Simon Property 10K 2009 Annual report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		001-14469 (Commission File No.)		04-6268599 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

225 West Washington Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code)

(317) 636-1600
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered

Common stock, $0.0001 par value		New York Stock Exchange
6% Series I Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value		New York Stock Exchange
8³/8% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ý		Accelerated filero		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12-b of the Act). Yes o No ý

The aggregate market value of shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $14,157 million based on the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange for such stock on June 30, 2009.

As of January 31, 2010, Simon Property Group, Inc. had 289,976,654 and 8,000 shares of common stock and Class B common stock outstanding, respectively.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

Portions of the Registrant's Annual Report to Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Parts I, II and IV; and portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement in connection with its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Annual Report on Form 10-K
December 31, 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item No.

Part I
1.	Business	3
1A.	Risk Factors	8
1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	12
2.	Properties	12
3.	Legal Proceedings	48
4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	48
Part II
5.	Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	49
6.	Selected Financial Data	50
7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	50
7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	50
8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	50
9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	50
9A.	Controls and Procedures	50
9B.	Other Information	50
Part III
10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	51
11.	Executive Compensation	51
12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	51
13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	51
14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	51
Part IV
15.	Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules	52
Signatures		53

Table of Contents

Part I

Item 1. Business

Simon Property Group, Inc. is a Delaware corporation that operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code. Simon Property Group, L.P., or the Operating Partnership, is our majority-owned partnership subsidiary that owns all of our real estate properties. In this report, the terms "we", "us" and "our" refer to Simon Property Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

We own, develop and manage retail real estate properties, which consist primarily of regional malls, Premium Outlet® Centers, The Mills®, and community/lifestyle centers. As of December 31, 2009, we owned or held an interest in 321 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 162 regional malls, 41 Premium Outlet Centers, 67 community/lifestyle centers, 36 properties acquired in the 2007 acquisition of The Mills Corporation, or the Mills acquisition, and 15 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 41 states and Puerto Rico. Of the 36 properties acquired in The Mills portfolio, 16 of these properties are The Mills, 16 are regional malls, and four are community centers. We also own an interest in one parcel of land held in the United States for future development. Internationally, as of December 31, 2009, we had ownership interests in 51 European shopping centers (France, Italy and Poland), eight Premium Outlet Centers in Japan, one Premium Outlet Center in Mexico, and one Premium Outlet Center in South Korea. Also, through joint venture arrangements we have a 24% interest in two shopping centers in Italy currently under development. On February 4, 2010, we and our partner entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the interests in Simon Ivanhoe S.à.r.l, or Simon Ivanhoe, which owns seven shopping centers located in France and Poland.

For a description of our operational strategies and developments in our business during 2009, see the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" section of the 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders filed as Exhibit 13.1 to this Form 10-K.

Other Policies

The following is a discussion of our investment policies, financing policies, conflict of interest policies and policies with respect to certain other activities. One or more of these policies may be amended or rescinded from time to time without a stockholder vote.

Investment Policies

While we emphasize equity real estate investments, we may, at our discretion, invest in mortgages and other real estate interests consistent with our qualification as a REIT. We do not currently intend to invest to a significant extent in mortgages or deeds of trust; however, we hold a mortgage note which results in us receiving 100% of the economics of a property. We may invest in participating or convertible mortgages if we conclude that we may benefit from the cash flow or any appreciation in the value of the property.

We may invest in securities of other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers. However, any of these investments would be subject to the percentage ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for REIT qualification. These REIT limitations mean that we cannot make an investment that would cause our real estate assets to be less than 75% of our total assets. In addition, at least 75% of our gross income must be derived directly or indirectly from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, including "rents from real property," dividends from other REITs and, in certain circumstances, interest from certain types of temporary investments. At least 95% of our income must be derived from such real property investments, and from dividends, interest and gains from the sale or dispositions of stock or securities or from other combinations of the foregoing.

Subject to REIT limitations, we may invest in the securities of other issuers in connection with acquisitions of indirect interests in real estate. Such an investment would normally be in the form of general or limited partnership or membership interests in special purpose partnerships and limited liability companies that own one or more properties. We may, in the future, acquire all or substantially all of the securities or assets of other REITs, management companies or similar entities where such investments would be consistent with our investment policies.

Table of Contents

Financing Policies

We must comply with the covenants contained in our financing agreements that limit our ratio of debt to total assets or market value, as defined. For example, the Operating Partnership's lines of credit and the indentures for the Operating Partnership's debt securities contain covenants that restrict the total amount of debt of the Operating Partnership to 65%, or 60% in relation to certain debt, of total assets, as defined under the related arrangement, and secured debt to 50% of total assets. In addition, these agreements contain other covenants requiring compliance with financial ratios. Furthermore, the amount of debt that we may incur is limited as a practical matter by our desire to maintain acceptable ratings for our equity securities and the debt securities of the Operating Partnership.

If our Board of Directors determines to seek additional capital, we may raise such capital through additional equity offerings, debt financing, creating joint ventures with existing ownership interests in properties, retention of cash flows or a combination of these methods. Our ability to retain cash flows is limited by the requirement for REITs to distribute at least 90% of their taxable income. We must also take into account taxes that would be imposed on undistributed taxable income. If the Board of Directors determines to raise additional equity capital, it may, without stockholder approval, issue additional shares of common stock or other capital stock. The Board of Directors may issue a number of shares up to the amount of our authorized capital in any manner and on such terms and for such consideration as it deems appropriate. Such securities may be senior to the outstanding classes of common stock. Such securities also may include additional classes of preferred stock, which may be convertible into common stock. Existing stockholders have no preemptive right to purchase shares in any subsequent offering of our securities. Any such offering could dilute a stockholder's investment in us.

We expect most future borrowings would be made through the Operating Partnership or its subsidiaries. We might, however, incur borrowings that would be reloaned to the Operating Partnership. Borrowings may be in the form of bank borrowings, publicly and privately placed debt instruments, or purchase money obligations to the sellers of properties. Any such indebtedness may be secured or unsecured. Any such indebtedness may also have full or limited recourse to the borrower or cross-collateralized with other debt, or may be fully or partially guaranteed by the Operating Partnership. Although we may borrow to fund the payment of dividends, we currently have no expectation that we will regularly be required to do so.

On December 8, 2009, the Operating Partnership entered into a new $3.565 billion unsecured revolving corporate credit facility which replaced its $3.5 billion unsecured credit facility, or the Credit Facility, which expired on January 11, 2010. The new credit facility contains an accordion feature allowing the maximum borrowing capacity to expand to $4.0 billion. The new credit facility matures on March 31, 2013. We issue debt securities through the Operating Partnership, but we may issue our debt securities which may be convertible into capital stock or be accompanied by warrants to purchase capital stock. We also may sell or securitize our lease receivables. The proceeds from any borrowings or financings may be used for one or more of the following:

•: financing acquisitions;
•: developing or redeveloping properties;
•: refinancing existing indebtedness;
•: working capital or capital improvements; or
•: meeting the income distribution requirements applicable to REITs, if we have income without the receipt of cash sufficient to enable us to meet such distribution requirements.

We may also finance acquisitions through the following:

•: issuance of shares of common stock or preferred stock;
•: issuance of additional units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership;
•: issuance of preferred units of the Operating Partnership;
•: issuance of other securities; or
•: sale or exchange of ownership interests in properties.

The ability of the Operating Partnership to issue units of limited partnership interest to transferors of properties or other partnership interests may defer gain recognition for tax purposes by the transferor. It may also be advantageous for us since there are ownership limits that restrict the number of shares of our capital stock that investors may own.

Table of Contents

We do not have a policy limiting the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any particular property. Mortgage financing instruments, however, usually limit additional indebtedness on such properties. We also have covenants on our unsecured debt that limit our total secured debt.

Typically, we invest in or form special purpose entities to assist us in obtaining permanent financing at attractive terms. Permanent financing may be structured as a mortgage loan on a single property, or on a group of properties, and generally requires us to provide a mortgage interest on the property in favor of an institutional third party, as a joint venture with a third party, or as a securitized financing. For securitized financings, we create special purpose entities to own the properties. These special purpose entities are structured so that they would not be consolidated with us in the event we would ever become subject to a bankruptcy proceeding. We decide upon the structure of the financing based upon the best terms then available to us and whether the proposed financing is consistent with our other business objectives. For accounting purposes, we include the outstanding securitized debt of special purpose entities owning consolidated properties as part of our consolidated indebtedness.

Conflict of Interest Policies

We maintain policies and have entered into agreements designed to reduce or eliminate potential conflicts of interest. We have adopted governance principles governing our affairs and the Board of Directors, as well as written charters for each of the standing Committees of the Board of Directors. In addition, we have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our officers, directors, and employees. At least a majority of the members of our Board of Directors must qualify as independent under the listing standards for New York Stock Exchange companies and cannot be affiliated with the Simon family who are significant stockholders and/or unitholders in the Operating Partnership. Any transaction between us and the Simons, including property acquisitions, service and property management agreements and retail space leases, must be approved by a majority of our non-affiliated directors.

The sale by the Operating Partnership of any property that it owns may have an adverse tax impact on the Simons and the other limited partners of the Operating Partnership. In order to avoid any conflict of interest between Simon Property and the limited partners of the Operating Partnership, our charter requires that at least six of our independent directors must authorize and require the Operating Partnership to sell any property it owns. Any such sale is subject to applicable agreements with third parties. Noncompetition agreements executed by each of the Simons contain covenants limiting the ability of the Simons to participate in certain shopping center activities in North America.

Policies With Respect To Certain Other Activities

We intend to make investments which are consistent with our qualification as a REIT, unless the Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to so qualify as a REIT. The Board of Directors may make such a determination because of changing circumstances or changes in the REIT requirements. We have authority to offer shares of our capital stock or other securities in exchange for property. We also have authority to repurchase or otherwise reacquire our shares or any other securities. We may issue shares of our common stock, or cash at our option, to holders of units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership in future periods upon exercise of such holders' rights under the Operating Partnership agreement. Our policy prohibits us from making any loans to our directors or executive officers for any purpose. We may make loans to the joint ventures in which we participate.

Competition

The retail industry is dynamic and competitive. We compete with numerous merchandise distribution channels including regional malls, outlet centers, community/lifestyle centers, and other shopping centers in the United States and abroad. Internet retailing sites and catalogs also provide retailers with distribution options beyond existing brick and mortar retail properties and the numerous projects in development by commercial developers, real estate companies and other owners of retail real estate. The existence of competitive alternatives could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space and on the level of rents we can obtain. This results in competition for both the tenants to occupy the properties that we develop and manage as well as for the acquisition of prime sites (including

Table of Contents

land for development and operating properties). We believe that there are numerous factors that make our properties highly desirable to retailers including:

•: the quality and diversity of our properties;
•: our management and operational expertise;
•: our extensive experience and relationships with retailers and lenders;
•: our mall marketing initiatives and consumer focused strategic corporate alliances; and
•: our ability to reduce the total occupancy cost of our tenants.

Certain Activities

During the past three years, we have:

•: issued 6,133,556 shares of common stock upon the exchange of units of limited partnership interest of the Operating Partnership, or units;
•: issued 753,824 restricted shares of common stock, net of forfeitures, under The Simon Property Group 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 1998 Plan;
•: issued 694,981 shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options under the 1998 Plan;
•: purchased 595,000 shares of common stock;
•: issued 5,203,763 shares of common stock upon the conversion of 6,502,979 shares of Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, or Series I preferred stock;
•: issued 11,876,076 shares of common stock as part of the quarterly dividends to common stockholders;
•: issued 23,000,000 shares of common stock in a public offering at a public offering price of $50.00 per share;
•: issued 17,250,000 shares of common stock in a public offering at a public offering price of $31.50 per share;
•: redeemed all of the outstanding 3,000,000 shares of Series G preferred stock;
•: issued 812,381 shares of Series I preferred stock upon the exchange of Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units;
•: issued 4,000 shares of common stock upon conversion and retirement of all 4,000 shares of Class C common stock;
•: borrowed a maximum amount of $2.6 billion under the prior Credit Facility; the outstanding amount of borrowings under this facility as of December 31, 2009 was $446.1 million, all related to the U.S. dollar equivalent of Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings;
•: entered into our new $3.565 billion credit facility on December 8, 2009;
•: provided annual reports containing financial statements certified by our independent registered public accounting firm and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial statements to our security holders;
•: not made loans to other entities or persons, including our officers and directors, other than to certain joint venture properties;
•: not invested in the securities of other issuers for the purpose of exercising control, other than the Operating Partnership, certain wholly-owned subsidiaries and to acquire interests in real estate;
•: not underwritten securities of other issuers; and
•: not engaged in the purchase and sale or turnover of investments for the purpose of trading.

Employees

At January 5, 2010, we and our affiliates employed approximately 5,200 persons at various properties and offices throughout the United States, of which approximately 1,900 were part-time. Approximately 1,000 of these employees were located at our corporate headquarters in Indianapolis, Indiana and 100 were located at our Chelsea offices in Roseland, New Jersey.

Corporate Headquarters

Our corporate headquarters are located at 225 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, and our telephone number is (317) 636-1600.

Available Information

We are a large accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act) and are required, pursuant to Item 101 of Regulation S-K, to provide certain information regarding

Table of Contents

our website and the availability of certain documents filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our Internet website address is www.simon.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available or may be accessed free of charge through the "About Simon/Investor Relations/Financial Information" section of our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our Internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following corporate governance documents are also available through the "About Simon/Investor Relations/Corporate Governance" section of our Internet website or may be obtained in print form by request of our Investor Relations Department: Governance Principles, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, and Executive Committee Charter.

In addition, we intend to disclose on our Internet website any amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that are required to be publicly disclosed pursuant to rules of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers as of December 31, 2009.

Name		Position

David Simon	48	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Richard S. Sokolov	60	President and Chief Operating Officer
Gary L. Lewis	51	Senior Executive Vice President and President of Leasing
Stephen E. Sterrett	54	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
John Rulli	53	Executive Vice President and President — Simon Management Group
James M. Barkley	58	General Counsel; Secretary
Andrew A. Juster	57	Executive Vice President and Treasurer
Steven K. Broadwater	43	Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

The executive officers of Simon Property serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. For biographical information of David Simon, Richard S. Sokolov, Stephen E. Sterrett, James M. Barkley and John Rulli, see Item 10 of this report.

Mr. Lewis is the Senior Executive Vice President and President of Leasing of Simon Property. Mr. Lewis joined Melvin Simon & Associates, Inc., or MSA, in 1986 and held various positions with MSA and Simon Property prior to becoming Senior Executive Vice President and President of Leasing. In 2002 he was appointed to Executive Vice President — Leasing and in 2007 he became Senior Executive Vice President and President of Leasing.

Mr. Juster serves as Simon Property's Executive Vice President and Treasurer. He joined MSA in 1989 and held various financial positions with MSA until 1993 and thereafter has held various positions with Simon Property. Mr. Juster became Treasurer in 2001 and was promoted to Executive Vice President in 2008.

Mr. Broadwater serves as Simon Property's Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer and prior to that as Vice President and Corporate Controller. Mr. Broadwater joined Simon Property in 2004 and was promoted to Chief Accounting Officer in 2009.

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following factors, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and presented elsewhere by our management from time to time. These factors, among others, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows, and you should carefully consider them. It is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. You should not consider this list to be a complete statement of all potential risks or uncertainties and we may update them in our future periodic reports.

Risks Relating to Debt and the Financial Markets

We have a substantial debt burden that could affect our future operations.

As of December 31, 2009, our consolidated mortgages and other indebtedness, excluding the related premium and discount, totaled $18.6 billion. We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to meet required debt service. Our debt service costs generally will not be reduced if developments at the property, such as the entry of new competitors or the loss of major tenants, cause a reduction in the income from the property. Should such events occur, our operations may be adversely affected. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and income from this is insufficient to pay that indebtedness, the property could be foreclosed upon by the mortgagee resulting in a loss of income and a decline in our total asset value.

Disruption in the credit markets or downgrades in our credit ratings may adversely affect our ability to access external financings for our growth and ongoing debt service requirements.

We depend primarily on external financings, principally debt financings, to fund the growth of our business and to ensure that we can meet ongoing maturities of our outstanding debt. Our access to financing depends on our credit rating, the willingness of banks to lend to us and conditions in the capital markets. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain the financing we need for future growth or to meet our debt service as obligations mature, or that the financing available to us will be on acceptable terms.

Adverse changes in our credit rating could affect our borrowing capacity and borrowing terms.

Our outstanding senior unsecured notes and preferred stock are periodically rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies. The credit ratings are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to our industry and the economic outlook in general. Our credit rating can affect the amount of capital we can access, as well as the terms of any financing we obtain. Since we depend primarily on debt financing to fund our growth, adverse changes in our credit rating could have a negative effect on our future growth.

Our hedging interest rate protection arrangements may not effectively limit our interest rate risk.

We manage our exposure to interest rate risk by a combination of interest rate protection agreements to effectively fix or cap a portion of our variable rate debt. In addition, we refinance fixed rate debt at times when we believe rates and terms are appropriate. Our efforts to manage these exposures may not be successful.

Our use of interest rate hedging arrangements to manage risk associated with interest rate volatility may expose us to additional risks, including a risk that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement may fail to honor its obligations. Developing an effective interest rate risk strategy is complex and no strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. There can be no assurance that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Termination of these hedging agreements typically involves costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs.

Factors Affecting Real Estate Investments and Operations

We face risks associated with the acquisition, development and expansion of properties.

We regularly acquire and develop new properties and expand and redevelop existing properties, and these activities are subject to various risks. We may not be successful in pursuing acquisition, development or redevelopment/expansion opportunities. In addition, newly acquired, developed or redeveloped/expanded properties may not perform

Table of Contents

as well as expected. We are subject to other risks in connection with any acquisition, development and redevelopment/expansion activities, including the following:

•: construction costs of a project may be higher than projected, potentially making the project unfeasible or unprofitable;
•: we may not be able to obtain financing or to refinance construction loans on favorable terms, if at all;
•: we may be unable to obtain zoning, occupancy or other governmental approvals;
•: occupancy rates and rents may not meet our projections and the project may not be profitable; and
•: we may need the consent of third parties such as anchor tenants, mortgage lenders and joint venture partners, and those consents may be withheld.

If a development or redevelopment/expansion project is unsuccessful, either because it is not meeting our expectations when operational or was not completed according to the project planning, we could lose our investment in the project. Further, if we guarantee the property's financing, our loss could exceed our investment in the project.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid.

Our properties represent a substantial portion of our total consolidated assets. These investments are relatively illiquid. As a result, our ability to sell one or more of our properties or investments in real estate in response to any changes in economic or other conditions is limited. If we want to sell a property, we cannot assure you that we will be able to dispose of it in the desired time period or that the sales price of a property will exceed the cost of our investment.

Environmental Risks

As owners of real estate, we can face liabilities for environmental contamination.

Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require us, as a current or previous owner or operator of real property, to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at a property or at impacted neighboring properties. These laws often impose liability regardless of whether the property owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. These laws and regulations may require the abatement or removal of asbestos containing materials in the event of damage, demolition or renovation, reconstruction or expansion of a property and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. Those laws and regulations also govern the installation, maintenance and removal of underground storage tanks used to store waste oils or other petroleum products. Many of our properties contain, or at one time contained, asbestos containing materials or underground storage tanks (primarily related to auto service center establishments or emergency electrical generation equipment). The costs of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances may be substantial and could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition but is not estimable. The presence of contamination, or the failure to remediate contamination, may also adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or redevelop a property or to borrow using a property as collateral.

Our efforts to identify environmental liabilities may not be successful.

Although we believe that our portfolio is in substantial compliance with Federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances, this belief is based on limited testing. Nearly all of our properties have been subjected to Phase I or similar environmental audits. These environmental audits have not revealed, nor are we aware of, any environmental liability that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. However, we cannot assure you that:

•: existing environmental studies with respect to the portfolio reveal all potential environmental liabilities;
•: any previous owner, occupant or tenant of a property did not create any material environmental condition not known to us;
•: the current environmental condition of the portfolio will not be affected by tenants and occupants, by the condition of nearby properties, or by other unrelated third parties; or
•: future uses or conditions (including, without limitation, changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations or the interpretation thereof) will not result in environmental liabilities.

Table of Contents

Retail Operations Risks

Ongoing economic conditions are adversely affecting the general retail environment.

Our concentration in the retail real estate market means that we are subject to the risks that affect the retail environment generally, including the levels of consumer spending, seasonality, the willingness of retailers to lease space in our shopping centers, tenant bankruptcies, changes in economic conditions, consumer confidence and terrorist activities. The economy appears to be recovering from the recent recession during which consumer spending in the United States declined significantly. The unemployment rate remains relatively high and consumer confidence remains relatively depressed. We derive our cash flow from operations primarily from retail tenants, many of whom are currently under considerable economic stress. A significant deterioration in our cash flow from operations could require us to curtail planned capital expenditures or seek alternative sources of financing.

We may not be able to lease newly developed properties and renew leases and relet space at existing properties.

We may not be able to lease new properties to an appropriate mix of tenants or for rents that are consistent with our projections. Also, when leases for our existing properties expire, the premises may not be relet or the terms of reletting, including the cost of allowances and concessions to tenants, may be less favorable than the current lease terms. To the extent that our leasing plans are not achieved, our cash generated before debt repayments and capital expenditures could be adversely affected.

Some of our properties depend on anchor stores or major tenants to attract shoppers and could be adversely affected by the loss of or a store closure by one or more of these tenants.

Regional malls are typically anchored by department stores and other large nationally recognized tenants. The value of some of our properties could be adversely affected if these tenants fail to comply with their contractual obligations, seek concessions in order to continue operations, or cease their operations. Department store and larger store, also referred to as "big box", consolidations typically result in the closure of existing stores or duplicate or geographically overlapping store locations. We do not control the disposition of those department stores or larger stores that we do not own. We also may not control the vacant space that is not re-leased in those stores we do own. Other tenants may be entitled to modify the terms of their existing leases in the event of such closures. The modification could be unfavorable to us as the lessor and could decrease rents or expense recovery charges. Additionally, major tenant closures may result in decreased customer traffic which could lead to decreased sales at other stores. If the sales of stores operating in our properties were to decline significantly due to closing of anchors, economic conditions, or other reasons, tenants may be unable to pay their minimum rents or expense recovery charges. In the event of default by a tenant or anchor store, we may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover amounts due to us under the terms of our agreements with those parties.

We face potential adverse effects from the increasing number of tenant bankruptcies.

Although bankruptcy filings by retailers occur regularly in the course of our operations, the number of tenant bankruptcies has increased in the past two years. We continually seek to re-lease vacant spaces resulting from tenant terminations. The bankruptcy of a tenant, particularly an anchor tenant, may make it more difficult to lease the remainder of the affected properties. Future tenant bankruptcies could adversely affect our properties or impact our ability to successfully execute our re-leasing strategy.

Risks Relating to Joint Venture Properties

We have limited control with respect to some properties that are partially owned or managed by third parties, which may adversely affect our ability to sell or refinance them.

As of December 31, 2009, we owned interests in 182 income-producing properties with other parties. Of those, 18 properties are included in our consolidated financial statements. We account for the other 164 properties under the equity method of accounting, which we refer to as joint venture properties. We serve as general partner or property manager for 93 of these 164 properties; however, certain major decisions, such as selling or refinancing these properties, require the consent of the other owners. Of the properties for which we do not serve as general partner or property manager, 61 are in our international joint ventures. The other owners also have other participating rights that we consider substantive for purposes of determining control over the properties' assets. The remaining joint venture

Table of Contents

properties are managed by third parties. These limitations may adversely affect our ability to sell, refinance, or otherwise operate these properties.

The Operating Partnership guarantees debt or otherwise provides support for a number of joint venture properties.

Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture and is typically secured by a mortgage on the joint venture property. As of December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership has loan guarantees to support $47.2 million of our total $6.5 billion share of joint venture mortgage and other indebtedness. A default by a joint venture under its debt obligations may expose us to liability under a guaranty or letter of credit.

Other Factors Affecting Our Business

Our Common Area Maintenance (CAM) contributions may not allow us to recover the majority of our operating expenses from tenants.

CAM costs typically include allocable energy costs, repairs, maintenance and capital improvements to common areas, janitorial services, administrative, property and liability insurance costs, and security costs. We historically have used leases with variable CAM provisions that adjust to reflect inflationary increases. We have made a concerted effort to convert our leases to a fixed payment methodology which fixes our tenants' CAM contributions and should in turn reduce the volatility of and limitations on the recoveries we collect from our tenants for the reimbursement of our property operating expenses. However, with respect to both variable and fixed payment methodologies, the amount of CAM charges we bill to our tenants may not allow us to recover all of these operating costs.

We face a wide range of competition that could affect our ability to operate profitably.

Our properties compete with other retail properties and other forms of retailing such as catalogs and e-commerce websites. Competition may come from regional malls, outlet centers, community/lifestyle centers, and other shopping centers, both existing as well as future development projects. The presence of competitive alternatives affects our ability to lease space and the level of rents we can obtain. Renovations and expansions at competing sites could also negatively affect our properties.

We also compete with other retail property developers to acquire prime development sites. In addition, we compete with other retail property companies for tenants and qualified management.

Our international expansion may subject us to different or greater risk from those associated with our domestic operations.

We hold interests in joint venture properties that operate in Italy, France, Poland, Japan, Korea, and Mexico, and we have a minority investment in common shares of a U.K. retail real estate company. We may pursue additional expansion opportunities outside the United States. International development and ownership activities carry risks that are different from those we face with our domestic properties and operations. These risks include:

•: adverse effects of changes in exchange rates for foreign currencies;
•: changes in foreign political and economic environments, regionally, nationally, and locally;
•: challenges of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws including corporate governance, operations, taxes, and litigation;
•: differing lending practices;
•: differences in cultures;
•: changes in applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect foreign operations;
•: difficulties in managing international operations; and
•: obstacles to the repatriation of earnings and cash.

Although our international activities currently are a relatively small portion of our business (international properties represented approximately 6.3% of the GLA of all of our properties at December 31, 2009), to the extent that we expand our international activities, these risks could increase in significance which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Table of Contents

Some of our potential losses may not be covered by insurance.

We maintain commercial general liability, fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on all of our properties in the United States through wholly-owned captive insurance entities and other self-insurance mechanisms. Rosewood Indemnity, Ltd. and Bridgewood Insurance Company, Ltd. are our wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries, and have agreed to indemnify our general liability carrier for a specific layer of losses for the properties that are covered under these arrangements. The carrier has, in turn, agreed to provide evidence of coverage for this layer of losses under the terms and conditions of the carrier's policy. A similar policy written through these captive insurance entities also provides initial coverage for property insurance and certain windstorm risks at the properties located in coastal windstorm locations.

There are some types of losses, including lease and other contract claims that generally are not insured. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property. If this happens, we may still remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property.

We currently maintain insurance coverage against acts of terrorism on all of our properties in the United States on an "all risk" basis in the amount of up to $1 billion per occurrence for certified foreign acts of terrorism and $500 million per occurrence for non-certified domestic acts of terrorism. The current federal laws which provide this coverage are expected to operate through 2014. Despite the existence of this insurance coverage, any threatened or actual terrorist attacks in high profile markets could adversely affect our property values, revenues, consumer traffic and tenant sales.

Risks Relating to Federal Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT.

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code. We believe we have been organized and operated in a manner which allows us to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. We intend to continue to operate in this manner. However, our qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet, through actual annual operating results, asset diversification, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership, the various qualification tests imposed under the Internal Revenue Code. REIT qualification is governed by highly technical and complex provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. Accordingly, there is no assurance that we have operated or will continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.

If we fail to comply with those provisions, we may be subject to monetary penalties or ultimately to possible disqualification as a REIT. If such events occurs, and if available relief provisions do not apply:

•: we will not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income;
•: we will be subject to corporate level income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates; and
•: unless entitled to relief under relevant statutory provisions, we will also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

United States Properties

Our U.S. properties primarily consist of regional malls, Premium Outlet Centers, The Mills, community/lifestyle centers, and other properties. These properties contain an aggregate of approximately 244.8 million square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA, of which we own approximately 152.3 million square feet. Total estimated retail sales at the properties in 2009 were approximately $58 billion.

Regional malls typically contain at least one traditional department store anchor or a combination of anchors and big box retailers with a wide variety of smaller stores connecting the anchors. Additional stores are usually located along the perimeter of the parking area. Our 162 regional malls are generally enclosed centers and range in size from

Table of Contents

approximately 400,000 to 2.3 million square feet of GLA. Our regional malls contain in the aggregate more than 18,600 occupied stores, including approximately 710 anchors, which are mostly national retailers. For comparative purposes, we separate the information in this section on the 16 regional malls acquired from The Mills Corporation in 2007, or the Mills Regional Malls, from the information on our other regional malls.

Premium Outlet Centers generally contain a wide variety of designer and manufacturer stores located in an open-air center. Our 41 Premium Outlet Centers range in size from approximately 200,000 to 850,000 square feet of GLA. The Premium Outlet Centers are generally located near major metropolitan areas and tourist destinations including New York City, Los Angeles, Boston, Palm Springs, Orlando, Las Vegas, and Honolulu.

The Mills generally range in size from 1.0 million to 2.3 million square feet of GLA and are located in major metropolitan areas. They have a combination of traditional mall, outlet center, and big box retailers and entertainment uses. The Mills Regional Malls typically range in size from 700,000 to 1.3 million square feet of GLA and contain a wide variety of national retailers.

Community/lifestyle centers are generally unenclosed and smaller than our regional malls. Our 67 community/lifestyle centers generally range in size from approximately 100,000 to 900,000 square feet of GLA. Community/lifestyle centers are designed to serve a larger trade area and typically contain anchor stores and other national retail tenants, which occupy a significant portion of the GLA of the center. We also own traditional community shopping centers that focus primarily on value-oriented and convenience goods and services. These centers are usually anchored by a supermarket, discount retailer, or drugstore and are designed to service a neighborhood area. Finally, we own open-air centers adjacent to our regional malls designed to take advantage of the drawing power of the mall.

We also have interests in 15 other shopping centers or outlet centers. These properties range in size from approximately 85,000 to 1.0 million square feet of GLA, are considered non-core to our business model, and in total represent less than 1% of our total operating income before depreciation.

The following table provides representative data for our U.S. properties on a gross basis as of December 31, 2009:



% of total property annualized base rent	62.7	%	15.2	%	16.2	%	5.1	%	0.8	%
% of total property GLA	65.4	%	7.0	%	16.8	%	8.3	%	2.5	%
% of owned property GLA	57.7	%	11.1	%	19.5	%	9.1	%	2.6	%

As of December 31, 2009, approximately 92.1% of the owned GLA in regional malls and the retail space of the other properties was leased, approximately 97.9% of owned GLA in the Premium Outlet Centers was leased, approximately 93.9% of the owned GLA for The Mills and 89.3% of owned GLA for the Mills Regional Malls was leased, and approximately 90.7% of owned GLA in the community/lifestyle centers was leased.

We hold a 100% interest in 200 of our properties, effectively control 18 properties in which we have a joint venture interest, and hold the remaining 103 properties through unconsolidated joint venture interests. We are the managing or co-managing general partner or member of 311 properties. Substantially all of our joint venture properties are subject to rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, or other sale rights for all partners which are customary in real estate partnership agreements and the industry. Our partners in our joint ventures may initiate these provisions at any time, which will result in either the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire their partnership interest or the disposal of our partnership interest.

The following property table summarizes certain data for our regional malls, Premium Outlet Centers, The Mills, the Mills Regional Malls and community/lifestyle centers located in the United States, including Puerto Rico, as of December 31, 2009.

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

	Regional Malls
1.	Anderson Mall	SC	Anderson (Greenville)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1972	83.0	%	671,881	Belk Ladies Fashion Store, Belk Men's & Home Store, JCPenney, Sears, Dillard's, Books A Million(6)
2.	Apple Blossom Mall	VA	Winchester	Fee	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	89.8	%	440,042	Belk, JCPenney, Sears, Eastwynn Theatres
3.	Arsenal Mall	MA	Watertown (Boston)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1999	95.4	%(17)	504,334	Marshalls, Filene's Basement
4.	Atrium Mall	MA	Chestnut Hill (Boston)	Fee	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	95.0	%	205,461	Borders Books & Music
5.	Auburn Mall	MA	Auburn (Worcester)	Fee	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	99.4	%	588,330	Macy's, Macy's Home Store, Sears
6.	Aventura Mall(1)	FL	Miami Beach	Fee	33.3%	(4)	Built 1983	96.0	%	2,099,768	Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Macy's Mens & Home Furniture, JCPenney, Sears, Nordstrom, Equinox Fitness Clubs, AMC Theatre
7.	Avenues, The	FL	Jacksonville	Fee	25.0%	(4)(2)	Built 1990	94.0	%	1,117,396	Belk, Dillard's, JCPenney, Belk Men and Kids, Sears
8.	Bangor Mall	ME	Bangor	Fee	67.4%	(15)	Acquired 2003	91.6	%	652,842	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods
9.	Barton Creek Square	TX	Austin	Fee	100.0%		Built 1981	98.0	%	1,429,623	Nordstrom, Macy's, Dillard's Women's & Home, Dillard's Men's & Children's, JCPenney, Sears, AMC Theatre
10.	Battlefield Mall	MO	Springfield	Fee and Ground Lease (2056)	100.0%		Built 1970	95.1	%	1,198,568	Macy's, Dillard's Women's, Dillard's Men's, Children's & Home, JCPenney, Sears
11.	Bay Park Square	WI	Green Bay	Fee	100.0%		Built 1980	93.0	%	710,973	Younkers, Younkers Home Furniture Gallery, Kohl's, ShopKo, Marcus Cinema 16
12.	Bowie Town Center	MD	Bowie (Washington, D.C.)	Fee	100.0%		Built 2001	97.9	%	684,297	Macy's, Sears, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Safeway
13.	Boynton Beach Mall	FL	Boynton Beach (Miami)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1985	84.7	%	1,100,250	Macy's, Dillard's Men's & Home, Dillard's Women, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres
14.	Brea Mall	CA	Brea (Los Angeles)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	96.8	%	1,319,678	Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Macy's Men's Children & Home.
15.	Broadway Square	TX	Tyler	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1994	98.5	%	628,103	Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
16.	Brunswick Square	NJ	East Brunswick (New York)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1973	95.8	%	765,149	Macy's, JCPenney, Barnes & Noble, Mega Movies
17.	Burlington Mall	MA	Burlington (Boston)	Ground Lease (2048)	100.0%		Acquired 1998	96.6	%	1,317,842	Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Nordstrom, Crate & Barrel
18.	Cape Cod Mall	MA	Hyannis	Ground Leases (2029-2073)(7)	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	94.5	%	725,595	Macy's, Macy's Men's and Home, Sears, Best Buy, Marshalls, Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinema
19.	Castleton Square	IN	Indianapolis	Fee	100.0%		Built 1972	94.3	%	1,381,405	Macy's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Borders Books & Music, AMC Theatres
20.	Century III Mall	PA	West Mifflin (Pittsburgh)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1979	76.1	%(17)	1,225,538	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Macy's Jr.,(8)
21.	Charlottesville Fashion Square	VA	Charlottesville	Ground Lease (2076)	100.0%		Acquired 1997	94.3	%	569,861	Belk Women's & Children's, Belk Men's & Home, JCPenney, Sears
22.	Chautauqua Mall	NY	Lakewood (Jamestown)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1971	82.3	%	425,291	Sears, JCPenney, Bon Ton, Office Max, Dipson Cinema
23.	Chesapeake Square	VA	Chesapeake (Virginia Beach)	Fee and Ground Lease (2062)	75.0%	(12)	Built 1989	86.5	%	792,428	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Target, Burlington Coat Factory(6),(11)

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

24.	Cielo Vista Mall	TX	El Paso	Fee and Ground Lease (2022)(7)	100.0%		Built 1974	98.0	%	1,244,020	Macy's, Dillard's Women's & Furniture, Dillard's Men's, Children's & Home, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres
25.	Circle Centre	IN	Indianapolis	Property Lease (2097)	14.7%	(4)(2)	Built 1995	96.7	%	735,922	Nordstrom, Carson Pirie Scott, United Artists Theatre
26.	Coconut Point	FL	Estero (Cape Coral)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Built 2006	96.2	%(17)	1,196,150	Dillard's, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, DSW, Office Max, PetsMart, Ross Dress for Less, Cost Plus World Market, T.J. Maxx, Hollywood Theatres, Super Target
27.	Coddingtown Mall	CA	Santa Rosa	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2005	86.2	%	791,943	Macy's, JCPenney, Whole Foods(6),(8)
28.	College Mall	IN	Bloomington	Fee and Ground Lease (2048)(7)	100.0%		Built 1965	86.2	%	636,563	Macy's, Sears, Target, Dick's Sporting Goods, Bed Bath & Beyond
29.	Columbia Center	WA	Kennewick	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1987	92.6	%	768,430	Macy's, Macy's Mens & Children, JCPenney, Sears, Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinema
30.	Copley Place	MA	Boston	Fee	98.1%		Acquired 2002	95.6	%(17)	1,243,500	Neiman Marcus, Barneys New York
31.	Coral Square	FL	Coral Springs (Miami)	Fee	97.2%		Built 1984	95.9	%	941,339	Macy's Mens, Children & Home, Macy's Women, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
32.	Cordova Mall	FL	Pensacola	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	98.3	%	851,563	Dillard's Men's, Dillard's Women's, Belk, Best Buy, Bed Bath & Beyond, Cost Plus World Market, Ross Dress for Less
33.	Cottonwood Mall	NM	Albuquerque	Fee	100.0%		Built 1996	96.5	%	1,040,700	Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, United Artists Theatre,(11)
34.	Crossroads Mall	NE	Omaha	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1994	59.7	%	677,320	Sears, Target, Barnes & Noble,(11)
35.	Crystal Mall	CT	Waterford	Fee	74.6%	(4)	Acquired 1998	89.2	%	782,829	Macy's, JC Penney, Sears, Bed Bath & Beyond, Christmas Tree Store
36.	Crystal River Mall	FL	Crystal River	Fee	100.0%		Built 1990	77.2	%	420,109	JCPenney, Sears, Belk, Kmart, Regal Cinema
37.	Dadeland Mall	FL	Miami	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1997	100.0	%	1,487,689	Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Macy's, Macy's Children & Home, JCPenney
38.	DeSoto Square	FL	Bradenton	Fee	100.0%		Built 1973	78.2	%	678,310	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears,(8)
39.	Domain, The	TX	Austin	Fee	100.0%		Built 2006	92.8	%(17)	674,588	Neiman Marcus, Macy's, Borders Books & Music, Dick's Sporting Goods, Gold Class Cinemas(6), Dillard's(6)
40.	Eastland Mall	IN	Evansville	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	95.6	%	865,310	Macy's, JCPenney, Dillard's
41.	Edison Mall	FL	Fort Myers	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1997	96.8	%	1,050,922	Dillard's, Macy's Mens, Children & Home, Macy's Women, JCPenney, Sears
42.	Emerald Square	MA	North Attleboro (Providence—RI)	Fee	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	89.9	%	1,022,545	Macy's, Macy's Mens & Home Store, JCPenney, Sears
43.	Empire Mall(1)	SD	Sioux Falls	Fee and Ground Lease (2033)(7)	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	94.5	%	1,074,085	Macy's, Younkers, JCPenney, Sears, Gordmans, Hy-Vee
44.	Fashion Centre at Pentagon City, The	VA	Arlington (Washington, DC)	Fee	42.5%	(4)	Built 1989	99.3	%(17)	988,904	Nordstrom, Macy's
45.	Fashion Mall at Keystone, The	IN	Indianapolis	Ground Lease (2067)	100.0%		Acquired 1997	92.8	%	683,490	Saks Fifth Avenue, Crate & Barrel, Nordstrom, Keystone Art Cinema

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

46.	Fashion Valley	CA	San Diego	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2001	99.0	%	1,723,143	Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman-Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, AMC Theatres
47.	Firewheel Town Center	TX	Garland (Dallas)	Fee	100.0%		Built 2005	81.0	%(17)	1,004,241	Dillard's, Macy's, Barnes & Noble, DSW, Cost Plus World Market, AMC Theatres, Dick's Sporting Goods, Ethan Allen
48.	Florida Mall, The	FL	Orlando	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Built 1986	96.4	%	1,769,207	Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, H&M
49.	Forest Mall	WI	Fond Du Lac	Fee	100.0%		Built 1973	92.7	%	500,174	JCPenney, Kohl's, Younkers, Sears, Cinema I & II
50.	Forum Shops at Caesars, The	NV	Las Vegas	Ground Lease (2050)	100.0%		Built 1992	98.5	%	620,431
51.	Galleria, The	TX	Houston	Fee and Ground Lease (2029)	31.5%	(4)	Acquired 2002	94.0	%	2,298,144	Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Macy's (2 locations), Borders Books & Music, Galleria Tennis/Athletic Club
52.	Granite Run Mall	PA	Media (Philadelphia)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	83.4	%	1,032,675	JCPenney, Sears, Boscov's, Granite Run 8 Theatres, Acme, Kohl's
53.	Great Lakes Mall	OH	Mentor (Cleveland)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1961	87.2	%(17)	1,234,588	Dillard's Men's, Dillard's Women's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, AMC Theatres
54.	Greendale Mall	MA	Worcester (Boston)	Fee and Ground Lease (2009)(7)	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	92.4	%(17)	430,819	T.J. Maxx 'N More, Best Buy, DSW,(8)
55.	Greenwood Park Mall	IN	Greenwood (Indianapolis)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1979	97.8	%	1,280,183	Macy's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble, AMC Theatres
56.	Gulf View Square	FL	Port Richey (Tampa)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1980	82.4	%	753,572	Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Best Buy
57.	Gwinnett Place	GA	Duluth (Atlanta)	Fee	75.0%		Acquired 1998	81.4	%(17)	1,279,516	Belk, JCPenney, Macy's, Sears, Eastern Wells Market(6)
58.	Haywood Mall	SC	Greenville	Fee and Ground Lease (2017)(7)	100.0%		Acquired 1998	97.9	%	1,231,469	Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Belk
59.	Independence Center	MO	Independence (Kansas City)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1994	97.2	%	1,032,630	Dillard's, Macy's, Sears
60.	Indian River Mall	FL	Vero Beach	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Built 1996	82.1	%	737,007	Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, AMC Theatres
61.	Ingram Park Mall	TX	San Antonio	Fee	100.0%		Built 1979	93.4	%	1,125,708	Dillard's, Dillard's Home Store, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Bealls
62.	Irving Mall	TX	Irving (Dallas)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1971	84.1	%	1,053,052	Macy's, Dillard's, Sears, Burlington Coat Factory, La Vida Fashion and Home Décor, General Cinema
63.	Jefferson Valley Mall	NY	Yorktown Heights (New York)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1983	93.9	%	580,100	Macy's, Sears, H&M, Movies at Jefferson Valley
64.	King of Prussia	PA	King of Prussia (Philadelphia)	Fee	12.4%	(4)(15)	Acquired 2003	93.0	%(17)	2,615,101	Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's (Court), Nordstrom, Lord & Taylor, Macy's (Court), JCPenney, Sears, Crate & Barrel,(8)
65.	Knoxville Center	TN	Knoxville	Fee	100.0%		Built 1984	79.6	%(17)	978,027	JCPenney, Belk, Sears, The Rush Fitness Center, Regal Cinema,(11)
66.	La Plaza Mall	TX	McAllen	Fee and Ground Lease (2040)(7)	100.0%		Built 1976	98.6	%	1,199,643	Macy's, Macy's Home Store, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Joe Brand

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

67.	Laguna Hills Mall	CA	Laguna Hills (Los Angeles)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1997	92.4	%	865,170	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Laguna Hills Cinema, Nordstrom Rack, Total Woman Gym & Spa
68.	Lake Square Mall	FL	Leesburg (Orlando)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	73.4	%	559,088	JCPenney, Sears, Belk, Target, AMC Theatres, Books-A-Million
69.	Lakeline Mall	TX	Cedar Park (Austin)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1995	97.3	%	1,097,944	Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Regal Cinema
70.	Lehigh Valley Mall	PA	Whitehall	Fee	37.6%	(4)(15)	Acquired 2003	96.8	%(17)	1,169,188	Macy's, JCPenney, Boscov's, Barnes & Noble, HH Gregg(6), Babies R Us
71.	Lenox Square	GA	Atlanta	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	96.5	%	1,544,793	Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Macy's
72.	Liberty Tree Mall	MA	Danvers (Boston)	Fee	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	91.2	%	858,165	Marshalls, The Sports Authority, Target, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Kohl's, Best Buy, Staples, AC Moore, K&G Fashion Superstore, AMC Theatres, Nordstrom Rack, Off Broadway Shoes
73.	Lima Mall	OH	Lima	Fee	100.0%		Built 1965	90.7	%	737,679	Macy's, JCPenney, Elder-Beerman, Sears
74.	Lincolnwood Town Center	IL	Lincolnwood (Chicago)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1990	95.0	%	421,382	Kohl's, Carson Pirie Scott
75.	Lindale Mall(1)	IA	Cedar Rapids	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	86.5	%	688,593	Von Maur, Sears, Younkers
76.	Livingston Mall	NJ	Livingston (New York)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	94.5	%	984,599	Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Barnes & Noble
77.	Longview Mall	TX	Longview	Fee	100.0%		Built 1978	90.3	%	638,605	Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Bealls,(11)
78.	Mall at Chestnut Hill, The	MA	Chestnut Hill (Boston)	Lease (2039)(9)	47.2%	(4)	Acquired 2002	89.9	%	474,929	Bloomingdale's, Bloomingdale's Home Furnishing and Men's Store
79.	Mall at Rockingham Park, The	NH	Salem (Boston)	Fee	24.6%	(4)	Acquired 1999	98.7	%	1,020,232	JCPenney, Sears, Macy's,(11)
80.	Mall of Georgia	GA	Buford (Atlanta)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1999	95.8	%	1,795,702	Nordstrom, Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble, Haverty's Furniture, Bed Bath & Beyond(16), Regal Cinema
81.	Mall of New Hampshire, The	NH	Manchester	Fee	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	97.8	%	811,290	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Best Buy, A.C. Moore
82.	Maplewood Mall	MN	Minneapolis	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 2002	91.0	%	929,788	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's, Barnes & Noble
83.	Markland Mall	IN	Kokomo	Ground Lease (2041)	100.0%		Built 1968	96.4	%	416,092	Sears, Target, MC Sporting Goods,(8)
84.	McCain Mall	AR	N. Little Rock	Fee	100.0%		Built 1973	92.5	%	775,281	Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears,(11)
85.	Melbourne Square	FL	Melbourne	Fee	100.0%		Built 1982	81.5	%	665,119	Macy's, Dillard's Men's, Children's & Home, Dillard's Women's, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods,(8)
86.	Menlo Park Mall	NJ	Edison (New York)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1997	96.9	%(17)	1,322,885	Nordstrom, Macy's, Barnes & Noble, Cineplex Odeon, WOW! Work Out World, Fortunoff Backyard Store(6)
87.	Mesa Mall(1)	CO	Grand Junction	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	87.9	%	882,172	Sears, Herberger's, JCPenney, Target, Cabela's(6)
88.	Miami International Mall	FL	Miami	Fee	47.8%	(4)	Built 1982	92.1	%	1,071,449	Macy's Mens & Home, Macy's Women & Children, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears
89.	Midland Park Mall	TX	Midland	Fee	100.0%		Built 1980	92.9	%	617,576	Dillard's, Dillard's Mens & Juniors, JCPenney, Sears, Bealls, Ross Dress for Less
90.	Miller Hill Mall	MN	Duluth	Ground Lease (2013)	100.0%		Built 1973	96.6	%	805,552	JCPenney, Sears, Younkers, Barnes & Noble, DSW

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

91.	Montgomery Mall	PA	North Wales (Philadelphia)	Fee	60.0%	(15)	Acquired 2003	85.8	%	1,147,480	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods,(11)
92.	Muncie Mall	IN	Muncie	Fee	100.0%		Built 1970	92.9	%	634,997	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Elder Beerman
93.	North East Mall	TX	Hurst (Dallas)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1971	96.7	%	1,670,157	Nordstrom, Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Rave Theatre
94.	Northfield Square	IL	Bourbonnais	Fee	31.6%	(12)	Built 1990	90.4	%	530,011	Carson Pirie Scott Women's, Carson Pirie Scott Men's, Children's & Home, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Movies 10
95.	Northgate Mall	WA	Seattle	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1987	94.1	%	1,058,542	Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Toys 'R Us, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, DSW
96.	Northlake Mall	GA	Atlanta	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	86.8	%	961,104	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's
97.	NorthPark Mall	IA	Davenport	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	90.6	%	1,073,101	Dillard's, Von Maur, Younkers, JCPenney, Sears, Barnes & Noble
98.	Northshore Mall	MA	Peabody (Boston)	Fee	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	93.6	%(17)	1,581,213	JCPenney, Sears, Filene's Basement, Nordstrom, Macy's Mens/Furniture, Macys, H&M, Barnes & Noble, Toys 'R Us, Shaw's Grocery
99.	Northwoods Mall	IL	Peoria	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1983	95.0	%	693,963	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears
100.	Oak Court Mall	TN	Memphis	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1997	94.5	%(17)	848,974	Dillard's, Dillard's Mens, Macy's
101.	Ocean County Mall	NJ	Toms River (New York)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	98.8	%	890,133	Macy's, Boscov's, JCPenney, Sears
102.	Orange Park Mall	FL	Orange Park (Jacksonville)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1994	98.6	%	954,994	Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres
103.	Orland Square	IL	Orland Park (Chicago)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1997	98.5	%	1,210,124	Macy's, Carson Pirie Scott, JCPenney, Sears
104.	Oxford Valley Mall	PA	Langhorne (Philadelphia)	Fee	65.0%	(15)	Acquired 2003	91.9	%(17)	1,332,202	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, United Artists Theatre,(11)
105.	Paddock Mall	FL	Ocala	Fee	100.0%		Built 1980	95.4	%	554,029	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Belk
106.	Penn Square Mall	OK	Oklahoma City	Ground Lease (2060)	94.5%		Acquired 2002	98.6	%	1,050,684	Macy's, Dillard's Women's, Dillard's Men's, Children's & Home, JCPenney, Dickinson Theatre
107.	Pheasant Lane Mall	NH	Nashua (Manchester)	—	—	(14)	Acquired 2002	94.7	%	869,722	JCPenney, Sears, Target, Macy's,(8)
108.	Phipps Plaza	GA	Atlanta	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	93.7	%	818,137	Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Belk, AMC Theatres
109.	Plaza Carolina	PR	Carolina (San Juan)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 2004	92.5	%(17)	1,077,281	JCPenney, Sears, Tiendas Capri, Pueblo Xtra, Best Buy
110.	Port Charlotte Town Center	FL	Port Charlotte (Punta Gorda)	Fee	80.0%	(12)	Built 1989	90.3	%	766,723	Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Bealls, Sears, DSW, Regal Cinema
111.	Prien Lake Mall	LA	Lake Charles	Fee and Ground Lease (2025)(7)	100.0%		Built 1972	95.3	%	791,249	Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres, Kohl's
112.	Quaker Bridge Mall	NJ	Lawrenceville (Trenton)	Fee	38.0%	(4)(15)	Acquired 2003	93.0	%	1,098,559	Macy's, Lord & Taylor, JCPenney, Sears
113.	Richmond Town Square	OH	Richmond Heights (Cleveland)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1966	93.7	%	1,016,028	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinemas
114.	River Oaks Center	IL	Calumet City (Chicago)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1997	90.2	%(17)	1,356,960	Macy's, Carson Pirie Scott, JCPenney, Sears

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

115.	Rockaway Townsquare	NJ	Rockaway (New York)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	96.3	%	1,243,848	Macy's, Lord & Taylor, JCPenney, Sears
116.	Rolling Oaks Mall	TX	San Antonio	Fee	100.0%		Built 1988	86.7	%(17)	883,369	Dillard's, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears
117.	Roosevelt Field	NY	Garden City (New York)	Fee and Ground Lease (2090)(7)	100.0%		Acquired 1998	96.1	%(17)	2,225,748	Bloomingdale's, Bloomingdale's Furniture Gallery, Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods, Loews Theatre, Xsport Fitness
118.	Ross Park Mall	PA	Pittsburgh	Fee	100.0%		Built 1986	94.8	%	1,208,241	JCPenney, Sears, Nordstrom, L.L. Bean, Macy's
119.	Rushmore Mall(1)	SD	Rapid City	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	76.2	%	835,097	JCPenney, Herberger's, Sears, Carmike Cinemas, Hobby Lobby, Toys R Us,(11)
120.	Santa Rosa Plaza	CA	Santa Rosa	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	97.4	%	692,275	Macy's, Sears,(11)
121.	Seminole Towne Center	FL	Sanford (Orlando)	Fee	45.0%	(4)(2)	Built 1995	89.2	%	1,125,976	Macy's, Dillard's, Belk, JCPenney, Sears, United Artists Theatre, H&M
122.	Shops at Mission Viejo, The	CA	Mission Viejo (Los Angeles)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1979	97.7	%	1,148,957	Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Macy's (2 locations)
123.	Shops at Sunset Place, The	FL	S. Miami	Fee	37.5%	(4)(2)	Built 1999	90.8	%	514,429	NikeTown, Barnes & Noble, GameWorks, Z Gallerie, LA Fitness, AMC Theatres, Splitsville
124.	Smith Haven Mall	NY	Lake Grove (New York)	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 1995	95.3	%	1,287,415	Macy's, Macy's Furniture Gallery, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble
125.	Solomon Pond Mall	MA	Marlborough (Boston)	Fee	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	99.2	%	886,327	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Regal Cinema
126.	South Hills Village	PA	Pittsburgh	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1997	94.2	%(17)	1,141,179	Macy's, Sears, Barnes & Noble, Carmike Cinemas,(11)
127.	South Shore Plaza	MA	Braintree (Boston)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	97.4	%	1,160,760	Macy's, Lord & Taylor, Sears, Filene's Basement, Nordstrom(6), Target(6)
128.	Southern Hills Mall(1)	IA	Sioux City	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	81.9	%	796,680	Younkers, JCPenney, Sears, Scheel's Sporting Goods, Barnes & Noble, Carmike Cinemas
129.	Southern Park Mall	OH	Youngstown	Fee	100.0%		Built 1970	94.0	%	1,190,065	Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Cinemark Theatres
130.	SouthPark	NC	Charlotte	Fee & Ground Lease (2040)(10)	100.0%		Acquired 2002	94.0	%	1,625,365	Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom, Macy's, Dillard's, Belk, Dick's Sporting Goods, Crate & Barrel, Joseph Beth Booksellers
131.	SouthPark Mall	IL	Moline	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	76.1	%	1,017,116	Dillard's, Von Maur, Younkers, JCPenney, Sears
132.	SouthRidge Mall(1)	IA	Des Moines	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	53.4	%	889,046	JCPenney, Younkers, Sears, Target
133.	Springfield Mall(1)	PA	Springfield (Philadelphia)	Fee	38.0%	(4)(15)	Acquired 2005	84.6	%	589,263	Macy's, Target
134.	Square One Mall	MA	Saugus (Boston)	Fee	49.1%	(4)	Acquired 1999	97.2	%	929,330	Macy's, Sears, Best Buy, T.J. Maxx N More, Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, Filene's Basement
135.	St. Charles Towne Center	MD	Waldorf (Washington, D.C.)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1990	96.4	%	979,904	Macy's, Macy's Home Store, JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's, Dick Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

136.	St. Johns Town Center	FL	Jacksonville	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Built 2005	99.1	%	1,222,579	Dillard's, Target, Ashley Furniture Home Store, Barnes & Noble, Dick's Clothing & Sporting Goods, Ross Dress for Less, Staples, DSW, JoAnn Fabrics, PetsMart
137.	Stanford Shopping Center	CA	Palo Alto (San Francisco)	Ground Lease (2054)	100.0%		Acquired 2003	98.0	%(17)	1,364,356	Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, Macy's Mens Store
138.	Summit Mall	OH	Akron	Fee	100.0%		Built 1965	94.7	%	770,221	Dillard's Women's & Children's, Dillard's Men's & Home, Macy's
139.	Sunland Park Mall	TX	El Paso	Fee	100.0%		Built 1988	94.1	%	917,642	Macy's, Dillard's Women's & Children's, Dillard's Men's & Home, Sears, Forever 21,(8)
140.	Tacoma Mall	WA	Tacoma (Seattle)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1987	87.5	%	1,248,990	Nordstrom, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, David's Bridal, Forever 21(6)
141.	Tippecanoe Mall	IN	Lafayette	Fee	100.0%		Built 1973	90.2	%	862,773	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Kohl's, Dick's Sporting Goods, H.H. Gregg
142.	Town Center at Aurora	CO	Aurora (Denver)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	83.2	%	1,081,725	Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Century Theatres
143.	Town Center at Boca Raton	FL	Boca Raton (Miami)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	98.7	%	1,753,585	Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdale's, Nordstrom, Macy's, Sears, Crate & Barrel
144.	Town Center at Cobb	GA	Kennesaw (Atlanta)	Fee	75.0%		Acquired 1998	95.5	%	1,275,928	Belk, Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Macy's Furniture
145.	Towne East Square	KS	Wichita	Fee	100.0%		Built 1975	93.8	%	1,120,581	Dillard's, Von Maur, JCPenney, Sears
146.	Towne West Square	KS	Wichita	Fee	100.0%		Built 1980	85.4	%	941,485	Dillard's Women's & Home, Dillard's Men's & Children, JCPenney, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, The Movie Machine
147.	Treasure Coast Square	FL	Jensen Beach	Fee	100.0%		Built 1987	89.7	%	878,213	Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Borders Books & Music, Regal Cinema
148.	Tyrone Square	FL	St. Petersburg (Tampa)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1972	93.1	%	1,095,029	Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Borders Books & Music
149.	University Park Mall	IN	Mishawaka	Fee	100.0%		Built 1979	91.3	%	922,625	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Barnes & Noble
150.	Upper Valley Mall	OH	Springfield	Fee	100.0%		Built 1971	80.4	%	739,469	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Elder-Beerman, MC Sporting Goods, Chakeres Theatres
151.	Valle Vista Mall	TX	Harlingen	Fee	100.0%		Built 1983	50.7	%	651,110	Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Big Lots(6), Forever 21
152.	Valley Mall	VA	Harrisonburg	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	82.8	%	506,333	JCPenney, Belk, Target, Books A Million,(8)
153.	Virginia Center Commons	VA	Glen Allen (Richmond)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1991	89.3	%	784,830	Macy's, Dillard's Men's, Dillard's Women's, Children's & Home, JCPenney, Sears
154.	Walt Whitman Mall	NY	Huntington Station (New York)	Ground Lease (2022)	100.0%		Acquired 1998	95.5	%	1,027,405	Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomingdale's, Lord & Taylor, Macy's
155.	Washington Square	IN	Indianapolis	Fee	100.0%		Built 1974	74.2	%	963,220	Sears, Target, Dick's Sporting Goods, Burlington Coat Factory, Kerasotes Theatres,(11)
156.	West Ridge Mall	KS	Topeka	Fee	100.0%		Built 1988	92.3	%	992,403	Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Burlington Coat Factory
157.	West Town Mall	TN	Knoxville	Ground Lease (2042)	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1991	98.0	%	1,335,164	Belk Women, Dillard's, JCPenney, Belk Men, Home and Kids, Sears, Regal Cinema

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

158.	Westchester, The	NY	White Plains (New York)	Fee	40.0%	(4)	Acquired 1997	94.0	%(17)	827,393	Neiman Marcus, Nordstrom
159.	Westminster Mall	CA	Westminster (Los Angeles)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	86.5	%	1,186,978	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Target
160.	White Oaks Mall	IL	Springfield	Fee	80.7%		Built 1977	81.2	%(17)	919,871	Macy's, Bergner's, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods,(8)
161.	Wolfchase Galleria	TN	Memphis	Fee	94.5%		Acquired 2002	94.4	%	1,152,554	Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears, Malco Theatres
162.	Woodland Hills Mall	OK	Tulsa	Fee	94.5%		Acquired 2002	98.7	%	1,092,057	Macy's, Dillard's, JCPenney, Sears

	Total Regional Mall GLA									160,034,865

	Premium Outlet Centers
1.	Albertville Premium Outlets	MN	Albertville (Minneapolis)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 2004	92.8	%	429,563	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, Lucky Brand, Nautica, Nike, Old Navy, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
2.	Allen Premium Outlets	TX	Allen (Dallas)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 2004	99.8	%	441,542	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
3.	Aurora Farms Premium Outlets	OH	Aurora (Cleveland)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 2004	93.7	%	300,383	Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Liz Claiborne, Michael Kors, Nautica, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger
4.	Camarillo Premium Outlets	CA	Camarillo (Los Angeles)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 2004	98.0	%	673,912	Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Diesel, Giorgio Armani, Hugo Boss, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sony, Tommy Hilfiger
5.	Carlsbad Premium Outlets	CA	Carlsbad (San Diego)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 2004	99.7	%	288,029	Adidas, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Calvin Klein, Coach, Crate & Barrel, Gap Outlet, Guess, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger
6.	Carolina Premium Outlets	NC	Smithfield (Raleigh)	Ground Lease (2029)	100.0%		Acquired 2004	99.1	%	438,981	Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, Liz Claiborne, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
7.	Chicago Premium Outlets	IL	Aurora (Chicago)	Fee	100.0%		Built 2004	100.0	%	437,342	Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Diesel, Elie Tahari, Gap Outlet, Giorgio Armani, J.Crew, Kate Spade, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, Sony, Theory
8.	Cincinnati Premium Outlets	OH	Monroe (Cincinnati)	Fee	100.0%		Built 2009	98.7	%	338,327	Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear Company, Gap Outlet, Hanes Brands, J.Crew, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks 5th Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger, The North Face

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)		Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

9.	Clinton Crossing Premium Outlets	CT	Clinton (New Haven)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	98.4	%	276,164	Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Liz Claiborne, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Talbots, Tommy Hilfiger
10.	Columbia Gorge Premium Outlets	OR	Troutdale (Portland)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	95.8	%	163,885	Adidas, Calvin Klein, Carter's, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Guess, Levi's, Liz Claiborne, Tommy Hilfiger
11.	Desert Hills Premium Outlets	CA	Cabazon (Palm Springs)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	99.9	%	501,771	Burberry, Coach, Dior, Elie Tahari, Giorgio Armani, Gucci, Lacoste, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragamo, Theory, True Religion, Yves Saint Laurent, Zegna
12.	Edinburgh Premium Outlets	IN	Edinburgh (Indianapolis)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	98.0	%	377,784	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Coldwater Creek, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Levi's, Nautica, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
13.	Folsom Premium Outlets	CA	Folsom (Sacramento)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	98.8	%	296,035	BCBG Max Azria, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, Nautica, Nike, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger
14.	Gilroy Premium Outlets	CA	Gilroy (San Jose)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	96.1	%	577,909	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, J.Crew, Hugo Boss, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sony, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion
15.	Houston Premium Outlets	TX	Houston	Fee	100.0%	Built 2008	99.4	%	425,500	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Gap Outlet, Juicy Couture, Lucky Brand, Michael Kors, Nike, True Religion, Tommy Hilfiger
16.	Jackson Premium Outlets	NJ	Jackson	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	98.9	%	285,833	Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Liz Claiborne, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
17.	Jersey Shore Premium Outlets	NJ	Tinton Falls	Fee	100.0%	Built 2008	97.0	%	434,367	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Burberry, Brooks Brothers, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Guess, J. Crew, Kate Spade, Michael Kors, Theory, Nike, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion, Under Armour
18.	Johnson Creek Premium Outlets	WI	Johnson Creek (Milwaukee)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	89.4	%	277,672	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Columbia Sportswear, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Nike, Old Navy, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
19.	Kittery Premium Outlets	ME	Kittery	Ground Lease (2014)	100.0%	Acquired 2004	97.4	%	264,771	Adidas, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Puma, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger
20.	Las Americas Premium Outlets	CA	San Diego	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2007	98.3	%	560,873	Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Sony, Tommy Bahama, True Religion

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)		Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

21.	Las Vegas Outlet Center	NV	Las Vegas	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	100.0	%	469,046	Adidas, Aeropostale, Ann Taylor, Bose, Calvin Klein, Coach, DKNY, Gymboree, Levi's, Liz Claiborne, Nautica, Nike, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger
22.	Las Vegas Premium Outlets	NV	Las Vegas	Fee	100.0%	Built 2003	100.0	%	538,681	A/X Armani Exchange, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Burberry, Coach, David Yurman, Diesel, Dolce & Gabbana, Elie Tahari, Etro, Hugo Boss, Lacoste, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, Tag Heuer, Ted Baker, True Religion
23.	Leesburg Corner Premium Outlets	VA	Leesburg (Washington D.C.)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	97.1	%	517,700	Ann Taylor, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Coach, Crate & Barrel, Diesel, DKNY, Juicy Couture, Lacoste, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Under Armour, Williams-Sonoma
24.	Liberty Village Premium Outlets	NJ	Flemington	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	94.1	%	164,260	Ann Taylor, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, J.Crew, Liz Claiborne, Michael Kors, Nautica, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
25.	Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets	IN	Michigan City	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	96.0	%	454,315	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Coldwater Creek, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
26.	Napa Premium Outlets	CA	Napa	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	99.6	%	179,386	Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Lucky Brand, Nautica, Tommy Hilfiger
27.	North Georgia Premium Outlets	GA	Dawsonville (Atlanta)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	98.2	%	539,982	Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Hugo Boss, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Talbots, Tommy Hilfiger, Williams-Sonoma
28.	Orlando Premium Outlets	FL	Orlando	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	100.0	%	549,434	Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Diesel, Dior, Fendi, Giorgio Armani, Hugo Boss, J. Crew, Lacoste, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Salvatore Ferragamo, Tag Heuer, Theory
29.	Osage Beach Premium Outlets	MO	Osage Beach	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	91.6	%	393,051	Adidas, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Coldwater Creek, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger
30.	Petaluma Village Premium Outlets	CA	Petaluma (Santa Rosa)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	96.6	%	195,968	Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Gap Outlet, Nike, Puma, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Hilfiger
31.	Philadelphia Premium Outlets	PA	Limerick (Philadelphia)	Fee	100.0%	Built 2007	96.9	%	549,106	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, DKNY, Elie Tahari, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Sony

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)		Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

32.	Rio Grande Valley Premium Outlets	TX	Mercedes (McAllen)	Fee	100.0%	Built 2006	96.9	%	584,790	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, DKNY, Gap Outlet, Guess, Hugo Boss, Loft Outlet, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Sony, Tommy Hilfiger
33.	Round Rock Premium Outlets	TX	Round Rock (Austin)	Fee	100.0%	Built 2006	98.0	%	488,903	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, Guess, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger
34.	Seattle Premium Outlets	WA	Tulalip (Seattle)	Ground Lease (2034)	100.0%	Built 2005	99.1	%	443,760	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Hugo Boss, J. Crew, Juicy Couture, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Sony, Tommy Hilfiger
35.	St. Augustine Premium Outlets	FL	St. Augustine (Jacksonville)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	97.0	%	328,557	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
36.	The Crossings Premium Outlets	PA	Tannersville	Fee and Ground Lease (2019)(7)	100.0%	Acquired 2004	99.3	%	411,114	Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Coldwater Creek, Guess, J.Crew, Liz Claiborne, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Reebok, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour
37.	Vacaville Premium Outlets	CA	Vacaville	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	98.3	%	437,650	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Columbia Sportswear, DKNY, Gucci, J.Crew, Michael Kors, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Restoration Hardware, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger
38.	Waikele Premium Outlets	HI	Waipahu (Honolulu)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	99.5	%	209,937	A/X Armani Exchange, Banana Republic, Calvin Klein, Coach, Guess, Michael Kors,Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Tommy Bahama, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion
39.	Waterloo Premium Outlets	NY	Waterloo	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	96.5	%	417,549	Adidas, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Coach, Columbia Sportswear, Gap Outlet, J.Crew, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger, Under Armour, VF Outlet
40.	Woodbury Commons Premium Outlets	NY	Central Valley (New York)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	100.0	%	844,734	Banana Republic, Burberry, Chanel, Chloe, Coach, Dior, Dolce & Gabbana, Fendi, Giorgio Armani, Gucci, Lacoste, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Nike, Oscar de la Renta, Polo Ralph Lauren, Prada, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragmo, Theory, Tory Burch, Versace, Yves St. Laurent
41.	Wrentham Village Premium Outlets	MA	Wrentham (Boston)	Fee	100.0%	Acquired 2004	99.7	%	635,997	Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Brooks Brothers, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Coach, Cole Haan, Elie Tahari, Hugo Boss, J. Crew, Lacoste, Movado, Nike, Polo Ralph Lauren, Saks Fifth Avenue Off 5th, Salvatore Ferragmo, Sony, Williams-Sonoma, Theory, Tommy Hilfiger, True Religion, Under Armour

	Total U.S. Premium Outlet Centers GLA								17,144,563

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

	Community/Lifestyle Centers
1.	Arboretum at Great Hills	TX	Austin	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	87.4	%	206,827	Barnes & Noble, Pottery Barn
2.	Bloomingdale Court	IL	Bloomingdale (Chicago)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1987	96.2	%	630,359	Best Buy, T.J. Maxx N More, Office Max, Old Navy, Wal-Mart, Dick's Sporting Goods, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Picture Show,(8)
3.	Brightwood Plaza	IN	Indianapolis	Fee	100.0%		Built 1965	100.0	%	38,493
4.	Charles Towne Square	SC	Charleston	Fee	100.0%		Built 1976	100.0	%	71,794	Regal Cinema
5.	Chesapeake Center	VA	Chesapeake (Virginia Beach)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1989	96.1	%	305,935	K-Mart, Movies 10, Petsmart, Michaels, Value City Furniture
6.	Clay Terrace	IN	Carmel (Indianapolis)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Built 2004	94.7	%(17)	614,458	Dick's Sporting Goods, Whole Foods, DSW, Bouncertown
7.	Cobblestone Court	NY	Victor	Fee	35.7%	(4)(13)	Built 1993	98.8	%	265,477	Dick's Sporting Goods, Kmart, Office Max
8.	Countryside Plaza	IL	Countryside (Chicago)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1977	87.7	%	403,756	Best Buy, Home Depot, PetsMart, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Office Depot, Value City Furniture
9.	Crystal Court	IL	Crystal Lake (Chicago)	Fee	37.9%	(4)(13)	Built 1989	58.8	%	278,978	(8)
10.	Dare Centre	NC	Kill Devil Hills	Ground Lease (2058)	100.0%		Acquired 2004	100.0	%	168,707	Belk, Food Lion
11.	DeKalb Plaza	PA	King of Prussia (Philadelphia)	Fee	50.3%	(15)	Acquired 2003	100.0	%	101,742	Changed property name from Dekalb; ACME Grocery,(11)
12.	Eastland Convenience Center	IN	Evansville	Ground Lease (2075)	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	96.1	%	175,639	Toys 'R Us, Bed Bath & Beyond, Marshalls,(8)
13.	Empire East(1)	SD	Sioux Falls	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998	98.1	%	297,278	Kohl's, Target, Bed Bath & Beyond
14.	Fairfax Court	VA	Fairfax (Washington, D.C.)	Fee	41.3%	(4)(13)	Built 1992	85.8	%	254,301	Burlington Coat Factory, Offenbacher's,(8)
15.	Forest Plaza	IL	Rockford	Fee	100.0%		Built 1985	93.2	%	428,039	Kohl's, Marshalls, Michaels, Factory Card Outlet, Office Max, Bed Bath & Beyond, Petco, Babies R' Us, Toys R' Us,(8)
16.	Gaitway Plaza	FL	Ocala	Fee	32.2%	(4)(13)	Built 1989	100.0	%	208,755	Books-A-Million, Office Depot, T.J. Maxx, Ross Dress for Less, Bed Bath & Beyond
17.	Gateway Shopping Center	TX	Austin	Fee	100.0%		2004	89.2	%	513,017	Star Furniture, Best Buy, Recreational Equipment, Inc., Whole Foods, Crate & Barrel, The Container Store, Old Navy, Regal Cinema, Nordstrom Rack,(8)
18.	Great Lakes Plaza	OH	Mentor (Cleveland)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1976	89.6	%	164,104	Michael's, Best Buy, HH Gregg,(8)
19.	Greenwood Plus	IN	Greenwood (Indianapolis)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1979	100.0	%	155,319	Best Buy, Kohl's
20.	Hamilton Town Center	IN	Noblesville (Indianapolis)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Built 2008	88.5	%	655,490	JCPenney, Borders, Dick's Sporting Goods, Old Navy, Stein Mart, Bed Bath & Beyond, DSW, Hamilton 16 IMAX
21.	Henderson Square	PA	King of Prussia (Philadelphia)	Fee	76.0%	(15)	Acquired 2003	96.0	%	107,383	Genuardi's Family Market,(8)
22.	Highland Lakes Center	FL	Orlando	Fee	100.0%		Built 1991	75.0	%	492,321	Marshalls, Bed Bath & Beyond, American Signature Furniture, Ross Dress for Less, Burlington Coat Factory,(8)

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

23.	Indian River Commons	FL	Vero Beach	Fee	50.0%		Built 1997	100.0	%	255,942	Lowe's, Best Buy, Ross Dress for Less, Bed Bath & Beyond, Michael's
24.	Ingram Plaza	TX	San Antonio	Fee	100.0%		Built 1980	100.0	%	111,518	Sheplers, Macy's Home Store
25.	Keystone Shoppes	IN	Indianapolis	Ground Lease (2067)	100.0%		Acquired 1997	93.9	%	29,140
26.	Lake Plaza	IL	Waukegan (Chicago)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1986	93.6	%	215,568	Home Owners Bargain Outlet,(8)
27.	Lake View Plaza	IL	Orland Park (Chicago)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1986	83.8	%	367,843	Factory Card Outlet, Best Buy, Petco, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Golf Galaxy, Value City Furniture,(11)
28.	Lakeline Plaza	TX	Cedar Park (Austin)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1998	88.2	%	387,430	T.J. Maxx, Old Navy, Best Buy, Ross Dress for Less, Office Max, PetsMart, Party City, Cost Plus World Market, Toys 'R Us,(8)
29.	Lima Center	OH	Lima	Fee	100.0%		Built 1978	88.2	%	236,878	Kohl's, Hobby Lobby, T.J. Maxx
30.	Lincoln Crossing	IL	O'Fallon (St. Louis)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1990	95.5	%	243,326	Wal-Mart, PetsMart, The Home Depot
31.	Lincoln Plaza	PA	King of Prussia (Philadelphia)	Fee	65.0%	(15)	Acquired 2003	98.6	%	267,965	Burlington Coat Factory, AC Moore, Michaels, T.J. Maxx, Home Goods, HH Gregg(6),(8)
32.	MacGregor Village	NC	Cary	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 2004	58.6	%	144,042
33.	Mall of Georgia Crossing	GA	Buford (Atlanta)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1999	98.1	%	440,610	Best Buy, American Signature Furniture, T.J. Maxx 'n More, Nordstrom Rack, Staples, Target
34.	Markland Plaza	IN	Kokomo	Fee	100.0%		Built 1974	100.0	%	90,527	Best Buy, Bed Bath & Beyond
35.	Martinsville Plaza	VA	Martinsville	Ground Lease (2046)	100.0%		Built 1967	97.1	%	102,105	Rose's, Food Lion
36.	Matteson Plaza	IL	Matteson (Chicago)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1988	69.7	%	270,892	Dominick's,(8)
37.	Muncie Plaza	IN	Muncie	Fee	100.0%		Built 1998	98.6	%	172,621	Kohl's, Target, Shoe Carnival, T.J. Maxx, MC Sporting Goods, Kerasotes Theatres
38.	New Castle Plaza	IN	New Castle	Fee	100.0%		Built 1966	72.8	%	91,648	Ace Hardware(6), Aaron's Rents(6)
39.	North Ridge Plaza	IL	Joliet (Chicago)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1985	84.3	%	305,070	Hobby Lobby, Office Max, Minnesota Fabrics, Burlington Coat Factory, Ultra Foods Grocery
40.	North Ridge Shopping Center	NC	Raleigh	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 2004	95.8	%	166,667	Ace Hardware, Kerr Drugs, Harris-Teeter Grocery
41.	Northwood Plaza	IN	Fort Wayne	Fee	100.0%		Built 1974	83.8	%	208,076	Target, Cinema Grill
42.	Palms Crossing	TX	McAllen	Fee	100.0%		Built 2007	100.0	%	337,249	Bealls, DSW, Barnes & Noble, Babies 'R Us, Sports Authority, Guitar Center, Cavendar's Boot City, Best Buy
43.	Pier Park	FL	Panama City Beach	Fee	100.0%		Built 2008	95.1	%	815,670	Dillard's, JCPenney, Target, Old Navy, Borders, Grand Theatres, Ron Jon Surf Shop
44.	Plaza at Buckland Hills, The	CT	Manchester	Fee	41.3%	(4)(13)	Built 1993	62.5	%	334,885	Jo-Ann Fabrics, Party City, Toys 'R Us, Michaels, PetsMart,(11)

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

45.	Regency Plaza	MO	St. Charles (St. Louis)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1988	95.5	%	287,473	Wal-Mart, Sam's Wholesale Club, PetSmart
46.	Richardson Square	TX	Richardson (Dallas)	Fee	100.0%		Built 2008	100.0	%	517,265	Lowe's, Ross Dress for Less, Sears, Super Target, Anna's Linens
47.	Ridgewood Court	MS	Jackson	Fee	35.7%	(4)(13)	Built 1993	99.3	%	369,500	T.J. Maxx, Lifeway Christian Bookstore, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Michaels, Marshalls
48.	Rockaway Commons	NJ	Rockaway (New York)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	90.9	%	149,570	Best Buy, Acme Grocery,(8)
49.	Rockaway Town Plaza	NJ	Rockaway (New York)	Fee	100.0%		Acquired 1998	100.0	%	459,241	Target, PetsMart, Dick's Sporting Goods, AMC Theatres
50.	Royal Eagle Plaza	FL	Coral Springs (Miami)	Fee	42.0%	(4)(13)	Built 1989	98.4	%	199,059	Stein Mart,(11)
51.	Shops at Arbor Walk, The	TX	Austin	Ground Lease (2056)	100.0%		Built 2006	89.0	%	442,585	Home Depot, Marshall's, DSW, Golf Galaxy, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Ethan Allen
52.	Shops at North East Mall, The	TX	Hurst (Dallas)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1999	97.8	%	365,008	Michael's, PetsMart, Old Navy, T.J. Maxx, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Barnes & Noble
53.	St. Charles Towne Plaza	MD	Waldorf (Washington, D.C.)	Fee	100.0%		Built 1987	75.3	%	394,604	K & G Menswear, CVS, Shoppers Food Warehouse, Dollar Tree, Value City Furniture, Big Lots,(8)
54.	Teal Plaza	IN	Lafayette	Fee	100.0%		Built 1962	22.4	%	101,087	Pep Boys,(8)
55.	Terrace at the Florida Mall	FL	Orlando	Fee	100.0%		Built 1989	80.2	%	346,693	Marshalls, American Signature Furniture, Global Import, Target, Bed Bath & Beyond,(8)
56.	Tippecanoe Plaza	IN	Lafayette	Fee	100.0%		Built 1974	100.0	%	90,522	Best Buy, Barnes & Noble
57.	University Center	IN	Mishawaka	Fee	100.0%		Built 1980	52.5	%	150,524	Michael's, Best Buy
58.	Village Park Plaza	IN	Carmel (Indianapolis)	Fee	35.7%	(4)(13)	Built 1990	98.6	%	549,623	Bed Bath & Beyond, Ashley Furniture HomeStore(16), Kohl's, Wal-Mart, Marsh, Menards, Regal Cinema
59.	Washington Plaza	IN	Indianapolis	Fee	100.0%		Built 1976	57.1	%	50,107
60.	Waterford Lakes Town Center	FL	Orlando	Fee	100.0%		Built 1999	100.0	%	949,678	Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx, Bed Bath & Beyond, Old Navy, Barnes & Noble, Best Buy, Jo-Ann Fabrics, Office Max, PetsMart, Target, Ashley Furniture HomeStore, L.A. Fitness, Regal Cinema
61.	West Ridge Plaza	KS	Topeka	Fee	100.0%		Built 1988	86.6	%	254,519	T.J. Maxx, Toys 'R Us, Target
62.	West Town Corners	FL	Altamonte Springs (Orlando)	Fee	32.2%	(4)(13)	Built 1989	96.9	%	385,643	Sports Authority, PetsMart, Winn-Dixie Marketplace, American Signature Furniture, Wal-Mart, Lowes Home Improvement
63.	Westland Park Plaza	FL	Orange Park (Jacksonville)	Fee	32.2%	(4)(13)	Built 1989	81.9	%	163,254	Sports Authority, PetsMart, Burlington Coat Factory
64.	White Oaks Plaza	IL	Springfield	Fee	100.0%		Built 1986	93.2	%	391,474	T.J. Maxx, Office Max, Kohl's, Babies 'R Us, Country Market
65.	Whitehall Mall	PA	Whitehall	Fee	38.0%	(15)(4)	Acquired 2003	92.6	%	588,566	Sears, Kohl's, Bed Bath & Beyond, Borders Books & Music, Gold's Gym, Buy Buy Baby
66.	Willow Knolls Court	IL	Peoria	Fee	35.7%	(4)(13)	Built 1990	96.7	%	382,377	Burlington Coat Factory, Kohl's, Sam's Wholesale Club, Willow Knolls 14, Office Max
67.	Wolf Ranch Town Center	TX	Georgetown (Austin)	Fee	100.0%		Built 2005	79.8	%	626,457	Kohl's, Target, Michaels, Best Buy, Office Depot, Old Navy, PetsMart, T.J. Maxx, DSW

	Total Community/Lifestyle Center GLA									20,348,673

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

				Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)

					Legal Ownership			Year Built or Acquired
	Other Properties	State	City (CBSA)						Occupancy(5)			Total GLA		Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)						Occupancy(5)			Total GLA		Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
1.	Crossville Outlet Center	TN	Crossville	Fee		100.0%		Acquired 2004		94.4	%		151,205	Bass, Dressbarn, Kasper, L'eggs Hanes Bali Playtex, Liz Claiborne, Rack Room Shoes, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
2.	Factory Merchants Branson	MO	Branson	Ground Lease (2021)		100.0%		Acquired 2004		60.3	%		273,657	Carter's, Crocs, Izod, Jones New York, Pendleton, Reebok, Tuesday Morning
3.	Factory Stores of America-Boaz	AL	Boaz	Ground Lease (2027)		100.0%		Acquired 2004		77.5	%		111,636	Bon Worth, Easy Spirit, Rue21, VF Outlet
4.	Factory Stores of America—Georgetown	KY	Georgetown	Fee		100.0%		Acquired 2004		95.9	%		173,330	Bass, Dressbarn, Rack Room Shoes, Rue 21, Van Heusen
5.	Factory Stores of America—Graceville	FL	Graceville	Fee		100.0%		Acquired 2004		100.0	%		84,066	Factory Brand Shoes, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
6.	Factory Stores of America—Lebanon	MO	Lebanon	Fee		100.0%		Acquired 2004		100.0	%		85,930	Dressbarn, Factory Brand Shoes, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
7.	Factory Stores of America—Nebraska City	NE	Nebraska City	Fee		100.0%		Acquired 2004		97.8	%		89,615	Bass, Easy Spirit, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
8.	Factory Stores of America—Story City	IA	Story City	Fee		100.0%		Acquired 2004		78.6	%		112,510	Dressbarn, Factory Brand Shoes, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
9.	Factory Stores of North Bend	WA	North Bend	Fee		100.0%		Acquired 2004		94.7	%		223,611	Adidas, Bass, Carter's, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Gap Outlet, Izod, Nike, Nine West, PacSun, Tommy Hilfiger, Van Heusen, VF Outlet
10.	The Shoppes at Branson Meadows	MO	Branson	Ground Lease (2021)		100.0%		Acquired 2004		73.2	%		286,489	Branson Meadows Cinemas, Dressbarn, VF Outlet
11.	Highland Mall(1)	TX	Austin	Fee and Ground Lease (2070)		50.0%	(4)	Acquired 1998		51.1	%		1,077,898	Dillard's Men's and Women's, Macy's,(8)
12.	Mall at The Source, The	NY	Westbury (New York)	Fee		25.5%	(4)(2)	Built 1997		76.2	%		722,883	Fortunoff Backyard Store(6), Off 5th-Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom Rack, David's Bridal, Golf Galaxy,(8)
13.	Nanuet Mall	NY	Nanuet (New York)	Fee		100.0%		Acquired 1998		36.3	%		912,615	Macy's, Sears,(8)
14.	Palm Beach Mall	FL	West Palm Beach (Miami)	Fee		100.0%		Built 1967		16.8	%		1,082,909	JCPenney, Sears(16),(8)
15.	University Mall	FL	Pensacola	Fee		100.0%		Acquired 1994		0.0	%		709,711	JCPenney, Sears, Belk

	Total Other GLA												6,098,065

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

				Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)

	Mills Properties				Legal Ownership			Year Built or Acquired
	The Mills®	State	City (CBSA)						Occupancy(5)			Total GLA		Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)						Occupancy(5)			Total GLA		Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants
1.	Arizona Mills	AZ	Tempe (Phoenix)	Fee		25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007		93.8	%		1,244,726	Marshalls, Last Call Neiman Marcus, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, Burlington Coat Factory, Sears Appliance Outlet, Gameworks, Sports Authority, Ross Dress for Less, JCPenney Outlet, Group USA, Harkins Cinemas, IMAX Theatre, F.Y.E., Sea Life Center(6)
2.	Arundel Mills	MD	Hanover (Baltimore)	Fee		29.6%	(4)	Acquired 2007		99.7	%		1,293,011	Bass Pro Shops, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, The Children's Place, Dave & Buster's, F.Y.E., H&M, Medieval Times, Modell's, Neiman Marcus Last Call, OFF 5TH Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Old Navy, T.J. MAXX, Cinemark Egyptian 24 Theatres
3.	Colorado Mills	CO	Lakewood (Denver)	Fee		18.8%	(4)(2)	Acquired 2007		83.1	%		1,098,098	Borders Books Music Café, Eddie Bauer Outlet, Last Call Clearance Center from Neiman Marcus, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, OFF 5TH Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Sports Authority, Super Target, United Artists Theatre
4.	Concord Mills	NC	Concord (Charlotte)	Fee		29.6%	(4)(2)	Acquired 2007		99.3	%		1,333,923	Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, FYE, The Children's Place Outlet, Dave & Buster's, NIKE, TJ Maxx, Group USA, Sun & Ski, AC Moore, Off Broadway Shoes, Old Navy, Bed Bath & Beyond, NASCAR Speedpark, AMC Theatres, Best Buy(6)
5.	Discover Mills	GA	Lawrenceville (Atlanta)	Fee		25.0%	(4)(2)	Acquired 2007		94.5	%		1,183,079	Bass Pro Shops, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, Neiman Marcus Last Call, Medieval Times, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, ROSS Dress for Less, Sears Appliance Outlet, Sun & Ski Sports, Urban Behavior, Spaha Skatepark, Dave & Buster's, AMC Theatres
6.	Franklin Mills	PA	Philadelphia	Fee		50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007		87.0	%		1,719,292	Dave & Buster's, JC Penney Outlet Store, Burlington Coat Factory, Marshalls HomeGoods, Modell's Sporting Goods, Group USA, Bed Bath & Beyond, Sam Ash Music, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, Last Call Neiman Marcus, Off Broadway Shores, Sears Appliance Outlet, H&M, Spaha Skatepark, AMC Theatres
7.	Grapevine Mills	TX	Grapevine (Dallas)	Fee		29.6%	(4)	Acquired 2007		96.3	%		1,776,870	Bed, Bath & Beyond, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, The Children's Place, Forever 21, Group USA—The Clothing Co. JCPenney Outlet, Marshalls, NIKE, OFF 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, Old Navy, Virgin Megastore, Gameworks, AMC Theatres, Dr. Pepper Star Center, Sun & Ski Sports, Last Call Neiman Marcus, Sears Appliance Outlet, Bass Pro Outdoor World, Spaha Skatepark, Off Broadway Shoes(6)
8.	Great Mall	CA	Milpitas (San Jose)	Fee		24.5%	(4)(2)	Acquired 2007		94.9	%		1,355,734	Last Call Neiman Marcus, Sports Authority, Group USA, Old Navy, Kohl's, Dave & Busters, H&M, Sears Appliance Outlet, Burlington Coat Factory, Marshalls, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, NIKE, Century Theatres, Bed Bath & Beyond, XXI Forever
9.	Gurnee Mills	IL	Gurnee (Chicago)	Fee		50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007		95.7	%		1,810,682	Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Bed Bath & Beyond, Burlington Coat Factory, H & M, Kohl's, Marshall's Home Goods, Off 5th—Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Nickles & Dimes, Sears Grand, The Sports Authority, TJ Maxx, VF Outlet, Marcus Cinemas, Last Call Neiman Marcus, Value City Furniture

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

10.	Katy Mills	TX	Katy (Houston)	Fee	31.3%	(4)(2)	Acquired 2007	89.9	%	1,554,899	Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Bed Bath and Beyond, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, F.Y.E.-For Your Entertainment, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus Last Call Clearance Center, Nike Factory Store, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Sun & Ski Sports, AMC Theatres, Old Navy, Off Broadway Shoes, XXI Forever
11.	Ontario Mills	CA	Ontario	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	93.2	%	1,476,974	Burlington Coat Factory, Totally for Kids, NIKE, Gameworks, The Children's Place Outlet, Marshalls, JCPenney Outlet, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Bed Bath & Beyond, Nordstrom Rack, Dave & Busters, Group USA, Sam Ash Music, Off Broadway Shoes, AMC Theatres, H&M, F.Y.E., Second Spin
12.	Opry Mills	TN	Nashville	Fee	24.5%	(4)(2)	Acquired 2007	97.6	%	1,159,314	Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, Dave & Buster's, The Gibson Showcase, Bed Bath & Beyond, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Barnes & Noble, Old Navy, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Nike Factory Store, Sun & Ski Sports, BLACKLION, Regal Cinemas, XXI Forever, VF Outlet
13.	Potomac Mills	VA	Prince William (Washington, D.C.)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	98.1	%	1,550,514	Group USA, Marshall's, TJ Maxx, Sears Appliance Outlet, Old Navy, JCPenney Outlet, Urban Behavior, Burlington Coat Factory, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Nordstrom Rack, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Costco Warehouse, The Children's Place, AMC Theatres, Modell's Sporting Goods, Books-A-Million, H&M, Last Call Neiman Marcus, XXI Forever
14.	Sawgrass Mills	FL	Sunrise (Miami)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	99.8	%	2,251,047	American Signature Home, Beall's Outlet, Bed Bath & Beyond, Brandsmart USA, Burlington Coat Factory, Gameworks, JCPenney Outlet Store, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus Last Call Clearance Center, Nike Factory Store, Nordstrom Rack, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue Outlet, Ron Jon Surf Shop, The Sports Authority, Super Target, TJ Maxx, VF Factory Outlet, Wannado City, FYE, Off Broadway Shoes, Regal Cinemas, GAP Outlet, Books-A-Million
15.	St. Louis Mills	MO	Hazelwood (St. Louis)	Fee	25.0%	(4)(2)	Acquired 2007	80.8	%	1,174,876	Bed Bath & Beyond, Books-A-Million, Burlington Coat Factory, Cabela's, iceZONE, Marshalls MegaStore, NASCAR SpeedPark, Off Broadway Shoe Warehouse, Sears Appliance Outlet, The Children's Place Outlet, Regal Cinemas, Plan 9 Skatepark
16.	The Block at Orange	CA	Orange (Los Angeles)	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	92.1	%	720,973	Dave & Buster's, Vans Skatepark, Lucky Strike Lanes, Borders Books & Music, Hilo Hattie, Off 5th Saks Fifth Avenue, AMC Theatres, Nike Factory Store, Last Call Neiman Marcus, Off Broadway Shoes, H&M(6)

	Subtotal The Mills®									22,704,012

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

	Mills Regional Malls
17.	Briarwood Mall	MI	Ann Arbor	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	95.5	%	970,429	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, Von Maur
18.	Del Amo Fashion Center	CA	Torrance (Los Angeles)	Fee	25.0%	(4)(2)	Acquired 2007	89.6	%(17)	2,381,128	Macy's, Macy's, Macy's Home & Furnishings, JCPenney, Sears, Marshalls, T.J. Maxx, Barnes & Noble, JoAnn Fabrics, Crate & Barrel, L.A. Fitness, Burlington Coat Factory, AMC Theatres
19.	Dover Mall	DE	Dover	Fee	34.1%	(4)	Acquired 2007	94.6	%	885,622	Macy's, JCPenney, Boscov's, Sears, Carmike Cinemas
20.	Esplanade, The	LA	Kenner (New Orleans)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	83.9	%	899,407	Dillard's, Dillard's Men's, Macy's,(11)
21.	Falls, The	FL	Miami	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	93.3	%	807,255	Bloomingdale's, Macy's, Regal Cinema
22.	Galleria at White Plains, The	NY	White Plains (New York)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	79.0	%	863,293	Macy's, Sears, H&M
23.	Hilltop Mall	CA	Richmond (San Francisco)	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	75.8	%	1,077,326	JCPenney, Sears, Macy's, Wal-Mart, 24 Hour Fitness
24.	Lakeforest Mall	MD	Gaithersburg (Washington, D.C.)	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	84.5	%	1,045,387	Macy's, Lord & Taylor, JCPenney, Sears, H&M
25.	Mall at Tuttle Crossing, The	OH	Dublin (Columbus)	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	97.4	%	1,107,706	Macy's, Macy's, Sears, JCPenney
26.	Marley Station	MD	Glen Burnie (Baltimore)	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	82.1	%	1,069,106	Macy's, JCPenney, Sears, The Movies at Marley Station, Gold's Gym,(11)
27.	Meadowood Mall	NV	Reno	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	89.1	%(17)	876,391	Macy's Men's, Macy's, Sears, JCPenney, Sports Authority
28.	Northpark Mall	MS	Ridgeland	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	97.2	%	955,735	Dillard's, JCPenney, Belk, Regal Cinema
29.	Shops at Riverside, The	NJ	Hackensack (New York)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	86.8	%	762,197	Bloomingdale's, Saks Fifth Avenue, Barnes & Noble, Pottery Barn
30.	Southdale Center	MN	Edina (Minneapolis)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	91.0	%(17)	1,338,840	Macy's, JCPenney, Marshall's, AMC Theatres,(8)
31.	Southridge Mall	WI	Greendale (Milwaukee)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	90.5	%	1,211,830	JC Penney, Sears, Kohl's, Boston Store, Cost Plus World Market,(8)
32.	Stoneridge Shopping Center	CA	Pleasanton (San Francisco)	Fee	25.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	97.1	%	1,301,273	Macy's Women's, Macy's Men's, Nordstrom, Sears, JCPenney, H&M

	Subtotal Mills Regional Malls									17,552,925

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Property Table

U.S. Properties

	Property Name	State	City (CBSA)	Ownership Interest (Expiration if Lease)(3)			Year Built or Acquired				Retail Anchors and Selected Major Tenants

	Mills Community Centers
33.	Arundel Mills Marketplace	MD	Hanover (Baltimore)	Fee	29.6%	(4)	Acquired 2007	100.0	%	101,613	Michael's, Staples, HH Gregg(6)
34.	Concord Mills Marketplace	NC	Concord (Charlotte)	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	100.0	%	230,683	BJ's Wholesale Club, Garden Ridge
35.	Denver West Village	CO	Lakewood	Fee	18.8%	(4)	Acquired 2007	98.5	%	310,160	Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Office Max, Whole Foods, DSW, Ultimate Electronics, Christy Sports, United Artists
36.	Liberty Plaza	PA	Philadelphia	Fee	50.0%	(4)	Acquired 2007	99.0	%	371,618	Wal-Mart, Dick's Sporting Goods, Raymour & Flanigan, Pathmark Food Market

	Subtotal Mills Community Centers									1,014,074

	Total Mills Properties									41,271,011
					��
	Total U.S. Properties GLA									244,897,177

Table of Contents

FOOTNOTES:

(1): This property is managed by a third party.
(2): Our direct and indirect interests in some of the properties held as joint venture interests are subject to preferences on distributions in favor of other partners or us.
(3): The date listed is the expiration date of the last renewal option available to the operating entity under the ground lease. In a majority of the ground leases, we have a right of first refusal or the right to purchase the lessor's interest. Unless otherwise indicated, each ground lease listed in this column covers at least 50% of its respective property.
(4): Joint venture properties accounted for under the equity method.
(5): Regional Malls—Executed leases for all company-owned GLA in mall stores, excluding majors. Premium Outlet Centers—Executed leases for all company-owned GLA (or total center GLA). Community/Lifestyle Centers — Executed leases for all company-owned GLA including majors and mall stores.
(6): Indicates anchor or major that is currently under development.
(7): Indicates ground lease covers less than 50% of the acreage of this property.
(8): Indicates vacant anchor space(s).
(9): The lease at the Mall at Chestnut Hill includes the entire premises including land and building.
(10): Indicates ground lease covers outparcel only.
(11): Indicates vacant anchor owned by another company, but we still collect rent and/or fees under an agreement.
(12): We receive substantially all the economic benefit of the property due to a preference or advance.
(13): Outside partner receives substantially all of the economic benefit due to a partner preference.
(14): We own a mortgage note that encumbers Pheasant Lane Mall that entitles us to 100% of the economics of this property.
(15): Our indirect ownership interest is through an approximately 76% ownership interest in Kravco Simon Investments.
(16): Indicates anchor has announced its intent to close this location.
(17): Mall & Freestanding GLA includes office space as follows:


		Arsenal Mall—107,188 sq. ft.		Northshore Mall—12,367 sq. ft.
		Century III Mall—30,032 sq. ft.		Oak Court Mall—126,583 sq. ft.
		Coconut Point—1,325 sq. ft.		Oxford Valley Mall—110,324 sq. ft.
		Clay Terrace—110,754 sq. ft.		Plaza Carolina—28,436 sq. ft.
		The Domain—92,954 sq. ft.		River Oaks Center—116,912 sq. ft.
		Copley Place—867,601 sq. ft.		Rolling Oaks Mall—6,383 sq. ft.
		Fashion Centre at Pentagon City, The—169,089 sq. ft.		Roosevelt Field—1,610 sq. ft.
		Firewheel Town Center—74,999 sq. ft.		South Hills Village—4,361 sq. ft.
		Great Lakes Mall—2,051 sq. ft.		Stanford Shopping Center—5,748 sq. ft.
		Greendale Mall—119,860 sq. ft.		The Westchester—820 sq. ft.
		Gwinnett Place—32,603 sq. ft.		White Oaks Mall—7,807 sq. ft.
		King of Prussia Mall—13,100 sq. ft.		Del Amo Fashion Center—114,413 sq. ft.
		Knoxville Center—1,455 sq. ft.		Meadowood Mall—6,013 sq. ft.
		Lehigh Valley Mall—11,754 sq. ft.		Southdale Center—20,295 sq. ft.
		Menlo Park Mall—52,424 sq. ft.

Table of Contents

International Properties

Our ownership interests in properties outside the United States are primarily owned through joint venture arrangements. However, we have a direct minority investment in Liberty International, PLC, or Liberty, as further described below.

European Investments

The following summarizes our joint venture investments in Europe and the underlying countries in which these joint ventures own and operate real estate properties as of December 31, 2009:

Joint Venture Investment				Countries of Operation

Gallerie Commerciali Italia, S.p.A., or GCI	49.0	%	44	Italy
Simon Ivanhoe	50.0	%	7	France, Poland

In addition, we jointly hold with a third party an interest in one parcel of land for development near Paris, France outside of these two joint ventures. Simon Ivanhoe and GCI are fully integrated European retail real estate developers, owners and managers.

Our properties in Europe consist primarily of hypermarket-anchored shopping centers. Substantially all of our European properties are anchored by either the hypermarket retailer Auchan, primarily in Italy, who is also our partner in GCI, or are anchored by the hypermarket Carrefour in France and Poland. Certain of the properties in Italy are subject to leaseholds whereby GCI leases all or a portion of the premises from a third party who is entitled to receive substantially all the economic benefits of that portion of the properties. Auchan and Carrefour are the two largest hypermarket operators in Europe. These centers comprise over 13.4 million square feet of GLA and were 95.9% leased as of December 31, 2009.

On February 4, 2010, we and our partner in Simon Ivanhoe, Ivanhoe Cambridge Inc., or Ivanhoe Cambridge, entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the interests in Simon Ivanhoe which owns seven shopping centers located in France and Poland to Unibail-Rodamco. The joint venture partners will receive consideration of €715 million for their interests, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We expect our share of the gain on sale of our interests in Simon Ivanhoe to be approximately $300 million. The transaction is scheduled to close during the first half of 2010, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.

We and Ivanhoe Cambridge have the right to participate with Unibail-Rodamco in the potential development of up to five new retail projects in the Simon Ivanhoe pipeline, subject to customary approval rights. We will own a 25% interest in any of these projects in which we agree to participate.

Other International Investments

We also hold real estate interests in eight joint venture properties in Japan, one joint venture property in Mexico, and one joint venture property in Korea. The eight Japanese Premium Outlet Centers operate in various cities throughout Japan and are held in a joint venture with Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. These centers comprise over 2.4 million square feet of GLA and were 99.6% leased as of December 31, 2009.

The following summarizes our holdings in these international joint ventures and the underlying countries in which these joint ventures own and operate real estate properties as of December 31, 2009:

Holdings				Countries of Operation

Chelsea Japan Co. Ltd.	40.0	%	8	Japan
Premium Outlets Punta Norte (Mexico City)	50.0	%	1	Mexico
Yeoju Premium Outlets (Seoul)	50.0	%	1	South Korea

In 2009, we completed construction and opened Ami Premium Outlets, a 224,500 square foot center located outside Tokyo, Japan. We have a 40% interest in this property consistent with the ownership structure of our other Japanese investments. We also completed construction and opened a 171,800 square foot expansion at Kobe-Sanda Premium Outlets in Hyougo-ken, Japan. Also in December 2009, we recognized a loss on our joint venture interests in

Table of Contents

our shopping centers in China. We sold our interests to affiliates of our Chinese partner for approximately $29 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $20 million.

We hold a minority interest in Liberty which is a U.K. Real Estate Investment Trust that operates regional shopping centers and owns other prime retail assets throughout the U.K. Liberty is a U.K. FTSE 100 listed company, with shareholders' funds of £3.2 billion and property investments of £6.1 billion, of which its U.K. regional shopping centers comprise 70%. Assets of the group under control or joint control amount to £9.3 billion. Our interest in Liberty is less than 6% of its outstanding shares. We adjust the carrying value of this investment quarterly using quoted market prices, including a related foreign exchange component.

The following property table summarizes certain data for our properties located in Europe, Japan, Mexico, and Korea at December 31, 2009.

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
International Property Table

	COUNTRY/Property Name	City (Metropolitan area)	Ownership Interest			Year Built		Retail Anchors and Major Tenants

	FRANCE
1.	Bay 2	Torcy (Paris)	Fee	50.0	%	2003	576,800	Carrefour, Leroy Merlin
2.	Bay 1	Torcy (Paris)	Fee	50.0	%	2004	348,900	Conforama, Go Sport
3.	Bel'Est	Bagnolet (Paris)	Fee	17.5	%	1992	173,100	Auchan
4.	Villabé A6	Villabé (Paris)	Fee	7.5	%	1992	284,300	Carrefour
5.	Wasquehal	Wasquehal (Lille)	Fee	50.0	%	2006	254,700	Carrefour

	Subtotal France						1,637,800
	ITALY
6.	Ancona — Senigallia	Senigallia (Ancona)	Fee	49.0	%	1995	82,800	Cityper
7.	Ascoli Piceno — Grottammare	Grottammare (Ascoli Piceno)	Fee	49.0	%	1995	94,800	Cityper
8.	Ascoli Piceno — Porto Sant'Elpidio	Porto Sant'Elpidio (Ascoli Piceno)	Fee	49.0	%	1999	162,300	Cityper
9.	Bari — Casamassima	Casamassima (Bari)	Fee	49.0	%	1995	547,800	Auchan, Coin, Eldo, Bata, Leroy Merlin, Decathlon
10.	Bari — Modugno	Modugno (Bari)	Fee	49.0	%	2004	143,500	Auchan, euronics, Decathlon
11.	Brescia — Mazzano	Mazzano (Brescia)	Fee / Leasehold (2)	49.0	%(2)	1994	230,700	Auchan, Bricocenter
12.	Brindisi-Mesagne	Mesagne (Brindisi)	Fee	49.0	%	2003	228,600	Auchan, Leroy Merlin, Piazza Italia, Euronics
13.	Cagliari — Santa Gilla	Cagliari	Fee / Leasehold (2)	49.0	%(2)	1992	190,700	Auchan, Bricocenter
14.	Catania — La Rena	Catania	Fee	49.0	%	1998	146,200	Auchan
15.	Cinisello	Cinisello (Milano)	Fee	49.0	%	2007	375,600	Auchan, Darty, Scarpe & Scarpe, H&M, Piazza Italia, Conbipel
16.	Cuneo	Cuneo (Torino)	Fee	49.0	%	2004	282,200	Auchan, Bricocenter, Decathlon, Euronics
17.	Giugliano	Giugliano (Napoli)	Fee	49.0	%(5)	2006	754,500	Auchan, Leroy Merlin, Decathlon, Conbipel, Scarpe & Scarpe, Euronics, Eldo
18.	Milano — Rescaldina	Rescaldina (Milano)	Fee	49.0	%	2000	377,100	Auchan, Bricocenter, Decathlon, Media World
19.	Milano — Vimodrone	Vimodrone (Milano)	Fee	49.0	%	1989	190,600	Auchan, Bricocenter
20.	Napoli — Pompei	Pompei (Napoli)	Fee	49.0	%	1990	91,400	Auchan
21.	Nola — Volcano Buono	Nola (Napoli)	Fee	22.1	%	2007	876,000	Auchan, Coin, Holiday Inn, Media World, Piazza Italia, H&M, Cisalfa, Zara
22.	Padova	Padova	Fee	49.0	%	1989	105,800	Auchan
23.	Palermo	Palermo	Fee	49.0	%	1990	82,900	Auchan
24.	Pesaro — Fano	Fano (Pesaro)	Fee	49.0	%	1994	112,300	Auchan
25.	Pescara	Pescara	Fee	49.0	%	1998	161,500	Auchan, Euronics
26.	Pescara — Cepagatti	Cepagatti (Pescara)	Fee	49.0	%	2001	269,800	Auchan, Bata
27.	Piacenza — San Rocco al Porto	San Rocco al Porto (Piacenza)	Fee	49.0	%	1992	179,200	Auchan, Darty
28.	Porta Di Roma	Roma	Fee	19.6	%	2007	1,255,400	Auchan, Leroy Merlin, UGC Theatres, Ikea, Media World, Decathlon, H&M, Zara
29.	Roma — Collatina	Collatina (Roma)	Fee	49.0	%	1999	63,600	Auchan
30.	Sassari — Predda Niedda	Predda Niedda (Sassari)	Fee / Leasehold (2)	49.0	%(2)	1990	233,700	Auchan, Bricocenter, Media World
31.	Taranto	Taranto	Fee	49.0	%	1997	201,700	Auchan, Bricocenter
32.	Torino	Torino	Fee	49.0	%	1989	171,800	Auchan
33.	Torino — Venaria	Venaria (Torino)	Fee	49.0	%	1982	165,600	Auchan, Bricocenter
34.	Venezia — Mestre	Mestre (Venezia)	Fee	49.0	%	1995	246,700	Auchan

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
International Property Table

	COUNTRY/Property Name	City (Metropolitan area)	Ownership Interest			Year Built		Retail Anchors and Major Tenants

	ITALY (continued)
35.	Vicenza	Vicenza	Fee	49.0	%	1995	98,500	Auchan
36.	Ancona	Ancona	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1993	165,200	Auchan
37.	Bergamo	Bergamo	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1976	119,900	Auchan
38.	Brescia — Concesio	Concesio (Brescia)	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1972	117,500	Auchan, Bata
39.	Cagliari — Marconi	Cagliari	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1994	193,400	Auchan, Bricocenter, Bata
40.	Catania — Misterbianco	Misterbianco (Catania)	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1989	99,300	Auchan
41.	Merate — Lecco	Merate (Lecco)	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1976	162,000	Auchan, Bricocenter
42.	Milano — Cesano Boscone	Cesano Boscone (Milano)	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	2005	283,900	Auchan, Darty
43.	Milano — Nerviano	Nerviano (Milano)	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1991	111,600	Auchan
44.	Monza	Monza	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	2008	211,700	Auchan, H&M
45.	Napoli — Mugnano di Napoli	Mugnano di Napoli	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1992	192,900	Auchan, Bricocenter
46.	Olbia	Olbia	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1993	207,600	Auchan, Zara
47.	Roma — Casalbertone	Roma	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1998	147,600	Auchan
48.	Torino — Rivoli	Rivoli (Torino)	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1986	94,100	Auchan
49.	Verona — Bussolengo	Bussolengo (Verona)	Leasehold (3)	49.0	%(3)	1975	164,600	Auchan, Bricocenter

	Subtotal Italy						10,394,600
	POLAND
50.	Arkadia Shopping Center	Warsaw	Fee	50.0	%	2004	1,103,000	Carrefour, Leroy Merlin, Media, Saturn, Cinema City, H & M, Zara, Royal Collection, Peek & Clopperburg
51.	Wilenska Station Shopping Center	Warsaw	Fee	50.0	%	2002	308,600	Carrefour

	Subtotal Poland						1,411,600
	JAPAN
52.	Ami Premium Outlets	Ami (Tokyo)	Fee	40.0	%	2009	224,500	Brooks Brothers, Coach, Cole Haan, Diesel, Gap, OshKosh B'Gosh, Tommy Hilfiger
53.	Gotemba Premium Outlets	Gotemba City (Tokyo)	Fee	40.0	%	2000	481,900	Bally, Coach, Diesel, Gap, Gucci, Jill Stuart, L.L. Bean, Nike, Tod's
54.	Kobe-Sanda Premium Outlets	Hyougo-ken (Osaka)	Ground Lease (2026)	40.0	%	2007	365,300	BCBG, Bose, Coach, Cole Haan, Lego, Nike, Petit Bateau, Max Azria, Theory
55.	Rinku Premium Outlets	Izumisano (Osaka)	Ground Lease (2020)	40.0	%	2000	322,800	Bally, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Gap, Nautica, Nike, Timberland, Versace
56.	Sano Premium Outlets	Sano (Tokyo)	Ground Lease (2022)	40.0	%	2003	390,700	Bally, Brooks Brothers, Coach, Nautica, New Yorker, Nine West, Timberland
57.	Sendai-Izumi Premium Outlets	Izumi Park Town (Sendai)	Ground Lease (2027)	40.0	%	2008	164,200	Levi's, Miss Sixty, OshKosh B'Gosh, Pleats Please Issey Miyake, St. John, T-Fal, Tasaki, United Arrows, PLS+T, Ray Ban
58.	Toki Premium Outlets	Toki (Nagoya)	Ground Lease (2024)	40.0	%	2005	231,900	Adidas, Brooks Brothers, Bruno Magli, Coach, Eddie Bauer, Furla, Nautica, Nike, Timberland, Versace
59.	Tosu Premium Outlets	Fukuoka (Kyushu)	Ground Lease (2023)	40.0	%	2004	239,800	BCBG, Bose, Coach, Cole Haan, Lego, Nike, Petit Bateau, Max Azria, Theory

	Subtotal Japan						2,421,100

Table of Contents

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
International Property Table

	COUNTRY/Property Name	City (Metropolitan area)	Ownership Interest			Year Built		Retail Anchors and Major Tenants

	MEXICO
60.	Punta Norte Premium Outlets	Mexico City	Fee	50.0	%	2004	244,200	Christian Dior, Sony, Nautica, Levi's, Nike Rockport, Reebok, Adidas, Samsonite

	Subtotal Mexico						244,200
	SOUTH KOREA
61.	Yeoju Premium Outlets	Yeoju	Fee	50.0	%	2007	249,900	Armani, Burberry, Dunhill, Ermenegildo Zegna, Salvatore Ferragamo

	Subtotal South Korea						249,900

	TOTAL INTERNATIONAL ASSETS						16,359,200

FOOTNOTES:

(1): All gross leasable area listed in square feet.
(2): This property is held partially in fee and partially encumbered by a leasehold on the premise which entitles the lessor to the majority of the economics of the portion of the property subject to the leasehold.
(3): These properties are encumbered by a leasehold on the entire premises which entitles the lessor the majority of the economics of the property.
(4): Represents the sales area of the anchor and excludes any warehouse/storage areas.
(5): Gallerie Commerciali Italia owns 100% of the shopping gallery at this center which consists of 177,600 sf of leaseable area. In addition, Galleria Commerciali Italia owns a 40% interest in the retail parks at this center, which consist of 446,900 sf of leasable area.

Table of Contents

Land

We have direct or indirect ownership interests in approximately 700 acres of land held in the United States for future development.

Sustainability and Energy Efficiency

Due to the size of our portfolio, we focus on energy efficiency as a core sustainability strategy. Through the continued use of energy conservation practices, energy efficiency projects, and continuous monitoring and reporting, we have reduced our energy consumption at comparable properties every year since 2003. As a result, excluding new developments and expansions, we reduced the electricity usage over which we have direct control by 238 million kWhs since 2003. This represents a 17% percent reduction in electricity usage across a portfolio of comparable properties and reflects an annual value of over $27.5 million in avoided operating costs. Our documented reduction in greenhouse gas emissions resulting from our energy management efforts is 140,000 metric tons CO2e.

We were awardedNAREIT's Leader in the Light Award for the fifth year in a row. We are the only company to have achieved the Leader in the Light distinction every single year since NAREIT launched the program in 2005. We were included in the 2009 Carbon Disclosure Project's Global 500 Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index. The 2009 Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index highlights 50 companies worldwide that have displayed the most professional approach to corporate governance with respect to climate change disclosure practices. We were the only real estate company to be recognized.

Mortgage Financing on Properties

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the mortgages and other indebtedness encumbering our properties, and the properties held by our domestic and international joint venture arrangements, and also our unsecured corporate debt. Substantially all of the mortgage and property related debt is nonrecourse to us.

Table of Contents

MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name			Face Amount			Annual Debt Service

*Consolidated Indebtedness:*
*Secured Indebtedness:*
Simon Property Group, LP:
Anderson Mall	6.20%		$	27,270		$	2,216		10/10/12
Arsenal Mall HCHP Office	8.20%			973			202		05/05/16
Bangor Mall	6.15%			80,000			4,918	(2)	10/01/17
Battlefield Mall	4.60%			92,750			6,154		07/01/13
Bloomingdale Court	8.15%			26,573			2,376		11/01/15
Brunswick Square	5.65%			82,244			5,957		08/11/14
Carolina Premium Outlets — Smithfield	9.10%			19,386	(6)		2,114		03/10/13	(25)
Century III Mall	6.20%			80,498	(9)		6,541		10/10/12
Chesapeake Square	5.84%			69,849			5,162		08/01/14
Copley Place	0.88%	(1)		200,000			1,762	(2)	08/01/10	(3)
Coral Square	8.00%			81,667			8,065		10/01/10
The Crossings Premium Outlets	5.85%			52,505			4,649		03/13/13
Crossroads Mall	6.20%			40,617			3,285		10/10/12
Crystal River	7.63%			14,676			1,385		11/11/10	(25)
Dare Centre	9.10%			1,614	(6)		176		03/10/13	(25)
DeKalb Plaza	5.28%			2,946			233		01/01/15
Desoto Square	5.89%			63,799			4,561		07/01/14
The Factory Shoppes at Branson Meadows	9.10%			9,016	(6)		983		03/10/13	(25)
Factory Stores of America	9.10%			15,579	(6)		1,699		03/10/13	(25)
Forest Mall	6.20%			16,190	(10)		1,316		10/10/12
Forest Plaza	7.50%			18,957			1,685		10/10/19
Forum Shops at Caesars, The	4.78%			515,335			34,564		12/01/10
Gateway Shopping Center	5.89%			87,000			5,124	(2)	10/01/11
Greenwood Park Mall	8.00%			79,756	(37)		7,044		08/01/16
Gwinnett Place	5.68%			115,000			6,532	(2)	06/08/12
Henderson Square	6.94%			14,367			1,270		07/01/11
Highland Lakes Center	6.20%			14,924	(9)		1,213		10/10/12
Independence Center	5.94%			200,000			11,886	(2)	07/10/17
Ingram Park Mall	6.99%			75,884	(20)		6,724		08/11/11
Kittery Premium Outlets	5.39%	(11)		43,556	(7)		2,347	(2)	07/10/13	(3)
Knoxville Center	6.99%			57,464	(20)		5,092		08/11/11
Lake View Plaza	8.00%			16,000			1,409		01/01/15
Lakeline Plaza	7.50%			17,759			1,578		10/10/19
Las Americas Premium Outlets	5.84%			180,000			10,511	(2)	06/11/16
Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets	5.39%	(11)		88,623	(7)		4,775	(2)	07/10/13	(3)
Longview Mall	6.20%			30,300	(9)		2,462		10/10/12
MacGregor Village	9.10%			6,492	(6)		708		03/10/13	(25)
Mall of Georgia	7.09%			181,606	(32)		16,649		07/01/10
Markland Mall	6.20%			21,437	(10)		1,742		10/10/12
Midland Park Mall	6.20%			31,295	(10)		2,543		10/10/12
Montgomery Mall	5.17%			87,806			6,307		05/11/14	(25)
Muncie Plaza	7.50%			7,383			656		10/10/19
Northfield Square	6.05%			28,344			2,485		02/11/14
Northlake Mall	6.99%			66,290	(20)		5,874		08/11/11
North Ridge Shopping Center	9.10%			7,929	(6)		865		03/10/13	(25)
Oxford Valley Mall	6.76%			71,975			7,801		01/10/11

Table of Contents

MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name			Face Amount

Palm Beach Mall	6.20%			50,725		4,068		10/10/12
Penn Square Mall	7.75%			99,422		8,597		04/01/16
Philadelphia Premium Outlets	4.19%	(11)		190,000		7,969	(2)	07/30/14	(3)
Plaza Carolina — Fixed	7.50%			89,524		7,552		06/01/14
Plaza Carolina — Variable Swapped	7.63%	(11)		99,050		8,498		06/01/14
Port Charlotte Town Center	7.98%			50,423		4,680		12/11/10	(25)
Regency Plaza	5.50%	(24)		4,000	(4)	273		12/14/14	(3)
Richmond Towne Square	6.20%			43,957	(10)	3,572		10/10/12
SB Boardman Plaza Holdings	5.94%			22,916		1,682		07/01/14
SB Trolley Square Holding	9.03%			27,453		2,880		08/01/10
Secured Term Loan	0.93%	(1)		735,000		6,842	(2)	03/05/12	(3)
South Park Mall	8.00%			197,463	(37)	17,434		08/01/16
St. Charles Towne Plaza	5.50%	(24)		26,000	(4)	1,772		12/14/14	(3)
Stanford Shopping Center	2.38%	(1)		240,000		5,714	(2)	07/01/13	(3)
Summit Mall	5.42%			65,000		3,526	(2)	06/10/17
Sunland Park Mall	8.63%	(13)		32,835		3,773		01/01/26
Tacoma Mall	7.00%			120,426		10,778		10/01/11
Texas Lifestyle Centers Secured Loan	3.85%	(5)		260,000	(8)	10,009	(2)	09/23/13	(3)
Town Center at Cobb	5.74%			280,000		16,072	(2)	06/08/12
Towne West Square	6.99%			49,671	(20)	4,402		08/11/11
University Park Mall	1.08%	(1)		100,000	(32)	1,081	(2)	07/09/10	(3)
Upper Valley Mall	5.89%			47,640		3,406		07/01/14
Valle Vista Mall	5.35%			40,000		3,598	(2)	05/10/17
Walt Whitman Mall	8.00%			121,669	(37)	10,742		08/01/16
Washington Square	5.94%			29,777		2,194		07/01/14
Waterloo Premium Outlets	5.39%	(11)		72,822	(7)	3,923	(2)	07/10/13	(3)
West Ridge Mall	5.89%			68,392		4,885		07/01/14
West Ridge Plaza	5.50%	(24)		5,000	(4)	341		12/14/14	(3)
White Oaks Mall	5.54%			50,000		2,768	(2)	11/01/16
White Oaks Plaza	7.50%			14,766		1,312		10/10/19
Wolfchase Galleria	5.64%			225,000		12,700	(2)	04/01/17
Woodland Hills Mall	7.79%			96,941		8,414		04/05/19

Total Consolidated Secured Indebtedness			$	6,599,506

Table of Contents

MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name				Face Amount			Annual Debt Service

*Unsecured Indebtedness:*
Simon Property Group, LP:
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility — USD		0.61%	(15)	$	—		$	—	(2)	03/31/13
Revolving Credit Facility — Yen Currency		0.54%	(15)		238,950	(33)		1,290	(2)	03/31/13
Revolving Credit Facility — Euro Currency		0.83%	(15)		207,112	(34)		1,715	(2)	03/31/13
Unsecured Notes — 4C		7.38%			200,000			14,750	(14)	06/15/18
Unsecured Notes — 6B		7.75%			200,000			15,500	(14)	01/20/11
Unsecured Notes — 8A		6.35%			350,000			22,225	(14)	08/28/12
Unsecured Notes — 9A		4.88%			300,000			14,625	(14)	03/18/10
Unsecured Notes — 9B		5.45%			200,000			10,900	(14)	03/15/13
Unsecured Notes — 10B		4.90%			200,000			9,800	(14)	01/30/14
Unsecured Notes — 11A		4.88%			400,000			19,500	(14)	08/15/10
Unsecured Notes — 11B		5.63%			500,000			28,125	(14)	08/15/14
Unsecured Notes — 12 A		5.10%			600,000			30,600	(14)	06/15/15
Unsecured Notes — 12 B		4.60%			400,000			18,400	(14)	06/15/10
Unsecured Notes — 13 A		5.38%			500,000			26,875	(14)	06/01/11
Unsecured Notes — 13 B		5.75%			600,000			34,500	(14)	12/01/15
Unsecured Notes — 14 A		5.75%			400,000			23,000	(14)	05/01/12
Unsecured Notes — 14 B		6.10%			400,000			24,400	(14)	05/01/16
Unsecured Notes — 15 A		5.60%			600,000			33,600	(14)	09/01/11
Unsecured Notes — 15 B		5.88%			500,000			29,375	(14)	03/01/17
Unsecured Notes — 16 A		5.00%			600,000			30,000	(14)	03/01/12
Unsecured Notes — 16 B		5.25%			650,000			34,125	(14)	12/01/16
Unsecured Notes — 19A		5.30%			700,000			37,100	(14)	05/30/13
Unsecured Notes — 19B		6.13%			800,000			49,000	(14)	05/30/18
Unsecured Notes — 20A		10.35%			650,000			67,275	(14)	04/01/19
Unsecured Notes — 21A		6.75%			1,100,000			74,250	(14)	05/15/14

					11,296,062
The Retail Property Trust, subsidiary:
Unsecured Notes — CPI 4		7.18%			75,000			5,385	(14)	09/01/13
Unsecured Notes — CPI 5		7.88%			250,000			19,688	(14)	03/15/16

					325,000
CPG Partners, LP, subsidiary:
Unsecured Notes — CPG 5		8.25%			150,000			12,375	(14)	02/01/11
Unsecured Notes — CPG 6		6.88%			100,000			6,875	(14)	06/15/12
Unsecured Notes — CPG 7		6.00%			150,000			9,000	(14)	01/15/13

					400,000

	Total Consolidated Unsecured Indebtedness			$	12,021,062

	Total Consolidated Indebtedness at Face Amounts			$	18,620,568
	Net Premium on Indebtedness				47,530
	Net Discount on Indebtedness				(37,796	)

	Total Consolidated Indebtedness			$	18,630,302

	Our Share of Consolidated Indebtedness			$	18,354,130

Table of Contents

MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name			Face Amount			Annual Debt Service

*Joint Venture Indebtedness:*
*Secured Indebtedness:*
Ami Premium Outlets	2.09%		$	130,116	(26)	$	2,716	(2)	09/25/23
Apple Blossom Mall	7.99%			36,071			3,607		09/10/10
Arizona Mills	7.90%			132,072			12,728		10/05/10
Arkadia Shopping Center	4.68%	(31)		146,622			6,863	(2)	05/31/12
Arkadia Shopping Center — 2	6.73%	(31)		168,986			13,359		05/31/12
Arundel Marketplace	5.92%			11,394			884		01/01/14
Arundel Mills	6.14%			385,000			23,639	(2)	08/01/14
Atrium at Chestnut Hill	6.89%			43,821			3,880		03/11/11	(25)
Auburn Mall	7.99%			42,221			4,222		09/10/10
Aventura Mall	5.91%			430,000			25,392	(2)	12/11/17
Avenues, The	5.29%			71,286			5,325		04/01/13
Bay 1 (Torcy) — Fixed	4.15%	(31)		17,860			740	(2)	05/31/11
Bay 1 (Torcy) — Variable	1.40%	(31)		2,303			32	(2)	05/31/11
Bay 2 (Torcy) — Fixed	4.24%	(31)		66,031			2,797	(2)	06/30/11
Bay 2 (Torcy) — Variable	1.40%	(31)		9,195			129	(2)	06/30/11
Block at Orange	6.25%			220,000			13,753	(2)	10/01/14
Briarwood Mall	7.50%			119,726			10,641		11/30/16
Cape Cod Mall	6.80%			88,969			7,821		03/11/11
Circle Centre Mall	5.02%			71,378			5,165		04/11/13
Clay Terrace	5.08%			115,000			5,842	(2)	10/01/15
Cobblestone Court	1.23%	(1)		2,628			77		04/16/10
Coconut Point	5.83%			230,000			13,409	(2)	12/10/16
Coddingtown Mall	1.38%	(1)		15,500			214	(2)	07/14/10
Colorado Mills	2.01%	(18)		164,308			3,304	(2)	11/12/11
Concord Marketplace	5.76%			13,268			1,013		02/01/14
Concord Mills Mall	6.13%			163,990			13,208		12/07/12
Crystal Mall	5.62%			94,591			7,319		09/11/12	(25)
Dadeland Mall	6.75%			180,609			15,566		02/11/12	(25)
Del Amo	1.73%	(1)		335,000			5,799	(2)	01/23/13	(3)
Denver West Village	8.15%			21,826			2,153		10/01/11
Discover Mills — 1	7.32%			23,700			1,735	(2)	12/11/11
Discover Mills — 2	6.08%			135,000			8,212	(2)	12/11/11
Domain Residential Phase II	2.23%	(1)		31,561			704	(2)	07/22/13	(3)
Domain Residential Building P	2.23%	(1)		3,631			81	(2)	11/07/11	(3)
Domain Westin	2.18%	(1)		22,172			484	(2)	10/15/13	(3)
Dover Mall & Commons	2.18%	(29)		83,756	(35)		1,827	(2)	02/01/12	(3)
Eastland Mall	5.79%			168,000			9,734	(2)	06/01/16
Emerald Square Mall	5.13%			129,453			9,479		03/01/13
Empire Mall	5.79%			176,300			10,215	(2)	06/01/16
Esplanade, The	2.18%	(29)		75,136	(35)		1,639	(2)	02/01/12	(3)
Falls, The	7.50%			115,735			10,287		11/30/16
Fashion Centre Pentagon Retail	6.63%			149,341			12,838		09/11/11	(25)
Fashion Centre Pentagon Office	5.50%	(30)		40,000			2,200	(2)	10/01/12	(3)
Fashion Valley Mall	4.00%	(28)		350,000			14,000	(2)	10/09/13
Firewheel Residential	5.91%			22,949			1,356	(2)	11/20/16	(3)
Florida Mall, The	7.55%			243,081			22,766		12/10/10
Franklin Mills	5.65%			290,000			16,385	(2)	06/01/17
Gaitway Plaza	4.60%			13,900	(17)		640	(2)	07/01/15
Galleria at White Plains	2.18%	(29)		125,566	(35)		2,739	(2)	02/01/12	(3)
Galleria Commerciali Italia — Facility A	5.37%	(16)		333,880			23,699		12/22/11	(3)
Galleria Commerciali Italia — Facility B	5.85%	(16)		330,770			24,832		12/22/11
Galleria Commerciali Italia — Catania	1.43%	(16)		89,737			1,284	(2)	12/17/10
Galleria Commerciali Italia — Cinisello — Fixed	5.38%	(16)		107,064			7,382		03/31/15
Galleria Commerciali Italia — Cinisello — Variable	1.45%	(16)		74,535			1,823		03/31/15
Galleria Commerciali Italia — Giugliano A	4.77%	(16)		38,699			1,847	(2)	10/20/13
Galleria Commerciali Italia — Giugliano B	4.78%	(16)		36,314			2,692		10/20/13
Galleria Commerciali Italia — Giugliano C	5.19%	(16)		15,308			1,568		10/20/13
Granite Run Mall	5.83%			116,577			8,622		06/01/16

Table of Contents

MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name

Grapevine Mills	5.90%	(11)	270,000		15,937	(2)	09/22/14	(3)
Great Mall of the Bay Area	6.01%		270,000		16,227	(2)	08/28/15	(3)
Greendale Mall	6.00%		45,000		2,699	(2)	10/01/16
Gotemba Premium Outlets — Fixed	1.55%		67,448	(26)	11,147		10/25/14
Gotemba Premium Outlets — Variable	0.67%	(12)	8,046	(26)	1,203		05/31/12
Gurnee Mills	5.77%		321,000		18,512	(2)	07/01/17
Hamilton Town Center	1.83%	(1)	95,283		1,745	(2)	05/29/12	(3)
Highland Mall	6.83%		63,980		5,571		07/10/11
Hilltop Mall	4.99%		64,350		3,211	(2)	07/08/12
Houston Galleria — 1	5.44%		643,583		34,985	(2)	12/01/15
Houston Galleria — 2	5.44%		177,417		9,644	(2)	12/01/15
Indian River Commons	5.21%		9,625		637		11/01/14
Indian River Mall	5.21%		65,213		4,313		11/01/14
Katy Mills	6.69%		143,596		12,207		01/09/13
King of Prussia Mall — 1	7.49%		127,047		23,183		01/01/17
King of Prussia Mall — 2	8.53%		8,936		1,685		01/01/17
Kobe Sanda Premium Outlets — Fixed	1.49%		23,399	(26)	3,036		01/31/14
Kobe Sanda Premium Outlets — Variable	0.93%	(12)	53,781	(26)	6,744		01/31/14
Lakeforest Mall	4.90%		141,050		6,904	(2)	07/08/10
Lehigh Valley Mall	0.79%	(36)	150,000		1,186	(2)	08/09/10	(3)
Liberty Plaza	5.68%		43,000		2,442	(2)	06/01/17
Liberty Tree Mall	5.22%		35,000		1,827	(2)	10/11/13
Mall at Rockingham	5.61%		260,000		14,586	(2)	03/10/17
Mall at Tuttle Crossing	5.05%		114,578		7,774		11/05/13
Mall of New Hampshire	6.23%		134,814		10,079		10/05/15
Marley Station	4.89%		114,400		5,595	(2)	07/01/12
Meadowood Mall	1.10%	(27)	150,880		1,661	(2)	01/09/12
Mesa Mall	5.79%		87,250		5,055	(2)	06/01/16
Miami International Mall	5.35%		93,113		6,533		10/01/13
Mills Senior Loan Facility	1.48%	(1)	695,000		10,293	(2)	06/07/12	(3)
Net Leases I	7.96%		26,501		2,109	(2)	10/10/10
Net Leases II	9.35%		20,873		1,952	(2)	01/10/23
Northpark Mall — Mills	2.18%	(29)	105,543	(35)	2,302	(2)	02/01/12	(3)
Northshore Mall	5.03%		201,627		13,566		03/11/14	(25)
Ontario Mills	4.98%	(11)	175,000		8,718	(2)	12/05/13	(3)
Opry Mills	6.16%		280,000		17,248	(2)	10/10/14
Plaza at Buckland Hills, The	4.60%		24,800	(17)	1,142	(2)	07/01/15
Potomac Mills	5.83%		410,000		23,901	(2)	07/11/17
Quaker Bridge Mall	7.03%		18,767		2,407		04/01/16
Ridgewood Court	4.60%		14,650	(17)	674	(2)	07/01/15
Rinku Premium Outlets	1.84%		31,390	(26)	7,291		11/25/14
Rushmore Mall	5.79%		94,000		5,446	(2)	06/01/16
Sano Premium Outlets	0.56%	(12)	48,641	(26)	18,146		05/31/18
Sawgrass Mills	5.82%		820,000		47,724	(2)	07/01/14
Seminole Towne Center	3.23%	(22)	69,140		4,871		08/09/11	(3)
Sendai Premium Outlets	0.52%	(12)	37,083	(26)	4,120		10/31/18
Shops at Riverside, The	1.03%	(1)	138,000		1,423	(2)	11/14/11	(3)
Shops at Sunset Place, The	2.42%	(21)	80,848		4,692		05/09/10	(3)
Smith Haven Mall	5.16%		180,000		9,283	(2)	03/01/16
Solomon Pond	3.97%		107,182		6,505		08/01/13
Source, The	6.65%		124,000		8,246	(2)	09/30/10
Southdale Center	5.18%		186,550		9,671	(2)	04/01/10
Southern Hills Mall	5.79%		101,500		5,881	(2)	06/01/16
SouthPark Residential	1.63%	(1)	41,146		1,126		02/28/10	(3)
Southridge Mall	5.23%		124,000		6,489	(2)	04/01/12

Table of Contents

MORTGAGE AND OTHER DEBT ON PORTFOLIO PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

Property Name				Face Amount

Springfield Mall		1.33%	(1)		72,300		962	(2)	12/01/10	(3)
Square One		6.73%			85,957		7,380		03/11/12
St. Johns Town Center		5.06%			170,000		8,602	(2)	03/11/15
St. John's Town Center Phase II		5.50%	(11)		77,500		4,266	(2)	05/10/15	(3)
St. Louis Mills		6.39%			90,000		5,751	(2)	01/08/12
Stoneridge Shopping Center		7.50%			228,659		19,214		11/30/16
Toki Premium Outlets — Fixed		1.80%			9,108	(26)	2,560		10/31/11
Tosu Premium Outlets — Fixed		1.50%			7,603	(26)	2,149		08/24/13
Tosu Premium Outlets — Variable		0.67%	(12)		10,409	(26)	3,539		01/31/12
Valley Mall		5.83%			45,340		3,357		06/01/16
Villabe A6 — Bel'Est — Fixed		6.16%	(31)		10,013		616	(2)	08/31/11
Villabe A6 — Bel'Est — Variable		1.40%	(31)		2,557		36	(2)	08/31/11
Village Park Plaza		4.60%			29,850	(17)	1,374	(2)	07/01/15
West Town Corners		4.60%			18,800	(17)	865	(2)	07/01/15
West Town Mall		6.34%			210,000		13,309	(2)	12/01/17
Westchester, The		4.86%			500,000		24,300	(2)	06/01/10
Whitehall Mall		7.00%			12,029		1,149		11/01/18
Wilenska Station Shopping Center — Fixed		5.05%	(31)		26,781		1,351	(2)	08/31/11
Wilenska Station Shopping Center — Variable		2.23%	(31)		16,125		360	(2)	08/31/11

	Total Joint Venture Secured Indebtedness at Face Amounts			$	16,432,997
*Unsecured Indebtedness:*
TMLP Trust Preferred Unsecured Securities		7.38%			100,000		7,375	(2)	03/30/36	(19)

Total Joint Venture Unsecured Indebtedness					100,000
	Net Premium on Indebtedness				17,872
	Net Discount on Indebtedness				(1,593	)
	Total Joint Venture Indebtedness			$	16,549,276

	Our Share of Joint Venture Indebtedness			$	6,552,370	(23)

(Footnotes on following page)

Table of Contents

(Footnotes for preceding pages)

(1): Variable rate loans based on LIBOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 56 bps to 450 bps. LIBOR as of December 31, 2009 was 0.23%.
(2): Requires monthly payment of interest only.
(3): Includes applicable extension available at the Operating Partnership's option.
(4): Loans secured by these three Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.
(5): We have executed a swap agreement that fixes the interest rate on $200 million of this loan at 4.35%.
(6): Loans secured by these Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted. Factory Stores of America includes Boaz, Georgetown, Graceville, Lebanon, Nebraska City and Story City.
(7): Loans secured by these three Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.
(8): Loan is secured by The Domain Shopping Center, Palms Crossing, and Shops at Arbor Walk and is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.
(9): Loans secured by these three Properties are cross-collateralized.
(10): Loans secured by these four Properties are cross-collateralized.
(11): Associated with these loans are interest rate swap agreements that effectively fix the interest rate of the loans at the all-in rate presented.
(12): Variable rate loans based on Yen LIBOR plus interest rate spreads ranging from 35 bps to 187.5 bps. Yen LIBOR as of December 31, 2009 was 0.1650%.
(13): Lender also participates in a percentage of certain gross receipts above a specified base. This threshold was met and additional interest was paid in 2009.
(14): Requires semi-annual payments of interest only.
(15): On December 8, 2009, we entered into a new unsecured revolving corporate credit facility providing an initial borrowing capacity of $3.565 billion. The new facility contains an accordian feature up to $4.0 billion and will mature on March 31, 2013. The base interest on the credit facility is LIBOR plus 210 basis points. The balance as of December 31, 2009 reflects interest at LIBOR plus 37.5 basis points as the borrowings on the new facility were not drawn until January 5, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, $3.1 billion was available after outstanding borrowings and letter of credits.
(16): Amounts shown in USD equivalent. Euro equivalent is 716.0 million. Associated with these loans are interest rate swap agreements with a total combined Euro 601.4 million notional amount that effectively fixes Facility A and B, Giugliano, and a portion of Cinisello at 5.50%.
(17): Loans secured by these five Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.
(18): LIBOR + 1.780%, with LIBOR capped at 4.000%.
(19): Redeemable beginning 3/30/11, pricing re-sets every 5 years based on an index of LIBOR + 2.375%.
(20): Loans secured by these four Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.
(21): Interest rate spread uses weighted average spread payable on the loan. As of 12/31/09, the spread was 2.189%, with LIBOR capped at 7.50%.
(22): LIBOR + 3.000%, with LIBOR capped at 8.500%.
(23): Our share of indebtedness for joint ventures excludes our share of indebtedness of $145.9 million in joint venture entities in which Gallerie Commerciali Italia holds a non-controlling interest.
(24): Through an interest rate floor agreement, the LIBOR rate is currently fixed at 1.50%.
(25): The maturity date shown represents the Anticipated Maturity Date of the loan which is typically 10-20 years earlier than the stated Maturity Date of the loan. Should the loan not be repaid at the Anticipated Repayment Date the applicable interest rate shall increase as specified in the loan agreement.
(26): Amounts shown in US Dollar Equivalent. Yen equivalent 39,382.5 million
(27): LIBOR + 0.870%, with LIBOR capped at 4.000%.
(28): Through an interest rate floor agreement, the LIBOR rate is currently fixed at 1.00%.
(29): LIBOR + 1.950%, with LIBOR capped at 6.00%.
(30): LIBOR + 4.500%, with LIBOR capped at 8.250%. Through an interest rate floor agreement, the LIBOR rate is currently fixed at 1.50%.

Table of Contents

(31): Amounts shown in USD equivalent. Euro equivalent is 325.5 million. Associated with these loans are interest rate swap agreements with a total combined Euro 304.4 million notional amount that effectively fixed these loans at a combined 5.44%.
(32): Loan was paid off after 12/31/09.
(33): Amounts shown in US Dollar Equivalent. Balances include borrowings on multi-currency tranche of Yen 22,125.0 million.
(34): Amounts shown in US Dollar Equivalent. Balances include borrowings on multi-currency tranche of Euro 144.5 million.
(35): Loans secured by these four Properties are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.
(36): LIBOR + 0.560%, with LIBOR capped at 7.00%.
(37): Loans secured by these three Properties are cross-collateralized.

The changes in consolidated mortgages and other indebtedness for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 are as follows:

			2009			2008			2007

Balance, Beginning of Year			$	18,042,532		$	17,218,674		$	15,394,489
	Additions during period:
		New Loan Originations		2,073,874			1,833,677			3,362,732
		Loans assumed in acquisitions and consolidations		—			—			399,545
		Net Premium		3,162			(7,192	)		(1,669	)
	Deductions during period:
		Loan Retirements		(1,427,858	)		(930,818	)		(1,862,145	)
		Amortization of Net Premiums		(10,627	)		(14,611	)		(13,661	)
		Scheduled Principal Amortization		(50,781	)		(57,198	)		(60,617	)

Balance, End of Year			$	18,630,302		$	18,042,532		$	17,218,674

Table of Contents

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that such litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Table of Contents

Part II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "SPG". The quarterly price range for the shares and the distributions declared per share for each quarter in the last two fiscal years are shown below:

	High		Low		Close		Declared Dividends

2008
1^st Quarter	$	96.67	$	74.80	$	92.91	$	0.90
2^nd Quarter		106.11		89.24		89.89		0.90
3^rd Quarter		106.43		79.93		97.00		0.90
4^th Quarter		95.97		33.78		53.13		0.90
2009
1^st Quarter	$	54.24	$	24.27	$	34.64	$	0.90
2^nd Quarter		57.45		32.56		51.43		0.60
3^rd Quarter		76.05		45.00		69.43		0.60
4^th Quarter		83.82		64.20		79.80		0.60

There is no established public trading market for Simon Property's Class B common stock. Distributions per share of the Class B common stock are identical to the common stock.

Holders

The number of holders of record of common stock outstanding was 2,061 as of December 31, 2009. The Class B common stock is held entirely by a voting trust to which the Estate of Melvin Simon, Herbert Simon, David Simon and certain of their affiliates are parties and is exchangeable on a one-for-one basis into shares of common stock.

Dividends

We are required to pay a minimum level of dividends to maintain our status as a REIT. Our dividends typically exceed our net income generated in any given year primarily because of depreciation, which is a "non-cash" expense. Our future dividends will be determined by the Board of Directors based on actual results of operations, cash available for dividends and limited partner distributions, and what may be required to maintain our status as a REIT.

Dividends during 2009 aggregated $2.70 per share and were paid part in stock and part in cash, subject to stockholder election. Dividends during 2008 aggregated $3.60 and were paid entirely in cash. On February 2, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.60 per share, payable all in cash.

We offer an Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan that allows stockholders to acquire additional shares by automatically reinvesting cash dividends. Shares are acquired pursuant to the plan at a price equal to the prevailing market price of such shares, without payment of any brokerage commission or service charge.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

During the fourth quarter of 2009, we issued 416,265 shares of common stock to limited partners in exchange for an equal number of units. The issuance of the shares of common stock was made pursuant to the terms of the Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership and was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, in reliance upon Section 4(2).

Issuances Under Equity Compensation Plans

For information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans, see Item 12 of this report.

Table of Contents

Temporary Equity

During 2009, holders of our Series I preferred stock were not eligible to convert their shares into shares of our common stock as the triggering price of $75.34 was not met. As of December 31, 2009, the conversion trigger price of $74.18 had been met and each share of Series I preferred stock is convertible into 0.847495 of a share of common stock through March 31, 2010.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Selected Financial Data section of our 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders filed as Exhibit 13.1 to this Form 10-K.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of our 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders filed as Exhibit 13.1 to this Form 10-K.

Item 7A. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements contained in Item 15.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with participation of management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2009.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our management's report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth in our 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders filed as Exhibit 13.1 to this Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

During the fourth quarter of the year covered by this report, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors approved certain non-audit tax compliance services to be provided by Ernst & Young, LLP, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. This disclosure is made pursuant to Section 10A(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Table of Contents

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 2010 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A and the information included under the caption "Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Part I hereof.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules



(1)	Consolidated Financial Statements
	Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries' consolidated financial statements and independent registered public accounting firm's reports are included in our 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders, filed as Exhibit 13.1 to this Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.	66
(2)	Financial Statement Schedule
	Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries Schedule III — Schedule of Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation	55
	Notes to Schedule III	62
(3)	Exhibits
	The Exhibit Index attached hereto is hereby incorporated by reference to this Item. The following exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.	63

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.
	By	/s/ DAVID SIMON David Simon Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
February 25, 2010

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated

Signature	Capacity	Date


/s/ DAVID SIMON David Simon	Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	February 25, 2010
/s/ HERBERT SIMON Herbert Simon	Chairman Emeritus and Director	February 25, 2010
/s/ RICHARD S. SOKOLOV Richard S. Sokolov	President, Chief Operating Officer and Director	February 25, 2010
/s/ MELVYN E. BERGSTEIN Melvyn E. Bergstein	Director	February 25, 2010
/s/ LINDA WALKER BYNOE Linda Walker Bynoe	Director	February 25, 2010
/s/ REUBEN S. LEIBOWITZ Reuben S. Leibowitz	Director	February 25, 2010
/s/ J. ALBERT SMITH, JR. J. Albert Smith, Jr.	Director	February 25, 2010
/s/ KAREN N. HORN Karen N. Horn	Director	February 25, 2010

Table of Contents

Signature	Capacity	Date


/s/ ALLAN HUBBARD Allan Hubbard	Director	February 25, 2010
/s/ DANIEL C. SMITH Daniel C. Smith	Director	February 25, 2010
/s/ STEPHEN E. STERRETT Stephen E. Sterrett	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	February 25, 2010
/s/ STEVEN K. BROADWATER Steven K. Broadwater	Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)	February 25, 2010

SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

			Initial Cost (Note 3)				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (Note 3)				Gross Amounts At Which Carried At Close of Period

Name, Location	Encumbrances		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total (1)		Accumulated Depreciation (2)		Date of Construction
*Regional Malls*
Anderson Mall, Anderson, SC	$	27,270	$	1,712	$	15,227	$	1,363	$	20,347	$	3,075	$	35,574	$	38,649	$	13,198	1972
Arsenal Mall, Watertown, MA		974		15,505		47,680		—		9,603		15,505		57,283		72,788		16,281	1999 (Note 4)
Bangor Mall, Bangor, ME		80,000		5,478		59,740		—		8,439		5,478		68,179		73,657		19,068	2004 (Note 5)
Barton Creek Square, Austin, TX		—		2,903		20,929		7,983		60,813		10,886		81,742		92,628		40,201	1981
Battlefield Mall, Springfield, MO		92,749		3,919		27,231		3,000		61,932		6,919		89,163		96,082		48,410	1970
Bay Park Square, Green Bay, WI		—		6,358		25,623		4,133		23,301		10,491		48,924		59,415		19,918	1980
Bowie Town Center, Bowie, MD		—		2,710		65,044		235		5,022		2,945		70,066		73,011		22,804	2001
Boynton Beach Mall, Boynton Beach, FL		—		22,240		78,804		4,666		25,329		26,906		104,133		131,039		36,361	1985
Brea Mall, Brea, CA		—		39,500		209,202		—		24,419		39,500		233,621		273,121		75,793	1998 (Note 4)
Broadway Square, Tyler, TX		—		11,470		32,431		—		21,888		11,470		54,319		65,789		21,642	1994 (Note 4)
Brunswick Square, East Brunswick, NJ		82,244		8,436		55,838		—		27,888		8,436		83,726		92,162		34,463	1973
Burlington Mall, Burlington, MA		—		46,600		303,618		19,600		89,107		66,200		392,725		458,925		109,314	1998 (Note 4)
Castleton Square, Indianapolis, IN		—		26,250		98,287		7,434		70,202		33,684		168,489		202,173		57,429	1972
Century III Mall, West Mifflin, PA		80,498		17,380		102,364		10		8,379		17,390		110,743		128,133		67,765	1979
Charlottesville Fashion Square, Charlottesville, VA		—		—		54,738		—		13,767		—		68,505		68,505		24,847	1997 (Note 4)
Chautauqua Mall, Lakewood, NY		—		3,257		9,641		—		16,238		3,257		25,879		29,136		12,020	1971
Chesapeake Square, Chesapeake, VA		69,852		11,534		70,461		—		7,652		11,534		78,113		89,647		38,695	1989
Cielo Vista Mall, El Paso, TX		—		1,005		15,262		608		43,751		1,613		59,013		60,626		32,839	1974
College Mall, Bloomington, IN		—		1,003		16,245		720		43,466		1,723		59,711		61,434		27,524	1965
Columbia Center, Kennewick, WA		—		17,441		66,580		—		21,593		17,441		88,173		105,614		31,141	1987
Copley Place, Boston, MA		200,000		—		378,045		—		82,083		—		460,128		460,128		100,206	2002 (Note 4)
Coral Square, Coral Springs, FL		81,666		13,556		93,630		—		14,346		13,556		107,976		121,532		49,864	1984
Cordova Mall, Pensacola, FL		—		18,626		73,091		7,321		43,912		25,947		117,003		142,950		32,959	1998 (Note 4)
Cottonwood Mall, Albuquerque, NM		—		10,122		69,958		—		3,528		10,122		73,486		83,608		33,010	1996
Crossroads Mall, Omaha, NE		40,616		639		30,658		409		35,857		1,048		66,515		67,563		28,955	1994 (Note 4)
Crystal River Mall, Crystal River, FL		14,677		5,393		20,241		—		4,718		5,393		24,959		30,352		9,701	1990
DeSoto Square, Bradenton, FL		63,800		9,011		52,675		—		8,036		9,011		60,711		69,722		24,080	1973
Domain, The, Austin, TX (Note 6)		—		45,152		197,010		—		116,395		45,152		313,405		358,557		23,272	2005
Edison Mall, Fort Myers, FL		—		11,529		107,350		—		28,453		11,529		135,803		147,332		44,774	1997 (Note 4)
Fashion Mall at Keystone, The, Indianapolis, IN		—		—		120,579		—		47,063		—		167,642		167,642		55,893	1997 (Note 4)
Firewheel Town Center, Garland, TX		—		8,636		82,716		—		24,714		8,636		107,430		116,066		19,242	2004
Forest Mall, Fond Du Lac, WI		16,190		721		4,491		—		8,795		721		13,286		14,007		7,628	1973
Forum Shops at Caesars, The, Las Vegas, NV		515,335		—		276,567		—		205,817		—		482,384		482,384		125,792	1992

SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

			Initial Cost (Note 3)				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (Note 3)				Gross Amounts At Which Carried At Close of Period

Name, Location	Encumbrances		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total (1)		Accumulated Depreciation (2)		Date of Construction
Great Lakes Mall, Mentor, OH		—		12,302		100,362		—		10,449		12,302		110,811		123,113		43,963	1961
Greenwood Park Mall, Greenwood, IN		79,756		2,423		23,445		5,253		114,940		7,676		138,385		146,061		48,964	1979
Gulf View Square, Port Richey, FL		—		13,690		39,991		2,023		19,354		15,713		59,345		75,058		24,168	1980
Gwinnett Place, Duluth, GA		115,000		17,051		141,191		—		4,527		17,051		145,718		162,769		44,560	1998 (Note 5)
Haywood Mall, Greenville, SC		—		11,585		133,893		6		19,228		11,591		153,121		164,712		62,123	1998 (Note 4)
Independence Center, Independence, MO		200,000		5,042		45,798		—		30,779		5,042		76,577		81,619		32,121	1994 (Note 4)
Ingram Park Mall, San Antonio, TX		75,883		733		17,163		73		20,283		806		37,446		38,252		20,984	1979
Irving Mall, Irving, TX		—		6,737		17,479		2,533		41,844		9,270		59,323		68,593		33,697	1971
Jefferson Valley Mall, Yorktown Heights, NY		—		4,868		30,304		—		24,248		4,868		54,552		59,420		28,382	1983
Knoxville Center, Knoxville, TN		57,464		5,006		21,617		3,712		34,521		8,718		56,138		64,856		28,459	1984
La Plaza Mall, McAllen, TX		—		1,375		9,828		6,569		37,748		7,944		47,576		55,520		22,371	1976
Laguna Hills Mall, Laguna Hills, CA		—		27,928		55,446		—		15,975		27,928		71,421		99,349		23,937	1997 (Note 4)
Lakeline Mall, Austin, TX		—		10,088		81,568		14		15,965		10,102		97,533		107,635		37,558	1995
Lenox Square, Atlanta, GA		—		38,058		492,411		—		59,056		38,058		551,467		589,525		172,284	1998 (Note 4)
Lima Mall, Lima, OH		—		7,662		35,338		—		10,124		7,662		45,462		53,124		20,174	1965
Lincolnwood Town Center, Lincolnwood, IL		—		7,907		63,480		28		7,077		7,935		70,557		78,492		36,846	1990
Livingston Mall, Livingston, NJ		—		22,214		105,250		—		37,483		22,214		142,733		164,947		41,050	1998 (Note 4)
Longview Mall, Longview, TX		30,300		259		3,567		124		8,013		383		11,580		11,963		5,866	1978
Mall of Georgia, Mill Creek, GA		181,606		47,492		326,633		—		3,762		47,492		330,395		377,887		77,040	1999 (Note 5)
Maplewood Mall, Minneapolis, MN		—		17,119		80,758		—		12,635		17,119		93,393		110,512		24,107	2002 (Note 4)
Markland Mall, Kokomo, IN		21,436		—		7,568		—		10,262		—		17,830		17,830		9,718	1968
McCain Mall, N. Little Rock, AR		—		—		9,515		10,530		10,723		10,530		20,238		30,768		14,382	1973
Melbourne Square, Melbourne, FL		—		15,762		55,891		4,160		27,756		19,922		83,647		103,569		28,680	1982
Menlo Park Mall, Edison, NJ		—		65,684		223,252		—		34,457		65,684		257,709		323,393		92,976	1997 (Note 4)
Midland Park Mall, Midland, TX		31,295		687		9,213		—		15,004		687		24,217		24,904		13,526	1980
Miller Hill Mall, Duluth, MN		—		2,965		18,092		—		28,217		2,965		46,309		49,274		29,333	1973
Montgomery Mall, Montgomeryville, PA		87,806		27,105		86,915		—		26,558		27,105		113,473		140,578		25,593	2004 (Note 5)
Muncie Mall, Muncie, IN		—		172		5,776		52		26,863		224		32,639		32,863		16,533	1970
North East Mall, Hurst, TX		—		128		12,966		19,010		148,955		19,138		161,921		181,059		65,948	1971
Northfield Square, Bourbonnais, IL		28,344		362		53,396		—		1,479		362		54,875		55,237		32,484	2004 (Note 5)
Northgate Mall, Seattle, WA		—		24,369		115,992		—		93,772		24,369		209,764		234,133		59,203	1987
Northlake Mall, Atlanta, GA		66,291		33,400		98,035		—		4,111		33,400		102,146		135,546		51,225	1998 (Note 4)
Northwoods Mall, Peoria, IL		—		1,185		12,779		2,372		36,238		3,557		49,017		52,574		27,409	1983
Oak Court Mall, Memphis, TN		—		15,673		57,304		—		8,822		15,673		66,126		81,799		24,864	1997 (Note 4)
Ocean County Mall, Toms River, NJ		—		20,404		124,945		—		24,044		20,404		148,989		169,393		46,941	1998 (Note 4)

SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

			Initial Cost (Note 3)				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (Note 3)				Gross Amounts At Which Carried At Close of Period

Name, Location	Encumbrances		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total (1)		Accumulated Depreciation (2)		Date of Construction
Orange Park Mall, Orange Park, FL		—		12,998		65,121		—		39,766		12,998		104,887		117,885		41,154	1994 (Note 4)
Orland Square, Orland Park, IL		—		35,514		129,906		—		21,862		35,514		151,768		187,282		55,391	1997 (Note 4)
Oxford Valley Mall, Langhorne, PA		71,974		24,544		100,287		—		8,156		24,544		108,443		132,987		49,372	2003 (Note 4)
Paddock Mall, Ocala, FL		—		11,198		39,727		—		16,347		11,198		56,074		67,272		18,705	1980
Penn Square Mall, Oklahoma City, OK		99,422		2,043		155,958		—		28,419		2,043		184,377		186,420		61,042	2002 (Note 4)
Pheasant Lane Mall, Nashua, NH		—		3,902		155,068		550		15,596		4,452		170,664		175,116		52,805	2004 (Note 5)
Phipps Plaza, Atlanta, GA		—		16,725		210,610		—		21,311		16,725		231,921		248,646		76,724	1998 (Note 4)
Plaza Carolina, Carolina, PR		188,573		15,493		279,560		—		20,990		15,493		300,550		316,043		55,466	2004 (Note 4)
Port Charlotte Town Center, Port Charlotte, FL		50,423		5,471		58,570		—		15,056		5,471		73,626		79,097		31,207	1989
Prien Lake Mall, Lake Charles, LA		—		1,842		2,813		3,091		37,464		4,933		40,277		45,210		19,256	1972
Richmond Town Square, Richmond Heights, OH		43,957		2,600		12,112		—		60,116		2,600		72,228		74,828		43,911	1966
River Oaks Center, Calumet City, IL		—		30,884		101,224		—		10,742		30,884		111,966		142,850		40,239	1997 (Note 4)
Rockaway Townsquare, Rockaway, NJ		—		44,116		212,257		27		33,088		44,143		245,345		289,488		74,755	1998 (Note 4)
Rolling Oaks Mall, San Antonio, TX		—		1,929		38,609		—		13,905		1,929		52,514		54,443		26,140	1988
Roosevelt Field, Garden City, NY		—		163,721		702,008		—		33,311		163,721		735,319		899,040		234,922	1998 (Note 4)
Ross Park Mall, Pittsburgh, PA		—		23,541		90,203		—		72,422		23,541		162,625		186,166		59,406	1986
Santa Rosa Plaza, Santa Rosa, CA		—		10,400		87,864		—		10,681		10,400		98,545		108,945		32,612	1998 (Note 4)
Shops at Mission Viejo, The, Mission Viejo, CA		—		9,139		54,445		7,491		146,869		16,630		201,314		217,944		81,183	1979
South Hills Village, Pittsburgh, PA		—		23,445		125,840		—		16,649		23,445		142,489		165,934		50,152	1997 (Note 4)
South Shore Plaza, Braintree, MA		—		101,200		301,495		—		127,313		101,200		428,808		530,008		104,593	1998 (Note 4)
Southern Park Mall, Boardman, OH		—		16,982		77,767		97		23,597		17,079		101,364		118,443		41,451	1970
SouthPark, Charlotte, NC		197,463		42,092		188,055		100		164,585		42,192		352,640		394,832		91,062	2002 (Note 4)
St. Charles Towne Center, Waldorf, MD		—		7,710		52,934		1,180		26,150		8,890		79,084		87,974		37,402	1990
Stanford Shopping Center, Palo Alto, CA		240,000		—		339,537		—		4,730		—		344,267		344,267		69,994	2003 (Note 4)
Summit Mall, Akron, OH		65,000		15,374		51,137		—		39,624		15,374		90,761		106,135		30,368	1965
Sunland Park Mall, El Paso, TX		32,836		2,896		28,900		—		7,456		2,896		36,356		39,252		21,221	1988
Tacoma Mall, Tacoma, WA		120,426		37,803		125,826		—		75,878		37,803		201,704		239,507		62,843	1987
Tippecanoe Mall, Lafayette, IN		—		2,897		8,439		5,517		43,537		8,414		51,976		60,390		32,830	1973
Town Center at Aurora, Aurora, CO		—		9,959		56,832		6		56,934		9,965		113,766		123,731		39,427	1998 (Note 4)
Town Center at Boca Raton, Boca Raton, FL		—		64,200		307,317		—		149,623		64,200		456,940		521,140		137,639	1998 (Note 4)
Town Center at Cobb, Kennesaw, GA		280,000		32,585		158,225		—		12,644		32,585		170,869		203,454		50,106	1998 (Note 5)
Towne East Square, Wichita, KS		—		8,525		18,479		1,429		38,802		9,954		57,281		67,235		31,582	1975

SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

			Initial Cost (Note 3)				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (Note 3)				Gross Amounts At Which Carried At Close of Period

Name, Location	Encumbrances		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total (1)		Accumulated Depreciation (2)		Date of Construction
Towne West Square, Wichita, KS		49,672		972		21,203		61		12,084		1,033		33,287		34,320		19,037	1980
Treasure Coast Square, Jensen Beach, FL		—		11,124		72,990		3,067		34,044		14,191		107,034		121,225		39,848	1987
Tyrone Square, St. Petersburg, FL		—		15,638		120,962		—		28,321		15,638		149,283		164,921		56,840	1972
University Park Mall, Mishawaka, IN		100,000		16,768		112,158		7,000		47,817		23,768		159,975		183,743		88,505	1996 (Note 4)
Upper Valley Mall, Springfield, OH		47,639		8,421		38,745		—		10,016		8,421		48,761		57,182		18,095	1979
Valle Vista Mall, Harlingen, TX		40,000		1,398		17,159		329		20,017		1,727		37,176		38,903		19,229	1983
Virginia Center Commons, Glen Allen, VA		—		9,764		50,547		4,149		9,268		13,913		59,815		73,728		26,452	1991
Walt Whitman Mall, Huntington Station, NY		121,669		51,700		111,258		3,789		42,377		55,489		153,635		209,124		60,850	1998 (Note 4)
Washington Square, Indianapolis, IN		29,777		6,319		36,495		—		12,457		6,319		48,952		55,271		41,451	1974
West Ridge Mall, Topeka, KS		68,392		5,453		34,132		1,168		23,410		6,621		57,542		64,163		24,866	1988
Westminster Mall, Westminster, CA		—		43,464		84,709		—		31,920		43,464		116,629		160,093		35,785	1998 (Note 4)
White Oaks Mall, Springfield, IL		50,000		3,024		35,692		2,102		38,441		5,126		74,133		79,259		29,573	1977
Wolfchase Galleria, Memphis, TN		225,000		15,881		128,276		—		9,068		15,881		137,344		153,225		50,573	2002 (Note 4)
Woodland Hills Mall, Tulsa, OK		96,941		34,211		187,123		—		13,024		34,211		200,147		234,358		59,463	2004 (Note 5)
*Premium Outlet Centers*
Albertville Premium Outlets, Albertville, MN		—		3,900		97,059		—		3,575		3,900		100,634		104,534		24,398	2004 (Note 4)
Allen Premium Outlets, Allen, TX		—		13,855		43,687		97		18,356		13,952		62,043		75,995		15,159	2004 (Note 4)
Aurora Farms Premium Outlets, Aurora, OH		—		2,370		24,326		—		1,919		2,370		26,245		28,615		12,948	2004 (Note 4)
Camarillo Premium Outlets, Camarillo, CA		—		16,670		224,721		558		61,998		17,228		286,719		303,947		46,488	2004 (Note 4)
Carlsbad Premium Outlets, Carlsbad, CA		—		12,890		184,990		96		1,954		12,986		186,944		199,930		34,025	2004 (Note 4)
Carolina Premium Outlets, Smithfield, NC		19,385		3,170		59,863		—		2,115		3,170		61,978		65,148		17,766	2004 (Note 4)
Chicago Premium Outlets, Aurora, IL		—		659		118,005		2,951		8,366		3,610		126,371		129,981		30,748	2004 (Note 4)
Cincinnati Premium Outlets, Monroe, OH		—		14,117		71,520		—		—		14,117		71,520		85,637		1,496	2008
Clinton Crossing Premium Outlets, Clinton, CT		—		2,060		107,556		1,125		1,646		3,185		109,202		112,387		24,068	2004 (Note 4)
Columbia Gorge Premium Outlets, Troutdale, OR		—		7,900		16,492		—		2,207		7,900		18,699		26,599		7,212	2004 (Note 4)
Desert Hills Premium Outlets, Cabazon, CA		—		3,440		338,679		—		3,481		3,440		342,160		345,600		58,991	2004 (Note 4)
Edinburgh Premium Outlets, Edinburgh, IN		—		2,857		47,309		—		10,939		2,857		58,248		61,105		16,078	2004 (Note 4)
Folsom Premium Outlets, Folsom, CA		—		9,060		50,281		—		3,058		9,060		53,339		62,399		15,888	2004 (Note 4)
Gilroy Premium Outlets, Gilroy, CA		—		9,630		194,122		—		6,634		9,630		200,756		210,386		43,334	2004 (Note 4)
Houston Premium Outlets, Cypress, TX		—		21,159		69,350		—		29,801		21,159		99,151		120,310		7,483	2007
Jackson Premium Outlets, Jackson, NJ		—		6,413		104,013		3		3,318		6,416		107,331		113,747		19,936	2004 (Note 4)
Jersey Shore Premium Outlets, Tinton Falls, NJ		—		16,141		50,979		—		74,921		16,141		125,900		142,041		6,810	2007
Johnson Creek Premium Outlets, Johnson Creek, WI		—		2,800		39,546		—		5,407		2,800		44,953		47,753		8,905	2004 (Note 4)
Kittery Premium Outlets, Kittery, ME		43,556		11,832		94,994		—		5,516		11,832		100,510		112,342		15,376	2004 (Note 4)
Las Americas Premium Outlets, San Diego, CA		180,000		45,168		251,878		—		1,992		45,168		253,870		299,038		17,528	2007 (Note 4)
Las Vegas Outlet Center, Las Vegas, NV		—		13,085		160,777		—		4,875		13,085		165,652		178,737		26,104	2004 (Note 4)
Las Vegas Premium Outlets, Las Vegas, NV		—		25,435		134,973		—		60,663		25,435		195,636		221,071		35,631	2004 (Note 4)

SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

			Initial Cost (Note 3)				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (Note 3)				Gross Amounts At Which Carried At Close of Period

Name, Location	Encumbrances		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total (1)		Accumulated Depreciation (2)		Date of Construction
Leesburg Corner Premium Outlets, Leesburg, VA		—		7,190		162,023		—		2,860		7,190		164,883		172,073		37,929	2004 (Note 4)
Liberty Village Premium Outlets, Flemington, NJ		—		5,670		28,904		—		1,724		5,670		30,628		36,298		10,929	2004 (Note 4)
Lighthouse Place Premium Outlets, Michigan City, IN		88,623		6,630		94,138		—		4,170		6,630		98,308		104,938		27,212	2004 (Note 4)
Napa Premium Outlets, Napa, CA		—		11,400		45,023		—		1,401		11,400		46,424		57,824		11,295	2004 (Note 4)
North Georgia Premium Outlets, Dawsonville, GA		—		4,300		132,325		—		1,859		4,300		134,184		138,484		30,053	2004 (Note 4)
Orlando Premium Outlets, Orlando, FL		—		14,040		304,410		15,855		46,533		29,895		350,943		380,838		54,490	2004 (Note 4)
Osage Beach Premium Outlets, Osage Beach, MO		—		9,460		85,804		3		3,301		9,463		89,105		98,568		21,963	2004 (Note 4)
Petaluma Village Premium Outlets, Petaluma, CA		—		13,322		14,067		—		305		13,322		14,372		27,694		6,798	2004 (Note 4)
Philadelphia Premium Outlets, Limerick, PA		190,000		16,676		105,249		—		15,749		16,676		120,998		137,674		13,119	2006
Rio Grande Valley Premium Outlets, Mercedes, TX		—		12,229		41,547		—		36,143		12,229		77,690		89,919		11,223	2005
Round Rock Premium Outlets, Round Rock, TX		—		21,977		82,252		—		2,806		21,977		85,058		107,035		15,859	2005
Seattle Premium Outlets, Seattle, WA		—		—		103,722		—		16,902		—		120,624		120,624		21,945	2004 (Note 4)
St. Augustine Premium Outlets, St. Augustine, FL		—		6,090		57,670		2		6,959		6,092		64,629		70,721		17,160	2004 (Note 4)
The Crossings Premium Outlets, Tannersville, PA		52,505		7,720		172,931		—		9,530		7,720		182,461		190,181		34,238	2004 (Note 4)
Vacaville Premium Outlets, Vacaville, CA		—		9,420		84,850		—		6,712		9,420		91,562		100,982		24,908	2004 (Note 4)
Waikele Premium Outlets, Waipahu, HI		—		22,630		77,316		—		1,820		22,630		79,136		101,766		19,046	2004 (Note 4)
Waterloo Premium Outlets, Waterloo, NY		72,822		3,230		75,277		—		5,759		3,230		81,036		84,266		21,307	2004 (Note 4)
Woodbury Common Premium Outlets, Central Valley, NY		—		11,110		862,559		1,658		4,004		12,768		866,563		879,331		152,183	2004 (Note 4)
Wrentham Village Premium Outlets, Wrentham, MA		—		4,900		282,031		—		3,922		4,900		285,953		290,853		57,357	2004 (Note 4)
*Community/Lifestyle Centers*
Arboretum at Great Hills, Austin, TX		—		7,640		36,774		71		8,678		7,711		45,452		53,163		14,792	1998 (Note 4)
Bloomingdale Court, Bloomingdale, IL		26,573		8,748		26,184		—		9,176		8,748		35,360		44,108		16,687	1987
Brightwood Plaza, Indianapolis, IN		—		65		128		—		337		65		465		530		327	1965
Charles Towne Square, Charleston, SC		—		—		1,768		370		10,636		370		12,404		12,774		6,920	1976
Chesapeake Center, Chesapeake, VA		—		5,352		12,279		—		643		5,352		12,922		18,274		4,928	1989

SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

			Initial Cost (Note 3)				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (Note 3)				Gross Amounts At Which Carried At Close of Period

Name, Location	Encumbrances		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total (1)		Accumulated Depreciation (2)		Date of Construction
Countryside Plaza, Countryside, IL		—		332		8,507		2,554		9,010		2,886		17,517		20,403		7,784	1977
Dare Centre, Kill Devil Hills, NC		1,614		—		5,702		—		213		—		5,915		5,915		932	2004 (Note 4)
DeKalb Plaza, King of Prussia, PA		2,946		1,955		3,405		—		1,125		1,955		4,530		6,485		1,716	2003 (Note 4)
Forest Plaza, Rockford, IL		18,957		4,132		16,818		453		10,043		4,585		26,861		31,446		9,708	1985
Gateway Shopping Center, Austin, TX		87,000		24,549		81,437		—		9,520		24,549		90,957		115,506		21,562	2004 (Note 4)
Great Lakes Plaza, Mentor, OH		—		1,028		2,025		—		5,016		1,028		7,041		8,069		3,863	1976
Greenwood Plus, Greenwood, IN		—		1,129		1,792		—		3,735		1,129		5,527		6,656		2,863	1979
Henderson Square, King of Prussia, PA		14,367		4,223		15,124		—		147		4,223		15,271		19,494		3,112	2003 (Note 4)
Highland Lakes Center, Orlando, FL		14,924		7,138		25,284		—		1,558		7,138		26,842		33,980		13,306	1991
Ingram Plaza, San Antonio, TX		—		421		1,802		4		59		425		1,861		2,286		1,234	1980
Keystone Shoppes, Indianapolis, IN		—		—		4,232		—		967		—		5,199		5,199		1,889	1997 (Note 4)
Lake Plaza, Waukegan, IL		—		2,487		6,420		—		1,087		2,487		7,507		9,994		3,590	1986
Lake View Plaza, Orland Park, IL		16,000		4,702		17,543		—		12,317		4,702		29,860		34,562		13,316	1986
Lakeline Plaza, Austin, TX		17,759		5,822		30,875		—		6,375		5,822		37,250		43,072		14,239	1998
Lima Center, Lima, OH		—		1,808		5,151		—		6,780		1,808		11,931		13,739		4,706	1978
Lincoln Crossing, O'Fallon, IL		—		674		2,192		—		769		674		2,961		3,635		1,256	1990
Lincoln Plaza, King of Prussia, PA		—		—		21,299		—		3,322		—		24,621		24,621		9,081	2003 (Note 4)
MacGregor Village, Cary, NC		6,493		502		8,897		—		187		502		9,084		9,586		1,417	2004 (Note 4)
Mall of Georgia Crossing, Mill Creek, GA		—		9,506		32,892		—		295		9,506		33,187		42,693		11,953	2004 (Note 5)
Markland Plaza, Kokomo, IN		—		206		738		—		6,260		206		6,998		7,204		2,872	1974
Martinsville Plaza, Martinsville, VA		—		—		584		—		408		—		992		992		744	1967
Matteson Plaza, Matteson, IL		—		1,771		9,737		—		2,675		1,771		12,412		14,183		6,426	1988
Muncie Plaza, Muncie, IN		7,383		267		10,509		87		1,355		354		11,864		12,218		4,356	1998
New Castle Plaza, New Castle, IN		—		128		1,621		—		1,477		128		3,098		3,226		2,081	1966
North Ridge Plaza, Joliet, IL		—		2,831		7,699		—		3,240		2,831		10,939		13,770		4,902	1985
North Ridge Shopping Center, Raleigh, NC		7,930		385		12,838		—		493		385		13,331		13,716		2,215	2004 (Note 4)
Northwood Plaza, Fort Wayne, IN		—		148		1,414		—		1,554		148		2,968		3,116		1,844	1974
Palms Crossing, McAllen, TX (Note 6)		—		13,923		45,925		—		6,430		13,923		52,355		66,278		5,448	2006
Pier Park, Panama City Beach, FL		—		23,586		73,158		—		42,162		23,586		115,320		138,906		9,461	2006
Regency Plaza, St. Charles, MO		4,000		616		4,963		—		583		616		5,546		6,162		2,479	1988
Richardson Square, Richardson, TX		—		6,285		—		1,268		15,494		7,553		15,494		23,047		895	1977
Rockaway Commons, Rockaway, NJ		—		5,149		26,435		—		7,499		5,149		33,934		39,083		7,918	1998 (Note 4)
Rockaway Town Plaza, Rockaway, NJ		—		—		18,698		2,225		1,754		2,225		20,452		22,677		3,084	2004
Shops at Arbor Walk, The, Austin, TX (Note 6)		—		930		42,546		—		5,090		930		47,636		48,566		7,520	2005

SCHEDULE III

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)

			Initial Cost (Note 3)				Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition (Note 3)				Gross Amounts At Which Carried At Close of Period

Name, Location	Encumbrances		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total (1)		Accumulated Depreciation (2)		Date of Construction
Rockaway Commons, Rockaway, NJ
Shops at North East Mall, The, Hurst, TX		—		12,541		28,177		402		3,666		12,943		31,843		44,786		14,064	1999
St. Charles Towne Plaza, Waldorf, MD		26,000		8,377		18,993		—		3,276		8,377		22,269		30,646		10,608	1987
Teal Plaza, Lafayette, IN		—		99		878		—		3,011		99		3,889		3,988		2,754	1962
Terrace at the Florida Mall, Orlando, FL		—		2,150		7,623		—		5,197		2,150		12,820		14,970		4,738	1989
Tippecanoe Plaza, Lafayette, IN		—		—		745		234		5,169		234		5,914		6,148		3,165	1974
University Center, Mishawaka, IN		—		3,071		7,413		—		1,810		3,071		9,223		12,294		6,490	1980
Washington Plaza, Indianapolis, IN		—		941		1,697		—		398		941		2,095		3,036		2,586	1976
Waterford Lakes Town Center, Orlando, FL		—		8,679		72,836		—		14,036		8,679		86,872		95,551		34,254	1999
West Ridge Plaza, Topeka, KS		5,000		1,376		4,560		—		1,778		1,376		6,338		7,714		3,032	1988
White Oaks Plaza, Springfield, IL		14,766		3,169		14,267		—		1,556		3,169		15,823		18,992		7,098	1986
Wolf Ranch Town Center, Georgetown, TX		—		21,785		51,547		—		6,729		21,785		58,276		80,061		9,665	2004
*Other Properties*
Crossville Outlet Center, Crossville, TN		—		263		4,380		—		223		263		4,603		4,866		890	2004 (Note 4)
Factory Merchants Branson, Branson, MO		—		1,383		19,637		1		846		1,384		20,483		21,867		1,801	2004 (Note 4)
The Shoppes at Branson Meadows, Branson, MO		9,016		—		5,205		—		262		—		5,467		5,467		931	2004 (Note 4)
Factory Stores of America — Boaz, AL		2,637		—		924		—		25		—		949		949		131	2004 (Note 4)
Factory Stores of America — Georgetown, KY		6,248		148		3,610		—		49		148		3,659		3,807		566	2004 (Note 4)
Factory Stores of America — Graceville, FL		1,857		12		408		—		66		12		474		486		70	2004 (Note 4)
Factory Stores of America — Lebanon. MO		1,560		24		214		—		—		24		214		238		49	2004 (Note 4)
Factory Stores of America — Nebraska City, NE		1,464		26		566		—		31		26		597		623		99	2004 (Note 4)
Factory Stores of America — Story City, IA		1,812		7		526		—		5		7		531		538		79	2004 (Note 4)
Factory Stores of North Bend, North Bend, WA		—		2,143		36,197		—		1,989		2,143		38,186		40,329		6,903	2004 (Note 4)
Nanuet Mall, Nanuet, NY		—		27,310		162,993		—		3,322		27,310		166,315		193,625		152,965	1998 (Note 4)
Palm Beach Mall, West Palm Beach, FL		50,725		11,962		112,437		—		35,195		11,962		147,632		159,594		104,571	1967
University Mall, Pensacola, FL		—		4,256		26,657		—		3,405		4,256		30,062		34,318		26,506	1994
*Development Projects*
Other pre-development costs		—		37,635		7,656		—		—		37,635		7,656		45,291		—
*Other*		—		3,097		11,047		—		499		3,097		11,546		14,643		5,758

	$	5,554,138	$	2,572,883	$	17,511,497	$	185,111	$	4,754,224	$	2,757,994	$	22,265,721	$	25,023,715	$	6,806,670

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Schedule III as of December 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)

(1) Reconciliation of Real Estate Properties:

The changes in real estate assets for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 are as follows:

		2009			2008			2007

Balance, beginning of year		$	24,907,970		$	24,163,367		$	22,644,299
	Acquisitions and consolidations		—			7,640			743,457
	Improvements		315,928			797,717			1,057,663
	Disposals and de-consolidations		(200,183	)		(60,754	)		(282,052	)

Balance, close of year		$	25,023,715		$	24,907,970		$	24,163,367

The unaudited aggregate cost of real estate assets for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2009 was $20,019,482.

(2) Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation:

The changes in accumulated depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 are as follows:

		2009			2008			2007

Balance, beginning of year		$	6,015,677		$	5,168,565		$	4,479,198
	Acquisitions and consolidations (5)		—			—			12,714
	Depreciation expense		893,139			871,556			808,041
	Disposals		(102,146	)		(24,444	)		(131,388	)

Balance, close of year		$	6,806,670		$	6,015,677		$	5,168,565

Depreciation of our investment in buildings and improvements reflected in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income is calculated over the estimated original lives of the assets as follows:

•: Buildings and Improvements — typically 10-40 years for the structure, 15 years for landscaping and parking lot, and 10 years for HVAC equipment.
•: Tenant Allowances and Improvements — shorter of lease term or useful life.

(3): Initial cost generally represents net book value at December 20, 1993, except for acquired properties and new developments after December 20, 1993. Initial cost also includes any new developments that are opened during the current year. Costs of disposals and impairments of property are first reflected as a reduction to cost capitalized subsequent to acquisition.
(4): Not developed/constructed by us or our predecessors. The date of construction represents the acquisition date.
(5): Property initial cost for these properties is the cost at the date of consolidation for properties previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Accumulated depreciation amounts for properties consolidated which were previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting include the minority interest holders' portion of accumulated depreciation.
(6): Secured by a $260,000 cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted mortgage loan facility.

		Exhibits

			2		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as February 12, 2007, by and among SPG-FCM Ventures, LLC, SPG-FCM Acquisitions, Inc., SPG-FCM Acquisitions, L.P., The Mills Corporation, and The Mills Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23, 2007).
			3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Registrant's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 27, 2009).
			3.2		Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2009).
			3.3		Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and Rights of the 6% Series I Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.0001 Par Value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 20, 2004).
			3.4		Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and Rights of the 8³/8% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.0001 Par Value (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 20, 2004).
			9.1		Second Amended and Restated Voting Trust Agreement, Voting Agreement and Proxy dated as of March 1, 2004 between Melvin Simon & Associates, Inc., on the one hand and Melvin Simon, Herbert Simon and David Simon on the other hand (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004).
			9.2		Voting Trust Agreement, Voting Agreement and Proxy dated as of March 1, 2004 between David Simon, Melvin Simon and Herbert Simon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9.2 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004).
			10.1		Eighth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Simon Property Group, L.P. dated as of May 8, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 9, 2008).
			10.2		$3,500,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2005, among Simon Property Group, L.P., the Institutions named therein as Lenders and the Institutions named therein as Co-Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2005).
			10.3		Amendment to Credit Agreement among Simon Property Group, L.P., the Institutions named therein as Lenders and the Institutions named therein as Co-Agents, dated October 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant's Form 10-K).
			10.4		Form of the Indemnity Agreement between the Registrant and its directors and officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant's Form S-4 filed August 13, 1998 (Reg. No. 333-61399)).
			10.5		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 24, 1998, by and among the Registrant and the persons named therein. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 9, 1998).
			10.6		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 27, 1999 by and among the Registrant and the persons named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed March 24, 2004 (Reg. No. 333-113884)).
			10.7		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 14, 1997, by and between O'Connor Retail Partners, L.P. and Simon DeBartolo Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed December 7, 2001 (Reg. No. 333-74722)).
			10.8*		Simon Property Group, L.P. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 9, 2008).
			10.9*		Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement under the Simon Property Group, L.P. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant's 2004 Form 10-K).
			10.10*		Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Simon Property Group, L.P. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrant's 2006 Form 10-K).
			10.11*		Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Simon Property Group, L.P. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Registrant's 2004 Form 10-K).
			10.12*		Employment Agreement among Richard S. Sokolov, the Registrant, and Simon Property Group Administrative Services Partnership, L.P. dated January 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Registrant's 1008 Form 10-K).
			10.13*		Description of Director and Executive Compensation Agreements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Registrant's 2008 Form 10-K).
			10.14		Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2007, by and among The Mills Limited Partnership, as Borrower, The Mills Corporation, as Parent, certain of its subsidiaries, as Guarantors, the lenders party thereto and Simon Property Group, L.P., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23, 2007).
			10.15		Voting Agreement dated as of June 20, 2004 among the Registrant, Simon Property Group, L.P. and certain holders of shares of common stock of Chelsea Property Group, Inc. and/or common units of CPG Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 22, 2004).

		Exhibits

			10.16		Form of Amendment to Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2008 Stock Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 1, 2009).
			10.17*		Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan dated as of December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 5, 2009).
			10.18*		Amendment — 2008 Performance Based-Restricted Stock Agreement dated as of March 6, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 5, 2009).
			10.19		$3,565,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of December 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Simon Property Group, L.P.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 2009).
			12.1		Statement regarding computation of ratios.
			13.1		Selected Financial Data, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Financial Statements of the Registrant as contained in the Registrant's 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders.
			21.1		List of Subsidiaries of the Company.
			23.1		Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
			31.1		Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
			31.2		Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
			32		Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
			101		The following materials from the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (1) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (2) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income, (3) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (4) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

*: Represents a management contract, or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Regulation S-K.

Exhibit 12.1

SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
(in thousands)

			For the Year Ended December 31,

			2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
Earnings:
	Pre-tax income from consolidated continuing operations		$	382,042		$	603,141		$	663,283		$	741,097		$	486,532
	Add:
		Pre-tax (loss) income from 50% or greater than 50% owned unconsolidated entities		(22,914	)		(29,093	)		(9,061	)		45,313			49,939
		Distributed income from less than 50% owned unconsolidated entities		60,877			61,482			51,594			53,000			66,165
		Amortization of capitalized interest		4,367			4,927			2,462			5,027			2,772
Fixed Charges				1,259,428			1,271,710			1,218,298			985,797			932,404
Less:
		Income from unconsolidated entities		(40,220	)		(32,246	)		(38,120	)		(110,819	)		(81,807	)
		Interest capitalization		(14,749	)		(28,451	)		(37,270	)		(34,073	)		(15,502	)
		Preferred distributions of consolidated subsidiaries		(11,885	)		(17,599	)		(21,580	)		(26,979	)		(28,080	)

Earnings			$	1,616,946		$	1,833,871		$	1,829,606		$	1,658,363		$	1,412,423

Fixed Charges:
	Portion of rents representative of the interest factor			9,082			8,996			9,032			9,052			8,869
	Interest on indebtedness (including amortization of debt expense)			1,223,712			1,196,334			1,150,416			915,693			879,953
	Interest capitalized			14,749			28,451			37,270			34,073			15,502
	Loss on extinguishment of debt			—			20,330			—			—			—
	Preferred distributions of consolidated subsidiaries			11,885			17,599			21,580			26,979			28,080

Fixed Charges			$	1,259,428		$	1,271,710		$	1,218,298		$	985,797		$	932,404
	Add: Preferred Stock Dividends			26,309			41,119			55,075			77,695			73,854

Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends			$	1,285,737		$	1,312,829		$	1,273,373		$	1,063,492		$	1,006,258

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends				1.26x			1.40x			1.44x			1.56x			1.40x

For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, "earnings" have been computed by adding fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest, to pre-tax income from consolidated continuing operations including income from noncontrolling interests and our share of pre-tax (loss) income from 50%, or greater than 50%, owned unconsolidated affiliates which have fixed charges, and including our share of distributed operating income from less than 50% owned unconsolidated affiliates instead of income from the less than 50% owned unconsolidated affiliates. There are generally no restrictions on our ability to receive distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures where no preference in favor of the other owners of the joint venture exists. "Fixed charges" consist of interest costs, whether expensed or capitalized, the interest component of rental expenses, preferred distributions, losses on extinguishment of debt, and amortization of debt issue costs.

Exhibit 13.1

The following tables set forth selected financial data. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Other data we believe is important in understanding trends in our business is also included in the tables.

			As of or for the Year Ended December 31,

			2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
			(in thousands, except per share data)
OPERATING DATA:
	Total consolidated revenue		$	3,775,216		$	3,783,155		$	3,650,799		$	3,332,154		$	3,166,853
	Consolidated income from continuing operations			387,262			599,560			674,605			729,727			503,148
	Net income available to common stockholders		$	283,098		$	422,517		$	436,164		$	486,145		$	401,895
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
	Income from continuing operations		$	1.06		$	1.88		$	2.09		$	2.20		$	1.27
	Discontinued operations			—			—			(0.13	)		—			0.55

	Net income attributable to common stockholders		$	1.06		$	1.88		$	1.96		$	2.20		$	1.82

	Weighted average shares outstanding			267,055			225,333			222,998			221,024			220,259
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
	Income from continuing operations		$	1.05		$	1.87		$	2.08		$	2.19		$	1.27
	Discontinued operations			—			—			(0.13	)		—			0.55

	Net income attributable to common stockholders		$	1.05		$	1.87		$	1.95		$	2.19		$	1.82

	Diluted weighted average shares outstanding			268,472			225,884			223,777			221,927			221,130
	Dividends per share (1)		$	2.70		$	3.60		$	3.36		$	3.04		$	2.80
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	3,957,718		$	773,544		$	501,982		$	929,360		$	337,048
	Total assets			25,948,266			23,422,749			23,442,466			22,003,173			21,068,666
	Mortgages and other indebtedness			18,630,302			18,042,532			17,218,674			15,394,489			14,106,117
	Total equity		$	5,182,962		$	3,101,967		$	3,414,612		$	4,040,676		$	4,444,227
OTHER DATA:
	Cash flow provided by (used in):
		Operating activities	$	1,720,520		$	1,635,887		$	1,559,432		$	1,316,148		$	1,195,141
		Investing activities		(418,991	)		(1,022,275	)		(2,049,576	)		(607,432	)		(52,434	)
		Financing activities	$	1,882,645		$	(342,050	)	$	62,766		$	(116,404	)	$	(1,325,743	)
		Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends		1.26x			1.40x			1.44x			1.56x			1.40x
	Funds from Operations (FFO) (2)		$	1,748,280		$	1,852,331		$	1,691,887		$	1,537,223		$	1,411,368

	FFO allocable to Simon Property		$	1,440,554		$	1,477,446		$	1,342,496		$	1,215,319		$	1,110,933

Notes

(1): Represents dividends declared per period.
(2): FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe provides useful information to investors. Please refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a definition and reconciliation of FFO.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are included in this Annual Report to Stockholders.

Overview

Simon Property Group, Inc., or Simon Property, is a Delaware corporation that operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, among other things, a company must distribute at least 90 percent of its taxable income to its stockholders annually. Taxes are paid by stockholders on dividends received and any capital gains distributed. Most states also follow this federal treatment and do not require REITs to pay state income tax. Simon Property Group, L.P., or the Operating Partnership, is our majority-owned partnership subsidiary that owns all of our real estate properties. In this discussion, the terms "we", "us" and "our" refer to Simon Property Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

We own, develop and manage retail real estate properties, which consist primarily of regional malls, Premium Outlet® centers, The Mills®, and community/lifestyle centers. As of December 31, 2009, we owned or held an interest in 321 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 162 regional malls, 41 Premium Outlet centers, 67 community/lifestyle centers, 36 properties acquired in the 2007 acquisition of The Mills Corporation, or the Mills acquisition, and 15 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 41 states and Puerto Rico. Of the 36 properties acquired in the Mills portfolio, 16 of these properties are The Mills, 16 are regional malls, and four are community centers. Internationally, as of December 31, 2009, we had ownership interests in 51 European shopping centers (France, Italy and Poland), eight Premium Outlet centers in Japan, one Premium Outlet center in Mexico, and one Premium Outlet center in South Korea. Also, through joint venture arrangements we have a 24% interest in two shopping centers in Italy currently under development. During 2009, we recognized a loss on the sale of four of our U.S. properties and all of our shopping centers in operation or under development in China. We also agreed to purchase a portfolio of 22 outlet shopping centers. The purchase is expected to close in the first half of 2010. In early 2010, we and our joint venture partner agreed to sell our interests in seven shopping centers in France and Poland.

We generate the majority of our revenues from leases with retail tenants including:

•: Base minimum rents,
•: Overage and percentage rents based on tenants' sales volume, and
•: Recoveries of substantially all of our recoverable expenditures, which consist of property operating, real estate taxes, repair and maintenance, and advertising and promotional expenditures.

Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.

We seek growth in earnings, funds from operations, or FFO, and cash flows by enhancing the profitability and operation of our properties and investments. We seek to accomplish this growth through the following:

•: Focusing on leasing to increase revenues and utilizing economies of scale to reduce operating expenses,
•: Expanding and re-tenanting existing franchise locations at competitive market rates,
•: Adding mixed-use elements to properties,
•: Selectively acquiring high quality real estate assets or portfolios of assets, and
•: Selling non-core assets.

We also grow by generating supplemental revenue from the following activities:

•: Establishing our malls as leading market resource providers for retailers and other businesses and consumer-focused corporate alliances, including: payment systems (such as handling fees relating to the sales of bank-issued prepaid cards), national marketing alliances, static and digital media initiatives, business development, sponsorship, and events,

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

•: Offering property operating services to our tenants and others, including waste handling and facility services, and the sale of energy,
•: Selling or leasing land adjacent to our shopping center properties, commonly referred to as "outlots" or "outparcels," and
•: Generating interest income on cash deposits and loans made to related entities.

We focus on high quality real estate across the retail real estate spectrum. We expand or renovate to enhance existing assets' profitability and market share when we believe the investment of our capital meets our risk-reward criteria. We selectively develop new properties in metropolitan areas that exhibit strong population and economic growth.

We routinely review and evaluate acquisition opportunities based on their ability to complement our portfolio. Our international strategy includes partnering with established real estate companies and financing international investments with local currency to minimize foreign exchange risk.

To support our growth, we employ a three-fold capital strategy:

•: Provide the capital necessary to fund growth,
•: Maintain sufficient flexibility to access capital in many forms, both public and private, and
•: Manage our overall financial structure in a fashion that preserves our investment grade credit ratings.

Results Overview

Diluted earnings per common share decreased $0.82 during 2009, or 43.9%, to $1.05 from $1.87 for 2008. The decrease in diluted earnings per share was due primarily to losses on asset sales and impairment charges. These included a $140.5 million, or $0.44 per diluted share, other-than-temporary impairment charge related to our investment in Liberty International, PLC, or Liberty, a U.K. REIT. We recorded the other-than-temporary charge in the second quarter of 2009 due to the significance and duration of the decline in quoted fair value, including the related currency exchange component, below the carrying value of the securities. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we also recorded adjustments in the carrying values of three underperforming assets, including one consolidated operating property and two joint venture assets, the write-off of certain predevelopment costs related to projects that we no longer plan to pursue due to economic conditions, and adjustments to carrying values for certain parcels of land, amounting to $88.1 million, or $0.27 per diluted share, net of related tax benefit and noncontrolling interest share. We also recorded net losses related to the sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities of $30.1 million, or $0.09 per diluted share. For 2009, earnings per share were diluted by approximately $0.21 per share as a result of two equity offerings and the shares we issued in the quarterly dividends. For 2008, we recorded a $20.3 million, or $0.07 per diluted share, loss on extinguishment of debt related to our redemption of the 7% MandatOry Par Put Remarked Securities, or MOPPRS. In addition, we recorded impairment charges of $21.2 million, or $0.07 per diluted share, during 2008.

In the United States, our business fundamentals were relatively stable, except for tenant sales psf which were down across the portfolio, and were dependent upon asset type, geographic location, and mix of specialty and luxury tenants. Average base rents for the regional mall and domestic Premium Outlet portfolios were relatively stable for 2009. The regional malls average base rent ended the year at $40.04 psf, or an increase of 1.4% over 2008. The domestic Premium Outlets average base rent ended the year at $33.45 psf, or an increase of 21.0%. The stability of the occupancy, rent psf, and releasing rental spread fundamentals contributed to the growth in our operating results despite the adverse economic conditions affecting our tenants and retail consumers.

Internationally, in 2009, we and our joint venture partners opened one additional center and expanded one existing Premium Outlet Center in Japan which added an aggregate 396,300 square feet of retail space to the international portfolio. Also in December 2009, we recognized a loss on our joint venture interests in our shopping centers in China. We sold our interests to affiliates of our Chinese partner for approximately $29 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $20 million.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

On February 4, 2010, we and our partner in Simon Ivanhoe S.à.r.l, or Simon Ivanhoe, Ivanhoe Cambridge Inc., or Ivanhoe Cambridge, entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the interests in Simon Ivanhoe which owns seven shopping centers located in France and Poland to Unibail-Rodamco. The joint venture partners will receive consideration of €715 million for their interests, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We expect our share of the gain on sale of our interests in Simon Ivanhoe to be approximately $300 million. The transaction is scheduled to close during the first half of 2010, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.

Our effective overall borrowing rate at December 31, 2009 increased 50 basis points to 5.62% as compared to 5.12% at December 31, 2008. This increase was primarily due to a $1.4 billion increase in our portfolio of relatively higher rate fixed rate debt. Our financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009, included:

•: decreasing borrowings on the Operating Partnership's $3.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, or the Credit Facility, to approximately $446.1 million as of December 31, 2009. The ending balance on this facility is entirely comprised of the U.S. dollar equivalent of Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings. On December 8, 2009, the Operating Partnership entered into a new unsecured revolving corporate credit facility providing an initial borrowing capacity of $3.565 billion. The new credit facility contains an accordion feature allowing the maximum borrowing capacity to expand to $4.0 billion. The new credit facility matures on March 31, 2013 Borrowings on the new facility were not drawn until January 5, 2010 when the Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings on the Credit Facility were transitioned to the new credit facility.
•: issuing $650.0 million in 10.35% senior unsecured notes due 2019. We used the proceeds of the offering to reduce borrowings on the Credit Facility.
•: issuing $1.1 billion in 6.75% senior unsecured notes due 2014. We used the proceeds of the offering for general corporate purposes.
•: redeeming five series of maturing unsecured notes totaling $900.0 million which had fixed rates ranging from 3.50% to 8.63%.
•: borrowing $400.0 million on a loan which matures on August 1, 2016 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 8.00%. This loan is secured by cross-collateralized, cross-defaulted mortgages on Greenwood Park Mall, South Park Mall, and Walt Whitman Mall.

On January 12, 2010, the Operating Partnership commenced a cash tender offer for any and all senior unsecured notes of ten outstanding series with maturity dates ranging from 2011 to March 2013. The total principal amount of the notes accepted for purchase on January 26, 2010 was approximately $2.3 billion, with a weighted average duration of 2.0 years and a weighted coupon of 5.76%. The Operating Partnership purchased the tendered notes with cash on hand and the proceeds from an offering of $2.25 billion of senior unsecured notes that closed on January 25, 2010. The senior notes offering was comprised of $400.0 million of 4.20% notes due 2015, $1.25 billion of 5.65% notes due 2020 and $600.0 million of 6.75% notes due 2040. We will report a $165.6 million charge to earnings in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of the tender offer.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

United States Portfolio Data

The portfolio data discussed in this overview includes the following key operating statistics: occupancy; average base rent per square foot; and comparable sales per square foot for our four domestic platforms. We include acquired properties in this data beginning in the year of acquisition and remove properties sold in the year disposed. For comparative purposes, we separate the information in this section on the 16 regional malls we acquired from The Mills Corporation in 2007, or the Mills Regional Malls, from the information on our other regional malls. We do not include any properties located outside of the United States in this section. The following table sets forth these key operating statistics for:

•: properties that are consolidated in our consolidated financial statements,
•: properties we account for under the equity method of accounting as joint ventures, and
•: the foregoing two categories of properties on a total portfolio basis.

	2009		%/Basis Points Change(1)	2008		%/Basis Points Change(1)	2007		%/Basis Point Change(1)

Regional Malls:
*Occupancy*
Consolidated		92.4%	-20 bps		92.6%	-130 bps		93.9%	+90 bps
Unconsolidated		91.4%	-50 bps		91.9%	-80 bps		92.7%	-80 bps
Total Portfolio		92.1%	-30 bps		92.4%	-110 bps		93.5%	+30 bps
*Average Base Rent per Square Foot*
Consolidated	$	38.43	0.6%	$	38.21	5.4%	$	36.24	4.2%
Unconsolidated	$	43.19	2.8%	$	42.03	8.5%	$	38.73	6.2%
Total Portfolio	$	40.04	1.4%	$	39.49	6.5%	$	37.09	4.8%
*Comparable Sales per Square Foot*
Consolidated	$	410	(7.9%)	$	445	(5.7%)	$	472	2.2%
Unconsolidated	$	483	(7.6%)	$	523	(1.3%)	$	530	4.9%
Total Portfolio	$	433	(7.9%)	$	470	(4.3%)	$	491	3.2%
Premium Outlet Centers:
*Occupancy*		97.9%	-100 bps		98.9%	-80 bps		99.7%	+30 bps
*Average Base Rent per Square Foot*	$	33.45	21.0%	$	27.65	7.7%	$	25.67	5.9%
*Comparable Sales per Square Foot*	$	500	(1.8%)	$	509	1.0%	$	504	7.0%
The Mills®:
*Occupancy*		93.9%	-60 bps		94.5%	+40 bps		94.1%	—
*Average Base Rent per Square Foot*	$	19.62	0.6%	$	19.51	2.4%	$	19.06	—
*Comparable Sales per Square Foot*	$	369	(0.8%)	$	372	—	$	372	—
Mills Regional Malls:
*Occupancy*		89.3%	190 bps		87.4%	-210 bps		89.5%	—
*Average Base Rent per Square Foot*	$	35.41	(4.3%)	$	36.99	3.8%	$	35.63	—
*Comparable Sales per Square Foot*	$	380	(9.1%)	$	418	(5.9%)	$	444	—
Community/Lifestyle Centers:
*Occupancy*
Consolidated		89.3%	—		89.3%	-360 bps		92.9%	+140 bps
Unconsolidated		93.2%	-10 bps		93.3%	-330 bps		96.6%	+10 bps
Total Portfolio		90.7%	—		90.7%	-340 bps		94.1%	+90 bps
*Average Base Rent per Square Foot*
Consolidated	$	13.94	1.8%	$	13.70	7.6%	$	12.73	7.0%
Unconsolidated	$	12.55	1.1%	$	12.41	4.7%	$	11.85	1.5%
Total Portfolio	$	13.45	1.5%	$	13.25	6.6%	$	12.43	5.2%

(1): Percentages may not recalculate due to rounding. Percentage and basis point changes are representative of the change from the comparable prior period.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Occupancy Levels and Average Base Rent Per Square Foot. Occupancy and average base rent are based on mall and freestanding Gross Leasable Area, or GLA, owned by us in the regional malls, and all tenants at The Mills, Premium Outlet Centers, and community/lifestyle centers. Our portfolio has maintained relatively stable occupancy and increased the aggregate average base rents despite continuing economic difficulties.

Comparable Sales Per Square Foot. Comparable sales include total reported retail tenant sales at owned GLA (for mall and freestanding stores with less than 10,000 square feet) in the regional malls and all reporting tenants at The Mills and the Premium Outlet Centers and community/lifestyle centers. Retail sales at owned GLA affect revenue and profitability levels because sales determine the amount of minimum rent that can be charged, the percentage rent realized, and the recoverable expenses (common area maintenance, real estate taxes, etc.) that tenants can afford to pay.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

International Property Data

The following are selected key operating statistics for certain of our international properties.



European Shopping Centers
Occupancy	95.9	%			98.4	%			98.7	%
Comparable sales per square foot	€400		(2.7	)%	€411		(2.4	)%	€421
Average rent per square foot	€31.41		4.3	%	€30.11		1.8	%	€29.58
International Premium Outlet Centers (1)
Occupancy	99.6	%			99.9	%			100	%
Comparable sales per square foot	¥94,468		2.7	%	¥92,000		(1.3	)%	¥93,169
Average rent per square foot	¥4,714		0.6	%	¥4,685		1.3	%	¥4,626

(1): Does not include one center in Mexico (Premium Outlets Punta Norte) and one center in Korea (Yeoju Premium Outlets).

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue, and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. From time to time, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, see Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

•: We, as a lessor, retain substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the investment properties and account for our leases as operating leases. We accrue minimum rents on a straight-line basis over the terms of their respective leases. Substantially all of our retail tenants are also required to pay overage rents based on sales over a stated base amount during the lease year. We recognize overage rents only when each tenant's sales exceed its sales threshold.
•: We review investment properties for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of investment properties may not be recoverable. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, declines in cash flows, occupancy and comparable sales per square foot at the property. We measure any impairment of investment property when the estimated undiscounted operating income before depreciation and amortization plus its residual value is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, we charge to income the excess of carrying value of the property over its estimated fair value. We may decide to sell properties that are held for use and the sale prices of these properties may differ from their carrying values. We also review our investments including investments in unconsolidated entities if events or circumstances change indicating that the carrying amount of our investments may not be recoverable. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the fair value of the investments below carrying value is other-than-temporary.
•: To maintain our status as a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income in any given year and meet certain asset and income tests. We monitor our business and transactions that may potentially impact

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

our REIT status. In the unlikely event that we fail to maintain our REIT status, and available relief provisions do not apply, then we would be required to pay federal income taxes at regular corporate income tax rates during the period we did not qualify as a REIT. If we lost our REIT status, we could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four years unless our failure was due to reasonable cause and certain other conditions were met. As a result, failing to maintain REIT status would result in a significant increase in the income tax expense recorded during those periods.

•: We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to the buildings as-if-vacant, land and market value of in-place leases. In the case of the fair value of buildings and the allocation of value to land and other intangibles, our estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the market value of in-place leases, we make our best estimates of the tenants' ability to pay rents based upon the tenants' operating performance at the property, including the competitive position of the property in its market as well as sales psf, rents psf, and overall occupancy cost for the tenants in place at the acquisition date. Our assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in-place leases.
•: A variety of costs are incurred in the development and leasing of properties. After determination is made to capitalize a cost, it is allocated to the specific component of a project that is benefited. Determination of when a development project is substantially complete and capitalization must cease involves a degree of judgment. The costs of land and buildings under development include specifically identifiable costs. The capitalized costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs and other costs incurred during the period of development. We consider a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy and cease capitalization of costs upon opening.

Results of Operations

In addition to the activity discussed above in "Results Overview", the following acquisitions, property openings, and other activity significantly affected our consolidated results from continuing operations in the comparative periods:

•: During 2009, we sold four consolidated properties described below.
•: During 2009, we recognized a loss on our joint venture interests in our shopping centers in China. We sold our interests to affiliates of our Chinese partner for approximately $29 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $20 million.
•: On August 6, 2009, we opened Cincinnati Premium Outlets, a 400,000 square foot outlet center located in Warren County, Ohio, north of Cincinnati.
•: On April 23, 2009, we opened The Promenade at Camarillo Premium Outlets, a 220,000 square foot expansion located in Ventura County, north of Los Angeles.
•: On November 13, 2008, we opened Jersey Shore Premium Outlets, a 435,000 square foot outlet center with 120 designer and name-brand outlet stores located in Tinton Falls, New Jersey.
•: On November 6, 2008, we opened the second phase of Orlando Premium Outlets, a 114,000 square foot expansion that is 100% leased and adds 40 new merchants, located in Orlando, Florida.
•: On May 1, 2008, we opened Pier Park, a 900,000 square foot, open-air retail center located in Panama City, Florida.
•: On March 27, 2008, we opened Houston Premium Outlets, a 427,000 square foot outlet center located approximately 30 miles west of Houston in Cypress, Texas.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

•: On November 15, 2007, we opened Palms Crossing, a 396,000 square foot community center, located adjacent to the new McAllen Convention Center in McAllen, Texas.
•: On November 8, 2007, we opened Philadelphia Premium Outlets, a 425,000 square foot outlet center located 35 miles northwest of Philadelphia in Limerick, Pennsylvania.
•: On August 23, 2007, we acquired Las Americas Premium Outlets, a 560,000 square foot upscale outlet center located in San Diego, California, for $283.5 million, including the assumption of its $180.0 million mortgage.
•: On March 29, 2007, we acquired an additional 25% interest in two regional malls (Town Center at Cobb and Gwinnett Place) in the Mills acquisition and now consolidate those properties.
•: On March 28, 2007, we acquired a 100% interest in The Maine Outlet, a 112,000 square foot outlet center located in Kittery, Maine for a purchase price of $45.2 million.
•: On March 9, 2007, we opened The Domain, in Austin, Texas, which combines 700,000 square feet of luxury fashion and restaurant space, 75,000 square feet of Class A office space and 390 apartments.

In addition to the activities discussed above and in "Results Overview", the following acquisitions, dispositions, and property openings affected our income from unconsolidated entities in the comparative periods:

•: On September 28, 2009, we opened Suzhou In City Plaza, a 750,000 square foot center located in Suzhou, China. We held a 32.5% ownership interest in this center which was sold as part of the disposition of our interests in China.
•: On September 25, 2009, we opened Zhengzhou In City Plaza, a 465,000 square foot center located in Zhengzhou, China. We held a 32.5% ownership interest in this center which was sold as part of the disposition of our interests in China.
•: On July 9, 2009, Chelsea Japan Company, Ltd., or Chelsea Japan, the joint venture which operates the Japanese Premium Outlet Centers in which we have a 40% ownership interest, opened Ami Premium Outlets located in Ami, Japan.
•: On December 30, 2008, Cincinnati Mills, one of the properties we acquired in the Mills acquisition, was sold. We held a 50% interest the shopping center.
•: On October 16, 2008, Chelsea Japan, opened Sendai-Izumi Premium Outlets located in Izumi Park Town, Japan. We hold a 40% ownership interest in Chelsea Japan.
•: On August 25, 2008, Gallerie Commerciali Italia, or GCI, one of our European joint ventures in which we hold a 49% ownership interest, opened Monza, a 211,600 square foot shopping center in Monza, Italy.
•: On June 5, 2008, we opened Changshu In City Plaza, a 487,000 square foot retail center located in Changshu, China. We held a 32.5% ownership interest in this center which was sold as part of the disposition of our interests in China.
•: On May 2, 2008, we opened Hamilton Town Center, a 950,000 square foot open-air retail center in Noblesville, Indiana. We hold a 50% ownership interest in this center.
•: On December 6, 2007, GCI opened Nola, a 876,000 square foot shopping center in Naples, Italy.
•: On October 17, 2007, we acquired an 18.75% interest in Denver West Village in Lakewood, Colorado through our 50% ownership in SPG-FCM.
•: On September 27, 2007, GCI opened Cinisello, located in Milan, Italy.
•: On July 5, 2007, Simon Ivanhoe sold its interest in five assets located in Poland, for which we recorded our share of the gain of $90.6 million.
•: On July 5, 2007, Chelsea Japan opened the 195,000 square foot first phase of Kobe-Sanda Premium Outlets, located just north of downtown Kobe, Japan.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

•: On June 1, 2007, Chelsea Japan opened Yeoju Premium Outlets, a 250,000 square foot center in Korea.
•: On February 16, 2007, SPG-FCM Ventures, LLC, or SPG-FCM, an entity in which a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership holds a 50% interest, entered into a definitive agreement to acquire The Mills Corporation, or Mills. The Mills acquisition added 36 properties and over 42 million square feet of gross leasable area to our portfolio. The properties are generally located in major metropolitan areas and consist of a combination of traditional anchor tenants, local and national retailers, and a number of larger "big box" tenants. We made an equity investment of $650.0 million and provided loans to SPG-FCM and Mills in various amounts throughout 2007 to acquire Mills' remaining common and preferred equity, and to pay various costs of the transaction. We serve as manager of the properties acquired in this transaction, which is more fully discussed in the "Liquidity and Capital Resources" section.

For the purposes of the following comparisons between the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the above transactions are referred to as the property transactions. In the following discussions of our results of operations, "comparable" refers to properties open and operating throughout both the current and prior year.

During 2009, we sold four consolidated properties that had an aggregate book value of $13.7 million for aggregate sales proceeds of $3.9 million, resulting in a net loss on sale of $9.8 million. The loss on sale of these assets recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and the operating results of the properties that we sold or disposed of during 2009 were not significant to our consolidated results of operations. The following is a list of the consolidated properties we sold and the date of disposition:

Property		Date of Disposition

Knoxville Commons		November 2, 2009
Park Plaza		November 2, 2009
Eastland Plaza		October 30, 2009
Raleigh Springs Mall		October 15, 2009

In 2008 we had no consolidated property dispositions.

During 2007, we disposed of five consolidated properties that had an aggregate book value of $91.6 million for aggregate sales proceeds of $56.4 million, resulting in a net loss on sale of approximately $35.3 million. The loss on sale of these assets has been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. The operating results of the properties that we sold or disposed of during 2007 were not significant to our consolidated results of operations. The following is a list of consolidated property dispositions and the date of disposition for which we have reported the results of sale within discontinued operations:

Property		Date of Disposition

Lafayette Square		December 27, 2007
University Mall		September 28, 2007
Boardman Plaza		September 28, 2007
Griffith Park Plaza		September 20, 2007
Alton Square		August 2, 2007

Year Ended December 31, 2009 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2008

Minimum rents increased $24.9 million in 2009, of which the property transactions accounted for $27.3 million of the increase, offset by a decrease in comparable minimum rents of $2.4 million, or 0.1%. The decrease in comparable minimum rents was primarily attributable to a $15.4 million decline in the fair market value of in-place lease amortization and a $12.6 million decrease in straight-line rents, offset by an increase in minimum rents of $22.8 million and an increase in comparable rents from carts, kiosks, and other temporary tenants of $2.8 million. Overage rents decreased $15.3 million or 15.3%, as a result of a reduction in tenant sales for the period as compared to the prior year.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Tenant reimbursements decreased $3.7 million, due to a $14.8 million, or 1.4%, decrease in the comparable properties as a result of a decrease in expenditures allocable to tenants paying common area maintenance on a proportionate basis, offset by an $11.1 million increase attributable to the property transactions.

Management fees and other revenues decreased $8.4 million principally as a result of decreased earned premiums of our wholly-owned captive insurance entities and lower fee revenue due to the reduction in development, leasing and joint venture property refinancing activity.

Total other income decreased $5.4 million, and was principally the result of the following:

•: a $15.4 million decrease in interest income primarily due to lower reinvestment rates and the lower rate applicable to our variable rate loan facility with SPG-FCM,
•: a $2.3 million decrease in net other activity, and

These decreases were offset in part by a $6.5 million increase in land sale activity primarily related to a land sale in the fourth quarter of 2009 and a $5.8 million increase in lease settlement income.

Property operating expenses decreased $30.2 million, or 6.6%, primarily related to lower utility costs resulting from our cost control and cost reduction initiatives.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $28.1 million due to the impact of prior year openings and expansion activity and acceleration of depreciation for certain properties scheduled for redevelopment.

Repairs and maintenance decreased $16.1��million due to our cost savings efforts.

Home and regional office expense decreased $34.8 million primarily due to decreased personnel costs attributable to our cost control initiatives and lower incentive compensation levels.

During 2009, we recognized a non-cash charge of $140.5 million representing an other-than-temporary impairment in the fair value below the carrying value of our minority investment in Liberty. We recorded the charge to earnings due to the significance and duration of the decline in the total share price, including currency revaluations. In addition, we recorded impairment charges in 2009 of $56.9 million related to one regional mall, certain parcels of land and certain predevelopment costs related to projects no longer being pursued. In 2008, we recognized an impairment of $16.5 million primarily representing the write-down of a mall property to its estimated net realizable value and the write-off of predevelopment costs for various development opportunities which we no longer plan to pursue.

During 2009, we recorded $5.7 million in transaction expenses related to costs associated with significant acquisition related activities. In accordance with the required adoption of a new accounting pronouncement effective January 1, 2009, all transaction costs are expensed as incurred and are no longer capitalized as a component of acquisition cost as prior accounting guidance permitted.

Interest expense increased $44.9 million primarily related to the Operating Partnership's issuance of $500 million of senior unsecured notes on August 11, 2009, $600 million senior unsecured notes on May 15, 2009 and $650 million senior unsecured notes on March 25, 2009, offset by decreased interest expense on our prior Credit Facility due to the payoff of the U.S. tranche and other property debt refinancings.

The 2008 period included a loss on extinguishment of debt of $20.3 million in the second quarter of 2008 related to the redemption of $200 million in remarketable debt securities. We extinguished the debt because the remarketing reset base rate was above the rate for 30-year U.S. Treasury securities at the date of redemption.

Income tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiaries decreased $8.8 million due to the recognition of a $5.8 million tax benefit in 2009 related to the adjustment of the carrying value of our investment in an unconsolidated non-retail real estate entity.

Income from unconsolidated entities increased $8.0 million as a result of our 2008 joint venture openings and expansion activity, interest rate savings from favorable interest rates and debt refinancings, and additional depreciation provisions related to the finalization of purchase accounting on asset basis step-ups in the 2008 period associated with

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

the acquisition of Mills, offset by the gain recognized in 2008 from our disposition of an investment holding of non-retail real estate adjacent to one of our regional mall operating properties.

In 2009, we recognized a $42.7 million impairment charge representing our share of impairment charges recorded by unconsolidated entities and also impairment charges on our investment in certain unconsolidated entities for which we deemed the declines in value below our carrying amount other-than-temporary.

The loss on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities of $30.1 million in 2009 was the result of the sale of one regional mall, three community centers, and our 32.5% joint venture interests in our shopping centers operating or under development in China.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased $58.0 million primarily due to a decrease in the income of the Operating Partnership.

Preferred dividends decreased $14.8 million as a result of the conversion of 6.4 million Series I preferred shares into common shares during 2008.

Year Ended December 31, 2008 vs. Year Ended December 31, 2007

Minimum rents increased $137.2 million in 2008, of which the property transactions accounted for $64.6 million of the increase. Comparable rents increased $72.6 million, or 3.6%. This was primarily due to an increase in minimum rents of $82.1 million and an $8.5 million increase in straight-line rents, offset by a $16.4 million decrease in comparable property activity, primarily attributable to lower amounts of fair market value of in-place lease amortization. Overage rents decreased $9.8 million or 8.9%, as a result of a reduction in tenant sales for the period as compared to the prior year.

Tenant reimbursements increased $42.8 million, due to a $26.9 million increase attributable to the property transactions and a $15.9 million, or 1.6%, increase in the comparable properties due to our ongoing initiative to convert leases to a fixed reimbursement methodology for common area maintenance costs.

Management fees and other revenues increased $18.7 million principally as a result of the full year of additional management fees derived from managing the properties acquired in the Mills acquisition, and additional leasing and development fees as a result of incremental joint venture property activity.

Total other income decreased $56.6 million principally as a result of the following:

•: a $26.7 million decrease in interest income primarily due to the repayment of loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills, and lower interest rates attributable to this loan facility, combined with decreased interest earnings on investments due to lower excess cash balances and interest rates earned in 2008 as compared to 2007,
•: an $18.7 million decrease in lease settlement income as a result of significant lease settlements received from two department stores in 2007, and
•: a $14.3 million decrease in loan financing fees related to Mills-related loan activity during 2007 which did not recur in 2008.

These decreases were offset in part by a $3.1 million increase in net other activity.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $63.8 million in 2008 primarily due to our acquisition, expansion and renovation activity and the accelerated depreciation of tenant improvements for tenant leases terminated during the period and for properties scheduled for redevelopment.

Real estate taxes increased $21.3 million from the prior period, $9.0 million of which is related to the property transactions, and $12.3 million from our comparable properties due to the effect of increases resulting from reassessments, higher tax rates, and the effect of expansion and renovation activities.

Repairs and maintenance decreased $12.3 million due to our cost savings efforts.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Provision for credit losses increased $14.5 million primarily due to an increase in tenant bankruptcies and tenant delinquencies. This was reflected in total square footage lost to tenant bankruptcies of 1,104,000 during 2008 as compared to only 69,000 square feet in 2007.

Home and regional office expense increased $8.3 million primarily due to increased personnel costs, primarily the result of the Mills acquisition, and the increased expense from certain incentive compensation plans.

Other expenses increased $6.1 million due to increased consulting and professional fees, including legal fees and related costs.

In 2008, we recognized impairment charges of $16.5 million primarily representing the write-down of a mall property to its estimated net realizable value and the write-off of predevelopment costs for various development opportunities that we no longer plan to pursue.

Interest expense increased marginally by $1.3 million despite an $823.9 million increase in consolidated borrowings to fund our development and redevelopment activities, and the full year impact of our borrowings to fund the Mills-related loans, due to a 55 basis point decline in our weighted average borrowing rates. This decrease in weighted average borrowing rates was driven primarily by a decline in the applicable LIBOR rate for a majority of our consolidated floating rate debt instruments, including the Credit Facility.

We recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $20.3 million in the second quarter of 2008 related to the redemption of $200 million in remarketable debt securities. We extinguished the debt because the remarketing reset base rate was above the rate for 30-year U.S. Treasury securities at the date of redemption.

Income tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiaries increased $14.9 million due primarily to a $19.5 million tax benefit recognized in 2007 related to the impairment charge resulting from of the write-off of our investment in a land joint venture in Phoenix, Arizona.

Income from unconsolidated entities decreased $5.9 million, due primarily to the impact of the Mills acquisition (net of eliminations). On a net basis, our share of loss from SPG-FCM increased $4.7 million from the prior period due to a full year of SPG-FCM activity in 2008 as compared to only nine months of activity in 2007. The loss was driven by depreciation and amortization expense on asset basis step-ups in purchase accounting.

In 2007, we recognized an impairment charge of $55.1 million related to a land joint venture in Phoenix, Arizona.

The gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities of $92.0 million in 2007 was primarily the result of Simon Ivanhoe selling its interest in certain assets located in Poland.

In 2007, the loss on sale of discontinued operations of $35.3 million represents the net loss upon disposition of five non-core properties consisting of three regional malls and two community/lifestyle centers.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased $12.1 million primarily due to a decrease in the income of the Operating Partnership.

Preferred dividends decreased $14.0 million as a result of the conversion of 6.4 million Series I preferred shares into common shares and the redemption of the Series G preferred stock in the fourth quarter of 2007.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Because we generate revenues primarily from long-term leases, our financing strategy relies primarily on long-term fixed rate debt. We manage our floating rate debt to be at or below 15-25% of total outstanding indebtedness by negotiating interest rates for each financing or refinancing based on current market conditions. Floating rate debt currently comprises approximately 12% of our total consolidated debt at December 31, 2009. We also enter into interest rate protection agreements as appropriate to assist in managing our interest rate risk. We derive most of our liquidity from leases that generate positive net cash flow from operations and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities that totaled $1.9 billion during 2009. In addition, the new credit facility provides an alternative source of liquidity as our cash needs vary from time to time.

Our balance of cash and cash equivalents increased $3.2 billion during 2009 to $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2009. December 31, 2009 and 2008 balances include $38.1 million and $29.8 million, respectively, related to our co-branded gift card programs, which we do not consider available for general working capital purposes.

On December 31, 2009, we had available borrowing capacity of approximately $3.1 billion under the Credit Facility, net of outstanding borrowings of $446.1 million and letters of credit of $5.7 million. During 2009, the maximum amount outstanding under the Credit Facility was $1.6 billion and the weighted average amount outstanding was $669.8 million. The weighted average interest rate was 0.94% for the year ended December 31, 2009. On December 8, 2009, the Operating Partnership entered into a new unsecured revolving corporate credit facility providing an initial borrowing capacity of $3.565 billion. The new credit facility contains an accordion feature allowing the maximum borrowing capacity to expand to $4.0 billion. The new credit facility matures on March 31, 2013. Borrowings on the new facility were not drawn until January 5, 2010 when the Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings on the Credit Facility were transitioned to the new credit facility.

We and the Operating Partnership have historically had access to public equity and long term unsecured debt markets and access to private equity from institutional investors at the property level.

Our business model requires us to regularly access the debt and equity capital markets to raise funds for acquisition and development activity, redevelopment capital, and to refinance maturing debt. The turmoil in the capital markets that began in 2008 and which now shows signs of abating had an impact on many businesses', including ours, ability to access debt and equity capital. We raised approximately $3.4 billion in the public capital markets in 2009; however, there is no assurance we will be able to continue to do so in future periods or on similar terms or conditions. We believe we have sufficient cash on hand and availability under the new credit facility to address our debt maturities and capital needs through 2010.

As discussed further in Financing and Debt below, on January 12, 2010, we commenced a tender offer to purchase ten outstanding series of notes. We subsequently purchased $2.285 billion of notes on January 26, 2010. The purchase of the notes was primarily funded with proceeds from the sale of $2.25 billion of senior unsecured notes issued on January 25, 2010.

On February 16, 2010, we announced that we had made a written offer in early February to acquire General Growth Properties, Inc. (or General Growth) in a transaction valued at more than $10 billion, including approximately $9 billion in cash. Of this consideration, approximately $7 billion will be paid to unsecured creditors, representing par value plus accrued and unpaid dividends and interest. The transaction would not be subject to a financing condition and would be financed through cash on hand, asset sales and through equity co-investments in acquired properties by strategic institutional investors, with the balance coming from our existing credit facility. We indicated our willingness to discuss consideration consisting in whole or in part of our common equity in lieu of the cash portion of the consideration to General Growth's stockholders, and perhaps certain of its unsecured creditors, for those who would prefer to receive equity. The offer is subject to confirmatory due diligence and the negotiation and execution of a definitive transaction agreement, as well as required bankruptcy court and creditor approvals. As of the filing of this report, no transaction has occurred.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Acquisition of The Mills Corporation by SPG-FCM

On February 16, 2007, SPG-FCM, a 50/50 joint venture between an affiliate of the Operating Partnership and funds managed by Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., or Farallon, entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of Mills for $25.25 per common share in cash. The acquisition of Mills and its interests in the 36 properties that remain at December 31, 2009 was completed in April 2007. As of December 31, 2009, we and Farallon had each funded $650.0 million into SPG-FCM to acquire all of the common stock of Mills. As part of the transaction, the Operating Partnership also made loans to SPG-FCM and Mills primarily at rates of LIBOR plus 270-275 basis points. These funds were used by SPG-FCM and Mills to repay loans and other obligations of Mills, including the redemption of preferred stock, during 2007. As of December 31, 2009, the outstanding balance of our loan to SPG-FCM was $632.0 million, and the average outstanding balance during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009 of all loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills was approximately $589.5 million. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded approximately $9.3 million, $15.3 million and $39.1 million in interest income (net of inter-entity eliminations) related to these loans, respectively. We also recorded fee income, including fee income amortization related to up-front fees on loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills, during 2009, 2008 and 2007 of approximately $3.7 million, $3.1 million and $17.4 million (net of inter-entity eliminations), respectively, for providing refinancing services to Mills' properties and SPG-FCM. The existing loan facility to SPG-FCM bears a rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points and matures on June 7, 2010, with two available one-year extensions. Fees charged on loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the loan.

The Mills acquisition involved the purchase of all Mills' outstanding shares of common stock and common units for approximately $1.7 billion (at $25.25 per share or unit), the assumption of $954.9 million of preferred stock, the assumption of a proportionate share of property-level mortgage debt, of which SPG-FCM's share approximated $3.8 billion, the assumption of $1.2 billion in unsecured loans provided by us, costs to effect the acquisition, and certain liabilities and contingencies, including an ongoing investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $8 billion. SPG-FCM has completed its purchase price allocations for the Mills acquisition using valuations developed with the assistance of a third-party professional appraisal firm.

In conjunction with the Mills acquisition, we acquired a majority interest in two properties in which we previously held a 50% ownership interest (Town Center at Cobb and Gwinnett Place) and as a result we have consolidated these two properties at the date of acquisition.

In addition to the loans provided to SPG-FCM, we also provide management services to substantially all of the properties in which SPG-FCM holds an interest.

Cash Flows

Our net cash flow from operating activities and distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities totaled $1.9 billion during 2009. In addition, we received net proceeds from our debt financing and repayment activities in 2009 of $542.1 million. These activities are further discussed below in "Financing and Debt". Also during 2009, we:

•: sold 40,250,000 shares of common stock resulting in total proceeds of $1.6 billion,
•: paid stock dividends and unitholder distributions of $147.8 million in cash and $754.2 million in common stock and units,
•: paid preferred stock dividends and preferred unit distributions totaling $38.2 million,
•: redeemed our 7.75%/8% cumulative redeemable preferred units for $85.1 million,
•: funded consolidated capital expenditures of $376.3 million (includes development and other costs of $160.4 million, renovation and expansion costs of $159.0 million, and tenant costs and other operational capital expenditures of $56.9 million) and
•: funded investments in unconsolidated entities of $107.2 million.

In general, we anticipate that cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet operating expenses, monthly debt service, recurring capital expenditures, and distributions to stockholders necessary to maintain our REIT

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

qualification on a long-term basis. In addition, we expect to be able to obtain capital for nonrecurring capital expenditures, such as acquisitions, major building renovations and expansions, as well as for scheduled principal maturities on outstanding indebtedness, from:

•: excess cash generated from operating performance and working capital reserves,
•: borrowings on our new credit facility,
•: additional secured or unsecured debt financing, or
•: additional equity raised in the public or private markets.

We expect to generate positive cash flow from operations in 2010, and we consider these projected cash flows in our sources and uses of cash. These cash flows are principally derived from retail tenants, many of whom continue to experience considerable financial distress. A significant deterioration in projected cash flows from operations could cause us to increase our reliance on available funds from the new credit facility, curtail planned capital expenditures, or seek other additional sources of financing as discussed above.

Financing and Debt

Unsecured Debt

Our unsecured debt at December 31, 2009 consisted of approximately $11.6 billion of senior unsecured notes of the Operating Partnership and $446.1 million outstanding under our prior Credit Facility. The total outstanding balance of the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2009 was comprised of the U.S. dollar equivalent of Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings which expired on January 11, 2010. The balance as of December 31, 2009 reflects interest at LIBOR plus 37.5 basis points and an additional facility fee of 12.5 basis points as these borrowings were made under our prior Credit Facility. On December 8, 2009, the Operating Partnership entered into a new unsecured revolving corporate credit facility providing an initial borrowing capacity of $3.565 billion. The new credit facility contains an accordion feature allowing the maximum borrowing capacity to expand to $4.0 billion. The new credit facility matures on March 31, 2013. The base interest on the new credit facility is LIBOR plus 210 basis points and includes a facility fee of 40 basis points. Borrowings on the new facility were not drawn until January 5, 2010 when the Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings on the Credit Facility were transitioned to the new credit facility.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we drew amounts from the prior Credit Facility to fund the redemption of $600.0 million of maturing senior unsecured notes. We repaid a total of $1.2 billion on our Credit Facility during the year ended December 31, 2009. The maximum outstanding balance during the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $1.6 billion. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the weighted average outstanding balance of the prior Credit Facility was approximately $669.8 million.

On March 25, 2009 the Operating Partnership issued $650.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 10.35%. The proceeds from the offering were used to reduce borrowings on the prior Credit Facility and for general business purposes.

On May 15, 2009, the Operating Partnership issued $600.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 6.75%. The proceeds from the offering were used for general business purposes. The notes were re-opened on August 11, 2009, and an additional $500.0 million of senior unsecured notes were issued. We used the proceeds from the offering for general business purposes.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Secured Debt

Total secured indebtedness was $6.6 billion and $6.3 billion at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

On July 30, 2009, we borrowed $400.0 million on a mortgage that is secured by Greenwood Park Mall, Southpark Mall, and Walt Whitman Mall, which matures on August 1, 2016 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 8.00%. This is a cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted loan as it pertains to these properties.

Summary of Financing

Our consolidated debt, adjusted to reflect outstanding derivative instruments, and the effective weighted average interest rates as of December 31, 2009, and 2008, consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

Debt Subject to	Adjusted Balance as of December 31, 2009				Adjusted Balance as of December 31, 2008

Fixed Rate	$	16,814,240	6.10	%	$	15,424,318	5.76	%
Variable Rate		1,816,062	1.19	%		2,618,214	1.31	%

	$	18,630,302	5.62	%	$	18,042,532	5.12	%

As of December 31, 2009, we had $694.2 million of notional amount fixed rate swap agreements that have a weighted average fixed pay rate of 2.79% and a weighted average variable receive rate of 0.60%. As of December 31, 2009, the net effect of these agreements effectively converted $694.2 million of variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.

Contractual Obligations and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements: The following table summarizes the material aspects of our future obligations as of December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

		2010		2011 to 2012		2013 to 2015		After 2015		Total

Long Term Debt
Consolidated (1)		$	2,311,705	$	4,965,828	$	6,424,036	$	4,918,999	$	18,620,568

Pro Rata Share Of Long Term Debt:
	Consolidated (2)	$	2,292,867	$	4,835,957	$	6,355,112	$	4,860,737	$	18,344,673
	Joint Ventures (2)		788,956		1,931,365		2,190,793		1,633,423		6,544,537

Total Pro Rata Share Of Long Term Debt			3,081,823		6,767,322		8,545,905		6,494,160		24,889,210
Consolidated Capital Expenditure Commitments (3)			27,938		357		—		—		28,295
Joint Venture Capital Expenditure Commitments (3)			6,115		3,779		—		—		9,894
Consolidated Ground Lease Commitments (4)			16,782		33,760		51,974		630,654		733,170

Total		$	3,132,658	$	6,805,218	$	8,597,879	$	7,124,814	$	25,660,569

(1): Represents principal maturities only and therefore, excludes net premiums and discounts of $9,734 and all required interest payments. We incurred interest expense during 2009 of $992.1 million, net of capitalized interest of $14.5 million.
(2): Represents our pro rata share of principal maturities and excludes net premiums and discounts.
(3): Represents our pro rata share of capital expenditure commitments.
(4): Represents only the minimum non-cancellable lease period, excluding applicable lease extension and renewal options.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of our investments in real estate joint ventures which are common in the real estate industry and are described in Note 7 of the notes to the accompanying financial statements. Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture, is typically secured by the joint venture property, and is non-recourse to us. As of December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership had loan guarantee obligations to support $47.2 million to support our total $6.5 billion share of joint venture mortgage and other indebtedness presented in the table above.

Preferred Stock Activity

During 2009, we issued a total of 500,891 shares of Series I 6% Preferred Stock upon conversion of an equal number of Series I preferred units.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

Buy-sell provisions are common in real estate partnership agreements. Most of our partners are institutional investors who have a history of direct investment in retail real estate. Our partners in our joint venture properties may initiate these provisions at any time. If we determine it is in our stockholders' best interests for us to purchase the joint venture interest and we believe we have adequate liquidity to execute the purchase without hindering our cash flows, then we may initiate these provisions or elect to buy. If we decide to sell any of our joint venture interests, we expect to use the net proceeds to reduce outstanding indebtedness or to reinvest in development, redevelopment, or expansion opportunities.

Acquisitions. Although the acquisition of high quality individual properties or portfolios of properties remains an integral component of our growth strategies, we did not acquire any properties during 2009.

We entered into a definitive agreement in December 2009 to acquire all of the outlet shopping centers currently owned by Prime Outlets Acquisition Company and certain of its affiliated entities, or the Prime Outlets, subject to Prime Outlets' existing fixed rate indebtedness and preferred stock. The Prime Outlets consist of 22 high quality outlet centers located in major metropolitan markets. We will pay consideration (consisting of cash and units of the Operating Partnership) of approximately $0.7 billion for the owners' interests in the Prime Outlets. The acquisition is subject to several closing conditions relating to certain financing arrangements of the Prime Outlets. Assuming all closing conditions are satisfied on a timely basis, we expect the transaction will close in the second quarter of 2010.

Dispositions. We continue to pursue the sale of properties that no longer meet our strategic criteria or that are not the primary retail venue within their trade area. In 2009, we sold the following wholly-owned properties: Raleigh Springs, a regional mall located in Memphis, Tennessee; Eastland Plaza, a community center located in Tulsa, Oklahoma; Knoxville Commons, a community center located in Knoxville, Tennessee; and Park Plaza, a community center located in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. We received net proceeds of $3.9 million on the U.S. property dispositions and recorded a net loss on these dispositions of $9.8 million. Also in December 2009, we recognized a loss on our joint venture interests in our shopping centers operating and under development in China. We sold our interests to affiliates of our Chinese partner for approximately $29 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $20 million. The loss on sales of these wholly owned entities and our joint venture interests in China is included in "(Loss) gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities" in the 2009 consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

On February 4, 2010, we and our partner in Simon Ivanhoe, Ivanhoe Cambridge, entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the interests in Simon Ivanhoe which owns seven shopping centers located in France and Poland to Unibail-Rodamco. The joint venture partners will receive consideration of €715 million for the assets, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We expect our share of the gain on sale of our interests in Simon Ivanhoe to be approximately $300 million. The transaction is scheduled to close during the first half of 2010, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.

We do not believe the sale of these properties and joint venture interests will have a material impact on our future results of operations or cash flows. We believe the disposition of these assets will enhance the average overall quality of our portfolio.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Development Activity

New Domestic Developments. Given the significant downturn in the economy, we have substantially reduced our development spending. On August 6, 2009, we opened Cincinnati Premium Outlets, a 400,000 square foot upscale manufacturers' outlet center located in Monroe, OH. The total cost to complete this project was approximately $93.0 million, which was funded with available cash from operations. Also included in development projects is a 600,000 square foot Phase II expansion at The Domain, which is expected to open in the first half of 2010. Other than these projects, our share of other 2009 new developments was not significant.

Strategic Domestic Expansions and Renovations. In addition to new development, we incur costs related to construction for significant renovation and expansion projects at our properties. On April 23, 2009, we opened The Promenade at Camarillo Premium Outlets, a 220,000 square foot expansion of an existing center. The total cost to complete this project was approximately $73.0 million and was funded with available cash from operations. Included in our renovation and expansion projects is the addition of Nordstrom at South Shore Plaza, which is expected to open in the first half of 2010. We expect to fund this capital project with cash flow from operations. Our share of the cost of renovation or expansion projects that we expect to initiate or complete in 2010 is approximately $40.0 million.

Capital Expenditures on Consolidated Properties.

The following table summarizes total capital expenditures on consolidated properties on a cash basis:

	2009		2008		2007

New Developments and Other	$	160	$	327	$	432
Renovations and Expansions		159		432		349
Tenant Allowances		43		72		106
Operational Capital Expenditures		14		43		130

Total	$	376	$	874	$	1,017

International Development Activity. We typically reinvest net cash flow from our international investments to fund future international development activity. We believe this strategy mitigates some of the risk of our initial investment and our exposure to changes in foreign currencies. We have also funded our European investments with Euro-denominated borrowings that act as a natural hedge against local currency fluctuations. This has also been the case with our Premium Outlet Centers in Japan and Mexico where we use Yen and Peso denominated financing, respectively. Currently, our consolidated net income exposure to changes in the volatility of the Euro, Yen, Peso and other foreign currencies is not material. We expect our share of international development costs for 2010 will be approximately $65.0 million.

The carrying amount of our total combined investment in Simon Ivanhoe and GCI, as of December 31, 2009, including all related components of other comprehensive income, was $298.8 million. On December 14, 2009, we made an additional capital contribution to GCI of $79.4 million which was used to fund certain liabilities of the joint venture. The contribution increased our investment in GCI but did not impact our ownership percentage of the venture. Our investments in Simon Ivanhoe and GCI are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Currently, two European developments are under construction which will add approximately 942,000 square feet of GLA for a total net cost of approximately €221 million, of which our share is approximately €53 million, or $76.0 million based on current Euro:USD exchange rates. Although we agreed to sell our joint venture interest in Simon Ivanhoe in 2010, we and Ivanhoe Cambridge have the right to participate with Unibail-Rodamco in the potential development of up to five new retail projects in the Simon Ivanhoe pipeline, subject to customary approval rights. We will own a 25% interest in any of these projects in which we agree to participate.

As of December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of our 40% joint venture investment in the eight Japanese Premium Outlet Centers including all related components of other comprehensive income was $302.2 million. In 2009, we completed construction and opened Ami Premium Outlets, a 224,500 square foot center located outside Tokyo, Japan. The project's total projected net cost is JPY 15.4 billion, of which our share is approximately JPY 6.2 billion, or $66.8 million based on applicable Yen:USD exchange rates. We also completed construction and opened a 171,800

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

square foot expansion at Kobe-Sanda Premium Outlets in Hyougo-ken, Japan. The project's total projected net cost is JPY 7.6 billion, of which our share is approximately JPY 3.0 billion, or $33.0 million based on applicable Yen:USD exchange rates. Currently, Toki Premium Outlets Phase III and Tosu Premium Outlets Phase III are under construction in Japan. Toki Premium Outlets Phase III is a 62,000 square foot expansion to the Toki Premium Outlet Center located in Toki, Japan. The project's total projected net cost is JPY 2.2 billion, of which our share is approximately JPY 864 million, or $9.4 million based on applicable Yen:USD exchange rates. Tosu Premium Outlets Phase III is a 52,000 square foot expansion to the Tosu Premium Outlet Center located in Fukuoka, Japan. The project's total projected net cost is JPY 3.2 billion, of which our share is approximately JPY 1.3 billion, or $13.7 million based on applicable Yen:USD exchange rates.

Dividends and Stock Repurchase Program

Dividends during 2009 aggregated $2.70 per share and were paid in a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, subject to stockholder election. Dividends during 2008 aggregated $3.60 per share and were paid entirely in cash. We must pay a minimum amount of dividends to maintain our status as a REIT. Our dividends typically exceed our consolidated net income generated in any given year primarily because of depreciation, which is a "non-cash" expense. Our future dividends and future distributions of the Operating Partnership will be determined by the Board of Directors based on actual results of operations, cash available for dividends and limited partner distributions, and what may be required to maintain our status as a REIT.

Our Board had authorized the repurchase of up to $1.0 billion of common stock through July 2009. No purchases were made as part of this program in 2009. The program was not renewed and has now expired.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements made in this section or elsewhere in this report may be deemed "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained, and it is possible that our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to: the impact of a prolonged recession, our ability to meet debt service requirements, the availability and terms of financing, changes in our credit rating, changes in market rates of interest and foreign exchange rates for foreign currencies, the ability to hedge interest rate risk, risks associated with the acquisition, development and expansion of properties, general risks related to retail real estate, the liquidity of real estate investments, environmental liabilities, changes in market rental rates, trends in the retail industry, relationships with anchor tenants, the inability to collect rent due to the bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or otherwise, risks relating to joint venture properties, competitive market forces, risks related to international activities, insurance costs and coverage, terrorist activities, and maintenance of our status as a real estate investment trust. We discuss these and other risks and uncertainties under the heading "Risk Factors" in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. We may update that discussion in subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, but otherwise we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Non-GAAP Financial Measure — Funds from Operations

Industry practice is to evaluate real estate properties in part based on funds from operations, or FFO. We consider FFO to be a key measure of our operating performance that is not specifically defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. We believe that FFO is helpful to investors because it is a widely recognized measure of the performance of REITs and provides a relevant basis for comparison among REITs. We also use this measure internally to measure the operating performance of our portfolio.

We determine FFO based on the definition set forth by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, as consolidated net income computed in accordance with GAAP:

•: excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization,
•: excluding gains and losses from extraordinary items and cumulative effects of accounting changes,
•: excluding gains and losses from the sales of previously depreciated operating properties,
•: plus the allocable portion of FFO of unconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting based upon economic ownership interest, and
•: all determined on a consistent basis in accordance with GAAP.

We have adopted NAREIT's clarification of the definition of FFO that requires us to include the effects of nonrecurring items not classified as extraordinary, cumulative effect of accounting changes, or a gain or loss resulting from the sale of previously depreciated operating properties. We include in FFO gains and losses realized from the sale of land, outlot buildings, marketable and non-marketable securities, and investment holdings of non-retail real estate. However, you should understand that our computation of FFO might not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs and that FFO:

•: does not represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP,
•: should not be considered as an alternative to consolidated net income determined in accordance with GAAP as a measure of operating performance, and
•: is not an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

The following schedule sets forth total FFO before allocation to the limited partners of the Operating Partnership and FFO allocable to us. This schedule also reconciles FFO to consolidated net income, which we believe is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure for the periods presented.

		For the Year Ended December 31,

		2009			2008			2007
		(in thousands)
Funds from Operations		$	1,748,280		$	1,852,331		$	1,691,887

Increase/(Decrease) in FFO from prior period			(5.6	)%		9.5	%		10.1	%

Consolidated Net Income		$	387,262		$	599,535		$	639,236
Adjustments to Arrive at FFO:
	Depreciation and amortization from consolidated properties and discontinued operations		983,487			954,494			892,488
	Simon's share of depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated entities		399,509			376,670			315,159
	Loss (gain) on sales of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and discontinued operations		30,108			—			(56,792	)
	Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest holders in properties		(5,496	)		(11,091	)		(12,903	)
	Depreciation and amortization attributable to noncontrolling interest holders in properties		(8,396	)		(8,559	)		(8,646	)
	Preferred distributions and dividends		(38,194	)		(58,718	)		(76,655	)

Funds from Operations		$	1,748,280		$	1,852,331		$	1,691,887

	FFO Allocable to Simon Property	$	1,440,554		$	1,477,446		$	1,342,496
Diluted net income per share to diluted FFO per share reconciliation:
Diluted net income per share		$	1.05		$	1.87		$	1.95
	Depreciation and amortization from consolidated properties and beneficial interests, and our share of depreciation and amortization from unconsolidated affiliates, net of noncontrolling interest portion of depreciation and amortization		4.22			4.69			4.27
	Loss (gain) on sales of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities and discontinued operations, net of limited partners' interest		0.09			—			(0.20	)
	Impact of additional dilutive securities for FFO per share		(0.03	)		(0.14	)		(0.12	)

Diluted FFO per share		$	5.33		$	6.42		$	5.90

Basic weighted average shares outstanding			267,055			225,333			222,998
Adjustments for dilution calculation:
Effect of stock options			316			551			778
Effect of contingently issuable shares from stock dividends			1,101			—			—
Impact of Series C cumulative preferred 7% convertible units			46			75			122
Impact of Series I preferred stock			6,354			10,773			11,065
Impact of Series I preferred units			1,228			1,531			2,485

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding			276,100			238,263			237,448
Weighted average limited partnership units outstanding			57,292			57,175			58,036

Diluted weighted average shares and units outstanding			333,392			295,438			295,484

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management's Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

•: Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and disposition of assets;
•: Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
•: Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

Based on that assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on their assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. Their report appears on page 89 of this Annual Report.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Simon Property Group, Inc.:

We have audited Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries' management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 of Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and our report dated February 25, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


		/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana February 25, 2010

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Simon Property Group, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


		/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana February 25, 2010

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)

				December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

ASSETS:
	Investment properties, at cost			$	25,336,189		$	25,205,715
		Less — accumulated depreciation			7,004,534			6,184,285

					18,331,655			19,021,430
	Cash and cash equivalents				3,957,718			773,544
	Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net				402,729			414,856
	Investment in unconsolidated entities, at equity				1,468,577			1,663,886
	Deferred costs and other assets				1,155,587			1,028,333
	Note receivable from related party				632,000			520,700

			Total assets	$	25,948,266		$	23,422,749

LIABILITIES:
	Mortgages and other indebtedness			$	18,630,302		$	18,042,532
	Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenues				987,530			1,086,248
	Cash distributions and losses in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity				457,754			380,730
	Other liabilities and accrued dividends				159,345			155,151

			Total liabilities		20,234,931			19,664,661

Commitments and contingencies
Limited partners' preferred interest in the Operating Partnership and noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties					125,815			276,608
Series I 6% convertible perpetual preferred stock, 19,000,000 shares authorized, 8,091,155 and 7,590,264 issued and outstanding, respectively, at liquidation value					404,558			379,513
EQUITY:
Stockholders' equity
	Capital stock (850,000,000 and 750,000,000 total shares authorized, respectively, $.0001 par value, 238,000,000 and 237,996,000 shares of excess common stock, respectively, 100,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock):
			Series J 8³/8% cumulative redeemable preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 796,948 issued and outstanding, with a liquidation value of $39,847		45,704			46,032
			Common stock, $.0001 par value, 511,990,000 and 400,004,000 shares authorized, respectively, 289,866,711 and 235,691,040 issued and outstanding, respectively		29			24
			Class B common stock, $.0001 par value, 10,000 and 12,000,000 shares authorized,respectively, 8,000 issued and outstanding		—			—
	Capital in excess of par value				7,547,959			5,410,147
	Accumulated deficit				(2,955,671	)		(2,491,929	)
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss				(3,088	)		(165,066	)
	Common stock held in treasury at cost, 4,126,440 and 4,379,396 shares, respectively				(176,796	)		(186,210	)

			Total stockholders' equity		4,458,137			2,612,998
Noncontrolling interests					724,825			488,969

			Total equity		5,182,962			3,101,967

			Total liabilities and equity	$	25,948,266		$	23,422,749

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

			For the Twelve Months Ended December 31,

			2009			2008			2007
REVENUE:
	Minimum rent		$	2,316,838		$	2,291,919		$	2,154,713
	Overage rent			84,922			100,222			110,003
	Tenant reimbursements			1,062,227			1,065,957			1,023,164
	Management fees and other revenues			124,059			132,471			113,740
	Other income			187,170			192,586			249,179

		Total revenue		3,775,216			3,783,155			3,650,799

EXPENSES:
	Property operating			425,703			455,874			454,510
	Depreciation and amortization			997,598			969,477			905,636
	Real estate taxes			333,957			334,657			313,311
	Repairs and maintenance			91,736			107,879			120,224
	Advertising and promotion			93,565			96,783			94,340
	Provision for credit losses			22,655			24,035			9,562
	Home and regional office costs			110,048			144,865			136,610
	General and administrative			18,124			20,987			19,587
	Impairment charge			197,353			16,489			—
	Transaction expenses			5,697			—			—
	Other			72,088			69,061			62,987

		Total operating expenses		2,368,524			2,240,107			2,116,767

OPERATING INCOME				1,406,692			1,543,048			1,534,032
Interest expense				(992,065	)		(947,140	)		(945,852	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt				—			(20,330	)		—
Income tax benefit (expense) of taxable REIT subsidiaries				5,220			(3,581	)		11,322
Income from unconsolidated entities				40,220			32,246			38,120
Impairment charge from investments in unconsolidated entities				(42,697	)		(4,683	)		(55,061	)
(Loss) gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities				(30,108	)		—			92,044

Consolidated income from continuing operations				387,262			599,560			674,605
Discontinued operations				—			(25	)		(117	)
Loss on sale of discontinued operations				—			—			(35,252	)

CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME				387,262			599,535			639,236
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests				77,855			135,899			147,997
Preferred dividends				26,309			41,119			55,075

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS			$	283,098		$	422,517		$	436,164

BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
		Income from continuing operations	$	1.06		$	1.88		$	2.09
		Discontinued operations		—			—			(0.13	)

		Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	1.06		$	1.88		$	1.96

DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
		Income from continuing operations	$	1.05		$	1.87			2.08
		Discontinued operations		—			—			(0.13	)

		Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	1.05		$	1.87		$	1.95

	Consolidated Net Income		$	387,262		$	599,535		$	639,236
	Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate hedge agreements			1,509			(50,973	)		(10,760	)
	Net (loss) gain on derivative instruments reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense			(14,754	)		(3,205	)		902
	Currency translation adjustments			(8,244	)		(6,953	)		6,297
	Changes in available-for-sale securities and other			224,694			(168,619	)		2,020

	Comprehensive income			590,467			369,785			637,695
	Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests			119,082			89,302			147,608

	Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders		$	471,385		$	280,483		$	490,087

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)

					For the Twelve Months Ended December 31,

					2009			2008			2007
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Consolidated Net Income				$	387,262		$	599,535		$	639,236
		Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities —
			Depreciation and amortization			1,009,490			956,827			875,284
			Impairment charges			240,050			21,172			55,061
			Loss (gain) on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities			30,108			—			(92,044	)
			Loss on disposal or sale of discontinued operations			—			—			35,252
			Straight-line rent			(24,653	)		(33,672	)		(20,907	)
			Equity in income of unconsolidated entities			(40,220	)		(32,246	)		(38,120	)
			Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities			105,318			118,665			101,998
		Changes in assets and liabilities —
			Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net			37,465			(14,312	)		(40,976	)
			Deferred costs and other assets			(28,089	)		(21,295	)		(70,138	)
			Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, deferred revenues and other liabilities			3,789			41,213			114,786

				Net cash provided by operating activities		1,720,520			1,635,887			1,559,432

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
		Acquisitions				—			—			(263,098	)
		Funding of loans to related parties				(120,000	)		(8,000	)		(2,752,400	)
		Repayments on loans to related parties				8,700			35,300			2,204,400
		Capital expenditures, net				(376,275	)		(874,286	)		(1,017,472	)
		Cash impact from the consolidation and de-consolidation of properties				—			—			6,117
		Net proceeds from sale of partnership interests, other assets and discontinued operations				33,106			—			56,374
		Investments in unconsolidated entities				(107,204	)		(137,509	)		(687,327	)
		Purchase of marketable and non-marketable securities				(132,984	)		(355,994	)		(29,644	)
		Sale of marketable securities				74,116			8,997			16,989
		Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities and other				201,550			309,217			416,485

			Net cash used in investing activities			(418,991	)		(1,022,275	)		(2,049,576	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
		Proceeds from sales of common stock and other				1,642,228			11,106			156,710
		Purchase of limited partner units				—			(16,009	)		(83,993	)
		Preferred stock redemptions				(87,689	)		(1,845	)		(300,468	)
		Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders in properties				(30,706	)		(28,251	)		(91,032	)
		Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders in properties				2,795			4,005			2,903
		Preferred distributions of the Operating Partnership				(11,885	)		(17,599	)		(21,580	)
		Preferred dividends and distributions to stockholders				(148,507	)		(852,446	)		(804,271	)
		Distributions to limited partners				(25,658	)		(205,850	)		(194,823	)
		Mortgage and other indebtedness proceeds, net of transaction costs				3,220,706			4,456,975			5,577,083
		Mortgage and other indebtedness principal payments				(2,678,639	)		(3,692,136	)		(4,177,763	)

			Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			1,882,645			(342,050	)		62,766

INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS						3,184,174			271,562			(427,378	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year						773,544			501,982			929,360

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year					$	3,957,718		$	773,544		$	501,982

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(Dollars in thousands)

		Preferred Stock			Common Stock		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Capital in Excess of Par Value			Accumulated Deficit			Common Stock Held in Treasury			Noncontrolling interests			Total Equity

Balance at December 31, 2006		$	195,532		$	23	$	19,239		$	5,010,256		$	(1,771,481	)	$	(193,599	)	$	780,706		$	4,040,676

Conversion of limited partner units (1,692,474 common shares, Note 10)											22,781									(22,781	)		—
Stock options exercised (231,025 common shares)											7,604												7,604
Series I preferred stock conversion to common stock (65,907 preferred shares to 51,987 common shares)											3,296												3,296
Series I preferred unit conversion to limited partner units																				30,320			30,320
Series J preferred stock premium amortization			(328	)																			(328	)
Treasury stock purchase (572,000 Shares)																	(49,269	)					(49,269	)
Series G preferred stock accretion			1,157																				1,157
Series G preferred stock redemption (3,000,000 shares)			(150,000	)																			(150,000	)
Series L preferred stock issuance (6,000,000 shares)			150,000																				150,000
Series L preferred stock redemption (6,000,000 shares)			(150,000	)																			(150,000	)
Stock incentive program (222,725 common shares, net)											(29,262	)					29,262						—
Common stock retired (23,000 shares)											(773	)		(1,518	)								(2,291	)
Amortization of stock incentive											26,779												26,779
Other											571			(10,918	)					(17,996	)		(28,343	)
Adjustment to limited partners' interest from increased ownership in the Operating Partnership											26,466									(26,466	)		—
Distributions to common shareholders and limited partners, excluding Operating Partnership preferred interests														(804,271	)					(194,823	)		(999,094	)
Distributions to other noncontrolling interest partners																				(82,010	)		(82,010	)
Other comprehensive income								(1,152	)											(389	)		(1,541	)
Net income, excluding $21,580 attributable to preferred interests in the Operating Partnership														491,239						126,417			617,656

Balance at December 31, 2007		$	46,361		$	23	$	18,087		$	5,067,718		$	(2,096,949	)	$	(213,606	)	$	592,978		$	3,414,612

Conversion of limited partner units (2,574,608 common shares, Note 10)						1					31,350									(31,351	)		—
Conversion of Class C stock (4,000 shares)																							—
Issuance of common shares upon conversion of Class C shares (4,000 common shares)																							—
Stock options exercised (282,106 common shares)											11,886												11,886
Series I preferred stock conversion to common stock (6,437,072 preferred shares to 5,151,776 common shares)											321,854												321,854
Series I preferred unit conversion to limited partner units																				74,695			74,695
Series J preferred stock premium amortization			(329	)																			(329	)
Stock incentive program (276,872 common shares, net)											(27,396	)					27,396						—
Amortization of stock incentive											28,640												28,640
Other											(450	)		(6,170	)					(10,908	)		(17,528	)
Adjustment to limited partners' interest from increased ownership in the Operating Partnership											(23,455	)								23,455			—
Distributions to common shareholders and limited partners, excluding Operating Partnership preferred interests														(852,446	)					(205,850	)		(1,058,296	)
Distributions to other noncontrolling interest partners																				(25,753	)		(25,753	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)								(183,153	)											(46,597	)		(229,750	)
Net income, excluding $17,599 attributable to preferred interests in the Operating Partnership														463,636						118,300			581,936

Balance at December 31, 2008		$	46,032		$	24	$	(165,066	)	$	5,410,147		$	(2,491,929	)	$	(186,210	)	$	488,969		$	3,101,967

Conversion of limited partner units (1,866,474 common shares, Note 10)											24,033									(24,033	)		—
Public offerings of common stock (40,250,000 common shares)						4					1,638,336												1,638,340
Stock options exercised (181,850 common shares)											4,725												4,725
Series J preferred stock premium amortization			(328	)																			(328	)
Conversion of Series C preferred Units to limited partner units																				763			763
Issuance of limited partner units with the redemption of the Series C preferred units																				1,875			1,875
Issuance of limited partner units with the redemption of the Series D preferred units																				38,086			38,086
Stock incentive program (254,227 common shares, net)											(9,414	)					9,414						—
Amortization of stock incentive											22,870												22,870
Other											(508	)		(4,141	)					70			(4,579	)
Adjustment to limited partners' interest from increased ownership in the
	Operating Partnership										(162,732	)								162,732			—
Distributions to common shareholders and limited partners, excluding Operating Partnership preferred interests														(769,008	)					(159,392	)		(928,400	)
Stock and units issued to common shareholders and limited partners (11,876,076 common shares)						1					620,502									133,734			754,237
Distributions to other noncontrolling interest partners																				(25,176	)		(25,176	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)								161,978												41,227			203,205
Net income, excluding $11,885 attributable to preferred interests in the Operating Partnership														309,407						65,970			375,377

Balance at December 31, 2009		$	45,704		$	29	$	(3,088	)	$	7,547,959		$	(2,955,671	)	$	(176,796	)	$	724,825		$	5,182,962

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

1. Organization

Simon Property Group, Inc. is a Delaware corporation that operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code. Simon Property Group, L.P., or the Operating Partnership, is our majority-owned partnership subsidiary that owns all of our real estate properties. In these notes to consolidated financial statements, the terms "we", "us" and "our" refer to Simon Property, the Operating Partnership, and their subsidiaries.

We own, develop and manage retail real estate properties, which consist primarily of regional malls, Premium Outlet® centers, The Mills®, and community/lifestyle centers. As of December 31, 2009, we owned or held an interest in 321 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 162 regional malls, 41 Premium Outlet centers, 67 community/lifestyle centers, 36 properties acquired in the 2007 acquisition of The Mills Corporation, or the Mills acquisition, and 15 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 41 states and Puerto Rico. Of the 36 properties acquired in the Mills portfolio, 16 of these properties are The Mills, 16 are regional malls, and four are community centers. We also own an interest in one parcel of land held in the United States for future development. Internationally, as of December 31, 2009, we had ownership interests in 51 European shopping centers (France, Italy and Poland), eight Premium Outlet centers in Japan, one Premium Outlet center in Mexico, and one Premium Outlet center in South Korea. Also, through joint venture arrangements we have a 24% interest in two shopping centers in Italy currently under development.

We generate the majority of our revenues from leases with retail tenants including:

•: Base minimum rents,
•: Overage and percentage rents based on tenants' sales volume, and
•: Recoveries of substantially all of our recoverable expenditures, which consist of property operating, real estate tax, repairs and maintenance, and advertising and promotional expenditures.

Revenues of our management company, after intercompany eliminations, consist primarily of management fees that are typically based upon the revenues of the property being managed.

We also generate supplemental revenue from the following activities:

•: Establishing our malls as leading market resource providers for retailers and other businesses and consumer-focused corporate alliances including payment systems (such as handling fees relating to the sales of bank-issued prepaid cards), national marketing alliances, static and digital media initiatives, business development, sponsorship, and events,
•: Offering property operating services for major capital expenditures such as roofing, parking lots and energy systems,
•: Selling or leasing land adjacent to our shopping center properties, commonly referred to as "outlots" or "outparcels," and
•: Generating interest income on cash deposits and loans made to related entities.

2. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries, and all significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.

We consolidate properties that are wholly owned or properties that we own less than 100% but we control. Control of a property is demonstrated by, among other factors, our ability to:

•: manage day-to-day operations,
•: refinance debt and sell the property without the consent of any other partner or owner, and
•: the inability of any other partner or owner to replace us.

We also consolidate a variable interest entity, or VIE, when we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Our determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE considers all relationships between us and the VIE, including management agreements and other contractual arrangements, when determining the party obligated to absorb the

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

2. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation (Continued)

majority of the expected losses, as defined, by accounting standards. There have been no changes during 2009 in conclusions about whether an entity qualifies as a VIE or whether we are the primary beneficiary of any previously identified VIE. During 2009, we did not provide financial or other support to a previously identified VIE that we were not previously contractually obligated to provide.

Investments in partnerships and joint ventures represent our noncontrolling ownership interests in properties. We account for these investments using the equity method of accounting. We initially record these investments at cost and we subsequently adjust for net equity in income or loss, which we allocate in accordance with the provisions of the applicable partnership or joint venture agreement, and cash contributions and distributions. The allocation provisions in the partnership or joint venture agreements are not always consistent with the legal ownership interests held by each general or limited partner or joint venture investee primarily due to partner preferences. We separately report investments in joint ventures for which accumulated distributions have exceeded investments in and our share of net income of the joint ventures within "Cash distributions and losses in partnerships and joint ventures, at equity" in the consolidated balance sheets. The net equity of certain joint ventures is less than zero because of financing or operating distributions that are usually greater than net income, as net income includes non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization.

As of December 31, 2009, we consolidated 200 wholly-owned properties and 18 additional properties that are less than wholly-owned, but which we control or for which we are the primary beneficiary. We account for the remaining 164 properties using the equity method of accounting (joint venture properties). We manage the day-to-day operations of 93 of the 164 joint venture properties but have determined that our partner or partners have substantive participating rights in regards to the assets and operations of these joint venture properties. Our investments in joint ventures in Europe, Japan, Mexico and Korea comprise 61 of the remaining 71 properties. The international properties are managed by joint ventures in which we share oversight responsibility with our partner. Additionally, we account for our investment in SPG-FCM Ventures, LLC, or SPG-FCM, which acquired The Mills Corporation and its majority-owned subsidiary, The Mills Limited Partnership, or collectively Mills, in April 2007, using the equity method of accounting. We have determined that SPG-FCM is not a VIE and that Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., or Farallon, our joint venture partner, has substantive participating rights with respect to the assets and operations of SPG-FCM pursuant to the applicable partnership agreements.

We allocate net operating results of the Operating Partnership after preferred distributions to third parties and to us based on the partners' respective weighted average ownership interests in the Operating Partnership. Net operating results of the Operating Partnership attributable to third parties are reflected in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.

Our weighted average ownership interest in the Operating Partnership was as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,

	2009			2008			2007
Weighted average ownership interest		82.4	%		79.8	%		79.4	%

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, our ownership interest in the Operating Partnership was 83.2% and 80.4%, respectively. We adjust the limited partners' interest in the Operating Partnership at the end of each period to reflect their interest in the Operating Partnership.

Reclassifications

We made certain reclassifications of prior period amounts in the consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2009 presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income available to common stockholders or earnings per share.

Subsequent Events

We have evaluated the financial statements for subsequent events through the time of the filing of this Form 10-K.

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Investment Properties

We record investment properties at cost. Investment properties include costs of acquisitions; development, predevelopment, and construction (including allocable salaries and related benefits); tenant allowances and improvements; and interest and real estate taxes incurred during construction. We capitalize improvements and replacements from repair and maintenance when the repair and maintenance extends the useful life, increases capacity, or improves the efficiency of the asset. All other repair and maintenance items are expensed as incurred. We capitalize interest on projects during periods of construction until the projects are ready for their intended purpose based on interest rates in place during the construction period. The amount of interest capitalized during each year is as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,

	2009		2008		2007
Capitalized interest	$	14,502	$	27,847	$	35,793

We record depreciation on buildings and improvements utilizing the straight-line method over an estimated original useful life, which is generally 10 to 40 years. We review depreciable lives of investment properties periodically and we make adjustments when necessary to reflect a shorter economic life. We amortize tenant allowances, tenant inducements and tenant improvements utilizing the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or occupancy term of the tenant, if shorter. We record depreciation on equipment and fixtures utilizing the straight-line method over seven to ten years.

We review investment properties for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of investment properties may not be recoverable. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, declines in cash flows, occupancy and comparable sales per square foot at the property. We measure any impairment of investment property when the estimated undiscounted operating income before depreciation and amortization plus its residual value is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, we charge to income the excess of carrying value of the property over its estimated fair value. We estimate fair value using unobservable market data such as operating income, estimated capitalization rates, or multiples, leasing prospects and local market information. We may decide to sell properties that are held for use and the sale prices of these properties may differ from their carrying values. We also review our investments including investments in unconsolidated entities if events or circumstances change indicating that the carrying amount of our investments may not be recoverable. We will record an impairment charge if we determine that a decline in the fair value of the investments is other-than-temporary.

Certain of our real estate assets contain asbestos. The asbestos is appropriately contained, in accordance with current environmental regulations, and we have no current plans to remove the asbestos. If these properties were demolished, certain environmental regulations are in place which specify the manner in which the asbestos must be handled and disposed. Because the obligation to remove the asbestos has an indeterminable settlement date, we are not able to reasonably estimate the fair value of this obligation.

Purchase Accounting Allocation

We allocate the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component which may be derived from various observable or unobservable inputs and assumptions. Also, we may utilize third party valuation specialists. These components typically include buildings, land and intangibles related to in-place leases and we estimate:

•: the fair value of land and related improvements and buildings on an as-if-vacant basis.

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

•: the market value of in-place leases based upon our best estimate of current market rents and amortize the resulting market rent adjustment into revenues.
•: the value of costs to obtain tenants, including tenant allowances and improvements and leasing commissions.
•: the value of revenue and recovery of costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period, as if the space was vacant.

Amounts allocated to building are depreciated over the estimated remaining life of the acquired building or related improvements. We amortize amounts allocated to tenant improvements, in-place lease assets and other lease-related intangibles over the remaining life of the underlying leases. We also estimate the value of other acquired intangible assets, if any, which are amortized over the remaining life of the underlying related leases or intangibles.

Discontinued Operations

We reclassify any material operations and gains or losses on disposal related to consolidated properties sold during the period to discontinued operations. During 2007, we reported the net loss upon sale on five consolidated assets sold in "Loss on sale of discontinued operations" in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The operating results of the assets disposed of in 2007 were not significant to our consolidated results of operations. There were no consolidated assets sold during 2008. During 2009, we reported the net loss of approximately $9.8 million upon the sale of four consolidated assets in "(Loss) gain on sales of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities" in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The loss on these assets and the operating results were not significant to our consolidated results of operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash and cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents generally consist of commercial paper, bankers acceptances, Eurodollars, repurchase agreements, and money markets. Our gift card programs are administered by banks. We collect gift card funds at the point of sale and then remit those funds to the banks for further processing. As a result, cash and cash equivalents, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, includes a balance of $38.1 million and $29.8 million, respectively, related to these gift card programs which we do not consider available for general working capital purposes. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk include our cash and cash equivalents and our trade accounts receivable. We place our cash and cash equivalents with institutions with high credit quality. However, at certain times, such cash and cash equivalents may be in excess of FDIC and SIPC insurance limits. See Notes 4, 8, and 10 for disclosures about non-cash investing and financing transactions.

Marketable and Non-Marketable Securities

Marketable securities consist primarily of the investments of our captive insurance subsidiaries, our investment in shares of stock of Liberty International PLC, or Liberty, our deferred compensation plan investments, and certain investments held to fund the debt service requirements of debt previously secured by investment properties that have been sold.

The types of securities included in the investment portfolio of our captive insurance subsidiaries typically include U.S. Treasury or other U.S. government securities as well as corporate debt securities with maturities ranging from less than 1 to 10 years. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and are valued based upon quoted market prices or other observable inputs when quoted market prices are not available. The amortized cost of debt securities, which approximates fair value, held by our captive insurance subsidiaries is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Our investment in Liberty is also accounted for as an available-for-sale security. Liberty operates regional shopping centers and is the owner of other retail assets

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

throughout the United Kingdom, as well as certain real estate assets in the U.S. Our interest in Liberty is adjusted to their quoted market price, including a related foreign exchange component. Changes in the values of these securities are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the gain or loss is realized or until any unrealized loss is deemed to be other-than-temporary. We review any declines in value of these securities for other-than-temporary impairment and consider the severity and duration of any decline in value. To the extent an other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis is established. Subsequent changes are then recognized through other comprehensive income unless another other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred.

During 2009, we recognized a non-cash charge of $140.5 million, or $0.44 per diluted share, representing an other-than-temporary impairment in fair value below the carrying value of our investment in Liberty. At June 30 and December 31, 2009, we owned 35.4 million shares at a weighted average original cost per share of £5.74. As of June 30 and December 31, 2009, Liberty's quoted market price was £3.97 and £5.15 per share, respectively. As a result of the significance and duration of the decline in the total share price at June 30, 2009, including currency revaluations, we deemed the decline in value as other-than-temporary impairment establishing a new cost basis of our investment in Liberty. As a result, changes in available-for-sale securities and other in the 2009 consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income include the reclassification of $140.5 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings related to this non-cash charge. Prior to the quarter ending June 30, 2009, the changes in value of our Liberty investment were reflected in other comprehensive income. Effective July 1, 2009, we resumed marking to market our Liberty investment through other comprehensive income. The resulting mark-to-market adjustment at December 31, 2009 was an increase in the carrying value of Liberty of $58.2 million with a corresponding adjustment in other comprehensive income.

Our insurance subsidiaries are required to maintain statutory minimum capital and surplus as well as maintain a minimum liquidity ratio. Therefore, our access to these securities may be limited. Our deferred compensation plan investments are classified as trading securities and are valued based upon quoted market prices. The investments have a matching liability recorded as the amounts are fully payable to the employees that earned the compensation. Changes in the values of these securities and changes to the matching liability to employees are both recognized in earnings and as a result the impact to consolidated net income is zero. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, we have investments of $51.7 million and $53.4 million, respectively, which must be used to fund the debt service requirements of debt related to investment properties sold. These investments are classified as held-to-maturity and are recorded at amortized cost as we have the ability and intent to hold these investments to maturity.

During 2008, we made an investment of $70 million in a non-marketable security that we account for under the cost method. To the extent an other-than-temporary decline in fair value is deemed to have occurred, we would adjust this investment to its estimated fair value.

Net unrealized gains as of December 31, 2009 were approximately $59.4 million and represented the valuation and related currency adjustments for our marketable securities. As of December 31, 2009, other than the adjustment related to our investment in Liberty recorded during the second quarter, we do not consider any decline in value of any of our other marketable and non-marketable securities to be an other-than-temporary impairment, as these market value declines, if any, are not significant, have existed for a short period of time, and, in the case of debt securities, we have the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity.

Fair Value Measurements

We hold marketable securities that total $464.1 million at December 31, 2009, and are considered to have Level 1 fair value inputs. In addition, we have derivative instruments which are classified as having Level 2 inputs which consist primarily of interest rate swap agreements with a gross liability balance of $13.0 million and a gross asset balance of $0.3 million and interest rate cap agreements with a minimal asset value. Level 1 fair value inputs are quoted prices for identical items in active, liquid and visible markets such as stock exchanges. Level 2 fair value inputs

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

are observable information for similar items in active or inactive markets, and appropriately consider counterparty creditworthiness in the valuations. Level 3 fair value inputs reflect our best estimate of inputs and assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the valuation estimate. Certain wholly owned assets and equity method investments in real estate were determined to be impaired in 2009. We used Level 3 inputs in estimating the fair value of these assets to measure our impairment. Note 8 includes discussion of the fair value of debt.

Use of Estimates

We prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

Segment Disclosure

Our primary business is the ownership, development, and management of retail real estate. We have aggregated our retail operations, including regional malls, Premium Outlet Centers, The Mills, and community/lifestyle centers, into one reportable segment because they have similar economic characteristics and we provide similar products and services to similar types of tenants. Further, all material operations are within the United States and no customer or tenant comprises more than 10% of consolidated revenues.

Deferred Costs and Other Assets

Deferred costs and other assets include the following as of December 31:

	2009		2008

Deferred financing and lease costs, net	$	265,906	$	237,619
In-place lease intangibles, net		13,900		33,280
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net		19,424		32,812
Marketable securities of our captive insurance companies		75,703		105,860
Goodwill		20,098		20,098
Other marketable securities		388,427		210,867
Prepaids, notes receivable and other assets, net		372,129		387,797

	$	1,155,587	$	1,028,333

Deferred Financing and Lease Costs. Our deferred costs consist primarily of financing fees we incurred in order to obtain long-term financing and internal and external leasing commissions and related costs. We record amortization of deferred financing costs on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective loans or agreements. Our deferred leasing costs consist primarily of capitalized salaries and related benefits in connection with lease originations. We record amortization of deferred leasing costs on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Details of these deferred costs as of December 31 are as follows:

	2009			2008

Deferred financing and lease costs	$	417,975		$	444,220
Accumulated amortization		(152,069	)		(206,601	)

Deferred financing and lease costs, net	$	265,906		$	237,619

100

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

We report amortization of deferred financing costs, amortization of premiums, and accretion of discounts as part of interest expense. Amortization of deferred leasing costs is a component of depreciation and amortization expense. We amortize debt premiums and discounts, which are included in mortgages and other indebtedness, over the remaining terms of the related debt instruments. These debt premiums or discounts arise either at the debt issuance or as part of the purchase price allocation of the fair value of debt assumed in acquisitions. The accompanying statements of operations and comprehensive income include amortization as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,

	2009			2008			2007
Amortization of deferred financing costs	$	20,408		$	17,044		$	15,467
Amortization of debt premiums, net of discounts		(10,627	)		(14,701	)		(23,000	)
Amortization of deferred leasing costs		32,744			31,674			26,033

Intangible Assets

The average life of in-place lease intangibles is approximately 5.5 years and is amortized over the remaining life of the leases of the related property on the straight-line basis and is included with depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The fair market value of above and below market leases is amortized into revenue over the remaining lease life as a component of reported minimum rents. The weighted average remaining life of these intangibles is approximately 1.2 years. The unamortized amount of below market leases is included in "Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles and deferred revenues" in the consolidated balance sheets and was $60.9 million and $94.3 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amount of amortization of above and below market leases, net for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $20.0 million, $35.4 million, and $44.6 million, respectively. If a lease is terminated prior to the original lease termination, any remaining unamortized intangible is charged to earnings.

Details of intangible assets as of December 31 are as follows:

	2009			2008

In-place lease intangibles	$	90,183		$	160,125
Accumulated amortization		(76,283	)		(126,845	)

In-place lease intangibles, net	$	13,900		$	33,280

Acquired above market lease intangibles	$	104,690		$	144,224
Accumulated amortization		(85,266	)		(111,412	)

Acquired above market lease intangibles, net	$	19,424		$	32,812

101

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Estimated future amortization, and the increasing (decreasing) effect on minimum rents for our above and below market leases as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

	Below Market Leases		Above Market Leases			Increase to Minimum Rent, Net

2010	$	22,117	$	(6,958	)	$	15,159
2011		15,663		(4,909	)		10,754
2012		10,669		(3,703	)		6,966
2013		6,527		(2,592	)		3,935
2014		2,803		(1,119	)		1,684
Thereafter		3,124		(143	)		2,981

	$	60,903	$	(19,424	)	$	41,479

Derivative Financial Instruments

On January 1, 2009, we adopted newly issued accounting guidance on disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities which amends and expands previous disclosure requirements. The guidance requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives and quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments. We record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. We use a variety of derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to manage or hedge the risks associated with our indebtedness and interest payments. Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps and caps. We require that hedging derivative instruments be highly effective in reducing the risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. As a result, there was no significant ineffectiveness from any of our derivative activities during the period. We formally designate any instrument that meets these hedging criteria as a hedge at the inception of the derivative contract.

As of December 31, 2009, we had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives related to interest rate risk:

Interest Rate Derivative		Notional Amount

Interest Rate Swaps	4	$	694.2 million
Interest Rate Caps	3	$	388.4 million

The carrying value of our interest rate swap agreements, at fair value, is a net liability of $12.7 million as of December 31, 2009, of which $13.0 million is included with other liabilities and $0.3 million is included with deferred costs and other assets. The interest rate cap agreements were of no net value at December 31, 2009 and we generally do not apply hedge accounting to these arrangements. The total gross accumulated other comprehensive loss related to our derivative activities, including our share of the other comprehensive loss from joint venture properties, was approximately $52.3 million as of December 31, 2009.

We are also exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on investments denominated in a foreign currency that we hold, primarily in Japan and Europe. We use currency forward agreements to manage our exposure to changes in foreign exchange rates on certain Yen-denominated receivables. Currency forward agreements involve fixing the USD-Yen exchange rate for delivery of a specified amount of foreign currency on a specified date. The currency forward agreements are typically cash settled in US dollars for their fair value at or close to their settlement date. We entered into USD-Yen forwards during 2009 for approximately ¥3 billion that we expect to receive through April 2011 at an average exchange rate of 97.1 USD:Yen, of which approximately ¥1.6 billion remains as of December 31, 2009.

102

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The December 31, 2009 liability balance related to these forwards was $0.7 million and is included in other liabilities. We have reflected the changes in fair value for these forward contracts in earnings. The underlying currency adjustments on the foreign-denominated receivables are also reflected in income and generally offset the amounts in earnings for these forward contracts.

We have no credit-risk-related hedging or derivative activities.

Noncontrolling Interests and Temporary Equity

Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted a newly issued accounting standard for noncontrolling interests, which requires a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary to be reported as equity and the amount of net income specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest to be included within consolidated net income. This standard also requires consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the parent's ownership interest and requires fair value measurement of any noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. In connection with our adoption which was fully reflected in our December 31, 2008 Form 10-K/A, we also reviewed and retrospectively adopted the measurement and classification provisions for redeemable securities as further discussed below. As a result, we adjust the carrying amounts of noncontrolling redeemable interests held by third parties in certain of our properties to redemption values at each reporting date. Because holders of the noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties can require us to redeem these interests for cash, we classify these noncontrolling redeemable interests outside of permanent equity. These adjustments increased accumulated deficit in consolidated equity. Adjustments to the carrying amounts of these noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties, to reflect the change in redemption value at the end of each reporting period, are recorded to accumulated deficit. Additionally, due to certain cash redemption features that may be deemed outside of our control, certain preferred units are also classified as temporary equity.

We classify our Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (or Series I preferred stock) in temporary equity due to the possibility that we could be required to redeem the security for cash upon the occurrence of a change in control event, which would include a change in the majority of our directors that occurs over a two year period. The carrying amount of the Series I preferred stock is equal to its liquidation value, which is the amount payable upon the occurrence of such event. The limited partners' interests in the Operating Partnership and nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in properties are classified in equity as noncontrolling nonredeemable interests.

Details of the carrying amount of our noncontrolling interests that are reflected in permanent equity are as follows as of December 31:

	2009			2008

Limited partners' units and preferred units in the Operating Partnership	$	892,603		$	639,779
Nonredeemable noncontrolling deficit interests in properties, net		(167,778	)		(150,810	)

Total noncontrolling interests reflected in equity	$	724,825		$	488,969

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (which includes nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated properties, limited partners' interests in the Operating Partnership and preferred distributions of the Operating Partnership) is now a component of consolidated net income. In addition, the individual components of other comprehensive income are presented in the aggregate for both controlling and noncontrolling interests, with the portion attributable to noncontrolling interests deducted from comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders.

103

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

A rollforward of noncontrolling interests for the years ending December 31 is as follows:

		2009			2008			2007

Noncontrolling interests, beginning of period		$	488,969		$	592,978		$	780,706
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests			65,970			118,300			126,417
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders (1)			(184,568	)		(231,603	)		(276,833	)
Other Comprehensive income (loss) allocable to noncontrolling interests:
	Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate hedging agreements		1,297			(10,380	)		(2,295	)
	Net (loss) gain on derivative instruments reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense		(2,597	)		(649	)		186
	Currency translation adjustments		(1,385	)		(1,426	)		1,306
	Changes in available-for-sale securities and other		43,912			(34,142	)		414

			41,227			(46,597	)		(389	)

Adjustment to limited partners' interest from increased (decreased) ownership in the Operating Partnership			162,732			23,455			(26,466	)
Units issued to limited partners			174,458			74,695			30,320
Units exchanged for shares of common stock			(24,033	)		(31,351	)		(22,781	)
Other			70			(10,908	)		(17,996	)

Total noncontrolling interests, end of period		$	724,825		$	488,969		$	592,978

(1): The 2009 activity includes non-cash distributions of $133.7 million representing the portion of quarterly distributions paid in units.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The components of our accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following as of December 31:

	2009			2008

Cumulative translation adjustments	$	(10,768	)	$	(2,524	)
Accumulated derivative losses, net		(52,345	)		(39,100	)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net		59,358			(165,336	)

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(3,755	)	$	(206,960	)

Less: Accumulated other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		667			41,894

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss net of noncontrolling interests	$	(3,088	)	$	(165,066	)

Included in cumulative translation adjustment is the loss related to the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on foreign currency denominated debt of $1.7 million and $46.9 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, that hedges the currency exposure related to certain of our foreign investments. The net unrealized gains as of December 31, 2009 of $59.4 million represents the valuation and related currency adjustments for our marketable securities, primarily related to our investment in Liberty. In the second quarter of 2009 we reclassified $140.5 million

104

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

from accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings related to our investment in Liberty as a result of our assessment that the decline in value was deemed an other-than-temporary impairment.

Revenue Recognition

We, as a lessor, retain substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the investment properties and account for our leases as operating leases. We accrue minimum rents on a straight-line basis over the terms of their respective leases. Substantially all of our retail tenants are also required to pay overage rents based on sales over a stated base amount during the lease year. We recognize overage rents only when each tenant's sales exceed the applicable sales threshold.

We structure our leases to allow us to recover a significant portion of our property operating, real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, and advertising and promotion expenses from our tenants. A substantial portion of our leases, other than those for anchor stores, require the tenant to reimburse us for a substantial portion of our operating expenses, including common area maintenance, or CAM, real estate taxes and insurance. This significantly reduces our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation. Such property operating expenses typically include utility, insurance, security, janitorial, landscaping, food court and other administrative expenses. We accrue reimbursements from tenants for recoverable portions of all these expenses as revenue in the period the applicable expenditures are incurred. For approximately 80% of our leases in the U.S. regional mall portfolio, we receive a fixed payment from the tenant for the CAM component. Without the fixed-CAM component, CAM expense reimbursements are based on the tenant's proportionate share of the allocable operating expenses and CAM capital expenditures for the property. We also receive escrow payments for these reimbursements from substantially all our non-fixed CAM tenants and monthly fixed CAM payments throughout the year. We recognize differences between estimated recoveries and the final billed amounts in the subsequent year. These differences were not material in any period presented. Our advertising and promotional costs are expensed as incurred.

Management Fees and Other Revenues

Management fees and other revenues are generally received from our unconsolidated joint venture properties as well as third parties. Management fee revenue is earned based on a contractual percentage of joint venture property revenue. Development fee revenue is earned on a contractual percentage of hard costs to develop a property. Leasing fee revenue is earned on a contractual per square foot charge based on the square footage of current year leasing activity. We recognize revenue for these services provided when earned based on the underlying activity.

Insurance premiums written and ceded are recognized on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the policies. Insurance losses are reflected in property operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations and comprehensive income and include estimates for losses incurred but not reported as well as losses pending settlement. Estimates for losses are based on evaluations by third-party actuaries and management's best estimates. Total insurance reserves for our insurance subsidiaries and other self-insurance programs as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximated $117.2 million and $116.5 million, respectively, and are included in "Other liabilities and accrued dividends" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We recognize fee revenues from our co-branded gift card programs when the fees are earned under the related arrangements with the card issuer. Generally, these revenues are recorded at the issuance of the gift card for handling fees.

Allowance for Credit Losses

We record a provision for credit losses based on our judgment of a tenant's creditworthiness, ability to pay and probability of collection. In addition, we also consider the retail sector in which the tenant operates and our historical collection experience in cases of bankruptcy, if applicable. Accounts are written off when they are deemed to be no

105

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

longer collectible. Presented below is the activity in the allowance for credit losses and includes the activities related to discontinued operations during the following years:

	For the Year Ended December 31,

	2009			2008			2007
Balance, beginning of period	$	44,650		$	33,810		$	32,817
Consolidation of previously unconsolidated entities		—			—			495
Provision for credit losses		22,655			24,037			9,672
Accounts written off, net of recoveries		(22,118	)		(13,197	)		(9,174	)

Balance, end of period	$	45,187		$	44,650		$	33,810

Income Taxes

We and certain subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership have elected to be taxed as REITs under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations relating to REIT qualification. In order to maintain this REIT status, the regulations require us to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to stockholders and meet certain other asset and income tests as well as other requirements. We intend to continue to adhere to these requirements and maintain our REIT status and that of the REIT subsidiaries. As REITs, these entities will generally not be liable for federal corporate income taxes as long as they continue to distribute in excess of 100% of their taxable income. Thus, we made no provision for federal income taxes for these entities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. If Simon Property or the REIT subsidiaries fail to qualify as a REIT, we or that entity will be subject to tax at regular corporate rates for the years in which it failed to qualify. If we lose our REIT status we could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four years unless our failure to qualify was due to reasonable cause and certain other conditions were satisfied.

We have also elected taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, status for some of our subsidiaries. This enables us to provide services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs and participate in activities that do not qualify as "rents from real property". For these entities, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if we believe all or some portion of the deferred tax asset may not be realized. An increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from the change in circumstances that causes a change in our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset is included in income.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had a net deferred tax asset of $8.7 million and $8.9 million, respectively, related to our TRS subsidiaries. The net deferred tax asset is included in deferred costs and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consists primarily of operating losses and other carryforwards for federal income tax purposes as well as the timing of the deductibility of losses or reserves from insurance subsidiaries. No valuation allowance has been recorded as we believe these amounts will be realized. State income, franchise or other taxes were not significant in any of the periods presented.

106

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

4. Real Estate Acquisitions, Disposals, and Impairment

We acquire properties to generate both current income and long-term appreciation in value. We acquire individual properties or portfolios of other retail real estate companies that meet our investment criteria and sell properties which no longer meet our strategic criteria. Our consolidated acquisition and disposal activity for the periods presented are highlighted as follows:

2009 Acquisitions

We had no consolidated property acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2009.

2008 Acquisitions

Effective January 1, 2008, we acquired additional interests in three existing consolidated properties of between 1.8% and 5%, for an aggregate $6.2 million in cash. Two of the properties continue to have a noncontrolling interest holder. We now own 100% of the third property.

2007 Acquisitions

As a result of the Mills acquisition which is more fully discussed in Note 7, we consolidated two regional mall properties, Town Center at Cobb and Gwinnett Place. In addition to the Mills acquisition, on March 1, 2007, we acquired the remaining 40% interest in both University Park Mall and University Center located in Mishawaka, Indiana from our partner and as a result, we now own 100% of these properties. On March 28, 2007, we acquired The Maine Outlet, a 112,000 square foot outlet center located in Kittery, Maine, adjacent to our Kittery Premium Outlets property. On August 23, 2007, we acquired Las Americas Premium Outlets, a 560,000 square foot upscale outlet center located in San Diego, California. We also purchased an additional 1% interest in Bangor Mall on July 13, 2007, and an additional 6.5% interest in Montgomery Mall on November 1, 2007. The aggregate purchase price of the consolidated assets acquired during 2007, excluding Town Center at Cobb and Gwinnett Place, was approximately $394.2 million, including the assumption of our share of debt of the properties acquired.

2009 Dispositions

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we sold four consolidated properties for which we received net proceeds of $3.9 million. The loss on disposal (net) totaled $9.8 million and is included in "(Loss) gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities" in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

2008 Dispositions

We had no consolidated property dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2008.

2007 Dispositions

During the year ended December 31, 2007, we sold five consolidated properties for which we received net proceeds of $56.4 million. The loss on disposal (net) totaled $35.2 million and is included in "Loss on sale of discontinued operations" in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

2009 Impairment

In 2009, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $240.1 million ($228.6 million, net of a tax benefit of $5.8 million and noncontrolling interest holders' share of $5.7 million). As discussed in Note 3, this non-cash charge includes a $140.5 million other-than-temporary impairment of our investment in Liberty. In addition, the total charge includes adjustments recorded in the fourth quarter in the carrying value of one wholly-owned and one joint venture regional mall, a write-down of five land parcels and two joint venture non-retail real estate assets, and certain predevelopment costs related to projects no longer being pursued.

107

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

4. Real Estate Acquisitions, Disposals, and Impairment (Continued)

2008 Impairment

In 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $21.2 million ($19.4 million, net of tax benefit), which resulted primarily from a $10.5 million reduction in the carrying value of a regional mall to its estimated net realizable value and the write-off of predevelopment costs related to various projects that we no longer plan to pursue.

5. Per Share Data

We determine basic earnings per share based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. We determine diluted earnings per share based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average shares that would have been outstanding assuming all dilutive potential common shares were converted into shares at the earliest date possible. The following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted earnings per share.

	For the Year Ended December 31,

	2009		2008		2007
Net Income attributable to Common Stockholders — Basic	$	283,098	$	422,517	$	436,164
Effect of dilutive securities:
Impact to General Partner's interest in Operating Partnership from all dilutive securities and options		50		209		313

Net Income attributable to Common Stockholders — Diluted	$	283,148	$	422,726	$	436,477

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding — Basic		267,054,946		225,332,593		222,998,313
Effect of stock options		315,897		551,057		778,471
Effect of contingently issuable shares from stock dividends		1,101,307		—		—

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding — Diluted		268,472,150		225,883,650		223,776,784

For the year ending December 31, 2009, potentially dilutive securities include stock options, convertible preferred stock, contingently issuable shares from stock dividends, units that are exchangeable for common stock and preferred units that are convertible into units or exchangeable for our preferred stock. The only securities that had a dilutive effect for the year ended December 31, 2009 were stock options and contingently issuable shares from stock dividends. The only security that had a dilutive effect for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were stock options.

We accrue dividends when they are declared. The taxable nature of the dividends declared for each of the years ended as indicated is summarized as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,

	2009			2008			2007
Total dividends paid per common share	$	2.70		$	3.60		$	3.36

Percent taxable as ordinary income		99.3	%		84.7	%		92.9	%
Percent taxable as long-term capital gains		0.7	%		1.2	%		7.1	%
Percent nontaxable as return of capital		—			14.1	%		—

		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

108

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

6. Investment Properties

Investment properties consist of the following as of December 31:

	2009		2008

Land	$	2,757,994	$	2,795,026
Buildings and improvements		22,265,721		22,112,944

Total land, buildings and improvements		25,023,715		24,907,970
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		312,474		297,745

Investment properties at cost		25,336,189		25,205,715
Less — accumulated depreciation		7,004,534		6,184,285

Investment properties at cost, net	$	18,331,655	$	19,021,430

Construction in progress included above	$	281,683	$	358,254

7. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

Joint ventures are common in the real estate industry. We use joint ventures to finance properties, develop new properties, and diversify our risk in a particular property or portfolio. We held joint venture ownership interests in 103 properties in the U.S. as of December 31, 2009. We also held interests in two joint ventures which owned 51 European shopping centers as of December 31, 2009 and 52 as of December 31, 2008. We also held interests in eight joint venture properties under operation in Japan, one joint venture property in Mexico, and one joint venture property in Korea. We account for these joint venture properties using the equity method of accounting.

Substantially all of our joint venture properties are subject to rights of first refusal, buy-sell provisions, or other sale or marketing rights for partners which are customary in real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. Our partners in these joint ventures may initiate these provisions at any time (subject to any applicable lock up or similar restrictions), which could result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire the joint venture interest from our partner.

Acquisition of The Mills Corporation by SPG-FCM

On February 16, 2007, SPG-FCM, a 50/50 joint venture between an affiliate of the Operating Partnership and funds managed by Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., or Farallon, entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of Mills for $25.25 per common share in cash. The acquisition of Mills and its interests in the 36 properties that remain at December 31, 2009 was completed in April 2007. As of December 31, 2009, we and Farallon had each funded $650.0 million into SPG-FCM to acquire all of the common stock of Mills. As part of the transaction, the Operating Partnership also made loans to SPG-FCM and Mills at rates of LIBOR plus 270-275 basis points. These funds were used by SPG-FCM and Mills to repay loans and other obligations of Mills, including the redemption of preferred stock, during 2007. As of December 31, 2009, the outstanding balance of our loan to SPG-FCM was $632.0 million, and the average outstanding balance during the year ended December 31, 2009 of all loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills was approximately $589.5 million. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded approximately $9.3 million, $15.3 million and $39.1 million in interest income (net of inter-entity eliminations) related to these loans, respectively. We also recorded fee income, including fee income amortization related to up-front fees on loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills, during 2009, 2008 and 2007 of approximately $3.7 million, $3.1 million and $17.4 million (net of inter-entity eliminations), respectively, for providing refinancing services to Mills' properties and SPG-FCM. The existing loan facility to SPG-FCM bears a rate of LIBOR plus 275 basis points and matures on June 7, 2010, with two available one-year extensions. Fees charged on loans made to SPG-FCM and Mills are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the loan.

109

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

7. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities (Continued)

As a result of the change in control of Mills, holders of Mills' Series F convertible cumulative redeemable preferred stock had the right to require the repurchase of their shares for cash equal to the liquidation preference per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends. During the second quarter of 2007, all of the holders of Mills' Series F preferred stock exercised this right, and Mills redeemed this series of preferred stock for approximately $333.2 million, including accrued dividends. Further, as of August 1, 2007, The Mills Corporation was liquidated and the holders of the remaining series' of Mills preferred stock were paid a liquidation preference of approximately $693.0 million, including accrued dividends.

During the third quarter of 2007, the holders of less than 5,000 common units in the Mills' operating partnership, or Mills units, received $25.25 in cash, and those holding 5,000 or more Mills units had the option to exchange for cash of $25.25, or Units of the Operating Partnership based on a fixed exchange ratio of 0.211 Operating Partnership units for each Mills unit. That option expired on August 1, 2007. Holders electing to exchange received 66,036 units in the Operating Partnership for their Mills units. The remaining Mills units were exchanged for cash.

Effective July 1, 2007, we or an affiliate of ours began serving as the manager for substantially all of the properties in which SPG-FCM holds an interest. In conjunction with the Mills acquisition, we acquired a majority interest in two properties in which we previously held a 50% ownership interest (Town Center at Cobb and Gwinnett Place) and as a result we have consolidated these two properties at the date of acquisition. We have reclassified the results of these properties in the Joint Venture Statements of Operations into "Income from consolidated joint venture interests."

The Mills acquisition involved the purchase of all of Mills' outstanding shares of common stock and common units for approximately $1.7 billion (at $25.25 per share or unit), the assumption of $954.9 million of preferred stock, the assumption of a proportionate share of property-level mortgage debt, of which SPG-FCM's share approximated $3.8 billion, the assumption of $1.2 billion in unsecured loans provided by us, costs to effect the acquisition, and certain liabilities and contingencies, including an ongoing investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $8 billion. The valuations were developed with the assistance of a third-party professional appraisal firm.

We subsequently sold our interest in Cincinnati Mills and Broward and Westland Malls, which we acquired through the Mills acquisition, and recognized no gain or loss on these dispositions.

Summary Financial Information

A summary of our investments in joint ventures and share of income from such joint ventures follows. We condensed into separate line items major captions of the statements of operations for joint venture interests sold or consolidated. Consolidation occurs when we acquire an additional interest in the joint venture and as a result, gain control of the property or become the primary beneficiary of a VIE. We reclassified these line items into "Income from discontinued joint venture interests" and "Income from consolidated joint venture interests" so that we may present

110

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

7. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities (Continued)

comparative results of operations for those joint venture interests held as of December 31, 2009. Balance sheet information for the joint ventures is as follows:

		December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008

BALANCE SHEETS
Assets:
Investment properties, at cost		$	21,555,729	$	21,472,490
Less — accumulated depreciation			4,580,679		3,892,956

			16,975,050		17,579,534
Cash and cash equivalents			771,045		805,411
Tenant receivables and accrued revenue, net			364,968		428,322
Investment in unconsolidated entities, at equity			235,173		230,497
Deferred costs and other assets			477,223		594,578

	Total assets	$	18,823,459	$	19,638,342

Liabilities and Partners' Equity:
Mortgages and other indebtedness		$	16,549,276	$	16,686,701
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, intangibles, and deferred revenue			834,668		1,070,958
Other liabilities			920,596		982,254

	Total liabilities		18,304,540		18,739,913
Preferred units			67,450		67,450
Partners' equity			451,469		830,979

	Total liabilities and partners' equity	$	18,823,459	$	19,638,342

Our Share of:
Partners' equity		$	316,800	$	533,929
Add: Excess Investment			694,023		749,227

Our net Investment in Joint Ventures		$	1,010,823	$	1,283,156

"Excess Investment" represents the unamortized difference of our investment over our share of the equity in the underlying net assets of the joint ventures acquired. We amortize excess investment over the life of the related properties, typically no greater than 40 years, and the amortization is included in the reported amount of income from unconsolidated entities.

As of December 31, 2009, scheduled principal repayments on joint venture properties' mortgages and other indebtedness are as follows:


2010	$	2,096,802
2011		1,771,246
2012		2,719,029
2013		1,849,252
2014		2,328,857
Thereafter		5,767,811

Total principal maturities		16,532,997
Net unamortized debt premiums and discounts		16,279

Total mortgages and other indebtedness	$	16,549,276

111

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

7. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities (Continued)

This debt becomes due in installments over various terms extending through 2036 with interest rates ranging from 0.52% to 9.35% and a weighted average rate of 5.06% at December 31, 2009.

		For the Year Ended December 31,

		2009			2008			2007
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenue:
Minimum rent		$	1,965,565		$	1,956,129		$	1,682,671
Overage rent			132,260			130,549			119,134
Tenant reimbursements			987,028			1,005,638			852,312
Other income			174,611			199,774			201,075

	Total revenue		3,259,464			3,292,090			2,855,192
Operating Expenses:
Property operating			656,399			671,268			580,910
Depreciation and amortization			801,618			775,887			627,929
Real estate taxes			261,294			263,054			220,474
Repairs and maintenance			110,606			124,272			113,517
Advertising and promotion			65,124			70,425			62,182
Provision for credit losses			16,123			24,053			22,448
Impairment charge			18,249			—			—
Other			182,201			177,298			162,570

	Total operating expenses		2,111,614			2,106,257			1,790,030

Operating Income			1,147,850			1,185,833			1,065,162
Interest expense			(884,539	)		(969,420	)		(853,307	)
(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities			(4,739	)		(5,123	)		665
Loss on sale of asset			—			—			(6,399	)

Income from Continuing Operations			258,572			211,290			206,121
Income from consolidated joint venture interests			—			—			2,562
Income from discontinued joint venture interests			—			47			202
Gain on disposal or sale of discontinued operations, net			—			—			198,956

Net Income		$	258,572		$	211,337		$	407,841

Third-Party Investors' Share of Net Income		$	170,265		$	132,111		$	232,586

Our Share of Net Income			88,307			79,226			175,255
Amortization of Excess Investment			(55,690	)		(46,980	)		(46,503	)
Our Share of Net Gain Related to Properties/Assets Sold			—			—			(90,632	)
Our Share of Impairment Charge from Investments in Unconsolidated Entities			7,603			—			—

Income from Unconsolidated Entities, Net		$	40,220		$	32,246		$	38,120

2009 Impairment

In December 2009 we recognized non-cash impairment charges of $7.6 million representing our share of impairment charges on joint venture properties. This charge represents adjustments to the carrying value of certain parcels of land and the write-off of predevelopment costs related to certain projects no longer being pursued. In addition, in December 2009 we recognized $35.1 million of impairment charges for investments in certain

112

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

7. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities (Continued)

unconsolidated entities including one regional mall and two non-retail real estate assets for which declines in value below our carrying amount were deemed other-than-temporary.

2007 Impairment

During the fourth quarter of 2007, we recorded an impairment charge of $55.1 million, $36.5 million net of tax benefit, representing our entire equity investment in a joint venture, including interest capitalized on our invested equity, which had invested in a parcel of land.

International Joint Venture Investments

European Joint Ventures. We conduct our international operations in Europe through our two European joint venture investment entities; Simon Ivanhoe S.à.r.l., or Simon Ivanhoe, and Gallerie Commerciali Italia, or GCI. The carrying amount of our total combined investment in these two joint venture investments is $298.8 million and $224.2 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, including all related components of other comprehensive income. The Operating Partnership has a 50% ownership in Simon Ivanhoe and a 49% ownership in GCI as of December 31, 2009. On December 14, 2009, we made an additional capital contribution to GCI of $79.4 million which was used to fund certain liabilities of the joint venture. The contribution increased our investment in GCI but did not impact our ownership percentage of the venture.

On July 5, 2007, Simon Ivanhoe completed the sale of five non-core assets in Poland and we presented our share of the gain upon this disposition in "(Loss) gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities" in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

Asian Joint Ventures. We conduct our international Premium Outlet operations in Japan through joint ventures with Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. The carrying amount of our investment in these Premium Outlet joint ventures in Japan is $302.2 million and $312.6 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, including all related components of other comprehensive income. We have a 40% ownership in these Japan Premium Outlet Centers through a joint venture arrangement. During 2007, we completed construction and opened our first Premium Outlet in Korea. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008 respectively, our investment in our Premium Outlet in Korea, for which we hold a 50% ownership interest, approximated $26.1 million and $18.0 million including all related components of other comprehensive income.

In December 2009, we recognized a loss on our 32.5% interests in our shopping centers operating or under development in China. The interests were sold to affiliates of our Chinese partner for approximately $29 million, resulting in a loss of approximately $20 million which is included in "(Loss) gain on sale of assets and interests in unconsolidated entities" in the 2009 consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

113

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

8. Indebtedness and Derivative Financial Instruments

Our mortgages and other indebtedness, excluding the impact of derivative instruments, consist of the following as of December 31:

	2009		2008

*Fixed-Rate Debt:*
Mortgages and other notes, including $9,757 and $15,312 net premiums, respectively. Weighted average interest and maturity of 6.18% and 4.0 years at December 31, 2009.	$	5,239,263	$	4,192,430
Unsecured notes, including $23 net discount and $1,887 net premium, respectively. Weighted average interest and maturity of 6.06% and 4.4 years at December 31, 2009.		11,574,977		10,726,887

Total Fixed-Rate Debt		16,814,240		14,919,317
*Variable-Rate Debt:*
Mortgages and other notes, at face value. Weighted average interest and maturity of 1.36% and 2.2 years.		1,370,000		2,076,927
Credit Facility (see below)		446,062		1,046,288

Total Variable-Rate Debt		1,816,062		3,123,215

Total Mortgages and Other Indebtedness	$	18,630,302	$	18,042,532

General. At December 31, 2009, we have pledged 80 properties as collateral to secure related mortgage notes including 8 pools of cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized mortgages encumbering a total of 34 properties. Under these cross-default provisions, a default under any mortgage included in the cross-defaulted package may constitute a default under all such mortgages and may lead to acceleration of the indebtedness due on each property within the collateral package. Of our 80 encumbered properties, indebtedness on 24 of these encumbered properties and our unsecured debt are subject to various financial performance covenants relating to leverage ratios, annual real property appraisal requirements, debt service coverage ratios, minimum net worth ratios, debt-to-market capitalization, and/or minimum equity values. Our mortgages and other indebtedness may be prepaid but are generally subject to payment of a yield-maintenance premium or defeasance.

Some of the limited partners guarantee a portion of our consolidated debt through foreclosure guarantees. In total, 54 limited partners provide guarantees of foreclosure of $291.1 million of our consolidated debt at three consolidated properties. In each case, the loans were made by unrelated third party institutional lenders and the guarantees are for the benefit of each lender. In the event of foreclosure of the mortgaged property, the proceeds from the sale of the property are first applied against the amount of the guarantee and also reduce the amount payable under the guarantee. To the extent the sale proceeds from the disposal of the property do not cover the amount of the guarantee, then the limited partner is liable to pay the difference between the sale proceeds and the amount of the guarantee so that the entire amount guaranteed to the lender is satisfied. The debt is non-recourse to us and our affiliates.

Unsecured Debt

Our unsecured debt consists of approximately $11.6 billion of senior unsecured notes of the Operating Partnership and $446.1 million outstanding under our $3.5 billion unsecured credit facility, or the Credit Facility, at December 31, 2009. The total outstanding balance of the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2009 was comprised of the U.S. dollar equivalent of Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings. The balance as of December 31, 2009 reflects interest at LIBOR plus 37.5 basis points and an additional facility fee of 12.5 basis points as these borrowings were made under our prior Credit Facility. On December 8, 2009, the Operating Partnership entered into a new unsecured revolving corporate credit facility to replace the previous Credit Facility providing an initial borrowing capacity of

114

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

8. Indebtedness and Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)

$3.565 billion. The new credit facility contains an accordion feature allowing the maximum borrowing capacity to expand to $4.0 billion. The new credit facility matures on March 31, 2013. The base interest on the new credit facility is LIBOR plus 210 basis points and includes a facility fee of 40 basis points. Borrowings on the new facility were not drawn until January 5, 2010 when the Euro and Yen-denominated borrowings on the Credit Facility were transitioned to the new credit facility. As of December 31, 2009, we are in compliance with all of the covenants of our unsecured debt.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we drew amounts from our prior Credit Facility to fund the redemption of $600.0 million of maturing senior unsecured notes. We repaid a total of $1.2 billion on our prior Credit Facility during the year ended December 31, 2009. The maximum outstanding balance during the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $1.6 billion. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the weighted average outstanding balance on the prior Credit Facility was approximately $669.8 million.

On March 25, 2009, the Operating Partnership issued $650.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 10.35%. We used proceeds from the offering to reduce borrowings on the prior Credit Facility.

On May 15, 2009, the Operating Partnership issued $600.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed interest rate of 6.75%. We used the proceeds from the offering for general business purposes. The offering of these notes was re-opened on August 11, 2009, and an additional $500.0 million of senior unsecured notes were issued. We used the proceeds from the offering for general business purposes.

Secured Debt

The balance of fixed and variable rate mortgage notes was $6.6 billion and $6.3 billion as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Of the 2009 amount, $5.6 billion is nonrecourse to us. The fixed-rate mortgages generally require monthly payments of principal and/or interest. The interest rates of variable-rate mortgages are typically based on LIBOR.

On July 30, 2009, we borrowed $400.0 million on a mortgage that is secured by Greenwood Park Mall, Southpark Mall, and Walt Whitman Mall, which matures on August 1, 2016 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 8.00%. This loan is cross-collateralized and contains cross default provisions as it pertains to these properties.

Debt Maturity and Other

Our scheduled principal repayments on indebtedness as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:


2010	$	2,311,705
2011		2,015,128
2012		2,950,700
2013		2,493,227
2014		2,675,490
Thereafter		6,174,318

Total principal maturities		18,620,568
Net unamortized debt premium and other		9,734

Total mortgages and other indebtedness	$	18,630,302

Our cash paid for interest in each period, net of any amounts capitalized, was as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,

	2009		2008		2007
Cash paid for interest	$	994,688	$	1,001,718	$	983,219

115

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

8. Indebtedness and Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)

Derivative Financial Instruments

Our exposure to market risk due to changes in interest rates primarily relates to our long-term debt obligations. We manage exposure to interest rate market risk through our risk management strategy by a combination of interest rate protection agreements to effectively fix or cap a portion of variable rate debt. We are also exposed to foreign currency risk on financings of certain foreign operations. Our intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures, with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging these exposures. We do not enter into either interest rate protection or foreign currency rate protection agreements for speculative purposes.

We may enter into treasury lock agreements as part of an anticipated debt issuance. If the anticipated transaction does not occur, the cost is charged to consolidated net income. Upon completion of the debt issuance, the cost of these instruments is recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt agreement.

As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of our outstanding consolidated derivatives is a net liability of $12.7 million, of which $13.0 million is included with other liabilities and $0.3 million is included with deferred costs and other assets. In addition, we recorded the benefits from our treasury lock and interest rate hedge agreements in accumulated other comprehensive loss and the unamortized balance of these agreements is $2.8 million as of December 31, 2009. The net deficit from terminated swap agreements is also recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and the unamortized balance is $2.0 million as of December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, our outstanding LIBOR based derivative contracts consisted of:

•: interest rate cap protection agreements with a notional amount of $388.4 million which mature in July 2010 and June 2014, and
•: fixed rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $694.2 million which have a weighted average fixed pay rate of 2.79% and a weighted average variable receive rate of 0.60%.

Within the next year, we expect to reclassify to earnings approximately $14.0 million of losses from the current balance held in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The amount of ineffectiveness relating to cash flow hedges recognized in income during the periods presented was not material.

Our joint ventures may also enter into interest rate swaps or caps, which are recorded at fair value on the joint venture balance sheets. Included in our accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 is our share of the joint ventures' accumulated derivative losses of $30.1 million and $19.6 million, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of our variable-rate mortgages and other loans approximates their fair values. We estimate the fair values of consolidated fixed-rate mortgages using cash flows discounted at current borrowing rates and other indebtedness using cash flows discounted at current market rates. We estimate the fair values of consolidated fixed-rate unsecured notes using quoted market prices, or, if no quoted market prices are available, we use quoted market prices for securities with similar terms and maturities. The fair values of financial instruments and our related discount rate assumptions used in the estimation of fair value for our consolidated fixed-rate mortgages and other indebtedness as of December 31 is summarized as follows:

	2009			2008

Fair value of fixed-rate mortgages and other indebtedness	$	16,580		$	12,385
Weighted average discount rates assumed in calculation of fair value for fixed-rate mortgages		6.11	%		6.33	%

116

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

9. Rentals under Operating Leases

Future minimum rentals to be received under noncancelable tenant operating leases for each of the next five years and thereafter, excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses and percentage rent based on tenant sales volume as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:


2010	$	1,903,085
2011		1,742,176
2012		1,553,825
2013		1,352,275
2014		1,169,506
Thereafter		3,276,193

	$	10,997,060

Approximately 0.7% of future minimum rents to be received are attributable to leases with an affiliate of a limited partner in the Operating Partnership.

10. Equity

Our Board of Directors is authorized to reclassify excess common stock into one or more additional classes and series of capital stock, to establish the number of shares in each class or series and to fix the preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, and qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption of such class or series, without any further vote or action by the stockholders. The issuance of additional classes or series of capital stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of Simon Property without further action of the stockholders. The ability to issue additional classes or series of capital stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from acquiring, a majority of our outstanding voting stock.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, other than for the election of directors. At the time of the initial public offering of our predecessor in 1993, the charter of the predecessor gave Melvin Simon, Herbert Simon, David Simon and certain of their affiliates, or the Simons, the right to elect four of the members of the Board of Directors, conditioned upon the Simons, or entities they control, maintaining specified levels of equity ownership in our predecessor, the Operating Partnership and all subsidiaries. In addition, at that time, Melvin Simon & Associates, Inc., or MSA, acquired 3,200,000 shares of our Class B common stock. MSA placed the Class B common stock into a voting trust under which the Simons were the sole trustees. These voting trustees had the authority to elect up to four members of the Board of Directors. These same arrangements were incorporated into our Charter in 1998 during the combination of our predecessor and Corporate Property Investors, Inc. Shares of Class B common stock convert automatically into an equal number of shares of common stock upon the sale or transfer thereof to a person not affiliated with the estate of Melvin Simon, Herbert Simon or David Simon. The Class B shares can be converted into shares of common stock at the option of the holders. At the initial offering we reserved 3,200,000 shares of common stock for the possible conversion of the outstanding Class B shares. During 2008, all outstanding Class C shares were converted to 4,000 shares of common stock.

Common Stock Issuances and Repurchases

In 2009, we issued 1,866,474 shares of common stock to 62 limited partners in exchange for an equal number of Units.

117

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

10. Equity (Continued)

We issued 181,850 shares of common stock related to employee and director stock options exercised during 2009. We used the net proceeds from the option exercises of approximately $4.6 million to acquire additional units. The Operating Partnership used the net proceeds for general business purposes.

On December 18, 2009, we issued 1,802,063 shares of common stock as part of the quarterly dividend to common stockholders at an average closing price of $77.78 per share. The Operating Partnership also issued 365,981 units to limited partners related to its distribution.

On September 18, 2009, we issued 2,029,044 shares of common stock as part of the quarterly dividend to common stockholders at an average closing price of $73.97 per share. The Operating Partnership also issued 411,489 units to limited partners related to its distribution.

On June 19, 2009, we issued 2,525,204 shares of common stock as part of the quarterly dividend to common stockholders at an average closing price of $52.92 per share. The Operating Partnership also issued 514,720 units to limited partners related to its distribution.

On May 12, 2009, we issued 23,000,000 shares of common stock in a public offering at a public offering price of $50.00 per share. Proceeds from the offering were used for general business purposes.

On March 25, 2009, we issued 17,250,000 shares of common stock in a public offering at a public offering price of $31.50 per share. Proceeds from the offering were used to repay amounts drawn on the Credit Facility and for general business purposes.

On March 18, 2009, we issued 5,519,765 shares of common stock as part of the quarterly dividend to common stockholders at an average closing price of $35.38 per share. The Operating Partnership also issued 1,345,151 units to limited partners related to its distribution.

Temporary Equity

As discussed in Note 3, as a result of the retrospective adoption of an accounting standard for noncontrolling interests, we classify as temporary equity those securities for which there is the possibility that we could be required to redeem the security for cash irrespective of the probability of such a possibility. As a result, we reclassified one series of preferred stock from permanent equity, and we maintained in temporary equity several series of preferred units of the Operating Partnership. Each of these securities that are classified in temporary equity is discussed below.

Series I 6% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock. This series of preferred stock was issued in connection with our acquisition of Chelsea Property Group in 2004. The terms of this series of preferred stock are substantially identical to those of the related series of 6% Series I Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units, or the Series I preferred units, described below. During 2009, holders exchanged 500,891 preferred units for an equal number of shares of preferred stock. In prior years, 1,115,442 preferred units had been exchanged for an equal number of shares of preferred stock. Dividends accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 6% per share. However, if the redemption date falls between the record date and the preferred stock dividend payment date, the redemption price will be the liquidation preference only. The redemption may occur only if, for 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before notice of redemption is issued, the closing price per share of the common stock exceeds 130% of the applicable redemption price. This series of preferred stock is also convertible into common stock by the holder upon the occurrence of a conversion triggering event. A conversion triggering event includes the following: (a) if we call the preferred stock for redemption; or, (b) if we are a party to a consolidation, merger, share exchange, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets; or, (c) if during any fiscal quarter after the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2004, the closing sale price of the common stock for at least 20 trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter exceeds 125% of the applicable conversion price. If the

118

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

10. Equity (Continued)

closing trigger price condition is not met at the end of any quarter, then conversions are not permitted in the following quarter. This series of preferred stock can also be put to us for cash upon the occurrence of a change of control event, which would include a change in the majority of our directors that occurs over a two year period. As a result, this series of preferred stock is classified outside permanent equity because such change in composition could be deemed outside our control. The carrying amount of the Series I Preferred Stock of $404,558 and $379,513 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, is equal to its liquidation value, which is the amount payable upon the occurrence of such event.

As of December 31, 2009, the conversion trigger price of $74.18 had been met and each share of Series I preferred stock is now convertible into 0.847495 of a share of common stock through March 31, 2010. During 2009, the conversion trigger price was met and accordingly holders of the Series I preferred stock did not have the right to convert their shares to common stock during the year.

Limited Partners' Preferred Interests in the Operating Partnership and Other Noncontrolling Redeemable Interests in Properties. The following table summarizes each series of preferred units of the Operating Partnership and the amount of the noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties as of December 31. The noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties are more fully discussed in Note 3. The redemption features of each of these series of preferred units of the Operating Partnership contain provisions which could require us to settle the redemption in cash. As a result, these series of preferred units in the Operating Partnership, along with the noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties, remain classified outside permanent equity.

	2009		2008

6% Series I Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units, 19,000,000 units authorized, 1,017,480 and 1,518,371 issued and outstanding, respectively	$	50,874	$	75,919
7.75%/8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, 900,000 shares authorized, 0 and 850,698 issued and outstanding, respectively		—		85,070
7.50% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, 260,000 units authorized, 255,373 issued and outstanding		25,537		25,537
8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units, 2,700,000 units authorized, 0 and 1,356,814 issued and outstanding, respectively		—		40,704

		76,411		227,230
Other noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties		49,404		49,378

Limited partners' preferred interest in the Operating Partnership and other noncontrolling redeemable interests in properties	$	125,815	$	276,608

6% Series I Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units. This series of preferred units accrues cumulative quarterly distributions at $3.00 per unit. The preferred units are exchangeable for shares of Series I preferred stock on a one for one basis or, at Simon's option, may be settled in cash. In 2009, holders exchanged 500,891 preferred units of this series for an equal number of shares of Series I preferred stock. The preferred units have terms that are substantially identical to the Series I preferred stock.

7.75%/8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units. This series of preferred units was redeemable on or after January 1, 2011, or earlier upon the occurrence of certain tax triggering events, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation value ($100.00 per unit), accrued and unpaid distributions. On June 30, 2009, upon the occurrence of a tax triggering event, the Operating Partnership redeemed all outstanding units for cash.

7.50% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units. This series of preferred units accrues cumulative quarterly distributions at a rate of $7.50 annually. The Operating Partnership may redeem the preferred units on or after November 10, 2013, unless there is the occurrence of certain tax triggering events such as death of the initial holder, or the transfer of any units to any person or entity other than the persons or entities entitled to the benefits of the original

119

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

10. Equity (Continued)

holder. The redemption price is the liquidation value ($100.00 per preferred unit) plus accrued and unpaid distributions, payable either in cash or fully registered shares of our common stock at our election. In the event of the death of a holder of the preferred units, the occurrence of certain tax triggering events applicable to the holder, or on or after November 10, 2006, the holder may require the Operating Partnership to redeem the preferred units at the same redemption price payable at the option of the Operating Partnership in either cash or shares of common stock.

8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units. This series of preferred units was redeemed on August 27, 2009, at liquidation value ($30.00 per unit), and $0.3867 in accrued and unpaid distributions and was paid in the form of 614,055 units of the Operating Partnership.

Permanent Equity

Preferred Stock. Dividends on all series of preferred stock are calculated based upon the preferred stock's preferred return multiplied by the preferred stock's corresponding liquidation value. The Operating Partnership pays preferred distributions to us equal to the dividends we pay on the preferred stock issued.

Series C 7.00% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock and Series D 8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. We issued these two series of preferred stock in 1999 to facilitate the possible conversion of two related series of preferred units: 7.00% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Units (classified as noncontrolling interests) and the 8.00% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units (classified as temporary equity). Each of these series of preferred stock has terms that are substantially identical to the related series of preferred units. There are no shares of either series currently outstanding.

Series J 8³/8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. We issued this series of preferred stock in 2004 to replace a series of Chelsea preferred stock. Dividends accrue quarterly at an annual rate of 8³/8% per share. We can redeem this series, in whole or in part, on or after October 15, 2027 at a redemption price of $50.00 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. This preferred stock was issued at a premium of $7.5 million as of the date of our acquisition of Chelsea. The unamortized premium included in the carrying value of the preferred stock at December 2009 and 2008 was $5.9 million and $6.2 million, respectively.

Noncontrolling Interests

The following series of preferred units is included in noncontrolling interests due to the ability for the Operating Partnership to settle the redemption in either cash or units at its election. The noncontrolling interests in the consolidated balance sheets also include the third parties' nonredeemable minority holdings in properties that we consolidate but do not wholly-own and the limited partners' common interest in the Operating Partnership due to our ability to settle any redemption in cash or common stock at our election. These noncontrolling interests are classified as permanent equity in connection with our accounting for noncontrolling interests as discussed in Note 3.

7.00% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Units. This series of preferred units was redeemed on August 27, 2009, at liquidation value ($28.00 per unit), and $0.3158 in accrued and unpaid distributions and was paid in the form of 30,234 units of the Operating Partnership.

Other Equity Activity

Notes Receivable from Former CPI Stockholders. Notes receivable of $17.2 million from stockholders of an entity we acquired in 1998 are reflected as a deduction from capital in excess of par value in the consolidated statements of equity in the accompanying financial statements. The notes do not bear interest and become due at the time the underlying shares are sold.

The Simon Property Group 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. This plan, or the 1998 plan, provides for the grant of equity-based awards in the form of options to purchase shares, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock grants and

120

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

10. Equity (Continued)

performance unit awards. Options may be granted which are qualified as "incentive stock options" within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and options which are not so qualified. An aggregate of 11,300,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1998 plan. Additionally, the partnership agreement requires us to sell shares of common stock to the Operating Partnership, at fair value, sufficient to satisfy the exercising of any stock options, and for us to purchase units for cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares.

Administration. The 1998 plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The committee determines which eligible individuals may participate and the type, extent and terms of the awards to be granted to them. In addition, the committee interprets the 1998 plan and makes all other determinations deemed advisable for its administration. Options granted to employees become exercisable over the period determined by the committee. The exercise price of an employee option may not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Employee options generally vest over a three-year period and expire ten years from the date of grant. Since 2001, we have not granted any options to employees, except for a series of reload options we assumed as part of a prior business combination.

Automatic Awards For Eligible Directors. Directors who are not also our employees or employees of our affiliates receive automatic awards under the 1998 plan. Until 2003, these awards took the form of stock options. Since then, the awards have been shares of restricted stock. Currently, each eligible director receives on the first day of the first calendar month following his or her initial election an award of restricted stock with a value of $82,500 (pro-rated for partial years of service). Thereafter, as of the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, eligible directors who are re-elected receive an award of restricted stock having a value of $82,500. In addition, eligible directors who serve as chairpersons of the standing committees (excluding the Executive Committee) receive an additional annual award of restricted stock having a value of $10,000 (in the case of the Audit Committee) or $7,500 (in the case of all other standing committees). The Lead Director also receives an annual restricted stock award having a value of $12,500. The restricted stock vests in full after one year.

Once vested, the delivery of the shares of restricted stock (including reinvested dividends) is deferred under our Director Deferred Compensation Plan until the director retires, dies or becomes disabled or otherwise no longer serves as a director. The directors may vote and are entitled to receive dividends on the underlying shares; however, any dividends on the shares of restricted stock must be reinvested in shares of common stock and held in the deferred compensation plan until the shares of restricted stock are delivered to the former director. The committee successively approved annual stock incentive programs each year from 2001 until 2009 when no program was established.

In addition to automatic awards, eligible directors may be granted discretionary awards under the 1998 plan.

Restricted Stock. The 1998 plan also provides for shares of restricted stock to be granted to certain employees at no cost to those employees, subject to achievement of certain financial and return-based performance measures established by the committee related to the most recent year's performance. Once granted, the shares of restricted stock then vest annually over a four-year period (25% each year) beginning on January 1 of each year. The cost of restricted stock grants, which is based upon the stock's fair market value on the grant date, is charged to earnings ratably over the vesting period. Through December 31, 2009 a total of 4,992,636 shares of restricted stock, net of forfeitures, have been awarded under the plan. Information regarding restricted stock awards is summarized in the following table for each of the years presented:

	For the Year Ended December 31,

	2009		2008		2007
Restricted stock shares awarded during the year, net of forfeitures		254,227		276,872		222,725
Weighted average fair value of shares granted during the year	$	29.44	$	85.77	$	120.55
Amortization expense	$	22,870	$	28,640	$	26,779

121

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

10. Equity (Continued)

The weighted average life of our outstanding options as of December 31, 2009 is 1.7 years. Information relating to Director Options and Employee Options from December 31, 2006 through December 31, 2009 is as follows:

	Director Options					Employee Options

	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share
Shares under option at December 31, 2006		16,500		$	28.57		1,198,263		$	32.07

Granted		—			N/A		23,000			99.03
Exercised, none were forfeited during the period		(16,500	)		28.57		(214,525	)		32.62

Shares under option at December 31, 2007		—		$	—		1,006,738		$	33.48

Granted		—			—		—			—
Exercised, none were forfeited during the period		—			—		(282,106	)		41.96

Shares under option at December 31, 2008		—		$	—		724,632		$	30.18

Granted		—			—		—			—
Exercised		—			—		(181,850	)		25.52
Forfeited		—			—		(37,100	)		70.73

Shares under option at December 31, 2009		—		$	—		505,682		$	28.88

		Outstanding and Exercisable

Employee Options: Range of Exercise Prices		Options		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life in Years		Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share
$23.41—$30.38			429,633		1.21	$	25.48
$30.39—$46.97			49,749		4.09		46.97
$46.98—$50.17			26,300		4.17		50.17

	Total		505,682			$	28.88

We also maintain a tax-qualified retirement 401(k) savings plan and offer no other postretirement or post employment benefits to our employees.

Exchange Rights

Limited partners in the Operating Partnership have the right to exchange all or any portion of their units for shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis or cash, as determined by the Board of Directors. The amount of cash to be paid if the exchange right is exercised and the cash option is selected will be based on the trading price of our common stock at that time. At December 31, 2009, we had reserved 69,501,466 shares of common stock for possible issuance upon the exchange of units, stock options, and Class B common stock and certain convertible preferred stock.

122

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

We are involved in various other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that such litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Lease Commitments

As of December 31, 2009, a total of 29 of the consolidated properties are subject to ground leases. The termination dates of these ground leases range from 2012 to 2090. These ground leases generally require us to make fixed annual rental payments, or a fixed annual rental plus a percentage rent component based upon the revenues or total sales of the property. Some of these leases also include escalation clauses and renewal options. We incurred ground lease expense included in other expense as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,

	2009		2008		2007
Ground lease expense	$	32,086	$	30,681	$	30,499

Future minimum lease payments due under these ground leases for years ending December 31, excluding applicable extension options, are as follows:


2010	$	16,782
2011		16,823
2012		16,937
2013		17,184
2014		17,084
Thereafter		648,360

	$	733,170

Insurance

123

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

11. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Guarantees of Indebtedness

Joint venture debt is the liability of the joint venture and is typically secured by the joint venture property, which is non-recourse to us. As of December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership has loan guarantees of $47.2 million underlying joint venture related mortgage or other indebtedness. Mortgages which are guaranteed by us are secured by the property of the joint venture and that property could be sold in order to satisfy the outstanding obligation.

Concentration of Credit Risk

We are subject to risks incidental to the ownership and operation of commercial real estate. These risks include, among others, the risks normally associated with changes in the general economic climate, trends in the retail industry, creditworthiness of tenants, competition for tenants and customers, changes in tax laws, interest rate and foreign currency levels, the availability of financing, and potential liability under environmental and other laws. Our regional malls, Premium Outlet Centers, The Mills, and community/lifestyle centers rely heavily upon anchor tenants like most retail properties. Four retailers occupied 535 of the approximately 1,325 anchor stores in the properties as of December 31, 2009. An affiliate of one of these retailers is a limited partner in the Operating Partnership.

Limited Life Partnerships

We are the controlling partner in several consolidated partnerships that have a limited life. We estimated the settlement values of these noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 as approximately $115 million and $130 million, respectively. The settlement values are based on the estimated fair values upon a hypothetical liquidation of the partnership interests and estimated yield maintenance or prepayment penalties associated with the payment to settle any underlying secured mortgage debt.

12. Related Party Transactions

Our management company provides management, insurance, and other services to Melvin Simon & Associates, Inc., a related party, and other non-owned properties. Amounts for services provided by our management company and its affiliates to our unconsolidated joint ventures and other related parties were as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,

	2009		2008		2007
Amounts charged to unconsolidated joint ventures	$	120,866	$	125,663	$	95,564
Amounts charged to properties owned by related parties		4,522		4,980		5,049

During 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded interest income of $9.3 million, $15.3 million and $39.1 million respectively, and financing fee income of $3.7 million, $3.1 million and $17.4 million, respectively, net of inter-entity eliminations, related to the loans that we have provided to Mills and SPG-FCM and lending financing services to those entities and the properties in which they hold an ownership interest.

124

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

13. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new accounting guidance on business combinations and noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements which requires an acquirer to measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair values on the acquisition date, with goodwill being the excess value over the net identifiable assets acquired. The guidance also requires acquisition related costs to be expensed as incurred. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. On January 1, 2009, we adopted the guidance which did not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2008, the FASB issued a staff position which permitted a one-year deferral for the implementation of previously issued guidance related to fair value measurements with regard to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). On January 1, 2009, we adopted the fair value measurement guidance as it relates to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis. The adoption had no impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The provisions of the guidance are applied at such time as a fair value measurement of a nonfinancial asset or nonfinancial liability is required, which may result in a fair value that is materially different than would have been calculated prior to adoption.

In June 2008, the FASB ratified guidance which provides an entity use a two step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument's contingent exercise and settlement provisions. We adopted the guidance on January 1, 2009 which had no impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On January 1, 2009, we adopted guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. Under this guidance, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on reported earnings per share.

In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance which established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The statement introduces new terminology but is based on the same principles that previously existed in the accounting standards. The guidance requires disclosure of the date through which management has evaluated subsequent events and whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. The guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have any impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) which is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification defines a new hierarchy for U.S. GAAP and establishes the Codification as the sole source for authoritative guidance to be applied by nongovernmental entities. The adoption of the Codification changed the manner in which U.S. GAAP guidance is referenced, but did not have any impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB also issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs). This amendment requires an enterprise to perform a qualitative analysis when determining whether or not it must consolidate a VIE. The amendment also requires an enterprise to continuously reassess whether it must consolidate a VIE. Additionally, the amendment requires enhanced disclosures about an enterprise's involvement with VIEs and any significant change in risk exposure due to that involvement, as well as how its involvement with VIEs impacts the enterprise's financial statements. Finally, an enterprise will be required to disclose significant judgments and assumptions used to determine whether or not to consolidate a VIE. This amendment is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. Management is in the process of determining the impact of adopting this amendment.

125

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

14. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Quarterly 2009 and 2008 data is summarized in the table below. Quarterly amounts may not equal annual amounts due to rounding.

	First Quarter		Second Quarter			Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter

2009
Total revenue	$	918,492	$	903,612		$	924,932	$	1,028,180
Operating income		364,216		224,698			392,177		425,601
Consolidated income (loss) from continuing operations		146,248		(14,108	)		139,189		115,933
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders		106,768		(20,760	)		105,547		91,543
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share — Basic	$	0.45	$	(0.08	)	$	0.38	$	0.32
Net income (loss) per share — Basic	$	0.45	$	(0.08	)	$	0.38	$	0.32
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share — Diluted	$	0.45	$	(0.08	)	$	0.38	$	0.32
Net income (loss) per share — Diluted	$	0.45	$	(0.08	)	$	0.38	$	0.32
Weighted average shares outstanding		235,908,551		268,289,545			281,430,338		283,967,587
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		236,128,461		268,289,545			282,474,292		284,595,548
2008
Total revenue	$	895,298	$	922,947		$	935,594	$	1,029,316
Operating income		351,775		379,038			383,351		428,884
Consolidated income from continuing operations		129,022		114,353			159,736		196,449
Net income available to common stockholders		87,933		76,572			112,809		145,203
Income from continuing operations per share — Basic	$	0.39	$	0.34		$	0.50	$	0.64
Net income per share — Basic	$	0.39	$	0.34		$	0.50	$	0.64
Income from continuing operations per share — Diluted	$	0.39	$	0.34		$	0.50	$	0.64
Net income per share — Diluted	$	0.39	$	0.34		$	0.50	$	0.64
Weighted average shares outstanding		223,455,345		224,982,539			225,356,074		227,512,179
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		224,071,920		225,571,345			225,925,532		227,909,356

15. Subsequent Events

We entered into a definitive agreement in December 2009 to acquire all of the outlet shopping centers currently owned by Prime Outlets Acquisition Company and certain of its affiliated entities, or the Prime Outlets, subject to Prime Outlets' existing fixed rate indebtedness and preferred stock. The Prime Outlets consist of 22 outlet centers located in major metropolitan markets. We will pay consideration (consisting of cash and units of the Operating Partnership) of approximately $0.7 billion for the owners' interests in the Prime Outlets. The acquisition is subject to several closing conditions relating to certain financing arrangements of the Prime Outlets. Assuming all closing conditions are satisfied on a timely basis, we expect the transaction will close in the second quarter of 2010.

126

Simon Property Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts and where indicated as in millions or billions)

15. Subsequent Events (Continued)

5.65% notes due 2020 and $600.0 million of 6.75% notes due 2040. We will report a $165.6 million charge to earnings in the first quarter of 2010 as a result of the tender offer.

On February 4, 2010, we and our partner in Simon Ivanhoe, Ivanhoe Cambridge Inc., or Ivanhoe Cambridge, entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the interests in Simon Ivanhoe which owns seven shopping centers located in France and Poland to Unibail-Rodamco. The joint venture partners will receive consideration of €715 million for the interests, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We expect our share of the gain on sale of our interests in Simon Ivanhoe to be approximately $300 million. The transaction is scheduled to close during the first half of 2010, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.

127

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	8th grade Good

Simon Property (SPG) 10-K2009 FY Annual report

Content analysis