QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | |
ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007. |
or |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 333-56365
FairPoint Communications, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | 13-3725229 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
521 East Morehead Street, Suite 250 Charlotte, North Carolina (Address of Principal Executive Offices) | |
28202 (Zip Code) |
(704) 344-8150 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer ý Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
As of November 1, 2007, there were 35,228,122 shares of the Registrant's common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
Documents incorporated by reference:None
INDEX
| |
| | Page
|
---|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | | |
Item 1. | | Financial Statements | | 4 |
| | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 (unaudited) and December 31, 2006 | | 4 |
| | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited) | | 5 |
| | Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited) | | 6 |
| | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited) | | 7 |
| | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited) | | 8 |
| | Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) | | 9 |
Item 2. | | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | 19 |
Item 3. | | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | | 32 |
Item 4. | | Controls and Procedures | | 33 |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | | |
Item 1. | | Legal Proceedings | | 34 |
Item 1A. | | Risk Factors | | 34 |
Item 2. | | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | | 34 |
Item 3. | | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | | 36 |
Item 4. | | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | | 36 |
Item 5. | | Other Information | | 36 |
Item 6. | | Exhibits | | 36 |
| | Signatures | | 37 |
2
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Some statements in this Quarterly Report are known as "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things:
- •
- future performance generally,
- •
- our dividend policy and expectations regarding dividend payments,
- •
- business development activities,
- •
- future capital and operating expenditures, including in connection with our proposed merger with a subsidiary of Verizon Communications Inc.,
- •
- the status of the regulatory approval process for such merger,
- •
- future interest expense,
- •
- distributions from minority investments and passive partnership interests,
- •
- net operating loss carry forwards,
- •
- technological developments and changes in the communications industry,
- •
- financing sources and availability,
- •
- compliance with the covenants in our credit facility,
- •
- regulatory support payments,
- •
- the effects of regulation and competition, and
- •
- pending litigation.
These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained in this Quarterly Report that are not historical facts. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates" and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward looking statements. Because these forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause actual results, events or developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other factors discussed in this Quarterly Report and in Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report. You should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which are based on the information currently available to us and speak only as of the date on which this Quarterly Report was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, your attention is directed to any further disclosures made on related subjects in our subsequent periodic reports filed with the SEC on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K and Schedule 14A.
Except as otherwise required by the context, references in this Quarterly Report to "FairPoint," "our company," "we," "us," or "our" refer to the combined business of FairPoint Communications, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries. Except as otherwise required by the context, all references to the "Company" refer to FairPoint Communications, Inc. excluding its subsidiaries.
3
Item 1. Financial Statements.
FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | September 30, 2007
| | December 31, 2006
| |
---|
| | (unaudited)
| |
| |
---|
| | (Dollars in thousands)
| |
---|
Assets | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | |
| Cash | | $ | 8,842 | | $ | 3,805 | |
| Current receivables, net | | | 49,349 | | | 28,533 | |
| Other current assets | | | 11,965 | | | 13,184 | |
| Deferred income tax, net | | | 8,387 | | | 33,648 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets | | | 78,543 | | | 79,170 | |
| |
| |
| |
Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $621.6 million and $583.0 million, respectively | | | 248,365 | | | 246,264 | |
Investments | | | 6,529 | | | 12,057 | |
Goodwill | | | 498,913 | | | 499,184 | |
Deferred income tax, net | | | 38,162 | | | 23,830 | |
Deferred charges and other assets | | | 20,260 | | | 24,725 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | $ | 890,772 | | $ | 885,230 | |
| |
| |
| |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 26,270 | | $ | 14,337 | |
| Dividends payable | | | 13,953 | | | 13,908 | |
| Current portion of long-term debt | | | 743 | | | 714 | |
| Demand notes payable | | | 260 | | | 312 | |
| Accrued interest payable | | | 712 | | | 560 | |
| Other accrued liabilities | | | 21,234 | | | 16,017 | |
| Liabilities of discontinued operations | | | 475 | | | 486 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | | 63,647 | | | 46,334 | |
| |
| |
| |
Long-term liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Long-term debt, net of current portion | | | 607,294 | | | 607,272 | |
| Deferred credits and other long-term liabilities | | | 16,176 | | | 6,897 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total long-term liabilities | | | 623,470 | | | 614,169 | |
| |
| |
| |
Minority interest | | | 7 | | | 8 | |
| |
| |
| |
Stockholders' equity: | | | | | | | |
| Common stock | | | 353 | | | 352 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | | | 491,325 | | | 530,536 | |
| Accumulated deficit | | | (285,990 | ) | | (311,545 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net | | | (2,040 | ) | | 5,376 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 203,648 | | | 224,719 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 890,772 | | $ | 885,230 | |
| |
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
4
FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
| | Three months ended September 30,
| | Nine months ended September 30,
| |
---|
| | 2007
| | 2006
| | 2007
| | 2006
| |
---|
| | (Dollars in thousands)
| | (Dollars in thousands)
| |
---|
Revenues | | $ | 75,707 | | $ | 70,700 | | $ | 215,276 | | $ | 199,687 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization | | | 54,846 | | | 40,362 | | | 155,716 | | | 112,242 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | 12,624 | | | 12,839 | | | 37,873 | | | 39,826 | |
| Gain on sale of operating assets | | | (2,164 | ) | | — | | | (2,164 | ) | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating expenses | | | 65,306 | | | 53,201 | | | 191,425 | | | 152,068 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income from operations | | | 10,401 | | | 17,499 | | | 23,851 | | | 47,619 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net gain on sale of investments and other assets | | | 2,759 | | | 64 | | | 49,586 | | | 14,289 | |
| Interest and dividend income | | | 294 | | | 211 | | | 805 | | | 3,138 | |
| Interest expense | | | (9,924 | ) | | (9,969 | ) | | (29,932 | ) | | (29,514 | ) |
| Loss on derivative instruments | | | (5,669 | ) | | — | | | (5,669 | ) | | — | |
| Equity in net earnings of investees | | | 320 | | | 1,841 | | | 4,889 | | | 8,206 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total other (expense) income | | | (12,220 | ) | | (7,853 | ) | | 19,679 | | | (3,881 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(Loss) income before income taxes | | | (1,819 | ) | | 9,646 | | | 43,530 | | | 43,738 | |
Income tax expense | | | (3,372 | ) | | (3,668 | ) | | (17,974 | ) | | (16,965 | ) |
Minority interest | | | — | | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (5,191 | ) | $ | 5,977 | | $ | 25,555 | | $ | 26,771 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Weighted average shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | | 34,770 | | | 34,651 | | | 34,736 | | | 34,618 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Diluted | | | 34,770 | | | 34,796 | | | 34,967 | | | 34,711 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Earnings (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | 0.17 | | $ | 0.74 | | $ | 0.77 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Diluted | | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | 0.17 | | $ | 0.73 | | $ | 0.77 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
5
FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholder's Equity (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
(in thousands)
| | Common Stock
| |
| | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Additional paid-in capital
| | Accumulated deficit
| | Total stockholders' equity
| |
---|
| | Shares
| | Amount
| |
---|
Balance at December 31, 2006 | | 35,218 | | $ | 352 | | $ | 530,536 | | $ | 5,376 | | $ | (311,545 | ) | $ | 224,719 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 25,555 | | | 25,555 | |
Issuance of restricted shares, net of forfeitures | | 56 | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | |
Restricted stock cancelled for withholding tax | | (50 | ) | | — | | | (855 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (855 | ) |
Exercise of restricted units | | 4 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Stock based compensation expense | | — | | | — | | | 3,012 | | | — | | | — | | | 3,012 | |
Dividends declared | | — | | | — | | | (41,809 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (41,809 | ) |
Tax benefit from stock based compensation expense | | — | | | — | | | 441 | | | — | | | — | | | 441 | |
Unrealized loss from cash flow hedges, net of tax | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (7,416 | ) | | — | | | (7,416 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at September 30, 2007 | | 35,228 | | $ | 353 | | $ | 491,325 | | $ | (2,040 | ) | $ | (285,990 | ) | $ | 203,648 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
6
FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
| | Three months ended September 30,
| | Nine months ended September 30,
|
---|
| | 2007
| | 2006
| | 2007
| | 2006
|
---|
| | (Dollars in thousands)
|
---|
Net (loss) income | | $ | (5,191 | ) | $ | 5,977 | | $ | 25,555 | | $ | 26,771 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Change in net unrealized gain (loss), net of tax expense (benefit) of $5.1 million and $(3.4) million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and net of tax benefit of $(4.5) million and tax expense of $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively | | | 8,390 | | | (5,610 | ) | | (7,416 | ) | | 57 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Comprehensive income | | $ | 3,199 | | $ | 367 | | $ | 18,139 | | $ | 26,828 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
7
FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| | Nine months ended September 30,
| |
---|
| | 2007
| | 2006
| |
---|
| | (Dollars in thousands)
| |
---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | $ | 25,555 | | $ | 26,771 | |
| |
| |
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations: | | | | | | | |
| | Deferred income taxes | | | 19,411 | | | 15,159 | |
| | Amortization of debt issue costs | | | 1,159 | | | 1,200 | |
| | Depreciation and amortization | | | 37,873 | | | 39,826 | |
| | Minority interest in income of subsidiaries | | | 1 | | | 2 | |
| | Income from equity method investments | | | (4,889 | ) | | (8,206 | ) |
| | Net gain on sale of investments and other assets | | | (49,586 | ) | | (14,289 | ) |
| | Gain on sale of operating assets | | | (2,164 | ) | | — | |
| | Loss on derivative instruments | | | 5,669 | | | — | |
| | Other non cash items | | | 2,963 | | | 1,403 | |
| | Changes in assets and liabilities arising from operations: | | | | | | | |
| | | Accounts receivable and other current assets | | | (21,399 | ) | | 2,838 | |
| | | Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities | | | 12,771 | | | (4,193 | ) |
| | | Income taxes | | | (1,274 | ) | | (520 | ) |
| | | Other assets/liabilities | | | (1,942 | ) | | (996 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | Total adjustments | | | (1,407 | ) | | 32,224 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations | | | 24,148 | | | 58,995 | |
| |
| |
| |
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations: | | | | | | | |
| Net capital additions | | | (39,870 | ) | | (25,636 | ) |
| Distributions from investments | | | 2,640 | | | 7,901 | |
| Net proceeds from sales of investments and other assets | | | 60,229 | | | 43,416 | |
| Acquisitions of telephone properties, net of cash acquired | | | — | | | (37,643 | ) |
| Other, net | | | 265 | | | (183 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations | | | 23,264 | | | (12,145 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations: | | | | | | | |
| Loan origination costs | | | (628 | ) | | — | |
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | | | 115,945 | | | 94,450 | |
| Repayments of long-term debt | | | (115,919 | ) | | (99,583 | ) |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | — | | | 24 | |
| Dividends paid to common stockholders | | | (41,763 | ) | | (41,384 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations | | | (42,365 | ) | | (46,493 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| Cash flows of discontinued operations: | | | | | | | |
| | Operating cash flows, net used in | | | (10 | ) | | (957 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | Net increase (decrease) in cash | | | 5,037 | | | (600 | ) |
Cash, beginning of period | | | 3,805 | | | 5,083 | |
| |
| |
| |
Cash, end of period | | $ | 8,842 | | $ | 4,483 | |
| |
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
8
FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(1) Organization and Basis of Financial Reporting
On February 8, 2005, the Company consummated an initial public offering, or the initial public offering, of 25,000,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share, or common stock, at a price to the public of $18.50 per share. In connection with the initial public offering, the Company entered into a new senior secured credit facility, or the credit facility, with a syndicate of financial institutions, including Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent. The credit facility is comprised of a revolving facility in an aggregate principal amount of $100 million (less amounts reserved for letters of credit) and a term facility in an aggregate principal amount of $588.5 million (including a $22.5 million delayed draw facility). The revolving facility has a six year maturity and the term facility has a seven year maturity.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of FairPoint Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, have been omitted and condensed pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of the Company's management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of FairPoint's results of operations, financial position, and cash flows. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations which might be expected for the entire year. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Management views its business of providing video, data and voice communication services to residential and business customers as one business segment and currently aggregates these revenue streams under the quantitative and qualitative thresholds defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information."
(2) Certain Transactions
- (a)
- Dividends
Our board of directors has adopted a dividend policy which reflects our judgment that our stockholders would be better served if we distributed a substantial portion of our cash available for distribution to our stockholders instead of retaining it in our business. As a result of this dividend policy, we may not have significant cash available to meet any unanticipated liquidity requirements, other than available borrowings, if any, under our credit facility. If we do not have sufficient cash to meet such unanticipated liquidity requirements, our financial condition and our business will suffer. However, our board of directors may, in its discretion, amend or repeal the dividend policy to decrease the level of dividends provided for or discontinue entirely the payment of dividends.
On September 13, 2007, the Company declared a dividend totaling $13.9 million, or $0.39781 per share of common stock, which was paid on October 16, 2007 to holders of record as of September 28, 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company paid dividends totaling $41.8 million, or $1.19343 per share of common stock.
9
- (b)
- Merger
On January 15, 2007, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Verizon Communications Inc., or Verizon, and Northern New England Spinco Inc., or Spinco, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 20, 2007, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 28, 2007, and Amendment No. 3 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 3, 2007, referred to herein as the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which Spinco will merge with and into the Company with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation for legal purposes, which transaction is referred to herein as the Merger. Spinco is a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of Verizon that will own or indirectly own Verizon's local exchange and related business activities in Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. The Company expects to be the acquiree for accounting purposes. Consequently, certain Merger related costs that are normally capitalized will be expensed as incurred in connection with the transaction and FairPoint's assets and liabilities will be recorded at fair value upon acquisition. The Merger is subject to regulatory approval.
As of September 30, 2007, approximately $44.6 million of costs related to the Merger had been capitalized and $40.8 million had been expensed. These amounts were partially offset by approximately $26.2 million and $12.3 million, respectively, for amounts that have or will be reimbursed to the Company by Verizon pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Verizon will reimburse the Company for up to $40.0 million of certain qualified transition costs (subject to the specific terms contained in the Merger Agreement). As of September 30, 2007, approximately $20.2 million was recorded within current receivables.
On January 15, 2007, the Company entered into a Master Services Agreement, or MSA, with Capgemini U.S. LLC. Through the MSA, the Company intends to replicate and/or replace certain existing Verizon systems during a phased period lasting from January 2007 through the fourth quarter of 2008. The Company is currently in the application development stage of the project and the Company will capitalize certain costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining internal use software in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." Capitalized costs include direct development costs associated with internal use software, including direct labor costs and external costs of materials and services. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred.
(3) Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." The Company's effective income tax rate for the interim periods presented is based on the Company's actual effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and differs from the federal and state statutory income tax rate primarily due to nondeductible acquisition expenses.
For the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recorded income tax expense of $3.4 million, resulting in an effective rate of (185.4%) compared to 38.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2006. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recorded income tax expense of $18.0 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 41.3% compared to 38.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
10
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company disposed of its 7.5% ownership interest in the Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership and disposed of the assets of Yates City Telephone Company, resulting in the recognition of gains of $44.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for federal and state income tax purposes that is taxed at the Company's blended statutory rate of 37.6%. Furthermore, the Company effectively settled tax exposure items totaling $2.7 million with the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, resulting in a reduction of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Interpretation No. (FIN) 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes," liability and income tax expense. The Company also recognized other discrete items resulting in a reduction of income tax expense of $536,000. The Company treated these items as discrete events during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Excluding these discrete events, the Company's effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was (97%).
In 2007, the Company considered all estimated expenses related to the Merger and determined that some of these expenses were not deductible for income tax purposes. Excluding the impact of the non-deductible transaction costs attributable to the Merger, the annualized effective rate will be approximately 38%.
In assessing the ability to realize deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company expects that future taxable income will more likely than not be sufficient to recover net deferred tax assets.
The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 requires applying a "more likely than not" threshold to the recognition and de-recognition of tax positions. The Company's unrecognized tax benefits totaled $3.7 million as of January 1, 2007 and $1.0 million as of September 30, 2007, of which $1.0 million would impact its effective tax rate, if recognized. There are no amounts recorded for interest and penalties because the Company has net operating loss carryforwards which would be utilized to offset any actual cash payments. Based on the outcome of certain examinations, the expiration of the statute of limitations for certain jurisdictions, or favorable resolution of the matters, we believe that within the next 12 months it is reasonably possible that none of our previously unrecognized tax benefits could be recorded to our income tax provision. The tax years subject to examination in the U.S. begin in 2001 due to net operating loss carryforwards which generally serve to extend the period of time for examination. Tax years are typically subject to examination for three years after the filing of the tax return.
(4) Discontinued Operations and Restructure Charges
In November 2001, the Company announced its plan to discontinue the competitive communications business operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, FairPoint Carrier Services, Inc., or Carrier Services.
Net liabilities of the discontinued competitive communications operations as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
11
(5) Interest Rate Swap Agreements
The Company assesses interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. The Company maintains risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both the Company's outstanding and forecasted debt obligations. The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including cash flow sensitivity analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on the Company's future cash flows.
The Company uses variable and fixed-rate debt to finance its operations, capital expenditures and acquisitions. The variable-rate debt obligations expose the Company to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. The Company believes it is prudent to limit the variability of a portion of its interest payments. To meet this objective, from time to time, the Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from interest rate risk. These swaps change the variable-rate cash flow exposure on the debt obligations to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, the Company pays a variable interest rate plus an additional payment if the variable rate payment is below a contractual rate, or it receives a payment if the variable rate payment is above the contractual rate. The chart below provides details of each of the Company's interest rate swap agreements.
Effective Date:
| | Notional Amount
| | Rate
| | Rate, including applicable margin
| | Expiration Date
|
---|
February 8, 2005 | | $ | 130.0 Million | | 3.76 | % | 5.51 | % | December 31, 2007 |
February 8, 2005 | | $ | 130.0 Million | | 3.98 | % | 5.73 | % | December 31, 2008 |
February 8, 2005 | | $ | 130.0 Million | | 4.11 | % | 5.86 | % | December 31, 2009 |
April 29, 2005 | | $ | 50.0 Million | | 4.72 | % | 6.47 | % | March 31, 2012 |
June 30, 2005 | | $ | 50.0 Million | | 4.69 | % | 6.44 | % | March 31, 2011 |
June 30, 2006 | | $ | 50.0 Million | | 5.36 | % | 7.11 | % | December 31, 2009 |
As a result of these swap agreements, as of September 30, 2007, approximately 89% of the Company's indebtedness bore interest at fixed rates rather than variable rates. Effective on September 30, 2005, the Company amended the terms of its credit facility. This amendment reduced the effective interest rate margins applicable to the Company's interest rate swap agreements by 0.25% to 1.75%.
The aforementioned interest rate swaps qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The effect of hedge ineffectiveness on net income was insignificant for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. At September 30, 2007, the fair market value of these swaps was a $3.3 million liability and has been recorded, net of tax of $1.2 million, as a decrease to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Of the $3.3 million, $1.2 million is included in other current assets and $4.5 million is included in deferred credits and other long-term liabilities.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had entered into four additional swap agreements which had not reached their effective date. One swap agreement is for a notional amount of $65.0 million at a rate of 4.91% (or 6.66% including the applicable margin), is effective as of December 31, 2007 and expires on December 30, 2011. A second swap agreement is for a notional amount of $100.0 million at a rate of 5.02% (or 6.77% including the applicable margin), is effective as of December 31, 2008 and expires on December 31, 2010. The third swap agreement is for a notional amount of $75.0 million at a
12
rate of 5.46% (or 7.21% including the applicable margin), is effective as of December 31, 2007 and expires on December 31, 2010. The fourth swap agreement is for a notional amount of $150.0 million at a rate of 5.65% (or 7.40% including the applicable margin), is effective as of December 31, 2009 and expires on December 31, 2011. These swaps qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
In addition, during the third quarter of 2007, the Company entered into four forward starting swap agreements, which are contingent upon the closing of the Merger, for a total notional amount of $400 million. These swaps did not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. As of September 30, 2007, the changes in fair value of the contingent swap contracts resulted in a $5.7 million pre-tax loss included in other income (expense) on our condensed consolidated statement of operations. Of the $5.7 million liability, $0.8 million is included in other accrued liabilities and $4.9 million is included in deferred credits and other long-term liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
(6) Investments
The Company had a 7.5% ownership in Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership, which was consistently accounted for under the equity method using a three-month lag due to the timing of our receipt of the partnership financial statements. On January 15, 2007, Taconic Telephone Corp., or Taconic, a subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Partnership Interest Purchase Agreement, or the O-P Interest Purchase Agreement, with Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Verizon Wireless of the East LP, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell its 7.5% limited partnership interest in Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership to Cellco Partnership, or the O-P Disposition. The O-P Disposition closed on April 10, 2007. In the second quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a gain on the O-P Disposition of approximately $46.4 million. Total proceeds from the sale were $55.0 million, of which approximately $1.2 million was paid to the Company in the form of distributions from Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership in the first and second quarters of 2007.
Summary financial information for Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership follows as of and for the periods included in the company's condensed consolidated financial statements:
| | As of December 31, 2006
|
---|
| | (in thousands)
|
---|
Current assets | | $ | 11,304 |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 38,917 |
| |
|
Total assets | | $ | 50,221 |
| |
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 431 |
Partners' capital | | | 49,790 |
| |
|
| | $ | 50,221 |
| |
|
| | Three months ended June 30, 2006
| | Nine months ended June 30, 2006
|
---|
| | (in thousands)
|
---|
Revenues | | $ | 42,588 | | $ | 131,282 |
Operating income | | | 32,891 | | | 103,769 |
Net income | | | 33,159 | | | 104,548 |
13
In August 2007, the Company received $2.7 million from the escrow account related to the sale of its investment in Southern Illinois Cellular Corporation, which was completed in 2006.
The Company also has other investments in non-marketable securities which are accounted for using the cost and equity methods of accounting. The Company continually monitors all of these investments for possible impairment by evaluating the financial performance of the businesses in which it invests and comparing the carrying value of the investment to quoted market prices (if available), or the fair values of similar investments, which in certain instances, is based on traditional valuation models utilizing multiples of cash flows. When circumstances indicate that a decline in the fair value of the investment has occurred and the decline is other than temporary, the Company records the decline in value as a realized impairment loss and a reduction in the cost of the investment.
(7) Long Term Debt
Long term debt at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 is shown below:
| | September 30, 2007
| | December 31, 2006
| |
---|
| | (In thousands)
| |
---|
Senior secured notes (credit facility), variable rates ranging from 7.12% to 9.18% (weighted average rate of 7.17%) at September 30, 2007, due 2011 to 2012 | | $ | 604,090 | | $ | 603,500 | |
Senior notes, 11.875%, due 2010 | | | 2,050 | | | 2,050 | |
Senior notes to RTFC, fixed rate, ranging from 8.2% to 9.2%, due 2009 to 2014 | | | 1,897 | | | 2,436 | |
| |
| |
| |
| Total outstanding long-term debt | | | 608,037 | | | 607,986 | |
Less current portion | | | (743 | ) | | (714 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| Total long-term debt, net of current portion | | $ | 607,294 | | $ | 607,272 | |
| |
| |
| |
The approximate aggregate maturities of long-term debt for each of the five years subsequent to September 30, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
Year ending September 30,
| |
|
---|
2008 | | $ | 743 |
2009 | | | 307 |
2010 | | | 2,208 |
2011 | | | 15,758 |
2012 | | | 588,679 |
Thereafter | | | 342 |
| |
|
| | $ | 608,037 |
| |
|
The Company has a credit facility consisting of a revolving facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $100.0 million and a term facility in an aggregate principal amount of $588.5 million.
The term facility matures in February 2012 and the revolving facility matures in February 2011. Borrowings bear interest, at the Company's option, for the revolving facility and for the term facility at
14
either (a) the Eurodollar rate (as defined in the credit facility) plus an applicable margin or (b) the Base rate (as defined in the credit facility) plus an applicable margin. The Eurodollar rate applicable margin and the Base rate applicable margin for loans under the term facility are 1.75% and 0.75%, respectively, and the Eurodollar rate applicable margin and the Base rate applicable margin for loans under the revolving facility are 2.0% and 1.0%, respectively. Interest with respect to Base rate loans is payable quarterly in arrears and interest with respect to Eurodollar loans is payable at the end of the applicable interest period and every three months in the case of interest periods in excess of three months.
The credit facility provides for payment to the lenders of a commitment fee on any unused commitments equal to 0.5% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, as well as other fees.
On January 25, 2007, the Company entered into an amendment to its credit facility which is intended to facilitate certain transactions related to the Merger. Among other things, such amendment: (i) permits the Company to consummate the O-P Disposition and retain the proceeds thereof up to an amount equal to $55.0 million; (ii) excludes the gain on the O-P Disposition from the calculation of "Available Cash" under the credit facility, (iii) amends the definition of "Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA" to allow for certain one-time add-backs to the calculation thereof for cash operating expenses incurred in connection with the Merger (subject to an overall cap on the amount of such add-backs); (iv) amends the definition of "Consolidated Capital Expenditures" to exclude certain expenditures incurred by the Company in connection with transition and integration costs prior to consummation of the Merger (subject to an overall cap on the amount of such exclusions); and (v) increases the leverage covenant and dividend suspension test to 5.50 to 1.00 and 5.25 to 1.00, respectively.
The credit facility requires certain mandatory prepayments, including first to prepay outstanding term loans under the credit facility and, thereafter, to repay loans under the revolving facility and/or to reduce revolving facility commitments with, subject to certain conditions and exceptions, 100% of the net cash proceeds the Company receives from any sale, transfer or other disposition of any assets, 100% of net casualty insurance proceeds and 100% of the net cash proceeds the Company receives from the issuance of permitted securities and, at certain times if the Company is not permitted to pay dividends, with 50% of the increase in the Company's Cumulative Distributable Cash (as defined in the credit facility) during the prior fiscal quarter. Reductions to the revolving commitments under the credit facility from the foregoing recapture events will not reduce the revolving commitments under the credit facility below $50.0 million.
The credit facility provides for voluntary prepayments of the revolving facility and the term facility and voluntary commitment reductions of the revolving facility, subject to giving proper notice and compensating the lenders for standard Eurodollar breakage costs, if applicable.
The credit facility requires that the Company maintain certain financial covenants. The credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants, including, without limitation, the following tests: a minimum interest coverage ratio equal to or greater than 3.0 to 1.0 and a maximum leverage ratio equal to or less than 5.50 to 1.0. The credit facility also contains negative covenants and restrictions, including, among others, with respect to redeeming and repurchasing other indebtedness, loans and investments, additional indebtedness, liens, capital expenditures, changes in the nature of the Company's business, mergers, acquisitions, asset sales and transactions with the Company's affiliates.
15
The credit facility restricts the Company's ability to declare and pay dividends on its common stock as follows:
- •
- The Company may use all of its available cash accumulated after April 1, 2005 plus certain incremental funds to pay dividends, but may not in general pay dividends in excess of such amount. "Available Cash" is defined in the credit facility as Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (a) minus (i) cash interest expense, (ii) repayments of indebtedness other than repayments of the revolving facility (unless funded by debt or equity), (iii) consolidated capital expenditures (unless funded by long-term debt, equity or the proceeds from asset sales or insurance recovery events or related to the Merger), (iv) cash taxes, (v) cash consideration paid for acquisitions (unless funded by debt or equity), (vi) cash paid to make certain investments, and (vii) certain non-cash items excluded from Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and paid in cash and (b) plus (i) the cash amount of extraordinary gains and gains on sales of assets (excluding the gain realized on the sale of the Company's investment in the Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership) and (ii) certain non-cash items excluded from Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and received in cash. "Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA" is defined in the credit facility as Consolidated Net Income (which is defined in the credit facility and includes distributions from investments) (a) plus the following to the extent deducted from Consolidated Net Income: provision for income taxes, interest expense, depreciation, amortization, losses on sales of assets and other extraordinary losses, certain one-time charges recorded as operating expenses related to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (subject to an overall cap on the amount of such charges which may be added back) and certain other non-cash items, and (b) minus, to the extent included in Consolidated Net Income, gains on sales of assets and other extraordinary gains and all non-cash items.
- •
- The Company may not pay dividends if a default or event of default under the credit facility has occurred and is continuing or would exist after giving effect to such payment, if the Company's leverage ratio is above 5.25 to 1.00 or if the Company does not have at least $10.0 million of cash on hand (including unutilized commitments under the credit facility's revolving facility).
The credit facility also permits the Company to use available cash to repurchase shares of its capital stock, subject to the same conditions.
The Company may obtain letters of credit under the revolving facility to support obligations of the Company and/or obligations of its subsidiaries incurred in the ordinary course of business in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $10.0 million and subject to limitations on the aggregate amount outstanding under the revolving facility. As of September 30, 2007, a letter of credit had been issued for $1.4 million.
The credit facility is guaranteed, jointly and severally, subject to certain exceptions, by all first tier subsidiaries of the Company. The Company has provided to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as collateral agent for the benefit of the lenders under the credit facility and certain hedging creditors under permitted hedging agreements, collateral consisting of (subject to certain exceptions) 100% of the Company's equity interests in the subsidiary guarantors and certain other intermediate holding company subsidiaries. Newly acquired or formed direct or indirect subsidiaries of the Company which own equity interests of any subsidiary that is an operating company will be required to provide the collateral described above.
16
The credit facility contains customary events of default, including but not limited to, failure to pay principal, interest or other amounts when due, breach of covenants or representations, cross-defaults to certain other indebtedness in excess of specified amounts, judgment defaults in excess of specified amounts, certain ERISA defaults, the failure of any guaranty or security document supporting the credit facility and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency.
(8) Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share has been computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Except when the effect would be anti-dilutive, the diluted earnings per share calculation calculated using the treasury stock method includes the impact of stock units, shares of non-vested common stock and shares that could be issued under outstanding stock options.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the common shares used for basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share:
| | Three Months Ended
| | Nine Months Ended
|
---|
| | September 30, 2007
| | September 30, 2006
| | September 30, 2007
| | September 30, 2006
|
---|
| | (In thousands)
|
---|
Weighted average number of common shares used for basic (loss) earnings per share | | 34,770 | | 34,651 | | 34,736 | | 34,618 |
Effect of potential dilutive shares | | — | | 145 | | 231 | | 93 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive shares used for diluted earnings per share | | 34,770 | | 34,796 | | 34,967 | | 34,711 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the above reconciliation | | 786 | | 1,522 | | 555 | | 1,580 |
For the three months ended September 30, 2007, all potentially dilutive shares are anti-dilutive due to the net loss during the third quarter of 2007.
(9) Disposition of Assets
On July 31, 2007, the Company completed the sale of the assets of Yates City Telephone Company, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, or Yates, for $2.5 million, resulting in a gain of $2.2 million during the third quarter of 2007. Yates is located in Yates City, Illinois and had less than 500 access lines at the time of the sale. The gain is recorded in income from operations as a gain on sale of operating assets.
(10) Subsequent Events
In October 2007, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements which are contingent upon closing of the Merger. The first swap agreement is for a notional amount of $100.0 million at a rate of 4.5% (or 6.25% including the applicable margin), is effective as of June 30,
17
2008 and expires on December 31, 2010. The second swap agreement is for a notional amount of $100.0 million at a rate of 4.5% (or 6.25% including the applicable margin), is effective as of June 30, 2008 and expires on December 31, 2010.
(11) Litigation
On June 6, 2005, a purported class action complaint was filed in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, of the State of North Carolina by Robert Lowinger on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated persons against the Company, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certain of the Company's current and former directors and certain of the Company's stockholders. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) and liability under Section 15 of the Securities Act, and alleges that the Company's registration statement on Form S-1 (which was declared effective by the SEC on February 3, 2005) and the related prospectus dated February 3, 2005, each relating to the Company's initial public offering of common stock, contained certain material misstatements and omitted certain material information necessary to be included relating to the Company's broadband products and access line trends. The plaintiff, who has been a plaintiff in several prior securities cases, seeks rescission rights and unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of the common stock "issued pursuant and/or traceable to the Company's IPO during the period from February 3, 2005 through March 21, 2005". The Company removed the action to Federal Court. The plaintiff filed a motion to remand the action to the North Carolina State Court, which was denied by the Federal Magistrate. The plaintiff has objected to and appealed the Magistrate's decision to the District Court Judge. The Company has contested the appeal and filed a Motion to Dismiss the action. The Magistrate, on February 9, 2006, issued a Memorandum and a Recommendation to the District Court Judge that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. The plaintiff filed a Notice of Objection to the Magistrate's Recommendation. On August 16, 2007, the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina accepted the Magistrate's recommendations as its own and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.
From time to time, the Company is involved in other litigation and regulatory proceedings arising out of its operations. Management believes that the Company is not currently a party to any legal proceedings, the adverse outcome of which, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
18
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis provides information that our management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated results of operations and financial condition of FairPoint Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The discussion should be read in conjunction with FairPoint's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 included in FairPoint's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Overview
We are a leading provider of communications services in rural and small urban communities, offering an array of services, including local and long distance voice, data, Internet and broadband product offerings. We are one of the largest telephone companies in the United States focused on serving rural and small urban communities, and we are the 12th largest local telephone company in the United States, in each case based on number of access lines. We operate in 18 states with 309,857 access line equivalents (including voice access lines and high speed data, or HSD, lines which include digital subscriber line, or DSL, wireless broadband and cable modems) in service as of September 30, 2007.
We were incorporated in February 1991 for the purpose of acquiring and operating local exchange carriers in rural markets. Since 1993, we have acquired 35 such businesses, 30 of which we continue to own and operate. Many of our telephone companies have served their respective communities for over 75 years. The majority of the communities we serve have fewer than 2,500 access lines. Most of our telephone companies qualify as rural local exchange carriers under the Telecommunications Act.
Rural local exchange carriers, or RLECs, have historically been characterized by stable operating results and strong cash flow margins and operate in supportive regulatory environments. In particular, existing state and federal regulations permit RLECs to charge rates that enable recovery of operating costs, plus a reasonable rate of return on invested capital (as determined by relevant regulatory authorities). Historically, competition has typically been limited because RLECs primarily serve sparsely populated rural communities with predominantly residential customers, and the cost of operations and capital investment requirements for new entrants is high. However, in our markets, we have experienced some voice competition from cable providers and competitive local exchange carriers. We are also subject to competition from wireless and other technologies. If competition were to increase, the originating and terminating access revenues we receive may be reduced. We periodically negotiate interconnection agreements with other telecommunications providers which could ultimately result in increased competition in those markets.
Access lines are an important element of our business. Recently, many rural telephone companies have experienced a loss of access lines due to increased competition, the introduction of DSL services (resulting in customers substituting DSL for a second line) and challenging economic conditions. We have not been immune to these conditions but we have been able to mitigate our access line loss somewhat through bundling services, retention programs, continued community involvement and a variety of other focused programs.
Our board of directors has adopted a dividend policy which reflects our judgment that our stockholders would be better served if we distributed a substantial portion of the cash generated by our business in excess of operating needs, interest and principal payments on our indebtedness, dividends on future senior classes of our capital stock, if any, capital expenditures, taxes and future reserves, if any, as regular quarterly dividend payments to our stockholders, rather than retained and used for other purposes. However, our board of directors may, in its discretion, amend or repeal the dividend policy to decrease the level of dividends provided for or discontinue entirely the payment of dividends.
19
We are subject to regulation by federal and state governmental agencies. At the federal level, the Federal Communications Commission has jurisdiction over interstate and international communications services. State telecommunications regulators exercise jurisdiction over intrastate and local communications services.
On January 15, 2007, we entered into the Merger Agreement pursuant to which Spinco will merge with and into the Company with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation. Following the Merger, our operations will be more focused on small urban markets and will be more geographically concentrated in the northeastern United States. We expect to face more competition in our business located in the northeastern United States and we expect to be less dependent on access and Universal Service Fund revenue.
As of September 30, 2007, approximately $44.6 million of costs related to the Merger had been capitalized and $40.8 million had been expensed. These amounts were partially offset by approximately $26.2 million and $12.3 million, respectively, for amounts that have or will be reimbursed to us by Verizon pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Verizon will reimburse us for up to $40.0 million of certain qualified transition costs (subject to the specific terms contained in the Merger Agreement). At September 30, 2007, we had received approximately $18.3 million in cash reimbursements for qualified transition costs. As of September 30, 2007, approximately $20.2 million was recorded within current receivables.
The regulatory approval process is proceeding. We have submitted pre-filed testimony, answered data requests, participated in technical conferences, presented testimony at hearings (which have concluded) and are preparing formal briefs and reply briefs. Settlement conferences with certain interveners continue. There can be no assurance that regulatory approval will be received or received on a satisfactory and timely basis. In addition, at the current time, it is unclear what restrictions, if any, on our operations, capital structure and/or our ability to pay dividends at the current level and/or what expenditure requirements, if any, may be imposed as part of any such regulatory approvals.
If we cannot obtain a waiver under our credit facility, we anticipate that we may be in breach of certain financial covenants contained in our credit facility which will be measured as of March 31, 2008, if we continue to make expected pre-closing Merger related expenditures in 2008 and the Merger has not been consummated. If such a breach occurs, the lenders party to our credit facility could terminate our ability to borrow under our credit facility and accelerate the outstanding indebtedness under our credit facility. If the indebtedness under our credit facility were accelerated, we would not have the ability to repay such indebtedness. See "—Liquidity and Capital Resources."
On January 15, 2007, we entered into the MSA with Capgemini U.S. LLC. Through the MSA, we intend to replicate and/or replace certain existing Verizon systems during a phased period lasting from January 2007 through the fourth quarter of 2008. We are currently in the application development stage of the project and are recognizing costs in accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use". We have recognized both external service costs associated with the MSA based on total labor incurred as of September 30, 2007 compared to the total estimated labor to substantially complete the implementation project.
Management views its business of providing video, data and voice communication services to residential and business customers as one business segment and currently aggregates these revenue streams under the quantitative and qualitative thresholds defined in SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information."
We face risks that could materially adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity or the market price of our common stock. For a discussion of certain of the risks facing us, see Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report.
20
Revenues
We derive our revenues from:
- •
- Local calling services. We receive revenues from providing local exchange telephone services, including monthly recurring charges for basic service, usage charges for local calls and service charges for special calling features.
- •
- Universal Service Fund high cost loop support. We receive payments from the Universal Service Fund to support the high cost of our operations in rural markets. This revenue stream fluctuates based upon our average cost per loop compared to the national average cost per loop. For example, if the national average cost per loop increases and our operating costs (and average cost per loop) remain constant or decrease, the payments we receive from the Universal Service Fund would decline. Conversely, if the national average cost per loop decreases and our operating costs (and average cost per loop) remain constant or increase, the payments we receive from the Universal Service Fund would increase. The national average cost per loop in relation to our average cost per loop has increased, and we believe that the national average cost per loop will likely continue to increase in relation to our average cost per loop. As a result, the payments we receive from the Universal Service Fund have declined and will likely continue to decline.
- •
- Interstate access revenue. These revenues are primarily based on a regulated return on rate base and recovery of allowable expenses associated with the origination and termination of interstate calls both to and from our customers. Interstate access charges to long distance carriers and other customers are based on access rates filed with the Federal Communications Commission. These revenues also include Universal Service Fund payments for local switching support, long term support and interstate common line support.
- •
- Intrastate access revenue. These revenues consist primarily of charges paid by long distance companies and other customers for access to our networks in connection with the origination and termination of long distance telephone calls both to and from our customers. Intrastate access charges to long distance carriers and other customers are based on access rates filed with the state regulatory agencies.
- •
- Long distance services. We receive revenues from long distance services we provide to our residential and business customers. In addition, Carrier Services provides communications providers not affiliated with us with wholesale long distance services.
- •
- Data and Internet services. We receive revenues from monthly recurring charges for services, including HSD, special access, private lines, Internet and other services.
- •
- Other services. We receive revenues from other services, including billing and collection, directory services and sale and maintenance of customer premise equipment.
21
The following summarizes our revenues and percentage of revenues from continuing operations from these sources (in thousands):
| | Revenues
| | % of Revenues
| |
---|
| | Three months ended September 30,
| | Nine months ended September 30,
| | Three months ended September 30,
| | Nine months ended September 30,
| |
---|
Revenue Source(1)
| |
---|
| 2007
| | 2006
| | 2007
| | 2006
| | 2007
| | 2006
| | 2007
| | 2006
| |
---|
Local calling services | | $ | 17,453 | | $ | 16,586 | | $ | 52,489 | | $ | 49,872 | | 23 | % | 23 | % | 24 | % | 25 | % |
Universal service fund high cost loop | | | 5,245 | | | 5,116 | | | 14,306 | | | 14,666 | | 7 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % |
Interstate access revenues | | | 18,360 | | | 19,402 | | | 54,898 | | | 53,630 | | 24 | % | 28 | % | 26 | % | 27 | % |
Intrastate access revenues | | | 13,541 | | | 10,545 | | | 32,872 | | | 28,012 | | 18 | % | 15 | % | 15 | % | 14 | % |
Long distance services | | | 7,843 | | | 6,694 | | | 22,506 | | | 17,896 | | 10 | % | 10 | % | 10 | % | 9 | % |
Data and Internet services | | | 8,805 | | | 7,108 | | | 24,862 | | | 20,676 | | 12 | % | 10 | % | 12 | % | 10 | % |
Other services | | | 4,460 | | | 5,249 | | | 13,343 | | | 14,935 | | 6 | % | 7 | % | 6 | % | 8 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total | | $ | 75,707 | | $ | 70,700 | | $ | 215,276 | | $ | 199,687 | | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- Beginning in the second quarter of 2007, we re-categorized certain revenues to more accurately reflect the nature of those revenues. Prior year amounts were re-categorized to be presented on a comparable basis.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses are categorized as operating expenses and depreciation and amortization.
- •
- Operating expenses include cash expenses incurred in connection with the operation of our central offices and outside plant facilities and related operations. In addition to the operational costs of owning and operating our own facilities, we also purchase long distance services from the regional bell operating companies, large independent telephone companies and third party long distance providers. In addition, our operating expenses include expenses relating to the Merger, sales and marketing, customer service and administration and corporate and personnel administration. Also included in operating expenses are non-cash expenses related to stock based compensation. Stock based compensation consists of compensation charges incurred in connection with the employee stock options, stock units and non-vested stock granted to our executive officers and directors.
- •
- Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation of our communications network and equipment.
Acquisitions and Dispositions
- •
- On July 31, 2007, we completed the sale of the assets of Yates for $2.5 million. Yates is located in Yates City, Illinois and had less than 500 access lines at the time of the sale.
- •
- On January 15, 2007, we entered into the Merger Agreement pursuant to which FairPoint and Spinco will merge, with FairPoint continuing as the surviving corporation for legal purposes. Spinco is a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of Verizon that will own or indirectly own Verizon's local exchange and related business activities in Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. For accounting purposes, we expect that FairPoint will be the acquiree. Consequently, Merger related costs will be expensed as incurred and FairPoint's assets and liabilities will be recorded at fair value at acquisition.
22
- •
- On November 15, 2006, we completed a merger with The Germantown Independent Telephone Company, or GITC. The merger consideration was $10.7 million (or $9.2 million net of cash acquired). GITC is a single exchange rural incumbent local exchange carrier located in the Village of Germantown, Ohio, which served approximately 4,400 access line equivalents as of the date of acquisition.
- •
- On August 17, 2006, we completed the purchase of Unite Communications Systems, Inc., or Unite, for approximately $11.5 million (or $11.4 million net of cash acquired). Unite owns ExOp of Missouri, Inc., which is a facilities-based voice, data and video service provider located outside of Kansas City, Missouri. Unite served approximately 4,200 access lines in Kearney and Platte City, Missouri, approximately 50 miles north of the Cass County service territory, as of the date of acquisition.
- •
- On July 26, 2006, we completed the purchase of the assets of Cass County Telephone Company Limited Partnership and LEC Long Distance, Inc., or Cass County, for approximately $28.7 million. Cass County served approximately 8,600 access line equivalents, as of the date of acquisition, in Missouri and Kansas.
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth the percentages of revenues represented by selected items reflected in our consolidated statements of operations. The comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared with Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
| | Three months ended September 30,
| | Three months ended September 30,
| |
---|
| | 2007
| | % of revenues
| | 2006
| | % of revenues
| |
---|
| | (in thousands)
| |
| | (in thousands)
| |
| |
---|
Revenues | | $ | 75,707 | | 100.0 | % | $ | 70,700 | | 100.0 | % |
Operating expenses | | | 54,846 | | 72.4 | % | | 40,362 | | 57.1 | % |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 12,624 | | 16.7 | % | | 12,839 | | 18.1 | % |
Gain on sale of operating assets | | | (2,164 | ) | (2.9 | )% | | — | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating expenses | | | 65,306 | | 86.2 | % | | 53,201 | | 75.2 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income from operations | | | 10,401 | | 13.8 | % | | 17,499 | | 24.8 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net gain on sale of investments and other assets | | | 2,759 | | 3.6 | % | | 64 | | 0.1 | % |
Interest and dividend income | | | 294 | | 0.4 | % | | 211 | | 0.3 | % |
Interest expense | | | (9,924 | ) | (13.1 | )% | | (9,969 | ) | (14.1 | )% |
Loss on derivative instruments | | | (5,669 | ) | (7.5 | )% | | — | | — | |
Equity in net earnings of investees | | | 320 | | 0.4 | % | | 1,841 | | 2.6 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total other (expense) income | | | (12,220 | ) | (16.2 | )% | | (7,853 | ) | (11.1 | )% |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before income taxes | | | (1,819 | ) | (2.4 | )% | | 9,646 | | 13.7 | % |
Income tax expense | | | (3,372 | ) | (4.5 | )% | | (3,668 | ) | (5.2 | )% |
Minority interest in income of subsidiaries | | | — | | — | | | (1 | ) | (0.0 | )% |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (5,191 | ) | (6.9 | )% | $ | 5,977 | | 8.5 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
23
Revenues
Revenues increased $5.0 million to $75.7 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to $70.7 million in the third quarter of 2006. Of this increase, $2.0 million was attributable to companies acquired in the last twelve months and $3.0 million was attributable to our existing operations. We derived our revenues from the following sources:
Local calling services. Local calling service revenues increased $0.9 million to $17.5 million in 2007 compared to 2006. Excluding the impact of acquired operations, local calling service revenues increased $0.2 million compared to the third quarter of 2006. Voice access lines, including lines acquired, decreased 3.5% from the third quarter of 2006 and decreased sequentially from the second quarter of 2007 by 1.8%. Voice access lines, excluding acquired lines, decreased 4.8% from the third quarter of 2006.
Universal Service Fund high cost loop. Universal Service Fund high cost loop receipts increased $0.1 million to $5.2 million in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the third quarter of 2006. Excluding the impact of acquired companies, Universal Service Fund high cost loop receipts were flat compared to 2006.
Interstate access revenues. Interstate access revenues were $18.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $19.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Excluding the impact of acquired companies, interstate access revenues decreased $1.5 million compared to 2006.
Intrastate access revenues. Intrastate access revenues increased $3.0 million to $13.5 million in 2007 compared to 2006. Excluding the impact of acquired companies, intrastate access revenues increased $2.8 million compared to 2006. This increase is principally due to the settlement of certain previously disputed access revenues of $4.4 million.
Long distance services. Long distance services revenues increased $1.1 million to $7.8 million in 2007 compared to 2006. This is attributable to the increase in subscribers and minutes related to bundles and packages sold to our existing customers. Interstate long distance penetration as of September 30, 2007 was 53.7% of voice access lines as compared to 45.6% as of September 30, 2006.
Data and Internet services. Data and internet services revenues increased $1.7 million to $8.8 million in 2007 compared to 2006. Excluding the impact of acquired companies, data and internet services revenues increased $1.4 million compared to 2006. This increase is due primarily to increases in HSD customers as we continue to market our broadband services. Our number of HSD subscribers increased from 57,095 as of September 30, 2006 to 66,978 as of September 30, 2007 and represents a 27.6% penetration of voice access lines.
Other services. Other revenues decreased from $5.2 million in 2006 to $4.5 million in 2007. Excluding the impact of acquired companies, other revenues decreased $0.9 million compared to 2006. This decrease is principally driven by a decrease in directory revenues in 2007.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization. Operating expenses increased $14.5 million to $54.8 million in 2007 compared to 2006. Approximately $1.4 million of this increase is related to operating expenses of the companies acquired during the last twelve months. In addition, the primary drivers of this increase were Merger related expenses of $12.5 million and cost of goods sold of $0.6 million (principally related to HSD and long distance services), bad debt expense of $0.6 million, materials and supplies expense of $0.3 million and audit and tax services of $0.3 million. These
24
increases were partially offset by decreases in employee related costs of $0.6 million, billing expenses of $0.5 million, contract services of $0.4 million and consulting expenses of $0.3 million.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $0.2 million to $12.6 million in 2007 due primarily to the maturing nature of our plant assets.
Gain on sale of operating assets. Gain on sale of operating assets in the third quarter of $2.2 million resulted from the sale of the assets of Yates.
Income from operations. Income from operations decreased $7.1 million to $10.4 million in 2007. This was driven principally by the increase in expenses discussed above. Also driving the decrease in income from operations is the increased percentage of lower margin unregulated revenues in our total business mix due to HSD and long distance revenue growth, which offset higher margin regulated revenues.
Other income (expense). Total other expense increased $4.4 million to $12.2 million in 2007. Net gains on sale of investments and other assets increased $2.7 million, principally as a result of a gain on the release of escrowed funds related to the sale of Southern Illinois Cellular Corporation. Equity in net earnings of investees decreased $1.5 million in 2007 due to the O-P Disposition in April 2007. In addition, we recorded a loss on derivative instruments for the change in fair value of $5.7 million in the third quarter of 2007.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense of $3.4 million was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2007, resulting in an effective rate of (185.4%) compared to 38.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2006.
During the third quarter of 2007, we disposed of the assets of Yates, resulting in the recognition of a gain of $2.2 million for federal and state income tax purposes that is taxed at our blended statutory rate of 37.6%. We treated this item as a discrete event during the third quarter.
We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Our effective income tax rate for the interim periods presented is based on our actual effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and differs from the federal statutory income tax rate primarily due to nondeductible permanent differences. In 2007, we considered all estimated expenses related to the Merger and determined that some of these expenses were not deductible for income tax purposes. Based on current projections, we believe our annual effective tax rate for 2007 will be 97%. Excluding the impact of the non-deductible transaction costs attributable to the Merger, the annualized effective rate will be approximately 38%.
As of December 31, 2006, we had $235.1 million of federal and state net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards. As a result, the income tax expense we record is generally greater than the income taxes we currently pay.
Net (loss) income. Net loss was $5.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to net income of $6.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. The differences between 2007 and 2006 are a result of the factors discussed above.
25
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
| | Nine months ended September 30,
| | Nine months ended September 30,
| |
---|
| | 2007
| | % of revenues
| | 2006
| | % of revenues
| |
---|
| | (in thousands)
| |
| | (in thousands)
| |
| |
---|
Revenues | | $ | 215,276 | | 100.0 | % | $ | 199,687 | | 100.0 | % |
Operating expenses | | | 155,716 | | 72.3 | % | | 112,242 | | 56.2 | % |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 37,873 | | 17.6 | % | | 39,826 | | 20.0 | % |
Gain on sale of operating assets | | | (2.164 | ) | (1.0 | )% | | — | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating expenses | | | 191,425 | | 88.9 | % | | 152,068 | | 76.2 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income from operations | | | 23,851 | | 11.1 | % | | 47,619 | | 23.8 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net gain on sale of investments and other assets | | | 49,586 | | 23.0 | % | | 14,289 | | 7.2 | % |
Interest and dividend income | | | 805 | | 0.4 | % | | 3,138 | | 1.6 | % |
Interest expense | | | (29,932 | ) | (13.9 | )% | | (29,514 | ) | (14.8 | )% |
Loss on derivative instruments | | | (5,669 | ) | (2.6 | )% | | — | | — | |
Equity in net earnings of investees | | | 4,889 | | 2.2 | % | | 8,206 | | 4.1 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total other income (expense) | | | 19,679 | | 9.1 | % | | (3,881 | ) | (1.9 | )% |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before income taxes | | | 43,530 | | 20.2 | % | | 43,738 | | 21.9 | % |
Income tax expense | | | (17,974 | ) | (8.3 | )% | | (16,965 | ) | (8.5 | )% |
Minority interest in income of subsidiaries | | | (1 | ) | (0.0 | )% | | (2 | ) | (0.0 | )% |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income | | $ | 25,555 | | 11.9 | % | $ | 26,771 | | 13.4 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Revenues
Revenues increased $15.6 million to $215.3 million in 2007 compared to $199.7 million in 2006. Of this increase, $11.5 million was attributable to companies acquired in the last twelve months and $4.1 million was attributable to our existing operations. We derived our revenues from the following sources:
Local calling services. Local calling service revenues increased $2.6 million to $52.5 million in 2007 compared to 2006. Excluding the impact of acquired operations, local calling service revenues decreased $1.1 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Voice access lines, excluding acquired lines, decreased 4.8% from the prior year.
Universal Service Fund high cost loop. Universal Service Fund high cost loop receipts decreased $0.4 million to $14.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Excluding the impact of acquired companies, Universal Service Fund high cost loop receipts decreased $1.4 million compared to 2006.
Interstate access revenues. Interstate access revenues were $54.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $53.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Excluding the impact of acquired companies, interstate access revenues decreased $2.0 million compared to 2006.
Intrastate access revenues. Intrastate access revenues increased $4.9 million to $32.9 million in 2007 compared to 2006. Excluding the impact of acquired companies, intrastate access revenues
26
increased $3.7 million compared to 2006. This increase is principally due to the settlement of certain previously disputed access revenues in the third quarter of 2007.
Long distance services. Long distance services revenues increased $4.6 million to $22.5 million in 2007 compared to 2006. This is attributable to the increase in subscribers and minutes related to bundles and packages sold to our existing customers. Interstate long distance penetration as of September 30, 2007 was 53.7% of voice access lines as compared to 45.6% as of September 30, 2006.
Data and Internet services. Data and internet services revenues increased $4.2 million to $24.9 million in 2007 compared to 2006. Excluding the impact of acquired companies, data and internet services revenues increased $3.0 million compared to 2006. This increase is due primarily to increases in HSD customers as we continue to market our broadband services. Our number of HSD subscribers increased from 57,095 as of September 30, 2006 to 66,978 as of September 30, 2007 and represents a 27.6% penetration of voice access lines.
Other services. Other revenues decreased from $14.9 million in 2006 to $13.3 million in 2007. Excluding the impact of acquired companies, other revenues decreased $2.5 million compared to 2006. This decrease is principally driven by a decrease in directory revenues in 2007.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization. Operating expenses increased $43.5 million to $155.7 million in 2007 from $112.2 million in 2006. Approximately $6.0 million of this increase is related to operating expenses of the companies acquired during the last twelve months. In addition, the primary drivers of this increase were Merger related expenses of $28.4 million and increases in cost of goods sold of $2.4 million (principally related to HSD and long distance services), operating taxes of $1.3 million (principally related to the O-P Disposition), official toll expenses of $1.0 million, employee related costs of $0.7 million, materials and supplies expenses of $0.5 million and operating insurance expenses of $0.3 million.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $2.0 million to $37.9 million in 2007 due principally to the maturing nature of our plant assets.
Gain on sale of operating assets Gain on sale of operating assets in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of $2.2 million resulted from the sale of the assets of Yates.
Income from operations. Income from operations decreased $23.8 million to $23.9 million in 2007. This was driven principally by the increase in expenses discussed above. Also driving the decrease in income from operations is the increased percentage of lower margin unregulated revenues in our total business mix due to HSD and long distance revenue growth, which offset higher margin regulated revenues.
Other income (expense). Total other income (expense) increased $23.6 million to $19.7 million in 2007. Net gains on sale of investments and other assets increased $35.3 million principally as a result of the sale of the Company's investment in Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership. Interest expense increased $0.4 million to $29.9 million in 2007. Equity in net earnings of investees decreased $3.3 million in 2007 due to the O-P Disposition in April 2007. Interest and dividend income decreased $2.3 million to $0.8 million in 2007. In addition, we recorded a loss on derivative instruments for the change in fair value of $5.7 million in 2007.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense of $18.0 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, resulting in an effective rate of 41.3% compared to 38.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we disposed of our 7.5% ownership interest in the Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership and the assets of Yates, resulting in the
27
recognition of gains of $44.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for federal and state income tax purposes that is taxed at the Company's blended statutory rate of 37.6%. Furthermore, we effectively settled tax exposure items totaling $2.7 million with the IRS resulting in a reduction of the FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes," liability and income tax expense. We also recognized other discrete items resulting in a reduction of income tax expense of $536,000. We treated these items as discrete events during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Excluding these discrete events, our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was (97%).
As of December 31, 2006, we had $235.1 million of federal and state NOL carryforwards. As a result, the income tax expense we record is generally greater than the income taxes we currently pay.
Net income. Net income was $25.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to net income of $26.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The differences between 2007 and 2006 are a result of the factors discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our short and long-term liquidity needs arise primarily from: (i) interest payments primarily related to our credit facility; (ii) capital expenditures, including those related to the Merger; (iii) working capital requirements as may be needed to support the growth of our business, including those related to the Merger; (iv) dividend payments on our common stock; and (v) potential acquisitions.
Our board of directors has adopted a dividend policy which reflects our judgment that our stockholders would be better served if we distributed a substantial portion of our cash available for distribution to our stockholders instead of retaining it in our business. As a result of this dividend policy, we may not have significant cash available to meet any unanticipated liquidity requirements, other than available borrowings, if any, under our credit facility. If we do not have sufficient cash to meet such unanticipated liquidity requirements, our financial condition and our business will suffer. However, our board of directors may, in its discretion, amend or repeal the dividend policy to decrease the level of dividends provided for or discontinue entirely the payment of dividends. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we paid dividends on our common stock totaling $41.8 million, or $1.19343 per share. The amount of dividends we pay following the Merger could be reduced as a result of conditions that may be imposed by regulatory authorities in connection with the approval of the Merger or financial covenants in new indebtedness incurred in connection with the Merger.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations was $24.1 million and $59.0 million, respectively. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities in 2007 was primarily due to expenses related to the Merger.
Our ability to service our indebtedness depends on our ability to generate cash in the future. We are not required to make any scheduled principal payments under our credit facility's term loan facility prior to maturity in February 2012. However, we will need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity and we may not be able to refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we were unable to renew or refinance our credit facility, our failure to repay all amounts due on the maturity date would cause a default under our credit facility.
Our credit facility consists of a revolving facility, or the revolver, in a total principal amount of up to $100.0 million, of which $76.5 million was available at October 31, 2007 and a term loan facility, or the term loan, in a total principal amount of $588.5 million with $588.5 million outstanding at October 31, 2007. The term loan matures in February 2012 and the revolver matures in February 2011. The revolver has a swingline sub-facility in an amount of $5.0 million and a letter of credit sub-facility in an amount of $10.0 million, which will allow issuances of standby letters of credit for our account.
28
Borrowings under our revolver bear interest, at our option, at either (i) the Eurodollar rate plus 2.00% or (ii) a base rate, as such term is defined in our credit facility, plus 1.00%.
On January 25, 2007, we entered into an amendment to our credit facility that is intended to facilitate certain transactions related to the Merger. Among other things, such amendment: (i) permits us to consummate the O-P Disposition and retain the proceeds thereof up to an amount equal to $55.0 million; (ii) excludes the gain on the O-P Disposition from the calculation of "Available Cash" under our credit facility; (iii) amends the definition of "Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA" to allow for certain one-time add-backs to the calculation thereof for operating expenses incurred in connection with the Merger (subject to an overall cap on the amount of such add-backs); (iv) amends the definition of "Consolidated Capital Expenditures" to exclude certain expenditures incurred by us in connection with transition and integration costs prior to consummation of the Merger (subject to an overall cap on the amount of such exclusions); and (v) increases the leverage covenant and dividend suspension test to 5.50 to 1.00 and 5.25 to 1.00, respectively. We expect that operating expenses incurred in connection with the Merger and expenditures in connection with transition and integration costs will exceed the aggregate cap by the end of December 2007, and we will no longer be able to add any such expenses in excess of the cap back to calculate "Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA" and/or exclude any such expenditures in excess of the cap to calculate "Consolidated Capital Expenditures" after such time.
Our credit facility contains financial covenants, including, without limitation, the following tests: a minimum interest coverage ratio equal to or greater than 3.0 to 1 and a maximum leverage ratio equal to or less than 5.50 to 1. Our credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants and also contains negative covenants and restrictions, including, among others, with respect to redeeming and repurchasing our other indebtedness, loans and investments, additional indebtedness, liens, capital expenditures, changes in the nature of our business, mergers, acquisitions, asset sales and transactions with affiliates. Subject to certain limitations set forth in our credit facility, we may use all of our Cumulative Distributable Cash (as defined in our credit facility) accumulated after April 1, 2005 to declare and pay dividends, but we may not in general pay dividends in excess of such amount. On March 11, 2005, April 29, 2005 and September 14, 2005, we entered into technical amendments to our credit facility.
Borrowings under our credit facility bear interest at variable interest rates. We have entered into various interest rate swap agreements which are detailed in note 5 of the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report. As a result of these swap agreements, as of September 30, 2007, approximately 89% of our indebtedness bore interest at fixed rates rather than variable rates. After these interest rate swap agreements expire, our annual debt service obligations on such portion of the term loans will vary from year to year unless we enter into a new interest rate swap or purchase an interest rate cap or other interest rate hedge. To the extent interest rates increase in the future, we may not be able to enter into new interest rate swaps or to purchase interest rate caps or other interest rate hedges on acceptable terms.
In 2003, the Company issued $225.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 117/8% notes. These notes were to mature on March 1, 2010. These notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company, ranking pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future senior debt of the Company, including all obligations under our credit facility, and senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Company. On February 9, 2005, we repurchased $223.0 million principal amount of the 117/8% notes tendered pursuant to the tender offer for such notes. $2.1 million principal amount of the 117/8% notes remains outstanding.
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations was $23.3 million and $(12.1) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Proceeds from sales of investments and other assets were $60.2 million and $43.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, capital expenditures were $39.9 million and
29
$25.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and distributions from investments were $2.6 million and $7.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in capital expenditures primarily relates to Merger related capital expenditures. Distributions from investments decreased as a result of the O-P Disposition.
On January 15, 2007, Taconic entered into the O-P Interest Purchase Agreement pursuant to which Taconic agreed to effect the O-P Disposition. This transaction closed on April 10, 2007 and therefore we no longer receive distributions from Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership effective as of such date. In August 2007, we received $2.7 million from the escrow account related to the sale of our investment in Southern Illinois Cellular Corporation, which was completed in 2006.
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations was $42.4 million and $46.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt were $26 thousand. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net repayments of long-term debt were $5.1 million.
We expect to fund the Merger through the issuance of approximately 53.8 million shares of our common stock to existing Verizon stockholders and the incurrence of $1.7 billion of new indebtedness. We anticipate that the new indebtedness will consist of bank debt and senior unsecured notes in proportions that have yet to be determined. We have obtained commitment letters for up to $2.080 billion of bank financing to facilitate the re-financing of our existing bank debt with the new bank debt to be incurred in connection with the Merger.
We expect that total capital expenditures for 2007 will be approximately $29.0 million to $31.0 million, excluding capital expenditures related to the Merger.
We expect to continue to incur significant monthly cash expenditures related to the Merger through the closing of the Merger. We currently expect the Merger will close on January 31, 2008; however the closing may be delayed if required regulatory approvals have not been obtained. If such a delay occurs, there can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash from operations or have borrowings available under our credit facility to make these pre-closing Merger related expenditures and satisfy our debt service and our dividend and working capital requirements. Subject to restrictions in our credit facility, we may incur more indebtedness to satisfy such obligations, but there can be no assurance that additional financing, if permitted under the terms of our credit facility, will be available to us on terms acceptable to us or at all. If borrowings under our credit facility and/or other additional financing are not available to us and we continue to make these pre-closing Merger related expenditures, we may need to decrease the level of dividends payable on our common stock or discontinue entirely the payment of dividends. In addition, unless we have at least $10.0 million of cash on hand (including unutilized commitments under our credit facility's revolving facility), we will not be permitted under our credit facility to pay dividends on our common stock.
In addition, if we cannot obtain a waiver under our credit facility, we anticipate that we may be in breach of certain financial covenants contained in our credit facility which will be measured as of March 31, 2008 if we continue to make expected pre-closing Merger related expenditures in 2008 and the Merger has not been consummated. If such a breach occurs, the lenders party to our credit facility could terminate our ability to borrow under our credit facility and accelerate the outstanding indebtedness under our credit facility, and our ability to pay dividends under our credit facility would be suspended. If the indebtedness under our credit facility were accelerated, we would not have the ability to repay such indebtedness.
We expect to spend approximately $125.0 million to $140.0 million following the closing of the Merger (assuming the Merger closes on January 31, 2008) primarily on network systems upgrades related to the integration of the acquired business. We plan to fund these expenditures through cash flow from operations, borrowings under the delayed draw term loan facility of the new credit facility we
30
expect to enter into in connection with the consummation of the Merger and borrowings under the revolving facility of such new credit facility, if necessary.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Summary of Contractual Obligations
The tables set forth below contain information with regard to disclosures about contractual obligations and commercial commitments.
The following table discloses aggregate information about our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2007 and the periods in which payments are due:
| | Payments due by period
|
---|
| | Total
| | Less than 1 year
| | 1-3 years
| | 3-5 years
| | More than 5 years
|
---|
| | (Dollars in thousands)
|
---|
Contractual obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Debt maturing within one year | | $ | 743 | | $ | 743 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — |
| Long term debt | | | 607,294 | | | — | | | 2,515 | | | 604,437 | | | 342 |
| Fixed interest payments | | | 94,219 | | | 30,521 | | | 49,798 | | | 13,752 | | | 148 |
| Variable interest payments | | | 89,589 | | | 8,371 | | | 32,417 | | | 48,801 | | | — |
| Operating leases | | | 7,010 | | | 1,588 | | | 1,821 | | | 1,187 | | | 2,414 |
| Hardware and software contracts | | | 141,887 | | | 141,887 | | | — | | | — | | | — |
| Unrecognized tax benefits | | | 985 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 985 |
| Minimum purchase contract | | | 148 | | | 104 | | | 32 | | | 12 | | | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Total contractual cash obligations | | $ | 941,875 | | $ | 183,214 | | $ | 86,583 | | $ | 668,189 | | $ | 3,889 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
The following table discloses aggregate information about our derivative financial instruments as of September 30, 2007, the source of fair value of these instruments and their maturities.
| | Fair Value of Contracts at Period-End
|
---|
| | Total
| | Less than 1 year
| | 1-3 years
| | 3-5 years
| | More than 5 years
|
---|
| | (Dollars in thousands)
|
---|
Source of fair value: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instruments(1) | | $ | (8,946 | ) | 396 | | (8,224 | ) | (1,118 | ) | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
- (1)
- Fair value of interest rate swaps at September 30, 2007 was provided by the counterparties to the underlying contracts using consistent methodologies.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in consolidated financial statements. Changes in these estimates and assumptions are considered reasonably possible and may have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements and thus actual results could differ from the amounts reported and disclosed herein.
The Company capitalizes certain costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining internal use software in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of
31
Position 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use" (98-1). Capitalized costs include direct development costs associated with internal use software, including direct labor costs and external costs of materials and services. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred.
Our critical accounting policies that require the use of estimates and assumptions were disclosed in detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006; apart from 98-1, they have not changed materially from that disclosure.
New Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements." SFAS No. 157 is definitional and disclosure oriented and addresses how companies should approach measuring fair value when required by GAAP; it does not create or modify any current GAAP requirements to apply fair value accounting. SFAS No. 157 provides a single definition for fair value that is to be applied consistently for all accounting applications, and also generally describes and prioritizes according to reliability the methods and inputs used in valuations. The new measurement and disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 157 are effective for us in the first quarter of 2008. We are still evaluating the impact, if any, from adopting SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an Amendment of SFAS No. 115," which permits an entity to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Entities that elect the fair value option will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis, with a few exceptions. SFAS No. 159 amends previous guidance to extend the use of the fair value option to available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities. The Statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements to help financial statement users understand the effect of the election. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 159.
Inflation
We do not believe inflation has a significant effect on our operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
As of September 30, 2007, approximately 89% of our existing indebtedness bore interest at fixed rates or effectively at fixed rates. Our earnings are affected by changes in interest rates as our long-term indebtedness under our credit facility has variable interest rates based on either the prime rate or LIBOR. If interest rates on our variable rate indebtedness (excluding variable rate indebtedness which has its interest rate effectively fixed under interest rate swap agreements) outstanding at September 30, 2007 increased by 10%, our interest expense would have increased, and our income before taxes would have decreased, by approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
We have entered into interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on our variable rate indebtedness. The fair value of these swaps was a net liability of approximately $8.9 million at September 30, 2007. The fair value indicates an estimated amount we would have paid to cancel the contracts or transfer them to other parties.
We use variable and fixed-rate debt to finance our operations, capital expenditures and acquisitions. The variable-rate debt obligations expose us to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. We believe it is prudent to limit the variability of a portion of our interest payments. To meet this objective, we enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from interest rate risk. These swaps change the variable-rate cash flow exposure on
32
the debt obligations to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, we pay a variable interest rate plus an additional payment if the variable rate payment is below a contractual rate, or we receive a payment if the variable rate payment is above the contractual rate. The chart below provides details of each of our interest rate swap agreements as of September 30, 2007.
Effective Date:
| | Notional Amount
| | Rate
| | Rate, including applicable margin
| | Expiration Date
|
---|
February 8, 2005 | | $130.0 Million | | 3.76 | % | 5.51 | % | December 31, 2007 |
February 8, 2005 | | $130.0 Million | | 3.98 | % | 5.73 | % | December 31, 2008 |
February 8, 2005 | | $130.0 Million | | 4.11 | % | 5.86 | % | December 31, 2009 |
April 29, 2005 | | $50.0 Million | | 4.72 | % | 6.47 | % | March 31, 2012 |
June 30, 2005 | | $50.0 Million | | 4.69 | % | 6.44 | % | March 31, 2011 |
June 30, 2006 | | $50.0 Million | | 5.36 | % | 7.11 | % | December 31, 2009 |
December 31, 2007 | | $65.0 Million | | 4.91 | % | 6.66 | % | December 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2007 | | $75.0 Million | | 5.46 | % | 7.21 | % | December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2008 | | $100.0 Million | | 5.02 | % | 6.77 | % | December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 | | $150.0 Million | | 5.65 | % | 7.40 | % | December 31, 2011 |
June 30, 2008* | | $100.0 Million | | 4.99 | % | 6.74 | % | December 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2008* | | $100.0 Million | | 4.95 | % | 6.70 | % | June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2008* | | $100.0 Million | | 5.45 | % | 7.20 | % | December 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2008* | | $100.0 Million | | 5.30 | % | 7.05 | % | December 30, 2010 |
* Contingent upon closing of the Merger.
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 contains information about market risks under "Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk."
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.
Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (a) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in this Quarterly Report has been timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules of the SEC and (b) include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We continue to update our internal controls over financial reporting as necessary to accommodate any modifications to our business processes or accounting procedures. During the second quarter of 2007, we converted our accounting and enterprise resource planning system and have continued to modify the system subsequent to the end of the second quarter. However, during the quarter ended September 30, 2007, there have been no changes that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
33
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
On June 6, 2005, a purported class action complaint was filed in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, of the State of North Carolina by Robert Lowinger on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated persons against the Company, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certain of the Company's current and former directors and certain of the Company's stockholders. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) and liability under Section 15 of the Securities Act, and alleges that the Company's registration statement on Form S-1 (which was declared effective by the SEC on February 3, 2005) and the related prospectus dated February 3, 2005, each relating to the Company's initial public offering of common stock, contained certain material misstatements and omitted certain material information necessary to be included relating to the Company's broadband products and access line trends. The plaintiff, who has been a plaintiff in several prior securities cases, seeks rescission rights and unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of the common stock "issued pursuant and/or traceable to the Company's IPO during the period from February 3, 2005 through March 21, 2005". The Company removed the action to Federal Court. The plaintiff filed a motion to remand the action to the North Carolina State Court, which was denied by the Federal Magistrate. The plaintiff has objected to and appealed the Magistrate's decision to the District Court Judge. The Company has contested the appeal and filed a Motion to Dismiss the action. The Magistrate, on February 9, 2006, issued a Memorandum and a Recommendation to the District Court Judge that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. The plaintiff filed a Notice of Objection to the Magistrate's Recommendation. On August 16, 2007, the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina accepted the Magistrate's recommendations as its own and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.
From time to time, we are involved in other litigation and regulatory proceedings arising out of our operations. Management believes that we are not currently a party to any legal proceedings, the adverse outcome of which, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, there were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
For a discussion of the risks facing us, refer to Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
We did not sell any unregistered equity securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
Under Delaware law, our board of directors may declare dividends only to the extent of our "surplus" (which is defined as total assets at fair market value minus total liabilities, minus statutory capital) or, if there is no surplus, out of our net profits for the then current and/or immediately preceding fiscal year.
34
Our credit facility restricts our ability to declare and pay dividends on our common stock as follows:
- •
- We may use our cumulative distributable cash to pay dividends, but may not in general pay dividends in excess of the amount of our cumulative distributable cash. "Cumulative distributable cash" is defined in our credit facility as the amount of "available cash" generated beginning on April 1, 2005 through the end of the Company's most recent fiscal quarter for which financial statements are available and a compliance certificate has been delivered (a) minus the aggregate amount of dividends paid after July 30, 2005 and the aggregate amount of investments made after April 1, 2005 using such cash, (b) plus the aggregate amount of distributions received from such investments (not to exceed the amount originally invested). "Available Cash" is defined in our credit facility as Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA (a) minus (i) cash interest expense (adjusted for amortization and swap interest), (ii) scheduled principal payments on indebtedness, (iii) consolidated capital expenditures, (iv) investments, (v) cash income taxes, and (vi) non-cash items excluded from Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA and paid in cash and (b) plus (i) the cash amount of any extraordinary gains and gains realized on asset sales other than in the ordinary course of business (excluding the gain realized on the O-P Disposition) and (ii) cash received on account of non-cash gains and non-cash income excluded from Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA. "Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA" is defined in our credit facility as Consolidated Net Income (which is defined in the credit facility and includes distributions from investments) (a) plus the following to the extent deducted from Consolidated Net Income: provision for income taxes, consolidated interest expense, depreciation, amortization, losses on sales of assets and other extraordinary losses, certain one-time charges recorded as operating expenses related to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (subject to a cap on the amount of such charges which may be added back) and certain other non-cash items, each as defined, (b) minus gains on sales of assets and other extraordinary gains and all non-cash items increasing Consolidated Net Income.
- •
- We may not pay dividends if a default or event of default under our credit facility has occurred and is continuing or would exist after giving effect to such payment, if our leverage ratio is above 5.25 to 1.00 or if we do not have at least $10 million of cash on hand (including unutilized commitments under our credit facility's revolving facility).
For purposes of calculating "Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA" under our credit facility, we are permitted to add back certain operating expenses incurred in connection with the Merger (subject to an overall cap on the amount of such add-backs). In addition, certain capital expenditures related to the Merger are excluded from the definition of "Consolidated Capital Expenditures" under our credit facility (subject to an overall cap on the amount of such exclusions). As disclosed in Part I of this Quarterly Report, we expect that we will reach the aggregate cap by the end of December 2007, and will no longer be able to add any such expenses back to calculate "Adjusted Consolidated EBITDA" or exclude any such expenditures from "Consolidated Capital Expenditures." As a result, after we reach the aggregate cap, we expect that the amount of "Available Cash" we generate prior to the closing of the Merger will decrease, which may adversely affect our ability to continue paying dividends at the current level.
Our credit facility also permits us to use available cash to repurchase shares of our capital stock, subject to the same conditions.
See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Description of Certain Indebtedness—Credit Facility" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and note 7 of the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for a more detailed description of our credit facility and these restrictions.
35
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The Company held its annual meeting on August 22, 2007. As of the record date for the annual meeting, there were 35,241,541 shares of our common stock outstanding. Below is a summary of the proposals voted on at the annual meeting and the outcome of such vote with respect to each proposal.
1. The proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement, as amended, and to approve the issuance of FairPoint common stock to Verizon stockholders pursuant to the Merger Agreement was approved with 22,017,856 votes for, 316,208 votes against and 684,229 abstentions.
2. The proposal to elect David L. Hauser to serve as a director of FairPoint until the 2010 annual meeting was approved with 30,752,430 votes for, 2,642 votes against and 754,047 abstentions. Claude C. Lilly and Robert S. Lilien continued as directors of FairPoint serving until the 2008 annual meeting and Eugene B. Johnson and Patricia Garrison-Corbin continued as directors of FairPoint serving until the 2009 annual meeting.
3. The proposal to ratify KPMG LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 was approved by 31,185,518 votes for, 214,388 votes against and 109,213 abstentions.
4. The proposal to adjourn the annual meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies for the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the issuance of FairPoint common stock in connection therewith was approved by 30,205,777 votes for, 1,103,899 votes against and 199,443 abstentions.
Item 5. Other Information.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report are listed in the index to exhibits immediately preceding such exhibits, which index to exhibits is incorporated herein by reference.
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, and the undersigned also has signed this Quarterly Report in his capacity as the Registrant's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer).
| | FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. |
Date: November 2, 2007 | | By: | | /s/ JOHN P. CROWLEY Name: John P. Crowley Title:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
37
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No.
| | Description
|
---|
2.1 | | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 13, 2006, among FairPoint, MJD Ventures, Inc., FairPoint Germantown Corporation and The Germantown Independent Telephone Company.(1) |
2.2 | | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 15, 2007, by and among Verizon Communications Inc., Northern New England Spinco Inc. and FairPoint.(2) |
2.3 | | Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 20, 2007, by and among Verizon Communications Inc., Northern New England Spinco Inc. and FairPoint.(2) |
2.4 | | Amendment No. 2 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 28, 2007, by and among Verizon Communications Inc., Northern New England Spinco Inc. and FairPoint.(3) |
2.5 | | Amendment No. 3 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 3, 2007, by and among Verizon Communications Inc., Northern New England Spinco Inc. and FairPoint.(4) |
2.6 | | Distribution Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2007, by and between Verizon Communications Inc. and Northern New England Spinco Inc.(2) |
2.7 | | Amendment No. 1 to Distribution Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2007, by and between Verizon Communications Inc. and Northern New England Spinco Inc.(2) |
2.8 | | Amendment No. 2 to Distribution Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2007, by and between Verizon Communications Inc. and Northern New England Spinco Inc.(2) |
2.9 | | Amendment No. 3 to Distribution Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2007, by and between Verizon Communications Inc. and Northern New England Spinco Inc.(2) |
2.10 | | Transition Services Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2007, by and among Verizon Information Technologies LLC, Northern New England Telephone Operations Inc., Enhanced Communications of Northern New England Inc. and FairPoint.(2) |
2.11 | | Master Services Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2007, by and between FairPoint and Capgemini U.S. LLC.(2) |
2.12 | | Amendment No. 1 to Master Services Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2007, by and between FairPoint and Capgemini U.S. LLC.(4) |
2.13 | | Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2007, by and among Verizon Communications Inc., Northern New England Spinco Inc. and FairPoint.(2) |
2.14 | | Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2007, by and among FairPoint, Verizon Communications Inc. and Northern New England Spinco Inc.(5) |
2.15 | | Partnership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2007, by and among Verizon Wireless of the East LP, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Taconic Telephone Corp.(2) |
2.16 | | Joinder Agreement, dated as of April 5, 2007, by and among Warwick Valley Telephone Company, Taconic Telephone Corp., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Verizon Wireless of the East LP.(6) |
3.1 | | Eighth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of FairPoint.(7) |
3.2 | | Amended and Restated By-Laws of FairPoint.(7) |
| | |
38
4.1 | | Indenture, dated as of March 6, 2003, by and between FairPoint and The Bank of New York, relating to FairPoint's $225,000,000 117/8% Senior Notes due 2010.(8) |
4.2 | | Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 20, 2005, by and between FairPoint and The Bank of New York, amending the Indenture dated as of March 6, 2003 between FairPoint and The Bank of New York.(7) |
4.3 | | Form of Initial Senior Note due 2010.(8) |
4.4 | | Form of Exchange Senior Note due 2010.(8) |
10.1 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2005, by and among FairPoint, various lending institutions, Bank of America, N.A., CoBank ACB, General Electric Capital Corporation and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.(7) |
10.2 | | First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 11, 2005, among FairPoint, various lending institutions, Bank of America, N.A., CoBank ACB, General Electric Capital Corporation and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.(7) |
10.3 | | Second Amendment and Consent to Credit Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2005, among FairPoint, various lending institutions, Bank of America, N.A., CoBank ACB, General Electric Capital Corporation and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.(9) |
10.4 | | Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2005, among FairPoint, various lending institutions, Bank of America, N.A., CoBank ACB, General Electric Capital Corporation and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.(10) |
10.5 | | Fourth Amendment and Waiver to Credit Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2007, among FairPoint, various lending institutions, Bank of America, N.A., CoBank ACB, General Electric Capital Corporation and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.(11) |
10.6 | | Pledge Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2005, by FairPoint, ST Enterprises, Ltd., FairPoint Broadband, Inc., MJD Services Corp., MJD Ventures, Inc., C-R Communications, Inc., Comerco, Inc., GTC Communications, Inc., Ravenswood Communications, Inc., Utilities, Inc., FairPoint Carrier Services, Inc. and St. Joe Communications, Inc.(7) |
10.7 | | Subsidiary Guaranty, dated as of February 8, 2005, by FairPoint Broadband, Inc., MJD Ventures, Inc., MJD Services Corp., ST Enterprises, Ltd. and FairPoint Carrier Services, Inc.(12) |
10.8 | | Form of Swingline Note.(7) |
10.9 | | Form of RF Note.(7) |
10.10 | | Form of B Term Note.(7) |
10.11 | | Amended and Restated Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2000, by and among FairPoint and its Subsidiaries.(13) |
10.12 | | Affiliate Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2005.(7) |
10.13 | | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2006, by and between FairPoint and Eugene B. Johnson.(14) |
10.14 | | Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2007, by and between FairPoint and Walter E. Leach, Jr.(15) |
| | |
39
10.15 | | Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2007, by and between FairPoint and Peter G. Nixon.(15) |
10.16 | | Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2007, by and between FairPoint and Shirley J. Linn.(15) |
10.17 | | Change in Control and Severance Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2007, by and between FairPoint and John P. Crowley.(15) |
10.18 | | Letter Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2007, by and between FairPoint and Patrick T. Hogan.(16) |
10.19 | | FairPoint Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan.(17) |
10.20 | | FairPoint Amended and Restated 2000 Employee Stock Incentive Plan.(18) |
10.21 | | FairPoint 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.(7) |
10.22 | | FairPoint Annual Incentive Plan.(7) |
10.23 | | Form of February 2005 Restricted Stock Agreement.(19) |
10.24 | | Form of Director Restricted Stock Agreement.(20) |
10.25 | | Form of Director Restricted Unit Agreement.(20) |
10.26 | | Form of Non-Director Restricted Stock Agreement.(21) |
21 | | Subsidiaries of FairPoint.(22) |
31.1 | | Certification as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
31.2 | | Certification as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
32.1 | | Certification required by 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*† |
32.2 | | Certification required by 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*† |
99.1 | | Risk Factors.* |
- *
- Filed herewith.
- †
- Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 33-8238, this certification will be treated as "accompanying" this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and not "filed" as part of such report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and this certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
- (1)
- Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint for the period ended September 30, 2006.
- (2)
- Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of FairPoint, declared effective as of July 16, 2007.
- (3)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on June 28, 2007.
- (4)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on July 9, 2007.
40
- (5)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on January 19, 2007.
- (6)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on April 10, 2007.
- (7)
- Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FairPoint for the year ended December 31, 2004.
- (8)
- Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FairPoint for the year ended December 31, 2002.
- (9)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on May 4, 2005.
- (10)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on October 3, 2005.
- (11)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on January 26, 2007.
- (12)
- Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint for the period ended March 31, 2005.
- (13)
- Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint for the period ended September 30, 2000.
- (14)
- Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint for the period ended March 31, 2006.
- (15)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on March 19, 2007.
- (16)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on April 23, 2007.
- (17)
- Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of FairPoint, declared effective as of August 9, 2000.
- (18)
- Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FairPoint for the year ended December 31, 2003.
- (19)
- Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of FairPoint, declared effective as of February 3, 2005.
- (20)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on June 20, 2005.
- (21)
- Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of FairPoint filed on September 23, 2005.
- (22)
- Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FairPoint for the year ended December 31, 2006.
41
QuickLinks
INDEXPART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATIONFAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Condensed Consolidated Balance SheetsFAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholder's Equity (Unaudited) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 (in thousands)FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)SIGNATURESExhibit Index