Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER | 333-56857 | |
333-56857-01 | ||
333-56857-02 |
ALLIANCE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LLC
ALLIANCE LAUNDRY CORPORATION
ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
DELAWARE DELAWARE DELAWARE | 39-1927923 39-1928505 52-2055893 | |
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) | (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.) |
P.O. BOX 990
RIPON, WISCONSIN 54971-0990
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
(920) 748-3121
(REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of Alliance Laundry Corporation’s common stock outstanding as of May 10, 2005: 1,000 shares.
Table of Contents
Form 10-Q
For The Period Ended March 31, 2005
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
March 31, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | ||||||
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||
Assets | |||||||
Current assets: | |||||||
Cash | $ | 7,091 | $ | 11,471 | |||
Accounts receivable, net | 8,197 | 5,611 | |||||
Inventories, net | 30,844 | 26,761 | |||||
Beneficial interests in securitized accounts receivable | 17,797 | 19,479 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other | 2,821 | 1,088 | |||||
Total current assets | 66,750 | 64,410 | |||||
Notes receivable, net | 6,161 | 6,742 | |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 74,162 | 30,481 | |||||
Goodwill, net | 139,903 | 55,414 | |||||
Beneficial interests in securitized financial assets | 18,502 | 19,379 | |||||
Deferred income tax assets | 9,320 | — | |||||
Debt issuance costs, net | 12,839 | 5,751 | |||||
Other intangibles, net | 150,260 | 1,839 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 477,897 | $ | 184,016 | |||
Liabilities and Member’s Equity (Deficit) | |||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | $ | — | $ | 12,036 | |||
Revolving credit facility | — | — | |||||
Accounts payable | 8,293 | 11,618 | |||||
Other current liabilities | 22,143 | 24,718 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 30,436 | 48,372 | |||||
Long-term debt: | |||||||
Senior credit facility | 198,000 | 118,218 | |||||
Senior subordinated notes | 149,266 | 110,000 | |||||
Junior subordinated note | — | 28,776 | |||||
Other long-term debt | — | 529 | |||||
Other long-term liabilities | 6,759 | 7,218 | |||||
Mandatorily redeemable preferred interests | — | 6,000 | |||||
Total liabilities | 384,461 | 319,113 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 8) | |||||||
Member’s equity (deficit) | 93,436 | (135,097 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and member’s equity (deficit) | $ | 477,897 | $ | 184,016 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 | Three Months March 31, | |||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Predecessor | |||||||||||
Net revenues: | |||||||||||||
Commercial and consumer laundry | $ | 41,751 | $ | 17,470 | $ | 56,308 | |||||||
Service parts | 7,492 | 3,213 | 9,972 | ||||||||||
49,243 | 20,683 | 66,280 | |||||||||||
Cost of sales | 43,337 | 15,585 | 45,521 | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 5,906 | 5,098 | 20,759 | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | 6,742 | 3,829 | 8,653 | ||||||||||
Transaction costs associated with sale of business | — | 18,790 | — | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 6,742 | 22,619 | 8,653 | ||||||||||
Operating (loss) income | (836 | ) | (17,521 | ) | 12,106 | ||||||||
Interest expense | 3,764 | 995 | 7,110 | ||||||||||
Loss from early extinguishment of debt | — | 9,867 | — | ||||||||||
Costs related to abandoned public offerings | — | — | 728 | ||||||||||
(Loss) income before taxes | (4,600 | ) | (28,383 | ) | 4,268 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | (1,669 | ) | 9 | 49 | |||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (2,931 | ) | $ | (28,392 | ) | $ | 4,219 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 | Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (2,931 | ) | $ | (28,392 | ) | $ | 4,219 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 4,125 | 526 | 2,587 | |||||||||||
Non-cash interest | (842 | ) | 351 | 1,783 | ||||||||||
Non-cash incentive unit compensation | — | 1,089 | — | |||||||||||
Non-cash debt financing write-off | — | 5,751 | — | |||||||||||
Non-cash inventory expense | 5,606 | — | — | |||||||||||
Deferred taxes | (1,668 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | 1 | — | 34 | |||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | (2,030 | ) | (556 | ) | 1,608 | |||||||||
Inventories | (1,610 | ) | (1,833 | ) | (6,118 | ) | ||||||||
Other assets | 4,011 | 101 | 2,128 | |||||||||||
Accounts payable | (22,401 | ) | 19,076 | (1,458 | ) | |||||||||
Other liabilities | (1,048 | ) | (2,732 | ) | 2,269 | |||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (18,787 | ) | (6,619 | ) | 7,052 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (514 | ) | (188 | ) | (698 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (514 | ) | (188 | ) | (698 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt | (2,000 | ) | 1 | (5,061 | ) | |||||||||
Proceeds from senior term loan | 200,000 | — | — | |||||||||||
Proceeds from senior subordinated notes | 149,250 | — | — | |||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt | (275,920 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Contribution from member | 117,000 | — | — | |||||||||||
Distribution to old unitholders | (151,996 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Debt financing costs | (13,172 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Cash paid for capitalized offering related costs | (1,364 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Net proceeds—management note | — | (71 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 21,798 | (70 | ) | (5,061 | ) | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash | 2,497 | (6,877 | ) | 1,293 | ||||||||||
Cash at beginning of period | 4,594 | 11,471 | 7,937 | |||||||||||
Cash at end of period | $ | 7,091 | $ | 4,594 | $ | 9,230 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 4,045 | $ | 1,133 | $ | 2,561 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF MEMBER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT) AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
Member’s Equity (Deficit) | Management Loans | Minimum Pension Liability | Unrealized Holding Gain on Residual Interests, Net | Total Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Predecessor balances at December 31, 2004 | $ | (131,227 | ) | $ | (1,380 | ) | $ | (3,619 | ) | $ | 1,129 | $ | (135,097 | ) | ||||||
Net loss from January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 | (28,392 | ) | — | — | — | (28,392 | ) | |||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gain | — | — | — | 203 | 203 | |||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | $ | (28,189 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Predecessor balances at January 27, 2005 | (159,619 | ) | (1,380 | ) | (3,619 | ) | 1,332 | (163,286 | ) | |||||||||||
Transaction and purchase accounting | 254,863 | 1,380 | 3,619 | 259,862 | ||||||||||||||||
Successor balances at January 27, 2005 | 95,244 | — | — | 1,332 | 96,576 | |||||||||||||||
Net loss from January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | (2,931 | ) | — | — | — | (2,931 | ) | |||||||||||||
Unrealized holding loss | — | — | — | (209 | ) | (209 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | $ | (3,140 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Successor balances at March 31, 2005 | $ | 92,313 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,123 | $ | 93,436 | ||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
As a result of the January 27, 2005 transactions described further in Note 2, activity that occurred prior to January 27, 2005 has been reflected as the Predecessor and activity that occurred after January 27, 2005 has been reflected as the Successor. We have inserted a dark vertical line to segregate the activities of the Predecessor and Successor. The distinction between Predecessor and Successor relates to the application of purchase accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial Standard (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations”. The basis of the assets and liabilities have been reflected at fair market values in the Successor financial statements.
Throughout this quarterly report, we refer to Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as “Alliance Holdings,” and, together with its consolidated operations, as “Alliance”, “we,” “our” “Predecessor”, “Successor” and “us,” unless otherwise indicated. Any reference to “Alliance Laundry” refers to our wholly-owned subsidiary, Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and its consolidated operations, unless otherwise indicated.
The unaudited financial statements as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 present the consolidated financial position and results of operations of Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC, including our wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiaries, Alliance Laundry Systems LLC and Alliance Laundry Corporation.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements contain all adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) for a fair statement of our financial position and operating results for the periods presented. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations to be expected for the full year.
These financial statements have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such regulations, although we believe the disclosures provided are adequate to prevent the information presented from being misleading.
Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
This report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 333-56857) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which includes our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004.
NOTE 2. SALE OF ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC
On January 27, 2005, ALH Holding Inc. (“ALH”), an entity formed by Teachers’ Private Capital, the private equity arm of Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (“OTPP”), acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interests in Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC pursuant to a unit purchase agreement for aggregate consideration of $466.3 million. In connection with such acquisition, the executive officers of Alliance Laundry acquired $7.4 million of newly issued shares of common stock of ALH, and our other management
7
Table of Contents
employees acquired $2.2 million of newly issued shares of ALH common stock in exchange for equity interests in Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC and cash pursuant to ALH’s stock purchase and rollover investment plan. A portion of the aggregate acquisition consideration was used to repay our existing indebtedness, redeem our outstanding preferred equity interests and pay certain fees and expenses payable in connection with the consummation of the acquisition and the financing transactions described below, and the balance was paid to the then current equity holders of Alliance Holdings.
We refer to the acquisition of Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC and the related management investments in ALH as the “Acquisition.” The Acquisition was financed with $350.0 million of debt financing described below, the management equity, approximately $107.4 million of new equity capital from OTPP and available cash. As a result of the Acquisition, all of the outstanding equity interests of Alliance Laundry are owned by Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC, all of the equity interests of Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC are owned by ALH and approximately 91.8% of the capital stock of ALH is owned by OTPP. The remaining capital stock of ALH is owned by our management.
In connection with the closing of the Acquisition, we consummated the following financing transactions, (the “Financing Transactions”, which we refer to, together with the Acquisition, as the “Transactions”):
• | the closing of the issuance of $150.0 million 8 1/2% senior subordinated notes due January 15, 2013, the “2005 Senior Subordinated Notes.” The proceeds from the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes offering were $149.3 million; |
• | the closing of Alliance Laundry’s new $250.0 million senior secured credit facility, which we refer to as the “New Senior Credit Facility,” consisting of a six-year $50.0 million revolving credit facility and a seven-year $200.0 million term loan facility. On the closing date (January 27, 2005), the term loan facility was drawn in full, but the revolving credit facility remained undrawn; and |
• | the settlement of the tender offer and consent solicitation, or the tender offer, initiated by us on January 4, 2005 for the $110.0 million aggregate principal amount of our then outstanding 9 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the “1998 Senior Subordinated Notes”). The tender offer expired at 5:00 PM New York City time on February 2, 2005, and approximately 5.10% of the total principal amount of the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes remained outstanding after the consummation of the tender offer. We redeemed the remaining 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes in accordance with the indenture governing such notes on March 7, 2005. |
In connection with the consummation of the Transactions, Alliance Laundry and Alliance Laundry Corporation became the obligors under the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes. Alliance Laundry is the borrower and obligor under the New Senior Credit Facility and Alliance Laundry Corporation became a guarantor under the New Senior Credit Facility, and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC became a guarantor of the New Senior Credit Facility and the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes.
Alliance Laundry Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alliance Laundry and was originally incorporated for the sole purpose of serving as a co-issuer of the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes. Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC is the parent of Alliance Laundry and has provided a full and unconditional guarantee of the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes. Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC and Alliance Laundry Corporation do not have any operations or assets independent of Alliance Laundry.
8
Table of Contents
New Senior Credit Facility
Concurrent with the closing of the Acquisition we entered into a New Senior Credit Facility, consisting of a six-year $50.0 million revolving credit facility (the “New Revolving Credit Facility”) and a seven-year $200.0 million term loan facility (the “New Term Loan Facility”). Alliance Laundry is the borrower under this facility and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC and Alliance Laundry Corporation are the guarantors under this facility. The New Term Loan Facility requires quarterly principal payments of $0.5 million beginning on June 30, 2005, through December 31, 2011. The final principal payment of $186.5 million is due on January 27, 2012. We are required to make prepayments with the proceeds from the issuance of certain equity, the incurrence of certain indebtedness, the disposition of certain assets and from excess cash flow, as defined in the New Senior Credit Facility.
The New Revolving Credit Facility is available, subject to certain conditions, for general corporate purposes in the ordinary course of business and for other transactions permitted under the New Senior Credit Facility. A portion of the New Revolving Credit Facility not in excess of $35.0 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit.
Borrowings under the New Senior Credit Facility bear interest, at our option, at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus (a) the base rate, which is the higher of (1) the prime lending rate as set forth on the British Banking Association Telerate and (2) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.5% or (b) the Eurodollar rate, which will be the rate at which Eurodollar deposits for one, two, three or six months are offered in the interbank Eurodollar market. The applicable margin for the New Revolving Credit Facility is expected to be, initially, 1.50% with respect to base rate loans and 2.50% with respect to Eurodollar loans. The applicable margin for the New Term Loan Facility is 1.25% with respect to base rate loans and 2.25% with respect to Eurodollar loans, subject to step-downs if we meet certain leverage ratios. The interest rate on these borrowings as of March 31, 2005 was 4.97%.
In addition, we are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee currently equal to 1/2 of 1% per annum on the average daily unused portion of the $50.0 million revolving loan commitment. We are also obligated to pay a commission on all outstanding letters of credit in the amount of the applicable margin, then in effect with respect to Eurodollar loans under the New Revolving Credit Facility, which currently is 2.50%, as well as a 0.25% fronting fee on the aggregate amount of all outstanding letters of credit. There were no borrowings under the New Revolving Loan Facility as of March 31, 2005.
Additional borrowings and the issuance of additional letters of credit under the New Senior Credit Facility are subject to certain continuing representations and warranties, including the absence of any development or event which has had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
2005 Senior Subordinated Notes
As part of the Financing Transactions, we offered and sold $150.0 million of 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes and received proceeds of approximately $149.3 million. The maturity date of the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes is January 15, 2013. The 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes are general unsecured obligations and are subordinated in right of payment to all current and future senior indebtedness, including permitted borrowings under the New Senior Credit Facility. The indenture governing the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes, among other things, restricts our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to make investments, incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, pay dividends, create liens, sell assets, merge or consolidate with other entities, enter into transactions with affiliates and engage in certain business activities.
Interest on the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes accrues at the rate of 8 1/2% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15, commencing on July 15, 2005.
9
Table of Contents
The 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes are subject to redemption on or after January 15, 2009, in whole or in part, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days notice, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on January 15 of the years indicated below:
Year | Redemption Price | ||
2009 | 104.250 | % | |
2010 | 102.125 | % | |
2011 and thereafter | 100.000 | % |
If we experience certain kinds of changes in control, we must offer to repurchase the then outstanding notes at the redemption price set forth in the indenture governing the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes. At any time prior to January 15, 2009, we may redeem up to 35% of the notes with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings at the redemption price set forth in the indenture governing the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes.
Debt Maturities and Liquidity Considerations
The aggregate scheduled maturities of long-term debt in subsequent years, after giving effect to a $2.0 million voluntary prepayment made prior to March 31, 2005, are as follows (in thousands):
2005 | $ | — | |
2006 | 1,500 | ||
2007 | 2,000 | ||
2008 | 2,000 | ||
2009 | 2,000 | ||
Thereafter | 340,500 | ||
$ | 348,000 | ||
The New Senior Credit Facility and the indenture governing the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes contain a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to dispose of assets, repay other indebtedness (including, in the case of the New Senior Credit Facility, the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes), incur liens, make capital expenditures and make certain investments or acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidation and otherwise restrict our operating activities. In addition, under the New Senior Credit Facility, the Company is required to satisfy specified financial ratios and tests, including a maximum of total debt to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement governing the New Senior Credit Facility) and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
The maximum ratio of consolidated debt to Adjusted EBITDA under the New Senior Credit Facility is scheduled to be 6.50 at June 30, 2005. We believe that future cash flows from operations, together with available borrowings under the New Revolving Credit Facility, will be adequate to meet our anticipated requirements for capital expenditures, working capital, interest payments, scheduled principal payments and other debt repayments that may be required as a result of the scheduled ratio of consolidated debt to Adjusted EBITDA discussed above. These covenants are not applicable for the Company prior to June 30, 2005.
10
Table of Contents
NOTE 3. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
As a result of the Acquisition certain of our principles of consolidation and significant accounting policies have been adjusted accordingly. For a complete discussion of our principles of consolidation and significant accounting policies, the following comments should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The new policies adopted are discussed below.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill will not be amortized. However, under SFAS No. 142, goodwill will be tested for impairment at least annually and more frequently if an event occurs which indicates the goodwill may be impaired. Impairment of goodwill is measured according to a two-step approach. In the first step, the fair value of a reporting unit, as defined by the statement, is compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. In the second step the implied value of the goodwill is estimated as the fair value of the reporting unit less the fair value of all other tangible and intangible assets of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess, not to exceed the carrying amount of the goodwill.
Additionally, under SFAS No. 142, intangible assets not subject to amortization (indefinite lived intangible assets) shall be tested for impairment at least annually and more frequently if an event occurs which indicates the intangible asset may be impaired. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The Company’s other recorded intangible assets, tradenames and trademarks, have been deemed to have an indefinite life.
Income Taxes
Certain items of income and expense are not recognized on our income tax returns and financial statements in the same year, which creates timing differences. The income tax effect of these timing differences results in (1) deferred income tax assets that create a reduction in future income taxes and (2) deferred income tax liabilities that create an increase in future income taxes. Recognition of deferred income tax assets is based on management’s belief that it is more likely than not that the income tax benefit associated with certain temporary differences, income tax operating loss and capital loss carry forwards and income tax credits, would be realized. We have not recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred income tax assets based, in part, on our assessment of future taxable income and in light of our ongoing prudent and feasible income tax strategies. If our estimate of future taxable income or tax strategies change at any time in the future, we may have to record a valuation allowance; recording such an adjustment could have a material effect on our financial condition.
NOTE 4. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
During January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which clarifies the consolidation and disclosure requirements related to variable interests in a variable interest entity. A variable interest entity is an entity for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN No. 46, which replaced FIN No. 46. The revised Interpretation (“FIN 46-R”) was adopted by us beginning on January 1, 2005 for interests in entities created on or before December 31, 2003 and as of the date we first become involved with a potential variable interest entity created after December 31, 2003. The impact was not material to the financial statements.
11
Table of Contents
FIN 46-R provides exceptions from its scope for certain entities, including qualifying special-purpose securitization entities subject to the reporting requirements of SFAS No. 140 and business entities, as defined, that do not possess certain characteristics.
Our primary variable interests are notes receivable that we have retained and are comprised primarily of equipment loans to laundromat operators and other end-users. The carrying value of such loans was approximately $3.9 million at March 31, 2005. If in the future we are required to consolidate a variable interest entity in which one or both of our SFAS No. 140 qualifying special-purpose entities also holds a variable interest, the qualifying status of the special-purpose entity with such holdings would be eliminated. In that instance, we would be required to determine if we are the primary beneficiary of the affected securitization entity under FIN 46-R and if so, to consolidate that entity, which would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
During December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS 123”) and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as expense in the financial statements based on their fair values beginning with the first annual period after June 15, 2005. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 will no longer be an alternative to expense recognition. We will adopt SFAS 123R using the modified-prospective method in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 123R upon our financial statements.
The FASB is expected to re-expose a proposed statement that would amend and clarify SFAS No. 140 (and related implementation guidance). The proposed statement will address permitted activities of qualifying special-purpose entities, including the degree of discretion allowable in determining the terms of beneficial interests issued after inception, and whether certain transfers can meet the criteria for sale accounting under SFAS No. 140 if the transferor or any consolidated affiliate provides liquidity support for the transferee’s beneficial interests. As the proposed statement has not been issued, we are unable to determine the effects of the related transition provisions, if any, on our existing securitization entities. However, in the event that transfers to our existing asset backed facility would no longer qualify as sales of financial assets in the future, we may recognize additional costs for a replacement facility or it may have other material financial statement effects. An exposure draft is expected in the third quarter of 2005 and a final document is anticipated in the first quarter of 2006.
NOTE 5. INFREQUENTLY OCCURRING ITEMS
In connection with the Acquisition, the Company incurred $18.8 million of seller related expenses. These expenses were comprised of underwriting, legal and professional fees of $5.9 million, change of control bonuses paid to the executive management of $6.2 million and fees paid to Bain Capital Partners LLC and Bruckman, Rosser, Sherrill & Co. totaling $6.7 million. These amounts were expensed in the period ended January 27, 2005, and are reflected as a deduction in determining operating (loss) income.
In connection with the Acquisition, the Company incurred $9.9 million in expenses related to the early redemption of debt. These expenses were comprised of tender and call premium fees of $4.1 million associated with the redemption of the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes and the write-off of $5.8 million of remaining unamortized debt issuance costs associated with both the Company’s 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes and the Company’s prior Senior Credit Facility. These amounts were expensed in the period ended January 27, 2005, and are reflected as a loss from early retirement of debt.
12
Table of Contents
On April 13, 2004 we announced that Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (“Alliance Laundry Holdings”), a company formed to be the holding company for the operations of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, and its subsidiaries filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the proposed initial public offering of Income Deposit Securities (“IDSs”) representing shares of Alliance Laundry Holdings’ Class A common stock and senior subordinated notes. The registration statement also related to an offering of a separate issue of senior subordinated notes of the same series as the senior subordinated notes represented by the IDSs. In connection with the proposed IDS offering, as of March 31, 2004 we had incurred and recorded $0.7 million of offering related expense in the consolidated statement of income, and had capitalized $0.4 million of debt and offering related expenses in the consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2004 we had incurred and recorded $1.3 million of offering related expenses in the consolidated statement of income. In addition we had capitalized $3.5 million of debt and offering related costs in other assets within the consolidated balance sheet. On December 7, 2004 we chose to abandon the proposed IDS offering, and consequently wrote off the $3.5 million of capitalized costs in 2004.
NOTE 6. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
The Acquisition price including transaction costs was approximately $466.3 million. The sources and uses of funds in connection with the Acquisition are summarized below (in thousands):
Sources: | |||
Proceeds Senior Term Loan | $ | 200,000 | |
Proceeds from 8 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 | 149,250 | ||
Proceeds from equity investors | 108,396 | ||
Exchange of equity | 8,604 | ||
Total sources | $ | 466,250 | |
Uses: | |||
Stated purchase price | $ | 450,000 | |
Working capital adjustment | 840 | ||
Fees and expenses | 15,410 | ||
Total uses | $ | 466,250 | |
13
Table of Contents
The Company has prepared a preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values as determined by an independent third-party valuation firm as of the date of the acquisition. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of net assets acquired is summarized below (in thousands):
Gross | EITF 88-16 Adjustment | Adjusted Balance January 27, 2005 | ||||||||
Acquired tangible net assets | $ | 152,990 | $ | (4,153 | ) | $ | 148,837 | |||
Acquired intangible assets—trademarks and tradenames | 122,800 | (8,697 | ) | 114,103 | ||||||
Acquired intangible assets—customer agreements and distributor network | 30,400 | (2,153 | ) | 28,247 | ||||||
Acquired intangible assets—engineering and manufacturing designs and processes | 8,460 | (599 | ) | 7,861 | ||||||
Acquired intangible assets—patents | 70 | — | 70 | |||||||
Acquired intangible assets—computer software and other | 963 | (58 | ) | 905 | ||||||
Goodwill | 150,567 | (10,663 | ) | 139,904 | ||||||
Total allocation of purchase price | $ | 466,250 | $ | (26,323 | ) | $ | 439,927 | |||
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 88-16, “Basis in Leveraged Buyout Transactions,” management’s continuing residual interest has been reflected at its original cost, adjusted for its share of the Company’s earnings, losses and equity adjustments since the date of original acquisition (“predecessor basis”). In accordance with EITF Issue No. 90-12, “Allocating Basis to Individual Assets and Liabilities within the Scope of Issue 88-16,” only a partial step-up of assets and liabilities to fair value has been recorded in purchase accounting. The partial step-up has resulted in the Company’s assets and liabilities being adjusted by approximately 92.92% of the difference between their fair value at the date of acquisition and their historical carrying cost.
Identifiable intangible assets, which are subject to amortization, consist primarily of customer agreements and distributor networks which are amortized over the assets’ estimated useful lives ranging from five to twelve years; engineering drawings, product designs and manufacturing processes, which are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from four to fifteen years; and computer software and patents which are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from four to fifteen years. Intangible assets also include trademarks and tradenames, which have an indefinite life. Such assets are not amortized, but will be subject to an annual impairment test pursuant to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assets was as follows (in thousands):
January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 | Three Months March 31, | |||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Predecessor | |||||||
Amortization expense | $ | 771 | $ | 14 | $ | 59 | |||
14
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of identifiable intangible assets as of March 31, 2005 (in thousands):
March 31, 2005 | |||||||||
Gross Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Amount | |||||||
Identifiable intangible assets: | |||||||||
Trademarks, tradenames | $ | 114,103 | $ | — | $ | 114,103 | |||
Customer agreements and distributor network | 28,247 | 604 | 27,643 | ||||||
Engineering and manufacturing designs and processes | 7,861 | 107 | 7,754 | ||||||
Patents | 74 | — | 74 | ||||||
Computer software and other | 746 | 60 | 686 | ||||||
$ | 151,031 | $ | 771 | $ | 150,260 | ||||
Estimated amortization expense for existing identifiable intangible assets is expected to be approximately $4.1 million, $4.5 million, $4.5 million, $4.5 million and $4.1 million for each of the years in the five-year period ending December 31, 2009, respectively. Estimated amortization expense can be affected by various factors including future acquisitions or divestitures of product and/or licensing and distribution rights.
In connection with the Transactions the Company recorded approximately $150.6 million of Successor goodwill. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 88-16, “Basis in Leveraged Buyout Transactions,” the goodwill attributable to the Predecessor basis of $10.7 million has been recorded as a reduction of equity. Pursuant to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” the Successor goodwill will not be amortized but will be subject to an annual impairment test.
The Company’s allocation of purchase price to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the Acquisition is preliminary and subject to refinement as more information relative to the fair values as of January 27, 2005 becomes available. Changes to the preliminary allocation will be made as the information becomes available, and is expected to be finalized in the second quarter.
NOTE 7. INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at cost using the first-in, first-out method but not in excess of net realizable value, and consist of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | |||||||
Materials and purchased parts | $ | 11,082 | $ | 9,899 | ||||
Work in process | 4,037 | 3,713 | ||||||
Finished goods | 17,062 | 14,468 | ||||||
Inventory reserves | (1,337 | ) | (1,319 | ) | ||||
$ | 30,844 | $ | 26,761 | |||||
The Company wrote inventories up to fair market value as a result of the Acquisition. This resulted in a net write-up of $6.2 million, and $5.6 million of this amount was expensed to cost of sales in the period January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005. The remaining $0.6 million is expected to be expensed in the second quarter as this inventory is sold.
15
Table of Contents
NOTE 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Various claims and legal proceedings generally incidental to the normal course of business are pending or threatened against us. While we cannot predict the outcome of these matters, in the opinion of management, any liability arising thereunder will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations after giving effect to provisions already recorded.
In April 2002 we were named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Imonex Services, Inc. for patent infringement, arising from a coin selector, the “W2000,” which was a vendor supplied component used in certain of our products. The vendor, W. H. Münzprüfer Dietmar Trenner GmbH, indemnified us and agreed to pay and is paying for our representation in this matter. Imonex accused us, and other Münzprüfer customers, of patent infringement resulting from the sales of the W2000 within the Münzprüfer customers’ products. Trial commenced January 6, 2003 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Following the trial, the court indicated it would enter an order rendering judgment for Imonex that the asserted patent claims were infringed, are not invalid, and were not procured by inequitable conduct. The court indicated it will issue a permanent injunction and invited the parties to submit proposed injunction languages, and objections thereto. The court has withheld ruling upon the timelines of Imonex bringing its damage claims. The court reduced the jury’s damage verdict from $10,350,000 ($5,382,000 against us with the remainder against the other Münzprüfer customers) against all defendants, to $490,295 ($267,645 against us with the remainder against the other Münzprüfer customers) and gave Imonex the option to accept the reduced damages or have a new trial on damages. On April 28, 2003, Imonex filed an election for a new trial on damages, and filed proposed language for the injunction. The Münzprüfer customers filed their objections to the injunction language on May 5, 2003. On August 1, 2003, the court ruled it will not award any additional damages for willful infringement, but entered judgment for Imonex on the issues of infringement, and validity of the Imonex’s patents. Imonex submitted expert reports at the new trial on damages which attempted to prove actual damages of approximately $16,267,644 (approximately $6,305,232 against us with the remainder against other Münzprüfer customers). On August 12, 2003 a preliminary injunction was issued prohibiting W2000 coin selector usage. The trial on damages commenced August 18, 2003 and yielded a jury verdict of $1,396,873 to Imonex ($614,662 against us with the remainder against the other Münzprüfer customers).
Final judgment on the August 18, 2003 jury verdict was rendered on February 9, 2004 against all the Münzprüfer customers. The final judgment included $614,662 against us, plus prejudgment interest, yielding $771,728 against us. In addition, the judgment awarded court costs to Imonex, including attorneys’ fees. On February 23, 2004, Imonex submitted an application seeking from all the Münzprüfer customers a total of $669,107 in attorneys’ fees and $133,214 in court costs. The preliminary injunction of August 12, 2003 was made permanent. The Münzprüfer customers have filed a post judgment motion seeking to have the judgment amended or set aside.
Imonex has filed a Notice of Appeal and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit set the date of docketing as March 16, 2004. Münzprüfer and the Münzprüfer customers have filed cross-appeals. Imonex has served a statement of issues that it will pursue on appeal. Imonex filed its appeal brief on May 13, 2004. Münzprüfer and the Münzprüfer customers’ appeal brief was filed June 25, 2004. Imonex filed its Reply Brief of Appellant on August 9, 2004. The Münzprüfer customers’ Reply Appeal Brief was timely filed. The United States Court of Appeals for The Federal Circuit heard oral arguments on December 7, 2004. We are presently awaiting the court’s opinion.
Our position remains that any liability related to this lawsuit is properly borne by Münzprüfer. We believe that Münzprüfer has the ability to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations up to the amount of the final judgment. We have also reached tentative agreement with Münzprüfer as to acceptable methods of satisfying the provisions of the indemnification agreement, in the event the judgment is not appealed, or is not overturned upon appeal. In accordance with GAAP, as a judgment has been rendered by the court, in the fourth quarter of 2003, we recorded an appropriate payable to Imonex related to our liability and a corresponding receivable balance from Münzprüfer within our consolidated financial statements.
16
Table of Contents
Environmental, Health and Safety Matters
We are subject to comprehensive and frequently changing federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations, including laws and regulations governing emissions of air pollutants, discharges of waste and storm water and the disposal of hazardous wastes. We are also subject to liability for the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination (including contamination caused by other parties) at the properties we own or operate and at other properties where our Company or predecessors have arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances. As a result, we are involved, from time to time, in administrative and judicial proceedings and inquiries relating to environmental matters. There can be no assurance that we will not be involved in such proceedings in the future and that the aggregate amount of future clean-up costs and other environmental liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We believe that our facilities and operations are in material compliance with all environmental, health and safety laws.
Certain environmental investigatory and remedial work had been conducted at our Marianna, Florida facility by a former operator of the property and had been funded through an escrow account. On December 28, 2004, a Conditional Site Rehabilitation Completion Order was issued by the Florida Department of Natural Resources. Therefore, the remediation by the former operator of the property has been successfully concluded. Accordingly, the remaining balance in the escrow account, after we were reimbursed for our remaining expenses, was released to the former operator per our escrow agreement.
NOTE 9. GUARANTEES
We, through our special purpose bankruptcy remote subsidiary entered into a $300.0 million Asset Backed Facility (the “Asset Backed Facility”) on December 2, 2002 for the purpose of selling trade receivables and certain equipment loans. Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Backed Facility, we provide credit enhancement to the note purchasers consisting of an irrevocable letter of credit, an unconditional lending commitment of the lenders under the Senior Credit Facility, subject to certain limits. We are obligated under the reimbursement provisions of the Senior Credit Facility to reimburse the lenders for any drawings on the credit enhancement by the facility indenture trustee. If the credit enhancement is not replenished by us after a drawing, the trust will not be permitted to request new borrowings under the Asset Backed Facility and the Asset Backed Facility will begin to amortize. The amount of the irrevocable letter of credit related to the Asset Backed Facility at March 31, 2005 was $26.3 million.
We offer warranties to our customers depending upon the specific product and the product use. Standard product warranties vary from one to three years for most parts with certain components extending to five years. Certain customers have elected to buy products without warranty coverage. The standard warranty program requires that we replace defective components within a specified time period from the date of installation. We record an estimate for future warranty related costs based on actual historical incident rates and cost per incident trends. Based on analysis of these and other factors, the carrying amount of our warranty liability is adjusted as necessary. While our warranty costs have historically been within our calculated estimates, it is possible that future warranty costs could exceed those estimates.
17
Table of Contents
The changes in the carrying amount of our total product warranty liability for the periods presented were as follows:
January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | January 1, 2005 through January 27, | Three Months March 31, | ||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Predecessor | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 4,309 | $ | 4,309 | $ | 4,759 | ||||||
Accruals for current and pre-existing warranties issued during the period | 369 | 140 | 422 | |||||||||
Settlements made during the period | (469 | ) | (140 | ) | (572 | ) | ||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 4,209 | $ | 4,309 | $ | 4,609 | ||||||
NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES
As of January 27, 2005 Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC is now a single member LLC owned by ALH, which is a corporation for U.S. tax purposes. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements are being presented as if Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC was taxed as a corporation. As of January 28, 2005, we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes whereby deferred income taxes are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are revalued to reflect new tax rates in the periods rate changes are enacted.
As a result of the Acquisition, the net book values of the Company’s assets and liabilities have been reestablished. Deferred income tax assets (liabilities) were established as of January 28, 2005 as follows (in thousands):
January 28, 2005 | ||||
Successor | ||||
Deferred income tax liability: | ||||
Unrealized gain on equipment notes sold | $ | (1,727 | ) | |
Deferred income tax assets: | ||||
Basis difference in inventory | 181 | |||
Basis difference in fixed assets | 1,346 | |||
Basis difference in intangibles | 4,372 | |||
Deferred financing costs | 3,422 | |||
Other | 58 | |||
$ | 9,379 | |||
Net deferred income tax assets | $ | 7,652 | ||
The income tax provision (benefit) is determined by applying an estimated annual effective income tax rate of 36% to income before taxes. The estimated effective income tax rate was determined by applying statutory income tax rates to our annualized forecast of pretax income adjusted for certain permanent book/tax differences and tax credits.
There are various factors that may cause our tax assumptions to change in the near term, and we may have to record a valuation allowance against our deferred income tax assets. We cannot predict whether future U.S. federal and state income tax laws and regulations might be passed that could have a material effect on our results of operations. We will assess the impact of significant changes to the U.S. federal and state income tax laws and regulations on a regular basis and update the assumptions and estimates used to prepare our consolidated financial statements when new regulations and legislation are enacted.
18
Table of Contents
We did not provide for U.S. federal income taxes or tax benefits for the Predecessor Company as it was a partnership for tax reporting purposes and the payment of federal and most state taxes were the responsibility of the partners.
NOTE 11. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME / (LOSS)
Comprehensive income/(loss) for the periods presented consist of the following (in thousands):
January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 | Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 | |||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Predecessor | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (2,931 | ) | $ | (28,392 | ) | $ | 4,219 | |||||
Net unrealized holding (loss) gain on residual interests, net | (209 | ) | 203 | 851 | |||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (3,140 | ) | $ | (28,189 | ) | $ | 5,070 | |||||
NOTE 12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Substantially all of our employees are covered by a defined benefit pension plan. In addition, we provide certain health care benefits for retired employees. The components of periodic benefit costs for these plans for the periods presented are as follows:
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||
January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 | Three Months March 31, | January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 | Three Months March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | 303 | 151 | 406 | 22 | 11 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
Interest cost | 455 | 229 | 671 | 21 | 10 | 28 | |||||||||||||||
Expected return on assets | (604 | ) | (311 | ) | (827 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Amortization of net obligation | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | — | 6 | 18 | — | 4 | — | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of loss | — | 4 | 18 | — | 7 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 154 | $ | 79 | $ | 286 | $ | 43 | $ | 32 | $ | 76 | |||||||||
Employer Contributions
We anticipate making a voluntary contribution in 2005 of approximately $1.0 million to the pension plan which is consistent with our previous disclosures in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2005, no contributions have been made.
19
Table of Contents
In April 2004, the Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004 (the “Act”) was signed into law allowing many corporations to reduce their required pension contributions during 2004 and 2005. The Act had no material impact on our 2005 required minimum contribution of zero. In order to maintain a healthy funded plan we have chosen to fund the plan.
NOTE 13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pre-Acquisition Executive Unit Purchase Agreements
Certain members of management of the Company had entered into executive unit purchase agreements (the “Purchase Agreements”) which governed the Executives’ investment in their common membership interests of the Company prior to the Acquisition. The Purchase Agreements included vesting provisions for certain Class M, Class B and Class C Units which were issued as an incentive for the Executive’s retention and future performance. The Class M, Class B and Class C Units were purchased by the Executives at a nominal value based upon the subordinated nature of such interests.
Based upon a valuation of these and all other previously issued incentive units, for the period ended January 27, 2005, we recognized $1.1 million of compensation expense, primarily associated with the acceleration of vesting of these units as of the Acquisition date. There was no incentive unit compensation expense recognized at March 31, 2004.
NOTE 14. MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED INTERESTS
Prior to the Acquisition, we had outstanding mandatorily redeemable preferred interests (the “preferred interests”) with a liquidation value of $6.0 million. The holders of the preferred interests were entitled to receive distributions from us in an amount equal to their unreturned capital (as defined in the Alliance Laundry Holdings Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement) prior to distributions in respect of any other membership interests of the Company. These units were redeemed as of January 27, 2005.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
We believe we are the leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of stand-alone commercial laundry equipment in North America and a leader worldwide. Under the well-known brand names of Speed Queen®, UniMac®, Huebsch® and Ajax®, we produce a full line of commercial washing machines and dryers with load capacities from 16 to 250 pounds as well as presses and finishing equipment. Our commercial products are sold to four distinct customer groups: (i) laundromats; (ii) multi-housing laundries, consisting primarily of common laundry facilities in apartment buildings, universities and military installations; (iii) on-premise laundries, consisting primarily of in-house laundry facilities of hotels, hospitals, nursing homes and prisons; and (iv) drycleaners.
The North American stand-alone commercial laundry equipment industry’s revenues are primarily driven by population growth and the replacement cycle of laundry equipment. With economic conditions having limited effect on the frequency of use, and therefore the useful life of laundry equipment, industry
20
Table of Contents
revenues have been relatively stable over time. Similarly, with a majority of our revenues generated by recurring sales of replacement equipment and service parts, we have experienced stable revenues even during economic slowdowns.
Sales of stand-alone commercial laundry equipment are the single most important driver of our revenues. In 2004, our net revenues from the sale of commercial laundry equipment were approximately $239.2 million, which comprised over 85% of our total net revenues. The other main component of our revenues is the sale of high margin service parts. We offer immediate response service whereby many of our parts are available on a 24-hour turnaround for emergency repair parts orders. In 2004, our net revenues from the sale of service parts were approximately $38.2 million, almost 14% of our total net revenues.
We estimate that our overall market share is approximately 38% in 2004. We have achieved steady revenues by building an extensive and loyal distribution network for our products, establishing a significant installed base of units and developing and offering a full innovative product line. As a result of our large installed base, a significant majority of our revenue is attributable to replacement sales of equipment and service parts.
We believe that continued population expansion in North America will continue to drive steady demand for garment and textile laundering by all customer groups that purchase commercial laundry equipment. We anticipate growth in demand for commercial laundry equipment in international markets as well, especially in developing countries where laundry processing has historically been far less sophisticated than in North America. In addition, customers are increasingly trading up to equipment with enhanced functionality, thereby raising average selling prices. Customers are also moving towards equipment with increased water and energy efficiency as the result of government and consumer pressure and a focus on operating costs.
Recent Developments
On January 27, 2005, ALH Holding Inc. (“ALH”), an entity formed by Teachers’ Private Capital, the private equity arm of Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (“OTPP”), acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interests in Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC pursuant to a unit purchase agreement for aggregate consideration of $466.3 million. In connection with such acquisition, the executive officers of Alliance Laundry acquired $7.4 million of newly issued shares of common stock of ALH, and our other management employees acquired $2.2 million of newly issued shares of ALH common stock in exchange for equity interests in Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC and cash pursuant to ALH’s stock purchase and rollover investment plan. A portion of the aggregate acquisition consideration was used to repay our existing indebtedness, redeem our outstanding preferred equity interests and pay certain fees and expenses payable in connection with the consummation of the acquisition and the financing transactions described below, and the balance was paid to the then current equity holders of Alliance Holdings.
We refer to the acquisition of Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC and the related management investments in ALH as the “Acquisition.” The Acquisition was financed with $350.0 million of debt financing described below, the management equity, approximately $107.4 million of new equity capital from OTPP and available cash. As a result of the Acquisition, all of the outstanding equity interests of Alliance Laundry are owned by Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC, all of the equity interests of Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC are owned by ALH and approximately 91.8% of the capital stock of ALH is owned by OTPP. The remaining capital stock of ALH is owned by our management.
In connection with the closing of the Acquisition, we consummated the following financing transactions, (the “Financing Transactions”, which we refer to, together with the Acquisition, as the “Transactions”):
• | the closing of the issuance of $150.0 million 8 1/2% senior subordinated notes due January 15, 2013, the “2005 Senior Subordinated Notes.” The proceeds from the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes offering were $149.3 million; |
21
Table of Contents
• | the closing of Alliance Laundry’s new $250.0 million senior secured credit facility, which we refer to as the “New Senior Credit Facility,” consisting of a six-year $50.0 million revolving credit facility and a seven-year $200.0 million term loan facility. On the closing date (January 27, 2005), the term loan facility was drawn in full, but the revolving credit facility remained undrawn; and |
• | the settlement of the tender offer and consent solicitation, or the tender offer, initiated by us on January 4, 2005 for the $110.0 million aggregate principal amount of our then outstanding 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes. The tender offer expired at 5:00 PM New York City time on February 2, 2005, and approximately 5.10% of the total principal amount of the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes remained outstanding after the consummation of the tender offer. We redeemed the remaining 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes in accordance with the indenture governing such notes on March 7, 2005. |
In connection with the consummation of the Transactions, Alliance Laundry and Alliance Laundry Corporation became the obligors under the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes. Alliance Laundry is the borrower and obligor under the New Senior Credit Facility and Alliance Laundry Corporation became a guarantor under the New Senior Credit Facility, and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC became a guarantor of the New Senior Credit Facility and the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes.
Alliance Laundry Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alliance Laundry and was originally incorporated for the sole purpose of serving as a co-issuer of the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes. Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC is the parent of Alliance Laundry and has provided a full and unconditional guarantee of the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes. Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC and Alliance Laundry Corporation do not have any operations or assets independent of Alliance Laundry.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the financial statement date and reported amounts of revenues and expenses, including amounts that are susceptible to change. Our critical accounting policies include accounting methods and estimates underlying such financial statement preparation, as well as judgments around uncertainties affecting the application of those policies. In applying critical accounting policies, materially different amounts or results could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. We believe that our critical accounting policies, involving significant estimates, uncertainties and susceptibility to change, include the following:
Revenue Recognition. Revenue from product sales is recognized by us when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred and ownership has transferred to the customer; (iii) the price to the customer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. With the exception of certain sales to international customers, which are recognized upon receipt or acceptance by the customer, these criteria are satisfied, and accordingly, revenue is recognized upon shipment by us. In addition, warranty and sales incentive costs are estimated and accrued at the time of sale, as appropriate.
22
Table of Contents
We sell notes receivable and accounts receivable through our special-purpose bankruptcy remote entities. Servicing revenue, interest income on beneficial interests retained, and gains on the sale of notes receivable are included in commercial laundry revenue. In determining the gain on sales of notes receivable, the investment in the sold receivable pool is allocated between the portion sold and the portion retained, based on their relative fair values. We generally estimate the fair values of our retained interests based on the present value of expected future cash flows to be received, using our best estimate of key assumptions, including credit losses, prepayment rates, interest rates and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved.
Inventories. We value inventories at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Valuing inventories at the lower of cost or market requires the use of estimates and judgment. Our policy is to evaluate all inventory quantities for amounts on-hand that are potentially in excess of estimated usage requirements, and to write-down any excess quantities to estimated net realizable value. Inherent in the estimates of net realizable value are our estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, possible alternative uses and ultimate realization of potentially excess inventory.
Notes and Accounts Receivable. We value notes receivable not sold and accounts receivable net of allowances for uncollectible accounts. These allowances are based on estimates of the portion of the receivables that will not be collected in the future, and in the case of notes receivable, also considers estimated collateral liquidation proceeds. However, the ultimate collectibility of a receivable is significantly dependent upon the financial condition of the individual customer, which can change rapidly and without advance warning. Balances are written off after all collection efforts have been exhausted.
Retained Interests in Securitized Notes Receivable. We value retained beneficial interests in notes receivable sold to our off-balance sheet special-purpose entities based upon the present value of expected future cash flows to be received on the residual portion of cash flows on the notes, using our best estimate of key assumptions, including credit losses, prepayment rates, interest rates and discount rates commensurate with the risks inherent in such estimates. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in the estimated fair value of retained interests are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss). Impairment losses are recognized when the estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of the retained interest. Note 4 to the financial statements discloses the sensitivity of current fair value estimates to immediate adverse changes in certain valuation assumptions.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill will not be amortized. However, under SFAS No. 142, goodwill will be tested for impairment at least annually and more frequently if an event occurs which indicates the goodwill may be impaired. Impairment of goodwill is measured according to a two-step approach. In the first step, the fair value of a reporting unit, as defined by the statement, is compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. In the second step the implied value of the goodwill is estimated as the fair value of the reporting unit less the fair value of all other tangible and intangible assets of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess, not to exceed the carrying amount of the goodwill.
Additionally, under SFAS No. 142, intangible assets not subject to amortization (indefinite lived intangible assets) shall be tested for impairment at least annually and more frequently if an event occurs which indicates the intangible asset may be impaired. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The Company’s other recorded intangible assets, tradenames and trademarks, have been deemed to have an indefinite life.
23
Table of Contents
Income Taxes.Certain items of income and expense are not recognized on our income tax returns and financial statements in the same year, which creates timing differences. The income tax effect of these timing differences results in (1) deferred income tax assets that create a reduction in future income taxes and (2) deferred income tax liabilities that create an increase in future income taxes. Recognition of deferred income tax assets is based on management’s belief that it is more likely than not that the income tax benefit associated with certain temporary differences, income tax operating loss and capital loss carry forwards and income tax credits, would be realized. We have not recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred income tax assets based, in part, on our assessment of future taxable income and in light of our ongoing prudent and feasible income tax strategies. If our estimate of future taxable income or tax strategies change at any time in the future, we may have to record a valuation allowance; recording such an adjustment could have a material effect on our financial condition.
Employee Pensions. We sponsor a defined benefit pension plan covering the majority of our employees. Generally accepted accounting principles require us to develop actuarial assumptions in determining annual pension expense and benefit obligations for the related plan. Such assumptions include discount rate, expected rate of return on plan assets, compensation increases and employee turnover rates. These assumptions are reviewed on an annual basis and modified as necessary to reflect changed conditions. For purposes of determining our pension expense for 2005, the discount rate and expected rate of return on plan assets have been reduced to 5.75% and 8.75%, respectively.
Further, generally accepted accounting principles require the recognition of a minimum pension liability and in certain circumstances an adjustment to member’s equity (deficit) when the fair market value of year-end pension assets are less than the accumulated benefit obligation.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in this report.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As a result of the Acquisition, the Consolidated Financial Statements present our results of operations, financial position and cash flows prior to the date of the Acquisition transaction under “Predecessor.” The financial effects of the Acquisition transaction and our results of operations, financial position and cash flows following the closing of the Acquisition are presented under “Successor.” In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP, our Predecessor results have not been aggregated with our Successor results and, accordingly, our Consolidated Financial Statements do not show results of operations or cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005. However, in order to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 in comparison with the three months ended March 31, 2004, we have presented and discussed below our Predecessor results and our Successor results on a combined basis. The combined results of operations are non-GAAP financial measures and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the Predecessor and Successor results.
24
Table of Contents
Below is a reconciliation of the combined results of operations for the periods presented (in thousands):
January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 | Three Months March 31, | Three Months March 31, | ||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Combined | Predecessor | ||||||||||||
Net revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and consumer laundry | $ | 41,751 | $ | 17,470 | $ | 59,221 | $ | 56,308 | |||||||
Service parts | 7,492 | 3,213 | 10,705 | 9,972 | |||||||||||
49,243 | 20,683 | 69,926 | 66,280 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales | 43,337 | 15,585 | 58,922 | 45,521 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 5,906 | 5,098 | 11,004 | 20,759 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | 6,742 | 3,829 | 10,571 | 8,653 | |||||||||||
Transaction costs associated with sale of business | — | 18,790 | 18,790 | — | |||||||||||
Total operating expense | 6,742 | 22,619 | 29,361 | 8,653 | |||||||||||
Operating (loss) income | (836 | ) | (17,521 | ) | (18,357 | ) | 12,106 | ||||||||
Interest expense | 3,764 | 995 | 4,759 | 7,110 | |||||||||||
Loss from early extinguishment of debt | — | 9,867 | 9,867 | — | |||||||||||
Costs related to abandoned public offerings | — | — | — | 728 | |||||||||||
(Loss) income before taxes | (4,600 | ) | (28,383 | ) | (32,983 | ) | 4,268 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | (1,669 | ) | 9 | (1,660 | ) | 49 | |||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (2,931 | ) | $ | (28,392 | ) | $ | (31,323 | ) | $ | 4,219 | ||||
Below is a reconciliation of certain items of the combined statements of cash flows for the periods presented (in thousands):
January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 | Three Months March 31, | Three Months March 31, | |||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Combined | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operations | $ | 4,291 | $ | (20,675 | ) | $ | (16,384 | ) | $ | 8,623 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by working capital | (23,078 | ) | 14,056 | (9,022 | ) | (1,571 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | $ | (18,787 | ) | $ | (6,619 | ) | $ | (25,406 | ) | $ | 7,052 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||||
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (514 | ) | (188 | ) | (702 | ) | (698 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (514 | ) | $ | (188 | ) | $ | (702 | ) | $ | (698 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt | (2,000 | ) | 1 | (1,999 | ) | (5,061 | ) | |||||||||
Proceeds from senior term loan | 200,000 | — | 200,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from senior subordinated notes | 149,250 | — | 149,250 | — | ||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt | (275,920 | ) | — | (275,920 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Contribution from member | 117,000 | — | 117,000 | — | ||||||||||||
Distribution to old shareholders | (151,996 | ) | — | (151,996 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Debt financing costs | (13,172 | ) | — | (13,172 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Cash paid for capitalized offering related costs | (1,364 | ) | — | (1,364 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net proceeds—management note | — | (71 | ) | (71 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) used in financing activities | $ | 21,798 | $ | (70 | ) | $ | 21,728 | $ | (5,061 | ) | ||||||
25
Table of Contents
Net revenues. Net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased $3.6 million, or 5.5%, to $69.9 million from $66.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. This increase was attributable to higher commercial and consumer laundry revenue of $2.9 million and service parts revenue of $0.7 million. The increase in commercial and consumer laundry revenue was due to higher international revenue of $1.3 million, higher North American commercial equipment revenue of $1.1 million and higher consumer laundry revenue of $1.2 million, which were partly offset by lower earnings from our off-balance sheet equipment financing program of $0.7 million. Revenue for North America was higher for coin-operated laundry customers and on-premise laundries. Revenue for international customers was higher in Europe and Latin America. Alliance re-entered the consumer laundry marketplace in the third three months of 2004, and as such, there was no comparable revenue recognized in the first three months of 2004. Our off-balance sheet equipment financing program earnings were lower due to lower net present values on notes sold resulting from a narrower spread between interest earned and the cost of capital and due to adjusting beneficial interests to their respective fair market values.
Gross profit. Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2005 decreased $9.8 million, or 47.0%, to $11.0 million from $20.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. This decrease was primarily attributable to nickel and chrome surcharges of $1.3 million related to stainless steel purchases, higher depreciation expense of $1.4 million driven by the Acquisition asset write-up to fair market values, the amortization of $5.6 million related to an inventory step-up to fair market value recorded on the Acquisition date, lower earnings from our off-balance sheet equipment financing program of $0.7 million and higher medical and workers compensation costs of $0.5 million. Significant steel cost increases as compared to the prior year were mostly offset by price increases which were effective within the three months ended March 31, 2005. As a result of these factors, gross profit as a percentage of net revenues decreased to 15.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from 31.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased $2.0 million, or 22.6%, to $10.6 million from $8.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was primarily due to $1.1 million on non-cash incentive compensation resulting from the acceleration of vesting for incentive units on the date of the Acquisition and $0.7 million of increased amortization expenses driven primarily by Acquisition date write-ups to fair market value for customer agreements, engineering drawings, and our distribution network. Sales expenses also increased by $0.2 million as compared to the prior period due to incremental costs associated with consumer laundry. As a result of these factors, selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of net revenues increased to 15.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to 13.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
Transaction costs associated with sale of business. Transaction costs associated with sale of business for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were $18.8 million, with no similar costs in 2004. These costs are comprised of seller transaction fees including transaction underwriting fees of $4.5 million, legal and professional fees of $1.3 million, a management sale bonus of $6.2 million and advisory fees to Bain Capital Partners LLC and Bruckman, Rosser, Sherrill & Co. of $6.8 million. Offering related expense as a percentage of net revenues was 1.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Operating (loss) income. As a result of the foregoing, operating (loss) income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 decreased $30.5 million, to a loss of $18.4 million as compared to operating income of $12.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Operating income as a percentage of net revenues decreased to negative 26.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to a positive 18.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
Interest expense. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 decreased $2.3 million, or 33.1%, to $4.8 million from $7.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Interest expense in
26
Table of Contents
2005 includes a favorable non-cash adjustment of $1.1 million to reflect changes in the fair value of an interest rate swap agreement entered into after the Acquisition. Interest expense in 2004 includes an unfavorable non-cash adjustment of $0.4 million to reflect changes in the fair value of a previous interest rate swap agreement. Interest expense in 2005 also includes the recognition of $0.7 million of interest income related to investor promissory notes for the period from May 5, 1998 through January 27, 2005 in accordance with applicable accounting requirements.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt. Loss on early extinguishment of debt for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $9.9 million, with no similar costs in 2004. These costs include the write-off of $5.8 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with pre-Acquisition debt, which was paid off as of the Acquisition date and $4.1 million of call and call premium costs associated with redeeming the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes. Offering related expense as a percentage of net revenues was 14.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Net (loss) income. As a result of the foregoing, our net (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $31.3 million as compared to net income of $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Net (loss) as a percentage of net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was a negative 44.8% as compared to a positive 6.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
In connection with the consummation of the January 27, 2005 Transactions, we refinanced substantially all of our indebtedness with the proceeds of the offering of the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes and borrowings under the New Senior Credit Facility.
2002 Senior Credit Facility. All borrowings under our amended and restated credit agreement dated as of August 2, 2002 (“2002 Senior Credit Facility”), which was comprised of a $193.0 million term loan facility and a $45.0 million revolving credit facility were repaid in connection with the consummation of the Transactions and all outstanding letters of credit under our amended and restated August 2002 credit agreement were refinanced.
New Senior Credit Facility. The New Senior Credit Facility is comprised of a senior secured revolving credit facility in a total principal amount of up to $50.0 million (less amounts received for letters of credit), which we refer to as the “New Revolving Credit Facility,” and a senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $200.0 million, which we refer to as the “New Term Loan Facility.” The New Revolving Credit Facility has a six-year maturity and the New Term Loan Facility has a seven-year maturity. We expect to use borrowings under the New Revolving Credit Facility for general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures and letters of credit. We used borrowings under the New Term Loan Facility together with proceeds from the offering of the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes to pay the adjusted equity purchase price under the Acquisition, to repay outstanding debt, including the 2002 senior credit facility, 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes, junior subordinated promissory notes, unreturned capital on certain preferred units, and to pay fees and expenses related to the Financing Transactions.
The New Senior Credit Facility requires that we meet certain financial tests including, without limitation, a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. The New Senior Credit Facility allows a maximum ratio of consolidated debt to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined by the New Senior Credit Facility) beginning with the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the first financial condition covenant test period), of 6.50. The New Senior Credit Facility contains customary covenants and restrictions including, among others, limitations or prohibitions on capital expenditures and acquisitions, declaring and paying dividends and other distributions, redeeming and repurchasing our other indebtedness, loans and investments, additional indebtedness, liens, guarantees, recapitalizations, mergers, asset sales and transactions with affiliates.
27
Table of Contents
Additional borrowings and the issuance of additional letters of credit under the New Senior Credit Facility are subject to certain continuing representations and warranties, including the absence of any development or event which has had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
Securitization Programs. On November 26, 2002, a trust, Alliance Laundry Equipment Receivables Trust 2002-A (“ALERT 2002A”), formed by a special-purpose bankruptcy remote subsidiary of ours, entered into a $300.0 million revolving facility (the “Asset Backed Facility”), backed by equipment loans and trade receivables originated by us. During the first three years of the Asset Backed Facility, we are permitted, from time to time, to sell our trade receivables and certain equipment loans to the special purpose subsidiary, which in turn will transfer them to the trust. The trust finances the acquisition of the trade receivables and equipment loans through borrowings under the Asset Backed Facility. Funding availability for trade receivables is limited to a maximum of $60.0 million, while funding for equipment loans is limited at $300.0 million less the amount of funding outstanding for trade receivables. Funding for the trade receivables and equipment loans is subject to certain eligibility criteria standard for transactions of this type. After December 2, 2005 (or earlier in the event of a rapid amortization event or an event of default), the trust will not be permitted to request new borrowings under the facility and the outstanding borrowings will amortize over a period of up to nine years thereafter. Based on current market conditions, we believe that we will be able to refinance the facility. However, should market conditions change or our financial position deteriorate, we may not be able to refinance the facility on advantageous terms or at all.
Additional advances under the Asset Backed Facility are subject to certain continuing conditions, including but not limited to (i) the weighted average life, weighted average interest rate, and the amount of fixed rate equipment loans held by the trust, (ii) the absence of a rapid amortization event or event of default, as defined, (iii) our compliance, as servicer, with certain financial covenants, and (iv) no event having occurred which materially and adversely affects our operations.
The risk of loss to the note purchasers under the new Asset Backed Facility resulting from default or dilution on the trade receivables and equipment loans is protected by credit enhancement, provided in the form of cash reserves, letters of credit and overcollateralization. Further, the timely payment of interest and the ultimate payment of principal on the facility is guaranteed by Ambac Assurance Corporation. All of the residual beneficial interests in the trust and cash flows remaining from the pool of receivables and loans after payment of all obligations under the Asset Backed Facility would accrue to our benefit. Except for the retained interests and amounts of the letters of credit outstanding from time to time as credit enhancement, we provide no support or recourse for the risk of loss relating to default on the assets transferred to the trust. In addition, we are paid a monthly servicing fee equal to one-twelfth of 1.0% of the aggregate balance of such trade receivables and equipment loans.
1998 Senior Subordinated Notes. On January 4, 2005, we commenced a cash tender offer and consent solicitation with respect to all $110.0 million of our outstanding 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes. The tender offer for the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes expired at 5:00 p.m. New York City time on February 2, 2005, and approximately 5.10% of the principal amount of the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes remained outstanding after the consummation of the tender offer. We redeemed the remaining 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes in accordance with the indenture governing such notes on March 7, 2005.
2005 Senior Subordinated Notes. As part of the Financing Transactions, we offered and sold $150.0 million of 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes and received proceeds of approximately $149.3 million. The 2005 Notes Indenture governing the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes, among other things, restricts our ability and
28
Table of Contents
the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to make investments, incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, pay dividends, create liens, sell assets, merge or consolidate with other entities, enter into transactions with affiliates and engage in certain business activities.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.
We have presented EBITDA below and Adjusted EBITDA below because certain covenants in the indenture governing our 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes are tied to ratios based on these measures. “EBITDA” represents net income before interest expense, income tax (provision) benefit and depreciation and amortization, and “Adjusted EBITDA” is EBITDA as further adjusted to exclude, among other things, certain non-recurring expenses and other non-recurring non-cash charges. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent, and should not be considered, an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations, as determined by GAAP, and our calculations thereof may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies. Based on our industry and debt financing experience, we believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are customarily used to provide useful information regarding a company’s ability to service and/or incur indebtedness. In addition, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are defined in the indenture governing our 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes in a manner which is identical to the definition of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in our New Senior Credit Facility under which we are required to satisfy specified financial ratios and tests, including a maximum of total debt to Adjusted EBITDA and a minimum interest coverage ratio. The indenture governing our 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes also requires us to meet a fixed charge coverage ratio in order to incur additional indebtedness, subject to certain exceptions.
The following is a reconciliation from Net (Loss) Income to EBITDA and from EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA for the combined periods presented:
January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 | January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 | Three Months March 31, | Three Months March 31, | |||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Combined | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (2,931 | ) | $ | (28,392 | ) | $ | (31,323 | ) | $ | 4,219 | |||||
Provision for income taxes | (1,669 | ) | 9 | (1,660 | ) | 49 | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income before income taxes | (4,600 | ) | (28,383 | ) | (32,983 | ) | 4,268 | |||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 3,764 | 995 | 4,759 | 7,110 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (a) | 4,141 | 526 | 4,667 | 2,587 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash interest expense included in amortization above | (348 | ) | — | (348 | ) | (483 | ) | |||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 2,957 | $ | (26,862 | ) | $ | (23,905 | ) | $ | 13,482 | ||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||
Finance program adjustments (b) | 916 | 31 | 947 | 644 | ||||||||||||
Other non-recurring charges (c) | 193 | 28,657 | 28,850 | 728 | ||||||||||||
Other non-cash charges (d) | 5,606 | 1,089 | 6,695 | — | ||||||||||||
Management fees paid to affiliates of Bain | — | 83 | 83 | 254 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 9,672 | $ | 2,998 | $ | 12,670 | $ | 15,108 | ||||||||
(a) | Depreciation and amortization amounts include amortization of deferred financing costs included in interest expense. |
29
Table of Contents
(b) | We currently operate an off-balance sheet commercial equipment finance program in which newly originated equipment loans are sold to qualified special-purpose bankruptcy remote entities. In accordance with GAAP, we are required to record gains/losses on the sale of these equipment based promissory notes. In calculating Adjusted EBITDA, management determines the cash impact of net interest income on these notes. The finance program adjustments are the difference between GAAP basis revenues (as prescribed by SFAS No. 125/140) and cash basis revenues. |
(c) | Other non-recurring charges include executive retention costs included in administrative expenses and infrequently occurring items as follows: |
• | Other non-recurring charges in 2004 relate to expenses associated with a proposed initial public offering of Income Deposit Securities (“IDS”). In connection with the proposed IDS offering, as of December 31, 2004 we had incurred and recorded $1.3 million of offering related expenses in the consolidated statement of income. In addition we had capitalized $3.5 million of debt and offering related costs in other assets within the consolidated balance sheet. On December 7, 2004, we chose to abandon the proposed IDS offering, and consequently wrote off the $3.5 million of capitalized costs in 2004. As of March 31, 2004 we had incurred $0.7 million of expenses associated with this proposed transaction. |
• | Other non-recurring charges for the period from January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 relate to seller transaction costs of $18.8 million incurred as part of the business sale and a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $9.9 million. The seller transaction costs are primarily comprised of transaction underwriting fees of $4.5 million, legal and professional fees of $1.3 million, Bain and BRS advisory fees of $6.8 million and a management sale bonus of $6.2 million. The loss on early extinguishment of debt includes the write-off of $5.8 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with pre-Acquisition debt, which was paid off as of the Acquisition date and $4.1 million of call and call premium costs associated with redeeming the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes. |
• | Other non-recurring charges for the period from January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 relate to a periodic accrual under a one time retention bonus agreement, entered into with certain management employees concurrent with the Acquisition. Under the retention bonus agreements, the executives are entitled to receive special retention bonus awards upon the second anniversary of the closing date of the Acquisition, subject generally to their continued employment with Alliance Laundry through such date. The aggregate amount of retention bonuses payable under these agreements is approximately $2.3 million. |
(d) | Other non-cash charges are described as follows: |
• | Non-cash charges for the period from January 1, 2005 through January 27, 2005 relate to non-cash incentive compensation expense resulting from the acceleration of vesting for the incentive units at the date of the Acquisition. |
• | Non-cash charges for the period from January 28, 2005 through March 31, 2005 relate to the amortization of $5.6 million associated with the inventory step-up to fair market value recorded at the Acquisition date. |
30
Table of Contents
Liquidity
After the Acquisition, our principal sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from operations and borrowings under our $50.0 million New Revolving Credit Facility. Our principal uses of liquidity are to meet debt service requirements, finance our capital expenditures and provide working capital. We expect that capital expenditures in 2005 will not exceed $6.0 million. We expect the ongoing requirements for debt service, capital expenditures and working capital will be funded by internally generated cash flow and borrowings under the New Revolving Credit Facility. The aggregate scheduled maturities of long-term debt in subsequent years after giving effect to a $2.0 million voluntary prepayment made prior to March 31, 2005 are as follows:
Year | Amount Due | ||
(Dollars in millions) | |||
2005 | $ | — | |
2006 | 1.5 | ||
2007 | 2.0 | ||
2008 | 2.0 | ||
2009 | 2.0 | ||
Thereafter | 340.5 |
The New Senior Credit Facility and the indenture governing the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes contain a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to dispose of assets, repay other indebtedness, incur liens, make capital expenditures and make certain investments or acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidation and otherwise restrict our operating activities. In addition, under the New Senior Credit Facility, the Company is required to satisfy specified financial ratios and tests, including a maximum of total debt to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement governing the New Senior Credit Facility) and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
The New Senior Credit Facility requires us to comply with certain financial ratios and tests in order to comply with the terms of the agreement. Our first measurement date for financial covenants under the New Senior Credit Facility is June 30, 2005. The occurrence of any default of these covenants could result in acceleration of our obligations under the New Senior Credit Facility (approximately $198.0 million) and foreclosure on the collateral securing such obligations. Further, such an acceleration would constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes, under our Asset Backed Facility and under our ALERT 2000 securitization arrangement.
The maximum ratio of consolidated debt to Adjusted EBITDA under the New Senior Credit Facility is scheduled to be 6.50 at June 30, 2005. We believe that future cash flows from operations, together with available borrowings under the New Revolving Credit Facility, will be adequate to meet our anticipated requirements for capital expenditures, working capital, interest payments, scheduled principal payments and other debt repayments that may be required as a result of the scheduled ratio of consolidated debt to Adjusted EBITDA discussed above. These covenants are not applicable for the Company prior to June 30, 2005.
At March 31, 2005, there were no borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. Letters of credit issued on our behalf under the Revolving Credit Facility totaled $27.8 million at March 31, 2005. At March 31, 2005, we had $22.2 million of our existing $50.0 million Revolving Credit Facility available. At June 30, 2005 and thereafter, the amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility will also be subject to certain limitations which relate primarily to a maximum ratio of consolidated debt to EBITDA (as defined by the New Senior Credit Facility).
31
Table of Contents
The New Term Loan Facility is repayable in the following aggregate annual amounts:
Year | Amount Due | ||
(Dollars in millions) | |||
2005 | $ | — | |
2006 | 1.5 | ||
2007 | 2.0 | ||
2008 | 2.0 | ||
2009 | 2.0 | ||
Thereafter | 190.5 |
The New Term Loan Facility is also subject to mandatory prepayment with the proceeds of certain debt incurrences, asset sales and a portion of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the New Senior Credit Facility). The New Revolving Credit Facility will terminate on January 27, 2011.
We believe, based on currently available information, that for the foreseeable future, cash flows from operations, together with available borrowings under the New Senior Credit Facility, will be adequate to meet our anticipated requirements for capital expenditures, working capital, interest payments, scheduled principal payments and other debt repayments while achieving all required covenant requirements under the New Senior Credit Facility and 2005 Senior Subordinated Notes.
Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal or to refinance our indebtedness, or to pay the interest or liquidated damages, if any thereon, or to fund planned capital expenditures, will depend upon our future performance, which, in turn, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive and other factors that are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that our business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures after satisfying certain liabilities arising in the ordinary course of business. If unable to do so, we may be required to refinance all or a portion of our debt, to sell assets or to obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that any such refinancing would be available or that any such sales of assets or additional financing could be obtained.
Our Asset Backed Facility provides for a total of $300.0 million in off-balance sheet financing for trade receivables and equipment loans. The finance programs have been and will continue to be structured in a manner that qualifies for off-balance sheet treatment in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. It is expected that under the Asset Backed Facility, we will continue to act as originator and servicer of the equipment financing promissory notes and the trade receivables.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes to our off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations since the filing of our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Cash Flows
Cash used in operating activities for the combined three months ended March 31, 2005 of $25.4 million was driven by cash used by operations of $16.4 million (net income adjusted for depreciation, amortization and non-cash interest) and higher working capital requirements of $9.0 million. The higher cash used by operations includes $18.8 million of transaction costs associated with the sale of the business and $4.1 million of call and call premium costs associated with redeeming the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes. Working capital requirements increased for accounts receivable and inventory with decreases in accounts payable and other liabilities. The working capital investment in receivables at March 31, 2005 of $8.2 million increased $2.6 million as compared to the balance of $5.6 million at December 31, 2004 due solely to the timing of sales of accounts receivable to the qualified special-purpose bankruptcy remote entities. The working capital investment in inventories of $30.8 million increased $4.1 million as compared to the balance of $26.8 million at December 31, 2004 in preparation to meet second quarter sales needs. The working capital investment in other liabilities at March 31, 2005 of $22.1 million decreased $2.6 million as compared to the balance of $24.7 million at December 31, 2004 due to the payment of annual management bonuses, payment of customer volume rebates and a favorable interest payable adjustment to recognize the favorable impact of an interest rate swap agreement.
32
Table of Contents
Net cash used in operating activities for the combined three months ended March 31, 2005 of $25.4 million decreased by $32.5 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. This decrease was primarily due to lower cash provided by operations of $25.0 million and higher net cash used in changes in assets and liabilities of $7.5 million for the combined three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. The lower cash provided by operations of $25.0 million includes $18.8 million of transaction costs associated with the sale of the business and $4.1 million of call and call premium costs associated with redeeming the 1998 Senior Subordinated Notes. The higher net cash used in changes in assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2005 of $7.5 million was largely due to a $2.6 million increase in accounts receivable for the combined three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to a decrease of $1.6 million for the same period in 2004 and a decrease in other liabilities of $3.8 million for the combined three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to an increase of $2.3 million for the same period in 2004. Offsetting the above, we increased inventory stocking levels by $3.4 million for the combined three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to an increase of $6.1 million for the same period in 2004.
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 were $0.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Capital spending in both 2005 and 2004 was principally oriented toward product enhancements and reducing manufacturing costs.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
During January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which clarifies the consolidation and disclosure requirements related to variable interests in a variable interest entity. A variable interest entity is an entity for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN No. 46, which replaced FIN No. 46. The revised Interpretation (“FIN 46-R”) was adopted by us beginning on January 1, 2005 for interests in entities created on or before December 31, 2003 and as of the date we first became involved with a potential variable interest entity created after December 31, 2003. The impact was not material to the financial statements.
FIN 46-R provides exceptions from its scope for certain entities, including qualifying special-purpose securitization entities subject to the reporting requirements of SFAS No. 140 and business entities, as defined, that do not possess certain characteristics.
Our primary variable interests are notes receivable that we have retained and are comprised primarily of equipment loans to laundromat operators and other end-users. The carrying value of such loans was approximately $3.9 million at March 31, 2005. If in the future we are required to consolidate a variable interest entity in which one or both of our SFAS No. 140 qualifying special-purpose entities also holds a variable interest, the qualifying status of the special-purpose entity with such holdings would be eliminated. In that instance, we would be required to determine if we are the primary beneficiary of the affected securitization entity under FIN 46-R and if so, to consolidate that entity, which would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
During December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS 123”) and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as expense in the financial statements based on their fair values beginning with the first annual period after June 15, 2005. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 will no longer be an alternative to expense recognition. We will adopt SFAS 123R using the modified-prospective method in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 123R on our financial statements.
The FASB is expected to re-expose a proposed statement that would amend and clarify SFAS No. 140 (and related implementation guidance). The proposed statement will address permitted activities of qualifying special-purpose entities, including the degree of discretion allowable in determining the terms of beneficial interests issued after inception, and whether certain transfers can meet the criteria for sale accounting under SFAS No. 140 if the transferor or any consolidated affiliate provides liquidity support for the transferee’s beneficial interests. As the proposed statement has not been issued, we are unable to determine the effects of the related transition provisions, if any, on our existing securitization entities. However, in the event that transfers to our existing asset backed facility would no longer qualify as sales of financial assets in the future, we may recognize additional costs for a replacement facility or it may have other material financial statement effects. An exposure draft is expected in the third quarter of 2005 and a final document is anticipated in the first quarter of 2006.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are potentially exposed to market risk associated with changes in interest and foreign exchange rates. From time to time we may enter into derivative financial instruments to hedge our interest rate exposures and to hedge exchange rate fluctuations between United States dollars and foreign currencies. An instrument will be treated as a hedge if it is effective in offsetting the impact of volatility in our underlying exposures. We do not enter into derivatives for speculative purposes. There have been no material changes in our market risk exposures as compared to those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 333-56857).
33
Table of Contents
On December 12, 2002, we entered into an $80.0 million interest rate swap agreement with Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. to hedge a portion of our interest rate risk related to our term loan borrowings under the previous Senior Credit Facility. This swap agreement was settled on January 27, 2005 with an immaterial impact.
Effective March 4, 2005, we entered into a $67.0 million interest rate swap agreement with The Bank of Nova Scotia to hedge a portion of our interest rate risk related to our term loan borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility. Under the swap, which matures on March 4, 2008, we pay a fixed rate of 3.81%, and receive or pay quarterly interest payments based upon the three month LIBOR rate. Under the swap, there was no net cash interest paid during the three months ended March 31, 2005. The fair value of this interest rate swap agreement, which represents the amount that we would pay to settle the instrument, was $0.9 million at March 31, 2005.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) We carried out an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer along with our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer along with our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective for the purposes set forth in the definition thereof in Exchange Act Rule 15d-15(e).
(b) There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have occurred during our first quarter of 2005 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
With the exception of the reported actual results, the information presented herein contains predictions, estimates or other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, including items specifically discussed in the “Note 3 – Commitments and Contingencies” section of this document. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that such plans, intentions, expectations, objectives or goals will be achieved. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those included in forward-looking statements include: impact of competition; continued sales to key customers; possible fluctuations in the cost of raw materials and components; possible fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which affect the competitiveness of our products abroad; market acceptance of new and enhanced versions of our products; the impact of substantial leverage and debt service on us and other risks listed from time to time in our reports, including but not limited to our Annual Report on Form 10-K (file no. 333-56857). We do not undertake any obligation to update any such forward looking statements unless required by law.
34
Table of Contents
List of Exhibits.
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
35
Table of Contents
Alliance Laundry Systems LLC has duly caused this quarterly report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ THOMAS F. L’ESPERANCE Thomas F. L’Esperance | Chairman and CEO | 5-13-05 | ||
/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS Bruce P. Rounds | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | 5-13-05 |
Alliance Laundry Corp. has duly caused this quarterly report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ THOMAS F. L’ESPERANCE Thomas F. L’Esperance | Chairman and CEO | 5-13-05 | ||
/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS Bruce P. Rounds | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | 5-13-05 |
Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC has duly caused this quarterly report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ THOMAS F. L’ESPERANCE Thomas F. L’Esperance | Chairman and CEO | 5-13-05 | ||
/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS Bruce P. Rounds | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | 5-13-05 |
36