 | ) |
Benefit for income taxes | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 24 | | | | — | | | | 25 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | | | (69 | ) | | | 14 | | | | (1 | ) | | | (13 | ) | | | (69 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations | | | 11 | | | | 2 | | | | 1 | | | | (3 | ) | | | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | | | (58 | ) | | | 16 | | | | — | | | | (16 | ) | | | (58 | ) |
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2 | | | | — | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts L.P. | | $ | (58 | ) | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | (16 | ) | | $ | (56 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Quarter ended September 5, 2008 | |
| | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Eliminations | | | Consolidated | |
REVENUES | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 138 | | | $ | 1,120 | | | $ | (154 | ) | | $ | 1,139 | |
Hotel operating expenses | | | — | | | | — | | | | (788 | ) | | | — | | | | (788 | ) |
Property-level expenses | | | (6 | ) | | | (34 | ) | | | (49 | ) | | | — | | | | (89 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (13 | ) | | | (60 | ) | | | (57 | ) | | | — | | | | (130 | ) |
Corporate and other expenses | | | (2 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | — | | | | (14 | ) |
Rental expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | (154 | ) | | | 154 | | | | — | |
Interest income | | | 5 | | | | 1 | | | | 4 | | | | (6 | ) | | | 4 | |
Interest expense | | | (54 | ) | | | (20 | ) | | | (22 | ) | | | 6 | | | | (90 | ) |
Net gains on property transactions | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Equity in earnings of affiliates | | | 65 | | | | 29 | | | | — | | | | (93 | ) | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 29 | | | | 48 | | | | 49 | | | | (93 | ) | | | 33 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | | | 29 | | | | 48 | | | | 45 | | | | (93 | ) | | | 29 | |
Income from discontinued operations | | | 18 | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | | 47 | | | | 48 | | | | 46 | | | | (94 | ) | | | 47 | |
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | — | | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts L.P. | | $ | 47 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 49 | | | $ | (94 | ) | | $ | 50 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
17
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
(in millions)
Year-to-date ended September 11, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Eliminations | | | Consolidated | |
REVENUES | | $ | 135 | | | $ | 369 | | | $ | 2,780 | | | $ | (445 | ) | | $ | 2,839 | |
Hotel operating expenses | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,975 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,975 | ) |
Property-level expenses | | | (17 | ) | | | (99 | ) | | | (155 | ) | | | — | | | | (271 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (88 | ) | | | (215 | ) | | | (175 | ) | | | — | | | | (478 | ) |
Corporate and other expenses | | | (3 | ) | | | (24 | ) | | | (23 | ) | | | — | | | | (50 | ) |
Rental expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | (445 | ) | | | 445 | | | | — | |
Interest income | | | 10 | | | | 1 | | | | 8 | | | | (14 | ) | | | 5 | |
Interest expense | | | (159 | ) | | | (62 | ) | | | (57 | ) | | | 14 | | | | (264 | ) |
Net gains on property transactions | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 12 | | | | — | | | | 13 | |
Gain on foreign currency and derivatives | | | 4 | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 5 | |
Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates | | | (66 | ) | | | 35 | | | | — | | | | (5 | ) | | | (36 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (183 | ) | | | 5 | | | | (29 | ) | | | (5 | ) | | | (212 | ) |
Benefit for income taxes | | | — | | | | — | | | | 29 | | | | — | | | | 29 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | | | (183 | ) | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | (5 | ) | | | (183 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (3 | ) | | | (11 | ) | | | 2 | | | | 9 | | | | (3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | | | (186 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | 2 | | | | 4 | | | | (186 | ) |
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts L.P. | | $ | (186 | ) | | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | (185 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Year-to-date ended September 5, 2008 | |
| | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Eliminations | | | Consolidated | |
REVENUES | | $ | 363 | | | $ | 381 | | | $ | 3,502 | | | $ | (688 | ) | | $ | 3,558 | |
Hotel operating expenses | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,357 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,357 | ) |
Property-level expenses | | | (17 | ) | | | (105 | ) | | | (142 | ) | | | — | | | | (264 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (40 | ) | | | (175 | ) | | | (162 | ) | | | — | | | | (377 | ) |
Corporate and other expenses | | | (4 | ) | | | (21 | ) | | | (20 | ) | | | — | | | | (45 | ) |
Gain on insurance settlement | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7 | | | | — | | | | 7 | |
Rental expense | | | — | | | | — | | | | (688 | ) | | | 688 | | | | — | |
Interest income | | | 16 | | | | 4 | | | | 13 | | | | (20 | ) | | | 13 | |
Interest expense | | | (151 | ) | | | (71 | ) | | | (60 | ) | | | 20 | | | | (262 | ) |
Net gains on property transactions | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | — | | | | 2 | |
Equity in earnings of affiliates | | | 101 | | | | 53 | | | | 2 | | | | (153 | ) | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 267 | | | | 66 | | | | 98 | | | | (153 | ) | | | 278 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | — | | | | — | | | | (11 | ) | | | — | | | | (11 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | | | 267 | | | | 66 | | | | 87 | | | | (153 | ) | | | 267 | |
Income from discontinued operations | | | 36 | | | | 12 | | | | 2 | | | | (14 | ) | | | 36 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME | | | 303 | | | | 78 | | | | 89 | | | | (167 | ) | | | 303 | |
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5 | ) | | | — | | | | (5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to Host Hotels & Resorts L.P. | | $ | 303 | | | $ | 78 | | | $ | 84 | | | $ | (167 | ) | | $ | 298 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
18
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
Year-to-date ended September 11, 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Consolidated | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by (used in) operations | | $ | (24 | ) | | $ | 191 | | | $ | 203 | | | $ | 370 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sales of assets, net | | | 30 | | | | 143 | | | | 26 | | | | 199 | |
Proceeds from sale of interest in CBM Joint Venture LLC | | | 13 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13 | |
Investments in and return of capital from affiliates, net | | | 39 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 39 | |
Capital expenditures | | | (19 | ) | | | (120 | ) | | | (116 | ) | | | (255 | ) |
Change in furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement fund | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (16 | ) | | | (20 | ) |
Changes in restricted cash designated for FF&E replacement fund | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | (7 | ) | | | (11 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | | 61 | | | | 17 | | | | (113 | ) | | | (35 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financing costs | | | (6 | ) | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | (10 | ) |
Issuances of debt | | | 386 | | | | — | | | | 120 | | | | 506 | |
Repayments on credit facility | | | (410 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (410 | ) |
Repurchase of senior notes, including exchangeable debentures | | | (115 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (115 | ) |
Debt prepayments and scheduled maturities | | | — | | | | (207 | ) | | | (135 | ) | | | (342 | ) |
Scheduled principal repayments | | | — | | | | (3 | ) | | | (8 | ) | | | (11 | ) |
Common stock issuance | | | 588 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 588 | |
Distributions on common units | | | (27 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (27 | ) |
Distributions on preferred units | | | (7 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (7 | ) |
Distributions to non-controlling interests | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) |
Change in restricted cash, other than FF&E replacement fund | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | 6 | |
Transfers to/from Parent | | | 64 | | | | (19 | ) | | | (45 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 473 | | | | (226 | ) | | | (71 | ) | | | 176 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | $ | 510 | | | $ | (18 | ) | | $ | 19 | | | $ | 511 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
19
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
Year-to-Date ended September 5, 2008
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries | | | Consolidated | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by operations | | $ | 228 | | | $ | 205 | | | $ | 282 | | | $ | 715 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sales of assets, net | | | 15 | | | | 23 | | | | — | | | | 38 | |
Investment in affiliates | | | (18 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (18 | ) |
Capital expenditures | | | (36 | ) | | | (220 | ) | | | (207 | ) | | | (463 | ) |
Change in furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E) reserves | | | (9 | ) | | | 16 | | | | (6 | ) | | | 1 | |
Change in restricted cash designated for FF&E reserves | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Other | | | (9 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (9 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash used in investing activities | | | (57 | ) | | | (181 | ) | | | (212 | ) | | | (450 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financing costs | | | (3 | ) | | | — | | | | (5 | ) | | | (8 | ) |
Issuances of debt | | | 210 | | | | — | | | | 300 | | | | 510 | |
Debt prepayments | | | — | | | | — | | | | (211 | ) | | | (211 | ) |
Scheduled principal repayments | | | — | | | | (4 | ) | | | (8 | ) | | | (12 | ) |
Stock repurchase | | | (100 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (100 | ) |
Distributions on common OP units | | | (433 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (433 | ) |
Distributions on preferred OP units | | | (7 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (7 | ) |
Distributions to minority interest | | | — | | | | — | | | | (7 | ) | | | (7 | ) |
Change in restricted cash | | | — | | | | 3 | | | | 6 | | | | 9 | |
Transfers to/from Parent | | | 128 | | | | (32 | ) | | | (96 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash used in financing activities | | | (205 | ) | | | (33 | ) | | | (21 | ) | | | (259 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | $ | (34 | ) | | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 49 | | | $ | 6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
20
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is a Maryland corporation and operates as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. owns properties and conducts operations through Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership of which Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is the sole general partner and in which it holds approximately 98% of the partnership interests as of September 11, 2009. In this report, we use the terms “we” or “our” to refer to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. together, unless the context indicates otherwise. We also use the term “Host” to specifically refer to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and the terms “operating partnership” or “Host LP” to refer to Host Hotels & Resorts, L.P. in cases where it is important to distinguish between Host and Host LP.
Forward-Looking Statements
In this report on Form 10-Q, we make some forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “expect,” “may,” “intend,” “predict,” “project,” “plan,” “will,” “estimate” and other similar terms and phrases. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance that involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated at the time the forward-looking statements are made. These risks and uncertainties include those risk factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that we will attain these expectations or that any deviations will not be material. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we disclaim any obligations or undertaking to publicly release updates to any forward-looking statement contained in this report to conform the statement to actual results or changes in our expectations.
Outlook
We currently own 112 hotel properties, which operate primarily in the luxury and upper upscale hotel sectors. For a general overview of our business and a discussion of our reporting periods, see our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The current economic outlook remains unpredictable both in the United States and internationally. While the operating results for our properties were slightly better than expected in the third quarter, we expect trends affecting overall lodging demand to continue to be weak for the remainder of 2009 and at least into the first half of 2010. We do not anticipate an increase in lodging demand until several economic indicators, particularly U.S. GDP, business investment, employment, corporate profits and consumer spending, experience sustained quarter-over-quarter growth. In addition, we expect that luxury hotels will continue to underperform other property types in the near term as consumers continue to stay at less expensive alternatives. As a result of the current economy and the slowly recovering credit market, increases in lodging supply will likely slow significantly over the next few years. This may be particularly relevant for the markets and lodging sectors in which we compete due to the long-term planning and high level of investment associated with these properties.
As we described above, we expect the economic fundamentals will continue to negatively affect the group and transient demand segments for the remainder of 2009 and in 2010. We believe occupancy, currently near historical lows, will begin to improve, but we expect continued pressure on the average room rate until demand increases significantly. In addition, we expect that reduced travel and concerns over corporate expenditures will continue to diminish booking activity and reduce attendance at group events, resulting in lower banquet, food and beverage and other revenues. Similarly, the reduction in corporate travel budgets will continue to negatively affect transient business travel. We have experienced some slowing of the negative trends in recent periods. While our group booking pace is still below 2008 levels, we have noticed an increase in short-term bookings as the year has progressed. However, it remains difficult to accurately forecast group demand. In addition, meeting planners are taking advantage of historically high room availability, which has resulted in a shift in pricing power and lower average room rates.
21
The general economic trends discussed above make it difficult to predict our future operating results. We may experience further declines in hotel revenues or earnings at our properties for any number of reasons, including, but not limited to, greater than anticipated weakness in the economy, changes in travel patterns and the continued impact of the trends identified above.
Results of Operations
The following table reflects certain line items from our statements of operations and other significant operating statistics (in millions, except operating statistics and percentages):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | | | % Increase (Decrease) | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total hotel sales | | $ | 890 | | | $ | 1,117 | | | (20.3 | )% |
Operating costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property-level costs (1) | | | 903 | | | | 1,007 | | | (10.3 | ) |
Corporate and other expenses | | | 19 | | | | 14 | | | 35.7 | |
Operating profit (loss) | | | (10 | ) | | | 118 | | | N/M | (4) |
Interest expense | | | 95 | | | | 90 | | | 5.6 | |
Loss attributable to non-controlling interests | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | | (33.3 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations | | | 11 | | | | 18 | | | (38.9 | ) |
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | | | (56 | ) | | | 50 | | | N/M | |
| | | |
All hotel operating statistics (2): | | | | | | | | | | | |
RevPAR | | $ | 108.49 | | | $ | 137.75 | | | (21.2 | )% |
Average room rate | | $ | 154.90 | | | $ | 184.53 | | | (16.1 | )% |
Average occupancy | | | 70.0 | % | | | 74.7 | % | | (4.7 | ) pts. |
Comparable hotel operating statistics (3): | | | | | | | | | | | |
RevPAR | | $ | 108.85 | | | $ | 138.34 | | | (21.3 | )% |
Average room rate | | $ | 155.00 | | | $ | 184.96 | | | (16.2 | )% |
Average occupancy | | | 70.2 | % | | | 74.8 | % | | (4.6 | ) pts. |
22
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year-to-date ended | | | | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | | | % Increase (Decrease) | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total hotel sales | | $ | 2,763 | | | $ | 3,479 | | | (20.6 | )% |
Operating costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property-level costs (1) | | | 2,724 | | | | 2,998 | | | (9.1 | ) |
Corporate and other expenses | | | 50 | | | | 45 | | | 11.1 | |
Gain on insurance settlement | | | — | | | | 7 | | | N/M | |
Operating profit | | | 65 | | | | 522 | | | (87.5 | ) |
Interest expense | | | 264 | | | | 262 | | | 0.8 | |
(Income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests | | | 1 | | | | (5 | ) | | N/M | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | | (3 | ) | | | 36 | | | N/M | |
Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders | | | (185 | ) | | | 298 | | | N/M | |
| | | |
All hotel operating statistics (2): | | | | | | | | | | | |
RevPAR | | $ | 112.09 | | | $ | 144.07 | | | (22.2 | )% |
Average room rate | | $ | 169.40 | | | $ | 195.80 | | | (13.5 | )% |
Average occupancy | | | 66.2 | % | | | 73.6 | % | | (7.4 | ) pts. |
Comparable hotel operating statistics (3): | | | | | | | | | | | |
RevPAR | | $ | 112.73 | | | $ | 145.05 | | | (22.3 | )% |
Average room rate | | $ | 169.81 | | | $ | 196.76 | | | (13.7 | )% |
Average occupancy | | | 66.4 | % | | | 73.7 | % | | (7.3 | ) pts. |
(1) | Amount represents total operating costs and expenses per our condensed consolidated statements of operations less corporate expenses and gains on insurance settlement. |
(2) | Operating statistics are for all properties as of September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008 and include the results of operations for hotels we have sold prior to their disposition. |
(3) | Comparable hotel operating statistics for September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008 are based on 112 comparable hotels as of September 11, 2009. |
2009 Compared to 2008
Hotel Sales Overview
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | | | Year-to-date ended | | | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 | | % Increase (Decrease) | | | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 | | % Increase (Decrease) | |
| | (in millions) | | | | | (in millions) | | | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rooms | | $ | 579 | | $ | 736 | | (21.3 | )% | | $ | 1,707 | | $ | 2,179 | | (21.7 | )% |
Food and beverage | | | 242 | | | 304 | | (20.4 | ) | | | 831 | | | 1,062 | | (21.8 | ) |
Other | | | 69 | | | 77 | | (10.4 | ) | | | 225 | | | 238 | | (5.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total hotel sales | | $ | 890 | | $ | 1,117 | | (20.3 | ) | | $ | 2,763 | | $ | 3,479 | | (20.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hotel sales declined 20.3% and 20.6% for the quarter and year-to-date, respectively, reflecting continued weakness in the lodging industry. Revenues for properties sold or classified as held for sale in 2009 or 2008 have been reclassified as discontinued operations. See “Discontinued Operations” below.
We discuss operating results for our hotels on a comparable basis. Comparable hotels are those properties that we have owned for the entirety of the reporting periods being compared. Comparable hotels do not include the results of properties acquired or sold, or that incurred significant property damage and business interruption or large scale capital improvements during these periods. As of September 11, 2009, 112 hotels have been classified as comparable hotels. See “Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics” for a complete description of our comparable hotels. We discuss our operating results by property type (i.e. urban, suburban, resort/conference or airport), geographic region and mix of business (i.e. transient, group or contract).
23
Comparable hotel sales decreased 20.3% to approximately $901 million for the quarter and decreased 21.5% to approximately $2.8 billion year-to-date compared to last year. The revenue decline reflects the decrease in occupancy of 4.6 percentage points for the quarter and 7.3 percentage points year-to-date and a decrease in average room rates of 16.2% for the quarter and 13.7% year-to-date.
Food and beverage revenues for our comparable hotels decreased 20.3% for the quarter and 22.6% year-to-date compared to last year. The decrease in the quarter reflects a decline in both banquet and restaurant outlet revenues. Other revenues for our comparable hotels, which primarily represent spa, golf, parking, internet connectivity and attrition fees, decreased 10.9% for the quarter and 8.4% year-to-date.
Comparable Hotel Sales by Property Type
The following tables set forth performance information for our comparable hotels by property type as of September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008:
Comparable Hotels by Property Type (a)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of September 11, 2009 | | Quarter ended September 11, 2009 | | Quarter ended September 5, 2008 | | | |
| | No. of Properties | | No. of Rooms | | Average Room Rate | | Average Occupancy Percentages | | | RevPAR | | Average Room Rate | | Average Occupancy Percentages | | | RevPAR | | Percent Change in RevPAR | |
Urban | | 53 | | 34,481 | | $ | 166.19 | | 75.3 | % | | $ | 125.20 | | $ | 200.16 | | 77.8 | % | | $ | 155.73 | | (19.6 | )% |
Suburban | | 32 | | 12,121 | | | 130.21 | | 62.6 | | | | 81.56 | | | 154.00 | | 70.2 | | | | 108.17 | | (24.6 | ) |
Resort/Conference | | 13 | | 8,082 | | | 181.51 | | 58.7 | | | | 106.50 | | | 209.98 | | 67.3 | | | | 141.32 | | (24.6 | ) |
Airport | | 14 | | 6,955 | | | 107.88 | | 71.5 | | | | 77.13 | | | 130.89 | | 76.6 | | | | 100.25 | | (23.1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
All Types | | 112 | | 61,639 | | | 155.00 | | 70.2 | | | | 108.85 | | | 184.96 | | 74.8 | | | | 138.34 | | (21.3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | As of September 11, 2009 | | Year-to-Date ended September 11, 2009 | | Year-to-Date ended September 5, 2008 | | | |
| | No. of Properties | | No. of Rooms | | Average Room Rate | | Average Occupancy Percentages | | | RevPAR | | Average Room Rate | | Average Occupancy Percentages | | | RevPAR | | Percent Change in RevPAR | |
Urban | | 53 | | 34,481 | | $ | 178.48 | | 69.2 | % | | $ | 123.54 | | $ | 206.98 | | 75.5 | % | | $ | 156.25 | | (20.9 | )% |
Suburban | | 32 | | 12,121 | | | 139.21 | | 59.2 | | | | 82.37 | | | 159.30 | | 67.7 | | | | 107.87 | | (23.6 | ) |
Resort/Conference | | 13 | | 8,082 | | | 221.67 | | 63.7 | | | | 141.28 | | | 256.76 | | 73.8 | | | | 189.58 | | (25.5 | ) |
Airport | | 14 | | 6,955 | | | 116.70 | | 68.0 | | | | 79.41 | | | 137.11 | | 75.3 | | | | 103.23 | | (23.1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
All Types | | 112 | | 61,639 | | | 169.81 | | 66.4 | | | | 112.73 | | | 196.76 | | 73.7 | | | | 145.05 | | (22.3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | The reporting period for our comparable operating statistics for the year-to-date periods ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008 is from January 3, 2009 to September 11, 2009 and December 29, 2007 to September 5, 2008, respectively. For further discussion, see “Reporting Periods” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
During the third quarter of 2009, RevPAR decreased significantly across all of our hotel property types due to the overall decline in lodging demand. Our urban properties had the strongest quarter relative to other property types with a RevPAR decline of 19.6%. These properties were able to reduce the decline in RevPAR for the quarter relative to other property types as reductions in room rates served to induce occupancy.
24
Comparable Hotel Sales by Geographic Region
The following tables set forth performance information for our comparable hotels by geographic region as of September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008:
Comparable Hotels by Geographic Region (a)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of September 11, 2009 | | Quarter ended September 11, 2009 | | Quarter ended September 5, 2008 | | | |
| | No. of Properties | | No. of Rooms | | Average Room Rate | | Average Occupancy Percentages | | | RevPAR | | Average Room Rate | | Average Occupancy Percentages | | | RevPAR | | Percent Change in RevPAR | |
Pacific | | 27 | | 15,943 | | $ | 158.93 | | 75.6 | % | | $ | 120.11 | | $ | 193.33 | | 80.9 | % | | $ | 156.43 | | (23.2 | )% |
Mid-Atlantic | | 10 | | 8,330 | | | 195.30 | | 80.2 | | | | 156.62 | | | 261.70 | | 82.2 | | | | 215.15 | | (27.2 | ) |
North Central | | 14 | | 6,204 | | | 129.60 | | 68.8 | | | | 89.17 | | | 153.95 | | 72.7 | | | | 111.91 | | (20.3 | ) |
Florida | | 9 | | 5,677 | | | 144.33 | | 58.1 | | | | 83.84 | | | 165.06 | | 67.8 | | | | 111.95 | | (25.1 | ) |
DC Metro | | 12 | | 5,416 | | | 164.33 | | 76.7 | | | | 126.11 | | | 175.45 | | 80.4 | | | | 140.98 | | (10.5 | ) |
New England | | 8 | | 4,293 | | | 155.79 | | 75.5 | | | | 117.60 | | | 176.16 | | 79.6 | | | | 140.22 | | (16.1 | ) |
South Central | | 9 | | 5,687 | | | 128.42 | | 64.1 | | | | 82.38 | | | 142.39 | | 62.7 | | | | 89.31 | | (7.8 | ) |
Mountain | | 8 | | 3,364 | | | 118.41 | | 55.0 | | | | 65.18 | | | 136.63 | | 65.6 | | | | 89.70 | | (27.3 | ) |
Atlanta | | 8 | | 4,252 | | | 144.45 | | 60.5 | | | | 87.34 | | | 160.60 | | 66.4 | | | | 106.63 | | (18.1 | ) |
International | | 7 | | 2,473 | | | 139.39 | | 60.9 | | | | 84.83 | | | 171.67 | | 64.7 | | | | 111.05 | | (23.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
All Regions | | 112 | | 61,639 | | | 155.00 | | 70.2 | | | | 108.85 | | | 184.96 | | 74.8 | | | | 138.34 | | (21.3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | As of September 11, 2009 | | Year-to-Date ended September 11, 2009 | | Year-to-Date ended September 5, 2008 | | | |
| | No. of Properties | | No. of Rooms | | Average Room Rate | | Average Occupancy Percentages | | | RevPAR | | Average Room Rate | | Average Occupancy Percentages | | | RevPAR | | Percent Change in RevPAR | |
Pacific | | 27 | | 15,943 | | $ | 172.35 | | 68.6 | % | | $ | 118.24 | | $ | 201.37 | | 76.9 | % | | $ | 154.86 | | (23.7 | )% |
Mid-Atlantic | | 10 | | 8,330 | | | 203.13 | | 73.9 | | | | 150.17 | | | 258.16 | | 79.9 | | | | 206.39 | | (27.2 | ) |
North Central | | 14 | | 6,204 | | | 129.12 | | 60.6 | | | | 78.24 | | | 151.19 | | 66.5 | | | | 100.48 | | (22.1 | ) |
Florida | | 9 | | 5,677 | | | 189.56 | | 65.0 | | | | 123.22 | | | 218.67 | | 75.6 | | | | 165.31 | | (25.5 | ) |
DC Metro | | 12 | | 5,416 | | | 190.83 | | 75.4 | | | | 143.89 | | | 197.28 | | 76.4 | | | | 150.75 | | (4.6 | ) |
New England | | 8 | | 4,293 | | | 159.22 | | 62.1 | | | | 98.84 | | | 177.22 | | 74.0 | | | | 131.14 | | (24.6 | ) |
South Central | | 9 | | 5,687 | | | 144.63 | | 64.8 | | | | 93.72 | | | 160.63 | | 68.9 | | | | 110.60 | | (15.3 | ) |
Mountain | | 8 | | 3,364 | | | 154.81 | | 56.0 | | | | 86.67 | | | 173.01 | | 66.8 | | | | 115.57 | | (25.0 | ) |
Atlanta | | 8 | | 4,252 | | | 152.94 | | 59.9 | | | | 91.59 | | | 170.62 | | 68.4 | | | | 116.75 | | (21.5 | ) |
International | | 7 | | 2,473 | | | 138.55 | | 60.9 | | | | 84.39 | | | 172.50 | | 69.3 | | | | 119.60 | | (29.4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
All Regions | | 112 | | 61,639 | | | 169.81 | | 66.4 | | | | 112.73 | | | 196.76 | | 73.7 | | | | 145.05 | | (22.3 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | The reporting period for our comparable operating statistics for the year-to-date periods ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008 is from January 3, 2009 to September 11, 2009 and December 29, 2007 to September 5, 2008, respectively. For further discussion, see “Reporting Periods” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
For the third quarter of 2009, comparable hotel RevPAR declined significantly across all of our geographic regions when compared to the third quarter of 2008. Our South Central and DC Metro regions significantly outperformed the remainder of the portfolio, with RevPAR declines of 7.8% and 10.5%, respectively. The South Central region benefited from an increase in RevPAR of .3% at our San Antonio properties, as renovation work completed last year at the San Antonio Marriott Riverwalk, as well as an increase in citywide activity for the third quarter of 2009 helped the year-over-year comparison. For our DC Metro region, the downtown properties continued to benefit from strong government and government-related demand, as well as solid leisure business.
RevPAR in the New England region declined 16.1% for the quarter. City-wide room nights in Boston increased, however, they were at discounted rates. The results for the quarter were also negatively affected by two hotels that were under renovation during the quarter. Our Pacific region had a RevPAR decline of 23.2% for the quarter, however, results varied by market. The Seattle market outperformed the rest of the region as the hotels were able to induce demand through rate reductions. Our San Francisco market had a difficult quarter, particularly when compared to the third quarter of 2008, which had very strong transient and city-wide demand. The decline of 25.1% in our Florida region was driven by significant RevPAR declines at our Orlando World Center Marriott, as the hotel experienced a significant increase in group cancellations.
25
The Mid-Atlantic region underperformed the portfolio with a RevPAR decline of 27.2%. The decline was driven by a significant decrease in group demand. Transient demand was strong as international leisure business continued to increase throughout the quarter, however, the transient business was at discounted rates.
Hotels Sales by Business Mix.The majority of our customers fall into three broad groups: transient, group and contract business. The information below is derived from business mix data for 105 of our hotels for which business mix data is available from our managers. For further detail on our business mix, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In the third quarter of 2009, overall transient RevPAR decreased 20.2% when compared to 2008, reflecting a slight decline in total room nights and a decline in average rate of 20.0%. The decline primarily reflects a shift from the higher-rated premium and corporate business to the price-sensitive transient discount business. Demand in the premium and corporate business declined 12.4%, despite a decline in average rates of 24%, which led to a RevPAR decline of 33.5% in this business. This was slightly offset by the 6.9% growth in room nights from price-sensitive transient discount business during the quarter as customers, particularly leisure travelers, utilized discount programs implemented by our managers and third-party travel websites offering discounted rates.
During the third quarter, group RevPAR declined approximately 24.1% reflecting a decline in total room nights of 15.4% and a decline in average room rates of 10.3%. The decline in room rates was primarily due to corporate group discounts and short-term group rate concessions. The primary driver of the decline in room nights was a significant reduction in corporate group business of 42.9%. In addition to significant reductions in corporate group meetings, this also reflects low attendance at group meetings and groups increasingly renegotiating rates.
Property-level Operating Expenses
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | | | Year-to-Date ended | | | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 | | % Increase (Decrease) | | | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 | | % Increase (Decrease) | |
| | (in millions) | | | | | (in millions) | | | |
Rooms | | $ | 169 | | $ | 186 | | (9.1 | )% | | $ | 470 | | $ | 533 | | (11.8 | )% |
Food and beverage | | | 205 | | | 249 | | (17.7 | ) | | | 634 | | | 781 | | (18.8 | ) |
Hotel departmental expenses | | | 263 | | | 305 | | (13.8 | ) | | | 765 | | | 873 | | (12.4 | ) |
Management fees | | | 33 | | | 48 | | (31.3 | ) | | | 106 | | | 170 | | (37.6 | ) |
Other property-level expenses | | | 95 | | | 89 | | 6.7 | | | | 271 | | | 264 | | 2.7 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 138 | | | 130 | | 6.2 | | | | 478 | | | 377 | | 26.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total property- level operating expenses | | $ | 903 | | $ | 1,007 | | (10.3 | ) | | $ | 2,724 | | $ | 2,998 | | (9.1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The overall decrease in operating expenses is consistent with lower overall demand at our properties. These operating expenses, which are both fixed and variable, are primarily affected by changes in occupancy and inflation, though the effect on specific costs will vary. The primary drivers for the decline in these expenses were the decline in wages and benefits and a decline in controllable expenses such as food and beverages cost of goods sold, as hotel managers actively cut costs to manage operating margin decline. Wages and benefits declined approximately 11% and 13% for the quarter and year-to-date 2009, respectively, which represents approximately 44% and 45%, respectively, of the overall decrease in property-level operating expenses. Other controllable expenses declined approximately 18% and 21% for the quarter and year-to-date, respectively, which represents approximately 35% and 38%, respectively, of the overall decrease in property-level operating expenses. We expect these costs to continue to decline throughout 2009; however, consistent with the trend beginning in the third quarter, we believe the decline
26
will continue to moderate when compared to the first half of the year as implementation of contingency plans and cost saving measures increased over the course of 2008, making the comparison more difficult. Utilities decreased 17.3% and 12.4% for the quarter and year-to-date 2009, respectively.
Management fees are calculated as a percentage of total revenues, as well as the level of operating profit at each property. Therefore, the 31.3% and 37.6% decline above for the quarter and year-to-date 2009 correlates to the overall decline in revenues and operating profit at our hotels.
We identify properties to be tested for impairment based on certain events or circumstances that occur which indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable when compared to projected undiscounted cash flows. We test these properties for impairment based on management’s estimate of expected future undiscounted cash flows during our expected holding period. As a result of these analyses, we recorded non-cash property impairment charges totaling $97 million year-to-date based on the difference between the fair value of these properties and their carrying amounts. Of these property impairment charges, $31 million was included in discontinued operations. No impairment charges were recorded in the third quarter. Additionally, we evaluate the recoverability of our investment in affiliates based on our assessment of the fair value of our investment as compared to our carrying value. During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of $34 million with respect to our joint venture in Europe, which is included in equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates.
Corporate and Other Expenses.Corporate and other expenses primarily consist of employee salaries and bonuses and other costs such as employee stock-based compensation expense, travel, corporate insurance, audit fees, building rent and systems costs. The $5 million increase in corporate expenses for the quarter is primarily due to an increase in share-based payments expense, as executive compensation share-based costs returned to more normalized levels compared to the historically low executive compensation expense in 2008.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased $3 million for the quarter and $8 million year-to-date. The decrease is primarily due to lower interest rates during 2009.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $5 million for the quarter and $2 million year-to-date 2009, which includes $6 million and $7 million of non-cash interest expense for the quarters ended September 11, 2009 and September 5, 2008, respectively, on our debentures. Interest expense includes $19 million and $21 million of non-cash interest expense related to our debentures for year-to-date 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net gains on Property Transactions. In 2009, the increase in gains on property transactions for both the third quarter and year-to-date is primarily due to the gain of approximately $9 million (or $5 million, net of tax) related to the sale of our 3.6% limited partnership interest in CBM JV in the third quarter.
Equity in Earnings (losses) of Affiliates.Our share of income of affiliates decreased by $3 million and $39 million for the quarter and year-to-date, respectively. The year-to-date decline was primarily due to the $34 million non-cash impairment charge related to our investment in the joint venture in Europe described below. The quarter and year-to-date periods were also affected by the overall decline in operations at the hotels owned by the European joint venture.
27
Discontinued Operations.Discontinued operations consist of five hotels disposed of in 2009 and two hotels disposed of during 2008 and represent the results of operations and the gains on the disposition of these hotels during the periods. The following table summarizes the revenues, income before taxes, and the gain on dispositions, net of tax, of the hotels which have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | Year-to-Date ended |
| | September 11, 2009 | | September 5, 2008 | | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 |
| | (in millions) |
Revenue | | $ | 6 | | $ | 30 | | $ | 40 | | | $ | 89 |
Income (loss) before taxes | | | 2 | | | 5 | | | (29 | ) | | | 13 |
Gain on dispositions, net of tax | | | 9 | | | 13 | | | 26 | | | | 24 |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Requirements
We seek to maintain a capital structure and liquidity profile with an appropriate balance of cash, debt and equity to provide financial flexibility given the inherent volatility in the lodging industry. As the overall economic outlook continues to be uncertain, we have taken several steps to preserve capital, increase liquidity and extend debt maturities. Year-to-date, we have raised approximately $1.3 billion through debt and equity issuances, mortgage financings and hotel sales. We have used the proceeds from these transactions and available cash to repay $128 million face amount of senior notes and debentures at a discount of approximately $12 million, to repay $410 million outstanding under our credit facility and to repay $344 million in mortgage debt. We intend to use the remaining proceeds to repay debt, acquire new properties, invest in the existing portfolio through our capital expenditure program and to maintain higher than historical cash levels. We have also implemented several cash-saving initiatives at both the corporate and hotel levels. We believe, as a result of these efforts and the overall strength of our balance sheet, we have sufficient liquidity and access to the capital markets to withstand the decline in operating cash flow, pay our near-term debt maturities and fund our capital expenditure programs.
Host uses cash primarily for acquisitions, capital expenditures, debt payments and dividends to stockholders. As a REIT, Host is required to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gain, on an annual basis. During the fourth quarter of 2009, Host will satisfy its REIT distribution requirements by the issuance of dividends, approximately 90% of which will be in the form of Host common stock. Host LP will not issue corresponding OP units (see “Distribution Policy”). Funds used by Host to make the 10% cash distribution will be provided by Host LP.
Capital Resources. As a REIT, Host depends primarily on external sources of capital to finance future growth, including acquisitions, and to fund our near-term debt maturities and increase our liquidity.
On August 19, 2009, Host entered into a Sales Agency Financing Agreement with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, through which Host may issue and sell, from time to time, shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $400 million. The sales will be made in “at the market” offerings under SEC rules, including sales made directly on the New York Stock Exchange. BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC is acting as sales agent. Host has issued approximately 13 million shares of common stock through this program at an average price of $10 per share for proceeds of approximately $130 million, net of $1.3 million of commissions. Approximately $22 million of the proceeds were received subsequent to quarter end. The net proceeds were contributed to us in exchange for an equivalent number of OP units. Host may continue to sell shares of common stock under this program from time to time based on market conditions, although Host is not under an obligation to sell any shares.
28
Cash Balances.As of September 11, 2009, we had $1.0 billion of cash and cash equivalents, which was an increase of $511 million from December 31, 2008. We also currently have $600 million available under our credit facility.
Debt Transactions.In May 2009, Host’s Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to $750 million of senior notes and exchangeable debentures. We may purchase senior notes and exchangeable debentures through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers or, in some cases, through the early redemption of such securities pursuant to their terms. Repurchases of debt, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. Any refinancing or retirement before the maturity date would affect earnings and Funds From Operations, or FFO, per diluted unit, as defined below, as a result of the payment of any applicable call premiums and the acceleration of previously deferred financing costs. We currently have $708 million remaining under this program. See “Cash Provided by Financing Transactions” for detail on our 2009 debt transactions.
Acquisitions and Dispositions. During the third quarter, we sold four non-core hotels for proceeds of approximately $90 million and recognized a gain of $9 million, net of tax. During the first quarter of 2009, we sold the Hyatt Regency Boston for net proceeds of approximately $113 million and recorded a gain on the sale of $20 million, net of tax.
On September 11, 2009, we sold our remaining 3.6% limited partnership interest in CBM JV for approximately $13 million and recorded a gain of approximately $5 million, net of taxes. As a result of this transaction, we no longer have any ownership interest in CBM JV. The net loss for the third quarter of 2009 includes a $12 million tax benefit related to the reversal of an excess deferred tax liability that was established in prior periods associated with our investment.
We believe that the current operating environment, combined with the significant number of hotel properties encumbered with very high levels of debt, may result in owners and/or lenders making these properties available for sale due to their inability to repay the debt at maturity. We believe that these opportunities will not reach the market until 2010 or subsequent years as distressed owners and their lenders will first explore other options. However, we have been actively exploring potential acquisitions and expect to be able to take advantage of these opportunities over time. Any acquisitions would be financed through a combination of methods, including proceeds from sales of properties from our existing portfolio, the incurrence of debt, available cash, advances under our credit facility, proceeds from equity offerings of Host, or issuance of OP units by Host LP.
Capital Expenditures. Our capital expenditures generally fall into three broad categories: renewal and replacement expenditures, repositioning/return on investment, or ROI, projects and value enhancement projects. Repositioning/ROI capital expenditures are selective capital improvements outside the scope of the typical renewal and replacement capital expenditures.
For year-to-date 2009, total capital expenditures decreased $208 million to $255 million. Significant projects completed during the year included the completion of the 62,750 square foot ballroom addition at the Swissôtel Chicago for approximately $52 million, the renovation of approximately 1,500 guest rooms at the Sheraton Boston Hotel, San Francisco Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf and The Westin Tabor Center for a total of $58 million and the renovation of the 51,000 square foot Palms Ballroom at the Orlando World Center Marriott for approximately $8 million. Our renewal and replacement capital expenditures for year-to-date 2009 were approximately $114 million, which reflects a decrease of approximately 53% from 2008 levels. We expect total renewal and replacement capital expenditures for 2009 to be approximately $160 million to $170 million. Our renewal and replacement capital expenditures are generally funded by the furniture, fixture and equipment funds established at certain of our hotels (typically funded with approximately 5% of property revenues) and by our available cash. We also spent approximately $141 million for year-to-date 2009 on repositioning/ROI projects, which reflects a decrease of approximately 35% compared to 2008 levels. We expect total repositioning/ROI expenditures for 2009 to be approximately $170 million to $175 million, which will represent a decline of approximately 40% from full year 2008 levels. As a result of the extensive three-year capital expenditure program which was completed in 2008, we believe that our properties will remain in a strong competitive position with respect to their market competitors despite our reduction in capital expenditures in 2009.
29
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our principal sources of cash include operations, the sale of assets, and proceeds from debt and equity issuances and refinancing. Our principal uses of cash include debt repayments and repurchases, capital expenditures, operating costs, corporate expenses and distributions to equity holders.
Cash Provided by Operations. Cash provided by operations for year-to-date 2009 decreased $345 million to $370 million compared to the year-to-date 2008, due primarily to declines in operations at our hotels.
Cash Used in Investing Activities.Approximately $35 million of cash was used in investing activities during the first three quarters of 2009. This included approximately $255 million of capital expenditures, partially offset by the return of a $39 million investment in the European joint venture and $212 million of net proceeds from the disposition of assets. The following table summarizes the significant investing activities as of October 15, 2009 (in millions):
| | | | | |
Transaction Date | | Description of Transaction | | Investment/ Sale Price |
August | | Sale of 3.6% investment in CBM Joint Venture Limited Partnership | | $ | 13 |
August | | Disposition of Hanover Marriott Hotel | | | 27 |
July | | Disposition of Boston Marriott Newton | | | 28 |
July | | Disposition of Sheraton Stamford/Washington Dulles Marriott Suites | | | 36 |
February | | Disposition of Hyatt Regency Boston (1) | | | 113 |
January | | Return of investment in European joint venture (2) | | | 39 |
| | | | | |
| | | | $ | 256 |
| | | | | |
(1) | Includes $5 million of reserves which were returned by the hotel manager. |
(2) | Represents approximately $39 million of funds returned by our European joint venture related to a portfolio acquisition that was terminated in December 2008. |
30
Cash Provided by Financing Activities. Approximately $176 million of cash was provided by financing activities during the first three quarters of 2009. The following tables summarize the significant debt and equity transactions as of October 15, 2009 (net of discounts and financing costs, in millions):
| | | | | | |
Transaction Date | | Description of Transaction | | Transaction Amount | |
Debt | | | | | | |
September | | Repayment of the credit facility term loan | | $ | (210 | ) |
September | | Repayment of the mortgage loan secured by the Westin Kierland Resort & Spa | | | (135 | ) |
August/June | | Repurchase of the approximately $49 million face amount of the 2007 Exchangeable Senior Debentures | | | (42 | ) |
July | | Repayment of the mortgage loan secured by the San Diego Marriott Hotel & Marina | | | (175 | ) |
June | | Repurchase of $4 million face amount of Series M senior notes | | | (4 | ) |
May | | Repayment of the revolving portion of the credit facility | | | (200 | ) |
May | | Proceeds from issuance of $400 million, 9% Series T senior notes | | | 380 | |
March | | Proceeds from the issuance of the mortgage loan secured by the JW Marriott, Washington, D.C. | | | 117 | |
March | | Repayment of the mortgage loan secured by the Westin Indianapolis | | | (34 | ) |
March | | Repurchase of $75 million face amount of the 2004 Exchangeable Senior Debentures | | | (69 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | $ | (372 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| |
Partners’ Capital | | | | |
September | | Issuance of approximately 13 million common OP units (1) | | $ | 130 | |
April | | Issuance of 75.75 million common OP units | | | 480 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | $ | 610 | |
| | | | | | |
(1) | Approximately $22 million of the cash was received after quarter end. |
Debt
As of September 11, 2009, our total debt was $5.5 billion, and we have no further debt maturities in 2009, and only $325 million of 2004 Debentures that holders have the right to put to us in 2010. The weighted average interest rate of our debt was approximately 6.7% and the weighted average maturity was 4.6 years as of September 11, 2009. Additionally, 90% of our debt had a fixed rate of interest as of September 11, 2009. As of October 15, 2009, 100 of our hotels are unencumbered by mortgage debt.
31
As of September 11, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our debt was comprised of (in millions):
| | | | | | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | December 31, 2008 |
Series K senior notes, with a rate of 71/8% due November 2013 | | $ | 725 | | $ | 725 |
Series M senior notes, with a rate of 7% due August 2012 | | | 344 | | | 348 |
Series O senior notes, with a rate of 63/8% due March 2015 | | | 650 | | | 650 |
Series Q senior notes, with a rate of 63/4% due June 2016 | | | 800 | | | 800 |
Series S senior notes, with a rate of 67/8% due November 2014 | | | 497 | | | 497 |
Series T senior notes, with a rate of 9% due May 2017 | | | 387 | | | — |
2004 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 3.25% due April 2024 (1) | | | 320 | | | 383 |
2007 Exchangeable Senior Debentures, with a rate of 25/8% due April 2027(1) | | | 502 | | | 533 |
Senior notes, with a rate of 10.0%, due May 2012 | | | 7 | | | 7 |
| | | | | | |
Total senior notes | | | 4,232 | | | 3,943 |
Mortgage debt (non-recourse) secured by $1.5 billion and $2.1 billion of real estate assets, with an average interest rate of 5.4% and 6.2% at September 11, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, maturing through December 2023 (2) respectively | | | 1,221 | | | 1,436 |
Credit facility, including the $210 million term loan | | | — | | | 410 |
Other | | | 86 | | | 87 |
| | | | | | |
Total debt | | $ | 5,539 | | $ | 5,876 |
| | | | | | |
(1) | SeeApplication of New Accounting Standards. |
(2) | The assets securing mortgage debt represents the book value of real estate assets, net of accumulated depreciation. These amounts do not represent the current market value of the assets. |
2007 Exchangeable Senior Debentures. On March 23, 2007, we issued the $600 million 2007 Debentures and received proceeds of $589 million, net of underwriting fees and expenses and original issue discount. During the third quarter of 2009, we repurchased approximately $49 million face amount of the 2007 Debentures for approximately $42 million. As of September 11, 2009, we have $551 million face amount of the 2007 Debentures that remain outstanding. The 2007 Debentures mature on April 15, 2027 and are equal in right of payment with all of our other senior notes. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears on January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15 of each year beginning on July 15, 2007. We can redeem for cash all, or part of, the 2007 Debentures at any time on or after April 20, 2012 upon 15 days notice at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest. Holders have the right to require us to repurchase the 2007 Debentures on April 15, 2012, April 15, 2017 and April 15, 2022 for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest. Holders may exchange their 2007 Debentures for Host common shares prior to maturity under certain conditions, including when the closing sale price of Host’s common stock is more than 130% of the exchange price per share for at least 20 of 30 consecutive trading days during certain periods or any time up to two days prior to the date on which the 2007 Debentures have been called for redemption. On exchange, we must deliver cash in an amount equal to not less than the lower of the exchange value (which is the applicable exchange rate multiplied by the average price of Host’s common shares) and the aggregate principal amount of the 2007 Debentures to be exchanged and, at our option, Host’s shares, cash or a combination thereof for any excess above the principal value. The current exchange rate is 31.35 shares of Host common stock per $1,000 principal amount of debentures, which is equivalent to an exchange price of $31.90 per share of Host common stock. Upon issuance of such shares by Host, we will issue to Host an equivalent number of common OP units. The exchange rate may be adjusted under certain circumstances, including the payment of common dividends exceeding $.20 per share in any given quarter. The 2007 Debentures are not currently exchangeable.
2004 Exchangeable Senior Debentures. On March 16, 2004, we issued the $500 million 2004 Debentures and received proceeds of $484 million, net of discounts, underwriting fees and expenses. During 2009, we repurchased $75 million face amount of the 2004 Debentures for approximately $69 million and recorded a gain on the purchase of approximately $3 million. As of September 11, 2009, we have repurchased $175 million face amount of the 2004 Debentures and, as a result, $325 million face amount of the 2004 Debentures remain outstanding. The outstanding 2004 Debentures mature on April 15, 2024 and are equal in right of payment with all of our other senior notes.
32
Interest is payable quarterly in arrears on January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15 of each year. Holders have the right to require us to repurchase the 2004 Debentures on April 15, 2010, April 15, 2014 and April 15, 2019 for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount. Holders may exchange their 2004 Debentures for Host common shares prior to maturity under certain conditions, including at any time at which the closing sale price of Host’s common stock is more than 120% of the exchange price per share, for at least 20 of 30 consecutive trading days during certain periods or any time up to two days prior to the date on which the debentures have been called for redemption. The current exchange rate is 63.3687 shares for each $1,000 of principal amount of the 2004 Debentures, (which is equivalent to an exchange price of $15.78 per share). The exchange rate may be adjusted under certain circumstances, including the payment of common dividends. We can redeem for cash all or part of the 2004 Debentures at any time subsequent to April 19, 2009 upon 30 days notice at the applicable redemption price as set forth in the indenture. The 2004 Debentures are not currently exchangeable.
Financial Covenants
Credit Facility Covenants. Our credit facility contains certain important financial covenants concerning allowable leverage, unsecured interest coverage and required fixed charge coverage. Due to the decline in operations during the year, our unsecured interest coverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio have declined and our leverage ratio has increased relative to year end 2008. Total debt used in the calculation of our leverage ratio is based on a “net debt” concept under which cash and cash equivalents in excess of $100 million are deducted from our total debt balance. To the extent no amounts are outstanding under the credit facility, a violation of these covenants would not be a default.
We are in compliance with all of our financial covenants under the credit facility. The following table summarizes the financial tests contained in the credit facility as of September 11, 2009:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Actual Ratio | | Covenant Requirement |
| | | | | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 |
Leverage ratio | | 4.8x | | Maximum ratio of: | | 7.25x | | 7.25x | | 7.25x |
Fixed charge coverage ratio | | 1.9x | | Minimum ratio of: | | 1.05x | | 1.10x | | 1.15x |
Unsecured interest coverage ratio | | 3.0x | | Minimum ratio of: | | 1.75x | | 1.75x | | 1.75x |
Senior Notes Indenture Covenants.Under the terms of our senior notes indenture, which includes our Debentures, our ability to incur indebtedness and pay distributions is subject to certain restrictions and the satisfaction of various financial conditions, including maintaining a certain EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio and levels of indebtedness and secured indebtedness relative to adjusted total assets. As noted above, the decline in operations has caused a similar decline in our EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio relative to year-end 2008. Even if we are below the coverage levels otherwise required to incur debt and pay distributions, we are still permitted to incur certain types of debt, including (i) credit facility debt, (ii) refinancing debt, (iii) up to $300 million of mortgage debt whose proceeds would be used to repay debt under the credit facility (and permanently reduce our ability to borrow under the credit facility by such amount), and (iv) up to $100 million of other debt. We are still permitted to make distributions of Host’s estimated taxable income necessary to maintain Host’s REIT status.
In addition, our senior notes indenture also imposes a requirement to maintain unencumbered assets (as defined in the indenture based on undepreciated property costs) of not less than 125% of the aggregate amount of senior note debt plus other debt not secured by mortgages. This coverage must be maintained at all times and is distinct from the coverage requirements necessary to incur debt or to make distributions as discussed above (whose consequences, where we fall below the coverage level, are limited to restricting our ability to incur new debt or to make distributions, but which would not otherwise cause a default under our senior notes indenture).
33
We are in compliance with all of our financial covenants under the senior notes indenture. The following table summarizes the financial tests contained in the senior notes indenture as of September 11, 2009:
| | | | | |
| | Actual Ratio | | | Covenant Requirement |
Unencumbered assets tests | | 316 | % | | Minimum ratio of 125% |
Total indebtedness to total assets | | 33 | % | | Maximum ratio of 65% |
Secured indebtedness to total assets | | 7 | % | | Maximum ratio of 45% |
EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio | | 2.7x | | | Minimum ratio of 2.0x* |
* | 1.7x for preferred unit payments. |
For further detail of our credit facility and senior notes, see our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
European Joint Venture
We hold a 32.1% ownership interest in a joint venture based in Europe (the “Euro JV”) that owns 11 hotel properties located in six countries. Throughout 2009, the Euro JV has experienced significant declines in revenues and operating profit due to the weakness in overall lodging demand throughout Europe. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge totaling $34 million in the second quarter based on the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of our investment. This impairment charge is included in equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The Euro JV currently has €724 million in mortgage debt. The significant decline in operations at the Euro JV may trigger covenant defaults, cash sweeps or non-payment defaults under the mortgage loans later this year or in 2010. The Euro JV has initiated discussions with the lenders of mortgage loans on the majority of this debt. In particular, the Euro JV has entered into discussions regarding mortgage loans secured by six properties totaling €344 million that are due in 2013 and have the potential to trigger covenant defaults, cash sweeps or non-payment defaults in 2009. These loans are cross-collateralized, meaning that a default under one loan could trigger a default on the loans for the other five properties. The joint venture has the right to cure certain covenants, including debt-service-coverage and loan-to-value covenants, a limited number of times by making cash deposits. If covenant defaults are triggered, discussions with lenders are unsuccessful, and the Euro JV does not elect to cure the defaults, the lenders may, among other remedies, accelerate the loans. All of these mortgage loans are non-recourse to us, Host and our partners and a default under these loans does not trigger a default under any of our debt.
Distribution Policy
Host is required to distribute at least 90% of its annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to its stockholders to maintain its qualification as a REIT, including taxable income recognized for federal income tax purposes but with regard to which we do not receive cash. Funds used by Host to pay dividends on its common and preferred stock are provided through distributions from Host LP. For every share of common and preferred stock of Host, Host LP has issued to Host a corresponding common OP unit and preferred OP unit. As of September 11, 2009, Host is the owner of substantially all of the preferred OP units and approximately 98% of the common OP units.
Investors should take into account the 2% non-controlling interest in Host LP common OP units when analyzing common and preferred dividend payments by Host to its stockholders, as these holders share, on a pro rata basis, in cash amounts being distributed by Host LP to holders of its corresponding common and preferred OP units. When Host pays a cash common or preferred dividend, Host LP pays an equivalent per unit distribution on all common or preferred OP units. For example, if Host paid a $1 per share dividend on its common stock, it would be based on payment of a $1 per unit distribution by Host LP to Host, as well as to other common OP unit holders. In accordance with the partnership agreement, OP unit holders will not participate in the stock dividend discussed below. As a result, subsequent to the stock dividend, the conversion ratio of one Host LP common OP unit to one share of Host common stock will exceed the current conversion ratio of one-to-one.
34
Host’s current policy on common dividends is generally to distribute, over time, 100% of its taxable income. On September 14, 2009, Host declared a special dividend of $.25 per share on common stock. In reliance on the specific terms of guidance issued by the IRS (and subject to certain elections by our stockholders), Host will pay approximately 90% of this common dividend with Host common stock, with the remaining 10% paid with cash, both of which will be taxable to stockholders. Host LP similarly intends to make a $.025 per unit distribution to Host and non-controlling holders of common OP units. Common OP unitholders will not, however, participate in the portion of the dividend being paid with shares of Host common stock and will not receive any Host common stock or additional common OP units. Instead, the ratio (currently 1:1) at which each common OP unitholder can convert its common OP units to shares of Host common stock will be proportionately adjusted to reflect the issuance of additional shares of Host common stock as a taxable stock dividend similar to the adjustment that would occur had Host effected a stock split. Accordingly, this means the equivalency of OP units and Host common stock will no longer be maintained. Host intends to continue paying a cash dividend on its preferred stock, regardless of its amount of taxable income, unless contractually restricted. The amount of any dividend will be determined by Host’s Board of Directors. The special distribution will be paid on December 18, 2009 to unitholders of record as of November 6, 2009.
The FASB issued an exposure draft on September 30, 2009, which would require stock dividends, including distributions to stockholders with components of stock and cash, to be accounted for as a stock dividend. If this accounting treatment is ratified, Host will retroactively restate basic and diluted earnings per share and FFO per diluted share for all periods presented assuming that the common shares had been issued as of the beginning of the first period presented. Assuming the dividend was paid September 11, 2009, Host would have issued approximately 13.2 million shares.
Host previously suspended the quarterly dividend on its common stock and has no current plan to reinstitute the quarterly dividend. The Company intends to continue paying a cash dividend on its preferred stock, regardless of its amount of taxable income, unless contractually restricted. The amount of any dividend will be determined by Host’s Board of Directors.
On September 14, 2009, Host’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.5546875 per share on its Class E cumulative redeemable preferred stock. The dividend was paid on October 15, 2009 to preferred stockholders of record as of September 30, 2009. Accordingly, Host LP made a similar distribution on its Class E preferred OP units.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe the reported amounts would be materially different, application of these policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. We evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to the impairment of long-lived assets, on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies, including certain critical accounting policies, are disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K.
Application of New Accounting Standards
The FASB recently amended its guidance surrounding a company’s analysis to determine whether any of its variable interests constitute controlling financial interests in a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both of the following characteristics:
| a. | The power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. |
35
| b. | The obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. |
Additionally, an enterprise is required to assess whether it has an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a variable interest entity operates as designed when determining whether it has the power to direct the activities of the variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. The new guidance also requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The guidance is effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009 and, accordingly, we will reevaluate our interests in variable interest entities for the period beginning on January 1, 2010 to determine that the entities are reflected properly in the financial statements as investments or consolidated entities. We do not anticipate that the implementation of this guidance will have any material effect on our financial statements.
Comparable Hotel Operating Statistics
We present certain operating statistics (i.e., RevPAR, average daily rate and average occupancy) and operating results (revenues, expenses and adjusted operating profit) for the periods included in this report on a comparable hotel basis. We define our comparable hotels as properties (i) that are owned or leased by us and the operations of which are included in our consolidated results, whether as continuing operations or discontinued operations for the entirety of the reporting periods being compared and (ii) that have not sustained substantial property damage or business interruption, or undergone large-scale capital projects during the reporting periods being compared.
All of the 112 hotels that we owned on September 11, 2009 have been classified as comparable hotels.
The operating results of the seven hotels we disposed of as of September 11, 2009 and during 2008 are not included in comparable hotel results for the periods presented herein. Moreover, because these statistics and operating results are for our hotel properties, they exclude results for our non-hotel properties and other real estate investments.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use certain “non-GAAP financial measures,” which are measures of our historical financial performance that are not calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. They are as follows: (i) Funds From Operations (FFO) per diluted unit, and (ii) Comparable Hotel Operating Results. A complete discussion of these measures (including the reasons why we believe they are useful to investors, the additional purposes for which management uses these measures and their limitations) is included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10–K.
36
FFO per Diluted Unit
We present FFO per diluted unit as a non-GAAP measure of our performance in addition to our earnings per unit (calculated in accordance with GAAP). We calculate FFO per diluted unit for a given operating period as our FFO (defined as set forth below) for such period divided by the number of fully diluted units outstanding during such period. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) defines FFO as net income (calculated in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, real estate-related depreciation and amortization and adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. FFO is presented on a per unit basis after making adjustments for the effects of dilutive securities, including the payment of preferred unit distributions, in accordance with NAREIT guidelines. We believe that FFO per diluted unit is a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance and that presentation of FFO per diluted unit, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation of earnings per unit, provides beneficial information to investors. The following table provides a reconciliation of net income available to common unitholders per unit to FFO per diluted unit (in millions, except per unit amounts):
Reconciliation of Net Income Available to
Common Unitholders to Funds From Operations per Diluted Unit
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | Year-to-date ended | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | | | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | |
| | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (58 | ) | | $ | 47 | | | $ | (186 | ) | | $ | 303 | |
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to non- controlling interests | | | 2 | | | | 3 | | | | 1 | | | | (5 | ) |
Distributions on preferred units | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | (6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) available to common unitholders | | | (58 | ) | | | 48 | | | | (191 | ) | | | 292 | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Gains) loss on dispositions, net of taxes | | | (14 | ) | | | (13 | ) | | | (31 | ) | | | (23 | ) |
Amortization of deferred gains and other property transactions, net of taxes | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (3 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization (a) | | | 138 | | | | 133 | | | | 417 | | | | 387 | |
Partnership adjustments | | | 2 | | | | 1 | | | | 4 | | | | 9 | |
Adjustments for dilutive securities (b): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assuming conversion of 2004 Exchangeable Senior Debentures | | | — | | | | 8 | | | | — | | | | 22 | |
Assuming deduction of gain recognized for the repurchase of 2004 Exchangeable Debentures (c) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted FFO (b)(d)(e) | | $ | 67 | | | $ | 176 | | | $ | 193 | | | $ | 684 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Diluted weighted average units outstanding(b)(d) | | | 619.3 | | | | 573.1 | | | | 584.1 | | | | 574.1 | |
Diluted FFO per unit (b)(d)(e) | | $ | .11 | | | $ | .31 | | | $ | .33 | | | $ | 1.19 | |
(a) | In accordance with the guidance on FFO per diluted unit provided by NAREIT, we do not adjust net income for the non-cash impairment charges when determining our FFO per diluted unit. |
(b) | FFO per diluted unit in accordance with NAREIT is adjusted for the effects of dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include OP units granted to Host for Host shares granted under Host’s comprehensive stock plans, preferred OP units held by minority partners, exchangeable debt securities and other non-controlling interests that have the option to convert their limited partnership interest to common OP units. No effect is shown for securities if they are anti-dilutive. |
37
(c) | During the first quarter of 2009, we repurchased $75 million face amount of the 2004 Debentures with a carrying value of $72 million for $69 million. The adjustments to dilutive FFO related to the 2004 Debentures repurchased during the year include the $3 million gain on repurchase, net of interest expense on the repurchased debentures. |
(d) | FFO per diluted unit and earnings per diluted unit were significantly affected by certain transactions, the effects of which are shown in the table below (in millions, except per unit amounts): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended September 11, 2009 | | | Quarter ended September 5, 2008 | |
| | Net Income (Loss) | | | FFO | | | Net Income (Loss) | | | FFO | |
Gain on dispositions, net of taxes | | $ | 14 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 13 | | | $ | — | |
Non-cash interest expense — 2007 Debentures (1) | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
Non-cash interest expense — 2004 Debentures (2) | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | (3 | ) | | | — | |
Loss on debt extinguishments (3) | | | (2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | �� | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 6 | | | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | 6 | | | $ | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted units | | | 617.9 | | | | 619.3 | | | | 542.0 | | | | 573.1 | |
Per diluted unit | | $ | .01 | | | $ | (.01 | ) | | $ | .01 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Year-to-date ended September 11, 2009 | | | Year-to-date ended September 5, 2008 | |
| | Net Income (Loss) | | | FFO | | | Net Income (Loss) | | | FFO | |
Gain on hotel dispositions, net of taxes | | $ | 31 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | — | |
Non-cash interest expense — 2007 Debentures (1) | | | (12 | ) | | | (12 | ) | | | (11 | ) | | | (11 | ) |
Non-cash interest expense — 2004 Debentures (2) | | | (7 | ) | | | (7 | ) | | | (10 | ) | | | — | |
Dilutive effect of 2004 Debentures (4) | | | — | | | | (9 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Non-cash impairment charges | | | (131 | ) | | | (131 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Gain on debt extinguishments and the CMBS defeasance (3) | | | 5 | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | (114 | ) | | $ | (154 | ) | | $ | 3 | | | $ | (11 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted units | | | 583.0 | | | | 604.7 | | | | 542.9 | | | | 574.1 | |
Per diluted unit | | $ | (.20 | ) | | $ | (.24 | ) | | $ | .01 | | | $ | (.02 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Represents the non-cash interest expense recognized in 2008 and 2009 related to the 2007 Debentures in accordance with the retroactive implementation of new accounting pronouncement in the first quarter of 2009. |
(2) | Represents the non-cash interest expense recognized in 2008 and 2009 related to the 2004 Debentures in accordance with the retroactive implementation of new accounting pronouncement in the first quarter of 2009. No effect is shown for the 2004 Debentures if they were dilutive in the calculation of earnings per diluted unit or FFO per diluted unit, as the interest expense is added-back to earnings in the dilution calculation. |
(3) | Includes gains/losses associated with the repurchase of our 2007 Debentures and the repayment of the term loan. Additionally, as prescribed by the sharing agreement with the successor borrower in connection with the 2007 defeasance of a $514 million collateralized mortgage-backed security, we received $7 million and recorded the gain as a reduction of interest expense in the second quarter 2009. |
38
| The loan had an initial maturity date of September 15, 2009, and was prepayable beginning on May 1, 2009. We had been legally released from all obligations under the loan upon the defeasance in 2007. |
(4) | Represents dilutive effect, if applicable, of the 2004 Debentures after adjustment (2) above for non-cash interest expense related to the new accounting pronouncement. |
(e) | FFO per diluted unit and loss per diluted unit include a $12 million tax benefit, or $0.02 per common unit related to the reversal of an excess deferred tax liability that was established in periods associated with our investment in CBM JV, which was sold on September 11, 2009. |
Comparable Hotel Operating Results
We present certain operating results for our hotels, such as hotel revenues, expenses and adjusted operating profit, on a comparable hotel, or “same store” basis as supplemental information for investors. We present these hotel operating results on a comparable hotel basis because we believe that doing so provides investors and management with useful information for evaluating the period-to-period performance of our hotels and facilitates comparisons with other hotel REITs and hotel owners. The following table presents certain operating results and statistics for our comparable hotels for the periods presented herein:
Comparable Hotel Results (a)
(in millions, except hotel statistics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | Year-to-Date ended | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | | | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | |
Number of hotels | | | 112 | | | | 112 | | | | 112 | | | | 112 | |
Number of rooms | | | 61,639 | | | | 61,639 | | | | 61,639 | | | | 61,639 | |
Percent change in Comparable Hotel RevPAR | | | (21.3 | )% | | | — | | | | (22.3 | )% | | | — | |
| | | | |
Comparable hotel sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Room | | $ | 585 | | | $ | 743 | | | $ | 1,726 | | | $ | 2,224 | |
Food and beverage | | | 246 | | | | 309 | | | | 843 | | | | 1,089 | |
Other | | | 71 | | | | 79 | | | | 231 | | | | 251 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comparable hotel sales (b) | | | 902 | | | | 1,131 | | | | 2,800 | | | | 3,564 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comparable hotel expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Room | | | 171 | | | | 188 | | | | 473 | | | | 542 | |
Food and beverage | | | 208 | | | | 253 | | | | 641 | | | | 799 | |
Other | | | 39 | | | | 45 | | | | 112 | | | | 133 | |
Management fees, ground rent and other costs | | | 337 | | | | 383 | | | | 985 | | | | 1,141 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comparable hotel expenses (c) | | | 755 | | | | 869 | | | | 2,211 | | | | 2,615 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comparable hotel adjusted operating profit | | | 147 | | | | 262 | | | | 589 | | | | 949 | |
Non-comparable hotel results, net (d) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4 | | | | (4 | ) |
Office buildings and limited service properties, net (e) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization, including impairment charges | | | (138 | ) | | | (130 | ) | | | (478 | ) | | | (377 | ) |
Corporate and other expenses | | | (19 | ) | | | (14 | ) | | | (50 | ) | | | (45 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating profit | | $ | (10 | ) | | $ | 118 | | | $ | 65 | | | $ | 522 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) | The reporting period for our comparable operating statistics for the third quarter of 2009 is from January 3, 2009 to September 11, 2009 and for the third quarter of 2008 from December 29, 2007 to September 5, 2008. For further discussion, see “Reporting Periods” in our most recent Annual Report of Form 10–K. |
39
(b) | The reconciliation of total revenues per the condensed consolidated statements of operations to the comparable hotel sales is as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | Year-to-Date ended | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | | | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | |
Revenues per the consolidated statements of operations | | $ | 912 | | | $ | 1,139 | | | $ | 2,839 | | | $ | 3,558 | |
Business interruption revenues for comparable hotels | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7 | |
Hotel sales for the property for which we record rental income, net | | | 9 | | | | 11 | | | | 31 | | | | 37 | |
Rental income for office buildings and select service hotels | | | (19 | ) | | | (19 | ) | | | (58 | ) | | | (58 | ) |
Adjustment for hotel sales for comparable hotels to reflect Marriott’s fiscal year for Marriott-managed hotels | | | — | | | | — | | | | (12 | ) | | | 20 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comparable hotel sales | | $ | 902 | | | $ | 1,131 | | | $ | 2,800 | | | $ | 3,564 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(c) | The reconciliation of operating costs per the condensed consolidated statements of operations to the comparable hotel expenses is as follows (in millions): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter ended | | | Year-to-Date ended | |
| | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | | | September 11, 2009 | | | September 5, 2008 | |
Operating costs and expenses per the consolidated statements of operations | | $ | 922 | | | $ | 1,021 | | | $ | 2,774 | | | $ | 3,036 | |
Hotel expense for comparable hotels classified as held-for-sale | | | 9 | | | | 11 | | | | 32 | | | | 39 | |
Rent expense for office buildings and select service hotels | | | (19 | ) | | | (19 | ) | | | (58 | ) | | | (59 | ) |
Adjustment for hotel expenses for comparable hotels to reflect Marriott’s fiscal year for Marriott-managed hotels | | | — | | | | — | | | | (9 | ) | | | 14 | |
Depreciation and amortization, including impairment charges | | | (138 | ) | | | (130 | ) | | | (478 | ) | | | (377 | ) |
Corporate and other expenses | | | (19 | ) | | | (14 | ) | | | (50 | ) | | | (45 | ) |
Gain on insurance settlement | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comparable hotel expenses | | $ | 755 | | | $ | 869 | | | $ | 2,211 | | | $ | 2,615 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(d) | Non-comparable hotel results, net includes the following items: (i) the results of operations of our non-comparable hotels whose operations are included in our consolidated statements of operations as continuing operations, and (ii) the difference between the number of days of operations reflected in the comparable hotel results and the number of days of operations reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. For further detail, see “Reporting Periods” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10–K. |
(e) | Represents rental income less rental expense for select service properties and office buildings. |
40
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Interest Rate Sensitivity
As of September 11, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 90% and 88.1%, respectively, of our outstanding debt bore interest at fixed rates. See Item 7A of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10–K.
On August 12, 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of $125 million related to the $300 million Ritz Carlton, Naples and Newport Beach Marriott Hotel & Spa mortgage loan. As a result, we will pay a variable interest rate equal to 3-month LIBOR plus 2.7%, as opposed to the fixed rate of 5.531%, on the notional amount of $125 million through March 1, 2014. At September 11, 2009, the variable interest rate was 3.16%.
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
As we have non-U.S. operations (specifically, the ownership of hotels in Canada, Mexico and Chile and investments in our European joint venture), currency exchange risk arises as a normal part of our business. To manage the currency exchange risk applicable to ownership in non-U.S. hotels, where possible, we may enter into forward or option contracts. The foreign currency exchange agreements that we have entered into were strictly to hedge foreign currency risk and not for trading purposes.
During 2008, we entered into three foreign currency forward purchase contracts totaling €60 million (approximately $88 million) to hedge a portion of the foreign currency exposure resulting from the eventual repatriation of our net investment in the European joint venture. These derivatives are considered a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, and, in accordance with SFAS 133, are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income within the partners’ capital portion of our balance sheet. We also evaluate counterparty credit risk in the calculation of the fair value of the swaps. Year-to-date, we recorded a decrease in the fair value of the derivative instruments totaling approximately $6 million. The fair value of the derivative instruments as of September 11, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $0.4 million and $6 million, respectively, which is included in accumulated other comprehensive income. The following table summarizes our three foreign currency purchase contracts (in millions):
| | | | | | | | |
Transaction Date | | Transaction Amount in Euros | | Transaction Amount in Dollars | | Forward Purchase Date |
February 2008 | | € | 30 | | € | 43 | | August 2011 |
February 2008 | | | 15 | | | 22 | | February 2013 |
May 2008 | | | 15 | | | 23 | | May 2014 |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including Host’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, Host’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes to Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
41
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
We are involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business. On April 27, 2005, we initiated suit against Keystone-Texas Property Holding Corporation (“Keystone”) in the 73rd Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas, Case No. 05-CI-14229, seeking a declaration that a provision of our ground lease for the property under the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter was valid and claiming that Keystone had breached that lease provision. On April 6, 2006, a Bexar County Court granted an interlocutory motion for summary judgment that the provision was not valid and the lease provision had not been breached. On October 18, 2006, Keystone filed an amended counterclaim and later, a third party claim, alleging that we tortiously interfered with Keystone’s attempted sale of the property and that we slandered Keystone’s title to the property. We believe that we were asserting rights that parties had recognized as valid in past dealings. Keystone is seeking between $30 million and $40 million in damages. A jury trial on Keystone’s amended counterclaim and third party claim potentially could begin as early as mid-January 2010. We believe that our actions were entirely lawful and that Keystone’s claims are without merit.
We are vigorously defending this claim; however, no assurance can be given as to the outcome of any pending legal proceedings. We do not believe that the final resolution will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
| | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Common Units Purchased | | | Average Price Paid per Common Unit | | Total Number of Common Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Approximate Dollar Value of Common Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (in millions) |
June 20, 2009 - July 19, 2009 | | 75,029 | * | | 1 share of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. common stock* | | — | | $ | — |
July 20, 2009- August 19, 2009 | | 6,628 | * | | 1 share of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. common stock* | | — | | | — |
August 20, 2009- September 11, 2009 | | 25,093 | | | 1 share of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. common stock* | | — | | | — |
Total | | 106,750 | * | | 1 share of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. common stock* | | — | | $ | — |
* | Reflects (1) common OP units redeemed by holders in exchange for one share of Host common stock for each common OP unit and (2) common OP units cancelled upon cancellations of a corresponding number of shares of Host’s common stock by Host. |
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as part of this report and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
| | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| |
10.42 | | Sales Agency Financing Agreement, dated August 19, 2009, between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, as sales agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 20, 2009). |
| |
12.1* | | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Distributions. |
42
| | |
| |
31.1* | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
31.2* | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
32†* | | Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
† | This certificate is being furnished solely to accompany the report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. |
43
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| | HOST HOTELS & RESORTS, L.P. |
| | By: Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., its general partner |
| |
October 15, 2009 | | /S/ BRIAN G. MACNAMARA |
| | Brian G. Macnamara Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller |
44